| Doc_id | Review | Left | Term | Right | Rating |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Good overview with interview | 1) | Good | 1) overview with interview | 4.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | I think the course /whole specialization is really good. But I keep getting my paid toolkits really late. Only when I finished the course | 1) the course /whole specialization is really | Good | 1) But I keep getting my paid | 4.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | good course. Positives: very practical, interesting assignments Development areas: 4 stars because sometimes want more to the point and less not very improtant info in the lections. sorry. for the sake of time In overall, a good course. would recommend | 1) | Good | 1) course. Positives: very practical, interesting assignments | 4.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | good course. Positives: very practical, interesting assignments Development areas: 4 stars because sometimes want more to the point and less not very improtant info in the lections. sorry. for the sake of time In overall, a good course. would recommend | 2) sake of time In overall, a | Good | 2) course. would recommend | 4.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Good entry level course with lot's of examples, case studies and techniques that really work. Thanks a lot to the developers! | 1) | Good | 1) entry level course with lot's of | 5.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Good content and examples | 1) | Good | 1) content and examples | 5.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | Good perspectives, introduced to the blogging world, could not ask anything better to learn. Super co | 1) | Good | 1) perspectives, introduced to the blogging world, | 5.0 |
| -0BI9jXyEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | This course provides many useful tips for building a blog and writing good blog articles, I gained a lot after taking it. | 1) for building a blog and writing | Good | 1) blog articles, I gained a lot | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | Perfect Course for Supply Chain Professionals. Very good Content and Well Delivered. | 1) Course for Supply Chain Professionals. Very | Good | 1) Content and Well Delivered. | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | Professor is very good at explaining ideas and has very deep understanding of the course | 1) Professor is very | Good | 1) at explaining ideas and has very | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | Very Good Professor | 1) Very | Good | 1) Professor | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -1YwAnTLEeSjmyIAC0aXFg | Very useful overview course. Goes into good explanations on difficult to understand concepts. | 1) Very useful overview course. Goes into | Good | 1) explanations on difficult to understand concepts. | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Pretty good course that introduces a lot of useful tools and the concept of reproduciblity. However, it is not quite as applicable as the previous courses for those who are individual contributors in the private sector and rarely have others double check their analyses or need to publish anything. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course that introduces a lot of | 4.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good but not that deep. This should be in 2 weeks. | 1) | Good | 1) but not that deep. This should | 4.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | An informative course that will teach you the paradigm of reproducible research, this is very important in Data Science. You'll learn how to write a data science report using R markdown. That's not the most important thing though. The most important thing is knowing how to start your research and what to do with the data to come up with valuable insights. That process includes getting and cleaning data, manipulation, processing of data, analyzing the data and drawing inference from results. Great course for people who are looking to be serious data scientist! Rigor and thorough, this is a very good introduction to report writing in R. | 1) and thorough, this is a very | Good | 1) introduction to report writing in R. | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Too expensive for the material it provides; it is helpful and necessary but this course can be summarised in 1-2 lectures. There is a very good lecture from an external speaker,which was very good and funny (at least i found it funny) and i didn't realise that it was 30 mins long. | 1) 1-2 lectures. There is a very | Good | 1) lecture from an external speaker, which | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Too expensive for the material it provides; it is helpful and necessary but this course can be summarised in 1-2 lectures. There is a very good lecture from an external speaker,which was very good and funny (at least i found it funny) and i didn't realise that it was 30 mins long. | 2) an external speaker, which was very | Good | 2) and funny (at least i found | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good course. I will recommend it for everyone. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I will recommend it for | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good, but maybe not at solid as those before it. Some reproducibility concepts felt a bit vague. | 1) Very | Good | 1) but maybe not at solid as | 4.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good learning | 1) | Good | 1) learning | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The course was good. I enjoyed it. The biggest problem was the un-moderated participation of at least one other student. This particular student drove the discussion of assignments, leaving little room for others to explore, ask, and answer questions. As far as I know the student was not a mentor/TA, but It would have been most helpful for staff to weigh in on some of the student's post. I really believe the student was feeding his/her ego. | 1) The course was | Good | 1) I enjoyed it. The biggest problem | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Course is generall very good and lots of fun! 2 things i would change: ... the Assignment 1 is too early in the course or the Lectures are disordered, but I needed the second and third week material to do the first weeks assignment. ... Add Jupyter Notebooks in the Specialization in addition to Knit-R | 1) Course is generall very | Good | 1) and lots of fun! 2 things | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Instructor not as good. A big fail when you need the 2nd lesson in order to complete the 1st programming assignment. | 1) Instructor not as | Good | 1) A big fail when you need | 2.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | The content is good but the contents have a lot of overlap. The instructors are definitely knowledgeble about the material and clear about the presentation but a lot of the same matierial are repeated throughout the course unintentionally. Think the insturctors just thought it was enough to throw a bunch of things together and called it the day. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) but the contents have a lot | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's, for sure, a necessary content but don't feel like something that deserves to be on this specialization. Content is good. | 1) be on this specialization. Content is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good to know the principles here. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) to know the principles here. Thanks. | 4.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Great class with excellent supporting material. A little chaotic, but very good overall. | 1) material. A little chaotic, but very | Good | 1) overall. | 4.0 |
| -4ffSHNYEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Overall a good course for self-study. The assignments in particular are excellent for data cleaning, analysis and interpretation. The quizzes are very basic though and appear to be there only to check if the student has gone through the lectures. The knowledge needed to answer the quizzes and achieve the desired results in the assignments are vastly different and should be addressed. The case studies at the end are insightful and more use could be made of them in a more advanced course. There is a lot of repetition of concepts throughout the course and this can become distracting. THe format for the lecture videos varies throughout and this inconsistency (along with extreme audio volume changes) also becomes distracting. Other than that, excellent for driving the need for reproducible research (RR) home, presenting and explaining some tools available to achieve RR and ways of publishing results/reports from these studies. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course for self-study. The assignments in | 3.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Came to know and judge various topics and common laws including specific once.Great teaching spirit and good explanations. | 1) specific once. Great teaching spirit and | Good | 1) explanations. | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I very much enjoyed this course. It provided background on environmental law and introduced me to some common law doctrines as environmental law. Good investment of time. | 1) common law doctrines as environmental law. | Good | 1) investment of time. | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | good basic class | 1) | Good | 1) basic class | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Instructor was very enthusiastic about the course, I thought it was well structured and it's good to get a framework for things. As someone who came in as pretty conservative leaning on the Environmental issue, it helps me become more knowledgeable about why the EPA can do the things it can, and a better understanding of how environmental law works. More information is always better! | 1) it was well structured and it's | Good | 1) to get a framework for things. | 4.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | As a state government employee in environmental protection, I found this course to be extremely helpful in understanding the history of environmental common and statutory law. Professor Don Hornstein is extremely knowledgeable and well spoken on every topic he covers and is clearly passionate about his work. The assigned readings are interesting and illustrate the evolution of environmental law very well. Professor Hornstein's commentary encompasses these readings well and extends further to provide a better contextual understanding of each. The assignments are straightforward for anyone who completes the readings and watches the videos and help with retention of the lessons. Overall, the course was very good for those wanting a general knowledge of Environmental Law, and Professor Hornstein is a very fine teacher! | 1) lessons. Overall, the course was very | Good | 1) for those wanting a general knowledge | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | I really liked the structure of the lesson plan and the individual lectures. It is told almost like a story with parts for you to test your recall and understanding of the unfolding adventure. Really good course and very much worth the time. | 1) understanding of the unfolding adventure. Really | Good | 1) course and very much worth the | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Absolutely love the professor. He is very clear and articulate. You also don't really need to do the readings if you're very good at listening. Or you don't need to watch the lectures if you're super good at law and policy and don't need any clarifications. He makes it fun and interesting. I also learned quite a lot. Love all the examples he gives. Great class I would definitely recommend for people trying to get a little introduction and background to environmental law. | 1) do the readings if you're very | Good | 1) at listening. Or you don't need | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Absolutely love the professor. He is very clear and articulate. You also don't really need to do the readings if you're very good at listening. Or you don't need to watch the lectures if you're super good at law and policy and don't need any clarifications. He makes it fun and interesting. I also learned quite a lot. Love all the examples he gives. Great class I would definitely recommend for people trying to get a little introduction and background to environmental law. | 2) watch the lectures if you're super | Good | 2) at law and policy and don't | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | It is a very good course, specially for people who wants to know more about, of course enviromental law, and comonn law system too. The teacher gives you a practical and interesting focus about cases and precedents dictaded by the US law system. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course, specially for people who wants | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The lectures are really interesting and clear. It is a very good course to make all law students and staff working in environmental field get to know the theory and practice of environmental law and policy of US. | 1) and clear. It is a very | Good | 1) course to make all law students | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Professor Hornstein is brilliantly easy to follow -- he walks you through "legalese" at a beginner's pace, apt for a college undergraduate-level. I particularly like his One-minute Lawyer videos, wherein he explains the case readings in a conversational style. Very good for reviewing. | 1) readings in a conversational style. Very | Good | 1) for reviewing. | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Good, but could have been a little more demanding. | 1) | Good | 1) but could have been a little | 3.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Law does not have a reputation for being light reading, an interesting field full of personality and humor. Professor Hornstein defies that stereotype. I learned a great deal from this course, and actually looked forward to the lectures because of his good nature and lighthearted presentation of the material. For anyone who wants a basic introduction but may be hesitant about taking a law class, I highly recommend this one. | 1) to the lectures because of his | Good | 1) nature and lighthearted presentation of the | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | The best course that I have ever had on Coursera. It goes along with a great pace, and sessions are not too long to lose you to distraction. Each session includes good amount of information which I think they are all useful for someone in the field. All in all, the course is designed perfectly. A+ | 1) you to distraction. Each session includes | Good | 1) amount of information which I think | 5.0 |
| -A_ToPNPEeSAEiIAC9TCSQ | Prof. Horstein was a great lecturer - he had a very structured approach and spoke to his audience, not just "at" his audience. I enjoyed the mini-quizes inside of the videos, and felt his lectures were the perfect length. I learned quite a bit in this course! I'm a trainee lawyer in the UK and have a Masters in international policy (political science) so this was a very good way for me to see if I'm genuinely interested in environmental law - which I am. Thanks! | 1) science) so this was a very | Good | 1) way for me to see if | 5.0 |
| -ebwLHHsEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | very professional best in web!! most updated knowladge , code is very good | 1) updated knowladge , code is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | pretty good course | 1) pretty | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very interesting information about dogs that's also a 'myth burster' of sorts for me. Dr. Hare 's video's were not only well made but also well spaced. I found a few quiz questions difficult to understand even though I paid close attention to all lessons. But hey- I passed the final quiz in first attempt so Its all good! Thanks Dr. Hare & Duke University for making this 'different' course available!! | 1) in first attempt so Its all | Good | 1) Thanks Dr. Hare & Duke University | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I didn't come away with much understanding of how dogs think - I don't have much experience with dogs and I was hoping to learn about how to have a good relationship with a dog before I decide whether to get one - but the science is fascinating and I am glad I took the class anyway. | 1) learn about how to have a | Good | 1) relationship with a dog before I | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | This was excellent! As a professional dog trainer, I really value the information I got from this course. Yes I also bought his book but It is a really good resource. You can get it used at a lower cost. I have been recommending this course to my "want to know more" clients. | 1) book but It is a really | Good | 1) resource. You can get it used | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I haven't completely finished this course yet but so far so good! Great information; presented very clearly and keeps you interested. | 1) course yet but so far so | Good | 1) Great information; presented very clearly and | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | GOOD! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I really liked this course. I have owned and trained dogs from a very early time in my life. I found it very interesting how dogs evolved from wolves and how that is apparent in dogs today. I typically like courses to be heavy on the science side, but this class was well presented for mid-level people or people who don't have a science background. Of course people will disagree with some of the material but overall it was an interesting class and the book recommended for the class was a good read. Mahalo from Hawaii | 1) recommended for the class was a | Good | 1) read. Mahalo from Hawaii | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very good course will be a great help in my dog training by allowing me a better understanding of Dog Cognition. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course will be a great help | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Dr. Hare did a great job explaining the results of experiments and what they mean in laymen terms. The information was well presented, and he is an enthusiastic professor. Although the super science-y stuff at the beginning may be a bit of a turnoff or seem boring for people like me without a science background, it really sets a good foundation for the more conventionally interesting material later in the course. I strongly recommend this course, and the accompanying activities via Dognition. | 1) science background, it really sets a | Good | 1) foundation for the more conventionally interesting | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Good information contained within the course which has sparked my interest in continuing to learn and build on my small amount of knowledge. Lower rating than I would usually give for a course because of the way the lectures are delivered. Having a lecturer standing in front of a brick wall, plugging his book and not really connecting with online students was not great. A couple of times during the lectures I dozed off and had to re-run them. If the plugging of own material was removed and the background and tone of voice were altered this could be a captivating and interesting course. | 1) | Good | 1) information contained within the course which | 3.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | very well presented and enjoyable to listen to, the summary's helped a lot and the quizzes were a good way to remember what was learnt in the lessons. Thank you | 1) lot and the quizzes were a | Good | 1) way to remember what was learnt | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Good beginning level class and a nice reminder of how complex learning really is. | 1) | Good | 1) beginning level class and a nice | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | very interesting, good new input! | 1) very interesting, | Good | 1) new input! | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | very good and easy to follow learnt a lot | 1) very | Good | 1) and easy to follow learnt a | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | LOVED the course, ENJOYED the learning! Great video presentations by Dr. Hare … easy to engage, and wonderful to have the flexible fit into my schedule. Keep up to good work. Would like to know more about how the "Certificate" is issued. Keep getting opportunity to pay for the certificate on screen, even though I did that at the start of the course. LOVE the book as well … thank you for providing such great tools. | 1) into my schedule. Keep up to | Good | 1) work. Would like to know more | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | It was very interesting course, I thought I knew a lot about dogs psychology and cognition but it turned out that I have a lot of white blankc about some thing. Very informative course with good slides and some very interesting information. | 1) some thing. Very informative course with | Good | 1) slides and some very interesting information. | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very good! I love dogs! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I love dogs! | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very good course, it gives an overview on some important aspects of dog (and human) evolution and cognition. Important work is going on at Duke University at the Dog Cognition Lab. Dr. Hare is a very inspired person and scientist and his willing to share and go further in research and understanding about humans and canines is involving. Highly recommended . | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it gives an overview on | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | It was a little long before getting to the REALLY interesting stuff, but it's a good course for what you pay. I wish there were a follow up one, like a level 2. I also wish that Brian didn't refer to groups of dogs as "dog packs" as dogs are not pack animals. This leads to confusion as dog owners will then believe that they need to be a pack leader and everything that comes with that stereotype. I also wish he didn't focus so much on the idea that dogs are from wolves, because again, many people revert to "this is how wolves are so this is how i treat my dog" it leads to confusion. Just read the comments on some threads. Even while doing this course, people were saying how they need to be a pack leader and how they follow what Cesar Milan does. However, for those of us that know there is a difference, it was interesting to learn more about the differences between wolves and dogs. I just wish the course focused more on dogs | 1) REALLY interesting stuff, but it's a | Good | 1) course for what you pay. I | 3.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Overall, I enjoyed this course, but it gave just a bit too much information on cognitive studies in other species, and it left me still wanting to learn more about dogs. The last 2 weeks were great! The professor was engaging and his work was very interesting, but he said ummm and ahhh so many times that it was a little distracting. The quizzes were good, but some of the questions were worded very oddly so I just couldn't get them right without several attempts. I didn't feel like he covered dog emotion at all. I thought there would be some discussion of facial expressions, the meaning of different tail wags, and the extent of dog emotion (for example, how they grieve and how long they grieve after a loss). | 1) a little distracting. The quizzes were | Good | 1) but some of the questions were | 3.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Such a great and interesting course! I'm really learning so much from this and feel it's really well put together. Great work from Brian Hare et al - keep up the good work you're doing! | 1) et al - keep up the | Good | 1) work you're doing! | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | great course gives really good insight into cognitive thought of canines and other animals | 1) great course gives really | Good | 1) insight into cognitive thought of canines | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | excellent course to understanding your dog. Good information about how dogs evolved. 2 thumbs up. | 1) excellent course to understanding your dog. | Good | 1) information about how dogs evolved. 2 | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Brian provided a great course that informed and entertained. Good for those with many levels of animal interaction and familiarity. | 1) great course that informed and entertained. | Good | 1) for those with many levels of | 4.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Good course for any dog lover to take. | 1) | Good | 1) course for any dog lover to | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I´d found this course really good, I have a litle bit experience with dog training throw the years experience with my dogs and internet videos, but this approach never have it before, I thanks to Dr. Ohara for the great course he made for Coursera I definitely apply dognition games to my dogs and the dogs of my friends. Saludos | 1) I´d found this course really | Good | 1) I have a litle bit experience | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very interesting course. The quizzes were challenging, which was good, and I liked that there was a final exam, too. The lecturer was maybe a bit too "wordy" and could have cut to the point faster without repetition but he was being enthusiastic about his topic, so that is forgiven. Overall, a good course! | 1) The quizzes were challenging, which was | Good | 1) and I liked that there was | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Very interesting course. The quizzes were challenging, which was good, and I liked that there was a final exam, too. The lecturer was maybe a bit too "wordy" and could have cut to the point faster without repetition but he was being enthusiastic about his topic, so that is forgiven. Overall, a good course! | 2) so that is forgiven. Overall, a | Good | 2) course! | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | I loved the course. Please, could you pland other courses about dogs, cognition, emotion, trainning....? I think the profesor is very good. Plese, could you organized more courses with him? | 1) I think the profesor is very | Good | 1) Plese, could you organized more courses | 5.0 |
| -Eu38u08EeSKeyIACwQXPg | Great course. I would recommend this course to anyone who wants to learn about the evolution of our relationship with dogs--a unique relationship to be sure. Good opportunity to input into citizen scientist data base if interested, and willing to submit a fee. | 1) dogs--a unique relationship to be sure. | Good | 1) opportunity to input into citizen scientist | 5.0 |
| -GA2-bmnEeWkwBIgnN7tuw | A very good course if one is interested to practise public health in the future ;-) | 1) A very | Good | 1) course if one is interested to | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course. Most of the new features and technologies were well explained. Maybe a little more hands-on exercise will not be a bad idea. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Most of the new features | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The structure of the course is awesome, and the instructor is fantastic. Am enjoying his teaching approaches. Keep up the good work. | 1) his teaching approaches. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It´s a very good course, but when we get to the part of really generating the app, I had a lot of problems that were not covered in the course. | 1) It´s a very | Good | 1) course, but when we get to | 3.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | So far so good! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Its good | 1) Its | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Not as good as previous courses from this specialization | 1) Not as | Good | 1) as previous courses from this specialization | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course!!! | 1) | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course, but the development cycle is hard and I had to suffer a lot when it comes to the device emulations . I know the time is short, but I would be happy if you can provide a course or some helpful links. The first two weeks are nice to develop, because of the ionic serve --watch. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but the development cycle is | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Thank you good course | 1) Thank you | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent. The whole specialisation is excellent. Good balance between theory and practice. | 1) Excellent. The whole specialisation is excellent. | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Realy good | 1) Realy | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good course for familiarizing yourself with Hybrid Mobile Development. Teaches you the basics and some good features that comes with the Hybrid Mobile App Development. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for familiarizing yourself with Hybrid | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good course for familiarizing yourself with Hybrid Mobile Development. Teaches you the basics and some good features that comes with the Hybrid Mobile App Development. | 2) Teaches you the basics and some | Good | 2) features that comes with the Hybrid | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good course indeed, but should have information about places we can fin help especially parts where we run emulators. | 1) | Good | 1) course indeed, but should have information | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A well explained with good support course! I recommend this to everyone interested in the field. Note: I would want to know how to move further with the app and introduce it inside app store and google play store. This is omitted in the course. I am looking forward for this course updates if there will be any - and I think it will be improved! | 1) A well explained with | Good | 1) support course! I recommend this to | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course, although felt like it didn't quite cover enough fundamental material concerning Ionic framework and how it sits within the scope of the specialization. | 1) | Good | 1) course, although felt like it didn't | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good helpful course. | 1) | Good | 1) helpful course. | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course. Unfortunately the last week's worth of material wasn't particularly insightful or useful. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Unfortunately the last week's worth | 4.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | I am taking this course now, It is amazing to be able to develop IOS and Android Mobile apps and the same time. A good tip, you need to see the previous course about angular to understand better this about Ionic. | 1) apps and the same time. A | Good | 1) tip, you need to see the | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good :) | 1) very | Good | 1) :) | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Really good and practical course. It helps you reinforce the knowledge that you got from the three previous courses. | 1) Really | Good | 1) and practical course. It helps you | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The teacher is really good and you can see that they are doing a fantastic job with all the specialization | 1) The teacher is really | Good | 1) and you can see that they | 5.0 |
| -gcU5xn4EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Course Content and everything was good, video lectures have some disturbance please delete that noise. | 1) Course Content and everything was | Good | 1) video lectures have some disturbance please | 5.0 |
| -I9J2-oOEeWgEA49BslyNQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Feels like this course in the specialization was a bit rushed, compared to the first 3 courses. It had 2 modules (first & last) that were more like placeholders and the middle 4 modules went from concept to the maths behind the algorithm very quickly. It needs a bit of work on expanding the course and presenting a bit more slowly. Having said all that, the concepts and algorithms taught are very interesting and a good first step into the unsupervised learning section. | 1) taught are very interesting and a | Good | 1) first step into the unsupervised learning | 3.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Some of the interesting topics discussed in this course could be treated substantially more extensive and detailed in order to get a better grip and understanding on them (e.g. Gibbs sampling). After this course, it is a bit dazzling how much different algorithms and methods are available for clustering and retrieval tasks and this course easily could have been subdivided into two or three separate courses on the same topic with a more detailed treatment. Still, about many interesting subjects a tip of the iceberg has been brought to you ... it tastes so good that you would like to have much more! | 1) . . . it tastes so | Good | 1) that you would like to have | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Overall a good and useful course, however: A) They could do a much better job regarding LDA, standard Gibbs sampling, and Bayesian model and inference. Many slides on these 3 topics only contained some text and the instructor tried to "verbally" visualize the related important concepts. Hence not a good use of a video session. B) Week 1 and the 1st half of Week 6 were redundant. C) It would be much better to have a 7-week course with more topics and may be with some optional videos on Bayesian model, HMM. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) and useful course, however: A) They | 3.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Overall a good and useful course, however: A) They could do a much better job regarding LDA, standard Gibbs sampling, and Bayesian model and inference. Many slides on these 3 topics only contained some text and the instructor tried to "verbally" visualize the related important concepts. Hence not a good use of a video session. B) Week 1 and the 1st half of Week 6 were redundant. C) It would be much better to have a 7-week course with more topics and may be with some optional videos on Bayesian model, HMM. | 2) related important concepts. Hence not a | Good | 2) use of a video session. B) | 3.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good survey of the material, but assignments are superficial and don't test thorough understanding. | 1) | Good | 1) survey of the material, but assignments | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Following the overall quality of this Specialization, this course was excellent. From the content, to the assesments, material and teachers. This course is a really good starting point to become an expert in Machine Learning techniques. | 1) teachers. This course is a really | Good | 1) starting point to become an expert | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Like all the courses in this specialization so far, the material has been good. The reason for only 4 stars rather than 5 is the difficulty in getting questions answered in a timely manner. There don't seem to be any active mentors for this class. | 1) so far, the material has been | Good | 1) The reason for only 4 stars | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Still a very good course. Week 4 was very tough. The general concept can be understood from a 10,000 feet altitude but the lesson and programming assignment need to be reviewed, maybe with a slower step by step example. As some other student mentioned, it was... "brutal". Other than that looking forward to the next course in the specialization! | 1) Still a very | Good | 1) course. Week 4 was very tough. | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The things I liked: -The professor seems very knowledgeable about all the subjects and she also can convey them in a very understandable way (kudos to her since talking to a camera is not easy) -The course was well organized and the deadlines were adjusted when a technical difficulty was found by several students -All the assignments are easy to follow and very detailed -The testing code provided for the programming assignments is a huge help to make sure we are solving it the right way What can be improved: -Some of the concepts during weeks 4 and 5 seemed a bit rushed. Although the professor explained that some details were outside of the scope of this course, I felt that I needed a more thorough explanation in order to understand better -Some links to the documentation of libraries used in the programming assignments were lacking information on how to really use them, I wish we had some other link to worked examples too In general I can say this was another good course for this series. Making a course like this is not easy at all and I can see that they are putting a lot of effort to produce them. All of their hard work is really appreciated on my end. | 1) I can say this was another | Good | 1) course for this series. Making a | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course. Too long interval between modules make hard for non-Python developers. Easy to forget some of the Python structures. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Too long interval between modules | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | very good course but the last few topics could be improved with better assignments that could be broken down into smaller sub assignments | 1) very | Good | 1) course but the last few topics | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great course. Well packed, well explained, nice practical examples, good all around MOOC with of info. | 1) packed, well explained, nice practical examples, | Good | 1) all around MOOC with of info. | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course nice practical approach. I was kind of surprised that hierarchical clustering was kept at the end and discussed only marginally since it is a widely used approach. I liked the part about LDA but IMHO I would have liked more discussion about fundamental techniques rather than such an advanced method. Too focus on text data. Most of the application I worked on have limited textual data. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course nice practical approach. I was | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The specialization has a good quality on average. I started doing this course immediately after it went open. I had a feeling that the quality of the course went down (questions were often unclear and it took time to figure out what is expected as an answer). However, many problems were solved quite fast and teaching stuff is really helpful. I still would like to see more about MapReduce in-depth in this course. I did not have a feeling that it was covered sufficiently (only theory, no hands-on material). In general, hands-on material was great and useful. | 1) The specialization has a | Good | 1) quality on average. I started doing | 4.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course for KD trees, LSH, Gaussian mixed model and LDA. | 1) | Good | 1) course for KD trees, LSH, Gaussian | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good class, But it would be much better if the quiz is open to those who doesn't pay. | 1) | Good | 1) class, But it would be much | 5.0 |
| -N44X0IJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Not for the faint of heart but this course does a really good job of explaining clustering (and retrieval) of images and text. It includes several programming assignments which can be tackled with minimal programming experience if one perseveres. | 1) but this course does a really | Good | 1) job of explaining clustering (and retrieval) | 5.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Very interesting and relevant course for anyone interested in research involving human subjects. The teachers are very good at making a 'boring' and difficult subject interesting by providing thorough examples and very good online hand-on tools. Excellent course! | 1) human subjects. The teachers are very | Good | 1) at making a 'boring' and difficult | 5.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Very interesting and relevant course for anyone interested in research involving human subjects. The teachers are very good at making a 'boring' and difficult subject interesting by providing thorough examples and very good online hand-on tools. Excellent course! | 2) by providing thorough examples and very | Good | 2) online hand-on tools. Excellent course! | 5.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Very good and useful for those wish to pursue a career in Clinical Data Management. The classes were very good and the syllabus was well structured. Thanks for providing this opportunity and my sincere wishes to the lecturers and technical staffs. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful for those wish to | 5.0 |
| -nkoihN6EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Very good and useful for those wish to pursue a career in Clinical Data Management. The classes were very good and the syllabus was well structured. Thanks for providing this opportunity and my sincere wishes to the lecturers and technical staffs. | 2) Data Management. The classes were very | Good | 2) and the syllabus was well structured. | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good course, I really wish for a next more advanced level course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I really wish for a | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Excellent experience. Material, instructor and pace of the course were really good. | 1) pace of the course were really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very light and practical course. Good for beginners but also nice to refresh some tips for intermediate users. | 1) Very light and practical course. | Good | 1) for beginners but also nice to | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Good course . A must take for beginners ! | 1) | Good | 1) course . A must take for | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | A very nice experience. I expected an entry level course, but Erin organised a well rounded path. I got a new effective approach to the Ableton Live 9 software. I recommend to develop carefully your assignments: you will improve your own skills by comparing your solutions with those of the classmates. In addiction you'll find some "veteran" student willing to help. Good luck! | 1) " veteran" student willing to help. | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | This course covers a lot of ground in a short period of time, and does it in a way that makes it easy to quickly leverage the power of Ableton in production and live performance. I appreciated the simplicity and thoroughness of the videos, and the assignments kept me motivated. It's a great class for complete beginners, as well as intermediate users in need of a brush up. Erin has a good approach to teaching: she's efficient and clear, and her basic examples don't overwhelm the student. | 1) a brush up. Erin has a | Good | 1) approach to teaching: she's efficient and | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Really good resource for anyone wanting to learn the basics of a super flexible software. | 1) Really | Good | 1) resource for anyone wanting to learn | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good course for learning how to work in Ableton. Professor Barra teaches really great. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for learning how to work | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good instructions of the teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) instructions of the teacher! | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good introduction to this software, teatcher is great and very easy to understand. I have learned a lot of good stuffs such as how to warp audio, convert audio to midi and so on... I was used to work on cubase and I have discovered the specifities and the advantages of Live. Moreover thanks to the assignment objectives I had to force myself to be creative and It was a great feelig. Thanks for this course :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to this software, teatcher is | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good introduction to this software, teatcher is great and very easy to understand. I have learned a lot of good stuffs such as how to warp audio, convert audio to midi and so on... I was used to work on cubase and I have discovered the specifities and the advantages of Live. Moreover thanks to the assignment objectives I had to force myself to be creative and It was a great feelig. Thanks for this course :) | 2) I have learned a lot of | Good | 2) stuffs such as how to warp | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | I enjoyed very much the lessons and I had a very good time on preparing the assignment on Ableton. A great course. | 1) lessons and I had a very | Good | 1) time on preparing the assignment on | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good course for does how just starting with Ableton. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for does how just starting | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Good information! | 1) | Good | 1) information! | 4.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very good basic course. Enjoyed it very much | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic course. Enjoyed it very much | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Definitely recommend this short course which gives a good overview of Ableton Live's capabilities and how to use them. | 1) this short course which gives a | Good | 1) overview of Ableton Live's capabilities and | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | good, straight to the point Course, you can learn other things in this course like Blend.io | 1) | Good | 1) straight to the point Course, you | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Erin Barra is awesome..!!! Really good course to get up to speed with ableton. | 1) awesome. . ! ! ! Really | Good | 1) course to get up to speed | 5.0 |
| -nRRAPmuEeSndSIAC7LTLQ | Very helpful. Very good course. Thank you so much! | 1) Very helpful. Very | Good | 1) course. Thank you so much! | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | This Course is very Good For Children. | 1) This Course is very | Good | 1) For Children. | 3.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Very good Course for beginners.! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course for beginners. ! | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Good Course, for folks who never took any Comp Sci courses in high school or university | 1) | Good | 1) Course, for folks who never took | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | I like the course. Very well taught and provided us good amount of information in building projects on Scratch. Thank you. | 1) Very well taught and provided us | Good | 1) amount of information in building projects | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Thank you so much! What a fun and practical course. It was delivered so simply and provided a good starting point for coding. I wanted to learn some fundamentals and theory, which I would normally expect to be dry and boring, however with your happy delivery and application to Scratch made that learning process really enjoyable. I looked forward to every week of the lectures and the peer assessments were also insightful. A well structured program! I look forward to furthering my knowledge with you. Thank you again. | 1) delivered so simply and provided a | Good | 1) starting point for coding. I wanted | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | This is a great introductory programming course for anyone. It covers the basics of programming and prepares you for more advanced programming like java. If you can play with LEGOs you can do this course, yet it is still fun and challenging for the genuinely tech savvy. It's also a good creative outlet. The professor is cool and sweet, and although it sometimes feels like she had kids in mind for this course, the students are very diverse. Thanks Areti, I had a heck of a lot of fun!!! Now, it's midnight here, time for some Java (and some coffee too)!!! | 1) genuinely tech savvy. It's also a | Good | 1) creative outlet. The professor is cool | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | A good course to go through. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to go through. | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Very well organized course! The tutors were helpful and good lecturers. Easy to follow and understand! I particularly liked the extra interviews :) | 1) course! The tutors were helpful and | Good | 1) lecturers. Easy to follow and understand! | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | The teacher is very good at explaining those difficult ideas and thought in coding and algorithm. I have really acquired a lot from this interesting lesson. It's creative,vivid and attractive. Besides,scratch is a cute tool for coding. | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) at explaining those difficult ideas and | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | More tooled for High Schoolers, or those just entering into college. Very good course none the less. | 1) those just entering into college. Very | Good | 1) course none the less. | 4.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Excellent course! I've just finished it in this week and I'm very happy for it. Was a good experience. I'll continue to study programming because I think it so exciting. | 1) very happy for it. Was a | Good | 1) experience. I'll continue to study programming | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Very fun, good fundamentals and excellent examples. | 1) Very fun, | Good | 1) fundamentals and excellent examples. | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | What I like the most in this course was the simplicity. It is designed such that complete noobs (like myself) in software engineering can understand easily. There is also a good balance of theory and practice. | 1) understand easily. There is also a | Good | 1) balance of theory and practice. | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| -qKIDPnAEeS1QCIACy-KcQ | Simple and interesting, very good coding course for beginners. | 1) Simple and interesting, very | Good | 1) coding course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very good content and delivered in an effective manner. Lots of information and examples are quite valuable and not provided in the slides so I recommend everyone to have the handouts at hand when studying for the assignments and exams. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and delivered in an effective | 5.0 |
| -Y69EP9dEeSa0SIACyGBQw | its good to learn this subject free of cost and amazing teaching method. | 1) its | Good | 1) to learn this subject free of | 5.0 |
| -zH9iof2EeWGBwqGAoUFww | It's pretty good :) | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) :) | 5.0 |
| -zH9iof2EeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great introduction It is a great introduction course to this fascinating field. Explanations are very clear (supposing you have previous knowledge about molecular biology) and provided further reading links are very good if you look for deeper knowledge. I strongly recommend this course to biologstudents who did not have the opportunity to go into detail about epigenetics. | 1) provided further reading links are very | Good | 1) if you look for deeper knowledge. | 5.0 |
| -zH9iof2EeWGBwqGAoUFww | This course is brilliant. It presents a complicated topic with some details, taking non-experts in Biology, like me, to a good understanding. It is worth remembering the main elements in the course from time to time, so I am retaking this course (at least the videos) to refresh my memory. Wonderful course. I truly recommend it. | 1) in Biology, like me, to a | Good | 1) understanding. It is worth remembering the | 5.0 |
| -zH9iof2EeWGBwqGAoUFww | Good course with many aspects and details in the field of epigenetics. I think it is better to formulate the course at more weeks because there is much information at short time. The courses in specialised scientific field should get details like this course. | 1) | Good | 1) course with many aspects and details | 5.0 |
| 00citU52EeW2EwoziUhyxQ | j'ai bien aimé ce cours dans la tradition de l'enseignement mathématique de bon niveau que l'on connaît en France; very good course with great lecturers; the course went deep enough through the intended subject so that I did not feel cheated; I would say that while it skipped the case of more general fields what was given here was very rewarding; one needs to be fluent in french to follow the course and a good background in algebra would be a valuable prerequisite | 1) que l'on connaît en France; very | Good | 1) course with great lecturers; the course | 5.0 |
| 00citU52EeW2EwoziUhyxQ | j'ai bien aimé ce cours dans la tradition de l'enseignement mathématique de bon niveau que l'on connaît en France; very good course with great lecturers; the course went deep enough through the intended subject so that I did not feel cheated; I would say that while it skipped the case of more general fields what was given here was very rewarding; one needs to be fluent in french to follow the course and a good background in algebra would be a valuable prerequisite | 2) to follow the course and a | Good | 2) background in algebra would be a | 5.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Good intro | 1) | Good | 1) intro | 4.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | This is not an Introduction but a Review of Machine Learning methods used in Yandex. Probably, you have to multiply estimated required time by 10 to really understand lecture topics. Kaggle competition at the end makes the course really interesting. but: "A theory that you can't explain to a bartender is probably no damn good." -- Ernest Rutherford | 1) a bartender is probably no damn | Good | 1) " -- Ernest Rutherford | 5.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Short and good, a way to learn practical python ML skills and math background to understand and feel different ML technics | 1) Short and | Good | 1) a way to learn practical python | 5.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Good alternative for Andrew Ng course in Russian. Good level, but some difficulties with tasks submission. | 1) | Good | 1) alternative for Andrew Ng course in | 5.0 |
| 01XLylXyEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Good alternative for Andrew Ng course in Russian. Good level, but some difficulties with tasks submission. | 2) for Andrew Ng course in Russian. | Good | 2) level, but some difficulties with tasks | 5.0 |
| 03osAJejEeSA2iIACzAQrQ | Need more (understandable) subtitles. Peer-review for this course is not a good idea as well, given abstract concepts and different language. | 1) for this course is not a | Good | 1) idea as well, given abstract concepts | 1.0 |
| 03osAJejEeSA2iIACzAQrQ | Very good course. By a stroke of luck, before taking this course, I took another course on 中华传统文化 which was a wonderful refresher for what I grew up with in my formative years. I am particularly hopeful that with an integrative holistic approach of Western and Eastern medical disciplines, people can learn to prevent getting sick, work with doctors to heal themselves with minimium side effects when they fall ill. It is very interesting to note that thousands of years ago, Chinese believe that people can live to 120! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. By a stroke of luck, | 4.0 |
| 0815zSP7EeWXzxJxfIL00w | This was the most comprehensive ,clear explained and cmplete course I haver had on this subject. All the instructors were fantastic on doing their job explaining topics, subjects and situations that finally provide us all a very good understanding of the implications Sexuality have all along in our lives !! Excelente curso !!!!!!! muy recmendable !! lo promocionaré entre mi familia y amigos y colegas !!! Felicidades !!!! atte. Hugo Sierra hsierra2004@gmail.com | 1) finally provide us all a very | Good | 1) understanding of the implications Sexuality have | 5.0 |
| 0815zSP7EeWXzxJxfIL00w | A great course! You can learn a lot about human's sexuality and many other things, which are really useful, even in everyday life. It's also a good opportunity to improve your Spanish, if you're not native speaker. | 1) in everyday life. It's also a | Good | 1) opportunity to improve your Spanish, if | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good and easy to understand. | 1) | Good | 1) and easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | The course is good for getting an overall idea of the main topics of finance but not on getting a deep understanding on them | 1) The course is | Good | 1) for getting an overall idea of | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good Instructor. Explains hard things in a very easy way. He made this course very easy to learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Instructor. Explains hard things in a | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A good course for understanding the fundamental terms that I often hear when discussing issues with finance professionals. The supplementary material really helps grasp the concepts | 1) A | Good | 1) course for understanding the fundamental terms | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | I've missed at least one practical exercises on each module. Overall is good. | 1) exercises on each module. Overall is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good to gain basis in the financial terms and tools. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to gain basis in the financial | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A very good and quick introduction to finance and accounting for business. With this class, you will have the basis and you will know if you want to learn deeper about finance or not. | 1) A very | Good | 1) and quick introduction to finance and | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It was a good course but there were things missing, such as exercises and more examples. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course but there were things missing, | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | good intro and overview. | 1) | Good | 1) intro and overview. | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A really good course for anyone with non financial background. Its literally taught right from the basics with very helpful examples | 1) A really | Good | 1) course for anyone with non financial | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | good introduction financial course for non-financial person. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction financial course for non-financial person. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | So far so good! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course,is very good fo me | 1) | Good | 1) course, is very good fo me | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course,is very good fo me | 2) Good course, is very | Good | 2) fo me | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This is a good course for non-finance folk. My only wish is that the assignments or the lectures had more examples where we could practice and find out if we are making mistakes or getting things right. More math please! Highly recommended for anyone wishing to enter the world of P/E ratios, discounted cash flows, ROIs etc. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for non-finance folk. My only | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very easy to follow, as he gives easy-to-understand real life examples! Really good! | 1) gives easy-to-understand real life examples! Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Great course. Good instructor. Everything is explained in an easy-to-understand manner. | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) instructor. Everything is explained in an | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good introduction for non-financial people willing to understand some key concepts often present in out professional life. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for non-financial people willing to | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | The course was good but it would help if after specialization in particular subject,lets say finance,coursera could help connect students with employers around the world:) | 1) The course was | Good | 1) but it would help if after | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course for Non-finance people or people who interact too much with the financial chaps. With this course, One will not sit as a duck from the next time he / she sit in the business plan or other meetings, where price, cost, revenue, profit, performance, etc are disuccsed. | 1) | Good | 1) course for Non-finance people or people | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good course, easy to understand but it also lacks detail. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, easy to understand but it | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A very good course for beginners | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for beginners | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This was a good refresh on | 1) This was a | Good | 1) refresh on | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good , easy to understand . I have learnt a lot of concepts very important . | 1) Very | Good | 1) , easy to understand . I | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This is a really good Course!!!!!!! Easy to Understand!! I loved it! | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) Course! ! ! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good basic course if you have no background in Finance. Reviews the important concepts that can get you along easily. | 1) | Good | 1) basic course if you have no | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Basic stuff. Good choice of subjects. A little too short. | 1) Basic stuff. | Good | 1) choice of subjects. A little too | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A very quick overview of finance. Good review of fundamentals but not a lot of depth. | 1) A very quick overview of finance. | Good | 1) review of fundamentals but not a | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course was a good, quick introduction to finance for those of us who haven't been really exposed. My only reason for not giving 5 stars is that there were not enough examples of actually calculating ratios to understand what exactly needs to go into getting the numbers required. | 1) This course was a | Good | 1) quick introduction to finance for those | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Instructor is very good at explaining the topics. I like his style. | 1) Instructor is very | Good | 1) at explaining the topics. I like | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very Good to learn the basics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to learn the basics. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It is a good start for people always hear about terminologies in finance but never have a chance to lay out the structure of all concepts. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) start for people always hear about | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This is a good course to introduce the novice to financial terms used in common place. But in my opinion, the instructor could have a gone a bit further, explaining about Markets, Stocks, Bonds etc. Types of transactions involved. Maybe its expecting too much, but still, just a suggestion | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course to introduce the novice to | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good, help me understanding more about FI | 1) | Good | 1) help me understanding more about FI | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Boring financial concepts explained in interesting way. The professor way really good. I liked the course! | 1) interesting way. The professor way really | Good | 1) I liked the course! | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course gave me a good basic understanding finances. I can now better listen to the investors calls with a added level of understanding. | 1) This course gave me a | Good | 1) basic understanding finances. I can now | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very very good course. Gives a simplistic view of accounting and finance basics with nice examples. This should help a lot of people in getting their finances under control. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course. Gives a simplistic view of | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good introduction to Finance and Accounting concepts for those with no background in either field, even as students. I liked the valuation module the most! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Finance and Accounting concepts | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course, good introduction about finance, but some terms and topics require more explanation. | 1) | Good | 1) course, good introduction about finance, but | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course, good introduction about finance, but some terms and topics require more explanation. | 2) Good course, | Good | 2) introduction about finance, but some terms | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | My comments maybe not so useful as I had taken some study on this topic. This course give me opportunities to review what I learned before and I have to say this professor is really good. His explanation is clear. Maybe some addtional examples can be intresting | 1) to say this professor is really | Good | 1) His explanation is clear. Maybe some | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good introductory course. Complex concepts are explained in a simple form. It's not deep. It just provide a quick overview of the subject. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. Complex concepts are explained | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Simply and clearly explained, good examples. Just what you need for a short review of the topic. | 1) Simply and clearly explained, | Good | 1) examples. Just what you need for | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very easy to understand...good le | 1) Very easy to understand. . . | Good | 1) le | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | VERY GOOD COURSE,,,Give excellent glimpse to non finance professionals | 1) VERY | Good | 1) COURSE, , , Give excellent glimpse | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good basic overview of financial practices and methods. | 1) | Good | 1) basic overview of financial practices and | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course, fast and easy to get Could be enhanced by a few practical examples where the formulas presented could make more sense | 1) | Good | 1) course, fast and easy to get | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | The presenter is good and knowledgeable, but the information is barely skimmed over and there isn't any real opportunity to learn. A few worked examples might be good | 1) The presenter is | Good | 1) and knowledgeable, but the information is | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | The presenter is good and knowledgeable, but the information is barely skimmed over and there isn't any real opportunity to learn. A few worked examples might be good | 2) A few worked examples might be | Good | 2) | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A solid overview of accounting and finance for the non-financial professional. I have 0 finance and accounting experience, so I valued how broad this course was and I imagine it's a good primer for more in-depth courses. | 1) was and I imagine it's a | Good | 1) primer for more in-depth courses. | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good for dummies in finance or pure techies. Can add a bit more content in IRR, ROI topics as we come across those quite often. Also these topics will help engineers with technical knowledge to understand the bigger picture of financial viability of the projects they handle. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for dummies in finance or pure | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Pretty hard to Keep track but the content was good. I probably need to be a bit more focussed next time. | 1) Keep track but the content was | Good | 1) I probably need to be a | 2.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A very good course that introduced a lot a financial concepts. Not too deeply but widely. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course that introduced a lot a | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | I'm still not completed the full course but i can say it's good course and very awesome Instructor | 1) course but i can say it's | Good | 1) course and very awesome Instructor | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good, Introductory Course on Finance, | 1) | Good | 1) Introductory Course on Finance, | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good content for a short duration course. | 1) | Good | 1) content for a short duration course. | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | lack of examples to workout. good short videos. good option for introduction | 1) lack of examples to workout. | Good | 1) short videos. good option for introduction | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | lack of examples to workout. good short videos. good option for introduction | 2) examples to workout. good short videos. | Good | 2) option for introduction | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good for Non-Finance professionals to get an overview. | 1) | Good | 1) for Non-Finance professionals to get an | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Overall, it is good :) Hope there is a way to download all the study material. | 1) Overall, it is | Good | 1) :) Hope there is a way | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It could be more elaborated. In the 3rd week, there was more equations and hurry to complete the topic, i think. But all in all good. It gives you a brief idea of finance. | 1) i think. But all in all | Good | 1) It gives you a brief idea | 3.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course gives a good introduction for financial knowledge. However, the quizes are too simple. | 1) This course gives a | Good | 1) introduction for financial knowledge. However, the | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good overview. Could be a little bit more in-depth. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview. Could be a little bit | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Hy, Great, simple and very useful course. Good basics for every enterpreneur. | 1) Great, simple and very useful course. | Good | 1) basics for every enterpreneur. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | excellent presentation. not complicated with excess examples or digressions. good visuals that were easy to understand. Explanation given from a position of experience. | 1) complicated with excess examples or digressions. | Good | 1) visuals that were easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | A good overview for someone unfamiliar with finance but given the brief and introductory nature of the course, you'd need to do further reading to understand many of the concepts. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview for someone unfamiliar with finance | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It is a real good course with rich content for non-finance people. Good understanding and explanation of | 1) It is a real | Good | 1) course with rich content for non-finance | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It is a real good course with rich content for non-finance people. Good understanding and explanation of | 2) with rich content for non-finance people. | Good | 2) understanding and explanation of | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good course for non-financial professional | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for non-financial professional | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | As a nonfinancial person, I liked that it is a good clear intro finance. However, I wished there was more reading content available on the site to go more into depth on the topics. | 1) I liked that it is a | Good | 1) clear intro finance. However, I wished | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good introduction that gives a high level view of finance | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction that gives a high level | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | It was a good intro course. However, I wish there were a few more videos to go a bit more in-depth. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) intro course. However, I wish there | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Good brief introduction! Expecting more details. | 1) | Good | 1) brief introduction! Expecting more details. | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This is a very good course. I liked it very much! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. I liked it very much! | 5.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | For being a free course, it was pretty good. | 1) a free course, it was pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | This course is good for basics for Non finance professionals. Topics should have bee covered more in detail and totality. For examples Accounting principles coverd only 6 or 7 principles, while there are more principles. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for basics for Non finance professionals. | 4.0 |
| 0aY3BdGZEeSX5iIAC4tS5g | Very good course. Thouht me hot to control money and plan for the future. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thouht me hot to control | 5.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | Very Good Good. The professor is super brilliant and funny. What an attractive course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Good. The professor is super brilliant | 5.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | Very Good Good. The professor is super brilliant and funny. What an attractive course! | 2) Very Good | Good | 2) The professor is super brilliant and | 5.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | Interesting material and good teacher but very poor use of the media (an audio file would have been sufficient for most lectures) and low quality recording for some lectures (background noises, echos, wind...) | 1) Interesting material and | Good | 1) teacher but very poor use of | 3.0 |
| 0ayiYtaOEeWvEArBkQ8C9Q | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 0EqoQy7_EeWPngoW78wA_Q | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 0EqoQy7_EeWPngoW78wA_Q | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 0jVDw8z0EeSMfSIAC4tSZw | I liked the course very much, it could focus more on teaching metods during the assigments, but still give us a good material, tips and resourses to engage teaching practices. | 1) assigments, but still give us a | Good | 1) material, tips and resourses to engage | 3.0 |
| 0jVDw8z0EeSMfSIAC4tSZw | I am a geologist, however, I found the course very useful! Very good job! Congratulations! | 1) found the course very useful! Very | Good | 1) job! Congratulations! | 5.0 |
| 0l8lhEXrEeWbNhIvIryYow | It is a good course,It is useful. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, It is useful. | 5.0 |
| 0MxqCTygEea1gAouz62QPw | More information on Programming Assignment would have been helpful . Overall a good course to begin the specialization | 1) have been helpful . Overall a | Good | 1) course to begin the specialization | 4.0 |
| 0MxqCTygEea1gAouz62QPw | it's a fantastic course that gives you a good idea of what the objectives of recommender systems are and some intuition on the way how it can be accomplished. | 1) fantastic course that gives you a | Good | 1) idea of what the objectives of | 5.0 |
| 0SNVIkLcEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | Its very good and necesary for the persons who works whith people | 1) Its very | Good | 1) and necesary for the persons who | 5.0 |
| 0SYC5bspEeScJSIAC0aWWQ | Excellent course. It is applicable in many areas as our modern world is adding up complexity about everywhere and everyday in our lives. The course provides excellent perspectives of thinking and good exercisedecision | 1) provides excellent perspectives of thinking and | Good | 1) exercisedecision | 4.0 |
| 0SYC5bspEeScJSIAC0aWWQ | Very good ! Mr. Morin has this way of making complex issues very understandable and clear ... which is most probably due to the fact that complexity is his specialty subject ... | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! Mr. Morin has this way | 5.0 |
| 0SYC5bspEeScJSIAC0aWWQ | A must in a world more and more complexe, but where science says everything is connected, and good interactions can make the whole system evolve. Edgar Morin makes it easy, I loved weeks 2 and 5, and I'm finishing 3 and 6, it goes from general paradigm of complexity, to knowledge, companies, futur of civilisation, globalisationn etc etc Looking forward to courses covering applications of the system in different fields: permaculture, blue economy, integral theory etc etc oh yeaah Intergal theory.. Thank you :) | 1) science says everything is connected, and | Good | 1) interactions can make the whole system | 5.0 |
| 0w0JAG9JEeSp0iIAC12Jpw | Wonderful course for introduction this field. Good luck! | 1) Wonderful course for introduction this field. | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| 192QixZOEeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Not so good Lack of interest and practicability | 1) Not so | Good | 1) Lack of interest and practicability | 1.0 |
| 1b9VUDu6EeWdUgozVKt3nw | This course means well, but with very little critical thinking required, it ultimately communicates good intentions over solid content. | 1) critical thinking required, it ultimately communicates | Good | 1) intentions over solid content. | 2.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Good information, and detailed mathematical representation of the concepts, but often you will have to do outside research to truly understand the material, and the building blocks are not very helpful beyond a basic refresher course on matrices and statistics. This class requires a lot of studying and initiative to seek outside help to understand the material. If more time was dedicated to truly explaining the concepts and principles and the REASONING behind them instead of just supplying equations and test names, this class would get a 5 star rating. | 1) | Good | 1) information, and detailed mathematical representation of | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | GOOD COURSE! I can learn a lot of basic conception about econometircs, and the training exercises is good for me to understand what the teachers has taught in the course! | 1) | Good | 1) COURSE! I can learn a lot | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | GOOD COURSE! I can learn a lot of basic conception about econometircs, and the training exercises is good for me to understand what the teachers has taught in the course! | 2) econometircs, and the training exercises is | Good | 2) for me to understand what the | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | I find this course excellent. It is a well balanced course in combining econometric theory and its application. The fact is that to apply econometric theory one needs to understand fair bit of econometric method (that includes matrix algebra, some properties of inner product space etc.) as well as how to apply those concepts in practice. In this respect this course does serve its purpose very well. Overall, this course focuses some fundamental aspects and properties of cross-sectional data and time series data. Therefore, it provides one a good foundation (over 8 weeks) so that one can carry out one's future quest regarding any empirical topic by oneself ! I admit that modern econometric theory develops more sophisticated techniques but all of them share one common aspect i.e. they are based on more or less the same fundamentals or properties. Indeed, this course has been designed carefully by targeting those fundamentals and properties. Thus it might be very helpful to follow the modern econometric techniques. However, this course does not talk about the panel data analysis, which share both the cross-sectional and time series properties (more or less). In my opinion it might be better to have at least additional one week session on panel data. In particular, when the data set shares both cross-sectional and time series properties, which set of properties will be dominant or how the estimation technique incorporates the variation of two dimensions (i.e. cross-sectional and time ) etc. Finally, I like to thank all the teaching members and moderators of this course. I have enjoyed the lecture slides and videos very much. | 1) data. Therefore, it provides one a | Good | 1) foundation (over 8 weeks) so that | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | This course is not for someone who hasn't taken much advanced math. There's a strong requirement of linear algebra, calculus, and probability. Someone who is relying only on the math prep they give you in the course will likely be very under-prepared for some of the more theoretical homework assignments. With that disclaimer out of the way, this course gives a fairly good overview of important econometric techniques, though I wish they would have done more with time series analysis. A major shortcoming of this course is some of the more complicated material (RESET test, Chow test, endogeneity, etc) were not presented in a complete way (in my opinion). I found myself referring to quite a few outside sources in order to figure out some of the more complicated material. Keep this in mind when taking the class and give yourself extra time to read farther into the concepts discussed in class. | 1) way, this course gives a fairly | Good | 1) overview of important econometric techniques, though | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Good and challenging course. | 1) | Good | 1) and challenging course. | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Good content and exercise, very pedagogic. The only problem are the use of the program: If you don't know how to use a statistical program such as R, you will spend more time struggling with the program than understanding the topic. | 1) | Good | 1) content and exercise, very pedagogic. The | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | It is a very good course I guess, but being 15 years old, it didn't make any sense. However, I got to learn a lot of new things about a field which I wish to pursue. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course I guess, but being 15 | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Very Good Course! Many Thanks to course development team! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course! Many Thanks to course development | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Course was very good. It can be improved by giving more detail about various theories and proofs and explanations, and also by extending the course to few more weeks and by including few more topics. | 1) Course was very | Good | 1) It can be improved by giving | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | It is being a good experience for me, because the teachers and the structure of the course is great. | 1) It is being a | Good | 1) experience for me, because the teachers | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | This course will be a good revision if you have known the models before taking it. But if you are new to the models, you may not really understand them. This course tells you which models to use and how to implement, but does not tell you the rationale behind (maybe the theories are too difficult). The teaching staff are really helpful and answer every question you raise in the discussion forum. | 1) This course will be a | Good | 1) revision if you have known the | 3.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | The course is excellent, with a good balance between theory and practice. The level is intermediate. I wouldn’t recommend it for beginners. | 1) The course is excellent, with a | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. The | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Very good course, not many available online courses on this subject. Warning: Course is very fast paced (and the instructors give only broad hints as they move from 1 step to the next and it is left to us to figure out stuff - which is how it should be of course). Therefore expect to be kept busy throughout the course. I barely had any previous knowledge on the subject, so folks with some basic understanding of the subject may have a different view | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, not many available online courses | 5.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Very good course. But too much emphasis on statistical derivations. Also estimating models by using any statistical software (SPSS, STATA, R, Eviews) will for sure be an interesting ad on. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. But too much emphasis on | 4.0 |
| 1BM3lirjEeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1cjJ8SGJEeWa6hIFcmm3AQ | Very interesting course but work needs to done on the language component which was sometimes very confusing. Some really good Powerpoint presentation work. | 1) was sometimes very confusing. Some really | Good | 1) Powerpoint presentation work. | 4.0 |
| 1cjJ8SGJEeWa6hIFcmm3AQ | Overall good quality course, interesting and relevant. The only drawback are the quizzes because sometimes the answer is not clear, even after watching carefully the video and reading material. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) quality course, interesting and relevant. The | 4.0 |
| 1cW_OysHEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Very informative with good tools. Appropriate for parents as well as professionals working with children and families. | 1) Very informative with | Good | 1) tools. Appropriate for parents as well | 5.0 |
| 1cz3WSsXEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Good introductory course. I felt the wording of some of the quiz questions to be uneccessarily ambigous. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. I felt the wording | 4.0 |
| 1cz3WSsXEeWccAqzeA4VPw | A lot of useful information. Good educators. | 1) A lot of useful information. | Good | 1) educators. | 5.0 |
| 1cz3WSsXEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Love that I could take this course at my own pace. Good as all the other AMNH courses. | 1) this course at my own pace. | Good | 1) as all the other AMNH courses. | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The content is very good but the lecture presentation and structure could use improvement. Assignment instructions are not as clear as they could be. | 1) The content is very | Good | 1) but the lecture presentation and structure | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | A good course have lots of Quizzes and lecture material takes some time thats all. | 1) A | Good | 1) course have lots of Quizzes and | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | very good assignment! | 1) very | Good | 1) assignment! | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | Very good course. The only thing that I would suggest is an higher precence of moderators in the forum. It would be very appreciated. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The only thing that I | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | I really loved the dense collection of relevant information, this course is a great introduction to computer vision-related algorithms. Unfortunately the lecture videos are poorly edited and subtitles are inaccurate, however the slides are quite good and verbose enough to understand every topic. Assignments are quite good, however formula derivation explanations could be better. | 1) inaccurate, however the slides are quite | Good | 1) and verbose enough to understand every | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | I really loved the dense collection of relevant information, this course is a great introduction to computer vision-related algorithms. Unfortunately the lecture videos are poorly edited and subtitles are inaccurate, however the slides are quite good and verbose enough to understand every topic. Assignments are quite good, however formula derivation explanations could be better. | 2) understand every topic. Assignments are quite | Good | 2) however formula derivation explanations could be | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The course is a very good overall description of the Perception field. The part I really liked is that there was no haste or a concept just superficially discussed - lectures are long and detailed. The presentation of lectures especially from Prof. Jianbo Shi are excellent - to represent Matrices in colours and give a intuitive sense of every formula(especially the Jacobians and treating the image blending process as painting) . The bad part of this course is that pronunciations of faculties could be a little unclear and hence a very good transcript is required - which in this course is not upto the mark. There were few mistakes on the slides and should be rectified atleast in the pdf of the slides. What this means is that we have to go through some frustration while watching the video first time which gradually improves on second or third view. Also, there is absolutely no participation of teaching staff. A good content should be supplemented with assistance to further enhance learning experience. Few doubts because of this remains unclear and I wish I could have got this sorted in this class. | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) overall description of the Perception field. | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The course is a very good overall description of the Perception field. The part I really liked is that there was no haste or a concept just superficially discussed - lectures are long and detailed. The presentation of lectures especially from Prof. Jianbo Shi are excellent - to represent Matrices in colours and give a intuitive sense of every formula(especially the Jacobians and treating the image blending process as painting) . The bad part of this course is that pronunciations of faculties could be a little unclear and hence a very good transcript is required - which in this course is not upto the mark. There were few mistakes on the slides and should be rectified atleast in the pdf of the slides. What this means is that we have to go through some frustration while watching the video first time which gradually improves on second or third view. Also, there is absolutely no participation of teaching staff. A good content should be supplemented with assistance to further enhance learning experience. Few doubts because of this remains unclear and I wish I could have got this sorted in this class. | 2) little unclear and hence a very | Good | 2) transcript is required - which in | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The course is a very good overall description of the Perception field. The part I really liked is that there was no haste or a concept just superficially discussed - lectures are long and detailed. The presentation of lectures especially from Prof. Jianbo Shi are excellent - to represent Matrices in colours and give a intuitive sense of every formula(especially the Jacobians and treating the image blending process as painting) . The bad part of this course is that pronunciations of faculties could be a little unclear and hence a very good transcript is required - which in this course is not upto the mark. There were few mistakes on the slides and should be rectified atleast in the pdf of the slides. What this means is that we have to go through some frustration while watching the video first time which gradually improves on second or third view. Also, there is absolutely no participation of teaching staff. A good content should be supplemented with assistance to further enhance learning experience. Few doubts because of this remains unclear and I wish I could have got this sorted in this class. | 3) no participation of teaching staff. A | Good | 3) content should be supplemented with assistance | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | This course should have been very good. Lots of detail. But the material is not presented very clearly. The Assignments are also not setup so that it is easy to fix your work. It either passes, or you get minimal feedback. | 1) This course should have been very | Good | 1) Lots of detail. But the material | 2.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | That Chinese professor is so good at giving lectures | 1) That Chinese professor is so | Good | 1) at giving lectures | 4.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | I dont like how this course was presented. The professors are good but the way how they present the course is extremely inefficient. I mean, because the instructor only speaks moving hands from one side to other, it was very difficult to visualize what and where the instructor was referencing to. Eg. a figure with 3 formulas and many variables there was no way to know in what alpha variable in formulas the instructor was talking about, once all formulas had the alpha variable. Also, when trying to describe a 3D environment only moving hands, its quite impossible to determine what and where the instructor is. One suggestion to try to minimize this problem would be try to use a lase pointer or a stick or a pen or something similar to help the student to now where the instructor exactly is. One example of good presentation is the course of ML from Andrew Ng where he writes all the things while speaking which facilitates the student to follow the sequence. Hope this can help. | 1) course was presented. The professors are | Good | 1) but the way how they present | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | I dont like how this course was presented. The professors are good but the way how they present the course is extremely inefficient. I mean, because the instructor only speaks moving hands from one side to other, it was very difficult to visualize what and where the instructor was referencing to. Eg. a figure with 3 formulas and many variables there was no way to know in what alpha variable in formulas the instructor was talking about, once all formulas had the alpha variable. Also, when trying to describe a 3D environment only moving hands, its quite impossible to determine what and where the instructor is. One suggestion to try to minimize this problem would be try to use a lase pointer or a stick or a pen or something similar to help the student to now where the instructor exactly is. One example of good presentation is the course of ML from Andrew Ng where he writes all the things while speaking which facilitates the student to follow the sequence. Hope this can help. | 2) instructor exactly is. One example of | Good | 2) presentation is the course of ML | 3.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | Very good. Teachers worked hard. Practical and quite comprehensive for such short term. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Teachers worked hard. Practical and quite | 5.0 |
| 1eYewVu-EeWACQpGR_316w | The least comprehensive course I ever took. It needs very good prerequisite about computer vision. And the demostration was very poor. | 1) I ever took. It needs very | Good | 1) prerequisite about computer vision. And the | 1.0 |
| 1ll5BIJbEeSkLyIAC1OGNA | Its very good. Till now i am thankful to god that i came across this | 1) Its very | Good | 1) Till now i am thankful to | 5.0 |
| 1ll5BIJbEeSkLyIAC1OGNA | It's great course to understand what and how to give. The quest speakers gave lots of stories to student for "case study". And the assessment methodology of evaluating a nonprofit is quite useful and easy to participate. The assighment of assesement a nonprofit takes a while to think about and finish, but it was a good one to "train" our brain how to define a problem and how to get useful recourses to resolve them. | 1) and finish, but it was a | Good | 1) one to " train" our brain | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Great, short course with some good tips to make life easier. Will be trying this personally and professionally. | 1) Great, short course with some | Good | 1) tips to make life easier. Will | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Great course. It gives you good ideas of how to keep focused at work, knowing how to identify and prioritize matters by levels of importance. | 1) Great course. It gives you | Good | 1) ideas of how to keep focused | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good and very useful tips kept simple and easy to understand for everybody. However, personally I was looking for a more advanced content. | 1) | Good | 1) and very useful tips kept simple | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Job I really enjoyed having this course and learn new tips but if you can open the quiz parts so participants are able to solve them without having to purchase the Course Certificate that will be better. Thanks for your effort. | 1) | Good | 1) Job I really enjoyed having this | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good lesson to improve your daily work more smarter and efficient. | 1) | Good | 1) lesson to improve your daily work | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good as it was short and sweet | 1) | Good | 1) as it was short and sweet | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I liked. these methods really drives into good time management | 1) liked. these methods really drives into | Good | 1) time management | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The information is good, i thought it will be more information about it! =) | 1) The information is | Good | 1) i thought it will be more | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good insights about productivity | 1) | Good | 1) insights about productivity | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good practical types! | 1) Very | Good | 1) practical types! | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very easy to understand concepts, really makes you accountable for your time so that you make good work and home life balance easier. | 1) your time so that you make | Good | 1) work and home life balance easier. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good course. It was extremely easy for me as I have near-OCD tendencies and am a retired Army veteran. Time management has been one of my biggest practices in the last couple of decades of my life. Everything I've already known to be true was taught in this course. Great blocks of instruction! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It was extremely easy for | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A good course! it's simple to aply and it have very good stories and examples. | 1) A | Good | 1) course! it's simple to aply and | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A good course! it's simple to aply and it have very good stories and examples. | 2) to aply and it have very | Good | 2) stories and examples. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | There are some good tools to use, but the information presented it really just an overview and there isn't much substance to it. | 1) There are some | Good | 1) tools to use, but the information | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good information and advice. I wish it was more comprehensive though. It seemed to just give an overview of each topic discussed. More detail would have been nice. | 1) | Good | 1) information and advice. I wish it | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good tools for time management | 1) | Good | 1) tools for time management | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | great content, easy to follow. good examples. hit the spot! | 1) great content, easy to follow. | Good | 1) examples. hit the spot! | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Really good tools for managing your time and useful recommendations :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) tools for managing your time and | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A short course on how to manage your personnal or work time. The course will give you good advice, good practice and good tools. After this course, you will be able to manage your time with more efficiency but you are the only person who can make the real difference :) | 1) time. The course will give you | Good | 1) advice, good practice and good tools. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A short course on how to manage your personnal or work time. The course will give you good advice, good practice and good tools. After this course, you will be able to manage your time with more efficiency but you are the only person who can make the real difference :) | 2) course will give you good advice, | Good | 2) practice and good tools. After this | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A short course on how to manage your personnal or work time. The course will give you good advice, good practice and good tools. After this course, you will be able to manage your time with more efficiency but you are the only person who can make the real difference :) | 3) you good advice, good practice and | Good | 3) tools. After this course, you will | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good ideas and tips for working better on an every day schedule. Otimas ideias e dicas para trabalhar melhor no dia a dia. | 1) Very | Good | 1) ideas and tips for working better | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Precise and good advices for practical uses. | 1) Precise and | Good | 1) advices for practical uses. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course helpful in realizing mistake you may make as you get more occupied in schedule | 1) | Good | 1) course helpful in realizing mistake you | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good in content. But, I suppose, the slides can be polished with some animations and figures. | 1) | Good | 1) in content. But, I suppose, the | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Not so good. | 1) Not so | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This is a very good course. I've learned a lot. Thanks. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. I've learned a lot. Thanks. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Sometimes we will miss out the organization from our tones of tasks in our job. and it is good chance to know what actually we have missed and as a remind that we should work smarter instead of just work harder. | 1) in our job. and it is | Good | 1) chance to know what actually we | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This was a good time management course. It's fairly basic. But worth taking as a first time | 1) This was a | Good | 1) time management course. It's fairly basic. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It is a good course, but probably just a little too short. I think it will be a good idea to develop some arguments more in deep. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, but probably just a little | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It is a good course, but probably just a little too short. I think it will be a good idea to develop some arguments more in deep. | 2) I think it will be a | Good | 2) idea to develop some arguments more | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good. but this is just kind of manual. We must train ourselves to follow this tips. Every time we got failed that we didn't know how to train us. If you have already tried several times for time management and failed, You would fail because of the same reason. This course will just show what is good and what is bed. We already know. What we need to know is.... How to train us. | 1) | Good | 1) but this is just kind of | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good. but this is just kind of manual. We must train ourselves to follow this tips. Every time we got failed that we didn't know how to train us. If you have already tried several times for time management and failed, You would fail because of the same reason. This course will just show what is good and what is bed. We already know. What we need to know is.... How to train us. | 2) course will just show what is | Good | 2) and what is bed. We already | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Really good I learned a lot | 1) Really | Good | 1) I learned a lot | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It helped me understand why multitasking is doing no good to my career. | 1) understand why multitasking is doing no | Good | 1) to my career. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good overview of time management, provided decent introduction to strategies. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of time management, provided decent | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A lot of good information in a condensed fashion! | 1) A lot of | Good | 1) information in a condensed fashion! | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good tips! | 1) | Good | 1) tips! | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Pretty good | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good introductory class for time management | 1) | Good | 1) introductory class for time management | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Got some new ideas to try out. Good content | 1) some new ideas to try out. | Good | 1) content | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | very good and interesting presentations and I like the tone, style, and clarity of the teacher very much | 1) very | Good | 1) and interesting presentations and I like | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A good basic introduction to the principles of time management in the professional workplace. However, a bit light in terms of depth, and not overly challenging. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic introduction to the principles of | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Interesting course with good instructor. | 1) Interesting course with | Good | 1) instructor. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This teacher taught a lot of useful skills, all are very good! | 1) of useful skills, all are very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Was good on the description and clearly mentioned in each point. Felt like time can be managed somehow. | 1) Was | Good | 1) on the description and clearly mentioned | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A good course with good assignments | 1) A | Good | 1) course with good assignments | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A good course with good assignments | 2) A good course with | Good | 2) assignments | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Usefull Course and lot of good info on develop our productivity. | 1) Usefull Course and lot of | Good | 1) info on develop our productivity. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good course .....!!! | 1) | Good | 1) course . . . . . | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Course! Great introduction about time management tools, tips, and best practices. Could be better with more realistic examples. | 1) | Good | 1) Course! Great introduction about time management | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good simple information and tools that will help you in starting the long course of time management. Good instructor elaborating with multiple examples. | 1) | Good | 1) simple information and tools that will | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good simple information and tools that will help you in starting the long course of time management. Good instructor elaborating with multiple examples. | 2) the long course of time management. | Good | 2) instructor elaborating with multiple examples. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | so far, so good | 1) so far, so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Few good ideas, too much repetition of the obvious. | 1) Few | Good | 1) ideas, too much repetition of the | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course, but very high-leve | 1) | Good | 1) course, but very high-leve | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course. Worth taking it. Thank you. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Worth taking it. Thank you. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Found some of the points very good. Will definitely implement and reap the benefit. | 1) Found some of the points very | Good | 1) Will definitely implement and reap the | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course, but a bit simple if you have any previous experience with or interest in managing your own time. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but a bit simple if | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good tools to use for time management. My favorite lesson is where the facilitator stated we teach people how to treat us i.e. answering emails at 2am. It can wait. | 1) Very | Good | 1) tools to use for time management. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The presenter was good but the course was too basic and barely an overview. It needed to be longer to be worth it | 1) The presenter was | Good | 1) but the course was too basic | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This is a great introductory course on productivity. It is also a good 'refresher' on the basics for those who have forgotten what they learned earlier in the careers. ;-) | 1) on productivity. It is also a | Good | 1) 'refresher' on the basics for those | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good tips and techniques to better manage your time and priorities. | 1) | Good | 1) tips and techniques to better manage | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good reference. | 1) | Good | 1) reference. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | course is very good | 1) course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Job, a great work in personal organization. Thanks a lot !! | 1) | Good | 1) Job, a great work in personal | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course. Very good advises. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Very good advises. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course. Very good advises. | 2) Good course. Very | Good | 2) advises. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course points to good soluitons to nowaday's common bad habits, like procrastination or multitasking, and some of the strategies are very applicable the my work environment (not all because of hierarchical and cultural differences). The only point I would like to change is the teacher's tone of voice. It sounded too low for me, even after setting the volume to maximum I have had difficulties parsing the words. This may be an issue of english not being my mother language, but comparing to other courses that's is a possible explanation. Thank you very much. | 1) This course points to | Good | 1) soluitons to nowaday's common bad habits, | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good course! I learnt many useful tips! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I learnt many useful tips! | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | So far, its good and simple, this course is for those who really want to make practical impact in their lives. So far so good! | 1) So far, its | Good | 1) and simple, this course is for | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | So far, its good and simple, this course is for those who really want to make practical impact in their lives. So far so good! | 2) in their lives. So far so | Good | 2) | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Practical advice, easy to follow. Good job! | 1) Practical advice, easy to follow. | Good | 1) job! | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good tips | 1) | Good | 1) tips | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good delivery of the course. | 1) | Good | 1) delivery of the course. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good, I learn a lot about time management | 1) Very | Good | 1) I learn a lot about time | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Pretty basic stuff, but still good suggestions for new people in the field of time management and prioritization. | 1) Pretty basic stuff, but still | Good | 1) suggestions for new people in the | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | They seem like no brainers, but when your life/work balance is going off, it's a good reminder to follow the tips in this course. | 1) balance is going off, it's a | Good | 1) reminder to follow the tips in | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | A lot of good advice | 1) A lot of | Good | 1) advice | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course provides clear and crisp additions/modifications in our daily life style that can bring about significant changes. Instructor illustrates these solutions by means of very simple yet powerful examples and provides useful monitoring techniques that'll one help become more productive. All in all this is a good course one must take to learn or if you already know then refresh the ideas to become more productive. | 1) All in all this is a | Good | 1) course one must take to learn | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It´s simply, easy and good...but may be to basic | 1) It´s simply, easy and | Good | 1) . . but may be to | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Pointed skills, easily learnt thanks to the format and good instructor. | 1) learnt thanks to the format and | Good | 1) instructor. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course is very good for me. I find out many ways to save up my time and money. Thank you for providing such an interesting and helpful course. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for me. I find out many | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It was an interesting course and even if theoretically one is supposed to know and realize what is presented here it is good to have it told again for refreshing memory and reinforcement. | 1) what is presented here it is | Good | 1) to have it told again for | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very Good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good and useful content but some problems in vids | 1) | Good | 1) and useful content but some problems | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Pretty Good Learn Somewhat New Things All in All Happy With the Course | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) Learn Somewhat New Things All in | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good pacakge and system of delivering lecture | 1) | Good | 1) pacakge and system of delivering lecture | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | it was a good course which helped me track and manage my time | 1) it was a | Good | 1) course which helped me track and | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Efficient Tools and Resources. Good articles from the web to refer from. Readily applicable to work place for self and the team. | 1) Efficient Tools and Resources. | Good | 1) articles from the web to refer | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The provided material is good, but not good enough to be called a 'course'. It seems more like a 'talk', not a 'course'. I suggest to add more materials, or merge with other courses. | 1) The provided material is | Good | 1) but not good enough to be | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | The provided material is good, but not good enough to be called a 'course'. It seems more like a 'talk', not a 'course'. I suggest to add more materials, or merge with other courses. | 2) provided material is good, but not | Good | 2) enough to be called a 'course'. | 1.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It was very good and have enjoyed learning it. | 1) It was very | Good | 1) and have enjoyed learning it. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Really good short intro to the time management. | 1) Really | Good | 1) short intro to the time management. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Worth the time to learn new things or reenforce good habits | 1) to learn new things or reenforce | Good | 1) habits | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Clear and good instructions on how to increase productivity | 1) Clear and | Good | 1) instructions on how to increase productivity | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Course. Would've been great if important urgent quadrants were also covered. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. Would've been great if important | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course I liked it. Very useful | 1) | Good | 1) course I liked it. Very useful | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I found the modules repetitive and felt the course could have been shorter, but i did take away some useful tools and it did reinforce some good practices i was already doing. | 1) tools and it did reinforce some | Good | 1) practices i was already doing. | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | good enough for saving and managing my time | 1) | Good | 1) enough for saving and managing my | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very neat and nice lecture. It is very good to control and save time and also this lecture itself is well designed to do time managing. | 1) and nice lecture. It is very | Good | 1) to control and save time and | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | it's a good course and I find it very inspiring. If the teacher can outline more specific examples about time management would be more wonderful. | 1) it's a | Good | 1) course and I find it very | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It is a good course that gives you a general idea about how to manage your time. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course that gives you a general | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It's a good course and has helped me understand time management better than the motivational books ever did. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course and has helped me understand | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | what is good about the course is that it is a small course in time and to the point, hope to learn more | 1) what is | Good | 1) about the course is that it | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course!!! Need more contents!!! | 1) | Good | 1) course! ! ! Need more contents! | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Simple and practical guidelines which can be followed easily. I think I will be able to apply the methods discussed in the course on daily basis without actually spending much time on learning them as they are very practical! The course has been useful in making me realize where all my time has been going without quantifiable results and hopefully I will be able to make a habit of good time management. Thank you for putting it together :-) | 1) able to make a habit of | Good | 1) time management. Thank you for putting | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Maybe a little too short. Quite easy on the quizzes too. The information is very good though. Many of these techniques I am already doing, so this was more of an affirmation of being on the right track for me than much of anything else. | 1) quizzes too. The information is very | Good | 1) though. Many of these techniques I | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good Course o professional grooming | 1) | Good | 1) Course o professional grooming | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good curse. The issue is that it was way way too short, and I felt its content is the equivalent of a week, and that more could be said about it. Again, otherwise, good course. | 1) | Good | 1) curse. The issue is that it | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good curse. The issue is that it was way way too short, and I felt its content is the equivalent of a week, and that more could be said about it. Again, otherwise, good course. | 2) be said about it. Again, otherwise, | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Short but very direct. Small changes, as the Professor says, are key to change habits. And the course lives up to this. Though there are many more things to be done, the elements given are a good start to get us in the right path | 1) done, the elements given are a | Good | 1) start to get us in the | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Short but really good tips | 1) Short but really | Good | 1) tips | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Easy to absorb, the audio examples given in video are good for those who do not understand the basic concepts/terms explained in notes alone. I feel this was a helpful short course, that is both efficient and well organised. Really teaches you to work smarter, not harder ;) | 1) audio examples given in video are | Good | 1) for those who do not understand | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good content, but not the best. Need to improve Vietnamese subtitles! | 1) | Good | 1) content, but not the best. Need | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course is really good for initiating productivity. Thanks to all involved with the development of such a good course. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) for initiating productivity. Thanks to all | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | This course is really good for initiating productivity. Thanks to all involved with the development of such a good course. | 2) with the development of such a | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good practical and useful tips. In my opinion, the topics are covered with the right detail within the right time. Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) practical and useful tips. In my | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | I think that's a very good programme and a professional instructor . | 1) I think that's a very | Good | 1) programme and a professional instructor . | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It's alright, but could be much much better. I didn't feel engaged and half of the time I was just wishing the video would just end. The course itself highlighted some good ideas about saving time and prioritising, but the way it was presented just fell short for me. | 1) end. The course itself highlighted some | Good | 1) ideas about saving time and prioritising, | 3.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | It's a good course, very easy to understand and practical content | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, very easy to understand and | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Very nice tricks and insight to better manage your time and getting things done. Good course, achievable and worth the time spent. Thanks, Massimiliano | 1) your time and getting things done. | Good | 1) course, achievable and worth the time | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good course. It's very practical and the things thought help. | 1) | Good | 1) course. It's very practical and the | 5.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good brief overview of class at the 100 college level. Would be good for someone about to go back to school for undergrad. | 1) | Good | 1) brief overview of class at the | 4.0 |
| 1ndQqNPxEeSloiIAC3kKUw | Good brief overview of class at the 100 college level. Would be good for someone about to go back to school for undergrad. | 2) the 100 college level. Would be | Good | 2) for someone about to go back | 4.0 |
| 1vFfwoE5EeWuHwqbqMyacw | Good course to understand how to enter International Marketing and execute it. | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand how to enter | 5.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | A good oportunity to learn business English, communication and much more. | 1) A | Good | 1) oportunity to learn business English, communication | 4.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | Very good the words, and how can help foreign people | 1) Very | Good | 1) the words, and how can help | 5.0 |
| 2bhGZFS-EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | This is very good course. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very informative. Provides a good understanding about implication of data collection and probability. | 1) Very informative. Provides a | Good | 1) understanding about implication of data collection | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Good class! Suitable for beginners to R. I feel that I have made great achievement after finished all the tests! | 1) | Good | 1) class! Suitable for beginners to R. | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Really good content and the teacher is one of the best in Coursera. This is for many people a difficult subject that is made easy to digest. Looking forward to more courses from the same Teacher | 1) Really | Good | 1) content and the teacher is one | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very good one. Learnt a lot from it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) one. Learnt a lot from it. | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | 1) they are very active, they give | Good | 1) insights, they know the subject matter. | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very mixed feelings about this course. Generally speaking, the course lectures are informative and well organized. Mentors are reallly of great help, they are doing a great job, honestly: they are very active, they give good insights, they know the subject matter. But in the course lectures, there are occasions where concepts are used which were not formally introduced before their actual use. One example: in the lectures on probability, the first "slide" in the lecture talks about random processes, outcomes of random process,... On the next slide, the notion of probability of an event is introduced, but the very notion of "event" was never introduced. It is introduced in the accompanying book, but if it is the case that the book chapters should be read PRIOR to watching the course videos, that fact should be made clear. Further in the course on probability, some words are used "interchangeably" without the context making it clear why they can be used interchangeably. For instance, on some occasions, the concept of independent events is used, but then, later on, the discussion talks of independent processes. Which is which??? Is there a difference? If so, what is it? When do I need to use independent events as opposed to independent processes? The graded assignments are of varying quality. The most disturbing thing about them is that, on some occasions, concepts are used in the quiz questions (either directly in the questions and answer choices, or indirectly in the "correction" for the quiz after you have submitted it) that were never touched upon in the course. I have had two occasions of concepts not introduced in the course but used in the graded assignments. The first occurrence of a gap between course content and quiz questions was on a quiz question about inference. I failed the question, and understood why I failed based on the course content litterally minutes after failing the question (and one mentor actually rightly corrected me). But the question "correction" (the explanation text you receive after submitting, as justification for what the correct answer is) referred to the concept of "two-sided hypothesis test". Where did THAT come from?? I checked and rechecked the course videos, no mention at all of it. I checked the accompanying book, and the first mention of two-sided hypothesis test is way way way further in the book, in a chapter that is entirely focusing on inference. The second occurrence was in week 4. The course lectures cover two distributions: normal and binomial. The recommended reading in the book also focus on these two distributions (the recommended reading actually skips the section on geometric distribution, if I remember well). But in one of the quiz question, there was one of the possible answers referring to the geometric distribution. If it is the case that we are supposed to know and understand about geometric distributions, then the course content should cover the subject. Or at the very least, the course lecture should mention clearly that learners are advised to read about it in the accompanying book. The guidelines for the project assignment (week 5) are not all that clear as to what is expected from the learners. Sure, there are instructions on where to find the info, what structure should be followed,... There is also a very nice "example" project (designed by one of the mentors), which provides a lot of useful info (how to filter missing values from variables,...). But there is no real hint as to the depth of analysis we are expected to complete. This is definitely a source of confusion, not only for me, but also for a few other learners, from what I gathered in the discussion forums. The result is that the projects you get to review are of very disparate levels. Some end up in calculating one figure per research question, without any attempt at deriving trends or patterns, others do not include any plots at all,... The thing is that the peer review criteria do not really provide a good basis to ensure that learners did indeed assimilate the course contents. Most of the questions in the peer review assignment have a lot more to do with following a canvas and not so much with the course substance itself. For instance, some of the peer review criteria have to do with the narratives for computed statistics and plots. The criteria are: "Is each plot/R outout followed by a narrative", "Does the narrative correctly interpret the plots, or statistics", "Does the narrative address the research question". But when the research question is a question of the type "What it the IQR for income per state", for instance, the narrative can be very short: "IQR per state shows that the state with higher variability of income is...". So, the narrative meets the 3 evaluation criteria: there is a narrative, it does address the research question, and it does correctly interpret the statistics. But it is not particularly useful. I do understand that Internet-based peer review is challenging, and that you have to settle for "neutral" criteria that are easy to assess by learners. But the peer review grading "grid" as it currently stands is not "that" helpful in assessing whether the course contents has been assimilated. To conclude, when I took the course, my initial plan was to follow the entire specialization. But after having completed the first course of the specialization, I have radically changed my mind, and will look for alternatives "elsewhere" to get the knowledge/skillset that I am after. | 2) criteria do not really provide a | Good | 2) basis to ensure that learners did | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very good introductory course to probability and data. Very hands-on examples and outstanding explanations. I already had several statistics courses before in my life but not in this quality. I can really recommend this course to anyone who to learn more about statistics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to probability and data. | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The course videos are good, but the R programming is not well explained. I've enrolled in other Coursera courses that use R, Python or Octave, and they all provide clear demo videos for beginners to get up to standard with the code. This course doesn't do that so it's not a good intro to R, which is a shame because working in statistics these days is all about using R and similar tools so there should be a stronger emphasis on that. | 1) The course videos are | Good | 1) but the R programming is not | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The course videos are good, but the R programming is not well explained. I've enrolled in other Coursera courses that use R, Python or Octave, and they all provide clear demo videos for beginners to get up to standard with the code. This course doesn't do that so it's not a good intro to R, which is a shame because working in statistics these days is all about using R and similar tools so there should be a stronger emphasis on that. | 2) do that so it's not a | Good | 2) intro to R, which is a | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | If you have prior knowledge of R, then this course will help to brush up your statistics. The pacing of the material is very good. The examples used are relevant and interesting. Great course in general. | 1) pacing of the material is very | Good | 1) The examples used are relevant and | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Professor Cetinkaya-Rundel's explanations are clear and she gives many examples, the quizzes are fair and I think it is an excellent idea to have a lab in R to get students familiar with that tool. I recommend that students read the book chapters and do the practice problems there, it's very helpful. My one criticism is that the amount of R taught in the course is not really enough to do a good job on the capstone project, because the data in the given database is formatted very differently. I think maybe the course staff could reformat the database to make it more user-friendly for beginning R users, but in the meantime you may want to study a little R on the side at, say, DataCamp. | 1) not really enough to do a | Good | 1) job on the capstone project, because | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Good instruction, even though the final project is little bit hard. | 1) | Good | 1) instruction, even though the final project | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | I took this course hoping for a fundamental education in utilizing R for statistical analysis. Unfortunately, this course focuses heavily on statistical methods and very little on explaining the R processes used. Good for introductory stats students, not great for those interested in furthering their knowledge of R. | 1) on explaining the R processes used. | Good | 1) for introductory stats students, not great | 3.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Lectures and material we're really good. Haven't done the practical part, so can't say anything about it. | 1) Lectures and material we're really | Good | 1) Haven't done the practical part, so | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | One of the well made MOOCs. There are many courses in Coursera taught by good professors from good universities but are badly designed for an MOOC environment making it a bad experience. This course is really well designed. The contents is modular and lectures are split into easy to grasp chunks. The weekly lab exercises using R using real datasets is a plus. Though not much of R syntax is taught and it is up to us to explore(understandable since the goal of this course is not to teach R). The final project was a bit challenging but fun. The course 'mentors' are helpful. | 1) many courses in Coursera taught by | Good | 1) professors from good universities but are | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | One of the well made MOOCs. There are many courses in Coursera taught by good professors from good universities but are badly designed for an MOOC environment making it a bad experience. This course is really well designed. The contents is modular and lectures are split into easy to grasp chunks. The weekly lab exercises using R using real datasets is a plus. Though not much of R syntax is taught and it is up to us to explore(understandable since the goal of this course is not to teach R). The final project was a bit challenging but fun. The course 'mentors' are helpful. | 2) Coursera taught by good professors from | Good | 2) universities but are badly designed for | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | The content of this course is not terribly difficult, I thought, but it's a very good introduction into most aspects of Data Science. You learn to familiarize yourself with R quite well and get a lot of independence to create a final project based on a huge data set. One thing I would've liked is a sample completed project, start to finish, to see what was expected- the things that got produced (which you peer review) varied hugely in quality. | 1) I thought, but it's a very | Good | 1) introduction into most aspects of Data | 4.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very helpful, and at a good level for someone who lacks a strong background in either the stats or R. | 1) Very helpful, and at a | Good | 1) level for someone who lacks a | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | This course was excellent, the teaching material top-notch and with excellent pedagogy. It's amazing that the course authors offer a statistics textbook almost exactly covering the course content for free. The idea to combine R and statistics is right on the money too, thanks to this one can learn 2 skills at the same time, with statistical analysis letting you practice coding in R and R helping you visualise your statistics. The lectures are divided into small, easy to absorb chunks and the teacher does an excellent job explaining the material, giving very good examples and analogies to help the students understand concepts. The exercises and assignments are fun to complete, and the course offers a flexibility in how much time you spend on it per week, e.g. there are non-mandatory exercises to do. | 1) job explaining the material, giving very | Good | 1) examples and analogies to help the | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Really good introduction for anyone who doesn't know probability nor R. If you already know the basics of both, maybe this course is not for you. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction for anyone who doesn't know | 5.0 |
| 2dHcFsRdEeW2JxKnR3RyOw | Very informational, really good speed and content. Nice examples to illustrate the learnings. | 1) Very informational, really | Good | 1) speed and content. Nice examples to | 5.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | I think it's a good way to introduce the world of "accounting" but I think videos need to be more specific and I would have appreciated if there was some practical exercise and not only quiz! But all the informations are exposed clearly. | 1) I think it's a | Good | 1) way to introduce the world of | 4.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | This course is extremely basic. It took me about four hours to complete the entire course (minus the peer reviewed assignment since I audited). This wouldn't be an issue in and of itself, but there were quite a number of issues with the presentation, from questions appearing in the wrong video, to badly worded and misleading questions. It's as if the course material was quickly thrown together and not reviewed or tested. Overall, there is some good info in it if you have no background in accounting and no idea what a balance sheet is, but if you're looking for insight into interpreting balance sheets, this is not the class for you. | 1) or tested. Overall, there is some | Good | 1) info in it if you have | 3.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | 1) Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very | Good | 1) instructor, good content, well-designed. | 5.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | 2) this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, | Good | 2) content, well-designed. | 5.0 |
| 2g7bdO-KEeWTgg7cwVeSqQ | A very detailed and easy to understand explanation of accounting with good examples. Enjoyed this course! | 1) to understand explanation of accounting with | Good | 1) examples. Enjoyed this course! | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The way He explains is Good But it would be cool if he also Explains Every small thing in Unity. But yeah ,Great Course for a beginner though. | 1) The way He explains is | Good | 1) But it would be cool if | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good сourse. But it would be better if it covers more information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) сourse. But it would be better | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A great course of beginers in game development. The content is clear and concise. Brian has a good command over the topics. | 1) clear and concise. Brian has a | Good | 1) command over the topics. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It's a good start. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start. | 3.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course. It helps me to understand working processes in Unity 3D and essential scripting using C#. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It helps me to understand | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A great introduction to Unity and game development in general. Occasionally feels too "scripted" when watching the videos, but otherwise good. Thanks :) | 1) when watching the videos, but otherwise | Good | 1) Thanks :) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good pace, sets you on a path to creating your own basic games using Unity in no time and also brushes upon scripting with C# which can make your games x times more interesting! | 1) Very | Good | 1) pace, sets you on a path | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A good course that gives you an overall view of the development of a game. | 1) A | Good | 1) course that gives you an overall | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent introduction and good coverage as a start. Thank you! | 1) Excellent introduction and | Good | 1) coverage as a start. Thank you! | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I think it's a good course and easy to use. | 1) I think it's a | Good | 1) course and easy to use. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Easy to follow and understand, good balance of conceptual lectures and hands on practices. | 1) Easy to follow and understand, | Good | 1) balance of conceptual lectures and hands | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Recommended even if you have some experience with Unity. I have a Computer Science degree and worked as a professional game developer on released iOS and Android Unity games, and even though the material was a breeze, I still learned from it. Fits the description as a good introduction. The code week kind of throws beginners into the deep end a bit (lots of material just sort of thrown at you, but they warn you about the ramp up requirements). Good idea to invest time in some beginning programming resources before you dive into the week 4 material. What are you waiting for? Enroll! | 1) it. Fits the description as a | Good | 1) introduction. The code week kind of | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Recommended even if you have some experience with Unity. I have a Computer Science degree and worked as a professional game developer on released iOS and Android Unity games, and even though the material was a breeze, I still learned from it. Fits the description as a good introduction. The code week kind of throws beginners into the deep end a bit (lots of material just sort of thrown at you, but they warn you about the ramp up requirements). Good idea to invest time in some beginning programming resources before you dive into the week 4 material. What are you waiting for? Enroll! | 2) you about the ramp up requirements). | Good | 2) idea to invest time in some | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to game engines, in particular to Unity 3D. There are several projects that provide hand on experience. The only negative side is that the first 2 weeks provide very little material whereas most of the work is concentrated on the last 2 weeks. Overall this is good experience for anyone interested in learning about the subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to game engines, in particular | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to game engines, in particular to Unity 3D. There are several projects that provide hand on experience. The only negative side is that the first 2 weeks provide very little material whereas most of the work is concentrated on the last 2 weeks. Overall this is good experience for anyone interested in learning about the subject. | 2) last 2 weeks. Overall this is | Good | 2) experience for anyone interested in learning | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | i liked and enjoyed very much but the discussion form is not good , i don't receive answers of my problems. | 1) but the discussion form is not | Good | 1) , i don't receive answers of | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good intro to Unity and its basics accompanied with great lecturer. | 1) Really | Good | 1) intro to Unity and its basics | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course, really liked it, even if you are not a programer expert, or are a beginner, it's possible to do it. Strongly recommend it to who wants to start in the Game Development. | 1) | Good | 1) course, really liked it, even if | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Brian Winn is an astoundingly good teacher, and has leveraged a huge amount of professional knowledge to pour his heart into what is arguably the best $400 I've ever spent in my life. This teaching/learning format is inordinately effective, and I'm 100% looking forward to course 2, 3, 4, and the capstone. Thank you for going above and beyond in creating a truly fantastic learning environment, syllabus, and a plethora of wonderful content. | 1) Brian Winn is an astoundingly | Good | 1) teacher, and has leveraged a huge | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It's a real good course with a great base for know where and how start your own project, this course allows you to build basic 2D and 3D games, with a little more effort you can build amazing things. | 1) It's a real | Good | 1) course with a great base for | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good Starter Course, will be Nice more Unity Examples | 1) | Good | 1) Starter Course, will be Nice more | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introdution, gives a solid foundation for future studies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introdution, gives a solid foundation for | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This is an incredible first course in game design with Unity3D. The professor does a great job teaching the material with perfect sized lessons. The quizzes help reinforce the lessons topics while having a good depth of knowledge. | 1) the lessons topics while having a | Good | 1) depth of knowledge. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | very good intro. to unity engine | 1) very | Good | 1) intro. to unity engine | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good. Super recomendo, ele é começa devagar e explica com todos os detalhes sobre as diversas áreas de games | 1) Very | Good | 1) Super recomendo, ele é começa devagar | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course for beginners but I think you need to take a separate C# programming course as this course doesn't really teach you how t | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners but I think | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent course! I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to get into game development or game-orinted coding. It is also a really good introduction to Unity's interface and features. | 1) coding. It is also a really | Good | 1) introduction to Unity's interface and features. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I've always loved video games, but knew nothing about game dev. I decided to take this Specialization because the dev courses focus on Unity, a good choice for indie development. The example projects are fun and Brian Winn is an excellent, clear, and likable instructor. I'm a software engineer by trade, so customizing scripts was fun and easy for me, but it would probably be challenging for someone who has never programmed before. | 1) dev courses focus on Unity, a | Good | 1) choice for indie development. The example | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent Course. I Learn a lot of Unity. The explanations are very good and step by step. Thanks to Michigan State University | 1) of Unity. The explanations are very | Good | 1) and step by step. Thanks to | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I learned so much in this short course! I learned more than I ever thought I could about making video games, considering I'm a complete beginner. Great step by step videos for learning to make games in Unity, plus lectures about aspects of game development. It would not be very challenging if you are not a beginner, and there is almost no focus on writing your own scripts, so this wouldn't be the right course for someone wanting to learn to code their own games. I subtracted one star because there was no professor interaction (such as on the message boards), although the professor is very good in the videos. | 1) boards), although the professor is very | Good | 1) in the videos. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good Introductory course. Need to emphasize more on scripting. Or need to include a course in specialization about scripting. | 1) | Good | 1) Introductory course. Need to emphasize more | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I am really happy I have started this course as it has made me a good game developer and it teaches alot for begginers!!! | 1) as it has made me a | Good | 1) game developer and it teaches alot | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It's a good, but timid, introduction to game development with Unity. It addresses many relevant game development concepts, like programming, collision detection and 3D coordinates. It course may be better appreciated if taken as part of a specialization. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) but timid, introduction to game development | 3.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good intro to Unity and easy step into game development. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to Unity and easy step | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very very good course :) | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course with both theoretical and practical content. It lacks instructor and staff support. | 1) | Good | 1) course with both theoretical and practical | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This is a very good and complete course. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) and complete course. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good for beginners. I am not sure if anyone who has designed even a small game in Unity will be interested in this course. I was quite bored and had to go through all the videos just to complete the assignment which cannot be completed if you don't go through all the videos which I think is the drawback for this course. But again, its for beginners. As for me, I am looking forward to interesting and in-depth topics to learn about. The specialization will hold no value if it doesn't pose any challenge to its pursuers. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. I am not sure | 3.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The lecturer is quite good and this course is very useful | 1) The lecturer is quite | Good | 1) and this course is very useful | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The course gives you a good understanding of Unity and | 1) The course gives you a | Good | 1) understanding of Unity and | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Solid course with a good introduction to Unity. | 1) Solid course with a | Good | 1) introduction to Unity. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great introduction to game development for people, who had no experience in that and good base for future skills development. | 1) had no experience in that and | Good | 1) base for future skills development. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course. A unique experience for who's interested in these topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. A unique experience for who's | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good start result in 50% success. | 1) | Good | 1) start result in 50% success. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | We really need more coding on this one, perhaps half the time should be dedicated to actual coding. From creating environment grappling- hooks. As well as showing 2D gaming and how to work with Physics. The UI and the Unity Walkthrough on everything from Objects to Particles and animation was really well done. And the Tutor is very good at describing the differences between things, as well as alternating how to create things. | 1) done. And the Tutor is very | Good | 1) at describing the differences between things, | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course shows a good introduction to game development. The instructor goes to the point without losing track. It's my first online course for game development, and this gives me good hopes. | 1) This course shows a | Good | 1) introduction to game development. The instructor | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course shows a good introduction to game development. The instructor goes to the point without losing track. It's my first online course for game development, and this gives me good hopes. | 2) game development, and this gives me | Good | 2) hopes. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good technical base introduction to Unity 3D and usage of standard assets for basic prototyping. | 1) | Good | 1) technical base introduction to Unity 3D | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It is a very good course, with excelent documentation and the plataform makes it even better. Just loved it. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course, with excelent documentation and the | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great for an introduction and learning unity basics with a good balance in terms of task time and outcome | 1) and learning unity basics with a | Good | 1) balance in terms of task time | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good course | 1) Really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This was a very good survey of an intimidating topic. The walkthroughs are thorough, and each lesson gives you room to incorporate your own ideas. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) survey of an intimidating topic. The | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good examples and great video tutorials. The learning curve it's well balanced and the workshops are well structured according the lessons. | 1) | Good | 1) examples and great video tutorials. The | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course and the instructor really explained everything . | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and the instructor really explained | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to 3D game development in Unity game engine. Projects are also interesting and leave ample room to showcase our own creativity. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to 3D game development in | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It was a great course.The topics were well understood and the techniques used to make the games are providing a good basis for further game dev learning (in unity) | 1) make the games are providing a | Good | 1) basis for further game dev learning | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I think the course is good. I could've wished for some more engagement from the lecturer as it often felt like he was reading from a script, and I might as well have read the script myself. I also think the course was very slow paced and I finished all the projects in a week alongside my MSc-studies as well as working part-time, I wish the projects would've gone more in-depth for those students who wished to put in more hours into the course. | 1) I think the course is | Good | 1) I could've wished for some more | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent course and very good intro to Unity. Videos, assignments and everything really helped to become familiar with Unity and adopt good practices when making projects. | 1) Excellent course and very | Good | 1) intro to Unity. Videos, assignments and | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent course and very good intro to Unity. Videos, assignments and everything really helped to become familiar with Unity and adopt good practices when making projects. | 2) become familiar with Unity and adopt | Good | 2) practices when making projects. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course. A good intro to the use of Unity3D for video game development. A lot of the code is already given, everything is easy to install, so no coding experience is necessary prior. The teacher is very calm and teaches well. I would personnally have liked a bit more coding, but that's only me I guess. | 1) | Good | 1) course. A good intro to the | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course. A good intro to the use of Unity3D for video game development. A lot of the code is already given, everything is easy to install, so no coding experience is necessary prior. The teacher is very calm and teaches well. I would personnally have liked a bit more coding, but that's only me I guess. | 2) Good course. A | Good | 2) intro to the use of Unity3D | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I love this course and the way Coursera force us (in the good way) to learn. :) | 1) way Coursera force us (in the | Good | 1) way) to learn. :) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good lecturer with easy to understand material. Thanks a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecturer with easy to understand material. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to Unity3D game engine, if you want to do this on Coursera and not on official Unity tutorials. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Unity3D game engine, if | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This is really good course for people who just started explore Unity and basics of the game design. | 1) This is really | Good | 1) course for people who just started | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course provides exactly what it promises - introduction in quite easy pace to grasp ideas of game development and practice using Unity3D platform. It is professionally designed. Good stuff. | 1) Unity3D platform. It is professionally designed. | Good | 1) stuff. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A very good start for beginners, and informative to the experienced. Give the real online college feel and completed with real examples. | 1) A very | Good | 1) start for beginners, and informative to | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course that gets you going with Unity3D. Very simple to follow the hands-on lectures, just repeat in your own editor. The assignments are very easy, this is the easiest course I've completed on Coursera. Very basic coding involved, and you don't need to write anything from scratch. I will take the next Course offered by Michigan State University as well! | 1) | Good | 1) course that gets you going with | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course gives you a very good foundation, how to create beginner-intermediate complex games. Great example projects! | 1) This course gives you a very | Good | 1) foundation, how to create beginner-intermediate complex | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A very good intro, and everything works. I loved it | 1) A very | Good | 1) intro, and everything works. I loved | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to Unity3D. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Unity3D. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good course for an introduction into the Game Development! It's brief yet complete, making it a good course for doing online. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for an introduction into the | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good course for an introduction into the Game Development! It's brief yet complete, making it a good course for doing online. | 2) brief yet complete, making it a | Good | 2) course for doing online. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The instructor did a great job of presenting new aspects of game development in Unity, week after week. The deadlines and assignments did a good job of reinforcing what I'd learned while still letting me to have the creativity to feel like I made the game 'my own'. | 1) The deadlines and assignments did a | Good | 1) job of reinforcing what I'd learned | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Thank you for this course, things are more clear to me now. DefinitelyI will go for the specialisation. Keep up the good work! :) | 1) for the specialisation. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! :) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | followed instructions to download twice waste of time both times still kept getting an error never got past this to continue with the course so didn't learn anything other than there is little support out there to resolve the problem i think because the course is not monitored or if it is well then more fool me! it would have been a good opportunity to explore this had it been possible to download Unity oh well those who can do those who can't resume their day to day life packing boxes. | 1) me! it would have been a | Good | 1) opportunity to explore this had it | 1.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good course. Very high quality teaching and lectures | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Very high quality teaching and | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Great course!!! A lot of contents, but really well explained. You can feel that you are learining as you follow the lessons. Does not require any previous knowledge, but gives you a reallt good insight of what would it be to become a game developer. I totally recommend it. | 1) knowledge, but gives you a reallt | Good | 1) insight of what would it be | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Course very good. I learned a lot about architecture and game design with Unity . | 1) Course very | Good | 1) I learned a lot about architecture | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course. I have learnt a lot about Untiy3D as the teacher explained descriptively each section. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I have learnt a lot | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good introduction to Unity3d. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Unity3d. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | A great course for anyone wanting to start on unity3D in a light way. There is no need of previous knowledge neither in unity or programming language, just will to learn. For anyone that don't know programming a good complement after this course would be a oriented object programming course. | 1) anyone that don't know programming a | Good | 1) complement after this course would be | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The instructor videos were clear and informative. The course had a balanced mix of game development theory and practical exercises. Solid introduction to the Unity game design platform. The projects increased in difficulty and time commitment as the course progressed, building on prior knowledge. The peer review of game files was challenging at times, but it was a good experience to create actual games. | 1) at times, but it was a | Good | 1) experience to create actual games. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Super and clean concept and explanation. Good for beginners. Not enought programming, but when you start with Unity it is not so big problem. | 1) Super and clean concept and explanation. | Good | 1) for beginners. Not enought programming, but | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Useful!!! :) Nice and Good! | 1) Useful! ! ! :) Nice and | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course to begin with game development if you are open to learning new things. | 1) | Good | 1) course to begin with game development | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good introduction to Unity. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Unity. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | good experience and definitely a great primer on unity. didn't really focus on coding until the last lecture; even then it was pretty minimal. | 1) | Good | 1) experience and definitely a great primer | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course is Good. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course, I learned a lot about Unity. However, I feel that it does not promote investigation by ourselves. Basically, the videos are the steps we need to do to complete one half of the assignment, and the other half is just about repeating those steps we were shown. Also, I expected a bit more depth in the scripts week, but I understand it's hard to add a lot of content for just a week. The course is still good, but maybe too easy. | 1) | Good | 1) course, I learned a lot about | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good course, I learned a lot about Unity. However, I feel that it does not promote investigation by ourselves. Basically, the videos are the steps we need to do to complete one half of the assignment, and the other half is just about repeating those steps we were shown. Also, I expected a bit more depth in the scripts week, but I understand it's hard to add a lot of content for just a week. The course is still good, but maybe too easy. | 2) a week. The course is still | Good | 2) but maybe too easy. | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | mainly explanation part is nice and overall its a good course | 1) is nice and overall its a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course is very good at explaining both how and why you would do things a certain way in Unity, something that is missing from most of the tutorials you can find out on the Internet. The professor explains concepts behind why you need to use certain components instead of just giving a list of things to match up to replicate the projects. I've rated it 4 out of 5 stars not based on the content, but because the response time, interaction, and feedback could be improved upon. The content is definitely 5 of 5. I took this during the first run of the course, so I'm sure that the course staff will improve on this in the future once they get a bit more used to running a MOOC on Coursera. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) at explaining both how and why | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Pretty good, just wish it had more time to focus more on programming for this free portion of it. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) just wish it had more time | 4.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent, nice introduction to game programming with Unity 3D. Good Webcast, excelent course materials, Great teacher. Very good Job. | 1) to game programming with Unity 3D. | Good | 1) Webcast, excelent course materials, Great teacher. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Excellent, nice introduction to game programming with Unity 3D. Good Webcast, excelent course materials, Great teacher. Very good Job. | 2) excelent course materials, Great teacher. Very | Good | 2) Job. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | One of the best courses i have ever attended to. Full of useful information. I can't remember a session that was dull, or out of context. Nice pacing, application of the principles and technical know how in the projects. After this course i have a very good understanding of the UNITY development environment. It's a must if you consider a career in game design. Useful for both technical and non-technical persons. | 1) this course i have a very | Good | 1) understanding of the UNITY development environment. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | It is a really good introduction to developing games using Unity3D. This course is 100% hands-on and you won´t need to read hundreds of pages just to get started. As stated, no prior programming experience is required since you won´t write code extensively. In fact it is reduced to just locating and inspecting the available scripts. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) introduction to developing games using Unity3D. | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Really good stuff | 1) Really | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | I'm currently starting week 3 of this and already I feel I have got a huge amount out of it. I was not a complete beginner going in, but with the course taking me back to real basics, I found it helped fill in a lot of blanks that I didn't even know I had. Even if the rest of the course from week 3 turns out to not be as good, I will still feel I got a tremendous amount out of this! The tutor is straightforward and an excellent lecturer, the course is so far structured really well and the practical exercises are simple to set up and get going on. | 1) turns out to not be as | Good | 1) I will still feel I got | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | The Course id realy good design to the beginers. I'm enjoyed to create game in unity with the spiker. | 1) The Course id realy | Good | 1) design to the beginers. I'm enjoyed | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Very good course to learn the basics of game development in Unity3D. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | So far so good. The professor explains very well and the material is excellent. | 1) So far so | Good | 1) The professor explains very well and | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | Good and easy to follow | 1) | Good | 1) and easy to follow | 5.0 |
| 2H8ExCTIEeWeDBJG1XrG0w | This course gives good motivation for learning. | 1) This course gives | Good | 1) motivation for learning. | 5.0 |
| 2InHZhR3EeW_mxLPrCkAqw | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2InHZhR3EeW_mxLPrCkAqw | A good introductory course. Easy and you can begin to program after taking the course. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. Easy and you can | 5.0 |
| 2InHZhR3EeW_mxLPrCkAqw | The teacher explains concepts very well. Really worth the time to go over the lectures several times. The programming assignments however lack instructions and the online judgement system has some strange requests which are not illustrated in the instruction. You have to guess what the assignment is about each time. Overall very good lectures but poor assignments. | 1) is about each time. Overall very | Good | 1) lectures but poor assignments. | 3.0 |
| 2InHZhR3EeW_mxLPrCkAqw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2NMoRcgLEeSA1yIACye2oA | A good intro course on Marxism. You MUST know Chinese to understand this course (and interact with classmates). | 1) A | Good | 1) intro course on Marxism. You MUST | 4.0 |
| 2prtDtPREeWh-hLKMaYc3w | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 2QKA3X3EEeW-FwqtbgSK1Q | Material is good Lecture style is dull, monotonous & uninspiring For best results - follow the advice given in the MOOC, i.e read relevant readings before viewing lectures. | 1) Material is | Good | 1) Lecture style is dull, monotonous & | 4.0 |
| 2QKA3X3EEeW-FwqtbgSK1Q | This give a very good insight into what i did not know earlier. Thank you Prof. Anders Holm. I recommend this course to all all. I did a lot of learning. Go for it | 1) This give a very | Good | 1) insight into what i did not | 3.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | very good to know how all the things internet related appeared | 1) very | Good | 1) to know how all the things | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Good introduction to how internet works. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to how internet works. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This course was really good, I learn alot and share things with staff members. | 1) This course was really | Good | 1) I learn alot and share things | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | It was really good and informative to know about history of Internet and people who invented it. Really nice! | 1) It was really | Good | 1) and informative to know about history | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | A lot of the assessments for the "history" section of the course are needless factual-item recall, and not very cognitively challenging or engaging. The combination of history/technology/security could be more tightly integrated, it feels like three discrete courses just merged together into one. Good material overall, just not sure the scale/scope is appropriate to one course. | 1) courses just merged together into one. | Good | 1) material overall, just not sure the | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Interesting and good overview of the internet and how it works. | 1) Interesting and | Good | 1) overview of the internet and how | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good course, helps with an overview, history and bases of internet. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, helps with an overview, history | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This is SUCH A GOOD COURSE. It got me interested in working in network and database security. Good teacher. Good supplemental materials. | 1) This is SUCH A | Good | 1) COURSE. It got me interested in | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This is SUCH A GOOD COURSE. It got me interested in working in network and database security. Good teacher. Good supplemental materials. | 2) working in network and database security. | Good | 2) teacher. Good supplemental materials. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This is SUCH A GOOD COURSE. It got me interested in working in network and database security. Good teacher. Good supplemental materials. | 3) network and database security. Good teacher. | Good | 3) supplemental materials. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great course. It gives a good understanding of how the internet works and where it comes from. I really enjoy the interviews with people that lay the foundations of the internet. | 1) Great course. It gives a | Good | 1) understanding of how the internet works | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I've learned so many good things i did not know about internet, it's just so amazing to look back in the history and find out how much effort people put into practice to build what we call today internet , Absolutely a great course!, Absolutely a great course! | 1) I've learned so many | Good | 1) things i did not know about | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Good guide to how the Internet developed, very well presented. | 1) | Good | 1) guide to how the Internet developed, | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Quite a good entry level course. | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) entry level course. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good course for beginners with interest in information technology. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners with interest in | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | i think its good | 1) i think its | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Give a broad overview of Internet, seems good | 1) a broad overview of Internet, seems | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | very good course. Lot of information, in simplified way and a great opportunity to watch interviews of genius computer scientists. | 1) very | Good | 1) course. Lot of information, in simplified | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Videos are poorly edited (too much blank space, the bullet points are not clearly visible, there is no narrative or discursive structure, the diagrams are not clear, and the interviews are raw and unedited). Sessions are too long and include too much irrelevant information. The little useful information there is, is not structured clearly and thus it's harder to learn. The material for the first 3 weeks resemble more to someone talking about "the good ol' days" rather than a properly thought-out history class. I had to leave the course as I found it to be a waste of my time, and I am glad I decided not to pay for a certificate for it. My expectations were a lot higher for a University course. | 1) to someone talking about " the | Good | 1) ol' days" rather than a properly | 1.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Playful and uncluttered with good hints for deeper study. Superb interviews with extraordinary people of internet era. | 1) Playful and uncluttered with | Good | 1) hints for deeper study. Superb interviews | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Really interesting, good questions,great topic. | 1) Really interesting, | Good | 1) questions, great topic. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good! There is a lot of history that isn't readily available from other sources, and the combined, overall view is what it makes this course additionaly valuable. | 1) Very | Good | 1) There is a lot of history | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Good stuff. Informative overview and fun teacher | 1) | Good | 1) stuff. Informative overview and fun teacher | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I thought this was a good foundation course, providing a great introduction to how the internet came into being, how it actually works and the basic security processes. | 1) I thought this was a | Good | 1) foundation course, providing a great introduction | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Fantastic course. Provides a good insight into the development of modern internet over the last few decades | 1) Fantastic course. Provides a | Good | 1) insight into the development of modern | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Excellent course, good level and well tutored. Worth the time and effort. | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) level and well tutored. Worth the | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Nice course! Provides a good basis in understanding the Internet, where it originated from and how it works. Mr. Severance is an excellent tutor and I really liked his videos and keynotes. He makes the material come to live. | 1) Nice course! Provides a | Good | 1) basis in understanding the Internet, where | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Nice course, good video's ive been int he IT since 84 and seen most of it... | 1) Nice course, | Good | 1) video's ive been int he IT | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Great course full of good info. | 1) Great course full of | Good | 1) info. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very interesting content, good level of difficulty each week, and very entertaining teacher! | 1) Very interesting content, | Good | 1) level of difficulty each week, and | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Good course and I loved it. | 1) | Good | 1) course and I loved it. | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | One of the strongest cases for enrolling in this course is that it will really help to round out the student's understanding and background of how and why computers work the way they do. The history portion is presented in a really accessible and palatable way, and it looks like it is a thorough job. Charles Severance knows his computers! I started reading Where Wizards Stay Up Late by Katie Hafner because of his interview with her that he includes in the course materials, and it complements the course completely. The quizzes also do a good job of making sure you've retained the important points and are following along. | 1) completely. The quizzes also do a | Good | 1) job of making sure you've retained | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | it is really good, what turing has been done for the british government and all history of internet...................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! well done..keep it up......all coursera team......!!thank you for all your time and sharing valuable information with us....!Thank you....!! | 1) it is really | Good | 1) what turing has been done for | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | Very good content, explains in a simple way technical things, making far easier to understand everything, it's also fun because it shows the history from the eyes of people that actually made it happen. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, explains in a simple way | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | The course is teached with good humor and an easy to understand method. Congratulation Dr. Chuck. | 1) The course is teached with | Good | 1) humor and an easy to understand | 4.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | I liked that it was easy and at the same time I wanted it to be a bit harder. Very good, basic entry level course. Chuck is awesome as always! | 1) to be a bit harder. Very | Good | 1) basic entry level course. Chuck is | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | It is a really good course which tells us about the history of technologies that we use now as well the technologies used behind them. Meeting with geniuses who helped create the technologies is a bonus | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course which tells us about the | 5.0 |
| 2UHGXkNtEeSfwCIACxeXRw | This is a very good course for those who know very little about the internet or computers and is a fantastic stepping-stone for doing other computer science course latter | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course for those who know very | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I liked it. The final project was a challenge but it was a good test of all the data science skills I learned over the whole course. Thanks! | 1) a challenge but it was a | Good | 1) test of all the data science | 5.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good scenario and a good learning opportunity. I don't think the quizzes related well to the problem we were trying to solve and introduced a red herring, however. Predicting the next best word is not the same as predicting the relative probability of 4 words where one is the "right answer" but not necessarily the best prediction of a text prediction algorithm. | 1) | Good | 1) scenario and a good learning opportunity. | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good scenario and a good learning opportunity. I don't think the quizzes related well to the problem we were trying to solve and introduced a red herring, however. Predicting the next best word is not the same as predicting the relative probability of 4 words where one is the "right answer" but not necessarily the best prediction of a text prediction algorithm. | 2) Good scenario and a | Good | 2) learning opportunity. I don't think the | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good test of what we learned in the courses. | 1) | Good | 1) test of what we learned in | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | This course is unlike all the others. Although you will need information gained in the previous nine modules, the Capstone Project requires you to work on a long and difficult problem using your own initiative. Mentors, tutors and Swiftkey employees are lacking throughout this project. I worked through many different R packages to generate the word prediction N-Grams because R has a tendency to run out of memory. Many students are forced to use a cut down version of the three million lines of text because of memory issues but I managed to find the proverbially needle in the R packages haystack that allowed me to use the entire dataset! I had problems with publishing the presentation to RPubs - it just would not work using either RStudio or RConsole but at least I had a fall back position of placing the presentation on my own website. It took me three attempts to complete this project, nine months (Jan-Sep 2016) and about 300 hours in total, I didn't give up so nor should you, you can do it! And Good Luck! Hope to chat with you on the Data Science Specialism LinkedIn Group for Completers! Finally was it worth paying for all of the certificates. Yes, it was! | 1) you, you can do it! And | Good | 1) Luck! Hope to chat with you | 5.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | A good & fun idea to implement. Would have prefered implementing my own idea though. | 1) A | Good | 1) & fun idea to implement. Would | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Overall a good course that makes you learn a lot on your own (unlike the rest of the series). Maybe a bit too much self learning. However, if you can complete it does give you a lot of learning especially in some text analysis which hasn't been covered before. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course that makes you learn a | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | There are things that have me prepped up for this capstone and I'm very excited about starting it: NLP is among one of the most challenging fields in data science and machine learning right now, this capstone will be a good chance to learn the theory and build an app that makes puts the NLP theory into practice. I like Shiny and I'm really looking forward to building the text predictive application. This course puts together all the skills in the other 9 courses, which is a nice way to sum up the entire specialization: delivering a product and putting all things learnt together. | 1) now, this capstone will be a | Good | 1) chance to learn the theory and | 5.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good and interesting project. | 1) | Good | 1) and interesting project. | 4.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | As a capstone to a series of courses that covered data science and R, I found this one to be a bit lacking. There was no involvement from the professors at JHU or the folks at SwiftKey. As was mentioned in another review, the course feels abandoned. All you get a few short (two minutes or so) videos that give you little in the way of instruction or direction. Basically, they just say, "Go do this. Good luck!" There were also no Mentors or TAs to guide students or answer questions. It was the students helping each other through the forums. Sometimes it was helpful and everyone involved learned something. Other times, it was the blind trying to lead the visually-impaired. On a positive note, you will use all of the skills from the previous courses: writing R functions, performing exploratory analysis and publishing it via RPubs. Your final product will be displayed for everyone via ShinyApps and a presentation using R Presentation (also published via RPubs). On a(nother) negative note, the topic of Natural Language Processing is not an easy one to just walk into and feel confident in providing a working next-word prediction algorithm in about eight (8) weeks. You're reading academic journal articles, watching multiple videos from another Coursera course (which actually focuses on the topic of NLP, and takes place over several courses and several months!). Supposedly, there is work going on to update the course, so hopefully future students will get a better experience. I did take a bit away from this course, especially since I made more than one attempt to complete it. However, it was definitely a shock to find myself missing those things that one typically finds in a learning environment -- descriptive background, assistance to problems, etc. -- and seeing that I was for all intents and purposes on my own. Even in the professional world of data analysis, I have never experienced the lack of support that I found in this course. With that, I am giving it three (3) stars. As I said, I did learn a bit, but it was a bit of a struggle that required multiple attempts to complete. This would have been better off as a stand alone topic (which it already is by another Coursera affiliated school), or having a capstone course that builds on a topic more in the wheelhouse of the JHU professors: a capstone project focusing on bioinformatics or biostatistics would have been amazing in comparison to this. | 1) just say, " Go do this. | Good | 1) luck! " There were also no | 3.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I had no experience in natural language processing before I took this course, and now I'm kind of in love with it! Some of my fellow learners complained about the new data type and little information provided, but I feel this is a good simulation of real world experience as a data scientist! The field is constantly changing, so we have to be ready to cope with unfamiliar problems and come up with creative solutions. Due to other commitments, I was once 3 weeks behind the weekly deadlines, but finally poured all my efforts into this and deployed an App in time... You never know how much you can accomplish before you are forced to do a "Mission Impossible" ;-) I think I've improved my hacking + googling skills, and built more confidence over completion of this course. Thank you, JHU and Coursera! | 1) but I feel this is a | Good | 1) simulation of real world experience as | 5.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Could be better. The teacher sometimes explain the concepts in a hard way, and not always shows how to do in practice. But you will get curious and in case of doubts, you can find more simple explanations on the web, and the forum is very good. The assignments are hard, you will need do research to accomplish then, but is the best way to learn. I think the specialization is good to someone without much knowledge on the field (like me). But it's only the start! | 1) web, and the forum is very | Good | 1) The assignments are hard, you will | 3.0 |
| 2y_2_3REEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Could be better. The teacher sometimes explain the concepts in a hard way, and not always shows how to do in practice. But you will get curious and in case of doubts, you can find more simple explanations on the web, and the forum is very good. The assignments are hard, you will need do research to accomplish then, but is the best way to learn. I think the specialization is good to someone without much knowledge on the field (like me). But it's only the start! | 2) learn. I think the specialization is | Good | 2) to someone without much knowledge on | 3.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I found this course very interesting, a good teach that keeps your attention along all the videos, with a lot of external material (papers, videos, web page) useful to improve your knowledge. Thanks to all the people that have worked on this course. | 1) found this course very interesting, a | Good | 1) teach that keeps your attention along | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good overview of various elements that are essential to manage in an international environment | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of various elements that are | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I found this course really interesting and useful for working environment. There are a lot of insight earned during the course. The reading materials are also impressive - not just relying on the theoretical context. HBR articles are on the the best reliant sources at the moment and as a fan of Harvard deliverables, I am glad that the University put it as the references. The video is out of the box. Involving the alumni having important position in mutlinational companies is a smart idea. The lecture is not just imposing to the academic literatures but also to best professional practices from the industries. Well done and keep the good work for the teaching lecturer! I will be very interested to participate in other courses from Universita Bocconi. | 1) industries. Well done and keep the | Good | 1) work for the teaching lecturer! I | 5.0 |
| 33tTdzylEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent course, very practical and based on a good theoritical foundation. | 1) very practical and based on a | Good | 1) theoritical foundation. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | The course provided a good basic and conceptual idea behind Management. | 1) The course provided a | Good | 1) basic and conceptual idea behind Management. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | The videos are excellent and it provides good information | 1) videos are excellent and it provides | Good | 1) information | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good materials, but too long and drawn out. | 1) | Good | 1) materials, but too long and drawn | 3.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very Good Content | 1) Very | Good | 1) Content | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Great Course for those who wants to leant capstones of management! Good structure and materials! | 1) wants to leant capstones of management! | Good | 1) structure and materials! | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | A brief basic course. Good understanding of Management. | 1) A brief basic course. | Good | 1) understanding of Management. | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | i like this course because the material which Mr. Dave gives is easy for understanding and he explains so good! | 1) for understanding and he explains so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | The Fundamentals of Management is a good introduction into this area of knowledge. | 1) The Fundamentals of Management is a | Good | 1) introduction into this area of knowledge. | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | not very good! | 1) not very | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very good!! Thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! Thanks. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | good fundamentals for PM | 1) | Good | 1) fundamentals for PM | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Great for people that, like me, does not have a management background but maybe end up dealing with this type of position. Good guidelines, simple but complete and using understandable examples. | 1) dealing with this type of position. | Good | 1) guidelines, simple but complete and using | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Gained good knowlegde about management. | 1) Gained | Good | 1) knowlegde about management. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Short but Still Very Impressive Distribution of the Topics with Good Learning Experience | 1) Impressive Distribution of the Topics with | Good | 1) Learning Experience | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | A good starting point for new or future managers. | 1) A | Good | 1) starting point for new or future | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | A Very Good overview of the "Fundamentals". One feels like they have all the information they need to start managing after completion. The Questions are fairly simple but the Content is Meaningful. Overall, I got a lot out of it, it's an enjoyable introduction to management. | 1) A Very | Good | 1) overview of the " Fundamentals" . | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Concise. A good tool to learn in few minutes. | 1) Concise. A | Good | 1) tool to learn in few minutes. | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | I enjoyed this class and it gave me some good ideas to apply to my career. | 1) class and it gave me some | Good | 1) ideas to apply to my career. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good information presented in a basic and unassuming way, with practical and easy to understand examples. | 1) | Good | 1) information presented in a basic and | 4.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | it is good useful course | 1) it is | Good | 1) useful course | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | A good program for Beginners. | 1) A | Good | 1) program for Beginners. | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very good course, that is very useful for people who did not studied bussines at the university | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, that is very useful for | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very good course and provides a clear fundamentals of management | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and provides a clear fundamentals | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Even though some of the information seems like common sense, it's good to have it stated aloud. I thought the pace was well done, the examples used applicable and easy to understand, and the instructor seemed to enjoy the topic he was teaching. It's a good introduction to thinking about these topics and understanding jobs and roles in any business. | 1) information seems like common sense, it's | Good | 1) to have it stated aloud. I | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Even though some of the information seems like common sense, it's good to have it stated aloud. I thought the pace was well done, the examples used applicable and easy to understand, and the instructor seemed to enjoy the topic he was teaching. It's a good introduction to thinking about these topics and understanding jobs and roles in any business. | 2) topic he was teaching. It's a | Good | 2) introduction to thinking about these topics | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | The Course was awesome, and Dave Nagy is really a good professor, he explains clearly with practicaexamples! thank you so much | 1) and Dave Nagy is really a | Good | 1) professor, he explains clearly with practicaexamples! | 5.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Good course that gives a basic idea how management works and what is the difference between managers and leaders. | 1) | Good | 1) course that gives a basic idea | 3.0 |
| 3791_tdbEeS2-SIAC4-TTw | Very good fundamentals course on management. I was able to complete it in a couple of evenings. | 1) Very | Good | 1) fundamentals course on management. I was | 5.0 |
| 39iAT2nMEeSqESIAC44MZQ | It's a very good course if you want to know how the bible came into being, events that happened from the very beginning and how the bible continues to remain and be read even today. Wonderful! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course if you want to know | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course.. Should have SVM related info too -- waiting for the promised optional videos from Prof. Carlos | 1) | Good | 1) course. . Should have SVM related | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good, sometimes is a little hard, but is very helpful and have a lot of practical exercises | 1) Very | Good | 1) sometimes is a little hard, but | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good survey of the material, but assignments are superficial. | 1) | Good | 1) survey of the material, but assignments | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The good: -Good examples to learn the concepts -Good organization of the material -The assignments were well-explained and easy to follow-up -The good humor and attitude of the professor makes the lectures very engaging -All videolectures are small and this makes them easy to digest and follow (optional videos were large compared with the rest of the lectures but the material covered on those was pretty advanced and its length is justifiable) Things that can be improved: -In some of the videos the professor seemed to cruise through some of the concepts. I understand that it is recommended to take the series of courses in certain order but sometimes I felt we were rushing through the material covered -I may be nitpicking here but I wish the professor used a different color to write on the slides (the red he used clashed horribly with some of the slides' backgrounds and made it difficult to read his observations) Overall, a good course to take and very easy to follow if taken together with the other courses in the series. | 1) The | Good | 1) -Good examples to learn the concepts | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The good: -Good examples to learn the concepts -Good organization of the material -The assignments were well-explained and easy to follow-up -The good humor and attitude of the professor makes the lectures very engaging -All videolectures are small and this makes them easy to digest and follow (optional videos were large compared with the rest of the lectures but the material covered on those was pretty advanced and its length is justifiable) Things that can be improved: -In some of the videos the professor seemed to cruise through some of the concepts. I understand that it is recommended to take the series of courses in certain order but sometimes I felt we were rushing through the material covered -I may be nitpicking here but I wish the professor used a different color to write on the slides (the red he used clashed horribly with some of the slides' backgrounds and made it difficult to read his observations) Overall, a good course to take and very easy to follow if taken together with the other courses in the series. | 2) The good: | Good | 2) examples to learn the concepts -Good | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The good: -Good examples to learn the concepts -Good organization of the material -The assignments were well-explained and easy to follow-up -The good humor and attitude of the professor makes the lectures very engaging -All videolectures are small and this makes them easy to digest and follow (optional videos were large compared with the rest of the lectures but the material covered on those was pretty advanced and its length is justifiable) Things that can be improved: -In some of the videos the professor seemed to cruise through some of the concepts. I understand that it is recommended to take the series of courses in certain order but sometimes I felt we were rushing through the material covered -I may be nitpicking here but I wish the professor used a different color to write on the slides (the red he used clashed horribly with some of the slides' backgrounds and made it difficult to read his observations) Overall, a good course to take and very easy to follow if taken together with the other courses in the series. | 3) -Good examples to learn the concepts | Good | 3) organization of the material -The assignments | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The good: -Good examples to learn the concepts -Good organization of the material -The assignments were well-explained and easy to follow-up -The good humor and attitude of the professor makes the lectures very engaging -All videolectures are small and this makes them easy to digest and follow (optional videos were large compared with the rest of the lectures but the material covered on those was pretty advanced and its length is justifiable) Things that can be improved: -In some of the videos the professor seemed to cruise through some of the concepts. I understand that it is recommended to take the series of courses in certain order but sometimes I felt we were rushing through the material covered -I may be nitpicking here but I wish the professor used a different color to write on the slides (the red he used clashed horribly with some of the slides' backgrounds and made it difficult to read his observations) Overall, a good course to take and very easy to follow if taken together with the other courses in the series. | 4) well-explained and easy to follow-up -The | Good | 4) humor and attitude of the professor | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The good: -Good examples to learn the concepts -Good organization of the material -The assignments were well-explained and easy to follow-up -The good humor and attitude of the professor makes the lectures very engaging -All videolectures are small and this makes them easy to digest and follow (optional videos were large compared with the rest of the lectures but the material covered on those was pretty advanced and its length is justifiable) Things that can be improved: -In some of the videos the professor seemed to cruise through some of the concepts. I understand that it is recommended to take the series of courses in certain order but sometimes I felt we were rushing through the material covered -I may be nitpicking here but I wish the professor used a different color to write on the slides (the red he used clashed horribly with some of the slides' backgrounds and made it difficult to read his observations) Overall, a good course to take and very easy to follow if taken together with the other courses in the series. | 5) to read his observations) Overall, a | Good | 5) course to take and very easy | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Not as good as the previous courses in this specialization - I agree with those who have noted that this one seemed a little rushed. However, these are still the best courses I've found on Coursera. | 1) Not as | Good | 1) as the previous courses in this | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | very very good | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good class, But it would be much better if the quiz is open to those who doesn't pay. | 1) | Good | 1) class, But it would be much | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A very good course, with effective intuitive explanations of what the algorithms are supposed to achieve and how. The exercises in Python help understand the topic and fix it in memory. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, with effective intuitive explanations of | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good practice and bit of theory. | 1) | Good | 1) practice and bit of theory. | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very easy to follow and didactic. Very good material in the assignments. | 1) easy to follow and didactic. Very | Good | 1) material in the assignments. | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good course overall. Some difficult materials such as boosting were not clear enough and I had to look into a few online resources to really understand it. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall. Some difficult materials such | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good lecture, good for everyone. | 1) | Good | 1) lecture, good for everyone. | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good lecture, good for everyone. | 2) good lecture, | Good | 2) for everyone. | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course content seemed to be rushed out, as a result, the quality is not as good as the first two. | 1) result, the quality is not as | Good | 1) as the first two. | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I really love this Classification course as well as Regression course!! This course is covering both mathematical background and practical implementation very well. Assignments are moderately challenging and it was a very good exercise for me to have a good intuition about classification algorithms. I only used standard Python libraries such as numpy, scikit-learn, matplotlib and pandas, and there were no problems for me to complete all of the assignments without any use of IPython, SFrames, GraphLab Create at all. I would say thank you so much to Carlos and Emily to give me such a great course!! P.S. This course would be perfect if it covered bootstrap and Random Forest in details. | 1) challenging and it was a very | Good | 1) exercise for me to have a | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | I really love this Classification course as well as Regression course!! This course is covering both mathematical background and practical implementation very well. Assignments are moderately challenging and it was a very good exercise for me to have a good intuition about classification algorithms. I only used standard Python libraries such as numpy, scikit-learn, matplotlib and pandas, and there were no problems for me to complete all of the assignments without any use of IPython, SFrames, GraphLab Create at all. I would say thank you so much to Carlos and Emily to give me such a great course!! P.S. This course would be perfect if it covered bootstrap and Random Forest in details. | 2) exercise for me to have a | Good | 2) intuition about classification algorithms. I only | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Simply a great course. Good intro to machine learning classifiation. | 1) Simply a great course. | Good | 1) intro to machine learning classifiation. | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Not as good as the Regression Course, but still very good. While I appreciate prof Guestrin's enthusiasm, I missed a little rigor and mathematical depth of the Regression's course by prof. Fox. I learned a lot, but I feel that regression clicked with me a little better than classification. But that's probably me. In either case, the whole series are awesome so far, better, in my opinion, than Anrdrew Ng's ML course on coursera, A small suggestion would be to switch the main toolset from the Graphlab to something more common, like Sci-kit learn and Pandas. | 1) Not as | Good | 1) as the Regression Course, but still | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Not as good as the Regression Course, but still very good. While I appreciate prof Guestrin's enthusiasm, I missed a little rigor and mathematical depth of the Regression's course by prof. Fox. I learned a lot, but I feel that regression clicked with me a little better than classification. But that's probably me. In either case, the whole series are awesome so far, better, in my opinion, than Anrdrew Ng's ML course on coursera, A small suggestion would be to switch the main toolset from the Graphlab to something more common, like Sci-kit learn and Pandas. | 2) the Regression Course, but still very | Good | 2) While I appreciate prof Guestrin's enthusiasm, | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Overall a great course and has a very good instructor. Teaches you all the fundamentals behind classification algorithms and models. Contains very good assignments/projects that make you implement the models yourself to get a much better understanding of the concepts. | 1) great course and has a very | Good | 1) instructor. Teaches you all the fundamentals | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Overall a great course and has a very good instructor. Teaches you all the fundamentals behind classification algorithms and models. Contains very good assignments/projects that make you implement the models yourself to get a much better understanding of the concepts. | 2) classification algorithms and models. Contains very | Good | 2) assignments/projects that make you implement the | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good content, very well explained... great course. Classification its a very broad topic but i think this is great introduction. The hands on where kinda on the easy side... but very interesting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, very well explained. . . | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course is definitely high-quality and the topics are covered in a good way. I'm not giving 5 stars because I would have expected SVMs and neural networks. Mentioning the many different algorithms for learning decision trees would have been nice, without necessarily focusing on each of them in depth. An entire week spent on precision/recall seems a little bit too much, without touching other metrics like F-score. Overall though a very nice course for beginners, and it definitely gives a good sense of classification challenges and approaches. | 1) the topics are covered in a | Good | 1) way. I'm not giving 5 stars | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | The course is definitely high-quality and the topics are covered in a good way. I'm not giving 5 stars because I would have expected SVMs and neural networks. Mentioning the many different algorithms for learning decision trees would have been nice, without necessarily focusing on each of them in depth. An entire week spent on precision/recall seems a little bit too much, without touching other metrics like F-score. Overall though a very nice course for beginners, and it definitely gives a good sense of classification challenges and approaches. | 2) beginners, and it definitely gives a | Good | 2) sense of classification challenges and approaches. | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A good course to start learning classifications and getting exposure to algorithms. The instructor is awesome!! | 1) A | Good | 1) course to start learning classifications and | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good, but overemphasizes niche software product (graphlab). | 1) | Good | 1) but overemphasizes niche software product (graphlab). | 3.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A very good introduce machine learning course, it's clear and easy to follow. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduce machine learning course, it's clear | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This is a very good course on classification as previous two. Good explanation on topics like logistic regression, stochastic gradient descent. The assignments are well designed. However the decision tree part should introduce entropy and gini which are mainly used for choosing the splitting feature. Also the random forest is worth discussing. Overall, this is a good course which contains a handful of knowledge. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course on classification as previous two. | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This is a very good course on classification as previous two. Good explanation on topics like logistic regression, stochastic gradient descent. The assignments are well designed. However the decision tree part should introduce entropy and gini which are mainly used for choosing the splitting feature. Also the random forest is worth discussing. Overall, this is a good course which contains a handful of knowledge. | 2) course on classification as previous two. | Good | 2) explanation on topics like logistic regression, | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This is a very good course on classification as previous two. Good explanation on topics like logistic regression, stochastic gradient descent. The assignments are well designed. However the decision tree part should introduce entropy and gini which are mainly used for choosing the splitting feature. Also the random forest is worth discussing. Overall, this is a good course which contains a handful of knowledge. | 3) worth discussing. Overall, this is a | Good | 3) course which contains a handful of | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | This specialization overall is pretty good. Personally I feel like Classification talks more about concepts and important ideas and requires less on coding comparing to Regression. Learned a lot! Love Carlos and Emily! | 1) This specialization overall is pretty | Good | 1) Personally I feel like Classification talks | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good course but too much easy, can be a good review. | 1) | Good | 1) course but too much easy, can | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good course but too much easy, can be a good review. | 2) too much easy, can be a | Good | 2) review. | 4.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | These Machine Learning classes have been fantastic so far, really enjoying them. Very good coverage of topics and challenging exercises to drive home the learning. The effort put into developing the classes has been superb and I look forward to the rest of the specialization. | 1) so far, really enjoying them. Very | Good | 1) coverage of topics and challenging exercises | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great course. The decision tree part is particularly great. However, there was a lot of repetition of overfitting principles and the programming assignments have too much code given. It is clear that it removes the complexity a bit, but it also makes it harder to fully understand because we "don't implement it ourself", we just fill up the gaps by translating a few sentences and formulas. The main challenge in Python, is to understand what each variables holds. Nevertheless, this course was amazing. Really enjoyed it. Good job! Thanks | 1) course was amazing. Really enjoyed it. | Good | 1) job! Thanks | 5.0 |
| 3c1bSkIJEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Take you too long to come back, but the content is great. Good job | 1) back, but the content is great. | Good | 1) job | 4.0 |
| 3cmY9AVPEeWr2CIAC20DIw | Yet another good course that is ruined by a peer review requirement. Dr. Singer is a fascinating person to learn from and I am glad I took the time to pursue the course. | 1) Yet another | Good | 1) course that is ruined by a | 2.0 |
| 3cmY9AVPEeWr2CIAC20DIw | For me it was a fantastic course. This is exactly that time in my life when I'm alwasy thinking about what I should work and how can I help as much as I can. This course helped me a lot and I recived a lot of good ideas for my essay and for my life also. | 1) and I recived a lot of | Good | 1) ideas for my essay and for | 5.0 |
| 3e249OIsEeSdRSIAC3-Q-A | Very useful and challenging course. I'm glad I was able to gain some insight into how digital marketing is operated at a high level in big companies, such as Grainger and Bosch. It's always a good experience to look at other companies and the way to do digital marketing. | 1) Grainger and Bosch. It's always a | Good | 1) experience to look at other companies | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | Super good | 1) Super | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | Good stuff. | 1) | Good | 1) stuff. | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | Pretty good! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3EPZVpSGEeSb9SIACzCJlg | Very good demonstration and analyse on Beethoven sonata and raise your interest in further exploring classical music | 1) Very | Good | 1) demonstration and analyse on Beethoven sonata | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | I think everyone can get junior skill of learning korean here and the classes are very good for us to study with our part-time. Thanks. | 1) here and the classes are very | Good | 1) for us to study with our | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The course is good .Like it. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) . Like it. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | This was a good introduction to 한글 (Hangul) and 한국어 (Korean). I believe that it prepared me well for Learn to Speak Korean 1 and I started that course with confidence. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to 한글 (Hangul) and 한국어 | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very good course to take along side with studies to help give more common conversations practice and explanations of grammar rules. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to take along side with | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | This course is very good! It's interesting and undertanding, I like it very much. Thank you, Yonsei and Coursera! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) It's interesting and undertanding, I like | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Really easy to follow, well presented and good materials. Thank you~ | 1) easy to follow, well presented and | Good | 1) materials. Thank you~ | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | A good class for beginners! | 1) A | Good | 1) class for beginners! | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is fun! Able to speak and read Korean after taking up this course. The sequence of syllabus is good from basic to daily essential. I hope they make more Korean Courses so we can continue to learn Korean after First Step Korean. | 1) course. The sequence of syllabus is | Good | 1) from basic to daily essential. I | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | I have been waiting for a Korean language course with coursera for a long time. it is very good course for beginner; I had all the explanations and the pronunciation techniques were helpful. | 1) a long time. it is very | Good | 1) course for beginner; I had all | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | This has been an exceptional course. I have really enjoyed it as an introductory course to Korean, because it does a good job of teaching the basics without trenching too much in the details. I believe that in beginning stages a learner should not boggle themselves down too much with the details of a language. With time and exposure details are learned. Our instructor was easy to comprehend in her English pronunciation; she was professional, and she seem to enjoy the topic. I feel confident in the foundation that has been set for me and therefore, I am confident to continue what I hope will become a lifetime journey of enjoying and learning Korean. | 1) to Korean, because it does a | Good | 1) job of teaching the basics without | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | I loved this course. The teacher is absolutely good and was so easy to follow the entire course :) I reccommend this course to everyone loves korean language and culture ;) 감사합니다!! :D | 1) this course. The teacher is absolutely | Good | 1) and was so easy to follow | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very good! I already learn the basic before actually. But after join this class, i learn a lot since we learn it from a native speaker. Thank you for Professor Kang, i really enjoy your class. Hope you will open the next level so i can learn more about korea, the language and also the culture. :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) I already learn the basic before | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | i learned a lot about this course, and the instructor is very good learning here is too much. | 1) course, and the instructor is very | Good | 1) learning here is too much. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | perfect course, good lecture, nice knowlage | 1) perfect course, | Good | 1) lecture, nice knowlage | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is really helpful, it expains things in a very easy way and the practices are good too. Highly recomended | 1) easy way and the practices are | Good | 1) too. Highly recomended | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Comprehensive, and practical. Good pacing with little steps taken in each lesson. Instructor has excellent spoken English so it is easy to concentrate on the Korean. | 1) Comprehensive, and practical. | Good | 1) pacing with little steps taken in | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good lessons for those who want to step into the world of Korean. Very good explanation and structure. Hope to have the deeper lessons in the future. | 1) | Good | 1) lessons for those who want to | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good lessons for those who want to step into the world of Korean. Very good explanation and structure. Hope to have the deeper lessons in the future. | 2) into the world of Korean. Very | Good | 2) explanation and structure. Hope to have | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | easy to study, good. | 1) easy to study, | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Thanks for good materials and lesson. I hope there are advance course. | 1) Thanks for | Good | 1) materials and lesson. I hope there | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good for new Korean learners to start from zero. | 1) | Good | 1) for new Korean learners to start | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Easy to learn! Very good course. | 1) Easy to learn! Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | With clear explanations, good pacing, and wonderful activities to practice reading, I enjoyed the lectures and am very grateful to be learning such a culturally rich language such as Korean. Thank you for giving me this opportunity! | 1) With clear explanations, | Good | 1) pacing, and wonderful activities to practice | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | good course, with accessible and interesting presentation of the material | 1) | Good | 1) course, with accessible and interesting presentation | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very good online course | 1) Very | Good | 1) online course | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Really good and useful for beginners. Now I can read Korean and understand basic conversation. Anyway this course is great | 1) Really | Good | 1) and useful for beginners. Now I | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | I feel that Teacher Kang is really good with visual aids. I love how varied the tests are! I can feel the different parts of my mind lighting up with information because of the wide variety of questions. She seems kind and very passionate about her work. Because of this course, I started looking into Yonsei University. 감사합니다, 성생님! | 1) feel that Teacher Kang is really | Good | 1) with visual aids. I love how | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Really good class for beginner and few experimented. 5 weeks of work, 4 hours by weeks for me. If you want to start Korean or if you just know some little stuffs, this class will help you a lot. | 1) Really | Good | 1) class for beginner and few experimented. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good teacher, it also provides pdf for courses which makes me feel nice. It is easy to understand some complex grammar. | 1) | Good | 1) teacher, it also provides pdf for | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The course is very useful i like it so much and i had no problem to understand any of the lecturers i find it very good and useful | 1) the lecturers i find it very | Good | 1) and useful | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It was a good class, and definitely laid down a foundation for learning and understanding the lesson. However, it was difficult at times trying to understand, the professor would say the Korean too swiftly. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) class, and definitely laid down a | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | FSK was well designed with clear explanation and relevant examples. This course is good for beginners, to those who are new to Korean and only know some Korean words though its dramas or musics. I hope to see the Second Step Korean course (or higher courses) from Yonsei in the coming months. Thanks professor and the course team for your hard work in getting this course up and running on Coursera! | 1) and relevant examples. This course is | Good | 1) for beginners, to those who are | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is very good course for beginners! | 1) It is very | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | A very good course! It would be great if there are some following courses to further improve our Korean. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! It would be great if | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | very good Course | 1) very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | First Step Korean is a really good beginner course to start learning Korean. The lectures are structured in a clear manner that gives the learner ample examples to understand the usage of the language and allows the learner to practice along very naturally with Prof. Kang. Personally, when I learnt basic Korean through Korean TV shows and classes in a community club, it was hard for me to grasp the grammar as it was pretty confusing. This basic course allowed me to understand the usage of grammar, such as 이, 가, 은, 는 and transforming basic form verbs. The lectures are delivered in a way that allows you to learn in a gradual manner and frequently review what you have learnt in previous lectures. The subtitles and notes make the lessons really easy to understand and follow. Through Coursera's online platform, the video lectures allows easy review of the lecture without having to physically sit through a class. I'm glad and grateful that First Step Korean is offered on Coursera and I hope there's a Second Step Korean in the near future for us to carry on with intermediate learning. | 1) First Step Korean is a really | Good | 1) beginner course to start learning Korean. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is a very good course for everyone to learn basic of Korean. For me who have learned Korean by read Korean lesson book somehow this course not give much thing to learn. GRAMMAR (5/5) This course is good because it give me more insight about Korean grammar (difference between normal. formal, and informal speech; the using of 예요/ 이에요, 이/가, etc). THE TEACHER (5/5) She explain clearly and give some exercise in the video to make us practice. I like the method. VOCABULARY (3/5) There were not much vocabulary in the course. I hope Yonsei University would add more new vocabulary in the course. TEST/ ASSIGNMENT (3/5) I've taken another language online course at another site that similar to Coursera. That site's assignments more complex than this course's given. This site only test our reading and listening but there were not speaking aspect that scored here. And I wish you will add writing aspect to the course. LESSON (3/5) The lessons those given here really simple. They were easy to understand, but I hope there will be a sequel of this course that will give us more advance lessons. Recommendation: - add more vocabulary, - add speaking and writing assignment, - a sequel of this course. Thank you for coursera and Yonsei University for giving me an opportunity to learn Korean Language for free. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course for everyone to learn basic | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | It is a very good course for everyone to learn basic of Korean. For me who have learned Korean by read Korean lesson book somehow this course not give much thing to learn. GRAMMAR (5/5) This course is good because it give me more insight about Korean grammar (difference between normal. formal, and informal speech; the using of 예요/ 이에요, 이/가, etc). THE TEACHER (5/5) She explain clearly and give some exercise in the video to make us practice. I like the method. VOCABULARY (3/5) There were not much vocabulary in the course. I hope Yonsei University would add more new vocabulary in the course. TEST/ ASSIGNMENT (3/5) I've taken another language online course at another site that similar to Coursera. That site's assignments more complex than this course's given. This site only test our reading and listening but there were not speaking aspect that scored here. And I wish you will add writing aspect to the course. LESSON (3/5) The lessons those given here really simple. They were easy to understand, but I hope there will be a sequel of this course that will give us more advance lessons. Recommendation: - add more vocabulary, - add speaking and writing assignment, - a sequel of this course. Thank you for coursera and Yonsei University for giving me an opportunity to learn Korean Language for free. | 2) learn. GRAMMAR (5/5) This course is | Good | 2) because it give me more insight | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | This course gives a good start. After that practice is more important which can be done through apps like memrise. | 1) This course gives a | Good | 1) start. After that practice is more | 4.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The teaching is in good structure, easy to understand and remember. Practice section helps me to better understand the context of the new words. The best course I've ever learned for Korean language. Looking forward to further courses. | 1) The teaching is in | Good | 1) structure, easy to understand and remember. | 5.0 |
| 3G1aij8iEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Very informative but I think that, if I hadn't already had a basic knowledge of the Korean alphabet and grammar structure, I'd have found the grammar explanations to be a bit too brief. Excellent for beginner level refresher though. Some glitches in the tests (e.g. the correct answer being something not taught until the next lesson) and the videos (one lesson unable to be downloaded on any of the computers to which I have access). Would be good if this course had some social /cultural lessons (like how to drink in front of a superior | 1) which I have access). Would be | Good | 1) if this course had some social | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good course that I would recommend to everyone that want to follow a career in creative writing or to improve their passion. It helped me to acknowledge things that you have to take in account when writing a book.I could not imagine some of this things when I was thinking about an action,and,how to put it on paper and sound good for the reader. The assignments are very good and you can also complete them in audit only mode , but only for yourself , no one will revive you. It`s not that easy to write something when you don`t know much things about the structures , how to build a character and so on , but , here you have everything you need and it`s free. I finished the course in audit only mode but if you have the possibility to buy it , don`t hesitate. | 1) A | Good | 1) course that I would recommend to | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good course that I would recommend to everyone that want to follow a career in creative writing or to improve their passion. It helped me to acknowledge things that you have to take in account when writing a book.I could not imagine some of this things when I was thinking about an action,and,how to put it on paper and sound good for the reader. The assignments are very good and you can also complete them in audit only mode , but only for yourself , no one will revive you. It`s not that easy to write something when you don`t know much things about the structures , how to build a character and so on , but , here you have everything you need and it`s free. I finished the course in audit only mode but if you have the possibility to buy it , don`t hesitate. | 2) put it on paper and sound | Good | 2) for the reader. The assignments are | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good course that I would recommend to everyone that want to follow a career in creative writing or to improve their passion. It helped me to acknowledge things that you have to take in account when writing a book.I could not imagine some of this things when I was thinking about an action,and,how to put it on paper and sound good for the reader. The assignments are very good and you can also complete them in audit only mode , but only for yourself , no one will revive you. It`s not that easy to write something when you don`t know much things about the structures , how to build a character and so on , but , here you have everything you need and it`s free. I finished the course in audit only mode but if you have the possibility to buy it , don`t hesitate. | 3) the reader. The assignments are very | Good | 3) and you can also complete them | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very good learning material even for non-english native person. | 1) Very | Good | 1) learning material even for non-english native | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I have learned a lot from this course. I appreciate the good instruction from Professor Skyhorse as well as the encouragement, constructive advice and critique from my lovely classmates . | 1) from this course. I appreciate the | Good | 1) instruction from Professor Skyhorse as well | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very basic course with an extremely limited view on what makes a good plot. | 1) limited view on what makes a | Good | 1) plot. | 2.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This course was really useful and Mr. Skyhorse's way of explaining in the videos was so good | 1) explaining in the videos was so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I'm really quite liking it! It's fun and I get to be creative! Yep! Good stuff! | 1) I get to be creative! Yep! | Good | 1) stuff! | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I enjoyed this course. Brando did a good job in breaking down the important aspects of plot and providing examples. I liked that lessons were concise. Each one contained roughly three videos, most less than 10 minutes. I thought this was very beginner friendly. I found Feyman's pyramid and Alice Adam's ABDCE of plot structure particularly useful and I especially enjoyed the Shop Talk videos where fellow writers discussed their approach to writing. I only audited this course, but it bugged me that my board kept displaying overdue assignments when that feature was locked. | 1) enjoyed this course. Brando did a | Good | 1) job in breaking down the important | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Didn't pay to unlock the assignments but still enjoyed it. Lecturer explains points clearly and gives examples from familiar literature. Even if you aren't an aspiring (or struggling) writer, you'll still learn a lot about the structure of good storytelling. Ever wondered why movies and novels seem to follow the same pattern, yet it always works? You'll find out here. Great course. My only regret is that assignment reviews are locked until you pay for them. It would've been nice if only the capstone project required payment. | 1) a lot about the structure of | Good | 1) storytelling. Ever wondered why movies and | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | really good organized! | 1) really | Good | 1) organized! | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I thought the course was very informative. It had a lot of good and essential information for writing and the teacher was clear and easy to understand. | 1) informative. It had a lot of | Good | 1) and essential information for writing and | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Course is a little formulaic, had trouble making my submissions follow the structure outlined but still, I learnt some useful tips and actually got to just write something orderly. Liked some of the visiting speakers (the third speaker who talked about character - mature lady, dark hair) was quite good. So was the first gentleman. Overall, the course is ok but given the strict methodology and requirements for writing, I don't know if I'll make it through the specialisation. Thank you for reading! | 1) mature lady, dark hair) was quite | Good | 1) So was the first gentleman. Overall, | 1.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I didn't take this class for credit, I took this class as a refresher. The professor gave a lot of good information and I really enjoyed the class. I enjoyed the class so much, I would take it again. Please recommend a book for the next class. Good class! | 1) The professor gave a lot of | Good | 1) information and I really enjoyed the | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I didn't take this class for credit, I took this class as a refresher. The professor gave a lot of good information and I really enjoyed the class. I enjoyed the class so much, I would take it again. Please recommend a book for the next class. Good class! | 2) a book for the next class. | Good | 2) class! | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Before taking this course I had no idea that there can actually be a format to follow to create a good story! I've learned a lot and Brando Skyhorse | 1) format to follow to create a | Good | 1) story! I've learned a lot and | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This was a great way to get started writing again after a long time. The videos were engaging and full of good information. It's good to see and hear real authors talk about the work. | 1) videos were engaging and full of | Good | 1) information. It's good to see and | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This was a great way to get started writing again after a long time. The videos were engaging and full of good information. It's good to see and hear real authors talk about the work. | 2) and full of good information. It's | Good | 2) to see and hear real authors | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | very good and well organized course that helped me a lot to improve my writing skills. | 1) very | Good | 1) and well organized course that helped | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A very good course for any beginning writers | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for any beginning writers | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very good lessons to learn | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons to learn | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The instructor has done a good job with the structure and assignments for this course. He explains the course and the assignments very well. I enjoyed the course. | 1) The instructor has done a | Good | 1) job with the structure and assignments | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good introductory course to the craft of plot. Covers the basics, though I would appreciate some more complex assignments. Perhaps offer some more advanced course in the future? Maybe an advanced fiction specialization? Either way, good introductory course. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course to the craft of | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good introductory course to the craft of plot. Covers the basics, though I would appreciate some more complex assignments. Perhaps offer some more advanced course in the future? Maybe an advanced fiction specialization? Either way, good introductory course. | 2) an advanced fiction specialization? Either way, | Good | 2) introductory course. | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I found this course quite hard to take to; especially after starting the second one on Character. Saying that though, it is good to learn about different perspectives and approaches as education whatever form enables us to move forward on our learning path. | 1) Character. Saying that though, it is | Good | 1) to learn about different perspectives and | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Excellent course, helped me so much and gave me good ideas and inspiration. | 1) me so much and gave me | Good | 1) ideas and inspiration. | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | -Made on 10/05/2016- Low quantity of information and resources. For the cost , is not even near to other moocs. Block the sending and sharing of activities, and unable the peer evaluation because of a required payment, really handicap the learning and the quality of the course. If I pay a Mooc, is becouse of a strong quality and substantial learning; this two lacking in this course. I can give you a list of other moocs around this and other subjects (film, writing, mat, entrepreneurship, photography...) for you to make relations and compare structures. Please revise this course, you have nice video edition and the teacher is good, and willing to teach, but the global course is missing several things. I encourage you to take my words. | 1) video edition and the teacher is | Good | 1) and willing to teach, but the | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | A good introductory course designed to be effective for people of a basic background and beginning skill level. As a course from Wesleyan I was hoping for something a little more robust or actually at a college-level, so I was a little disappointed at how rudimentary this course was. Still, I did learn some new things about plot and would recommend for the new or beginning writer. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course designed to be effective | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The problem is that the only feedback a student gets is from other students. I only received 1 feedback from the supposedly 3 each week for 4 weeks. I gave 3 stars because the videos are very good and good concepts but I paid far more money than they now charge. So I doubt I will finish the certificate because the final course relies only on student feedback which is non-existent. | 1) stars because the videos are very | Good | 1) and good concepts but I paid | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The problem is that the only feedback a student gets is from other students. I only received 1 feedback from the supposedly 3 each week for 4 weeks. I gave 3 stars because the videos are very good and good concepts but I paid far more money than they now charge. So I doubt I will finish the certificate because the final course relies only on student feedback which is non-existent. | 2) the videos are very good and | Good | 2) concepts but I paid far more | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good exercises. Good, interesting, helpful teacher. short lessons. concrete instructions | 1) | Good | 1) exercises. Good, interesting, helpful teacher. short | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good exercises. Good, interesting, helpful teacher. short lessons. concrete instructions | 2) Good exercises. | Good | 2) interesting, helpful teacher. short lessons. concrete | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Overall, I sincerely think this course was useful to me. I did learn, and that is great. I got some good advice from the reviewers. And I appreciated most of the videos, especially the shop talks. But I wish the instructor or his staff were more present in the discussion area, and I would have preferred a better written material. The transcripts are not formatted. They are completely raw and difficult to use. Furthermore, I don't think it is normal that people duly registered to the class have difficulties to get their 3 reviews. Too many people have to ask for it in the forums. In conclusion, a good course with good video material, but a lack of presence and organization. | 1) that is great. I got some | Good | 1) advice from the reviewers. And I | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Overall, I sincerely think this course was useful to me. I did learn, and that is great. I got some good advice from the reviewers. And I appreciated most of the videos, especially the shop talks. But I wish the instructor or his staff were more present in the discussion area, and I would have preferred a better written material. The transcripts are not formatted. They are completely raw and difficult to use. Furthermore, I don't think it is normal that people duly registered to the class have difficulties to get their 3 reviews. Too many people have to ask for it in the forums. In conclusion, a good course with good video material, but a lack of presence and organization. | 2) in the forums. In conclusion, a | Good | 2) course with good video material, but | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Overall, I sincerely think this course was useful to me. I did learn, and that is great. I got some good advice from the reviewers. And I appreciated most of the videos, especially the shop talks. But I wish the instructor or his staff were more present in the discussion area, and I would have preferred a better written material. The transcripts are not formatted. They are completely raw and difficult to use. Furthermore, I don't think it is normal that people duly registered to the class have difficulties to get their 3 reviews. Too many people have to ask for it in the forums. In conclusion, a good course with good video material, but a lack of presence and organization. | 3) In conclusion, a good course with | Good | 3) video material, but a lack of | 3.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Pretty good class; good information. The classmates are engaged and have good feedback to give. I'm frustrated at the lack of instructor (or even staff presence) until at least week 3, when finally a staff member answered *one* of the many student questions that have been piling up. Students are a great resource for critiquing work, but we can't help each other with technical questions, or with assignment clarifications. So there *definitely* needs to be staff on hand for that. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) class; good information. The classmates are | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Pretty good class; good information. The classmates are engaged and have good feedback to give. I'm frustrated at the lack of instructor (or even staff presence) until at least week 3, when finally a staff member answered *one* of the many student questions that have been piling up. Students are a great resource for critiquing work, but we can't help each other with technical questions, or with assignment clarifications. So there *definitely* needs to be staff on hand for that. | 2) Pretty good class; | Good | 2) information. The classmates are engaged and | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Pretty good class; good information. The classmates are engaged and have good feedback to give. I'm frustrated at the lack of instructor (or even staff presence) until at least week 3, when finally a staff member answered *one* of the many student questions that have been piling up. Students are a great resource for critiquing work, but we can't help each other with technical questions, or with assignment clarifications. So there *definitely* needs to be staff on hand for that. | 3) The classmates are engaged and have | Good | 3) feedback to give. I'm frustrated at | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good class, good lectures. The plot devices taught are very specific, but helpful for beginning writers for whom conflict, and movement are not easy. I'm a beginning writer and I struggle with finishing a story because at some point I just think, well now what? what's supposed to happen? The class helps you push the characters into conflict, and make choices, which is the heart of a good story. My only complaint - the assignments were so structured that they were tedious. the peer reviews in this class were also painful. Reading other people's work, I felt like perhaps we needed less structure and more space to practice simpler techniques. But overall, i'm using what I've learned in my writing, and its definitely helped! | 1) | Good | 1) class, good lectures. The plot devices | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good class, good lectures. The plot devices taught are very specific, but helpful for beginning writers for whom conflict, and movement are not easy. I'm a beginning writer and I struggle with finishing a story because at some point I just think, well now what? what's supposed to happen? The class helps you push the characters into conflict, and make choices, which is the heart of a good story. My only complaint - the assignments were so structured that they were tedious. the peer reviews in this class were also painful. Reading other people's work, I felt like perhaps we needed less structure and more space to practice simpler techniques. But overall, i'm using what I've learned in my writing, and its definitely helped! | 2) Good class, | Good | 2) lectures. The plot devices taught are | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good class, good lectures. The plot devices taught are very specific, but helpful for beginning writers for whom conflict, and movement are not easy. I'm a beginning writer and I struggle with finishing a story because at some point I just think, well now what? what's supposed to happen? The class helps you push the characters into conflict, and make choices, which is the heart of a good story. My only complaint - the assignments were so structured that they were tedious. the peer reviews in this class were also painful. Reading other people's work, I felt like perhaps we needed less structure and more space to practice simpler techniques. But overall, i'm using what I've learned in my writing, and its definitely helped! | 3) which is the heart of a | Good | 3) story. My only complaint - the | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very interesting course and good advices! =) | 1) Very interesting course and | Good | 1) advices! =) | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | It's a good course. The explanations of plot and scene have made me understand for the first time what writing fiction is all about, and for the first time I was bale to write fiction that is better than anything I had ever written before. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. The explanations of plot and | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good material. Brando Skyhorse is a very talented lecturer. The exercises look simple but are actually very difficult, so set aside more time than you expect to complete them within the parameters. | 1) | Good | 1) material. Brando Skyhorse is a very | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | While this course was interesting, it seemed very light. There was only about 10 or so minutes of 'content' a week, plus some interviews (which were very interesting, but didn't feel as though they taught too much). The assignments were all good except for the third one about the physical object. It was a weird prompt and not in a good way. I would recommend this course, but I'd also love to see it expanded a bit. | 1) too much). The assignments were all | Good | 1) except for the third one about | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | While this course was interesting, it seemed very light. There was only about 10 or so minutes of 'content' a week, plus some interviews (which were very interesting, but didn't feel as though they taught too much). The assignments were all good except for the third one about the physical object. It was a weird prompt and not in a good way. I would recommend this course, but I'd also love to see it expanded a bit. | 2) weird prompt and not in a | Good | 2) way. I would recommend this course, | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | This is a very good course, but I would have expected transcripts of the talks as well. I have done a few coursera courses and the supplementary materials here are minimal. Also, in the week 4, it is confusing to have the video transcript in the assigment section - very unclear whether that's a part of the assigment or not. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course, but I would have expected | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I finished this course in a single day in roughly about 8 hours, including taking notes and doing writing assignments. The material is quite good, more geared towards the beginner to the concepts of Plot. But, in my favorite parts - the interviews with Amity Gaige and Amy Bloom, I discovered new sides and tones to Character and Setting. And, they now compel me towards doing the rest of the courses in this specialization. I really wish I could submit my assignments even without the certificate version of the course. Thank you Mr. Skyhorse and the Coursera team. :) | 1) writing assignments. The material is quite | Good | 1) more geared towards the beginner to | 4.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The instructor really gives the nitty-gritty of how to write a plot that will intrigue readers. He explains what a plot is (and it may not be what you think! The assignment is much harder than it looks! Believe me, it took three days for me to get mine done, sign of a good assignment as I can typically write 250 words in a snap (this review for example!). If you want to write, this is a good beginning. | 1) get mine done, sign of a | Good | 1) assignment as I can typically write | 5.0 |
| 3KNgoXgcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | The instructor really gives the nitty-gritty of how to write a plot that will intrigue readers. He explains what a plot is (and it may not be what you think! The assignment is much harder than it looks! Believe me, it took three days for me to get mine done, sign of a good assignment as I can typically write 250 words in a snap (this review for example!). If you want to write, this is a good beginning. | 2) want to write, this is a | Good | 2) beginning. | 5.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | Nive that the course covered a broad range of topics. And good to get pushed to do some kaggle competition and peer review. | 1) a broad range of topics. And | Good | 1) to get pushed to do some | 5.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | good course material! | 1) | Good | 1) course material! | 4.0 |
| 3mA6QTIyEeWsOA5fzAmxbw | The lectures in this course were very good but I would have preferred much, much more homework to practice the concepts covered in the lectures. Also, I was somewhat disappointed when a certain issue with the course that I asked about in the forums was never addressed by the course staff. Of course, I could have been wrong about it but, but based on the response from other students I was not the only one having this problem. | 1) lectures in this course were very | Good | 1) but I would have preferred much, | 3.0 |
| 3oV7d6_HEeS5PyIAC4GQ5A | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3oV7d6_HEeS5PyIAC4GQ5A | John Covach's lectures are clear and well-thought out, and he does a good job of fielding the "fan mentality" that so often plagues other rock history and music history courses. | 1) well-thought out, and he does a | Good | 1) job of fielding the " fan | 5.0 |
| 3r_VmUhHEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | This course covered a lot of ground & will be a good jumping off point. | 1) of ground & will be a | Good | 1) jumping off point. | 4.0 |
| 3r_VmUhHEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 3r_VmUhHEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | Very good course. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| 3r_VmUhHEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | I requested for a refund and I did not receive it. I guess I won't get it until about 2 weeks. I want a refund because it's too easy, this is stuff I learned in freshman biology. It's nice that it offers resources and links however, I wanted to take a course and get a certificate in one at my level to prove that I can learn beyond a high school biology level. And the course says it's for educators but it doesn't go into much detail on how to actually teach the information. I guess this is good if you want to be a substitute at a middle school or high school, but it's not for me. I was looking for something that was more so at a college level. Also on the important information, they sort of skim over sometimes. I'm 19, I'm not in school because I don't want to waste thousands of dollars on stuff that's elementary so I don't think I could get any special benefits and get courses for free, but that's also the reason why I'm on here, but I'm disappointed to have wasted 50 dollars if they aren't going to refund me. I can barely afford 50 dollars, I'm unemployed and no one will hire. I wanted to take a course in something that would at least get me some kind of job or volunteer work within my field of interest. Seriously, not even these minimum wage jobs will hire you if you didn't go or aren't going to college. Just wanted to feel like I accomplished something suited to my level. | 1) the information. I guess this is | Good | 1) if you want to be a | 1.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | This lecture was introduced in very details. It's very good for me. | 1) introduced in very details. It's very | Good | 1) for me. | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | The lessos are really good for beginner and also for people have cs degree to revise the concepts like protcol suite | 1) The lessos are really | Good | 1) for beginner and also for people | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good information, but not good for people lacking background knowledge. Lecturer reads off slides and gives very little supplementary information. | 1) | Good | 1) information, but not good for people | 2.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good information, but not good for people lacking background knowledge. Lecturer reads off slides and gives very little supplementary information. | 2) Good information, but not | Good | 2) for people lacking background knowledge. Lecturer | 2.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Solid course! Keep up the good work. | 1) Solid course! Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | An exceptionally good course! Relatively short yet very informative, covering the core concepts about TCP and IP protocols. | 1) An exceptionally | Good | 1) course! Relatively short yet very informative, | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good refreshing info | 1) | Good | 1) refreshing info | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Course is really good and covers TCP and UDP basics in a proper and simple manner !! | 1) Course is really | Good | 1) and covers TCP and UDP basics | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good introductory course. No labs involved. No certificate issued. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. No labs involved. No | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | A good introductory course | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | average course not too good not too bad | 1) average course not too | Good | 1) not too bad | 3.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good: i understand a lot of things. | 1) | Good | 1) i understand a lot of things. | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | EXCELLENT TEACHING AND GOOD VISUALIZATION OF CONCEPTS | 1) EXCELLENT TEACHING AND | Good | 1) VISUALIZATION OF CONCEPTS | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course. Highly recommended. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Highly recommended. | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great course, I've learned a lot of networking, the course teaches the basic stuff of internet and it is a good way to start this. I recommend this course to anyone who has a little experience of this, I want to clarify some information like layers, for example. | 1) of internet and it is a | Good | 1) way to start this. I recommend | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good inntroduction to TCP/IP and IP V4 and V6. | 1) | Good | 1) inntroduction to TCP/IP and IP V4 | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Was very my informative and a good resource to brush-up my academic skills. | 1) Was very my informative and a | Good | 1) resource to brush-up my academic skills. | 4.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good Course to understand the basics of Internet Network. | 1) | Good | 1) Course to understand the basics of | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Professor Jong-Moon Chung is very good at teaching this class. Perfect rhythm and pace, useful and clear analogies. Thank you very much! | 1) Professor Jong-Moon Chung is very | Good | 1) at teaching this class. Perfect rhythm | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 3TdKKA-VEeWhsgqB1eduww | It's a good one we should all do this | 1) It's a | Good | 1) one we should all do this | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Good presentations. Enjoyed the lectures, good information, and good illustrations and maps. I'm grateful to have this opportunity to learn about this period. Phillip Zelikow takes you through the history through time zones, while visiting various ideas and happenings around different parts of the world, and how they are interconnected. I would like to see some reading material for further understanding (not just suggested books). Overall, I would recommen | 1) | Good | 1) presentations. Enjoyed the lectures, good information, | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Good presentations. Enjoyed the lectures, good information, and good illustrations and maps. I'm grateful to have this opportunity to learn about this period. Phillip Zelikow takes you through the history through time zones, while visiting various ideas and happenings around different parts of the world, and how they are interconnected. I would like to see some reading material for further understanding (not just suggested books). Overall, I would recommen | 2) Good presentations. Enjoyed the lectures, | Good | 2) information, and good illustrations and maps. | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Good presentations. Enjoyed the lectures, good information, and good illustrations and maps. I'm grateful to have this opportunity to learn about this period. Phillip Zelikow takes you through the history through time zones, while visiting various ideas and happenings around different parts of the world, and how they are interconnected. I would like to see some reading material for further understanding (not just suggested books). Overall, I would recommen | 3) Enjoyed the lectures, good information, and | Good | 3) illustrations and maps. I'm grateful to | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Very good, concise, relevant and with an excellent presentation. Gives you the big picture on history and also offers an insight in the decision making that shaped world history. Also it offers a big picture, focusing not only on Western history, but on China, Africa, India, Japan, Latin America and the Muslim world. Excellent! | 1) Very | Good | 1) concise, relevant and with an excellent | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Excellent course. Good overview of history, well taught, and very much worth the time and the effort. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) overview of history, well taught, and | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | The classes are very good and objective. It helps a lot undestand the present world | 1) The classes are very | Good | 1) and objective. It helps a lot | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Overall good class--instructor is lively and engaging | 1) Overall | Good | 1) class--instructor is lively and engaging | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Another great course from a professor at UVA! Almost all of the lectures were engaging. He teaches history in an easily accessible way, using very good maps, diagrams, paintings, and clear illustrations of his topics. I would recommend this course everyone, but especially folks who find history to be a dry, dusty thing, as he breathes life into the material. | 1) an easily accessible way, using very | Good | 1) maps, diagrams, paintings, and clear illustrations | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Very good for overview of these years, I really recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for overview of these years, I | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | good refresher, events of the period pulled together well, pleasant to listen to | 1) | Good | 1) refresher, events of the period pulled | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | very good overview of world history | 1) very | Good | 1) overview of world history | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | A good course with great and clear explanation of history | 1) A | Good | 1) course with great and clear explanation | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Very good course - ties many disparate threads together to make a cogent explanation of how and why the modern world came to be. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course - ties many disparate threads | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Pretty good summary | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) summary | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | I liked the approach of the topic and the narration style. The focus on finding reasons behind historical moments is a good feature of this course. | 1) reasons behind historical moments is a | Good | 1) feature of this course. | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | very good!!! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Instructor is really good giving lectures. History suddenly seems full of fun and power | 1) Instructor is really | Good | 1) giving lectures. History suddenly seems full | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Very good course on modern history. Explains a lot how we went from the traditional world to the modern | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on modern history. Explains a | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | This was my first course, so I don't have any comparison. But I found it really well done. Clearly spoken, interesting content, well understandable. A good introduction to worlds recent history! | 1) spoken, interesting content, well understandable. A | Good | 1) introduction to worlds recent history! | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | As a fan of History, I highly recommand this MOOC, it is always good for you to see history from a different prospective. | 1) recommand this MOOC, it is always | Good | 1) for you to see history from | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | I think the course is interesting, but very general. The lecturer is very good and all presentations are clear. There is a lack of references and links to self-study. | 1) very general. The lecturer is very | Good | 1) and all presentations are clear. There | 4.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | good comparative study | 1) | Good | 1) comparative study | 5.0 |
| 3UY0FCmGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Good lectures, although I prefer application based courses. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures, although I prefer application based | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good introduction to a wealth of great tools and to the concept of data products. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to a wealth of great | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good and useful module. | 1) | Good | 1) and useful module. | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good overview of available tools. Lack of practice exercises makes preparing for quizzes difficult. However, the course project does a good job to get your feet wet with Shiny Apps. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of available tools. Lack of | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good overview of available tools. Lack of practice exercises makes preparing for quizzes difficult. However, the course project does a good job to get your feet wet with Shiny Apps. | 2) However, the course project does a | Good | 2) job to get your feet wet | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | I liked the course and found it informative, but wish there were more stuff on Shiny Widgets and Input/Output/Render topic. R Shiny tutorial is pretty good, but I was hoping more relevant info about those topics from this course. | 1) topic. R Shiny tutorial is pretty | Good | 1) but I was hoping more relevant | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Good course. Teaches you to take advantage of Shiny, Slidify, GoogleVis and Rpubs | 1) | Good | 1) course. Teaches you to take advantage | 5.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | Taken this course in its old fashion style. Now reviewing the new design was a little bit displacing, but I ascribe this to the fact I've done all the specialization courses in the old design. However the structure of the course is quite good. Some typos were reported, as well as a bug on the unanswered questions in quiz 3. Main worst point was the missing format of several text boxes. I would have appreciated paragraphs, bold and italic, some links, picture, not only raw plain text. Overall review is nonetheless over the average. | 1) structure of the course is quite | Good | 1) Some typos were reported, as well | 4.0 |
| 3Vo3Am1LEeWMPAqsmzmVew | This course gives a good introduction on how to develop an application. It gives all the available tools in the field out for us to try and use them. The course is enjoyable and not stressful. I find the assignment as meant to get us to do the project and not really there to fail us. It is difficult to fail to course as only the minimum is required. | 1) This course gives a | Good | 1) introduction on how to develop an | 4.0 |
| 3vTfVlUsEeWaMw4b4yEpbw | Excellent course, informative, good use of visuals. Work is at an easy pace for those with less time. | 1) Excellent course, informative, | Good | 1) use of visuals. Work is at | 5.0 |
| 3vTfVlUsEeWaMw4b4yEpbw | This is a very good course. The material is formatted in a way that is very digestible even for those without a strong science background. Some of the quiz questions are harder than they should be, and challenging to locate the correct answer to. And it is not immediately clear that in order to pass the course a student must read the book the course is based upon. There are some spelling errors that should be corrected, and a few errors in the filmed dialogue. But the information contained in the course is good. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. The material is formatted in | 4.0 |
| 3vTfVlUsEeWaMw4b4yEpbw | This is a very good course. The material is formatted in a way that is very digestible even for those without a strong science background. Some of the quiz questions are harder than they should be, and challenging to locate the correct answer to. And it is not immediately clear that in order to pass the course a student must read the book the course is based upon. There are some spelling errors that should be corrected, and a few errors in the filmed dialogue. But the information contained in the course is good. | 2) information contained in the course is | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good! Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thanks | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | So far, so good! I am exciting to start the evaluations | 1) So far, so | Good | 1) I am exciting to start the | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | so for so good. | 1) so for so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course. The faculty was extremely good, and teaching was great! | 1) Excellent course. The faculty was extremely | Good | 1) and teaching was great! | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good and perfect course for new comers. The lessons have been properly designed and needs to applauded. The English language and orator ship is good and fair in listening. The picture quality is also good. The examples given are fair. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and perfect course for new comers. | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good and perfect course for new comers. The lessons have been properly designed and needs to applauded. The English language and orator ship is good and fair in listening. The picture quality is also good. The examples given are fair. | 2) English language and orator ship is | Good | 2) and fair in listening. The picture | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good and perfect course for new comers. The lessons have been properly designed and needs to applauded. The English language and orator ship is good and fair in listening. The picture quality is also good. The examples given are fair. | 3) listening. The picture quality is also | Good | 3) The examples given are fair. | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | If you're currently working in a leadership role this course provides some thoughtful exercises and content you can apply to your day job. Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation of the issues). | 1) can apply to your day job. | Good | 1) content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | If you're currently working in a leadership role this course provides some thoughtful exercises and content you can apply to your day job. Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a good presentation of the issues). | 2) Good content (nothing earth-shattering, but a | Good | 2) presentation of the issues). | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really liked this course. Its the second one I take on Coursera. I think Im ending the course with a lot of tools to work on my leadership. Very good examples, videos and explanations. If you need to improve your leadership, this curse will definitely will help you. | 1) to work on my leadership. Very | Good | 1) examples, videos and explanations. If you | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course with just the right amount of video and homework assignment to keep you engaged. The videos and data presented were very well curated and there were plenty of fun examples that helped clarify different points. Peer review is a good way of hearing lots of different perspectives. Overall, very enjoyable, thanks. | 1) different points. Peer review is a | Good | 1) way of hearing lots of different | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course. However, it was very basic. I learned, but not sufficient for the 4 hours per week that I invested. | 1) | Good | 1) course. However, it was very basic. | 3.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, it is well done and very useful. Examples and external video are perfect to undertake and understand the course. | 1) | Good | 1) course, it is well done and | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great! I really feel good about this course, Which is quite perfect learning with advanced strategies. I thank to my Professor and University of Michigan. My Twitter : https://twitter.com/Praveenicici My LinkedIn : https://www.linkedin.com/in/praveenicici | 1) Great! I really feel | Good | 1) about this course, Which is quite | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Fantastic material, very good teaching, they use conclusions from research and apply it in a very practical way, applicable in day to day situations. A real added value for my professional life. | 1) Fantastic material, very | Good | 1) teaching, they use conclusions from research | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good course, was a great starting point as new manager. the course is based on great concepts, studies, examples and of course great teachers. Highly recommended. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, was a great starting point | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good content, interesting, inspiring, somehow challenging assignments. Meets my expectations so far. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, interesting, inspiring, somehow challenging assignments. | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It has been a good eye-opener and insightful refresher course to understand the people aspect relevant to team. | 1) It has been a | Good | 1) eye-opener and insightful refresher course to | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | it is a great course. it gave me good understanding of how to motivate others and how to use the available tools to get the maximum outcomes of them | 1) a great course. it gave me | Good | 1) understanding of how to motivate others | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good. Might include some more vivid case studies | 1) | Good | 1) Might include some more vivid case | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | As both a healthcare professional and an executive for a healthcare organization I am blown away by how good the courses within the Leading People and Teams specialization are. I found Coursera through my own search for personal professional development and every course I have done has been top notch but the courses in this specialization really raise the bar. I have encouraged my peers and subordinates to take the courses within the Leading People and Teams Specialization and we may actually do a coordinated effort to get leaders and aspiring leaders into this Coursera specialization. | 1) I am blown away by how | Good | 1) the courses within the Leading People | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really recommend this course. Th authors give good range of infotmation and structure it in the way it helps you to understand how to implement the knowledge in youreveryday job. They provide the dataof researchs and surveys that confirms the information. The new information is good iilustrated with the real business examples. | 1) recommend this course. Th authors give | Good | 1) range of infotmation and structure it | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really recommend this course. Th authors give good range of infotmation and structure it in the way it helps you to understand how to implement the knowledge in youreveryday job. They provide the dataof researchs and surveys that confirms the information. The new information is good iilustrated with the real business examples. | 2) the information. The new information is | Good | 2) iilustrated with the real business examples. | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great, transversal, with common biaises, actionable plan and good insights. | 1) with common biaises, actionable plan and | Good | 1) insights. | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, maybe needs a little more practice | 1) | Good | 1) course, maybe needs a little more | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good course which provides solid understanding on how to motivate and drive your colleagues and subordinates.The course particulary describes why it is essential to have a vision for you team and how to communicate it to your peers, gives the ideas on how to reward your employees based on their values. | 1) A | Good | 1) course which provides solid understanding on | 4.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good and interesting course, with lots of research based advice. There are several practical exercises which deepens the knowledge. The lecturers are also very good, and they present the information in the very good manner. | 1) A | Good | 1) and interesting course, with lots of | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good and interesting course, with lots of research based advice. There are several practical exercises which deepens the knowledge. The lecturers are also very good, and they present the information in the very good manner. | 2) knowledge. The lecturers are also very | Good | 2) and they present the information in | 5.0 |
| 41f7CjlXEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good and interesting course, with lots of research based advice. There are several practical exercises which deepens the knowledge. The lecturers are also very good, and they present the information in the very good manner. | 3) present the information in the very | Good | 3) manner. | 5.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Really good. | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Excellent course! Many materials, very good lectures and very practically comprehensive exercises. Congratulations. | 1) Excellent course! Many materials, very | Good | 1) lectures and very practically comprehensive exercises. | 5.0 |
| 487jV_KLEeS5LyIAC3lSsg | Great team and good information. Logically organized. I'd love to find a similar course for writers, not just educators and librarians. | 1) Great team and | Good | 1) information. Logically organized. I'd love to | 4.0 |
| 4BkqMnE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 4BkqMnE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | Favorite course of all. Larry is such a likable teacher and very good, was actually sad that his course ended. | 1) such a likable teacher and very | Good | 1) was actually sad that his course | 5.0 |
| 4G2HtIWlEeSlzyIACiGe0w | So far so good | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 4G2HtIWlEeSlzyIACiGe0w | Very good! I don't understand the language, but the professor is fantastic and make it easy. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I don't understand the language, but | 5.0 |
| 4G2HtIWlEeSlzyIACiGe0w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 4G2HtIWlEeSlzyIACiGe0w | Exelente, la relatora es muy clara y provista de muy buen material, las explicacion y la producción de los videos es bastante novedosa y hace muy fácil su aprendizaje, en cuanto a la teoría entrega muchos conceptos interesantes, menciona autores entrega guías y herramientas para evaluar algo que parece muy abstracto la creatividad. Excellent, the teacher is very clear, and give very good material, the explication and video production is really creative, and make learning easier, talking about theory, the teacher gives very much concepts, give authors, and tools for evaluate something which seems so abstract, the creativity. | 1) is very clear, and give very | Good | 1) material, the explication and video production | 5.0 |
| 4gFDJxJhEeayXBIQdVd_6w | Was completely surprised by this course. There is so much information presented in a clear, understandable, and intriguing way. I was engaged the whole time. This class has been the catalyst I've needed for awhile to inspire me to pick up my guitar daily and make progress on ideas. Its so great to have a dependable structure to work with as opposed to hoping inspiration is enough to get me something good. I am so thankful this course exists and it so accessible. Highly recommend! | 1) is enough to get me something | Good | 1) I am so thankful this course | 5.0 |
| 4gFDJxJhEeayXBIQdVd_6w | A bit disorganized and rambling lectures. Good content | 1) A bit disorganized and rambling lectures. | Good | 1) content | 3.0 |
| 4gFDJxJhEeayXBIQdVd_6w | Excellent course. I have been writing songs for years, some of which might be considered good. However, I always knew I didn't really know how to write songs as a craft. That's why I took this course. The course has now provided me with the toolbox to begin approaching songwriting as it really is, a craft based on skills one learns and develops. I very much would like to take a another course with Pat Pattison, because this one was huge fun! Thanks Pat, Thanks Berklee, Thanks Coursera. | 1) some of which might be considered | Good | 1) However, I always knew I didn't | 5.0 |
| 4IKVIdWxEeWlbgqNCYymGw | I think this information is very dated - Calories In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending exercise to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal fats denigrated . . . . so many recommendations that have little 'science' behind them, and which have not produced good results for 95% of the people who have used them. I've lost weight with a lower calorie diet and exercise, so, yes, it can work, but it is very difficult. I've kept it off easily for two years with a high fat/low carb eating plan. I've changed my exercise to mostly Pilates when my weight stabilized and I enjoy it enough to stay with it. knowing how difficult it is to stick to a low fat/high carb diet - which causes me to struggle with cravings, even when I am eating unprocessed organic seasonal local food - I hate to see a low fat diet recommended to people struggling with losing weight. I recommend "The Big Fat Surprise" and "Good Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate view of healthy living. | 1) them, and which have not produced | Good | 1) results for 95% of the people | 2.0 |
| 4IKVIdWxEeWlbgqNCYymGw | I think this information is very dated - Calories In/Calories Out, High Carb/Low Fat, recommending exercise to lose weight, vegetable oils recommended/animal fats denigrated . . . . so many recommendations that have little 'science' behind them, and which have not produced good results for 95% of the people who have used them. I've lost weight with a lower calorie diet and exercise, so, yes, it can work, but it is very difficult. I've kept it off easily for two years with a high fat/low carb eating plan. I've changed my exercise to mostly Pilates when my weight stabilized and I enjoy it enough to stay with it. knowing how difficult it is to stick to a low fat/high carb diet - which causes me to struggle with cravings, even when I am eating unprocessed organic seasonal local food - I hate to see a low fat diet recommended to people struggling with losing weight. I recommend "The Big Fat Surprise" and "Good Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate view of healthy living. | 2) The Big Fat Surprise" and " | Good | 2) Calories, Bad Calories" as an alternate | 2.0 |
| 4jKfxkuFEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | It was a good course, but maybe it could be better with more electronic topics. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course, but maybe it could be | 4.0 |
| 4JSB920jEeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | v.v.good | 1) v. v. | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 4JSB920jEeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| 4JSB920jEeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | it was good | 1) it was | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Great overview and practical insights from the industry. Very beneficial as a good introduction. | 1) the industry. Very beneficial as a | Good | 1) introduction. | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | very interesting and inspiring; the assignment is good but could test our knowledge deeper. | 1) interesting and inspiring; the assignment is | Good | 1) but could test our knowledge deeper. | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Such a good course! There should be more fashion course options like this one. | 1) Such a | Good | 1) course! There should be more fashion | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | I loved this course, the content is good, has a lot of interviews and cases. | 1) loved this course, the content is | Good | 1) has a lot of interviews and | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Good course and bhjfkfkhbuvutv7tvurvuvurvtv | 1) | Good | 1) course and bhjfkfkhbuvutv7tvurvuvurvtv | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The content of the course is very interesting, and I plan to go go through with it. A huge downside is that it is very difficult to follow the course because of the professors' strong accent and, at times, incorrect pronunciation. It is distracting. Also, it would be good to have weekly assignments, to stay on track. | 1) is distracting. Also, it would be | Good | 1) to have weekly assignments, to stay | 3.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Contents are good and interesting, but speakers' english is so low and bad (pronunciation) that the course becomes almost unpleasant. | 1) Contents are | Good | 1) and interesting, but speakers' english is | 2.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | I love the course the course material was good and very informative. | 1) the course the course material was | Good | 1) and very informative. | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Very good course, sad its finished. Good level of content aimed at a business professional interested in the fashion and luxury segment. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, sad its finished. Good level | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Very good course, sad its finished. Good level of content aimed at a business professional interested in the fashion and luxury segment. | 2) Very good course, sad its finished. | Good | 2) level of content aimed at a | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Awesome course, great materials and good teachers. Thank you Bocconi. | 1) Awesome course, great materials and | Good | 1) teachers. Thank you Bocconi. | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Hi Everyone. I just enrolled in this course. This is one of best course I have taken online. I have a background in IT - Fashion Retail Business. I am hoping this course will help with career growth and I can learn some new and important topics about retails domain. Both the Instructors (Erica Corbellini and Stefania Saviolo) are good. I highly recommend this course to anyone wanting to learn more about retail domain and I had a great time taking it. Thank you. | 1) (Erica Corbellini and Stefania Saviolo) are | Good | 1) I highly recommend this course to | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Short explanation, too many concepts and no sequence of theories introduced. On the other side, very nice subject and materials, I assume that the profs are very good too, just restructuring of the whole story-tell of the course would be more effective. | 1) assume that the profs are very | Good | 1) too, just restructuring of the whole | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | Great teachers, good body gesticulation. | 1) Great teachers, | Good | 1) body gesticulation. | 5.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | 1) quality of the content is very | Good | 1) However, the content should be more | 4.0 |
| 4tHoAq3EEeSk9iIAC49U6w | The quality of the content is very good. However, the content should be more detailed. Further, certain key subject-areas are missing such as the fashion calendar, quality control, merchandising, cool-hunting and forecasting, market research, event management, public relations management, retail operations in more detail, logistics, store operations etc. Overall, however, the course is a good overview about managing fashion and luxury companies. Moreover, interviews with CEOs and brand directors would make the course more interesting. | 2) Overall, however, the course is a | Good | 2) overview about managing fashion and luxury | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | A good introduction to computational aspects of bioinformatics. However, the pace of the course might seem too low if you have a strong computer science background. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to computational aspects of bioinformatics. | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | It's good, but I would prefer that the python was taught within the course. | 1) It's | Good | 1) but I would prefer that the | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Very good course, and very similar to the first course of the Bioinformatics Specialization. However be warned, it takes a lot of time and effort to complete this course (definitely more than 10 hours a week). | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, and very similar to the | 5.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | VERY GOOD. CONGRATS! | 1) VERY | Good | 1) CONGRATS! | 4.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | An excellent course that is a great opportunity for anyone interested in bioinformatics, no previous experience is necessary but either a biological, mathematical or computing background will give you advantages in certain areas. Being a biologist I struggled at first and many of you may do the same but stick with it, work hard on it and you will be rewarded and it is incredibly satisfying. Due to the practical coding nature of the course, each week can take up a lot of you time. Best if you have a few weeks free (e.g. a graduate student like me) so you can spend a few whole days of it but could be done before/after work if you are motivated and plug away at it each day - just something to keep in mind though, don't expect a light easy 1 hour a week course, it is intensive but in a good way. It can get frustrating, you will want to give up time and time again....but stick at it and you will have a shiny new Coursera certificate and a wealth of programming knowledge under your belt once you finish! A massive two thumbs up for this course, one of the best ones out there that gives you real worthwhile skills that employers and academia want. Thanks to all the course staff for a great experience! | 1) it is intensive but in a | Good | 1) way. It can get frustrating, you | 5.0 |
| 4vLX1NAeEeWihQ6ogHC6vQ | Stepic issues with not syncing progress and assignment completion. All else was good. Well paced. | 1) and assignment completion. All else was | Good | 1) Well paced. | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It was awesome course, helped me to get through all topics of Angular JS and assignments gave me very good grip on Angular coding. Thanks much. | 1) JS and assignments gave me very | Good | 1) grip on Angular coding. Thanks much. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Super good start for people without any javascript experience. But you will need more in real life :) | 1) Super | Good | 1) start for people without any javascript | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course, go ahead | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, go ahead | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | it is good , but some items needs to be illustrated in more details , a great thing of this course is that it gives a lot of practice exercises | 1) it is | Good | 1) , but some items needs to | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | really good course for beginners who are stepping in the Angular JS. | 1) really | Good | 1) course for beginners who are stepping | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The tutor is exceptionally good. It included all the sources for documentation but I felt I learned more from by reading the Angularjs official documentation than from this course. Assignments covered a variety of concepts. | 1) The tutor is exceptionally | Good | 1) It included all the sources for | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Quite a good experience. | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) experience. | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very complete course, good teacher on my first experience with coursera, really great ! | 1) Very complete course, | Good | 1) teacher on my first experience with | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I am a bit disappointed by this course. I was expecting a more fast paced course with more information regarding Angular. Unfortunately in the videos there is a lot of time spent on unnecessary details and reading out loud the source code. The exercises are quite basic and they did not pose real challenges - except for errors coming from mismatched packages or mistakes in configuration files. Also I think that the level of support provided by the mentors of this course is lacking. Mentors are quite absent and very late in providing any help in the forums so the students have to kind of counsel one another - that is sometimes good but a proper class also requires a good level of supervision. All in all I think this is an OK course that is mostly geared to the uninitiated. It needs some serious work to make it a great course. | 1) one another - that is sometimes | Good | 1) but a proper class also requires | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I am a bit disappointed by this course. I was expecting a more fast paced course with more information regarding Angular. Unfortunately in the videos there is a lot of time spent on unnecessary details and reading out loud the source code. The exercises are quite basic and they did not pose real challenges - except for errors coming from mismatched packages or mistakes in configuration files. Also I think that the level of support provided by the mentors of this course is lacking. Mentors are quite absent and very late in providing any help in the forums so the students have to kind of counsel one another - that is sometimes good but a proper class also requires a good level of supervision. All in all I think this is an OK course that is mostly geared to the uninitiated. It needs some serious work to make it a great course. | 2) a proper class also requires a | Good | 2) level of supervision. All in all | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Course for angular JS | 1) | Good | 1) Course for angular JS | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | a great course and good instructor. | 1) a great course and | Good | 1) instructor. | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great Course for angular 1.x for angular newbies.It includes almost all the angular basic concept,including module,controller,service,filter,directive,view,data model,expressions,two way binding,dependency injection.And also this course provides a good full example illustrating how to use angular CRUD app.However,finishing this course is far from being proficient in angular developing,you should keep practicing more and find more resources from angular official websites. | 1) And also this course provides a | Good | 1) full example illustrating how to use | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a lot better than trying to learn the methods and information on my own without an instructor. I feel very empowered. In any case, the course was a very good brain workout. | 1) case, the course was a very | Good | 1) brain workout. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A wonderful course! Good theory with coll practices! | 1) A wonderful course! | Good | 1) theory with coll practices! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course, very informative | 1) | Good | 1) course, very informative | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course was just fine. Some of the lectures were really good while some lectures were really confusing. The good thing is that course provides excellent resources for further exploring the topics in the course. So i had to consult these additional resources when i find lectures confusing. Course Assignments were really simple. Hardly any assignment took me more than an hour to complete. | 1) Some of the lectures were really | Good | 1) while some lectures were really confusing. | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course was just fine. Some of the lectures were really good while some lectures were really confusing. The good thing is that course provides excellent resources for further exploring the topics in the course. So i had to consult these additional resources when i find lectures confusing. Course Assignments were really simple. Hardly any assignment took me more than an hour to complete. | 2) some lectures were really confusing. The | Good | 2) thing is that course provides excellent | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Examples are clear, very good introductory course. Can using w3schoool as reference | 1) Examples are clear, very | Good | 1) introductory course. Can using w3schoool as | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I like this course for some reasons: - a lot of understandable theory; - good practical tasks; - understandable and detailed speech of teacher. | 1) a lot of understandable theory; - | Good | 1) practical tasks; - understandable and detailed | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good quality content and great instructor. I recommend it! It does not cover though a very important feature from angular: directives. | 1) | Good | 1) quality content and great instructor. I | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall the course is very good but it gets trickier the further you go, specially if you have no experience in this area whatsoever... Take it from someone who's first contact with Web Development was the first course in this Specialization: "HTML, CSS & JavaScript". My advice to students in a similar situation is to look for other sources of information as well and try to experiment with your code as the lessons go by so you can really grasp the meaning of the pieces of code you're writing. Eventually, they'll start to make sense :-) | 1) Overall the course is very | Good | 1) but it gets trickier the further | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good course to help me start with angular and javascript frame work learning! | 1) very | Good | 1) course to help me start with | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good one. Like the "Bloomers" at the end of some videos. | 1) | Good | 1) one. Like the " Bloomers" at | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good course for Angular JS. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for Angular JS. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Had good content but description was a like scattered manner. It could have better if explanation should be in fluent manner. | 1) Had | Good | 1) content but description was a like | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course, with much to learn. By applying step by step every aspect of the course was for me very helpful. I hope more and more courses to follow this example. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, with much to learn. By | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | not good as usual one, the code you provided can not work, I had to debug again and the instructions for the assignments are not concrete as the last two courses | 1) not | Good | 1) as usual one, the code you | 1.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | also, good course but not free to access the assignment | 1) also, | Good | 1) course but not free to access | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very Nice Course. Takes us through everything and enables us with basic promised objective. Good Luck to Course creators, keep adding more to it. | 1) enables us with basic promised objective. | Good | 1) Luck to Course creators, keep adding | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good. i liked this course. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) i liked this course. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. I had a lot of fun. Structure of the course is very good. | 1) Structure of the course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The teacher is very good! He explains very well and the material is very carefully prepared. Great Course! | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) He explains very well and the | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good introduction to AngularJS, but falls short on connecting the dots in places. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to AngularJS, but falls short | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It was really a extremely good course. | 1) It was really a extremely | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pros: a lot of good content, worth 8 weeks of study, so good bang for the buck. Takes modular approach, where things are gradually taken apart and shown how to improve using another Angular module or approach. Cons: can be a little academical, very time-intensive. I have a much better understanding now of MVC concept using JS framework. | 1) Pros: a lot of | Good | 1) content, worth 8 weeks of study, | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pros: a lot of good content, worth 8 weeks of study, so good bang for the buck. Takes modular approach, where things are gradually taken apart and shown how to improve using another Angular module or approach. Cons: can be a little academical, very time-intensive. I have a much better understanding now of MVC concept using JS framework. | 2) worth 8 weeks of study, so | Good | 2) bang for the buck. Takes modular | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. Absolutely recommendable. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Absolutely recommendable. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | So good i love it so much . Thank you | 1) So | Good | 1) i love it so much . | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is deceivingly full of content. If you want to get through this course you need to have a lot of time on your hands because of the shear amount of debugs your code will produce even if you follow the steps to the letter. So many things are taught over a 4 week period that if you do not do the extra reading to understand what is happening you will get an overview of angularjs, bower, gulp, grunt, yo, yeoman and so on without really knowing how to use any of these tools again. Also because of the number of interdependent parts to the application you create, when the professor decides to give you one of the html or js files again to do an assignment, chances are everything will break and you will spend a long time figuring out which variables' names have been changed and blabla... The professor does not give you a good basis for debugging your code, you need to modify the set up of gulp to show understandable stack traces to figure out what is going wrong. If you want a challenging course where you have to go the extra mile learning things from documentation and blogs to substitute the lack of detail in order to complete the course, than this is the course for you! I think this course needs to be restructured and the length increased to 6 weeks instead of 4, with more detailed content and understand of each tool and especially more on angularjs | 1) professor does not give you a | Good | 1) basis for debugging your code, you | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course and teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and teacher! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good. Thank you | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thank you | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good :D | 1) | Good | 1) :D | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course.. Assignments should be independent of lectures to test understanding. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. . Assignments should be independent | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a good course to know AngulerJS | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course to know AngulerJS | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is very good, the teacher very clear, easy to follow. In yet it is a basic course | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) the teacher very clear, easy to | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really the best!!! But It will be good if lecture includes some errors we can make and silly mistakes which affects results adversely. Jogesh sir is very good teacher and he is clear and brief in less time | 1) ! ! But It will be | Good | 1) if lecture includes some errors we | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really the best!!! But It will be good if lecture includes some errors we can make and silly mistakes which affects results adversely. Jogesh sir is very good teacher and he is clear and brief in less time | 2) results adversely. Jogesh sir is very | Good | 2) teacher and he is clear and | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very very good course!! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Takes a bit of time to get adjusted to the workflow. It's a bit trial and error, especially if your using Windows. Best bet is to use a unix-terminal so if you have windows use a terminal like Git Bash. Overall it's a very good course and gets you into the meat and bones of Web Development. Just remember to come with patience and do things on time :). | 1) Git Bash. Overall it's a very | Good | 1) course and gets you into the | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I really enjoyed this course; it has given me a really good platform of AngularJS to build upon. | 1) it has given me a really | Good | 1) platform of AngularJS to build upon. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | it 's amzing AngularJS's course and a good teacher ... Thank you | 1) 's amzing AngularJS's course and a | Good | 1) teacher . . . Thank you | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good to begin with Angular | 1) | Good | 1) to begin with Angular | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pity that people had to spend more time on making the plugins work than actually doing the exercises/assignments but good content nonetheless. | 1) than actually doing the exercises/assignments but | Good | 1) content nonetheless. | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I will rate this course 5 star.. it contains good explanation of all MVC components in angular Everyone related to the feild of web designing should do this course Thank you ,prof. Jogesh K. Muppala | 1) course 5 star. . it contains | Good | 1) explanation of all MVC components in | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course overall. It could dig into a little more detail but given the duration and workload it's still pretty good. I think it's targeted towards people who are either working or studying full-time and taking this on the side. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course overall. It could dig into | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course overall. It could dig into a little more detail but given the duration and workload it's still pretty good. I think it's targeted towards people who are either working or studying full-time and taking this on the side. | 2) duration and workload it's still pretty | Good | 2) I think it's targeted towards people | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall, this is a very effective introduction to AngularJS. AngularJS can be intimidating or confusing, and this course is largely an introduction, but the videos and exercises do a great job of letting you get over the initial learning curve. This course will give you a thorough foundation in AngularJS, way better than any other free course online, and will give you an idea of where you can go off and explore on your own if you're interested in going on to develop intermediate skills. My only critique of this course is that I really had to explore the "additional materials" at the end of each section to get a grasp of some of the concepts. I found that some of the videos oversimplified pretty complicated subjects and weren't thorough enough to allow you to complete some of the exercises. I also think the course briefly introduces some pretty complicated tools too early to new developers and doesn't do a good job of explaining their value (like Grunt and Gulp). However, this course is still amazing for a free course. If you've done any of the quick tutorials in AngularJS (like codeacademy's), you've really only scratched the surface of AngularJS. A hands-on course like this give you a much better foundation. To conclude, despite it's minor flaws, this is still the best free introduction to AngularJS online today. Good luck! | 1) new developers and doesn't do a | Good | 1) job of explaining their value (like | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall, this is a very effective introduction to AngularJS. AngularJS can be intimidating or confusing, and this course is largely an introduction, but the videos and exercises do a great job of letting you get over the initial learning curve. This course will give you a thorough foundation in AngularJS, way better than any other free course online, and will give you an idea of where you can go off and explore on your own if you're interested in going on to develop intermediate skills. My only critique of this course is that I really had to explore the "additional materials" at the end of each section to get a grasp of some of the concepts. I found that some of the videos oversimplified pretty complicated subjects and weren't thorough enough to allow you to complete some of the exercises. I also think the course briefly introduces some pretty complicated tools too early to new developers and doesn't do a good job of explaining their value (like Grunt and Gulp). However, this course is still amazing for a free course. If you've done any of the quick tutorials in AngularJS (like codeacademy's), you've really only scratched the surface of AngularJS. A hands-on course like this give you a much better foundation. To conclude, despite it's minor flaws, this is still the best free introduction to AngularJS online today. Good luck! | 2) free introduction to AngularJS online today. | Good | 2) luck! | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great combination of theory and practical, gives good understanding of angular and framework. | 1) combination of theory and practical, gives | Good | 1) understanding of angular and framework. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Professor's lecture is pretty good, and assignment is well designed. | 1) Professor's lecture is pretty | Good | 1) and assignment is well designed. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is very good. My only point of concern is the installation procedures of packages, where the instructor either is installing an old package or not using any new installation procedures causing students to have a whole lot of issues with setting up their development environment | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) My only point of concern is | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really good course to get your feet wet! A good mix of theory and exercises. Loved it! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course to get your feet wet! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really good course to get your feet wet! A good mix of theory and exercises. Loved it! | 2) to get your feet wet! A | Good | 2) mix of theory and exercises. Loved | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is good only for newbies and very high-level. No advanced info about Angrular. No tricks. No info about custom directives, $watch, digest cycle, etc. I had expected more detailed course | 1) This course is | Good | 1) only for newbies and very high-level. | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | a very good introduction to angularJS | 1) a very | Good | 1) introduction to angularJS | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Angular exercises. But I think that testing should get its own segment. Becomes a bit lengthy with 30 min videos and only scraping the surface on the subject. | 1) | Good | 1) Angular exercises. But I think that | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course and very pleasant Professor ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and very pleasant Professor ! | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent Course. Good teaching and coverage of wide range of topics. | 1) Excellent Course. | Good | 1) teaching and coverage of wide range | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good overview and step by step dive into this javascript framework. The instructor knows how to deliver one piece of information at a time and with simple exercices to put it into practice. The assignments are not very hard, but they give you confidence in what you have learned. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview and step by step dive | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. Gived me a good knowledge and understanding of an AngularJs. I would like to take all the courses of this specialisation. | 1) Great course. Gived me a | Good | 1) knowledge and understanding of an AngularJs. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good lesson! With good material and good explanation of everything! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lesson! With good material and good | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good lesson! With good material and good explanation of everything! | 2) Very good lesson! With | Good | 2) material and good explanation of everything! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good lesson! With good material and good explanation of everything! | 3) good lesson! With good material and | Good | 3) explanation of everything! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very good course.I did not have such an experience even in the classroom.The course was fantastic.Thank you from the heart to all teachers and the coursera community. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. I did not have such | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really good course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good quality | 1) | Good | 1) quality | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good explanation with examples. Few examples need changes in gulp file to run and view the output. For beginners, it may be tough to understand and make changes. Please handle it. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation with examples. Few examples need | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Was very difficult to follow. This is a complex subject and the prof is trying his best, but there are times the explanation is not sufficient. Instructions for installing gulp was not good. I was unable to complete the following exercises after gulp installation failed. Instruction needs to be short and crisp. Building on top of each other project has its negative. There must be solution at the end or at least a check point where you can start clean for the next project. | 1) Instructions for installing gulp was not | Good | 1) I was unable to complete the | 2.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Course. Cleared lots of doubts I had about Angular. Respect the professor. Thank you very much. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. Cleared lots of doubts I | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course for the introduction to Angular JS | 1) | Good | 1) course for the introduction to Angular | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good and useful course! Try it! | 1) | Good | 1) and useful course! Try it! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very interesting course and very well structured. The subjects are handled with the correct depth corresponding to its importance. The indicated time spent by week corresponds accurately to the time needed, if you have some previous experience in web development. The exercises are focused in the important details and very well organized. If you have interest in client side web development and particularly in Angular, this is a very good opportunity to learn. Probably in a near future this course must be updated to cover Angular 2.0. It really worth the time spent! | 1) in Angular, this is a very | Good | 1) opportunity to learn. Probably in a | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | As the rest of the courser, this one is another example of a good job | 1) one is another example of a | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. I learned a lot about Angular JS and much more. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I learned a lot about | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, especially good is coverent grunt and gulp which is very useful, also angular is covered very well for start. I learned a lot, even if i have some of angular knowledge. | 1) | Good | 1) course, especially good is coverent grunt | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, especially good is coverent grunt and gulp which is very useful, also angular is covered very well for start. I learned a lot, even if i have some of angular knowledge. | 2) Good course, especially | Good | 2) is coverent grunt and gulp which | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course and very good explanations of the concepts. | 1) Great course and very | Good | 1) explanations of the concepts. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good teacher and good hard working course | 1) very | Good | 1) teacher and good hard working course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good teacher and good hard working course | 2) very good teacher and | Good | 2) hard working course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is very well done and gives a very good understanding of angular framework. | 1) well done and gives a very | Good | 1) understanding of angular framework. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I think it's a very good introduction to AngularJS. You learn and understand what you're doing in almost lessons. I'd hardly recommend it to any beginner !!! I found that the 4rth week was very very compressed. You could spend 1 more week explaining all the Front-End tools such as Gulp, Grunt, Yo (Yeoman) etc. And go deeper with the AngularJS as well. In some points I felt myself alone with no teacher support regardless there's a students forum. I'd improve the transparency and the communication teacher-student. Anyway I very happy to spent that time on this course he explains really paciently :D | 1) I think it's a very | Good | 1) introduction to AngularJS. You learn and | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course as for me! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course as for me! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course, just a few notes short of excelence. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, just a few notes short | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I liked this course, especially in the way is built. The subject was not so easy but anyway, thanks to the organization of lectures and exercises, i was able to achieve the target. The teacher is good and clear in the explanation. | 1) achieve the target. The teacher is | Good | 1) and clear in the explanation. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Although a good introduction course, sometime is focus on javascript tools rather than on AngularJS itself which, in hand, looses time and doesn't explain/give examples on how to create directives and filters, which are two core functionalities of this framework. | 1) Although a | Good | 1) introduction course, sometime is focus on | 3.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pretty good coverage of Angular as whole, how to setup a Angular project, and how it fits into bigger picture web development. Criticisms: - Overall, the code presentation (in exercises, provided files, and the slides) was ugly. Good looking and properly styled code is important to ingrain, and this course fell pretty short there. Code was (very) poorly indented, had inconsistent single vs. double quotes, and didn't follow any style guide out there. Use some beautifier and make sure jshint doesn't have any suggestions for improvement! Slides need at least some monospaced font; better would be colored code snippets or screenshots. - The Gulp and Grunt week felt pretty strangely structured. The two task runners just had such long lectures videos that it was a really big hump to get over, especially since we didn't use Grunt later. - (harder to fix) My files got pretty inconsistent with what I needed to copy/download over week-by-week from the course. Some sort of git repository and easier way to pull changes would be good. I ended up version controlling every week and every week's assignment. So yeah, I'd say this was worth taking, but some parts of the setup are pretty frustrating and version controlling makes life much easier. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) coverage of Angular as whole, how | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pretty good coverage of Angular as whole, how to setup a Angular project, and how it fits into bigger picture web development. Criticisms: - Overall, the code presentation (in exercises, provided files, and the slides) was ugly. Good looking and properly styled code is important to ingrain, and this course fell pretty short there. Code was (very) poorly indented, had inconsistent single vs. double quotes, and didn't follow any style guide out there. Use some beautifier and make sure jshint doesn't have any suggestions for improvement! Slides need at least some monospaced font; better would be colored code snippets or screenshots. - The Gulp and Grunt week felt pretty strangely structured. The two task runners just had such long lectures videos that it was a really big hump to get over, especially since we didn't use Grunt later. - (harder to fix) My files got pretty inconsistent with what I needed to copy/download over week-by-week from the course. Some sort of git repository and easier way to pull changes would be good. I ended up version controlling every week and every week's assignment. So yeah, I'd say this was worth taking, but some parts of the setup are pretty frustrating and version controlling makes life much easier. | 2) files, and the slides) was ugly. | Good | 2) looking and properly styled code is | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Pretty good coverage of Angular as whole, how to setup a Angular project, and how it fits into bigger picture web development. Criticisms: - Overall, the code presentation (in exercises, provided files, and the slides) was ugly. Good looking and properly styled code is important to ingrain, and this course fell pretty short there. Code was (very) poorly indented, had inconsistent single vs. double quotes, and didn't follow any style guide out there. Use some beautifier and make sure jshint doesn't have any suggestions for improvement! Slides need at least some monospaced font; better would be colored code snippets or screenshots. - The Gulp and Grunt week felt pretty strangely structured. The two task runners just had such long lectures videos that it was a really big hump to get over, especially since we didn't use Grunt later. - (harder to fix) My files got pretty inconsistent with what I needed to copy/download over week-by-week from the course. Some sort of git repository and easier way to pull changes would be good. I ended up version controlling every week and every week's assignment. So yeah, I'd say this was worth taking, but some parts of the setup are pretty frustrating and version controlling makes life much easier. | 3) way to pull changes would be | Good | 3) I ended up version controlling every | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course had some rough spots here and there, but taking it as a whole, I still give it 5 stars. Why? a) The professor. Professor Jogesh has a great sense of humour and was entertaining enough to keep the classes lively and entertaining to the end. (Even if I did play the video at 2x speed most of the time :) b) The forums. There were a lot of experienced dudes on the forums who were willing to help out with bugs and any configuration issues. The professor also appeared on the forums from time to time. That's gold dust when learning a topic for the first time. c) Depth and pace of coverage. A lot of different topics were introduced and covered well enough for me to be able to use them in my projects and to further explore them without feeling overwhelmed. d) The assignments. They were not too daunting, but were excellent to drive home key points covered in the lectures. e) Peer review of assignments. I learnt some good techniques by reviewing the code of more experienced fellow classmates taking the course. f) Most important of all, the structure and pace of the course were balanced well enough for me to stay with it and to feel that I'd learnt a lot by its end. You will not be an AngularJS expert after 4 weeks, but will have covered relevant subtopics in enough depth to be able to progress further with confidence. | 1) review of assignments. I learnt some | Good | 1) techniques by reviewing the code of | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thank you Professor Muppala. I learned lot of thinks and enjoyed this course.I was able to complete all the assignment with the help of this tutorials.It is organized in a very good manner. | 1) It is organized in a very | Good | 1) manner. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good Course , professor makes course very easy. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course , professor makes course very | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is good course to learn Angular JS for beginner. It explained well how to use web tools with angular and how to start with it. | 1) It is | Good | 1) course to learn Angular JS for | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very useful material, the professor teaches it at a good pace and at an easy to understand level, the exercises are easy to follow and replicating the professor's steps is very simple (except for the Gulp steps, but that's not graded anyway), so you can follow how he did what he did | 1) the professor teaches it at a | Good | 1) pace and at an easy to | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a good course to start with this technology | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course to start with this technology | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | After completion I got a pretty good understanding about AngularJS and its features. | 1) After completion I got a pretty | Good | 1) understanding about AngularJS and its features. | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very very very very good course. I learned quite a lot from it. Thanks Professor. | 1) very very very very | Good | 1) course. I learned quite a lot | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good introduction to AngularJS. Moreover their provide a wide variety of additional information related to the course, which is very useful to enlarge the basic contents studied. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to AngularJS. Moreover their provide | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. It allows to learn the basics of angular js very fast and easily. I only missed a little more of content in directives scopes, but here you can learn a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It allows to learn the | 4.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course and very well organized. Is a must if you want you want to learn angular from the begining. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and very well organized. Is | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course!! Easy to follow..course organisation is really good. :-) | 1) follow. . course organisation is really | Good | 1) :-) | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good tutorials... | 1) Very | Good | 1) tutorials. . . | 5.0 |
| 52blABnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I was able to grasp the overview of the course. The instructions are delivered well and the flow seems in order. However my lack of background with the topic discussed cause me to stop watching everything. Plus, I can't do the said assignment because I am a beginning on this topic. it seems this is not a course for me to rate based on content. However I will rate it in terms of the aesthetic, organization or structure of the slides . The organization of the content of the slides needs to be properly organized. Long paragraphs are a pain to read. Further when comparing, two concepts, it is easier to comprehend when they are in table form. For instance in FrontEnd JavaScript Framework Overview video, it is better in terms of organization and aesthetic to show library vs. framework in table form. Also, the volume of Introduction to AngularJS video is too loud. Though I can adjust it and lower the volume, but sudden high volume sound is discouraging when the next video has normal volume causing me to adjust it again. I was only able to watch few of the videos but they are good. Just a little improvement needed. | 1) of the videos but they are | Good | 1) Just a little improvement needed. | 3.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Topics related to the economy or business are not something I am good at or enjoy reading about, this course helped me learn a bunch of useful things I would otherwise not have put effort into studying. | 1) business are not something I am | Good | 1) at or enjoy reading about, this | 4.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | If you are interested in having a deeper insight of the 3D printing technology, I recommend this course. There are no prerequisites, all you need is the desire to learn. This course will introduce to to you the different 3D manufacturing methods, and present to you to 3D printing companies that are presently actively. If you want to transitions into the 3D printing field, I believe this course is a good start. | 1) I believe this course is a | Good | 1) start. | 5.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Very good inspirational examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) inspirational examples. | 5.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | good introduction into the applications of 3D printing. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into the applications of 3D | 3.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | good overview what you can do with this amazing technology. | 1) | Good | 1) overview what you can do with | 5.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Very good in-depth look at the potential applications for 3D printing. I especially liked the sections on development and education. This class gets you thinking about the potential ramifications of 3D printing and how it can change the economy, both locally and globally. | 1) Very | Good | 1) in-depth look at the potential applications | 4.0 |
| 58H3s7ZHEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | A good course to see the various market and non-profit aspects of 3D printing. Lot of examples and initiatives, a | 1) A | Good | 1) course to see the various market | 5.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | Is a good course, with a comprenhensible material and resourses. I think they should improve the quility of video-classes and some teachers doesn´t have good english pronunciation. | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course, with a comprenhensible material and | 5.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | Is a good course, with a comprenhensible material and resourses. I think they should improve the quility of video-classes and some teachers doesn´t have good english pronunciation. | 2) video-classes and some teachers doesn´t have | Good | 2) english pronunciation. | 5.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | I find this to be a very nice and stimulating course. The teachers are enthusiastic and entertaining. The course material (slides, quizzes, captions) needs to be polished, but the general organization of the course is logical, clear, and systematic. The course presents an experimentalist's view of the subject, which I find very good considering that much related Coursera material is quite theoretical. There are plenty of historical notes and introductions of general neurobiology research viewpoints (don't miss the excellent bonus material interviews!). In particular, I enjoyed the "cherry picking" metaphor. Some students have had problems with the instructors' accent, but perhaps because English is not my first language, this has not been a problem for me at all. I'm looking forward to part two of the course! | 1) the subject, which I find very | Good | 1) considering that much related Coursera material | 4.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | This course is useless and perhaps even harmful. The professors would have done much better if they had taught the class in their native Chinese language and then got a really good translator to make subtitles in English. I tried turning off the sound and just watching the presentation while reading the subtitles, but even this was so badly done in terms of language and presentation, that although I desperately wanted to take a course in advanced neurobiology, I felt that this course could actually destroy my love for the subject or teach me things that are incorrect because of language mistakes. If you are not a native speaker of English then by all means steer even further clear as you will learn some very bad English habits and pronunciation. I'm sure the profs' English ability is fine for collaborating with other professionals who already know the material, but teaching in English was a big mistake. Again, I highly suggest they re-do the entire thing in Chinese and get really good translations and subtitles made and then I think it could be an awesome course. Now, as is, it would be truly foolish to take this course. | 1) language and then got a really | Good | 1) translator to make subtitles in English. | 1.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | This course is useless and perhaps even harmful. The professors would have done much better if they had taught the class in their native Chinese language and then got a really good translator to make subtitles in English. I tried turning off the sound and just watching the presentation while reading the subtitles, but even this was so badly done in terms of language and presentation, that although I desperately wanted to take a course in advanced neurobiology, I felt that this course could actually destroy my love for the subject or teach me things that are incorrect because of language mistakes. If you are not a native speaker of English then by all means steer even further clear as you will learn some very bad English habits and pronunciation. I'm sure the profs' English ability is fine for collaborating with other professionals who already know the material, but teaching in English was a big mistake. Again, I highly suggest they re-do the entire thing in Chinese and get really good translations and subtitles made and then I think it could be an awesome course. Now, as is, it would be truly foolish to take this course. | 2) thing in Chinese and get really | Good | 2) translations and subtitles made and then | 1.0 |
| 5AYG1NbQEeWEOQ7ZE5jC0Q | Lots of good information, but the presentation is very bad. Not only are the professors clearly struggling with the English (and the material, calling anatomical planes "plates" and confounding sulci with fissures, etc), but some of the recording/video editing decisions make it less engaging and more difficult to follow. For example, the size of the images is often compromised because they chose to show the professor on the left side of the screen, even though it is absolutely unnecessary to do so. Overall, I do not recommend this course. | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) information, but the presentation is very | 1.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | Fantastic! Good work that the teacher can compact the course section to less than 10-minute videos each week, and it is clear. Easy to grasp . . . help a lot for my initial study! MLA format and work cited page are great too . . . thanks! | 1) Fantastic! | Good | 1) work that the teacher can compact | 4.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | Very easy steps to learn. lot of assignments to practice. Good work. Thank you. | 1) learn. lot of assignments to practice. | Good | 1) work. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | It has good content, but there were missing classes to give more advices or clear any question students have, when grading peer review homeworks there were plenty of mistakes that would have been avoided if there were more video lectures or forums with teachers. | 1) It has | Good | 1) content, but there were missing classes | 3.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | so good. must be engaged | 1) so | Good | 1) must be engaged | 5.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | At this point, I think that the course is good, however there should be more reviews. Three reviews of people who is also learning is not enough, in my opinion. I have received some comments like 'some sentences are not good'. Which tells me absolutely nothing. I think people should be encouraged to exemplify what they mean ,to take the sentences that they believe that are wrong, and extend why. For the rest, the course is very good. | 1) I think that the course is | Good | 1) however there should be more reviews. | 4.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | At this point, I think that the course is good, however there should be more reviews. Three reviews of people who is also learning is not enough, in my opinion. I have received some comments like 'some sentences are not good'. Which tells me absolutely nothing. I think people should be encouraged to exemplify what they mean ,to take the sentences that they believe that are wrong, and extend why. For the rest, the course is very good. | 2) comments like 'some sentences are not | Good | 2) Which tells me absolutely nothing. I | 4.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | At this point, I think that the course is good, however there should be more reviews. Three reviews of people who is also learning is not enough, in my opinion. I have received some comments like 'some sentences are not good'. Which tells me absolutely nothing. I think people should be encouraged to exemplify what they mean ,to take the sentences that they believe that are wrong, and extend why. For the rest, the course is very good. | 3) the rest, the course is very | Good | 3) | 4.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | I am in love for this course, a lot of good information, practice activities, etc... It is helping me a lot! | 1) for this course, a lot of | Good | 1) information, practice activities, etc. . . | 5.0 |
| 5c9BeiTUEeW3AhKilvRZ0Q | nice things to do and good examples. | 1) nice things to do and | Good | 1) examples. | 4.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | This is a great course for those who are thinking about a career in HR. It is also serves a good refresher for current managers. | 1) HR. It is also serves a | Good | 1) refresher for current managers. | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Just taking part of the course material was rewarding. A good basic introduction to HRM | 1) the course material was rewarding. A | Good | 1) basic introduction to HRM | 4.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | a good one for gaining more knowledge regarding managing people | 1) a | Good | 1) one for gaining more knowledge regarding | 3.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good for learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for learning. | 4.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good to learn! | 1) | Good | 1) to learn! | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good overview on HR. Only one comment - would it be possible to add to the law part another perspective than the US perspective? For participants from other countries it would be great to have some general insights to i.e. European regulations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview on HR. Only one comment | 5.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 5D-g-HEiEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Overall good course. I would appreciate if the slides could've been provided. Also some external resources to further study of the topics covered would add value. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course. I would appreciate if the | 4.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | good course with detailed information. I enjoyed by part of this. | 1) | Good | 1) course with detailed information. I enjoyed | 5.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | This is an outstanding course which covers such a wide range of energies including wind solar, and a large variety of bio-fuels. I was impressed with the selection of different presenters who were all specialists in their field. The level of technical detail is appropriate for a layman while being quite in depth. In fact in some cases one might feel overwhelmed but this was intended in order to give a good feeling of the innovative technologies, problems and futures. It was good to review the well known energy sources like nuclear, hydro, fracking, corn ethanol, etc, but I would say most people are unaware of all these alternative sources of energy such as from various plants, algae to make bio-fuels or electricity. The questionnaires were both helpful in forcing one to pay sufficient attention even if sometimes they are near impossible to get 20 on 20. Also I thought the interviews were especially well prepared and helpful to recall the basic material presented. Bravo | 1) intended in order to give a | Good | 1) feeling of the innovative technologies, problems | 5.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | This is an outstanding course which covers such a wide range of energies including wind solar, and a large variety of bio-fuels. I was impressed with the selection of different presenters who were all specialists in their field. The level of technical detail is appropriate for a layman while being quite in depth. In fact in some cases one might feel overwhelmed but this was intended in order to give a good feeling of the innovative technologies, problems and futures. It was good to review the well known energy sources like nuclear, hydro, fracking, corn ethanol, etc, but I would say most people are unaware of all these alternative sources of energy such as from various plants, algae to make bio-fuels or electricity. The questionnaires were both helpful in forcing one to pay sufficient attention even if sometimes they are near impossible to get 20 on 20. Also I thought the interviews were especially well prepared and helpful to recall the basic material presented. Bravo | 2) technologies, problems and futures. It was | Good | 2) to review the well known energy | 5.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | Very good, informative course. A broad field of science is included, from biotech to sociology, and lots of information. Recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) informative course. A broad field of | 5.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | Very good and interesting overall, the slides are very helpful. The only thing for me is that it's going a bit fast sometimes. The content can be quite technical and for a social science graduate like myself it would be nice if some very technical things could be explained just tiny bit more. But overall it's understandable and clearly done. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting overall, the slides are | 4.0 |
| 5epfT7cBEeScDCIAC9REiQ | A very good course. I totally recommend it for those who want to get some insight into the world of energy from different perspectives. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. I totally recommend it for | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | So far so good! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | This course is brilliant and the lecturer is a very good speaker. | 1) and the lecturer is a very | Good | 1) speaker. | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | It would be nice with more than [Ted the HVAC tech] to clear things up, he is hard to relate to if you have another kind of software you want to develop. Othervise i really like the methods and the videos, the teacher is easy to understand, he has good points and is good at explaning his material. | 1) is easy to understand, he has | Good | 1) points and is good at explaning | 4.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | It would be nice with more than [Ted the HVAC tech] to clear things up, he is hard to relate to if you have another kind of software you want to develop. Othervise i really like the methods and the videos, the teacher is easy to understand, he has good points and is good at explaning his material. | 2) he has good points and is | Good | 2) at explaning his material. | 4.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Recommend this course as a good introduction. User Stories is most valuable part. | 1) Recommend this course as a | Good | 1) introduction. User Stories is most valuable | 4.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good course. Introduce you to agile methodology, and show how to do first steps in agile development. Also the is excellent, interesting assignment project | 1) | Good | 1) course. Introduce you to agile methodology, | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good content easily explained with practical approach. Recommended | 1) | Good | 1) content easily explained with practical approach. | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good introduction, goes deep enough with good examples | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, goes deep enough with good | 5.0 |
| 5g_hAYo4EeWTzg6WBWinhQ | Good introduction, goes deep enough with good examples | 2) Good introduction, goes deep enough with | Good | 2) examples | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good course. It was my start in Coursera. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It was my start in | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | very good and up to date. This is one of the best courses I ever taken. Thank you so much | 1) very | Good | 1) and up to date. This is | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Really good for free. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for free. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This is an excellent course. Very clear lectures with good real world examples. Highly recommended! | 1) excellent course. Very clear lectures with | Good | 1) real world examples. Highly recommended! | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | well structured, engaging, educating with good use of modern communicaton tools | 1) well structured, engaging, educating with | Good | 1) use of modern communicaton tools | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Really good! | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | The course was a great experience for a coursera beginner like me. The reader explained the issues with good examples and used descriptive use cases. The only problem I had was that some of the exams are broke down my browser, but I think that this was a problem between coursera and IE11. | 1) The reader explained the issues with | Good | 1) examples and used descriptive use cases. | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good course. Easy to follow and served in adequate portions. Lots of examples and very didacting format that builds on the knowledge. Excellent intro to competitive strategy. thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Easy to follow and served | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent perspective of competitive strategy in general. The lecturer was very articulate and gave insightful anecdotes to all the concepts being taught. Very good for developing business thinking on the fly with all the different considerations. Suggestion would be to create a end of course case project. | 1) all the concepts being taught. Very | Good | 1) for developing business thinking on the | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | This is an interesting course with inspiring strategical thoughts for many real-life scenarios. Good for both new comers for business strategies and seasoned strategists to recap the most important theories and actual applications. Highly recommended! | 1) strategical thoughts for many real-life scenarios. | Good | 1) for both new comers for business | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent course. Very good content and the instructor is excellent, explaining concepts and using very clear examples. Thanks! | 1) Excellent course. Very | Good | 1) content and the instructor is excellent, | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very much enjoyed the course; the instructor used good examples and the content was relevant and aligned well with the subject matter. Enough examples and quizzes to reinforce the theories. I'm looking forward to follow-up with the 2nd course. | 1) enjoyed the course; the instructor used | Good | 1) examples and the content was relevant | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | really good! On suggestions: Publish the slides. Thanks | 1) really | Good | 1) On suggestions: Publish the slides. Thanks | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Excellent Course with a good learning opportunity with Examples and Quiz at end of each topic | 1) Excellent Course with a | Good | 1) learning opportunity with Examples and Quiz | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good stuff | 1) | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Its very good for understanding purpose thank you so much | 1) Its very | Good | 1) for understanding purpose thank you so | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Great teacher and very good explanation of the subject | 1) Great teacher and very | Good | 1) explanation of the subject | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Would have rated it 4 if i had received my certificate of accomplishment like i was told at the starting of the course. The course was very informative and explained thoroughly and all but when you put it down on your resume or something its good to have a document backing up the claim. | 1) on your resume or something its | Good | 1) to have a document backing up | 3.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Really good! | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good course, refresh on strategy | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, refresh on strategy | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Enjoyed this course. There was a bit of confusion on some points, but overall really good. | 1) on some points, but overall really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good compare to what the courses in Nicaragua are like. Perhaps the bad point are the examples that the professor use, many of then are not so realistics. When learning about a situation that conditionate our strategy, we must also know what others inputs take part too. | 1) Very | Good | 1) compare to what the courses in | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good starter into Game Theory and Competitive Strategy | 1) Very | Good | 1) starter into Game Theory and Competitive | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I have no previous business experience and I really enjoyed this class. It gave me insight into game theory and marketing and product development concepts. Good pace and good explanation of topics. | 1) and marketing and product development concepts. | Good | 1) pace and good explanation of topics. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | I have no previous business experience and I really enjoyed this class. It gave me insight into game theory and marketing and product development concepts. Good pace and good explanation of topics. | 2) product development concepts. Good pace and | Good | 2) explanation of topics. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Really Good! I love the examples using on the curse and the attitude of the professor. | 1) Really | Good | 1) I love the examples using on | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | That is good! | 1) That is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Is a good course. because have a resumed content with a practical view and usability in real world. | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course. because have a resumed content | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good analytical concepts into strategy with competitors. Recommended for anyone who is in business and or intends to start a business in a competitive environment. | 1) | Good | 1) analytical concepts into strategy with competitors. | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | very good and very didactic. Keep pushing | 1) very | Good | 1) and very didactic. Keep pushing | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Great course and well worth the time. I took this as a refresher and enjoyed it immensely. Great content, good lecturer. | 1) and enjoyed it immensely. Great content, | Good | 1) lecturer. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good teacher! real examples! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher! real examples! | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good course, interesting and helpful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, interesting and helpful. | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good introductory class to the topic. Much time spent on examples. However, each module feels somewhat a bit disconnected from the other ones. A case study or example which would navigate students through all 6 modules would greatly help students remembering it all. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory class to the topic. Much | 3.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Splendid explanations, good examples and a great teacher. | 1) Splendid explanations, | Good | 1) examples and a great teacher. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good content, nice videos with interesting speaker. Very interactive course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, nice videos with interesting speaker. | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | A good intersection of Micro-economics and Game Theory. Very well structured. | 1) A | Good | 1) intersection of Micro-economics and Game Theory. | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Was really good | 1) Was really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very insightful, although very theoretical. It is great to create awareness of different strategical concepts and how they are applied, but not enough details in how it would actually play out in a real scenario between different entities. Kept me wanting to learn more though, which is a very good thing ;). | 1) more though, which is a very | Good | 1) thing ;). | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good Attractiveness | 1) | Good | 1) Attractiveness | 3.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | A very informative course, looks at the application of game theory to the world of business. Clear explanations and good tests. I would like to know why he has an AT-AT next to him in lectures however. | 1) world of business. Clear explanations and | Good | 1) tests. I would like to know | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good, basic concepts covered with examples | 1) | Good | 1) basic concepts covered with examples | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Amazing online course. Tobias Kretschmer is a great presenter and lecturer. He has a good way of implementing fun into these subjects, as well as keeping them very informative. I learned a lot from this course. -Tobias Brouwers, Denmark | 1) presenter and lecturer. He has a | Good | 1) way of implementing fun into these | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good! It was very intresting for me! | 1) Very | Good | 1) It was very intresting for me! | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | The professor was good. There was an over abundance of game theory, however. | 1) The professor was | Good | 1) There was an over abundance of | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | very well structured course, good to have no limitations on start or end dates. I enjoyed it and learned a lot. | 1) very well structured course, | Good | 1) to have no limitations on start | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good course especially for those involved in business strategy. It requires attention and a lot of quizzes to be solved. Nonetheless all information shared by the professor can be useful and a knowledge advantage. This course can be taken by people who aren't familiar with business/finance/economics. | 1) | Good | 1) course especially for those involved in | 4.0 |
| 5Ih5rOq7EeODsBIxORBKNw | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | difficult course that is full of information but if anatomy is your 'thing' then this is a very good course to take. | 1) 'thing' then this is a very | Good | 1) course to take. | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | is a very very boring curse, don't recommend anyone, please for your good at everyboduy else kill this course, don't embarrass yourself and the universities that represents | 1) don't recommend anyone, please for your | Good | 1) at everyboduy else kill this course, | 1.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | Outstanding, clear, well-explained, not overwhelming. Dissections really aid to have a more realistic understanding. Good supplemental materials cover the material with great focus, and if more details are needed it is easy to get those elsewhere. Great effort by U. Leiden! | 1) to have a more realistic understanding. | Good | 1) supplemental materials cover the material with | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | it is a very good course escpecially for medical student | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) course escpecially for medical student | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | very good . | 1) very | Good | 1) . | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | Very good material, explainations and teachers. Recommended for everyone who wants to learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material, explainations and teachers. Recommended for | 5.0 |
| 5iIbgmdpEeW0sAqIx1_alQ | Very good course, still in the beginning, but liking so much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, still in the beginning, but | 5.0 |
| 5JJoCSsxEeWWnhJMxi0Z9Q | not too good ,,because in assignments session they doesnt know what the right ans is, as in first assignment ,the ques is about circumference of circle as in google the exact ans is what they wronged it | 1) not too | Good | 1) , , because in assignments session | 1.0 |
| 5JJoCSsxEeWWnhJMxi0Z9Q | Great course. Good explanations and examples. The quizes and tests are not very easy sometimes, but they do you let think again. Very enjoyable! Just the course I was looking for a long time! | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) explanations and examples. The quizes and | 5.0 |
| 5JJoCSsxEeWWnhJMxi0Z9Q | Very good course for basic physics. If you're looking for a physic course to build the base for Mechanical Engineering, highly recommend this one. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for basic physics. If you're | 2.0 |
| 5JJoCSsxEeWWnhJMxi0Z9Q | very good explanations :) | 1) very | Good | 1) explanations :) | 5.0 |
| 5lBjD4h_EeWgrxLS5SGTUQ | Seemed like a good course, however I could not stand this professor's voice so if that doesn't bother you I'm sure it is decent. (it might possibly be the poor audio that is off putting as well) | 1) Seemed like a | Good | 1) course, however I could not stand | 3.0 |
| 5nAQCXqJEeWb-BLhFdaGww | good course, but need to pay for tests | 1) | Good | 1) course, but need to pay for | 3.0 |
| 5nAQCXqJEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I really liked this course because it is very specific, shows very good examples and provides practical resources. | 1) it is very specific, shows very | Good | 1) examples and provides practical resources. | 5.0 |
| 5NGh4meREeSxSCIAC1SPQw | One of the best courses I've ever taken on Emotional Intelligence. I can't believe how good this professor can teach! | 1) Emotional Intelligence. I can't believe how | Good | 1) this professor can teach! | 5.0 |
| 5NGh4meREeSxSCIAC1SPQw | very good course for all managers | 1) very | Good | 1) course for all managers | 5.0 |
| 5NGh4meREeSxSCIAC1SPQw | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| 5qe8W_5iEeSiniIAC1OXJA | Awesome course! Pretty dense material but it is so well explained that the complexity of the subject is actually mastered. I confess that I watched each week's lectures twice in order to get a real good grasp on the subject. The first time I did it slowly, takin detailed notes, the second time just paying attention to the explanation in order to review and understand better. I took me more time than what I usually spend on other courses, but it was mostly due to me being a novice on the subject. | 1) in order to get a real | Good | 1) grasp on the subject. The first | 5.0 |
| 5qe8W_5iEeSiniIAC1OXJA | Very good course with simple approach and extremely useful knowledge. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with simple approach and extremely | 5.0 |
| 5qe8W_5iEeSiniIAC1OXJA | Very good content and the teacher seems very comfortable with it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and the teacher seems very | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Very good starting point or restarting point for working with sequence data as a compuational biologist. Very clear course with good lab sessions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) starting point or restarting point for | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Very good starting point or restarting point for working with sequence data as a compuational biologist. Very clear course with good lab sessions. | 2) compuational biologist. Very clear course with | Good | 2) lab sessions. | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Awesome course. The lectures are good and the lab portion is great. The lab really helps understanding how to use online tools and resources. | 1) Awesome course. The lectures are | Good | 1) and the lab portion is great. | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | quiz questions are well explained so much that I could follow easily! Good examples for learning! | 1) much that I could follow easily! | Good | 1) examples for learning! | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | good but lengthy videos.. | 1) | Good | 1) but lengthy videos. . | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | I personally found the course very useful. It provides a good overview of some of the most widely used bioinformatic tools nowadays, without being too demanding. That labs are particularly good, and you are able to explore at your own pace but with the necessary guidance. I have a background in molecular and cell biology, so I found it very easy to follow. | 1) course very useful. It provides a | Good | 1) overview of some of the most | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | I personally found the course very useful. It provides a good overview of some of the most widely used bioinformatic tools nowadays, without being too demanding. That labs are particularly good, and you are able to explore at your own pace but with the necessary guidance. I have a background in molecular and cell biology, so I found it very easy to follow. | 2) too demanding. That labs are particularly | Good | 2) and you are able to explore | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Very good course for beginners! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Good campaign for abolishing illiteracy. It would be good to update answers for the final quiz (BLAST search and phylogenetic assay). | 1) | Good | 1) campaign for abolishing illiteracy. It would | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Good campaign for abolishing illiteracy. It would be good to update answers for the final quiz (BLAST search and phylogenetic assay). | 2) for abolishing illiteracy. It would be | Good | 2) to update answers for the final | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | it is a very good courses. I learnt a lot about how to build a phylogenetic tree here. | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) courses. I learnt a lot about | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | The best course ever ! Easy, well teached and breathtaking. This course helped me a lot in my university in my undergraduation. You can get a good knowledge about bioinformatics enough to work with it, and these teachings is necessary to improve skills to get better in this area. | 1) my undergraduation. You can get a | Good | 1) knowledge about bioinformatics enough to work | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | On the theoretical side, this is a very good introduction, and clearly a lot of effort has been poured into the practical part - only for that, the Toronto team deserves a lot of credit. Sadly, it suffers from the same problem as nearly every intro course in bioinformatics: the labs are merely a set of instructions to follow... even the very last. Still, if you never heard of BLAST or how to draw a phylogenetic tree, this is the course to do. | 1) theoretical side, this is a very | Good | 1) introduction, and clearly a lot of | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | Very good and complete course. Even having some basic background with bioinformatics, this course was still valuable in order to further cement previously learned concepts, as well as learn some new concepts and tools. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and complete course. Even having some | 5.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | There was a lot of stuff I could immediately use for my work. some of the other stuff was good to know to better understand what can be done behind the scene. | 1) some of the other stuff was | Good | 1) to know to better understand what | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | A good, interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic methods. Professor Provart is able to make thing easy, whilst showing you how to exploit data and tools freely - well ... usually, they are for free - available on the Internet. I suggest this course to everyone approaching the topic. Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic Method II to be initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic methods. The 5th star is missing because I would like to have some more insights about some underlying "reasons why". But, I reckon this as my own peculiarity. Good job, Professor Provart! And thank you very much for this! | 1) A | Good | 1) interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic | 4.0 |
| 5uXCfFu2EeSU0SIACxCMgg | A good, interesting and attractive introduction to Bioinformatic methods. Professor Provart is able to make thing easy, whilst showing you how to exploit data and tools freely - well ... usually, they are for free - available on the Internet. I suggest this course to everyone approaching the topic. Personally, I will also take Bioinformatic Method II to be initiated to elements of structural Bioinformatic methods. The 5th star is missing because I would like to have some more insights about some underlying "reasons why". But, I reckon this as my own peculiarity. Good job, Professor Provart! And thank you very much for this! | 2) reckon this as my own peculiarity. | Good | 2) job, Professor Provart! And thank you | 4.0 |
| 5uY2s0U4EeWbNhIvIryYow | All users are good at using social Media but they don't really understand the SM Ethics. Thanks to this course to give us the world view on SM Ethics. Love the course | 1) All users are | Good | 1) at using social Media but they | 5.0 |
| 5uY4gGkTEeSOPSIAC2gGHg | Good course for people involved in the design of public policies. This course is perfect to politics and CEOs, people with the money to invest or the ability to organice big group of people and educate them to invest. | 1) | Good | 1) course for people involved in the | 4.0 |
| 5uY4gGkTEeSOPSIAC2gGHg | This was a fascinating course on how to revive a failing business area by use of government financing of primarily tech start-ups. It was a place in the country that is very different than Silicon Valley. The knowledge to finance a new startup was very limited and had to be set up in government funded groups that could mentor all the new businesses. There was a quick tour to other countries such as Greece which showed that even the EU had set up a Fund for Greek startups. The one they were working on was a company that was trying to produce an app. They did say that due to the lack of tech knowledge in their country the EU Fund was still full of money and could fund other startups. The main course went back to Cleveland, where most of the effort was made to use a government approach. They set up their own foundations, extended loans, made contacts with Venture Capitalists that participated in Silicon Valley and in this new type of gov approach. After 10 years of working with this, they had some very good companies with great ideas. The only drawback was that they didn't employ enough people to revitalize the entire area of Cleveland. They were just beginning to do something that used the actual resources of the area. There was a well known Cleveland Medical Center and some of the Professors there had done research which was new. For some reason, again the lack of business resources, they had never created any companies from what they knew. They did begin to create companies from the medical researchers in the area. The main one had to do with maintaining cardiac health. And | 1) with this, they had some very | Good | 1) companies with great ideas. The only | 5.0 |
| 5uY4gGkTEeSOPSIAC2gGHg | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | I think it is a good MOOC, but is the less interesting mood of the specialized course. Still, it has a lot of information, and extra sources that help me. The teacher seems a little confused some times an use to distract me. | 1) I think it is a | Good | 1) MOOC, but is the less interesting | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Honestly didn't learn much from this course. The majority of content is simply common sense, and things you'll know if you've spent any time on the internet in the recent years. The good parts were the evaluation of different marketing channels (traditional and digital) and various stats on how people spend from the industry (ownership of TV networks, time spent per day on different media, etc.). | 1) internet in the recent years. The | Good | 1) parts were the evaluation of different | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The books, readings, and additional resources for studying are really good and helpfull. The only thing is that the videos where they explain the courses could be more fluid, dynamic and with a better domain of the tool by the professor. | 1) additional resources for studying are really | Good | 1) and helpfull. The only thing is | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content is good, but the way the lectures are given not so much. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) but the way the lectures are | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Rhiannon Clifton is a teacher I sensed as not very good at the beginning of the course. To my surprise she acquired such self confidence in the end that I can say I am very glad I was part of her course. I would like to have another chance to be on her courses in the future. Congrats!! I know you are on the right path for teaching | 1) teacher I sensed as not very | Good | 1) at the beginning of the course. | 5.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Pretty good course | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The presenter in this course is hard to follow and does not have good slides. She often does not put her bullet points or lists on the slides ( I am a visual learner and she does not provide enough on screen info) She is really uncomfortable and makes it really hard to listen to her talk. She struggles through the entire presentation which is just super distracting. Content is good though. | 1) to follow and does not have | Good | 1) slides. She often does not put | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The presenter in this course is hard to follow and does not have good slides. She often does not put her bullet points or lists on the slides ( I am a visual learner and she does not provide enough on screen info) She is really uncomfortable and makes it really hard to listen to her talk. She struggles through the entire presentation which is just super distracting. Content is good though. | 2) is just super distracting. Content is | Good | 2) though. | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The content of this course is very good. However I feel it is unfortunate that the lecturer did not make an effort in preparing the presentation of the material. This makes a huge difference. Especially when it is an online course, the lecturer needs to bring the story to life rather than simply reading with hesitation from the slides in most instances. | 1) content of this course is very | Good | 1) However I feel it is unfortunate | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The professor is just reading the text. Not really a good example of interactive e-learning content. | 1) reading the text. Not really a | Good | 1) example of interactive e-learning content. | 1.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course structure is okay and availability of course material e-book is big plus for the course. However there are negatives also. This is a course on "Digital Marketing" and it has to be taken to great heights in terms of content and delivery. Most critical issue is delivery. The most happening and lively subject like this needs a delivery in a exalted method. Though reference material is good collection but there is total disconnect between video lectures and those reference material at many instances. Revamp all video series. Add more case studies videos. | 1) exalted method. Though reference material is | Good | 1) collection but there is total disconnect | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | This course is not as good as the ones that are part of the Digital Marketing specialization. It was hard to keep traction and interest to finish it. | 1) This course is not as | Good | 1) as the ones that are part | 2.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Good course but it's too much academic, I can see that you were talking things you don't understand or read a script without put any of your efforts. | 1) | Good | 1) course but it's too much academic, | 3.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Good introduction to the digital marketing landscape! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the digital marketing landscape! | 5.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | really good and informative. | 1) really | Good | 1) and informative. | 5.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | A great course with good literature, easy to follow videos, a nice community, and very helpful content! | 1) A great course with | Good | 1) literature, easy to follow videos, a | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Great overview with good example and PDF. Thanks | 1) Great overview with | Good | 1) example and PDF. Thanks | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course offers a good mix of media used for the lectures. The book that accompanies the course is worth reading. The assessments and quizes are good to handle when completing all lectures and readings. The course requires some pre knowledge. | 1) The course offers a | Good | 1) mix of media used for the | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | The course offers a good mix of media used for the lectures. The book that accompanies the course is worth reading. The assessments and quizes are good to handle when completing all lectures and readings. The course requires some pre knowledge. | 2) reading. The assessments and quizes are | Good | 2) to handle when completing all lectures | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Very good course to go through as a beginner in Digital Marketing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to go through as a | 4.0 |
| 5_M54uIIEeSsKCIAC3iEqA | Very good, informative and useful. My only wish is that the presenter was a bit more natural, rather than appearing to read the text off the screen all the time. But that is just a minor comment | 1) Very | Good | 1) informative and useful. My only wish | 5.0 |
| 6-AmfoyrEeWbIxKn7M-nSQ | Great way to learn the techniques of good writing. Thanks Coursera and the tutors. | 1) way to learn the techniques of | Good | 1) writing. Thanks Coursera and the tutors. | 5.0 |
| 6-FfIC8hEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Very Good Insights and tools. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Insights and tools. | 5.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | Good survey of techniques | 1) | Good | 1) survey of techniques | 4.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | A great overview of text retrieval methods. Good coverage of search engines. A longer course will cover search engine better (remember this is a 6 weeker) | 1) great overview of text retrieval methods. | Good | 1) coverage of search engines. A longer | 5.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | very good ! thank | 1) very | Good | 1) ! thank | 5.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | Very good course for someone who wants to understand how text retrieval works. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for someone who wants to | 5.0 |
| 68PSjeudEeWwngojZhi1dw | This course is complemented with a software and text (not mandatory) and good explanation with diagrams... | 1) software and text (not mandatory) and | Good | 1) explanation with diagrams. . . | 5.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | Very good course, thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, thank you. | 4.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | Good course and effective learning experience . | 1) | Good | 1) course and effective learning experience . | 5.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | Very good and more! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and more! | 5.0 |
| 6AL8FY7BEeW5gxKDBxYMJw | top course. interesting, relevant, well structured, good examples | 1) top course. interesting, relevant, well structured, | Good | 1) examples | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course to understand the basic game design principles. | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand the basic game | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | its good | 1) its | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course is a very good intro course. The instructor Fran is both informative and funny. Fran really offers some great advice on how to think in terms of ways to develop and test your game in different ways. I thought it was certainly worth it and I think you would think the same too! | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) intro course. The instructor Fran is | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | A good course, with the using of peer review as an instrument of continuous confrontation, but lacks support from the staff. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, with the using of peer | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | A very good intro into the process behind creating higher quality game rules and storylines. Also a lot of fun to watch. Definitely a good course for | 1) A very | Good | 1) intro into the process behind creating | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | A very good intro into the process behind creating higher quality game rules and storylines. Also a lot of fun to watch. Definitely a good course for | 2) of fun to watch. Definitely a | Good | 2) course for | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course helped me a lot understanding the basics of Game Design! Definately good if you are interested in building a basic Game Design knowledge. I'm going for the specialization so I'm excited to keep learning more as I am currently working at a Game company but not in the Game teams... I would love to join them someday :D | 1) the basics of Game Design! Definately | Good | 1) if you are interested in building | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good. It could be better with more videos | 1) | Good | 1) It could be better with more | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The cours was very good. The lecturer gave us a great idea of gamedesign and was very motivating. | 1) The cours was very | Good | 1) The lecturer gave us a great | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good course and the lecturer video is well made and interesting! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and the lecturer video is | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Really good introduction to game design and to the rest of the courses. It does not have five stars because the task could be felt as repetitive if you started with a more developed idea from week 1. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to game design and to | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Nice organisation of course contents. Every stage, you can see your own game getting better. The peer students are especially good! | 1) better. The peer students are especially | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The course is fun and a very intresting approach to game design throug board game design. You get good tips for designing games and the different and important things to know. Though I think it could go deeper into some topics and explain a little more beyond just giving examples, videos are good but a little short, each week is roughly 20 minutes long each. Even though I really liked it and got the best of it . | 1) throug board game design. You get | Good | 1) tips for designing games and the | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The course is fun and a very intresting approach to game design throug board game design. You get good tips for designing games and the different and important things to know. Though I think it could go deeper into some topics and explain a little more beyond just giving examples, videos are good but a little short, each week is roughly 20 minutes long each. Even though I really liked it and got the best of it . | 2) beyond just giving examples, videos are | Good | 2) but a little short, each week | 3.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good course. Learned new information that proved to be useful regarding game design and also designed a board game to play with colleagues at the office. If you want to learn game design this is a great and easy way to start. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Learned new information that proved | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | A very good experience, but if it could've helped me to find a job it would have been even better. | 1) A very | Good | 1) experience, but if it could've helped | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | good course, really an introduction =) But the teacher is always reading a "Teleprompter". He is not spontaneous... Except when He uses RPG to demonstrate an example ;-) But the content is great | 1) | Good | 1) course, really an introduction =) But | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course is an excellent introduction into the world of game design. Fran Krause's teaching style is both engaging and fun. While the lectures are really short, and there's not really a whole lot of material, I found that I learned well through the doing the projects. My only criticisms are that this course is a little too easy and a little too short. A good game increases it's difficulty as the levels progress. If you don't increase the difficulty, you take away from the reward. The same can be said about a good course. | 1) and a little too short. A | Good | 1) game increases it's difficulty as the | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course is an excellent introduction into the world of game design. Fran Krause's teaching style is both engaging and fun. While the lectures are really short, and there's not really a whole lot of material, I found that I learned well through the doing the projects. My only criticisms are that this course is a little too easy and a little too short. A good game increases it's difficulty as the levels progress. If you don't increase the difficulty, you take away from the reward. The same can be said about a good course. | 2) same can be said about a | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course made me see the basics of Game Design and what i need to know while designing my game for a single player or multiplayer. Good Job! | 1) for a single player or multiplayer. | Good | 1) Job! | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | good enough for beginners, and the puppet is funny. | 1) | Good | 1) enough for beginners, and the puppet | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good course overall. Would recommend to every game developer and game designer. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course overall. Would recommend to every | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good course, though it is an introduction, I feel as though I already knew most of the subjects that were explained, however I did not know the impact that those could have on a game's value and how it helps the player engage in the game. The course was simple to follow and helped me know what to focus on when starting a game. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, though it is an introduction, | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course with good concepts but could do with a lot more depth. This course's content would be one week of content for other courses | 1) | Good | 1) course with good concepts but could | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course with good concepts but could do with a lot more depth. This course's content would be one week of content for other courses | 2) Good course with | Good | 2) concepts but could do with a | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course, I enjoyed the fact that there was a lot of hands-on work rather than just lectures, however, there could be more of the latter aswell. Quizes would be nice too. The quality of the course is very high. Thank you for this course. :) | 1) | Good | 1) course, I enjoyed the fact that | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course! Can use more concepts | 1) | Good | 1) course! Can use more concepts | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good to get started with a game. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to get started with a game. | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The course was fun and the progression through the weeks assignments was good. The contents were presented in a interesting way and were pertinent, but i would know a little more deeper. | 1) progression through the weeks assignments was | Good | 1) The contents were presented in a | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The instructor is a good story teller, teaching important skills from smalls tips which are useful. | 1) The instructor is a | Good | 1) story teller, teaching important skills from | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very fun course to take, the teacher makes good dynamics to keep me focused. | 1) course to take, the teacher makes | Good | 1) dynamics to keep me focused. | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very good! The idea of delivering a work per week helped me develop the discipline and the creativity. | 1) Very | Good | 1) The idea of delivering a work | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | This course was interesting. It's truly an introduction to the field. I've actually read about Game Design in my spare time and it was nice to remember some of the concepts I've seen. It's all positive and good but I'd have liked to see the assignments handled a bit differently. It just felt too much one way, especially with one page rule. I do understand this is done to keep people organized and not going crazy with their ideas because since it's peer reviewed it should be fair. Also, once your game idea from an earlier week didn't have much room to introduce the aspect presented in the current week you feel kind of stuck. Although assignments mention we should build on previous weeks' games there is also mention to building a new game too. That part could be clarified or the nature of the exercise can be much more varied than one page requirement. | 1) I've seen. It's all positive and | Good | 1) but I'd have liked to see | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Well structured lessons and basics concepts to learn. The course is absolutely accessible for everyone and all the concepts and words are perfectly explained with a lot of examples. Also mention that the spoken English is quite easy to understand, thanks to a good pronunciation and excellent pacing. In any case, you can enable the subs if you need them. | 1) easy to understand, thanks to a | Good | 1) pronunciation and excellent pacing. In any | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | The instructor is good but the amount of content is severely lacking compared to alternatives. | 1) The instructor is | Good | 1) but the amount of content is | 2.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | I'M LEARNING,ENJOYING THIS COURSE. LECTURE IS SO GOOD. ASSIGNMENTS ARE EAST AND CHALLENGING. | 1) ENJOYING THIS COURSE. LECTURE IS SO | Good | 1) ASSIGNMENTS ARE EAST AND CHALLENGING. | 4.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Great Course, great professor, great videos and very very good content. Eve if you're not a beginner you should do this course to refresh your knowledge. | 1) professor, great videos and very very | Good | 1) content. Eve if you're not a | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Very useful for start game designers, funny and good profesor. | 1) for start game designers, funny and | Good | 1) profesor. | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course, gets you thinking about the important things in Games - why we play them in the first place. Great teacher - mad as a hat! Kept things jovial and fun with good explanations in a professional course | 1) | Good | 1) course, gets you thinking about the | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | Good course, gets you thinking about the important things in Games - why we play them in the first place. Great teacher - mad as a hat! Kept things jovial and fun with good explanations in a professional course | 2) Kept things jovial and fun with | Good | 2) explanations in a professional course | 5.0 |
| 6DwzaCw7EeWGvAojQA48rw | A fun course with a good instructor. it introduces a simple process for brainstorming ideas. | 1) A fun course with a | Good | 1) instructor. it introduces a simple process | 4.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | The course is a well thought and masterfully set of lessons on the main principle of journalism: it talks ethics starting from maybe old concepts that surprisingly are still fitting today. Being a basic course, it is very easy to follow and finish. Quizzes are alternating between very good and very bad. Tough ethical decisions and a space to discuss them is a really great thing, but peer grading two phrases essays with only the ability of telling yes or no doesn't make for a good use of the crowdsourcing the very course is advocating. The videos seem to have been made with an indecent knowledge of the technology, especially for journalists who are supposed to use it daily; green screens were used so badly as some parts of the professors "spark white", and slides are often cut away and put back in view while the teacher is talking about it, which was downright infuriating. It still qualifies for a very good opening course in journalism, but needs serious improvement. | 1) finish. Quizzes are alternating between very | Good | 1) and very bad. Tough ethical decisions | 3.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | The course is a well thought and masterfully set of lessons on the main principle of journalism: it talks ethics starting from maybe old concepts that surprisingly are still fitting today. Being a basic course, it is very easy to follow and finish. Quizzes are alternating between very good and very bad. Tough ethical decisions and a space to discuss them is a really great thing, but peer grading two phrases essays with only the ability of telling yes or no doesn't make for a good use of the crowdsourcing the very course is advocating. The videos seem to have been made with an indecent knowledge of the technology, especially for journalists who are supposed to use it daily; green screens were used so badly as some parts of the professors "spark white", and slides are often cut away and put back in view while the teacher is talking about it, which was downright infuriating. It still qualifies for a very good opening course in journalism, but needs serious improvement. | 2) or no doesn't make for a | Good | 2) use of the crowdsourcing the very | 3.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | The course is a well thought and masterfully set of lessons on the main principle of journalism: it talks ethics starting from maybe old concepts that surprisingly are still fitting today. Being a basic course, it is very easy to follow and finish. Quizzes are alternating between very good and very bad. Tough ethical decisions and a space to discuss them is a really great thing, but peer grading two phrases essays with only the ability of telling yes or no doesn't make for a good use of the crowdsourcing the very course is advocating. The videos seem to have been made with an indecent knowledge of the technology, especially for journalists who are supposed to use it daily; green screens were used so badly as some parts of the professors "spark white", and slides are often cut away and put back in view while the teacher is talking about it, which was downright infuriating. It still qualifies for a very good opening course in journalism, but needs serious improvement. | 3) It still qualifies for a very | Good | 3) opening course in journalism, but needs | 3.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Easy to follow and really good advice, which automatically reminds one why one wants to become a Journalist. | 1) Easy to follow and really | Good | 1) advice, which automatically reminds one why | 5.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | I liked that it focus on new media, however I missed some text material to support the classes. Some minor mistakes on the exercises still need to be fixed. Some videos could be better produced, but the content is very good and I understand that it is also intended to be view on cellphones, so it was good. | 1) produced, but the content is very | Good | 1) and I understand that it is | 4.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | I liked that it focus on new media, however I missed some text material to support the classes. Some minor mistakes on the exercises still need to be fixed. Some videos could be better produced, but the content is very good and I understand that it is also intended to be view on cellphones, so it was good. | 2) view on cellphones, so it was | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Good: The video lectures cover a nice variety of topics giving you a good introduction of journalism, ethics, and other important considerations for becoming a journalist. Bad: The entire course feels hastily put together. Some of the videos have summarizing points, which is helpful when taking notes, but they flash on the screen briefly, then cut to a closeup of the lecturer, then cut back to the summery points so quickly that you can't copy them down and it becomes super distracting. The quizzes are a joke. They usually consist of 1-3 questions with two answers each and once choice so outrageous that they don't take any thought at all to complete. You could just skip to the quizzes without watching a single lecture and "ace" them easily. The assignments are also a joke. They ask for 1-2 sentence answers max! Some of them ask you to "use more than one word" to respond. I've taken free courses on here than involve 1000 word essays and then at least you're forced to process the information in the lectures. You can pass this course without watching a single lecture and that's a travesty to Michigan State. It is full of typos and oversights that could have been avoided if they had once person run through the course as a quality control. One of the quizzes has the answer included right beneath the question as a typo! The simple assignments are described in 3 different places, sometimes with conflicting instructions. They tell you what to do and how to review your peers in one section and then the actually assignment has different instructions on what to do than the page prior so you end up unsure of what the assignment actually wants you to do. For example: the final assignment at firsts asks you how to engage with your audience, and then you click next and the SAME question is now asking you how you distribute content. Did they even try?? In Summery: The content in the lectures are a good but shallow overview of journalism, but don't expect to be challenged to do anything but fill in ovals and regurgitate questions. Not too much to learn here. | 1) | Good | 1) The video lectures cover a nice | 2.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Good: The video lectures cover a nice variety of topics giving you a good introduction of journalism, ethics, and other important considerations for becoming a journalist. Bad: The entire course feels hastily put together. Some of the videos have summarizing points, which is helpful when taking notes, but they flash on the screen briefly, then cut to a closeup of the lecturer, then cut back to the summery points so quickly that you can't copy them down and it becomes super distracting. The quizzes are a joke. They usually consist of 1-3 questions with two answers each and once choice so outrageous that they don't take any thought at all to complete. You could just skip to the quizzes without watching a single lecture and "ace" them easily. The assignments are also a joke. They ask for 1-2 sentence answers max! Some of them ask you to "use more than one word" to respond. I've taken free courses on here than involve 1000 word essays and then at least you're forced to process the information in the lectures. You can pass this course without watching a single lecture and that's a travesty to Michigan State. It is full of typos and oversights that could have been avoided if they had once person run through the course as a quality control. One of the quizzes has the answer included right beneath the question as a typo! The simple assignments are described in 3 different places, sometimes with conflicting instructions. They tell you what to do and how to review your peers in one section and then the actually assignment has different instructions on what to do than the page prior so you end up unsure of what the assignment actually wants you to do. For example: the final assignment at firsts asks you how to engage with your audience, and then you click next and the SAME question is now asking you how you distribute content. Did they even try?? In Summery: The content in the lectures are a good but shallow overview of journalism, but don't expect to be challenged to do anything but fill in ovals and regurgitate questions. Not too much to learn here. | 2) variety of topics giving you a | Good | 2) introduction of journalism, ethics, and other | 2.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Good: The video lectures cover a nice variety of topics giving you a good introduction of journalism, ethics, and other important considerations for becoming a journalist. Bad: The entire course feels hastily put together. Some of the videos have summarizing points, which is helpful when taking notes, but they flash on the screen briefly, then cut to a closeup of the lecturer, then cut back to the summery points so quickly that you can't copy them down and it becomes super distracting. The quizzes are a joke. They usually consist of 1-3 questions with two answers each and once choice so outrageous that they don't take any thought at all to complete. You could just skip to the quizzes without watching a single lecture and "ace" them easily. The assignments are also a joke. They ask for 1-2 sentence answers max! Some of them ask you to "use more than one word" to respond. I've taken free courses on here than involve 1000 word essays and then at least you're forced to process the information in the lectures. You can pass this course without watching a single lecture and that's a travesty to Michigan State. It is full of typos and oversights that could have been avoided if they had once person run through the course as a quality control. One of the quizzes has the answer included right beneath the question as a typo! The simple assignments are described in 3 different places, sometimes with conflicting instructions. They tell you what to do and how to review your peers in one section and then the actually assignment has different instructions on what to do than the page prior so you end up unsure of what the assignment actually wants you to do. For example: the final assignment at firsts asks you how to engage with your audience, and then you click next and the SAME question is now asking you how you distribute content. Did they even try?? In Summery: The content in the lectures are a good but shallow overview of journalism, but don't expect to be challenged to do anything but fill in ovals and regurgitate questions. Not too much to learn here. | 3) content in the lectures are a | Good | 3) but shallow overview of journalism, but | 2.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Really good course and I never felt a moment of boredom while studying it | 1) Really | Good | 1) course and I never felt a | 5.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | It is a good introductory course, but the technical aspect for this module is bad... | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introductory course, but the technical aspect | 3.0 |
| 6Fa6w3EjEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | Excellent course material and good learner participation. I think a stronger instructor presence will round it off nicely (even if only in the forums). Great presentation Mr Grimm! | 1) Excellent course material and | Good | 1) learner participation. I think a stronger | 5.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | This course is very good especially for beginners getting started with SAS or python for data analytics. The lessons are very clear and easy to understand. Learnt a lot of valuable information and also enjoyed it. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) especially for beginners getting started with | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | very good course teaching the basics of pandas and descriptive statistics. | 1) very | Good | 1) course teaching the basics of pandas | 5.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | It was really good. | 1) It was really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | good introduction for people who have no knowledge about data management | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for people who have no | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Simple material, and nicely presented. Good choice for beginners | 1) Simple material, and nicely presented. | Good | 1) choice for beginners | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Simple and powerful Course. If you are a beginner. Just follow the instructions and Assignment Schedule. The course may seem a bit easy, if you are good at math and have some prior programming experience, yet you can be surprised with what new you learned by the end of the Course, considering the time you spend. Also you develop sound reasoning to answer your own questions regarding handling and presenting Data. The clarity you develop is worth it. | 1) a bit easy, if you are | Good | 1) at math and have some prior | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | It was good overall, some of the course materials were a bit sparse. You had to do your own research into getting packages working in spyder etc. I'd probably recommend that learners learn some python separately and read the docs for pandas. | 1) It was | Good | 1) overall, some of the course materials | 3.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Very good introductory course on managing, subsetting, and manipulating data with SAS or Python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course on managing, subsetting, and | 5.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Very disappointed about this course. The topic is very interesting, for me at least, but the course organization is horrible. Lectures do not provide enough information to complete the assignments. Zero interaction from course staff. Issues with getting assignments graded. In previous session the staff just refered you to the coursera helpdesk, but you cannot easily contact coursera directly. Main focus of course seems to be earning money and not educating. Be warned and don't pay for this course! I really don't get why this course has so many good reviews. | 1) why this course has so many | Good | 1) reviews. | 1.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Very good references - codebooks and examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) references - codebooks and examples. | 4.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The course is a very good introduction to Python for data exploration and management. That being said, it focuses too much on categorical data analysis, and I felt the transition to quantitative/continuous data was not very well done. Moreover, some more explanations about several Python functions or coding choices could be better explained. But it's encouraging to see this type of statistical course for Python and not R!! Again! | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) introduction to Python for data exploration | 3.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | The content is OK, but that's about it. Near zero interaction from staff, short videos leave a lot to be desired, and worst of all, there seems to be a problem getting everyone's assignments peer reviewed (which makes no sense). There is a somewhat comical thread wherein staff direct students to contact coursera directly via a "contact us" link on a page, but get this, the link isn't there. Students repeatedly pointed this out only to get directed again to the non-existant link. In an online forum it's important to actually address concerns. Replys that avoid directly addressing concerns sound like automated messages. And that's the feeling I get here. This course requires a DIY attitude and a willingness to proceed without feedback. If you're looking for a good example of online learning, look elsewhere. | 1) feedback. If you're looking for a | Good | 1) example of online learning, look elsewhere. | 2.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | Good Learning experience and loved the way of teaching. | 1) | Good | 1) Learning experience and loved the way | 5.0 |
| 6JyoHjVOEeWBMQ5pdIoFkQ | good but i thought it will cover most of SAS technology. But it has covered basics only . | 1) | Good | 1) but i thought it will cover | 3.0 |
| 6K8l2CwFEeaU1xK12iolBQ | good, but need to pay to attend test | 1) | Good | 1) but need to pay to attend | 3.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very good course as a starting point. Although it still shall be better if there could be more detailed, academic study contents involved. And in addition, it might be both more inspiring and more attracting if the lecturer giving the information with more spoken presentation which approaching to a real class rather than a fixed script text. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course as a starting point. Although | 3.0 |
| 6kAowBObEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I'm three weeks into and really enjoying this course. It's light – about 2-3 hours a week so far, plus maybe one film, feels sufficient. The student is free to choose her degree of intensity. At the same time it opens a richness of vistas on the study of film in general as well as the course content. I think it's a good model for the massive online course: both highly customisable and sufficiently demanding (deadlines are essential) to maintain engagement. | 1) course content. I think it's a | Good | 1) model for the massive online course: | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Pretty good overview of Agile Process in detail. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) overview of Agile Process in detail. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | A good overview of the how, what and why of processes. Will make you want to jump onto the next course | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of the how, what and | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very good course. Explain the agile practices and methodologies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Explain the agile practices and | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very good overview of different software management tools | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of different software management tools | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Curso excelente! Good job! | 1) Curso excelente! | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good topics | 1) | Good | 1) topics | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good starting point. | 1) | Good | 1) starting point. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great overview of Agile Software Development Processes. Good foundation for the entire course. | 1) overview of Agile Software Development Processes. | Good | 1) foundation for the entire course. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good material. | 1) | Good | 1) material. | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very good introduction to agile processes and practices. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to agile processes and practices. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very good course taught by very positive and skilful professors. Recommend | 1) Very | Good | 1) course taught by very positive and | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | It was good but so introductory Instructors just reading the documents | 1) It was | Good | 1) but so introductory Instructors just reading | 3.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course is good but the end of unit quiz are not accessible unless you pay. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but the end of unit quiz | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | very well conducted. Nice overview of the theory and practices. Would have been good to have some examples and case studies (more like the Microsoft daily build.) | 1) theory and practices. Would have been | Good | 1) to have some examples and case | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good sessions | 1) | Good | 1) sessions | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course laid out the concepts pretty well but if one had access to the materials, the lectures were not really necessary to understand the concepts. This was because the lectures were pretty much a re-reading of the materials and more importance could be placed on creating scenarios where the processes would be applicable. This would be a far better use of the lecture time than trying to combine the two and not doing a good job of either. | 1) the two and not doing a | Good | 1) job of either. | 3.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The explanations and examples are very good. Thanks. | 1) The explanations and examples are very | Good | 1) Thanks. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | This is a very good lecture to introduce the Agile software development process. It's very clear and the length is good for me. I like it very much! Recommend to all. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) lecture to introduce the Agile software | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | This is a very good lecture to introduce the Agile software development process. It's very clear and the length is good for me. I like it very much! Recommend to all. | 2) very clear and the length is | Good | 2) for me. I like it very | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good overview of agile practices. If you're doing the specialization, they say you can take courses 2 & 3 in any order. Technically that's true, but my recommendation is to do them in order. They refer to course 2 in course 3, and the difficulty of assignments decreases if you do them in opposite order like I did. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of agile practices. If you're | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Thanks a lot for all the instructors and the team behind this course. The content quality reminds me of some agile principles. Simplicity of the words, the illustrations, the examples Feedback from students through the discussions Technical excellence and good design Welcoming change (I've witnessed commitments of the team to improve some points in the content) I'm thrilled to go on and look at the next courses I say Bravo ! Smail | 1) through the discussions Technical excellence and | Good | 1) design Welcoming change (I've witnessed commitments | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good course to get the fundamental learning.... | 1) | Good | 1) course to get the fundamental learning. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good explained course with interesting information about processes and practices in agile. Not too detailed, but can give you an overall overview of what a process implies and what are the general practices used in software. | 1) | Good | 1) explained course with interesting information about | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great production values and more "meat" to it than the intro course. I like the scenario based questions. It still seems a little light on content, but the content that is present is good. | 1) the content that is present is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good course. Information is concise and well structured. I have completed the assignments spending approximately 1.5 hours a week on it and found the course difficulty to be easy. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Information is concise and well | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very good course ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good definition for extreme programming and software process models. | 1) | Good | 1) definition for extreme programming and software | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | I really enjoy this specialization, it is srtuctured very well, lot's of useful information and it is explained very good. | 1) information and it is explained very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Nice and clear presentation of the topic. Good course for everyone who might want to work with software development. | 1) and clear presentation of the topic. | Good | 1) course for everyone who might want | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course is a very good explanation of what processes are, as well as a nice introduction of the agile approach to manage software projects. | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) explanation of what processes are, as | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Its a wonderful course for enlightening anyone on the basics of Software process and Agile. Very good lectures!! | 1) of Software process and Agile. Very | Good | 1) lectures! ! | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very Good Course Thank you | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course Thank you | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Interesting, "agile" and complete. The quizzes are of a good level. | 1) complete. The quizzes are of a | Good | 1) level. | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Excellent course! Very easy to follow, and the notes were really good! I believe that this course delivers critical knowledge to any Business Analyst, Product Manager and Product Development Manager. | 1) follow, and the notes were really | Good | 1) I believe that this course delivers | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very Good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Pretty broad introduction to some different processes. Gave a pretty good intro to agile methodologies. I like that there was some depth in the explanation of Kanban. Looking forward to continuing in the specialization. | 1) some different processes. Gave a pretty | Good | 1) intro to agile methodologies. I like | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good introduction to many core concepts. Overall video and presentation quality are quite good. The course is not particularly challenging, so if you are concerned with time requirements, I don't think you need to worry. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to many core concepts. Overall | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good introduction to many core concepts. Overall video and presentation quality are quite good. The course is not particularly challenging, so if you are concerned with time requirements, I don't think you need to worry. | 2) video and presentation quality are quite | Good | 2) The course is not particularly challenging, | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Amazing Course. So very enlightening and so very well taught. The quizzes help to reinforce the material learnt in the Lectures. The quiz question made it so that you had to constantly think critically to answer real world problem scenarios. Would recommend it to anyone to gain a good understanding of Software Processes and Agile Practices. | 1) it to anyone to gain a | Good | 1) understanding of Software Processes and Agile | 5.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good course! Excellent to reinforce my knowledge on scrum, xp and agile. In the end however I think that the content was somehow repetitive, but this not change the quality of the course. | 1) | Good | 1) course! Excellent to reinforce my knowledge | 4.0 |
| 6lQZLjVvEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | good but abit brief | 1) | Good | 1) but abit brief | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very good course which I'd highly recommend to writer beginners and those, like myself, who need to brush up and learn a few more techniques. All the lessons were very useful and the assignments were challenging and interesting | 1) Very | Good | 1) course which I'd highly recommend to | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very generic advice although the interviews with children's writers were illuminating and helpful. The marking system was inaccurate, for example it deducted marks for submitting an assignment over word count when it wasn't! Good, solid advice about setting character, scene and place and ideas to help you out of writer's block. The two main presenters were very knowledgeable and it was pitched to an international audience. Some of the activities were repetitious but I guess the craft of writing is but there was a sense of the course tapering away at the end with a proposal letter to a publisher with very little exemplar material being provided to assist. | 1) over word count when it wasn't! | Good | 1) solid advice about setting character, scene | 2.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I Love this Course. It challenges me to write. It makes me believe I can be a good writer, may be an author. Thank you Commonwealth Education Trust Team. | 1) me believe I can be a | Good | 1) writer, may be an author. Thank | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | what I loved better was the possibility of rescheduling the deadlines :-) I work in the peruvian rainforest and sometimes there is no access to internet for a good while | 1) no access to internet for a | Good | 1) while | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Its a great Course. It has a lot of good recommendations, interviews and tools for new writers. It also has a very good format and the authors that participate communicate good and share very interesting experiences and points of view of what it is for them to write. I think the interaction and forums dont work very good. Ive taken other workshops (not online) but a primarial resource for improving and getting to find out things is the feedback from others. Thank you very much, and when I start publishing Ill get my certificate from this course. | 1) Course. It has a lot of | Good | 1) recommendations, interviews and tools for new | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Its a great Course. It has a lot of good recommendations, interviews and tools for new writers. It also has a very good format and the authors that participate communicate good and share very interesting experiences and points of view of what it is for them to write. I think the interaction and forums dont work very good. Ive taken other workshops (not online) but a primarial resource for improving and getting to find out things is the feedback from others. Thank you very much, and when I start publishing Ill get my certificate from this course. | 2) writers. It also has a very | Good | 2) format and the authors that participate | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Its a great Course. It has a lot of good recommendations, interviews and tools for new writers. It also has a very good format and the authors that participate communicate good and share very interesting experiences and points of view of what it is for them to write. I think the interaction and forums dont work very good. Ive taken other workshops (not online) but a primarial resource for improving and getting to find out things is the feedback from others. Thank you very much, and when I start publishing Ill get my certificate from this course. | 3) and the authors that participate communicate | Good | 3) and share very interesting experiences and | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Its a great Course. It has a lot of good recommendations, interviews and tools for new writers. It also has a very good format and the authors that participate communicate good and share very interesting experiences and points of view of what it is for them to write. I think the interaction and forums dont work very good. Ive taken other workshops (not online) but a primarial resource for improving and getting to find out things is the feedback from others. Thank you very much, and when I start publishing Ill get my certificate from this course. | 4) interaction and forums dont work very | Good | 4) Ive taken other workshops (not online) | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This course was very nice, its objectives were clear and it gave a good panorama of the writing experience. The interviews with writers were interesting and some tips about editing and publishing were really valuable. | 1) were clear and it gave a | Good | 1) panorama of the writing experience. The | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very simplistic in places and preaches their style as if it is the only way sometimes too. However it's a good grounding in the basics and there are some useful exercises. | 1) way sometimes too. However it's a | Good | 1) grounding in the basics and there | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | A good but simple introduction to writing. The instructors (particularly David) are friendly and helpful - it's just that nothing is dealt with in any great depth. However, that helps make it good as an introduction. | 1) A | Good | 1) but simple introduction to writing. The | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | A good but simple introduction to writing. The instructors (particularly David) are friendly and helpful - it's just that nothing is dealt with in any great depth. However, that helps make it good as an introduction. | 2) depth. However, that helps make it | Good | 2) as an introduction. | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very good course. Many valuable information and advice about writing in general not just aimed at young readers. Would recommand. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Many valuable information and advice | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Provides good basic information. The assignments are simple and can easily be "passed" by following directions, not necessarily by writing well. Many reviews say the critiquing is the draw-point of this class, but that is all done by fellow students not by publishing experts or professionals. So while this course "opens the treasure chest," it leaves you a long way from publishable | 1) Provides | Good | 1) basic information. The assignments are simple | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This is a great course to get you writing. The interviews with writers are particularly helpful. The assignments are well thought out though there was some confusion when it came to peer reviews and how to assess word count which the staff are trying to sort out. Peer reviews were very varied as some people just wrote one word down which was no help at all, while someone inexperienced wil struggle with this I think the course should include an early module on reading and critically as reviewing someone's work is a great aid to writing and editing your own work. Course paperwork could include a critical checklist to help with peer reviews. I would have found that helpful so that I could be confident Of doing a good job. I think you should also be able to edit your reviews as a mistake will mean your fellow writer could be marked down. All in all though well worth doing. Many Thanks to the tutors, staff and guest writers. | 1) could be confident Of doing a | Good | 1) job. I think you should also | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Good videos but strucural info and help. Unfortunately , for me it wasn´t very exciting or motivating and perhaps that is because of my own interests. | 1) | Good | 1) videos but strucural info and help. | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | A great tool for beginner writes, but not very good at showing you how to write SPECIFICALLY for children. | 1) for beginner writes, but not very | Good | 1) at showing you how to write | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Excellent. Thanks to the professors' guidance, I wrote a children's picture book and have submitted my manuscript to a local publisher. Cross my fingers and toes for good measure! | 1) Cross my fingers and toes for | Good | 1) measure! | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I loved this course. Although I was familiar with a most of the topics already. I think from way back at school, and also from some reading on my own, but it has been a while, so it was good to go through it again. The assignments were really good. Week 5, about publishing, was what was most new to me. Would be nice if there's a follow-up course on 'Publishing'. One more thing, not sure why it's called 'Writing for young readers',.... I feel, there's not a lot specifically on writing for young readers.I'd say it's more like a (general) "introduction to writing stories". Still, this is a great course for anyone interested in starting to write. | 1) been a while, so it was | Good | 1) to go through it again. The | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I loved this course. Although I was familiar with a most of the topics already. I think from way back at school, and also from some reading on my own, but it has been a while, so it was good to go through it again. The assignments were really good. Week 5, about publishing, was what was most new to me. Would be nice if there's a follow-up course on 'Publishing'. One more thing, not sure why it's called 'Writing for young readers',.... I feel, there's not a lot specifically on writing for young readers.I'd say it's more like a (general) "introduction to writing stories". Still, this is a great course for anyone interested in starting to write. | 2) it again. The assignments were really | Good | 2) Week 5, about publishing, was what | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Basic course for budding writers. Good practice. Also, excellent interviews with other published writers, editors and playwrights. It was the highlight of the course for me. | 1) Basic course for budding writers. | Good | 1) practice. Also, excellent interviews with other | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The instructors are such good examples of kindness. I like the gentle and effective course. I plan to take it again! | 1) The instructors are such | Good | 1) examples of kindness. I like the | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | This course is really meant for beginning writers for Young Readers. The information is good and at a pace that is easy to follow. If you are an advanced writer or have experience, it may not be as valuable for you. However, if you are just starting to look at becoming a professional, or have limited experience beyond writing for yourself, you will find this a very valuable learning experience. | 1) for Young Readers. The information is | Good | 1) and at a pace that is | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Fun course for folks just learning about the process, and a good review for others who wrote at one point in their lives and desire to return but d | 1) learning about the process, and a | Good | 1) review for others who wrote at | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The course didn't feel as though it was aimed at a university level audience, which is what I expect from Coursera courses. I I did appreciate the prompt that the assignments gave me to actually sit down and write, but so far the feedback wasn't very helpful. I think that there should be much more guidance on how to give good feedback to peers. Reading a good number of submissions from members of the course, I didn't feel that this course gave them the practical skills needed for good prose, but w | 1) more guidance on how to give | Good | 1) feedback to peers. Reading a good | 2.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The course didn't feel as though it was aimed at a university level audience, which is what I expect from Coursera courses. I I did appreciate the prompt that the assignments gave me to actually sit down and write, but so far the feedback wasn't very helpful. I think that there should be much more guidance on how to give good feedback to peers. Reading a good number of submissions from members of the course, I didn't feel that this course gave them the practical skills needed for good prose, but w | 2) good feedback to peers. Reading a | Good | 2) number of submissions from members of | 2.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The course didn't feel as though it was aimed at a university level audience, which is what I expect from Coursera courses. I I did appreciate the prompt that the assignments gave me to actually sit down and write, but so far the feedback wasn't very helpful. I think that there should be much more guidance on how to give good feedback to peers. Reading a good number of submissions from members of the course, I didn't feel that this course gave them the practical skills needed for good prose, but w | 3) them the practical skills needed for | Good | 3) prose, but w | 2.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | The general advice given is very good and useful, and the section | 1) The general advice given is very | Good | 1) and useful, and the section | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | interesting and clear ! For all levels of English Good experience | 1) ! For all levels of English | Good | 1) experience | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I want to give it 3 1/2 starts - sometimes the modules seem really segmented and you spend half the time repeating the same ideas or recapping the course material (that was new that week!). While the assessment tasks were great exercises, the fact that they're peer-reviewed means that the feedback you get is often unhelpful or poorly informed. It was a good course to do, but I don't think it's really going to change anyone's life (and I would encourage people to not take the peer feedback too seriously!). | 1) or poorly informed. It was a | Good | 1) course to do, but I don't | 3.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very good Training! Lots of examples and practical knowledge. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Training! Lots of examples and practical | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | I learned a lot of interesting things. Both Maria and David were great teachers: they spoke clearly, making examples and trying to speak as slowly as possible (which is good for a not native english speaker as myself). The interviews were another interesting addition to the course, as the peer reviews: they were not created or structured to lead to failure but to selfimprovement an improvement trough other's advices. It was great. I hope they'll make another course like this in the future, it would totally have my enrollment. Thank you, to the both of you, for the things you taught me! | 1) as slowly as possible (which is | Good | 1) for a not native english speaker | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very good course I learned so many helpful things. The teachers did their best to make the course entertaining and helpful. Thank you Maria and David! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course I learned so many helpful | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | It was good tips. it has really interesting interviews. It was been really positive experience and encouraging to keep writing. | 1) It was | Good | 1) tips. it has really interesting interviews. | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very cool easy going course. The videos are short and to the point and the authors in it speak clearly and are easy to understand and follow. The assignments are great fun to do and the community and forms are friendly. If you have an interest in writing in general and want to start writing I'd recommend it as it's good way to get started. | 1) writing I'd recommend it as it's | Good | 1) way to get started. | 5.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | An excellent course. The inclusion of excerpts allows one to develop a greater understanding of the different topics dealt in the MOOC. Also, several excerpts are from stories written by authors based in different continents; this makes reading the excerpts all the more interesting. Also, the course allows one to adjust the deadlines for submitting assignments, which is a good thing. | 1) for submitting assignments, which is a | Good | 1) thing. | 4.0 |
| 6mOCpgP8EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | Very good course and Prof specialy guest Prof ,now really i have a tools to write story for children and teenager(my dream) ,i hope that i will succeed in my new experience.Thanks for all. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and Prof specialy guest Prof | 4.0 |
| 6Q6xanzkEeWUswr9_O_RKw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 6r0j3li_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Absolutely exceptional and filled with tangible products that you can immediately use in building a credible portfolio/resume. It was a good bit of work but entirely worthwhile. | 1) a credible portfolio/resume. It was a | Good | 1) bit of work but entirely worthwhile. | 5.0 |
| 6r0j3li_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 6r0j3li_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | That's one of the best courses ever i passed. I strongly recomend to take the whole course for further learners. Good luck everyone who is going to take exactly these courses. | 1) the whole course for further learners. | Good | 1) luck everyone who is going to | 5.0 |
| 6r0j3li_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Great course! Really loved it! Keep up the good work with the course. | 1) Really loved it! Keep up the | Good | 1) work with the course. | 5.0 |
| 6VIQlm6rEeSDGiIAC1sNTA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 6VIQlm6rEeSDGiIAC1sNTA | Good but very confusing course. It was very hard to know what its purpose was. | 1) | Good | 1) but very confusing course. It was | 5.0 |
| 71uAg8wYEeSyoSIACwgCjw | A good MOOC, but i was also hoping to see how to make solid lectures for class. | 1) A | Good | 1) MOOC, but i was also hoping | 4.0 |
| 71uAg8wYEeSyoSIACwgCjw | Excellent course! Very good videos, and useful reading materials. Nothing to complain about. I look forward to being involved in more of Match's MOOCs. Thank you! | 1) Excellent course! Very | Good | 1) videos, and useful reading materials. Nothing | 5.0 |
| 76FVnKNaEeWHXAr1OpR7HQ | Good course but would have loved two things : more practical examples and certainly more detailed info on multiples. | 1) | Good | 1) course but would have loved two | 4.0 |
| 76FVnKNaEeWHXAr1OpR7HQ | Very good as a structure. Valuable as a course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) as a structure. Valuable as a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good for someone who knows about programming, but not in python. The pace is pleasant, it is better than a book, as you hear how the jargon is used. Highly recommend it. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for someone who knows about programming, | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course, maybe a bit too basic if you have previous knowledge of another language. | 1) | Good | 1) course, maybe a bit too basic | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course, it gies you great skills for starting to program in many languages. In my case, it also helped me to refresh previous skills and also leearn new concepts. Greetings from Venezuela. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, it gies you great skills | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good , If its more Exercise/ Assignment problems it good | 1) | Good | 1) , If its more Exercise/ Assignment | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good , If its more Exercise/ Assignment problems it good | 2) its more Exercise/ Assignment problems it | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a good option for those starting with programming and who want to learn Python as a first programming language. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) option for those starting with programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good start if you are new to Python | 1) | Good | 1) start if you are new to | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners who have no previous experience in programming. Chuck is a great instructor who brings fun to the learning process. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners who have no previous | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor is very good at making Python easy and fun to learn. It made learning very fun and it kept my motivation to complete assignments high. | 1) The professor is very | Good | 1) at making Python easy and fun | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good, fundamental, useful | 1) | Good | 1) fundamental, useful | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course "Programming for Everybody [ with Python ]" is a very good initial start up course who want to learn python from the beginning. After i have completed this course, i have got a level of confidence to program in python and the 5 week dedication has helped me to become much better. | 1) with Python ]" is a very | Good | 1) initial start up course who want | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really a good course. I learnt a lot. And I will learn the further courses. | 1) It is really a | Good | 1) course. I learnt a lot. And | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Overall, a very good course. For the vast majority of it, I felt that information was explained carefully and there was a good balance of challenge and support. | 1) Overall, a very | Good | 1) course. For the vast majority of | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Overall, a very good course. For the vast majority of it, I felt that information was explained carefully and there was a good balance of challenge and support. | 2) explained carefully and there was a | Good | 2) balance of challenge and support. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for the beginners to programming | 1) | Good | 1) for the beginners to programming | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is very Good course for basic python programing. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course for basic python programing. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to programming (in Python)! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to programming (in Python)! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is really inspiring and intresting too and the main is the teaching aids of Dr. Chuck and his friendly behaviour make too curios about the course material all about a good course. | 1) the course material all about a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course! | 1) | Good | 1) Course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course to start with Python. | 1) | Good | 1) course to start with Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for pyhton beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for pyhton beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, adequate for newcommers to programming as it's a very basic level. Thank you for everything!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, adequate for newcommers to programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very clear classes and fun assignments. Really good! | 1) clear classes and fun assignments. Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for someone just start learning Python | 1) | Good | 1) for someone just start learning Python | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This very Good course for learn Basic python programing and improve you skills in python . | 1) This very | Good | 1) course for learn Basic python programing | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | GOOD COURSE! CLEAR AND WELL ORGANIZED!!! | 1) | Good | 1) COURSE! CLEAR AND WELL ORGANIZED! ! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to Python! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Python! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course provides very good material.It is easy to understand.Practice exercises are very useful and challenging. | 1) The course provides very | Good | 1) material. It is easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice course to start with. I think this course is good for beginner | 1) with. I think this course is | Good | 1) for beginner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's a great course that inspires my interest on Python. Thank you professor Charles Severance and your team to offer such a good course. | 1) your team to offer such a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good both as Introduction to Python and Introduction to Computer Science! | 1) Very | Good | 1) both as Introduction to Python and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginners | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to Python programming | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Python programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was good but sometimes I was thinking that some of the aspects could be explained quicker. | 1) It was | Good | 1) but sometimes I was thinking that | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was my first programming experience in my life!! I would like to honestly mention here that I had some doubts and insecurities about overall difficulty level and few other things of the " Learning Programming Languages" and whether I would be able to do it successfully or not sort of things. But I m very glad to state that this course really helped me a lot to get over this fear and to obtain an excellent grade. It guided me even how one should think while learning a programming language. Dr. Severance was more than helpful and kind to guide us during this whole learning process. I believe he has successfully understood the mindset of newbies and is encouraging. Overall, I feel very positive and I am going join next Course as well. Thank you Coursera for all the facilities and thank you very very much Dr. Charles Severance for conducting this great course. Good luck!! Mukta | 1) Severance for conducting this great course. | Good | 1) luck! ! Mukta | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor taught very clearly and he is pretty humourous as well. It's really a good beginning course of python. | 1) humourous as well. It's really a | Good | 1) beginning course of python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, comprehensive and easy to follow. Good examples. | 1) course, comprehensive and easy to follow. | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good vibe but way too easy.... even for beginners! I am no beginner but I finished the whole thing in less than an hour.... Not much learned | 1) | Good | 1) vibe but way too easy. . | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to Python, it gets you into the mindset of programming and combining syntax to do something useful. The videos could be more to the point and better quality though. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Python, it gets you | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | was good | 1) was | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good one to start with | 1) | Good | 1) one to start with | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Its a very good course. Recommended for everybody. Besides, Lectures are very interesting. If you want to learn programming through scratch, enroll for this course right away. | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course. Recommended for everybody. Besides, Lectures | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The teaching approach is nice and followable. The course materials are understandable. It's provides a good basis in programming. | 1) materials are understandable. It's provides a | Good | 1) basis in programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good explanations, just a little bit too slow for me. Downside: Python 2 and not 3. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations, just a little bit too | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good, excellent Course | 1) very | Good | 1) excellent Course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for real beginners in programming | 1) | Good | 1) course for real beginners in programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! I really liked the online experience and the instructor did a very good job of explaining the material. I'd recommend this course to anyone who is interested in coding. | 1) and the instructor did a very | Good | 1) job of explaining the material. I'd | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good. For who never had contact with progamming. good start | 1) Very | Good | 1) For who never had contact with | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good. For who never had contact with progamming. good start | 2) who never had contact with progamming. | Good | 2) start | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course actually! | 1) very | Good | 1) course actually! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's very easy to understand and to study the teacher is very good and I hope I can meet hem one day | 1) to study the teacher is very | Good | 1) and I hope I can meet | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really well-paced introduction for getting started with python. Even though I have programming experience, the lectures really covered the basics very well and gave me a good foundation to further learn python. | 1) very well and gave me a | Good | 1) foundation to further learn python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for programming beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for programming beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Teaching way is very good, teacher explain very detail in each topic, I understand very clear what he said. Thank you. | 1) Teaching way is very | Good | 1) teacher explain very detail in each | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | this is my first online class and it was very good! and Dr.chuck's lecture was the best one i have heared! | 1) online class and it was very | Good | 1) and Dr. chuck's lecture was the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really good introduction course of Python with hands-on exercises. The tutor is really interesting, and I had great fun and sense of achievement during the course. I highly recommend it to those who want to learn Python. | 1) A really | Good | 1) introduction course of Python with hands-on | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introductory course. Lots of time spent explaining basic concepts with good examples. Be sure to get the book (free pdf available) and read the chapters to help you with the assignments. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. Lots of time spent | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introductory course. Lots of time spent explaining basic concepts with good examples. Be sure to get the book (free pdf available) and read the chapters to help you with the assignments. | 2) time spent explaining basic concepts with | Good | 2) examples. Be sure to get the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction in Thinking as a programmer and learning python. I will start the second course right away, because - yeah, it's just the first half | 1) | Good | 1) introduction in Thinking as a programmer | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice and well structured class. I liked it to learn the basic Python syntax (loops, functions etc.), before you get to data structures in the second class. At first, that was counter-intuitive to me, since in other courses on different programming languages, it was the other way around, but it worked quite nicely. The only weakness of the class: In the assignments where you have to enter your code to get a specific output, just getting the output was not enough. A more or less concrete code was required. It was sometimes a bit frustrating to figure out what went wrong. But anyhow: A good course for anyone with little programming experience and a wish to learn Python! | 1) what went wrong. But anyhow: A | Good | 1) course for anyone with little programming | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is good for everyone to get started | 1) It is | Good | 1) for everyone to get started | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good and sure source of learning python for beginner | 1) A | Good | 1) and sure source of learning python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, good explanations, excited for the next instalment. Only downside is it seems that Python 3 is now being implemented as opposed to python 2. I personally would have preferred if this course went as far as lists. | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) explanations, excited for the next instalment. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | IT IS A GOOD COURSE FOR ANYONE WHO HAS NO BACKFROUND OF PROGRAM LANGUAGE. Love it. | 1) IT IS A | Good | 1) COURSE FOR ANYONE WHO HAS NO | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course introduces the related topic in a simple yet interesting way. The lecturer knows how to teach and is an expert in his domain. Very good choice! | 1) an expert in his domain. Very | Good | 1) choice! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really good course for beginners. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good way to learn to progamming in Python, the teacher explain very well. | 1) | Good | 1) way to learn to progamming in | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Explanations is pretty well, but it is not so difficulty. So it's good for beginners. | 1) is not so difficulty. So it's | Good | 1) for beginners. | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for the beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for the beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, very helpful | 1) | Good | 1) course, very helpful | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was really good experience and very good learning platform. With this course I have gained confidence about my python programming skills. Thank you very much for the instructor. | 1) It was really | Good | 1) experience and very good learning platform. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was really good experience and very good learning platform. With this course I have gained confidence about my python programming skills. Thank you very much for the instructor. | 2) was really good experience and very | Good | 2) learning platform. With this course I | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Extremely helpful with a good understanding of how the code works. I'm going to use this to help me teach fundamentals of code to my friends in STEM Club. | 1) Extremely helpful with a | Good | 1) understanding of how the code works. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course!! Dr. Chuck is so good that he is making a learning video so interactive. Perfect teaching perfect syllabus. Just want the assignments to be bit more tough | 1) course! ! Dr. Chuck is so | Good | 1) that he is making a learning | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good and useful | 1) very | Good | 1) and useful | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, easy to follow. It would be nice to see the code also in Python 3. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, easy to follow. It would | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | so good,i like it | 1) so | Good | 1) i like it | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | really good and well structured. | 1) really | Good | 1) and well structured. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Intro | 1) | Good | 1) Intro | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it's a really good course for the people who have totally no background of programming. | 1) it's a really | Good | 1) course for the people who have | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Thanks, Dr Chucks for a really good paced course! | 1) Thanks, Dr Chucks for a really | Good | 1) paced course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course. Can be better in terms of information and assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Can be better in terms | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good all starter course, it is a little basic for those that have some prior experience with Python. | 1) | Good | 1) all starter course, it is a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is just amazing. It help me start learning Python and also help to improve my English. The professor is excellent and also very funny,i like him. Course material is the reason that i choose the course.This course has a chinese subtitle,and also has a PDF version of the book(which also has translated into chinese),it's so good. I will take the following course as well,and i think it will also help me a lot. I'm looking forword to it. | 1) has translated into chinese), it's so | Good | 1) I will take the following course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course for bigginers | 1) very | Good | 1) course for bigginers | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was a good intro to programming for sure! The book is very clear and concise. There could have been more information provided each week. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) intro to programming for sure! The | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course is good , i should say that it explains the basics to programming very well:) | 1) Course is | Good | 1) , i should say that it | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very basic, but very good with good didatics! | 1) Very basic, but very | Good | 1) with good didatics! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very basic, but very good with good didatics! | 2) Very basic, but very good with | Good | 2) didatics! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Brief intro to python, good for beginners. Cool professor, especially the wig part. Interviews are also quite meaningful to students who wanna know more about things behind the language. | 1) Brief intro to python, | Good | 1) for beginners. Cool professor, especially the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good professor! I like this course! | 1) very | Good | 1) professor! I like this course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Wonderful lecturer! I have programming background so I skipped a few lectures. I believe this is truly a good module for beginners without programming experience as the lecturer goes detailed in explaining the concepts. | 1) I believe this is truly a | Good | 1) module for beginners without programming experience | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good introduction, similar to the first half of my python class in cc | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, similar to the first half | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course and easy to understand, can be completed within 2 days. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course and easy to understand, | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course. I enjoyed learning the basics of the Python computer language. The only reason this didn't get 5 stars was because the class information was not presented 100% clearly. It was not very clear where to access the book, or what readings corresponded to which lectures. Otherwise a great class. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. I enjoyed learning the | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good as an introduction to Python for Informatics | 1) Very | Good | 1) as an introduction to Python for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof. Charles is amazing. His lectures are very informative and clear. I appreciate this as a good platform to develop my Python skills. I do believe this may be my most favorite online course to date. | 1) clear. I appreciate this as a | Good | 1) platform to develop my Python skills. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good program for absolute beginers | 1) very | Good | 1) program for absolute beginers | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course. Probably add more (optional) exercises to help get practise. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. Probably add more (optional) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was a very good introduction to Python! | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) introduction to Python! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good explanations. Concepts are presented in a comfortable way. So much instructive. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations. Concepts are presented in a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introduction to python | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to python | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners .. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners . . | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Quite python basics.If you have learned other programming languages,you just need 2-5 hours to complete this course. Anyway,it is a good start for learning python. | 1) this course. Anyway, it is a | Good | 1) start for learning python. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course helped me a lot. | 1) very | Good | 1) course helped me a lot. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very good for beginners to understand and execute. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for beginners to understand and execute. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was a good class for someone without any programming experience. The lectures really helped me to start understanding python language (and programming basic logic in general). However the course load is light and the pace is quite slow. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) class for someone without any programming | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello, I am glad that I am getting this course from one of the (Best) Author of Python Book. I am really happy with the contents & teaching style that made me so confident about coding in Python. Contents are helpful, discussion forum clarifies many doubts & the deep understanding of each module in this course make it a perfect choice for anyone to who even does not know 'A' of Python's Alphabet or of any coding language can start & learn to code. Good initiative by Author & Mentor. Please provide many such courses in near future so that we can learn best from Top University which is anyway not possible for students like us with financial problems! We learn many things from home & from Greatest University like in this case University of Michigan! Thanks for all work for making this course available online. | 1) can start & learn to code. | Good | 1) initiative by Author & Mentor. Please | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Perhaps not the most appropriate for people with some coding experience but I really wish my first programming classes were half as good as Professor Severance's classes. I strongly recommend them if you are beginner, and even if you're not, they are most fun and allow you to slowly learn Python. | 1) first programming classes were half as | Good | 1) as Professor Severance's classes. I strongly | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | On capstone now... really good introduction to programming & computer science. Absolutely loved the weekly interviews with the legends in the field of Computer Science. | 1) On capstone now. . . really | Good | 1) introduction to programming & computer science. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | VERY GOOD | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great Course for beginners with no background in programming. The professor takes his time and explains everything in details. The material is clear and the assignments are good way to practice and test your understanding. Thank you! | 1) is clear and the assignments are | Good | 1) way to practice and test your | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good traning , easy to understand and was explained clearly. | 1) | Good | 1) traning , easy to understand and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Teacher is very good and makes learning programming interesting and fun to learn. | 1) Teacher is very | Good | 1) and makes learning programming interesting and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction for people who have no prior programming background | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for people who have no | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is really good for absolute beginners !! Each and every basic details of programming are presented and explained so nicely. If you are planning to go for python programming you can easily achieve taking this course. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) for absolute beginners ! ! Each | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for learning the basic syntax and the professor is great. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for learning the basic syntax and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course itself is wonderful,very instructive, well organized, and easy to understand. My only "complaint" is that it is too simple. That being said, this course is the fundamental of the fundamental of python. Mastering this sole course is far below enough to wield python as a powerful data analyzing tool. Also, I think even though this is designed to be an intro course, for people like me who is a total rookie in the world of computer science, it should have mentioned, at least touched upon a little of what is algorithm, because there is no way we won't come across various algorithms in the future of learning computer science. I just think it'd be good to have a heads-up. | 1) science. I just think it'd be | Good | 1) to have a heads-up. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and gave feeling like in real class. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and gave feeling like in real | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good introduction to Programming and also complete introduction to Python. Content is shown with an easy-to-follow logic recommended for everyone. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to Programming and also complete | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good indeed! | 1) Very | Good | 1) indeed! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good, hands-on course, Doctor Chuck is a great teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) hands-on course, Doctor Chuck is a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction. I will continue with the next courses! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. I will continue with the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good introductory of python. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory of python. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Its a very good course. The instructor is humorous and a very fine teacher. I recommend this course for people beginning to know python programming. | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course. The instructor is humorous and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Love it! Lectures, notes and assignments all are very good! Thanks! | 1) notes and assignments all are very | Good | 1) Thanks! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, could do with moving to Python 3 though | 1) | Good | 1) course, could do with moving to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course materials and instructions. The instrutor explains ideas vividly and goes into quites details, great! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course materials and instructions. The instrutor | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | this course is for some one who is new to python programming and is one of the best course i have taken ,good explanation , and great enthusiastic teacher Mr.Charles Severance I really liked the way he handled the explanation for various topics | 1) best course i have taken , | Good | 1) explanation , and great enthusiastic teacher | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, but a little bit easy for programmers who have experience in other programming languages. Better to add more challenging assignments. :) | 1) | Good | 1) course, but a little bit easy | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for the basics of Python | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for the basics of Python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | its very good | 1) its very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. Starts ground up with simple examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Starts ground up with simple | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | so good so perfect so Helpful tnx a lot | 1) so | Good | 1) so perfect so Helpful tnx a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good to start off newly. But I think an certificate of completion must have been issued after completing the course for those taking the free course | 1) | Good | 1) to start off newly. But I | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The way of teaching is so good that even a person with no programming skills can understand justified the tittle python for everybody surely for everybody | 1) The way of teaching is so | Good | 1) that even a person with no | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and informative course at basic level. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative course at basic level. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for starters... | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for starters. . . | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good Introduction to Python Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Introduction to Python Course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good courser to get started with the basics of programming and from here spring board to other areas. | 1) | Good | 1) courser to get started with the | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome experience. Dr. Chuck is a good teacher, gives real time examples, walked us through his world tour. Perfect Videos , sessions.I would give 10/10 for Dr.Chuck , Sir you are the best. | 1) Awesome experience. Dr. Chuck is a | Good | 1) teacher, gives real time examples, walked | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof Chuck is one of the funniest professor I've ever heard. Good sense of humor paired with high experiences in teaching, excellent teaching materials (perfect difficulty for the quizzes and assignment). I would like to be such a good lecturer once! | 1) the funniest professor I've ever heard. | Good | 1) sense of humor paired with high | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof Chuck is one of the funniest professor I've ever heard. Good sense of humor paired with high experiences in teaching, excellent teaching materials (perfect difficulty for the quizzes and assignment). I would like to be such a good lecturer once! | 2) would like to be such a | Good | 2) lecturer once! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, it's worth trying | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it's worth trying | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good Start for Beginners in programming | 1) A | Good | 1) Start for Beginners in programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for python learners who want to start from the basic concepts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for python learners who want to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course for the beginner | 1) very | Good | 1) course for the beginner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | easy to understand. good for beginer | 1) easy to understand. | Good | 1) for beginer | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | For these who major in computer science in university, this course can be kind of easy. But it's really acceptable for those who have no experience with programming. It can be a good way to get started with Python. | 1) with programming. It can be a | Good | 1) way to get started with Python. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Sometimes a bit slow and long explanations. But generally very good and easy to understand | 1) and long explanations. But generally very | Good | 1) and easy to understand | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good content, but slow pace. tiny increments per week | 1) | Good | 1) content, but slow pace. tiny increments | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent Course Content with good assignment work !!! Dr Severance is a Great Professor. | 1) Excellent Course Content with | Good | 1) assignment work ! ! ! Dr | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good start, clear information. Glad i took it :-) | 1) | Good | 1) start, clear information. Glad i took | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I liked it, good course to starts in Python! | 1) I liked it, | Good | 1) course to starts in Python! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good ! I'v learned very with this course.. ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! I'v learned very with this | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good basics.. | 1) very | Good | 1) basics. . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners but if you have prior experience in programming. this course is NOT for you | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners but if you have | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good pacing, amusing teacher. It's a great way to get started with coding. | 1) | Good | 1) pacing, amusing teacher. It's a great | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good explanations, easy to understand | 1) | Good | 1) explanations, easy to understand | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it's a very good course for starting learning with python | 1) it's a very | Good | 1) course for starting learning with python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginners , who dont have idea about programming , and good start for every one new in python | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners , who dont have | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginners , who dont have idea about programming , and good start for every one new in python | 2) have idea about programming , and | Good | 2) start for every one new in | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course is pretty good and the pace it goes through is quite good. Chuck does a great job to keep it going :). | 1) Course is pretty | Good | 1) and the pace it goes through | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Course is pretty good and the pace it goes through is quite good. Chuck does a great job to keep it going :). | 2) pace it goes through is quite | Good | 2) Chuck does a great job to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course ! Great examples and Dr.Chuck is a very good profesor. This Course encourage me to take the entire specialisation. I'm already doing the second one! | 1) and Dr. Chuck is a very | Good | 1) profesor. This Course encourage me to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I enjoyed this course. I was a good introduction to Python. The videos and material are easy to understand. I look forward to taking the other courses in this specialization. | 1) enjoyed this course. I was a | Good | 1) introduction to Python. The videos and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for basic understanding Python | 1) | Good | 1) course for basic understanding Python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for novice programmer,an experienced programmer may leave it | 1) | Good | 1) for novice programmer, an experienced programmer | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course for beginners,although students with little coding experience will find this course a little slow. | 1) | Good | 1) Course for beginners, although students with | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | all good stuff thanks | 1) all | Good | 1) stuff thanks | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the greatest teachings by a professor. Good method of teaching and thus my way of learning has been differed from the orthodox classroom learning. Thank You Coursera! i'm enjoying the video learning and I'm keen to learn other courses from this very organization. | 1) the greatest teachings by a professor. | Good | 1) method of teaching and thus my | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | So far so good, I recommend the course to anyone wanting a start in the programming world. Would like some other exercises to practice more. I know this would make the logistics more complex but this could be optional! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) I recommend the course to anyone | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginner！ | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginner！ | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teaching | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Basic course, if you already have programming notions, this course might not be necessary. The teacher is very good and good exercises. | 1) be necessary. The teacher is very | Good | 1) and good exercises. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Basic course, if you already have programming notions, this course might not be necessary. The teacher is very good and good exercises. | 2) The teacher is very good and | Good | 2) exercises. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is way too simple and too slow. Probably good for someone who has never done programming before. | 1) too simple and too slow. Probably | Good | 1) for someone who has never done | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for absolute beginners in any programming language. Helped me to learn the basics of Python. | 1) | Good | 1) course for absolute beginners in any | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Charles Severance's course is very clear, organized and easy to understand. This a a very good material for Python starters. | 1) to understand. This a a very | Good | 1) material for Python starters. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I feel good! It was my first step to be a programmer! This course was step by step and it cause to learn more and spend more time for learning! | 1) I feel | Good | 1) It was my first step to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a very very nice course made by a funny and good teacher, the course will help you step by step on learning the basics of python by showing you explanations followed by a quiz (not really hard but very useful for the purpouse of helping the user to remember the lessons) and then by a proper exercise, the only thing i would add it would be a specific lesson on punctuation and syntax of the python lenguage becouse a couple of time i've been struggling with exercises and the problem were indentations and some punctuation. Thank you a lot mr. Chuck, coursera and the community! | 1) course made by a funny and | Good | 1) teacher, the course will help you | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Quite good, sometimes the lecture slides spent a little too much time on explaining a basic concept. For example, it probably isn't necessary to repeatedly explain a loop iterating 5 times until the end of the loop. But otherwise the course cleared up a few things that I was having a hard time wrapping my head around with a different crash course I took in another class. | 1) Quite | Good | 1) sometimes the lecture slides spent a | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good and fun course to get started on python you can do it on almost every computer or laptop system | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) and fun course to get started | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I did like this course however it is very very basic. I think it should have been merged with course 2 as the course contents are as good as one week work. | 1) as the course contents are as | Good | 1) as one week work. | 1.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course to start with the python..! | 1) | Good | 1) course to start with the python. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is my first ever online course. I'm so happy that I've chosen this course. It is really good. Lecturer is teaching in such a way that the classes are not seeming boring at all, thanks to the professor. Thank you COURSERA | 1) chosen this course. It is really | Good | 1) Lecturer is teaching in such a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I think the textbook does a great job of explaining things very well. I did not watch any videos so can not comment on them as supplements to the textbook. However, after taking this course, I do feel like I have a good foundation for learning Python and code in general. My only criticism is that the course still uses an older version of Python which has some differences and can make the learning frustrating if you are not aware of those differences. Granted, with a free textbook for an older version this is a minor issue thus far in the series. | 1) do feel like I have a | Good | 1) foundation for learning Python and code | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good course | 1) a | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Extremely basic but Dr. Chuck is so interesting that you never get bored. You can pass the course in a few days with minimum or even no programming knowledge. It's a good starting point for beginners. | 1) even no programming knowledge. It's a | Good | 1) starting point for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very well designed course. It has given me a good start to kick-off Python learning. | 1) course. It has given me a | Good | 1) start to kick-off Python learning. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | You won't snooze, this I can promise. Professor Charles does everything one possibly can to make the lectures interesting and still manages who get across all the important stuff. It was a great learning experience for me. It's especially good if you don't have a lot of time to learn this language. | 1) learning experience for me. It's especially | Good | 1) if you don't have a lot | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to python, presented with easy to understand examples and exercises cement the concepts learned. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to python, presented with easy | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Best lesson materials so far! Good job Dr. Chuck! | 1) Best lesson materials so far! | Good | 1) job Dr. Chuck! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good courses , I've learned a lot . | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses , I've learned a lot | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Videos are very good. Giving examples of our daily life experiences while teaching is easy to be related | 1) Videos are very | Good | 1) Giving examples of our daily life | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introduction to programming for the beginners. I really appreciated it! | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to programming for the beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good Course to Start with Python | 1) A | Good | 1) Course to Start with Python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for starters | 1) | Good | 1) course for starters | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really great step-by-step tutorial which helps you to make first steps with python. Good samples, easy to get content, nice additional materials. | 1) to make first steps with python. | Good | 1) samples, easy to get content, nice | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good course on beginning programming. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course on beginning programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really helpful way to learn python for beginners.Very good explanation. | 1) to learn python for beginners. Very | Good | 1) explanation. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Just scratches the surface. Good to get started for absolute beginners. | 1) Just scratches the surface. | Good | 1) to get started for absolute beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners with little or no knowledge of Python or programing. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners with little or no | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course. Easy to understand. Good material for beginners | 1) Great course. Easy to understand. | Good | 1) material for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners with no previse knowledge of programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners with no previse knowledge | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good beginner course. Good pace. Looking forward to the next course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) beginner course. Good pace. Looking forward | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good beginner course. Good pace. Looking forward to the next course. | 2) Very good beginner course. | Good | 2) pace. Looking forward to the next | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Wow Chuck!! Really good job and it was really nice to learn in this way. Now up to course 2! | 1) Wow Chuck! ! Really | Good | 1) job and it was really nice | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for students with no programming experience | 1) | Good | 1) for students with no programming experience | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a good class, and I got very used thanks Dr. chuk and university of Michigan | 1) This is a | Good | 1) class, and I got very used | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really Good! Professor Chuck is very good at teaching. His lectures have so much fun and every lecture contains exactly enough material that not too much nor too difficult. And it is not too easy that make you feel boring. You need to pay attention and concentrate. I really like the course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Professor Chuck is very good at | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really Good! Professor Chuck is very good at teaching. His lectures have so much fun and every lecture contains exactly enough material that not too much nor too difficult. And it is not too easy that make you feel boring. You need to pay attention and concentrate. I really like the course. | 2) Really Good! Professor Chuck is very | Good | 2) at teaching. His lectures have so | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners, Strongly suggest new programers to take it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners, Strongly suggest new programers | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good information , very helpful information. | 1) very | Good | 1) information , very helpful information. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | ALL OF THE GOOD THINGS! | 1) ALL OF THE | Good | 1) THINGS! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, very good start to programming. | 1) Great course, very | Good | 1) start to programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good basic course for input/output in Python - looking forward to progressing with future courses and seeing how far I can improve my skills with Dr Chuck's help! Thanks for setting up this course and looking after the students | 1) | Good | 1) basic course for input/output in Python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, professor, slides, interviews ..... everything was excelent. Thanks alot | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, professor, slides, interviews . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | For folks that have never programmed this class does a really good job of explaining the basics in very understandable terms. wish it had a way to advance past basics into syntax for those that understand the basics. | 1) programmed this class does a really | Good | 1) job of explaining the basics in | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it was an excellent course. you managed to deliver this source in a fun and understandable way. good job. | 1) in a fun and understandable way. | Good | 1) job. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent work!!! I've learnt a lot. A very good course | 1) I've learnt a lot. A very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introductory course. Quite 'easy' but an excellent primer for what comes later. Giving 5 stars as could run lectures at 1.5 speed / pause at appropriate times. Most importantly I did not need to conform to the advised weeks and could just do at own pace. So very convenient. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. Quite 'easy' but an | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Generally a very good course. Some of the very simple things seemed to be explained in far more detail than necessary, but then other more difficult area, were breezed through rapidly. Although of course it is always possible to track back through the videos or pause them until you've got your head round it. | 1) Generally a very | Good | 1) course. Some of the very simple | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | i feel this course is very good and every beginner should go for this course. thumbs up to university of michigan | 1) i feel this course is very | Good | 1) and every beginner should go for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good beginner course! For the content is not so intimidating for beginner to chicken out half-way. Thumbs up! | 1) | Good | 1) beginner course! For the content is | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Could do better with explaining in a better way, but overall is very good. | 1) better way, but overall is very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, especially for those, who want to start programming and know nothing about it. Dr Chuck is an excellent educator, really engaging with a great sense of humour, so if you're a newbie and interested in learning about Python, surely you won't fall asleep during his lectures. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, especially for those, who want | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is very good, really motivation. Thanks Dr. Charles Severance | 1) It is very | Good | 1) really motivation. Thanks Dr. Charles Severance | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent teaching with good pacing. I've had many false starts with learning Python (and programming in general) but this was the first time I've gotten this far! | 1) Excellent teaching with | Good | 1) pacing. I've had many false starts | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great intro, very basic but good for getting fundamentals | 1) Great intro, very basic but | Good | 1) for getting fundamentals | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course esp for the starters! | 1) | Good | 1) course esp for the starters! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course. A little too basic for those who already know the basic rules of programming. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. A little too basic | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Love it!. Good for a beginner in programming and for advanced programmer without the Python knowledge | 1) Love it! . | Good | 1) for a beginner in programming and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course............ | 1) | Good | 1) course. . . . . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good intro to python. Gets you on basics as well as loops and conditional statements. The lectures cover the book materials and are helpful for understanding. The worked examples are often straight forward, but occasionally require some debugging and extending your thinking a little past the current material. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to python. Gets you on | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Chuck is a very interesting lecturer and the material is very good, although the course is a little bit too trivial. | 1) lecturer and the material is very | Good | 1) although the course is a little | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | excellent stuff to start programming. A good stuff to start Python as well. I really liked the interviews in between the lectures. great work. | 1) excellent stuff to start programming. A | Good | 1) stuff to start Python as well. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, especially the bonus video part are really giving interesting background | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, especially the bonus video part | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and informative cours! Helps you to understand basic language elements and provide you an opportunity to further progression in future. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative cours! Helps you to | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very detailed, but not deep enough ha. Anyway, a good class! | 1) not deep enough ha. Anyway, a | Good | 1) class! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Professor Chuck for this course is very hard, the discussion section of the teaching assistants are also very positive, very suitable for beginners who are a good program | 1) suitable for beginners who are a | Good | 1) program | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Introduction for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction for beginners | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is very useful as a good overview to programming with Python and a quick look at some of the basic functions. Is a good introduction for the later Python courses in the series. The first few lectures are a very general introduction to programming as a concept rather than Python specifically so can be skimmed over if you're not completely new to the concept. Overall, a good introduction to the topic. | 1) course is very useful as a | Good | 1) overview to programming with Python and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is very useful as a good overview to programming with Python and a quick look at some of the basic functions. Is a good introduction for the later Python courses in the series. The first few lectures are a very general introduction to programming as a concept rather than Python specifically so can be skimmed over if you're not completely new to the concept. Overall, a good introduction to the topic. | 2) of the basic functions. Is a | Good | 2) introduction for the later Python courses | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is very useful as a good overview to programming with Python and a quick look at some of the basic functions. Is a good introduction for the later Python courses in the series. The first few lectures are a very general introduction to programming as a concept rather than Python specifically so can be skimmed over if you're not completely new to the concept. Overall, a good introduction to the topic. | 3) new to the concept. Overall, a | Good | 3) introduction to the topic. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof is cool. A good platform to start programming. | 1) Prof is cool. A | Good | 1) platform to start programming. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | While the videos are a good guide, the quizzes and assignments are way too easy. I find that, whenever I am studying, finding out how to do difficult exercises are the best way to really learn. Good course | 1) While the videos are a | Good | 1) guide, the quizzes and assignments are | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | While the videos are a good guide, the quizzes and assignments are way too easy. I find that, whenever I am studying, finding out how to do difficult exercises are the best way to really learn. Good course | 2) the best way to really learn. | Good | 2) course | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for real beginner of programming, if you already have experience with any other language, this might be too easy | 1) | Good | 1) for real beginner of programming, if | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy to follow, and the Dr Chuck is quite interesting. However, the pace is a little slow. Still a good course, though. | 1) is a little slow. Still a | Good | 1) course, though. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very clear, good introduction | 1) Very clear, | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to computer programming and python. The concepts have been presented gradually and also it has been made a connection between the program and the hardware running the program. I also liked very much the bonus videos at the end of each chapter. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to computer programming and python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good class,interesting teacher,make me know how to think | 1) | Good | 1) class, interesting teacher, make me know | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good class for beginners, easy to understand and challenging at the same time. | 1) | Good | 1) class for beginners, easy to understand | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor is great at walking you through the concepts at a good pace. Sometimes it feels too slow however its really not as I think the pace helps cement the concepts. | 1) you through the concepts at a | Good | 1) pace. Sometimes it feels too slow | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good start for Python I must say! | 1) | Good | 1) start for Python I must say! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The lectures are very good. But the Discussion forum became a "hidden question - mistic answer" panel lately. Could we get some non-scored assignments to discuss them openly with mentors and to learn more ? | 1) The lectures are very | Good | 1) But the Discussion forum became a | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Severance put in lot of efforts to make python easy for all the learners. This Course is about the basics of python. If you are a beginner, you will learn a lot of concepts very easily. For people who have a bit of programming knowledge in other languages, this will help in learning the syntax. Overall a good course to go through. | 1) in learning the syntax. Overall a | Good | 1) course to go through. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good, but wish it went more in depth in lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) but wish it went more in | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I have previous education in programming. This was a good refresher to start programming with again, especially Python - a language I'm new to. I just wish the interactive Python assignment submission tool would accept both Python 2 and 3. Otherwise, it's pretty great! | 1) education in programming. This was a | Good | 1) refresher to start programming with again, | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Teacher's lectures are very well done. Good explanations, even for someone who is mildly experience with programming already! | 1) Teacher's lectures are very well done. | Good | 1) explanations, even for someone who is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners, very detailed, convenient assignment system. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners, very detailed, convenient assignment | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent class.. Its like a workshop... Good job :) | 1) Its like a workshop. . . | Good | 1) job :) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | simple, easy, good to learn | 1) simple, easy, | Good | 1) to learn | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good course that uses a variety of tools for better learning | 1) a | Good | 1) course that uses a variety of | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is not that much helpful for those who want to do work for coding. I mean the level of toughness of questions is not too good to compete any coding competition. | 1) toughness of questions is not too | Good | 1) to compete any coding competition. | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | thank you avery good cours | 1) thank you avery | Good | 1) cours | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good, he is so funny and contents also good and easy to understand. | 1) | Good | 1) he is so funny and contents | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good, he is so funny and contents also good and easy to understand. | 2) is so funny and contents also | Good | 2) and easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it is so good, the teachers can transmit the knowledge required | 1) it is so | Good | 1) the teachers can transmit the knowledge | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I recommend this class especially for beginners. If you are good with coding in other languages and want to learn Python you can skip to chapter 3 or 4. If you are new to computers and how programming works, I definitely recommend watching all the courses. (My experiences based) | 1) especially for beginners. If you are | Good | 1) with coding in other languages and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good content for getting started in Python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content for getting started in Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course as well as the course contents are perfect. Dr. Chuck explains all the concepts really well. Whether one has done programming earlier or not, this course will give you an insight of what programming means. I would highly recommend this course to everyone who wants to learn Python. Go for it . Good Luck! | 1) learn Python. Go for it . | Good | 1) Luck! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course and the teacher is easy to follow. It is a good introduction to the world of programming at a pace that is easy | 1) easy to follow. It is a | Good | 1) introduction to the world of programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent introduction. Good for everybody. How programming should be. | 1) Excellent introduction. | Good | 1) for everybody. How programming should be. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a little boring for someone who has learned C or Java or any language before, however, it is really a good one for beginners, whether you love Python or just want to learn programming through one language. | 1) before, however, it is really a | Good | 1) one for beginners, whether you love | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It isver good. | 1) It isver | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good course for beginners | 1) A | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good start for zero experience learners. | 1) A | Good | 1) start for zero experience learners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good lectures and even fun. the tool is extremely useful. more feedback and assistance would generally improve the quality | 1) very | Good | 1) lectures and even fun. the tool | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really very good but basic introduction to the Python programming language. | 1) Really very | Good | 1) but basic introduction to the Python | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good beginner course. The teacher explains everything clearly and thoroughly. | 1) A very | Good | 1) beginner course. The teacher explains everything | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good course! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Intro course! | 1) | Good | 1) Intro course! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This material is great! Very well put together, going at a good pace but not to fast for me to digest. Really one of the best coding courses I've ever taken | 1) well put together, going at a | Good | 1) pace but not to fast for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginner. Prof teaches very elegantly and the concepts are brought about with clarity and easy to understand method. I simply love the course and professor's teaching style. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginner. Prof teaches very | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to Python. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, a student can catch all necessary skills within the short period of time, thank the awesome professor and the brilliant textbook. | 1) | Good | 1) course, a student can catch all | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Solid, entertaining intro to programming and Python. Dr. Chuck does a good job of not overwhelming in the first course while giving enough info to get us started on the road to programming. | 1) and Python. Dr. Chuck does a | Good | 1) job of not overwhelming in the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's a vey good course for new bird. Strong recommend to python learner. | 1) It's a vey | Good | 1) course for new bird. Strong recommend | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Professor is really good at explaining how the programming works in a digestible and insightful manner. Highly recommend this class to anyone trying to learn python. | 1) Professor is really | Good | 1) at explaining how the programming works | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a great course for learning the basics of Python programming. It allows the student have a good grasp of the foundations of Python. | 1) It allows the student have a | Good | 1) grasp of the foundations of Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introduction to the material, though a bit simplistic. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the material, though a | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good course to start learner. | 1) a | Good | 1) course to start learner. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Fantastic experience. Great explanation and good assignments. | 1) Fantastic experience. Great explanation and | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good classes to get a basic understanding about python programming | 1) | Good | 1) classes to get a basic understanding | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginner | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a very good introduction "for anybody". | 1) a very | Good | 1) introduction " for anybody" . | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginner, but too easy for me ^_^ | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner, but too easy for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good course for beginners, especially those who have not programmed anything before. If you have prior experience in programming and not aiming for the Specialization, you can just skip ahead ;) Just one note: if you're really enthusiastic, all the content here won't be enough for you! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for beginners, especially those who | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's a clear and nice tutorial. Although I've learned python before, I still find it fascinating and worthy to spend several hours to review some of the basics. And the professor himself is super humorous. Good experience, 5/5 | 1) the professor himself is super humorous. | Good | 1) experience, 5/5 | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good beginners course! Short, easy to understand lectures that teach you the basics of Python Programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) beginners course! Short, easy to understand | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is a very good one for beginners in both programming and Python. The teacher is engaging and easily understood, and the material is good. The course could do with a more systematized "homework" system in addition to the quizzes and assessments, but a well-organized student has all the elements to do additional work by himself if needed. | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) one for beginners in both programming | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is a very good one for beginners in both programming and Python. The teacher is engaging and easily understood, and the material is good. The course could do with a more systematized "homework" system in addition to the quizzes and assessments, but a well-organized student has all the elements to do additional work by himself if needed. | 2) easily understood, and the material is | Good | 2) The course could do with a | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good intro to programming. Enjoyed the coursework; plan to continue so I can learn even more... | 1) | Good | 1) intro to programming. Enjoyed the coursework; | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great Course really. Good material and easy to follow and understand. | 1) Great Course really. | Good | 1) material and easy to follow and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good and when you finish you get the feeling i learned something | 1) very | Good | 1) and when you finish you get | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good pace for someone like myself who had not "programmed" since learning PASCAL back in 1983. I look forward to taking the entire series of Python classes. | 1) A | Good | 1) pace for someone like myself who | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. The materials are perfect, the videos clear, funny and comprehensible, the assignments easy if one does follow and learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The materials are perfect, the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction. The text is confusing at times, but that's just part of learning new language. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. The text is confusing at | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course!! | 1) very | Good | 1) course! ! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introduction to python! | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to python! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | One of the best courses I've taken on Coursera. The content is very crisp and not too overly simplistic and very, very engaging. The faculty, Charles Severance is superb. His explanations and videos are a good balance of fun and learning. This course rekindled my love for coding and the Bonus videos are kinda..they are simply great. | 1) His explanations and videos are a | Good | 1) balance of fun and learning. This | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course and good teacher | 1) | Good | 1) course and good teacher | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course and good teacher | 2) Good course and | Good | 2) teacher | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and entertaining lessons to start with Python. Also highly recommended for people that have no prior experience with programming. This course is much better structured with its tasks, assignments and lessons than a lot of other (very confusing) coursera courses. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and entertaining lessons to start with | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | easy and good | 1) easy and | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | excellent course.good for any beginner. | 1) excellent course. | Good | 1) for any beginner. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | really good, great for beginners, need to get rid of slides with white text on green background | 1) really | Good | 1) great for beginners, need to get | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course content. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and useful course | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teacher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I like the sense of Humor of Dr. Charles. His teaches like someone of our age, like a friend, I appreciate that. The course will not be a burden on anyone. It's easy to follow along. The concepts taught are not taught in a structured way (although the way they are taught is good). My advice to the staff is that Structure all the similar things and explain them at one place. Some important and helpful things are left out. Overall, it's a good course for beginners. | 1) the way they are taught is | Good | 1) My advice to the staff is | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I like the sense of Humor of Dr. Charles. His teaches like someone of our age, like a friend, I appreciate that. The course will not be a burden on anyone. It's easy to follow along. The concepts taught are not taught in a structured way (although the way they are taught is good). My advice to the staff is that Structure all the similar things and explain them at one place. Some important and helpful things are left out. Overall, it's a good course for beginners. | 2) are left out. Overall, it's a | Good | 2) course for beginners. | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, perfect for beginners. I had some previous knowledge so found it a little slow, but just powered on with the python informatics, which has a better pace than the course. I'll probably rely more on the course videos going forward though as I venture deeper in to the language. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, perfect for beginners. I had | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginner | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really enjoy the videos describing the history of the language. The exercises were very good and the 'Office Hours' videos were lots of fun. Its really great to see how many people are interested in Python all around the world. These all provided a good foundation. I also thought it was great to be able to do the exercises and programming problems at any time. I look forward to the second course in this series. | 1) the language. The exercises were very | Good | 1) and the 'Office Hours' videos were | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really enjoy the videos describing the history of the language. The exercises were very good and the 'Office Hours' videos were lots of fun. Its really great to see how many people are interested in Python all around the world. These all provided a good foundation. I also thought it was great to be able to do the exercises and programming problems at any time. I look forward to the second course in this series. | 2) the world. These all provided a | Good | 2) foundation. I also thought it was | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a good beginner course for Python. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) beginner course for Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excelent course. I am a programmer teacher and I do not know Python. That is the reason to do this course. But beyond that I am excited because the examples and the way to teach are very good. | 1) the way to teach are very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, I love it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I love it. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is a great start. The professor really makes it fun to learn and uses good techniques to make concepts easy to understand. | 1) it fun to learn and uses | Good | 1) techniques to make concepts easy to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and basic python language course | 1) Very | Good | 1) and basic python language course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The Course " Programming for Everybody (Getting Started with Python)" is so good for beginners , | 1) (Getting Started with Python)" is so | Good | 1) for beginners , | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, definitely sparked my interest in programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, definitely sparked my interest in | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good enough for getting started. | 1) | Good | 1) enough for getting started. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good basic introduction to Python. The course should be easy to understand and follow even if you are not a programmer. To top it all Chuck is an amazing teacher full or energy, enthusiasm and knowledge. His love for Python is seen in each and every chapter. I am glad that I took this course on Coursera. Will definitely recommend this to others. Would love to take the advanced part of the course soon. | 1) | Good | 1) basic introduction to Python. The course | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for the beginner. Thanks Prof. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for the beginner. Thanks Prof. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course but it needs some getting in-depth. | 1) | Good | 1) Course but it needs some getting | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good lectures, assignments, and examples. An excellent course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures, assignments, and examples. An excellent | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good to start learning Python. More exercices would be great. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to start learning Python. More exercices | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introdution to python | 1) A | Good | 1) introdution to python | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginers | 1) | Good | 1) for beginers | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is exceptionally good for those who don't have programming background | 1) This course is exceptionally | Good | 1) for those who don't have programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good introduction for people who have never do anything with programming. It is really basic knowledge. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for people who have never | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and fun. Materials are consistent and guidance is clear to understand (not always so with some Coursera course). | 1) Very | Good | 1) and fun. Materials are consistent and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | excellent material.....very good teaching.. | 1) material. . . . . very | Good | 1) teaching. . | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginners................I enjoyed it. | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners. . . . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was great! This course was really a good match for my learning style and I thought Prof Severance was awesome! | 1) great! This course was really a | Good | 1) match for my learning style and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it's good to freshman but To the older it is so easy. | 1) it's | Good | 1) to freshman but To the older | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is an excellent introduction for beginners and there are good explanations by the instructor. I just wish there were more problems or assignments provided for practice. Overall, I recommend this course to anyone with no programming background looking to take a step into that world. | 1) introduction for beginners and there are | Good | 1) explanations by the instructor. I just | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good and useful | 1) | Good | 1) and useful | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very helpful and good teacher | 1) very helpful and | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course! The teacher is amazing, explains well and teaches the right way. Good job! :) | 1) well and teaches the right way. | Good | 1) job! :) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I gave five stars because the course was very easy to follow, the lectures gave a feeling of sitting in a class room and listening to the professor. Secondly, the exercises were good at making me understand the concepts. | 1) the professor. Secondly, the exercises were | Good | 1) at making me understand the concepts. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's a very good course for beginners for python. The course material is put together very well. The assignments are not really challenging if you already know programming, but for beginners it should be very exciting. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course for beginners for python. The | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a very good complement to the textbook 'Python for Informatics'. This particular course covers Chapter 1 - 5 only. For the rest of the book, you'll need to follow the "Python for Everybody Specialization". | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) complement to the textbook 'Python for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | clear and simple explanation very good for beginner like me | 1) clear and simple explanation very | Good | 1) for beginner like me | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course is pretty basic however I think it’s necessary to start with good base for the rest of the specialization courses. | 1) think it’s necessary to start with | Good | 1) base for the rest of the | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it's awesome.Instructor is awesome and so good. Everyone must check out this course. | 1) awesome. Instructor is awesome and so | Good | 1) Everyone must check out this course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I loved this course. Its really good for beginners, though I was not completely one. The teacher is funny and knows how to explain the concepts in a clear and concise way. | 1) I loved this course. Its really | Good | 1) for beginners, though I was not | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course for a person who is new to programming although writing assignments with the autograder is a bit irritating as it catches mistakes like an extra space or small and capital so make sure u take care of these small issues | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for a person who is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The instructor is too good. I feel like I am talking to him directly. | 1) The instructor is too | Good | 1) I feel like I am talking | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excelent course! Excelent professor, great pedagogical methods used, a very accesible language and very good quality information. And the book is awesome! Thanks for uploading it. | 1) a very accesible language and very | Good | 1) quality information. And the book is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am a new stduent from india name is akshay goyal and the teaching way is very good of teacher . Its a very good experience learnitng from other populer countrie's university | 1) and the teaching way is very | Good | 1) of teacher . Its a very | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am a new stduent from india name is akshay goyal and the teaching way is very good of teacher . Its a very good experience learnitng from other populer countrie's university | 2) of teacher . Its a very | Good | 2) experience learnitng from other populer countrie's | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content, very clear and easy to understand with good examples and exercises! | 1) clear and easy to understand with | Good | 1) examples and exercises! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very basic but good for people who don't have any prior programming experience, | 1) Very basic but | Good | 1) for people who don't have any | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | His Explaination is good | 1) His Explaination is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. Must for all the starters. Recommend it to all the beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Must for all the starters. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course for beginners. and I would like to put some suggestions: 1. might be worthy discussing a little about type conversion samples like: x= "1"; x = int(x); 2. for HW 5.2, if user put floating number, it will pass the try, but actually we need to output integer. which is easy to fix but might cause frustration thanks! | 1) very | Good | 1) course for beginners. and I would | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for 0 base student to learn how to coding. But too easy for some one who has coding background. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for 0 base student to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good, I use to program when I was in high school. I feel like doing it again (now I'm about to graduate from a business school), so I take this course. The materials are not so hard to catch up and I enjoy learning new program. (I use to do basic C++ and Java) | 1) | Good | 1) I use to program when I | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to programing and love the relax style the teacher have as we're in a real classroom and not at an online course | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to programing and love the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | As someone with no introduction to programming at all, this course was easy to follow through and was a pretty good introductory course! | 1) follow through and was a pretty | Good | 1) introductory course! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course. | 1) very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good explanation for beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation for beginner. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good introductory course | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introductory course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Loved the course! Extremely good teacher, really explained everything to detail. Thank you so much! | 1) Loved the course! Extremely | Good | 1) teacher, really explained everything to detail. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for introducing in Python | 1) | Good | 1) course for introducing in Python | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, easy for beginner; a breeze for experience programmers. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, easy for beginner; a breeze | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Fair course. Explanations are good and materials are solid. | 1) Fair course. Explanations are | Good | 1) and materials are solid. | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course and intro to Python. Coupled with Codeacademy.com it has been fairly easy. | 1) | Good | 1) course and intro to Python. Coupled | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great teacher, good beginner exercises, very thankful to Coursera and University of Michigan for it. | 1) Great teacher, | Good | 1) beginner exercises, very thankful to Coursera | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for starters. Well thought. | 1) | Good | 1) for starters. Well thought. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | must learn course. Very good mentor. | 1) must learn course. Very | Good | 1) mentor. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good course I swear. Very practical and good explanations from the teacher. Thank you | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course I swear. Very practical and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good course I swear. Very practical and good explanations from the teacher. Thank you | 2) course I swear. Very practical and | Good | 2) explanations from the teacher. Thank you | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course for novices. If you have coded in a structured language in the past this course seems a little slow but still a good revision. | 1) a little slow but still a | Good | 1) revision. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Awesome course structure. A good start to learn python | 1) Awesome course structure. A | Good | 1) start to learn python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Exceptional teaching skills and very good dynamics. Incridable course methodology, I recommend. | 1) Exceptional teaching skills and very | Good | 1) dynamics. Incridable course methodology, I recommend. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teaching from a nice professor! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching from a nice professor! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very easy course if you already have programming experience. Good way to brush up your python skills, but might be too slow for advanced learners. | 1) if you already have programming experience. | Good | 1) way to brush up your python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy to understand, a good course for programming beginners. | 1) Easy to understand, a | Good | 1) course for programming beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very interesting and clear with good humor :-) | 1) Very interesting and clear with | Good | 1) humor :-) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr Chuck is a very good instructor who manage to inject both humor and clarity into his teaching. He got me hooked on Python! I always look forward to the next lesson. The lesson content is well-planned and paced..Great work! | 1) Dr Chuck is a very | Good | 1) instructor who manage to inject both | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great location to start learning about Python. Dr. Chuck is great teacher. I enjoyed learning and gain good Python foundation for future courses. | 1) teacher. I enjoyed learning and gain | Good | 1) Python foundation for future courses. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course to start programming with Python, well organized, lots of materials, the teacher is very cool and I've really liked this course. Thanks very much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to start programming with Python, | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's really a introductory course. Had good learning experience. It would have been better if it is bit faster as compared to now. Just only suggestion :) | 1) It's really a introductory course. Had | Good | 1) learning experience. It would have been | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Lectures clearly explained & good content shared. Enjoyed the classes. | 1) Lectures clearly explained & | Good | 1) content shared. Enjoyed the classes. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good class. Very suitable for new learners even if you have never learnt anything about programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. Very suitable for new learners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty good course for a beginner. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course for a beginner. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and step-by-step as NKOTB would state. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and step-by-step as NKOTB would state. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is quite good to learn basic | 1) This is quite | Good | 1) to learn basic | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very good for the beginner and intermediate person that wants to learn or refresh their skills in programming. i first learned programmer in college (17 years ago) using FORTRAN. I had to learn it in semester; this course provides an interesting format and instruction (Dr. Chuck is a good teacher). This first course gives you a little back ground and it gets you started with the process of programming. I would have given the course a 5 star, but i found the book a challenge to follow for a beginner. I fumbled my way through it. only because of my past experience with FORTRAN programming. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for the beginner and intermediate person | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very good for the beginner and intermediate person that wants to learn or refresh their skills in programming. i first learned programmer in college (17 years ago) using FORTRAN. I had to learn it in semester; this course provides an interesting format and instruction (Dr. Chuck is a good teacher). This first course gives you a little back ground and it gets you started with the process of programming. I would have given the course a 5 star, but i found the book a challenge to follow for a beginner. I fumbled my way through it. only because of my past experience with FORTRAN programming. | 2) and instruction (Dr. Chuck is a | Good | 2) teacher). This first course gives you | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for anyone who's a beginner. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1) | Good | 1) for anyone who's a beginner. ! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent introduction to Python, well explained, helpful skill-building assignments and very good learning environment. Fantastic book! Thanks. | 1) explained, helpful skill-building assignments and very | Good | 1) learning environment. Fantastic book! Thanks. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good one for beginner! I learned how to use Pyhon!! | 1) | Good | 1) one for beginner! I learned how | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The instructor is a very good teacher | 1) The instructor is a very | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Quite good for beginners. | 1) Quite | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a good course to get familiar not only with Python, but with programming as well. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course to get familiar not only | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course, takes you step by step and teaches you all you need to do for a good basis of programming. for those who want to remove some rust, you can just read the lectures and run on this course. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, takes you step by step | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course, takes you step by step and teaches you all you need to do for a good basis of programming. for those who want to remove some rust, you can just read the lectures and run on this course. | 2) you need to do for a | Good | 2) basis of programming. for those who | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Being a beginner with absolutely NO idea of programming, this program has helped me a lot in learning the basics about python. Charles is very good in the work he does; you can easily understand his teachings. I'm so excited to continue the rest of the coursework ! | 1) basics about python. Charles is very | Good | 1) in the work he does; you | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The teacher is really good and entertained. I really enjoied this course and learned, despite it is very basic. | 1) The teacher is really | Good | 1) and entertained. I really enjoied this | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good thing, should be promoted | 1) | Good | 1) thing, should be promoted | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I have see many courses of computer programing in courser, some are not really good and some are not really for beginners (even if they say it). So I follow this course ones before and I din not finish but I really like it, because is for beginners, is clear and slow in the way to show the topic, is fun, but also and most importan I feel like I'm learning a lot. Almost finish course 1 and really optimistic to do all specialization. | 1) in courser, some are not really | Good | 1) and some are not really for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for fresh programmer | 1) | Good | 1) for fresh programmer | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course to enter into world of programming with python | 1) very | Good | 1) course to enter into world of | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excelent Course, the tutor is a very good teacher and person and that is reflected in the course, thanks for making this course and the book available for everyone :) | 1) Course, the tutor is a very | Good | 1) teacher and person and that is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course and really good introduction to the Python language | 1) Great course and really | Good | 1) introduction to the Python language | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello i am Adan Bae. I am from korea. How are you today!? This class is very very awesome and useful for me!!! Because i wanted to learn the Python, but it is not famous language in korea. So i looked up the class in the MOOC and Coursera Finally i could meet the Dr. Chuck's class. then i tried to hard to understand his class. Because i don't have good English skill. But i did it!! I got it! Thank you Dr. Chuck and Everyone who made this class alot!! I really hope to meet you wherever Korea or America. See you in next class!! | 1) his class. Because i don't have | Good | 1) English skill. But i did it! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I felt unprepared for Exercise 5.2. Otherwise good. | 1) unprepared for Exercise 5. 2. Otherwise | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to programming with Python. Dr. Chuck knows how to put it simple and fun | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to programming with Python. Dr. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's really good for begin the python programmer | 1) It's really | Good | 1) for begin the python programmer | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The first part of a good introductory course to Python. The automated grading makes this course a little easier to handle, in comparison to those that have peer-reviewed grading. | 1) The first part of a | Good | 1) introductory course to Python. The automated | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for newbies | 1) Very | Good | 1) for newbies | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The Instructor is very good and friendly. Also the book and videos are free. | 1) The Instructor is very | Good | 1) and friendly. Also the book and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good start to anyone that want to learn programming. קורס מצויין לכל מי שרוצה להתחיל ללמוד תכנות בקלות מהבית. מומלץ! | 1) | Good | 1) start to anyone that want to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | All of the review I've read were that the course was great, so maybe it is me that was the problem. However, as I would go through the written material, I would try to work the problems given as examples, and when they did not work, I was confused and wondered why the example given to teach us would not work. I asked for help a number of times, providing screen shots of the results I got trying to duplicate what the example was supposed to show, and page numbers of where the example was presented in the course materials. One former student basically said that I should not be trying to duplicate the examples, but just accept the concept they were trying to show. Another did a good job of explaining one of my questions, but then all replies to my question ceased. I decide to drop out of the class and try teaching myself, as I have done on everything I have learned about computers since my 1st computer in 1983. I have been very impressed with other courses given by Coursera members, but this one was not one of them. All of the other submissions praise the course, so maybe it is just me, but none of the other submissions mentioned any actual things the course had done - just that it was great. | 1) trying to show. Another did a | Good | 1) job of explaining one of my | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to Python. Interesting and easy to start. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Python. Interesting and easy | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great class, I really enjoyed it. Thank you for taking the time to make such a good program for everyone to use. I cant wait to start the next course. | 1) the time to make such a | Good | 1) program for everyone to use. I | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a course with which I had a good deal of knowledge and thus paving me the way to the vast and enriching world of coding. I enjoyed it a lot! | 1) course with which I had a | Good | 1) deal of knowledge and thus paving | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good strat course. Good proffesor. Thank's all! | 1) | Good | 1) strat course. Good proffesor. Thank's all! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good strat course. Good proffesor. Thank's all! | 2) Good strat course. | Good | 2) proffesor. Thank's all! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. Dr Chuck has made it interesting and simple to understand | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Dr Chuck has made it | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The first python lesson I have finished. It is quite simple. The certified fee is too expensive comparing the information in the class. Anyway, I like this class and the teacher. It is a quite good journey till now. | 1) the teacher. It is a quite | Good | 1) journey till now. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course. Great professor. Tons of notes and good examples in code. | 1) Great professor. Tons of notes and | Good | 1) examples in code. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is really good and helpful!! | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) and helpful! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is really best course for individual wants to learn python without having previous knowledge in programming. Dr. Charles has explained each concepts in simple manner and his book "Python for infromatics" is really good. | 1) " Python for infromatics" is really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Prof. Severance is a fantastic teacher. I'm so happy to see people like him committed to good quality learning for everyone. I got the print version of the book, which helped me go though the course more easily. | 1) see people like him committed to | Good | 1) quality learning for everyone. I got | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a good course for the people who are new to programming. The instructor is really intuitive and engaging. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for the people who are | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good material and funny professor makes it easy. However, assignments are a bit too easy. | 1) | Good | 1) material and funny professor makes it | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course showing the fundamental knowledge of Python, perfect for the beginners. Thank you Dr. Chuck! :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course showing the fundamental knowledge of | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course I grasped each and every concept of Python. Thanks :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course I grasped each and every | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course assignments weren't challenging enough for me and lectures were too slow for my liking. But, I do understand that the course is more suited for people without prior experience in programming, so I have nothing to complain about. Good beginner course! | 1) I have nothing to complain about. | Good | 1) beginner course! | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is very good explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks for this good course. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is very good explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks for this good course. | 2) more to say. Thanks for this | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to programming. It made me register for the second module before I had even finished the first one! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to programming. It made me | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to Python and good challenges in the work exercises. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Python and good challenges | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to Python and good challenges in the work exercises. | 2) Very good introduction to Python and | Good | 2) challenges in the work exercises. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good teaching, good course | 1) | Good | 1) teaching, good course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good teaching, good course | 2) Good teaching, | Good | 2) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course to start Python and more importantly programming. Fun way to get beginners interested in programming. Definitely recommend this course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course to start Python and more | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. Everything is understandable even if you don't have any experience in programming!!Thank you,Charles Severance!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Everything is understandable even if | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | super good course!!! | 1) super | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Coverage of basic concepts is good. | 1) Coverage of basic concepts is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teaching, basic course (as it's meant to be). And a very good introduction. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching, basic course (as it's meant | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teaching, basic course (as it's meant to be). And a very good introduction. | 2) meant to be). And a very | Good | 2) introduction. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to python programming, very good explanations even in step by step detail level. A big thank you to Dr. Chuck and Coursera ! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to python programming, very good | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to python programming, very good explanations even in step by step detail level. A big thank you to Dr. Chuck and Coursera ! | 2) Good introduction to python programming, very | Good | 2) explanations even in step by step | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Basic python stuff covered. Useful for someone coming in with no real programming exposure. And a good revision for someone picking up programming after a gap. Dr.Chuck's style is easy and engaging to follow. Note that this course covers only first five chapters of the python book. Rest is covered as part of paid course. | 1) no real programming exposure. And a | Good | 1) revision for someone picking up programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | awesome instructor....very good first course | 1) awesome instructor. . . . very | Good | 1) first course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really had good time learning this course. And this course instructor Charles Severance gave amazing details and intro towards programming, many lecturers just go with direct definitions and concepts present in some textbook but don't go with simplicity. Many new students need something that is simple and clear so I think sir Charles is best in doing that and hes my favourite lecturer now. If the courses are this fun and interesting I wouldn't mind paying for it. | 1) I really had | Good | 1) time learning this course. And this | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for begginers but quite boring for those who know programming in language other than python | 1) | Good | 1) course for begginers but quite boring | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | great course to start Python.And good teacher. | 1) great course to start Python. And | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great Course, Professor is great Human being. Thank you sir for such a good course. best course for beginners in programming. | 1) Thank you sir for such a | Good | 1) course. best course for beginners in | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good course to understand the basics of Python, though there's no difference between the book chapters and the video lectures (lectures are basically readings of the chapters) - I expected more info in general. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to understand the basics of | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I recommend it to absolute beginners to programming. For those new to Python but otherwise, good programmers, this course gently introduces you to Python in an effortless manner. great course for programming beginners and those new to python. | 1) those new to Python but otherwise, | Good | 1) programmers, this course gently introduces you | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course! Very easy for beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) course! Very easy for beginners! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really helpful informative and interesting course. Much good info ant very interesting lectures. Thanks for your time ! | 1) helpful informative and interesting course. Much | Good | 1) info ant very interesting lectures. Thanks | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, I would recommend it to people who are new to python. Thnx Dr Chuck! | 1) | Good | 1) course, I would recommend it to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good structure and materials. Thank you! | 1) Very | Good | 1) structure and materials. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginner. Very easy to follow. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner. Very easy to follow. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | for beginners is wary good :) | 1) for beginners is wary | Good | 1) :) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is really an amazing course and the thing that makes it more amazing is the course instructor. He is a very good teacher. He know how to teach students at THEIR level. Loving this course so far. | 1) course instructor. He is a very | Good | 1) teacher. He know how to teach | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to the material. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the material. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a good course for a beginner! | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for a beginner! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Before this course,I know nothing about coding.I think it's a good start for python study.Dr.Chuck is truly brilliant and humorous.I do love this course. Grazie! | 1) about coding. I think it's a | Good | 1) start for python study. Dr. Chuck | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good start towards Python world! | 1) A | Good | 1) start towards Python world! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good ,I have finished it. | 1) | Good | 1) , I have finished it. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good course for introduction. Too simple and too little exercise. | 1) a | Good | 1) course for introduction. Too simple and | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Basics are explained in layman terms. Good start point for Python I think. | 1) Basics are explained in layman terms. | Good | 1) start point for Python I think. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | 1) fast movement at the same time. | Good | 1) exercises to practice. The method of | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good. I am a 31 year old accountant and have always wanted to learn programming. I've given it a few tries before, but I always ended up confused, bored, and discouraged. This course made it very clear what I needed to know and does a great job teaching you how to implement the concepts covered. I've already started the next course, and it continues in the same fashion. Thanks Dr. Chuck! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I am a 31 year old | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to general programming using Python. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to general programming using Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good to start programming and learning Python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to start programming and learning Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginner!! | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good one... want to have this quality more :D | 1) Very | Good | 1) one. . . want to have | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good as an introductory class. I really Chuck's teaching style and his way of explaining helps a lot! Would for sure complete these 5-course series. | 1) Very | Good | 1) as an introductory class. I really | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good but for the future I would suggest more interaction with mentors or teachers... maybe one hour Skype class per week for Q&A | 1) Very | Good | 1) but for the future I would | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. Instruction was very easy to understand. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Instruction was very easy to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course for people with no programming background. very clear and easy-paced. for those of you who are familiar with python or other computer languages, i would suggest to use 1,5 of the normal speed when watching the lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) course for people with no programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An good introduction to Python geared towards people without programming experience. If you already have a good programming experience the only interesting thing of interest will be the syntax, but that's just a fraction of the video's time. You will probably start skipping forward on the basic ideas of how computers work and lessons will take just the time to listen to the videos and you probably will be able to finish a couple of lessons in one evening, instead of a week. I really appreciated the extra videos that give some background on the history behind programming. At the end of this course you will have a basic idea of how a computer works and how you can instruct it to do still very basic things. | 1) An | Good | 1) introduction to Python geared towards people | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An good introduction to Python geared towards people without programming experience. If you already have a good programming experience the only interesting thing of interest will be the syntax, but that's just a fraction of the video's time. You will probably start skipping forward on the basic ideas of how computers work and lessons will take just the time to listen to the videos and you probably will be able to finish a couple of lessons in one evening, instead of a week. I really appreciated the extra videos that give some background on the history behind programming. At the end of this course you will have a basic idea of how a computer works and how you can instruct it to do still very basic things. | 2) experience. If you already have a | Good | 2) programming experience the only interesting thing | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good lesson for who wants to learn python | 1) Very | Good | 1) lesson for who wants to learn | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Help you understanding python quickly and clearly, this is a good start! | 1) quickly and clearly, this is a | Good | 1) start! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I though that this was a very good beginner course to programming. I have had a introductory course for C programming and it was similar. The quality was good and it had many good ways to reinforce the concepts. Although some of the beginning classes were very basic I still learning some concepts that I did not know. | 1) though that this was a very | Good | 1) beginner course to programming. I have | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I though that this was a very good beginner course to programming. I have had a introductory course for C programming and it was similar. The quality was good and it had many good ways to reinforce the concepts. Although some of the beginning classes were very basic I still learning some concepts that I did not know. | 2) it was similar. The quality was | Good | 2) and it had many good ways | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I though that this was a very good beginner course to programming. I have had a introductory course for C programming and it was similar. The quality was good and it had many good ways to reinforce the concepts. Although some of the beginning classes were very basic I still learning some concepts that I did not know. | 3) was good and it had many | Good | 3) ways to reinforce the concepts. Although | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | There is some good material but the presentation seems a bit uneven; some parts are repeated many times at very slow speed while other parts, equally important, barely rate a word. The quizzes can be very searching and you really need to have paid close attention to every word (however quickly or slowly it passed by). I would have liked more practical exercises. The accompanying book is good and I am still looking forward to the other courses in the sequence which move further away from my limited knowledge of Python. | 1) There is some | Good | 1) material but the presentation seems a | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | There is some good material but the presentation seems a bit uneven; some parts are repeated many times at very slow speed while other parts, equally important, barely rate a word. The quizzes can be very searching and you really need to have paid close attention to every word (however quickly or slowly it passed by). I would have liked more practical exercises. The accompanying book is good and I am still looking forward to the other courses in the sequence which move further away from my limited knowledge of Python. | 2) practical exercises. The accompanying book is | Good | 2) and I am still looking forward | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a perfect one for people who are beginning to take their first steps in the world of Python (and programming, in general).. All the lectures, assignments, and the course materials offer quite good insight to basic and fundamental programming concepts.. And, considering the syntactical ease of Python, it makes programming easy to learn and understand, removing the extra clutter found in the more traditional languages like C/C++ or Java,, And, finally, the instructor, Prof. Charles Severance, who is more affectionately called Dr. Chuck just mixes fun and learning to create quite an exciting and memorable teaching environment, But, while all of this good, I felt that this course lacked the bite for a more advanced learner or someone who has spent sometime in the world of programming.. The complexity of the quizzes or the assignments are at beginner level... Best for complete beginners.. But, like i mentioned earlier, it is very easy to rush the whole course in a couple of days time or at most, one week for an advanced learner. This course lays the foundation for the more advanced courses in Python.. Technically, it is the first part of the Programming for Everybody specialization, which consists of 5 courses, revolving around the world of Python.. So, my final advice to all beginners is to take their sweet time understanding and grasping these fundamental concepts,, These form the foundation stone for any programming language as well as Computer Science world. Don't worry about the assignments, you will get more than ample time to complete them and succeed in them.. Plus, I feel that you will also enjoy some of the bonus interviews.. They could be quite motivating or thought-provoking.. And, for advanced beginners, you can rush through this course and brush up on some basic concepts to move into more advanced courses, which will not only be a lot more challenging and catering more advanced and diverse concepts and topics.. And, in my opinion, this specialization package could be, at this current moment, the best possible experience when compared to learning the basics of Python online.. And, could be the closest thing to a face-to-face learning experience.. | 1) and the course materials offer quite | Good | 1) insight to basic and fundamental programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a perfect one for people who are beginning to take their first steps in the world of Python (and programming, in general).. All the lectures, assignments, and the course materials offer quite good insight to basic and fundamental programming concepts.. And, considering the syntactical ease of Python, it makes programming easy to learn and understand, removing the extra clutter found in the more traditional languages like C/C++ or Java,, And, finally, the instructor, Prof. Charles Severance, who is more affectionately called Dr. Chuck just mixes fun and learning to create quite an exciting and memorable teaching environment, But, while all of this good, I felt that this course lacked the bite for a more advanced learner or someone who has spent sometime in the world of programming.. The complexity of the quizzes or the assignments are at beginner level... Best for complete beginners.. But, like i mentioned earlier, it is very easy to rush the whole course in a couple of days time or at most, one week for an advanced learner. This course lays the foundation for the more advanced courses in Python.. Technically, it is the first part of the Programming for Everybody specialization, which consists of 5 courses, revolving around the world of Python.. So, my final advice to all beginners is to take their sweet time understanding and grasping these fundamental concepts,, These form the foundation stone for any programming language as well as Computer Science world. Don't worry about the assignments, you will get more than ample time to complete them and succeed in them.. Plus, I feel that you will also enjoy some of the bonus interviews.. They could be quite motivating or thought-provoking.. And, for advanced beginners, you can rush through this course and brush up on some basic concepts to move into more advanced courses, which will not only be a lot more challenging and catering more advanced and diverse concepts and topics.. And, in my opinion, this specialization package could be, at this current moment, the best possible experience when compared to learning the basics of Python online.. And, could be the closest thing to a face-to-face learning experience.. | 2) environment, But, while all of this | Good | 2) I felt that this course lacked | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good lecture but the lecturer really can be precised. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecture but the lecturer really can | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Exceptionally Good, and probably the best course i have ever been a part of. The course makes learning python Easy, simple and fun special Thanks to Dr Chuck. The way course is split among the weeks make it an amazing experience to learn and do the hands on programming. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) and probably the best course i | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Fantastic course! Great teacher, clear explanations and good examples | 1) course! Great teacher, clear explanations and | Good | 1) examples | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good study and practical materials I really liked it. It would've been better if the autograder works correctly .! | 1) Really | Good | 1) study and practical materials I really | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course indeed. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course indeed. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course, went from knowing absolutely nothing to knowing a few useful things. i liked Chuck; the way he teaches as well as his sense of humour. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, went from knowing absolutely nothing | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent intoroductory course into Python. good pace and excellent assessment environement. | 1) Excellent intoroductory course into Python. | Good | 1) pace and excellent assessment environement. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This was a very good course for beginners in programming. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course for beginners in programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | this is very nice course, it will not take long time per week , you can do it while working or studying something else with ease, and professor chuck is really good to make you interested in the whole course, I really loved this course | 1) ease, and professor chuck is really | Good | 1) to make you interested in the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Feel the instructor is good but sometimes is difficult to follow his lectures. | 1) Feel the instructor is | Good | 1) but sometimes is difficult to follow | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | quit good but too easy | 1) quit | Good | 1) but too easy | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very detailed and explicit course. For me, as for the one who has a little bit practice in programming before, some of lessons had seemed to "easy". But anyway it is very good course. | 1) . But anyway it is very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I loved the course! It was exactly what I was looking for - start learning to programme from scratch. The teacher was good as well (and really funny :D), always giving very detailed explanations and good examples. | 1) programme from scratch. The teacher was | Good | 1) as well (and really funny :D), | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I loved the course! It was exactly what I was looking for - start learning to programme from scratch. The teacher was good as well (and really funny :D), always giving very detailed explanations and good examples. | 2) always giving very detailed explanations and | Good | 2) examples. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great way to learn and from the comfort of my own home. I am really getting a lot out of the course. I am taking the advice of the teacher and am playing with what I have already learned. That is making all the difference in the world to me. It is a good idea that I am lucky enough to take advantage of, thank all of you people that have made this happen. Your the Best!! | 1) world to me. It is a | Good | 1) idea that I am lucky enough | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very good for beginners. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr Chuck's introduction to programming where he is explaining variables, constants and later functions, arguments etc. is really good and I would say universal for any programming language. So definitely excellent course for anyone. | 1) later functions, arguments etc. is really | Good | 1) and I would say universal for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Lectures are too good. Helpful not only for python learners but all who wants to be a programmer | 1) Lectures are too | Good | 1) Helpful not only for python learners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for me as beginner. A lot of deep explanations how all this stuff works. | 1) | Good | 1) course for me as beginner. A | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | too easy, save us us much time to learn it. beside this, it is also a good experience because it has many bonus about the background of the development of Python. | 1) beside this, it is also a | Good | 1) experience because it has many bonus | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I feel there could have been more assignments (and perhaps ones that start from scratch). I personally felt having more [forced] practice would be good. As we only wrote code to apply each concept maybe once, and even these applications were already half worked out for us. | 1) having more [forced] practice would be | Good | 1) As we only wrote code to | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I liked the course. It really is a true beginners' class. I think the instructor taught well with good examples illustrating each point. I deducted a point because the exercises were too easy and there weren't enough of them. I understand that it's not easy to come up with a good grading system, but the grading system definitely could be better. | 1) think the instructor taught well with | Good | 1) examples illustrating each point. I deducted | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I liked the course. It really is a true beginners' class. I think the instructor taught well with good examples illustrating each point. I deducted a point because the exercises were too easy and there weren't enough of them. I understand that it's not easy to come up with a good grading system, but the grading system definitely could be better. | 2) easy to come up with a | Good | 2) grading system, but the grading system | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good starting point to learn Python! | 1) Very | Good | 1) starting point to learn Python! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Its really good. | 1) Its really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good lectures. Everything is very clear. The pace could be a little faster. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures. Everything is very clear. The | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for beginner, not difficult to start | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner, not difficult to start | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | excelent. complete information and good teacher. | 1) excelent. complete information and | Good | 1) teacher. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An extremely good intro course for Python. Concepts were explain with a lot of examples | 1) An extremely | Good | 1) intro course for Python. Concepts were | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Wonderful course, the professor is teaching in a good manner and clarifies every single detail. The curse is entertaining and useful. Thank you! | 1) the professor is teaching in a | Good | 1) manner and clarifies every single detail. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good didactics. It was a pleasure to participate in this course. Thanks for providing such good material. | 1) Very | Good | 1) didactics. It was a pleasure to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good didactics. It was a pleasure to participate in this course. Thanks for providing such good material. | 2) this course. Thanks for providing such | Good | 2) material. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction, peppered with interesting interviews of people who initiated something new in the Open Source world. And a lecturer who has humour. It was fun to participate. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, peppered with interesting interviews of | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr Charles is very enthusiastic and fun teacher. His comparison to life's examples makes it so much easier to learn Definitely a good beginner session to python. | 1) much easier to learn Definitely a | Good | 1) beginner session to python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | this course is very basic course for python and assignments are good. | 1) course for python and assignments are | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course, very clear and well put together. If you have some previous coding experience, you might find the pace a bit slow, but the slides are very good also and it's really great that Dr Chuck has made the textbook freely available. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, very clear and well put | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course, very clear and well put together. If you have some previous coding experience, you might find the pace a bit slow, but the slides are very good also and it's really great that Dr Chuck has made the textbook freely available. | 2) slow, but the slides are very | Good | 2) also and it's really great that | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good start that digs into the very basics | 1) | Good | 1) start that digs into the very | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The clear explanations made programming concepts easy to understand. Even as a novice I was able to understand. Good job. | 1) novice I was able to understand. | Good | 1) job. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | More coding exercises, as optional for example, would be nice. Otherwise good course and guide videos. | 1) for example, would be nice. Otherwise | Good | 1) course and guide videos. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction to python. Dr Chuck is a very friendly, affable teacher. The textbook is free. The load of this class is not so heavy. I really enjoyed the class. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to python. Dr Chuck is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good teaching, Awsome Chuck... | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching, Awsome Chuck. . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for a beginner | 1) | Good | 1) course for a beginner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good one and nice way to learn!! | 1) | Good | 1) one and nice way to learn! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for someone who is beginner to programming . Lessons go through a lot of details for first timers. | 1) | Good | 1) for someone who is beginner to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good class, easy to understand. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class, easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I had done some python before, but I thought I should start at the start. Dr Chuck is an engaging teacher, who doesn't assume any knowledge and takes things at a good pace, not too slow but not too fast. I'm looking forward to doing more of his courses. | 1) knowledge and takes things at a | Good | 1) pace, not too slow but not | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very clear instruction, good even for people who have no coding experience, but not too basic for coders new to Python. | 1) Very clear instruction, | Good | 1) even for people who have no | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners to programming. A bit slow if you already know programming, and just want to learn Python. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners to programming. A bit | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Like the style of the professor and his really cool tea cup :P . Good start for any one. First time ever completed a coursera course . Cheers for me :) | 1) really cool tea cup :P . | Good | 1) start for any one. First time | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good for start | 1) | Good | 1) for start | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good information and great delivery of content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information and great delivery of content. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good and easy to understand python programming ;) | 1) very | Good | 1) and easy to understand python programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent content. A good start for people who does't have any knowledge about programming. | 1) Excellent content. A | Good | 1) start for people who does't have | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good overview | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I enjoyed this course and it was a very good introduction to Python. The free textbook associated with the course is a great reference also. | 1) course and it was a very | Good | 1) introduction to Python. The free textbook | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Chuck is da man! Awesome class. Dr. Chuck touched upon all the nuances of basic Python that most students are too embarrassed to ask about but which are nevertheless mission-critical to effective programming. This capacity to address unspoken concerns both in presentations and assignments is one of the secrets of a good MOOC professor since students can't ask questions. This class is especially useful for those students who just completed codecademy.com's Python class since it explicitly addresses several issues that weren't addressed there. Finally, no one can rival Dr. Chuck's ability to access celebrity programmers whose presence adds an important dimension of context and helps students feel like they already belong to the international community of coders. Job well done. | 1) one of the secrets of a | Good | 1) MOOC professor since students can't ask | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is very good course and It helped me a lot to enhance my basic knowledge in PYTHON.I would like to take few more courses from UM on Python. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course and It helped me a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good coverage of the basic concepts. Is very useful for beginning programmers. One of the best courses I have ever completed. | 1) Very | Good | 1) coverage of the basic concepts. Is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course to get started with! | 1) | Good | 1) course to get started with! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very nice course, good for starter. | 1) Very nice course, | Good | 1) for starter. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Its good and perfectly suited for someone who wants to get a feel for Python programming language. | 1) Its | Good | 1) and perfectly suited for someone who | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is very good and understandable course. I specially thanks to Professor who explain each thing in very expressive manner and assignments are too good. Thanks for the developers and Coursera which give me this opportunity. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) and understandable course. I specially thanks | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is very good and understandable course. I specially thanks to Professor who explain each thing in very expressive manner and assignments are too good. Thanks for the developers and Coursera which give me this opportunity. | 2) expressive manner and assignments are too | Good | 2) Thanks for the developers and Coursera | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is very good for beginners. Material and "Bonus " Videos were adding more information to the course. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) for beginners. Material and " Bonus | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Both the lectures and text have good information and well explained examples. Low production value. | 1) Both the lectures and text have | Good | 1) information and well explained examples. Low | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | No matter how good you are with a computer or programming. This course will be the one for you! I love the sheer humour of the teachers and the simple explanations they give. I would definitely recommend this course to anybody. | 1) No matter how | Good | 1) you are with a computer or | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | fantastic teacher, good to start | 1) fantastic teacher, | Good | 1) to start | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introduction to Python ! | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Python ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is the best course to start learning pyhton. Dr. chuck is good instructor and the rest team is also very responsive. | 1) start learning pyhton. Dr. chuck is | Good | 1) instructor and the rest team is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for anyone who has struggled to understand how to program, especially in a self-directed/self-motivated way. This course taught by Dr. Chuck was broken down into concise simple sections that kept me interested, and I could follow along easily, with just the right amount of complexity in the quizzes and chapter exercises, so as not to discourage me. I've tried to learn computer programming using Java (inside & outside of a tertiary environment) with very limited success, but switched to learning python because it seemed more intuitive. So while i'm not a complete "novice" to programming, this course had the "Goldilocks Effect" for me. "Just right" :D | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for anyone who has struggled | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for a beginner, but I find sometimes the bonus videos are a bit useless. But each to themselves! would recommend for a beginner. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for a beginner, but I find | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good but too easy... | 1) | Good | 1) but too easy. . . | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good explained for a beginner in programming. Begins easy, but you get more and more an in-depth explanation of programming. Awesome professor, explains it very well and keeps me motivated. | 1) Really | Good | 1) explained for a beginner in programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | 比较好的入门课。 For high-level students , the video about some famous people is good. | 1) video about some famous people is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | easy, interesting, informative. love Dr. Chuck. a very good beginning course for Python learner | 1) informative. love Dr. Chuck. a very | Good | 1) beginning course for Python learner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, I had previous knowledge of Python but it was good to see a different approach with more background behind it. | 1) knowledge of Python but it was | Good | 1) to see a different approach with | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course. Very basic. But well taught and clearly explained concepts. If you are already familiar with programming concepts take a more advanced course. But for anyone needing a boost in confidence, or to pick up programming without feeling intimidated this is a very good course to take. | 1) feeling intimidated this is a very | Good | 1) course to take. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Thanks for courses! Its good start in programming. | 1) Thanks for courses! Its | Good | 1) start in programming. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is my first course I am taking on Coursera and I am amazed how much I am actually learning. Dr Chuck is really good in the video lessons and really manage to 'come thru the screen'. | 1) actually learning. Dr Chuck is really | Good | 1) in the video lessons and really | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Job Thanks alot | 1) | Good | 1) Job Thanks alot | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very funny and experienced Professor! Very helpful and thorough course, but a little bit too easy. Very good starting point for those want to learn programing but no previous programing experience. | 1) a little bit too easy. Very | Good | 1) starting point for those want to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | 4 stars for: If you are a complete beginner in Programming ,this is really a good point to start 1 star for : the presentation, out of the box knowledge | 1) Programming , this is really a | Good | 1) point to start 1 star for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good introduction to programming. Suggested for all the beginners in CS. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to programming. Suggested for all | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This lecture is good for beginners to learn python programming language. | 1) This lecture is | Good | 1) for beginners to learn python programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a very good introduction to programming concepts, along with Python. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to programming concepts, along with | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content is good and easy to follow but lack depth. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) and easy to follow but lack | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The professor explain really good the material. The best thing is to review the book, it helps to understand better the concepts of Programming and capability of Python | 1) The professor explain really | Good | 1) the material. The best thing is | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good introduction. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. I like it. I can learn some new thoughts happyly. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I like it. I can | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course, the professor has excellent communication skills and the mentors are very helpful. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, the professor has excellent communication | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really a good start for student who are not major in computer science. And Dr. Chuck is really a good teacher. He makes the video clear and easy to understand. | 1) It is really a | Good | 1) start for student who are not | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really a good start for student who are not major in computer science. And Dr. Chuck is really a good teacher. He makes the video clear and easy to understand. | 2) And Dr. Chuck is really a | Good | 2) teacher. He makes the video clear | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The explanations were very good and the exercises and assignments reinforced my understanding. | 1) The explanations were very | Good | 1) and the exercises and assignments reinforced | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good didactics and content. | 1) | Good | 1) didactics and content. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good learning methods | 1) | Good | 1) learning methods | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, good pacing... if you have never done any programming. Might be a bit too slow for anybody with any programming experience. | 1) | Good | 1) course, good pacing. . . if | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, good pacing... if you have never done any programming. Might be a bit too slow for anybody with any programming experience. | 2) Good course, | Good | 2) pacing. . . if you have | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | interesting and good program to build a good foundation for those who are new to programming | 1) interesting and | Good | 1) program to build a good foundation | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | interesting and good program to build a good foundation for those who are new to programming | 2) and good program to build a | Good | 2) foundation for those who are new | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Chuck is very good at teaching this class! His dedication to this course makes students know more about the essence of Python! Go Dr. Chuck! Go Python! | 1) Dr. Chuck is very | Good | 1) at teaching this class! His dedication | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is my first encouter with programming and I really enjoy it. The lecturer's way of explanation is very clear and simple. I did not expect to become so interested in it, however, learning Python turned out to be a fresh and great experience. Thanks to Dr Chuck it is real fun to learn Python. You can get through this course even if you think you are not very good at mathemathics (personal experience). I recommend this course to everybody who is interested in beginning their adventure with programming. | 1) you think you are not very | Good | 1) at mathemathics (personal experience). I recommend | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This class was very informative and easy for beginners to understand. The instructor was very good. | 1) to understand. The instructor was very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good quality course given by a pedagogic and charismatic teacher! It is too easy for someone who already knows another coding language, but I understand that it is intended for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) quality course given by a pedagogic | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really like almost every part of this course. It goes at a good pace for people who have no programming experience. I previously attempted to take a Python course that did not explain enough of what it wanted, and I almost gave up on learning Python. This course is not like that. The only downside to it is that the professor explains almost too much; the pace is almost too slow. If you have no programming experience but want to try Python, this is definitely the course to start with. | 1) this course. It goes at a | Good | 1) pace for people who have no | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Material with top instructor | 1) | Good | 1) Material with top instructor | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Hello There! I am a PHP web application developer and I am highly interested to make myself a good programmer. Recently I am to learn OpenERP Software which is created using Python. I found this course very useful to enrich my skill in programming concept and learning Python. I am very happy to find this course via one of my friends. I am so excited. This is really a great opportunity to learn. Thanks much for your effort dear management! :-) | 1) highly interested to make myself a | Good | 1) programmer. Recently I am to learn | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | pretty good course for 1st timers, but spending more time on showing how to draw flow charts may be better | 1) pretty | Good | 1) course for 1st timers, but spending | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course on Python. | 1) | Good | 1) course on Python. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good videos, great way to get started with python. looking forward to the next course. | 1) | Good | 1) videos, great way to get started | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course with great teacher | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with great teacher | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introductory course for beginners . | 1) A very | Good | 1) introductory course for beginners . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a really good course for people that don't know anything about programming, charles severance is also a very good teacher, makes the class easy and funny. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course for people that don't know | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a really good course for people that don't know anything about programming, charles severance is also a very good teacher, makes the class easy and funny. | 2) charles severance is also a very | Good | 2) teacher, makes the class easy and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good beginning course. The instructor is excelent and his explanations very clear. I recommend this course for people that is starting to program. Rubens Araujo | 1) A very | Good | 1) beginning course. The instructor is excelent | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good Course: Very Easy to take the first steps in programming with python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course: Very Easy to take the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great course.... The Professor was very good in transferring knowledge... | 1) . . The Professor was very | Good | 1) in transferring knowledge. . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is really good for python beginners. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) for python beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course for beginers | 1) very | Good | 1) course for beginers | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course, simple and easy to follow. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, simple and easy to follow. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the course is very good | 1) the course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course content is good. As a beginner i found it very much helpful for learning python. | 1) The course content is | Good | 1) As a beginner i found it | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course! Interesting and perfect for those who want to learn Python! | 1) | Good | 1) course! Interesting and perfect for those | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good content with additional inspiring interviews. Names on it, it is getting started course, it is giving foundations of Python. Because I have some programming background in Java, I have completed it in a week without skipping anything. Dr. Charles Severance makes his job very well and more importantly in very enjoying way :). I'm looking forward to taking next Python course from him. Last but not least, very thanks to Coursera for providing us accessing top class courses in free of charge. Best wishes for all from Turkey. | 1) A very | Good | 1) content with additional inspiring interviews. Names | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good introduction to Python!. The instructor's character is cool! and you will like what you do!. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Python! . The instructor's | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Job , Chuck Sir.. I really liked this course and enjoyed it a lot. Thanks Mohit Kumar | 1) | Good | 1) Job , Chuck Sir. . I | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course! A little simple. Suitable for people who don't have programming background. | 1) | Good | 1) course! A little simple. Suitable for | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for the absolute beginner. I'm not an absolute beginner to programming but I am to python so I found I could skip a heck of a lot. Exercises are useful for getting into routine of writing programs and the worked exercise videos show best practice. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for the absolute beginner. I'm not | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for starters, but should enhance the complication of assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) for starters, but should enhance the | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great course for the beginners!!! And a good and funny professor at the helm of the course!!! A really good experience for the students!!! Thank you, sir!!! | 1) the beginners! ! ! And a | Good | 1) and funny professor at the helm | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A great course for the beginners!!! And a good and funny professor at the helm of the course!!! A really good experience for the students!!! Thank you, sir!!! | 2) the course! ! ! A really | Good | 2) experience for the students! ! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good material for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) material for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice course, well presented, good level assessments and example. Well done, thanks | 1) Nice course, well presented, | Good | 1) level assessments and example. Well done, | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good course for beginners who have little experience in programming. For more seasoned programmers a bit more detailing. A big thanks to professor Chuck for making the course highly interactive and the motivational series after chapters is great. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for beginners who have little | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good course but way too easy since I'd programmed in other languages before... I finished the whole course in an afternoon but was useful to learn some of the important syntax and key words in the python language | 1) A | Good | 1) course but way too easy since | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it was quite good | 1) it was quite | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is really a good class for programming beginners! | 1) It is really a | Good | 1) class for programming beginners! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course for beginners.... | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. . . . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I have a little experience from a couple of college classes programming in java and MATLAB. This course was a good, straightforward introduction to python. For those familiar with the general structures of programming (conditional statements, loops, etc.) , this course will be easy and go quickly - you may be able to finish in a week or two. | 1) and MATLAB. This course was a | Good | 1) straightforward introduction to python. For those | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A good introduction course to programming in general. Dr. Chuck clearly explains things that I've never been able to grasp from books. I love the Computing Conversation videos, watching the inventors of Python and Arduino inspires anyone watching to create fun things to play around with or something more useful. I often come back to these videos for inspiration | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction course to programming in general. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginers | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginers | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course,but i think that exams are are very easy. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but i think that exams | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good start course for new leaner | 1) | Good | 1) start course for new leaner | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Quite fun, Dr Severance goes into good detail on the topic, his lectures are quite engaging, as he has filmed himself talking, so they are a lot more personal, and less "mind blowing" than some hardcore programming courses. | 1) Quite fun, Dr Severance goes into | Good | 1) detail on the topic, his lectures | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A bit of a slow start, but that's probably necessary for a programming course. Good way to get started. Definitely need to take the follow-up courses. | 1) probably necessary for a programming course. | Good | 1) way to get started. Definitely need | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a great course!! It moves a good pace and allows those with full time job to continue to learn and sharpen their skills. I love the material that they make available to the students, it is very helpful! | 1) great course! ! It moves a | Good | 1) pace and allows those with full | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The lectures are very good, and initiate thinking process like a computer executes a program. I would expect more challenging practice problems | 1) The lectures are very | Good | 1) and initiate thinking process like a | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good to learn and the teacher is great | 1) | Good | 1) to learn and the teacher is | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I have problems with focusing and specially focusing in lectures where the professors are too technical with their vocabulary, however with Professor Chuck's way of teaching I don't have this difficulty, he is able to teach in a way that is simple and posible to understand. I wish every professor can join this teaching style for the sake of learning "complex concepts" in an easy way. Since the professor is really good the course is great!! | 1) way. Since the professor is really | Good | 1) the course is great! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a nice introductory course to programing with good foundations to continue learning. | 1) nice introductory course to programing with | Good | 1) foundations to continue learning. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is really easy to understand for those who does not have basis in informatics at all. The free book is also quite pragmatic.Professor Chuck is good at delivering information! | 1) also quite pragmatic. Professor Chuck is | Good | 1) at delivering information! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good intro to Python - very instructive videos especially on the installation and actual implementation/use of the program | 1) | Good | 1) intro to Python - very instructive | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good to start learning python from scratch. The Bonus Video are Awesome. I Loved this course. | 1) | Good | 1) to start learning python from scratch. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is really good! | 1) This is really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good intro class to programming using the python language. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro class to programming using the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | it is very good, i like it. | 1) it is very | Good | 1) i like it. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course has really helped me to built a strong fundamental concept in Python. Charles Severance was really good at explaining the fundamental concepts. Hope to continue further Python courses with him. Thank you. | 1) in Python. Charles Severance was really | Good | 1) at explaining the fundamental concepts. Hope | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A bit slow if you already know other languages but the teacher is nice and I guess that for people who have no idea about programming it is a good lecture | 1) idea about programming it is a | Good | 1) lecture | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | its good | 1) its | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good starter course for someone without any prior programming experience. | 1) | Good | 1) starter course for someone without any | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners!! | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good, slow-paced course. Better than the interactive python something course for full-beginners. | 1) Really | Good | 1) slow-paced course. Better than the interactive | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good class | 1) | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | For beginners in programming is very good. For someone who have some experience with other programming languages, this first course is too much easy but has interesting things (interviews, etc.) anyway so it is not a waste of time even for then. | 1) For beginners in programming is very | Good | 1) For someone who have some experience | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Job! Perfect for learning the programming basics and basic-theories. Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) Job! Perfect for learning the programming | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for noob. | 1) | Good | 1) for noob. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course, python had very much significance in today's world.Thank You all. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, python had very much significance | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | pretty good | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a very good course. I'm looking forward for the next one. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course. I'm looking forward for the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course was very easy if you got prior knowledge in programming in any other programming language. However this was a pretty good introduction to Python. I'm wondering why you are still teaching Python 2, when most people are already using Python 3 already. I've seen there are major differences between Python 2 and 3, most examples learned here would give Syntax error in Python 3. I think this used to be an older course, recorded several years ago. That's why Python 2 is being used. Python 3 is pretty much mature now. | 1) language. However this was a pretty | Good | 1) introduction to Python. I'm wondering why | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Nice Course. Provides a very good introduction to Python Programming.. | 1) Nice Course. Provides a very | Good | 1) introduction to Python Programming. . | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I'd been intimidated by python for awhile, despite having experience in other programming languages. This was a really good introduction for a beginner and made digesting the blocks incredibly easy. Another great benefit of the course is the extensive media through which you can access the information for the course. Video, the textbook and even podcasts (which I have listened to on bike rides); Dr. Severance clearly wants to make the information as accessible as possible. Additionally, Dr. Severance is incredibly personable and funny. I would love to have him as a professor. My one complaint with the course would be that it moves really slow if you already have any coding experience. To give you an idea, I have a background in R and got through this course in 2 days. Either way, I'm on to the next course in the series and will continue on with the rest of them. Thank you, Dr. Severance! | 1) programming languages. This was a really | Good | 1) introduction for a beginner and made | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course. People with a good heart too | 1) | Good | 1) course. People with a good heart | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course. People with a good heart too | 2) Good course. People with a | Good | 2) heart too | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | An excellent introduction to the Python programming. It is a very good start for those who do not have programming knowledge. | 1) Python programming. It is a very | Good | 1) start for those who do not | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Starts slow for someone who is interested in learning programming, but after a few chapters you realize how important it is to learn the first few (simple) things. Teacher is very good at transmitting concepts and highly entertaining. Course is excellent! | 1) few (simple) things. Teacher is very | Good | 1) at transmitting concepts and highly entertaining. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginners, just take the pace, don't hurry and you will master all. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners, just take the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The lectures are good for the beginners. | 1) The lectures are | Good | 1) for the beginners. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good course for beginners to start and it is the best way to start learning python. It provides a start for the confused beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for beginners to start and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good one !! | 1) | Good | 1) one ! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent introduction to Python. Instructor teaches with humour and lots of examples, making the lecture videos useful and entertaining. Good pace for an intro course, easy to start with increasing difficulty as it progresses. | 1) the lecture videos useful and entertaining. | Good | 1) pace for an intro course, easy | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course was very good, professor Charles Severance was very detailed! | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) professor Charles Severance was very detailed! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginners. Lacks sufficient exercises. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. Lacks sufficient exercises. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good stuff. I think that working in an IDE like PyCharm would greatly assist those new to the development community. Very grateful for Coursera | 1) | Good | 1) stuff. I think that working in | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course. Although the paste of the course was a bit slow for a person who is already familiar with programming languages other than Python, speeding up the sessions solved everything. The only draw back which prevents this course from reaching five stars is the lack of more challenging problems that could have been put in the course as a bonus for those who are after wrestling with codes a bit more. The rest is good. | 1) a bit more. The rest is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | the lecturer is great! the learning material is comprehensive. everything is very good for python starters ! | 1) material is comprehensive. everything is very | Good | 1) for python starters ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | GOOD!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I think this would be a very good introduction to anyone starting to learn to program in a new language - Having experience in other languages meant that I was able to skip most of the lectures and complete the quizzes/assignment with a python 'cheat sheet'. Hopefully still a useful background for learning more in-depth python features. Lectures were interesting and well-structured. | 1) think this would be a very | Good | 1) introduction to anyone starting to learn | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a good introduction to Python | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction to Python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I loved this class! It was challenging but didn't take over my life (I have a full time job), and I think I got a good handle on the basics. The professor is really entertaining and is great at teaching. I definitely recommend this to someone trying to get an introduction to programming. | 1) and I think I got a | Good | 1) handle on the basics. The professor | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for beginners | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I think it's a great course and it's a good idea the people can get a demonstrable title for this programing language. | 1) a great course and it's a | Good | 1) idea the people can get a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It's a great, well documented course for a beginner. It was a good idea to split the previous huge python course to an easier acceptable parts. | 1) for a beginner. It was a | Good | 1) idea to split the previous huge | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very Good starting course for people having no background in Programming | 1) A very | Good | 1) starting course for people having no | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very easy if you have a programming background, however, perfect for beginners. The course is well paced and introduces advanced concepts at a good pace. | 1) and introduces advanced concepts at a | Good | 1) pace. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good and fun! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and fun! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good primer to Python. Quizzes were spot on and the assignments were clear. Highly recommended for a beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) primer to Python. Quizzes were spot | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good Beginner Course for Python. Pretty short in material length but if you are looking to start programming I would strongly recommend it. Very good examples and quizes at the end of each section make sure you know your stuff. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Beginner Course for Python. Pretty short | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good Beginner Course for Python. Pretty short in material length but if you are looking to start programming I would strongly recommend it. Very good examples and quizes at the end of each section make sure you know your stuff. | 2) I would strongly recommend it. Very | Good | 2) examples and quizes at the end | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for Beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) for Beginners! | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really good course for beginner's who want to learn some programming. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course for beginner's who want to | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great training !! Keep up the good work !! | 1) training ! ! Keep up the | Good | 1) work ! ! | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good and simple introduction in programming. Like it. | 1) | Good | 1) and simple introduction in programming. Like | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Needs an update and the slides are hard to see, but overall very good. | 1) hard to see, but overall very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course,great way to start learning python | 1) | Good | 1) course, great way to start learning | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great course, the instructor explains the topics well with great examples and gives a good foundation before moving on to the next step. | 1) with great examples and gives a | Good | 1) foundation before moving on to the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a good entry level to Python and gives sound instruction in the fundamentals of programming. | 1) a | Good | 1) entry level to Python and gives | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good and nice job | 1) | Good | 1) and nice job | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good starting course for a new language | 1) | Good | 1) starting course for a new language | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good from starters from "0“ experience of Python. Don't be afraid, it's fu | 1) | Good | 1) from starters from " 0“ experience | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good training material, easy to comprehend by new programming students. Still some background in programming is helpful. | 1) | Good | 1) training material, easy to comprehend by | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | i learned about many python basic syntax in this class. good! | 1) python basic syntax in this class. | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good for beginners. (y) | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners. (y) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I didn't enter this course because I wanted to learn Python as such; well that too, but I would actually like to teach, mentor, inspire and influence people in a positive way. If I can be only half as good as Dr. Chuck, I'll be a very happy man :) When I have the financial resources, I would seriously consider doing the rest of the Python Specializations too. Thanks Francois Laubscher, South Africa. | 1) I can be only half as | Good | 1) as Dr. Chuck, I'll be a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to Python. Examples and assignments were just what I needed to get a jumpstart. Professor has an amazing and funny teaching style (if you're someone from the coding industry), helps chill out and relax and learn at the same time !! Thank you very much !! Can't believe it's all free ... | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Python. Examples and assignments | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | That was very good lecture. I loved the teacer, and his technic. | 1) That was very | Good | 1) lecture. I loved the teacer, and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good start to get the basics down in Python. Would recommend to students that want to learn Python. However I would recommend upgrading the class to use Python 3. | 1) Really | Good | 1) start to get the basics down | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for starting to programming on Python! | 1) | Good | 1) course for starting to programming on | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I Just loved the amazing course. This should be Good to learn through. I am very glad about my Class Teacher. | 1) the amazing course. This should be | Good | 1) to learn through. I am very | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very interesting course, linear with a good teacher. i would have liked to do more exercises. | 1) Very interesting course, linear with a | Good | 1) teacher. i would have liked to | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A very good course, taught really well by Professor Charles Severance. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, taught really well by Professor | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great intro into programming; easy to follow up and very well explained. I'm a 8 year programmer and I loved the way these classes was given. Teacher is very clear and concise and speak in a fun way wich makes it good to learn the basics (the hardest part for someone who doesn't know anything about programming, in my opninion) | 1) a fun way wich makes it | Good | 1) to learn the basics (the hardest | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | well taught, good pace, am continuing to course 2 | 1) well taught, | Good | 1) pace, am continuing to course 2 | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introductory course. I've programmed in Perl in the past and this gave me the opportunity to familiarize myself with Python's basic commands and syntax. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. I've programmed in Perl | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Clear and Good! | 1) Clear and | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course for beginners, it is the clasical course that covers the first 2-3 chapters of every programming book. It is good in case you want to do the whole specialization in other case is too simple if you are going to pay for it. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners, it is the | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good course for beginners, it is the clasical course that covers the first 2-3 chapters of every programming book. It is good in case you want to do the whole specialization in other case is too simple if you are going to pay for it. | 2) of every programming book. It is | Good | 2) in case you want to do | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | So far so good. A bit on the slow side, but this is understandable as it is an intro course. Dr Chuck certainly has the energy and enthusiasm to make an intro programming course very very engaging and fun. Looking forward to the next level up! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) A bit on the slow side, | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is very good, and it help me build a foundation to programming. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) and it help me build a | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | a bit slow but good for someone with zero experience | 1) a bit slow but | Good | 1) for someone with zero experience | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Dr. Chuck is always a safe bet for a good course. | 1) always a safe bet for a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | GOOD PROGRAM | 1) | Good | 1) PROGRAM | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course, the content is very good and the explanations are clear. Un curso excelente, buen contenido y buenas explicaciones. Muy recomendado. | 1) Excellent course, the content is very | Good | 1) and the explanations are clear. Un | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good insight, great teacher. overall great experience. highly recommended for newbies like me. | 1) | Good | 1) insight, great teacher. overall great experience. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A really good and friendly introductory to not just Python, but programming as a concept in general. | 1) A really | Good | 1) and friendly introductory to not just | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is good for beginners. It is really "Programming for Everybody". | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for beginners. It is really " | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I love the enthusiasm of the professor and the material he covered. This would be very good for complete beginner to programming, but may make you feel little slow for people migrating from other languages like C/C+ etc. Overall, i enjoyed the course. Thanks | 1) he covered. This would be very | Good | 1) for complete beginner to programming, but | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It was a bit too easy. But a good foundation for the "Everybody" audience. | 1) a bit too easy. But a | Good | 1) foundation for the " Everybody" audience. | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good intro/refresher for someone with no or very little programming knowledge. | 1) | Good | 1) intro/refresher for someone with no or | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course to start basic programming in Python | 1) | Good | 1) course to start basic programming in | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I really liked the course. Its a good course to learn the basics of programming through Python. The thing I liked the most was the flow charts of each program that helped me to understand the concepts easily. Thanks Dr. Chuck. I would like to visit you if I get a chance. | 1) really liked the course. Its a | Good | 1) course to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good to start learning python | 1) Very | Good | 1) to start learning python | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good course, even for those who already have a programming background. This course teaches programming basics, quick and easy. I completed the course within 2 weeks, and I had learned a lot. I truly enjoyed watching the "Bonus videos" - really interesting and motivating. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, even for those who already | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Great introduction course with good organized detail. Although I am an experienced C/C++ programmer, I think this should be still very easy for beginners. | 1) Great introduction course with | Good | 1) organized detail. Although I am an | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course for beginners, a little boring for developers who want to learn Python. I recommend this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners, a little boring | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Enjoyed the class good introductory material. I've been in IT for over 30 years and wanted to learn Python. | 1) Enjoyed the class | Good | 1) introductory material. I've been in IT | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good info; just wish the Android app, desktop app, and iOs app all updated more gracefully (maybe a critique of Coursera more generally?) Assignments are pretty easy. | 1) Very | Good | 1) info; just wish the Android app, | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good for most entry-level. For people who already have a basic knowledge of the course will be very easy | 1) | Good | 1) for most entry-level. For people who | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The lessons were not too hard and Chuck covered the basics well. It's also good that he mixes in humor so the videos are not boring. | 1) covered the basics well. It's also | Good | 1) that he mixes in humor so | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is GOOD | 1) It is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for starter although I have learn some other languages before. And the teacher is enthusiastic, nice! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for starter although I have learn | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good for refreshing my knowledge of the language | 1) Very | Good | 1) for refreshing my knowledge of the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty good for starters | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) for starters | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I thought the class was good, although if you are already an experienced programmer (like me), I suggest that you do a quick review of the python documentation to understand python syntax, then simply complete each assignment rather than sitting through the videos. | 1) I thought the class was | Good | 1) although if you are already an | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course is a very good place to start learning programming. Although I have a Bachelor's degree in Computer Engineering, I still found the delivery style in the course very interesting. It is a great course for someone who is trying to learn how to program. Python, as a language itself is very intuitive and this course helps a new learner understand the basics of programming as well as learn the language easily. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) place to start learning programming. Although | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction to programming. Lecturer is great. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to programming. Lecturer is great. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is really good course for beginners. I really appreciate the efforts taken by Coursera team and whoever con for designing such beautiful course for beginners. | 1) This is really | Good | 1) course for beginners. I really appreciate | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent explanation and material provided. Very good. | 1) Excellent explanation and material provided. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course for absolute beginners. No prior programming knowledge needed. | 1) | Good | 1) course for absolute beginners. No prior | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Managed to complete this in 2 weeks as I have quite a lot of time available. The exercises were fairly simple and easy to understand giving me a good grounding in the basics of python. | 1) easy to understand giving me a | Good | 1) grounding in the basics of python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This is a nice slow wade-in to the concepts behind programming with lessons that happen to use Python. Very good for me. I enjoyed it and recommend it highly. | 1) that happen to use Python. Very | Good | 1) for me. I enjoyed it and | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Its easy and fun. Good for those starting to programme. | 1) Its easy and fun. | Good | 1) for those starting to programme. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good programming introduction and via Python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) programming introduction and via Python. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Easy to understand. I think it is very good for starters like me. | 1) understand. I think it is very | Good | 1) for starters like me. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good explanations and Dr.Chuck makes the course fun. Exercises could probably be a bit more challenging, but it will do for absolute beginners. Thank you. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations and Dr. Chuck makes the | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course design for the beginners who does not know anything about programming and Python. Must Give it a try so that you can know and understand the basics ! overall i will give 9/10. | 1) | Good | 1) Course design for the beginners who | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good starting point for python! | 1) Very | Good | 1) starting point for python! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction into python programming, but could be more programming exercises in this course. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into python programming, but could | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Quick and simple, very easy if you have some knowledge of what you are doing. Good if you are getting started. | 1) knowledge of what you are doing. | Good | 1) if you are getting started. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty Good! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really Good work on the Course :) Enjoyed it.. Really Useful.. Keep it up. Hoping for more :) Dr Chuck is amazing :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) work on the Course :) Enjoyed | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The course was very basic. It was nicely taught and the examples and the lectures were really enjoyable. However, some shortcomings I felt were that the colors in the slides could have been a bit clearer. Another thing was that some concepts were introduced in the lectures which were not explained completely. A real beginner would not be able to understand them which would in some parts defeat the purpose of the course. Other than that, I felt the course was really structured well. The assignments were easy and the quizzes did test the knowledge about the subject taught so far. It was such that any new person would not feel discouraged. Keep up the good job people. | 1) not feel discouraged. Keep up the | Good | 1) job people. | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Clear instructions. Good for beginners! | 1) Clear instructions. | Good | 1) for beginners! | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good introduction level course! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction level course! | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a very simple and smooth course for new comers, i think it would be better to have more challenging tasks and more related to a real world, that's why i've put 3 stars. Practise is everything, so good tasks are the essential part of learning process. | 1) 3 stars. Practise is everything, so | Good | 1) tasks are the essential part of | 3.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The only course I've actually start learning some programming. Especially good for those who don't know anything about programming and could hardly imagine how things done inside this electrical magic box. In some sense better than Codeschool, task is a bit harder, and the overall coverage is deeper, though I passed it on 1.5x video speed because of lots of talking. Like it anyway. | 1) actually start learning some programming. Especially | Good | 1) for those who don't know anything | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | So good course im learning a lot. Thanks so much | 1) So | Good | 1) course im learning a lot. Thanks | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a good course for them who don't have any programming background and guest videos are awesome. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for them who don't have | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very Good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7A1yFTaREeWWBQrVFXqd1w | A little bit too fundamental...Professor is kind and funny, which is good! | 1) is kind and funny, which is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7fljFneTEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good course. Bom curso. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Bom curso. | 4.0 |
| 7fljFneTEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very very very good course. I have done several courses, but this one is the best. They teach TDD since class 1. They teach model. They teach JUnit. This guys are awesome. | 1) Very very very | Good | 1) course. I have done several courses, | 5.0 |
| 7GFLpG5wEeWSPQr3Cum54Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Concepts covered a slightly harder to comprehend than with the previous courses in the specialization. I found myself having to keep going back and forth through the lessons in an attempt to understand. You really do need to read up on other sources to plug in some gaps, but overall it is a good course that covers a lot. | 1) gaps, but overall it is a | Good | 1) course that covers a lot. | 4.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course. We had the opportunity to learn some business issues and find ways to develop solutions via BI systems. We had also good lessons | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. We had the opportunity to | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course. We had the opportunity to learn some business issues and find ways to develop solutions via BI systems. We had also good lessons | 2) via BI systems. We had also | Good | 2) lessons | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | 1) Content of the course is very | Good | 1) useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate | 3.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Content of the course is very good, useful and interesting, I greatly appreciate the knowledge delivered. But assignments could improve: -All module assignments seems mostly focalize on using Microstrategy tool. In assignments, i would like to see more exercises so that students learn through practice of business cases. For example, I prefer the way modules are organized in courses 1,2, and 3: concepts with examples, practice exercise, then assignment through similar exercise + a quiz. -In last assignment, there was no suggested solution(s) for the last question, i think this is missing for a good understanding. | 2) think this is missing for a | Good | 2) understanding. | 3.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It is a really good and well structured course. Initially, I felt the structure is not making me think but when I reached the end, in summative project, I realized how much I have learned. Anyone with basic IT background would be comfortable with the course. Learned various concepts of Business Intelligence; and microstrategy as a BI tool is good for analyzing. After I am done, I am going to spend more time looking at other tools of Microstrategy and apply those in the capstone course if required. I came across some students facing issues with microstrategy in the Discussion forum but I think improper installation or hardware and software support could be the cause. Thank You, Mr. Karimi. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) and well structured course. Initially, I | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It is a really good and well structured course. Initially, I felt the structure is not making me think but when I reached the end, in summative project, I realized how much I have learned. Anyone with basic IT background would be comfortable with the course. Learned various concepts of Business Intelligence; and microstrategy as a BI tool is good for analyzing. After I am done, I am going to spend more time looking at other tools of Microstrategy and apply those in the capstone course if required. I came across some students facing issues with microstrategy in the Discussion forum but I think improper installation or hardware and software support could be the cause. Thank You, Mr. Karimi. | 2) microstrategy as a BI tool is | Good | 2) for analyzing. After I am done, | 5.0 |
| 7gLccRnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course has some good technical and analytical understanding of BI tools and application plus the BI project helped me derive useful visualizations. This course has helped me build my analytical skills to a different level which I think is expected in the actual BI industry. | 1) The course has some | Good | 1) technical and analytical understanding of BI | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | Wonder experience with lot of definition and example to use as Manager. Put good foundation of philosophy in very easy terms. Recommended for every one. | 1) example to use as Manager. Put | Good | 1) foundation of philosophy in very easy | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | This course is very good! Really enjoyed! It helps develop the ability to think. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) Really enjoyed! It helps develop the | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | Its been a good learning. The narration was to the point and the course content was thorough for the scope envisaged. Enjoyed it. More importantly it forces you to think !. so it's kind of interactive. Thank you very much. | 1) Its been a | Good | 1) learning. The narration was to the | 5.0 |
| 7Iw3cbCiEeS-qCIACimRTw | It's very good course for managers | 1) It's very | Good | 1) course for managers | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | I never had prior exposure to online courses, this is my first experience and I am very happy to complete the course successfully. It was a very good forum and an excellent opportunity to learn about systematic reviews and meta-analysis from one among the world class university. I express my sincere thanks to Coursera and Johns Hopkins University for providing an excellent course. | 1) course successfully. It was a very | Good | 1) forum and an excellent opportunity to | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | systematic meta analysis is good for madecine postguaduate stu,it is helpfui!!! | 1) systematic meta analysis is | Good | 1) for madecine postguaduate stu, it is | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Very good course, it help me alot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it help me alot. | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | The course is a good introduction to the topic, however, it is a pity that there is no follow up to the course. At the end of the course you will not be able to perform a SLR + meta-analysis. | 1) The course is a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic, however, it | 4.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | It's a very good introductory course to systematic reviews. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) introductory course to systematic reviews. | 4.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | It's a good course to have a first approach to meta-analysis, not for a deep comprehension or for acquisition of advanced techniques about meta-analysis data menagement. I hope you will organize an advanced course about this issues. Thank you!! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course to have a first approach | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Good introduction to conducting systematic reviews in general and a teaser for doing meta-analysis. I enjoyed it! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to conducting systematic reviews in | 4.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Very nice course! I wish I had like this when doing my master's degree. Special thanks for teachers speaking in a very understandable way (very good for non-native english-speakers) | 1) in a very understandable way (very | Good | 1) for non-native english-speakers) | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | Really good course | 1) Really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7jEat7ioEeWfYA612mWHZw | excellent course with good relevant information | 1) excellent course with | Good | 1) relevant information | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | It is a good course for all people who want to know more aobut this resource. In opinion each chapter could be a course in order to make a especialization and, about all, one course dedicated to software (wasp... windpro...) would give 5 stars. A good introduction course, i hope it helps me to find a new job... :( | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for all people who want | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | It is a good course for all people who want to know more aobut this resource. In opinion each chapter could be a course in order to make a especialization and, about all, one course dedicated to software (wasp... windpro...) would give 5 stars. A good introduction course, i hope it helps me to find a new job... :( | 2) ) would give 5 stars. A | Good | 2) introduction course, i hope it helps | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Excellent course. I suggest that in a few quizzes you were asking to get the numbers off the slides in the video. It is very difficult to read the numbers off the video. Can you instead add the slides in the quiz PDF file? All the information required to answer the quizzes should be in the PDF file. The course material was very good. The problem sets were very good too because of real life data. The rigor of courses was average. I can understand why you do not want to make the course more rigorous. However, it would help advanced engineering students to go through a more rigorous course. | 1) file. The course material was very | Good | 1) The problem sets were very good | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Excellent course. I suggest that in a few quizzes you were asking to get the numbers off the slides in the video. It is very difficult to read the numbers off the video. Can you instead add the slides in the quiz PDF file? All the information required to answer the quizzes should be in the PDF file. The course material was very good. The problem sets were very good too because of real life data. The rigor of courses was average. I can understand why you do not want to make the course more rigorous. However, it would help advanced engineering students to go through a more rigorous course. | 2) good. The problem sets were very | Good | 2) too because of real life data. | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Great course! It offers a very good overview and basics in wind energy. | 1) Great course! It offers a very | Good | 1) overview and basics in wind energy. | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Very good and informative, the instructors are apparently new to teach in front of a camera, they will be better in time. I look forward to an advanced course from the same team. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative, the instructors are apparently | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Good course but a little more detail with better referencing to links and documents would be more helpful. Also, a little more in-depth info for each topic will also be well appreciated. Overall a good course for beginners like me who knew nothing about Wind Energy before taking this course. | 1) | Good | 1) course but a little more detail | 3.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Good course but a little more detail with better referencing to links and documents would be more helpful. Also, a little more in-depth info for each topic will also be well appreciated. Overall a good course for beginners like me who knew nothing about Wind Energy before taking this course. | 2) also be well appreciated. Overall a | Good | 2) course for beginners like me who | 3.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | It's very good, i thing one of the best. | 1) It's very | Good | 1) i thing one of the best. | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | This course will help one to get a very good overview of the Wind Energy Sector. Anyone who has no idea regarding wind energy can get a very good idea through this course. I loved studying this course. Thanks DTU. | 1) help one to get a very | Good | 1) overview of the Wind Energy Sector. | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | This course will help one to get a very good overview of the Wind Energy Sector. Anyone who has no idea regarding wind energy can get a very good idea through this course. I loved studying this course. Thanks DTU. | 2) wind energy can get a very | Good | 2) idea through this course. I loved | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | A pretty good introductory course but not much more. I really hope to see it followed up by a more advanced version! Thanks for all the help! | 1) A pretty | Good | 1) introductory course but not much more. | 4.0 |
| 7O843CBJEeWcQw5YiljpGw | It's a good course if you want to get a little idea of how wind turbines work. I enjoyed it. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course if you want to get | 5.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | The course is going good | 1) The course is going | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | Good content..but should also have some graded excercises | 1) | Good | 1) content. . but should also have | 3.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | Although I am a Marketing Lecturer, this was a very good introduction to International Marketing. By completed this course, and the subsequent courses I will be equipped to design new courses for the minor program at my faculty | 1) Marketing Lecturer, this was a very | Good | 1) introduction to International Marketing. By completed | 5.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | Wanted a little more heft to the class. Professor is good, provides clear explanation of concepts and creatively applies his own to the theory. | 1) heft to the class. Professor is | Good | 1) provides clear explanation of concepts and | 4.0 |
| 7pzdAYE3EeWb1w5ZMj87pw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| 7Sx79iWNEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7Sx79iWNEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good course, I cannot wait to complete the next course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I cannot wait to complete | 5.0 |
| 7Sx79iWNEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | A good course, but not up to par with the first two. The content was far more theoretical and left me looking for applicable information. That said it was still a good course. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, but not up to par | 3.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | A good course, but not up to par with the first two. The content was far more theoretical and left me looking for applicable information. That said it was still a good course. | 2) That said it was still a | Good | 2) course. | 3.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | Not as complete as the two first courses of the specialization but still good. | 1) courses of the specialization but still | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | good but sometimes cannot hear clearly what the tutor says whenever they have strong Spanish accent. | 1) | Good | 1) but sometimes cannot hear clearly what | 3.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | Good course! For a student like me beginner in Digital Marketing the course covered my expectations. Recommended! | 1) | Good | 1) course! For a student like me | 5.0 |
| 7t9y531dEeWKYwric11Hpw | This is a very great program full of important and accurate information! Congratulations! I find it very complete inside its category. It's pretty interesting since the first moment you watch the first video lecture. Good design and presentation of the program. In other words: beautiful! Thanks. Keep bringing quality! | 1) you watch the first video lecture. | Good | 1) design and presentation of the program. | 5.0 |
| 7TpL2X3IEeWfrQ7ngHMGEQ | One of the best courses I ever had. Clear, enjoyable... only good stuff! | 1) had. Clear, enjoyable. . . only | Good | 1) stuff! | 5.0 |
| 7TpL2X3IEeWfrQ7ngHMGEQ | Very good, but some topics may need to be explained further, like the realization of the switches | 1) Very | Good | 1) but some topics may need to | 4.0 |
| 7TpL2X3IEeWfrQ7ngHMGEQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 7TpL2X3IEeWfrQ7ngHMGEQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 7vasMEd_EeW8cBKtDAegYw | A pretty good overview of modern poetry. Very high on generalities and low on details - like detailed readings of individual poems. The fact the the majority of the instructors just read their lectures and many of them never look up at the camera at all makes this seem very lazy and impersonal. There's very little of the engagement that would really make this interesting. | 1) A pretty | Good | 1) overview of modern poetry. Very high | 3.0 |
| 7wfVmobsEeWgjA5cAvYgmw | The last assignment is a time-waster and really poorly designed. Not all adults are into coloring; this is not elementary school and what's the point of coloring a picture of the Arch for you? Frankly I can't be bothered to look up sources for the descriptions of Roman soldiers' attire, and especially to figure what each number is pointing to. It wasn't even always clear what the numbers on the template referred to and two of the numbers were missing. In addition, there were a lot of glitches with the grading software. Finally our questions were almost never answered. Otherwise I found this to be an interesting course and I learned quite a bit from it, although it could have been condensed into three or four classes at the very most. The video lectures were videotaped a bit strangely, with Professor Fine often seeming to talk to an invisible person on the right or the left of the camera, instead of at the viewer. The videos I liked were mostly the office hours ones and the one with the interview with Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove at Park Avenue Synagogue. I could have gotten a very good grade on this course, but the last assignment ruined that. No, I will not be recommending this course or any others by this Professor. | 1) I could have gotten a very | Good | 1) grade on this course, but the | 2.0 |
| 7_kA050XEeWIXgpWJNgyEw | Good Course, but it needs more focus on ContentProviders and Services. | 1) | Good | 1) Course, but it needs more focus | 4.0 |
| 7_kA050XEeWIXgpWJNgyEw | Like part 1 this course is very informative for anyone new to android development. Pacing is good. The assignments are well developed and clear, although I found one to be on the really tricky side. Good course. | 1) new to android development. Pacing is | Good | 1) The assignments are well developed and | 4.0 |
| 7_kA050XEeWIXgpWJNgyEw | Like part 1 this course is very informative for anyone new to android development. Pacing is good. The assignments are well developed and clear, although I found one to be on the really tricky side. Good course. | 2) be on the really tricky side. | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| 7_wUMCBSEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good, thanks Coursera. | 1) Very | Good | 1) thanks Coursera. | 5.0 |
| 82sYmnQ8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good audio and video quality. Explanations are very understandable and given with a lot of examples. Summaries and connections between the different content parts are provided regularly. | 1) Very | Good | 1) audio and video quality. Explanations are | 3.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Great course and very good material | 1) Great course and very | Good | 1) material | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | It's really a good course. | 1) It's really a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course to understanding the world of Private Equity and Venture Capital | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to understanding the world of | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good course. Mentally prepared me for the my PE job. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Mentally prepared me for the | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | This course contains a lot of good sources and it is so helpful. You can't miss it! | 1) This course contains a lot of | Good | 1) sources and it is so helpful. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course which covers widely the role and the activity of a private equity firm both in Europe and US&UK. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course which covers widely the role | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good introduction to VC industry | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to VC industry | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Great course, great instructor. Very simple and straight forward with good ways to apply theory and nice interviews at the end of each week. | 1) Very simple and straight forward with | Good | 1) ways to apply theory and nice | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Interesting and informative. A good entry-level course for those looking to get a clearer picture of the PE/VC space. I found the financial side of it a bit difficult to follow (though might just be me). Keep up the good work Universita Bocconi | 1) Interesting and informative. A | Good | 1) entry-level course for those looking to | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Interesting and informative. A good entry-level course for those looking to get a clearer picture of the PE/VC space. I found the financial side of it a bit difficult to follow (though might just be me). Keep up the good work Universita Bocconi | 2) just be me). Keep up the | Good | 2) work Universita Bocconi | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good and concise course. | 1) | Good | 1) and concise course. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Really good course. I'd love to do a specialization in this topic. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I'd love to do a | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Difficult things laid out in an easy way to follow. A very good course. | 1) easy way to follow. A very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good introduction to private equity. As a financial auditor in PE, this course allows me to develop my knowledge in PE, especially regarding the PE vehicles in the US and UK. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to private equity. As a | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The content is amazing and is good to watch professors from outside the anglo world. | 1) The content is amazing and is | Good | 1) to watch professors from outside the | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good videos, good slides, good excel-sheets, and fair exams. | 1) | Good | 1) videos, good slides, good excel-sheets, and | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good videos, good slides, good excel-sheets, and fair exams. | 2) Good videos, | Good | 2) slides, good excel-sheets, and fair exams. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good videos, good slides, good excel-sheets, and fair exams. | 3) Good videos, good slides, | Good | 3) excel-sheets, and fair exams. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | I really like this lesson, the teacher gives very good explaination about how does work private in Europe, US and UK. | 1) this lesson, the teacher gives very | Good | 1) explaination about how does work private | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | I was waiting for a good Private Equity course long time. I find this course very well structured. I give it 5 Stars. | 1) I was waiting for a | Good | 1) Private Equity course long time. I | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good and clear!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and clear! ! ! | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | pretty good one | 1) pretty | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | An awesome course for the students who want to pursue a career as Private Equity Analyst. This course is an excellent overview of Private Equity and Venture Capital business model used in the field of the finance. Everything is explained very well. The presentation is kept short and informative with good slides. The exercises are interesting and fun to do. They help a lot to learn the course material. I highly recommend this course. Thank You! | 1) is kept short and informative with | Good | 1) slides. The exercises are interesting and | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good and interesting course although there was not much feedback and replies by the Unversity. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course although there was | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course, needs a follow up one for more depth and may be example cases on valuation and structuring syndication. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, needs a follow up one | 4.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course to learn about VC and PE. Very good professor, knowledgeable and articulate. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn about VC and | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course to learn about VC and PE. Very good professor, knowledgeable and articulate. | 2) learn about VC and PE. Very | Good | 2) professor, knowledgeable and articulate. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Covers good fundamental concepts of PE and VC. Teaches both qualitative and quantitative skills. | 1) Covers | Good | 1) fundamental concepts of PE and VC. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The course is really good and the professor well prepared. It should include more real life examples and it should analyze a real PE firm or fund. Most of the courses are abstract and they do not analyze a real life case. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) and the professor well prepared. It | 3.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The course is a good starting point for students who are interested in Private Equity. The content is rigorous and explore all the basic principles in different fields (tax, legal and financial issues). Therefore, I highly recommand this course. Many thanks professor Stefano Caselli, it was a good experience. | 1) The course is a | Good | 1) starting point for students who are | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | The course is a good starting point for students who are interested in Private Equity. The content is rigorous and explore all the basic principles in different fields (tax, legal and financial issues). Therefore, I highly recommand this course. Many thanks professor Stefano Caselli, it was a good experience. | 2) professor Stefano Caselli, it was a | Good | 2) experience. | 5.0 |
| 84pGjiPgEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| 893hvnH8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This was really good course. It was very detailed. I do think that some of the peer evaluations should be more specific. | 1) This was really | Good | 1) course. It was very detailed. I | 5.0 |
| 8cCaMoJkEeWXJRLCDq5sWw | Good background and enjoyed delving into the detail of the Middle East. | 1) | Good | 1) background and enjoyed delving into the | 4.0 |
| 8cCaMoJkEeWXJRLCDq5sWw | Extremely good course, with the ability to impart an abundance of information in a short format. | 1) Extremely | Good | 1) course, with the ability to impart | 5.0 |
| 8cCaMoJkEeWXJRLCDq5sWw | A great course all around, just like Part I. Bitter sweet to be done as there was so much great information in here. I highly recommend both courses if you want to learn a good amount of information on the Middle East in a short period of time. | 1) if you want to learn a | Good | 1) amount of information on the Middle | 5.0 |
| 8cCaMoJkEeWXJRLCDq5sWw | Good course. Very informative - lots of important information. Nicely done. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Very informative - lots of | 5.0 |
| 8G7jDCT-EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Some of the videos are really good. Unfortunately I feel there is little actual help to complete a project in the given time. The great thing about this course is the feeling of publishing your own game. That is priceless :) | 1) Some of the videos are really | Good | 1) Unfortunately I feel there is little | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | good course for realizing the innovations in digital world | 1) | Good | 1) course for realizing the innovations in | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | The first segment on why "Digital Changes Everything" is good background but the rest was too abstract for me with nothing I could really take away and practice. | 1) why " Digital Changes Everything" is | Good | 1) background but the rest was too | 1.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | very good updated information and analysis | 1) very | Good | 1) updated information and analysis | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Very good MOOC ; clear and quick with high quality contents and lessons. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) MOOC ; clear and quick with | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Informative short videos and interesting articles. Good course, thank you! | 1) Informative short videos and interesting articles. | Good | 1) course, thank you! | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Good subject and good selection of documents. I don't appreciate the "speaker" voice on the presentation, I rather like to see and hear the author. Too fast and too short. | 1) | Good | 1) subject and good selection of documents. | 3.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Good subject and good selection of documents. I don't appreciate the "speaker" voice on the presentation, I rather like to see and hear the author. Too fast and too short. | 2) Good subject and | Good | 2) selection of documents. I don't appreciate | 3.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | very good mede and intersting course! | 1) very | Good | 1) mede and intersting course! | 5.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | A good perspective. The videos were well done. | 1) A | Good | 1) perspective. The videos were well done. | 4.0 |
| 8GTGgDxOEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Really nice information to know more about the new digital market and its business models. Enriched a lot my knowledge and, for sure, it'll happen to you too if you take the course and study it. *The videos are really good - deep information, short and beautiful to watch. | 1) study it. *The videos are really | Good | 1) - deep information, short and beautiful | 5.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This was a great course; very good explanations teoretical and practice, you gave us powerful tools to analyze data and took the necesary time for cover the topics. Maybe you can add in the future some exercises that we have to upload for review among each other students. Thank you very much for share this tools and your knowledge. | 1) This was a great course; very | Good | 1) explanations teoretical and practice, you gave | 4.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good learning outcomes. Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) learning outcomes. Thanks | 5.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Thank you - good course and very well | 1) Thank you - | Good | 1) course and very well | 5.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good, but gives the very basics. | 1) | Good | 1) but gives the very basics. | 4.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | 4.5 stars actually. Good overview of modeling risk. | 1) 4. 5 stars actually. | Good | 1) overview of modeling risk. | 4.0 |
| 8H8wFp3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Some good sections of the course, but others are not explained well at all. Overall valuable material | 1) Some | Good | 1) sections of the course, but others | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | A good, enjoyable course with some interesting additional reading. I think I would have preferred a little more detail/content to have given it a full five stars. That said...I am very happy to have taken and passed the course. Thank you all involved. Now on to 'Managing Data Analysis'!! | 1) A | Good | 1) enjoyable course with some interesting additional | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good and useful material | 1) | Good | 1) and useful material | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This course gave me good insight about building a data science team that can be easily related to my work environment. | 1) This course gave me | Good | 1) insight about building a data science | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | good insights and ways to avoid problems in building and importantly advertising your team | 1) | Good | 1) insights and ways to avoid problems | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course and a daring venture for what is really an art form, beyond it's scientific requirements. This part of the specialization needs a little refinement. I posted this in the discussion forum. · 7 days ago · Edited First of all.....these guys running this data science department have their hands full. They are teaching live classes for students who have spent OODLES (lots) of money to attend this prestigious college . Johns Hopkins is about as good as it gets for a medical degree. Then they are doing experiments and other data science for the research division of Johns Hopkins which is also as good as it gets........THEN they are doing these MOOC courses on top of all their other responsibilities......Dr. Leek is a University of Washington Alumni, which is also top notch for Data Science. The video lesson is flawed, there is no denying it. But I must say these teachers are very open to improvement in the course and your comments on what could be better done are received and acted upon, so I would include them in your thank you letter to the teachers. ALSO I think these MOOC courses are best done by all members of the department contributing. Truly this field IS a team sport. I feel this course was good, but the videos need to be edited and scripted, so unnecessary language, which dilutes the core knowledge, that must be learned, is not diluted where questions are left in the students head about content when being tested. I learned long ago in a college calculus class that if your mark isn't perfect, it's OK, so long as you pass with a high score......even if it is the teachers fault. The course could use better video production with teleprompter scripting......maybe some AV students at Johns Hopkins could get on board. it will happen eventually I'm sure. You want to take a course that is absolutely one of the best courses I've taken anywhere and truly the best online. Try the number one business course on Coursera: GROW TO GREATNESS, either part 1 or 2, University of Virginia, Darden School Of Business...........A team created course with one helluva a teacher who is a business person, researcher and award-winning writer. I would recommend this course to ANY student and especially E-Teachers. The problem with this course is that there is a lot of information that can be included but may not be absolutely necessary as a "core concept". Needless to say, the more technical skills any employee has, the more insight they will have into their teammate's skills, as well, as the overall mission of the data department and the business it serves. I'm more of a tech and infrastructure person, I'm not real passionate about coding. I find it tedious. The more I learn about it, the more I enjoy it, albeit, from a distance. I can't see myself creating great blocks of scripts, but the more I know about how they are created AND what rules the code in a project must abide by, the better my skills will be as a data center manager. So I'm trying to learn as much as possible about R, Python, and companion programs like ggvis for creating visualizations. I'd say visualizations are an essential skill for a data manager, since you have to present results and projects, questions, and answers to higher ups and other departments. this link comes from the resource section of this course: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/ggvis-data-visualization-r-tutorial This link or URL is of much more value to me, than a flawed test question and a reduction in my 100 percent average in the specialization. Without this lesson, in this course, I would not have this valuable resource. Another great link, which has a great FREE print publication as well: http://www.processor.com/ ...these people have been advising data center managers longer than just about anybody ! Verbally and in the transcript are some nebulous statements that point toward the main idea, that concept being: the more any employee, on any data science or technical team member IS, a "jack of all trades", the better. So that could have been included in some more general way on the quiz, because really that is pretty much a general rule, I've found, working in ANY capacity in the tech industry. I have done a great deal of audio editing, working at numerous radio stations, with Adobe Audition. With others like: Pro Tools, or any other really good quality AV digital editor the result is streamlined, near seamless, audio-video, or one or the other. You just learn how to read and edit wave forms of all kinds. Years ago, in Dallas, Texas, attending Richland College. I learned a valuable lesson. I was taking a college level Calc-Trig math class being taught by the regular professor's WIFE. I don't know if the professor was sick, but this woman, who was teaching the class for the whole semester, frankly, was not qualified. I had always been considered an illiterate by my high school math teachers, a married couple who, frankly, were highly abnormal even on the geekiest scale. These people were acting like they were a world above most people in the class. Needless to say, I assumed, by their "adult" opinions, they were sent by God Himself, to educate me thru denigration. I was amazed, how 10 years later, in College math how well I was doing. I was carrying a 100 percent average ! So midterm this faux professor declares, "I'll be prefiguring all the arithmetic to be easy, so you won't have to bring your calculators !" SO I DIDN'T.......and of course the teacher's wife proclaims....."I didn't have time to make the arithmetic easy so you'd better use your calculators !" I literally had pages and pages of figuring in handwriting accompanying my 3 page test. The result was a C plus on the test. I angrily told the sub teacher "I did not bring a calculator to this test because you said it wouldn't be necessary, therefore I must be allowed to redo this test with a calculator !" She of course relented, "No that won't be possible...that's not a bad grade...." she continued, "what are you worried about ?"........ I was so peeved, I was going to drop the class. It was too late in the semester, and I was so disgusted with this woman's cavalier dismissal of my perfect grade that I just stopped going to class. The result was a failing final grade. Who ultimately suffered from this dilemma ? That, albeit, unfairly was me.....who created this "academic" tragedy, by the aggravation of a deeply flawed situation. Once again, that would be me. | 1) . Johns Hopkins is about as | Good | 1) as it gets for a medical | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course and a daring venture for what is really an art form, beyond it's scientific requirements. This part of the specialization needs a little refinement. I posted this in the discussion forum. · 7 days ago · Edited First of all.....these guys running this data science department have their hands full. They are teaching live classes for students who have spent OODLES (lots) of money to attend this prestigious college . Johns Hopkins is about as good as it gets for a medical degree. Then they are doing experiments and other data science for the research division of Johns Hopkins which is also as good as it gets........THEN they are doing these MOOC courses on top of all their other responsibilities......Dr. Leek is a University of Washington Alumni, which is also top notch for Data Science. The video lesson is flawed, there is no denying it. But I must say these teachers are very open to improvement in the course and your comments on what could be better done are received and acted upon, so I would include them in your thank you letter to the teachers. ALSO I think these MOOC courses are best done by all members of the department contributing. Truly this field IS a team sport. I feel this course was good, but the videos need to be edited and scripted, so unnecessary language, which dilutes the core knowledge, that must be learned, is not diluted where questions are left in the students head about content when being tested. I learned long ago in a college calculus class that if your mark isn't perfect, it's OK, so long as you pass with a high score......even if it is the teachers fault. The course could use better video production with teleprompter scripting......maybe some AV students at Johns Hopkins could get on board. it will happen eventually I'm sure. You want to take a course that is absolutely one of the best courses I've taken anywhere and truly the best online. Try the number one business course on Coursera: GROW TO GREATNESS, either part 1 or 2, University of Virginia, Darden School Of Business...........A team created course with one helluva a teacher who is a business person, researcher and award-winning writer. I would recommend this course to ANY student and especially E-Teachers. The problem with this course is that there is a lot of information that can be included but may not be absolutely necessary as a "core concept". Needless to say, the more technical skills any employee has, the more insight they will have into their teammate's skills, as well, as the overall mission of the data department and the business it serves. I'm more of a tech and infrastructure person, I'm not real passionate about coding. I find it tedious. The more I learn about it, the more I enjoy it, albeit, from a distance. I can't see myself creating great blocks of scripts, but the more I know about how they are created AND what rules the code in a project must abide by, the better my skills will be as a data center manager. So I'm trying to learn as much as possible about R, Python, and companion programs like ggvis for creating visualizations. I'd say visualizations are an essential skill for a data manager, since you have to present results and projects, questions, and answers to higher ups and other departments. this link comes from the resource section of this course: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/ggvis-data-visualization-r-tutorial This link or URL is of much more value to me, than a flawed test question and a reduction in my 100 percent average in the specialization. Without this lesson, in this course, I would not have this valuable resource. Another great link, which has a great FREE print publication as well: http://www.processor.com/ ...these people have been advising data center managers longer than just about anybody ! Verbally and in the transcript are some nebulous statements that point toward the main idea, that concept being: the more any employee, on any data science or technical team member IS, a "jack of all trades", the better. So that could have been included in some more general way on the quiz, because really that is pretty much a general rule, I've found, working in ANY capacity in the tech industry. I have done a great deal of audio editing, working at numerous radio stations, with Adobe Audition. With others like: Pro Tools, or any other really good quality AV digital editor the result is streamlined, near seamless, audio-video, or one or the other. You just learn how to read and edit wave forms of all kinds. Years ago, in Dallas, Texas, attending Richland College. I learned a valuable lesson. I was taking a college level Calc-Trig math class being taught by the regular professor's WIFE. I don't know if the professor was sick, but this woman, who was teaching the class for the whole semester, frankly, was not qualified. I had always been considered an illiterate by my high school math teachers, a married couple who, frankly, were highly abnormal even on the geekiest scale. These people were acting like they were a world above most people in the class. Needless to say, I assumed, by their "adult" opinions, they were sent by God Himself, to educate me thru denigration. I was amazed, how 10 years later, in College math how well I was doing. I was carrying a 100 percent average ! So midterm this faux professor declares, "I'll be prefiguring all the arithmetic to be easy, so you won't have to bring your calculators !" SO I DIDN'T.......and of course the teacher's wife proclaims....."I didn't have time to make the arithmetic easy so you'd better use your calculators !" I literally had pages and pages of figuring in handwriting accompanying my 3 page test. The result was a C plus on the test. I angrily told the sub teacher "I did not bring a calculator to this test because you said it wouldn't be necessary, therefore I must be allowed to redo this test with a calculator !" She of course relented, "No that won't be possible...that's not a bad grade...." she continued, "what are you worried about ?"........ I was so peeved, I was going to drop the class. It was too late in the semester, and I was so disgusted with this woman's cavalier dismissal of my perfect grade that I just stopped going to class. The result was a failing final grade. Who ultimately suffered from this dilemma ? That, albeit, unfairly was me.....who created this "academic" tragedy, by the aggravation of a deeply flawed situation. Once again, that would be me. | 2) Johns Hopkins which is also as | Good | 2) as it gets. . . . | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course and a daring venture for what is really an art form, beyond it's scientific requirements. This part of the specialization needs a little refinement. I posted this in the discussion forum. · 7 days ago · Edited First of all.....these guys running this data science department have their hands full. They are teaching live classes for students who have spent OODLES (lots) of money to attend this prestigious college . Johns Hopkins is about as good as it gets for a medical degree. Then they are doing experiments and other data science for the research division of Johns Hopkins which is also as good as it gets........THEN they are doing these MOOC courses on top of all their other responsibilities......Dr. Leek is a University of Washington Alumni, which is also top notch for Data Science. The video lesson is flawed, there is no denying it. But I must say these teachers are very open to improvement in the course and your comments on what could be better done are received and acted upon, so I would include them in your thank you letter to the teachers. ALSO I think these MOOC courses are best done by all members of the department contributing. Truly this field IS a team sport. I feel this course was good, but the videos need to be edited and scripted, so unnecessary language, which dilutes the core knowledge, that must be learned, is not diluted where questions are left in the students head about content when being tested. I learned long ago in a college calculus class that if your mark isn't perfect, it's OK, so long as you pass with a high score......even if it is the teachers fault. The course could use better video production with teleprompter scripting......maybe some AV students at Johns Hopkins could get on board. it will happen eventually I'm sure. You want to take a course that is absolutely one of the best courses I've taken anywhere and truly the best online. Try the number one business course on Coursera: GROW TO GREATNESS, either part 1 or 2, University of Virginia, Darden School Of Business...........A team created course with one helluva a teacher who is a business person, researcher and award-winning writer. I would recommend this course to ANY student and especially E-Teachers. The problem with this course is that there is a lot of information that can be included but may not be absolutely necessary as a "core concept". Needless to say, the more technical skills any employee has, the more insight they will have into their teammate's skills, as well, as the overall mission of the data department and the business it serves. I'm more of a tech and infrastructure person, I'm not real passionate about coding. I find it tedious. The more I learn about it, the more I enjoy it, albeit, from a distance. I can't see myself creating great blocks of scripts, but the more I know about how they are created AND what rules the code in a project must abide by, the better my skills will be as a data center manager. So I'm trying to learn as much as possible about R, Python, and companion programs like ggvis for creating visualizations. I'd say visualizations are an essential skill for a data manager, since you have to present results and projects, questions, and answers to higher ups and other departments. this link comes from the resource section of this course: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/ggvis-data-visualization-r-tutorial This link or URL is of much more value to me, than a flawed test question and a reduction in my 100 percent average in the specialization. Without this lesson, in this course, I would not have this valuable resource. Another great link, which has a great FREE print publication as well: http://www.processor.com/ ...these people have been advising data center managers longer than just about anybody ! Verbally and in the transcript are some nebulous statements that point toward the main idea, that concept being: the more any employee, on any data science or technical team member IS, a "jack of all trades", the better. So that could have been included in some more general way on the quiz, because really that is pretty much a general rule, I've found, working in ANY capacity in the tech industry. I have done a great deal of audio editing, working at numerous radio stations, with Adobe Audition. With others like: Pro Tools, or any other really good quality AV digital editor the result is streamlined, near seamless, audio-video, or one or the other. You just learn how to read and edit wave forms of all kinds. Years ago, in Dallas, Texas, attending Richland College. I learned a valuable lesson. I was taking a college level Calc-Trig math class being taught by the regular professor's WIFE. I don't know if the professor was sick, but this woman, who was teaching the class for the whole semester, frankly, was not qualified. I had always been considered an illiterate by my high school math teachers, a married couple who, frankly, were highly abnormal even on the geekiest scale. These people were acting like they were a world above most people in the class. Needless to say, I assumed, by their "adult" opinions, they were sent by God Himself, to educate me thru denigration. I was amazed, how 10 years later, in College math how well I was doing. I was carrying a 100 percent average ! So midterm this faux professor declares, "I'll be prefiguring all the arithmetic to be easy, so you won't have to bring your calculators !" SO I DIDN'T.......and of course the teacher's wife proclaims....."I didn't have time to make the arithmetic easy so you'd better use your calculators !" I literally had pages and pages of figuring in handwriting accompanying my 3 page test. The result was a C plus on the test. I angrily told the sub teacher "I did not bring a calculator to this test because you said it wouldn't be necessary, therefore I must be allowed to redo this test with a calculator !" She of course relented, "No that won't be possible...that's not a bad grade...." she continued, "what are you worried about ?"........ I was so peeved, I was going to drop the class. It was too late in the semester, and I was so disgusted with this woman's cavalier dismissal of my perfect grade that I just stopped going to class. The result was a failing final grade. Who ultimately suffered from this dilemma ? That, albeit, unfairly was me.....who created this "academic" tragedy, by the aggravation of a deeply flawed situation. Once again, that would be me. | 3) sport. I feel this course was | Good | 3) but the videos need to be | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a great course and a daring venture for what is really an art form, beyond it's scientific requirements. This part of the specialization needs a little refinement. I posted this in the discussion forum. · 7 days ago · Edited First of all.....these guys running this data science department have their hands full. They are teaching live classes for students who have spent OODLES (lots) of money to attend this prestigious college . Johns Hopkins is about as good as it gets for a medical degree. Then they are doing experiments and other data science for the research division of Johns Hopkins which is also as good as it gets........THEN they are doing these MOOC courses on top of all their other responsibilities......Dr. Leek is a University of Washington Alumni, which is also top notch for Data Science. The video lesson is flawed, there is no denying it. But I must say these teachers are very open to improvement in the course and your comments on what could be better done are received and acted upon, so I would include them in your thank you letter to the teachers. ALSO I think these MOOC courses are best done by all members of the department contributing. Truly this field IS a team sport. I feel this course was good, but the videos need to be edited and scripted, so unnecessary language, which dilutes the core knowledge, that must be learned, is not diluted where questions are left in the students head about content when being tested. I learned long ago in a college calculus class that if your mark isn't perfect, it's OK, so long as you pass with a high score......even if it is the teachers fault. The course could use better video production with teleprompter scripting......maybe some AV students at Johns Hopkins could get on board. it will happen eventually I'm sure. You want to take a course that is absolutely one of the best courses I've taken anywhere and truly the best online. Try the number one business course on Coursera: GROW TO GREATNESS, either part 1 or 2, University of Virginia, Darden School Of Business...........A team created course with one helluva a teacher who is a business person, researcher and award-winning writer. I would recommend this course to ANY student and especially E-Teachers. The problem with this course is that there is a lot of information that can be included but may not be absolutely necessary as a "core concept". Needless to say, the more technical skills any employee has, the more insight they will have into their teammate's skills, as well, as the overall mission of the data department and the business it serves. I'm more of a tech and infrastructure person, I'm not real passionate about coding. I find it tedious. The more I learn about it, the more I enjoy it, albeit, from a distance. I can't see myself creating great blocks of scripts, but the more I know about how they are created AND what rules the code in a project must abide by, the better my skills will be as a data center manager. So I'm trying to learn as much as possible about R, Python, and companion programs like ggvis for creating visualizations. I'd say visualizations are an essential skill for a data manager, since you have to present results and projects, questions, and answers to higher ups and other departments. this link comes from the resource section of this course: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/ggvis-data-visualization-r-tutorial This link or URL is of much more value to me, than a flawed test question and a reduction in my 100 percent average in the specialization. Without this lesson, in this course, I would not have this valuable resource. Another great link, which has a great FREE print publication as well: http://www.processor.com/ ...these people have been advising data center managers longer than just about anybody ! Verbally and in the transcript are some nebulous statements that point toward the main idea, that concept being: the more any employee, on any data science or technical team member IS, a "jack of all trades", the better. So that could have been included in some more general way on the quiz, because really that is pretty much a general rule, I've found, working in ANY capacity in the tech industry. I have done a great deal of audio editing, working at numerous radio stations, with Adobe Audition. With others like: Pro Tools, or any other really good quality AV digital editor the result is streamlined, near seamless, audio-video, or one or the other. You just learn how to read and edit wave forms of all kinds. Years ago, in Dallas, Texas, attending Richland College. I learned a valuable lesson. I was taking a college level Calc-Trig math class being taught by the regular professor's WIFE. I don't know if the professor was sick, but this woman, who was teaching the class for the whole semester, frankly, was not qualified. I had always been considered an illiterate by my high school math teachers, a married couple who, frankly, were highly abnormal even on the geekiest scale. These people were acting like they were a world above most people in the class. Needless to say, I assumed, by their "adult" opinions, they were sent by God Himself, to educate me thru denigration. I was amazed, how 10 years later, in College math how well I was doing. I was carrying a 100 percent average ! So midterm this faux professor declares, "I'll be prefiguring all the arithmetic to be easy, so you won't have to bring your calculators !" SO I DIDN'T.......and of course the teacher's wife proclaims....."I didn't have time to make the arithmetic easy so you'd better use your calculators !" I literally had pages and pages of figuring in handwriting accompanying my 3 page test. The result was a C plus on the test. I angrily told the sub teacher "I did not bring a calculator to this test because you said it wouldn't be necessary, therefore I must be allowed to redo this test with a calculator !" She of course relented, "No that won't be possible...that's not a bad grade...." she continued, "what are you worried about ?"........ I was so peeved, I was going to drop the class. It was too late in the semester, and I was so disgusted with this woman's cavalier dismissal of my perfect grade that I just stopped going to class. The result was a failing final grade. Who ultimately suffered from this dilemma ? That, albeit, unfairly was me.....who created this "academic" tragedy, by the aggravation of a deeply flawed situation. Once again, that would be me. | 4) Pro Tools, or any other really | Good | 4) quality AV digital editor the result | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good course to build a foundation on how to recruit your data science team | 1) | Good | 1) course to build a foundation on | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good but should come after the Managing Data Analysis for understanding better what the people you hire are actually going to do. Preventing the "Dilbertification" of the data science manager. | 1) | Good | 1) but should come after the Managing | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Gives a good overview for newbies in the field and provides a few great link | 1) Gives a | Good | 1) overview for newbies in the field | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I have studied this course as part of the Executive Data Science Specialization. I think this set of four courses meet my objectives by providing a very nice overview on the key points of data science projects. They are good to give a flavor on data science and data science projects helping decide if you want to search for more in depth knowledge. | 1) of data science projects. They are | Good | 1) to give a flavor on data | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | A good overview on how to build and manage data science teams. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview on how to build and | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Gives a good idea of the roles required to build a competent team, dispelling the myth of the all encompassing data science guru | 1) Gives a | Good | 1) idea of the roles required to | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good overview on the roles and how to align expectations. | 1) | Good | 1) overview on the roles and how | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Expensive course. Good for how to find a team. | 1) Expensive course. | Good | 1) for how to find a team. | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good and interesting course, I recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course, I recommend! | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Ver good with clear and on point material. I would suggest to include real life stories of success and failure some managers had in building a data science team, and discuss about the mistakes or the strengths of their recruitment process. | 1) Ver | Good | 1) with clear and on point material. | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good interesting material but the quizzes were badly designed and did not test concepts well. | 1) | Good | 1) interesting material but the quizzes were | 3.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Topics are explained pretty good | 1) Topics are explained pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good overview of the different roles and skills needed for the roles of a data science team. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the different roles and | 4.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good practical review of the composition of a data science team. | 1) Very | Good | 1) practical review of the composition of | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Thanks for your efforts, I can't put my hand on something specifically and say good job! but you did a great job! thanks for sharing your knowledge for everyone on earth without any complication! You have taught me a lot and I own you a lot! | 1) hand on something specifically and say | Good | 1) job! but you did a great | 5.0 |
| 8LAp90EaEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good coverage in a very fast intro to the subject. Definitely take away some things I am able to put into use in my work. I get the feeling this is quite a new course (compared with the very well established Data Science Specialization) and does not have the student interaction base yet. I hope this aspect develops - perhaps even with the TAs. For this level course student interaction could be even more valuable than the more hands on data science subjects. Hope this specialization takes off as well as the DSS did! | 1) | Good | 1) coverage in a very fast intro | 4.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | Very Good, the course is very useful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) the course is very useful. | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | This is one of the best courses that I have ever taken before! I have got a good introduction in functional programming and understood a lot of new concepts of programming languages. | 1) taken before! I have got a | Good | 1) introduction in functional programming and understood | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | The best introduction to functional programming I've seen. The course lectures make for a smooth learning experience and the exercises in the assignments range from simple to moderately challenging and are a good complement for the lectures. | 1) to moderately challenging and are a | Good | 1) complement for the lectures. | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | This course is *unbelievably* good. It opens your mind and changes the way you reason about programming. Truly a remarkable course about functional programming. Dan is an amazing teacher and the way he explains advanced concepts makes it seem like they are not advanced at all. Every one should take this one. | 1) This course is *unbelievably* | Good | 1) It opens your mind and changes | 5.0 |
| 8om3I-4LEeSbxyIACw0OOQ | Impressive Course!!! Dan is a very smart, passionate, responsible teacher, eager to enlighten us with his thoughts on PL. Though the course might seem quite hard to novice programmers, the gain on learning the contents in this course is rather huge. In this course, you will learn functional programming style, some programming paradigms that are already or expectedly prevalent and a good taste of general programming languages! You should not miss it! | 1) already or expectedly prevalent and a | Good | 1) taste of general programming languages! You | 5.0 |
| 8TE-KTw4Eea67A6Z1aCfuw | I lack for architecture so much and this course was a good opportunity for me hope more arch courses | 1) much and this course was a | Good | 1) opportunity for me hope more arch | 5.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Good course ... good introduction to the topic. | 1) | Good | 1) course . . . good introduction | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Good course ... good introduction to the topic. | 2) Good course . . . | Good | 2) introduction to the topic. | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Parts are thin on detail. This is a good and broad overview but lacks in-depth information of use to cyber security specialists. Still, a good course to start with if you plan to move forward. | 1) thin on detail. This is a | Good | 1) and broad overview but lacks in-depth | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Parts are thin on detail. This is a good and broad overview but lacks in-depth information of use to cyber security specialists. Still, a good course to start with if you plan to move forward. | 2) to cyber security specialists. Still, a | Good | 2) course to start with if you | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | The topic of the course is very interesting, the readings were important, but some of the reading were based on a book, that I had to purchase. Was a very useful course, but was a little bit tiring, videos with 12 minutes with too much theory but less pratical examples. But was a good experience. I would like to thanks the professors, that made this course. | 1) less pratical examples. But was a | Good | 1) experience. I would like to thanks | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Good for an international perspective on Cyber Conflicts. Covers a wide range of topics | 1) | Good | 1) for an international perspective on Cyber | 4.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | A comprehensive course with good thematic. | 1) A comprehensive course with | Good | 1) thematic. | 5.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Good material. | 1) | Good | 1) material. | 5.0 |
| 8TKORJrSEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | This was a very good course (4.5/5.0). One area that could be improved would be the discussion of industrial control systems (ICS). On lecture briefly mentions STUXNET and SCADA, but this was rather incomplete discussion. A very recent incident that could have been used was the attack on the Ukraine Power grid as a demo of a cyber attack against infrastructure. https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/alerts/IR-ALERT-H-16-056-01?_mc=sm_dr_editor_kellyjacksonhiggins I am perhaps biased toward this area, since this is my field of work. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course (4. 5/5. 0). One area | 4.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, but not that much network and not so much security. Nevertheless, good course with useful techniques and explanations. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but not that much network | 4.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good course, but not that much network and not so much security. Nevertheless, good course with useful techniques and explanations. | 2) and not so much security. Nevertheless, | Good | 2) course with useful techniques and explanations. | 4.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This series of courses are great. The ones I've taken. Good Job!!! | 1) are great. The ones I've taken. | Good | 1) Job! ! ! | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | This course was not as good as the first course. I found myself typing codes mindlessly a lot and feeling the guilt that I'm not learning a lot from the app I'm making because there is too much coding going on and it's not clear what's more important. The final exam was too easy (almost a joke!) and it didn't help me figure out if I actually did learn something by typing out all these codes. I would like more lecture, snippet of codes and explaining what they do and have us fill out part of a code by thinking through as oppose to typing out the whole thing. | 1) This course was not as | Good | 1) as the first course. I found | 3.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good information, good quality presentation. The working examples are well chosen and fun to work along with. Thank you! | 1) Really | Good | 1) information, good quality presentation. The working | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Really good information, good quality presentation. The working examples are well chosen and fun to work along with. Thank you! | 2) Really good information, | Good | 2) quality presentation. The working examples are | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The content has a very good breadth component(covering json response handling,core data and push notifications.The very important components of iOS).All of them have been handled in suitable depth.Professor Don Patterson's diction and style of teaching is great. As I'm currently working as an iOS engineer, it is helping me a lot in expanding my skills. | 1) The content has a very | Good | 1) breadth component(covering json response handling, core | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty good explanation. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) explanation. | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent intermediate level course for objectives C. Good approach to the course presentation. Introduces concepts clearly and then drives into actual implementation. | 1) intermediate level course for objectives C. | Good | 1) approach to the course presentation. Introduces | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 8To4DTVtEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | wery good | 1) wery | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Well done, well explained, good assignments, looking forward to take the second. | 1) Well done, well explained, | Good | 1) assignments, looking forward to take the | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | As other reviewers have noted, this course is NOT for beginning programmers! (Unless maybe you are a mathematical genius with total recall.) I have a little background in programming, HTML and CSS, but I found this course to be an absolute nightmare. It would be interesting to find out if any of the rave reviews came from real beginners. Most of the problems have already been noted by other reviews, so I will only mention a few that I did not see mentioned. The course requirements should include hardware and software essentials. In particular, the student has no choice but to use Android Studio. If their system is not running a 64bit OS at 2.4 GHz with at least 8 GB of RAM, it can literally take DAYS for Studio to complete the build so that the student can do anything with assignment code. There is a desperate need for a glossary. The course dives in with more acronyms than the military, and assumes the attmpting learner already has a handle on APIs, SDKs, etc., not to mention many other technical terms (interfaces, ...). If I asked the average programmer to evaluate the MT based on comparisons with the Complutensian Polyglot and Codex Alexandricus, the effect would probably be about the same. Another glaring omission for beginners is a battery of exercises for each concept/skill. As for "We've organized all these topics into units that represent roughly 4-6 hours of work each," that is absurd! If you multiplied that by 10, it would still be a stretch. I have no doubt about the programming and technical competence of the instructors (though there are some errors in a number of the instructions). And I'm sure they are very nice people who really want others to learn. The root problem seems to be what professional communicators call "The Curse of Knowledge" -- a syndrome in which a person is so familiar with their subject that they cannot begin to imagine what it is like for someone who is not. My recommendation to a beginner is to look somewhere else. Take a good introductory course in Java before diving into the vastly more complex world of the Android environment. I am not qualified to evaluate the course from the perspective of an experienced programmer, but I have noted that they are frustrated by clutter caused by token attempts to make this a beginner course. My recommendation to the faculty is to completely re-engineer this whole specialization. They should have a separate set of courses truly designed for beginners, and they should get help from qualified instructional designers who specialize in online adult education. (Might not be a bad idea to get the VU English department to review the lecture text as well.) My recommendation to anyone is to never believe anything Coursera tells you about a course. Audit the course BEFORE you pay any money! This is especially important if the course has not actually started. This course started two months late, and I could not get a refund before the course even got under way! After taking nearly 6 months to wade through a little over half the course requirements, I decided to look at the rest of the assignments and project. This removed all doubt that to continue was a hopeless waste of time. So, I decided to end the nightmare, and I'm glad it's over! | 1) to look somewhere else. Take a | Good | 1) introductory course in Java before diving | 1.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Few thoughts: The very first videos describing Java For Android were containing really too many keywords/concepts, and it might be discouraging for someone new to programmation who just started the class, try to make it less dense. That's my point of view as someone who already had a good programming background. The lessons were okay. However the slides could be really improved and make things concise for someone who is new to Java. Finally I was really disappointed by the assignments. I often spent more time reading and trying to understand a long assignment (which could be reduced to a few lines), than writing the solution. Also, the frequent use of "rand" seems to be leading a lot of people to "almost correct" solutions, and they spend a long time debugging (that's what I understood reading the forums). | 1) as someone who already had a | Good | 1) programming background. The lessons were okay. | 2.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Really good course, even for someone who is not from the programming background. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, even for someone who is | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Really good and pretty intense course. Requires effort. | 1) Really | Good | 1) and pretty intense course. Requires effort. | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | This is a good course but there's some flaws (not about knowledge) | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course but there's some flaws (not | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | The assignments are challenging and well balanced. The extra provided code adds a good opportunity to see how professional programmers code and the course videos explain all the content clearly and in an organized fashion. Overall, the course is made easy through the videos and the assignments do well to compel good and continuous practice. | 1) The extra provided code adds a | Good | 1) opportunity to see how professional programmers | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | The assignments are challenging and well balanced. The extra provided code adds a good opportunity to see how professional programmers code and the course videos explain all the content clearly and in an organized fashion. Overall, the course is made easy through the videos and the assignments do well to compel good and continuous practice. | 2) the assignments do well to compel | Good | 2) and continuous practice. | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | This course wasn't well suited to me, being a person with a programming background. It was too introductory. But that doesn't say anything against the course. The reason I don't rate the course highly is that it just wasn't that coherent. I would have preferred to have a single, consistently good instructor. | 1) preferred to have a single, consistently | Good | 1) instructor. | 2.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | It's a good course, but you do need programming experience. Also, takes twice as much time as they say, at least. Also, third week of course has a lot of work, while fourth week has very little. Would be nice to balance them out. I did get a lot out of the course and plan to continue with this specialization. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, but you do need programming | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Course was really good. If someone is not having any coding experience then also he can learn with the help of these courses. | 1) Course was really | Good | 1) If someone is not having any | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | A useful course, with clear explanations of the main features of Java programming language and Object Oriented Programming. I found the teachers competent and I liked the approach of the course, especially aimed at understanding the logic of Java and the logic of good software development. Finally I found very useful peer review assessments. | 1) of Java and the logic of | Good | 1) software development. Finally I found very | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | It is told that to take this course, basic computer skills like sending emails and downloading files are necessary-this is a beginning level course. Then, in the first module, instructors talk about polymorphism, inheritance and abstraction. For someone who have no prior programming experience, these are definitely not suitable topics to start with. Moreover, students are supposed to learn these concepts to get a good grade from first quiz, although they know nothing about programming. I had some programming experience, so I was already familiar with these subjects. But the lectures were too boring to keep watching. I watched like 10 videos and learned nothing about the course subject. I think I won't be spending my time for this course, which seems to me like reading some reference files. | 1) learn these concepts to get a | Good | 1) grade from first quiz, although they | 1.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Very good. By far the best course of android. | 1) Very | Good | 1) By far the best course of | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | very good introduction to java for android. | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction to java for android. | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Now that I have completed the course I'd like to give some feedback on how I think it was. 1. Quizzes are horrible. The fact we get no feedback on incorrect answers is not very helpful. There are only 3 quizzes where I missed just one question but no matter what, I can't get them correct. It would be helpful if there was some explanation why an answer your selected was wrong, a hint or something. Also while some of the quiz answers are obvious from watching the lessons, some are totally not and if someone doesn't have ANY programming experience I think they would find some questions almost impossible to answer. I have a programming background and out of all the quizzes I just missed 1 question on 3 of them, but I've been trying to answer them again, and again, and again and I just can't get them right. If there was feedback after taking a quiz I'm sure it would of helped. For those 3 quizzes, I took them so many times all the other answers are memorized and I just keep trying to get that one right. It's not helpful and then it turns into a "just keep selecting different things until it's right" thing instead of understanding it. 2. The course says it's for beginners to programming but I beg to differ. I think the way the material is presented and how the assignments are laid out I do not think someone(or not many people) would have gotten through that Week two ascii assignment. I thought they assignments in some cases were harder than the lessons. Maybe it's because they way they were explained in the lessons which brings me to #3 3. I do not think the instructors use the best/most clear examples to present the material to students. There are many easier examples to teach about looping than showing an Ascii art example. Because not only does the student have to grasp the concept of loops, then also have to think about ascii print logic. I think to someone with no experience would get pretty lost pretty quickly in this course. Some of the things explained in the lessons I would actually look up other videos of other people explaining it to get a clearer picture. 4. Some material is not consistent. Like in some assignments the text is wrong, for the Account code example, you never really mention the mOut or the interface the class uses which are in the example files and what to do with them when you write the other constructors (The course goes over this later when talking about the constructors and calling a constructor from another constructor but not that early on when you're working with the Account example files 5. It seems this course really isn't fully developed yet and is still going through it's growing pains Overall, I would say there are many other courses that are far better at teaching the basics of Java. For me, since I do have some Java experience and a programming background it wasn't too bad, But I'm thinking of the guy who has never touched a line of code before. I just don't think the course does a good enough job at explaining things to someone like that. I really hope the next courses in the specialization are better organized than this because starting with the next course because the next ones are more important to me than this course was only because of my prior background | 1) don't think the course does a | Good | 1) enough job at explaining things to | 3.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Content was good. But organization could have been better. Assignments and auto-grader had issues and the problem statements were modified during the course. | 1) Content was | Good | 1) But organization could have been better. | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course. First time enrolled course in Coursera. I really enjoyed it. Lots of quiz and weekly assignment kept me busy for 4 weeks. And because of these ( assignment due date), i really learned by forcing myself to complete all in time. Quite tough on week 3, and i watched the videos multiple times and google the subject in order to understand the contents. Take this course, and struggle for 4 weeks. Will not regret. | 1) | Good | 1) course. First time enrolled course in | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course!!. the approach is well-balanced (no superficial and at the same time not too much professional). The quiz are done very well. | 1) | Good | 1) course! ! . the approach is | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course in general but it could use more exercises and solutions for those exercises. It could be a great course in future Also, sometimes it's confusing like you are asked to download code and write it along with the video but the files already (at least partially) contain the code that you should write and it looks quite different from the video. | 1) | Good | 1) course in general but it could | 3.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Very good course, maybe too basic for who has already a java background :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, maybe too basic for who | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | Good course on Java and OOP, Android it's a sort of pretext, but it's ok | 1) | Good | 1) course on Java and OOP, Android | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | A good introduction to java programming, the mentor team was really helpful and interactive and it was a pleasure to interact with them! Unfortunately, it is clear that this course still needs to be polished: some assignments contained mistakes or where even bugged. Mistakes and bugs have been fixed when they were reported but it still left an "amateur" aftertaste (especially considering that we had to wait for a few weeks for this course). | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to java programming, the mentor | 4.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | i gave this course 1 star not because its bad in content, its just because i was expecting more due to the fact it has been delayed several times; then when it finally came it was like any other youtube or online tutorial. i was expecting something as big as udacity but unfortunately its not. Don't expect to know or understand java with this course, no practical or step by step example in this course. what makes it worst is the fact they never show you how to build an app from scratch while the only app they have in this course, they dont do it. you have to do it on your own. dont get me wrong. all of them are good instructors but the way they did it, its definitely is not a beginner friendly. give a calculator as an assignment to build while you never built one app in this course, i think its not an effective way to teach. i will not pay for this specialization. i will do the udacity nanodegree one | 1) me wrong. all of them are | Good | 1) instructors but the way they did | 1.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | v good | 1) v | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 8UQBnm04EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Enjoyed the class! Makes me feel good that I am not crazy about too much cleanliness! | 1) Enjoyed the class! Makes me feel | Good | 1) that I am not crazy about | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Good introduction into the world of microbiome. The only drawback - not enough of this precious, well-delivered information. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into the world of microbiome. | 4.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | I'm quite impressed how good these course is. Big thanks for giving us so much knowledge :) | 1) I'm quite impressed how | Good | 1) these course is. Big thanks for | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Great subject and some very well presented videos. However there were several which were incomprehensible. Either because of the quality of the video or the very heavy accent of the speaker especially to a non-American viewer. One doesn't always want to read a transcript but to listen and concentrate. If all the videos had been of good listenable quality I would have given the course 5 stars | 1) all the videos had been of | Good | 1) listenable quality I would have given | 3.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | good!!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | This is a very good course. The instructors are knowledgeable and very clear in their exposition. The materials are very good and there are many things worth learning within. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. The instructors are knowledgeable and | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | This is a very good course. The instructors are knowledgeable and very clear in their exposition. The materials are very good and there are many things worth learning within. | 2) their exposition. The materials are very | Good | 2) and there are many things worth | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | I liked most everything about this course, even if it stretches one to understand / pronounce the biological terms. Still it is better to have a little more of the scientific component than too less. The videos were very well done, good to have the sub-titles because sometimes with Rob it was had to follow so it was nice to read too. The extra material and reference were also well appreciated. In fact we would be very interested to follow-up if/when more results of the project are known. Hint - write another book! | 1) The videos were very well done, | Good | 1) to have the sub-titles because sometimes | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Overall this course has covered a lot of good and interesting information! I found the presentation to be lacking somewhat as the course-leaders were reading off the info in front of the camera, which gave the lectures an artificial sort of feel. I did enjoy the different interviews along the way, which spiced things up a bit. The grading of this course needs to be revised, in my view, as some things will go amiss when students grade each other. All in all it's clear that a lot of work has gone into this course, and that is definitely to be commended by all involved. | 1) course has covered a lot of | Good | 1) and interesting information! I found the | 3.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | so far so good course for begginers | 1) so far so | Good | 1) course for begginers | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Course content was very good and I'd highly recommend this class. However the course policy of getting other students to grade the assignments results in people with big egos assigning other students arbitrarily bad grades. Maybe this can be fixed on the next iteration. Otherwise, bravo. | 1) Course content was very | Good | 1) and I'd highly recommend this class. | 4.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Very good course for understanding the broad scope of microbiomics | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for understanding the broad scope | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Good course, I liked everything except reading from cards that made the lectures feel very artifical. | 1) | Good | 1) course, I liked everything except reading | 4.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | very good introduction for microbime in gut | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction for microbime in gut | 5.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | In general this was an easy, interesting and enjoyable course, Video interviews and lectures by key researchers in this exciting field were a highlight. It's an introductory course so not deep, but fun. A couple of things significantly detracted from the course for me. One was a feeling of unqualified evangelism. I think the microbiome is indeed a hugely important field, but the level of hype here, and lack of any critical perspective, was off-putting. This is particularly disturbing for products like probiotics, which have become a huge industry with little solid evidence to support them, or to choose between them. Also, they devote a lot of time to selling the American Gut Project. Which is a good cause, but I would rather they had spent that time teaching me something useful. I resent being duped into watching ads when I've signed up to be educated. The other thing that bothered me was the course required us to divulge a lot of personal information to other students in pointless, time-consuming projects. I didn't learn anything from these projects and found them annoying. | 1) American Gut Project. Which is a | Good | 1) cause, but I would rather they | 3.0 |
| 93w6xNzBEeSvjyIAC3jXcg | Very good course. I like the course assignments. For one who have not taken a biology course before, it is tough, though broad reading over the years about health, and having worked in a biotechnology companies helped. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I like the course assignments. | 5.0 |
| 99SZyjVxEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good simulation of real software development activities. | 1) Very | Good | 1) simulation of real software development activities. | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Typically writing courses deal with either the business of writing, or the pretentious art and literature side of writing. Almost nobody deals with the science of writing. Where is the talk on motivational arrows? Character likabilities like being unrelenting? Where is the meta-analysis of good techniques in writing? meta-data is the future of defining the science of writing, but it's not mentioned here even slightly. What about will he/won't he moments? Backstory interacting and being relevant to the plot? What about fish out of water? This course doesn't even touch upon foundational pillars and tenets that make good writing. I couldn't imagine paying for this course, since I've already paid too much with my time. As it stands, I could have taught a better course than this, and maybe some day I'll be so fortunate as to move writing studies in the right direction, towards the truth that older generation teachers are unwilling to accept: that good writing is empirical, and therefore can be learned. | 1) unrelenting? Where is the meta-analysis of | Good | 1) techniques in writing? meta-data is the | 4.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Typically writing courses deal with either the business of writing, or the pretentious art and literature side of writing. Almost nobody deals with the science of writing. Where is the talk on motivational arrows? Character likabilities like being unrelenting? Where is the meta-analysis of good techniques in writing? meta-data is the future of defining the science of writing, but it's not mentioned here even slightly. What about will he/won't he moments? Backstory interacting and being relevant to the plot? What about fish out of water? This course doesn't even touch upon foundational pillars and tenets that make good writing. I couldn't imagine paying for this course, since I've already paid too much with my time. As it stands, I could have taught a better course than this, and maybe some day I'll be so fortunate as to move writing studies in the right direction, towards the truth that older generation teachers are unwilling to accept: that good writing is empirical, and therefore can be learned. | 2) foundational pillars and tenets that make | Good | 2) writing. I couldn't imagine paying for | 4.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Typically writing courses deal with either the business of writing, or the pretentious art and literature side of writing. Almost nobody deals with the science of writing. Where is the talk on motivational arrows? Character likabilities like being unrelenting? Where is the meta-analysis of good techniques in writing? meta-data is the future of defining the science of writing, but it's not mentioned here even slightly. What about will he/won't he moments? Backstory interacting and being relevant to the plot? What about fish out of water? This course doesn't even touch upon foundational pillars and tenets that make good writing. I couldn't imagine paying for this course, since I've already paid too much with my time. As it stands, I could have taught a better course than this, and maybe some day I'll be so fortunate as to move writing studies in the right direction, towards the truth that older generation teachers are unwilling to accept: that good writing is empirical, and therefore can be learned. | 3) teachers are unwilling to accept: that | Good | 3) writing is empirical, and therefore can | 4.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Just finished watching all the videos and it is excellent! To say, 'well done' to any bit of good work is to take hold of the powers which have made the effort and strengthen them beyond our knowledge. Phillips Brooks | 1) 'well done' to any bit of | Good | 1) work is to take hold of | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Just as good as the others in the Creative Writing specialization. Try them all! | 1) Just as | Good | 1) as the others in the Creative | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | The lectures in this class are well done and informative, and they provide a lot of good material. However, the assignment portion needs a lot of work. The instructions weren't clear for anyone taking the class which resulted in incredibly difficult grading. It was hard to even understand the basic ideas of what was required for an assignment. I think the teacher very much needs to go back and change the wording of the assignments, add more information in the instructions, and also post an example to show what is expected since a lot of the assignments are very strange, like a describing a character without mentioning the character in any way. | 1) and they provide a lot of | Good | 1) material. However, the assignment portion needs | 3.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | I like this course. I have done some good job and at the same time I can feel some disadvantages of myself. I learned how to find, create a character and how to make them alive. | 1) this course. I have done some | Good | 1) job and at the same time | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | simple easy but not that easy Assignment tho it's good for you | 1) not that easy Assignment tho it's | Good | 1) for you | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course was very interesting and the assignments were good. I thought it relied too much on conversations with other authors but overall it was enjoyable and I learned new skills. | 1) very interesting and the assignments were | Good | 1) I thought it relied too much | 4.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good course, but assignment instructions were difficult to understand at times and no examples were given. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but assignment instructions were difficult | 3.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course, gave a lot of insight on writing and specially about the character | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, gave a lot of insight | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | It is a really good course, i've got some problems with the task, because it was a bit difficult for me as my native language is Spanish, but despite that, it went all good. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course, i've got some problems with | 5.0 |
| 9a6pC3gcEeWxvQr3acyajw | It is a really good course, i've got some problems with the task, because it was a bit difficult for me as my native language is Spanish, but despite that, it went all good. | 2) but despite that, it went all | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| 9D3LWblUEeWbNBLZhfEI2Q | good course, poor slides in pdf | 1) | Good | 1) course, poor slides in pdf | 4.0 |
| 9fePAbQLEeWu-gqgbeGTiQ | Very good course, nice pace, very good graphics. Concise. I would have expected more information on metal processing than on metal properties. If you have a good recommendation on a course about metal forming, I would appreciate that. But still a very good course. Thank you very much! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, nice pace, very good graphics. | 5.0 |
| 9fePAbQLEeWu-gqgbeGTiQ | Very good course, nice pace, very good graphics. Concise. I would have expected more information on metal processing than on metal properties. If you have a good recommendation on a course about metal forming, I would appreciate that. But still a very good course. Thank you very much! | 2) Very good course, nice pace, very | Good | 2) graphics. Concise. I would have expected | 5.0 |
| 9fePAbQLEeWu-gqgbeGTiQ | Very good course, nice pace, very good graphics. Concise. I would have expected more information on metal processing than on metal properties. If you have a good recommendation on a course about metal forming, I would appreciate that. But still a very good course. Thank you very much! | 3) metal properties. If you have a | Good | 3) recommendation on a course about metal | 5.0 |
| 9fePAbQLEeWu-gqgbeGTiQ | Very good course, nice pace, very good graphics. Concise. I would have expected more information on metal processing than on metal properties. If you have a good recommendation on a course about metal forming, I would appreciate that. But still a very good course. Thank you very much! | 4) appreciate that. But still a very | Good | 4) course. Thank you very much! | 5.0 |
| 9fePAbQLEeWu-gqgbeGTiQ | Good Course for the biginner | 1) | Good | 1) Course for the biginner | 4.0 |
| 9GGvo5QIEeWBAQoVMoNgNQ | Pretty ok. Prett interesting. Good theoretical background and strcuturing. | 1) Pretty ok. Prett interesting. | Good | 1) theoretical background and strcuturing. | 4.0 |
| 9h_j5XEiEeWbbw5cIAKQrw | This was by far the worst course in the series. There is a lot of good content in this course that needs to be shared, but I just felt the delivery failed in a lot of ways. Here are some issues 1) Often, concepts are thrown out but aren't explained clearly. Speaker glosses over them without giving concrete examples 2) The structure of the course is poorly configured. On several occasions, inline quizzes test you on concepts that haven't been introduced until later in the video, forcing you to guess at answers. Also, the assignment portion of the course asks you to submit a word or pdf with images, but it wasn't configured to allow uploads. You could only submit text in a text box. I realized I wasn't the only person with the issue when I graded assignments from others who had trouble submitting their assignment. In some cases, I believe students failed that portion of the course because they could not figure out how to submit. I have some IT background and was able to share my homework through my shared drive fortunately. 3) The speaker should re-record his lecture. It was obvious (or at least seemed as if) he was reading a teleprompter. There were many awkward pauses between sentences that made it hard to listen to. Often times, the audio presentation were inconsistent with the words in the slide, making it confusing because I didn't know which I should be following. | 1) series. There is a lot of | Good | 1) content in this course that needs | 1.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | This course is very good and you can learn a lot of knowledge.Then you can design a better game. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) and you can learn a lot | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Very good. Excellent teacher - I strongly recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Excellent teacher - I strongly recommend. | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Good course to help you get started designing video game worlds. | 1) | Good | 1) course to help you get started | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | The course material provide good reference and study for world design. | 1) The course material provide | Good | 1) reference and study for world design. | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | In general the course was really good, I just had the problem that some points weren't as clearly explained as I wished them to be. It's a bit hard to follow up, since sometimes the examples are not what is asked for in the homework and there's nothing to compare your work to, so the student as well as the grading peers are not always sure what is important in the assignment. Add some more examples and explain them directly, I think that would help a lot. :) | 1) In general the course was really | Good | 1) I just had the problem that | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Very good and informative course. I liked it mostly because of how it explains the ways one can create the video game world we desire and what must be taken into account. I already had prior knowledge on how to create a video game world that was consistent, but this reinforced what I already knew and took it a bit further. Very recommended for those who are beginners and want to learn how to create a world that feels real and is consistent throughout a game. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative course. I liked it | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Good course, but there are not much useful information. It's more analytic | 1) | Good | 1) course, but there are not much | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | A very good experience, but if it could've helped me to find a job it would have been even better. | 1) A very | Good | 1) experience, but if it could've helped | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Compare to Last Course in this Specialization this course lacked the good pace through the assignments, they were out of pace or out of tune, and also there were mostly general talks more than tips to make the student get in to the flow and create a better work, All in All it was Great but compared to the course before it, it had issues :D | 1) this Specialization this course lacked the | Good | 1) pace through the assignments, they were | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Easy to follow and well-packed with good information and tips, but I would like to see some kind of quiz-function along the course to test the knowledge I've been learning. | 1) Easy to follow and well-packed with | Good | 1) information and tips, but I would | 3.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | I had good assignments, but less content than I expected. | 1) I had | Good | 1) assignments, but less content than I | 4.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | Realy good one! | 1) Realy | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| 9p1NWzJzEeWFJhJQP1CW-Q | I was a little bit dissapointed with this course because, in my opinion, it is not structured well, it is just an amount of questions we need to think about. It has ended but I have the feeling I still have no good idea about what is world design for video games... | 1) the feeling I still have no | Good | 1) idea about what is world design | 2.0 |
| 9tZaH-SOEeWVyArzYsqChQ | Good at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 1) | Good | 1) at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 5.0 |
| 9tZaH-SOEeWVyArzYsqChQ | Good at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 2) Good at explaining concepts | Good | 2) Quizzes& assignments | 5.0 |
| 9tZaH-SOEeWVyArzYsqChQ | It's a good course for cloud studing | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for cloud studing | 5.0 |
| 9uthHBq9EeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good course with people that seems to love to teach this subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with people that seems to | 5.0 |
| 9wSqaVu-EeWPXA4vXFBIfw | The capstone is really good. Too bad it means the end of this specialization... I liked it here. But it is also the beginning of playing more with ROS, simulation tools and real robots. | 1) The capstone is really | Good | 1) Too bad it means the end | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Learned a lot throughout the course. Easy to understand lectures and good supplemental materials that makes this course an enjoyable one. | 1) course. Easy to understand lectures and | Good | 1) supplemental materials that makes this course | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Thoroughly enjoying prof. Estrada's course. he Witty Prof. vs Student notes is a very good read. | 1) vs Student notes is a very | Good | 1) read. | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Very informative and easy to understand, the professor is really good, interesting practical examples. | 1) to understand, the professor is really | Good | 1) interesting practical examples. | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | This was a very good course for a down and dirty review of WACC, NPV, IRR, EVA, etc. The instructor covers the material well and I found that the reading material was a very good compliment to the lectures and helped embed the material for use in the assignments. I recommend this course for those looking for a review or an introduction to Corporate Finance. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course for a down and dirty | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | This was a very good course for a down and dirty review of WACC, NPV, IRR, EVA, etc. The instructor covers the material well and I found that the reading material was a very good compliment to the lectures and helped embed the material for use in the assignments. I recommend this course for those looking for a review or an introduction to Corporate Finance. | 2) the reading material was a very | Good | 2) compliment to the lectures and helped | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | I do not judge the course itself as I am a novice. But I can assure it is really well structured, easy to follw, well explained and at times intuitive. The professor has an engaging way to explain and the deadlines are feasable. I took all exams and finished 97.5% which is a good result to a total novice. Good job! I am taking more courses for sure! Thank you Coursera. | 1) finished 97. 5% which is a | Good | 1) result to a total novice. Good | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | I do not judge the course itself as I am a novice. But I can assure it is really well structured, easy to follw, well explained and at times intuitive. The professor has an engaging way to explain and the deadlines are feasable. I took all exams and finished 97.5% which is a good result to a total novice. Good job! I am taking more courses for sure! Thank you Coursera. | 2) good result to a total novice. | Good | 2) job! I am taking more courses | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | It's good course. | 1) It's | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Very practical course. Proffesor has good tips and very easy to understand explanations and practical examples. | 1) Very practical course. Proffesor has | Good | 1) tips and very easy to understand | 5.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | It is a very good course. It explained very clear the fundamentals and principles of finance. Also is free if you do not need a certificate. It does not have very deep explanation of the formulas, so it is only good for people who only want to know and understand the principles. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course. It explained very clear the | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | It is a very good course. It explained very clear the fundamentals and principles of finance. Also is free if you do not need a certificate. It does not have very deep explanation of the formulas, so it is only good for people who only want to know and understand the principles. | 2) the formulas, so it is only | Good | 2) for people who only want to | 4.0 |
| 9zXfqf2IEeSnBSIACi-PoQ | An absolute must for those interested in how we pick 'good' projects, create value in our companies, and choose the best investment | 1) those interested in how we pick | Good | 1) projects, create value in our companies, | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | It is a really good course, it covers all the sustainability pillars with great explanations and examples. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course, it covers all the sustainability | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | shame you have to pay for this course although the content is good | 1) this course although the content is | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | It is a very good course,It gives you an abstract about the life around you. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course, It gives you an abstract | 4.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Really awesome course! Especially the peer review assignments. They give an overall view of what are the problems being faced by everyone around the world! The course structure is really good and is optimal for learning. After the course, one really has a changed perspective towards the earth and you would be inspired with purpose! A purpose to work for the betterment of humankind! | 1) world! The course structure is really | Good | 1) and is optimal for learning. After | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | excelente.... really really good I saw all videos in one night. | 1) excelente. . . . really really | Good | 1) I saw all videos in one | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a good course and I can get a brief idea what the position is the earth is. Also, I can remember some key figures about the environment situation. The difficulties of the quizs are designed suitability for student memorizing key point and concepts | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course and I can get a | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I like how the lectures are delivered. It is very engaging, and the content has been very useful. Level of details is also good for me. | 1) useful. Level of details is also | Good | 1) for me. | 5.0 |
| a0fzUULWEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good course material. I am learning lot of new things. | 1) | Good | 1) course material. I am learning lot | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A really good introduction to the course, well explained, good videos, I only wish I could have read the extra materials too. Only one complaint (very minor) - I live in Colombia and found a couple of references to Columbia in the materials. But overall super. | 1) A really | Good | 1) introduction to the course, well explained, | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A really good introduction to the course, well explained, good videos, I only wish I could have read the extra materials too. Only one complaint (very minor) - I live in Colombia and found a couple of references to Columbia in the materials. But overall super. | 2) introduction to the course, well explained, | Good | 2) videos, I only wish I could | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A good overview on Terrorism issue. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview on Terrorism issue. | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | So good! | 1) So | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Interesting course but: 1) The transcripts for each week are appalling. Here is a copied and pasted example: "Separatist groups remained active in almost 90% of decapitation cases where only a third of ideologically ideological organizations such as left wing and right wing organizations. Are damaged by it. And then, in general, in 17% of the cases. So 7% of the cases, decapitation led to the collapse of an organization." How are those that are hearing impaired meant to understand what the course leader is communicating? It took me so long to understand the transcript that I may as well have listened instead. The subtitles option reads the same as the transcript - not much good for anyone with anything but perfect hearing. 2) The estimated timings for each activity are somewhat optimistic. '10 minutes' is the recommended reading time for each week's reading content. Within this reading list are, on average, 8 articles, some of which amount to over 70 pages - if each article is roughly 25-40 pages on average, and there are around 8 articles, how will this reading activity take the student only '10 minutes' to complete? Apart from that, I did really enjoy the course!! | 1) as the transcript - not much | Good | 1) for anyone with anything but perfect | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Really enjoyed the material. The videos were simple, especially for a beginner. This is the first course I completed online and the experience was really good. Prof. Bakker is an able instructor and the concepts were well explained. The tests were simple though. Most of them took only one or two attempts to pass. That counts as a positive by the way. | 1) online and the experience was really | Good | 1) Prof. Bakker is an able instructor | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very good courses for someone who want to understand the basics of Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Only thing I would suggest to improve the course will be to be more up date with the latest event on terrorist attack in Europe. | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses for someone who want to | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | In general good, but not updated - seems from around 2013, so the new developments are not mentioned. | 1) In general | Good | 1) but not updated - seems from | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good review of the theory but course is outdated given the number of events in the last 2 years that relate to the information provided in the course -- particularly as it relates to attacks | 1) | Good | 1) review of the theory but course | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | The Course is really good. The presentation is intense and clearly structured. I would specifically emphasize the quality of the required and recommended reading lists. | 1) The Course is really | Good | 1) The presentation is intense and clearly | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Extremely informative and up-to-date Very good material and a very organized way of presenting the subjects Congratulations on such a good course and thank you! | 1) Extremely informative and up-to-date Very | Good | 1) material and a very organized way | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Extremely informative and up-to-date Very good material and a very organized way of presenting the subjects Congratulations on such a good course and thank you! | 2) the subjects Congratulations on such a | Good | 2) course and thank you! | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | In my opinion, this course is great. I'm doing my MSc in Forensic Psychology and I did this course to learn more about terrorism. The professor does a very good job at keeping the audience interested and he speaks clearly and slowly enough for everybody to understand. For a 7 week course, you get tons of information and, most importantly, it is well organized, going through modules in a systematic and thoughful way. Every week you have about 3 or 4 required readings, which will deepen your knowledge about the subjects addressed during the videos. I would strongly recommend this course to anyone who wants to have someone very knowledgeable guide you through an interesting and current topic. Thumbs up to Coursera as well, everything went perfectly. | 1) terrorism. The professor does a very | Good | 1) job at keeping the audience interested | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Great course. Good introduction on a pretty complex subject. Well brought and great articles included! | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) introduction on a pretty complex subject. | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Theoretically the course is very lacking. There is little focus on the scholarly work in the field except perhaps the first few lectures. The content and scope of the course is too small. Overall however the content is good for a very basic introduction and | 1) small. Overall however the content is | Good | 1) for a very basic introduction and | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It's a good introduction. Being green in this subject, it really changes my understanding of terrorism. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction. Being green in this subject, | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good fist MOOC experience. Pity the google hangout wasn't up but never mind. Would prefer more questions in the videos to check I'm listening attentively. Would also like to see a list of all the reading material in one place rather than per lectiure. Then I can go to each web page and save as epub usiing the crhome dotepub extension and copy to my ereader. Anyway you can streamline that kind of admin task would be appreciated. You ought to spruke ways to read the web pages, because reading it on a laptop or even tablet is a bit tedious. Also with the PDFs, some info on saving them as resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course content was good and I like the coursera front end. Need someway to manage tthe growing library of reading material that accumalates not just with this one course but if you do multiple MOOCs over time, Thank! | 1) | Good | 1) fist MOOC experience. Pity the google | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good fist MOOC experience. Pity the google hangout wasn't up but never mind. Would prefer more questions in the videos to check I'm listening attentively. Would also like to see a list of all the reading material in one place rather than per lectiure. Then I can go to each web page and save as epub usiing the crhome dotepub extension and copy to my ereader. Anyway you can streamline that kind of admin task would be appreciated. You ought to spruke ways to read the web pages, because reading it on a laptop or even tablet is a bit tedious. Also with the PDFs, some info on saving them as resizable PDFs would be appreciated. Course content was good and I like the coursera front end. Need someway to manage tthe growing library of reading material that accumalates not just with this one course but if you do multiple MOOCs over time, Thank! | 2) would be appreciated. Course content was | Good | 2) and I like the coursera front | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A really good course, which introduces a structured approach to the analysis of terrorism and counter-terrorism. It peels away the media hype surrounding the reality of the issues. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course, which introduces a structured approach | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | I would like to give 4.5 but it is not an option. Mainly because the course is good but sometimes Professor Bakker fails to hold my attention, due to lack of fire in his lecturing style. Whilst I know lectures cannot always be exciting , no matter how keen one is on the subject, I feel that some of the more tedious course material would be absorbed better if presented in a less monotone manner. | 1) option. Mainly because the course is | Good | 1) but sometimes Professor Bakker fails to | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | The prof is very good in explaining the concepts. | 1) The prof is very | Good | 1) in explaining the concepts. | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | I am enjoying this course very much, it is informative and very well organized and presented. I highly recommend it to anyone with an internet in the topic as it provides an excellent overview and includes current academic and non academic (mass media, world leaders. etc). perspectives. The video lectures are exciting and I look forward to the time I spend viewing them, the core readings are relevant and there are good suggestions for those wanted to gain a deeper understanding of the material. Dr Edwin Bakker the professor for this course is an excellent educator. | 1) readings are relevant and there are | Good | 1) suggestions for those wanted to gain | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It was a good course, however, it seems that the recording was from the earlier course. Which I don't mind, however, some of the comment wasn't relevant, so it was a bit weird. In terms of content and how the course run, it was beyond my expectation. The list of literature provided were quite extesive and strategicaly chosen. I wish there's a whole syllabus that we can access in the beginning of the course to prepare for the assignment. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course, however, it seems that the | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | The course is good and offers some interesting insights into the current state of things regarding terrorism, as well as a glimpse in the mindset of the terrorists and terrorist organizations. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) and offers some interesting insights into | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very interesting, good videos and reading material. Loved learning about terrorism. | 1) Very interesting, | Good | 1) videos and reading material. Loved learning | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | My opinion about the course is without doubt positive. It is geared to both college-educated people and for those people without previous knowledge course. The course allows different levels of depth; both can be used to acquire general knowledge about terrorism and counterterrorism, to elaborate on specific aspects, because it offers the student a varied and useful bibliography and recommended readings. As far as the platform is concerned, it is very intuitive and easy to handle, even an online course. My feeling has been to meet not only the vastness of the subject, the platform can be part of the course and the ability to communicate through forums with students sharing concerns and seek solutions. It's an easy course to follow although it online because it is well structured and has a good organization. This does not mean that the course is exceeded without hard work, as the estimated 5/6 hours a week of dedication is pretty accurate.It is not the typical course online almost testimonial. You have to work hard if you want to get a good result. So maybe it's the most rewarding thing I have done. From what I have learned and by the possibilities I see this field. It has also been rewarding by Professor Dr. Edwin Baker and his team for their skill and dedication, they have been tremendously didactic. If it were not for them, I would not have been able to finish. And fellow students from all countries, from forums and debates that have exposed enriching opinions. Thanks to all. | 1) is well structured and has a | Good | 1) organization. This does not mean that | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | My opinion about the course is without doubt positive. It is geared to both college-educated people and for those people without previous knowledge course. The course allows different levels of depth; both can be used to acquire general knowledge about terrorism and counterterrorism, to elaborate on specific aspects, because it offers the student a varied and useful bibliography and recommended readings. As far as the platform is concerned, it is very intuitive and easy to handle, even an online course. My feeling has been to meet not only the vastness of the subject, the platform can be part of the course and the ability to communicate through forums with students sharing concerns and seek solutions. It's an easy course to follow although it online because it is well structured and has a good organization. This does not mean that the course is exceeded without hard work, as the estimated 5/6 hours a week of dedication is pretty accurate.It is not the typical course online almost testimonial. You have to work hard if you want to get a good result. So maybe it's the most rewarding thing I have done. From what I have learned and by the possibilities I see this field. It has also been rewarding by Professor Dr. Edwin Baker and his team for their skill and dedication, they have been tremendously didactic. If it were not for them, I would not have been able to finish. And fellow students from all countries, from forums and debates that have exposed enriching opinions. Thanks to all. | 2) if you want to get a | Good | 2) result. So maybe it's the most | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good information but definitely different from that of the law enforcement communities | 1) | Good | 1) information but definitely different from that | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | I really like the professor, all the material given, and of course the topic. It's a very interesting course and I love that the professor provides names of important authors in the field, books, films and also schools specialized in studies on terrorism and counterterrorism. I started considering counterterrorism as a career path after my Law degree, we will see how the course will go, but so far (week threem, about to start week four) so good! | 1) about to start week four) so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very good teacher and Theme discussion | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher and Theme discussion | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | This is a really interesting course with current information about the state of terrorism and counterterrorism studies today and with an updated module on ISIS and what is happening in Syria at the moment. The history is an important aspect ,so having finished the course I feel I have a good overview of where we are and where we are coming from with an acknowledgement of the future. I wasn't sure that I would finish since one of the quizzes was so tricky but I got through it and learnt to revise well for the final exam. The videos are very well presented by Dr. Bakker and guests and the essential and supplementary readings very pertinent and enlarging.I wish I still had access to those materials as I didn't read everything I would have liked to but know I can at least refer to Perspectives on Terrorism online whenever I want to for current articles. | 1) course I feel I have a | Good | 1) overview of where we are and | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Good course for a general understanding of Terrorism History. | 1) | Good | 1) course for a general understanding of | 4.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent course. Organized and with teaching materials of good quality. | 1) Organized and with teaching materials of | Good | 1) quality. | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | It was very good to learn terrorism from the theory angle and believe the two groups should work closer. | 1) It was very | Good | 1) to learn terrorism from the theory | 3.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Excellent tutor - leading speakers from the field with a good slant on all angles that we are covering out there today. I really enjoyed the course despite not being from this background though have an interest… well worth looking at if you are wanting to gain a greater understanding in the field. | 1) speakers from the field with a | Good | 1) slant on all angles that we | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Thank you! Prof. & TA's .. Awesome Course to give good Foundation to Understand the Concepts. | 1) . . Awesome Course to give | Good | 1) Foundation to Understand the Concepts. | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Very useful course. Instructor is very good. They way instructor taught is simple & very helpful. Thank you for this friendly course. | 1) Very useful course. Instructor is very | Good | 1) They way instructor taught is simple | 5.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | A very good and thought provoking course. It is a re-run of an archived course and sadly a number of reference materials that had been on the dashboard are not reposted with it. Also there are references to discussion forums that don't exist. If the missing material and content were up to date it would be a strong and complete course. | 1) A very | Good | 1) and thought provoking course. It is | 2.0 |
| A0IYf6jOEeSnlCIAC1EMbw | Extremely clear and well presented course. Congratulations to the team who made such a good course. | 1) the team who made such a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Good but so basic. | 1) | Good | 1) but so basic. | 3.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | This course was a fairly decent introduction to personal branding. It certainly made me aware of it, although, it did not completely prepare me for the enormous task of consistent branding. It was a good place to start if you know nothing about things like twitter which I didn't. | 1) of consistent branding. It was a | Good | 1) place to start if you know | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Incredible and very useful content made in a very good estructure. | 1) useful content made in a very | Good | 1) estructure. | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Kimberly was energetic, a great speaker, and she was a joy to listen to! I've never thought about personal branding before, and this course laid a good groundwork for me to evaluate how I should present myself to the world through a brand. | 1) before, and this course laid a | Good | 1) groundwork for me to evaluate how | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | The course is good! But a little bit more on social media. It will be better if we can learn more about tactics and methods of personal branding. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) But a little bit more on | 3.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Good for personal development | 1) | Good | 1) for personal development | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | As suggested by other learners, this course is a good introduction for the majority of us out there. It gives you the essential skills you need, as well as provides resources to dig deeper. Extra bonus, the instructor is very engaging and funny, and the format is informal in a good way. | 1) other learners, this course is a | Good | 1) introduction for the majority of us | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | As suggested by other learners, this course is a good introduction for the majority of us out there. It gives you the essential skills you need, as well as provides resources to dig deeper. Extra bonus, the instructor is very engaging and funny, and the format is informal in a good way. | 2) the format is informal in a | Good | 2) way. | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Very good course but some of the videos were buffering and I couldn't view them properly. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course but some of the videos | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Thanks, Kimberley. It was good course! | 1) Thanks, Kimberley. It was | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great instructor! Very good content and reference readings. I only wish the course wouldn't be so introductory. | 1) Great instructor! Very | Good | 1) content and reference readings. I only | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Excellent teacher. Very well recorded videos. Good lectures and nice content. It changes the way how you see your life (personal and professional aspects). Congratulations. I recommend to all. | 1) Excellent teacher. Very well recorded videos. | Good | 1) lectures and nice content. It changes | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Great course. Everything is clear and easy to follow. Some of the things I already knew and some that I didn't, but it was good to hear it all from a different source and using words. Definitely worth the time. | 1) that I didn't, but it was | Good | 1) to hear it all from a | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Really liked the course! Gives a very good base to personal branding and it is easy to follow with short and interesting videos. Keep it up. Congratulations. | 1) liked the course! Gives a very | Good | 1) base to personal branding and it | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | A great course, with a good programation. I think that it was really importante for my carrer. | 1) A great course, with a | Good | 1) programation. I think that it was | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Its a good practical lecture but I think it have lots of room to improve. The material itself can be covered in 2 weeks lecture. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) practical lecture but I think it | 2.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | good and nice to experience | 1) | Good | 1) and nice to experience | 4.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Good course. Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) course. Thanks | 5.0 |
| a0OJ1ha4EeWKlgqs7LdhRw | Thisis a really introdutory lessons about personal branding. I think i saw good tips but could be more infos. | 1) personal branding. I think i saw | Good | 1) tips but could be more infos. | 3.0 |
| A2RSXymKEeWJTQ5-ju9xSw | I would love to thank you for your hard working. It was a good course. I have learnt a lot from you. In addition, I'm looking forward to participating with you on another course. Thank you once more again. | 1) your hard working. It was a | Good | 1) course. I have learnt a lot | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Good course to study. Clearly understood the aspects of business strategy with the help of the examples and the assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) course to study. Clearly understood the | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very deep and good if you want to climb up the lather of management in business. | 1) Very deep and | Good | 1) if you want to climb up | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excelent! To the point! Easy to understand. Good material | 1) To the point! Easy to understand. | Good | 1) material | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | very good business strategy introduction | 1) very | Good | 1) business strategy introduction | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent course and good content | 1) Excellent course and | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent foundation material, good material and very professional language. | 1) Excellent foundation material, | Good | 1) material and very professional language. | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Fefinitely recommended for beginners !! A very good course with very clear explanation of concepts | 1) for beginners ! ! A very | Good | 1) course with very clear explanation of | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Provides very good understanding on Business strategy | 1) Provides very | Good | 1) understanding on Business strategy | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | A very good foundation course. The final assignment is a very good practice and test of application and knowledge gained from the course. Very practical and good. It lets the learner walks away knowing how to apply logical reasoning using the tools than just understanding and forgetting it later as humans always does. | 1) A very | Good | 1) foundation course. The final assignment is | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | A very good foundation course. The final assignment is a very good practice and test of application and knowledge gained from the course. Very practical and good. It lets the learner walks away knowing how to apply logical reasoning using the tools than just understanding and forgetting it later as humans always does. | 2) The final assignment is a very | Good | 2) practice and test of application and | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | A very good foundation course. The final assignment is a very good practice and test of application and knowledge gained from the course. Very practical and good. It lets the learner walks away knowing how to apply logical reasoning using the tools than just understanding and forgetting it later as humans always does. | 3) from the course. Very practical and | Good | 3) It lets the learner walks away | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good content, videos, rich content, up-to-date subjects. Highly recommended. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, videos, rich content, up-to-date subjects. | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | A good course for future MBA students especially the ones interested to pursue a MBA degree in Strategy Management | 1) A | Good | 1) course for future MBA students especially | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent contents.. Good speed. Evaluation was challenging but not too strict... Looking forward to more courses on Coursera. | 1) Excellent contents. . | Good | 1) speed. Evaluation was challenging but not | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good Basic strategy management concepts. Will help in clearing some doubts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Basic strategy management concepts. Will help | 4.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Good course to start learning about Business Strategy | 1) | Good | 1) course to start learning about Business | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course structure. Good lectures and lecturers. Good additional material and in general a very interesting course on the foundations of Business Strategy. Highly recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course structure. Good lectures and lecturers. | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course structure. Good lectures and lecturers. Good additional material and in general a very interesting course on the foundations of Business Strategy. Highly recommended! | 2) Very good course structure. | Good | 2) lectures and lecturers. Good additional material | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course structure. Good lectures and lecturers. Good additional material and in general a very interesting course on the foundations of Business Strategy. Highly recommended! | 3) course structure. Good lectures and lecturers. | Good | 3) additional material and in general a | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good teachers, always trying to explain the theory with real examples. Very good course, that stimulates you to do the final assignment, the moment when you really learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers, always trying to explain the | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good teachers, always trying to explain the theory with real examples. Very good course, that stimulates you to do the final assignment, the moment when you really learn. | 2) the theory with real examples. Very | Good | 2) course, that stimulates you to do | 5.0 |
| a3f86i8hEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Think it was a very good course, a bit high level though. It is "Foundations" though, so that is a somewhat unfair criticism. | 1) Think it was a very | Good | 1) course, a bit high level though. | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good course, very suitble for freshman | 1) | Good | 1) course, very suitble for freshman | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | very good and understandable course. Moves just at the right pace. | 1) very | Good | 1) and understandable course. Moves just at | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very well thought out and methodical approach. Assignments are in accordance with the lectures and challenges in a good way. | 1) the lectures and challenges in a | Good | 1) way. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Lessons are very good but the Assignments for the later weeks are way too hard for people with no math or programming experience. | 1) Lessons are very | Good | 1) but the Assignments for the later | 2.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | It's a very good course that will sharpen your MATLAB skills ^_^ | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course that will sharpen your MATLAB | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This is a very good course especially the exercises which are taught in the class. The homework is very challenging! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course especially the exercises which are | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good effort. | 1) Very | Good | 1) effort. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course at an introductory level for MATLAB. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course at an introductory level for | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Quite good course with changeling homework. Not for programming beginners! | 1) Quite | Good | 1) course with changeling homework. Not for | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This course is a very good introduction to programming in general and covers all the basic concepts that is used in most of the programming languages. The lecturer makes things interesting with a sense of humour. The assignments which comes later on can be a tad difficult for someone new to programming, but as the professor says , stick with it, solve it, and the feeling you get when you finish it is unparalleled. All the doubts and queries in the discussion forums are answered quickly and efficiently. Great course and a great experience over all. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) introduction to programming in general and | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Excellent! Challenging HW Assignments. Lecture notes & Presentations cover the fundamentals of matlab in details. Good course to get started with programing using Matlab. | 1) the fundamentals of matlab in details. | Good | 1) course to get started with programing | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | very very good. Well done ;-) | 1) very very | Good | 1) Well done ;-) | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course. Highly recommend it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Highly recommend it. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very Good Introductory Course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Introductory Course. | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good introductory course! | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course! | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very well explained by the instructor. Coursera is a very good platform for learning. | 1) the instructor. Coursera is a very | Good | 1) platform for learning. | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Really good course! Had to learn to use MATLAB for an econometrics PhD course, and this course was veryu helpful on getting me started. The e-book is also very good. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! Had to learn to use | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Really good course! Had to learn to use MATLAB for an econometrics PhD course, and this course was veryu helpful on getting me started. The e-book is also very good. | 2) started. The e-book is also very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I like this course very much. The way of explaining thins is good and innovative. Mostly I like Homework section, we know that Homework is stressful but I like pattern of homework which is motivating for doing homework. Although I enrolled very late I like this course very much. This course improves logical thinking but hard attention is needed. I would like to attend other courses if release in future. Thanks A lot Professors and Mentors...... | 1) The way of explaining thins is | Good | 1) and innovative. Mostly I like Homework | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | it is a very good introductory course, i'm really enjoying it! however, lessons can sometimes be very slow | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) introductory course, i'm really enjoying it! | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Excellent course with wonderful explanations and illustrations. The team handling the grader technology has done a very good job too. Last but not the least, the forums for discussions have been eye-openers in the case of a few problems. The mentors have promptly replied to queries in the best possible way. 5 stars from me. | 1) grader technology has done a very | Good | 1) job too. Last but not the | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Great teaching and very thought provoking assignments. A really good course! | 1) very thought provoking assignments. A really | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | A brilliant course for both beginners and experienced programmers. The professor carries along with a steady pace and has made good problem sets to increase learning. His lecture style is so inspiring , informative and sometimes funny that i find myself spending most of my time in this course. Hope people at Vanderbilt continue to produce such valuable courses in the future. | 1) a steady pace and has made | Good | 1) problem sets to increase learning. His | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I really enjoy the course. It helped me to know and understand how to use MATLAB in a basic way. This course will strength your MATLAB skill with a lot of assignments. The longer you go, the harder exercises but I believe that's a good way to learn. | 1) exercises but I believe that's a | Good | 1) way to learn. | 5.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course, with clear explanations of the key concepts. However, I felt hindered in being able to complete all tasks in the homeworks each week as many questions alienate someone like me with little mathematics/physics background. I feel if the questions were more general I would have been able to perform better each week. Very good lecture content though. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, with clear explanations of the | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course, with clear explanations of the key concepts. However, I felt hindered in being able to complete all tasks in the homeworks each week as many questions alienate someone like me with little mathematics/physics background. I feel if the questions were more general I would have been able to perform better each week. Very good lecture content though. | 2) to perform better each week. Very | Good | 2) lecture content though. | 4.0 |
| A4W_GyDjEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | So far the course appears to be very good, but the request for an upgrade after every video becomes more and more annoying as the number multiplies | 1) the course appears to be very | Good | 1) but the request for an upgrade | 4.0 |
| A82QaHtJEeSliSIAC0EO7A | The course really helped me in understanding the basics of health informatics and definitely adds value to my CV. The faculty is very well versed and have a good knowledge of the subject. The class of data visualization really helped in evaluating how to visualize data and present it in a good form. | 1) very well versed and have a | Good | 1) knowledge of the subject. The class | 5.0 |
| A82QaHtJEeSliSIAC0EO7A | The course really helped me in understanding the basics of health informatics and definitely adds value to my CV. The faculty is very well versed and have a good knowledge of the subject. The class of data visualization really helped in evaluating how to visualize data and present it in a good form. | 2) data and present it in a | Good | 2) form. | 5.0 |
| A82QaHtJEeSliSIAC0EO7A | Really a good starting point for anyone interested in learning or starting a new career in health informatics. | 1) Really a | Good | 1) starting point for anyone interested in | 5.0 |
| A97cQkR4EeawVwo82dylKw | +: I reached my goal for the course and now I understand a bit about R. I succeeded to pass within much shorter time than anticipated course duration. The course certificate is posted to my Linkedin profile. -: No human mentors on the course discussion forum - all questions answered by other students. Automatic tests in swirl are too restrictive and do not accept perfectly correct student solutions slightly different to those anticipated by the authors. Week 2 assignment is much different from the reading material. Nothing taught about charting in R. Overall comment: I think it is good value for money. | 1) Overall comment: I think it is | Good | 1) value for money. | 4.0 |
| A9OckSDZEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good historical overview. I especially liked the 'case studies' of the various European countries during the 40s. The literature part included some very good reading and interesting movies. I would recommend this course to anyone interested in the topic o | 1) | Good | 1) historical overview. I especially liked the | 4.0 |
| A9OckSDZEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good historical overview. I especially liked the 'case studies' of the various European countries during the 40s. The literature part included some very good reading and interesting movies. I would recommend this course to anyone interested in the topic o | 2) The literature part included some very | Good | 2) reading and interesting movies. I would | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good overview of buddhist meditation | 1) | Good | 1) overview of buddhist meditation | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good intro on meditation. | 1) | Good | 1) intro on meditation. | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The labs are superb. The title is misleading - it is as much about the neuroscience as Buddhism, and the lectures are dry. However, because the labs are so good, I give it five stars. | 1) However, because the labs are so | Good | 1) I give it five stars. | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good course, profound and complete. I strongly reccomend it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, profound and complete. I strongly | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Overall - Good course - covers both theoretical & practical. | 1) Overall - | Good | 1) course - covers both theoretical & | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good. There is room for improvement. Congratulations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) There is room for improvement. Congratulations. | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good content. MIght want to change up the presentations for variety - add visual aids, etc. | 1) | Good | 1) content. MIght want to change up | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | 1) key. Bad agenda = bad results, | Good | 1) motivation will cause good results. ) | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | (I posted this review in a blog [https://guhyasamajacenter.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/review-of-the-free-coursera-tibetan-buddhist-meditation-and-the-modern-world-lesser-vehicle-course-given-by-uva/]. Much of the courseware was outstanding. Many of the videos were so poorly done (boring) that I couldn't watch them. (I do not watch people read prepared text in a video. Ever.) ----------- From the blog ---------------------------------- I recently took the FREE Coursera course, "Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World". (https://www.coursera.org/learn/buddhist-meditation) From the course catalog: " Tibetan Buddhist Meditation and the Modern World explores the immense variety of meditation practices past and present. We present their histories, their philosophical underpinnings, their transformations in the modern global world, and we give you a chance to reflect upon meditation practices through secular contemplations designed just for this course." (Note: In the class overview, it is noted that the term "Lesser Vehicle" is "perjorative" but they use it anyway. ??") There are many FREE reasons to take this FREE "Lesser Vehicle" course (the first of four): #1 - An awesome, wonderful hour-long interview with Sharon Salzberg, one of the founders of the Insight Meditation Society. What an awesome lady. I was not aware that she is also a Dzogchen student. (Did I mention it was FREE?) Worth signing up for the course just to skip to Week 6 to watch this interview. #2 - Guided Meditations by Dr. Anne Klein and Anam Thubten. Very, very, very nice. FREE, it's ALL FREE. #3 - The Science of Mindfulness against the Background of the Scientific Study of Meditation videos with Dr. Clifford Saron, neuroscientist. His videos start in Week 1 and continue through Week 6 in building a basis for understanding the scientific research on meditation. He (and the course) demonstrates what can and cannot (presently) be scientifically proven about meditation. One excellent example: Two trained pianists were told to learn a complicated piece of music, one with the piano, and the other only in his imagination. After 2 weeks (I think) of practice, their brains' MRI patterns exhibited almost the exact same changes. Dr. Saron noted that the results are not definitive but still may have implications for the compassion/bodhicitta meditations we do. #4: An interview on "Buddhist Modernism", with David McMahan. Very much academic-oriented. One statement, in particular, struck me since, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be true: "The Buddhist Tantra teachings are not accepted nor are they popular in the West." For all the Buddhist monastics that visit the USA and the West to grab donations and go back to their home countries, few of them are sticking around to teach complete Tantra classes. The few that do (and do it well) are having a hard time making ends meet. (That's just my opinion, I guess.) There are also short 5-10 minute interviews with Khenpo Tsultrim Lodro (a short "snapshot" of the Tibetan take on the week's particular subject, which was often better (to me) than the 90min-long "talking head" version ) and Ven. Tsoknyi Rinpoche ("How does Buddhism change in a New Culture" and "Benefits and Dangers of Secularing Buddhism", the TB rebuttal, as it were. He did note that motivation is the key. Bad agenda = bad results, good motivation will cause good results.) Have I noted the course is FREE? So you can take the course, and the following courses, without doing any of the assignments/quizzes. Watch (or download) any video or transcript to your heart's content whenever you wish in any order you wish. (That assumes the courses are not taken off-line at a future date.) Further in the course description is a blurb that may point to at least 3 future courses in "Mahāyāna, …Vajrayāna, …and a fourth vehicle, which is explicit in many Tibetan materials, though no standard term ever emerged that was accepted by all sectarian traditions - we will thus term it as the “Natural Vehicle” or “Post Tantra”." If the quality of guided meditations (GM) in following classes are even half the quality of this course's GM's, then that's all the reason I need to continue the future classes, too. Course gotchas: #1. That said (other shoe dropping here), the other half of the course was videos of people reading their prepared academic papers, in monotone or semi-monotone voices. (Transcripts are available. I figure I can read a paper in 5% of the time someone else reads it to me in a video. Ugh.) However, they would probably need the voice of Morgan Freeman, James Earl Jones, B. Cumberbatch or James Spader to keep me awake. To be fair, the content is golden, although the papers seems to be geared to the academic community, rather than the student community. Books and Videos on these subjects are all over Amazon, YouTube, FPMT, Dharma-Documentaries, etc. #2. The Sharon Salzberg (SS), in her interview, brought up an excellent point. She noted that she and a noted clinical psychology (CP) scientist (researcher) (whose name I have forgotten) were at a conference where the issue on the table was that someone was having trouble with "loving kindness" meditation as a first meditation class. SS noted that she would instantly recommend the student change to "calm abiding" meditation whereas the CP could not change that student's meditation technique to another technique (such as calm abiding) as her research findings would then be invalid. Similarly, many of the non-Buddhist guided meditations that I viewed in this course felt like a physical education or "How To" class. Do this. Do that. It did not feel as though they lived the material, just taught it. (Whereas it was patently obvious Dr. Klein & Anam Thubten were definitely "walking the walk", so to speak, so were able to speak from the heart.) Interviews I did not watch, that may be of great interest to others, include meditation in the school system by Tish Jennings, meditation in the Business Community (an interview with David Mick), the Burmese meditation tradition in an interview with Erik Braun, the MBSR (Meditation Based Stress Reduction) with Susan Bauer-Wu, and meditation in the legal community with Rhonda Magee. And all that is just the first course. Many of it's "failings" may just be my karmic opinions. The course is worth checking out and watching/reading/meditating on those parts that interest you. In that respect, the breadth of the course content is quite nice and so well done. Grade: B-. | 2) bad results, good motivation will cause | Good | 2) results. ) Have I noted the | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | An interesting class that traces the origins of Buddhist meditation and the Western usage today. A nice dovetailing of research topics covered to attempt to link measurable changes due to meditation practices while trying to maintain a good control group; not easy. | 1) practices while trying to maintain a | Good | 1) control group; not easy. | 3.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The content of the course is amazingly rich. I've particularly appreciated all the interviews. The science was also very interesting, although at the end (starting from week 4 if I remember well), the result don't seem so convincing. But it is still really amazing. (May I suggest to try to use Machine Learning algorithm to analyze the huge amount of result from the retreat project, they are getting pretty good at facial recognition and analysis.) The contemplative labs were an interesting plus. The only caveats is that, although the content presented by Germano and Schaeffer is amazing (and precious to me), I think they could improve the presentation. I would suggest to consult with a specialist in communication who will be able to point out what could be improved and how. I feel that without that, the communication objective will fail (as reported by most students including myself). Here are a few points I have noticed. Complex background create a distraction, especially when the reading is monotonous, it's preferable to have simple neutral background, like a library. Reading in a monotonous voice is not engaging for the viewer. Dandling around and all sort of gestural distractions don't help us focusing on the content. Sentences are too long and use too many technical words, two things that any communicator will immediately suggest to drop especially if you are targeting a large audience. In one video the background was nice (a forest), yet the noise of the bird were too loud compare to the voice. Plus there was many cut in this video and almost every time the camera had moved from its previous position creating yet another distraction. But don't get me wrong, I have appreciated this content, I just felt that it needed a huge investment from my part to be able to grab it into memory and learn from it. This is the reason why I haven't graded this course with 5 stars. I think that if the speaker could improve this part it would facilitate the students work and improve greatly the overall learning. | 1) retreat project, they are getting pretty | Good | 1) at facial recognition and analysis. ) | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Most of the interviews were very interesting and useful addition to the lectures. Prof. David Francis Germano questions were of good standard. | 1) David Francis Germano questions were of | Good | 1) standard. | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | not very good audio. | 1) not very | Good | 1) audio. | 1.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good a bit too academic by times but otherwise a goldmine for anyone interested in the science and context of buddhist meditation | 1) Very | Good | 1) a bit too academic by times | 5.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Quite good | 1) Quite | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| aaNxjzc9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Extremely dry, academic style presentation, could use a LOT of work to make it appeal to others in the future. "Lesser" Vehicle is also considered an insult in many circles. Not a good title for a class. | 1) insult in many circles. Not a | Good | 1) title for a class. | 2.0 |
| aAo9tS8NEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Excellent course! I enjoyed the lectures and writing assignments and it was a good introduction to Constitutional Law. I also took Part 1 of this course. Thanks to Yale, Coursera, and Professor Amar for making this available online. | 1) writing assignments and it was a | Good | 1) introduction to Constitutional Law. I also | 5.0 |
| aAo9tS8NEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | The lecturer's style doesn't go with the nature of a MOOC. By using his book as the notes for lectures, he doesn't give himself a chance to prioritize content so it's kept clear in the exposition. His favorite word is uh-um. In a classroom (face-to-face) situation, the lecturer is likely to see and react to listeners' look of confusion; in a studio he is just talking to himself. He repeats points -- this can be good if done smoothly but it's very confusing when the lecturer is inarticulate, like the present case. It's really too bad because he clearly has a lot of knowledge that could be used to popularize thinking about the unwritten constitution. | 1) repeats points -- this can be | Good | 1) if done smoothly but it's very | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Content was good, but occasionally hard to understand the lecturers' English. Worth taking though. | 1) Content was | Good | 1) but occasionally hard to understand the | 3.0 |
| AeZELZrJEeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | A good overview on antimicrobial resistance and how it is measured in the lab. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview on antimicrobial resistance and how | 4.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Not really good instructions and example in the task. | 1) Not really | Good | 1) instructions and example in the task. | 4.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This specialisation started off good in the first 1-2 courses but has since taken many steps back. The content is dated and not well though through, and it feels like the whole thing could have been put into 2-3 courses | 1) This specialisation started off | Good | 1) in the first 1-2 courses but | 2.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I've learned a few things, because I've already designed a responsive website, but it should be very good for newcomers. I'll definitely change my own approach to design, as he showed - it's good to design mobile-first, but going back and forth multiple devices to show information more clearly is even better. | 1) website, but it should be very | Good | 1) for newcomers. I'll definitely change my | 4.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | I've learned a few things, because I've already designed a responsive website, but it should be very good for newcomers. I'll definitely change my own approach to design, as he showed - it's good to design mobile-first, but going back and forth multiple devices to show information more clearly is even better. | 2) design, as he showed - it's | Good | 2) to design mobile-first, but going back | 4.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | A bit of a mess. If you are going in expecting to learn nuances of creating effective wireframes and mockups, you will be disappointed. Assignments are good and thought-provoking, but not clearly written. You will get out of the course what you invest in it. Take your assignments seriously and invest a lot of time, even if you know that you are able to pass with a lesser effort. | 1) you will be disappointed. Assignments are | Good | 1) and thought-provoking, but not clearly written. | 3.0 |
| afay6xVFEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The course is very good. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| afDgOoSTEeSA1yIAC1EHSw | Good content but the Chinese translation is bad, which makes quiz quite obscure in meaning | 1) | Good | 1) content but the Chinese translation is | 4.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Everything perfect, but developing apps that makes use of iphone and iwatch/appletv screens. Not a clue about how to communicate one with another. Good to develop standalone iphone, iwatch or appletv apps, though. | 1) how to communicate one with another. | Good | 1) to develop standalone iphone, iwatch or | 4.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Lectures are great! And it would be better if we can see all the code from video, yet in week 1 lecture3, some function been blocked and I am not sure if I do it right by myself. Download code may be an option, yet it is better for us to type code by following the lecture, because downloading makes me lazy, typing code by ourselves is a good way to learn. Thank you so much! | 1) typing code by ourselves is a | Good | 1) way to learn. Thank you so | 4.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good course, a lot of usefull information. I would like to participate in all of courses of this lector. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, a lot of usefull information. | 5.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Week on NSURLSession and CoreData is ok (but compared to other courses on Coursera - so and so). Everything else - not very good. But anyway, quick dive into swift. | 1) so). Everything else - not very | Good | 1) But anyway, quick dive into swift. | 3.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Although Parham Aarabi is listed as the professor throughout this specialization, it's a bit of a bait-and-switch. Prof Aarabi is an award-winning professor at U of Toronto, but it turns out he knows little about iOS and has Jack Wu teach most of the material. Jack Wu is probably a heck of a developer but he's a terrible instructor. This class is the best of the three in the specialization because Mike Spears does a pretty good job with the sections he teaches. | 1) because Mike Spears does a pretty | Good | 1) job with the sections he teaches. | 3.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The material is very poorly explained. Pre-coded stuff isn't good either, as it's very hard to comprehend, even with the professor's explanations, which also don't seem to be aimed at beginners. | 1) very poorly explained. Pre-coded stuff isn't | Good | 1) either, as it's very hard to | 1.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | It was good but i felt the last two weeks like stuffing content. I'd have like to dig deeper into mobile development instead of wasting time in appleTV | 1) It was | Good | 1) but i felt the last two | 3.0 |
| AMBr8zelEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. Well organized and comprehensive. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Well organized and comprehensive. | 5.0 |
| aPM0Nx7iEea8agoSdQeRvQ | A good continuation of Think Again I. However, final quiz had lots of bugs in it. | 1) A | Good | 1) continuation of Think Again I. However, | 4.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Good intro course for people trying to understand data science role in Genome related data and other informations. | 1) | Good | 1) intro course for people trying to | 4.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Very good and useful course with very deep supports ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course with very deep | 5.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Good introduction to the galaxy tool. However, the final project was too difficult for what was given in the lectures. I spent 97% of the time I spent on the course doing only the final project. It was too difficult and unfair. I think a way to improve the final project might be to make easier a little bit and give exclusive lectures to help students to do the final project. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the galaxy tool. However, | 1.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Many asumptions regarding the background of the student not stated int he course information. Good T.A | 1) not stated int he course information. | Good | 1) T. A | 3.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Very good experience. The lectures seemed to have covered very few topics but I was able to manage. It will be nice to have more information on running galaxy locally and the way tools and genomes can be imported/installed as that is one thing I really struggled with. Overall the course is good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) experience. The lectures seemed to have | 5.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Very good experience. The lectures seemed to have covered very few topics but I was able to manage. It will be nice to have more information on running galaxy locally and the way tools and genomes can be imported/installed as that is one thing I really struggled with. Overall the course is good. | 2) struggled with. Overall the course is | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | I liked this course. I would like to study more examples of genome data processing. I wish good luck to creators and mentors of the course. | 1) of genome data processing. I wish | Good | 1) luck to creators and mentors of | 5.0 |
| aPvqvZlYEeWQGBKrxISOrQ | Good course, great tool. | 1) | Good | 1) course, great tool. | 4.0 |
| ar3BAJ07EeW4xRJkiwxnYw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| asSgiHyvEeWpcQ7HugVD8Q | Good refresh of managerial knowledge, especially if combined with my practical experience, thx | 1) | Good | 1) refresh of managerial knowledge, especially if | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | for a ESL student, its really a challenge for me, but i am glad i have passed it, thank you all--the teachers, and the mentors, what an experience! since this is my first course, i'll continue my 2nd, and 3rd course, good luck to you! | 1) continue my 2nd, and 3rd course, | Good | 1) luck to you! | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Excellent introduction to the basics of philosophy. Lecturers are really good. | 1) basics of philosophy. Lecturers are really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This is absolutely fantastic course. Thank you very much for offering it! The course content is very good and there pointers to enormous amount of very enlightening literature! | 1) it! The course content is very | Good | 1) and there pointers to enormous amount | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I would suggest this really very good introductory course as a starting point to everyone interested in different philosophical questions. | 1) I would suggest this really very | Good | 1) introductory course as a starting point | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Great general introduction to Philosophy. I suggest taking this philosophy course before any others because it puts a lot into perspective and it gives you a good idea of what path to take in your personal studies in philosophy and beyond. | 1) perspective and it gives you a | Good | 1) idea of what path to take | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I thought that this course was a very good introduction. It gave brief glimpses into different kinds of philosophy. | 1) that this course was a very | Good | 1) introduction. It gave brief glimpses into | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good course. It covers various disciplines in philosophy (e.g. of science, of mind, ethics), with interesting presentation and discussion topics. However it doesn't feel very systematic. It feels more like a series of videos about philosophy than a holistic course at philosophy. | 1) | Good | 1) course. It covers various disciplines in | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | This is a very good and interesting course. The instructors lecture the course from an easy way to understand. I hope that they will open an advanced course for this field. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) and interesting course. The instructors lecture | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A good introduction to philosophy. Also a life changing experience to start think the whys of everything you do. I recommend this to everyone. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to philosophy. Also a life | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It's pretty good. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good information, thank you so much for all experience gained through this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information, thank you so much for | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | The course material is mostly good if a bit basic at times. If the notes went a little more in depth, or the suggested resources were a little less bulky, it would be 5 stars. | 1) The course material is mostly | Good | 1) if a bit basic at times. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A very good introduction. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A good course. However, I would expect more coherence between the different modules discussed. In its current structure, the course represents a glance at an arbitrary selection of several topics (unrelated to e, existing in today's philosophy, rather than a coherent introduction into the broad discipline of philosophy. However, this may be just a matter of approach - this approach is also perfectly valid. | 1) A | Good | 1) course. However, I would expect more | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good course, very arbitrary chosen topics though | 1) | Good | 1) course, very arbitrary chosen topics though | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good introduction to philosophy. The amount of work and care that was used to create this course is clearly visible in the videos with the speakers, backgrounds, video and sound quality. Thanks very much! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to philosophy. The amount of | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | is a very good course to start in the world of think, | 1) is a very | Good | 1) course to start in the world | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Really good course! Very much enjoyed it! Thank you for an amazing month! The only thing I would mention, was that at times the computer would sometime move the selected answer on the quiz, which made it frustrating on the last week's quiz and on week 2 (or 3 I think, can't remember it correctly) when it occurred, but apart from that everything else was fine! Thank you! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! Very much enjoyed it! Thank | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I took this course just to listen to the lectures as an intro to the subject. One of the prof's accent was so heavy that I couldn't understand her well enough to listen to her lectures so had to skip that part. Other than that, it was enjoyable. I don't know if it was a good intro or not, complete enough or whatever... but it was generally interesting. | 1) don't know if it was a | Good | 1) intro or not, complete enough or | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is really a good place to start orienting oneself with the scholarly tradition of philosophy. | 1) It is really a | Good | 1) place to start orienting oneself with | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | hasta el momento me ha gustado mucho lo que visto, good job teachers.... | 1) ha gustado mucho lo que visto, | Good | 1) job teachers. . . . | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good!!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A very good introduction to major branches of Philosophy. While some questions on assignments were rather vague, and some lectures rather dull (I don't think I bothered watching the videos from the third week on... just relied on the- excellently put together!- handouts). Overall, a great course to take for a beginner to the world of Philosophy :D | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to major branches of Philosophy. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Fully satisfied with this course. Very good program and content, good videos, professional teachers... I really learned a lot. I recommend the course 100 % | 1) Fully satisfied with this course. Very | Good | 1) program and content, good videos, professional | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Fully satisfied with this course. Very good program and content, good videos, professional teachers... I really learned a lot. I recommend the course 100 % | 2) course. Very good program and content, | Good | 2) videos, professional teachers. . . I | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good, too short though | 1) Very | Good | 1) too short though | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course, it perfectly introduces some of the most relevant topics in philosophical discussion, some are new some are very very old but still fascinating. I would strongly recommend this course for anyone interested in learning about philosophy, history and culture in general. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it perfectly introduces some of | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A good intro course to rewind an old knowledge or tu star up in this path of tought. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro course to rewind an old | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very interesting course with different approaches and topics on philosphy. Nice way to refresh knowledge or to get a new ones. Everything is really understandable with good videos and course materials provided. | 1) ones. Everything is really understandable with | Good | 1) videos and course materials provided. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It's a great introduction to the variety of philosophical topics, being introductory it just scratches the surface though. Could be made more interesting, but nonetheless a good course to get started with philosophy. | 1) made more interesting, but nonetheless a | Good | 1) course to get started with philosophy. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | The classes were pretty good, but the bibliography was not. The bibliography consists of encyclopedia's articles which are not necessarily written to a beginner. It is quite discouraging for someone starting with philosophy to read articles which lacks a pedagogic approach. | 1) The classes were pretty | Good | 1) but the bibliography was not. The | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | 'Introduction to Philosophy' is very insightful. The fundamentals of philosophy is explained in a way which is so easy to understand. Very good program. | 1) is so easy to understand. Very | Good | 1) program. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | good ones | 1) | Good | 1) ones | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | The course is great. The informatiion is objective, easy to process and good, the only bad thing about this course is that even though it has spanish subtitles all the test are in english which makes them way to hard to resolve. If you give the option of spanish subtitles on an english curse at least translate the test too. | 1) is objective, easy to process and | Good | 1) the only bad thing about this | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | the course content was very much good and it was very useful. | 1) the course content was very much | Good | 1) and it was very useful. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good to follow by the subs | 1) | Good | 1) to follow by the subs | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course, the classes were very elusive and the teacher is amazing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the classes were very elusive | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good variety and challenging but achievable. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) variety and challenging but achievable. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course, Offers insights from various domains of Philosophy, which one doesn't go in usually. And ends up discovering that there are in fact various ways to look at this subject which is an essential tool for living and constant improving our quality of life. The University of Edinburgh has structured this course well, and the faculties, bright and deep in their domains makes you understand the contents more easily then they are. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, Offers insights from various domains | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good! Great work! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Great work! | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a good course with great content. The professors are well prepared and share their knowledge in an easy way so that everyone can understand their explanations. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course with great content. The professors | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | While the indidivual lectureres did have a breadth of knowledge, a manditory discusion should be held with the homeworks instead of just the quizzes for completion. Perhaps a page on each week should be good enough. Just to understand each lecturer's main points. | 1) page on each week should be | Good | 1) enough. Just to understand each lecturer's | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good teaching strategy. Takes you through ideas and gives you examples. Has a couple of questions each video to keep your attention. It is a very interesting subject, even if the teaching was bad, but the lectures add even more by taking their time with concepts. Keep doing what you're doing. I would take other courses by this school if they were similarly designed. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching strategy. Takes you through ideas | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good introductory course. Provides an overview of the different philosophical topics ranging from knowledge to time travel. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course. Provides an overview of | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I enjoyed this course immensely. I wanted to gain a general idea of what the science or belief behind Philosophy was. This course gave me just that. A good over view of the subjects and the ideas behind it. | 1) course gave me just that. A | Good | 1) over view of the subjects and | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course with interesting cases and different theories. And also a very good opportunity to think and learn the way of thinking. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with interesting cases and different | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very good course with interesting cases and different theories. And also a very good opportunity to think and learn the way of thinking. | 2) different theories. And also a very | Good | 2) opportunity to think and learn the | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A very good introduction to some of the fundamental and important ideas in philosophy, delivered in an engaging and straightforward fashion. Highly recommended. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to some of the fundamental | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I thought it was very good and the instructors were excellent. | 1) I thought it was very | Good | 1) and the instructors were excellent. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a pretty good course in understand the basics of philosophy and get a sense of what philosophy is doing. The reference materials are really great and can help you gain a deeper understanding of course materials. However, the course is more limited to introduction and does not go in-depth. A good course if you want a taste of philosophy. | 1) It is a pretty | Good | 1) course in understand the basics of | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a pretty good course in understand the basics of philosophy and get a sense of what philosophy is doing. The reference materials are really great and can help you gain a deeper understanding of course materials. However, the course is more limited to introduction and does not go in-depth. A good course if you want a taste of philosophy. | 2) and does not go in-depth. A | Good | 2) course if you want a taste | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Overall a good and balanced course. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) and balanced course. | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good introduction to Philosophy. Course length is appropriate and assignments are at the right level of difficulty. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Philosophy. Course length is | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Good course,i absolutely gained more knowledge about human beliefs and thoughts.Thank you instructors. | 1) | Good | 1) course, i absolutely gained more knowledge | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Great course to introduce non-professionals/beginners into major fields or topics of philosophy. Excellent quality of lessons: teachers were always good to understand, even for non-native speakers, and eager to get across main themes to disciples inexperienced in philosophical studies. Only critique: difficulty levels of exams could have been more evenly balanced. I can only recommend this course to anyone interested in the study of philosophy; great job by the University of Edinburgh and its staff for organizing this on Coursera. | 1) quality of lessons: teachers were always | Good | 1) to understand, even for non-native speakers, | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I didn't find the overall content of the course very well chosen for an introduction to philosophy - since it covers so little. The title of this course should have been "An Introduction to Just a Couple of Topics in Philosophy." And there are so few philosophers covered. However, the biggest problem was instructor Alasdair Richmond, whose response to debate was locking threads down every time his ideological positions were challenged. He showed himself completely inept to have a debate with more than one course participant and chose to censor a variety of viewpoints he dislikes. It was particularly ironic to see an instructor exercise censorship in a Philosophy course - a domain whose objective, after all, is the pursuit of truth as well as to ask and debate the "why" of everything! A petty tyrant does not make a good teacher. Should I ever meet anyone interested in studying Philosophy, my first recommendation to them will be stay away from the University of Edinburgh, since there is no respect for debate, freedom of expression, or inquiry there. | 1) petty tyrant does not make a | Good | 1) teacher. Should I ever meet anyone | 1.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | A great introduction to many philosophical areas, well planned, well tested and with very good professors. The only downsides were a couple of slightly ambiguous questions (which, having just watched an hour of philosophical teaching one could easily start wondering what they technically meant) and, to utter frustration, lack of a statement of accomplishment. Nevertheless, if philosophy is of it's own right your target, it is a course well worth taking. | 1) planned, well tested and with very | Good | 1) professors. The only downsides were a | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | I am compelled to maintain interest in the lectures and I have so far completed the second week. I think it is a good class and hope that it can only get better. | 1) week. I think it is a | Good | 1) class and hope that it can | 4.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | It is a very entertaining broad introduction to the topic of philosophy in general. The lecturers are very knowledgeable and are very good teachers. However, I wish there would be a more detailed treatment of the topics in question. I look forward to their future course on Philosophy of Science, as I believe that by focusing on a more narrow topic, they will be able to go a bit more in depth. | 1) are very knowledgeable and are very | Good | 1) teachers. However, I wish there would | 3.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | Very clear and good start. | 1) Very clear and | Good | 1) start. | 5.0 |
| Auue1KA-EeS9VCIACyUcdg | so good | 1) so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Av8sdKTtEeWzOhI8vzQnoQ | Good Marketing Course and great teacher!! | 1) | Good | 1) Marketing Course and great teacher! ! | 5.0 |
| AVCeb1TBEeWWpxI8aBTOyQ | I need subtitles in spanish, content is good | 1) need subtitles in spanish, content is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| AVCeb1TBEeWWpxI8aBTOyQ | it covers good vocabulary related to mkt and sales, but I would like to learn more vocubaulary related to idiom or english culture. they use some, but they could be more. | 1) it covers | Good | 1) vocabulary related to mkt and sales, | 4.0 |
| AXmFGEEjEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent. Very good explained. | 1) Excellent. Very | Good | 1) explained. | 5.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | Good one Vacob List is very good to remind myself. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) one Vacob List is very good | 4.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | Good one Vacob List is very good to remind myself. Thanks. | 2) Good one Vacob List is very | Good | 2) to remind myself. Thanks. | 4.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| aySVfHahEeWYyRL_9oqa4Q | Great course for those who learn English. Very good tests and challenging assignments. | 1) for those who learn English. Very | Good | 1) tests and challenging assignments. | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course for strenghtening the basis for a deeper cybersecurity learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for strenghtening the basis for | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | The course consider wide area of themes of Software Security, but not deep. Generally, It's really good course. | 1) but not deep. Generally, It's really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course. Very good introduction to some interesting concepts in software security. Well explained. Maybe introduce more practical exercises. They could also include references to places where you can practice the concepts learned. For example repositories as vulnhub and others are sites where you can put into practice exercises. It however is a course that is very well explained ... | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Very good introduction to some | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course. Very good introduction to some interesting concepts in software security. Well explained. Maybe introduce more practical exercises. They could also include references to places where you can practice the concepts learned. For example repositories as vulnhub and others are sites where you can put into practice exercises. It however is a course that is very well explained ... | 2) Very good course. Very | Good | 2) introduction to some interesting concepts in | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | This course requires you have a good ability of programming about C.You also know some knowledge about the HTML , JavaScript.The course covers a broad range of software security.The hardest part for me is symbolic execution.If your basic knowledge about programming is weak,you need to read materials from Google to understand it. | 1) This course requires you have a | Good | 1) ability of programming about C. You | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Excellent course. Good mix of theory & practical. Covers all aspects including vulnerability, detection, prevention, secure coding. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) mix of theory & practical. Covers | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | This course can only be taken who have good knowledge in programming.Although there is a assessment quiz at the start of the course It needs to kept in mind that since this course is part of specialization,most people would take it and not all of them are programmers.This course needs a revamp to suit all sorts of security enthusiasts. | 1) can only be taken who have | Good | 1) knowledge in programming. Although there is | 2.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | A good introduction .course to security covering a lot of topics | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction . course to security covering | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Could have gone more deeper in some of the topics which were covered at very high level. Overall a good introduction to the subject matter. | 1) at very high level. Overall a | Good | 1) introduction to the subject matter. | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | This is a tough course. Tough because I had no experience in C or C++. My background is dot-net and visual basic. It's been study C++ 5 hours a day and take the course 2 hours a day. I made it. The professor is spot on when he says a C++ background is needed. But I made it. If you have the required background you'll find it's a good basis for understanding the multiple vulnerabilities in this code, what they are and how they work. (You better understand stacks and heaps and pointers real well) Worth the time and the effort. Cheers to University if Maryland for making it available and to Professor Hicks for his hard work. | 1) required background you'll find it's a | Good | 1) basis for understanding the multiple vulnerabilities | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Some parts of the course were more advanced (Program Analysis), while some briefly touched the topic (Penetration Testing). Web Application Security was almost there, while Low Level Security was just right! Keep up the good work, recommended +++++ | 1) was just right! Keep up the | Good | 1) work, recommended +++++ | 4.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course. Does require a significant amount of commitment, I would put it at 10-12 hours per week if you're to do things properly. I think if you give it a lot you'll get a lot from it in return. It's very interesting and engaging with clear explanations throughout. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Does require a significant amount | 5.0 |
| aZysaaT7EeWiJhIfkgG__w | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | It is a good course for learning regression model implementation in R. You may need to have a basic understanding of popular regression models like linear & logistic as the course doesn't cover mathematical aspects in detail | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for learning regression model implementation | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | With all respect, Professor, if you are reading all our comments, I think you are a really smart person and you should take all the negative feedback from your students here, positively and constructively. As having good knowledge will never be equals to able to produce good students. Personally, I feel that you should lower down yourself and speak to the level of your students/audience. Use more simple examples, draw a big picture in our minds on what is this course all about, what are we going to achieve, in each of the topics, what are we going to look at and what methods available. For foundation class like this, I think few simple examples and introducing one or two useful methods in each topic would be more than sufficient to us. The objective should be providing us with the basic knowledge, get us interested in this subject, and able to apply those well taught basic knowledge. As when we are interested, for sure we will go and do more research, and some might even would like to move on to intermediate or advance levels. The key point here is "speak to the level of your audience". Even if you are able to talk everything above the sky and up to the moon. If no one able to understand you, it is useless. | 1) here, positively and constructively. As having | Good | 1) knowledge will never be equals to | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | With all respect, Professor, if you are reading all our comments, I think you are a really smart person and you should take all the negative feedback from your students here, positively and constructively. As having good knowledge will never be equals to able to produce good students. Personally, I feel that you should lower down yourself and speak to the level of your students/audience. Use more simple examples, draw a big picture in our minds on what is this course all about, what are we going to achieve, in each of the topics, what are we going to look at and what methods available. For foundation class like this, I think few simple examples and introducing one or two useful methods in each topic would be more than sufficient to us. The objective should be providing us with the basic knowledge, get us interested in this subject, and able to apply those well taught basic knowledge. As when we are interested, for sure we will go and do more research, and some might even would like to move on to intermediate or advance levels. The key point here is "speak to the level of your audience". Even if you are able to talk everything above the sky and up to the moon. If no one able to understand you, it is useless. | 2) be equals to able to produce | Good | 2) students. Personally, I feel that you | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good course. My only negative remark is that I really missed the swirl exercises that were available for the other courses of this specialization. | 1) | Good | 1) course. My only negative remark is | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very concise and good structured course. The new videos are much better than the old ones! Thank you Brian Caffo! However in the discussion forum you find less posts than in the previous format, which is a pitty. | 1) Very concise and | Good | 1) structured course. The new videos are | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course will give you a good basic foundation in regression models. However, do be prepared to do a good amount of work besides just viewing the videos. I would recommend at the very least to go through the exercises in the 'recommended textbook' to gain a better understanding. | 1) This course will give you a | Good | 1) basic foundation in regression models. However, | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course will give you a good basic foundation in regression models. However, do be prepared to do a good amount of work besides just viewing the videos. I would recommend at the very least to go through the exercises in the 'recommended textbook' to gain a better understanding. | 2) do be prepared to do a | Good | 2) amount of work besides just viewing | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The course is good. Unlike the previous courses I took in this track, there was almost no interaction in the forums and also no-one to give feedback. I wonder if there were any TA's present in this run. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) Unlike the previous courses I took | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course is better than Statistical Inference, and I think it is as useful. Non credit excersise are still very good at helping with understanding in practice what is going on. | 1) Non credit excersise are still very | Good | 1) at helping with understanding in practice | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Videos were very difficult to follow along with. Overall, I learned a good amount though. | 1) along with. Overall, I learned a | Good | 1) amount though. | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | This is a decent class, covering linear regression and a few of its variants in good detail. It's a challenging subject, but presented acceptably here. | 1) a few of its variants in | Good | 1) detail. It's a challenging subject, but | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The instructor is not good and doesn't explain things clearly. | 1) The instructor is not | Good | 1) and doesn't explain things clearly. | 2.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good course. Prof. Caffo is a great teacher! Hope to see an advanced version of RegMods soon! | 1) | Good | 1) course. Prof. Caffo is a great | 4.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good introduction to the usefulness and traps of linear models. By the way, having the teacher filmed for the lectures does provide a more engaging experience. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the usefulness and traps | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | The flows of courses instructed by Caffo(Statistical Inference and Regression Models) are too long to concentrate it and the quiz is not quite related in lecture. However, Contents of the book is really good, as well as homework in the book. | 1) Contents of the book is really | Good | 1) as well as homework in the | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Data, our “raw” material, becomes plentiful. Let’s learn form it. Thanks to constant progress in information technologies, this increasing production of data is an outstanding opportunity to improve our knowledge of subject matters we care about, e.g. environment, health, markets… Properly analyzing these data in the scope of addressing specific questions is not trivial. But it can be learn. And if there were one place where one could acquire these skills and become anxious to grow in that field, this would be the Coursera Regression Models course. Data analysts, like any professionals, need her/his set of tools. Good tools make good patricians. The Coursera Data Science Specialization that includes this Regression Models class is where one can learn how to use the right tools and reduce them into practice. Passionate instructors who obviously take great care in communicating effectively the knowledge they master teach these courses admirably. Highly recommended course and specialization, There are so many unanswered questions, so many new relationships to uncover. Learn how. | 1) professionals, need her/his set of tools. | Good | 1) tools make good patricians. The Coursera | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | Data, our “raw” material, becomes plentiful. Let’s learn form it. Thanks to constant progress in information technologies, this increasing production of data is an outstanding opportunity to improve our knowledge of subject matters we care about, e.g. environment, health, markets… Properly analyzing these data in the scope of addressing specific questions is not trivial. But it can be learn. And if there were one place where one could acquire these skills and become anxious to grow in that field, this would be the Coursera Regression Models course. Data analysts, like any professionals, need her/his set of tools. Good tools make good patricians. The Coursera Data Science Specialization that includes this Regression Models class is where one can learn how to use the right tools and reduce them into practice. Passionate instructors who obviously take great care in communicating effectively the knowledge they master teach these courses admirably. Highly recommended course and specialization, There are so many unanswered questions, so many new relationships to uncover. Learn how. | 2) set of tools. Good tools make | Good | 2) patricians. The Coursera Data Science Specialization | 5.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | good quick overview, could have more actual R examples in lectures | 1) | Good | 1) quick overview, could have more actual | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | As for the Statistical Inference course, this course is amazing but is presented in a more complex way than it should be. Once again the concepts are simple and the math not so hard, yet I had to do a lot of research outside the course to be able to understand these simple concepts and derive the not so hard mathematics. Brian Caffo is clearly brilliant and, I would say, seem to be a good lad too, but something is missing. Too often the details are thrown at us without being properly framed in the context or without having the proper concept being introduced progressively. I have a theory about teaching since I was 15, and so far it has proven to be true. Imagine that learning is about climbing a mountain in which tall steps have been carved. Each step is taller than the student. The teacher is somewhere higher than the students (not necessarily at the top, if there is such a thing). The job of the teacher is to throw boxes (concepts) and balls (details) of different size, shape and colors. The job of the student is to catch these boxes and balls and to put the right balls in the right boxes in order to make a staircase out of it to climb (at least) one of the giant stair up. A good teacher makes sure to throw the concepts first than the details and to clearly specify which balls go into which box, as well as which boxes go inside/over which other boxes. But most teacher simply throw the balls and boxes in an not so well structured manner, so the poor students try to catch as many as he can, but also miss a lot of them. His hands can hold a limited amount of balls. If he doesn't have the right box to put them, he would either miss the next balls, or put the one he hold in his hand in the wrong box. Bottom line, the best teachers are those who focus on the concepts (and context) and make sure that the concepts are well understood before introducing details to stuck in these concepts. From my experience our brain (or at least mine) better learn this way. It is as if our brain need first to establish a category-pattern (the concept/context) to which it will associate detail-patterns. But without a proper category-pattern, our brain is having a hard time to properly remember the detail-patterns or miss-associate them to the wrong category-pattern (which create even more confusion). Hope it was helpful somehow... | 1) would say, seem to be a | Good | 1) lad too, but something is missing. | 3.0 |
| a_xPWXNVEeWxvQr3acyajw | As for the Statistical Inference course, this course is amazing but is presented in a more complex way than it should be. Once again the concepts are simple and the math not so hard, yet I had to do a lot of research outside the course to be able to understand these simple concepts and derive the not so hard mathematics. Brian Caffo is clearly brilliant and, I would say, seem to be a good lad too, but something is missing. Too often the details are thrown at us without being properly framed in the context or without having the proper concept being introduced progressively. I have a theory about teaching since I was 15, and so far it has proven to be true. Imagine that learning is about climbing a mountain in which tall steps have been carved. Each step is taller than the student. The teacher is somewhere higher than the students (not necessarily at the top, if there is such a thing). The job of the teacher is to throw boxes (concepts) and balls (details) of different size, shape and colors. The job of the student is to catch these boxes and balls and to put the right balls in the right boxes in order to make a staircase out of it to climb (at least) one of the giant stair up. A good teacher makes sure to throw the concepts first than the details and to clearly specify which balls go into which box, as well as which boxes go inside/over which other boxes. But most teacher simply throw the balls and boxes in an not so well structured manner, so the poor students try to catch as many as he can, but also miss a lot of them. His hands can hold a limited amount of balls. If he doesn't have the right box to put them, he would either miss the next balls, or put the one he hold in his hand in the wrong box. Bottom line, the best teachers are those who focus on the concepts (and context) and make sure that the concepts are well understood before introducing details to stuck in these concepts. From my experience our brain (or at least mine) better learn this way. It is as if our brain need first to establish a category-pattern (the concept/context) to which it will associate detail-patterns. But without a proper category-pattern, our brain is having a hard time to properly remember the detail-patterns or miss-associate them to the wrong category-pattern (which create even more confusion). Hope it was helpful somehow... | 2) of the giant stair up. A | Good | 2) teacher makes sure to throw the | 3.0 |
| B07TSjljEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good rapport and great value. its a skillset that you can add. highly recommended. thank you. | 1) | Good | 1) rapport and great value. its a | 5.0 |
| b75Wh7MYEeWKaQ6n__gsuQ | Good material and practical ideas for the day-to-day use at work. | 1) | Good | 1) material and practical ideas for the | 3.0 |
| b75Wh7MYEeWKaQ6n__gsuQ | Good course , could be made better ! content is good and simple ! | 1) | Good | 1) course , could be made better | 3.0 |
| b75Wh7MYEeWKaQ6n__gsuQ | Good course , could be made better ! content is good and simple ! | 2) be made better ! content is | Good | 2) and simple ! | 3.0 |
| Bd1hjQihEeanEwrcMmtTvw | This course was really well organized and paced but packed full of a lot of really good information from great sources and leaders in the field. I really didn't know anything about exosomes before I started this course and now I feel like I can even teach the people in my own lab a few tricks. | 1) full of a lot of really | Good | 1) information from great sources and leaders | 5.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | very good course Thank u so much ST | 1) very | Good | 1) course Thank u so much ST | 5.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | it was a very good content with high level of knowledge | 1) it was a very | Good | 1) content with high level of knowledge | 5.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | discussion thread should be answerable and solution to the test should be available... all other things are good. | 1) . . all other things are | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | GOOD! | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Bg6XXXVJEeWKxgq26fqTNQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Overall it was a good course but the only thing I would recommend is relating with the assignments. What I saw in almost all the assignments we should have had experience on the work to do them. But since not everybody has that experience it would be nice to think even for beginners as well. | 1) Overall it was a | Good | 1) course but the only thing I | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good, however the instructor videos could be better in content. | 1) | Good | 1) however the instructor videos could be | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Again the content and presentation is great. But the web site is getting really annoying, especially in the assignment area. The editor is faulty and on the submission on visualization you cannot use visualizations(!) to make your point due to technical limitations (can't paste charts or screenshots).Sometimes verification does not work. Support is sometimes very good, sometimes useless, depends with whom you chat. | 1) not work. Support is sometimes very | Good | 1) sometimes useless, depends with whom you | 2.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Very useful information. Although you need statistics knowledge this course gives you a good broad perspective of the correct analytics practices you need to develop in order the have the right marketing insights. | 1) knowledge this course gives you a | Good | 1) broad perspective of the correct analytics | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | I enjoyed every minute of this course. Professor Hartman clearly has done an incredible effort in preparing the program. His style in conveying information is great too! Very good useful resources. Thank you | 1) conveying information is great too! Very | Good | 1) useful resources. Thank you | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Great course full of good insights and generally covers a lot but need to do your own research afterwards to truly understand the topic :) | 1) Great course full of | Good | 1) insights and generally covers a lot | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good theoretical and practial lessons. | 1) | Good | 1) theoretical and practial lessons. | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good course that provide basics. However, I wish it gave a chance to practice the gained knowledge! | 1) | Good | 1) course that provide basics. However, I | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good course overall. I gave it only four stars because I expected it to be more practical and more hands-on analysis to do for assignments, instead of just discussing things. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall. I gave it only | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | This course provided an good high-level overview of how to attack a data analysis problem as well as data collection and visualization. | 1) This course provided an | Good | 1) high-level overview of how to attack | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good resources provided in the course material, good overview of how analytics can be used and processed, overall a very good course. | 1) | Good | 1) resources provided in the course material, | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good resources provided in the course material, good overview of how analytics can be used and processed, overall a very good course. | 2) resources provided in the course material, | Good | 2) overview of how analytics can be | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good resources provided in the course material, good overview of how analytics can be used and processed, overall a very good course. | 3) used and processed, overall a very | Good | 3) course. | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Interesting course with great insights on web analytics. It will be good if there were some assignments where we could execute some analytics concepts | 1) on web analytics. It will be | Good | 1) if there were some assignments where | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Very interesting course with clean slides and good understanding of the key concepts. A bit more "practice" would have been better, but I still highly recommend this course for a basic knowledge in digital marketing. | 1) interesting course with clean slides and | Good | 1) understanding of the key concepts. A | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Module 1 is good. will see and rate later | 1) Module 1 is | Good | 1) will see and rate later | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good High Level understanding of Analytics | 1) | Good | 1) High Level understanding of Analytics | 3.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good Class，I like the meterials they recommand so much. | 1) | Good | 1) Class，I like the meterials they recommand | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good foundation class for marketers. Does not delve into ways to actually analyse data, but talks about sources to find data and how to present results in a meaningful manner. | 1) | Good | 1) foundation class for marketers. Does not | 5.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | It was an interesting overview and a good in-depth method of managing a digital marketing project. I wish there would have been more statistical insight and data analysis exercice. | 1) was an interesting overview and a | Good | 1) in-depth method of managing a digital | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Good intro to implement marketing analytics principal, especially lecture 5 onward. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to implement marketing analytics principal, | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | Basic, but good knowledge | 1) Basic, but | Good | 1) knowledge | 4.0 |
| bGZkCuIJEeSqWiIAC0gGHw | had a good learning experience | 1) had a | Good | 1) learning experience | 4.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | I was disappointed because the name is misleading. The course provides a good introduction & overview of the responsibilities of the CTO, but has very little specifically digital content. It deals with two-speed IT in a single short lecture, so of course the treatment is superficial. It is easy to find more in-depth material freely available, on the McKinsey website for example. | 1) is misleading. The course provides a | Good | 1) introduction & overview of the responsibilities | 3.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Etant contrôleur de gestion pour le département IT (HQ + Locale), le cours est vraiment intéressant et de très bonne qualité. J'insiste que la qualité et le professionnalisme des professeurs. I'm a controller for an IT department, the courses is very good and very helpful for my job. I recommand you to follow the training. | 1) IT department, the courses is very | Good | 1) and very helpful for my job. | 5.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | This is a good course for an CIO in a non technical company. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for an CIO in a | 5.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | Good content, but the course setting does (at least for me) not allow learn the content long term due to missing reading material. | 1) | Good | 1) content, but the course setting does | 3.0 |
| bIkXsq9HEeSmzyIAC0yFng | The course content is quite good, though it could have been deeper in some areas. But its peer review system is not working well, if at all. Regards, An Le. | 1) The course content is quite | Good | 1) though it could have been deeper | 3.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | This is a really suitable course for Physical Chemistry lovers and students, whichs introduces you into the world of Quantums, Thermodinamics and Kinetics, with wonderful videos plentiful of explanations, and really good programation, that encourages students. Congratulations to all the organazing lecturers!! | 1) videos plentiful of explanations, and really | Good | 1) programation, that encourages students. Congratulations to | 5.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | Super course, clear in the theoretical analysis, good practice quizzes and interesting virtual lab exercises. | 1) course, clear in the theoretical analysis, | Good | 1) practice quizzes and interesting virtual lab | 5.0 |
| BJXF0TLTEeSasiIACxClrQ | Excellent course, very good teachers, an easy and compact way of learning chemistry | 1) Excellent course, very | Good | 1) teachers, an easy and compact way | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good material, would be helpful to have more feedback of the course staff regarding assignment's issues. | 1) | Good | 1) material, would be helpful to have | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good class and especially last two weeks are really informative | 1) | Good | 1) class and especially last two weeks | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This course is very good because it is very clear. Nonetheless, I'm a bit disappointed that one have to purchase the course in order to complete it. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) because it is very clear. Nonetheless, | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good ,This is my first coursera couse. I think I can get through all the class. | 1) very | Good | 1) , This is my first coursera | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It is an excellent course very well prepared, concise and perfectly crafted to progress rapidly in written communications. Congratulations! Good Job! | 1) progress rapidly in written communications. Congratulations! | Good | 1) Job! | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very Good... | 1) Very | Good | 1) . . | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Lots of good tips... | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) tips. . . | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good content and methodology. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and methodology. | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good course, clear and pleasant. I now feel way more comfortable to write emails in English. Many thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, clear and pleasant. I now | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good course. Full of useful details. Only thing is at times Mr. Landers was uncomfortable in front of the camera and that made me uncomfortable too. Other than that it was pretty good. Thank you, Teo. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Full of useful details. Only | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good course. Full of useful details. Only thing is at times Mr. Landers was uncomfortable in front of the camera and that made me uncomfortable too. Other than that it was pretty good. Thank you, Teo. | 2) Other than that it was pretty | Good | 2) Thank you, Teo. | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good course material, and resources. Thumbs Up! | 1) | Good | 1) course material, and resources. Thumbs Up! | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I like your style of teaching. simple and concise. Good job! | 1) style of teaching. simple and concise. | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | The grade system is not fair, but class is good. | 1) is not fair, but class is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | it is good for non-English native speaker. + it is not free. i liked most the additional material. | 1) it is | Good | 1) for non-English native speaker. + it | 2.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good! I really like the contents and the style of this course! Highly recommended!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I really like the contents and | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good, and explicit, and well organised course. The only drawback is, it's not free...... Sorry, too poor to pay.... | 1) | Good | 1) and explicit, and well organised course. | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good content, feels very automated | 1) | Good | 1) content, feels very automated | 3.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This is an amazing course for those who are looking for improvement in their writing english email skills. It is also a good course to improve our writing skills in general. The professor Gerry Landers and Georgia Institute of Technology paid great attention and care with this course. I strongly recommend. | 1) email skills. It is also a | Good | 1) course to improve our writing skills | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | If you are not sure if your email will sound good to the reader this course is the quickest way to improve your writing skills. It is simple, objective, practical and the lecture videos are of high quality. | 1) sure if your email will sound | Good | 1) to the reader this course is | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I got really a good benifit by this valuable course. | 1) I got really a | Good | 1) benifit by this valuable course. | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It was good and simple | 1) It was | Good | 1) and simple | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Really good teacher and clear line of course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) teacher and clear line of course! | 5.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | A good course. Thank you. | 1) A | Good | 1) course. Thank you. | 3.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| BK2bam0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This course is really clear and useful. It helps me to find out and correct many mistakes that I had during writing Emails. Besides, there are many great examples telling us which kind of emails are good and which are not. I like it very much! | 1) us which kind of emails are | Good | 1) and which are not. I like | 5.0 |
| BkWivH6zEeSXPiIACxeBkA | Interesting course - good topics and novel angles used in approaching the topics. Plus intellectually engaging way of discussing over management issues. However - really annoying quiz questions. And good portion of the right and wrong answers were highly debatable - you had to know exactly what was the angle during this specific course. I still graded with 5 stars, hoping they will make some changes in grading. | 1) Interesting course - | Good | 1) topics and novel angles used in | 5.0 |
| BkWivH6zEeSXPiIACxeBkA | Interesting course - good topics and novel angles used in approaching the topics. Plus intellectually engaging way of discussing over management issues. However - really annoying quiz questions. And good portion of the right and wrong answers were highly debatable - you had to know exactly what was the angle during this specific course. I still graded with 5 stars, hoping they will make some changes in grading. | 2) - really annoying quiz questions. And | Good | 2) portion of the right and wrong | 5.0 |
| BkWivH6zEeSXPiIACxeBkA | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Very good explanation and interesting and useful course | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanation and interesting and useful course | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The videos are beautifully edited and interesting to watch. There's a good amount of information, without making the course overwhelming. The assignments are clear and focused on the content. | 1) and interesting to watch. There's a | Good | 1) amount of information, without making the | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The videos were very succinct and unobtrusively informative. The professor's approach was very good for a fundamentals course. My only real complaint would be the peer review system being the only provider of grades on the final project. The final grading feedback would be benefitted by the professor himself or a set of trained moderators that have more insight on design conventions. | 1) informative. The professor's approach was very | Good | 1) for a fundamentals course. My only | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I've always wanted to learn typography but learning on it's own without any practice is really boring. The assignments are really good in applying what I have learnt, making the learning really enjoyable. The course teacher is super zen and loving his style of teaching. I would want to take this full design course some day. | 1) really boring. The assignments are really | Good | 1) in applying what I have learnt, | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Really good course! The assignments are very well designed and just make you to learn more about typography. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! The assignments are very well | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good but nowhere near as in-depth as some of the other courses found on coursera. | 1) | Good | 1) but nowhere near as in-depth as | 3.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Excellent coverage. The assignments are good and the quality of the video is gret | 1) Excellent coverage. The assignments are | Good | 1) and the quality of the video | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Lots of interesting insights and good structure of the course. I wish the areas were covered a little more extensively though. | 1) Lots of interesting insights and | Good | 1) structure of the course. I wish | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Very good as an introductory course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) as an introductory course! | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | i learn many thing form Introduction to typography.its really good course | 1) form Introduction to typography. its really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good course! Learned a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) course! Learned a lot. | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This is good introduction on Typography. | 1) This is | Good | 1) introduction on Typography. | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | really good intro. | 1) really | Good | 1) intro. | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Very good overall explanations on the basics of Typography. Anther Kiley did a great job of explaining things in a simple yet detailed format. I never realized there was so much to letters and words in type! | 1) Very | Good | 1) overall explanations on the basics of | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Initially, I took the course just for general interest in typography. The nice experience I made here convinced me to go deeper into the material in the future. I definitely learned something that took me some steps forward. I especially liked the well-made videos. They are very good to listen to and they are very clearly designed, it is making things easy to understand. In the exams and in the peer reviews, it seemed to make a difference that some students had already taken the Graphics Design Specialization. I can definitely recommend this course. | 1) the well-made videos. They are very | Good | 1) to listen to and they are | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | I loved this course. Everything is explained really well and the assignments are pretty good too. 5 stars! | 1) well and the assignments are pretty | Good | 1) too. 5 stars! | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | A very good introduction to typography. Makes you face some aspects of text editing that were obscure before. Assignments are not overwhelmingly hard but tricky in details and interesting for investigation and execution. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to typography. Makes you face | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | As a self-taught designer, this course helped me learn a lot more about typography than good ol' hands-on experience has, to date. Great course. Thanks so much! :) | 1) a lot more about typography than | Good | 1) ol' hands-on experience has, to date. | 5.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Nice, brief intro to typography. Good, clear lecture content and interesting assignments. I feel like the "by the book" assignment should not be entirely peer graded. | 1) Nice, brief intro to typography. | Good | 1) clear lecture content and interesting assignments. | 4.0 |
| BPkiQyWcEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good material, but not nearly enough to justify a full course. Should've been 2X as many lectures and assignments at least. | 1) | Good | 1) material, but not nearly enough to | 3.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | very good introductory course to finance. the instructor is amazing | 1) very | Good | 1) introductory course to finance. the instructor | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | The lectures are good, but in the assignments he asks for tasks that are not at all explained in the videos. For a beginner's course it is way too difficult and time consuming. | 1) The lectures are | Good | 1) but in the assignments he asks | 2.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Good, it teaches important staff in Finance to those to don't finance at all. | 1) | Good | 1) it teaches important staff in Finance | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Great course. Instructor takes time to explain the concepts in detail. Assignments are really good! | 1) concepts in detail. Assignments are really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Very good. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thank you. | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | Great course. Truly enjoy the intellectual challenge from the well designed quiz. Great effort for the entire team. Keep up the good work. The world need educators like you to make learning fun and challenging. | 1) the entire team. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. The world need educators like | 5.0 |
| Bq5Eo50bEeW_wArffOXkOw | A well built course, with clear lessons and good exercises that really make the students think and learn about finance subjects. | 1) built course, with clear lessons and | Good | 1) exercises that really make the students | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | very good instructor | 1) very | Good | 1) instructor | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A very good way of transitioning into scala and functional programming. Language concepts were explained really well. | 1) A very | Good | 1) way of transitioning into scala and | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Really good explanation by the instructor. Good assignments. The assignments gave a good insights into functional programming. I loved the way the problems were decomposed into neat smaller functions. | 1) Really | Good | 1) explanation by the instructor. Good assignments. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Really good explanation by the instructor. Good assignments. The assignments gave a good insights into functional programming. I loved the way the problems were decomposed into neat smaller functions. | 2) Really good explanation by the instructor. | Good | 2) assignments. The assignments gave a good | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Really good explanation by the instructor. Good assignments. The assignments gave a good insights into functional programming. I loved the way the problems were decomposed into neat smaller functions. | 3) Good assignments. The assignments gave a | Good | 3) insights into functional programming. I loved | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good material, but the lecture format was very dry and composed primarily of long videos. | 1) | Good | 1) material, but the lecture format was | 3.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good pace, very educational. The assignments are well designed. Great course, one of the best I took. | 1) | Good | 1) pace, very educational. The assignments are | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good introduction to FP. :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to FP. :) | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good course! I like slides, explanations and examples | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I like slides, explanations and | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great course. I wish the prereqs would specify graphs, inductive proofs and other prerequsites from the math domain that were required to understand the examples. Switching to FP and recursive thinking is hard enough as it is - having to combine it with graph algorithms and other concepts, not necessarily familiar for OOP background programmers increases the effort unnecessarily. That being said, good thing the course offered a preview week. | 1) the effort unnecessarily. That being said, | Good | 1) thing the course offered a preview | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good and interesting course certainly provides a good level of foundation for functional programming. The exercises are challenging and it did take me longer then 3 hour to complete the course work. Further I had to revisit the videos and get the additional reading materials. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course certainly provides a | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good and interesting course certainly provides a good level of foundation for functional programming. The exercises are challenging and it did take me longer then 3 hour to complete the course work. Further I had to revisit the videos and get the additional reading materials. | 2) and interesting course certainly provides a | Good | 2) level of foundation for functional programming. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good course, learnt quite a lot even as someone with some existing experience of Scala. The exercises were challenging but not too difficult and the estimated completion time is pretty much spot on. Just a shame that the automatic grader and verification systems are less than reliable on some of the exercises. | 1) | Good | 1) course, learnt quite a lot even | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The flow and the course material is really good. The professor teaches very well. | 1) and the course material is really | Good | 1) The professor teaches very well. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | This is one of the best, terse, no fluff, and amazing courses that I have encountered on Coursera, with a few mind-bending exercises to test the student. (Although I have some experience with mid-level Haskell so I am sure that helped a bit with the exercises) Scala is a big language and Prof. Odersky showcases his intuition of connecting the topics which work, and gives a gentle introduction without overwhelming the student. I have only good things to say about this course. 5 stars. | 1) overwhelming the student. I have only | Good | 1) things to say about this course. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | It would be good to have examples that are not too much inclined towards Maths. | 1) It would be | Good | 1) to have examples that are not | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good course thanks! sometimes I think there are easier examples to explain concept, some mathematical examples make it more challenging to understand the computational concept. However, I'm very happy with the course. thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course thanks! sometimes I think there | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good course. A bit fast paced for someone with no significant programming experience but as stated in the description this is not a beginners course. Nevertheless, the concepts are explained in depth in the lectures and the assignments which are quite challenging even for someone with good programming background provide great insight to the issues discussed in the lectures. Highly recommended. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. A bit fast paced for | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good course. A bit fast paced for someone with no significant programming experience but as stated in the description this is not a beginners course. Nevertheless, the concepts are explained in depth in the lectures and the assignments which are quite challenging even for someone with good programming background provide great insight to the issues discussed in the lectures. Highly recommended. | 2) quite challenging even for someone with | Good | 2) programming background provide great insight to | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | It's a good course,although it starts a little slowly and then really builds up a lot of steam towards the end. I think it should be paced out to be an 8-week course and include shorter, less ambitious assignments. I personally found that the assignments lead to onerous difficulty unless one actively seeks out different aspects of the language other than what was taught in this course (particularly native list methods), and once that has begun, then the last two weeks of it seem like a long-winded slog. It's nice to be able to learn programming style from Odersky himself. I recommend the text "Functional Programming in Scala" to read and work through during the course. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, although it starts a little | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A very good introductory course to Scala and Functional programming. Please add more assignments(optional) to the course | 1) A very | Good | 1) introductory course to Scala and Functional | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good course of medium diffculty | 1) | Good | 1) course of medium diffculty | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A very good beginners course for learning Scala. The lectures are a bit dry but overall a very good course with good assignments. | 1) A very | Good | 1) beginners course for learning Scala. The | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A very good beginners course for learning Scala. The lectures are a bit dry but overall a very good course with good assignments. | 2) bit dry but overall a very | Good | 2) course with good assignments. | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A very good beginners course for learning Scala. The lectures are a bit dry but overall a very good course with good assignments. | 3) overall a very good course with | Good | 3) assignments. | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | A good course but it could be better. | 1) A | Good | 1) course but it could be better. | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Really good intro to functional programming, make sure you practice a lot! | 1) Really | Good | 1) intro to functional programming, make sure | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I really enjoyed the assignments, and thought they were a good way to get to know the basics of the language. They were similar to the type of "toy problem" that I like to do myself when learning another language, and were at a reasonable level of difficulty. I could have done without the proofs; I sort of skipped over these parts (about an hour of lecture, I guess). That's just my preference - I guess I'm not super proofy. There were very minor parts of the course that need updating, but nothing that required additional effort to get past. | 1) assignments, and thought they were a | Good | 1) way to get to know the | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Fantastic teaching and some very challenging exercises! It gives you a really great tool kit and some very useful source to refer to. Very good fun and a big thank you to the team at EPFL. | 1) useful source to refer to. Very | Good | 1) fun and a big thank you | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | For someone without experience in Java, but with other programming experience (C/Python), I found this course to be interesting and challenging. There's a lot of recursion in the assignments, which made my head spin. .. but I thought the course coverage was quite good. I supplemented with the instructor's book. the main recommendation I'd have is more information about using the IDEs. A lot of my frustrations ended up being about particulars of those. | 1) thought the course coverage was quite | Good | 1) I supplemented with the instructor's book. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | The course is very good and labs are sometimes difficult but useful. However some material was not covered, and it is always like that, but still it can include iterators and some other chapters | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) and labs are sometimes difficult but | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Really good course! The examples presented were specifically chosen to show the advantages and differences between functional programming and imperative programming. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! The examples presented were specifically | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good to absorb Scala as new language. But No farther guidance to how to think in Scala way. Please give some more(additional) exerciser which are real application using framework like Play. | 1) | Good | 1) to absorb Scala as new language. | 3.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I found it to be a good introduction to functional programming and/or scala, and the assignments are challenging enough to be interesting to those who are not complete beginners in those subjects. | 1) I found it to be a | Good | 1) introduction to functional programming and/or scala, | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good lectures and Assignments. Assignments are thought provoking. Cheers! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures and Assignments. Assignments are thought | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good introduction to functional programming and Scala. Although, the lectures and assignments can get rather mathy (pointless proof of refactoring using maths, Pascals Triangle, Huffman Coding, Counting Change, etc) If you don't have a mathematical background, I would suggest getting the basics of programming down before starting this course so you have less to worry about. I found myself reading up about the maths behind some of the assignments before tackling them, when this could've been avoided with less mathematical assignments. I looked into the first assignment of the next module in the specialization and thought to myself: "Why bother" as it just continues the trend of solving more complex mathematical problems -- something rarely tackled as a professional developer. I would've liked to see the standard collection functions taught and used more frequently: map, flatmap, fold, etc. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to functional programming and Scala. | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | It is my first course on Coursera and I have to admit that it is brilliant. The provided material is very helpful, lectures are very interesting and theory is interleaved with practice. Assignments are good and sometimes tricky. The lecturer, Martin Odersky, is very clear in conveying his message and, last but not least, is *the* person from whom to learn Scala. | 1) is interleaved with practice. Assignments are | Good | 1) and sometimes tricky. The lecturer, Martin | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Excellent! Would just like to get Martin's solutions (not for the solution but for the explanations that lead to the solution) cause even though I passed it I am not sure that all my decisions were that good :-). Anyway a must have if you're into FP and/or Scala! | 1) that all my decisions were that | Good | 1) :-). Anyway a must have if | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | I've been developing in imperative languages for the past 10 years, and my motivation for taking this course was to make sure that I was using the functional capabilities of the language. While I've embraced immutability and higher-order functions since I started writing Scala, I haven't solved significant programming challenges using functional thinking. Much of what I've already done with Scala so far has been relatively stateless request-response communication between systems, and the challenges so far tend to be on the architecture end. This first course taught me useful things that I hadn't encountered in my industry use of Scala. It has given me greater appreciation for the design of the language and the problems that Scala can solve elegantly. I've also acquired more interest in learning about more functional approaches to various problems -- perhaps I'll dig deeper into SICP at some point! The assignments were a good fit for me -- they were challenging enough that they got me to think but not so hard that I got stuck. Scala's rich type system came in handy for the assignments -- once you've got the right idea for an approach, you just have to get the data structures to click (with some help from the compiler), and things just work! I appreciate that the assignments and examples were realistic. Getting to implement Huffman Coding and basic data structures (functional and OO sets) helped me both appreciate the functional way to solve problems like these, and to understand the class of practical problems where similar solutions are applicable. Great course, and I'm excited for the next ones! Thanks to Martin and the course staff for their hard work on the course! | 1) some point! The assignments were a | Good | 1) fit for me -- they were | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Offers very good introduction to both functional programming paradigm and Scala language. | 1) Offers very | Good | 1) introduction to both functional programming paradigm | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great Content. Please keep up the good work. | 1) Great Content. Please keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | very good - rare to get a lesson from the inventor of the tech itself | 1) very | Good | 1) - rare to get a lesson | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Though learning deeply a language is always a challenge, this lecture focuses on constructs that makes Scala functions and exhibits good exercises to use recursions and functions. This is, I think a good start to become a good scala developer | 1) that makes Scala functions and exhibits | Good | 1) exercises to use recursions and functions. | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Though learning deeply a language is always a challenge, this lecture focuses on constructs that makes Scala functions and exhibits good exercises to use recursions and functions. This is, I think a good start to become a good scala developer | 2) functions. This is, I think a | Good | 2) start to become a good scala | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Though learning deeply a language is always a challenge, this lecture focuses on constructs that makes Scala functions and exhibits good exercises to use recursions and functions. This is, I think a good start to become a good scala developer | 3) a good start to become a | Good | 3) scala developer | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Great course! Good for all the programmers, which can give you better view of programming (even with other language) | 1) Great course! | Good | 1) for all the programmers, which can | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Specially on the last exercise, there is a bit of a distance between the classes and the challenges. Other than that, the course provides a very good introduction to functional programming at the same time as it introduce the scala language constructs and api. | 1) that, the course provides a very | Good | 1) introduction to functional programming at the | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good materials and challenging programming exercises. Makes you think. However some material is old and some new, so little confusing. Especially when going through the materials about installing the development environment. | 1) | Good | 1) materials and challenging programming exercises. Makes | 4.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Interesting assignments. Good lectures | 1) Interesting assignments. | Good | 1) lectures | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Excellent course. It's good to already know how to program in some C-like language before you start, as the exercises are reasonably challenging. | 1) Excellent course. It's | Good | 1) to already know how to program | 5.0 |
| bRPXgjY9EeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | it is very good | 1) it is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Very good course it's helped me so much | 1) Very | Good | 1) course it's helped me so much | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | thank you so much for this course , lectors are very good and the materials are easy to understand. | 1) this course , lectors are very | Good | 1) and the materials are easy to | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | A very good course structured to help non-native English speakers and to those who want to get into an entrepreneurship. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course structured to help non-native English | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | It's a brilliant course. the mentors are very good and they use common English which is understandable to all | 1) brilliant course. the mentors are very | Good | 1) and they use common English which | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | This course is very useful and practical. It helps me understand how to write a business plan and how to persuade investors. Furthermore, It also helps me idenfity which kind of investors are suitable for me. Good course, Thanks a lot. | 1) of investors are suitable for me. | Good | 1) course, Thanks a lot. | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | This course is really good. I came at it thinking I know English well and do not need to be taught like I'm a first grader. But I'm learning more about entrepreneurship. It is fantastic. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) I came at it thinking I | 4.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | this course is so good. i have learn so many things from this course. they use some creative way to make we practise our lesson. | 1) this course is so | Good | 1) i have learn so many things | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | I really enjoyed this course, it is very detailed and the instructions were crystal clear. The instructors were very good because they did their best to explain difficult concepts in an easy way. Also, the materials were very helpful and practical to understand the topics. | 1) crystal clear. The instructors were very | Good | 1) because they did their best to | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Dear hosts, many thanks for this excellent opportunity to gain knowledge. I wish you all the best and good luck! | 1) wish you all the best and | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | Very good. I liked! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I liked! | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bT0Wwd7yEeWlNQ4GEaPmcw | It is really a good course and instructors are also great. | 1) It is really a | Good | 1) course and instructors are also great. | 5.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | I thought there will be more on interfaces and views. Not really "Best practices in interface design" course. But it is good in Core Data and UITableViews. Worth time. Change name! :-) | 1) interface design" course. But it is | Good | 1) in Core Data and UITableViews. Worth | 4.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Good entrance level course for beginner! | 1) | Good | 1) entrance level course for beginner! | 5.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Gave me a very good perception of the best practises in iOS UI Design | 1) Gave me a very | Good | 1) perception of the best practises in | 5.0 |
| bTYGrDVuEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very pragmatic learning (lots of hands on!) and good examples to help you understand all concepts. | 1) (lots of hands on! ) and | Good | 1) examples to help you understand all | 5.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | Good for beginners, introduced basic theory systemly. But a few mistakes appeared, though corrected in the videos too, but better to clear them in the future shifts. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners, introduced basic theory systemly. | 4.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | The course material itself is good and you do learn a lot but for a course that starts at complete beginner level the final exam is too much of a reach for many. It feels like the course should be at least 50% longer as in that exam you are literally trying to stitch ideas together into educated guesses (i got 80% plus on all of the course work). It needs work to narrow the gap as this is not good learning, it frustrates many and is not helpful. | 1) The course material itself is | Good | 1) and you do learn a lot | 3.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | The course material itself is good and you do learn a lot but for a course that starts at complete beginner level the final exam is too much of a reach for many. It feels like the course should be at least 50% longer as in that exam you are literally trying to stitch ideas together into educated guesses (i got 80% plus on all of the course work). It needs work to narrow the gap as this is not good learning, it frustrates many and is not helpful. | 2) the gap as this is not | Good | 2) learning, it frustrates many and is | 3.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | Very good course with plenty information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with plenty information. | 4.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | Generally this course has good subjects and syllabus. In some parts of course they teach reasons of the subjects and it becomes more logical for me. The only reason that I gave four stars is lecture videos are not enough for the final exam. Especially for part 2 of final exam, some questions are more detailed for given lectures. However, it was a good introduction for music theory. | 1) Generally this course has | Good | 1) subjects and syllabus. In some parts | 4.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | Generally this course has good subjects and syllabus. In some parts of course they teach reasons of the subjects and it becomes more logical for me. The only reason that I gave four stars is lecture videos are not enough for the final exam. Especially for part 2 of final exam, some questions are more detailed for given lectures. However, it was a good introduction for music theory. | 2) given lectures. However, it was a | Good | 2) introduction for music theory. | 4.0 |
| bu-bs9_HEeSNQCIAC2-J5Q | I believe this is an excellent course! It covers really good grounds and has definitely helped me as a musician. Although a few things were hard to understand based on the way they explained it. However all in all a wonderful course! | 1) an excellent course! It covers really | Good | 1) grounds and has definitely helped me | 4.0 |
| bU8nHhtHEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | This is a good course. I like all the part Mechanics of Materials. I suggest you to please go through the Specialization of this course. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course. I like all the part | 5.0 |
| BuO0neR5EeWYOBIRup69HQ | Good course for general knowledge of the subject. I felt the amount of reading, especially the 4th week, should be more accurately represented. At least for time management. | 1) | Good | 1) course for general knowledge of the | 4.0 |
| BuO0neR5EeWYOBIRup69HQ | A very informative course in the sense that though its very basic but its the first time I got everything in a structured way. I am already a Infosec professional however my domain is not mobility. So mobility with security and its use business development is a phenomenal task. Hence, I guess its a very good course for this specialisation. I am not giving 5 stars as there is always scope for improvement. However, it may be taken as a five star course. Thanks to all the people who designed the course. | 1) Hence, I guess its a very | Good | 1) course for this specialisation. I am | 4.0 |
| BuO0neR5EeWYOBIRup69HQ | A good introduction to the subject of computer security and mobile security. More of a general subject and not vert in depth, but a great start. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the subject of computer | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very complex topic and also the one of most curious one too. A very good amount of knowledge one can gain about the big bang and our universe. Straight forward lectures through images and animations. but I feel that some of the explanations were very twisted in the 3rd week although I understand that the subject itself is one of the most complex topic of the research and these are scientists and not teacher but there is this room for the improvement. Also the quizzes were too easy and very straight forward and don't test the understanding of the topic very much. I am a very big supporter of the Coursera, I have stared many courses but due to some reasons couldn't complete any, this is the 1st course that I followed till the end. Thank you Coursera for this wonderful opportunity. | 1) most curious one too. A very | Good | 1) amount of knowledge one can gain | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | That's an amazing course! very good,vrey meanningful | 1) That's an amazing course! very | Good | 1) vrey meanningful | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very interesting course and good information. Could you more explanation and exercises to bridge gaps for those that are new to the field. | 1) Very interesting course and | Good | 1) information. Could you more explanation and | 4.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very good course. Gives a strong knowledge of space and universe to those who seek that knowledge. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Gives a strong knowledge of | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | really good, with a bit of humor thrown in here and there | 1) really | Good | 1) with a bit of humor thrown | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Overall a really good course. I learnt a lot about astronomy from this 4-week course. | 1) Overall a really | Good | 1) course. I learnt a lot about | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | The course is really good. It touches various topics of cosmology. Moreover not too much of mathematics is used. And Hitoshi Sir was really good in the explanations. Highly recommended. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) It touches various topics of cosmology. | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | The course is really good. It touches various topics of cosmology. Moreover not too much of mathematics is used. And Hitoshi Sir was really good in the explanations. Highly recommended. | 2) used. And Hitoshi Sir was really | Good | 2) in the explanations. Highly recommended. | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very Good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | It was not difficult to follow the course in terms of the mathematics. I wish there was a follow up course on all the mathematical side to the things explained here. The materials were arranged very creatively with a good flow which made a lot of things clear to me than any other thing I have read or watched up to this point about this area of physics. | 1) were arranged very creatively with a | Good | 1) flow which made a lot of | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Strongly recommend to all who interested in astrophysics. This course is very good for high school students or for students of 1st year at the university | 1) in astrophysics. This course is very | Good | 1) for high school students or for | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | very good course, although the very beginning is very basic. exceeded expectations. I would have liked it to have the video transcripts, as i like to have another source for learning and understanding the contents. i liked the professor and his attitude. i think some things are left kind of unanswered or implicit, which for someone who is not directly involved with the subject confuse me. maybe Q&A sessions with the professor would also be a good idea besides the recommended transcripts. overall it was very good | 1) very | Good | 1) course, although the very beginning is | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | very good course, although the very beginning is very basic. exceeded expectations. I would have liked it to have the video transcripts, as i like to have another source for learning and understanding the contents. i liked the professor and his attitude. i think some things are left kind of unanswered or implicit, which for someone who is not directly involved with the subject confuse me. maybe Q&A sessions with the professor would also be a good idea besides the recommended transcripts. overall it was very good | 2) the professor would also be a | Good | 2) idea besides the recommended transcripts. overall | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | very good course, although the very beginning is very basic. exceeded expectations. I would have liked it to have the video transcripts, as i like to have another source for learning and understanding the contents. i liked the professor and his attitude. i think some things are left kind of unanswered or implicit, which for someone who is not directly involved with the subject confuse me. maybe Q&A sessions with the professor would also be a good idea besides the recommended transcripts. overall it was very good | 3) recommended transcripts. overall it was very | Good | 3) | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very good course, superbly explained. He really knows his stuff. I'd recommend this course anytime, hands down. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, superbly explained. He really knows | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very good to get general Idea about the big bang, higgs boson, dark matter, dark energy, and antimatter. How were they discovered and what are their effects. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to get general Idea about the | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very good course. Loved the way the course is structured and presented. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Loved the way the course | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | it is good course for me and i study more thing of universe ,think you | 1) it is | Good | 1) course for me and i study | 4.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | Very good and complete course. After this course you will feel fulfilled and know you have accomplished something. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and complete course. After this course | 5.0 |
| bV6GUWEbEeSceSIACy-PDA | learnt the course with an ease. Trainers knowledge and teaching skill are very good. | 1) knowledge and teaching skill are very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bVgqTevEEeWvGQrWsIkLlw | Good survey of techniques | 1) | Good | 1) survey of techniques | 4.0 |
| bVgqTevEEeWvGQrWsIkLlw | Excellent Module! A most know & understand unit for all students of Data Science. Enjoyed every aspect of the learning .. Good teaching !!! | 1) aspect of the learning . . | Good | 1) teaching ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| bVgqTevEEeWvGQrWsIkLlw | Very good course! Thank you :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Thank you :) | 5.0 |
| bvroJANGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Lessons and videos in this class have been very well crafted and created. The lessons are both entertaining and informative at the same time. Good job ASU Teach English Now! Team! | 1) and informative at the same time. | Good | 1) job ASU Teach English Now! Team! | 5.0 |
| bvroJANGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | very good one | 1) very | Good | 1) one | 4.0 |
| bvroJANGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| bvroJANGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | Love it, as usual. Great course, good set up and great way of teaching (texts, videos and fun) | 1) Love it, as usual. Great course, | Good | 1) set up and great way of | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Very well structured, good foundation, great contextual environment and easy to understand principles. | 1) Very well structured, | Good | 1) foundation, great contextual environment and easy | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Good lecture and content | 1) | Good | 1) lecture and content | 4.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Good and clear. | 1) | Good | 1) and clear. | 4.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | This course and the professor was definitely worth spending time on and learning from. For those that are looking for more certificate, I believe London Business School has a good name, the course title and course knowledge is strong. My rating 10 out 10 and can't wait for the next one. | 1) believe London Business School has a | Good | 1) name, the course title and course | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Course content was very good, easy to follow. Julian made it quite interesting and insightful for managers who see change as the only constant and want to get the best out of their workplace. Really enjoyed the course. Looking forward to other courses from Julian | 1) Course content was very | Good | 1) easy to follow. Julian made it | 5.0 |
| bzhAuJ9sEeWJORITtzkPnQ | Good course specially for senior level executives who get caught in the usual rut of EBITDA/Profitability and Stock Analysts | 1) | Good | 1) course specially for senior level executives | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Kinda disappointed that in a course about Communication, Margaret can be such a "so-so" communicator herself. Except that, the course is good and offers some cool tips on how to deal with that new ways of communication that we must deal of. | 1) herself. Except that, the course is | Good | 1) and offers some cool tips on | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good course to learn communicating with various types of people in various environment. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn communicating with various | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Always good to learn how to communicate in an efficient way, even with new technology | 1) Always | Good | 1) to learn how to communicate in | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | This course is really helpful. I would recommend it to my friend to learn how they can improve their communication skills at workplace and can be a good employee and a great manager. | 1) at workplace and can be a | Good | 1) employee and a great manager. | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I thought it was going to be good. Did the first week videos and Lectures. But I feel cheated because it will not let me take the quiz to move on without paying for the course. No where did I ever see anything that said ahead you had to pay -- if you didn't want a certificate or to do the whole specialization. Coursera used to be a platform I used and recommended. No more. | 1) thought it was going to be | Good | 1) Did the first week videos and | 1.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | The content of the course was good. Lectures were effective. I specially liked the last statement after every lecture "where ever you may be have a great time" | 1) The content of the course was | Good | 1) Lectures were effective. I specially liked | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | It is good course. Very brief and practical. As always, the most important things is to practice in real life situation. | 1) It is | Good | 1) course. Very brief and practical. As | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | There wasn't a lot of information inside the video and the test's questions hade multiple possible answer. However, the links to ressources such as HarvardReview or Inc.com were pretty good and usefull. | 1) HarvardReview or Inc. com were pretty | Good | 1) and usefull. | 2.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good tools, approaches, and guidance on communication with different people within an organization. The only drawback of this course is that it relies a lot on additional readings rather than lectures slides. | 1) | Good | 1) tools, approaches, and guidance on communication | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good course, I recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I recommend! | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources supplied were extremely helpful. I didn't pay so much attention to the slides that came with this - in fact, I'm not even sure how relevant they are looking back. I had expected the overview videos to be an insight to the resource content, but it wasn't quite compiled that way. The tests could have been longer, and perhaps could have contained obvious solutions - in some instances the solutions provided were all applicable, leaving the student to select the best option. In other instances the options available weren't even discussed in the content, confusing the student. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to Workplace Communication. The resources | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Has good collection of resources for improvement of communication skills | 1) Has | Good | 1) collection of resources for improvement of | 3.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | It was GOOD !!! | 1) It was | Good | 1) ! ! ! | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I really enjoyed this course. Very good material and lots of hardwork from our tutor... | 1) I really enjoyed this course. Very | Good | 1) material and lots of hardwork from | 5.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good course. It will help both managers as well as direct reports to find a common interface for better communication, and more efficient business relationships. | 1) | Good | 1) course. It will help both managers | 4.0 |
| bzK7K9cYEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | good tips | 1) | Good | 1) tips | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good preparation. In-depth explanation. Wild ranges of resources. Very impressive. | 1) | Good | 1) preparation. In-depth explanation. Wild ranges of | 5.0 |
| C-Eq4BUkEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Quite good! the production is superb and the script also meticulous. Worth any minute! | 1) Quite | Good | 1) the production is superb and the | 5.0 |
| C-WALZ3LEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Very good online decision-making and scenarios course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) online decision-making and scenarios course! | 5.0 |
| C-WALZ3LEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | I liked the class and it gave good information. The professors ordered the materials well, and I would recommend anyone to take this MOOC. | 1) liked the class and it gave | Good | 1) information. The professors ordered the materials | 5.0 |
| c1njRLZEEeWEoAqTi6kTYw | Super good, challenging course that forces you to think. | 1) Super | Good | 1) challenging course that forces you to | 5.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | This course is what everybody needs! Take this course, enjoy these people's knowledge and change your life for good. | 1) knowledge and change your life for | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | I think it might turn out to be good for me in a long run. | 1) it might turn out to be | Good | 1) for me in a long run. | 5.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Good Course... | 1) | Good | 1) Course. . . | 4.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Very interesting topic, good short video-lectures and enthusiastic lectors. | 1) Very interesting topic, | Good | 1) short video-lectures and enthusiastic lectors. | 5.0 |
| c8dPVxUQEeWpKw4zIcjkHw | An awesome course with good explanations and tasks. At the end of the course, it enabled me to think the other way that I usually do not do on looking at any object. Thank you team. | 1) An awesome course with | Good | 1) explanations and tasks. At the end | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | This course is awesome. Jim Fowler is very good teacher. His explanations are concise, but very easy to assimilate because of all the visual resources. I loved the fact that the videos were short overall, since I do not have much free time to keep watching slow long videos. A perfect score. | 1) is awesome. Jim Fowler is very | Good | 1) teacher. His explanations are concise, but | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | excellent, very good teacher | 1) excellent, very | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Consistent video format, good explanations, video length not too long but also not too short. | 1) Consistent video format, | Good | 1) explanations, video length not too long | 4.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | There are a few mistakes that you need to look out for (check the discussion forum), but overall, this is a very good course! | 1) but overall, this is a very | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Overall ,a very good course!! | 1) Overall , a very | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Awesome professor and a very informative and helpful course. The professor explains in such a good manner. 10/5 and not 5/5. | 1) The professor explains in such a | Good | 1) manner. 10/5 and not 5/5. | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Very good, Focussed in learn the philosophy and know some mathematical tricks in the proofs. It was funny!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Focussed in learn the philosophy and | 4.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | This really is a good extention to the Calculus One course. A bit harder to understand, but I assume this was the main idea of Jim Fowler - to explain, as he mentions in one of the videos, that mathematics is not about calculations - it's about insight. So be prepared for less technical calculations in the tests and more creative thinking on how to solve this or that problem. | 1) This really is a | Good | 1) extention to the Calculus One course. | 4.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | I wanted to like this course, but (and perhaps it's a mathematician thing) the teacher just kept doing stuff without explaining WHY he is doing the stuff. He is very animated and a good presenter but, even when I understood what he was saying, I couldn't get past the "why is he doing this?" It is never "self-evident" for me. | 1) He is very animated and a | Good | 1) presenter but, even when I understood | 2.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Another fantastic course put together by Jim Fowler! The instructional videos provide good arguments and present the theorems, proofs, concepts, etc. very well. | 1) Jim Fowler! The instructional videos provide | Good | 1) arguments and present the theorems, proofs, | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | The course is very helpful in understanding the idea of sequences and series. Starting from zero, you will get a really good understanding of the topic and will see applications of it. I have to admit it. I like the way the prof explains things. He tries to deliver a message that math is not just about numbers and calculations, but insight and understanding. Very helpful and highly recommended if you are interested in math. | 1) zero, you will get a really | Good | 1) understanding of the topic and will | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Good, Very good | 1) | Good | 1) Very good | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Good, Very good | 2) Good, Very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | So far very good, very clear explanations. | 1) So far very | Good | 1) very clear explanations. | 5.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | .... might be considered as a good one | 1) . might be considered as a | Good | 1) one | 4.0 |
| c9w_wD0cEeS9XCIAC0GF3g | Amazing course. Really good with you're looking for a solid calculus background! | 1) Amazing course. Really | Good | 1) with you're looking for a solid | 5.0 |
| cdBWwMNwEeS3kiIACx2NTg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| cdBWwMNwEeS3kiIACx2NTg | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Provides a good foundation for understanding about Internet of Things! | 1) Provides a | Good | 1) foundation for understanding about Internet of | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good Intro to the essentials but a too much of theory. | 1) | Good | 1) Intro to the essentials but a | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very Good master. Easy to learn with us. | 1) Very | Good | 1) master. Easy to learn with us. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Really good introductory course on IoT technologies. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introductory course on IoT technologies. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | good information | 1) | Good | 1) information | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good intro for the IoT world! | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro for the IoT world! | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Vary good course! Thank you! | 1) Vary | Good | 1) course! Thank you! | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Step by Step from scratch. Very good lectures, presentations and explanations given by Prof. Ian G. Harris... Thanks! | 1) Step by Step from scratch. Very | Good | 1) lectures, presentations and explanations given by | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | GOOD interesting covers a broad amount of material and area proccessors networking design | 1) | Good | 1) interesting covers a broad amount of | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good so far | 1) | Good | 1) so far | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | a concise approach to good engineering project development | 1) a concise approach to | Good | 1) engineering project development | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Not good- weak lecturer- repeats himself endlessly- waste of time | 1) Not | Good | 1) weak lecturer- repeats himself endlessly- waste | 1.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It is an Excellent course. First i will thank to coursera for provide these type of courses.Students must get a very good knowledge when they did attend the all sessions. | 1) courses. Students must get a very | Good | 1) knowledge when they did attend the | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice introduction at a very basic level. Good if you know nothing about this subject. | 1) introduction at a very basic level. | Good | 1) if you know nothing about this | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good intro to IOT and embedded systems with short videos. Definitely boost my understanding. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to IOT and embedded systems | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good Introduction to IoT Concepts | 1) Very | Good | 1) Introduction to IoT Concepts | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Its a very introductory course. Good for novice and beginners. | 1) Its a very introductory course. | Good | 1) for novice and beginners. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good course for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very detailed and well covered topics. A very good course to introduce a budding IOT enthusiast. | 1) and well covered topics. A very | Good | 1) course to introduce a budding IOT | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It was good, as per the introductory part | 1) It was | Good | 1) as per the introductory part | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I enjoyed doing this module of the IOT course. It is well structured and provides a good grounding for the IOT. Thanks Coursera. Off now to sign up of the next module of this course. | 1) is well structured and provides a | Good | 1) grounding for the IOT. Thanks Coursera. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A fairly easy and very good introductory course. It'll help you understand what embedded systems are and how they are used. I would definitely recommend this course to anyone starting out on IoT. | 1) A fairly easy and very | Good | 1) introductory course. It'll help you understand | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good examples and very well explained basic things to understand IoT and Embedded Systems. | 1) | Good | 1) examples and very well explained basic | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good introduction to IoT | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to IoT | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The course content and intro about IoT is very good and interesting. This course will provide an opportunity to explore new generation intelligent devices. | 1) and intro about IoT is very | Good | 1) and interesting. This course will provide | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good introduction. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good attempt. | 1) | Good | 1) attempt. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good, with relevant content to nowadays. | 1) Very | Good | 1) with relevant content to nowadays. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Was well broken down really. A good introduction i'll have to say. | 1) Was well broken down really. A | Good | 1) introduction i'll have to say. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Nice course and builds good foundation for forth-coming courses. | 1) Nice course and builds | Good | 1) foundation for forth-coming courses. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Neatly explained. No prerequisite needed. Very good course. | 1) Neatly explained. No prerequisite needed. Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I enjoyed this course. It was very informative and I think it is a good way to start studying the subject. | 1) and I think it is a | Good | 1) way to start studying the subject. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A good one for beginners | 1) A | Good | 1) one for beginners | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Great! Very good curse! Really useful | 1) Great! Very | Good | 1) curse! Really useful | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This course provides a very good introduction to Internet of Things for beginners. However, the topics are not covered in much depth and feel a bit superficial. | 1) This course provides a very | Good | 1) introduction to Internet of Things for | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I loved the way Prof. Ian Harris teaches. It is so easy to understand. This is a nice introductory course for IoT and Embedded System. An easy one! Except for second week's assignment (which was slightly vague), rest was all good! | 1) was slightly vague), rest was all | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Introduction to the Internet of Things and Embedded Systems is very good online course | 1) Things and Embedded Systems is very | Good | 1) online course | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good content, clear and effective way to explain the core concepts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, clear and effective way to | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The lectures give you a good overview of the material, and the assignments help you solidify your understanding of embedded systems in the real world. | 1) The lectures give you a | Good | 1) overview of the material, and the | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Enjoyable, accessible introduction to IoT. Progresses at a good pace. | 1) introduction to IoT. Progresses at a | Good | 1) pace. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A very good course for novices looking to learn more about Internet of Things. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for novices looking to learn | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good introduction course. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Not as deep as i would like, but good intro and well presented..! | 1) deep as i would like, but | Good | 1) intro and well presented. . ! | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good course for understanding basics of IoT hardware/embedded systems. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for understanding basics of IoT | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Not very detailed and quite general. Nevertheless, you get a good sense of what IoT devices are and how the work. For an introduction, it's ok, but I expected more information and more assignments to make it really useful. In terms of value for money, I'd say you're better of spending a few hours on Google and forums. | 1) quite general. Nevertheless, you get a | Good | 1) sense of what IoT devices are | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good for starters | 1) | Good | 1) for starters | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Course address some elementary issues about IoT, but the instructor at times seems like he does not have a good grasp of the lecture materials. No access to quizzes or evaluations as auditing participant, which is a shame since most of the Coursera MOOCs allow access to evaluation material under the auditing modality. | 1) like he does not have a | Good | 1) grasp of the lecture materials. No | 2.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Excellent Course for beginners. No prior knowledge required. A lot to learn. The Instructor is very good. | 1) to learn. The Instructor is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This will probably be the worst course in the specialization and for good reason. The entire course is designed to overload you with terminology to get you up to speed for the follow courses. As a result this is a pretty bland and boring 4 weeks. The assignments feel like tedious filler an a lot of the questions in them are very poorly worded. The saving grace is that the course is just 4 weeks and can be completed in a fairly short amount of time. | 1) course in the specialization and for | Good | 1) reason. The entire course is designed | 2.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | This is very good introduction to Internet of Things domain. Specially the content related to components of embedded, IoT devices and Protocols. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) introduction to Internet of Things domain. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good basics coverage. Prof. is cool | 1) Very | Good | 1) basics coverage. Prof. is cool | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Don't get me wrong, this is a good course, the teacher obviously knows his stuff and delivers the information in a good way. It gives you what you need to know. But I expected more. A wider grasp on things, additional readings, quiz’s, related articles, links and so on. Maybe not mandatory but in addition to what already is there. | 1) get me wrong, this is a | Good | 1) course, the teacher obviously knows his | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Don't get me wrong, this is a good course, the teacher obviously knows his stuff and delivers the information in a good way. It gives you what you need to know. But I expected more. A wider grasp on things, additional readings, quiz’s, related articles, links and so on. Maybe not mandatory but in addition to what already is there. | 2) and delivers the information in a | Good | 2) way. It gives you what you | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good starting point to know the all the basics needed to build an IoT device. Thanks Prof. Ian and team for offering the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) starting point to know the all | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Great course with good information. | 1) Great course with | Good | 1) information. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | ya it is very good course for those who doesnot have knowledge about Computers . | 1) ya it is very | Good | 1) course for those who doesnot have | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good very high level introduction to IOT and embedded systems | 1) | Good | 1) very high level introduction to IOT | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A good intro to IoT. You need a good foundation or starting point for such a specialization and that is what this course provides. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro to IoT. You need a | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A good intro to IoT. You need a good foundation or starting point for such a specialization and that is what this course provides. | 2) intro to IoT. You need a | Good | 2) foundation or starting point for such | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The explanation is very good and effective.Real time examples are explained well. | 1) The explanation is very | Good | 1) and effective. Real time examples are | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good simple overview of what IoT is and which component it consist of and how these works | 1) | Good | 1) simple overview of what IoT is | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A good course for somebody who knows absolutely nothing about the presented subjects ( like networking, what is embedded software etc. ). Everything is explained in a way your grandmother could understand it. If you are somewhat familiar with them and are looking on information on what IoT exactly is, this course isn't really for you. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for somebody who knows absolutely | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good course. Professor very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Professor very good! | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very good course. Professor very good! | 2) Very good course. Professor very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The course explains the basics of Iot. I like the way the prof delivers the lecture, very easily understandable. A good brush up course for intermediate and advance level students too. | 1) the lecture, very easily understandable. A | Good | 1) brush up course for intermediate and | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good basic introduction. If you are already familiar with computers you may want to skip it though. | 1) | Good | 1) basic introduction. If you are already | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Great stuff. A very good beginning overview of IoT devices and things that are considered when planning their design and implementation. | 1) Great stuff. A very | Good | 1) beginning overview of IoT devices and | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Gives good insights on the fundamentals. Would be an excellent introduction for a beginner. | 1) Gives | Good | 1) insights on the fundamentals. Would be | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | very good, very clear | 1) very | Good | 1) very clear | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | The course gives very good understanding of what Internet of Things is all about - what it consists of, how it works, what the applications and implications are. The Professor's style is very engaging. He manages to explain complex matters in simple language. Highly recommend the course! | 1) The course gives very | Good | 1) understanding of what Internet of Things | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It was overall a good course for a beginner but too much theoretical things are there, one needs to push more on practicals. | 1) It was overall a | Good | 1) course for a beginner but too | 2.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Only 2 * because of technical issue that i faced in most of the videos are not loading properly . they will stuck somewhere and only audio will be continuing . so i couldnt finish the course. apart from that teaching is really good. hope you guys work on it to fix it. | 1) apart from that teaching is really | Good | 1) hope you guys work on it | 2.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Content is very light but it is good for an absolute beginner. | 1) is very light but it is | Good | 1) for an absolute beginner. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It's a good introductory course. I would have expected some more "meat" on the bones, but still I have to remember this is the first course out of a series so most probably it is good enough. Teacher is good and, even for a non English speaker student as I am, it is perfectly understandable and clear. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introductory course. I would have expected | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It's a good introductory course. I would have expected some more "meat" on the bones, but still I have to remember this is the first course out of a series so most probably it is good enough. Teacher is good and, even for a non English speaker student as I am, it is perfectly understandable and clear. | 2) series so most probably it is | Good | 2) enough. Teacher is good and, even | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It's a good introductory course. I would have expected some more "meat" on the bones, but still I have to remember this is the first course out of a series so most probably it is good enough. Teacher is good and, even for a non English speaker student as I am, it is perfectly understandable and clear. | 3) it is good enough. Teacher is | Good | 3) and, even for a non English | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | clearly explained and a very good course to startup with iot! loved it | 1) clearly explained and a very | Good | 1) course to startup with iot! loved | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good quality information, excellent instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) quality information, excellent instructor. | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good overview of what makes an IoT device different from a normal household device | 1) | Good | 1) overview of what makes an IoT | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | A great course to introduce IoT, it is good for you if you never heard about this topic. | 1) course to introduce IoT, it is | Good | 1) for you if you never heard | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good for beginners in embedded systems | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners in embedded systems | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good Basic Course | 1) | Good | 1) Basic Course | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Sometimes too easy, but may be good as a start point. Video lessons are long for the amount of the shared information. | 1) Sometimes too easy, but may be | Good | 1) as a start point. Video lessons | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I like this course Introduction to the internet of things and embedded systems conducted by university of California,Irvine,it gives clear picture of what is internet of things,it is really good course. | 1) internet of things, it is really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | I thought the content was great, but I thought the assignments were too onerous. I did the first one, but I didn't feel like I learned from it and peer feedback was very slow. I looked at the other assignments, but I thought they only asked me to put to paper things I was already thinking about anyway. Given the untimely and low quality of peer feedback on the first assignment, I didn't feel like I'd learn anything from completing and submitting any assignments. I refuse to buy a webcam for Coursera (I have a phone with that capability but the Coursera app doesn't support it for identity verification), so I can't get a certification anyway. I thought the content was interesting, but too basic to pay for. The major value I see in the certification path is extensive feedback on the capstone project, as I thought peer feedback came too late and wasn't extensive enough to be valuable. I do think the instructor does a good job of presenting the content | 1) do think the instructor does a | Good | 1) job of presenting the content | 3.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very well presented material, good production quality. A tad bit sparse on details, but I guess that is apt for an Intro level course. | 1) Very well presented material, | Good | 1) production quality. A tad bit sparse | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very Good Introduction into the IoT and Embedded Systems | 1) Very | Good | 1) Introduction into the IoT and Embedded | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good course, the teacher is very good in explaining the subject | 1) | Good | 1) course, the teacher is very good | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good course, the teacher is very good in explaining the subject | 2) Good course, the teacher is very | Good | 2) in explaining the subject | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Was a good introduction to IoT | 1) Was a | Good | 1) introduction to IoT | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Good start for a novice | 1) | Good | 1) start for a novice | 4.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | Very interesting. The instructor is really good. | 1) Very interesting. The instructor is really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | it is good one | 1) it is | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| CEwR00UZEeWb8RJf7Z1H0w | It is the best course and specialization about embedded systems and IoT aroud the whole coursera which I have ever seen before! Thank you for your good approach to education! | 1) seen before! Thank you for your | Good | 1) approach to education! | 5.0 |
| Cil8XPTgEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Great materials of very good value | 1) Great materials of very | Good | 1) value | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good basic learning course in javascript. Most of the students dont know even the simple basic concepts related to web design. Those can be covered in this course...Happy Coding Everybody. | 1) | Good | 1) basic learning course in javascript. Most | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course to get basics of JS. I took 3nd such course, but find something new and interest. Sometimes it feels a little higgledy-piggledy. But I like that style, this adds real emotions. You don't sleep! :) I only want assigment tasks to be a little harder. | 1) | Good | 1) course to get basics of JS. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | it is a basic class for javascript learner, also provided with HTML basics. Good for people have little knowledge about web programming. | 1) learner, also provided with HTML basics. | Good | 1) for people have little knowledge about | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Examples are very informative. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Examples are very informative. Thanks | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good tips on JavaScript and using it to implement interactivity on a web page. | 1) | Good | 1) tips on JavaScript and using it | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Best course for beginners I think. Very good and very clever structured program. The only problem that it's too short. You want more and more practice. | 1) course for beginners I think. Very | Good | 1) and very clever structured program. The | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good head start for web programming. | 1) | Good | 1) head start for web programming. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Nice Course.Good Explanations. | 1) Nice Course. | Good | 1) Explanations. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The teaching of the professor Colleen is wonderful and very interactive . Troy (teaching staff) is also very supportive .In short a very good course for interactive learning of Java script :) | 1) supportive . In short a very | Good | 1) course for interactive learning of Java | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is a good fundamental course. Colleen is a great teacher and I like her unique teaching style and viewpoint. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) fundamental course. Colleen is a great | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is the third course in a specialization, and I rate all of them highly. While this course if for beginning web developers & programmers, they do a good job of familiarization with the tools and considerations that go into building an attractive, responsive web site. As soon as I finish the fourth course in this series, I'm going to enroll in a "full stack" course. | 1) developers & programmers, they do a | Good | 1) job of familiarization with the tools | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | simple explanations . good course for beginner. | 1) simple explanations . | Good | 1) course for beginner. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good for course for beginners in javascript. You need to have some familiarity though with programming in general. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for course for beginners in javascript. | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course to start with. Thanks a lot! | 1) | Good | 1) course to start with. Thanks a | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good Introductory Course on Javascript | 1) Very | Good | 1) Introductory Course on Javascript | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | the information was not good consolidated, between week 2 and week 4 the rhythm changed considerably fast. The assignments and the examples in the videos weren't so clear and concatenate like in CSS3 and HTML5 | 1) the information was not | Good | 1) consolidated, between week 2 and week | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good course for beginners on this wonderful language. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for beginners on this wonderful | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course for beginner | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginner | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I realy enjoyed this course, I just learned great functinalyties from Java Script and Collen was a very good instructor in your classes! | 1) Script and Collen was a very | Good | 1) instructor in your classes! | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Easy, Simple, Straight to the Point and Informative it's a good place to start learning JavaScript | 1) the Point and Informative it's a | Good | 1) place to start learning JavaScript | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It seemed to move way to quickly without a good explanation of how to use the script. I learned a lot in HTML and CSS under this proff but not a lot from this course. I continue to review it and look up other resources. | 1) move way to quickly without a | Good | 1) explanation of how to use the | 2.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course. 1st week is a little fast. The other weeks are much better. It needs to be a longer course though covering many additional topics. Or offer it as additional courses for more JavaScript. | 1) | Good | 1) course. 1st week is a little | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good organized...easy understand | 1) very | Good | 1) organized. . . easy understand | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good for complete beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for complete beginners. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good introductory course in JAVA after you taking HTML and CSS. Course materials are harder( or broader) than actual assignments. Background: some experience in scientific computing, but no experience in java before. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course in JAVA after you | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thanks a lot for putting together the course content so neatly. It was a good course. | 1) content so neatly. It was a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | An excellent course, my JavaScript has improved greatly since I completed the requirements. Colleen is a fantastic teacher, I found the lectures to be highly informative and the assignments good fun. | 1) be highly informative and the assignments | Good | 1) fun. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Basic, but not overwhelming like some other courses I've taken. Very good. | 1) some other courses I've taken. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course was very good and pretty helpful! | 1) This course was very | Good | 1) and pretty helpful! | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | so far as good as previous courses in this specialization. Course materials are pretty easy to follow and course load is very balanced. | 1) so far as | Good | 1) as previous courses in this specialization. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good. Probably could use more assignments or links to further tutorials. The final assignment's instructions as they are written mislead English as a Second Language students to use methods that don't contribute to the functionality required in the script. A prior review from a longterm coder who was previously apprehensive of JavaScript before taking this course echoes 80% of my sentiments. This is a gentle but robust introduction for the intimidated, and success in this course is a confidence boost. | 1) | Good | 1) Probably could use more assignments or | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good project for javascript learners | 1) | Good | 1) project for javascript learners | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Especially the DOM part is really good :) | 1) Especially the DOM part is really | Good | 1) :) | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Definitely a beginner course, and the pace seemed good for what it was intended to be. | 1) beginner course, and the pace seemed | Good | 1) for what it was intended to | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Professor teaching way is very awesome and she always giving example of every step and also course material is good which easy to understand. | 1) step and also course material is | Good | 1) which easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good courser for the beginners, right place to start, and begin where the course ends. THANKS A LOT. especially thanks colleen | 1) | Good | 1) courser for the beginners, right place | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think this course does a pretty good of introducing JavaScript. It covers the essentials of how to create functions and implement event handlers that react to the users, which is the most common use of JS. As an introductory course, it correctly assumes some of its audience has no prior programming background. However, it is difficult to teach programming in such a short time. As an experienced programmer, I would recommend reviewing the order in which some of the concepts are presented to try to help in this aspect. I was personally hoping that the final assignment would be a bit more challenging, but it was very straightforward. Form handling (the topic in the final week) is certainly where I've used JS the most during my career, so I was glad that it was given special attention. Again, this is a really good course for beginners; Dr. Van Lent is awesome. | 1) think this course does a pretty | Good | 1) of introducing JavaScript. It covers the | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think this course does a pretty good of introducing JavaScript. It covers the essentials of how to create functions and implement event handlers that react to the users, which is the most common use of JS. As an introductory course, it correctly assumes some of its audience has no prior programming background. However, it is difficult to teach programming in such a short time. As an experienced programmer, I would recommend reviewing the order in which some of the concepts are presented to try to help in this aspect. I was personally hoping that the final assignment would be a bit more challenging, but it was very straightforward. Form handling (the topic in the final week) is certainly where I've used JS the most during my career, so I was glad that it was given special attention. Again, this is a really good course for beginners; Dr. Van Lent is awesome. | 2) attention. Again, this is a really | Good | 2) course for beginners; Dr. Van Lent | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A very good course that I would recommend to other people that are starting using JavaScript! Thank you, Adrian | 1) A very | Good | 1) course that I would recommend to | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is too short course and this module is very basic and short , so much more to talk about JS but instructor is good. | 1) talk about JS but instructor is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | As a beginner student. I enjoyed a good course that it gave me the tools to continue to seek methods to learn JavaScript and everything related to web design. | 1) a beginner student. I enjoyed a | Good | 1) course that it gave me the | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is a really good beginner's JavaScript class. If you're starting from scratch, start here. | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) beginner's JavaScript class. If you're starting | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good for beginers. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginers. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners to get used to the terms of JavaScript and basic working. Unfortunately it's not as good as the HTML and CSS courses in this specialization. The basics are touched upon but I don't feel confident enough to start JavaScript coding on my own yet. More explanation of the concepts is needed as some things are really difficult to understand and you have to search outside the course to understand them. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners to get used | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners to get used to the terms of JavaScript and basic working. Unfortunately it's not as good as the HTML and CSS courses in this specialization. The basics are touched upon but I don't feel confident enough to start JavaScript coding on my own yet. More explanation of the concepts is needed as some things are really difficult to understand and you have to search outside the course to understand them. | 2) basic working. Unfortunately it's not as | Good | 2) as the HTML and CSS courses | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course but bit more depth require | 1) | Good | 1) course but bit more depth require | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Not intended as comprehensive, but a very good starting point for understanding JS. | 1) intended as comprehensive, but a very | Good | 1) starting point for understanding JS. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I really enjoyed the course. The course more than achieved my expectations. The right amount of informations, good tips and very clear to understand. Thanks a lot. | 1) expectations. The right amount of informations, | Good | 1) tips and very clear to understand. | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Teacher's narrative is pretty clear, easy to follow. good for beginners. But the course content is very simple, somewhat too simple for the course title, it only touches on very very basic of javascript. | 1) is pretty clear, easy to follow. | Good | 1) for beginners. But the course content | 3.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The instructor very good | 1) The instructor very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good course just like all the previous courses in the specialisation. The professor took time to explain and introduce important concepts in JavaScript programming. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course just like all the previous | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good explanations ! I wish I learned with this class when I learned JS for the first time ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations ! I wish I learned | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Professor does a good job in explaining and gives a heads up of the general errors encountered in real life working with js | 1) Professor does a | Good | 1) job in explaining and gives a | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | There was a little bit less Javascript than I expected. But the course is good intro for beginners. | 1) I expected. But the course is | Good | 1) intro for beginners. | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course. It an introduction to CSS because this language has a lot of things to study. But for begginer's is excelent opportunity. | 1) | Good | 1) course. It an introduction to CSS | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good like the 2 previous courses. It could have gone a bit farther though, but very clear explanations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) like the 2 previous courses. It | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course is the best I have seem through out of the web. It is exactly I was looking for. Collen is a great teacher and able to provide excellent learning flow for student who has good knowledge of HTML an CSS, but very little on javascript. I was able to complete the lesson in less than 4 week, now I feel confident on learning more advance stuff. Thank you! | 1) learning flow for student who has | Good | 1) knowledge of HTML an CSS, but | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Nice course, gives a good overview about the language. Although I have found their introduction to html and css3 better. | 1) Nice course, gives a | Good | 1) overview about the language. Although I | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course if you want to learn how JavaScript works with HTML and CSS elements to make site pages more engaging but don't have a lot of time for lengthy lectures or assignments that take hours. There's room for the course to grow though. There's so much more a web designer can do with JavaScript to manipulate the DOM and provide a great experience for a site user, and I feel the instructor fell short in explaining event handlers and other cool animation trends seen in the industry. But I understand that this is for new web designers who may or may not be completely interested in programming as opposed to front-end design, so Colleen's teaching provides a good balance. Love the fact that the lectures are straight to the point. I was able to finish 4 weeks of material in less than 3 days, which for someone busy like me, is awesome! | 1) | Good | 1) course if you want to learn | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course if you want to learn how JavaScript works with HTML and CSS elements to make site pages more engaging but don't have a lot of time for lengthy lectures or assignments that take hours. There's room for the course to grow though. There's so much more a web designer can do with JavaScript to manipulate the DOM and provide a great experience for a site user, and I feel the instructor fell short in explaining event handlers and other cool animation trends seen in the industry. But I understand that this is for new web designers who may or may not be completely interested in programming as opposed to front-end design, so Colleen's teaching provides a good balance. Love the fact that the lectures are straight to the point. I was able to finish 4 weeks of material in less than 3 days, which for someone busy like me, is awesome! | 2) design, so Colleen's teaching provides a | Good | 2) balance. Love the fact that the | 4.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great class, the lecturer is very good! | 1) Great class, the lecturer is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good for beginers | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginers | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Clear and good pace of teaching and assignments! Good Job!! | 1) Clear and | Good | 1) pace of teaching and assignments! Good | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Clear and good pace of teaching and assignments! Good Job!! | 2) good pace of teaching and assignments! | Good | 2) Job! ! | 5.0 |
| CJs0DTk_EeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | the course is very good for new poeple on javascript and programming in general but it's tedious for people who who a bit of js or have a programming background as it goes on to talk about very basic stuff like variables and arrays anyone with 2 months experience in software know this concepts i suggest you add that this course is for the real noobies of js or programming in general | 1) the course is very | Good | 1) for new poeple on javascript and | 4.0 |
| cKvqIUXWEeSAFiIACyyIrg | alessandro demaio is very inspiring person ,he presnted ncds very well ,all lectures are good very easy to understand. | 1) very well , all lectures are | Good | 1) very easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Good intro, would like to see more info and details on specific subjects, but that might be for the actual medical classes. | 1) | Good | 1) intro, would like to see more | 3.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | I thoroughly enjoyed this course. I learned much about myself and have a clearer picture around whether a career in veterinary medicine would still be a good fit for me. (dream I put off #life) I believe a combination of hands on study would help me to further my academic skills within this field. Additionally, I was very challenged in ways I didn't expect and in other areas where I expected a deficiency in my learning there was none. Either way I succeeded and passed my tests and assessments successfully and was able to delve deeper into areas I hadn't dreamed I would. The only suggestion I have is utilization of an interactive video for blood flow through the heart which would be greatly beneficial to many including myself. Thank you for such an engaging and engrossing program. | 1) veterinary medicine would still be a | Good | 1) fit for me. (dream I put | 4.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | good course, but did not understand some of the content in week 2 | 1) | Good | 1) course, but did not understand some | 4.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | This is a really good overview about Veterinarian course. It goes into some depth to see, what I might be learning in a course as a student at a university. Thank you very< much for this online course. | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) overview about Veterinarian course. It goes | 5.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Good course and quite plain with materials and important content for learning from that course. Good teachers and very well explain. | 1) | Good | 1) course and quite plain with materials | 5.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | Good course and quite plain with materials and important content for learning from that course. Good teachers and very well explain. | 2) content for learning from that course. | Good | 2) teachers and very well explain. | 5.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | It was a great course with a very good general overview of veterinary studies and the profession. Week 1 definitely could have been broken up into two weeks! | 1) a great course with a very | Good | 1) general overview of veterinary studies and | 4.0 |
| ClCx1sbdEeShXyIAC5MC2w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good class. I recommend to everyone who want to study PR. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. I recommend to everyone who | 5.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, good introduction to Public Relations!!! | 1) | Good | 1) course, good introduction to Public Relations! | 3.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, good introduction to Public Relations!!! | 2) Good course, | Good | 2) introduction to Public Relations! ! ! | 3.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good intro to PR , but course material seemed somewhat redundant and lacked challenge at times. Professor's enthusiasm and passion was contagious and greatly appreciated. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro to PR , but course | 3.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course; I enjoyed all the lecture videos and have learned a lot. I look forward to complete other PR related courses from NUS shortly. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course; I enjoyed all the lecture | 5.0 |
| Cn3HgzTdEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introductory course to Public Relations. And the male teacher is really lovely. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course to Public Relations. And | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I recommend this course! It's very good | 1) I recommend this course! It's very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course, very instructive! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, very instructive! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Pretty good course, everything is explained very clearly, probably, the tasks are a bit easy, but I still appreciate the work of people who created this project. Thank you. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course, everything is explained very clearly, | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and easy to understand, especially for me whose English is not the first language. Highly recommended. Thank you, Tammy and UCI team. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easy to understand, especially for | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course! I recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I recommend. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | this course is very good | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is very good. Clear explanations and logic. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) Clear explanations and logic. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good review of English grammar and punctuation! I have a lot more confidence with my writing ability now! Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) review of English grammar and punctuation! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It was a good start, but I wish the assignments were a little bit harder. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) start, but I wish the assignments | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course to understand the basics of punctuation and grammar. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to understand the basics of | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | VERY GOOD COURSE! | 1) VERY | Good | 1) COURSE! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is beneficial for a person who wants to write well or to pursue career in writing. The teacher is very good. The course is very informative and productive. She prepared the course very well. Assignments and exercises will help you to learn things easily. Each and every second of lecture is worth to listen and they are very precise also. The professor has provided useful material which you can read later. I'm so glad that I took this course. | 1) in writing. The teacher is very | Good | 1) The course is very informative and | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is good and informative. And it provides with the knowledge of grammar and punctuation. | 1) This is | Good | 1) and informative. And it provides with | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I like this Course very much. Hope to do next course. I have learned how to punctuate sentences correctly. This will help me to write sentences in good and proper manner. Thank you all the Professors, Mentors, and University of California. | 1) help me to write sentences in | Good | 1) and proper manner. Thank you all | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Quick and easy course, and a good recap on my grammar skills! | 1) Quick and easy course, and a | Good | 1) recap on my grammar skills! | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course with a simple structure to deepen your knowledge in grammar and punctuation. | 1) | Good | 1) course with a simple structure to | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and clear course | 1) Very | Good | 1) and clear course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The class itself is quite good. However you can not submit the Module Quiz without purchasing the certificate, which is quite annoying. | 1) The class itself is quite | Good | 1) However you can not submit the | 2.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I just think good things about this course it is a great on line tool to learn. | 1) I just think | Good | 1) things about this course it is | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I liked very much this course. I had forgot many of these grammatical rules, so it was really good for me. As in any other language, English is not easy, you have to practice daily, even that be just a little bit. | 1) grammatical rules, so it was really | Good | 1) for me. As in any other | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. Interesting tips and summaries. Very helpful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Interesting tips and summaries. Very | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good! :) Thanks a lot | 1) | Good | 1) :) Thanks a lot | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a good refresher on one's grammar and punctuation. It's an absolute bummer that the quizzes are behind a paywall. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) refresher on one's grammar and punctuation. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This was a very good class and helpful. I only had some issues with not being able to see some things on my app like the practice exercises. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) class and helpful. I only had | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Great really good !!! | 1) Great really | Good | 1) ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is an amazing course in English writing. The course is simple but comprehensive. In addition, the tutor is very good in delivering the subject. | 1) In addition, the tutor is very | Good | 1) in delivering the subject. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | really nice and good can be learn in this course, l studied many words that known about grammar and punctuation in English language. assignment of this course is helping me to improve my language. the lecture look at good and friendly.. | 1) really nice and | Good | 1) can be learn in this course, | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | really nice and good can be learn in this course, l studied many words that known about grammar and punctuation in English language. assignment of this course is helping me to improve my language. the lecture look at good and friendly.. | 2) my language. the lecture look at | Good | 2) and friendly. . | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course! help review the basics. | 1) | Good | 1) course! help review the basics. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | material was good but it doesn't tell you to pay for the course until you take the quiz | 1) material was | Good | 1) but it doesn't tell you to | 1.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The lectures were good and useful. Anyone who has confusion or doubts on the correct usage of punctuations should sign up for this course. | 1) The lectures were | Good | 1) and useful. Anyone who has confusion | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course! Helped me a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Helped me a lot! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This helped me remember and understand many grammar topics. It had a lot of very good information. | 1) It had a lot of very | Good | 1) information. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good course with some interesting resources. Most of the practice resources use Flash and one of the assignment submissions is inconsistent with the other submission formats. The content of the course itself is 4.5 stars. For me there is one element that I wish had an explanation or somewhere to ask about it. Instead I'll need to search the internet for an answer and hope what I find is correct! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course with some interesting resources. Most | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good learning | 1) very | Good | 1) learning | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good starter course if you are looking to review Grammar and Punctuation. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) starter course if you are looking | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very useful and straightforward course on the basics of grammar (but just the basics of Verb Tenses; was expecting more of it in terms of grammar topics - Passive voice, Conditionals, Reported speech etc.) It's basically a Punctuation 101 course which focuses heavily on proper sentence structure and syntax - got a great deal a good stuff out of it, though. Warmly recommend it to everyone who is not confident in his basic writing skills. | 1) - got a great deal a | Good | 1) stuff out of it, though. Warmly | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good preparation to the following courses. | 1) A | Good | 1) preparation to the following courses. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, easy to understand, and useful. | 1) | Good | 1) course, easy to understand, and useful. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course! Don't be leave the course if the pre-course test results suggest you may be too good for the course. The grammar part was a review for the most part, but the punctuation section taught me a good deal of the rules I didn't know. | 1) | Good | 1) course! Don't be leave the course | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course! Don't be leave the course if the pre-course test results suggest you may be too good for the course. The grammar part was a review for the most part, but the punctuation section taught me a good deal of the rules I didn't know. | 2) results suggest you may be too | Good | 2) for the course. The grammar part | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course! Don't be leave the course if the pre-course test results suggest you may be too good for the course. The grammar part was a review for the most part, but the punctuation section taught me a good deal of the rules I didn't know. | 3) the punctuation section taught me a | Good | 3) deal of the rules I didn't | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Since the beginning to the end, I enjoyed this course because I learn new things for me. It had good explanations, nice examples and many exercises. Thank you very much. | 1) new things for me. It had | Good | 1) explanations, nice examples and many exercises. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 2.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good material and simple, fluid explanation. Perfect for anyone who wants to keep his grammar and punctuation in check! | 1) | Good | 1) material and simple, fluid explanation. Perfect | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course; it was structured in a very simple and efficient way. Also, it made see this kind of things very easy! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course; it was structured in a | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Even though the course was pretty basic, there were many new things I learned, especially certain tips and tricks. The lessons are simple; the examples were good for understanding and to the point. The course-content, video and audio qualities are good. Links to extra materials are also provided towards the end of each week. I felt the assignments were too simple. They were reviewed by other students and not by the course organisers. Though peer-review is a good practice, comments from the teachers would be much appreciated. I would prefer more options for discussion on a topic, other than through the assignments alone. | 1) lessons are simple; the examples were | Good | 1) for understanding and to the point. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Even though the course was pretty basic, there were many new things I learned, especially certain tips and tricks. The lessons are simple; the examples were good for understanding and to the point. The course-content, video and audio qualities are good. Links to extra materials are also provided towards the end of each week. I felt the assignments were too simple. They were reviewed by other students and not by the course organisers. Though peer-review is a good practice, comments from the teachers would be much appreciated. I would prefer more options for discussion on a topic, other than through the assignments alone. | 2) course-content, video and audio qualities are | Good | 2) Links to extra materials are also | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Even though the course was pretty basic, there were many new things I learned, especially certain tips and tricks. The lessons are simple; the examples were good for understanding and to the point. The course-content, video and audio qualities are good. Links to extra materials are also provided towards the end of each week. I felt the assignments were too simple. They were reviewed by other students and not by the course organisers. Though peer-review is a good practice, comments from the teachers would be much appreciated. I would prefer more options for discussion on a topic, other than through the assignments alone. | 3) course organisers. Though peer-review is a | Good | 3) practice, comments from the teachers would | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | After completing this course,i have a good knowledge on the types of sentences.I have learnt a lot from this course.Thank You.. | 1) completing this course, i have a | Good | 1) knowledge on the types of sentences. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good course, In the last lesson miss more examples. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, In the last lesson miss | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good for a starter.Thank you professor. | 1) | Good | 1) for a starter. Thank you professor. | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I really enjoy practicing with this course. It contains clear explanations and a good variety of practice exercises. | 1) It contains clear explanations and a | Good | 1) variety of practice exercises. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good content | 1) very | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good interactive course. | 1) | Good | 1) interactive course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good ! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a good course to review grammar and punctuation. Well done and clear. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course to review grammar and punctuation. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Focused too much on commas. Could have incorporated other grammar elements as well. Nevertheless, a very good, easy-to-follow course. | 1) elements as well. Nevertheless, a very | Good | 1) easy-to-follow course. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good review of basic grammar rules and good opportunities to practice them to improve your writing. | 1) | Good | 1) review of basic grammar rules and | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good review of basic grammar rules and good opportunities to practice them to improve your writing. | 2) review of basic grammar rules and | Good | 2) opportunities to practice them to improve | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, although no proctor or supervision at all. No place to go for questions or help. Please be aware this is primarily designed for non-native english speakers. This was not clear to me when I joined. And although the content is thorough, it is dull and the assignments uninspiring. If you want to know more about grammar, good (be sure to bone up through, because she assumes a lot about what you might remember from high school and for those of us over 40 ... hmmm). If you want to feel inspired to write something of value and interest to yourself or others, not so good. Over all I would not recommend this course or series of courses. And would suggest seeking out a course that has some kind of proctor or supervisory help available. | 1) | Good | 1) course, although no proctor or supervision | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, although no proctor or supervision at all. No place to go for questions or help. Please be aware this is primarily designed for non-native english speakers. This was not clear to me when I joined. And although the content is thorough, it is dull and the assignments uninspiring. If you want to know more about grammar, good (be sure to bone up through, because she assumes a lot about what you might remember from high school and for those of us over 40 ... hmmm). If you want to feel inspired to write something of value and interest to yourself or others, not so good. Over all I would not recommend this course or series of courses. And would suggest seeking out a course that has some kind of proctor or supervisory help available. | 2) want to know more about grammar, | Good | 2) (be sure to bone up through, | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course, although no proctor or supervision at all. No place to go for questions or help. Please be aware this is primarily designed for non-native english speakers. This was not clear to me when I joined. And although the content is thorough, it is dull and the assignments uninspiring. If you want to know more about grammar, good (be sure to bone up through, because she assumes a lot about what you might remember from high school and for those of us over 40 ... hmmm). If you want to feel inspired to write something of value and interest to yourself or others, not so good. Over all I would not recommend this course or series of courses. And would suggest seeking out a course that has some kind of proctor or supervisory help available. | 3) to yourself or others, not so | Good | 3) Over all I would not recommend | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Many tips in this course are very good and important. I missed some of them before and this course help me pay attention to them and learn them clearly. I highly recommended to you and I won't take you much time. | 1) tips in this course are very | Good | 1) and important. I missed some of | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, very useful! | 1) Very | Good | 1) very useful! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | this really helped me out a ton i have improved my grammar.I am good at grammar after this course | 1) have improved my grammar. I am | Good | 1) at grammar after this course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, But I missed some more practical exercises on writing. For us, non-native english speakers sometimes it is very difficult to identify our mistakes. But the whole module is very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) But I missed some more practical | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, But I missed some more practical exercises on writing. For us, non-native english speakers sometimes it is very difficult to identify our mistakes. But the whole module is very good. | 2) But the whole module is very | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good to learn the differences between each kind of sentences, and how is the punctuation for each one. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to learn the differences between each | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good refresher | 1) | Good | 1) refresher | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I think this is a good review for someone who has the basic in English grammar; however, if you're an ESL student or English-speaking person (who need to start over in grammar). Study first before starting this course. A lot of the feedback in the forum, I found to be poor except when it came from an English-speaking person. You get a lot of: " OK, Great, etc..", no real feedback. | 1) I think this is a | Good | 1) review for someone who has the | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is good, but I think it will be even better if it covers more about the 16 tenses, more punctuation, and capitalization. Thanks! | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but I think it will be | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good course, and it has a good structure to push student forward to improve their writing skills. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, and it has a good | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good course, and it has a good structure to push student forward to improve their writing skills. | 2) good course, and it has a | Good | 2) structure to push student forward to | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good lesson, I learned more skills in the grammar and the punctuation. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) lesson, I learned more skills in | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good practice and recall course | 1) | Good | 1) practice and recall course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The first course is though easy but interesting. It is a good start for listeners like me who is learning English as a second language to master some detailed information or rather punctuation about English. | 1) easy but interesting. It is a | Good | 1) start for listeners like me who | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good grammar course | 1) Very | Good | 1) grammar course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is good. Even though I could not grasp all the ideas, I am happy to learn the importance of punctuation. | 1) It is | Good | 1) Even though I could not grasp | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Its really good and easy to understand. | 1) Its really | Good | 1) and easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. Short and sweet, it covers the essentials. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Short and sweet, it covers | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good opportunity for revision. | 1) A | Good | 1) opportunity for revision. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good in as introduction to your essay writing. All of course materials were understandable; morever, patiently, she explained how I can make my sentence variety well. | 1) Very | Good | 1) in as introduction to your essay | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is very good. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course, I learned a lot about Grammar and Punctuation. A very friendly teacher. It´s a fast way to improve our writing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learned a lot about | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I really like the course! It´s good to study new things and review another ones! | 1) I really like the course! It´s | Good | 1) to study new things and review | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course; short but condence in knowleged. Highly recommended for all who want to produce good English. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course; short but condence in knowleged. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course; short but condence in knowleged. Highly recommended for all who want to produce good English. | 2) for all who want to produce | Good | 2) English. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Course for examining some English Grammar closely The course breaks down some aspects of English grammar and punctuation very nicely and has relevant practice exercises. I wish the course covered a slightly wider variety of topics or went into slightly more depth of explanation. The title "grammar and punctuation" is misleading in that only a few topics are covered. However, I believe someone learning English or reviewing academic writing would definitely benefit from going through this course. I am a native speaker, and I certainly learned a few things. :) Thank you Professor, TA's and Coursera! | 1) | Good | 1) Course for examining some English Grammar | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The information was quite was good, but the practice and assignments were too easy. Thanks for providing full explanations and a set of in-video examples for every rule. | 1) The information was quite was | Good | 1) but the practice and assignments were | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is very enlightening and very good for improving language skills. | 1) course is very enlightening and very | Good | 1) for improving language skills. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a very good course. I have learned so much just from one day of work. The interactive, educational games are motivating. This course makes learning about grammar and punctuation fun. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. I have learned so much | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A great course with a good explanation of the material. | 1) A great course with a | Good | 1) explanation of the material. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is a good review of what I have learnt before, and it clears out some confusions. Quite useful. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) review of what I have learnt | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good introductory course to academic gramatic. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to academic gramatic. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good for review of some common parts of English grammar | 1) | Good | 1) for review of some common parts | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, it provides important information in a new and fresh way. Every new concept is together with examples which make easier to understand and keep in memory the concept. | 1) Very | Good | 1) it provides important information in a | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very clear information and good exercises to practice. | 1) Very clear information and | Good | 1) exercises to practice. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Interesting and helpful course with good practice. Thank you so much. | 1) Interesting and helpful course with | Good | 1) practice. Thank you so much. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is very good for people that their English needs some correction ,it makes you think correctly about writing and also helps you in structure of phrases and punctuation. I like the way that the course was done ,thanks to all of the team (University of California, Irvine) ,you are doing a great work. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for people that their English needs | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Really good !! I am loving this couse so much !! | 1) Really | Good | 1) ! ! I am loving this | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Everything you need to know about punctuation to contruct a good essay included in this course. | 1) know about punctuation to contruct a | Good | 1) essay included in this course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good enough for students who know a little about English writing, but it is a little too easy for international students who have already begun their study in America. | 1) | Good | 1) enough for students who know a | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It was a good course! | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | All in all, this course opened up an universe of expression options for me! Furthermore, I felt in love with semicolons! Great presentation, perfect pace, and good practice! | 1) semicolons! Great presentation, perfect pace, and | Good | 1) practice! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A solid course for those who require a refresher on certain grammar rules. But, in my opinion, the course should go deeper in the different parts of the English grammar. For example, what are gerunds or infinitives? Still a good course though! I really enjoyed the teacher, as well. | 1) are gerunds or infinitives? Still a | Good | 1) course though! I really enjoyed the | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Course! | 1) | Good | 1) Course! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a great course! Personally, it has been very helpful to build a good foundation in English writing. Even though I took similar classes back in school, this course is the most effective one by far. I feel more confident to continue taking advanced writing course; moreover, writing seems less stressful. | 1) been very helpful to build a | Good | 1) foundation in English writing. Even though | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I am always absent but, this course is good for me. | 1) always absent but, this course is | Good | 1) for me. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Generally, the course is very good and was really useful for me. I just expected that it covers the use of all punctuation marks. | 1) Generally, the course is very | Good | 1) and was really useful for me. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a good course for polishing skills; however, excludes usage of several other punctuations which are often confused. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for polishing skills; however, excludes | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a very good course for everyone who wants to better or refresh their grammar and punctuation for a writing ordeal. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course for everyone who wants to | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good one , some parts was even useful for what I was seeking for - IELTS General Writing Flash Practices and in-Video Questions was interesting too | 1) | Good | 1) one , some parts was even | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This lesson is good for my writing and reading! | 1) This lesson is | Good | 1) for my writing and reading! | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a very good course, specially for internalizing the basics! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course, specially for internalizing the basics! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is very good for basic learning, I practice much of my basics due to this course which I forget. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for basic learning, I practice much | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a really good start. | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) start. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Contents are interesting and useful, even if the course deals with few topics. I think it is too expensive! A good grammar book is cheaper and more complete. I would not enroll this course anymore. | 1) think it is too expensive! A | Good | 1) grammar book is cheaper and more | 2.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Really good course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good clear examination of basic punctuation and grammar. The lectures are well presented and the exercises useful. The element which really doesn't work is the peer assessment or review. This seems intended to replace forum discussions but it is not a good substitute (and there are no forums). | 1) A | Good | 1) clear examination of basic punctuation and | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good clear examination of basic punctuation and grammar. The lectures are well presented and the exercises useful. The element which really doesn't work is the peer assessment or review. This seems intended to replace forum discussions but it is not a good substitute (and there are no forums). | 2) discussions but it is not a | Good | 2) substitute (and there are no forums). | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Content and Clear explanation. | 1) | Good | 1) Content and Clear explanation. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is a very good attempt to assist in building correct sentences in English. I f | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) attempt to assist in building correct | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is really good quolity course; highly reccomended. | 1) It is really | Good | 1) quolity course; highly reccomended. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course. Very usefull and practical to remember the basics of grammar, punctuation, sentences and etc. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Very usefull and practical to | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good, good and good. | 1) | Good | 1) good and good. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good, good and good. | 2) Good, | Good | 2) and good. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good, good and good. | 3) Good, good and | Good | 3) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good one, if you are confused where to put your commas and to learn tenses. | 1) | Good | 1) one, if you are confused where | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good english course for starters | 1) | Good | 1) english course for starters | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good course to brush up on your grammar. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to brush up on your | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a very complete overview. It is very helpful for reviewing English grammar and punctuation. The additional resources are also very good. | 1) The additional resources are also very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course. It helped me revise and learn some correct grammar usage in short time. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It helped me revise and | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a good course. It gave me a better insight about nuances of English Grammar. I wish the team very best in their future endeavours. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course. It gave me a better | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good Class!!! | 1) | Good | 1) Class! ! ! | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It was good. I give four stars because it was easier than I expected. | 1) It was | Good | 1) I give four stars because it | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is absolutely awesome. My teacher has noticed an improvement in my punctuation. I have nothing but good things to say about this course. | 1) my punctuation. I have nothing but | Good | 1) things to say about this course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The videos are really boring, however the course is good. | 1) really boring, however the course is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Hello, The overall content or education on English grammar was good. It made me to correct lot of things which I used to find difficult or project it wrong. Thank you for educating me correctly. Appreciate your work. | 1) or education on English grammar was | Good | 1) It made me to correct lot | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | pretty good!!! | 1) pretty | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Pretty good course to improve your basic english writing skills. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course to improve your basic english | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course to review grammar and punctuation rules | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to review grammar and punctuation | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This is a good overview of the basics. I enjoyed the practice exercises and interaction with fellow "classmates". | 1) This is a | Good | 1) overview of the basics. I enjoyed | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good to improve your learning | 1) | Good | 1) to improve your learning | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good contents and practise question to help understand the knowledge and concept. | 1) | Good | 1) contents and practise question to help | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and very useful course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and very useful course. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good review on punctuation and tense. However, I think the course is a little too simple. I hope that the class could cover more grammar topics in depth. | 1) A very | Good | 1) review on punctuation and tense. However, | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good lesson for me! That's great! I understand about grammar and punctuation. I am improving my skill. Thank you teacher. | 1) | Good | 1) lesson for me! That's great! I | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I had a good time learning new things which are generally not told in your academics. Thanks to UCI for offering it. Best wishes. | 1) I had a | Good | 1) time learning new things which are | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good course to revise grammar and punctuation | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to revise grammar and punctuation | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very good review for grammar. The teachers speaks very clearly and makes sure to explain well. I would defiantly recommend | 1) A very | Good | 1) review for grammar. The teachers speaks | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Wonderful ! I can´t belive that such a good course like this is avaliable for free on internet globally! Thanks, Coursera ! Thanks, University of California! | 1) I can´t belive that such a | Good | 1) course like this is avaliable for | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course is excellent for people, as myself, that has good base of English language, but due to a poor daily practice in the writing area forgot about the grammar rules. | 1) for people, as myself, that has | Good | 1) base of English language, but due | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is very good. It helped me a lot to learn to understand English sentence structure and punctuation. I really loved the course because the teacher doesn't patronize too much and explains quickly and well. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) It helped me a lot to | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good for the basics. Good lesson format. Although, the group component was unnecessary. | 1) | Good | 1) for the basics. Good lesson format. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good for the basics. Good lesson format. Although, the group component was unnecessary. | 2) Good for the basics. | Good | 2) lesson format. Although, the group component | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course is a very good course. It is well structured, and it has a lot of extra tools(links) to practice more grammar. I really enjoyed this course, and I will advice it to anyone. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) course. It is well structured, and | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good course for starter. Lectures are good, but the quizzes are too easy. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for starter. Lectures are good, | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good course for starter. Lectures are good, but the quizzes are too easy. | 2) good course for starter. Lectures are | Good | 2) but the quizzes are too easy. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course and excellent refresher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and excellent refresher! | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Great course, a good review and a good first step in learning more about the English language. | 1) Great course, a | Good | 1) review and a good first step | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Great course, a good review and a good first step in learning more about the English language. | 2) course, a good review and a | Good | 2) first step in learning more about | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Well structured and good content. very helpful | 1) Well structured and | Good | 1) content. very helpful | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a really good course when you are trying to understand more of the grammar and improve your writing | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course when you are trying to | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good course to improve your English Proficiency. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to improve your English Proficiency. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | the course is easy to follow and the explanations are very good as well. | 1) follow and the explanations are very | Good | 1) as well. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course has a very good structure and has many useful practice options. | 1) This course has a very | Good | 1) structure and has many useful practice | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very useful, but you need to have a good base English grammar knowledge. Logically-built, well-organized course. liked it! | 1) but you need to have a | Good | 1) base English grammar knowledge. Logically-built, well-organized | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good content, but without a creative didatic. | 1) | Good | 1) content, but without a creative didatic. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Awesome course! I need practice all the topics viewed here. Really really nice! Good job Coursera and California University. | 1) topics viewed here. Really really nice! | Good | 1) job Coursera and California University. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | This course was very helpful to me to refresh some English grammar. In particular it's good to better understand punctuation and verb tenses. | 1) some English grammar. In particular it's | Good | 1) to better understand punctuation and verb | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good way to go back to the basics | 1) | Good | 1) way to go back to the | 3.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | The course makes you learn: a) when you have to use Simple Past or Present Perfect; b) punctuation c) how to write in clear way. There are problems with IT platform: video often stops suddenly and sometimes it is difficult to understand where you are arrived in the course. Besides, sometimes you don't immediately understand what you have to do for passing to next step of the course. To sum up, the teacher is good. IT staff could do better. | 1) To sum up, the teacher is | Good | 1) IT staff could do better. | 4.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a very good course for people who need a good revision of english grammar and punctuation. I learn things that i did not know previously. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course for people who need a | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It is a very good course for people who need a good revision of english grammar and punctuation. I learn things that i did not know previously. | 2) course for people who need a | Good | 2) revision of english grammar and punctuation. | 5.0 |
| CQk7JA46EeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good, simple, understandable course, for everyone who want to improve his English. | 1) Very | Good | 1) simple, understandable course, for everyone who | 4.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Really good one. Would be 5 stars if there was better support. | 1) Really | Good | 1) one. Would be 5 stars if | 4.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great glass! The assignments were well designed and a lot of effort was put in to making sure students could understand what they were supposed to do. I've found that good assignments are were most other courses are very lacking. Having good assignments is what really motivates me to finish a class, and it's what helps me verify I've actually learned something. | 1) supposed to do. I've found that | Good | 1) assignments are were most other courses | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Great glass! The assignments were well designed and a lot of effort was put in to making sure students could understand what they were supposed to do. I've found that good assignments are were most other courses are very lacking. Having good assignments is what really motivates me to finish a class, and it's what helps me verify I've actually learned something. | 2) other courses are very lacking. Having | Good | 2) assignments is what really motivates me | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good starting point but very slim on the 'why's and the hardware is quite unlike anything you'd find in real life. In addition, I feel they leave too much unsaid and rely on visual comprehension far too much. I had to use the book to figure out the last two weeks. Overall, I did learn the more practical sides of hardware that other textbooks failed to convey. If they would add a Status register and break 'branching' into a separate instruction then I'd be happy with the CPU. | 1) | Good | 1) starting point but very slim on | 4.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | A very good self-contained course which takes you from "knowing nothing" to "building your very own virtual computer". | 1) A very | Good | 1) self-contained course which takes you from | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course is fantastic. The teachers are both very good at explaining the concepts and the project assignments. The experience of building a computer from basic logic gates is enlightening and the course material is very good and straightforward. I also bought their book (The Elements of Computing Systems) which is also very good and I recommend. It's a very rewarding experience. We really learn how computers *work*. | 1) fantastic. The teachers are both very | Good | 1) at explaining the concepts and the | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course is fantastic. The teachers are both very good at explaining the concepts and the project assignments. The experience of building a computer from basic logic gates is enlightening and the course material is very good and straightforward. I also bought their book (The Elements of Computing Systems) which is also very good and I recommend. It's a very rewarding experience. We really learn how computers *work*. | 2) and the course material is very | Good | 2) and straightforward. I also bought their | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | The course is fantastic. The teachers are both very good at explaining the concepts and the project assignments. The experience of building a computer from basic logic gates is enlightening and the course material is very good and straightforward. I also bought their book (The Elements of Computing Systems) which is also very good and I recommend. It's a very rewarding experience. We really learn how computers *work*. | 3) Computing Systems) which is also very | Good | 3) and I recommend. It's a very | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | I read the book before, it was translated in Chinese. It's really a good book and in very good topic. | 1) translated in Chinese. It's really a | Good | 1) book and in very good topic. | 5.0 |
| ct7G8DVLEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | I read the book before, it was translated in Chinese. It's really a good book and in very good topic. | 2) a good book and in very | Good | 2) topic. | 5.0 |
| ct9K_oG4EeWyzwo1CAL63Q | Good course. Accounting course was the best | 1) | Good | 1) course. Accounting course was the best | 4.0 |
| ct9K_oG4EeWyzwo1CAL63Q | Good idea / intend, horrible execution. | 1) | Good | 1) idea / intend, horrible execution. | 2.0 |
| ct9K_oG4EeWyzwo1CAL63Q | Peer review at times leaves a lot to be desired, esp geography specific biases. I would request that my final capstone submission be reviewed by course staff. I got very low scores whereas I think I did a good job on it covering all required domains extensively. | 1) whereas I think I did a | Good | 1) job on it covering all required | 4.0 |
| CU9gIddfEeWO_AoFkZ30NQ | It was a good, brief session that provided basic information on presentations. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) brief session that provided basic information | 4.0 |
| CU9gIddfEeWO_AoFkZ30NQ | Its good since you can learn about how to speak clearly and confidently in front of many people. | 1) Its | Good | 1) since you can learn about how | 5.0 |
| CuQpLnQ9EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good and brilliant one | 1) | Good | 1) and brilliant one | 4.0 |
| CuQpLnQ9EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good tools and explanations, good audio. Thanks! | 1) | Good | 1) tools and explanations, good audio. Thanks! | 4.0 |
| CuQpLnQ9EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good tools and explanations, good audio. Thanks! | 2) Good tools and explanations, | Good | 2) audio. Thanks! | 4.0 |
| CuQpLnQ9EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Very good lessons. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons. | 5.0 |
| CVrclTu_EeW0tw4knrMo3Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| cyoJdqJ7EeWSJQrARhLW0Q | This is very good capstone project | 1) This is very | Good | 1) capstone project | 4.0 |
| cYz0Y3QxEeSdOyIAC1STUg | Good general overview. Only wish it was longer and could cover material in more detail. | 1) | Good | 1) general overview. Only wish it was | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | awesome experiance ,good explanations but it would be better if you provide more time to do exercises | 1) awesome experiance , | Good | 1) explanations but it would be better | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A great and fun way to learn fundamentals of programming and basics of HTML, CSS, and Java Script. Exercises were simple and very good to reinforce what was learned on each session, plus they included challenge exercises for those who need something a little less basic. | 1) Script. Exercises were simple and very | Good | 1) to reinforce what was learned on | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good presentation of subject matter. | 1) Very | Good | 1) presentation of subject matter. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is good for beginners!! | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for beginners! ! | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and well structured course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and well structured course. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | No so good | 1) No so | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The teacher is very good, material is also very careful and useful. | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) material is also very careful and | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I'm confused as to why there was so much emphasis on domain knowledge rather than a good, solid foundation of basic principles. I'm also failing to see how much of this is going to be applicable to future installments of this course. As a starter for a Java course I am worried. | 1) on domain knowledge rather than a | Good | 1) solid foundation of basic principles. I'm | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great videos, interesting content. Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly stated. There could have probably been more coding work involved, but it is definitely a good first course as an introduction to programming in general. | 1) Great videos, interesting content. Quizzes were | Good | 1) assignments were clearly stated. There could | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great videos, interesting content. Quizzes were good, assignments were clearly stated. There could have probably been more coding work involved, but it is definitely a good first course as an introduction to programming in general. | 2) involved, but it is definitely a | Good | 2) first course as an introduction to | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An excellent course that is so easy to follow and comprehend. It has everything that a beginner needs. Wonderful teachers and very good content. I really enjoyed this course. Thank you so much! | 1) beginner needs. Wonderful teachers and very | Good | 1) content. I really enjoyed this course. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it is a very good course. Just need some adjustments on week 3 and steganography extraction and duplication. | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) course. Just need some adjustments on | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I haven't finished the second lesson yet and I am in love with this course; it's simple and suitable for beginners indeed. I have know many concepts I never heard of lie SEO, UX, UI. Thank you and keep the good work | 1) UI. Thank you and keep the | Good | 1) work | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was excellent. The instructors were very good and the material was well presented. The JavaScript part was a bit tough - but in a good way. Absolute beginners may struggle with that part a bit. But once you complete the course, you will realize that you have learned a lot. | 1) was excellent. The instructors were very | Good | 1) and the material was well presented. | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was excellent. The instructors were very good and the material was well presented. The JavaScript part was a bit tough - but in a good way. Absolute beginners may struggle with that part a bit. But once you complete the course, you will realize that you have learned a lot. | 2) bit tough - but in a | Good | 2) way. Absolute beginners may struggle with | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Speaking of beginner level it is good until you are learning css in it . but as java script starts this course becomes a headache , not because javascript is difficult but they made it difficult . instead of going with basics they teach you to manipulate images . which is not every one's interest field . they should improve their javascript course . other than that it is ok . | 1) Speaking of beginner level it is | Good | 1) until you are learning css in | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course that teaches many interesting and surprising things. I admit I was unaware of this material. Completely unaware. Creating beautiful webpages (HTML, CSS), creating and modifying images with JavaScript, encrypting and decrypting images in other images !!! Ooooh !!! What an unexpected joy !!! I did not know someone can do such things all by himself. I'm really happy to have gone through this course. One thing. It takes time. I think that the time required that is given in the information about the course is unreal. Anyway I wholeheartedly suggest this course to anyone interested in science, computers, and is energetic enough to absorb this amazing stuff. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course that teaches many interesting and | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good course and great experience, thanks for teaching | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course and great experience, thanks for | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it is really good effort. i am actually learning | 1) it is really | Good | 1) effort. i am actually learning | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good teaching skills I do say | 1) very | Good | 1) teaching skills I do say | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | that's very good course i love it | 1) that's very | Good | 1) course i love it | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really poor course. Rather than starting from the basics, this course picks random information to work with. Week 1 was information anybody with a computer knows. Week 2 was really good. Week 3 and 4 were completely useless. Rather than starting from the basics they jump into picture manipulation and encoding. Don't take this class if you want to learn about coding. | 1) computer knows. Week 2 was really | Good | 1) Week 3 and 4 were completely | 1.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and excellent teachers. I have a lot from the coursera | 1) Very | Good | 1) and excellent teachers. I have a | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good beginning lessons for people who demonstrate an interest! The instructors are passionate and helpful. | 1) | Good | 1) beginning lessons for people who demonstrate | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is NOT a beginner's course. There is not enough coverage of fundamental programming concepts, and too much playing around with complex application concepts such as Steganography. Simple image manipulation is a good way to teach programming concepts. Teaching bit arithmetic in a first programming course is NOT. Also, there are many errors in the videos that should be corrected. And finally, this course is advertised as requiring 3-5 hours per week. What a huge underestimate! I have been programming professionally since 1989. Other than week 1, every week requires closer to 8-10 hours at least. Stop advertising this as a beginning course, or restructure it such that it is more appropriate for beginners. | 1) Steganography. Simple image manipulation is a | Good | 1) way to teach programming concepts. Teaching | 1.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a good course for beginners but for the more experienced web programmers this is like a good brain teaser only. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for beginners but for the | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a good course for beginners but for the more experienced web programmers this is like a good brain teaser only. | 2) web programmers this is like a | Good | 2) brain teaser only. | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The javascript section was very good and helped me develop my programming skills. I really like the seven step approach and using it work through the exercises. The HTML and CSS sections were not very useful though. | 1) The javascript section was very | Good | 1) and helped me develop my programming | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course but I dont like how you have to finish each module within a week it would be better if you could finish everything in fourweeks | 1) | Good | 1) course but I dont like how | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I will give it a 3* review as I really enjoyed and learned a lot in the HTML and CSS part (first 2 weeks), but the java script is really poorly covered. It is too hard and with no "translations" on what the hell is going on. The Duke University team is good and they obviously know what they are doing, but they need to review this course and make it more simpler... :) | 1) on. The Duke University team is | Good | 1) and they obviously know what they | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is very good for beginners in programming. It is informative and reveals practical aspects of programming. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for beginners in programming. It is | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is a good course, but I'm not sure it's simple enough for beginners - it doesn't teach you all the steps you need to know | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, but I'm not sure it's | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall but the content uses library and other content that make it hard to apply the technologies to the real world, an emphasis on orienting the content to 'from scratch development' would be duly appreciated I think. Nevertheless interesting and well presented over all. | 1) | Good | 1) overall but the content uses library | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | pretty good but very time consuming | 1) pretty | Good | 1) but very time consuming | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great class. All the professors are very good. Learning a lot of new things. | 1) class. All the professors are very | Good | 1) Learning a lot of new things. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. A little demanding for someone who cannot invest substantial time figuring out how to code some problems. | 1) | Good | 1) course. A little demanding for someone | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is a bit of a show. Maybe that's good for teenagers and Millennials, but not for me. | 1) bit of a show. Maybe that's | Good | 1) for teenagers and Millennials, but not | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for beginners, but some of the practical examples could have been done better. For example it would have been nice if the course had taught how to execute JS code directly from a webpage, with or without using CodePen. This is the only reason why it gets 4 stars instead of 5. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners, but some of | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good but I think the java script they jump into very advanced stuff if you have never code before. | 1) | Good | 1) but I think the java script | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. Sometimes too easy, but go to start. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Sometimes too easy, but go | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | HTML and CSS is good. JS search for another course. | 1) HTML and CSS is | Good | 1) JS search for another course. | 1.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good. As a beginner, I have learned a lot about html, css and javascript from this well-designed four-week class. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) As a beginner, I have learned | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was an amazing Course. High quality videos, good practice quiz and interesting assignments. also the idea of final mini-project is very good. Thanks all of you for preparing this course | 1) an amazing Course. High quality videos, | Good | 1) practice quiz and interesting assignments. also | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was an amazing Course. High quality videos, good practice quiz and interesting assignments. also the idea of final mini-project is very good. Thanks all of you for preparing this course | 2) idea of final mini-project is very | Good | 2) Thanks all of you for preparing | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introduction | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | As the title of this course states, it is about web and programming for beginners. While myself I wasn't absolute beginner in Web and HTML, only Javascript was a new topic for me, I used this course to check my knowledge and experience and "brush up" my skills. Teachers are friendly , videos are good, questionnaires check your understanding. Tasks are interesting enoug for people "to get a taste of things" and do some funny stuff. Thanks to Duke University team! | 1) Teachers are friendly , videos are | Good | 1) questionnaires check your understanding. Tasks are | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course was really good. I am web application developer myself and I learned some new things here. One of the most important things that I learned here was Steganography. It was a new concept for me and I'm glad I learnt it. The JavaScript part of this course I must say, was very poor. It wasn't designed for beginners like the course mentioned. You could have taught some basic JavaScript stuff instead of just focusing on image manipulation. Anyways, great effort teachers! Thank You for teaching us. | 1) The course was really | Good | 1) I am web application developer myself | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | HTML and CSS are good. Javascript is not adequately covered. | 1) HTML and CSS are | Good | 1) Javascript is not adequately covered. | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good introduction to programming in general and in relation to web apps. A lot of focus on just a few problems, mainly graphics manipulation but a good starting point I think. Looking forward to learning much more in future courses. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to programming in general and | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good introduction to programming in general and in relation to web apps. A lot of focus on just a few problems, mainly graphics manipulation but a good starting point I think. Looking forward to learning much more in future courses. | 2) problems, mainly graphics manipulation but a | Good | 2) starting point I think. Looking forward | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The content of CSS and HTML are really good in this course, but the details about the JavaScript Code are not sufficient, this let me hard to understand the JavaScript. | 1) of CSS and HTML are really | Good | 1) in this course, but the details | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is very helpful and engaging. If you are starting computing for the first time, this is a very good place to start. It makes the impossible, possible. In the end, you'll feel good about learning computing. I guruntee you. | 1) first time, this is a very | Good | 1) place to start. It makes the | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is very helpful and engaging. If you are starting computing for the first time, this is a very good place to start. It makes the impossible, possible. In the end, you'll feel good about learning computing. I guruntee you. | 2) possible. In the end, you'll feel | Good | 2) about learning computing. I guruntee you. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good, I like it! | 1) very | Good | 1) I like it! | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice course. Everything is explained. Good first step. | 1) Nice course. Everything is explained. | Good | 1) first step. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | thank u so mach for this course it was simple and pretty good for the first 2 weeks i really enjoyed it :) ; but the other two weeks though ... i had a hard time there , if you try to improve it , the js wasn't understandable at all or at least mention in the course info that js background needed !! | 1) course it was simple and pretty | Good | 1) for the first 2 weeks i | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good professors. course really helped a lot. thanku coursera | 1) very | Good | 1) professors. course really helped a lot. | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | 适合编程初学者，有经验的可能会有些无聊 It's good for the green hand. May be a little boring for the ad programmers | 1) 适合编程初学者，有经验的可能会有些无聊 It's | Good | 1) for the green hand. May be | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Job !! Deserves Compliment !!!!! Keep it up forever | 1) | Good | 1) Job ! ! Deserves Compliment ! | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course for getting started. JavaScript might be a bit confusing for new learners, but learning slowly and looking up stuff on the internet will surely help a lot (and I guess this was the intention of the course creators: to make learners look up stuff on the internet on themselves). | 1) | Good | 1) course for getting started. JavaScript might | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overall beginner course but definitely for the beginners. Only the last week may be interesting to people that already know a bit about HTML and CSS, as the JavaScript part at the end has some interesting assignments; like hiding an image in another image. | 1) | Good | 1) overall beginner course but definitely for | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good learning start to learn web development :) thanks | 1) | Good | 1) learning start to learn web development | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I drop at the beginning of the Javascript, before Javascript, everything is good, after Javascript, "What are they talking about"? | 1) the Javascript, before Javascript, everything is | Good | 1) after Javascript, " What are they | 1.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is the first course in the Courser's Java Programming specialization, however, it uses JavaScript to teach high level programming concepts. If you want to learn JavaScript, this course is not for you. If you want to learn Java, this course is not for you. The course mainly solves image manipulation problems with Duke's proprietary JavaScript IDE. All the details are "black boxed" so you can't see what's in the JavaScript functions. I believe this is the wrong way to teach newbies because too much abstraction is never good. Also, as a man, I was personally offended by Professor Susan Rodger saying she wanted to see more women in programming. More woman means less men and that is sexist. As a supporter of equal opportunity, Duke University should take disciplinary action against Professor Rodger. I will not financially support any University that allows it's faculty to express inappropriate personal ideology in a classroom setting. I do not recommend this course, or any course with Professor Susan Rodger. | 1) because too much abstraction is never | Good | 1) Also, as a man, I was | 2.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is divided into 4 weeks. The first two weeks are about CSS and HTML. I started this course as a beginner and was able to keep up with it for the first two weeks. Week three material isn't explained at all and for a beginner, it is very difficult. I wouldn't recommend this course to a beginner at all. What i did like about the course was that the material is organized but that doesnt help if you dont understand what is being taught. I dropped out of this course at week 3. Good Luck. | 1) of this course at week 3. | Good | 1) Luck. | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course for the beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for the beginners. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introduction to web programming! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to web programming! | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | its very good for beginners. | 1) its very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 3.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Week 4 was a big leap from week 3. Difficult with less time to complete the project. But course was good . I think course could be extended by adding 2 more weeks so that more practice sessions could be given to students. | 1) complete the project. But course was | Good | 1) . I think course could be | 4.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good for the beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for the beginners | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice course with level of difficulty increasing in a good pace. All of the tools used are easily available. Instructors clear on the message being passed to the class. | 1) level of difficulty increasing in a | Good | 1) pace. All of the tools used | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | a good course for beginning. | 1) a | Good | 1) course for beginning. | 5.0 |
| c_rkuRoBEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| D-kRGMhiEeSHHCIAC12q0A | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| D-kRGMhiEeSHHCIAC12q0A | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | I found the lectures and reading material very interesting. The professors were very good at explaining complex material and it served to tie together some loose ends regarding various religions that I had been struggling with. As a retiree, I was not interested in receiving a certificate so I didn't take the tests or do the peer reviews though. I was only interested in hearing the lectures. | 1) very interesting. The professors were very | Good | 1) at explaining complex material and it | 5.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | Covered a broad range of religious beliefs about the afterlife. Solid overview of Darwin and evolution as well as good videos e.g. Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris. The videos of actual classroom delivery with students provided a realism to the online experience. Both profs. were excellent teachers with the necessary skills to handle sensitive topics. The course could be improved by more clearly written assignments. The content of these assignments was appropriate but the word structure was too vague and in some cases disjointed. Excellent course. Well done Rutgers. | 1) Darwin and evolution as well as | Good | 1) videos e. g. Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris. | 4.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | It's format needs a good narrator not based on stupid commercials. | 1) It's format needs a | Good | 1) narrator not based on stupid commercials. | 1.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | I enjoyed the course. It gave a good historical look at the foundations of religion. I'm looking forward to Unit 2. | 1) enjoyed the course. It gave a | Good | 1) historical look at the foundations of | 4.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | Very good, thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) thanks | 5.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | A new course with new material. The course is in the beginning stages of evolution, just like the human psyche. Perhaps someone will refine it in time but it is a very good course, especially considering nothing quite like this has been presented before. | 1) time but it is a very | Good | 1) course, especially considering nothing quite like | 4.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | My first choice and completed course here, two additional courses on soul beliefs follow and I will certainly be doing those as well. I found the material (both lectures and reading references) very interesting and it connected to daily life and many conversations I find myself referencing things that are discussed here. Retired professor, Daniel Ogilvie, is the primary lecturer and he's very easy to listen to. He has a good personality and gets you thinking. Because of the nature of soul and afterlife beliefs is a personal topic (controversial as well) he and the other lecturers I found to be very passionate and thoughtful in their presentations. I especially enjoyed the writing assignments and learned not only from writing my own submissions but also doing peer reviews. This is truly a one of a kind course in that you would be hard pressed to find one book or class that is inclusive of many different sources of soul and afterlife beliefs covered collectively. His own writing is one of the reading references (as an overview) specifically because you won't find it all under one roof elsewhere. The course discusses mythology, philosophy, many religions as well as atheism, psychology and neuroscience... some might consider the religious segments taboo or unsettling. Hopefully if you are considering this course you are an open-minded individual. I chose this course to work on for the purpose of personal enrichment and it has sparked motivation for me to continue auditing courses after not having formally studied in over 20 years. It was a challenge but well worth it! | 1) to listen to. He has a | Good | 1) personality and gets you thinking. Because | 5.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | I enrolled in this course hoping to find a balanced perspective about historical foundations for religions and other philosophies. It did include a good amount of interesting material around different systems, but there were a couple of key things that made me lose interest in the course at around week 6 out of 11. First, I felt that the instructor talks about how he wants people to learn to think for themselves, yet I also felt that he himself preaches. Much of the evidence in his lectures is delivered as an anecdote, which might appeal to some (e.g. I could see that happening to me) and probably made the course more entertaining, but didn't do it for me. I felt that the Wade reading, in contrast, was balanced, cited other sources, and pulled in a variety of perspectives, but when I listened to the lectures, I felt that Professor Ogilvie had a tendency to state points and expect people to believe them. Second, on a related note -- this course was not shaped for the online medium. I understand that it's cheaper and easier for universities to just use recordings of live lectures, but that meant that the lectures contained quite a bit of anecdotal rambling (e.g. going off on a tangent on how you should never take charge of somebody else's soul). Another, smaller beef I have with the presentation of the course is that when he had students who were raised under different religions come up and speak their beliefs, it took a long time to demonstrate a fairly simple idea -- despite people ascribing to the same "label," the same religion, they can have in fact been taught very different things. In a live university class, having students speak can work because the evidence is being presented by "one of you" ("you" being the students), and has the added benefit of building community in the class. But in an online class, I didn't feel that kinship at all. I'll make a disclaimer that much of this review is about how I personally felt about the course, and about how it wasn't right for me. Some of what I didn't like, others may like. But overall, despite being initially interested in the topic and why people believe what they do, I didn't feel that the material was delivered in a way that captured my continued interest. | 1) other philosophies. It did include a | Good | 1) amount of interesting material around different | 2.0 |
| d086Bc9YEeSS_CIACzcAUg | I loved the beginning of the course and the information about Darwin. I may agree with Dawson, but I find him too darn smug. I once watched a documentary about intelligent design, Another scientist told him how lucky he was to have such fame, wealth, and good health, He asked him if he died and found a God,what would he think? Dawson's answer was and I'm not exactly quoting but he | 1) to have such fame, wealth, and | Good | 1) health, He asked him if he | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Quite a good course. I just wished a free programming language being used in place of Matlab. | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) course. I just wished a free | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | I think the teacher should speak more clearly, he has a strong accent, however, the materials and contents in this lessons are pretty good. | 1) contents in this lessons are pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Very good overview of theory, specific algorithms, and some practice of application in MATLAB. There's a lot of material to cover and the videos are longer, requiring self-pacing throughout the individual lectures. Some of the weeks are very challenging. Extracurricular study, practice and implementation helped in areas where I had yet to encounter supporting material and/or prerequisites. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of theory, specific algorithms, and | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Course lessons are good,informative and easy-to-follow. | 1) Course lessons are | Good | 1) informative and easy-to-follow. | 5.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | A good course, with a tremendous amount of information. I would suggest to split it up to (at least) two courses. Prof. Katsaggelos is very enthusiastic, the summaries in the beginning and in the end are useful. Maybe, it would be helpful for the students to summarize the necessary mathematical knowledge for this course, because this topic is really colorful in mathematical point of view. As a mathematician, I really enjoyed that, but an outsider may not feel the same. All in all, if somebody learns all of the topics, he/she will have a very strong basis in this topic. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, with a tremendous amount of | 5.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | The course has a good content. I wish there was an active participation by the mentors on the discussion forum. | 1) The course has a | Good | 1) content. I wish there was an | 3.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | This is one of the best introductory courses on image processing. The lectures are very good and cover a large variety of topics. The only thing that I didn't like about this course is that the homework problems do not cover all the content. The programming problems should be designed to be more challenging. | 1) image processing. The lectures are very | Good | 1) and cover a large variety of | 5.0 |
| d0bq5PkAEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | it's a good material and nice professor, but sometimes the material is rather theoretical. Some lessons are very heavy with details and very basic practice excercises. I was missing deeper excercises that cover more of the studied material | 1) it's a | Good | 1) material and nice professor, but sometimes | 4.0 |
| d1D5SCmGEeWEOhKP8F7imw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| d1D5SCmGEeWEOhKP8F7imw | The quality of the lectures is very good but the material of the course has some little deficiencies, at least compared to the previous courses of the specialization: -Some slides are not completed. Dr. Khurram Afridi completes these slides in the lecture, but there are not the slides with the final result. I had to take screen captures to save this final result. -Subtitles impede to watch correctly the video when explaining in the subtitles area. I had to switch off the subtitles to be able to watch the video correctly. -I missed the pdfs of the homework assignments. I like to work on them off line, so I had to enter into the assignments to be able to see them. -I also missed the questions alternated during the videos as in previous courses. For these reasons I only give 4 stars instead of 5. | 1) quality of the lectures is very | Good | 1) but the material of the course | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | Good job! Intersting and clear) | 1) | Good | 1) job! Intersting and clear) | 5.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | This course is an overview of String Quartet music. It provides some nice resources to get to know certain composers or quartets better. It helped guide me to some nice music. The instructors are knowledgeable and do a good job imparting some of their insight into the lectures. The level of detail is about right for my time and attention span. | 1) instructors are knowledgeable and do a | Good | 1) job imparting some of their insight | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | good and useful course | 1) | Good | 1) and useful course | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | This course proved to be a waste of time. There was nothing about the structure and forms of the strong quartet, just "here's a good one to listen to." Almost complete devoid of intellectual content. | 1) strong quartet, just " here's a | Good | 1) one to listen to. " Almost | 1.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | Very good and wide ranging performances. The insights were interesting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and wide ranging performances. The insights | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | A very good introduction to the wonderful world of string's quartet.Thanks a lot. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the wonderful world of | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | To dig deeper into music theory, it helps to explore specific genres one-by-one. So to create a sort of spider's web of knowledge in one's mind to which any future knowledge can adhere to. This is my 3rd music course from coursera, and 2nd from Curtis. I very much recommend these. To learn in one's own pace helps to concentrate to subjects at times when the mind is ready and the mood level is good. This makes learning an enjoyable experience. I was no fan of String Quartets before, but I truly am now. The chamber music with it's roots in class system of societies has always troubled me with it's wigs and powders and halls with exclusive acoustics. But after completing this course I can see, that this is all just a facade and the "chamber" might as well be my backyard in a sunny afternoon. There are tunes which are very pleasant to hear even when counterpoint is not yet "your thing". Thank you for this wonderful experience. | 1) ready and the mood level is | Good | 1) This makes learning an enjoyable experience. | 5.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | The course is very good and the instructors are very communicative! The extra material is also very good, you have the chance to listen to so many compositions, which is very important in order to understand the touch of quartets. Personally, I would like to have some more advanced lectures and to be provided with the music sheets of the great composers in order to analyse them and learn from them! If Curtis is planning to organise a more advanced course, I would definitely join! | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) and the instructors are very communicative! | 4.0 |
| d1WkxNf4EeSFEiIAC0CpYw | The course is very good and the instructors are very communicative! The extra material is also very good, you have the chance to listen to so many compositions, which is very important in order to understand the touch of quartets. Personally, I would like to have some more advanced lectures and to be provided with the music sheets of the great composers in order to analyse them and learn from them! If Curtis is planning to organise a more advanced course, I would definitely join! | 2) The extra material is also very | Good | 2) you have the chance to listen | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Good, detailed lessons | 1) | Good | 1) detailed lessons | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | I'm not done with this course but I do love it. It's very informative about animal behavior and welfare and what welfare means in a lot of countries and cultures. This is a really good course for anyone in the animal field of sorts. Whether you take this as a refresher course or if it's something new to you. It's still a very lovely class and I'm glad to have picked it up and learn a few new things. | 1) and cultures. This is a really | Good | 1) course for anyone in the animal | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Interesting topics, and some good information presented on a variety of issues for many animals and situations. However, presented info is often vague and generalized, some sections discuss very little scientific data to back up claims made, and course is generally not very rigorous or challenging. | 1) Interesting topics, and some | Good | 1) information presented on a variety of | 2.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Great course!! If you are interested in animal welfare particularly animal welfare in animals produced for food, this is a very good course with lots of resources. | 1) for food, this is a very | Good | 1) course with lots of resources. | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Well made course with very good talking teachers. The course felt alive. | 1) Well made course with very | Good | 1) talking teachers. The course felt alive. | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Loved this course. It has really sparked my interest in learning more and building my small store of knowledge further. Good content, interesting lecturers, varied strands within overall subject. This is my second course run by Edinburgh University and I will certainly be looking for more. | 1) my small store of knowledge further. | Good | 1) content, interesting lecturers, varied strands within | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Very good course with a lot of complementary material and good classes. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with a lot of complementary | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Very good course with a lot of complementary material and good classes. | 2) a lot of complementary material and | Good | 2) classes. | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Great instructors and good information. I would recommend this course for anyone who is interested in aspects of animal welfare across the board, but especially for someone who is considering getting their first pet. The concepts are explained well, and easy to understand. | 1) Great instructors and | Good | 1) information. I would recommend this course | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | good and enjoyable course but quite succinct | 1) | Good | 1) and enjoyable course but quite succinct | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | good to have a knowledge about the animal welfare and their needs | 1) | Good | 1) to have a knowledge about the | 4.0 |
| D5GKj_UHEeSBSSIAC7JSBQ | A good way to get your feet wet on the topic of animal behaviour and welfare! | 1) A | Good | 1) way to get your feet wet | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good indeed! | 1) Very | Good | 1) indeed! | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Great for new teachers as it gives them the fundamentals of langauge learning theory. Also very good memory refresher and knowledge connector for experience teachers as it is well summarized and integrated presentation of such theories . | 1) of langauge learning theory. Also very | Good | 1) memory refresher and knowledge connector for | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | very detailed and instructive, I'll definitely apply those methods into my own class!Thanks for your efforts to make such good course! | 1) for your efforts to make such | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Dr. Shane's presentation about the ESL history is so interesting. I think this course not only tells us about how to be a good teacher, but also acts as a model of presenting an excellent course. | 1) us about how to be a | Good | 1) teacher, but also acts as a | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Creative presentation and good overview of the material. Not very challenging. | 1) Creative presentation and | Good | 1) overview of the material. Not very | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really good course. Everything really good summarized, explained and.... funny! that may be the best point to learn faster. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Everything really good summarized, explained | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really good course. Everything really good summarized, explained and.... funny! that may be the best point to learn faster. | 2) Really good course. Everything really | Good | 2) summarized, explained and. . . . | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Love this study about different language learning approach! I learned a lot about ESL/EFL history. Teacher is so funny. He'll be a good actor if he no longer want to work as a teacher^^ | 1) is so funny. He'll be a | Good | 1) actor if he no longer want | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The high level of the content and the teachers able to inspire, are maybe the best reason to do this course. I never saw so good teachers as they have here and the ability to teach and give valuable information to the learners as done here. In another situation, this course should cost a lot of money. Thanks to professors Shane Dixon, Jessica Cinco and Justin. More than teach, you are able to inspire! | 1) this course. I never saw so | Good | 1) teachers as they have here and | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | i found it entertaining and informative. It leaves room for discussion but has given me a non ESL teacher an interesting insight into the theories of Language Acquisition. I am interested in the way one Teaching Discipline takes knowledge from another, repacks it and sells it under their School of Teaching in almost the same way the despicable H.R. industry relaunches every few years. In summary a good section of the course well presented but i hate "Tests or Exams" :-( | 1) every few years. In summary a | Good | 1) section of the course well presented | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good course, great teachers, nice methodology... I reccomend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, great teachers, nice methodology. . | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good overview of the last 150 years of language teaching philosophy. The back-in-time and angel-and-devil skits were a little cheesy sometimes, but they helped to keep things interesting. More detail on some of the information presented would be nice, but it seems to be aimed at inexperienced teachers or people with native languages other than English, and so the level is kept fairly low. Overall, a good introduction to the subject and enough information provided to launch into your own independent study of some of the concepts introduced. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the last 150 years | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good overview of the last 150 years of language teaching philosophy. The back-in-time and angel-and-devil skits were a little cheesy sometimes, but they helped to keep things interesting. More detail on some of the information presented would be nice, but it seems to be aimed at inexperienced teachers or people with native languages other than English, and so the level is kept fairly low. Overall, a good introduction to the subject and enough information provided to launch into your own independent study of some of the concepts introduced. | 2) is kept fairly low. Overall, a | Good | 2) introduction to the subject and enough | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good course that can help to find out or identify your own teaching method or philosophy | 1) Very | Good | 1) course that can help to find | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good and useful course!!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good until now. Thank you | 1) | Good | 1) until now. Thank you | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really good organized | 1) Really | Good | 1) organized | 3.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Excellent Course! It taught me that I can take good things from the "bad" methodologies from the past. | 1) taught me that I can take | Good | 1) things from the " bad" methodologies | 4.0 |
| d64E7li7EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | It would really been helpful if you provided some readings for each approach. I could do outside readings but as you know you can find lots of readings which might be not useful for a beginner. The final test was not close by to being easy even though I did study. Thank you for that and that's a good job giving us a challenge to look forward to. | 1) you for that and that's a | Good | 1) job giving us a challenge to | 4.0 |
| DAJLDyr8EeWGvAojQA48rw | It's a very good course. Even it's a general view is very clear. The practioners point of view, put it at the end of some lessons are a very good idea and help to close the hole lesson. 10 points and go for more courses! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course. Even it's a general view | 5.0 |
| DAJLDyr8EeWGvAojQA48rw | It's a very good course. Even it's a general view is very clear. The practioners point of view, put it at the end of some lessons are a very good idea and help to close the hole lesson. 10 points and go for more courses! | 2) of some lessons are a very | Good | 2) idea and help to close the | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good examples -- good basic instruction in videos, but most of the value is in working the exercises which use some fairly interesting real world scenarios. And some of the direction is as vague as specs you might encounter as well. | 1) | Good | 1) examples -- good basic instruction in | 4.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good examples -- good basic instruction in videos, but most of the value is in working the exercises which use some fairly interesting real world scenarios. And some of the direction is as vague as specs you might encounter as well. | 2) Good examples -- | Good | 2) basic instruction in videos, but most | 4.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good problems to solve: creative, challenging & interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) problems to solve: creative, challenging & | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Like all the modules of this Java specialization, the teachers are very good and the course reaches the objective of teaching the fundamentals of software design with an excellent didactic. | 1) Java specialization, the teachers are very | Good | 1) and the course reaches the objective | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course! The programming exercises are will planned to reinforce the concepts learnt in the video lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) course! The programming exercises are will | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Not as challenging as the previous courses but still a very good course to continue learning Java. Thank you!. | 1) previous courses but still a very | Good | 1) course to continue learning Java. Thank | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good Course, but in my perspective the teachers could explain better. | 1) | Good | 1) Course, but in my perspective the | 3.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This class probably isn't as good as the previous two--but those had such high quality, they're hard to compete with. Overall, I continued to become a bit more comfortable with java and learned some things that might help me with my data science potential in the future! | 1) This class probably isn't as | Good | 1) as the previous two--but those had | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | pretty good, week 3 was challenging for me and the concepts of interface and so on. but in my opinion it should be this way for the learner to have problems and try solving them. Discussions were always helpful and am looking forward to the object oriented programming from San Diego university | 1) pretty | Good | 1) week 3 was challenging for me | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course. I hope there can be automated grader or feedbacks on codes or hints on quizzes to make the programming assignments more manageable. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I hope there can be | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course, it is brief but very interesting and practical. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it is brief but very | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good course, and the projects are fun!!! good choice | 1) very | Good | 1) course, and the projects are fun! | 5.0 |
| dB1qehnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good course, and the projects are fun!!! good choice | 2) the projects are fun! ! ! | Good | 2) choice | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Overall it's good, especially helpful for a novice like me. However, I did overcome some learning barriers in this class: PPTs are too theoretical, eg. there are quite a few PPTs full of words, and PPTs like that would easily drive me distracted and sleepy. Hopefully it'll be better^ ^ | 1) Overall it's | Good | 1) especially helpful for a novice like | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The Course was well structured and it gave a good introduction to Interaction Design. The videos were short and informative. The Assignments were exciting to do. | 1) well structured and it gave a | Good | 1) introduction to Interaction Design. The videos | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The lectures were great. While some people complained that "the instructor is reading off something else" that never seemed to be a problem. Mr. Klemmer did a good job of making the lectures friendly and understandable. The best part of the course was the assignments. I loved how I actually had to go to people and interview them, draw storyboards of ideas I have and heuristically evaluate sites. The assignments made sure I was actually engaged in doing them. One thing I would suggest is to try different motifs for different sessions. It seems that students always work with a "transportation problem" in this course. That can be mixed up from time to time I think to give the students a more diversified experience of Human Centered Design. | 1) a problem. Mr. Klemmer did a | Good | 1) job of making the lectures friendly | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Pretty good course on User Centered Interface Design. Rich, clear and very well documented | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course on User Centered Interface Design. | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very good for beginners | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good intro to the concepts of design. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the concepts of design. | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | This course was a very good introduction of HCI, videos were very clear and the heuristical theme had plenty of examples which make really easy to understand them. I would have appreciated more assignments, since there were so many topics there was many themes that could not be learned in a deeper way. | 1) This course was a very | Good | 1) introduction of HCI, videos were very | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | excellent instructor...very good tone, pace, and examples/illustrations. | 1) excellent instructor. . . very | Good | 1) tone, pace, and examples/illustrations. | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very good intro to the course, but the assignments could have been a little more specific. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to the course, but the | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | One of the best courses I have attended. Value for money. A special thanks to the instructor who did a pretty good job in explaining things in a simple yet efficient way. | 1) the instructor who did a pretty | Good | 1) job in explaining things in a | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I learned so much in this course!. The professor is really good and explains the concepts with practical examples. I really enjoyed this course and I am motivated to keep moving forward. | 1) course! . The professor is really | Good | 1) and explains the concepts with practical | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very good course, well elaborated and useful resources. Congrats! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, well elaborated and useful resources. | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good class, except for quizzes were complicated at times. User input instructions was not clear. | 1) | Good | 1) class, except for quizzes were complicated | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good information and assignment design, but please just have someone on your team go through this. I could list the issues with your lectures, but they're so easy to detect by anyone who is watching them actively. It makes me think that QC isn't a part of your workflow, and worry about the quality of future courses in this specialization. | 1) | Good | 1) information and assignment design, but please | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good lessons, interesting content. But media is a bit old fashioned, I missed more interactive activities and more modern videos. | 1) | Good | 1) lessons, interesting content. But media is | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good intro - I'm learning a lot. But in the end I feel that this specialization is not focused enough on developing portfolio pieces. One portfolio piece at the end of an 8-month course does not seem adequate to me. So I wish we focused more on developing high fidelity work - in addition to the need-finding, user research, sketches, short weekly assignments. This high fidelity, digital work could even be optional, but I need some guidance on what work to develop and how the overall process should look. Or even being allowed to enroll in the capstone before completing the first 7 sections would be helpful. | 1) | Good | 1) intro - I'm learning a lot. | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | good intro course to HCI | 1) | Good | 1) intro course to HCI | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Its good start of for this course. | 1) Its | Good | 1) start of for this course. | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Really good content. | 1) Really | Good | 1) content. | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The course is really good. It helps in understanding what HCI deals with, specially to a person who has very little background in this area. The assignments are really fun. The only issue is in the quiz evaluations, specially where there are multiple answers. Its a bug that can be resolved. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) It helps in understanding what HCI | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good material maybe you can do more examples | 1) | Good | 1) material maybe you can do more | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Great introduction for beginners and a good refresher for those who have been in the industry for a while. I appreciated the different user testing techniques that can be implemented. | 1) Great introduction for beginners and a | Good | 1) refresher for those who have been | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The course has a good level. The course mates helps to get new ideas. For non anglo speakers students the course is a hard challenge. The lessons has translations but a lot of ideas, concepts, the immaterial things... is hard to follow some explanations. My English has improve throught course. If you work you needs the weekend to end the assignments. I think is a good course with good materials. I recommend it | 1) The course has a | Good | 1) level. The course mates helps to | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The course has a good level. The course mates helps to get new ideas. For non anglo speakers students the course is a hard challenge. The lessons has translations but a lot of ideas, concepts, the immaterial things... is hard to follow some explanations. My English has improve throught course. If you work you needs the weekend to end the assignments. I think is a good course with good materials. I recommend it | 2) the assignments. I think is a | Good | 2) course with good materials. I recommend | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The course has a good level. The course mates helps to get new ideas. For non anglo speakers students the course is a hard challenge. The lessons has translations but a lot of ideas, concepts, the immaterial things... is hard to follow some explanations. My English has improve throught course. If you work you needs the weekend to end the assignments. I think is a good course with good materials. I recommend it | 3) think is a good course with | Good | 3) materials. I recommend it | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very good info, fun assignments just be sure to stay up to date week after week, the information, fresh, is a real help. Thanks alot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) info, fun assignments just be sure | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Great introduction, good videos and great use of peer review. Also discovered some very useful books to add even more background to my knowledge base. | 1) Great introduction, | Good | 1) videos and great use of peer | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The videos are slow and unengaging and way too much text on each slide. A few of the assignments have been weird, not so good brief and hard to find out how to do it correct and well. | 1) assignments have been weird, not so | Good | 1) brief and hard to find out | 2.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I think the course covers pretty good range of topics and gives you a good information. I really liked the peer review assignments and I think they put pressure on you to achieve the goals and learn from them. I definitely did not like the multiple answer questions or the last assessment. The questions are not well presented and there is a clear violation of the help and error recovery heuristic for me. I also did not like the video set-up. The quality of the course material is really poor and disappointing. I would like to believe that on a UI course people would have come up with a better and more intuitive set-up. Finally, I would like to have a document in the course resources that students can download and keep that contains all the information we taught like quick reference guide. Again we can download the videos but when you are looking to fins something specific searching in 2-3 videos is not fun at all. | 1) I think the course covers pretty | Good | 1) range of topics and gives you | 2.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I think the course covers pretty good range of topics and gives you a good information. I really liked the peer review assignments and I think they put pressure on you to achieve the goals and learn from them. I definitely did not like the multiple answer questions or the last assessment. The questions are not well presented and there is a clear violation of the help and error recovery heuristic for me. I also did not like the video set-up. The quality of the course material is really poor and disappointing. I would like to believe that on a UI course people would have come up with a better and more intuitive set-up. Finally, I would like to have a document in the course resources that students can download and keep that contains all the information we taught like quick reference guide. Again we can download the videos but when you are looking to fins something specific searching in 2-3 videos is not fun at all. | 2) of topics and gives you a | Good | 2) information. I really liked the peer | 2.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Overall good; some of the projects were a tad light, and there were some bugs I'd like to see fixed, but good. | 1) I'd like to see fixed, but | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Good overall introduction to many areas of Interaction Design that are part of the specialization. I had to work harder in this course than for most other MOOC courses. | 1) | Good | 1) overall introduction to many areas of | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | A very good introduction to the main themes any interaction designer has to know. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the main themes any | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | The content of this course is good but the production quality of the videos are not vary high. | 1) The content of this course is | Good | 1) but the production quality of the | 3.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | It's good! | 1) It's | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | not a good course | 1) not a | Good | 1) course | 1.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | it was a very good course with good peer reviews and assignments. it kept me glued to the course in its entire 6 week timeframe. | 1) it was a very | Good | 1) course with good peer reviews and | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | it was a very good course with good peer reviews and assignments. it kept me glued to the course in its entire 6 week timeframe. | 2) was a very good course with | Good | 2) peer reviews and assignments. it kept | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | This was a pretty good course. Assignment 1, especially, was very useful (conducting a need-finding interview). The storyboarding assignment was good, too. The assignments weren't always very clearly written, and I could tell from my peer-grading experience that some of the students had trouble understanding what was asked, especially the non-native English speakers. | 1) This was a pretty | Good | 1) course. Assignment 1, especially, was very | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | This was a pretty good course. Assignment 1, especially, was very useful (conducting a need-finding interview). The storyboarding assignment was good, too. The assignments weren't always very clearly written, and I could tell from my peer-grading experience that some of the students had trouble understanding what was asked, especially the non-native English speakers. | 2) need-finding interview). The storyboarding assignment was | Good | 2) too. The assignments weren't always very | 4.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | Really good introduction to the Humain centered design. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to the Humain centered design. | 5.0 |
| DDBg7AlXEeWTSSIAC0MDtg | I THINK THAT IS COURSE IS VERY GOOD. ONLY MUCH REQUERIMENTS FOR SEND WORK.HOW CHECK KEYBOARD AND SEND PHOTO WITH CAMERA IN THE MOMENT.WHEN THE CAMERA NOT WORK FOR DRIVERS USB AND ITS COULD SEND FILE PHOTO. | 1) THINK THAT IS COURSE IS VERY | Good | 1) ONLY MUCH REQUERIMENTS FOR SEND WORK. | 4.0 |
| DGwMEm01EeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good Stuff | 1) | Good | 1) Stuff | 5.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I don't see how the assignments would make me a more creative person. Some of the content was new and interesting but overall I din't think it was a good use of my time. | 1) I din't think it was a | Good | 1) use of my time. | 1.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | There is some good content on creativity in this course, thoug it barely addresses problem solving. "Do something different" assingments were an interesting idea. Some content material is missing, including the link to a text that is needed to answer a quizz which will influence your final grade. Grading standards are weird: maximum grades are to be given to assignments performed in public, as if things done in private aren't creative; there are better ways to have someone get out of their comfort zone. Assingments request that you be photographed or filmed, and there is no disclaimer that your photos or your privacy will be protected. If you are an introvert or simply a person who values privacy, this is not the course for you. | 1) There is some | Good | 1) content on creativity in this course, | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This is good experience for me. | 1) This is | Good | 1) experience for me. | 5.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Presentation is a little dull, bit the content is really good! | 1) dull, bit the content is really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| dh3wTQZNEeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Very good! Nice insghts about cretivity in a pratical way. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Nice insghts about cretivity in a | 5.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | This was a good introduction that bought in some new and previously visited concepts. I did find the course a little 'bitty' compared to other courses I have completed through Coursera, and the assignments were not very clearly structured. That said I would recommend it to anyone looking for a solid introduction to this area. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction that bought in some new | 3.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | The introduction was good enough to get me to enroll for the whole specialisation. Which takes some doing! | 1) The introduction was | Good | 1) enough to get me to enroll | 5.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | The content in this course is a very good introduction to educational theory and practice. There is just one aspect I philosophically disagree with, yet this is a pivotal point in education. The course assumes that Education is a way to change behaviour (as an external factor) Yet I am more inclined to the philosophy of: Education is to lift man up from the animal state; and by this uplift man will change his own relationship with the world (internal factor). The theory and practice given in this course are still valuable though, regardless of this difference in viewpoint. | 1) in this course is a very | Good | 1) introduction to educational theory and practice. | 4.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | This was really disappointing. There is almost no connection between the experience of the lectures (and that's all the videos are - lectures that track a PowerPoint presentation) and the assignments, quizzes, etc. Reference and source materials are frequently mentioned in passing, but there is no comprehensive list of works cited anywhere. The assignments are often vaguely described and, in more than one case, were described entirely differently in different places. I have nothing good to say about this experience. You're watching a fundamentally disconnected series of mostly ad-hoc discussions of vague concepts. A simple list of books to read would be much more valuable. This is by far the worst MOOC I've taken, from any source, in any discipline. The fact that it actually costs money simply adds to the pain. | 1) in different places. I have nothing | Good | 1) to say about this experience. You're | 1.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | It´s very focus on primary teaching which is good, but maybe there is a bit too much of theory, I was expecting a bit more of practical resources about how to face a classroom. Good course anyway! | 1) focus on primary teaching which is | Good | 1) but maybe there is a bit | 3.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | It´s very focus on primary teaching which is good, but maybe there is a bit too much of theory, I was expecting a bit more of practical resources about how to face a classroom. Good course anyway! | 2) about how to face a classroom. | Good | 2) course anyway! | 3.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | Good info but kind of dry | 1) | Good | 1) info but kind of dry | 2.0 |
| DmetrPp5EeScaiIAC9WIJw | Its good | 1) Its | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | It was really good on content part. I really like the course material. It is going to help me in my current organization project development work. At the same time i want to explore other available courses on cyber security. | 1) It was really | Good | 1) on content part. I really like | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | This course have very little to do with actual security. Most of the time you will hear about how to design applications, and what is a good design policy. | 1) design applications, and what is a | Good | 1) design policy. | 1.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Good explanations and detailed. Interesant concepts, developed in a comfortable way. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations and detailed. Interesant concepts, developed | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | An excellent Course on Usable Security & Privacy. Lectures by Jen Goldbeck are practical, peppered with good anecdotes that makes the course interesting. Many concepts that are taught are immediately implementable not just theory. Full Five stars to the course. Thank you Professor. Best Dr Jagan Vaman PhD CISA CGEIT C|CISO | 1) Jen Goldbeck are practical, peppered with | Good | 1) anecdotes that makes the course interesting. | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Good interesting course. Good lecturer. But course shoud covet more information because it's a little bit easy. | 1) | Good | 1) interesting course. Good lecturer. But course | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Good interesting course. Good lecturer. But course shoud covet more information because it's a little bit easy. | 2) Good interesting course. | Good | 2) lecturer. But course shoud covet more | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | This is a basic overview of security issues and user input for web sites, etc. It focuses on design, usability and other issues that affect how people interact with security log-in and other issues. It's a good foundation for looking at your or other's work and knowing the best way for the computer to interact with a user. | 1) log-in and other issues. It's a | Good | 1) foundation for looking at your or | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Interesting topics and some very good case studies. But overall I found the course a little repetitive and lacking technical depth. | 1) Interesting topics and some very | Good | 1) case studies. But overall I found | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Good introduction to the general security of UX design and experience. Remember this is just the start. Not too technical or difficult, quite easy to be honest. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the general security of | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | very good !! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Good course, clear materials! Please more videos! | 1) | Good | 1) course, clear materials! Please more videos! | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | A really good course in usable security. A little more of assignments would have been better | 1) A really | Good | 1) course in usable security. A little | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Very good need more good content like this. | 1) Very | Good | 1) need more good content like this. | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | Very good need more good content like this. | 2) Very good need more | Good | 2) content like this. | 5.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | iTS Okay. a few things seem a bit hokey. the interviews etc. But overall, not too bad. Good learning points. But will I pay for this. NO. Mainly b/c its hard to translate it in to a tangible value. No employer will say, OH, you took this class. Let me give you a job or promotion or more money... | 1) etc. But overall, not too bad. | Good | 1) learning points. But will I pay | 4.0 |
| dPkbnh6zEeWP0w4yK2369w | This is a course for students with little or no work experience. I've been in the industry for twenty years and found some good information, but the quizes aren't designed for experienced adult learners. Not being able to discuss with the professor why an answer is incorrect or even knowing exactly what about an answer makes it incorrect further distances the students from learning. Given that one essentially spends an extra work day each week on the course, I expected more value for my precious time. This week I decided the value isn't there. I might recommend the course for undergrad students but not for working adults. | 1) for twenty years and found some | Good | 1) information, but the quizes aren't designed | 1.0 |
| DPSL2G03EeWyAQ6K5KeLkw | interesting and with a good balance between theory and practice. A bibliography at the end of the course could be useful | 1) interesting and with a | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. A | 4.0 |
| dQ2zhQ_-EeWkZg42h4yEYQ | Very good structured | 1) Very | Good | 1) structured | 4.0 |
| dScDad8bEeWNrAqe1RXmgw | Good course for me but area need to be improved is the course navigation. | 1) | Good | 1) course for me but area need | 4.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course, interesting content. | 1) | Good | 1) course, interesting content. | 5.0 |
| DUIbAwrmEeWhsgqB1eduww | It's really really good this course, I've learned a lot of things and overall to key points to move forward negotiations in a properly way | 1) It's really really | Good | 1) this course, I've learned a lot | 5.0 |
| Dv10gNfIEeSALyIAC9SBuw | Very good teaching, very didactic! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching, very didactic! | 5.0 |
| Dv10gNfIEeSALyIAC9SBuw | Very good, with information clear to learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) with information clear to learn. | 5.0 |
| Dv10gNfIEeSALyIAC9SBuw | It's a very good couse. The professor Siedel is very good. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) couse. The professor Siedel is very | 5.0 |
| Dv10gNfIEeSALyIAC9SBuw | It's a very good couse. The professor Siedel is very good. | 2) couse. The professor Siedel is very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| Dvgs4iAXEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Good intro course, but that's all it is - an intro course. Expect great interviews and lecture videos, but don't expect too in-depth of a course. My review is biased because I already took Music Business Foundations from Berklee on Coursera and the material w | 1) | Good | 1) intro course, but that's all it | 3.0 |
| Dvgs4iAXEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Great course. It gives very good basics of what you need to know if you want to make a career in the music business. I loved all the interviews with industry insiders - they sort of allow you to see the big picture from different angles. All the recommended reading was also pretty useful. | 1) Great course. It gives very | Good | 1) basics of what you need to | 5.0 |
| Dvgs4iAXEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Interesting. Good for beginners but some info is a little bit out of date. Overall, good course. | 1) Interesting. | Good | 1) for beginners but some info is | 4.0 |
| Dvgs4iAXEeWKeQ6ae81EbQ | Interesting. Good for beginners but some info is a little bit out of date. Overall, good course. | 2) little bit out of date. Overall, | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A very good course!! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | great intro to the rest of the course content. Course material and external resources were relevant and gave good insight into SPM at a high level. | 1) external resources were relevant and gave | Good | 1) insight into SPM at a high | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good introduction to software product management! I definitely recommend it. :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to software product management! I | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Gives a good overview of Software Product Management. | 1) Gives a | Good | 1) overview of Software Product Management. | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This is good course for knowing the basics of Product Management. Have to follow through the other courses for complete knowledge about the Software Product Management. | 1) This is | Good | 1) course for knowing the basics of | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introductory course. It gives a quick overview of the whole specialization and some basic concepts. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. It gives a quick | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Provides a very good overview of Product Management and Process Management and the role of Product Manager. However, this is high level and introductory overview. | 1) Provides a very | Good | 1) overview of Product Management and Process | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A little too basic, and a little too talky. But a good foundation, and well presented at its level. | 1) a little too talky. But a | Good | 1) foundation, and well presented at its | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Being a beginner, this is a good introductory course for Software Product Management. | 1) Being a beginner, this is a | Good | 1) introductory course for Software Product Management. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introduction to Agile Software and Software Product Managment. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Agile Software and Software | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Definitely a brief overview of the rest of the specialization, but definitely gives some good groundwork for what to expect. This is NOT a standalone course | 1) the specialization, but definitely gives some | Good | 1) groundwork for what to expect. This | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Nice introduction, although I don't see any reason to call this "a course", if it's less than 2 hours total (at least it felt that way) while we have to listen to an intro every 5 minutes of it. Would've rated it 2 stars based on the content, but the level of presentation was really good and I appreciate the effort. | 1) the level of presentation was really | Good | 1) and I appreciate the effort. | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good course ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good Course for understanding the basics of product management, and discovering what it entails. | 1) | Good | 1) Course for understanding the basics of | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good overview | 1) | Good | 1) overview | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good introduction. I knew about all the stuff from the course from my previous work but it was too fragmented and lacked a lot of additional info. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. I knew about all the | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This course gave me good introduction to software management. The lectures were clear and simple and quizzes were on point. | 1) This course gave me | Good | 1) introduction to software management. The lectures | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Really great introduction course, which give you good basic understanding of software product management. My recommendations! | 1) great introduction course, which give you | Good | 1) basic understanding of software product management. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A good introduction to a very broad theme | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to a very broad theme | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excelent!! good job thanks for you time and knowledge. | 1) Excelent! ! | Good | 1) job thanks for you time and | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introduction to agile. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to agile. | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Really a good start/introduction to software product management course. The professors are really good | 1) Really a | Good | 1) start/introduction to software product management course. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Really a good start/introduction to software product management course. The professors are really good | 2) management course. The professors are really | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | It's a very good course, good start for the specialization. Curso muito bom, ótimo ponto de partida pra especialização. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course, good start for the specialization. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | It's a very good course, good start for the specialization. Curso muito bom, ótimo ponto de partida pra especialização. | 2) It's a very good course, | Good | 2) start for the specialization. Curso muito | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This is very good course to introduce the basic idea what the software product manager should be. Even as an experienced PM, I learned a lot from this course. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course to introduce the basic idea | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A good introductory course for those trying to get an introduction to the field of Product management | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course for those trying to | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good introduction! Simple, clear and direct to the point. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction! Simple, clear and direct to | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A very good introduction into what Software Product Management is really about and the first steps to understanding the role. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction into what Software Product Management | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Really good course. I really like the way they explain each topic. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I really like the way | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I highly recommend this course. Easy to follow, good contents and great teaching methodology. It's an introductory course. | 1) recommend this course. Easy to follow, | Good | 1) contents and great teaching methodology. It's | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good and detailed course for beginners in Software Product Management. | 1) | Good | 1) and detailed course for beginners in | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Gives good overview on SPM role. | 1) Gives | Good | 1) overview on SPM role. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introductory course, excellent videos. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course, excellent videos. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good Course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | It's a very good introductory course. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introductory course. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This is good content, but way too broad and general to be considered a proper introduction. The course was too easy for my taste to be considered worthy of a certification. | 1) This is | Good | 1) content, but way too broad and | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent Course Material and very well explained. The Course Notes are very good as well! | 1) explained. The Course Notes are very | Good | 1) as well! | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I enjoyed this course. It is a concise and informative introduction to good management of software product development. Benefits are direct to my current work. Thank you! | 1) a concise and informative introduction to | Good | 1) management of software product development. Benefits | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Quite good course about Software Product Management | 1) Quite | Good | 1) course about Software Product Management | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | very good, | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good prepared course with focused material | 1) | Good | 1) prepared course with focused material | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This course explained to me comprehensibly what a Product Manager does which is already a good thing to start from. In addition it really gave me some insight into modern ways of managing a development team. Therefore I would recommend that course to anyone working as a developer and not knowing what these "PMs" are doing. | 1) Manager does which is already a | Good | 1) thing to start from. In addition | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Clear explanations, good videos, professional instructors and very useful complementing material. | 1) Clear explanations, | Good | 1) videos, professional instructors and very useful | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The information is good, but basic. Even at the reduced price, it seems pricey and this information could be rolled into another course. | 1) The information is | Good | 1) but basic. Even at the reduced | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | good intro to what is software product management and its processes what are the phases , the roles, the outcome | 1) | Good | 1) intro to what is software product | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A good course to have a brief introduction to SPM | 1) A | Good | 1) course to have a brief introduction | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I like it. Good visualization, useful information! | 1) I like it. | Good | 1) visualization, useful information! | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good as an introduction to the specialization it is part of. | 1) | Good | 1) as an introduction to the specialization | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good introduction. Concise. To the point. Looking forward to the rest of the course in th | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. Concise. To the point. Looking | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A very good course, offered in very smart method Clear course objectives, good notes, language suitable for non-native speakers, excellent filming quality and the plus is using cartons which simplify the ideas Thanks university of Alberta and all the instructors | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, offered in very smart method | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | A very good course, offered in very smart method Clear course objectives, good notes, language suitable for non-native speakers, excellent filming quality and the plus is using cartons which simplify the ideas Thanks university of Alberta and all the instructors | 2) very smart method Clear course objectives, | Good | 2) notes, language suitable for non-native speakers, | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | it was an amazing course that explain everything clear, also had a good example for understand the concept. | 1) explain everything clear, also had a | Good | 1) example for understand the concept. | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very theoretical course. If you don't know much about software management, this course might have some good info, but covers things you probably know if you have been involved in any software management. | 1) management, this course might have some | Good | 1) info, but covers things you probably | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Course title is misleading. It is actually a course on Managing Agile Software development, not Product management. There is common understanding in active product management community that major focus for product manager is market. Market is not mentioned in this course at all. What requirements and schedule, guys??? Current product management is all about hypotheses, A/B testing, customer development, experiments, lean UX, etc. You completely missing the point. Still, this course can be a good one for those who want to start Managing agile software development. | 1) Still, this course can be a | Good | 1) one for those who want to | 1.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This course is a good introduction that includes an overview and includes Agile principles explanations for software product management. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction that includes an overview and | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Seemed like more of two week advertisement of the specialization and Agile, rather than a course. Some good information in the video lectures, but very heavy handed on the delivery. | 1) Agile, rather than a course. Some | Good | 1) information in the video lectures, but | 3.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Although is an introduction, I stay sure this course is a good beginning for SPM. I have been studying for two weeks, and I was getting lot information about agile. I have read Erick Ries books Lean Startup, and this course cleared many misunderstood that I had. | 1) stay sure this course is a | Good | 1) beginning for SPM. I have been | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good course! :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! :) | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good, short, but very rich! | 1) Very | Good | 1) short, but very rich! | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Excellent! Very good! | 1) Excellent! Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good Course, Good introduction to Agile Methodology | 1) | Good | 1) Course, Good introduction to Agile Methodology | 5.0 |
| DYv7azSfEeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good Course, Good introduction to Agile Methodology | 2) Good Course, | Good | 2) introduction to Agile Methodology | 5.0 |
| DzdXURoCEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The course is well structured and Prof Muppala presents it in an interesting way. The range of technology covered was good and would be useful. The CapStone Project timelines are not realistic at all - one has to start implementing almost from the word go, the artificial interim reports are distracting if one does not realize that and I think many students are forced to a second session to complete the course. | 1) The range of technology covered was | Good | 1) and would be useful. The CapStone | 3.0 |
| DzeIAhnpEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | 1) has discovered such kind of really | Good | 1) course and specialization. | 5.0 |
| DzeIAhnpEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was very challenging. Not everything was well prepared. But overall good! Thank you very much! | 1) everything was well prepared. But overall | Good | 1) Thank you very much! | 4.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Really enjoyed this course, very informative and good for someone joining the hospitality world for the first time. | 1) enjoyed this course, very informative and | Good | 1) for someone joining the hospitality world | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good interesting an well explained course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) interesting an well explained course. | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good and uptaded content on new hotel distribution ecosystem | 1) Very | Good | 1) and uptaded content on new hotel | 5.0 |
| DzPiWTeDEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very insightful. Highly recommended for anyone who is new to hotel revenue management. A good foundation course for hotel marketing and distribution. | 1) new to hotel revenue management. A | Good | 1) foundation course for hotel marketing and | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | I appreciated the professor's clear and articulate lectures, together with the use of in-lecture questions to reinforce the main concepts. I may not completely agree with all of the points raised by the good professor, but the perspective he offered on historical events was greatly appreciated. I also appreciated that approaching the methods of war within different cultures would have required a much larger and longer course and so I am grateful to the professor for placing his focus where he did. It is unfortunate that my timing in participating in this class reduced my ability to properly interact with other students during the progress of the lessons, but I have to accept responsibility for that aspect. Still, I consider this to be one of the more exceptional courses offered by Coursera and credit that largely to the presentation skills of the good professor. I thank him for sharing his knowledge and this opportunity to consider a topic I would not ordinarily study in such detail. | 1) of the points raised by the | Good | 1) professor, but the perspective he offered | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | I appreciated the professor's clear and articulate lectures, together with the use of in-lecture questions to reinforce the main concepts. I may not completely agree with all of the points raised by the good professor, but the perspective he offered on historical events was greatly appreciated. I also appreciated that approaching the methods of war within different cultures would have required a much larger and longer course and so I am grateful to the professor for placing his focus where he did. It is unfortunate that my timing in participating in this class reduced my ability to properly interact with other students during the progress of the lessons, but I have to accept responsibility for that aspect. Still, I consider this to be one of the more exceptional courses offered by Coursera and credit that largely to the presentation skills of the good professor. I thank him for sharing his knowledge and this opportunity to consider a topic I would not ordinarily study in such detail. | 2) to the presentation skills of the | Good | 2) professor. I thank him for sharing | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Great course! Good, clear and well structured lectures and interesting readings. Although much of the information in the course was not new to me, the course taught me several new viewpoints and that was really nice. Thank you for providing this course and for the effort! | 1) Great course! | Good | 1) clear and well structured lectures and | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Great. Gives very interesting points of view and he enlightens interesting aspects. I like his style of presentationand and he is very good to understand. If he would do another project with Cousera - I would join. Thanks! | 1) of presentationand and he is very | Good | 1) to understand. If he would do | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Good coverage and interesting lectures that provides a good history of all the warfare and on the social psychology. A fresh perspective I guess. | 1) | Good | 1) coverage and interesting lectures that provides | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Good coverage and interesting lectures that provides a good history of all the warfare and on the social psychology. A fresh perspective I guess. | 2) and interesting lectures that provides a | Good | 2) history of all the warfare and | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | good curse | 1) | Good | 1) curse | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | It very interesting MOOC and quite unique of it's kind. It's good MOOC for everyone who want to get deep vision of history, it highlight and studies wars in a unique and very interesting way. | 1) quite unique of it's kind. It's | Good | 1) MOOC for everyone who want to | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Really good! Great teacher and very good structure and arguments. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Great teacher and very good structure | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Really good! Great teacher and very good structure and arguments. | 2) Really good! Great teacher and very | Good | 2) structure and arguments. | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Great lectures. The course material spans from ancient warfare and tactics all the way to modern wars that involve atomic bombs and guerrillas. He not only introduces us to the history of western warfare, but more importantly he focuses on the relationship of war and society -- on how wars arise from societal needs or conflicts as well as on how wars shape and transform society. He strikes a good balance between addressing the paradoxes of war and avoiding getting too much in politics and ideologies of war. | 1) and transform society. He strikes a | Good | 1) balance between addressing the paradoxes of | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | A good course and very interesting perspectives. A pity Princeton does not issue certificates. | 1) A | Good | 1) course and very interesting perspectives. A | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Well worth your time in hearing first hand from combat veterans. " War What is it Good For?" an excellent book that is thought provoking, it covers a lot of the material that is discussed throughout the course. | 1) veterans. " War What is it | Good | 1) For? " an excellent book that | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | For an undergraduate course it's good - my only comment is on delivery - quotations given verbally might have been better if shown on screen to drive them home. I hope the professor will do a military history course that analyzes war more particularly now that we have the broad strokes. My interest is piqued from this course and I want to know more about specific wars/battles. I am also interested in war prior to 1500, esp. ancient civilizations. | 1) For an undergraduate course it's | Good | 1) - my only comment is on | 3.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | The professor is excellent, great didactic. Good material, readings and pictures to illustrate the course. I would only suggest to try to not repeat the content on the classes, but I understand he was repeating some topics in order to state some points. | 1) The professor is excellent, great didactic. | Good | 1) material, readings and pictures to illustrate | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | This was a very interesting course - clearly presented and well paced. The assignments were at a good level - with my only recommendation being a bit more detail in the marking rubrik. Thank you - it was a thought provoking analysis on a topic that could be very emotional. | 1) paced. The assignments were at a | Good | 1) level - with my only recommendation | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Good course, with a lot of information. | 1) | Good | 1) course, with a lot of information. | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Very good .. congratulations | 1) Very | Good | 1) . . congratulations | 5.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Very interesting course. The first few weeks are little beat boring, discussing some features that are obvious, but as the course continues the questions become more untresting, especially those which concern war with politics. As a whole it is a very good course, which gives the student a broad understandung of the issue. recommended!! | 1) a whole it is a very | Good | 1) course, which gives the student a | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Good information. Good discussion forum. Recommended. | 1) | Good | 1) information. Good discussion forum. Recommended. | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | Good information. Good discussion forum. Recommended. | 2) Good information. | Good | 2) discussion forum. Recommended. | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | An extremely interesting course, full of fascinating sociologycal and historical topics! The only thing that wasn't that good about it was the difficulty to get some of books the instructor mentioned. | 1) The only thing that wasn't that | Good | 1) about it was the difficulty to | 4.0 |
| d_71NKdPEeSOWCIAC2iDyw | I thoroughly enjoyed the course. Professor Centeno guided us through history to show that even wars can make some positive contributions to societies and to soldiers. You do not have to agree with him to notice that he is a very good online lecturer. It was my first MOOC where I felt I'm in an auditorium and not at my computer. | 1) notice that he is a very | Good | 1) online lecturer. It was my first | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Good course for quick understaniding of the basics for negotiation. also helpfull to go over before upcoming negotiation. | 1) | Good | 1) course for quick understaniding of the | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | good all to gather but looking for more interesting skills | 1) | Good | 1) all to gather but looking for | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very interesting and inspiring course. The material is of very good quality and the teacher is, to my mind, excellent. | 1) course. The material is of very | Good | 1) quality and the teacher is, to | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Good resources and material for self study. The Guest separe was very interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) resources and material for self study. | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very good. Could use more on soft skills. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Could use more on soft skills. | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very good course, I recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I recommend! | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Good Course. Topics are well explained. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. Topics are well explained. | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | I learned a lot of very good concepts in this well prepared lesson. Great teacher | 1) I learned a lot of very | Good | 1) concepts in this well prepared lesson. | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Good course!!! | 1) | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very good points. Logical and concisely presented. Will definitely influence the way that I approach a negotiation. Particularly like the idea that both parties need to come away satisfied with the outcome. | 1) Very | Good | 1) points. Logical and concisely presented. Will | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | the course structure and content are very good and interesting! | 1) course structure and content are very | Good | 1) and interesting! | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Great course! Summarized the experiences I had on actual negotiation. Also provided good tips, hint and resources for further study to improve my negotiation skills. | 1) had on actual negotiation. Also provided | Good | 1) tips, hint and resources for further | 4.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Very Good, | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| e4SzF9c1EeS-LCIAC3icWw | Great course, it gave me a good start in my career and I have used what I have learned! | 1) Great course, it gave me a | Good | 1) start in my career and I | 5.0 |
| e9PicBJhEeaoZBKRisF_Dw | This is probably one of the best courses I have ever taken. Although time was a limiting factor, a broad range of essential topics was covered thoroughly (given the time), and I really feel that I learnt a lot about hardware, software, sound engineering, and production skills. I also learnt a lot of terminology, which I was finding very confusing during my efforts to teach myself, and feel like I had a good foundation upon which to continue my learning and improve my skills. | 1) and feel like I had a | Good | 1) foundation upon which to continue my | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course. Very good instructor. | 1) Excellent course. Very | Good | 1) instructor. | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Sensacional. Everytime I saw all videos in the same day (yesterday) ... great teatcher and good material. Best course ever. | 1) . . . great teatcher and | Good | 1) material. Best course ever. | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent course! It helps to obtain good basis of MongoDB | 1) Excellent course! It helps to obtain | Good | 1) basis of MongoDB | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good lecture, which make beginner to make application following through it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecture, which make beginner to make | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Simply Good! | 1) Simply | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | The videos are really good, makes it fun to watch and learn. I especially like that it's appearently iive coded and you get to know the train of thoughts from the Lecturer. Really well done, thanks for this course :) | 1) The videos are really | Good | 1) makes it fun to watch and | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Amazing course! Very good material and didactics. Hope there are more meteor courses with him! | 1) Amazing course! Very | Good | 1) material and didactics. Hope there are | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Matthew is a great instructor. Loved the way how he taught the entire series especially this one. Step by Step explaining every little detail. Keep up the good work... | 1) every little detail. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. . . | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Excellent coursera and nice instructor, keep it up good work..... | 1) and nice instructor, keep it up | Good | 1) work. . . . . | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Ver good, indeed! | 1) Ver | Good | 1) indeed! | 5.0 |
| EA0hyTUGEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Best course in the specialization so far. Well thought out and explained. The course still has the same problem with quiz questions being at times obtuse, but overall it's a really good course. | 1) obtuse, but overall it's a really | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Good stuff. The teacher somehow managed to make accounting interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) stuff. The teacher somehow managed to | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Very interesting. Concentrates on the learning of fundamentals. A must-do for anyone coming from a non-business background. Very good review for business majors. | 1) coming from a non-business background. Very | Good | 1) review for business majors. | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Very good lecture and easy to follow! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecture and easy to follow! | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Really good course. Clear and well prepared | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Clear and well prepared | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Amazing course for those with no background in accounting. Being very dynamic, with a good pace and easy to follow, you will realize in a few weeks that your learning curve has an exponential growth. With this course you will be able to understand and make decisions of real companies from real financial statements. It is absolutely recommendable for those, like me, who have just started an MBA, or for those who are interested in learning the basics of accounting, getting ready to cover more advanced topics. | 1) accounting. Being very dynamic, with a | Good | 1) pace and easy to follow, you | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Professor was very good, easy to learn. I only do not give it a 5 because I wish accrual accounting had been discussed more at length. | 1) Professor was very | Good | 1) easy to learn. I only do | 4.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | This is a very interesting course, I would hace liked the teacher would explain a little bit more about NOF and Operational ratios, go further on this topics and less analysisi of Balance Sheet and P&L. But in general, great explanations and videos and completely easy to understand everything, very good examples. | 1) completely easy to understand everything, very | Good | 1) examples. | 4.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Great intro programme to Accounting and good practical exercise for business entrepreneurs! | 1) Great intro programme to Accounting and | Good | 1) practical exercise for business entrepreneurs! | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | A good course to understand fundamentals of financial accounting. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to understand fundamentals of financial | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | Simply too good | 1) Simply too | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| eBEnnYkqEeWGBwqGAoUFww | This is very good course for beginners and well explained wit practical example | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course for beginners and well explained | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Presentation of concepts is really good. | 1) Presentation of concepts is really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Teaches you a lot about understanding problems. This course provides the basis of creating a comprehensive thought. Although it is about software requirements, going through this course will help you become a good listener. | 1) course will help you become a | Good | 1) listener. | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Everything was good but I think they have to re think about the ambiguous requirements module | 1) Everything was | Good | 1) but I think they have to | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good learning. | 1) | Good | 1) learning. | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really good course for studying basics of software requirements domain. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for studying basics of software | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The material is really good and well explained. Totally recommended. | 1) The material is really | Good | 1) and well explained. Totally recommended. | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great Course, thanks to Tutor! By the way, Karl Wieger's "Software Requirement" is a good addition for this course and specialization | 1) Wieger's " Software Requirement" is a | Good | 1) addition for this course and specialization | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction to Requirements Gathering in general but more specifically agile techniques (e.g.: User Stories, Use Cases, Story Boards) | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Requirements Gathering in general | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good. I find a very good idea to include the topics about reducing the ambiguity, because it's one of the biggest problems in the real world. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I find a very good idea | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good. I find a very good idea to include the topics about reducing the ambiguity, because it's one of the biggest problems in the real world. | 2) Very good. I find a very | Good | 2) idea to include the topics about | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course to learn how to deal with software requirements, from an Agile perspective. Totally recommended. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn how to deal | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good for new people in the area. All the basics well covered. | 1) | Good | 1) for new people in the area. | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good material, easy to learn | 1) | Good | 1) material, easy to learn | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course with an excellent assignment. Just if more details are supplied then the course be more valuable. | 1) | Good | 1) course with an excellent assignment. Just | 4.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Its a very good course, easy to understand and good explanations and resources all through | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course, easy to understand and good | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Its a very good course, easy to understand and good explanations and resources all through | 2) good course, easy to understand and | Good | 2) explanations and resources all through | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I liked the content and the presentation of the course a lot. It is a good structured starting point from which I can go on learning the respective course topics. Further reading is delivered. This course offered me a structured repetition for a general understanding on the topic client needs and software requirements. | 1) course a lot. It is a | Good | 1) structured starting point from which I | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | really good practice tips | 1) really | Good | 1) practice tips | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's very good and useful course! | 1) It's very | Good | 1) and useful course! | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| EdKScTVwEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good overview. Wish there were more take away documents as well as links to additional information that summarized content in each section so you had a course book with terms at the end. | 1) | Good | 1) overview. Wish there were more take | 4.0 |
| Eeb34jesEeWXuQopUhAqaw | The project is a little bit easy yet tedious, a good practice of using Java though. | 1) little bit easy yet tedious, a | Good | 1) practice of using Java though. | 4.0 |
| Eeb34jesEeWXuQopUhAqaw | The course design is really good. It is very hands-on. We get to build our own applications and test our applications in the quiz. However I really hope if there can be more content. The course is rather short. The quality is good but the quantity is a bit insufficient. I hope this course can be longer. Additional weeks can teach us how to convert BlueJ projects or Eclipse projects into EXE or host it in the cloud. I also hope this course, in the future, teaches us to make graphical user interface, which would be a nice conclusion to whatever program that we make I love the course. I really want to see more coming out of the Capstone project. I love the idea of the capstone building a recommender engine. However, to make it a complete package, I suggest a few things: ---Teach learners to use main() to create apps and convert to exe ---Teach learners, after the entire project codings, how to create an Applet out of the source codes ---Teach learners how to implement graphical user interface (make buttons, input field for movie queries) ---Teach learners how to, instead of getting data from a file in the folder, reads the data from a live-feed instead. That would enhance the learning experience of the course. Thank you for all those. I'm a hungry guy so I suggest lots of things. However I'm very happy with the course designs. Very engaging and fruitful course series. | 1) The course design is really | Good | 1) It is very hands-on. We get | 5.0 |
| Eeb34jesEeWXuQopUhAqaw | The course design is really good. It is very hands-on. We get to build our own applications and test our applications in the quiz. However I really hope if there can be more content. The course is rather short. The quality is good but the quantity is a bit insufficient. I hope this course can be longer. Additional weeks can teach us how to convert BlueJ projects or Eclipse projects into EXE or host it in the cloud. I also hope this course, in the future, teaches us to make graphical user interface, which would be a nice conclusion to whatever program that we make I love the course. I really want to see more coming out of the Capstone project. I love the idea of the capstone building a recommender engine. However, to make it a complete package, I suggest a few things: ---Teach learners to use main() to create apps and convert to exe ---Teach learners, after the entire project codings, how to create an Applet out of the source codes ---Teach learners how to implement graphical user interface (make buttons, input field for movie queries) ---Teach learners how to, instead of getting data from a file in the folder, reads the data from a live-feed instead. That would enhance the learning experience of the course. Thank you for all those. I'm a hungry guy so I suggest lots of things. However I'm very happy with the course designs. Very engaging and fruitful course series. | 2) is rather short. The quality is | Good | 2) but the quantity is a bit | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | A quite good and complete course to understand the basics of astrophysics and planetary science. | 1) A quite | Good | 1) and complete course to understand the | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | It is a great ride so far. Good refreshment of basic astronomy. I highly recommend it. Very clear lectures too. | 1) is a great ride so far. | Good | 1) refreshment of basic astronomy. I highly | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | I took this course completely for fun, so did not complete any assignments, but I want to say that I enjoyed it immensely! Our lecturer brought immense enthusiasm to the rather heavy topic of astronomy and physics and managed to make it reasonable even to those of a non-science background (like me!). The people interviewed also brought very unique views and experiences to the subject, and gave us a good first hand account of what it is like to research and work on NASA projects and other spacefaring missions. Thank you to everyone who made this happen, I hope many other students share the same satisfaction from taking this online course! | 1) the subject, and gave us a | Good | 1) first hand account of what it | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | I have no professional interest in this course but watch the videos in my freetime. This should tell you everything about how good this course is. | 1) should tell you everything about how | Good | 1) this course is. | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | Very good and a good teacher | 1) Very | Good | 1) and a good teacher | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | Very good and a good teacher | 2) Very good and a | Good | 2) teacher | 5.0 |
| eEsmqKAMEeSI0SIAC2iJgw | very good course would definitely recommed | 1) very | Good | 1) course would definitely recommed | 5.0 |
| EeyElZz9EeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Very good course, perfectly interlinking theory and practice of statistic decision making. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, perfectly interlinking theory and practice | 5.0 |
| EeyElZz9EeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good revision for data analysis using Excel. | 1) | Good | 1) revision for data analysis using Excel. | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | very good course. Congratulations! | 1) very | Good | 1) course. Congratulations! | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | I didn't like the professor's teaching style. He took way more time than was necessary to get his points across. Plus the little quips where he's pretending to engage with the viewer made it feel like a kids show. There were some good nuggets of info, but there was too much filler to get to it. | 1) a kids show. There were some | Good | 1) nuggets of info, but there was | 2.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Great course. I've learned a lot. And also good to understand to foreigners. :D | 1) I've learned a lot. And also | Good | 1) to understand to foreigners. :D | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Unfortunately I can not deal with the professors voice. The content is good. | 1) the professors voice. The content is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Great Prof. Great Course. Learned a lot with the most efficient way. Made me good to think over my business, my goals, my opportunities. Thank you a lot! | 1) the most efficient way. Made me | Good | 1) to think over my business, my | 4.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Clear, simple and logical readings and tutorials. Great to get back into business theory after years in industry. Good to get back to basics and put into perspective where you currently are. | 1) business theory after years in industry. | Good | 1) to get back to basics and | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | I have been taking business courses for over 20 years, and have not run into a course so full of good ideas in such a short space of time, let alone for free. congratulations and than | 1) into a course so full of | Good | 1) ideas in such a short space | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good content. The pace is a very slow in my sense, but other than this good one. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content. The pace is a very | 4.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good content. The pace is a very slow in my sense, but other than this good one. | 2) my sense, but other than this | Good | 2) one. | 4.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Excellent course, highly recommended. One of the very rare courses I will take again as both the material and teacher were really good. | 1) the material and teacher were really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good course, easy to follow and relevant material | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, easy to follow and relevant | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Very useful course with a good learning structure! Recommended to everyone thinking about starting they own venture. | 1) Very useful course with a | Good | 1) learning structure! Recommended to everyone thinking | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | A very good course, I learn a lot with it | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, I learn a lot with | 5.0 |
| EfvjN5XvEeSqQiIACyEY7w | Excellent class taught by highly engaged professor. Good for someone with a few years of business experience or mid-level management. Would be less valuable for someone fresh out of school of just starting to climb the corporate ladder. | 1) class taught by highly engaged professor. | Good | 1) for someone with a few years | 5.0 |
| eGUHRneUEeWtpg5GoAM5Iw | Very good course. The only thing that i'd like to mention is that sometimes the enunciate of the exercises is not so clear. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The only thing that i'd | 4.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | Learning is part of the growing and acquisition of skills by which one can contribute to society. Coursera has very good courses. I am so happy, you provide opportunities for study and scholarship. Thanks. | 1) contribute to society. Coursera has very | Good | 1) courses. I am so happy, you | 5.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | Some of the lectures were too general, too fast, or left things out I also don't like the peer review type grading structure Also, I am sure I'm not the only person taking this course (or the whole series), who does not CURRENTLY, have a career in healthcare; I am working towards that - So; to ask us to do a market sizing memo and come up with something from nothing, while swearing not to plagiarize, is not a good method. I'm here to gain knowledge and skills - a broad overview. Perhaps a course or actual 2nd degree in Health Info Tech or Healthcare Admin. is better way to go for me; however, I cannot afford it finance or time - therefore, am trying to learn as much as possible off here. Kudsos to Parente for having super cool interests though - the sailing, the places he sails and the awesome vacation home in the Scottish Highlands! | 1) not to plagiarize, is not a | Good | 1) method. I'm here to gain knowledge | 3.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | This is a good course, providing quality information. It has a bit of a financial lean, as the professor has a background in this area; this was stretching for me as an engineer, but ultimately I found it helpful, as the financing of healthcare is an incredibly important issue! Unfortunately, the professor is a bit hard to understand; he does not speak in proper grammatical structure and often rambles or mutters, so even as a native English speaker, I had to turn on subtitles in order to understand the point he was trying to get across. Overall, after taking this course, I feel *much* more versed on the healthcare landscape and all the players involved therein. I recommend this course to students who want to better understand the general workings of the healthcare industry. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course, providing quality information. It has | 4.0 |
| EGWVwnE7EeWxvQr3acyajw | The professor just read the materials through all the modules, and the course was really boring. But, the content was quite updated that was the only good thing. Does not worth such a high payment. | 1) quite updated that was the only | Good | 1) thing. Does not worth such a | 2.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | A good overview into the meaning of the word Infographics and information on how Diagrams can be made more useful. It would surely help in my present work. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview into the meaning of the | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Very good. Good Content | 1) Very | Good | 1) Good Content | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Very good. Good Content | 2) Very good. | Good | 2) Content | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Good course, explaining basics on infographic. | 1) | Good | 1) course, explaining basics on infographic. | 4.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | The course is misrepresented as infographics for all. It is really infographics for journalists WITH experience in Adobe Illustrator. There is no chance that anyone walking into the course with zero experience in AI can pass. No chance, period! The final project grading is unfair & ridiculous. The scoring is "not good", "good", "excellent". Here's the thing... scoring "good" equals a fail in the project and, therefore, a fail in the course. Your classmates with experience in adobe are scoring you based upon the instructors "excellent" examples. Not realistic at all. I would also point out that the course is excellent for journalists but completely useless for those of us in the business world. Under no circumstances would we use journalistic-style infographics in the business world. Having worked for multiple Fortune 500's, this style would NEVER fly in the business world. I wish I had known before I signed up. I would never have wasted the hours, energy or money. | 1) ridiculous. The scoring is " not | Good | 1) , " good" , " excellent" | 1.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | The course is misrepresented as infographics for all. It is really infographics for journalists WITH experience in Adobe Illustrator. There is no chance that anyone walking into the course with zero experience in AI can pass. No chance, period! The final project grading is unfair & ridiculous. The scoring is "not good", "good", "excellent". Here's the thing... scoring "good" equals a fail in the project and, therefore, a fail in the course. Your classmates with experience in adobe are scoring you based upon the instructors "excellent" examples. Not realistic at all. I would also point out that the course is excellent for journalists but completely useless for those of us in the business world. Under no circumstances would we use journalistic-style infographics in the business world. Having worked for multiple Fortune 500's, this style would NEVER fly in the business world. I wish I had known before I signed up. I would never have wasted the hours, energy or money. | 2) is " not good" , " | Good | 2) , " excellent" . Here's the | 1.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | The course is misrepresented as infographics for all. It is really infographics for journalists WITH experience in Adobe Illustrator. There is no chance that anyone walking into the course with zero experience in AI can pass. No chance, period! The final project grading is unfair & ridiculous. The scoring is "not good", "good", "excellent". Here's the thing... scoring "good" equals a fail in the project and, therefore, a fail in the course. Your classmates with experience in adobe are scoring you based upon the instructors "excellent" examples. Not realistic at all. I would also point out that the course is excellent for journalists but completely useless for those of us in the business world. Under no circumstances would we use journalistic-style infographics in the business world. Having worked for multiple Fortune 500's, this style would NEVER fly in the business world. I wish I had known before I signed up. I would never have wasted the hours, energy or money. | 3) the thing. . . scoring " | Good | 3) equals a fail in the project | 1.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | You have to use adobe illustrator to make the infographic and I didn't think the course did a good enough job giving the basics for that. I had to do a lot of googling to figure out how to do stuff on my own. All of the assessments are done by the people in the course and I thought people were a little too harsh. If someone is completely new to AI then it is a bit much to expect the infographic to be magazine quality. | 1) didn't think the course did a | Good | 1) enough job giving the basics for | 3.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | Very informative and the speaker is very good. | 1) informative and the speaker is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | that's very good, but it could be better if there is a way to pay and get certificate. we are in educational and science word not politic word. I live in I.R.Iran and there is no way to pay. I suggest you to provide some prepaid card for Coursera, that we can use of them, same as ITune gift cards. | 1) that's very | Good | 1) but it could be better if | 3.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | An absolutely amazing experience and a good learning. Karl Gude has been a good facilitator and a very good expert in sharing his experience may it be practical or knowledge sharing. | 1) An absolutely amazing experience and a | Good | 1) learning. Karl Gude has been a | 4.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | An absolutely amazing experience and a good learning. Karl Gude has been a good facilitator and a very good expert in sharing his experience may it be practical or knowledge sharing. | 2) learning. Karl Gude has been a | Good | 2) facilitator and a very good expert | 4.0 |
| eH8S1b38EeWxzxJER_JW2w | An absolutely amazing experience and a good learning. Karl Gude has been a good facilitator and a very good expert in sharing his experience may it be practical or knowledge sharing. | 3) a good facilitator and a very | Good | 3) expert in sharing his experience may | 4.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | Some profs are very good, some are terrible. The terrible ones need to improve their teaching skills and even language skills. As a native Chinese speaker, I find some of the lectures very boring. Good lectures are clear, concise, and right to the point. Good teachers make the learning experience effortless and fun, poor teachers make it like a torture. | 1) Some profs are very | Good | 1) some are terrible. The terrible ones | 2.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | Some profs are very good, some are terrible. The terrible ones need to improve their teaching skills and even language skills. As a native Chinese speaker, I find some of the lectures very boring. Good lectures are clear, concise, and right to the point. Good teachers make the learning experience effortless and fun, poor teachers make it like a torture. | 2) some of the lectures very boring. | Good | 2) lectures are clear, concise, and right | 2.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | Some profs are very good, some are terrible. The terrible ones need to improve their teaching skills and even language skills. As a native Chinese speaker, I find some of the lectures very boring. Good lectures are clear, concise, and right to the point. Good teachers make the learning experience effortless and fun, poor teachers make it like a torture. | 3) concise, and right to the point. | Good | 3) teachers make the learning experience effortless | 2.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | very good. excellent lesson and very nice teachers. | 1) very | Good | 1) excellent lesson and very nice teachers. | 5.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | The method of delivery is a bit conservative, dry and boring but matter wise, it was really comprehensive and easy to understand. Good beginner course. | 1) really comprehensive and easy to understand. | Good | 1) beginner course. | 4.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | A little boring. Some lecturers did not deliver a good presentation and some "philosophical masterpiece" are not practical at all. | 1) Some lecturers did not deliver a | Good | 1) presentation and some " philosophical masterpiece" | 3.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | It's a good starting for Chinese Philosophy。 | 1) It's a | Good | 1) starting for Chinese Philosophy。 | 5.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | A good course that gave me a good refresher on at least what I grew up with decades ago. It also introduced me to two that I am aware of but have not read them. I especially like 王阳明 whose philosophy I resonate with. I checked out his work 传习录 from public library thereafter and am a firmer believer in how I would continue to conduct my life working with others. 无善无恶心之体 有善有恶意之动 知善知恶是良知 為善去恶是格物 | 1) A | Good | 1) course that gave me a good | 4.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | A good course that gave me a good refresher on at least what I grew up with decades ago. It also introduced me to two that I am aware of but have not read them. I especially like 王阳明 whose philosophy I resonate with. I checked out his work 传习录 from public library thereafter and am a firmer believer in how I would continue to conduct my life working with others. 无善无恶心之体 有善有恶意之动 知善知恶是良知 為善去恶是格物 | 2) good course that gave me a | Good | 2) refresher on at least what I | 4.0 |
| EjtfHZq7EeSB9CIACxCU6A | quite a good starter | 1) quite a | Good | 1) starter | 5.0 |
| eL9HZ2ItEeWpHwqwM9Gg0w | Very good course, but at the same time very hard. Unless you have quite a bit of experience programing, be prepared to spend at least 15 hours a week working on this class. The good news is that if you do spend that time, you will learn a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but at the same time | 5.0 |
| eL9HZ2ItEeWpHwqwM9Gg0w | Very good course, but at the same time very hard. Unless you have quite a bit of experience programing, be prepared to spend at least 15 hours a week working on this class. The good news is that if you do spend that time, you will learn a lot. | 2) week working on this class. The | Good | 2) news is that if you do | 5.0 |
| eL9HZ2ItEeWpHwqwM9Gg0w | Very well structured and informative. Got a good understanding of motifs finding and its related algorithms | 1) well structured and informative. Got a | Good | 1) understanding of motifs finding and its | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | very good instructor. | 1) very | Good | 1) instructor. | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It's a very good traning for a beginner. Overall system and key concepts have been introduced in this lecture. Very good! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) traning for a beginner. Overall system | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It's a very good traning for a beginner. Overall system and key concepts have been introduced in this lecture. Very good! | 2) been introduced in this lecture. Very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good overview course. This helps you understand the terms used in Big Data, Cloud Computing and Content Delivery Networks. You will understand most of the terms fairly well by the end of this course. I'm impressed by the instructor, his English is very good. His command of the subject is great. He manages to structure this course in a way that makes it more understandable than it would otherwise be. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview course. This helps you understand | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good overview course. This helps you understand the terms used in Big Data, Cloud Computing and Content Delivery Networks. You will understand most of the terms fairly well by the end of this course. I'm impressed by the instructor, his English is very good. His command of the subject is great. He manages to structure this course in a way that makes it more understandable than it would otherwise be. | 2) the instructor, his English is very | Good | 2) His command of the subject is | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Really good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good job on the explaining CDN concepts! In the two first modules, the lecturer just read from the slides. | 1) | Good | 1) job on the explaining CDN concepts! | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good Cloud Compyting and CDN lectures and material. Lack of practical examples and use cases in Big Data track. | 1) | Good | 1) Cloud Compyting and CDN lectures and | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | The course is very good Specially designed for the beginners of big data/cloud. Highly recommended. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) Specially designed for the beginners of | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | A good intro class! Thank you for sharing! | 1) A | Good | 1) intro class! Thank you for sharing! | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | A very basic course for Cloud and Big Data. For a laymen its good choice to cover all basics but not for a technical person. | 1) Big Data. For a laymen its | Good | 1) choice to cover all basics but | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good course for overview | 1) | Good | 1) course for overview | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good, may be we can have some more real world examples. | 1) | Good | 1) may be we can have some | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good introduction to those with small IT background. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to those with small IT | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | it's very good course.. congratulations! | 1) it's very | Good | 1) course. . congratulations! | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Great Instructor, good examples and aspects. | 1) Great Instructor, | Good | 1) examples and aspects. | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good explanation, Less material. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation, Less material. | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Great Slides! The slides were good enough to pass the exam. | 1) Great Slides! The slides were | Good | 1) enough to pass the exam. | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good material! | 1) | Good | 1) material! | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good !! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good content and presentations, Thanks, | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and presentations, Thanks, | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | it is good course | 1) it is | Good | 1) course | 2.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | for a beginner this course is very good and provide good basic knowledge related to cloud computing and others.. thanks for the course | 1) a beginner this course is very | Good | 1) and provide good basic knowledge related | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | for a beginner this course is very good and provide good basic knowledge related to cloud computing and others.. thanks for the course | 2) course is very good and provide | Good | 2) basic knowledge related to cloud computing | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This course was very knowledgeable but it didn't hads anything to use in practice, no coding and only theory. However it was very good. | 1) only theory. However it was very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good course to learn basics of cloud computing and CDN. However Big Data part needs to be more elaborate. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn basics of cloud | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good learn | 1) | Good | 1) learn | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Its good as an introductory course | 1) Its | Good | 1) as an introductory course | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | CDN topic was very good and well explained. | 1) CDN topic was very | Good | 1) and well explained. | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good expression ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) expression ! | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good for understanding basic overview of Big Data Hadoop, Cloud computing and CDN. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for understanding basic overview of Big | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | For a beginer, this is a very good starting point.. I am loving the contents and enjoying my learning.. | 1) a beginer, this is a very | Good | 1) starting point. . I am loving | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This course was good but from practical side I was not able to learn anything. That thing lacked in this course. | 1) This course was | Good | 1) but from practical side I was | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It is a good introductory class. You do not need any programming or math background to take this class. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introductory class. You do not need | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good introduction to edge technologies, very good explained with examples which make it easy to understand. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to edge technologies, very good | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good introduction to edge technologies, very good explained with examples which make it easy to understand. | 2) Good introduction to edge technologies, very | Good | 2) explained with examples which make it | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good course, I learned a lot of knowledge, especially in cloud services, which is the most updated tech in the world. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learned a lot of | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | good to have a brief knowledge | 1) | Good | 1) to have a brief knowledge | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good course for understanding the basic concept of cou | 1) | Good | 1) course for understanding the basic concept | 5.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It was very good and basic course. It would be great if its next part can also describe these technologies in detail and with hands-on experience. | 1) It was very | Good | 1) and basic course. It would be | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Trying to cover many subjects and diving deep into less interesting areas. The lectures themselves are very clear and easy to understand, accompanies with good decks. | 1) and easy to understand, accompanies with | Good | 1) decks. | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | good corse | 1) | Good | 1) corse | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Pretty good first introduction. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) first introduction. | 4.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | The contents of PPTs are just read out in the video lectures. It's as good as providing only the PPTs. | 1) in the video lectures. It's as | Good | 1) as providing only the PPTs. | 1.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It is a good short course to get an idea about Cloud Computing, Big Data and CDN. 2 Points to the gentle instructor, Please try to elaborate more outside what is written in the slides. and the other point, please revise the Cloud Computing quiz as it focused on dates and history rather than focusing on the core of the subject. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) short course to get an idea | 3.0 |
| eLzp7w-NEeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good overview of Cloud related technologies. Too many details sometimes about specific providers, something that in my opinion may not be really useful but overall is okay. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of Cloud related technologies. Too | 3.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | This course is not for me. Principal concepts seem very difficult from the first lesson. Professor hesitates, quiz is incomprehensible. So, Good Bye ! I do like blues and listen it very often, but this doesn't help me. | 1) Professor hesitates, quiz is incomprehensible. So, | Good | 1) Bye ! I do like blues | 2.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | Excellent course. The lectures are well organized and illustrated with good examples. This professor not only has a remarkable fund of knowledge but understands how to teach the material focussing on key points, practical tips and fun. I will certainly obtain his book to continue learning and hope he will consider teaching additional courses on this site. | 1) are well organized and illustrated with | Good | 1) examples. This professor not only has | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | Very good course for all musicians. Explains advanced blues and jazz theory in easy way. Very interesting material about the music history and harmony evaluation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for all musicians. Explains advanced | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | Really good! | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | An exceptionally good course on jazz theory and improvisation. Don't let the name mislead you, the blues is used in this course as the basis for form, harmonic and melodic improvasition, but this is a Jazz theory course, not a Blues (in the traditional sense) course. I recommend this course empahtically for anyone wanting to learn jazz improvisation. It is a good complement to another Coursera course, Jazz Improvisation by Gary Burton, which is also excellent, but more focused on melodic improvisation and with a more pratical approach. | 1) An exceptionally | Good | 1) course on jazz theory and improvisation. | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | An exceptionally good course on jazz theory and improvisation. Don't let the name mislead you, the blues is used in this course as the basis for form, harmonic and melodic improvasition, but this is a Jazz theory course, not a Blues (in the traditional sense) course. I recommend this course empahtically for anyone wanting to learn jazz improvisation. It is a good complement to another Coursera course, Jazz Improvisation by Gary Burton, which is also excellent, but more focused on melodic improvisation and with a more pratical approach. | 2) learn jazz improvisation. It is a | Good | 2) complement to another Coursera course, Jazz | 5.0 |
| emCu12atEeW2DA58V0Z6GQ | good lecture... nice lesson | 1) | Good | 1) lecture. . . nice lesson | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Enjoyable and easy to follow along with. good videos and examples. Helped fill in some gaps. | 1) and easy to follow along with. | Good | 1) videos and examples. Helped fill in | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Really good! | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | This course is very good especially for beginners getting started with SAS or python for data analytics. The lessons are very clear and easy to understand. Learnt a lot of valuable information and also enjoyed it. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) especially for beginners getting started with | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Very clear description of basic statistics without all the jargons and mathematical formulas behind it. Unfortunately, somehow, such a good course lacks students and the discussion forum is like ghost room with virtually zero interaction. | 1) behind it. Unfortunately, somehow, such a | Good | 1) course lacks students and the discussion | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Videos are good and to the point. Animation is very user friendly. | 1) Videos are | Good | 1) and to the point. Animation is | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Very good from a conceptual point of view. | 1) Very | Good | 1) from a conceptual point of view. | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Amazing course for intermediate , well designed course material very good information about the different types of hypothesis testing. | 1) , well designed course material very | Good | 1) information about the different types of | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | It is a good course for a complete beginner in statistical inference. It helped me to understand some points I found confusing in "Statistical Inference" Coursera course. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for a complete beginner in | 4.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | The manner how the course was done is very good. It was evenly paced. The only difficulty i encountered is when i try to submit assignments because for some reasons the internet in our area is so slow and i failed to create a tumblr account after several attempts. Also Im having difficulty with SAS also so i used other STAT software available on my laptop, it gives same outputs too. Great course! | 1) the course was done is very | Good | 1) It was evenly paced. The only | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | Very good for beginners. concept explanation as well as coding were great. doesn't take too long to finish. I enrolled regression modeling course by Wesleyan and waiting to start. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. concept explanation as well | 5.0 |
| ENhHCTboEeW8ZAoCexam_w | This is a good basic intro to both statistical concepts (correlations, analysis of variance (ANOVA) ), but also presents the methods for coding these tools in Python or SAS in a very accessible and easy to follow way. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) basic intro to both statistical concepts | 5.0 |
| eo6NBCQPEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I did this course as a parent of a dyslexic child. I thought it was brilliant and I made pages and pages of notes. It is well organised, engaging, and informative. I really liked the two presenters as well. They both seemed passionate about the topic and modeled good teaching in their explanations and advice. That said, I thought the assessment part of the course simply didn't work. It was far too narrow for anyone besides primary teachers and therefore excluded those who might be doing the course for other reasons. It doesn't matter to me, I don't need the certificate and I got a lot out of the course but for others it would be frustrating, I imagine. The quizzes too, for the most part, were a disaster. They were poorly written, confusing, and dishearteningly obscure. Otherwise, I loved this course and hope you will offer a follow up soon. | 1) passionate about the topic and modeled | Good | 1) teaching in their explanations and advice. | 4.0 |
| eo6NBCQPEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | This course gave me a great insight into how the mind of my dyslexic son works and good hints to help him succeed in the classroom. | 1) of my dyslexic son works and | Good | 1) hints to help him succeed in | 4.0 |
| ERjY4rTHEeSK3SIACw8Xnw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The lectures are fairly light and there are no assignments throughout the course to reinforce the material. Mostly they just introduce a few concepts then point you at the Apple Swift documentation. They really don't go into much detail. The final assignment is good for getting your feet wet but is poorly specified. | 1) much detail. The final assignment is | Good | 1) for getting your feet wet but | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course has good interactivity) | 1) This course has | Good | 1) interactivity) | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Pretty good basic course. Not that good as classic Scala Functional Programming (being simply awesome) but still good. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) basic course. Not that good as | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Pretty good basic course. Not that good as classic Scala Functional Programming (being simply awesome) but still good. | 2) Pretty good basic course. Not that | Good | 2) as classic Scala Functional Programming (being | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Pretty good basic course. Not that good as classic Scala Functional Programming (being simply awesome) but still good. | 3) Programming (being simply awesome) but still | Good | 3) | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course. Somewhat odd levels of difficulty. Like the weekly lessons are easy and then the wall goes up in the task at week 5. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Somewhat odd levels of difficulty. | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course is good, but in my opinion, it's too basic for people who are already developers (in platforms other than iOS). Hopefully the next course in the serie will be a little bit deeper. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but in my opinion, it's too | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I think its good that its given reference material for further readings, but this shouldn't exonerate you from explaining the details of the language, if I wanted to learn swift from apple's documentation I would be there right now, not here, if I'm watching your course its because I expect to learn it here. | 1) I think its | Good | 1) that its given reference material for | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It was simple good starter lesson.. | 1) It was simple | Good | 1) starter lesson. . | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Certainly not a beginners course. You needed to have a good programming knowledge to make any sense of this course. The final assignment asked you to do things you hadn't been taught. As I hadn't done any programming for 20 years, I certainly found this difficult. Fell behind and there isn't really anyone there to help. Almost asked for a refund but decided to try to continue. I'm struggling to motivate myself into the second course. I really hope it's better than the first one. | 1) course. You needed to have a | Good | 1) programming knowledge to make any sense | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This is very good course for iOS beginners | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course for iOS beginners | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The weekly lectures/assignments did little to prepare for the final assignment. They were short and high level without any coding to back them up. It is possible to blaze through the first four weeks in a couple hours.....and then spend weeks on the final assignment because you will need to learn most of it on your own by looking through api documentation. To the instructors: If you want to see what a good "intro to language" course looks like, checkout: https://www.coursera.org/course/programming1 | 1) you want to see what a | Good | 1) " intro to language" course looks | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course, I liked it maybe provide some solution to develop for IOS for those who don't have mac, maybe there is online IDE or something like that and more examples and hands on exercise. | 1) | Good | 1) course, I liked it maybe provide | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Pleased with the course. Well described all the videos and very understandable examples as well. Although no example codes were given so that's why I give a 4 stars. But I highly recommend it. I had a background in Objective-C and I was wondering how to start with Swift, and I think it was a good way to start. Thank you. | 1) and I think it was a | Good | 1) way to start. Thank you. | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The initial lessons were rather chaotic. The idea was good, but the execution was not really good. The significantly improved the quality for the second course so I assume that for a new iteration, the it will be better too. | 1) were rather chaotic. The idea was | Good | 1) but the execution was not really | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The initial lessons were rather chaotic. The idea was good, but the execution was not really good. The significantly improved the quality for the second course so I assume that for a new iteration, the it will be better too. | 2) but the execution was not really | Good | 2) The significantly improved the quality for | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is a waste of time and money. I'm an experienced programmer, and I thought this would be a good introduction to Swift; it wasn't. The first two weeks were short, introductory programming lessons. Week 3, "Advanced Swift," consisted of one 12-minute video that barely scratches the surface of three separate topics. Many things that I would consider fundamentals for this type of programming course (classes, for example) were rarely even mentioned, much less taught and demonstrated. If you want to learn Swift, look elsewhere. Don't waste your time and money on this course. | 1) I thought this would be a | Good | 1) introduction to Swift; it wasn't. The | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | It is a very good introduction to Swift. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) introduction to Swift. | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Far less staid than some of the more traditional academic teaching formats in this science field. I was surprised I actually anaged to get through the introductory module but by the end of the course I was less inclined to want to attempt the end of module project simply because the instructions did not really provided sufficient indicators that guided newcomers to the subject of programming but in this science field it seems that is the norm with many introductory programming courses. Maybe the people teaching have forgotten what its like to start at the beginning and recall a time when they thought surely there is a better way in which to teach this subject that makes the connection between theory and practice and the relative interconnection much like bitesize stepping stones links a more plausible and achievable option for those unfamiliar in the field of computer science. Not sure why this aspect seems to fall short in CS but for some reason it does. I should imagine this course for many people who are either familiar with the fundamentals of programming and/or aufait with CS concepts on the whole and have already acquired the necessary basic skill set / knowledge base of programming, will find the subject and teachings rather informative and a move forward in the development of programming languages as the format in writing programs does depict a much simpler approach when compared to other languages. Sadly, for a complete beginner to CS this, in my opinion, fails to sufficiently guide or assist newcomers in building the confidence to later embark on a project that draws on the subject topics taught thus far and to that end its a bit of a shame as it tends to dampen your enthusiasm if you are interested in the field of computer science as that lack of clarification on what aspects relate to what factors does not become clear so when faced with the daunting task of the end of module project you may find yourself non-plussed wondering which topic relates to which task in the final project? I am sure other people will be inclined to disagree with my opinion on this but this is, after all, just my opinion, after giving the subject taster a try, the end result for me, was that the teaching methods were good as they appeared more relaxed and format was offered in a far more enjoyable way of teaching/learning a subject that, I felt, attempted to invoke or entice people where an interest in CS had been sparked and was perhaps aiming to offer a route in which to build the foundations of a programming language but then by the final week it was a case of well we have thrown this information your way, its now up to you to decipher what you need to apply to the which part of the final project and is done so under the guise of problem solving. The latter being a plausible concept I would find perhaps more applicable later on in the specialisation as you develop knowledge/skills. But to be incorporated into the very first module of this pathway it seems doing so is, what it seems like most introductory programming courses invoke, and, is quite a leap to embark upon especially without first being offered stepping stones sufficient enough to feel certain you have adequate understanding to be able to sift through the information provided and subsequently decide upon which aspects are relevant in order to attempt to accomplish the tasks set that ultimately form to complete the final project. Its actually through being guided by the experts whose teachings highlight to newcomers through practical visual sessions where we actually begin to learn where these interconnections link between these chunks of informational topics - all of which form the essential fundamental building blocks - and in so doing, that perhaps perceived initial 'spoon fed' approach then enables a newcomer to build sufficient skills and knowledge to then be able to actually 'develop' their confidence. Without the essential basic foundational mixture how is it possible to engage newcomers enough for them to determine when they will then feel equipped to attempt a final project? This stepping stone approach is surely the most effective way to equip a person new to a subject field so they can then broaden their knowledge base. Alas, in CS it seems the falling flat on your face so to speak is a preferential approach to learning in this field of study. Its such a shame these highly intellectual people who create these courses forget what its like to start at the very beginning and the time it takes and guidance needed in order for a person to be able to feel like they are ready to dive in and give a topic like this a whirl. Like I said, its only my opinion but this is where the interconnection and building of the knowledge base falls short at an early stage of development. | 1) was that the teaching methods were | Good | 1) as they appeared more relaxed and | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This is a well designed course that is clear in what it focuses on to give you a good foundation. That said, there is so much more to learn. Make sure you look at the final project after each module to get an idea for all the opportunities to apply the optional materials. You can still pass without doing using the concepts in the optional sections but there is time to get even more out of the final project if you prepare and explore. | 1) focuses on to give you a | Good | 1) foundation. That said, there is so | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Course is good but the early weeks need to be more challenging. 70% of the work was in the last week. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) but the early weeks need to | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good course, give me a basic understanding of SWIFT language. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, give me a basic understanding | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good introduction, it would be even better with a few more presentation on SWIFT. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, it would be even better | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Thank you for this course. It was interesting and helpful. Before. But I failed. I got bad mark and I don't know why. I have only one good comment. But I have 3 bad marks and only 2 good. I am a looser, i guess. So I hate this course, this website, this review system and this world. Thank you again. | 1) know why. I have only one | Good | 1) comment. But I have 3 bad | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Thank you for this course. It was interesting and helpful. Before. But I failed. I got bad mark and I don't know why. I have only one good comment. But I have 3 bad marks and only 2 good. I am a looser, i guess. So I hate this course, this website, this review system and this world. Thank you again. | 2) 3 bad marks and only 2 | Good | 2) I am a looser, i guess. | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is good to start with Swift programming in IOS. this had help me a lot, while not having much time to devote. I appreciate this. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) to start with Swift programming in | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good Course! This class is for people who know how to program (intermediate to advance software programmers) | 1) | Good | 1) Course! This class is for people | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The others course i've taken here had been a little more demanding regarding to practical testing... And i still can't download the lessons in HD, please fix that for future courses. Keep it up the good work. | 1) future courses. Keep it up the | Good | 1) work. | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good course of Swift. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course of Swift. | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The Good: The idea of having the lectures in a Q&A style, two experts in continuous conversation about the topic has a potential The Bad: That potential is wasted on poorly planned lessons and course content The Ugly: Instructors run the Swift code that is written during the lesson and they get a wrong result due to an error in the code. They both agree that the result is weird but then continue to explain that this is how Swift works. In short, they are misleading and confusing you on a topic you are trying to learn. This is of course unintentional but gives you a clue about how the quality check on lecture videos are taken care of. Details here: https://www.coursera.org/learn/swift-programming/discussions/DBk-SJO2EeWNbBIwwhtGwQ | 1) The | Good | 1) The idea of having the lectures | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course should have been more thorough and should have been accompanies with good programming exercises as well..At some starting course there was also some cross talk among the instructors. The module on image processing should be reviewed as after some point it becomes sort of boring. | 1) and should have been accompanies with | Good | 1) programming exercises as well. . At | 2.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | i had no idea of swift, or even not much idea about oop. Got good idea of swift.. assignments can be improved. | 1) not much idea about oop. Got | Good | 1) idea of swift. . assignments can | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good Course. A bit short but goes straight to the point. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. A bit short but goes | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Really good overview of Swift language. | 1) Really | Good | 1) overview of Swift language. | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is a rare example of how it`s not done. Presentation is unstructured. Seems to be a student project where his professor "helps" along to check certain topics the student has to include to get a good grade. | 1) has to include to get a | Good | 1) grade. | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very knowledgeable educators. Course is given in a q&a style which is very very good for a web based course since the questions often are exactly what i want to ask. However, think the course can still be improved, especially in the following aspects. (1) examples in the course are not thought through ahead. Instead, educators came up with them on the spot. that way it may not be the best example to convey the message, plus the videos are made unnecessarily long in this way. Think it's good that for a programming course to show real time programming sometimes. But to do this all the time is a bit too much and therefore inefficient. Comparing to some other courses, think this one could really benefit if the educators could give some thought on how to teach, especially to think from a student perspective. For example: about the capability of overwriting and defining new operators, the example given was to define a knife operator and to overload plus operator to stew vegetables. Both examples do not make much sense to me. Although i did understand that it's nice that one can define his/her own operation/operator, when the examples came I actually got confused -- how do i stew vegetables with code?? (2) Some of the quiz questions I don't find useful. For this course I need lots of time to complete the quiz in contrast to other coursera courses I did. This is because i need to actually read the documentation in order to answer the quiz questions since they are really in depth. In this way, to do the quiz is actually the way to learn. But some questions are quite artificial, for example, there's a multi-choice question about "what are the different ways one can find help..." (3) Finally, I find the video and the quiz very abstract. that it's very difficult to follow without making a line of code myself... Also it is not clear what the educators expect as a pre-requisite for taking this course. Sometimes things are explained as if the listeners have no programming background at all. some other time, a concept is explained so fast I wonder whether i should have known objective-C in order to follow this course... | 1) q&a style which is very very | Good | 1) for a web based course since | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very knowledgeable educators. Course is given in a q&a style which is very very good for a web based course since the questions often are exactly what i want to ask. However, think the course can still be improved, especially in the following aspects. (1) examples in the course are not thought through ahead. Instead, educators came up with them on the spot. that way it may not be the best example to convey the message, plus the videos are made unnecessarily long in this way. Think it's good that for a programming course to show real time programming sometimes. But to do this all the time is a bit too much and therefore inefficient. Comparing to some other courses, think this one could really benefit if the educators could give some thought on how to teach, especially to think from a student perspective. For example: about the capability of overwriting and defining new operators, the example given was to define a knife operator and to overload plus operator to stew vegetables. Both examples do not make much sense to me. Although i did understand that it's nice that one can define his/her own operation/operator, when the examples came I actually got confused -- how do i stew vegetables with code?? (2) Some of the quiz questions I don't find useful. For this course I need lots of time to complete the quiz in contrast to other coursera courses I did. This is because i need to actually read the documentation in order to answer the quiz questions since they are really in depth. In this way, to do the quiz is actually the way to learn. But some questions are quite artificial, for example, there's a multi-choice question about "what are the different ways one can find help..." (3) Finally, I find the video and the quiz very abstract. that it's very difficult to follow without making a line of code myself... Also it is not clear what the educators expect as a pre-requisite for taking this course. Sometimes things are explained as if the listeners have no programming background at all. some other time, a concept is explained so fast I wonder whether i should have known objective-C in order to follow this course... | 2) long in this way. Think it's | Good | 2) that for a programming course to | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Course was the worst I have taken on Coursera. I wish I could have received a refund. The professors were hard to follow, laughed through mistakes and did not do a good job of walking through the course content. I would not recommend this course to anyone. | 1) mistakes and did not do a | Good | 1) job of walking through the course | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The videos were a bit unfocused, but over all I learned a good amount about Swift, and appreciate many of it's design decisions. | 1) but over all I learned a | Good | 1) amount about Swift, and appreciate many | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good compact introduction. | 1) | Good | 1) compact introduction. | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good introduction for us | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for us | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Was pretty good overall. I feel there was a lack of in-lecture questions in the first few videos. That aside, great course. | 1) Was pretty | Good | 1) overall. I feel there was a | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I'm dropping this course because it's just SO poorly conceived. Three weeks in, and I can't really articulate what I've actually learned (which leads me to believe that the answer is "not very much"). The major problem is that this course has no clear objective. And I don't mean that the individual lessons don't have objectives - I actually mean that the entire course doesn't know what it wants to be and the instructors seem to have bypassed this critical question. I have a background in Python, and I was under the impression that this course would teach me how to program in Swift (seems like a fairly straightforward goal). But it isn't that at all. If I were to summarize this course (perhaps a little uncharitably, because I'm annoyed at the time I wasted) it would be: some dudes with a computer talk about some cool features of a programming language. I'm fairly baffled by the fact that there was no thought put into which examples might best illustrate the features they were trying to teach. Which-examples-might-best-illustrate-the-feature-I-am-trying-to-teach is pedagogy 101. They would regularly work through examples just to conclude "actually that's a bad example". This is pretty strong evidence that there was no lesson planning involved. There were also no practice exercises, no posting of pieces of illustrative code, and hence, no way to actually get good at programming in Swift (unless it's self directed, in which case - why bother with the formality of taking a course on Coursera?). | 1) hence, no way to actually get | Good | 1) at programming in Swift (unless it's | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | good overview and introduction to Swift | 1) | Good | 1) overview and introduction to Swift | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Unfortunately the course is not very well thought out. The lecture videos are poorly organized, concepts are not presented in the proper context and lack sufficient detail/depth, little thought or effort was put into designing the examples in the videos, there are no actual coding exercises until the last week, there are no examples of elegant code, nor thoughtful examples of good vs. bad code, the quizzes contain questions that are poorly worded and ambiguous (and I think some actually have the wrong answers and are contradicted by other online resources). It's very high level, and they hand-wave important concepts. I really don't see how this class can actually teach you to build a robust high-quality app. You're probably better off just reading some of the official documentation online. | 1) elegant code, nor thoughtful examples of | Good | 1) vs. bad code, the quizzes contain | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | After 97% of the work completed, I have to admit that this course is NOT GOOD. The instructor is not actually the professor himself, and they do lots of mistakes in the videos. You do not learn anything that helpful, and perhaps the actual Swift documentation is way more clearer than this course is. | 1) admit that this course is NOT | Good | 1) The instructor is not actually the | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | No stars for this course, 3 modules I did, and I think is not a valuable course, gives a bad introduction to the language, there are inconsistencies in the theory and knowledge of the language. The preparation of the course is poor, there is no direction, a lot of errors using playground and the instructors hesitate and doubt all the time during the recording of the screen. That's not good point for the prestigious University of Toronto and Coursera. One star for the review is too much, no preparation, lack of security, bad quality. | 1) recording of the screen. That's not | Good | 1) point for the prestigious University of | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Unnecessary with the Swift vs Objective C session, did not provide any value - otherwise fairly good basic course | 1) provide any value - otherwise fairly | Good | 1) basic course | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good way to start learning swift. I hope other concepts will be explained in the next courses, but I have to say this course is held very well. | 1) | Good | 1) way to start learning swift. I | 4.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | A resource if your starting with Swift. Video quality is often poor. Examples are a bit too contrived. Generally, presentations should be better prepared, too much figuring things out during the video. Good choice of project for the practical.Many interesting coding practice tidbits along the way but needs polish. | 1) figuring things out during the video. | Good | 1) choice of project for the practical. | 3.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is poorly designed. What course on a programming language jumps first into how to use the debugger and what went wrong with a program? You are not introducing Swift, you are introducing xcode (and doing a terrible job of it). Also, I have been using xcode and Swift for 8 months now and producing some really good work, but I could only get 3/7 on your quiz because you have written questions with the purpose of tricking people instead of reinforcing or checking knowledge of the content. When you teach a new application, consider introducing the interface first. Explain what the various areas are, what they are needed for, and how to control them. This orients the user in the application and helps them to find their way around when they are trying to reinforce your teachings later. The presentation for this course is so unprofessional. It's like a running commentary on a movie instead of an educational presentation. I felt like I was listening to two geeks stuffing around and having a good time, instead of people who are professional teachers! I'm so incredibly disappointed with this course. Back to the wonderful work of Paul Hegarty from Stanford University on iTunes University and YouTube for me. University of Toronto - you should really consider what your teaching staff are doing before you unleash them on the world. | 1) months now and producing some really | Good | 1) work, but I could only get | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is poorly designed. What course on a programming language jumps first into how to use the debugger and what went wrong with a program? You are not introducing Swift, you are introducing xcode (and doing a terrible job of it). Also, I have been using xcode and Swift for 8 months now and producing some really good work, but I could only get 3/7 on your quiz because you have written questions with the purpose of tricking people instead of reinforcing or checking knowledge of the content. When you teach a new application, consider introducing the interface first. Explain what the various areas are, what they are needed for, and how to control them. This orients the user in the application and helps them to find their way around when they are trying to reinforce your teachings later. The presentation for this course is so unprofessional. It's like a running commentary on a movie instead of an educational presentation. I felt like I was listening to two geeks stuffing around and having a good time, instead of people who are professional teachers! I'm so incredibly disappointed with this course. Back to the wonderful work of Paul Hegarty from Stanford University on iTunes University and YouTube for me. University of Toronto - you should really consider what your teaching staff are doing before you unleash them on the world. | 2) geeks stuffing around and having a | Good | 2) time, instead of people who are | 1.0 |
| eUI0xjeIEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The professors did no prepared the classes. They make so many mistakes in the video lectures and they also laughts in the middle of the course and they send a non-professional feeling to the students. The content of the course is very good, but the proffesors could really do better. | 1) content of the course is very | Good | 1) but the proffesors could really do | 2.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | This is a very good and informational course : however, the person who is speaking tends to have a lot of mums and stammers a lot. Overall, pretty decent course. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) and informational course : however, the | 3.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Good course. Adam is a good teacher. The topics are nice. It's about the big bang, supermassive black holes, and how a star is born and dies.. and then some :) I really enjoyed taking this course. Two thumbs up! | 1) | Good | 1) course. Adam is a good teacher. | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Good course. Adam is a good teacher. The topics are nice. It's about the big bang, supermassive black holes, and how a star is born and dies.. and then some :) I really enjoyed taking this course. Two thumbs up! | 2) Good course. Adam is a | Good | 2) teacher. The topics are nice. It's | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Very good course. Instructive and easy to follow. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Instructive and easy to follow. | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Good overview of the topic. Inspiring lecturer. No need for any complicated math. Having a background in physics on advanced high school level should probably be enoughto pass this course. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the topic. Inspiring lecturer. | 4.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | overall lectures are good and explanatory. | 1) overall lectures are | Good | 1) and explanatory. | 5.0 |
| euRJEycxEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Good but not deep enough. It could be longer to cover more aspects or more profound. | 1) | Good | 1) but not deep enough. It could | 3.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I feel Professor Craig Wright offers a comprehensive, varied, accessible and fun overview of a very large subject, starting right at the beginning of musical history and bringing you up to the present day. He uses a wide variety of visual and audio resources including relevant works of art, architecture, artefacts, sketches, quotes from historical documents, surviving musical scores, music recordings, videos of live orchestral performance, music animations, costume, period instruments and interviews with musical colleagues of his who are able to share their expertise. In addition to all this he offers us his own photographs from his pilgrimages to cities such as Vienna, which adds further to the course's personal touch. What comes across throughout Wright's course videos is his immense love of, and desire to share that love of classical music, which for me is a major factor in what makes the course so appealing. I also enjoy his sense of humour and efforts to appeal to a younger generation (Wright is in his 70s). At more than one point in the course he adopts fancy dress to reflect the period he is exploring. A highlight I feel is when the course features a clip from one of his lectures at Yale University where he enrolls some colleagues to enact a scene from Don Giovanni in which Wright plays an angry father, slain by Don Giovanni in a duel. It is a touching (and amusing) example of his good humour and ability to have fun with his students. My only criticism would be his own piano playing which is often rushed and inaccurate, but I feel this is largely due to the time constraints of filming the videos. By his own admission, he realised early on in life that he was not up to the challenge of being a concert pianist - he is primarily a musicologist, not a pianist. Every piece of music touched on in the course is available via the course Spotify playlist (extremely helpful) so there is no difficulty in listening to professional recordings of all the pieces discussed. I would highly recommend this course to anyone seeking a background knowledge of the evolution of musical history. | 1) touching (and amusing) example of his | Good | 1) humour and ability to have fun | 4.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very interesting course about the development of classical music. By giving comparisons between music, architecture, visual arts, literature and by giving some historical background of the specific time periods, it give a good idea how the music evolved. | 1) specific time periods, it give a | Good | 1) idea how the music evolved. | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Exceptionally good! Thanks a lot Dr. Wright! | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) Thanks a lot Dr. Wright! | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very good course, interesting and educational. I really enjoyed it. I wish the professor will give another and more complex course about music understanding that involves specific notes, pitches and sclaes. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, interesting and educational. I really | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I simply love the course! I've rarely seen a professor who is so good in fascinating his students. I feel like I'm not only learning a lot in this course, but that it is also great fun learning with Prof. Wright. Thank you very much for that, I really appreciate the work everyone has put into this course, it was definitely worth it! | 1) seen a professor who is so | Good | 1) in fascinating his students. I feel | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | very good and relaxing course | 1) very | Good | 1) and relaxing course | 5.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great course! I learned a lot, discovered new music and the way mr. Wright presents the content is very good. | 1) Wright presents the content is very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| eV-OTCTuEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Well-structured, well-paced, easy to understand. Good mix of classical music and pop music references to help you understand. This course really helped me to understand exactly why I love certain classical music pieces. FYI if you're on Spotify, someone's created an accompanying playlist so you can listen to the music he references in full. | 1) Well-structured, well-paced, easy to understand. | Good | 1) mix of classical music and pop | 5.0 |
| eVrrS8E_EeWP5g5dlaZx4w | Amazing course by Dr. Dale Purvez! This is my second course from Duke University and i absolutely loved it all! This course was very unique in itself ! i.e It involved much more than just assignments. The final test which involved writing an essay which had to be peer reviewed was a good experience. Also reviewing the work done by fellow students have to be noted for it would be an amazing experience for anyone taking this course! I am very much looking for ward for such courses in future. Thank You Dr.Purves, Coursera and Duke University for this course! | 1) to be peer reviewed was a | Good | 1) experience. Also reviewing the work done | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Very good for everyone who want to know about Big Questions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for everyone who want to know | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | big history is a good course for everybody who interest history | 1) big history is a | Good | 1) course for everybody who interest history | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Why is this course dangerous? I took this course because first I liked the idea to have a history lesson spanning the age of the whole universe. Maybe it is also intriguing to explain everything just with one principle: the second law of thermodynamics. BUT as it turned out they don't have any clue what this second law of thermodynamics means. They always forget the second part of it: it is just valide in a closed system. I think everbody will agree, that the earth for example isn't a closed system. In the beginning they tell you you should be critical about everything new you hear or get taught. But if you are critical and question things they teach you they will ignore you. One glance at the discussion forum shows: they are fast in answering good feedback and compliments by students, but critical questions (with scientific papers who show different facts) get ignored for weeks and months. They are cherry picking. They just see what encourages their view and their opinion and ignore everything that contradicts their course, opinion, believe and dogma. In this respect they are so dangerous. That is the same principle how cults work. Maybe their goal, stopping polluting and changing the world in such a speed seems to be a good one. But also here you have to be careful. When they talk about climate change and the overuse of ressources they are exaggerating by a factor of 50! In my opinion you are damaging an important discussion if you are lying and exaggerating in such a shameless way. For sure it is not helpful! But again, the truth doesn't fit in their world view. Furthermore they "teach" that cities get blown away by taifoons is caused by the "universe balancing entropy". This isn't just lack of understanding physics, or history, or flow mechanics, it is just insane. In summary: this is not a history course, but the "teachings" of a lying, exaggerating, cherry picking cult with no knowledge in particle physics, cosmology, chemistry, biology or even history. So please: if you take this course, be aware of this pitfalls and their intentions. | 1) shows: they are fast in answering | Good | 1) feedback and compliments by students, but | 1.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Why is this course dangerous? I took this course because first I liked the idea to have a history lesson spanning the age of the whole universe. Maybe it is also intriguing to explain everything just with one principle: the second law of thermodynamics. BUT as it turned out they don't have any clue what this second law of thermodynamics means. They always forget the second part of it: it is just valide in a closed system. I think everbody will agree, that the earth for example isn't a closed system. In the beginning they tell you you should be critical about everything new you hear or get taught. But if you are critical and question things they teach you they will ignore you. One glance at the discussion forum shows: they are fast in answering good feedback and compliments by students, but critical questions (with scientific papers who show different facts) get ignored for weeks and months. They are cherry picking. They just see what encourages their view and their opinion and ignore everything that contradicts their course, opinion, believe and dogma. In this respect they are so dangerous. That is the same principle how cults work. Maybe their goal, stopping polluting and changing the world in such a speed seems to be a good one. But also here you have to be careful. When they talk about climate change and the overuse of ressources they are exaggerating by a factor of 50! In my opinion you are damaging an important discussion if you are lying and exaggerating in such a shameless way. For sure it is not helpful! But again, the truth doesn't fit in their world view. Furthermore they "teach" that cities get blown away by taifoons is caused by the "universe balancing entropy". This isn't just lack of understanding physics, or history, or flow mechanics, it is just insane. In summary: this is not a history course, but the "teachings" of a lying, exaggerating, cherry picking cult with no knowledge in particle physics, cosmology, chemistry, biology or even history. So please: if you take this course, be aware of this pitfalls and their intentions. | 2) a speed seems to be a | Good | 2) one. But also here you have | 1.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | very good..thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) . thank you | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This is a very simple course about complexity. I do a lot of rabbit holeing so found the lectures a good way to organize further reading and research on various topics. would recommend this class highly | 1) holeing so found the lectures a | Good | 1) way to organize further reading and | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | It is very good but it doesn't explain every thing | 1) It is very | Good | 1) but it doesn't explain every thing | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This is a good course. I liked the idea of the 9 thresholds of increasing complexity, with the energy required, the Goldilocks conditions, and emergence. I want to think about this a bit more, and see how I can apply it to other, smaller, thresholds. I like the idea of restoring the idea of a story to history. It's time to think about whether we should be moving into the driver's seat, and whether we have any idea of where we want to go. What would it take to make this a great course? The Discussion Forums don't seem to sparkle the way they do with some other courses I have done. I have completed other Coursera offerings, such as Origins (University of Copenhagen Natural History Museum), Our Earth (Climate, History, and Processes - University of Manchester), and Introduction to Genetics & Evolution (Duke University), and there was a lot of discussion among students. I felt that I learned a lot from the discussions, and not just the formal lectures. I also noticed the lecturers participating in the discussions. I cannot understand why this hasn't happened on this course, but it is part of my feeling that this course has a way to go yet. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course. I liked the idea of | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This course is blowing my mind (in a good way). It has been a long time since I've felt the wonder of the world (and universe) of which I am a part. In addition, this course is expanding the language with which I can talk about and understand my environments (new and old). The information is well-organised and concise and the resources are a good blend of academic, creative, informative and fun and the lecturers are knowledgable and passionate. I hope this field floods the world's places of education. | 1) is blowing my mind (in a | Good | 1) way). It has been a long | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This course is blowing my mind (in a good way). It has been a long time since I've felt the wonder of the world (and universe) of which I am a part. In addition, this course is expanding the language with which I can talk about and understand my environments (new and old). The information is well-organised and concise and the resources are a good blend of academic, creative, informative and fun and the lecturers are knowledgable and passionate. I hope this field floods the world's places of education. | 2) concise and the resources are a | Good | 2) blend of academic, creative, informative and | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Good, engaging and thought-provoking course. | 1) | Good | 1) engaging and thought-provoking course. | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The course is very nicely done and well organized. The fundamental organization around sources of learning and the progression of lessons are well done and strongly support knowledge building. Some of the speakers have verbal patterns or flows of speaking that can be a bit distracting, but they are all interesting and informative. I like that you can also download transcripts. I am a very visual learner whose mind tends to wander off when faced with a talking head. Having the transcript to follow as I listen allowed me to highlight and make notes while listening, ensuring greater attention to the content. Ultimately, I made the decision to not finish the course. Not because the course was not well done but because it doesn't align with my own interests in systems thinking and complexity. It is a good course and well worth engaging in, even if you discover, as I did, that it doesn't quite match one's learning needs. I do recommend it if you are interested in cosmology and theories related to the origins of the universe. | 1) thinking and complexity. It is a | Good | 1) course and well worth engaging in, | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | This Astronomy course is good but for people that are more interesting in the big bang theory and how the universe came into existence today. | 1) This Astronomy course is | Good | 1) but for people that are more | 4.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | The history of the universe, mainkind and the future in 6 weeks. A very short introduction but a good idea | 1) A very short introduction but a | Good | 1) idea | 3.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | i love this course. it seems good! | 1) i love this course. it seems | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | Various professors which are inspiring and knowledgable. Good format, short videos and links for digging deeper. But it´s a five star course because I enjoy being flabbergasted with my origin myth. | 1) professors which are inspiring and knowledgable. | Good | 1) format, short videos and links for | 5.0 |
| EwR6zhSDEeWCWhKuhISYpw | At this moment, this course has been really good. | 1) moment, this course has been really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course about NoSQL MongoDB. I learned a lot about the course but it would have been better if the instructor would have given some emphasis on programming with Unix machines like Macs. He used windows and in many cases I would run into problems like running Mongoid by including Gem files that he provided. I had to downgrade from rails 4 to 3 and then to 5, etc hitting StackOverflow every time to sort out technical issues. | 1) | Good | 1) course about NoSQL MongoDB. I learned | 3.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Overall good course with a lot of examples. Though, some important steps seems to be missing, so could not follow along with all the demos. Had to spend some unpredictable amount of time digging into some questions (probably, it is fine, but the difference between 2 previous courses and this one in the program is vivid). I had a problem installing 'doorkeeper-mongodb' and it does not seem that this problem for a number of users. Good that it was not in the final project. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course with a lot of examples. | 3.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Overall good course with a lot of examples. Though, some important steps seems to be missing, so could not follow along with all the demos. Had to spend some unpredictable amount of time digging into some questions (probably, it is fine, but the difference between 2 previous courses and this one in the program is vivid). I had a problem installing 'doorkeeper-mongodb' and it does not seem that this problem for a number of users. Good that it was not in the final project. | 2) problem for a number of users. | Good | 2) that it was not in the | 3.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Very good course! An in depth and comprehensive class on Rails + Mongo DB. Pros: - Topic explanations are short and on point - Homework and treated topics are closely related Cons: - Homework debugging is slow on Windows - Sometimes it is necessary to read on extra material on line | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! An in depth and comprehensive | 4.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good contents but a bit over-complicated assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) contents but a bit over-complicated assignments. | 2.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | An unexpectedly disappointing, and in fact, downright awful course. The lectures waste a good share of time as in places they barely scratch the surface of what is further required to be implemented in the assignments. The assignments themselves inherit the nice modular spec-test driven spirit of the first two classes. However, the instructions are mostly quite vague or even misleading, occasionally dropping some “hints”, which are often either not helpful, or just offer to copy-paste a quarter page of code. The tasks are very (and by “very" I mean EXTREMELY) long, tedious, boring to tears and to the point when you start to wonder if the authors are trolling the students. How about a 53 (yes, that is fifty three!) pages of assignment for the 3d week? To be fair, not all of this is the task statement, there is a lot of test code as well, but you know.. even one third of 53 is an impressive volume for a 4 weeks course (you get re-enrolled if you fail to be fair). Took me 44 hours of pure coding time (according to WakaTime) to finish the course. I have passed tens of courses on Coursera, and this one is by far the worst. That is taking into consideration that I would not rather call any other course (of those I have taken) “a bad one”. I suggest saving time and money by buying a book on Mongo and another one on Rails instead. I do believe though that the course is very green and certainly has to undergo some refinements and I will be happy to see future reviews shadow this one as obsolete. | 1) awful course. The lectures waste a | Good | 1) share of time as in places | 2.0 |
| eXbmvDe9EeWO-Qq6rEZAow | course work is too hectic. its hard for some one who is new to web app development and new to ruby! but over all strength and content of the course is good. | 1) and content of the course is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | The examples and the assignments are very cleverly thought out. Good teaching! | 1) assignments are very cleverly thought out. | Good | 1) teaching! | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | This class was pretty good. I liked the reading assignments, and there was some helpful instruction as well. I liked learning about the second person perspective, and the section on credibility and research was also really helpful. | 1) This class was pretty | Good | 1) I liked the reading assignments, and | 4.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I've enjoyed "The Craft of Setting and Description." It's given me a good chance to spend some time focusing on the details that matter. I've learned a lot about what to include where setting and description are concerned and what to leave out. It's been a very good course. | 1) Description. " It's given me a | Good | 1) chance to spend some time focusing | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I've enjoyed "The Craft of Setting and Description." It's given me a good chance to spend some time focusing on the details that matter. I've learned a lot about what to include where setting and description are concerned and what to leave out. It's been a very good course. | 2) leave out. It's been a very | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very good course, thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, thanks! | 4.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | If you've not read a single book on writing, this class might be good. Otherwise, don't expect to get much about the ~30 minutes of lecture. | 1) on writing, this class might be | Good | 1) Otherwise, don't expect to get much | 3.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Clear lectures with practical advice, and very good assignments. The assignments in the plot class and the character class were too confusing and structured, but the assignments in the craft of setting class were perfectly designed to help the student practice whatever was taught in the modules. I know it sounds unimportant, but we're here to write, and when we're given awkward assignments, the peer reviews go haywire and the writing quality declines for everyone. I read some of the best work, peer work, in this class and in the style class. | 1) lectures with practical advice, and very | Good | 1) assignments. The assignments in the plot | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Wow! This is a real good one! And also the extra literature is waaaaaaay to interesting!! | 1) Wow! This is a real | Good | 1) one! And also the extra literature | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very good and interesting course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course! | 5.0 |
| EZVzungdEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Excellent course that both informs and inspires. There is a good deal of content as well as advice. The student writer is encouraged to explore and be unafraid. The only draw back is that the online classroom does not allow the auditing students to post and get feedback on their assignments and it must be done externally to fully get the benefit of our fellow students. | 1) informs and inspires. There is a | Good | 1) deal of content as well as | 4.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course with knowledgeable professors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with knowledgeable professors. | 4.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good review, especially the atomic structure unit. The stoichiometry unit was also very comprehensive. I hope there could be more on gaseous state and solution/acid-base chemistry. Quizzes are very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) review, especially the atomic structure unit. | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good review, especially the atomic structure unit. The stoichiometry unit was also very comprehensive. I hope there could be more on gaseous state and solution/acid-base chemistry. Quizzes are very good. | 2) and solution/acid-base chemistry. Quizzes are very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | In detail. good! | 1) In detail. | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course, congratulation to University em Professors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, congratulation to University em Professors. | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | It's been awesome so far!!! great work and material. Good way to teach too. Thanks a million | 1) ! ! great work and material. | Good | 1) way to teach too. Thanks a | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | I have never been good at math nor chemistry but the professor explains the various processes in such a simplistic way that so far I passed the quizzes with a perfect score and I have a pretty good grasp of everything she's saying. Granted, I had to watch some explanations more than once but that's just my pace of learning. I'm thankful for this online course and waiting for the certification to become available! | 1) I have never been | Good | 1) at math nor chemistry but the | 5.0 |
| F0J_-3LWEeWxvQr3acyajw | I have never been good at math nor chemistry but the professor explains the various processes in such a simplistic way that so far I passed the quizzes with a perfect score and I have a pretty good grasp of everything she's saying. Granted, I had to watch some explanations more than once but that's just my pace of learning. I'm thankful for this online course and waiting for the certification to become available! | 2) score and I have a pretty | Good | 2) grasp of everything she's saying. Granted, | 5.0 |
| f8wh4qQ-EeWF3A6Yvo0Lpw | It is a very good course for learning how to write well. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course for learning how to write | 5.0 |
| f8wh4qQ-EeWF3A6Yvo0Lpw | Its a good course but not very exceptional. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course but not very exceptional. | 3.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | Good explanation | 1) | Good | 1) explanation | 4.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | Nice Lesson and good subject | 1) Nice Lesson and | Good | 1) subject | 3.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | This Course is very easy to learn, all it's themes are so good explained. I'm sorry but I might to change the RATE of this course. All went well until the course started reading the explanation of code , after that ... I lost , and I could not continue , because It just came out of nowhere , coding , there wasn't a previous step that says , we will encode here , or are we going to do this somewhere ... just appeared and disappeared as it appeared ... ... we were very well ... but I can not say much more ! | 1) learn, all it's themes are so | Good | 1) explained. I'm sorry but I might | 2.0 |
| FbK0-CSNEeWDEQ4YpP0FCQ | Pretty good beginner's cource | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) beginner's cource | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | good course for beginners in research | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners in research | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | The organization of this course was very good. I liked the themes and their order. I thought the videos could have been longer and more substancial, but the reading were great. I got confused on one of the assignments in which the questions of the given chapter were supposed to be answer. There were 3. I must have misunderstood or have another file, because no one I read had such question and I got not so great reviews. I think this should be looked at. Either way, thank you for this opportunity! | 1) organization of this course was very | Good | 1) I liked the themes and their | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | The course gave a very good introduction to what research is about, how to plan your research, and the basics of doing research. Good discussions with faculty members from different departments are shown, and they are quite rich. In my opinion, some written course materials summarizing the key points would have helped a lot to consolidate the key points. Nonetheless, I enjoyed doing the course! | 1) The course gave a very | Good | 1) introduction to what research is about, | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | The course gave a very good introduction to what research is about, how to plan your research, and the basics of doing research. Good discussions with faculty members from different departments are shown, and they are quite rich. In my opinion, some written course materials summarizing the key points would have helped a lot to consolidate the key points. Nonetheless, I enjoyed doing the course! | 2) and the basics of doing research. | Good | 2) discussions with faculty members from different | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Very good for an introduction to the basic ideas of research and why it is undertaken. Enjoyed it very much! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for an introduction to the basic | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Interesting course, provides a good insight for beginners. Wish there were more assignments and multi choice quizzes. | 1) Interesting course, provides a | Good | 1) insight for beginners. Wish there were | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | it is very good | 1) it is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | 1) Content is | Good | 1) I found the information in the | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | 2) Take this course, as it is | Good | 2) So why three stars? I know | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Content is good. I found the information in the videos valuable, albeit short and leaving me wanting more. I suppose that's what research is for. In general great and short course to get one on track with research methods.Take this course, as it is good. So why three stars? I know it is a long review, and feel free to remove it from the list, if you deem it appropriate. I have learned a lot in the course, and it is a valuable experience still. My problem lies with the design of the course, that seems to have started with great vigour at then lost the steam at the end. I would like to suggest few pointers. Especially since the presenters have another courses in the catalogue with similar issues. 1. Help learners to focus - Body language, and position in the room. Standing in front of windows with the traffic outside may seem a minor thing, but it detracts form you and the content. As a course designer it is a responsibility to set it right. Same applies for hands in back pockets, posture when sat down, lens flare etc. 2 - As instructors you have offered very little teaching. All was left to the guest speakers. All very good and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own mini lecture would help to establish you as experts (not that you are not, but we would not know that from the videos), rather than mere interviewers. (Summary of what was said). 3 - match the video and e-tivity focus. And think about the accessibility of the material to your learners, especially if no previous knowledge is required. Week three was about managing research and planning. The reading, was surprisingly different (week 4 activity would be more suitable here) and really hard to access to someone, who hasn't done much reading in theories of knowledge etc. This would be more accessible as a guided lecture and quiz, rather than 400 words response. I hope I was not offensive to anyone. I was trying to help you to help us learn better, if that makes sense. M | 3) to the guest speakers. All very | Good | 3) and knowledgeable. Some graphic and own | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Good on line course work in research methodology | 1) | Good | 1) on line course work in research | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Great course, I managed to refine my research question through its assignments, and got a better idea of how to go about creating a good literature review. Have bookmarked most of the readings for future reference. | 1) how to go about creating a | Good | 1) literature review. Have bookmarked most of | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | its very good course | 1) its very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Came to know some basic research strategies. Enjoyed the assignments. Good course, catered for grad students but Undergrads can also benefit from the Reading material provided. | 1) basic research strategies. Enjoyed the assignments. | Good | 1) course, catered for grad students but | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Very good course: doable, achievable, and feasible. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course: doable, achievable, and feasible. | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This course is a good introductory course on how to perform research and is well designed. Although the intended audience are students of various branches of study, the reading materials that are provided in the course concentrate more on social sciences. This is something that I as a computer science graduate feel hard to comprehend. If reading materials that are provided in the course address a general audience then it would be great | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introductory course on how to perform | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Very good teachers and interesting videos. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers and interesting videos. | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Some parts were good but overall the course was lacking in its ability to add value. There were generic discussions. Week 3 was almost useless; had it not been for a good reading provided for an assignment, it was too basic. Add some specificity in the course or name it Basics of Research Methods. | 1) Some parts were | Good | 1) but overall the course was lacking | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Some parts were good but overall the course was lacking in its ability to add value. There were generic discussions. Week 3 was almost useless; had it not been for a good reading provided for an assignment, it was too basic. Add some specificity in the course or name it Basics of Research Methods. | 2) had it not been for a | Good | 2) reading provided for an assignment, it | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | This is a good avenue to gather information and to contribute to the body of knowledge even at your smallest contribution! | 1) This is a | Good | 1) avenue to gather information and to | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Good course for anyone starting the journey of research. The course gives you an overview of the whole process in simple and easy way. Research work is challenging, however, this introductory course gives you some comfort when you hear the research scholars. | 1) | Good | 1) course for anyone starting the journey | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It's a really good course to learn general parameters of research. However I think the E-tivity 3 wasn't clear some people did a summary from the reading, some others answered the questions from the reading and me tried to do a connection between the videos and the reading. These misunderstandings can have impact in the evaluation from the partners | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course to learn general parameters of | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It's great to understand more of research methods in application, but I wish there were more resources provided to supplement our study. In general, this is a good course for those who start thinking of doing research in the future | 1) study. In general, this is a | Good | 1) course for those who start thinking | 3.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | Good course indeed. | 1) | Good | 1) course indeed. | 4.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | I enjoyed the interviews and the tips/suggestions offered in terms of assisting me as a "new learner" to make sure that I submit researchable topics and a research project that aligns to a good design process. Thank you to Coursera for the opportunity, you have done well. | 1) research project that aligns to a | Good | 1) design process. Thank you to Coursera | 5.0 |
| fCKQimXqEeSuUyIAC0mIhA | It's really a very good course. I loved it!!!!! | 1) It's really a very | Good | 1) course. I loved it! ! ! | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | good introduction to the specialization | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the specialization | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good one i like this site to build my skill more potent | 1) | Good | 1) one i like this site to | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very Good, I found the course exciting and great exercises. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I found the course exciting and | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | As it is an introductory course, one would not expect an in depth coverage and considering the fact that the course would have had students with varying levels of prior knowledge/experience, it was a good course. If you are already into marketing, it gives you an opportunity to re-visit the basics and presents interesting case studies. If you have no background in Digital Marketing, this is one of the best places to get started. Looking forward to course 2 of the specialization. A big Thank You to professor Aric and his assistant. Happy Learning! | 1) of prior knowledge/experience, it was a | Good | 1) course. If you are already into | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | good learning | 1) | Good | 1) learning | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good introduction and easy to follow along. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction and easy to follow along. | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Amazing course. If interested in marketing I would suggest to take this course. Material is really good and explanation with examples from Professor Aric is really good. | 1) take this course. Material is really | Good | 1) and explanation with examples from Professor | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Amazing course. If interested in marketing I would suggest to take this course. Material is really good and explanation with examples from Professor Aric is really good. | 2) examples from Professor Aric is really | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good course for someone seeking to know fundamentals of Digital Marketing. | 1) | Good | 1) course for someone seeking to know | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course! Good videos, the assignments are challenging and the concepts clear. Perfect :) | 1) Great course! | Good | 1) videos, the assignments are challenging and | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great Course Thanks Professor Aric Good Luck | 1) Great Course Thanks Professor Aric | Good | 1) Luck | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good content but would have preferred if it was more interactive. There is no way to discuss in detail and debate over a topic. I still have many questions unanswered and forum is very inactive. Wish there was a thread for each topic where people could just discuss their perspective. Overall good content but lack of interaction makes it incomplete in my opinion. | 1) | Good | 1) content but would have preferred if | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good content but would have preferred if it was more interactive. There is no way to discuss in detail and debate over a topic. I still have many questions unanswered and forum is very inactive. Wish there was a thread for each topic where people could just discuss their perspective. Overall good content but lack of interaction makes it incomplete in my opinion. | 2) could just discuss their perspective. Overall | Good | 2) content but lack of interaction makes | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Study material is very good but more recent things and cases need to be included. Most of the material here is 3-4 years old. | 1) Study material is very | Good | 1) but more recent things and cases | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good course . I would suggest everyone to take this course as it is very innovative with great ideas and case studies . Professor Aric has explained everything in detail about the current scenario of marketing and how the world is changing digitally . Thank You ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course . I would suggest everyone | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course offered an interesting overview and introduction to digital marketing; it is also a good start to the specialization in Digital Marketing. This was the first time I have taken a Coursera course and was able to complete it, and I've tried several. Quite often, the content is just too difficult to wade through without 1:1 human support. I think the workload was pitched correctly. I also liked how some theory was taught, and some research based on the theory. It is not just a bunch of case studies. There is an effort to describe the general principles that can apply across both firms and specific technologies, although there is a lot of both (firms and technologies) addressed as well. The most useful part of the course was a rather extensive discussion around pay what you want (PWYW), and the theory behind that, and the supporting case-based and research-based evidence, is really compelling. I plan to use a PWYW strategy as I develop my online startup. Thanks, Coursera and University of Illinois! On the negative side (and there's not much of that), some of the interviews of students on the U of I quad were ridiculously pointless. They really offered nothing of great value and took up substantial time. They were too anecdotal and at times the resulting content worked against the principles being taught in the course. I would rather see user-generated content, created by students and grads of the course, perhaps, from around the world, each discussing some aspect of that unit's topic. Just focusing on student interviews at U of I seems pretty parochial. I would also love to participate in UGC for a newsletter spinning off from this course. They use the courage presumably to extend the U of I community, but here's the thing: it creates its own community, and U of I would be well-served to re-oriented around it, rather than assuming that the only path forward is the reverse. Again, this is one of the most successful courses at Coursera. So maybe this is the direction for U of I to be heading...For example, I would anticipate offers from U or I for how they can get me into additional non-traditional business (or other) Coursera courses, or U of I courses or programs, or heck, teaching for U o I. Anyway, embrace the disruption! | 1) digital marketing; it is also a | Good | 1) start to the specialization in Digital | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good start to the course. Though I feel more energy and enthusiasm by the instructors would uplift the course. Some content is not prevalent at present (outdated). | 1) | Good | 1) start to the course. Though I | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The content of the course is very good. What I would improve are the Quizes; I'd concentrate more on key stuff, not include any questions concerning irrelevant details. Some of the assignment questions were also a bit unclear and the rating scales did not make sense at times. | 1) content of the course is very | Good | 1) What I would improve are the | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good course! Highly recommended for someone with no background in marketing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Highly recommended for someone with | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This was a very good introduction class to Digital Marketing. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) introduction class to Digital Marketing. | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Paid for the course and never took it. Terrible professor teaching the course, the format was poorly put together, and just wasn't overall a very good course. | 1) and just wasn't overall a very | Good | 1) course. | 1.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great Insight, a very good course to review the 4P model with a digital lens! | 1) Great Insight, a very | Good | 1) course to review the 4P model | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I have gotten great insight into the digital world and a good start on my specialization. I enjoyed the instructor and his engagement! | 1) into the digital world and a | Good | 1) start on my specialization. I enjoyed | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good key concepts | 1) | Good | 1) key concepts | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good course and I would absolutly recommend it to each and every one who has intrests in marketing. Moreover the teacher is quite brilliant and very good in delivering concepts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and I would absolutly recommend | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good course and I would absolutly recommend it to each and every one who has intrests in marketing. Moreover the teacher is quite brilliant and very good in delivering concepts. | 2) teacher is quite brilliant and very | Good | 2) in delivering concepts. | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | elementary .. good. | 1) elementary . . | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good course, but NO Statement of Accomplishment certificate | 1) | Good | 1) course, but NO Statement of Accomplishment | 2.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good course, clear and easy to understand some exercises were outdated as red laser doesn't exist any more | 1) | Good | 1) course, clear and easy to understand | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good insights. Thanks. I have thoroughly enjoyed this course and learnt a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) insights. Thanks. I have thoroughly enjoyed | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | perfect a very good class | 1) perfect a very | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good precious insight of the marketing in this present era. Thank you very much. João | 1) | Good | 1) precious insight of the marketing in | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Some good case studies and interesting content, but it's a 50,000 foot view of marketing. I was seeking a more technical and channel specific insights. This is much more conceptual and high level, so it was less useful for me. | 1) Some | Good | 1) case studies and interesting content, but | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Interesting and good course. | 1) Interesting and | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | A good teacher!! Is helpful! And he explain clear and consise, i recomend this course! | 1) A | Good | 1) teacher! ! Is helpful! And he | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great class with good case studies. Aric is great teacher | 1) Great class with | Good | 1) case studies. Aric is great teacher | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | I give this course 5 stars! I learned a lot and I like the hands on activities. The only thing I would change is how the assignments are graded. I know that they're graded by our peers but I don't think that everyone knows how to correctly grade assignments. I received some low scores and I disagree with them. I answered all of the questions with enough detail to be at least "good." | 1) detail to be at least " | Good | 1) " | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good understanding digital marketing world with principle of marketing and examples with real world | 1) | Good | 1) understanding digital marketing world with principle | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Packed full of real world case studies and concepts! We had a very good idea of how to apply these concepts as well. There were also well-designed assignments to trigger our thinking and knowledge synthesis. | 1) and concepts! We had a very | Good | 1) idea of how to apply these | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Is a good course to enter the world of digital marketing. | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course to enter the world of | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Its an Excellent course for any beginner , with good material and lectures and case studies. | 1) course for any beginner , with | Good | 1) material and lectures and case studies. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Gives a very good undestanding of current mayor trends in Marketing in a Digital World | 1) Gives a very | Good | 1) undestanding of current mayor trends in | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good class, with interesting points ans assignments and very god teacher | 1) | Good | 1) class, with interesting points ans assignments | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good class, good materials, easy to understand, you learn a lot! | 1) | Good | 1) class, good materials, easy to understand, | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good class, good materials, easy to understand, you learn a lot! | 2) Good class, | Good | 2) materials, easy to understand, you learn | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course was very good. The instructor's way of teaching with real examples were practical and easily understandable. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) The instructor's way of teaching with | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course content was comprehensive, thorough and required note taking with preparation for quizzes. Solid academically. Some of the assignments required use of third party applications and websites that did function as anticipated or are no longer supported. Peer grading was very poor. It frequently seemed students did not read submissions, off handedly grading. At times comments did not match the scores, such as "nice work," or "good job," while giving only 3 stars. | 1) " nice work, " or " | Good | 1) job, " while giving only 3 | 3.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent content and very good usage of resources to share knowledge. | 1) Excellent content and very | Good | 1) usage of resources to share knowledge. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Good starting point. | 1) | Good | 1) starting point. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course overall, good lectures and good exercises | 1) Great course overall, | Good | 1) lectures and good exercises | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course overall, good lectures and good exercises | 2) Great course overall, good lectures and | Good | 2) exercises | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very Good Course, Professor Arac was excellent in explaining this course and concepts. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course, Professor Arac was excellent in | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | very good! wonderful movie! I love it ! | 1) very | Good | 1) wonderful movie! I love it ! | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good content and presentation | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and presentation | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | good course but need more assignments | 1) | Good | 1) course but need more assignments | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This was a good course. I really like the instructor. I think he gives good examples and practical assignments to demonstrate the principles in the course. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course. I really like the instructor. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This was a good course. I really like the instructor. I think he gives good examples and practical assignments to demonstrate the principles in the course. | 2) the instructor. I think he gives | Good | 2) examples and practical assignments to demonstrate | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | That is a good course! Thank you guys! | 1) That is a | Good | 1) course! Thank you guys! | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course provides a good foundation in understanding the impact of digital technologies on business and how marketing is undergoing a shift. The course uses the popular marketing mix framework of 4Ps - Product, Promotion, Placement and Price and shows the effect of digital on each using theory, examples, case studies and exercises. | 1) The course provides a | Good | 1) foundation in understanding the impact of | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Great course, good content and easy pace. Introduced me to great new ideas like 3d printing and looking forward to the next course | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) content and easy pace. Introduced me | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | So good | 1) So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Hands on courses combining short theories and studies overview with practical examples and exercices. It is a very good introduction of the impact of the digital world on the marketing. | 1) and exercices. It is a very | Good | 1) introduction of the impact of the | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very interesting topics and very good teaching method. Recommended. | 1) Very interesting topics and very | Good | 1) teaching method. Recommended. | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Lacks depth but gives a good overview of the different aspects of Digital transformation. worth doing | 1) Lacks depth but gives a | Good | 1) overview of the different aspects of | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | A good view | 1) A | Good | 1) view | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really good introduction Digital marketing course! Very good Job Aric!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction Digital marketing course! Very good | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Really good introduction Digital marketing course! Very good Job Aric!! | 2) good introduction Digital marketing course! Very | Good | 2) Job Aric! ! | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Excellent introduction into the manner and practical usage that digital marketing is evolving in modern society. Specifically, this course is good at employing a number of different examples both digital and experimental instead of just one long lecture course. | 1) modern society. Specifically, this course is | Good | 1) at employing a number of different | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Awesome course that takes modern day digital marketing insights, best practices and real life scenarios into a good perspective for students to learn from | 1) and real life scenarios into a | Good | 1) perspective for students to learn from | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | The course is a good introduction to the Specialization and the topic in general. It could be a bit more structured (like the courses that follow) but overall, as an introduction, it works. | 1) The course is a | Good | 1) introduction to the Specialization and the | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Its a good course to initiate on Marketing field with Technologies help, and of course its very helpful. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course to initiate on Marketing field | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | That's a good course. A little bit repetitive if you have already studied about MKT. But it presents new concepts, interesting cases and give you some updates about what is happening in the market regarding the 4Ps. | 1) That's a | Good | 1) course. A little bit repetitive if | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | This was a good course though I feel there could have been a little more professionalism in terms of camera work and testing that apps and services truly were available to all students globally. Al in all a very insightful course that opened my eyes to some technologies and processes I was not yet aware of. Thank Aric Rindfleisch | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course though I feel there could | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Super Aric was awesome and the examples were very good. | 1) awesome and the examples were very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Basic, but good knowledge | 1) Basic, but | Good | 1) knowledge | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | very good and useful | 1) very | Good | 1) and useful | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | Overall a very good course. Great academic perspectiv. Just need to update some exercises to compensate for web changes. | 1) Overall a very | Good | 1) course. Great academic perspectiv. Just need | 4.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | It is a really good Marketing course. It is complete and very interactive course. It has a lot of interesting - real life- Cases that help you understand how is working the digital marketing nowadays. I recomend this course. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) Marketing course. It is complete and | 5.0 |
| FDKAdNsuEeSEcyIAC2mPOQ | It's a very good course. Learning up-to-date marketing means a lots! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course. Learning up-to-date marketing means a | 5.0 |
| feddFyYDEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Lots of good ideas in here. More focus on planning g would make it better, though. | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) ideas in here. More focus on | 4.0 |
| feddFyYDEeWP8AqYi9cmiw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Ff6HyFZrEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | It was way too theoretical, the concepts were not clearly explained, the tests had concepts that had not been explained and the teacher is not good explaining it, it is too monotonous | 1) explained and the teacher is not | Good | 1) explaining it, it is too monotonous | 2.0 |
| FioEDkKkEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | good course for beginners, it gives you the basics and hints for further self development in this field | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners, it gives you | 5.0 |
| FioEDkKkEeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Great course! If you really want to understand how Arduino works - you MUST go through this course! Only one thing - it is in Russian, so I hope course staff will make translation this course in English or they'll make good transcript and subtitles. | 1) course in English or they'll make | Good | 1) transcript and subtitles. | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Not very in-depth, but I don't think it was really meant to be. Good starting off point to see if you like this kind of thing, and it's helped me understand the important concepts behind public health. | 1) it was really meant to be. | Good | 1) starting off point to see if | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | This is a very good course. I'm a resident physician and am looking forward to completing it. I didn't realize I would be so busy with work last month. I'm hoping to finish it this month if it is still available. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. I'm a resident physician and | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good course, worth taking | 1) | Good | 1) course, worth taking | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | very good first step to public health | 1) very | Good | 1) first step to public health | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | It was a very helpful course for me in preparing for my master's program in public health. Dr David is a very good teacher and it was a great learning experience! | 1) health. Dr David is a very | Good | 1) teacher and it was a great | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | I have just completed Module 1 and I am really enjoying the course. Good quality presentations with a good depth of subject matter. From a health professional's (RN, ENP) who has not studied this subject before, this is an excellent introduction to the topic so far. | 1) I am really enjoying the course. | Good | 1) quality presentations with a good depth | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | I have just completed Module 1 and I am really enjoying the course. Good quality presentations with a good depth of subject matter. From a health professional's (RN, ENP) who has not studied this subject before, this is an excellent introduction to the topic so far. | 2) course. Good quality presentations with a | Good | 2) depth of subject matter. From a | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good course to learn the basics of epidemiology. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Very good and interesting course, I recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course, I recommend. | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | This is a very good and very basic course of epidemiology. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) and very basic course of epidemiology. | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | good information. organized well and not too many lectures | 1) | Good | 1) information. organized well and not too | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | The course provides a good introduction to epidemiology. Both teachers are relaxed and speak very well, which is important for foreign students. I would add more intermediate ,practice exercises before quizzes, intermingling them with lectures. Absorbing too much material before the quiz is not always easy. Especially formulas should be practiced repeatedly with some real life problems, although not too difficult ones, in line with the purpose of the course. | 1) The course provides a | Good | 1) introduction to epidemiology. Both teachers are | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good course, tough, but good. Very engaging for those interested in Epidemiology. Lots of detail! I walked away learning much from this course. | 1) | Good | 1) course, tough, but good. Very engaging | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good course, tough, but good. Very engaging for those interested in Epidemiology. Lots of detail! I walked away learning much from this course. | 2) Good course, tough, but | Good | 2) Very engaging for those interested in | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | A very good Basic and Refresher course on Epidemiology | 1) A very | Good | 1) Basic and Refresher course on Epidemiology | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | I liked that the quizzes were not easy, it made me feel the class was worth it. It is a good intro to study design and basic statistics. Definitely a gateway course. | 1) was worth it. It is a | Good | 1) intro to study design and basic | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | I thought this was a good basic level introduction course. One suggestion is to update the quiz section to be able to click on the questions that were answered incorrectly and see the correct answer with explanation (after passing). | 1) I thought this was a | Good | 1) basic level introduction course. One suggestion | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | There is no real flow between videos and questions, not easy to follow. Good efford, good content, just wrong methodology for online training for 2015. | 1) and questions, not easy to follow. | Good | 1) efford, good content, just wrong methodology | 1.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | There is no real flow between videos and questions, not easy to follow. Good efford, good content, just wrong methodology for online training for 2015. | 2) not easy to follow. Good efford, | Good | 2) content, just wrong methodology for online | 1.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good introductory course for any biologist of life science student. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course for any biologist of | 4.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | good. but why i can't see my certificate? i already completed and paid. | 1) | Good | 1) but why i can't see my | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good enough for a free course offering very basic understanding of the topic. Lots of video errors, and sometimes the lecturer's speech isn't very smooth. Tests are poorly worded sometimes in ways that contradict the language used in the lectures, making them difficult to pass even with notes. I wouldn't pay for the certificate - if I were an employer I would not recognize this course as teaching any sort of proficiency. | 1) | Good | 1) enough for a free course offering | 3.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | Fun introduction (I have no background at all in Epidemiology or related fields). However, the material is quite basic, and therefore not very challenging. Still worth the time if you want to get a good idea of what epidemiology is. | 1) if you want to get a | Good | 1) idea of what epidemiology is. | 3.0 |
| FjD-ZB8oEeScWCIACnuVZQ | It was a good basic intro into the statistical methods of epidemiology. Quite basic. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) basic intro into the statistical methods | 3.0 |
| fjjF0gVfEeW0KyIACxqWIg | Interesting content, good instructor | 1) Interesting content, | Good | 1) instructor | 5.0 |
| fjjF0gVfEeW0KyIACxqWIg | If you know harmony it's Excellent!if you don't know it's good but difficult! | 1) Excellent! if you don't know it's | Good | 1) but difficult! | 5.0 |
| Fle9Xzu7EeW6UhL5OnDMBQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | It was pretty good! | 1) It was pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Entertaining and interesting. Good introduction to the subject with plenty of links and references for further study. | 1) Entertaining and interesting. | Good | 1) introduction to the subject with plenty | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | This course is not so good. A lot of things are just come from the instructor's head without correcting reference from high quality literature. He can say whatever he think is right. But I would not say all animals do not have complex language systems, or we have one single origin of language. I would also suggest the instructor to interview more world-famous linguists, not just play simple ask and answer with his students. The examples of different languages in the later weeks are interesting. But somehow I expect some better understanding of more aspects of languages. In general I would say it still has so much space for improvement. I would not recommend anyone to spend time on learning this course. | 1) This course is not so | Good | 1) A lot of things are just | 1.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | VERY good content and classes! Some questions in the quizzes are confusing, and there was the trouble with the required reading for Week 3. The first Honors assignment is confusing - specially its very last input question. | 1) VERY | Good | 1) content and classes! Some questions in | 4.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | It is a very good Introduction for those of Us that know nothing of Linguistics. I was very happy to take it. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) Introduction for those of Us that | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Very special course ! with a good dinamic(class), makes us open our minds! congrats! | 1) Very special course ! with a | Good | 1) dinamic(class), makes us open our minds! | 5.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | The course was often confusing and the quizzes came down to a question of trial and error. I found this very frustrating. Although the topics were interesting, I didn't find them very well presented in spite of the enthusiasm of the lecturer. But there was a lot of ambiguity and bias and the inability to discuss except through the forums was off-putting. It wouild be good to know why answers were wrong in the quizzes particulalry when you had put a lot of effort into studying them. In the final exam, there are questions which are evidently wrong, both in their wording and in their marking and nothing has been done to remedy this in spite of the complaints in the discussion page. | 1) forums was off-putting. It wouild be | Good | 1) to know why answers were wrong | 2.0 |
| fM5baJoUEeW93wo8Ha4kow | Great course! The professor is enthusiastic and very clear in his presentation, and they present the material in digestible, clear language. The course also did a good job prioritizing what to include in a short amount of videos. Thank you! | 1) language. The course also did a | Good | 1) job prioritizing what to include in | 5.0 |
| fNwx2ttQEeWcBg435JRSdw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| FnZcU7lhEeW6YA7MjVrgzw | a good course, excellent professor, and content in acordance with my expectation.... | 1) a | Good | 1) course, excellent professor, and content in | 5.0 |
| Fo72zMekEeWrYA6c7hw6vQ | Very good introductory course on natural language processing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course on natural language processing. | 4.0 |
| Fo72zMekEeWrYA6c7hw6vQ | This course SEEMS to be a great course. But personally I think it's not. It talks about so many things but none of them are explained clearly. I can't get the picture of this field clearly. The assignment looks nice. But it's not. First, it's not well-organized. Sometimes you need to look at next week's course to do this week's quiz. The programming assignment is VERY VERY unsatisfying. It's not explained clearly; there's no helpful instruction; and it is very confusing. You need to spend hours and hours just UNDERSTANDING what you need to do. And some algorithms are not even told in the course and you need to implement them! I know this could be a good exercise but I would hope it at least provide some useful resources. Generally, I am very disappointed. I feel like I'm spending hours and hours but learning nothing. Just confusion. Please consider reformat the homework; make it more doable for new learners in this field. | 1) I know this could be a | Good | 1) exercise but I would hope it | 2.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | It was good broader perspective learning exposure. My heartiest congratulation to faculty team and Coursera. Many Many thanks | 1) It was | Good | 1) broader perspective learning exposure. My heartiest | 5.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Great course to understand the different aspects of urban infrastructure namely, energy and transport. It talks about various actors playing the role of managers and operators and the challenges faced by them. A good course overall. | 1) the challenges faced by them. A | Good | 1) course overall. | 4.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Excellent course, very good examples and perfect approaches !´m really satisfied.! | 1) Excellent course, very | Good | 1) examples and perfect approaches ! ´m | 5.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Good teaching. I hope to have a certificate for this course. | 1) | Good | 1) teaching. I hope to have a | 5.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Course is very good waiting for next in the series. | 1) Course is very | Good | 1) waiting for next in the series. | 4.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Great course! I hope the team releases the following module. The material provided is really good and the lectures are dynamic and well edited. The short answer assignment could be peer reviewed! | 1) module. The material provided is really | Good | 1) and the lectures are dynamic and | 5.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Good balance between presentations and interviews. The quality of the reading materials was well above my previous Coursera courses (great handouts from Iglus!). The scope could be extended to other urban infrastructure systems. Appropriate quizzes. Final exam could be slightly more demanding (less straightforward). Overall very good. | 1) | Good | 1) balance between presentations and interviews. The | 5.0 |
| FOGKYF0gEeWK1woL5P9cGQ | Good balance between presentations and interviews. The quality of the reading materials was well above my previous Coursera courses (great handouts from Iglus!). The scope could be extended to other urban infrastructure systems. Appropriate quizzes. Final exam could be slightly more demanding (less straightforward). Overall very good. | 2) more demanding (less straightforward). Overall very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course starts with a short introduction on the topic of usability and user experience. A good idea, but not very well presented. Next is an intro to bootstrap. OK, but not deep enough for a course called "Responsive Web Design". The last two weeks cover JavaScript. Or more precisely: they cover a few JavaScript libraries. To sum it up, the course could really use a revision. There are too many mistakes in the examples and sometimes, the instructors look a bit unprepared and confused. | 1) of usability and user experience. A | Good | 1) idea, but not very well presented. | 1.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good, fun to learn and well designed course. | 1) | Good | 1) fun to learn and well designed | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was good and I learned a lot! | 1) It was | Good | 1) and I learned a lot! | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good course :) love it | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course :) love it | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A course that really helped me to understand how to build my own responsive web page ! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with all of us! Keep up the good work! | 1) all of us! Keep up the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a great course, i recommend it, good to start in responsive design | 1) a great course, i recommend it, | Good | 1) to start in responsive design | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good course. I'm new to this subject, but I lear a lot from the first week. Thanks | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course. I'm new to this subject, | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its nice .But i don't have time for Assignment work .i feel good on templates. | 1) for Assignment work . i feel | Good | 1) on templates. | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy but still very helpful. Good for beginners. | 1) Easy but still very helpful. | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is useful. I've learned many things but in the last week the lectures seemed very rushed. There was many coding that was poorly explained or not explained at all. It started good but ended poorly. | 1) not explained at all. It started | Good | 1) but ended poorly. | 3.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice course with solid foundation and great examples. One recommendation would be to split the material on Week 4 into 2 weeks: Week 4 and Week 5. The teachers would have more time for explaining every bit in the lectures so the difficulty would step up evenly between weeks. Other than the amount of material on last week, it is a good course and highly recommended! | 1) on last week, it is a | Good | 1) course and highly recommended! | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Information provided are good. All in this course is about theoretic knowledge. One who completes the course has to remember each points when designing a website and also implementing. Further improvements required in this course to make sure more knowledge when taking this course. | 1) Information provided are | Good | 1) All in this course is about | 3.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good learning course | 1) | Good | 1) learning course | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I learned a lot from this course - From the html up to the javascript and jquery with bootstrap. Good work. | 1) the javascript and jquery with bootstrap. | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I did learn some new things, but there were times that I wasn't sure about the focus of the course: some of the questions are on the spectrum of too tricky-unclear, there were too many "find my error in the code" issues. Plus, the last project (gallery) - which has many good features and ideas, does not seem completely finished from a UX point of view. | 1) project (gallery) - which has many | Good | 1) features and ideas, does not seem | 3.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course, very clear and good structered. | 1) Great course, very clear and | Good | 1) structered. | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice course, very good explanations. | 1) Nice course, very | Good | 1) explanations. | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well paced course. Assignments are related to course material and are very good are cementing course topics. Very good course. | 1) to course material and are very | Good | 1) are cementing course topics. Very good | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well paced course. Assignments are related to course material and are very good are cementing course topics. Very good course. | 2) good are cementing course topics. Very | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very interesting course. Good relevant topics are explained (such as using Templates and javascript in order to make webcontent with dinamic data). Very useful course for those who would like to learn the basis of website development. | 1) Very interesting course. | Good | 1) relevant topics are explained (such as | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it was a good Course and i learnt a lot of information from it , it gives you info about a lot of things that hard to find any where else | 1) it was a | Good | 1) Course and i learnt a lot | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Explanation is Lovely........Really Good :-) | 1) . . . . . Really | Good | 1) :-) | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | For my first week I'm enjoying the simplicity to teach us how to build a good website... | 1) teach us how to build a | Good | 1) website. . . | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like how this specialisation evolves... as in the previous block, it does not give you all details, but merely sets the direction. The homework assignments are quite good and, if executed properly, will teach you a lot. The only complaint - frequent ambiguity of multiple choice quiz questions. | 1) direction. The homework assignments are quite | Good | 1) and, if executed properly, will teach | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good approach for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) approach for beginners | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome course and was a very good starter for RWD and Bootstrap ( also templating using Handlebars) :) fantastic Univ. Of London... | 1) Awesome course and was a very | Good | 1) starter for RWD and Bootstrap ( | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good specialization and very good course, the instructors show the material in a easy way making a good course for someone with a little knowledge about how to make a website and programming language | 1) Very | Good | 1) specialization and very good course, the | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good specialization and very good course, the instructors show the material in a easy way making a good course for someone with a little knowledge about how to make a website and programming language | 2) Very good specialization and very | Good | 2) course, the instructors show the material | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good specialization and very good course, the instructors show the material in a easy way making a good course for someone with a little knowledge about how to make a website and programming language | 3) in a easy way making a | Good | 3) course for someone with a little | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a good course. If I must complain about something is that, since the course covers a little too much too fast, the people that is not familiar with the subject might not understand the why or how of things explained. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. If I must complain about | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pace and content of the course is just nice. However, it would be good if more lecture slides were provided. | 1) just nice. However, it would be | Good | 1) if more lecture slides were provided. | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction. Easy to follow. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. Easy to follow. | 4.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good pace and good information. As with any course, the more you do above and beyond what is given as 'assignments' the better you will grasp the information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) pace and good information. As with | 5.0 |
| Fp0K8RoEEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good pace and good information. As with any course, the more you do above and beyond what is given as 'assignments' the better you will grasp the information. | 2) Very good pace and | Good | 2) information. As with any course, the | 5.0 |
| Fq__yk2bEeS5fSIACy-OMw | It is a good introductory course, but it relies too much on networks and could be confusing and demoralizing if you intend to pursue a career in systems biology. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introductory course, but it relies too | 2.0 |
| Fq__yk2bEeS5fSIACy-OMw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fq__yk2bEeS5fSIACy-OMw | A good step to learn this area. | 1) A | Good | 1) step to learn this area. | 5.0 |
| Fq__yk2bEeS5fSIACy-OMw | Great course! It explains very generally but clearly all different aspects involved in Systems Biology. The material used is good and so are the articles used for learning. | 1) Systems Biology. The material used is | Good | 1) and so are the articles used | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | The course material was interesting, but the TOTAL lack of support forces me to give it only one star. I left the following complaint in the general forum for this course 2 months ago. Neither Coursera, the instructor or any moderator ever responded. Many people were not able to run the software supplied in the course because of bugs, but the solution was left to the student. I have taken good courses on line before, but this is not one of them. It seems that the Dr. Tucker Balch and/or the moderators have totally abandoned this course, but Coursera keeps offering it and collecting money. The neither instructor or nor the moderators have posted on the Meet and Greet Forum. The instructor and/or moderators have ANSWERED NO QUESTIONS posted on ANY forum. The QSTK (software) BUGS have NOT BEEN ADDRESSED by the instructor or the moderators. Only students have answered these forum questions. "Computational Investing Part II is coming shortly." That is what they said 3 years ago. Further evidence of abandonment. | 1) to the student. I have taken | Good | 1) courses on line before, but this | 1.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Very effective overview of quant methods. Gives us a good foundation for digging deeper in the recommended texts. It even has a theme song! | 1) of quant methods. Gives us a | Good | 1) foundation for digging deeper in the | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | I like Mr Balch but to be honest I learned next to nothing. Maybe this is a good course for somebody who has no background in finance. As for myself I felt that I was wasting time and money. The book associated with this course was just like the course itself: shallow and doesn't go in any depth to explain the matter fully and rigorously. If you want to know WHAT computational investing is, you can take this class. Googling a bit will have roughly the same effect, though. If you want to learn how to actually DO computational investing, do not take this course - its just not serious enough. As the name of this course implies, you probably expected to find part II somewhere, which was promised to be a course about using machine learning in investing. 3 or 4 years after part I went live, part II is still missing and probably will never come out. The software used in this course, QSTK, is buggy and has been so for 3+ years. Its not maintained by anyone, and the people taking this course had to find ways to overcome QSTK bugs to be able to complete their assignments. And lastly: the exercises. There are none. All you get is a lame quiz for every week which basically asks to change some variables in the scripts provided. I did some coding for week 3 but that was it. No coding practice after that. | 1) to nothing. Maybe this is a | Good | 1) course for somebody who has no | 2.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Excellent! The professor and the teory is excellent, all the material is clear and good. | 1) all the material is clear and | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | course is pretty good and everything is very simply explained but i gave 4 stars only because many things was repeated so many times that it was sometimes soo boring and i thought we will compute in python more. | 1) course is pretty | Good | 1) and everything is very simply explained | 4.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Very good material. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material. | 5.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | I enjoyed this course. The content was good and the assignments challenging. The presenter was OK but he seemed a little unprepared at times. I think the course is a little dated in that the strategies taught simply don't work anymore, but as an introduction to some techniques and considerations for technical analysis then I recommend it. I also recommend that anyone considering this course without a strong python background takes some time to learn how to use Pandas - it will make your life much easier! | 1) enjoyed this course. The content was | Good | 1) and the assignments challenging. The presenter | 4.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | Good introductory course. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. | 4.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | GOOD: topics BAD: presentation (poor sound, unprepared and unrehearsed presentations, long intro's, unjustified use of greenscrenns, etc) shallow with regards to the theoretical aspects of what it is presented assignments are mechanical (easier than the tutorial and you have to perform the same tasks for different constants for several times) | 1) | Good | 1) topics BAD: presentation (poor sound, unprepared | 1.0 |
| fTnuinwaEeS7SCIACxCljA | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fw4ZgaAIEeSrPCIAC1SWlw | Good one! | 1) | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| Fw4ZgaAIEeSrPCIAC1SWlw | Even though i finished my graduate course some 6 years ago.. This class was very good enough to bring back the entire concepts back to my mind. I would even recommend this course to anyone who is currently doing their graduate in mechanical engineering. | 1) ago. . This class was very | Good | 1) enough to bring back the entire | 5.0 |
| Fw4ZgaAIEeSrPCIAC1SWlw | Good lectures and amount of homework problems. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures and amount of homework problems. | 5.0 |
| Fw4ZgaAIEeSrPCIAC1SWlw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Fw4ZgaAIEeSrPCIAC1SWlw | Much more challenging than you imagine, but really good | 1) challenging than you imagine, but really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| fYg6EC_5EeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | I think it is a good course any one can get benefits | 1) I think it is a | Good | 1) course any one can get benefits | 4.0 |
| fYg6EC_5EeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | This course was a good refresher which hit a lot of topics covered on the FE exam. I supplemented this course with some reference books and the NCEES manual and I was able to pass the FE Exam. | 1) This course was a | Good | 1) refresher which hit a lot of | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Good. I love the name. | 1) | Good | 1) I love the name. | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | It was a very good course. It was not only a legal course, but also a course concerned with economic thinking and logic thinking about what law is and why law is. I am a practicing lawyer. The course widen my eyes on legal matters and makes me think more deeply than before. It should be strongly recommend for legal students and legal professionals. | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) course. It was not only a | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Excellent and well-designed course that helps to stimulate critical thinking with concepts and good examples. | 1) stimulate critical thinking with concepts and | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Very good videos of Professor Ayers explaining everything in a way that makes you understand everything a bit better, than when reading it yourself. Definitely useful for people who is going to law school or want start at law school. | 1) Very | Good | 1) videos of Professor Ayers explaining everything | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | This was a very good intro course. Some additions that could be applied may include: describing different types of motions (interrogatives, cross motions); types of judgments (proscriptions, summary judgments, enjoinment), types of memoranda, or even a FOIA request. Maybe a look into work product privilege, protected documentation, principles of discovery. And finally, a little intro into the art of using case law as an event or test, for example; in "Miranda", "Keller", "Brown", or the "McDonnell Douglas test". I understand this is just an intro, but if these things could be fit in somehow that would be cool. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) intro course. Some additions that could | 4.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Good points and very good Homework! | 1) | Good | 1) points and very good Homework! | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | Good points and very good Homework! | 2) Good points and very | Good | 2) Homework! | 5.0 |
| fZN4SVfiEeWsGQ6fKrurvQ | This is really a good set of tools for law students. I have finished the first week, and it really helped a lot already. The videos are not very long, so you can just spend 30 minutes everyday for one or two small videos. The professor uses formal legal language that may require extra work but if you like the legal reasoning, it's such a wonderful exercise! | 1) This is really a | Good | 1) set of tools for law students. | 5.0 |
| G3vp_IE6EeWuHwqbqMyacw | It's good summarizing for hospitality and healthcare marketing. From this course You can start to develop and gain the knowledge from other sources - they gives a lof of links and articles. | 1) It's | Good | 1) summarizing for hospitality and healthcare marketing. | 5.0 |
| g4FwNDVyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I completely endorse the course. It definitely has given me an edge on how I conduct my assessments and when is the good time. Moreover I have had a lot of new learning take place in my career. Regards, Phillip | 1) my assessments and when is the | Good | 1) time. Moreover I have had a | 5.0 |
| g4FwNDVyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good course . | 1) very | Good | 1) course . | 4.0 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | I am sorry, but this course is made by PR specialist, people that should know how to talk to the public. Some teachers of this specialisation should been trained on how to behave in front of a camera. The content is nice but you repeat too many time the same stuff, in a very neutral voice, so it is really hard to keep watching the course. Thanks for sharing your knowledge, it is really helpful and rich, but as communication specialist, you can't just read a text, you have to live it. The source is important when releasing a message ! that's what you said ! The source should a good CV, but also has to know how to present the message. | 1) said ! The source should a | Good | 1) CV, but also has to know | 2.0 |
| G6m5MzTeEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Very good structure, proper pace and informative. Examples are explained and discussed. | 1) Very | Good | 1) structure, proper pace and informative. Examples | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Really enjoyed this course. Very good! | 1) Really enjoyed this course. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Good basics in order to then learn by yourself all the tools of responsive design ! | 1) | Good | 1) basics in order to then learn | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Good intro to Responsive Design, although the homeworks could be harder. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to Responsive Design, although the | 4.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Great delivery, good content separation. great assignments helped the information deliver at their bests. | 1) Great delivery, | Good | 1) content separation. great assignments helped the | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Very good introductory course to responsive web design | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to responsive web design | 4.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Very good organized and helpful. I liked the mode of approach, and at some points I got so inspired. Thank you very much Sincerely, Davronbek | 1) Very | Good | 1) organized and helpful. I liked the | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Pretty good! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Excellent course, very clear and full of good ideas. | 1) course, very clear and full of | Good | 1) ideas. | 5.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | Covers the basics pretty well. This should leave you with a good understanding of what responsive design is. The Bootstrap exercises help greatly in providing that. | 1) This should leave you with a | Good | 1) understanding of what responsive design is. | 4.0 |
| g9KhGjk_EeWXuQopUhAqaw | The course was very intersting and the Colleen was Really Wonderful. The one think that let me down is that i felt there wasn't enough material. The main ideas went again and again. Beside, I think that it was good combination between technical practice and therotical priniciples. | 1) Beside, I think that it was | Good | 1) combination between technical practice and therotical | 4.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | Best course I have ever taken. Thank you so much! Keep up the good work. | 1) you so much! Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | This course did an exceptional job of providing a lay audience with a broad overview of human genetics, evolution, behavior, and associated technologies. The lecturers were engaging and have an impressively varied range of knowledge. This course lays an exceptional foundation for exploring a variety of in-depth topics covered with a more narrow focus elsewhere on Coursera (e.g., molecular biology, evolution, human behavior, neuroscience, &c). Tammatha O'Brien’s initial lectures did a particularly good job of introducing basic genetics with accessible metaphors, without allowing those metaphors to be overextended. She was also careful to flag the caveats and exceptions where appropriate to ensure students didn’t walk away with an oversimplified narrative of molecular biology (a challenge I’ve seen in other introductory courses). Raymond St. Leger’s passion is clear, and makes his lecturers particularly captivating. For the most part, he did a good job of flagging areas where results were preliminary (e.g., based on a single study) or speculative (e.g., based on his interpretation of the research). Nonetheless, there were some areas where it was unclear if he was presenting a well-established scientific consensus, or his own (well-informed) conjecture. In these scenarios, it would be useful to provide a more comprehensive bibliography for students interested in diving deeper into the research. As an aspiring science communicator involved in addressing public concerns over GMOs, I was particularly pleased to not only see biotechnology covered, but also to have it effectively dispel many of the common criticisms. I’ve generally found that once a basic understanding of genetics and evolution is established, it’s a short leap to disarm most of the fears; nonetheless, I’ve now taken five genetics courses that have steered clear of even acknowledging either GMOs or their controversy. Thank you for addressing these head on. Thank you for taking the time to put this course together and sharing it with the public via Coursera. The effort is recognized, and much appreciated. | 1) O'Brien’s initial lectures did a particularly | Good | 1) job of introducing basic genetics with | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | This course did an exceptional job of providing a lay audience with a broad overview of human genetics, evolution, behavior, and associated technologies. The lecturers were engaging and have an impressively varied range of knowledge. This course lays an exceptional foundation for exploring a variety of in-depth topics covered with a more narrow focus elsewhere on Coursera (e.g., molecular biology, evolution, human behavior, neuroscience, &c). Tammatha O'Brien’s initial lectures did a particularly good job of introducing basic genetics with accessible metaphors, without allowing those metaphors to be overextended. She was also careful to flag the caveats and exceptions where appropriate to ensure students didn’t walk away with an oversimplified narrative of molecular biology (a challenge I’ve seen in other introductory courses). Raymond St. Leger’s passion is clear, and makes his lecturers particularly captivating. For the most part, he did a good job of flagging areas where results were preliminary (e.g., based on a single study) or speculative (e.g., based on his interpretation of the research). Nonetheless, there were some areas where it was unclear if he was presenting a well-established scientific consensus, or his own (well-informed) conjecture. In these scenarios, it would be useful to provide a more comprehensive bibliography for students interested in diving deeper into the research. As an aspiring science communicator involved in addressing public concerns over GMOs, I was particularly pleased to not only see biotechnology covered, but also to have it effectively dispel many of the common criticisms. I’ve generally found that once a basic understanding of genetics and evolution is established, it’s a short leap to disarm most of the fears; nonetheless, I’ve now taken five genetics courses that have steered clear of even acknowledging either GMOs or their controversy. Thank you for addressing these head on. Thank you for taking the time to put this course together and sharing it with the public via Coursera. The effort is recognized, and much appreciated. | 2) the most part, he did a | Good | 2) job of flagging areas where results | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | Thank you to Dr. O'Brien and Dr. St. Leger for an excellent course: solid information delivered clearly and intelligently. As the course moved along I found myself binge-watching! I must have finished all 7 weeks in record time-- like a good book, I could not put it down. This was an outstanding educational experience. | 1) weeks in record time-- like a | Good | 1) book, I could not put it | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | Very good! I learned a lot about genetic and biology! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I learned a lot about genetic | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | good course a bit hard to understand at times the information can get confusing but the it is there wish they would add printable bulletins at the end so make information readable just for extra help with the understanding of the material | 1) | Good | 1) course a bit hard to understand | 3.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | As someone that doesn't have much prior genetics knowledge besides intro science courses in college, I enjoyed this course a lot. It offered a good challenge and I felt like I learned a lot despite the complexity of the topics. The lectures were presented in a compelling way that related to day-to-day life and how humans interact. It has me excited for future developments in this field and has prompted me to do follow up research on some of the topics. | 1) course a lot. It offered a | Good | 1) challenge and I felt like I | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | The course was pretty good. Maybe concepts were illustrated too general and briefly (not in details) but maybe this course is just a warm up for people who are not specialists in those fields. Nevertheless it was quite fun to listen the lectures and that's why course went pretty fast. I only regret that there's no free Statements of Accomplishment. | 1) The course was pretty | Good | 1) Maybe concepts were illustrated too general | 3.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | Excellent course and very good explained | 1) Excellent course and very | Good | 1) explained | 5.0 |
| gbsG0MYYEeSsuSIAC8uEUA | Really good course. I have learned a lot. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I have learned a lot. | 5.0 |
| GCbhVSsqEeWNaBKfE9kXTQ | Love sports, very good corse to take !!! | 1) Love sports, very | Good | 1) corse to take ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| GDp6gzrnEeWCYBKNeFwojw | The course is good but it's stupid to make course only in chinese language. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but it's stupid to make course | 3.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good for basic understanding of FInEng field. Especially on Binomial Model. Many thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for basic understanding of FInEng field. | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course to understand financial products. The excel spreadsheets give a good overview of how to price such products in the limits of the model. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to understand financial products. The | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course to understand financial products. The excel spreadsheets give a good overview of how to price such products in the limits of the model. | 2) products. The excel spreadsheets give a | Good | 2) overview of how to price such | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Good course for a dry subject. I feel that the modeling could've been more thoroughly explain. For example, the professor could've used cases to analyze/explain what relationships between variables signify in greater detail. | 1) | Good | 1) course for a dry subject. I | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | nice challenging course with very good lecture videos and supporting material. the questions tested the material very well and were just challenging enough for my taste. Also the teachers were explaining the material very well. | 1) nice challenging course with very | Good | 1) lecture videos and supporting material. the | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | A very good mix of Detail and comprehensibility | 1) A very | Good | 1) mix of Detail and comprehensibility | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Challenging course but I've really got a good sense of the mechanics of main financial instruments such as bonds, options, futures, swaptions, etc. Being able to do all the exercises in Excel is pretty convenient. Exercises are difficult because there is no feedback - it's either right or wrong. | 1) course but I've really got a | Good | 1) sense of the mechanics of main | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Great course. I learned a lot and I'm fucking master in Financial engineering so it's a good sign | 1) in Financial engineering so it's a | Good | 1) sign | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Good course. Personally I think it is almost the perfect level for those who have some basic understandings about finance and look forward to go deep(such as me). This course requires some understanding about using Excel, which is quite useful when doing the quiz. Mastering Excel well would save a lot time. Some material might be a little hard but with patience and hardworking, it can still be solved. Highly recommended! | 1) | Good | 1) course. Personally I think it is | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The material covered in the course is highly relevant to the current job market. Professors Haugh & Iyengar were great at explaining the material and the quizzes were reasonably difficult. The learning spreadsheets were very good as well. Overall, it was a great learning experience and I will enthusiastically recommend it to my colleagues. | 1) difficult. The learning spreadsheets were very | Good | 1) as well. Overall, it was a | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | A very good course for students of Financial Engineering. Recommend people who have basic financial mathematics knowledge to join the course. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for students of Financial Engineering. | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Inconsitencies in instructions and information for some assignments otherwise very good | 1) information for some assignments otherwise very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | The course is good. Would be better if there are more examples given and lively interaction with fellow learners on the forums though. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) Would be better if there are | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | good learning with explanation on basic financials | 1) | Good | 1) learning with explanation on basic financials | 3.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | have not finished it yet , but a very good course so far, a lot theory mixed with exercises. | 1) it yet , but a very | Good | 1) course so far, a lot theory | 4.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course! Well-organized. The homework helps understanding. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Well-organized. The homework helps understanding. | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course !! It combines theory and practice ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! ! It combines theory | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | Very good course indeed. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course indeed. | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | This class gives allot of good information on those who are interested in the stock market and how it operates. Wish I would have started this class sooner. | 1) This class gives allot of | Good | 1) information on those who are interested | 5.0 |
| GEfA2A0UEeSWFyIACpBHcA | GOOD ONE | 1) | Good | 1) ONE | 3.0 |
| ggSJwHE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | Very well-explained information is given. Anyone who is a chicken-lover or keeps chickens should take this course. It's not too much to learn. The videos are short and to the point, yet well-explained. A very good course. | 1) the point, yet well-explained. A very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| ggSJwHE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | A very informative and interesting course, a good cover of both behaviour and welfare. Each section was explained well, so no background knowledge was required. I appreciated the additional video content to explain concepts. I would have liked a little more information on disease and nutrition but I understand it is difficult to cover everything in a short course. | 1) very informative and interesting course, a | Good | 1) cover of both behaviour and welfare. | 4.0 |
| ggSJwHE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | Can be taken by anyone with an interest in chickens! Good references and interesting variety of topics! | 1) anyone with an interest in chickens! | Good | 1) references and interesting variety of topics! | 4.0 |
| ggSJwHE8EeWxvQr3acyajw | Very worthwhile. Great overview of pertinent behavioral, environmental, physiological and biological factors influencing chicken behavior and welfare. Good videos with supplementary materials that added value to the course. Thank you for making this available through MOOC. | 1) factors influencing chicken behavior and welfare. | Good | 1) videos with supplementary materials that added | 5.0 |
| Gh3sMTAAEeW-zwq84wShFQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gh3sMTAAEeW-zwq84wShFQ | good python course！ | 1) | Good | 1) python course！ | 4.0 |
| Gh3sMTAAEeW-zwq84wShFQ | Easy to learn. Good for beginners. | 1) Easy to learn. | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| Gh3sMTAAEeW-zwq84wShFQ | I think the teacher is very good! | 1) I think the teacher is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The course is good but little bit theoretical for science that should be 80% practical . | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but little bit theoretical for science | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD TO KNOW THE BASICS | 1) | Good | 1) TO KNOW THE BASICS | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good introductory course This course explains the basics of Arduino and explains C programming which is essential for Arduino sketches.This course motivated me in further learning about the Arduino. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course This course explains the | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very Good lessons, great for understanding all the concepts and inpire you tu go deep to resolve the assignements. Great course!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons, great for understanding all the | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD place to start THe arduino intro is good but little short on c but its only 4 weeks not enough for me to grasp right off the bat anyway so i back off to next session then catch up more C then finish its only a couple short c videos then your asked to write programs with little or no knowledge basicly 3- 7 min lectures on the language EASY TO BE KINDA LOST AT FIRST IM 60 yrs old not twenty !!! From what im reading online LIBRARIES ARE TOTALLY LIMITED ON ARDUINOS IDE nd ITS NOT REALLY C its ARDUINO C because a lot of the workings of the arduino ide are easier for new people alot of the inner workings are hidden tough to learn the inner workings unlike a full featured IDE GOOD Platform to start on AFTER BASICS HERE with tidbits Id rather go later to C++ and spend the time there then get on better platform ARM PIC boards with real ides and REAL C + something you can use in the real world for bigger programs and I can see staying here at arduino too long and not going on to other platforms could cause bad programing habits to start with writing limited code just seems more productive after you get your electronics down coding and some hardwhare experience to go right to the real deal Pic arm or any of the other boards with a MUCH steeper learning curve GREAT to Figure out and learn electronics get some hardwhare experience here of course on ARDUINO and from what im seeing from some pros Even if there on more advanced platforms that run bigger faster programs dont have the bootloader many pros use arduino for a first layout to test circuits here first GOOD COURSE gets you DIGGING AND THINKING This is where to start you certainly cant start on advanced platforms right off its really almost impossible without a lot more skill to obtain first | 1) | Good | 1) place to start THe arduino intro | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD place to start THe arduino intro is good but little short on c but its only 4 weeks not enough for me to grasp right off the bat anyway so i back off to next session then catch up more C then finish its only a couple short c videos then your asked to write programs with little or no knowledge basicly 3- 7 min lectures on the language EASY TO BE KINDA LOST AT FIRST IM 60 yrs old not twenty !!! From what im reading online LIBRARIES ARE TOTALLY LIMITED ON ARDUINOS IDE nd ITS NOT REALLY C its ARDUINO C because a lot of the workings of the arduino ide are easier for new people alot of the inner workings are hidden tough to learn the inner workings unlike a full featured IDE GOOD Platform to start on AFTER BASICS HERE with tidbits Id rather go later to C++ and spend the time there then get on better platform ARM PIC boards with real ides and REAL C + something you can use in the real world for bigger programs and I can see staying here at arduino too long and not going on to other platforms could cause bad programing habits to start with writing limited code just seems more productive after you get your electronics down coding and some hardwhare experience to go right to the real deal Pic arm or any of the other boards with a MUCH steeper learning curve GREAT to Figure out and learn electronics get some hardwhare experience here of course on ARDUINO and from what im seeing from some pros Even if there on more advanced platforms that run bigger faster programs dont have the bootloader many pros use arduino for a first layout to test circuits here first GOOD COURSE gets you DIGGING AND THINKING This is where to start you certainly cant start on advanced platforms right off its really almost impossible without a lot more skill to obtain first | 2) to start THe arduino intro is | Good | 2) but little short on c but | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD place to start THe arduino intro is good but little short on c but its only 4 weeks not enough for me to grasp right off the bat anyway so i back off to next session then catch up more C then finish its only a couple short c videos then your asked to write programs with little or no knowledge basicly 3- 7 min lectures on the language EASY TO BE KINDA LOST AT FIRST IM 60 yrs old not twenty !!! From what im reading online LIBRARIES ARE TOTALLY LIMITED ON ARDUINOS IDE nd ITS NOT REALLY C its ARDUINO C because a lot of the workings of the arduino ide are easier for new people alot of the inner workings are hidden tough to learn the inner workings unlike a full featured IDE GOOD Platform to start on AFTER BASICS HERE with tidbits Id rather go later to C++ and spend the time there then get on better platform ARM PIC boards with real ides and REAL C + something you can use in the real world for bigger programs and I can see staying here at arduino too long and not going on to other platforms could cause bad programing habits to start with writing limited code just seems more productive after you get your electronics down coding and some hardwhare experience to go right to the real deal Pic arm or any of the other boards with a MUCH steeper learning curve GREAT to Figure out and learn electronics get some hardwhare experience here of course on ARDUINO and from what im seeing from some pros Even if there on more advanced platforms that run bigger faster programs dont have the bootloader many pros use arduino for a first layout to test circuits here first GOOD COURSE gets you DIGGING AND THINKING This is where to start you certainly cant start on advanced platforms right off its really almost impossible without a lot more skill to obtain first | 3) workings unlike a full featured IDE | Good | 3) Platform to start on AFTER BASICS | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD place to start THe arduino intro is good but little short on c but its only 4 weeks not enough for me to grasp right off the bat anyway so i back off to next session then catch up more C then finish its only a couple short c videos then your asked to write programs with little or no knowledge basicly 3- 7 min lectures on the language EASY TO BE KINDA LOST AT FIRST IM 60 yrs old not twenty !!! From what im reading online LIBRARIES ARE TOTALLY LIMITED ON ARDUINOS IDE nd ITS NOT REALLY C its ARDUINO C because a lot of the workings of the arduino ide are easier for new people alot of the inner workings are hidden tough to learn the inner workings unlike a full featured IDE GOOD Platform to start on AFTER BASICS HERE with tidbits Id rather go later to C++ and spend the time there then get on better platform ARM PIC boards with real ides and REAL C + something you can use in the real world for bigger programs and I can see staying here at arduino too long and not going on to other platforms could cause bad programing habits to start with writing limited code just seems more productive after you get your electronics down coding and some hardwhare experience to go right to the real deal Pic arm or any of the other boards with a MUCH steeper learning curve GREAT to Figure out and learn electronics get some hardwhare experience here of course on ARDUINO and from what im seeing from some pros Even if there on more advanced platforms that run bigger faster programs dont have the bootloader many pros use arduino for a first layout to test circuits here first GOOD COURSE gets you DIGGING AND THINKING This is where to start you certainly cant start on advanced platforms right off its really almost impossible without a lot more skill to obtain first | 4) layout to test circuits here first | Good | 4) COURSE gets you DIGGING AND THINKING | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good course, it goes from basic concepts to arduino programming itself, without taking too long on what is not 100% necessary. As an Electrical Engineer and an Electronics Technician my self, I saw almost 10 years of concepts I learned in those courses to be just briefly touched and got the necessary information to go ahead. It made Arduino trully accessible to anyone! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it goes from basic concepts | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good course for beginners and the instructor teaching simply way talent | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners and the instructor | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | I like this Course so much,In this course nothing is prerequisite,Instructor is very good he expains every things very nicely.I thinks all the student can do this course. | 1) nothing is prerequisite, Instructor is very | Good | 1) he expains every things very nicely. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The lecturer and structure were very good. Five Stars. Sadly, I felt the course could have used a bit more substance. Less than hour of lectures per week and only one programming assignment left me wanting more. By contrast after taking https://www.coursera.org/learn/matlab/home/welcome I realy felt like I had a grasp on the material. | 1) The lecturer and structure were very | Good | 1) Five Stars. Sadly, I felt the | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introduction to Arduino Platform | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Arduino Platform | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good and interesting to learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting to learn. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The course is well structured and the lectures are very good. However, It could use about 2 more modules that go into more detail about c programming in arduino. | 1) structured and the lectures are very | Good | 1) However, It could use about 2 | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A very good course to teach you the basics of Arduino platform and IDE. It'll help you get started on how to code your programs and lets you build up on it. I'd definitely recommend for a beginner. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to teach you the basics | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It can be nice to walk through this process with a lecturer. Ian Harris does it well and knows the content well enough. Most of this content however is given sufficiently in the pamphlet with the Arduino Uno Starter Kit. Some problems and applications above and beyond the starter kit's intro guide would be nice and appropriate for the course. Additionally, given that this is also supposed to be an intro to C, a bit more detail and some programmatic problem solving in C would have also added good value to the course. | 1) in C would have also added | Good | 1) value to the course. | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good programme for beginners, very resourceful. | 1) | Good | 1) programme for beginners, very resourceful. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A very good course. It does not teach you everything about C programming but does a very good job of teaching the bare minimum required to understand and implement simple C programs. The Arduino Platform is very well explained. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. It does not teach you | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A very good course. It does not teach you everything about C programming but does a very good job of teaching the bare minimum required to understand and implement simple C programs. The Arduino Platform is very well explained. | 2) C programming but does a very | Good | 2) job of teaching the bare minimum | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very educational and very good teacher! | 1) Very educational and very | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good introductory course. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good intro. course. Well-designed and well-delivered. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) intro. course. Well-designed and well-delivered. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | really good introduction course to the Arduino platform | 1) really | Good | 1) introduction course to the Arduino platform | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good intro but too simple. | 1) | Good | 1) intro but too simple. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | This is a good course, especially for beginners as one can learn the basics without spending too much time or getting confused by too many technical terms. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course, especially for beginners as one | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | this course has a very good content very good instructor and increased my experience a lot | 1) this course has a very | Good | 1) content very good instructor and increased | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | this course has a very good content very good instructor and increased my experience a lot | 2) has a very good content very | Good | 2) instructor and increased my experience a | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | overall a good course. Teaches you the basics of arduino and how to integrate c language with the arduino | 1) overall a | Good | 1) course. Teaches you the basics of | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good , but not very detailed for programming the Arduino | 1) | Good | 1) , but not very detailed for | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good for people new to programing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for people new to programing. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good prof | 1) Very | Good | 1) prof | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Great course, great delivery style from the Lecturer. Moves along at a good, but not excessive pace. | 1) the Lecturer. Moves along at a | Good | 1) but not excessive pace. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | nice course, good for begineers | 1) nice course, | Good | 1) for begineers | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The interface of the classes is too straight, not very flexible. It almost looks like a real classroom, which isn't good in case we're at home learning by ourselves. Still, it has a very good content. | 1) like a real classroom, which isn't | Good | 1) in case we're at home learning | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The interface of the classes is too straight, not very flexible. It almost looks like a real classroom, which isn't good in case we're at home learning by ourselves. Still, it has a very good content. | 2) ourselves. Still, it has a very | Good | 2) content. | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Well organised.Good Clarity of Concepts. Thank you Professor. | 1) Well organised. | Good | 1) Clarity of Concepts. Thank you Professor. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | GOOD..... | 1) | Good | 1) . . . . | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good introductiong for inexperient users. | 1) | Good | 1) introductiong for inexperient users. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good start up course | 1) | Good | 1) start up course | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | very good fully of information course | 1) very | Good | 1) fully of information course | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The course is useful ,teaches about different types of debugging but lacks examples of these systems. Good intro the the arduino. Thanks a lot. | 1) but lacks examples of these systems. | Good | 1) intro the the arduino. Thanks a | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introduction to Arduino and C. Easy to follow, short videos and good practical exercises. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Arduino and C. Easy | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introduction to Arduino and C. Easy to follow, short videos and good practical exercises. | 2) Easy to follow, short videos and | Good | 2) practical exercises. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good for begining, like me. | 1) | Good | 1) for begining, like me. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good but a lot of technical parts all though they are discounted as not needed to know! | 1) | Good | 1) but a lot of technical parts | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | This was one of my favorite courses I've even taken with Coursera. The instructor was very good at explaining the subject to a beginner like me who has some programming experience yet none with Arduino. | 1) with Coursera. The instructor was very | Good | 1) at explaining the subject to a | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It was good but according to me it had a paucity of arduino programming for which i enrolled . However it was still helpful and i enjoyed it . | 1) It was | Good | 1) but according to me it had | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very basic and good course for | 1) Very basic and | Good | 1) course for | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | This course is so good, clears all the concepts and also addresses the nitty-gritties of Arduino. | 1) This course is so | Good | 1) clears all the concepts and also | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good first intro to Arduino. | 1) | Good | 1) first intro to Arduino. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Had joined for free(non-specialization), it was good. Got a basic overview on ardunio. I had never worked on ardunio, but on AVR microcontroller. If you are looking for basic overview, its really good. Thanks to coursera :) | 1) Had joined for free(non-specialization), it was | Good | 1) Got a basic overview on ardunio. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Had joined for free(non-specialization), it was good. Got a basic overview on ardunio. I had never worked on ardunio, but on AVR microcontroller. If you are looking for basic overview, its really good. Thanks to coursera :) | 2) looking for basic overview, its really | Good | 2) Thanks to coursera :) | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good and understandable! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and understandable! | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A good pstart to know about Arduino and C Programming. | 1) A | Good | 1) pstart to know about Arduino and | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | really good | 1) really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introduction to the Arduino platform. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the Arduino platform. | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good course. Prof. Ian is very good. Only I miss a deeper discussion, more complete examples and assignments. Thanks a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Prof. Ian is very good. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good course. Prof. Ian is very good. Only I miss a deeper discussion, more complete examples and assignments. Thanks a lot. | 2) Good course. Prof. Ian is very | Good | 2) Only I miss a deeper discussion, | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good course for learning arduino | 1) | Good | 1) course for learning arduino | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good introductory course! Thank You!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course! Thank You! ! ! | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good introduction! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction! | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The teacher is really didactic and the material is good, but the course is too basic. It could be completed in a weekend. Maybe all this course could be only a Module. | 1) really didactic and the material is | Good | 1) but the course is too basic. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Really good and useful... | 1) Really | Good | 1) and useful. . . | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good as a start | 1) | Good | 1) as a start | 3.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good overall syllabus, but needs more concentration on Objective C. | 1) | Good | 1) overall syllabus, but needs more concentration | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good professor, good course for a start. | 1) Very | Good | 1) professor, good course for a start. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Very good professor, good course for a start. | 2) Very good professor, | Good | 2) course for a start. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | that good! | 1) that | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A good start in the world of Arduino. | 1) A | Good | 1) start in the world of Arduino. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | The very basics. Overall good. | 1) The very basics. Overall | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | from start with the arduino it´s very good | 1) start with the arduino it´s very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | I really enjoyed the class. I new a little about Arduino already, but this taught me a few new functions, and gave me an introduction ("hello world!" style introduction) to C programming. Good stuff, I can't wait to take the next course(s). | 1) " style introduction) to C programming. | Good | 1) stuff, I can't wait to take | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | It is an easy to follow but very basic course. It might be good for a newbie but I expected a little more. | 1) very basic course. It might be | Good | 1) for a newbie but I expected | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A very good course for the beginer of Arduino. After finish this course, you will feel that you are standing at the starting line of the Arduino journey. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for the beginer of Arduino. | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Really good class! | 1) Really | Good | 1) class! | 5.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | A good introduction to the Arduino platform. Looking forward to attending the next course. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the Arduino platform. Looking | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | Good beginners and introductory course to Arduino and C. Prof. Harris is a brilliant lecturer. | 1) | Good | 1) beginners and introductory course to Arduino | 4.0 |
| gh5rVEd3EeW2ZBIIl17oPw | good one really in depth tutorials, must watch. | 1) | Good | 1) one really in depth tutorials, must | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | This course gave a lot of information that is good to know, or even as a refresher | 1) a lot of information that is | Good | 1) to know, or even as a | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I'm a new horse owner. I've taken this course multiple times. It is the BEST introduction to being a responsible horse owner that I have found. I can't say enough good things. Even the content that didn't apply to my situation | 1) have found. I can't say enough | Good | 1) things. Even the content that didn't | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | This is a great course whether you're new to horses or just want to top-up or refresh your knowledge. I Really liked the format and Dr Mortensen is an enthusiastic and knowledgable teacher. I like that he reviews the discussion boards and works student's comments in to his intro videos. Good quality course. Thank you. | 1) comments in to his intro videos. | Good | 1) quality course. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Good basic information overview. Helpful instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) basic information overview. Helpful instructor. | 3.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | It is a really good course with high standard. Very good teacher and all is very well made. Thank you to you all involved | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course with high standard. Very good | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | It is a really good course with high standard. Very good teacher and all is very well made. Thank you to you all involved | 2) good course with high standard. Very | Good | 2) teacher and all is very well | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I like so much this course, th teacher explains all the things very good | 1) teacher explains all the things very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I am very impressed and I love it to bits. The assignements are not to complicated and refer to the lessons shown. The good part is, that I do have to do some local research for costs of outsorced services and equipment. This means, I am already practical within the whole topic and use the theorethical lessons within the real outside world. Thank you so very much for this course. I could have read all about this myself somewhere. However, such a course gives me good overview and practical 'starters'. I already think about doing some voluntary work at a nearby stable. | 1) refer to the lessons shown. The | Good | 1) part is, that I do have | 5.0 |
| GixeETxVEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I am very impressed and I love it to bits. The assignements are not to complicated and refer to the lessons shown. The good part is, that I do have to do some local research for costs of outsorced services and equipment. This means, I am already practical within the whole topic and use the theorethical lessons within the real outside world. Thank you so very much for this course. I could have read all about this myself somewhere. However, such a course gives me good overview and practical 'starters'. I already think about doing some voluntary work at a nearby stable. | 2) However, such a course gives me | Good | 2) overview and practical 'starters'. I already | 5.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | It is always a good to experience the excellence of the delivery in this course. Great materials with real life experts experience and analysis. Thumbs up. | 1) It is always a | Good | 1) to experience the excellence of the | 5.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Good course. Not many videos to watch, but a lot of papers to read. I think though the selection of them is very good and make you understand the concepts and the challenges of IoT. If you don't mind to read a lot, it is a very good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Not many videos to watch, | 4.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Good course. Not many videos to watch, but a lot of papers to read. I think though the selection of them is very good and make you understand the concepts and the challenges of IoT. If you don't mind to read a lot, it is a very good course. | 2) the selection of them is very | Good | 2) and make you understand the concepts | 4.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Good course. Not many videos to watch, but a lot of papers to read. I think though the selection of them is very good and make you understand the concepts and the challenges of IoT. If you don't mind to read a lot, it is a very good course. | 3) a lot, it is a very | Good | 3) course. | 4.0 |
| GkyTjuR5EeWpUQ6vdoq9ZQ | Widened the views on IOT industry, but it wasn't too challenging. Good starter course for IOT field. | 1) industry, but it wasn't too challenging. | Good | 1) starter course for IOT field. | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good introduction to ASD. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to ASD. | 3.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course was a good introduction to ASD. I was hoping to learn more about how to best serve students with ASD, but this course was not designed solely for educators. I will now look for a more specialized course in ASD. | 1) This course was a | Good | 1) introduction to ASD. I was hoping | 4.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | My 2-years old niece in China has just been diagnosed as a ASD child. I took this class to help the parents understand the disorder and take prompt steps to start intervention when she is still young. The class is concise and informative. The 5 week contents provide just enough information for parents who have ASD children that has just been diagnosed to briefly understand the challenge and solutions of having an ASD child. I find the videos that illustrates how ASD children behave and what the proper intervention needed from parents, friends, and teachers very useful. By participating the class, I understand what ASD disorder is and I will pass what I have learnt to our big family so everyone has a correct and positive perspective to ASD and offer help to alleviate the anxiety for the parents. This is a very good course. | 1) the parents. This is a very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This is a very well organized and very interesting course, with a lot of useful information for those who work or intend to work with children. It also gives you an insight into the world of adults with autism, which is not a subject you can usually hear a lot about. This course can motivate you to investigate further about ASD, and it gives you good reference points. | 1) about ASD, and it gives you | Good | 1) reference points. | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | very good course! easy to follow and learn! | 1) very | Good | 1) course! easy to follow and learn! | 5.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good but short course. The statment of acomplishment is unaviable. 50$ for short course is a big price | 1) | Good | 1) but short course. The statment of | 4.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Could be more computer friendly. Had good information but hard to engage because the majority of the lectures are just powerpoints with the professor talking over them. | 1) Could be more computer friendly. Had | Good | 1) information but hard to engage because | 3.0 |
| GMSg0yWsEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | good course, but short. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but short. | 4.0 |
| GniSDGdyEeWq4RLQvtY_lQ | I could not upload a correct video as I do not have the knowledge to do so but I didnot get to finish the course which I think is unfair. There should be some other ways of uploading the homework. I have given two stars not because the course is not good but because I was unfairly given less marks and as below70% is not passed did not get to complete the course | 1) not because the course is not | Good | 1) but because I was unfairly given | 1.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | It was good experience to enhance my knowledge. | 1) It was | Good | 1) experience to enhance my knowledge. | 4.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | Great course to review the topic of materials. I am currently working as a mechanical engineer and it has helped me to refresh the fundamental concepts covered during my degree. The material is presented in a clear way and I think this is a good approach to the subject. | 1) and I think this is a | Good | 1) approach to the subject. | 5.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | It was a good learning experience. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) learning experience. | 5.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | good course for refreshing knowledge in material science ; should have been more elaborate | 1) | Good | 1) course for refreshing knowledge in material | 4.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | Good course. As the name says, covers the stuff every engineer should know about. | 1) | Good | 1) course. As the name says, covers | 4.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | interesting . very good for engineering students specially in first year and beneficial for branches like mechanical, civil , structural , etc. | 1) interesting . very | Good | 1) for engineering students specially in first | 4.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | Excellent intro to Materials Science. The course covers the fundamental concepts such as yield stress, tensile strength, ductility and toughness without getting too involved in complex formulas. I have a background in mechanical engineering and found this course to be a good review of materials course I took in University. | 1) found this course to be a | Good | 1) review of materials course I took | 5.0 |
| GNr7-GFfEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | Good introductory course. It could use a little bit more presence from the responsibles though. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. It could use a | 4.0 |
| GNtVE1J0EeaAmBJfqzpttQ | The perspective of balance of this course is absolutely how I do see success. Is greatly explained and motivates the student in a very good way. | 1) motivates the student in a very | Good | 1) way. | 5.0 |
| goJ9vXd_EeWtpg5GoAM5Iw | Very good! There's room for improvement in the assignments, especially the quizzes that have simple questions and some have only one. | 1) Very | Good | 1) There's room for improvement in the | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course was very informative and its a good start for those interested in Solid Waste Management. It was very easy to understand basic concepts. It has created interest to learn more about Solid Waste Management. I would like to thank all the three professors, who shared their knowledge freely and also for keeping it simple and to the point. | 1) was very informative and its a | Good | 1) start for those interested in Solid | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | A very well summarised overview about waste management, which everyone should learn. Great knowledge, this will be a good foundation for future endeavors ! Thank you so much, Sam | 1) Great knowledge, this will be a | Good | 1) foundation for future endeavors ! Thank | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Excellent course, very concise and focused on the topic. Good instructors, with a lot of external experts being invited and presenting case studies. | 1) concise and focused on the topic. | Good | 1) instructors, with a lot of external | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | For students of Food Industry waste management the week 3,4 & 5 are specially interesting. Good tutors and the modules are well passed. | 1) 4 & 5 are specially interesting. | Good | 1) tutors and the modules are well | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | very good course and gives a lot of information to apply in countries in development! | 1) very | Good | 1) course and gives a lot of | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Very interesting topic and explained in very good detail, with many examples, case studies and recommended readings. Thank you for such a great course. | 1) interesting topic and explained in very | Good | 1) detail, with many examples, case studies | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | This course includes Municipal Solid Waste Management in developing countries, and issues that we do experience in latin american countries. It has a good overall technical data on solid waste management. | 1) latin american countries. It has a | Good | 1) overall technical data on solid waste | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | I really liked this course. I just wish there was more documentation on insect reproduction. Other than that really good! | 1) insect reproduction. Other than that really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Is a very good course with different examples from different locations worldwide. | 1) Is a very | Good | 1) course with different examples from different | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Very good and informative course | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative course | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | the course is very good | 1) the course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Good analysis of MSW practices in developing countries | 1) | Good | 1) analysis of MSW practices in developing | 4.0 |
| gpAI9GK4EeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Good information and acknowledge received by this course. Congratulations ! | 1) | Good | 1) information and acknowledge received by this | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great content, good practice using real-world business data. | 1) Great content, | Good | 1) practice using real-world business data. | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good introduction course to MySQL. Hope they includes how to import data, create table and update information too! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course to MySQL. Hope they | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a well-organized course. I really learnt a lot from the course. And the assignment and exercise work as a good practice for me to put what I learnt in the course into use. | 1) assignment and exercise work as a | Good | 1) practice for me to put what | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's pretty good for entry-level SQL learners. However, to further improve, much time is required. Also, exercises provided are sometimes really weird. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) for entry-level SQL learners. However, to | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I found the first 4 weeks of the course amazing: just really well structured, thought-out, and delivered in a way that positions the student for success. Jana breaks the material down into digestible bits, gives you sufficient practice, and even if you don't get it, you can look at the answers to the practice questions and figure out where your thinking was incorrect. The 5th week wasn't as well broken down, especially the last set of Teradata exercises. New concepts or ways of structuring queries were being introduced in those exercises, but there was no way to check for a correct solution if I couldn't come with one on my own (which was unfortunately half of the time). I still got a good grade on my last quiz, but I can't say that I really truly learned how to write the more complicated queries. I would suggest that the last Teradata exercise set has more explanation or perhaps just answers that the student can refer to in order to understand why his/her line of thinking isn't working. Otherwise, a truly fantastic course. I 100% recommend it. | 1) the time). I still got a | Good | 1) grade on my last quiz, but | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent introduction to SQL. Good, short overview of theoretical background. Lots of practice exercises. | 1) Excellent introduction to SQL. | Good | 1) short overview of theoretical background. Lots | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Switching between platforms was confusing but overall the course was good value for money | 1) confusing but overall the course was | Good | 1) value for money | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good, detailed course, I can recommend! Before that I knew nothing about SQL, now I have moved to higher level of analyst. Sometimes the instructions are not 100% clear, but it is minor problem. | 1) Very | Good | 1) detailed course, I can recommend! Before | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a very good class to learn to use SQL in a systematic manner, even if you had used SQL or are completely new. The two Databases ( Terradata and Dognition) gave a lot of valuable practice. | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) class to learn to use SQL | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Enjoyed the course. The exercised are well-designed. Good way to start MySQL ! | 1) the course. The exercised are well-designed. | Good | 1) way to start MySQL ! | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very useful:) Very good explained for the begginers:) | 1) Very useful:) Very | Good | 1) explained for the begginers:) | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good material but heavy work-load, especially since we are learning two new skills -SQL syntax and Data analysis. Request instructors/TA's to guide students more in the forums. Analysis like computing avg daily revenue should be explained better as I spent too much time figuring it out and the forum answers were way off. However, this being an online class I was very impressed with the detailed worksheets in MYSQL. | 1) | Good | 1) material but heavy work-load, especially since | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a good class and I learned a lot. The learning curve shoots up exponentially around the fourth week. I could see this course being perfect if broken down into two classes. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) class and I learned a lot. | 3.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course instruction is very good. If the Teradata database is improved, the course will deserve 5 star. | 1) The course instruction is very | Good | 1) If the Teradata database is improved, | 4.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thank you. It was good course. | 1) Thank you. It was | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really like this course!! With abundant exercises, detailed explanation, real-world data and sweeeeet professor, it is a good start for SQL beginner! | 1) and sweeeeet professor, it is a | Good | 1) start for SQL beginner! | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is really awesome! There are a lot of well designed exercises, which not only trained my skill to write SQL query but also deepen my understanding of relational database. The real business data provides learners an opportunity to get in touch with the real business world. So I am excited to recommend you to take this course. If you are a new beginner at MySQL, it can help you get started soon. If you already know some basic knowledge about SQL, this course will also be a good resource for practice. | 1) this course will also be a | Good | 1) resource for practice. | 5.0 |
| GplkvRnqEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course for learning SQL - the tutorials, materials and exercises provided are very well thought and structured. The staff put lot of effort and thinking into this one. I like the whole specialization and I can recommend taking it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for learning SQL - the | 5.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It's a good course | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Course lectures are good, but many quiz questions are out of syllabus. Sorry, I am not satisfied. | 1) Course lectures are | Good | 1) but many quiz questions are out | 2.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| gSfwG3HcEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Overall good course. Clean and elegant style of presentation. Some videos had some echo problems with the sound. Also there were some english typos in some slides and in video quizzes that should be corrected. I would like to seen the slides for the presentations. Also if this is going to be a series of courses wouldn't it make sense to bundle it in a specialization? Nonetheless, congratulations and thank you for presenting this course in Coursera. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course. Clean and elegant style of | 3.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | My rating of this course is excellent, because the quality is high. Interviews expert Don Norman was exciting, because it is one of the most important personalities in this field. Professor Scott, has very good methodology to give lessons, good explanation. It is a course where you can learn and put into practice what he learned very quickly. | 1) this field. Professor Scott, has very | Good | 1) methodology to give lessons, good explanation. | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | My rating of this course is excellent, because the quality is high. Interviews expert Don Norman was exciting, because it is one of the most important personalities in this field. Professor Scott, has very good methodology to give lessons, good explanation. It is a course where you can learn and put into practice what he learned very quickly. | 2) very good methodology to give lessons, | Good | 2) explanation. It is a course where | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Very good Concepts explained.. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Concepts explained. . | 5.0 |
| gt5ybBU-EeWhTg59fTWfpQ | THE COURSE IS VERY GOOD. | 1) THE COURSE IS VERY | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| gtbTilrcEeW5ChKOjFc59Q | A course with a very good level of detail regarding every important aspect of the topic (considering the amount of time required); information presented in a clear way. | 1) A course with a very | Good | 1) level of detail regarding every important | 5.0 |
| gttJnUtZEeW4rRLEP0z9Bw | The course can be informative, but the presentation needs some work. All of the instructional videos were merely a person reading a Power Point presentation to the viewer. The "in class" examples appeared to be completely hypothetical and were also read to the viewer without any video demonstration of how the presented information works in an actual class. In addition, the written information in the videos was confusingly organized and had not been fully edited. In multiple videos, there were typos. In at least one video, the instructors had not fully deleted the sentences from a previous version of a slide. When the revised slide was presented to the viewer, a word from a previous version was in the middle of the sentence. In addition, the previous version was obviously about a different subject. I was disappointed and continually frustrated with this course, especially since the instructors required me to pay fifty dollars in order to take the module quizzes and the final assessment. I have no problem paying for a good product. However, the professionalism displayed in the course was incredibly lacking. | 1) have no problem paying for a | Good | 1) product. However, the professionalism displayed in | 2.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course :) | 1) | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Just awesome. This was my first online course and, because it was so good, won't be my last. Andrew Ng is the man. | 1) course and, because it was so | Good | 1) won't be my last. Andrew Ng | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course teaches you a lot about how the algorithms work that most courses out there don't delve into (for example, things like alpha, the C parameter in SVM) which I think is a good way to learn about machine learning. | 1) SVM) which I think is a | Good | 1) way to learn about machine learning. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A really good introduction to ML, even tough it's a little outdated | 1) A really | Good | 1) introduction to ML, even tough it's | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course developed by Andrew Ng is quite interesting, going to the essentials in order student get the big picture and the essential tools for building the backbone of future ML applications. Of course, being confident with mathematics principles and notations will be helpful but most of the time, it's not an issue if you have the minimal knowledge. What it lacks on Coursera is the next stage of this course where we could investigate further the technologies presented but in more technical way. Maybe we might see that in the future... Regarding course supports (videos, forums ...), they are of good quality and the fact Andrew used them by drawing on slides helps to have a better understanding. We could notice that there are few minor errors (eg: a "j" index which becomes "i" in J(theta) writing) and I think the technical slides on Back propagation could be improved if a dedicated slide to used mathematical notations / definitions. Sometimes, there are some errors which could induce some confusions. But these minors errors don't hide the impressive work done by Andrew. Regarding assessments, quizzes could be tricky if you don't got the "spirit" (not an exam habit in France) and coding exercises are well structured in order the student will focus on the core modules of the lesson and not on information flow. These exercises are inspiring if you're interesting in teaching and inspiring for Data Scientist Apprentices if you investigate the utils functions developed to support the exercise. Many thanks for this great course and I hope my two cents will help other people to attend it Bruno | 1) . . ), they are of | Good | 1) quality and the fact Andrew used | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I studied computer science in Dortmund, Germany in the 90ies. I recommend this course to everyone who wants to have a very good understanding of machine learning. A little bit of advice, if you have never learned linear algebra on a university level, you should at least try to get a basic understanding of it before starting this course. I was happy that I remembered stuff, learning it from scratch in 1 or 2 weeks would be difficult, I assume. +: * Mathematical basics of machine learning are very well explained * Andrew Ng is a very good professor, he explains the topic very well and thoroughly * It is not limited by using a special framework or language * The support in the forums, and the transcription of the talks, and all the material that is given to you is really excellent. -: * I would be happy if the programming exercises would be a bit more fun, currently it feels like translating / transforming math formulas into octave, which is fine, but not very fun. Having said that I am only in week 4, perhaps this will happen later * some text questions in the multiple choice quizzes require a precise understanding of the english language, especially in regards to math, I am not a native speaker, so these questions feel especially hard for me | 1) who wants to have a very | Good | 1) understanding of machine learning. A little | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | About me: I studied computer science in Dortmund, Germany in the 90ies. I recommend this course to everyone who wants to have a very good understanding of machine learning. A little bit of advice, if you have never learned linear algebra on a university level, you should at least try to get a basic understanding of it before starting this course. I was happy that I remembered stuff, learning it from scratch in 1 or 2 weeks would be difficult, I assume. +: * Mathematical basics of machine learning are very well explained * Andrew Ng is a very good professor, he explains the topic very well and thoroughly * It is not limited by using a special framework or language * The support in the forums, and the transcription of the talks, and all the material that is given to you is really excellent. -: * I would be happy if the programming exercises would be a bit more fun, currently it feels like translating / transforming math formulas into octave, which is fine, but not very fun. Having said that I am only in week 4, perhaps this will happen later * some text questions in the multiple choice quizzes require a precise understanding of the english language, especially in regards to math, I am not a native speaker, so these questions feel especially hard for me | 2) * Andrew Ng is a very | Good | 2) professor, he explains the topic very | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is very good for beginners like me. It's the first class I manage to finish on Coursera. Because it's interesting and relatively easy to follow . Andrew loves teaching and is quite an outstanding teacher! This course offers me a chance to have an idea about AI and opens a door for me to a new world!THANK YOU! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for beginners like me. It's the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | my first awarded MOOC Course, feeling well now. Anyway, a good worthy lesson. | 1) Course, feeling well now. Anyway, a | Good | 1) worthy lesson. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is really good course!! | 1) This is really | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is really amazing. Professor Andrew Ng explains things in a really good manner and it is easy to comprehend. You will know many different things after completing this course. This will enhance your skills in Machine Learning for sure. Thank you Andrew Ng sir. | 1) Ng explains things in a really | Good | 1) manner and it is easy to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course with good balance of theoretical foundations, relevant examples and tests. | 1) Excellent course with | Good | 1) balance of theoretical foundations, relevant examples | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I think this course told by Andrew Ng is very precious for me,who is studying software engineering in university and focus on programming but not algorithm last years.It's hard to find good primer teaching materials on website. But now, after finishing this course, I think I have the ability to learn more about machine learning myself. Thanks to Andrew Ng and Coursera. | 1) last years. It's hard to find | Good | 1) primer teaching materials on website. But | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Easy to follow, useful, and very practical. At the same time, if you want to understand deeper why things work the way they do and/or the math behind it, the lectures give you good directions to look further into it. The programming assignments are a bit on the basic side (in terms of what you have to do vs what they give you), but are still great to put these ideas into a practical setting, and the optional parts help you explore the applications in more depth. Really glad I put the time into it. Totally worth it. | 1) behind it, the lectures give you | Good | 1) directions to look further into it. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's a good lesson for beginners who knows litttle about maths. | 1) it's a | Good | 1) lesson for beginners who knows litttle | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | GOOD COURSE, Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) COURSE, Thanks | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! Covers the basic topics and algorithms and gives good advice on how to apply machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Covers the basic topics and algorithms | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! Covers the basic topics and algorithms and gives good advice on how to apply machine learning. | 2) basic topics and algorithms and gives | Good | 2) advice on how to apply machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Pretty good course by Andrew Ng, easy to understand. The programming assignment is awesome, through which I can acquire basic programming ability with respect to several types of machine learning problems. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course by Andrew Ng, easy to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was a very good course. Actually one of the best that I completed. Lectures and programming assignments were very interesting challenges to me. Additional materials were helpfull. Thank You for your efforts to share material of this course in such a professional and well organized way. I hope to see more courses like this one. I recommend this course to everyone interested in machine learning. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course. Actually one of the best | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview, but less theory. Would also maybe be good to have had a section on starting from a problem and how to select a technique (supervised learning, unsupervised learning, etc.). | 1) | Good | 1) overview, but less theory. Would also | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview, but less theory. Would also maybe be good to have had a section on starting from a problem and how to select a technique (supervised learning, unsupervised learning, etc.). | 2) less theory. Would also maybe be | Good | 2) to have had a section on | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course，clear and helpful。Excellent introduction for machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course，clear and helpful。Excellent introduction for machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a good course for the beginners. The assigments of programming are really helpful. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for the beginners. The assigments | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. Explained very well. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Explained very well. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I'm a japanese college student of economics. I am not good at listening English but teacher speaks easy English so I can understand a little. At last , I used japanese translation :o it's so nice . I didn't know any thing about machine learning so I needed so hard work to understand and submit personal work. It's so difficult for me. Because I'm in summer vacation , I could. I don't have any kind of emotion like regret. I enjoyed this course. But this course is so difficult!!!!! | 1) student of economics. I am not | Good | 1) at listening English but teacher speaks | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good Course.Thanks to Andrew | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. Thanks to Andrew | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. Not only teaches concepts, it also gives you exercises to check your understanding. I wish i can get some real problems where i can apply all of these learnings. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Not only teaches concepts, it | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was very fun! I really enjoyed the videos and programming assignments. I think the class contents are well-paced and Andrew is really good at explaining. Thank you! | 1) are well-paced and Andrew is really | Good | 1) at explaining. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | So good content and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | 1) So | Good | 1) content and teacher. Thanks you Andrew. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, good balance between academic and real-world information. Very well taught! | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) balance between academic and real-world information. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course for understanding the scope of Machine Learning. A big thank you to everyone involved in creating, mentoring and knowledge sharing! | 1) A | Good | 1) course for understanding the scope of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Hi, I appreciate this course and the efforts put into it. However, I am unlikely to focus on it or be as much engaged as I'd hope to due to sound quality in your videos. I am really sorry for rating this course 4 stars. I hope that you'd recored your videos with a better microphone so I could enjoy listening to you and be more engaged in the course. I hope that you understand that it is hard to take a course with a bad sound quality, especially, that there is no excuse not to upgrade the microphone. Nowadays, almost everyone is using a respectably good microphone to recored videos. I believe if you use a better microphone many students would be more engaged and willing to take your course. My opinion might change after finishing this course but I don't think I'd be finishing this course anytime soon or at least on time before the next session because of the sound quality. Best regards, | 1) almost everyone is using a respectably | Good | 1) microphone to recored videos. I believe | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good course to start with ML. Andrew Ng, thank you very much for making this course free. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to start with ML. Andrew | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well organized course . Well designed so that it would appeal to wide varieties of students. Good Job Professor | 1) appeal to wide varieties of students. | Good | 1) Job Professor | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is pure good person with a lot of knowledge and experiences! I will every courses by Ng ! | 1) Andrew Ng is pure | Good | 1) person with a lot of knowledge | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good as an Introductory course. I would suggest that you should have a bit of background in Linear Algebra before taking this. | 1) Very | Good | 1) as an Introductory course. I would | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course for those who are new in this area. | 1) very | Good | 1) course for those who are new | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent course, with well presented study material, good supplementary resources, enjoyable and moderately sophisticated assignments (these usually took me more than the claimed 3 hours to accomplish, yet everything is solvable with a bit of thinking and attention). Recommended for anyone interested in conceptual foundations and basic topics of machine learning (elementary math and programming skills would be desirable). Thank a lot. | 1) course, with well presented study material, | Good | 1) supplementary resources, enjoyable and moderately sophisticated | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting course. Broad spectrum of basic terms introduced. Good opportunity to grasp a feeling of real problems concerning Machine Learning and to solve selected problems on your own. | 1) Broad spectrum of basic terms introduced. | Good | 1) opportunity to grasp a feeling of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Highly recommended to any one who wants to learn machine learning from scratch. Dr Ng shares both his knowledge of ML topics and a lot of valuable experience from real-life ML projects. After completion of the course, I am in a good position to pursue further study of more advanced ML topics such as Deep Learning. | 1) the course, I am in a | Good | 1) position to pursue further study of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class was great fun. I don't think I ever got bored watching a video or doing a programming assignment. The assignments were well-written and did a good job of ensuring a good understanding of the concepts without dragging on for hours. | 1) assignments were well-written and did a | Good | 1) job of ensuring a good understanding | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class was great fun. I don't think I ever got bored watching a video or doing a programming assignment. The assignments were well-written and did a good job of ensuring a good understanding of the concepts without dragging on for hours. | 2) a good job of ensuring a | Good | 2) understanding of the concepts without dragging | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Till now, the course seems to be very good and the flow is also very comfortable to follow | 1) the course seems to be very | Good | 1) and the flow is also very | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good material regarding machine learning, some more tutorials regarding matlab/octave need to be added | 1) Very | Good | 1) material regarding machine learning, some more | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | this course is very good ! professor Ng is absolutely the best teacher I have ever met ! also,the materials are very useful! thanks! | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) ! professor Ng is absolutely the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting introduction to Machine Learning. All lecture notes are beautifully presented by Andrew Ng. I have truly enjoyed his style. Quizzes and programming exercises are good | 1) style. Quizzes and programming exercises are | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good course if you want to start with machine learning. Provides both theoretical and practical knowledge regarding the different algorithms of machine learning. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course if you want to start | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a very good course and I would really recommend it to anyone who has interest in machine learning or data science. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course and I would really recommend | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a really good course for people who want to learn machine learning. I do love this class. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course for people who want to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very very good class. Andrew Good Job! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) class. Andrew Good Job! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very very good class. Andrew Good Job! | 2) Very very good class. Andrew | Good | 2) Job! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's good for who want to learn machine learning, the arrangement is properity. | 1) it's | Good | 1) for who want to learn machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you Prof. Ng and Mentors that your effort to educate - well designed course, teaching, quizzes and exercises to help us understand essence of ML. I am not a computer scientist graduate student / graduate but I am interested in data. This course will start my new direction of research and work. Good luck to all of you who encounter this course! | 1) new direction of research and work. | Good | 1) luck to all of you who | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well organised material. Good math explanations and proofs as much as needed. Andrew seems made for transmitting knowledge to people. | 1) Very well organised material. | Good | 1) math explanations and proofs as much | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course gives very good insight into fundamentals of machine learning. | 1) This course gives very | Good | 1) insight into fundamentals of machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, excellent faculty. Will give very good start towards ML | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, excellent faculty. Will give very | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, excellent faculty. Will give very good start towards ML | 2) course, excellent faculty. Will give very | Good | 2) start towards ML | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I got a good foundation on Machine Learning on which I hope to build. The course is well paced and structured and the weekly deadlines for the assignments have been useful to drive me to keep up and get my assignments done. The one thing I would change is add programming assignments for the last couple of weeks - it is somehow unsatisfying to go through the videos but not practice those concepts. | 1) I got a | Good | 1) foundation on Machine Learning on which | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. It exceeded my expectations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It exceeded my expectations. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you Andrew Ng, you are a great teacher. This course design is an art for which it presents a complicated subject in a simple and meaningful form. I hope to carry forward the good deeds by continuing the learning and ultimately create useful applications. | 1) I hope to carry forward the | Good | 1) deeds by continuing the learning and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very very good intro to Machine Learning. I highly recommend. | 1) very very | Good | 1) intro to Machine Learning. I highly | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | After completing the Machine Learning Course and after going through all of these videos and assignments, now I can say that I have learnt a lot from this course and content of the course have good quality and helps you expertise this field. Thanks a ton Prof. Andrew NG. | 1) and content of the course have | Good | 1) quality and helps you expertise this | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is acourse with a very high quality. Insights shared by the teacher and those programming homeworks are the most valuable part for me. There is relatively less material from theoretical aspect, but it's still good. (I use PRML as a complementary resource.) | 1) from theoretical aspect, but it's still | Good | 1) (I use PRML as a complementary | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | One of the best course on MOOC platforms. Thx and good luck. | 1) course on MOOC platforms. Thx and | Good | 1) luck. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good course with lot of fundamentals as well as practical examples and suggestions. Prof Ng is surely an expert in this field and it was a real pleasure attending his classes. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course with lot of fundamentals as | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is excellent! Prof. Ng has the magic to make everything simple to understand. It is very good for beginners with little background, and I learned a lot from this course. | 1) simple to understand. It is very | Good | 1) for beginners with little background, and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course over all. If you know a bit about linear algebra the course can get a little borring some times... | 1) Very | Good | 1) course over all. If you know | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introductory course to Machine Learning with a good balance of theoretical and practical information. Requires a little bit of programming experience in Matlab/Octave. | 1) course to Machine Learning with a | Good | 1) balance of theoretical and practical information. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course 5/7 perfect | 1) | Good | 1) course 5/7 perfect | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, the programming exercises weren't that challenging but I guess it is meant to be an introductory class. It is a great first step in machine learning for people with little programming experience as well. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the programming exercises weren't that | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good to learn the basics and to get a good start in machine learning. I missed in-depth comprehension in mathematics but that's ok. | 1) Very | Good | 1) to learn the basics and to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good to learn the basics and to get a good start in machine learning. I missed in-depth comprehension in mathematics but that's ok. | 2) the basics and to get a | Good | 2) start in machine learning. I missed | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | toally good | 1) toally | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very impressed with the course - though I must admit it is not for the weak heart-ed. Requires good knowledge matrix manipulation. | 1) not for the weak heart-ed. Requires | Good | 1) knowledge matrix manipulation. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is an excellent course. I knew virtually nothing about machine learning prior to doing this course, and now I feel I have a good understanding of the various models and their underlying assumptions, applications and limitations. Prof. Andrew Ng is a superb teacher - a leader in his field who is prepared to take the time to carefully and patiently explain the ML concepts in detail but with an eye to their practical application. I am most grateful to him and his team for taking the time to put together such a wonderful course. | 1) now I feel I have a | Good | 1) understanding of the various models and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, good material, excellent teacher. | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) material, excellent teacher. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | one of a good course on coursera | 1) one of a | Good | 1) course on coursera | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Just finished the course. This is indeed an amazing course which can get started you in practical machine learning in less than 3 months. You will developing your own neural networks from the scratch. Below are the pros and not pros (i won't call it cons) that i experienced. PROs : Gets onto topics right away. Information about practical implementation Doable. Not too difficult and not downright easy. You have to put effort if you do not have backgroud in undergraduate mathematics to understand the concepts. Prof. Andrew Ng. - He has knack of explaining something very complex in a very easy manner. Also, he justifies if he is not going to explain something Assignments evaluation and practical scenarios. Not PROs : Very High Level : This course does NOT go in detail to explain the derivations and mathematics behind machine learning course. I think its OK and that is what makes the course doable. I find it really hard to accept a formula if the reasons are not known and hence, sometimes our only task was to learn the formula. For example : in SVMs. What Next : It is just a feedback. I think at the end of course, course team should guide students, what do to next. May be which course can be a good follow up course for this. So, at the end, i just want to thanks Coursera team, Stanford Team, mentors, peers and Prof. Andrew Ng for spreading this knowledge for free. It is really helping people like me to study something not readily available in good quality in reach. Hopefully, i will also be able to give back to community some time soon. | 1) be which course can be a | Good | 1) follow up course for this. So, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Just finished the course. This is indeed an amazing course which can get started you in practical machine learning in less than 3 months. You will developing your own neural networks from the scratch. Below are the pros and not pros (i won't call it cons) that i experienced. PROs : Gets onto topics right away. Information about practical implementation Doable. Not too difficult and not downright easy. You have to put effort if you do not have backgroud in undergraduate mathematics to understand the concepts. Prof. Andrew Ng. - He has knack of explaining something very complex in a very easy manner. Also, he justifies if he is not going to explain something Assignments evaluation and practical scenarios. Not PROs : Very High Level : This course does NOT go in detail to explain the derivations and mathematics behind machine learning course. I think its OK and that is what makes the course doable. I find it really hard to accept a formula if the reasons are not known and hence, sometimes our only task was to learn the formula. For example : in SVMs. What Next : It is just a feedback. I think at the end of course, course team should guide students, what do to next. May be which course can be a good follow up course for this. So, at the end, i just want to thanks Coursera team, Stanford Team, mentors, peers and Prof. Andrew Ng for spreading this knowledge for free. It is really helping people like me to study something not readily available in good quality in reach. Hopefully, i will also be able to give back to community some time soon. | 2) study something not readily available in | Good | 2) quality in reach. Hopefully, i will | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good, there is nothing to explan except that | 1) | Good | 1) there is nothing to explan except | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! Good depth of coverage of concepts. However, it would be better to have additional resources and problem-solving opportunities, either within the course or outside (which course participants could make use of). | 1) Excellent course! | Good | 1) depth of coverage of concepts. However, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is really well designed. The assigments are very useful to fully capture the theoretical part. Andrew Ng is a very very good professor. It is really clear he is really comfortable with all these subjects and as an extraordinary ability to connect all the topics covered in the course as well as translating complicated concepts into a clear mental picture. | 1) Andrew Ng is a very very | Good | 1) professor. It is really clear he | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good start | 1) A | Good | 1) start | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course, gives a real good understanding of ML. | 1) Fantastic course, gives a real | Good | 1) understanding of ML. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good material for beginers | 1) | Good | 1) material for beginers | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A bit hard,but a really good course. | 1) A bit hard, but a really | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's a really good course, perfect assignments and tests. highly recommended! | 1) it's a really | Good | 1) course, perfect assignments and tests. highly | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent material and very good explanations during the courses. Thank you. | 1) Excellent material and very | Good | 1) explanations during the courses. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Despite I guess the course has a pretty good coverage of the ML basics, it is definitely just an introductive class. In particular I was surprised by the low quality of the material. The following are my notes and suggestions: -- I found the lectures highly redundant, with many unnecessary repetitions -- using a vector notation (like an arrow or a simple line on top of the letters) throughout the course would have make formulas much more readable -- too much hand writing on the slides while talking: a better set of slides with blocks of text shown at the right moment would be much smoother and readable -- very, very poor video editing (many times it's clear some parts of the videos were meant to be cut!!) -- the desire to create a format suitable for people with a scarce algebra preparation lead to use not the appropriate terminology, which would be more correct and easier to understand. Just realize that ML is basically applied math, and without a good math knowledge it is almost pointless to approach the subject | 1) guess the course has a pretty | Good | 1) coverage of the ML basics, it | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Despite I guess the course has a pretty good coverage of the ML basics, it is definitely just an introductive class. In particular I was surprised by the low quality of the material. The following are my notes and suggestions: -- I found the lectures highly redundant, with many unnecessary repetitions -- using a vector notation (like an arrow or a simple line on top of the letters) throughout the course would have make formulas much more readable -- too much hand writing on the slides while talking: a better set of slides with blocks of text shown at the right moment would be much smoother and readable -- very, very poor video editing (many times it's clear some parts of the videos were meant to be cut!!) -- the desire to create a format suitable for people with a scarce algebra preparation lead to use not the appropriate terminology, which would be more correct and easier to understand. Just realize that ML is basically applied math, and without a good math knowledge it is almost pointless to approach the subject | 2) basically applied math, and without a | Good | 2) math knowledge it is almost pointless | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am a super fan of the Andrew NG and very grateful for his contribution for ML area.Good luck to his adventure in Baidu. | 1) for his contribution for ML area. | Good | 1) luck to his adventure in Baidu. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course which is easy listened with a good teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course which is easy listened with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course which is easy listened with a good teacher! | 2) which is easy listened with a | Good | 2) teacher! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good beginner level course on machine learning. Gives good insight and intuition on basics of machine learning. Provides good foundation to learn more advanced concepts in machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) beginner level course on machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good beginner level course on machine learning. Gives good insight and intuition on basics of machine learning. Provides good foundation to learn more advanced concepts in machine learning. | 2) level course on machine learning. Gives | Good | 2) insight and intuition on basics of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good beginner level course on machine learning. Gives good insight and intuition on basics of machine learning. Provides good foundation to learn more advanced concepts in machine learning. | 3) on basics of machine learning. Provides | Good | 3) foundation to learn more advanced concepts | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's very good, help me a lot. | 1) It's very | Good | 1) help me a lot. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is an amazing teacher, he gave very good lectures. This class provide me basic knowledge of CNN, which I need to use in my project. If you want to study deep learning, I think you'd better to take this machine learning course first. At last, the programming task is very important!! | 1) an amazing teacher, he gave very | Good | 1) lectures. This class provide me basic | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The method of teaching is very good. The programming assignments help a lot in actual understanding of the the algorithm. Very interesting course. You will definitely enjoy it. Thank you!! Happy learning!! | 1) The method of teaching is very | Good | 1) The programming assignments help a lot | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Mathematical approach and way of teaching is good | 1) approach and way of teaching is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | thanks very much,good lessens for machine learning beginners | 1) thanks very much, | Good | 1) lessens for machine learning beginners | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good for me. | 1) | Good | 1) for me. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor didn't do a good job on explaining the theory. He moves too fast. This should improve so that student who has less/weak knowledge of Math can pass the quiz. If you are not a Math student, don't take this class. I was hoping to learn about how to program to control the machine/robot but it turns out that this is more focusing on the theory instead. I would recommend to take another course of ML/Big Data from UCI instead. | 1) Professor didn't do a | Good | 1) job on explaining the theory. He | 1.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice structure of lectures. Interesting and useful practical tasks. There is only one sad thing - sometimes answer in test are can't be matched exactly without assumptions. Very good practical examples. | 1) be matched exactly without assumptions. Very | Good | 1) practical examples. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good! It's quite helpful for me as a Machine Learning guideline. Applications are interesting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) It's quite helpful for me as | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good and easy to understand | 1) | Good | 1) and easy to understand | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to the subject that moves at a good pace but doesn't make such big jumps that it is difficult to follow. Andrew Ng presents the subject clearly and gives some good insights. One of the most valuable aspects of the course are the assignments where actual code is developed and worked upon. The code provided gives a good starting point for people to move forward and develop their own applications as they progress further. I would like to thank Professor Ng very much for producing this course and making it available so easily. Also to the people working with him to mentor those participating on the course. The course has very much wet my appetite for machine learning and I am now keen to pursue the subject further both through developing my own applications and learning more about the subject | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the subject that moves | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to the subject that moves at a good pace but doesn't make such big jumps that it is difficult to follow. Andrew Ng presents the subject clearly and gives some good insights. One of the most valuable aspects of the course are the assignments where actual code is developed and worked upon. The code provided gives a good starting point for people to move forward and develop their own applications as they progress further. I would like to thank Professor Ng very much for producing this course and making it available so easily. Also to the people working with him to mentor those participating on the course. The course has very much wet my appetite for machine learning and I am now keen to pursue the subject further both through developing my own applications and learning more about the subject | 2) the subject that moves at a | Good | 2) pace but doesn't make such big | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to the subject that moves at a good pace but doesn't make such big jumps that it is difficult to follow. Andrew Ng presents the subject clearly and gives some good insights. One of the most valuable aspects of the course are the assignments where actual code is developed and worked upon. The code provided gives a good starting point for people to move forward and develop their own applications as they progress further. I would like to thank Professor Ng very much for producing this course and making it available so easily. Also to the people working with him to mentor those participating on the course. The course has very much wet my appetite for machine learning and I am now keen to pursue the subject further both through developing my own applications and learning more about the subject | 3) the subject clearly and gives some | Good | 3) insights. One of the most valuable | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to the subject that moves at a good pace but doesn't make such big jumps that it is difficult to follow. Andrew Ng presents the subject clearly and gives some good insights. One of the most valuable aspects of the course are the assignments where actual code is developed and worked upon. The code provided gives a good starting point for people to move forward and develop their own applications as they progress further. I would like to thank Professor Ng very much for producing this course and making it available so easily. Also to the people working with him to mentor those participating on the course. The course has very much wet my appetite for machine learning and I am now keen to pursue the subject further both through developing my own applications and learning more about the subject | 4) upon. The code provided gives a | Good | 4) starting point for people to move | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well done and a good introduction to the field. Am excited to continue further! | 1) Very well done and a | Good | 1) introduction to the field. Am excited | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | When I started this class I had only the fuzziest notions about what machine learning really is. By the end I had a solid understanding both of the underlying mathematical principles used in machine learning and of the practical considerations for applying it to real world problems. I really enjoyed Professor Ng's lectures and the course mentors are very knowledgeable and helpful. The programming exercises did a lot to reinforce the week's material. The time estimates are pretty good too which made it easier for me to organize my schedule and get all the work done. I'm very happy with the course and looking forward to using machine learning in my projects. | 1) material. The time estimates are pretty | Good | 1) too which made it easier for | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is good for initial steps in machine learning. The pace is relatively slow. I don't like that some sections are stated "as too complicated" and the formulas are just provided without a proof(in particular the support vector machine lecture). I doubt anyone will implement this from scratch, but IMHO just providing the formula is almost the same as not mentioning the algorithm at all. I am familiar with the related material so it was not a great deal to me but I guess if you don't know linear algebra this could be frustrating. There are some glitches in the lectures - sentences repeating. There are also some minor mistakes that the lecturer does(everyone does some I guess). The last bit I did not like is that students are forced to use octave and that parts of the lectures focus on that. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) for initial steps in machine learning. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good material, good exercises to work on, adequate course duration. | 1) | Good | 1) material, good exercises to work on, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good material, good exercises to work on, adequate course duration. | 2) Good material, | Good | 2) exercises to work on, adequate course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good!!! i recommend this course | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! i recommend this course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good. thanks. | 1) very | Good | 1) thanks. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a good introduction to machine learning | 1) a | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course with very good explanations, thanks ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with very good explanations, thanks | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course with very good explanations, thanks ! | 2) Very good course with very | Good | 2) explanations, thanks ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! All the material is clear, in good order, only necessary information. | 1) All the material is clear, in | Good | 1) order, only necessary information. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for basic machine learning knowledge study | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for basic machine learning knowledge | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great intro to machine learning. Not too simple, but not too complicated for those without calculus skills. Very good mix of theory vs. practice and reasonable assignments were very useful to learning. We need a machine learning 2! | 1) for those without calculus skills. Very | Good | 1) mix of theory vs. practice and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, good overview over the most interesting topics of machine learning with the possibility to try them out with your own code. Easy to use submission system (both Octave and MATLAB worked fine). Minor drawback: an overview of more advanced/complex implementations of the concepts shown would be helpful for deciding where to go next after this course. Still, 5 Stars, because the course covers the important algorithms well enough to understand and use them, within very short videos. | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) overview over the most interesting topics | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course ! good level of abstraction and right pace | 1) Great course ! | Good | 1) level of abstraction and right pace | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course presents in a very accessible way a variety of ML techniques. It is definitely a good introductory course. The programming assignments could have been harder and the quizes could have required some harder calculations in hand. | 1) ML techniques. It is definitely a | Good | 1) introductory course. The programming assignments could | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good intro | 1) | Good | 1) intro | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course gives me a good ML knowledge with easy explanation. | 1) This course gives me a | Good | 1) ML knowledge with easy explanation. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course. Through my first week now and it's a really good course | 1) week now and it's a really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very clear and well taught lessons. Had a very good time learning many new concepts :) | 1) well taught lessons. Had a very | Good | 1) time learning many new concepts :) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course for an introduction into Machine Learning. Implementing the algorithms oneself is kind of unrealistic as there are plenty of existing libraries that do it for you but it's good for learning. I would have liked some more real world examples e.g. using caret, glm, random forest etc in R. | 1) do it for you but it's | Good | 1) for learning. I would have liked | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you guys. Course is very good. I'm now really excited to work on project that use Machine Learning. Hope I find one quite soon. Providing the course for free is a really awesome thing to do. I appreciate that, but there seems to be fee charged for certification after completing the course :(. | 1) Thank you guys. Course is very | Good | 1) I'm now really excited to work | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course with appropriate doze of theory. | 1) | Good | 1) course with appropriate doze of theory. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to machine learning. The content is fairly basic, it's up to you is you want to go deeper into the subject. Only one downside, the quality of videos is low. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. The content | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is an 11-week course. Around Week 3, it became the most informative course I have ever taken, and I have three degrees. It is no exaggeration to say that the amount of information presented in this course eclipses the sum total of what is offered in many degree programs... Yes, friends: it's that good! Don't hesitate; just enroll. | 1) . . Yes, friends: it's that | Good | 1) Don't hesitate; just enroll. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for beginners and those who want to learn the fundamentals of Machine Learning | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners and those who | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good for machine learning | 1) Very | Good | 1) for machine learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good one. We were provided Matlab library which expedite learning and coding process. | 1) Very | Good | 1) one. We were provided Matlab library | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is very good, easy to understand. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to Machine Learning. Insightful and whets your appetite for more. Would like to request a little more information on applying and interpreting PCA. Thank you for a very nice time and would wholeheartedly recommend this course to others who want to know more about machine learning. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning. Insightful and | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good lecture for the beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) lecture for the beginners. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was a very good start to Machine learning for me. I have learned a lot, yet i think the programming assignments were too easy to do and most of the time the answer was almost given directly. I think more challenging assignments would be better | 1) This course was a very | Good | 1) start to Machine learning for me. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very good,throgh taking this course,I have a general picture about machine learning .But ,there still exsists several problems,for example,the quality of the videos are low,and I am really looking forward to new version of the course. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) throgh taking this course, I have | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good lectures! | 1) | Good | 1) lectures! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good. There is no other way to learn better. :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) There is no other way to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good mix of theory and practice. You are also building on top of previous lessons, so it gives good feeling of continuity. | 1) | Good | 1) mix of theory and practice. You | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good mix of theory and practice. You are also building on top of previous lessons, so it gives good feeling of continuity. | 2) of previous lessons, so it gives | Good | 2) feeling of continuity. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a good instruction of machine learning.If you want to understand the fundamental concepts and tool of machine learning.This is your best choice to learning it in this course. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) instruction of machine learning. If you | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I think this is a really, really good course for machine learning! | 1) think this is a really, really | Good | 1) course for machine learning! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course, discover a lot of different algorithms and applications. Exercices are a little bit too easy though.. | 1) | Good | 1) course, discover a lot of different | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor is too good at teaching this subject. Loved it! | 1) Professor is too | Good | 1) at teaching this subject. Loved it! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great Introductory course about Machine Learning. Not knowing anything about ML, came out understanding a good bit. The examples in the course gives you a real world applications of ML and helps you understand the content. Highly recommend this course to anyone. | 1) about ML, came out understanding a | Good | 1) bit. The examples in the course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introductory course. I think the best part of the course is that you are given tools for which you can start applying the concepts yourself, without getting bogged down with theory. Its not too difficult if you have a moderate understanding of linear algebra and Matlab. Discussion help can be useful and replies are quick. I actually found the course very addictive and wish there were others of similar caliber. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course. I think the best | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a good start to know machine learning, PS: professor Andrew NG is so handsome ang gentle | 1) a | Good | 1) start to know machine learning, PS: | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome.... A very good introduction to machine learning | 1) Awesome. . . . A very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course helped me get a good ground knowledge about machine learning. It was certainly worth the time! | 1) This course helped me get a | Good | 1) ground knowledge about machine learning. It | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course for somebody generally versed in computer science, yet with no machine learning experience. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for somebody generally versed in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! clearly and easy to comprehend! | 1) very | Good | 1) clearly and easy to comprehend! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's quite good for beginners like me to learn about machine learning in this course. Practical advice on machine learning helps a lot. Some examples in the assignment are interesting though very few parts are required to implement by ourselves. I was struggling a lot when applying vectorization to the assignments, reminding me of my poor algebra :D | 1) It's quite | Good | 1) for beginners like me to learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Brief and good for new learner. | 1) Brief and | Good | 1) for new learner. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is so so so helpful. I wish I could rate 10 stars to this class. Dr. Ng is so good at teaching and so knowledgeable. I kinda have learned these knowledge before at school but was so confused. Dr. Ng just explained everything so clear and now I have a much better understanding to machine learning. | 1) this class. Dr. Ng is so | Good | 1) at teaching and so knowledgeable. I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Comprehensive course, amazing mentor and very good content. | 1) Comprehensive course, amazing mentor and very | Good | 1) content. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing classes, really good explanation of concepts | 1) Amazing classes, really | Good | 1) explanation of concepts | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | v good | 1) v | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course for introduction of machine learning. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for introduction of machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course - really interesting. Good blend of theory and concrete examples. | 1) Great course - really interesting. | Good | 1) blend of theory and concrete examples. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am excited. This is very good course about data processing techniques. | 1) I am excited. This is very | Good | 1) course about data processing techniques. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good pace, perfect grading mechanism, interesting | 1) | Good | 1) pace, perfect grading mechanism, interesting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's really good course, especially for beginners. I really liked the style of teaching - Andrew tell the complicated stuff in simple words. | 1) It's really | Good | 1) course, especially for beginners. I really | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | wonderful course gives good insights on the machine learning algorithms. thank you so | 1) wonderful course gives | Good | 1) insights on the machine learning algorithms. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Gives a really good overview of Machine Learning! | 1) Great course! Gives a really | Good | 1) overview of Machine Learning! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Completed 3 weeks. So far it is very good.. | 1) weeks. So far it is very | Good | 1) . | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good teaching and good materials to have. This is one of the best courses you could have in the Internet. | 1) | Good | 1) teaching and good materials to have. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good teaching and good materials to have. This is one of the best courses you could have in the Internet. | 2) Good teaching and | Good | 2) materials to have. This is one | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. In depth knowledge. | 1) Very | Good | 1) In depth knowledge. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A really good introduction to machine learning. The course is well structured and is perfect for anyone wanting to learn more about data science and machine learning from a technical point of view, especially those who already have a working knowledge of mathematics and statistics. My only criticism is that the editing of the videos could have been a bit better. | 1) A really | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. The course | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best first course in data science. Gives you a clear mathematical approach to prediction models. The course instructor and the co-founder of Coursera, Prof. Andrew Ng is really good and motivating too. | 1) Coursera, Prof. Andrew Ng is really | Good | 1) and motivating too. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a very good course !!! Like it very much and recommend to all who never stop learning. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course ! ! ! Like it | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is awesome and very clear. You can get a good undestanding of machine learning and the most its topic. Of course, we have to keep studying and knowing even more about this subject. Thank | 1) very clear. You can get a | Good | 1) undestanding of machine learning and the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to the field of Machine Learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the field of Machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to machine learning concepts. Anybody starting in machine learning should complete this course. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning concepts. Anybody | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Overall course is really good. But I would be much more happy if he covers deep learning or creates other courses on specific topic like deep learning, recommendation system. | 1) Overall course is really | Good | 1) But I would be much more | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good course in machine learning for beginners,who want to explore about this field. A well built course,with a great instructor. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course in machine learning for beginners, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great hands on exercises and very clearly explained material. Was a bit slow for me I had to watch it at 2x: perhaps the simplest maths should be factored out into a separate mini course and assume a certain background for this one. The course is rather broad, though I was surprised not to hear once about Bayes or Markov (n-grams, HMM etc.). It might be a good idea to create a specialisation consisting of a separate basic maths part, all the methods presented here, methods applicable to bioinformatics and NLP too. And to top it all of Computer Vision. I assume the by-pixel techniques used in this course were just illustrating the points, as I would expect Gabor wavelets or something to reduce dimensionality and save ourselves from sliding windows (and rotations as a bonus). I am not sure if in this specialisation I would have liked to have all "science" points (how to run an experiment analyse results) separate from "how to implement an algorithm" and "why the algorithm works" or mixed in as this course does. I think either works. Some navigational infrastructure on coursera would be awesome (wiki style opportunities to jump around between "aspects" etc.). Finally, some summary notes would be very useful. When I do decide to implement any of this I will have to look through the exercise pdfs which are a bit long and at my code - perhaps, at the end, when you know someone has completed the exercises. Otherwise, the exercises are awesome. | 1) etc. ). It might be a | Good | 1) idea to create a specialisation consisting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good overview of the basics of Machine Learning. As a novice to computerized data sorting, I felt this course provided the best mix of practical and theoretical backgrounds for some very useful algorithms. The MATLAB assignments take some time to complete so planning ahead will be helpful. | 1) A very | Good | 1) overview of the basics of Machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course makes it very easy to understand and learn the algorithms used in machine learning. Andrew sir explains everything with really good examples. A must take course for the people who love data science! | 1) Andrew sir explains everything with really | Good | 1) examples. A must take course for | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, Andrew Ng does a good job at easing you into this complex subject, particularly for somebody like myself without much maths background. Looking at other video courses on the subject, I think more interactive visualisations could've been a great help, for example to gain some intuition about polynomials with different input parameters. Drawing lines on screen works, but I've had many revelations when working with the interactive tools linked from the wiki content. In some course exercises, the tutor and lecturer disagreed on the approach (e.g. vectorised vs. iterative), so the videos/PDFs were inconsistent with discussions/tutorials - a bit confusing. | 1) Great course, Andrew Ng does a | Good | 1) job at easing you into this | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very good. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a useful and intensive course. besides machine learning, it was good to me to have a chance to learn matrix and regression with matrix. | 1) course. besides machine learning, it was | Good | 1) to me to have a chance | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | . It is really a good course to learn machine learning. I thank coursera | 1) . It is really a | Good | 1) course to learn machine learning. I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very easy to follow, well explained by Andrew Ng, good examples and fun programming assignments | 1) follow, well explained by Andrew Ng, | Good | 1) examples and fun programming assignments | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course for a new beginners but its also very old compared to modern developments. | 1) | Good | 1) course for a new beginners but | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course! The assignments really add to the program and gives you alghorithms to really work with in your own projects. | 1) A | Good | 1) course! The assignments really add to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice course, covering almost everything and starting form basic to advance level. Andrew is very good in explaining new things | 1) to advance level. Andrew is very | Good | 1) in explaining new things | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The first weeks it was difficult to implement the vectorized functions in Octave, but I perservered and suddenly it clicked. Andrew is a good teacher and does not just explain the mathematics, but also makes sure you understand the motivation and when to use certain algorithms. I learned a lot from this course. | 1) suddenly it clicked. Andrew is a | Good | 1) teacher and does not just explain | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course, has many useful information and methods | 1) | Good | 1) course, has many useful information and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was a great introduction to machine learning (ML). Besides the ML concepts and methods, the course explained the necessary mathematical and statistical concepts in a clear and simple manner. I believe people who have not done much maths or stats should be able to follow the materials. ML concepts were explained in a clear fashion with relevant examples and a good level of depth. The weekly programming exercises require the student put aside at least 2 hours but they are interesting and not impossibly challenging. | 1) fashion with relevant examples and a | Good | 1) level of depth. The weekly programming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is perfect and very flexible , the instructor is very good he really simplifies the concepts yet don't miss the core ideas . | 1) flexible , the instructor is very | Good | 1) he really simplifies the concepts yet | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very nice introduction to machine learning. Well structured and with a lot of good practical assignments! I would definitely recommend it! | 1) structured and with a lot of | Good | 1) practical assignments! I would definitely recommend | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was very information and had good hands-on training. | 1) It was very information and had | Good | 1) hands-on training. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good materials, matlab programs and quizzes and faculty members. This subject is key to understand the basics of neural networks | 1) Very | Good | 1) materials, matlab programs and quizzes and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course gave a good introduction but with little proofs or derivation. | 1) The course gave a | Good | 1) introduction but with little proofs or | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was a wonderful class.The patter and methodology used was excellent. Enjoyed learning . Keep up the good work professor , Thanks a lot Coursera !!!!! | 1) Enjoyed learning . Keep up the | Good | 1) work professor , Thanks a lot | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good so far. there were some minor errors in the presentation calculations but thats ok. | 1) | Good | 1) so far. there were some minor | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good primer on the subject. | 1) A | Good | 1) primer on the subject. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and I would recommend to anyone. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and I would recommend to anyone. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its a good course for Machine Learning and content is thorough that even beginner/non-coders wouldn't miss a step. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course for Machine Learning and content | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The teacher makes the difficult materials easy to understand. Furthermore, the exercises help students to have good intuitions to the theories. | 1) the exercises help students to have | Good | 1) intuitions to the theories. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to machine learning. Really enjoyed it. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. Really enjoyed | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nice course and a good pace | 1) Nice course and a | Good | 1) pace | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course in general | 1) Very | Good | 1) course in general | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very accessible course, with a wide variety of topics. It provides a good introduction to ML. The pacing of the course is good, and somewhat faster than e.g. WU's machine learning specialization (where linear regression and classification take up an entire module, instead of one lecture). In that sense, this course may be a particularly good fit for people that already have some working knowledge of statistics and (statistical) programming. Also, Andrew Ng is a very good and inspiring professor. In the programming exercises, there is a lot of emphasis on vectorization, which is very useful. However, once you've wrapped your head around that concept, many of them sometimes seem a little too straightforward to implement. Nonetheless, the applications are very cool, including e.g. computer vision and anomaly detection. The (free) software (Octave) is very intuitive and easy to use. All in all, an excellent course. If only there was an "intermediate ML" follow up by professor Ng. | 1) variety of topics. It provides a | Good | 1) introduction to ML. The pacing of | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very accessible course, with a wide variety of topics. It provides a good introduction to ML. The pacing of the course is good, and somewhat faster than e.g. WU's machine learning specialization (where linear regression and classification take up an entire module, instead of one lecture). In that sense, this course may be a particularly good fit for people that already have some working knowledge of statistics and (statistical) programming. Also, Andrew Ng is a very good and inspiring professor. In the programming exercises, there is a lot of emphasis on vectorization, which is very useful. However, once you've wrapped your head around that concept, many of them sometimes seem a little too straightforward to implement. Nonetheless, the applications are very cool, including e.g. computer vision and anomaly detection. The (free) software (Octave) is very intuitive and easy to use. All in all, an excellent course. If only there was an "intermediate ML" follow up by professor Ng. | 2) The pacing of the course is | Good | 2) and somewhat faster than e. g. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very accessible course, with a wide variety of topics. It provides a good introduction to ML. The pacing of the course is good, and somewhat faster than e.g. WU's machine learning specialization (where linear regression and classification take up an entire module, instead of one lecture). In that sense, this course may be a particularly good fit for people that already have some working knowledge of statistics and (statistical) programming. Also, Andrew Ng is a very good and inspiring professor. In the programming exercises, there is a lot of emphasis on vectorization, which is very useful. However, once you've wrapped your head around that concept, many of them sometimes seem a little too straightforward to implement. Nonetheless, the applications are very cool, including e.g. computer vision and anomaly detection. The (free) software (Octave) is very intuitive and easy to use. All in all, an excellent course. If only there was an "intermediate ML" follow up by professor Ng. | 3) this course may be a particularly | Good | 3) fit for people that already have | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very accessible course, with a wide variety of topics. It provides a good introduction to ML. The pacing of the course is good, and somewhat faster than e.g. WU's machine learning specialization (where linear regression and classification take up an entire module, instead of one lecture). In that sense, this course may be a particularly good fit for people that already have some working knowledge of statistics and (statistical) programming. Also, Andrew Ng is a very good and inspiring professor. In the programming exercises, there is a lot of emphasis on vectorization, which is very useful. However, once you've wrapped your head around that concept, many of them sometimes seem a little too straightforward to implement. Nonetheless, the applications are very cool, including e.g. computer vision and anomaly detection. The (free) software (Octave) is very intuitive and easy to use. All in all, an excellent course. If only there was an "intermediate ML" follow up by professor Ng. | 4) Also, Andrew Ng is a very | Good | 4) and inspiring professor. In the programming | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice explanations, good mix of theory/tests and practical assignments | 1) Very nice explanations, | Good | 1) mix of theory/tests and practical assignments | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it is a good leason to learn about the basic knowledge of machine learning. | 1) it is a | Good | 1) leason to learn about the basic | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best online course I have ever taken!! The Instructor Mr. Andrew teaches really great. I just love the way he teaches. The pace of the course is also good and not that hard to keep up. The assignments and quizzes are also simple and effective. One can learn a lot from this course. Thank you. :) | 1) pace of the course is also | Good | 1) and not that hard to keep | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the class is very good. i just think the assignmengs are not enough.I feel I can't learn about itdeeper. | 1) the class is very | Good | 1) i just think the assignmengs are | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent for the machine learning beginners. Courser prepares the surroundings for each topics before going into deep. Intermediate quiz and assignments for each covered topics are very good idea to check learned concepts with practical. Thanks a lot. | 1) for each covered topics are very | Good | 1) idea to check learned concepts with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction. I really enjoyed it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. I really enjoyed it! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for kick staring the learning of machine learning. Taught theory and statical information on different basic algorithm. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for kick staring the learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | really great course, does a really good job helping learners grasp regression through actually implementing techniques rather than simply having you use blackbox libraries. | 1) really great course, does a really | Good | 1) job helping learners grasp regression through | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Amazing course! Some more nuanced/ advanced applications as programming assignments would step up the course even more. Maybe keep them as optionals like many other assignments. Overall, a very good course for someone wanting to get into ML. | 1) many other assignments. Overall, a very | Good | 1) course for someone wanting to get | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for beginner in Machine Learning | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginner in Machine Learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The lecture is very concise and elegant. It helps me get the main idea of machine learning and avoid the tedious math formulas. A very good course for beginner. | 1) the tedious math formulas. A very | Good | 1) course for beginner. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course but a little light on the theory, especially on SVM's | 1) | Good | 1) course but a little light on | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptionally good and clear! | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) and clear! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good Course. Andrew Ng is indeed a hell of a Teacher! Highly recommend this course to anyone who wants to learn ML. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Course. Andrew Ng is indeed a | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great professor providing really good explanations about the basic ML concepts. It's really a course you must take if you want a good introduction to Machine Learning. (no prerequisite needed). | 1) Great professor providing really | Good | 1) explanations about the basic ML concepts. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great professor providing really good explanations about the basic ML concepts. It's really a course you must take if you want a good introduction to Machine Learning. (no prerequisite needed). | 2) must take if you want a | Good | 2) introduction to Machine Learning. (no prerequisite | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Being an aspiring Data Science professional, this course gave me a very good understanding about the fundamentals about machine learning. I enjoyed every week of this course, THANKS ANDREW NG | 1) this course gave me a very | Good | 1) understanding about the fundamentals about machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview of machine learning. In general focuses more on how to do, but due to course length skipped on some of the how or why in certain topics. Good mentor responses. Lecture video pause points are bugged. Lecture and assignments are quite detailed to walk you through it. Course content not designed to be difficult. Weeks are not very balanced. Some weeks take longer than other weeks, and you don't really know until the week starts. One thing I really dislike is you can't take notes online while watching the video. You'll have to do it elsewhere (on paper, on notepad). There isn't a quick summary of topics covered in the video you can go to. This would help if you wanted to rewatch a certain part but couldn't recall which video it was in. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of machine learning. In general | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview of machine learning. In general focuses more on how to do, but due to course length skipped on some of the how or why in certain topics. Good mentor responses. Lecture video pause points are bugged. Lecture and assignments are quite detailed to walk you through it. Course content not designed to be difficult. Weeks are not very balanced. Some weeks take longer than other weeks, and you don't really know until the week starts. One thing I really dislike is you can't take notes online while watching the video. You'll have to do it elsewhere (on paper, on notepad). There isn't a quick summary of topics covered in the video you can go to. This would help if you wanted to rewatch a certain part but couldn't recall which video it was in. | 2) how or why in certain topics. | Good | 2) mentor responses. Lecture video pause points | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its very good course | 1) Its very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great grounding in the just the right amount of detail of the most popular ML algorithms. Very clear and precise lectures, especially good when combined with the 'speed up' options. Even though you will undoubtable be using different languages for coding real applications than Octave/Matlab, the exercises are still very useful because they are pitched at just the right level of difficultly; they require you to understand the scripts and the system as a whole, but you are not required to become proficient enough to build the whole systems in Octave yourself which would be a waste of your time. | 1) Very clear and precise lectures, especially | Good | 1) when combined with the 'speed up' | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! Very focused on concrete applications, but also in providing a certain level of depth on the theory side. Very clear and practical lectures. Very good programming exercises, progressively challenging and good to sediment the knowledge. A good way of getting in touch with main topics in ML. | 1) Very clear and practical lectures. Very | Good | 1) programming exercises, progressively challenging and good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! Very focused on concrete applications, but also in providing a certain level of depth on the theory side. Very clear and practical lectures. Very good programming exercises, progressively challenging and good to sediment the knowledge. A good way of getting in touch with main topics in ML. | 2) good programming exercises, progressively challenging and | Good | 2) to sediment the knowledge. A good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! Very focused on concrete applications, but also in providing a certain level of depth on the theory side. Very clear and practical lectures. Very good programming exercises, progressively challenging and good to sediment the knowledge. A good way of getting in touch with main topics in ML. | 3) good to sediment the knowledge. A | Good | 3) way of getting in touch with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good course, which do not require high level programming skill. It is very suitable for beginners. Besides, this course is very comprehensive and introduce a lot in machine learning field. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course, which do not require high | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to Machine Learning. I really liked Andrew Ng. He is a very good teacher whatsoever! | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning. I really | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to Machine Learning. I really liked Andrew Ng. He is a very good teacher whatsoever! | 2) Andrew Ng. He is a very | Good | 2) teacher whatsoever! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course!!! | 1) very | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good explanation and guide for machine learning | 1) | Good | 1) explanation and guide for machine learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am halfway through the course and while the course is able to give good intuitions of what's going on at any one point in time it often lacks dept. The real reason I'm rating it 3/5, though, is that the mathematical notation is all over the place. You will find a matrix product such as A*B' only to go on and implement A'*B. This is SO confusing. I would still recommend this course, but you should definitely record every single lesson again without mistakes and fix those errors. | 1) the course is able to give | Good | 1) intuitions of what's going on at | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It gave me a very good introduction to many things that we have hearing about and even been using without bothering to ask how they work. Easy to follow but still requiring enough activity to understand it better. | 1) It gave me a very | Good | 1) introduction to many things that we | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction and exercise in the fundamentals of modern machine learning. Would be better if an optional reading list of key articles/books in the field were provided. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction and exercise in the fundamentals | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a good course to let you know the machine learning and AI. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course to let you know the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good pacing and clear explanations in the lecture videos. | 1) Very | Good | 1) pacing and clear explanations in the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Comprehensive course, well-designed assignments. Definitely a good start for learning ML. | 1) Comprehensive course, well-designed assignments. Definitely a | Good | 1) start for learning ML. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Currently I am taking this course. So far it has been very good. All the Assignments I try to do it on my own with out referring to much of the hints. It gives 100% clarity on various algorithms once completing the assignments. Over all very very good course for beginners. For who look for mathematical rigour this is not the course as it is more of implementing the end expressions using Octaves. More useful for IT engineers who work in companies than Researchers. | 1) So far it has been very | Good | 1) All the Assignments I try to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Currently I am taking this course. So far it has been very good. All the Assignments I try to do it on my own with out referring to much of the hints. It gives 100% clarity on various algorithms once completing the assignments. Over all very very good course for beginners. For who look for mathematical rigour this is not the course as it is more of implementing the end expressions using Octaves. More useful for IT engineers who work in companies than Researchers. | 2) the assignments. Over all very very | Good | 2) course for beginners. For who look | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course in Machine Learing was challenging, but do-able... and very rewarding. This is the first on-line course I've taken. It has been many years since my last formal college course, so I was a little rusty at the math (I'm 55 yrs old, ancient compared to my peers in this class. My last math class was over 3 decades ago, probably before most of my classmates were born. Damn, I'm old). Even so, with Mr. Ng's teaching style, I was able to finish the course with both a good grade and - better still - a good grasp on the subject material. I will certainly continue to pursue additional learning in this area. Machine Learning is a fascinating field. I was interested in this area way back in the late 80's when I first heard the term "Neural Network", but there were no on-line courses in that pre-internet era, so the availability of information about the subject was very limited. It was mainly in breathless magazine articles about the coming "AI" revolution. It took a few decades for that promising spark to mature into a practical reality. Now, with the appearance of Coursera and other on-line education portals, much of this information is readily available to all with the curiosity and perseverance to learn about it. I am grateful for this opportunity to learn about Machine Learning! | 1) finish the course with both a | Good | 1) grade and - better still - | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course in Machine Learing was challenging, but do-able... and very rewarding. This is the first on-line course I've taken. It has been many years since my last formal college course, so I was a little rusty at the math (I'm 55 yrs old, ancient compared to my peers in this class. My last math class was over 3 decades ago, probably before most of my classmates were born. Damn, I'm old). Even so, with Mr. Ng's teaching style, I was able to finish the course with both a good grade and - better still - a good grasp on the subject material. I will certainly continue to pursue additional learning in this area. Machine Learning is a fascinating field. I was interested in this area way back in the late 80's when I first heard the term "Neural Network", but there were no on-line courses in that pre-internet era, so the availability of information about the subject was very limited. It was mainly in breathless magazine articles about the coming "AI" revolution. It took a few decades for that promising spark to mature into a practical reality. Now, with the appearance of Coursera and other on-line education portals, much of this information is readily available to all with the curiosity and perseverance to learn about it. I am grateful for this opportunity to learn about Machine Learning! | 2) and - better still - a | Good | 2) grasp on the subject material. I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good pacing, very interesting content. The exercises are moderately challenging and help better integrate the content. | 1) | Good | 1) pacing, very interesting content. The exercises | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to machine learning. Andrew Ng has a more in-depth course on Stanford Engineering Everywhere, if anyone wants to learn more. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. Andrew Ng | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good machine learning class. But sometimes a little bit short on the mathematical proofs. | 1) Very | Good | 1) machine learning class. But sometimes a | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Find this course is easy to understand and intellectually stimulating. Good introduction on machine learning and data science in general! | 1) easy to understand and intellectually stimulating. | Good | 1) introduction on machine learning and data | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course ! | 1) | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's really good | 1) it's really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, it gives a good picture of machine learning. It would be useful to apply all the course in one small example like ocr. | 1) Great course, it gives a | Good | 1) picture of machine learning. It would | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's very good | 1) It's very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptionally good course material, Prof Ng's good job, great quizzes and well-guided assignments. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) course material, Prof Ng's good job, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exceptionally good course material, Prof Ng's good job, great quizzes and well-guided assignments. | 2) Exceptionally good course material, Prof Ng's | Good | 2) job, great quizzes and well-guided assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction to machine learning, from basic knowledge to a deeper insight in the subject. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning, from basic | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An enjoyable course with coverage of a good range of material supported by interesting examples. This is the best of several data science courses I've completed. | 1) enjoyable course with coverage of a | Good | 1) range of material supported by interesting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course provided very good general overview of ML, but did not go in-depth into mathematics behind many of algorithms discussed. | 1) Course provided very | Good | 1) general overview of ML, but did | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course and an amazing professor - a very good applied overview of machine learning techniques. | 1) an amazing professor - a very | Good | 1) applied overview of machine learning techniques. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good Course . | 1) A very | Good | 1) Course . | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | i recommend this is a good course for machine learning .......... :D | 1) i recommend this is a | Good | 1) course for machine learning . . | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, with very detailed explanations on all the algorithms and their strenghts and weaknesses. I only felt missing some words about deep learning as it is something that is directly in the field of Machine Learning and is something people talk about a lot on the media. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, with very detailed explanations on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Let me say that this is a great course and that I enjoyed it very much! My only problem is with the assignment that are, in my opinion, a bit limited and most of the time they focus on liner algebra implementations rather than give a better understanding of the algorithm. Most of the time the assignments focus on implementing a formula where the algorithm itself is already written for us. That is good as a first step but in the long run it doesn't give you some practical skills when you want to apply the algorithm to an external dataset. I would suggest to add some challenges (maybe ungraded) keggle style, like provided this dataset try to get a score better than a value. This will spark some discussion and it would help to apply the concepts and the practical tricks to a real (chewed) problem. | 1) already written for us. That is | Good | 1) as a first step but in | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very interesting and motivating! The lecturer is great. He describes algorithms in a very simple way, with a lot of visualization an provide good formed tasks, so that you can try algorithms in practice. I would like to thank Andrew Ng and Coursera for making this course! | 1) a lot of visualization an provide | Good | 1) formed tasks, so that you can | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good theoretical explaination but more practical exercises would have been welcome | 1) Very | Good | 1) theoretical explaination but more practical exercises | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good quality, Andrew NG is all the best. | 1) | Good | 1) quality, Andrew NG is all the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am learning so much from this course. It gives a very good introduction to the Machine Learning. | 1) this course. It gives a very | Good | 1) introduction to the Machine Learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a really good course , takes us through the most commonly used algorithms in machine learning and explains simply the way they work and how to detect to do to improve their performance. I'm quite happy to have chosen this course and complete it successfully. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course , takes us through the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good to start ML with this course | 1) | Good | 1) to start ML with this course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good intro course to machine learning | 1) Really | Good | 1) intro course to machine learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good start in DeepLearning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) start in DeepLearning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Been through 1st week. I would say Andrew Ng sir is really doing good job explaining every nook and rally of the stuff. Must take (so far my feeling) if you want to start-off in Machine Learning :) | 1) Andrew Ng sir is really doing | Good | 1) job explaining every nook and rally | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, only the programming exercises are a little basic. | 1) Very | Good | 1) only the programming exercises are a | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good introductory course to Machine Learning that covers many different algorithms for a variety of applications. Not only does it approach the subject in a simple and intuitive way, it also provides very good advice for implementing and running these algorithms. The programming assignments are well done and, through the use of provided code, allow you to glimpse at interesting applications of machine learning without having to spend too much time on boilerplate/preprocessing code. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introductory course to Machine Learning that | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good introductory course to Machine Learning that covers many different algorithms for a variety of applications. Not only does it approach the subject in a simple and intuitive way, it also provides very good advice for implementing and running these algorithms. The programming assignments are well done and, through the use of provided code, allow you to glimpse at interesting applications of machine learning without having to spend too much time on boilerplate/preprocessing code. | 2) intuitive way, it also provides very | Good | 2) advice for implementing and running these | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good class for machine learning starter. | 1) A very | Good | 1) class for machine learning starter. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course, needs a little updating though. | 1) | Good | 1) course, needs a little updating though. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course good lecture | 1) | Good | 1) course good lecture | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course good lecture | 2) good course | Good | 2) lecture | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, Started with zero experience in ML, but thanks to Andrew and team I got a good grip on it. Definitely recommended. | 1) Andrew and team I got a | Good | 1) grip on it. Definitely recommended. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | After years ,the math part of the course was difficult. Anyway, good course! | 1) of the course was difficult. Anyway, | Good | 1) course! | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good for starters and gives insight to actually how algorithms really work! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for starters and gives insight to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good practical overview of machine learning. | 1) A | Good | 1) practical overview of machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | 非常棒的课程！A Very good course！Thank you！ | 1) 非常棒的课程！A Very | Good | 1) course！Thank you！ | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An awesome course with an awesome teacher for awesomely less money with awesomely good materials. | 1) for awesomely less money with awesomely | Good | 1) materials. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is really good both at researching and teaching. | 1) Andrew Ng is really | Good | 1) both at researching and teaching. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's very good for beginners who want to learn machine learning. Thank you, Andrew Ng! | 1) It's very | Good | 1) for beginners who want to learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good Course, Introduction of Concepts of ML with practical hand on training and TIps/advice to apply in practice | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course, Introduction of Concepts of ML | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course - very clearly taught with good examples and programming exercises. This makes a huge difference - I really engaged with and enjoyed the course. I would highly recommend it. | 1) course - very clearly taught with | Good | 1) examples and programming exercises. This makes | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good. However, I need more detail and advanced exercise. | 1) | Good | 1) However, I need more detail and | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good balance of theory and practical tips. MATLAB assignments take time but most of the work is done for you, so you only need to apply the concepts you've just learned. (Optional) deadlines help a lot too! | 1) A | Good | 1) balance of theory and practical tips. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great professor, good material. If anything the class was too easy. | 1) Great professor, | Good | 1) material. If anything the class was | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course gives a very thorough introduction to Machine Learning, Octave and concepts behind ML. Hands on assignments are very good at introducing students to a variety of problems and builds a very good foundation. | 1) ML. Hands on assignments are very | Good | 1) at introducing students to a variety | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course gives a very thorough introduction to Machine Learning, Octave and concepts behind ML. Hands on assignments are very good at introducing students to a variety of problems and builds a very good foundation. | 2) of problems and builds a very | Good | 2) foundation. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction. Leaves one equipped enough to know the relevant areas to advance into ML | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction. Leaves one equipped enough to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good summary that will help you to navigate in the future ML techniques. | 1) A very | Good | 1) summary that will help you to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its a good beginner class. I found that the assignments were simplified to make it easier for folks not experienced in programming. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) beginner class. I found that the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class can be an introduction to people who are beginners of this field. To me, it gives me some basic concepts of machine learning, and a better understanding of how it works. Andrew is an attractive person who can encourage you to be fond of this course. For the public with different background , the mathematics of this course has to be easy, but the actual situation is that you should be good at calculus，statistics，linear algebra，convex optimization and so on, although most of them I have touched when I was a freshman. if you want to go deeper into it. There is still a long way to go!! In summary, I love Andrew, I love this course, and I love ML | 1) situation is that you should be | Good | 1) at calculus，statistics，linear algebra，convex optimization and so | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, this was my first course in Coursera, very interesting topics about learning algorithms. | 1) Very | Good | 1) this was my first course in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The lectures were good to excellent. The homework assignments were decent but felt a little "dumbed down". If it had been based on Python or R instead of MATLAB/Octave it would have been better though. There were lots of problems with submission using Octave. I almost quit because I just couldn't get it to work correctly, at least on a Mac. Switching to MATLAB made it easier. But MATLAB isn't something I'm going to be able to freely use after the course. Overall I found it to be a nice basic introduction to Machine Learning. It seems to have really just scratched the surface in terms of depth, but the breadth was good. I would recommend it to anyone looking for an introduction or first course in machine learning. | 1) The lectures were | Good | 1) to excellent. The homework assignments were | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The lectures were good to excellent. The homework assignments were decent but felt a little "dumbed down". If it had been based on Python or R instead of MATLAB/Octave it would have been better though. There were lots of problems with submission using Octave. I almost quit because I just couldn't get it to work correctly, at least on a Mac. Switching to MATLAB made it easier. But MATLAB isn't something I'm going to be able to freely use after the course. Overall I found it to be a nice basic introduction to Machine Learning. It seems to have really just scratched the surface in terms of depth, but the breadth was good. I would recommend it to anyone looking for an introduction or first course in machine learning. | 2) of depth, but the breadth was | Good | 2) I would recommend it to anyone | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course, Andrew NG is just perfect. I hope there will be more to come ! Keep doing the good job guys ! | 1) to come ! Keep doing the | Good | 1) job guys ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good for Machine Learning foundation | 1) Very | Good | 1) for Machine Learning foundation | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is really good course to start to learn machine learning. | 1) This is really | Good | 1) course to start to learn machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it is good for us to learn more interligent | 1) it is | Good | 1) for us to learn more interligent | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nice and easy introduction to the math behind the concept. Very good approach at the underlying logic. | 1) the math behind the concept. Very | Good | 1) approach at the underlying logic. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Pros: 1. Good examples and way of discussion. 2. Real experience in using of real applications. Cons: 1. Usage of MATLAB ( why not R or Python?) | 1) Pros: 1. | Good | 1) examples and way of discussion. 2. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew explains things in a very clear way. Some of the quizes seems redundant, ie., ask very basic questions which can be answered with common sense w/o knowing the content, but all in all give good intro. I gained enough knowledge to challenge PhDs specializing in ML when we brainstorm stuff. | 1) content, but all in all give | Good | 1) intro. I gained enough knowledge to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Love this course! Definitely need decent maths and some coding experience. You can get frustrated doing assignment without good linear algebra and some debugging experience. But it will be very rewarding experience once you go through it. | 1) can get frustrated doing assignment without | Good | 1) linear algebra and some debugging experience. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Is a very good course for immerse yourself in the machine learning world! | 1) Is a very | Good | 1) course for immerse yourself in the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Explanations are so logical and understandable that I very often have an impression of knowing what comes next. It is unbelievable how good this course are. | 1) comes next. It is unbelievable how | Good | 1) this course are. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a very good course | 1) a very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | All concepts are explained comprehensibly and there are also bunch of good examples for each concept. I really enjoy the labs, which let me to build something cool on my own using my fresh knowledge. | 1) and there are also bunch of | Good | 1) examples for each concept. I really | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am very pleased with the course, and don't regret the time spent. The way the topics are explained is very understandable even for new student, good examples was given and topics covered are fundamental. Thank you, I gained good knowledge! | 1) very understandable even for new student, | Good | 1) examples was given and topics covered | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am very pleased with the course, and don't regret the time spent. The way the topics are explained is very understandable even for new student, good examples was given and topics covered are fundamental. Thank you, I gained good knowledge! | 2) are fundamental. Thank you, I gained | Good | 2) knowledge! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, good explanations. Thanks a lot! | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) explanations. Thanks a lot! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great videos and good course structure. I did feel the assignments were sometimes a bit too 'easy', a lot was pre-programmed and the to-be implemented formulas were often provided in the assignments. This made it quite time-efficient, but perhaps the understanding improves when working with lecture notes for people to refer to when recalling formulas from the lectures. | 1) Great videos and | Good | 1) course structure. I did feel the | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction for machine learning. Of course, not enough for real application. We get a long way to go. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction for machine learning. Of course, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good: Professor is patient and nice. The explanation is very clear. I love it. The difficulty is also very flexible. I love it.!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Professor is patient and nice. The | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good deep learning of ML | 1) very | Good | 1) deep learning of ML | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a pretty good course for machine learning area | 1) This is a pretty | Good | 1) course for machine learning area | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is easy for starters to get the hang of what actual machine learning and artificial intelligence is. It's really a good course. | 1) artificial intelligence is. It's really a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The professor explains machine learning algorithms in a way such that it is easy to understand. The coding assignments are very very good. I think the professor spend hundreds of hours on designing these coding assignments. | 1) The coding assignments are very very | Good | 1) I think the professor spend hundreds | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | As far as I go, the progression is very well estimated even for someone like that didn't use maths since I was graduated. Good explaination and samples, I recommend this class | 1) use maths since I was graduated. | Good | 1) explaination and samples, I recommend this | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I love this one! Andrew gave us a good introduction to Machine Learning. Linear Regression, classification and clustering, all of these are basic concepts but I never learned about how it came from and why we use it before. Here in this class Andrew teaches me all I want to know. | 1) this one! Andrew gave us a | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning. Linear Regression, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, well balanced between theory and practice. Content was very carefully designed to suit people with different backgrounds/experience and gives you enough base on the subject so that you can start using it or enough to research and dive deeper into the subjects. | 1) Very | Good | 1) well balanced between theory and practice. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you for that course, I really enjoyed it. Mr. Ng is a great speaker, his voice is very clear and as it was very easy to understand him, even as a not native english speaker. I learned a lot of (in my understanding) "basics" of machine learning. The class was in my opinion to basic and to easy. I would really love to get more information, I've studied electronic- and information science, so most of the things he explained were already basics for me, only the usage of them was new. One of the most important things (for the job I have at the moment) I learned here was how to code properly vectorized code in Matlab. I use Matlab nearly every day at work but never got such a good explanation how to use the full power of Matlab. Again, thank you for this great course, I can suggest this course to everyone who wants to learn the basics of machine learning. After that... Maybe someone has an idea how to continue in that topic to increase my understanding and knowledge of Machine learning. | 1) work but never got such a | Good | 1) explanation how to use the full | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really helpful and useful course. The instructor has good way of teaching. | 1) and useful course. The instructor has | Good | 1) way of teaching. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good overview of machine learning and its mainstream tools. The instructor also provides a very good summary of rules of thumb for applying these tools in practice. A methodology for systematically applying machine learning in any kind of problems is also included. It gives a very good background for starters. | 1) A very | Good | 1) overview of machine learning and its | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good overview of machine learning and its mainstream tools. The instructor also provides a very good summary of rules of thumb for applying these tools in practice. A methodology for systematically applying machine learning in any kind of problems is also included. It gives a very good background for starters. | 2) The instructor also provides a very | Good | 2) summary of rules of thumb for | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good overview of machine learning and its mainstream tools. The instructor also provides a very good summary of rules of thumb for applying these tools in practice. A methodology for systematically applying machine learning in any kind of problems is also included. It gives a very good background for starters. | 3) also included. It gives a very | Good | 3) background for starters. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I like this course very much. It gives me an overview of machine learning and a sense of how to code using matlab. This course is very good for the beginners who learn machine learning and matlab from scratch. | 1) using matlab. This course is very | Good | 1) for the beginners who learn machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! It is worth to take. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! It is worth to take. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's really good, and I like the flexibility of re-adjusting the deadline given life complications! (holidays,work deadline and family commitments, where it's hard to have 10 weeks clear weeks to do online courses and home works) I think all coursera courses should run like this one! | 1) It's really | Good | 1) and I like the flexibility of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is my first course in Coursera and it is very good | 1) in Coursera and it is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is a skilled instructor who is adept at covering the material in a manner which makes it digestible to folks who may even have been a few years removed from their last university level Algebra and math courses and who have not been directly programming for quite some time. While I had been working on telemetry and big data analytics it was from a business perspective with a decent amount of common sense understanding about what was underneath making it work. I now feel like a have a good amount of depth into the details of the techniques and application of the high level concepts. Thanks Andrew! | 1) now feel like a have a | Good | 1) amount of depth into the details | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course material for beginners in Data Science. | 1) | Good | 1) course material for beginners in Data | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to machine learning. The only issue I have is quality of video materials which is rather low mostly due to bad mic used. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. The only | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course to take when studying machine learning, good introduction as to how specific algorithms are being utilize and how they work. Would recommend it to anyone who is trying to learn Machine Learning in theory and practical application. Don't expect this to be programming course for Machine Learning is more of how things work and how to apply them. | 1) to take when studying machine learning, | Good | 1) introduction as to how specific algorithms | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | i love the format of this course. Very good! | 1) the format of this course. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first course in machine learning and I definitely recommend others to do the same. The course covers broad range of topics in machine learning and can be used as very good foundation for more advanced topics such as: computer vision, neural networks etc. Andrew Ng is very gifted lecturer and can make the learning experience very pleasant. Hopefully I'll be able to take more of his classes in the future. | 1) and can be used as very | Good | 1) foundation for more advanced topics such | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course but the programming exercises didn't run with the new version of Octave without some changes. | 1) | Good | 1) course but the programming exercises didn't | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very nice introductory course to quickly grasp main concepts and be prepared for further deeper studying of specific cases. Good balance between theory and practice. Lots rigorous mathematical stuff is given in supplementary materials, so those who love to bother have an opportunity to see the 'whole picture'. | 1) further deeper studying of specific cases. | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. Lots | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really Good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good so far, but you should invest in a better microphone. It is sometime hard to listen to the end of your sentences. | 1) Very | Good | 1) so far, but you should invest | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Detail explanations, good exercises | 1) Detail explanations, | Good | 1) exercises | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent! Very easy and practical. Good structure. Partially covers almost every aspect of machine learning techniques used nowadays in popular apps, websites, searching engines. Very glad I took this course and finished it. | 1) Excellent! Very easy and practical. | Good | 1) structure. Partially covers almost every aspect | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really enjoyed taking this course. Learned quite few concepts that I wasn't aware of before. If you haven't done math for a while (but were good enough to understand the concept at your time) and dying to understand ML concepts but doesn't want to(or have time) to 'review' full math again this is the course for you. | 1) math for a while (but were | Good | 1) enough to understand the concept at | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The instructor Andrew NG is very good with his material and his explanation methods, but the course does not delve much into the details of the methods. My expectation of the course was that it would explain the core mathematics behind the scenes. | 1) The instructor Andrew NG is very | Good | 1) with his material and his explanation | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good thing is this course is easy enough to keep me insisting on it. Bad thing is, to some extent, I may need some time to figure out how to use the technique. :D | 1) | Good | 1) thing is this course is easy | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | this course is very good for new student.I like it | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) for new student. I like it | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good motivating lectures and I felt I made significant progress. | 1) | Good | 1) motivating lectures and I felt I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good intro to gradient descent, linear and logistic regression and SVM. Based on solid mathematical understanding, without nice graphical explanations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to gradient descent, linear and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's really good! the reason that is not 5 is that there are some sync errors with the exercises/lessons that confuse you. | 1) It's really | Good | 1) the reason that is not 5 | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent introductory course, to grasp fundamentals. Very good to begin with, in my view. | 1) introductory course, to grasp fundamentals. Very | Good | 1) to begin with, in my view. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent Course. I am 4 weeks in and the videos are really presented by the professor, the tutorials are very good, and the discussion forums are really helpful. The assignments are challenging and well formulated. I look forward to the rest of the course and to completing it. | 1) the professor, the tutorials are very | Good | 1) and the discussion forums are really | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's very good. I'm an undergraduate student studying CS in China. Hopefully one day I can really be in the live course in Stanford. | 1) It's very | Good | 1) I'm an undergraduate student studying CS | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for beginners. This course has completed satisfied my initial requirements. Quizzes and exercises are very include and ofcourse Mr Andrew is perfect at what he does. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners. This course has | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good lecture. The assignments could be a bit more difficult/complex. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecture. The assignments could be a | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course with a lot of well guided exercises! Made hard stuff easy to understand. Good way to start learning about Machie Learning. | 1) Made hard stuff easy to understand. | Good | 1) way to start learning about Machie | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. Interesting topics, and good assignments. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Interesting topics, and good assignments. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. Interesting topics, and good assignments. | 2) Really good course. Interesting topics, and | Good | 2) assignments. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good , but elementary ( undergrad level) | 1) | Good | 1) , but elementary ( undergrad level) | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I have seen other machine learning courses but it cannot get any simpler than this. Most of the other courses will directly dive you into complex formulas and theorems. But Mr. Andrew Ng made it so easy for me to understand the basic concepts with his real world examples that now I can apply them in my own projects with ease. The evaluation system is also pretty good with hands on assignments. The quizzes were a little bit tough at times, but they forced me to go back to the corresponding topic and review it so that my concepts become clear. The assignments were also realistic and at times challenging for people using Matlab or Octave for first time. Thank you very much for this course. I hope this will help a lot in my career as a researcher. | 1) The evaluation system is also pretty | Good | 1) with hands on assignments. The quizzes | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and thorough course. Everything is explained to the root, so for all the things you learn you learn why you are learning this, how it is used, and in which situation you would us it. I did have some previous experience from taking a computing science master, but I thought the difficulty level was perfect. You have to think about it, but there is enough explanation to make everything clear. I enjoyed it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and thorough course. Everything is explained | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good but sometimes pretty fast. | 1) | Good | 1) but sometimes pretty fast. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a good start for those who want to start explore Data Science. If more(Optional) concepts were included It would really be nice for those who already know a bit of Machine Learning. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start for those who want to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well constructed course and good assignments that bring out the essence of machine learning. | 1) Very well constructed course and | Good | 1) assignments that bring out the essence | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's so good that I don't even. | 1) It's so | Good | 1) that I don't even. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is really good for beginners. Prof. Ng's teaching is awesome. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) for beginners. Prof. Ng's teaching is | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course!! You could get seriously placed in a GOOD company AND in a GOOD position! Andrew Ng starts of a little dry.But at the end of every week, he gets simply divine ! A very comprehensive course balancing both the theoretical aspects and the practical approach very gracefully with a solid support of mathematics. Students with knowledge of Basic Statistics (i.e. High School) and standard Mathematics like functions and calculus are perfect for this course. | 1) could get seriously placed in a | Good | 1) company AND in a GOOD position! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course!! You could get seriously placed in a GOOD company AND in a GOOD position! Andrew Ng starts of a little dry.But at the end of every week, he gets simply divine ! A very comprehensive course balancing both the theoretical aspects and the practical approach very gracefully with a solid support of mathematics. Students with knowledge of Basic Statistics (i.e. High School) and standard Mathematics like functions and calculus are perfect for this course. | 2) a GOOD company AND in a | Good | 2) position! Andrew Ng starts of a | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Andrew keeps us motivated throughout the session. The course coverage is extremely good and neatly presented. Assignments have sufficient instructions that guide us well. After an exhaustive search, I would say this is the best course ever for beginners of Machine Learning. | 1) session. The course coverage is extremely | Good | 1) and neatly presented. Assignments have sufficient | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good course. Good examples Excellent quiz and exercises Slides are also very clear and easy-understanding | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Good examples Excellent quiz and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good course. Good examples Excellent quiz and exercises Slides are also very clear and easy-understanding | 2) Very Good course. | Good | 2) examples Excellent quiz and exercises Slides | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is such a good course that gives a good intuition into Machine Learning. For me it has given a new sense of appetite to learn and revisit Multivariable calculus, Numerical Methods, Probability. I hope it will trigger the same for many others too. The prof has taken a lot of effort to help us visualise Machine Learning. His efforts are truly appreciated! I would strongly recommend this course for everyone suitable and most importantly interested in the subject. | 1) This is such a | Good | 1) course that gives a good intuition | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is such a good course that gives a good intuition into Machine Learning. For me it has given a new sense of appetite to learn and revisit Multivariable calculus, Numerical Methods, Probability. I hope it will trigger the same for many others too. The prof has taken a lot of effort to help us visualise Machine Learning. His efforts are truly appreciated! I would strongly recommend this course for everyone suitable and most importantly interested in the subject. | 2) a good course that gives a | Good | 2) intuition into Machine Learning. For me | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course. Its even better if you make an effort to familiarize yourself with the mathematics behind the algorithms mentioned in the course. The MATLAB assignments are very useful in exhibiting the practical applications of the Machine Learning Algorithms taught. All in all, it is a must do course for anyone who is interested in ML and AI. People with good mathematical background and MATLAB experience will find completing this course a breeze. | 1) in ML and AI. People with | Good | 1) mathematical background and MATLAB experience will | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to understand explanation. Good lab exercises that focuses only on the algorithms itself, while additional code is added to show you what you implemented. | 1) Easy to understand explanation. | Good | 1) lab exercises that focuses only on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course! I've learned a lot even from skeleton code. Contains a lot topics in ML. Look forward to a course goes deeper! | 1) | Good | 1) course! I've learned a lot even | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent ramp-up of difficulty and good course | 1) Excellent ramp-up of difficulty and | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course to understand the basics of machine learning. Good assignments. | 1) understand the basics of machine learning. | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Contents are carefully organized with good exercises. The course covers the topics which are required to apply machine learning to real-world problems at basic levels. The topics are consistently addressed with motivation, theory, and implementation in order. The exercises are provided to teach the concepts of machine learning and their applications. Prof. Andrew Ng tried to eliminate technical barriers in writing codes in Matlab and let students understand the concepts fully. This class is the first choice of learning Machine Leaning for a self-driven learner. | 1) Contents are carefully organized with | Good | 1) exercises. The course covers the topics | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good Course ! Helps a lot ! | 1) | Good | 1) Course ! Helps a lot ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | 👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 good shit go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some good👌👌shit right👌👌th 👌 ere👌👌👌 right✔there ✔✔if i do ƽaү so my selｆ 💯 i say so 💯 thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMᎷМ💯 👌👌 👌НO0ОଠＯOOＯOОଠଠOoooᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ👌 👌👌 👌 💯 👌 👀 👀 👀 👌👌Good shit | 1) 👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀👌👀 | Good | 1) shit go౦ԁ sHit👌 thats ✔ some | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Perfect course! Good workload, about 4-6 hours a week. Well-paced. Relevant topics, good depth. Balance between theory and practise. | 1) Perfect course! | Good | 1) workload, about 4-6 hours a week. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Perfect course! Good workload, about 4-6 hours a week. Well-paced. Relevant topics, good depth. Balance between theory and practise. | 2) hours a week. Well-paced. Relevant topics, | Good | 2) depth. Balance between theory and practise. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is a great starter for machine learning. It has a good combination of theory and practical implementation. | 1) for machine learning. It has a | Good | 1) combination of theory and practical implementation. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good!:D | 1) Very | Good | 1) :D | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is verg good,and from assignment I also gain a lot.But I still expect teachers can tell us more details. | 1) The course is verg | Good | 1) and from assignment I also gain | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introductory course to Machine Learning | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course to Machine Learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Tutorials easy to follow with good challenging programming assignments. | 1) course. Tutorials easy to follow with | Good | 1) challenging programming assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginner. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An exceptional course which opened my eyes to the world of machine learning. I'm able to see patterns already as to how and when to apply the algorithms learned given different scenarios. The instructor Andrew is very good, clear, cohesive and coherent. The discussion group contains almost every help needed and the mentors are good. The course is also paced extremely well. But I felt there could have been more. Maybe I would be asking for a lot, but can there be more to this? I would certainly love to go a little deeper than this in the world of machine learning. | 1) scenarios. The instructor Andrew is very | Good | 1) clear, cohesive and coherent. The discussion | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An exceptional course which opened my eyes to the world of machine learning. I'm able to see patterns already as to how and when to apply the algorithms learned given different scenarios. The instructor Andrew is very good, clear, cohesive and coherent. The discussion group contains almost every help needed and the mentors are good. The course is also paced extremely well. But I felt there could have been more. Maybe I would be asking for a lot, but can there be more to this? I would certainly love to go a little deeper than this in the world of machine learning. | 2) help needed and the mentors are | Good | 2) The course is also paced extremely | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very usefully class, and very good teacher! | 1) Very usefully class, and very | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | the first part is amazing. very well, but when I begin with Mat lab, I´m in the way but alone two steps after. Is dificult for beginers.... in count is great experience find the solution and look the 100/100. It would be good: any more help in the first steps in Mat lab. | 1) look the 100/100. It would be | Good | 1) any more help in the first | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and complete course with a quite high level of examination. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and complete course with a quite | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well structured course for giving good overview of ML landscape, with programming assignments giving little sandboxes for student to be able to focus on crux of a particular ML technique. It gives good basic foundation to be able to appreciate various ML applications around and techniques used in them, and go out to explore ML further. | 1) Very well structured course for giving | Good | 1) overview of ML landscape, with programming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well structured course for giving good overview of ML landscape, with programming assignments giving little sandboxes for student to be able to focus on crux of a particular ML technique. It gives good basic foundation to be able to appreciate various ML applications around and techniques used in them, and go out to explore ML further. | 2) a particular ML technique. It gives | Good | 2) basic foundation to be able to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is good but not the best I've seen | 1) This course is | Good | 1) but not the best I've seen | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is so far the best MOOC I have done. The small exercices are very good for practicing but do not require too much time. The lessons are not too long but are very useful. | 1) done. The small exercices are very | Good | 1) for practicing but do not require | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, with a good teacher. The labs were really interesting and challenging in most of them!! :D | 1) Great course, with a | Good | 1) teacher. The labs were really interesting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course to do and have a deep understanding in it... | 1) | Good | 1) course to do and have a | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is really inspiring. It is good structured and provides good understanding of implementstion of machine learming algorithms. | 1) course is really inspiring. It is | Good | 1) structured and provides good understanding of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is really inspiring. It is good structured and provides good understanding of implementstion of machine learming algorithms. | 2) It is good structured and provides | Good | 2) understanding of implementstion of machine learming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nice, I'd like to learning much. It's a good introduce to my about machine learning. More knowledge advanced about machine learning can be introduced for us. Thanks. | 1) like to learning much. It's a | Good | 1) introduce to my about machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | helpful, and good code sample. | 1) helpful, and | Good | 1) code sample. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good instructor, valuable Information, excited course. Thanks :)) | 1) | Good | 1) instructor, valuable Information, excited course. Thanks | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very clear and intuitive in terms of explanations of complicated algorithms. This course is a very good foundation for further learning in academia or industry. | 1) algorithms. This course is a very | Good | 1) foundation for further learning in academia | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | All topics are introduced well. The pace of the lectures could be faster. The programming assignments are a really good addition and help to understand how the techniques work! | 1) The programming assignments are a really | Good | 1) addition and help to understand how | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This Online Course is simply good, eventought a lot of work it keeped me motivated by it's practically relevant thematics, and gave me a insight in modern Machine Learning mechanisms | 1) This Online Course is simply | Good | 1) eventought a lot of work it | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good introduction course to machine learning! | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction course to machine learning! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Pretty good to learn for novice | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) to learn for novice | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good videos. reasonable quiz questions. good programming assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) videos. reasonable quiz questions. good programming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good videos. reasonable quiz questions. good programming assignments. | 2) good videos. reasonable quiz questions. | Good | 2) programming assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent material and videos gives good taste of what ML is. Exercises go to the point, which is also very good. | 1) Excellent material and videos gives | Good | 1) taste of what ML is. Exercises | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent material and videos gives good taste of what ML is. Exercises go to the point, which is also very good. | 2) the point, which is also very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is very good course, and you can learn the algorithm of machine learning and also how to apply these algorithms by using Matlab and Octave. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course, and you can learn the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course and one of the best that Coursera has to offer. Prof. Ng is descriptive, clear and practical oriented towards the course. It's starts with very good explanation with the concepts and buils o | 1) the course. It's starts with very | Good | 1) explanation with the concepts and buils | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, complete course. It goes through a lot of different machine learning techniques, well explained. The assignments are interesting and sometimes a bit difficult but the forum is full of good tutoring and test cases which really helps to move through them. I enjoyed it very much! | 1) Very | Good | 1) complete course. It goes through a | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, complete course. It goes through a lot of different machine learning techniques, well explained. The assignments are interesting and sometimes a bit difficult but the forum is full of good tutoring and test cases which really helps to move through them. I enjoyed it very much! | 2) but the forum is full of | Good | 2) tutoring and test cases which really | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good!!! Thank you! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! Thank you! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Loved it as an intro course. Gave me good ideas about where to go next. | 1) as an intro course. Gave me | Good | 1) ideas about where to go next. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! I enjoy this course and recommend it to every one interested in data learning and programming learner. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I enjoy this course and recommend | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Don't be deterred by the use of octave. It's turned out to be a very quick way to get into the algebra of the models. A good course to point you towards the mathematical foundations: if you want more depth the detail is provided. | 1) the algebra of the models. A | Good | 1) course to point you towards the | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you for this excellent class. It was really well constructed, with good examples and clear explanations. For once in an online class, the exercices were sometimes challenging, which is the best way to learn. With best regards, Max | 1) It was really well constructed, with | Good | 1) examples and clear explanations. For once | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The class was very interesting and challenging and I learn a lot! I would recommend it if you wish to get a good feel for what machine learning is. I was very satisfied to learn about the possible applications and liked the guidance throughout the lectures on how to efficiently build machine learning systems. I hope I could apply it one day in the field on biophysics I'm currently working on. Thanks again for making this class interesting and fun for us! | 1) if you wish to get a | Good | 1) feel for what machine learning is. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good. Thanks for the course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Thanks for the course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course especially for math/cs students - a lot of focus is put on explaining the math behind algorithms and equations, so if you search for practical examples and use cases, maybe try to look for another course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course especially for math/cs students - | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The class is very good! | 1) The class is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The programming assignments are very well organized and give a good sense of the working principles of the algorithms. Also, the course enforces the reflection on how to potentialize the application of specific algorithms. | 1) very well organized and give a | Good | 1) sense of the working principles of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Professor Ng is very good at teaching. The material is easy to follow | 1) Professor Ng is very | Good | 1) at teaching. The material is easy | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | 1) the course is organized is really | Good | 1) It's amazing to look back in | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | 2) of each other. It is also | Good | 2) how there is always a programming | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am really satisfied with the course. I'm really glad I stuck with it. Looking forward to putting it to practice. The way the course is organized is really good. It's amazing to look back in all the subjects studied and how each one is built on top of each other. It is also good how there is always a programming exercise that really makes you think about the content studied on that lesson. I think the videos really need some post production. Some videos could be shortened since there is repeated material: Andrew decides to restart the explanation, because he messed up or something, but the part the he messed up is still in the video. It would be good if the Wiki that is present in Week 1 could also be present in all other Weeks, so we as students could feel encouraged to write the Wiki of each Week. | 3) in the video. It would be | Good | 3) if the Wiki that is present | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good!! hope can download slides. | 1) very | Good | 1) ! hope can download slides. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well constructed , logical and understandable course. A very good way to get introduced and learn more than just the basics. It has been a huge thrill every evening getting home from work and sit down next to the computer to watch the videos and study Machine Learning. Prof. Andrew Ng did put together a very effective program indeed. Thanks! | 1) logical and understandable course. A very | Good | 1) way to get introduced and learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good lecture! | 1) | Good | 1) lecture! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a wonderful course to start machine learning. Andrew maintains a consistent speed in explaining things which helps everyone. After finishing it I feel so much inspired to continue learning and practicing machine learning on my own. The volunteers of this course are also very good in helping us when we get stuck. Thanks to all the volunteers for creating threads on code submission and providing general guidance to all the students. Looking forward to more such courses. | 1) of this course are also very | Good | 1) in helping us when we get | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am personally missing reinforcement learning material, otherwise an excellent course with very good explanations. | 1) otherwise an excellent course with very | Good | 1) explanations. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Andrew Ng does a great job at explaining the material in a concise but still pretty complete manner. He is very effective at simplifying this topic so that it can be readily understood. Very good support staff as well. | 1) it can be readily understood. Very | Good | 1) support staff as well. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best ever, Andrew Ang is a really good teacher | 1) ever, Andrew Ang is a really | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Gives ppl good intiuition of machine learning, | 1) Gives ppl | Good | 1) intiuition of machine learning, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good, strongly recommed | 1) very | Good | 1) strongly recommed | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good exercises and simple to absorb | 1) | Good | 1) exercises and simple to absorb | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great high-level overview of a lot of topics! Every lecture was very well explained. The written assignments and programming exercises were a good balance between getting your hands dirty while still being paced that you could finish them all in a timely manner and finish the course with a busy schedule. I had fun! | 1) assignments and programming exercises were a | Good | 1) balance between getting your hands dirty | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good starting point for those with some basic quantitative backgrounds | 1) A | Good | 1) starting point for those with some | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great class. Pretty basic for someone with a strong stats background and quite light on the math, but gives good overview and provides learners with good intuition. | 1) light on the math, but gives | Good | 1) overview and provides learners with good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great class. Pretty basic for someone with a strong stats background and quite light on the math, but gives good overview and provides learners with good intuition. | 2) good overview and provides learners with | Good | 2) intuition. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course if perfectly organized. It has just the right amount of complexity and forces you to think and understand what it is going on. Being proficient with Linear Algebra is a big plus, in particular with matrix operations. If you are not, not a bid deal, but I recommend spending a good amount of time on the review lessons. Trust me. The choice of Octave/Matlab as a programming language makes perfect sense. Not everyone is seasoned programmer. I found it is fairly easy to pick up Octave syntax and become quite proficient in a few days. The course has also a few Mentors active in the Discussion Forum that make your life a lot easier. | 1) deal, but I recommend spending a | Good | 1) amount of time on the review | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | fairly easy, good for start | 1) fairly easy, | Good | 1) for start | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A great introduction to the field of Machine Learning to novices. The step by step method to explain this complex field in simple terms is really helpful. I would really recommend this as the first course in Machine learning for somebody interested in forming a strong foundation. Good mix of theory and practice. Thanks Andrew Ng for sharing his knowledge. Looking forward to more courses from him in future. | 1) interested in forming a strong foundation. | Good | 1) mix of theory and practice. Thanks | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, provide me basic understanding about Machine Learning, the tools, the algorithm that I can further study by myself in the future. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, provide me basic understanding about | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course offers informative lectures with good explanations, a set of quizzes with well-posed questions and even programming exercises that are evaluated online using Octave. Highly recommended! | 1) This course offers informative lectures with | Good | 1) explanations, a set of quizzes with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good stuff | 1) | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really enjoyed the course. It was a very good introduction to a lot of topics in machine learning. The quizes and assignments were manageable but not too easy. However, there were no written course materials to print out. Thats the reason I only rate the course 4 stars. | 1) the course. It was a very | Good | 1) introduction to a lot of topics | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to Machine Learning (may need to review your linear algebra skills a little though). | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning (may need | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a tough but great course. You need your passion and determination to finish this course - the homework really took me a long time. Besides learning about machine learning, the course also provide me a new angle to refresh my understanding of calculus, linear algebra and programming language. Great experience! It also gives you a genuine sense of achievement when you finally finish the course after all the hard work. The course can't make you an expert, but it's a very good start for learning about machine learning. Highly recommend! | 1) an expert, but it's a very | Good | 1) start for learning about machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is just great, a very good introduction to machine learning. Material are well organised and pretty interactive and makes the course very interesting. Thank you so much Pr. Andrew Ng for the sharing !! | 1) course is just great, a very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. Material are | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought that Machine Learning is a very dificult matter, and I still think that, but I'd like to say that I have learned about machine learning in a very easy way with this course. It has a lot of practical exercise where you can see what are you learning. Teacher talk and explain very good. | 1) learning. Teacher talk and explain very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best and most informative course I've taken so far. Dr. Ng is very good at demystifying deep concepts to students. | 1) so far. Dr. Ng is very | Good | 1) at demystifying deep concepts to students. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a very interesting course, which gives a good overview of this new field. Also the exercises are very illustrating and helpful to gain deeper knowledge. | 1) very interesting course, which gives a | Good | 1) overview of this new field. Also | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for introduction to ML. Must have. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for introduction to ML. Must | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very enriching course. I have learned a lot. The lecturer is very good, one of the best i've encountered on the web as well as in real life. | 1) a lot. The lecturer is very | Good | 1) one of the best i've encountered | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is an excellent one for anyone who want to get into the world of Machine Learning. The course material is structured very well and the Professor is very good at explaining all the concepts in a clear and concise way. A little programming experience in any language and a bit of linear algebra is enough to start this course. I gained a lot of understanding into the details of how machine learning is used in real life applications - thanks to the course!. | 1) well and the Professor is very | Good | 1) at explaining all the concepts in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction and advanced insight in the field at the same time. A performance to get to the essential without getting entangled with the maths, while you will need at least a little understanding of algebra. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction and advanced insight in the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for learn Deep Learning. | 1) | Good | 1) course for learn Deep Learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first on line course and the experience has been amazing. The lectures by Prof Andrew Ng were clear and the follow up programming exercises helped reinforce and enhance the concepts covered in the lectures. The entire course was very well organized - videos, notes, discussion groups, suggestions and tips by the mentors was very easy to follow. The focus of this course is on the practical application of machine learning techniques (supervised learning mostly but also some non supervised learning). Prof Andrew tries not to get into the advanced mathematical concepts but instead provides good intuition and then shows one how to apply the different ideas underpinning machine learning with some practical examples. In my view, this is an excellent way to quickly become familiar the concepts and to see machine learning in action. A student of the course will gain very good insights and can then follow up with the underlying math as needed. The final two lectures on how to scale machine learning to large systems and a suggested systematic framework for figuring out which aspects of the design to focus on were very instructive. In summary, i would highly recommend this course to anyone interested in the area of machine learning. Be prepared to work through some challenging (but very worthwhile) programming exercises to get the most out of the course. | 1) advanced mathematical concepts but instead provides | Good | 1) intuition and then shows one how | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first on line course and the experience has been amazing. The lectures by Prof Andrew Ng were clear and the follow up programming exercises helped reinforce and enhance the concepts covered in the lectures. The entire course was very well organized - videos, notes, discussion groups, suggestions and tips by the mentors was very easy to follow. The focus of this course is on the practical application of machine learning techniques (supervised learning mostly but also some non supervised learning). Prof Andrew tries not to get into the advanced mathematical concepts but instead provides good intuition and then shows one how to apply the different ideas underpinning machine learning with some practical examples. In my view, this is an excellent way to quickly become familiar the concepts and to see machine learning in action. A student of the course will gain very good insights and can then follow up with the underlying math as needed. The final two lectures on how to scale machine learning to large systems and a suggested systematic framework for figuring out which aspects of the design to focus on were very instructive. In summary, i would highly recommend this course to anyone interested in the area of machine learning. Be prepared to work through some challenging (but very worthwhile) programming exercises to get the most out of the course. | 2) of the course will gain very | Good | 2) insights and can then follow up | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent introduction for the basic understanding of the Machine Learning. Very good, structured, easy to follow and understand course for anyone whose has previous exposure to linear algebra using MATLAB and Octave. The mentors appear to be very active and hence should not be trouble for anyone without very strong background ( read prerequisite like Linear Algebra especially for the assignments). The Assignments are self explanatory enough that I did all of them in just 2-3 weeks, thanks to my 2-3 years of coding in MATLAB and linear algebra. Thanks very much Prof. Ng and the team! | 1) understanding of the Machine Learning. Very | Good | 1) structured, easy to follow and understand | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, but too focused on quantitatively analysis, maybe the practical applications will come in subsequent weeks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but too focused on quantitatively | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class was a great introduction to machine learning ideas and implementation. Prof. Ng does a really good job of not only showing you how to code up machine learning examples in MATLAB/Octave, but explaining the rationale behind them. If machine learning is as much an art as a science, then this is the "artistic" part, which is hard to find in a textbook. However, I do kind of wish we had covered fewer topics, but in more detail. Mind you, I'm biased because I was a math major and want to see proofs for everything, but I would have really liked to see more of the details behind support vector machines and neural networks. If you're looking for that kind of thing, then it's probably best to do additional reading on your own. Anyway, I still gave this class five stars because I have been searching for an introduction to machine learning that could give me a broad perspective (and share some wisdom of expertise) for a while now. I found it in Andrew Ng's machine learning class on Coursera. | 1) implementation. Prof. Ng does a really | Good | 1) job of not only showing you | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! Prof. Andrew NG gives very clear idea of how machine learning works and how to use them in data analysis . | 1) very | Good | 1) Prof. Andrew NG gives very clear | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew Ng is a very good lecturer, and the course was extremely well designed. | 1) Andrew Ng is a very | Good | 1) lecturer, and the course was extremely | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! There's a substantial amount of mathematics and code implementations but the breadth and clarity of the course is fantastic. | 1) Very | Good | 1) There's a substantial amount of mathematics | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! Widen my vision | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Widen my vision | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course to get into the world of data science! | 1) A | Good | 1) course to get into the world | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview of ML. Does not require a deep mathematical background and therefore lectures are not as rigorous as Alex Ihler's lectures (youtube) which take similar or less duration. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of ML. Does not require | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | VERY GOOD | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Crystal clear and well paced lectures, good coverage of several interesting topics, amusing exercises. Thanks professor Ng and TAs. | 1) Crystal clear and well paced lectures, | Good | 1) coverage of several interesting topics, amusing | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is an excellent introduction to ML. Coming from a mathematical background, I felt that at times the course was a bit slow (e.g. Professor Ng would spend time performing steps on every element of a matrix, when a couple of examples would have sufficed), but jumping ahead in the video solved this problem easily. I was a bit more frustrated, however, with the few instances of, "here's the formula, you don't need to know the derivation." I guess those who want to understand the math behind the techniques can always look elsewhere, but Professor Ng obviously knows a great deal and is able to clearly and concisely explain difficult subjects, and so I was a bit disappointed to not be getting his instruction in the more difficult aspects. But, overall this course is great. In particular, I found the programming assignments to be excellent. They are a good level of difficulty, and manage to be quite interesting, as well. I will definitely hold onto the code I wrote for this course for reference as I move forward. Professor Ng, please create a more advanced course next! | 1) to be excellent. They are a | Good | 1) level of difficulty, and manage to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction course to machine learning. There is no capstone project which is a disappointment | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course to machine learning. There | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course manages to be approachable while still covering a large variety of subjects. By the end of the class you won't be a master of any particular machine learning algorithm, but you will have a good idea of what you need to study further. Probably one of my favorite classes ever (and not just at Coursera). | 1) algorithm, but you will have a | Good | 1) idea of what you need to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is magnificent! It was a great pleasure to make programming assignments and watch lectures. Practically, it was so good, that I'm thinking of making some career choices soon. Thank you! | 1) watch lectures. Practically, it was so | Good | 1) that I'm thinking of making some | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent Course and Well detailed lectures. For a beginner in Machine learning, i am able to understand the concepts clearly. Quiz and Assignments are really good and interesting. I am hoping to complete this certification by new year | 1) clearly. Quiz and Assignments are really | Good | 1) and interesting. I am hoping to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good balance between theory and hands on exercises. Very enjoyable. | 1) | Good | 1) balance between theory and hands on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best online course i've ever attended. The explainations are crystal clear even for non-methematicians and the topic is widely covered ( No deep learning nor bayesian methods though). If only my former college teachers would've been half that good.. | 1) college teachers would've been half that | Good | 1) . | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good, but i think more suggested materials are needed. | 1) very | Good | 1) but i think more suggested materials | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | All-rounded, simple, beginner-friendly, well-designed exercises, good lecturer | 1) All-rounded, simple, beginner-friendly, well-designed exercises, | Good | 1) lecturer | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The exercises lead you to the edge of a cliff, then push you off. No guidance. Good luck if you don't already know linear algebra, matrix math, and matlab. I'll be looking elsewhere to learn about Machine Learning. Glad I didn't pay for this course! | 1) then push you off. No guidance. | Good | 1) luck if you don't already know | 1.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was my first coursera class, and I came out feeling confident in my use of the methods that Prof. Ng taught. The programming exercises do a very good job of guiding students through the implementational details of each learning method and usually provide examples to illustrate the strengths, weaknesses, and options within each. I'm a graduate student in a protein structure/rational drug design lab, and the topics from this class have already weaved their way into my projects. These methods are applicable to almost any quantitative form of data - I strongly recommend this course for other young researchers, either to prepare to implement the methods themselves, or to just start thinking about how to format the conventions of their sceintific domain in a machine-learnable way! | 1) The programming exercises do a very | Good | 1) job of guiding students through the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is excellent at explaining things. Unfortunately the course doesn't go through some of the derivations because it is introductory, but he still offers a reasonable explanation / intuition for most of the content. This is the de-facto standard ML class for beginners and a good intro to coursera and online courses in general. Take this course! | 1) ML class for beginners and a | Good | 1) intro to coursera and online courses | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good introduction to machine learning. It seem liked the right combination of breadth and depth for me. Each concept was coupled with a real life example, which was great. This course has motivated me to explore the field further and I would recommend it to others as well. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. It seem | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | However good the material and lectures may be, the use of an outdated version of Octave (which is not Mac-friendly and exceedingly brittle, to the extent where the supplied code requires manual patching in Windows and Linux) is a complete turn-off and makes it nearly impossible to complete the assignments on time unless you're prepared to spend at least twice as much time debugging your setup as doing the actual assignments. I'll come back when this is done with R or Python. | 1) However | Good | 1) the material and lectures may be, | 1.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A large number of topics covered. A very good explanation of the material. Interesting programming assignments. | 1) number of topics covered. A very | Good | 1) explanation of the material. Interesting programming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A really good course. The teacher explains a lot of different topics clearly. You will learn a lot of Machine Learning. Moreover, there are practical works that help you to implement what you see during the video. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course. The teacher explains a lot | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introduction into Machine Learning algorithm and as well a good refresher for practioneers. | 1) Learning algorithm and as well a | Good | 1) refresher for practioneers. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good, you can learn important concepts, the course is plenty of exercises and practice, But even better you can have recognition for work and, like in my case, get new contracts and clients. | 1) Really | Good | 1) you can learn important concepts, the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great content, well documented, good exercises and scripts for work submission | 1) Great content, well documented, | Good | 1) exercises and scripts for work submission | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I would totally recommend this course to someone looking to get an insight about the most popular methods of machine learning. The video lectures are well explained and the programming exercices are a really good guidance to learn by yourself to put everything in practice. | 1) the programming exercices are a really | Good | 1) guidance to learn by yourself to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I enjoyed the course. It covered many machine learning topics and supplied good advice and simple working example. It is a great practical guide. | 1) many machine learning topics and supplied | Good | 1) advice and simple working example. It | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | one of the best online course out there for any beginner to learn machine learning. Even if your background of maths is not strong, don't let that stop you from joining this course. The instructor is very good in explaining basic mathematics. In short, advance calculus is not a requirement for this course (but good to have). | 1) this course. The instructor is very | Good | 1) in explaining basic mathematics. In short, | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | one of the best online course out there for any beginner to learn machine learning. Even if your background of maths is not strong, don't let that stop you from joining this course. The instructor is very good in explaining basic mathematics. In short, advance calculus is not a requirement for this course (but good to have). | 2) a requirement for this course (but | Good | 2) to have). | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Incredibly good. Very clear, simple and yet it introduces very important concepts. Thanks! | 1) Incredibly | Good | 1) Very clear, simple and yet it | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a good course for me to spend time on it . | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for me to spend time | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a good introductory course! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introductory course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very enjoyable. Good practical examples and fun to learn | 1) Very enjoyable. | Good | 1) practical examples and fun to learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is very good. Like it. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) Like it. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Quality lessons, good course if you want to start in machine learning. | 1) Quality lessons, | Good | 1) course if you want to start | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good intro into Machine Learning. You will feel confident on completion of this course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro into Machine Learning. You will | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A really good course, useful and well structured | 1) A really | Good | 1) course, useful and well structured | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course!!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, the teacher did a very good job explaining a very difficult subject to a group of students with signifficantly different backgrounds. The quizzes were easy to solve once you took the time to see all the related videos. There was a little bit of handholding in the programming assignmentes, but that may be due to the aforementioned backgrounds the student came up with. I'm a spanish speaking mechanical engineer with just a programming hobby and I was able to finish with a 99% grade. If I could do it, anyone can | 1) course, the teacher did a very | Good | 1) job explaining a very difficult subject | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very easy to understand. Good fundamental knowledge for people who don't have any basic on Machine Learning. | 1) Very easy to understand. | Good | 1) fundamental knowledge for people who don't | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a very good introduction to machine learning. It covers a very broad set of material, and the lectures are very clear. The quizzes and programming assignments are based directly on the course material, making it easy to complete the assignments if you understand the lecture material (in contrast with some other courses I have taken where the assignments require lots of extra material not taught in the course). It is very helpful to have some programming experience, and some knowledge of linear algebra, probability, and calculus. The course is very topical, so it does not go very deep into the material, but it does offer some practical advice for using machine learning algorithms in daily applications. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. It covers | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good structured, well explained and useful materials. Thanks, professor Ng! | 1) Really | Good | 1) structured, well explained and useful materials. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good!! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, explanations are very clear :). | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, explanations are very clear :). | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's good! | 1) it's | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course for beginners in Machine Learning. Programming exercises can be a little more complex | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners in Machine Learning. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the first course I am taking on Coursera, it is very good, and I would like to see more more courses. | 1) taking on Coursera, it is very | Good | 1) and I would like to see | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good startup machine learning course with wonderful teaching by a good teacher! | 1) A very | Good | 1) startup machine learning course with wonderful | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good startup machine learning course with wonderful teaching by a good teacher! | 2) course with wonderful teaching by a | Good | 2) teacher! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, gives you all the basis needed for Machine Learning. Great lecturer, good videos and fun assignments. | 1) needed for Machine Learning. Great lecturer, | Good | 1) videos and fun assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very very good course. I also did the data science specialization of JHU. Difference is that the level of this course is much higher than DSC but the explanation is so good that you understand everything. Thank Andrew | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course. I also did the data | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very very good course. I also did the data science specialization of JHU. Difference is that the level of this course is much higher than DSC but the explanation is so good that you understand everything. Thank Andrew | 2) DSC but the explanation is so | Good | 2) that you understand everything. Thank Andrew | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This a really good course. I love the way Mr. Andrew teaches us. He makes everything so simple and easy to understand! | 1) This a really | Good | 1) course. I love the way Mr. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I'm an electronics Engineering undergraduate student and I had never known anything about ML before entering this class. In this course, the explanation of those complex ML concept is very clearly, and the examples used in the course help me understand those concept a lot. Moreover, this course also offer me the opportunity to implement ML algorithm. And I'm really curious how the submit system works :) Anyway, thanks to this class, thanks to professor Andrew, I have a good understanding of the fundamental of machine learning, and now I'm learning more advanced machine learning technique and dig into some math tricks. | 1) to professor Andrew, I have a | Good | 1) understanding of the fundamental of machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Exellent teacher and tasks. Cource give you good real skills. | 1) teacher and tasks. Cource give you | Good | 1) real skills. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course！ | 1) Very | Good | 1) course！ | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Got good grip over the basics of Machine Learning. Prof. Andrew NG teaches the concepts very clearly and makes the flow of the course very lucid and optimal | 1) Got | Good | 1) grip over the basics of Machine | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good pace, amazing explanations. So far the best MOOC I've ever done. I love it | 1) Really | Good | 1) pace, amazing explanations. So far the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course! Learned a lot and can't wait to apply it! Professor Ng is really good at teaching and the mentors and discussion board are really helpful! | 1) apply it! Professor Ng is really | Good | 1) at teaching and the mentors and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting course. The course material is very good, and Andrew Ng is very clear and interesting. It's the best course I have been following through the Coursera platform. | 1) course. The course material is very | Good | 1) and Andrew Ng is very clear | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is specially good if you have some experience on ML but without knowing the details. I recommend it! | 1) This course is specially | Good | 1) if you have some experience on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very engaging and easy to follow course with a lot of good samples as part of assignment. Loving it so far. | 1) follow course with a lot of | Good | 1) samples as part of assignment. Loving | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! I can only encourage anyone to take it if interested in the subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I can only encourage anyone | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course, very easy to understand, especially with lots of Homeworks/Labworks. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, very easy to understand, especially | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well structured course. Professor is excellent. Lecture videos are easy to understand, have good examples, and are well organized. The assignments are relevant and illustrate the process of actually running machine learning. However, the scope of topics does feel a bit too "intro/basic" and the material and assignments feel spoonfed. It would have been great if the course went deeper into each topic and also challenged the student to do more coding independently in Octave/Matlab. | 1) videos are easy to understand, have | Good | 1) examples, and are well organized. The | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Prof Andrew seems to be very passionate about Machine Learning. The way he teaches is simply awesome, beyond I can express in words. Quizzes and assignments are challenging. Course offers a good blend of theory and hands on. overall I am really enjoying attending this course and encourage everyone to make best use of it ! | 1) assignments are challenging. Course offers a | Good | 1) blend of theory and hands on. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good course to start with machine learning. Clears basic concepts without going into too much detail which makes it ideal for students with no background in calculus. Also, the structure and content is well organized and topics are not rushed upon. You not only learn algorithms but also best practrices to follow to achieve better accuracy. The programming exercises are also really good. All of this makes coupled with the helpful Coursera community to guide you when you are stuck- up with a problem makes it an ideal course to start learning machine learning. | 1) Extremely | Good | 1) course to start with machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good course to start with machine learning. Clears basic concepts without going into too much detail which makes it ideal for students with no background in calculus. Also, the structure and content is well organized and topics are not rushed upon. You not only learn algorithms but also best practrices to follow to achieve better accuracy. The programming exercises are also really good. All of this makes coupled with the helpful Coursera community to guide you when you are stuck- up with a problem makes it an ideal course to start learning machine learning. | 2) The programming exercises are also really | Good | 2) All of this makes coupled with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent introduction to machine learning, it gives much confidence with hands-on learning. The pace of the course is very good with required information being given to student with minimal confusion by a good teacher. After this course a typical student would be well prepared to learn further for solving real life problems. | 1) pace of the course is very | Good | 1) with required information being given to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | An excellent introduction to machine learning, it gives much confidence with hands-on learning. The pace of the course is very good with required information being given to student with minimal confusion by a good teacher. After this course a typical student would be well prepared to learn further for solving real life problems. | 2) student with minimal confusion by a | Good | 2) teacher. After this course a typical | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introductory course .. well explained | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course . . well explained | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and easily approachable introduction and overview of machine learning algorithms. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easily approachable introduction and overview | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course with a lot of hands-on, direct-to-application assignments. It is fairly introductory, so all you need is first year calculus, which in itself is not bad but this course is fairly theory-light. The theory that is included is just enough to be able to refer to further theory not covered. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with a lot of hands-on, | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good introduction of machine learning. It broaden my horizon. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction of machine learning. It broaden | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good class introducing machine learning. The programming assignments help me understand the concept. I think there can be more optional materials. | 1) A very | Good | 1) class introducing machine learning. The programming | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good introduction course on Machine Learning. Andrew Ng is a great instructor ! | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction course on Machine Learning. Andrew | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a very good class. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) class. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Stellar course. The content is great, good pacing, and the teacher is interesting and passionate about the subject. There are a few mistakes in the videos here and there, but nothing major. Definitely a great course that I'd recommand without hesitation to anyone curious about Machine Learning. | 1) Stellar course. The content is great, | Good | 1) pacing, and the teacher is interesting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of great condensed content. I miss a written summary of the videos though. Furthermore, the quality of sound is awful. Well designed quizzes and assignments. Good: In-video quizzes. | 1) awful. Well designed quizzes and assignments. | Good | 1) In-video quizzes. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course for beginner | 1) A | Good | 1) course for beginner | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent selfcontained, good pace, deep course. | 1) Excellent selfcontained, | Good | 1) pace, deep course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is the most practical, comprehensive, and best course on machine learning. Professor Andrew Ng makes all the difficult concepts very easy to follow based on intuition. I look forward more courses like this and also a specialization in machine learning from Stanford. Thank you professor Andrew Ng and please keep up your good work! | 1) Ng and please keep up your | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is good to begin with | 1) The course is | Good | 1) to begin with | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very thorough and motivating instructor, showing good examples. I would recommend having linear algebra knowledge as a pre-requisite for the course. | 1) Very thorough and motivating instructor, showing | Good | 1) examples. I would recommend having linear | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Pretty good course. Starts from very beginning of ML. Maybe there are too little of maths here (I needed to check and recap some chapters of algebra), but all presented concepts are reviewed very clear. Assignments are also very good and code from them is useful not only for the course. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course. Starts from very beginning of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Pretty good course. Starts from very beginning of ML. Maybe there are too little of maths here (I needed to check and recap some chapters of algebra), but all presented concepts are reviewed very clear. Assignments are also very good and code from them is useful not only for the course. | 2) very clear. Assignments are also very | Good | 2) and code from them is useful | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good class. I kept 1 star for the future in case I am having had a better class. | 1) A | Good | 1) class. I kept 1 star for | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. Only negative bit is the sound quality of the videos. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Only negative bit is the sound | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good Course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course with many practical examples. Course organization is also very good. Assignments become a bit more challenging after week 5, but it is well worth it. | 1) examples. Course organization is also very | Good | 1) Assignments become a bit more challenging | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course with good methodology. I liked the assignments and I was motivated all the time. I really recommend this course. | 1) This is a great course with | Good | 1) methodology. I liked the assignments and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good, better, best, never let it rest! | 1) | Good | 1) better, best, never let it rest! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Awesome course. Professor is great at teaching, very down-to-earth and practical material. Good assignments. I wish to have more Math theory(as optional) in PCA & Optimization. Perhaps adding a job Interview section related to Machine Learning would be great | 1) teaching, very down-to-earth and practical material. | Good | 1) assignments. I wish to have more | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a good course!!! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The courser is suitable for anyone who is interested in machine learning. Every concept is interpreted in detail with good plot or figure. I will highly recommend it! | 1) concept is interpreted in detail with | Good | 1) plot or figure. I will highly | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very useful and easy to learn.Thanks Andrew Ng for providing such a good course. | 1) Andrew Ng for providing such a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I have a strong background in programming and math so it was relatively basic but a good survey of the field of ML. | 1) it was relatively basic but a | Good | 1) survey of the field of ML. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very solid introduction to machine learning. The instructor is very knowledgeable and does a good job of explaining the intuition of the methods. I would recommend watching every video (even if you are already familiar with some of the methods watch the video anyway. You may see it from another perspective). | 1) is very knowledgeable and does a | Good | 1) job of explaining the intuition of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction to machine learning although the later exercises were quite easy. Once you get through the neural net back propagation section, there really isn't much of a challenge left. That said, you do get a good sense of how the various algorithms are implemented and can self-study from there. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning although the | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction to machine learning although the later exercises were quite easy. Once you get through the neural net back propagation section, there really isn't much of a challenge left. That said, you do get a good sense of how the various algorithms are implemented and can self-study from there. | 2) That said, you do get a | Good | 2) sense of how the various algorithms | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it is very good, teacher explain fine | 1) it is very | Good | 1) teacher explain fine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nice course, easy to follow good introduction | 1) Nice course, easy to follow | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction on machine learning. Andrew Ng is a good instructor and does a very good job of explaining the concepts. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction on machine learning. Andrew Ng | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction on machine learning. Andrew Ng is a good instructor and does a very good job of explaining the concepts. | 2) machine learning. Andrew Ng is a | Good | 2) instructor and does a very good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction on machine learning. Andrew Ng is a good instructor and does a very good job of explaining the concepts. | 3) good instructor and does a very | Good | 3) job of explaining the concepts. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great lectures ! Mathematical and practical aspects are both taken into account. Andrew Ng is really clear and gives good explanations. | 1) Ng is really clear and gives | Good | 1) explanations. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is really good, it covers a lot of different topics at once on a good level, so you can continue studying by yourself. Forms good understanding of machine learning. In my opinion one of the most important things is that the lecturer tries to explain each and every topic and not just give the ability to use it, there are a lot of step-by-step examples and additional explanation videos. Programming assignments are also good, they cover a lot of material and give real examples. Definitely recommend this course. It's fun. | 1) Course is really | Good | 1) it covers a lot of different | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is really good, it covers a lot of different topics at once on a good level, so you can continue studying by yourself. Forms good understanding of machine learning. In my opinion one of the most important things is that the lecturer tries to explain each and every topic and not just give the ability to use it, there are a lot of step-by-step examples and additional explanation videos. Programming assignments are also good, they cover a lot of material and give real examples. Definitely recommend this course. It's fun. | 2) different topics at once on a | Good | 2) level, so you can continue studying | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is really good, it covers a lot of different topics at once on a good level, so you can continue studying by yourself. Forms good understanding of machine learning. In my opinion one of the most important things is that the lecturer tries to explain each and every topic and not just give the ability to use it, there are a lot of step-by-step examples and additional explanation videos. Programming assignments are also good, they cover a lot of material and give real examples. Definitely recommend this course. It's fun. | 3) can continue studying by yourself. Forms | Good | 3) understanding of machine learning. In my | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is really good, it covers a lot of different topics at once on a good level, so you can continue studying by yourself. Forms good understanding of machine learning. In my opinion one of the most important things is that the lecturer tries to explain each and every topic and not just give the ability to use it, there are a lot of step-by-step examples and additional explanation videos. Programming assignments are also good, they cover a lot of material and give real examples. Definitely recommend this course. It's fun. | 4) explanation videos. Programming assignments are also | Good | 4) they cover a lot of material | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a great course with great mentors and helpful resources. Would recommend for anybody who likes to learn about machine learning. It is just a starting point. Having good knowledge with Calculus, Linear Algebra and Satistics will help a great deal but are not mandatory. However this is not realy true if you really want to understand the formulas and concepts presented. (So: Would recommend if you learn some (at least basic) topics on calculus, linear algebra and statistics before) | 1) is just a starting point. Having | Good | 1) knowledge with Calculus, Linear Algebra and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good with essential knowledge | 1) Very | Good | 1) with essential knowledge | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course and useful but not so difficult homework. Prof Ng is a superb professor. Everyone who is interested in ML should take this course. | 1) very | Good | 1) course and useful but not so | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Hello, the course is great. Only one suggestion is to go a little bit deeper in subjects such as SVM optimization techniques or PCA mathematical background. At least a good set of references could be suggested for the interested s | 1) PCA mathematical background. At least a | Good | 1) set of references could be suggested | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | this is a very good lesson! | 1) this is a very | Good | 1) lesson! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A practical course by a capable professor. Too simple in terms of theoretical aspects, but Prof. Ng is very good at making abstract concepts and methodologies easy to follow and understand. Great course as an introductory to Machine Learning. If you are interested, and want to learn more about the proof and in-depth mathematics behind, go to Stanford's site for this course. There are lecture notes, slides and exercises that students use when taking the course at Stanford. | 1) aspects, but Prof. Ng is very | Good | 1) at making abstract concepts and methodologies | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Extremely good introduction and overview of up-to-date machine learning methods. Andrew had simple and clear explanations and the exercises were challenging, not overwhelming, well-structured, and allowed the students to apply the relevant theory without being burdened by creating their own test programs or mastering the programming/scripting language. | 1) Extremely | Good | 1) introduction and overview of up-to-date machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course. Good balance between lectures and exercises. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) balance between lectures and exercises. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course to learn the actual machine learning methods | 1) A | Good | 1) course to learn the actual machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is simply amazing, all the content from the video lessons, through the quizzes and the programming exercises are really well done, and also, there are really good mentors helping on the Discussion areas. If one with the will to really dive into these complex things to extract knowledge, I assure you, you will. The course is well made, but doesn't mean it's easy. I questioned myself through a lot of times in the beginning if I really was capable of learning all of this stuff. But I didn't give up, and well, this might be one of the most important decisions I've made in my life. This course aroused in me the passion to carry this knowledge, and keep improving it through my career. | 1) done, and also, there are really | Good | 1) mentors helping on the Discussion areas. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. But I'd like to see a final review at the end of the course about the available Machine Learning libraries for MATLAB, Python, Apache Spark and/or JAVA. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. But I'd like to see | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | v good | 1) v | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, gives an excellent theoretical overview of linear regression, logistic regression, neural networks, as well as practical tips to make them work well on "real life" datasets. Thank you for the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, gives an excellent theoretical overview | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It goes step by step leading you to a clear understanding of the subject. The assignments proposes you a challenge which inspires you to get good solutions. I've learnt a lot from thhis course. Thank you! | 1) challenge which inspires you to get | Good | 1) solutions. I've learnt a lot from | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good explanations by a teacher that knows a lot about the subject, it was a big learning for me. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations by a teacher that knows | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to the subject. Holds your hand through the programming exercises, which is good for people with little background in programming. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the subject. Holds your | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introduction to the subject. Holds your hand through the programming exercises, which is good for people with little background in programming. | 2) through the programming exercises, which is | Good | 2) for people with little background in | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good lessons. Pay atention and understand untuitively. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons. Pay atention and understand untuitively. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | pretty good! | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and balanced introduction into machine learning. I would suggest everyone who wants to get in touch with ML to start with Andrew Ng course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and balanced introduction into machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is a survey course in Machine Learning which isn't afraid to get seriously in-depth with the detailed math and coding techniques underlying popular ML topics like logistic regression, neural networks, and SVMs. Andrew Ng also spends considerable time on applications and methods for determining if your learner is robust. It is a very challenging course, both conceptually and with the assignments. The assignments are very difficult and will require considerable time and effort. Previous experience with Matlab/Octave is helpful. In terms of math, I think at least one course in Linear Algebra should be prerequisite as the use of vector and matrix operations abound in this class. A good understanding of the programming concept of vectorization is also very helpful...if you don't already understand it...you will after you get through this course. A special thanks to Tom Mosher, one of the class mentors....his help and advice was very helpful in completing the course. | 1) operations abound in this class. A | Good | 1) understanding of the programming concept of | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great overall experience. The lectures are top notch. The section on backward propagation in neural nets was particularly well done. You spend most of the homeworks getting Octave implementations to work based on provided scaffolding code. This is a good method, but it does mean that you spend time with few examples than you might expect, as you must write the implementations at a fairly low level. The upside is that you end up with a deeper understanding of the methods than you might get from, say, using high-level commands in R. Thank you mister Ng for making this great opportunity to learn machine learning for free. | 1) provided scaffolding code. This is a | Good | 1) method, but it does mean that | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | For starters in Machine learning, this course serves as good foundation. It might not be easier to get understanding but its total worth of time if you are interested in machine learning. | 1) Machine learning, this course serves as | Good | 1) foundation. It might not be easier | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is very competent in his job of teaching a very complex idea in a way that you look at it and say "hey, this is really clever, actually, it is actually simple, it is soo simple that I don't understand why it is not common knowledge". The course is just this good. | 1) . The course is just this | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course. Thanks Andrew N.G. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Thanks Andrew N. G. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This courseis amazing as well as the teacher is good at teaching! | 1) as well as the teacher is | Good | 1) at teaching! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good To Learn Something About Machine Learning | 1) | Good | 1) To Learn Something About Machine Learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good!!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The best introductory level course for machine learning. Prof. Andrew Ng has done a good job to explain machine learning concepts to any wanna-be machine learning expert. | 1) Prof. Andrew Ng has done a | Good | 1) job to explain machine learning concepts | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Im learning so much, and enjoying so much. Very good. | 1) much, and enjoying so much. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, well explained, good practical exercises, I am loving it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, well explained, good practical exercises, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course, well explained, good practical exercises, I am loving it. | 2) Very good course, well explained, | Good | 2) practical exercises, I am loving it. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good guide to beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) guide to beginners. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I really enjoyed the class, and I feel like I learned a lot! I'd have given it 5 stars, but there's there are parts of the homework asignments that aren't well organized, for example I didn't know about the unit tests in the discussion threads for a while, and there's more detailed descriptions of the programming sections but they're really hard to find. All in all, a really good experience though. | 1) find. All in all, a really | Good | 1) experience though. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Clear and useful, a good choice for new learner | 1) Clear and useful, a | Good | 1) choice for new learner | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good course for a beginner to learn Machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for a beginner to learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Although I've only completed 2 week's of material, I found this to be extremely interesting. The videos are very good, assignments are excellent to better the understanding and the course seems to be understandable if some one has minimum but more than zero knowledge on linear algebra and programming. Great course, truly enjoying as I'm well ahead of my all deadlines :-) | 1) extremely interesting. The videos are very | Good | 1) assignments are excellent to better the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is very in-depth relative to other courses on Coursera. Professor Ng is very knowledgeable and does a really good job explaining such a difficult concept with zero prior experience. If you are coming into this course with no prior knowledge, you will have to use the discussion forums to do the assignments. Even if you do not know how to do the assignments, you will understand the theory behind the concepts regardless. My only gripe with this course is the use of Matlab or Octave which seems to be outdated. | 1) very knowledgeable and does a really | Good | 1) job explaining such a difficult concept | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was very nicely done. Dr Ng's videos and narrative were excellent. They were long enough to convey the material properly and short enough not to loose my attention. Assignments were very good as they left you just enough room to fail, learn and ultimately succeed. The quizzes were thought provoking. On the questions that stated "choose all that apply," I would suggest that some form of feedback be provided so that the test taker could know which ones were incorrectly selected/not selected. Perhaps partial credit would be good instead of 0/20 with one wrong selection. Feedback, perhaps an explanation, would be appropriate on all questions incorrectly answered. I would also suggest a pdf document that showed how to do the various matrix operations in octave with an example or two. This would include basic and advanced operations. I know linear algebra, I just didn't know the syntax in octave and this cost me 3-5 hours over the whole course. Now off to do some simple applications here at work like spam filter and anomaly detection to start. Thanks for an excellent course. | 1) loose my attention. Assignments were very | Good | 1) as they left you just enough | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was very nicely done. Dr Ng's videos and narrative were excellent. They were long enough to convey the material properly and short enough not to loose my attention. Assignments were very good as they left you just enough room to fail, learn and ultimately succeed. The quizzes were thought provoking. On the questions that stated "choose all that apply," I would suggest that some form of feedback be provided so that the test taker could know which ones were incorrectly selected/not selected. Perhaps partial credit would be good instead of 0/20 with one wrong selection. Feedback, perhaps an explanation, would be appropriate on all questions incorrectly answered. I would also suggest a pdf document that showed how to do the various matrix operations in octave with an example or two. This would include basic and advanced operations. I know linear algebra, I just didn't know the syntax in octave and this cost me 3-5 hours over the whole course. Now off to do some simple applications here at work like spam filter and anomaly detection to start. Thanks for an excellent course. | 2) selected. Perhaps partial credit would be | Good | 2) instead of 0/20 with one wrong | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introduction to Machine Learning! It was really simple to follow. For the practical exercises however, I struggled a bit with the programming language itself rather than with the actual algorithm implementation. It would be also good to have a list of recommended readings. | 1) algorithm implementation. It would be also | Good | 1) to have a list of recommended | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great introductory course to Machine Learning. Gave me great insights into the field. Good job mister Ng | 1) me great insights into the field. | Good | 1) job mister Ng | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was a really great course. the lectures given by prof. andraw ng were good and very clear. he explained everything in the best way possible. the quizes weren't very difficult but the programing excercizes were good and taught me a lot. I'm about to finish my Msc in physics after getting Bsc in electrical engineering nd physics and I think that this is one of the courses in which I've learned the most. thank you. | 1) given by prof. andraw ng were | Good | 1) and very clear. he explained everything | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It was a really great course. the lectures given by prof. andraw ng were good and very clear. he explained everything in the best way possible. the quizes weren't very difficult but the programing excercizes were good and taught me a lot. I'm about to finish my Msc in physics after getting Bsc in electrical engineering nd physics and I think that this is one of the courses in which I've learned the most. thank you. | 2) difficult but the programing excercizes were | Good | 2) and taught me a lot. I'm | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course for a beginner in Machine Learning. Nice explanation of concepts with good examples followed by programming assignments. I like the way of using an intuition to understand a new learning theory. Questions in quizzes will help check/improve basic concept of the learning algorithms with real world problems. | 1) Learning. Nice explanation of concepts with | Good | 1) examples followed by programming assignments. I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent teaching skills, course material, hands-on assignments. I wish all my faculty courses were like this. Good job and thank you for this opportunity! | 1) my faculty courses were like this. | Good | 1) job and thank you for this | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | 1) a. very | Good | 1) coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | 2) coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. | Good | 2) suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | a. very good coverage of standard algorithmic approaches. b. good suggestive guidelines on specifics of algorithms like issues / details one need to be careful, need not to bother etc.. c. broad coverage of examples.. d. tricky questions...good to experience... Overall I liked this course content and the breadth of coverage. Based on the difficulty i experienced let me place some points of improvements that would help every student.... e. could have dealt some specific examples in full (from definition to implementation) as part of video lecture which would helped better understanding of the problems, algorithms, impact of specifics, implementation issues, analysis methods, inferences that could be derived, final expected solution. f. expecting feedback on exercises.... not only correct or incorrect but reasoning for the responses could be of great help in better understanding.... g. downloadable videos could contain in video quiz... h. Octave content could be increased..... i. audio of the lectures needs fine tuning, hissing sounds could be filtered. For some of the lectures subtitles does not match at all... Thank you very much for coursera.... Thank you very much Prof. Andrew Ng..... Looking forward for mor courses related to ML by you.... | 3) . d. tricky questions. . . | Good | 3) to experience. . . Overall I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very good and Prof NG's explanation is also perfect. There could have been some ungraded examples to practice different type of scenarios, to help us understand more. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) and Prof NG's explanation is also | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good courses for machine learning! I've got a lot . | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses for machine learning! I've got | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to machine learning - highly recommended! Professor Ng is awesome; also, many thanks to the course mentor Tom Mosher. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning - highly | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course to setup your foundation on Machine Learning | 1) | Good | 1) course to setup your foundation on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course. Great mix of practical examples and theory. Good pace in the videos, great organization and clear explanations. The assignments are very well put together: difficult but with different checks built in along to way to help catch programming bugs. | 1) mix of practical examples and theory. | Good | 1) pace in the videos, great organization | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very useful but less mathematic knowledge is taught, basicly a good applied technic. | 1) mathematic knowledge is taught, basicly a | Good | 1) applied technic. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introductory course to Machine learning, though later parts of the course seemed to be rushed-through a little. Practical exercises were really great. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to Machine learning, though | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great class! I learned a lot, and Andrew Ng does a really good job of explaining not only how to do things, but why and how to evaluate what's happening and improve the results. | 1) and Andrew Ng does a really | Good | 1) job of explaining not only how | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is well defined. Exercises are good to learn about what we saw in the videos. Thanks teacher!! | 1) Course is well defined. Exercises are | Good | 1) to learn about what we saw | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good.. But not latest. | 1) | Good | 1) . But not latest. | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I am week 9 of current course but I already feel so good about the subject. The content covered by Professor and the ease with which he has gone over such complex subjects is beyond commendable. I thoroughly enjoyed the course. I just want Professor Ng to consider another advanced course which covers topics which he hasn't covered in this one, in detail, due to time and audience constraints. Also, there should be an option to get the certificate at the end of the course too, like, in my case, I wasn't sure if I will be able to follow deadlines due to work schedule but now at almost end of it, I feel like I should have opted for it. All in all, thank you so much! | 1) course but I already feel so | Good | 1) about the subject. The content covered | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The topics covered are really good. It could have been better if a few of the topics are covered in depth. | 1) The topics covered are really | Good | 1) It could have been better if | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Basic and good so far for the zero knowledge learners . | 1) Very Basic and | Good | 1) so far for the zero knowledge | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course! The topics covered give a very good overview on the theory and some applications of machine learning. It was great fun to complete this course. Thanks, BS | 1) The topics covered give a very | Good | 1) overview on the theory and some | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is my favourite course. Andrew Ng is a good lecture. Thank you very much. | 1) favourite course. Andrew Ng is a | Good | 1) lecture. Thank you very much. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great material, keep the good work. | 1) Great material, keep the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good material but sound quality of videos is bad, could use his own machine learning techniques to improve the sound, also no literature which is bad. | 1) | Good | 1) material but sound quality of videos | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course, clear lectures, good assignments. Wish it was more in depth. | 1) | Good | 1) course, clear lectures, good assignments. Wish | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course, clear lectures, good assignments. Wish it was more in depth. | 2) Good course, clear lectures, | Good | 2) assignments. Wish it was more in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a good course helping to gain the fundamental knowledge needed to get started with ML..:) | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course helping to gain the fundamental | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a pretty good course. Instructor Dr. Ng is good at machine learning and also good at teaching. | 1) It's a pretty | Good | 1) course. Instructor Dr. Ng is good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a pretty good course. Instructor Dr. Ng is good at machine learning and also good at teaching. | 2) good course. Instructor Dr. Ng is | Good | 2) at machine learning and also good | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's a pretty good course. Instructor Dr. Ng is good at machine learning and also good at teaching. | 3) good at machine learning and also | Good | 3) at teaching. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is well organized and with good tutors | 1) course is well organized and with | Good | 1) tutors | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good video and learning material,thanks for Ng. | 1) | Good | 1) video and learning material, thanks for | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Video lessons are excellent. Homework is well-written and does a good job of illustrating the lessons. | 1) Homework is well-written and does a | Good | 1) job of illustrating the lessons. | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good and easy understand | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easy understand | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very nice course! Andrew explains everything clearly and in enough details for anyone to understand. The content is very informative and gives a good coverage of ML algorithms and their applications as well as many practical pieces of advice of how to tune them or where to look for if something does not work. The coding tasks are also extremely useful as they help you try out in practice what you've just learned and help memorize the material better. Thank you Andrew! | 1) is very informative and gives a | Good | 1) coverage of ML algorithms and their | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good intro to ML - good balance between theory and real world application; negative: fast moving field, it's getting a bit dated | 1) | Good | 1) intro to ML - good balance | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good intro to ML - good balance between theory and real world application; negative: fast moving field, it's getting a bit dated | 2) good intro to ML - | Good | 2) balance between theory and real world | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Interesting and Mr. Andrew explanation is too good. | 1) and Mr. Andrew explanation is too | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good!!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! ! | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Of course, it is a very good course, but I hope it could dig more in machine learning presonaly. | 1) Of course, it is a very | Good | 1) course, but I hope it could | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Quite informative and the Tutor is good | 1) Quite informative and the Tutor is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course and pretty good job done by Andrew Ng who not only mentions different techniques used in machine learning but also explains the intuition behind them in layman terms. | 1) Excellent course and pretty | Good | 1) job done by Andrew Ng who | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good for getting start in Machine Learn even without programming background | 1) very | Good | 1) for getting start in Machine Learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good. It make sense for my learning linear algebra and Calculus. | 1) Very | Good | 1) It make sense for my learning | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good !!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Simple and comprehensive. A good introductory course to data science | 1) Simple and comprehensive. A | Good | 1) introductory course to data science | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good course helps you learn about Machine Learning and Prof. Ng is a great teacher. | 1) A | Good | 1) course helps you learn about Machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good introduction to machine learning concept and the algorithms. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning concept and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Dr Andrew Ang is doing a great job of explaining a very complex problems in a very simple and understandable way. It's not an easy course, especially the exercises. The force you to take that theory you've just learn and apply it to real practical exercises, that's never an easy task :-). That's why this course is so good. | 1) That's why this course is so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Assignments are too easy. I am not able to practice optimization methods implementation (Like - fmincg etc). Video lectures are good but at some places lack the explanation (Like how do we get the cost function of neuralnets). Still very helpful. | 1) - fmincg etc). Video lectures are | Good | 1) but at some places lack the | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a really good lecture. I will take this course again later to get the certificate. Thanks. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) lecture. I will take this course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good choice for you to walk into ML | 1) Very | Good | 1) choice for you to walk into | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It's pretty good for a beginner. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) for a beginner. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a really good course, I like it!. | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course, I like it! . | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Although I have not finished it yet I certanly believe it to be an outstanding course. It gives a good insight into the many aspects comprised by 'Machine Learning'. Obviously is not, and neither intended to be, as comprehensive as it's presential counterpart CS229. In my opinion it offers a good balance of math/theory and some hands on experience in the form of programming assignments. | 1) an outstanding course. It gives a | Good | 1) insight into the many aspects comprised | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Although I have not finished it yet I certanly believe it to be an outstanding course. It gives a good insight into the many aspects comprised by 'Machine Learning'. Obviously is not, and neither intended to be, as comprehensive as it's presential counterpart CS229. In my opinion it offers a good balance of math/theory and some hands on experience in the form of programming assignments. | 2) In my opinion it offers a | Good | 2) balance of math/theory and some hands | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good the topics and bring to develop new ideas | 1) very | Good | 1) the topics and bring to develop | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | First session containing the Regression and Gradient descent with 1 variable was a very good session explain the basics very well. Thanks for Andrew for a wonderful session | 1) with 1 variable was a very | Good | 1) session explain the basics very well. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good overview of ML for beginners. Each technique is very detailed and presented from intuition to pratice | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of ML for beginners. Each | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good materials and interactive approach! | 1) Very | Good | 1) materials and interactive approach! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is a great teacher, the programming task are also awesome and the support from the people working on the topics is pretty good. | 1) working on the topics is pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Lots of great information, a good introduction to machine learning algorithms. I feel confident I can apply what I've learned to real problems and systems. Main complaint is I wish there were more programming exercises on applying ML algorithms to real problems and less on implementing the algorithms that in reality I'm probably going to just use from a library like scikit-learn. | 1) Lots of great information, a | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning algorithms. I | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Some bugs but this course is very good | 1) bugs but this course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The approach used by Stanford is really focussed on theory with a good dose of practise. The practise is due to the use of Octave as programming environment direct and not as troublesome as it would have been when using another programming language like Python or Java. Having a background in linear algebra certainly helps. | 1) really focussed on theory with a | Good | 1) dose of practise. The practise is | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course to learn machine learning, and this is the second time to learn this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn machine learning, and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good class for Machine Learning！ Andrew NG makes all the complex algorithm very easy to understand! Highly recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) class for Machine Learning！ Andrew NG | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Fantastic course. Gives you a great kick start to the theme. Programming exercises guide you through basics of ML and give good practice experience. | 1) through basics of ML and give | Good | 1) practice experience. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | In this class, professor Andrew Ng introduced some common and powerful machine learning algorithm, including the basic mathematical theories and the typical applications of them. As a fresher, this is a good way to understand these algorithm. I really hope that more and more people can be one of students in this class. At last, I want to say thank you to everyone of Coursera! | 1) As a fresher, this is a | Good | 1) way to understand these algorithm. I | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good introduction. I liked most the fact that the videos are short, and the exercises are very well designed. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. I liked most the fact | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good lecture videos and very good exercises. | 1) | Good | 1) lecture videos and very good exercises. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good lecture videos and very good exercises. | 2) Good lecture videos and very | Good | 2) exercises. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, very well explained with a lot of examples and intuitions. The practical exercises are very well structured to make you think of what you were taught in the class. The teacher explains every part very well with a lot of examples and real case scenarios. If you want to start learning artificial intelligence this is the place to be. There are many algorithms you are taught and many good practices that should be applied to this algorithms to make them effective and performant. Something nice to have, would be the written courses or some paperback with the main ideas, but the videos are downloadable which fills this gap pretty good. Overall this is a nice course and you definitely should attend it if you're new to machine learning or want to better consolidate your knowledge. | 1) algorithms you are taught and many | Good | 1) practices that should be applied to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course, very well explained with a lot of examples and intuitions. The practical exercises are very well structured to make you think of what you were taught in the class. The teacher explains every part very well with a lot of examples and real case scenarios. If you want to start learning artificial intelligence this is the place to be. There are many algorithms you are taught and many good practices that should be applied to this algorithms to make them effective and performant. Something nice to have, would be the written courses or some paperback with the main ideas, but the videos are downloadable which fills this gap pretty good. Overall this is a nice course and you definitely should attend it if you're new to machine learning or want to better consolidate your knowledge. | 2) downloadable which fills this gap pretty | Good | 2) Overall this is a nice course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course! Just wish there was a state of accomplishment. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! Just wish there was a | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course has provided the insights into what is machine learning and how machine learning algorithms works. It would be good if it can provide real world problems and how to approach to solve them. | 1) learning algorithms works. It would be | Good | 1) if it can provide real world | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | exceptionally good and to the point... | 1) exceptionally | Good | 1) and to the point. . . | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course ! Good choice of topics, great explanations, I liked that there are many practical tips. I would have liked: less guided programming exercises (the solution was almost given in the comments in the file to write) and larger (the student has to write only small bits of the overall project). I would also have liked recommended links or reading whenever a proof or an explanation of a mathematical result was skipped. I think the choice of what was skipped as too detailed for an intro was good, but would have been nice to have pointers for students who wanted to explore more. | 1) Excellent course ! | Good | 1) choice of topics, great explanations, I | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course ! Good choice of topics, great explanations, I liked that there are many practical tips. I would have liked: less guided programming exercises (the solution was almost given in the comments in the file to write) and larger (the student has to write only small bits of the overall project). I would also have liked recommended links or reading whenever a proof or an explanation of a mathematical result was skipped. I think the choice of what was skipped as too detailed for an intro was good, but would have been nice to have pointers for students who wanted to explore more. | 2) too detailed for an intro was | Good | 2) but would have been nice to | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course, good lecturer, and also practical and lets you try for yourself and test your gained knowledge. Too bad there is no way to prove that all the assignments were completed successfully and so that I passed the course. | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) lecturer, and also practical and lets | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course. Introduces the basics well with a good emphasis on the underlying math. Bayesian techniques are missing. Also another suggestion : assignment submission in other languages , especially R - the industry language for prototyping ML algorithms. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Introduces the basics well with | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course. Introduces the basics well with a good emphasis on the underlying math. Bayesian techniques are missing. Also another suggestion : assignment submission in other languages , especially R - the industry language for prototyping ML algorithms. | 2) Introduces the basics well with a | Good | 2) emphasis on the underlying math. Bayesian | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Subject matter was broken down into bite-size lessons for easier consumption. Really good job taking a complex subject and making it easy to understand. I really learned a lot in this course. Highly recommended! | 1) bite-size lessons for easier consumption. Really | Good | 1) job taking a complex subject and | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | VERY GOOD COURSE | 1) VERY | Good | 1) COURSE | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very very good! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! easy to understand, good examples and assignments | 1) Great course! easy to understand, | Good | 1) examples and assignments | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course with a clear explanation of the key concepts. Thanks for giving us the chance to learn with you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with a clear explanation of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Excellent course Good blend of theory and practice. For those who want more theory/math, CS 229 or the Caltech course might be suitable followups | 1) Excellent course | Good | 1) blend of theory and practice. For | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Rly good for math understanding of ML! | 1) Rly | Good | 1) for math understanding of ML! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good introduction to Machine Learning with the right balance between Theory (Maths) & Practice What could have been even more awesome: Use R for assignments, An Overview of the other main ML Algorithms (decision trees, rules...) and a Summary of conditions where to use or not each category of algorithm Big thanks Andrew!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning with the | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Best way to start learning Machine Learning, clear concepts, good programming assignments. | 1) start learning Machine Learning, clear concepts, | Good | 1) programming assignments. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good for a beginner | 1) very | Good | 1) for a beginner | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course for beginners in machine learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners in machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good class | 1) Very | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is a good course for new learner in ML | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for new learner in ML | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is very good! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Beautifully taught with good examples. One of the best courses for beginners | 1) Beautifully taught with | Good | 1) examples. One of the best courses | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting topic and good way of teaching | 1) Very interesting topic and | Good | 1) way of teaching | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good way to practice R code in real case | 1) | Good | 1) way to practice R code in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Well worth the time, not only is the lecturer very good at communicating the concepts, but he also has real-world experience, and it shows. | 1) not only is the lecturer very | Good | 1) at communicating the concepts, but he | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | VERY GOOD! | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course, and thank you very much. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, and thank you very much. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good course :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good teacher! | 1) A | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very well designed with a clear focus. Wish more algorithms were included but good as it is. The projects were helpful and fun. The lectures were still my favorite part. | 1) Wish more algorithms were included but | Good | 1) as it is. The projects were | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course gives a good and thorough introduction to machine learning. | 1) The course gives a | Good | 1) and thorough introduction to machine learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | It is long ago (25+ years) that I dealt with ANNs by that time. This course is terms of content and didactial concept very well built. I can only recommend it. In particular, as it is not only taking care of the theoretical background but also has a lot of good stuff for me as a practitioner. Thanks | 1) but also has a lot of | Good | 1) stuff for me as a practitioner. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good intro to concepts in ML. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to concepts in ML. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very Good Course, Congratulations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course, Congratulations. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Would be nice to have lessons handsout if we do not want to watch the videos, the exercices are very well done so far. Very good course | 1) very well done so far. Very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A very good course for machine learning! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for machine learning! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good interaction and excellent practice framework code, reducing the difficulty threshold for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) interaction and excellent practice framework code, | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was by far the best class I have had so far on Coursera. I feel that I now have a really good understanding of linear and logistic regression and neural networks as well as the other learning methods that we touched upon. I thought that the quizzes and assignments were very appropriate and helped me to further cement my understanding that I gained through watching the video. Professor Ang explains the material very clearly. I always walked away feeling that any questions I might have were answered completely in the videos or in the discussions. I would highly recommend this class to anyone who wants to have a good understanding of Machine Learning. | 1) that I now have a really | Good | 1) understanding of linear and logistic regression | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This was by far the best class I have had so far on Coursera. I feel that I now have a really good understanding of linear and logistic regression and neural networks as well as the other learning methods that we touched upon. I thought that the quizzes and assignments were very appropriate and helped me to further cement my understanding that I gained through watching the video. Professor Ang explains the material very clearly. I always walked away feeling that any questions I might have were answered completely in the videos or in the discussions. I would highly recommend this class to anyone who wants to have a good understanding of Machine Learning. | 2) anyone who wants to have a | Good | 2) understanding of Machine Learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good Thank you sir | 1) very | Good | 1) Thank you sir | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good pace. Sophisticated concepts put in simple words. One of the best courses on Coursera I had a chance to do. | 1) Very | Good | 1) pace. Sophisticated concepts put in simple | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought this was a great course. I knew a bit about ML before taking it, but this course helped fill in a lot of gaps in my knowledge. The pacing was good and course material was taught in a logical order. There are good examples of ML applications and motivational problems. So there is a nice balance between theory and practical application. | 1) in my knowledge. The pacing was | Good | 1) and course material was taught in | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I thought this was a great course. I knew a bit about ML before taking it, but this course helped fill in a lot of gaps in my knowledge. The pacing was good and course material was taught in a logical order. There are good examples of ML applications and motivational problems. So there is a nice balance between theory and practical application. | 2) in a logical order. There are | Good | 2) examples of ML applications and motivational | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course content is really good. Assignments are in depth and help you build your concepts. | 1) Course content is really | Good | 1) Assignments are in depth and help | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I was a beginner of machine learning. Because of Ng's clear explanations and good MATLAB assignment, now I know many important algorithms and technics . It was a great course. | 1) Because of Ng's clear explanations and | Good | 1) MATLAB assignment, now I know many | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thank you to Andrew Ng for a great ML introductory course for a person with programming background. It gives a very good start for anyone who is clue-less about what "machine learning", "data scientist", "neural networks" etc. really mean. Assignments are designed just right - so that a newbie is not overwhelmed, gets confidence as s/he progresses. As I mentioned I consider it introductory course, because it gives lot of information which you tend to forget as you move through this course. So you need to practice a lot with real life example before you can become an expert. Now the challenge is finding a problem that has not been tackled using ML and trying to tackle it with what I have learned. | 1) programming background. It gives a very | Good | 1) start for anyone who is clue-less | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Thanks for such a good learning experience. | 1) Thanks for such a | Good | 1) learning experience. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Material is structured very well and it gives understanding why algorithms of machine learning look like they look. Andrew Ng is good teacher, who explains complex things very clear and easy to understand. The course is good starting point for further studying of machine learning. | 1) like they look. Andrew Ng is | Good | 1) teacher, who explains complex things very | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Material is structured very well and it gives understanding why algorithms of machine learning look like they look. Andrew Ng is good teacher, who explains complex things very clear and easy to understand. The course is good starting point for further studying of machine learning. | 2) easy to understand. The course is | Good | 2) starting point for further studying of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very interesting topic and good materials, a real pleasure following this course. | 1) Very interesting topic and | Good | 1) materials, a real pleasure following this | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very practical. very insightful. Someone may think it's too easy for ML class. But I would like to see good teacher can make a complex thing look simple. DR. NG is such good teacher. High recommendation. | 1) But I would like to see | Good | 1) teacher can make a complex thing | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very practical. very insightful. Someone may think it's too easy for ML class. But I would like to see good teacher can make a complex thing look simple. DR. NG is such good teacher. High recommendation. | 2) look simple. DR. NG is such | Good | 2) teacher. High recommendation. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course and the teaching is very clear. The exercises and experiences are good for practice. | 1) clear. The exercises and experiences are | Good | 1) for practice. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is an excellent introduction to machine learning. Credit goes to Prof Ng for making a complex subject so simple. He made it easy for people without mathematical background to understand the concepts behind the various algorithms. The course covers the core algorithms of machine learning in adequate depth. That level of depth is required to get a good understanding of the concepts surrounding an algorithm. What I find very exciting is that after completing an assignment, one can use the code to solve any problem outside the assignment set. I found it very exciting to use the algorithms to solve external problems including those on Kaggle. I also found the documentation in assignments pdf documents and that in the code very helpful. Great job done there. My recommendation for improving this course would be to include some more algorithms which are commonly mentioned on various forums on the internet e.g. tree based algorithms, random forest etc. Or at least give an introduction to these algorithms for students to then explore them further on their own. | 1) depth is required to get a | Good | 1) understanding of the concepts surrounding an | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This is my first course on any such topic. And I think for a noob like me its a good introduction to Machine Learning. | 1) a noob like me its a | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really good course！I've just started and already learned a lot, even though I am a rookie in math and computing. Love it! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course！I've just started and already learned | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good overview course for beginners like me | 1) | Good | 1) overview course for beginners like me | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course was fantastic. A glimpse of how good quality education could be brought to the millions of people around the world who otherwise would be capable but were not lucky enough to be born in the right place and/or with enough resources to afford world class education. | 1) was fantastic. A glimpse of how | Good | 1) quality education could be brought to | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | so far so good (1-3 week) | 1) so far so | Good | 1) (1-3 week) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good course but task is little bit lightweight | 1) | Good | 1) course but task is little bit | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | detailed explanation and the quizzes are good practice to strengthen the memory. | 1) detailed explanation and the quizzes are | Good | 1) practice to strengthen the memory. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great course! Really good explanation of hard topics and interesting tasks. | 1) Great course! Really | Good | 1) explanation of hard topics and interesting | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A good introductory course for newcomer in Machine Learning. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course for newcomer in Machine | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really great course with a reasonable amount of practical tasks. Gives a good and quite deep overview of machine learning algorithms. | 1) amount of practical tasks. Gives a | Good | 1) and quite deep overview of machine | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Nicely written, good exercises. | 1) Nicely written, | Good | 1) exercises. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | So far insanely good | 1) So far insanely | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Great material. Exceptional and very descriptive videos by Prof. Ng. Can't expect more. The course structure is beautifully shaped and this certainly adds to my CV like a charm. It would have been better if we had signature track for the course though. For everything else, it's as good as it gets. | 1) though. For everything else, it's as | Good | 1) as it gets. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good, practical and easily understandable course. I've learned new numerical methods in spite of that I've finished a semester long numerical methods course at the uni. | 1) Very | Good | 1) practical and easily understandable course. I've | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course is very good. I liked it. But what I didn't liked about it that you are not providing statement of accomplishment. If it would have been there I would have liked it more. It give boost to complete the course with full hard work. I hope you will give it a thought about it in future sessions. I know that this course is always open that can be a reason for you not providing statement of accomplishment but you are already grading students so it won't be that difficult to give statement of accomplishments | 1) Course is very | Good | 1) I liked it. But what I | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The course is very exhaustive and educative. Good job by Andrew! | 1) course is very exhaustive and educative. | Good | 1) job by Andrew! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very dedicating very good explained | 1) very dedicating very | Good | 1) explained | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This class is excellent on its own, but I'm taking it after having taken the 9-course sequence on Data Science from Johns Hopkins, which gave me a good foundation upon which to better understand this deeper dive into Machine Learning than what is presented in the 4-week course from JH on the same topic. Andrew Ng is presenting the material beautifully and understandably. The quizzes and the exercises complement the class lecture material quite well and both help cement the concepts presented. | 1) Johns Hopkins, which gave me a | Good | 1) foundation upon which to better understand | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I like this course. I think machine learnig wil have a good prospect. I like use it on my own research. | 1) think machine learnig wil have a | Good | 1) prospect. I like use it on | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good, | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Andrew is really good teacher | 1) Andrew is really | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Really cool course, Andrew Ng is a great teacher with an outstanding knowledge. I particularly loved when he said things like "I used string kernels just twice in my life, this other kernel maybe 5 or 6 times" because he was giving us a clear, practical measure of how/how much we were going to use it. I think that's what makes a teacher (and subsequently the course) great, mixing a really good theorical knowledge with years of in-the-field experience. I hope i'll be able to talk to him sometimes because he's a very bright person. Also congrats to the mentors working hard to mantain the course. | 1) the course) great, mixing a really | Good | 1) theorical knowledge with years of in-the-field | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is really good. I got the opportunity to learn the concepts theoritically and also apply them to real time problems. So I now have an in-depth understanding of all concepts. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) I got the opportunity to learn | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Easy to be Understood,very basic,good for beginners! | 1) Easy to be Understood, very basic, | Good | 1) for beginners! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is a good starting point for those whose are very new in Machine Learning field. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) starting point for those whose are | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | it's a very good course. give me so much about machine learning. Thanks , Andrew. | 1) it's a very | Good | 1) course. give me so much about | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Course very useful the people trying to learn ML. Basics were explained very clearly. I'm sure Professor Andrew Ng is very good at what he is teaching. | 1) sure Professor Andrew Ng is very | Good | 1) at what he is teaching. | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I'm currently finishing up week 8 of 11. Ng is a great lecturer, and the course is really well developed and interesting. The first week feels a bit slow, but stick with it and you'll get into some neat math and good algorithmic thinking. The ability to visualize vector and matrix operations will help out a lot, but now is as good a time to learn as ever! | 1) get into some neat math and | Good | 1) algorithmic thinking. The ability to visualize | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | I'm currently finishing up week 8 of 11. Ng is a great lecturer, and the course is really well developed and interesting. The first week feels a bit slow, but stick with it and you'll get into some neat math and good algorithmic thinking. The ability to visualize vector and matrix operations will help out a lot, but now is as good a time to learn as ever! | 2) a lot, but now is as | Good | 2) a time to learn as ever! | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A fantastic hands-on introduction to machine learning. A very good balance of theory and math with the hands-on aspect. The math, when it goes into calculus, is there for the interested student but is optional. This course is only introductory and should not be expected to provide anything approaching mastery in machine learning. Such mastery presupposes much deeper math skills than those covered here, along with much greater mastery of whatever language/tool is being used, and deeper knowledge and understanding of many other topics that are either merely touched upon here or skipped entirely. But you have to start somewhere, and this is a very good place to start. A few of the later modules have some very distressing errors in the material that can cause enormous confusion. Otherwise the material is very solid and well-vetted. The instructor is engaging and lively and his enthusiasm is infectious. | 1) introduction to machine learning. A very | Good | 1) balance of theory and math with | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | A fantastic hands-on introduction to machine learning. A very good balance of theory and math with the hands-on aspect. The math, when it goes into calculus, is there for the interested student but is optional. This course is only introductory and should not be expected to provide anything approaching mastery in machine learning. Such mastery presupposes much deeper math skills than those covered here, along with much greater mastery of whatever language/tool is being used, and deeper knowledge and understanding of many other topics that are either merely touched upon here or skipped entirely. But you have to start somewhere, and this is a very good place to start. A few of the later modules have some very distressing errors in the material that can cause enormous confusion. Otherwise the material is very solid and well-vetted. The instructor is engaging and lively and his enthusiasm is infectious. | 2) somewhere, and this is a very | Good | 2) place to start. A few of | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The Good: This course is a good introduction to fundamental topics and basic techniques in machine learning. I feel that the biggest strength of this course comes from Prof. Ng's suggestions for how to design and improve machine learning systems in practice. The Bad: This course is a few years old, and there are a lot of errors in the videos and even occasionally in the programming exercises as well. In my opinion, there is a little too much hand-holding in the programming exercises, so that while I was able to implement the important bits and pieces of the algorithms, I didn't get much chance to practice the more difficult task of organizing the entire system. The Ambiguous: This course is *very* light on the math, perhaps as light as you could possibly get. I imagine this is a relief for a lot of people, but personally I felt annoyed and even a little patronized with the number of times Prof. Ng said that we "don't have to worry" about the mathematical details of different concepts and algorithms. It's fine to skip over derivations and details for the sake of a simple presentation or to emphasize practical application, but surely it is important to go back and see what all this stuff means eventually. I will certainly be looking for other courses on machine learning that give a more mathematical treatment, and I think that anyone who wants to seriously get into ML should probably do the same. On a related note, Prof. Ng takes his time in each video, speaking slowly, repeating different points, and carefully explicating formulas with examples. For some people that may be good, but I found myself frequently skipping ahead in videos because I just wanted to get to the point. | 1) The | Good | 1) This course is a good introduction | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The Good: This course is a good introduction to fundamental topics and basic techniques in machine learning. I feel that the biggest strength of this course comes from Prof. Ng's suggestions for how to design and improve machine learning systems in practice. The Bad: This course is a few years old, and there are a lot of errors in the videos and even occasionally in the programming exercises as well. In my opinion, there is a little too much hand-holding in the programming exercises, so that while I was able to implement the important bits and pieces of the algorithms, I didn't get much chance to practice the more difficult task of organizing the entire system. The Ambiguous: This course is *very* light on the math, perhaps as light as you could possibly get. I imagine this is a relief for a lot of people, but personally I felt annoyed and even a little patronized with the number of times Prof. Ng said that we "don't have to worry" about the mathematical details of different concepts and algorithms. It's fine to skip over derivations and details for the sake of a simple presentation or to emphasize practical application, but surely it is important to go back and see what all this stuff means eventually. I will certainly be looking for other courses on machine learning that give a more mathematical treatment, and I think that anyone who wants to seriously get into ML should probably do the same. On a related note, Prof. Ng takes his time in each video, speaking slowly, repeating different points, and carefully explicating formulas with examples. For some people that may be good, but I found myself frequently skipping ahead in videos because I just wanted to get to the point. | 2) The Good: This course is a | Good | 2) introduction to fundamental topics and basic | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | The Good: This course is a good introduction to fundamental topics and basic techniques in machine learning. I feel that the biggest strength of this course comes from Prof. Ng's suggestions for how to design and improve machine learning systems in practice. The Bad: This course is a few years old, and there are a lot of errors in the videos and even occasionally in the programming exercises as well. In my opinion, there is a little too much hand-holding in the programming exercises, so that while I was able to implement the important bits and pieces of the algorithms, I didn't get much chance to practice the more difficult task of organizing the entire system. The Ambiguous: This course is *very* light on the math, perhaps as light as you could possibly get. I imagine this is a relief for a lot of people, but personally I felt annoyed and even a little patronized with the number of times Prof. Ng said that we "don't have to worry" about the mathematical details of different concepts and algorithms. It's fine to skip over derivations and details for the sake of a simple presentation or to emphasize practical application, but surely it is important to go back and see what all this stuff means eventually. I will certainly be looking for other courses on machine learning that give a more mathematical treatment, and I think that anyone who wants to seriously get into ML should probably do the same. On a related note, Prof. Ng takes his time in each video, speaking slowly, repeating different points, and carefully explicating formulas with examples. For some people that may be good, but I found myself frequently skipping ahead in videos because I just wanted to get to the point. | 3) For some people that may be | Good | 3) but I found myself frequently skipping | 4.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good and simple explanation of difficult topics | 1) | Good | 1) and simple explanation of difficult topics | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Good basic course which all electrical,electronics and comps people can learn easily. | 1) | Good | 1) basic course which all electrical, electronics | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Very good explanation about every topics, almost every one could followed. Thanks a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanation about every topics, almost every | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | This course is the best for those who want to learn and understand machine learning at a good pace. I attended this course for two months this year, was glad to do it till Neural Networks. | 1) and understand machine learning at a | Good | 1) pace. I attended this course for | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good insight to machine learning algorithms, easy formulations and good visualizations, lots of topics and exercises that help to understand the theory | 1) | Good | 1) insight to machine learning algorithms, easy | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | good insight to machine learning algorithms, easy formulations and good visualizations, lots of topics and exercises that help to understand the theory | 2) machine learning algorithms, easy formulations and | Good | 2) visualizations, lots of topics and exercises | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its amazing course, very detailed and good explanation of each algorithm. Mr Andrew NG has good teaching skills, I am glad that I came across this course. Thanks Cousera. :) | 1) Its amazing course, very detailed and | Good | 1) explanation of each algorithm. Mr Andrew | 5.0 |
| Gtv4Xb1-EeS-ViIACwYKVQ | Its amazing course, very detailed and good explanation of each algorithm. Mr Andrew NG has good teaching skills, I am glad that I came across this course. Thanks Cousera. :) | 2) each algorithm. Mr Andrew NG has | Good | 2) teaching skills, I am glad that | 5.0 |
| GukyRC_jEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | a very good intro but i feel it may do with more detail | 1) a very | Good | 1) intro but i feel it may | 4.0 |
| GukyRC_jEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | very good course, what interesting to me is the elaboration on the real world applications during this course. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, what interesting to me is | 4.0 |
| GukyRC_jEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Its a good course for starters. I was looking for more hands on FHIR when i took this course. I would be delighted to join a hands on FHIR course | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course for starters. I was looking | 3.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. But I have a strong feeling that would be nice to have more focus on the practice. Some lecture not really much with the results of assignments. Good course anyway. Pavel | 1) | Good | 1) course. But I have a strong | 3.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. But I have a strong feeling that would be nice to have more focus on the practice. Some lecture not really much with the results of assignments. Good course anyway. Pavel | 2) much with the results of assignments. | Good | 2) course anyway. Pavel | 3.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The course if good, but i believe the content should be more didactic. | 1) The course if | Good | 1) but i believe the content should | 3.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Very good introduction to the topic. Examples and programming exercises were very good, although last assignment was visibly less polished than earlier ones. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the topic. Examples and | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Very good introduction to the topic. Examples and programming exercises were very good, although last assignment was visibly less polished than earlier ones. | 2) Examples and programming exercises were very | Good | 2) although last assignment was visibly less | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good explanations, relevant assignments. But too small, too little graded assignments as for subject. Be better if the assignments has less starter code. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations, relevant assignments. But too small, | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | good in general, theory part on complexity is too tedious | 1) | Good | 1) in general, theory part on complexity | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Somewhat difficult course, but good to first learn parallel programming. | 1) Somewhat difficult course, but | Good | 1) to first learn parallel programming. | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | I learned very useful programming techniques, but I'm a bit lost as to whether these techniques are "good practices" or if they are "existing parallel programming features in Java, transposed as-is in Scala" | 1) to whether these techniques are " | Good | 1) practices" or if they are " | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. The only thing I would suggest to improve is in the Assignments, the error messages are not always sufficient information to recreate the bug that caused the error, so it is hard to correct the bug (since if you don't recreate the bug, you don't find the root cause). On the other hand it's understandable, that giving away too much info from the grader makes it easier to "workaround" the failed test without necessarily providing a good solution. Tricky trade-off. Anyway, both the lecturers do a very good job of explaining fairly complex stuff in ways that non-computer-science students can understand. | 1) | Good | 1) course. The only thing I would | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. The only thing I would suggest to improve is in the Assignments, the error messages are not always sufficient information to recreate the bug that caused the error, so it is hard to correct the bug (since if you don't recreate the bug, you don't find the root cause). On the other hand it's understandable, that giving away too much info from the grader makes it easier to "workaround" the failed test without necessarily providing a good solution. Tricky trade-off. Anyway, both the lecturers do a very good job of explaining fairly complex stuff in ways that non-computer-science students can understand. | 2) failed test without necessarily providing a | Good | 2) solution. Tricky trade-off. Anyway, both the | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. The only thing I would suggest to improve is in the Assignments, the error messages are not always sufficient information to recreate the bug that caused the error, so it is hard to correct the bug (since if you don't recreate the bug, you don't find the root cause). On the other hand it's understandable, that giving away too much info from the grader makes it easier to "workaround" the failed test without necessarily providing a good solution. Tricky trade-off. Anyway, both the lecturers do a very good job of explaining fairly complex stuff in ways that non-computer-science students can understand. | 3) both the lecturers do a very | Good | 3) job of explaining fairly complex stuff | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | A worthwhile course. I enjoyed the lectures a lot. Really good grounding on principles which can be applied in other languages/platforms in addition to Scala. | 1) enjoyed the lectures a lot. Really | Good | 1) grounding on principles which can be | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Really good course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The course was really good. Got to learn so much about parallel programming with that course. The explanation level is very basic and any Computer Science related person can easily grasp the concepts | 1) The course was really | Good | 1) Got to learn so much about | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | The course presents two core approaches to parallel programming - task and data parallelism. While these concepts are really useful, I expected more details on, for example, how to implement the _parallel_ construct used throughout the lectures. The materials were good and I can use some of the ideas straight after the lectures in my everyday coding, but the assignments were really slightly related to the topic. Barnes Hut simulation assignment. I'd say it has nothing in common with parallel programming in Scala. It looks like the authors looked for some real-life example or use case for Combiners and this simulation model looked nice. But, really, does any developer not working in university would ever use it? It's completely impractical, the most of the time I spent reading the description of simulation model, but the coding itself was just playing with 2D coordinates and some basic recursion. I'd expect something more practical, e.g. implementing simplified form of Hadoop map-reduce or something like that so I can use it after the course. But Barnes-Hut is too specific and is pretty far from everyday problems developers encounter. | 1) throughout the lectures. The materials were | Good | 1) and I can use some of | 2.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | A very good hands-on course. It's the best parallel programming on line course so far I see. | 1) A very | Good | 1) hands-on course. It's the best parallel | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | A very good course, the theories are explained well in the lectures and the assignments cover the learned information without being too difficult | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, the theories are explained well | 5.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good course. The assignments should focus on the parallel programming itself instead of language stuff. | 1) | Good | 1) course. The assignments should focus on | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Very good. Only things I wish were better is more comments in some assignments and more prepared tests. Also I miss not having "Statement of Accomplishment" like some other Scala courses :-(. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Only things I wish were better | 4.0 |
| GVy8tIIKEeWXmQ4F86nmrw | Good learning materials, however the assignments are designed for compute science students rather than professional software developers as the most important part of the assignments is not parallel code, but it is algorithms. Yes, there is parallel code in the code of the assignments, but it is mostly written and your task is to implement the algorithm using this existing parallel code, while in my opinion it should be the other way around - you should implement parallel code and algorithms code should be already provided for you. | 1) | Good | 1) learning materials, however the assignments are | 3.0 |
| gWFmbrP9EeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | Very well illustrated and organized course. Points made very clearly. Good learning experience. | 1) organized course. Points made very clearly. | Good | 1) learning experience. | 4.0 |
| gWFmbrP9EeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | So good course with an excellent Staff,so thanks for all and specially for University of Melbourne to give me that chance. | 1) So | Good | 1) course with an excellent Staff, so | 5.0 |
| gWFmbrP9EeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | Very good information with a fantastic understanding of the variety of artists. However, I almost dreaded logging in to watch the lectures; they were often boring me to tears. Were this information presented in a more engaging way, this review would be much higher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information with a fantastic understanding of | 3.0 |
| GY2Yx6DxEeSt6SIACzgCKw | I loved this course, which is giving me a good background for my work field. | 1) course, which is giving me a | Good | 1) background for my work field. | 4.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Very well taught and gives a good theoretical background, while still focusing on the practical side enough! | 1) Very well taught and gives a | Good | 1) theoretical background, while still focusing on | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Very nice review of basics algorithms and data analysis problem. Very good introduction to python programming in biology. | 1) algorithms and data analysis problem. Very | Good | 1) introduction to python programming in biology. | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | This is a good (albeit short) introduction to algorithms for DNA sequencing. The instructor does a good job of explaining some select algorithms as well as the pitfalls they may have. The programming assignments are short but fairly challenging for inexperienced programmers. If you like this course, you will enjoy the 6-part Bioinformatics specialization from UCSD on Coursera where they go into these algorithms in much more detail. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) (albeit short) introduction to algorithms for | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | This is a good (albeit short) introduction to algorithms for DNA sequencing. The instructor does a good job of explaining some select algorithms as well as the pitfalls they may have. The programming assignments are short but fairly challenging for inexperienced programmers. If you like this course, you will enjoy the 6-part Bioinformatics specialization from UCSD on Coursera where they go into these algorithms in much more detail. | 2) DNA sequencing. The instructor does a | Good | 2) job of explaining some select algorithms | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | I had a lot of fun doing the little programming assignments in this course. I did not know I like algorithms this much. The pace is good and it is well taught. | 1) algorithms this much. The pace is | Good | 1) and it is well taught. | 5.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | This course gives a good introduction to some basic algorithms. The standards it sets for students, however, is very low. They ask you to download an already written piece of Python code and change a line or two. To get the most out of this course, I recommend implementing all the algorithms yourself, perhaps even in a different language. "Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences" by Dan Gusfield will be very useful for that. | 1) This course gives a | Good | 1) introduction to some basic algorithms. The | 4.0 |
| Gyll8Zh9EeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | very good and very helpful | 1) very | Good | 1) and very helpful | 5.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | A good follow- up to the previous course. The material is well organised and gives a profound overview while still inciting further investigation, leaving enough room for expansion of the mind and new thoughts on... almost everything. | 1) A | Good | 1) follow- up to the previous course. | 4.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | A good starting point to ancient philosophy . | 1) A | Good | 1) starting point to ancient philosophy . | 4.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | Outstanding course for those who don't fear the important questions, such as: "What makes a good life?". Don't miss it! | 1) such as: " What makes a | Good | 1) life? " . Don't miss it! | 5.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | Good course well presented and interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) course well presented and interesting. | 5.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | Both of the Ancient Philosophy courses, Plato and His Predecessors, and Aristotle and His Successors were excellent. Susan is a very good lecturer, clear, and precise. I have completed 'Introduction to Philosophy' and the 'Philosophy of Science', both at the University of Edinburgh, and can highly recommend Susan's courses at University of Pennsylvania as the next step. | 1) were excellent. Susan is a very | Good | 1) lecturer, clear, and precise. I have | 5.0 |
| gZ6cbKKkEeW1Bw7HN8tFsw | Very good professor. She explains everything clearly and is really enthusiastic about the topic. | 1) Very | Good | 1) professor. She explains everything clearly and | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Was pretty good, but quite short and some assignments did not align as well with the lecture material as they could have. | 1) Was pretty | Good | 1) but quite short and some assignments | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Rather basic, nevertheless a good introduction to the topic of machine learning with R. Mostly concentrated on applications of the R caret package. | 1) Rather basic, nevertheless a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic of machine | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Unlike the rest of the modules in this specialisation, this one was well taught, a good blend of theory and practice and well paced. There were still a few issues with wording in quizzes (and some where there seemed to be two identical answers to one question, where one would be considered right and the other wrong - purely chance). In addition, the lack of consistency in how to submit assignments across the specialisation is frustrating, I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a way to show how to use github or something like that, but it shouldn't be the case. | 1) this one was well taught, a | Good | 1) blend of theory and practice and | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good introduction to machine learning. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning. | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I learned a lot in this class. There are slight gaps from the depth of material covered in the lectures to the quizzes and assignment. If you're good at researching online, you'll be fine. | 1) the quizzes and assignment. If you're | Good | 1) at researching online, you'll be fine. | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It's hard as hell, and very good. | 1) It's hard as hell, and very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course for learning the basics of the caret package. However, it is not a good course for learning machine learning. | 1) | Good | 1) course for learning the basics of | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course for learning the basics of the caret package. However, it is not a good course for learning machine learning. | 2) package. However, it is not a | Good | 2) course for learning machine learning. | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good content for beginner, lot of learning in machine learning special caret package in R. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content for beginner, lot of learning | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A very good course. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | In my opinion this course is highly technical and demanding in nature compared with the others. The learning experience is good and coursera.org has given a opportunity for customization ! thank you Coursera | 1) the others. The learning experience is | Good | 1) and coursera. org has given a | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good material, presented in an organized fashion. I was able to apply what I learned immediately in a work setting. | 1) | Good | 1) material, presented in an organized fashion. | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Title says everything. Practically and basically no theory explained. Good course though. | 1) Practically and basically no theory explained. | Good | 1) course though. | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good and useful! | 1) | Good | 1) and useful! | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent introduction to machine learning. I feel that I have a good basic foundation to start building upon. | 1) I feel that I have a | Good | 1) basic foundation to start building upon. | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | In my view the course was useful but not as good as the previus ones I followed in the specializacion (such as regression models and stat. inference). The subject was too broad and there was no space to cover in detail all the algorithms. Also I think it's a bit out of date because there is no references to xgbboost which is now dominating many Kaggle contests | 1) course was useful but not as | Good | 1) as the previus ones I followed | 3.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good overview of available techniques and the Caret package. Will get you started in machine learning. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of available techniques and the | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Principle and practices. Good coverage on topics to get you started! | 1) Principle and practices. | Good | 1) coverage on topics to get you | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introduction to machine learning, might suffer a bit from trying to cover too much ground in such a short time. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning, might suffer | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Some of the terms used here vary from the terms used in the industry. For example recall, precision etc. Overall this is a very good course with provides basics of machine learning. | 1) etc. Overall this is a very | Good | 1) course with provides basics of machine | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Pretty good overview of how to build some types of machine learning models through the caret library in R, but not much in terms of the theoretical underpinnings or why one method is better than the other or where it is most suitable. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) overview of how to build some | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This was a very good introduction to machine learning and how to use machine learning packages in R. It would have been better if the class had been longer than four weeks, but I learned a lot for the length of the course. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) introduction to machine learning and how | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great introduction to the subject with good classification examples using R. | 1) Great introduction to the subject with | Good | 1) classification examples using R. | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good class. I think there were some small issues with the class project. Like all real world problems it was not entirely well specified and the data was a bit odd to use for a prediction exercise because it was time series data. | 1) Really | Good | 1) class. I think there were some | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good course where you can learn how ML algorithms work practically. | 1) A | Good | 1) course where you can learn how | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is by far the most enlightening class in the whole specialization. I really got a good handle about how to build a predictive model and apply it to real datasets. | 1) whole specialization. I really got a | Good | 1) handle about how to build a | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good course. I am very knew to this topic but am sure will find a lot of application in my speciality - geophysics | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I am very knew to | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great practical whirlwind tour. Light on theory, however, but it's a good entry point to the field. Thumbs up! | 1) on theory, however, but it's a | Good | 1) entry point to the field. Thumbs | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | First and foremost I'm so thankful for the exposure to so much material in such a condensed schedule. Very good class. Even though I had to muscle my way through it. I think the class could be improved with one additional discussion thread for the project. A guide similar to the ones created for Inferential Statistics and Regression would also have been very helpful. I benefited immensely from reading parts of the book "An Introduction to Statistical Learning" while taking this course. | 1) in such a condensed schedule. Very | Good | 1) class. Even though I had to | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good overview of machine learning techniques and model evaluation. | 1) Really | Good | 1) overview of machine learning techniques and | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | 1) of these developments. So they are | Good | 1) for me, but I wonder to | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | 2) quizzes: I think these items are | Good | 2) practice and are at a reasonable | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | 3) final project: Again, this project is | Good | 3) practice and seems to be at | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thank you for inviting me to be a beta tester for Practical Machine Learning. I completed this course at the beginning of October of this year. When I was asked to be a "beta tester" I thought that I would be presented with new materials. However, the only thing that has changed is the look and layout of the Coursera web pages. The video lectures, quizzes, and assignment are the same as they have been for quite some time. Here are some specific comments: 1. The video lectures: To me, these are clear and easy to follow. However, like those in the other courses in the Data Science Specialization, this course covers a wide range of subjects but tends not to have much depth. When I compare this and other courses in the specialization to other moocs that I have taken including Machine Learning with Andrew Ng and the Stanford Online EdX Course Statistical Learning with Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani, the somewhat cursory treatment of the topics in the Data Science Specialization becomes more noticeable. Perhaps in the interest of "truth in advertising" this course should be called "A Brief Introduction to Practical Machine Learning." In the interest of full disclosure, I should note that I have an undergraduate degree in economics and an MS and PhD in psychology with a quantitative bent. I have had lots of statistics courses, especially those related to ANOVA, MANOVA, nonparametric statistics, correlation and regression methods, and structural equation modeling. The latter is important in psychology because researchers in this field like to measure latent variables. I had been an analyst using SPSS for several decades and the courses in this specialization helped me to migrate to R. Also, there have been may new developments that have become more accessible through R packages (like the fancier tree methods) that were not available when I completed my PhD. Thus these courses (and others such as the ones by Ng and Hastie and Tibshirani) have helped me to keep abreast of these developments. So they are good for me, but I wonder to what degree do the courses in the Data Science Specialization actually make a person a "data scientist?" 2. The quizzes: I think these items are good practice and are at a reasonable level of difficulty. However, these items are the same ones that you have been giving for quite some time, with perhaps a few new ones added. A little googling will lead you to the answers to these quizzes posted online. I recommend that you put a little time and effort into writing all new items. 3. The final project: Again, this project is good practice and seems to be at a reasonable level of difficulty. And again, this is the same project that appears to have been given at the end of numerous iterations of this course. And again, numerous write-ups for this project can be found online. And again, I would recommend that you put a little time and effort into finding a new data set for people to analyze. This would help minimize some of the rampant cheating that I found in this and in other classes in the specialization. On the subject of cheating, when I was doing the peer grading for the courses in the Specialization, I would enter the code of the students that I was grading into the Google search box and all too often I found links to submissions for the project by students who had taken earlier sessions of the class. That is, students were copying these earlier submissions by other students and submitting them as their own. And I don't mean that they were similar: students were copying other people's work line by line, character by character. I found that to be quite irritating and I always reported it to Coursera. Of course, if the instructors would change their assignments once I a while, then this sort of copying would be impossible. As it is, it appears that the good professors put a lot of time and effort into creating what are indeed a worthwhile set of classes. However, after they created the classes, they seem to have pushed the "autopilot" button and gone off to do their day jobs. I would suggest that re-engaging with these courses and reading some of the comments that other students have made would be helpful. Overall, I appreciate the courses in the Data Science Specialization and specifically this course. I know that these class materials took considerable time and efforts to create. I wish the instructors continued success with these classes. | 4) it is, it appears that the | Good | 4) professors put a lot of time | 4.0 |
| H02KsW1DEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good introductory course for people who has an interest in knowing the principles of machine learning and want to make a step forward. Sufficient details covered throughout the course and additional resources were provided which are very useful. Quizzes were well designed with minor improvements in the accidental mismatch of the answers due to package version issues. Overall the study experience was enjoyable and would definitely recommend to someone who wants to start knowing data science. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course for people who has | 4.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Awesome lecture. I wish the lectures at my University would have been as good as this. Then I think I would have a much better and more interesting time and I`d learned a lot more. Thanks for all your work!! Best wishes form Switzerland! | 1) my University would have been as | Good | 1) as this. Then I think I | 5.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | content was not as interesting as in the first course, but still good overall. Questions were also less analytical challenging as the first course. But I still enjoyed the course as the professor was explaining the subject clearly and the videos were compact and enjoyable. | 1) in the first course, but still | Good | 1) overall. Questions were also less analytical | 4.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Overall, this is a good subject. However, some slides are not well organized. Many questions in assignment are too tricky. | 1) Overall, this is a | Good | 1) subject. However, some slides are not | 3.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Good course, Hope we had a certification for this. | 1) | Good | 1) course, Hope we had a certification | 5.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Very good course, but it is not "advanced strategy". | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but it is not " | 4.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| H3HGeBK4EeS0RyIACp5OCg | It's a very good course, with fabolous material, examples and style | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course, with fabolous material, examples and | 5.0 |
| H7QOTaItEeWm9xJA1YXcWQ | pretty good | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | very good with a nice teacher. | 1) very | Good | 1) with a nice teacher. | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | This is a great course, with quality material and helpful videos. I felt very engaged and interested to learn through the course. I have learned some good techniques to help my clients at work with de-escalations techniques and paraphrasing for example. Thanks! | 1) the course. I have learned some | Good | 1) techniques to help my clients at | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | George made the PFA lecture very interesting. I feel like i am sitting in the class room, It help me to understand more about psychological first aid needs and how to be a good listener. | 1) needs and how to be a | Good | 1) listener. | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Excellent,its soo good to be able to do this course on-line. As a professional, I feel this course has enlightened me to better serve our communities in the event of a disaster or any kind of trauma. I never want to be unprepared in case someone is in trouble. TAKE THE COURSE. IT IS EXCELLENT. | 1) Excellent, its soo | Good | 1) to be able to do this | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | I thoroughly enjoyed the course. The course was systematic and ended with clarity. As i had witnessed a natural disaster (Floods) in my hometown I could relate the lesson very much to the disaster. Though I thought I helped victims physically now I know the psychological gaps which I couldn't address then. This course helped me to analyse what I could have done during that crisis. Discussion forum was good in reading fellow coursers view on the case study. Thanks to Professeor Everly and John Hopkins University. Congratulations to all the fellow coursers. | 1) during that crisis. Discussion forum was | Good | 1) in reading fellow coursers view on | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Explains a very good model which could be adopted and used to train relief workers in terms of providing psychological support in a case of a disaster. Course is structured nicely and provide simulation videos to comprehend the material better. | 1) Explains a very | Good | 1) model which could be adopted and | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | This is a very good c | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) c | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | It was a very good course - simple but had all essential components.... would have loved it if there were one more simulation for a different situation throughout the course.... Rest, it was a great learning.. | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) course - simple but had all | 4.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Good introduction to the subject and importantly leaves you wanting to explore a bit more | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the subject and importantly | 4.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Very good lectures and videos! Recommended for all those interested in helping people. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures and videos! Recommended for all | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Very good content. The power points are informative and to the point. The mock scenarios are filmed in a manner that is easy to follow and understand. I got a lot out of this. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) content. The power points are informative | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Great course! I think everyone should know this information, if only to know the proper way to help your children or loved ones deal with adversities. Instructor was very good, too. | 1) deal with adversities. Instructor was very | Good | 1) too. | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Good course that gives valuable tools to anyone, who occasionally have to handle people in life-crisis. Not only related to major disaster events | 1) | Good | 1) course that gives valuable tools to | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Informative and helpful. Though it is primarily for disaster survivors, there is good information in here for any crisis intervention. | 1) primarily for disaster survivors, there is | Good | 1) information in here for any crisis | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | Amazing course! Exactly what I expected, and more. Thank you for take the time to create a good and understandable course in an engaging way. If you are thinking to make another specialized on this, count me in! I look forward to hear about new courses from Johns Hopkins University. Thank you! Armando | 1) take the time to create a | Good | 1) and understandable course in an engaging | 5.0 |
| hbvvfJLaEeWBSw79YYA_8Q | A good overview of this important subject which I hope to use in my physical risk management workplace. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of this important subject which | 4.0 |
| HcZv2HHtEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Overall, a good an edifying course; I feel as though I learned a number of things about pharma and the medical device industry through taking it. The only thing that detracts from my rating is the clarity of the lectures: Bryana Mayer's lectures were a bit dense and confusing (particularly the first few), and she often read directly from the slides. For some of the lectures, it was not clear as to why that particular information was being covered. Despite this, I was able to gather useful information; it just wasn't always completely clear or easy. | 1) Overall, a | Good | 1) an edifying course; I feel as | 4.0 |
| HcZv2HHtEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good in general. a little boring and not really have competitor analysis. They had the worse lectures about the competitor analysis for medical device lectures! | 1) | Good | 1) in general. a little boring and | 4.0 |
| HcZv2HHtEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | All in all,the idea of the topic is good and informative, however honestly speaking I didnt like teaching method of professors. The video volume was very quite. | 1) the idea of the topic is | Good | 1) and informative, however honestly speaking I | 3.0 |
| HcZv2HHtEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Clear with good real examples! | 1) Clear with | Good | 1) real examples! | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Really good introduction to the basics of GIS and a great refresher. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to the basics of GIS | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good teaching methods. Convenient for starting to get to know GIS software and sharing your map data. | 1) | Good | 1) teaching methods. Convenient for starting to | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good start to learning GIS. | 1) Very | Good | 1) start to learning GIS. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | So far so good! I like the way the lectures and quizzes are presented. I am loving the instructor and his style. However, I have to go through the whole course before I could say how productive the course will be. Anyway, thanks a lot for the team! Thanks a lot Nick Sanots, Coursera, UC Davis and all fellow learners. I was a week late and could not complete the final assignment in time. However, the course is great! The course is medium paced, and best even for newcomers and intermediates alike. The chapters presented in the course are very productive and vivid. I simply love the course. I don't feel there is any room for improvement. Its just perfect! I love this course. Looking forward for next session of this course and next course. | 1) So far so | Good | 1) I like the way the lectures | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good forum to learn a lot of fundamentals on Arc GIS | 1) | Good | 1) forum to learn a lot of | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very Good for Beginners, Everything is explained in a very understandable way, the access to the program and the additional data makes it whole round. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for Beginners, Everything is explained in | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This course has provided a great introduction to GIS. It was easy to follow the lectures and the assignments were really fun. In this course, although being on the introduction level, we have been provided with good explanations of how GIS works and why we, for instance, press a certain button and not another. The course has given me a better understanding of different GIS functions but also the abilty to think more independently about the logic behind these functions. I'm looking forward the next course! | 1) level, we have been provided with | Good | 1) explanations of how GIS works and | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good course. It will help you to learn the basics of GIS from scratch | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It will help you to | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | This course is a good introduction for anyone beginning to work with GIS, because it starts from the very basics. The course has a great format and content; it's one of the best I've taken on Coursera. The tutorial assignments and project are great for practicing the concepts. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction for anyone beginning to work | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good intro to the subject with projects that result in finished maps. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the subject with projects | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very well presented. Unfortunately I think the order was a bit strange. We focused on data analysis instead of basics of data generation. In an introductory course I would have liked to see a bit more what different data looks like. Vectors, rasters, etc. Some of us live and work in countries that don't have a lot of data (I'm a South African and I work in Malaysia... California, the Karroo, and Borneo have different amounts of information available). We're not learning GIS to analyse data because we don't have much data available. We're building the data... We spent too much time on rivers/watersheds. I get that hydrology is Nick's field but some us will work with cities, or population, or roads, planning farmlands - a bit of variety would be nice. The data should not be available off the Coursera page - we should have to get it off the internet so we get familiar with public data resources. The websites should have the broadest data - good regardless of what country you're in. | 1) should have the broadest data - | Good | 1) regardless of what country you're in. | 3.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I really enjoyed the course, Nick explains the concepts in a way that transmits his energy and good vibe. The final task was a little hard, but we got almost all the tools needed to create an appropiate map. | 1) way that transmits his energy and | Good | 1) vibe. The final task was a | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good introduction, also for beginners. I found it rather easy, but maybe getting more complex with the further courses in the specialisation. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, also for beginners. I found | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | It's a very good course. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | it is good | 1) it is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good course esp for the starters! | 1) | Good | 1) course esp for the starters! | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good informative introductory class. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) informative introductory class. Thanks! | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | very good and hight quality video , more exemple step by step i like this cousre | 1) very | Good | 1) and hight quality video , more | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | A good introduction to GIS focusing on the fundamental principles with a good practical element included. There is a lot to take in over four weeks so it does require plenty of time to absorb all the required learning and complete the assignment. Plenty of information and resources are provided and the lectures are clear and easily to follow. The only criticism I would have is that there is probably too much emphasis on Arc GIS, it would have been nice to learn some more about open source platforms like QGIS. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to GIS focusing on the | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | A good introduction to GIS focusing on the fundamental principles with a good practical element included. There is a lot to take in over four weeks so it does require plenty of time to absorb all the required learning and complete the assignment. Plenty of information and resources are provided and the lectures are clear and easily to follow. The only criticism I would have is that there is probably too much emphasis on Arc GIS, it would have been nice to learn some more about open source platforms like QGIS. | 2) on the fundamental principles with a | Good | 2) practical element included. There is a | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellent.... the course was good for the GIS beginners | 1) . . . the course was | Good | 1) for the GIS beginners | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Really good for beginners and if this course have more detailed instruction of final assignment, I would like to give five stars. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for beginners and if this course | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | A very good starting point with great teaching style. The assignments were helpful | 1) A very | Good | 1) starting point with great teaching style. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good course for the beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) course for the beginners. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I learned a lot in a very fun way. This course is really good. | 1) fun way. This course is really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good background course and introduction to using ARCMap. Would have been nice to have materials to follow along with the lectures, but the assignments provided a second follow along at doing what was done in the lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) background course and introduction to using | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very smooth and fluid introduction to the basics of the GIS field and ArcGIS software. Feel like I developed good working knowledge in a very short time. Excited to go into more depth in future courses! | 1) ArcGIS software. Feel like I developed | Good | 1) working knowledge in a very short | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | I'm only done with week 1 of this course 'Fundamentals of GIS' and I divided the work load into two evenings. I'm a full time master student, but this way of learning is really great in combination with full-time work, study etc. Even tho it's rather late right now and I'm tired, I'm really considering to take a few more modules. The structure and the content is so exciting and really drags me into the world of GIS. The lecturer Nick Santos is really good, the pace is perfect and you are always able to go back to previous videos, documents or search the internet, ask your fellow students or the professor if something is bothering you or if you are just curious. I HIGHLY recommend this course and the specialisation aswell. | 1) The lecturer Nick Santos is really | Good | 1) the pace is perfect and you | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellent course with good lectures and examples. | 1) Excellent course with | Good | 1) lectures and examples. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Although it is not yet over, I would like to rate this course. I think the course structure is very good and the contents are very useful. I like the way it works. As well, I would like to thank the instructor, Mr. Nick Santos and all the team, since the explanations are great (besides, as a non-native English speaker, I could understand everything without any problem). | 1) think the course structure is very | Good | 1) and the contents are very useful. | 5.0 |
| hESqA3EhEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellent modules, excellent teaching, excellent moderation and responsiveness from the tutor. I was not expecting this quality. Really good! | 1) was not expecting this quality. Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HFhDw-STEeWYOBIRup69HQ | Coming out from two very good predecessors (C3, parts 1&2), this course is somewhat a disappointment. The contents are too broad without real focused depth, and too much time spent on background info in almost all lectures. There ought to be more hands-on practices, and the assessments should be more challenging towards understanding, rather than matching terms. | 1) Coming out from two very | Good | 1) predecessors (C3, parts 1&2), this course | 2.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The Good: Very palatable content and provides information at a very slow pace for ease of learning.More reasonable content and far more worthwhile than the first Arduino course of the series. The Bad: Not worth the money when looked at generally. The first and second course could easily have been merged. A lack of introduction to electronic circuits also hinders full use of what is being taught. | 1) The | Good | 1) Very palatable content and provides information | 3.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Really good for someone who is working with sensor, actuator, bread board for first time. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for someone who is working with | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Very good course! Thank you very much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Thank you very much. | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good classes | 1) | Good | 1) classes | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good but the 3rd assignment is not covered adequately nor the reading material is giving specific directions. | 1) | Good | 1) but the 3rd assignment is not | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good. I wish it was more extense though. It leaves you hungry. | 1) | Good | 1) I wish it was more extense | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | for new people to arduino, its a good introduction but very basic | 1) new people to arduino, its a | Good | 1) introduction but very basic | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | A good progression from the previous courses. Lots of hands-on programming. | 1) A | Good | 1) progression from the previous courses. Lots | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | So good,but I think the examples should be using the Arduino IDE, writing the code, not just "Open the example Fade..." | 1) So | Good | 1) but I think the examples should | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good Course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | good and very nice | 1) | Good | 1) and very nice | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Easy to follow, great introduction to topics. Very good to have a quick overview of interfacing with Arduino | 1) follow, great introduction to topics. Very | Good | 1) to have a quick overview of | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good hands on elements. A little bit brief on important coding elements. | 1) | Good | 1) hands on elements. A little bit | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Could have been much better.good for newbies! | 1) Could have been much better. | Good | 1) for newbies! | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | I expected more extensive courseworks. Did not involve me in a lot of courseworks. I learnt a lot but got to implement very few.Week3 assignment was good. | 1) implement very few. Week3 assignment was | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | This is a very basic course in using the arduino and having it communicate with various other devices. It is not a bad thing to have such a basic course exist, it is a good thing, but there are definite flaws in the course, the main ones being the grading system for the assignments and the lack of a place to go for clarification of the assignment / grading questions. Both the penultimate and the final assignments require a certain amount of extra research and learning beyond what was taught in the lectures and yet the grading instructions for the assignments did not allow for taking that into account; the grading criteria was either binary (grade of 100%, or 0) or had the possibility of a partial passing grade but without listing a number of possible criteria that would put a project into the partial passing grade category. | 1) basic course exist, it is a | Good | 1) thing, but there are definite flaws | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The course is good but I'd like a more complicated one. This is too easy. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but I'd like a more complicated | 3.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Very good course with hands-on lectures and an insightful introduction to real-world simple applications. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with hands-on lectures and an | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good course. Prof. Ian is very good. Only I miss a deeper discussion, more complete examples and assignments. Thanks a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Prof. Ian is very good. | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good course. Prof. Ian is very good. Only I miss a deeper discussion, more complete examples and assignments. Thanks a lot. | 2) Good course. Prof. Ian is very | Good | 2) Only I miss a deeper discussion, | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | really good basics got cleared...thanx to coach | 1) really | Good | 1) basics got cleared. . . thanx | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | I did not feel that I learned as much in this course as in the previous courses of the series. The assignments in particular seemed trivial, and were compromised even further due to some technical problems with the simulator recommended for students without access to actual hardware. This course would be a good candidate for revision, with a focus on gradually increasing the depth and complexity from stage to stage, and on commonly-used components such as current amplifiers and shift registers. Problems with the simulator should not be cause for compromising the assignments themselves, there are other ways to address those problems, many of which were employed by students as they competed their assignments. | 1) hardware. This course would be a | Good | 1) candidate for revision, with a focus | 2.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | The teacher is didactic and the material is good. But the course content is too superficial. Because of that, it is really easy to complete it in only one week or in a weekend. The second course: "The Arduino Platform and C Programming" and this one could be merged into one. | 1) is didactic and the material is | Good | 1) But the course content is too | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good and well structured course. | 1) | Good | 1) and well structured course. | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good job thanks | 1) | Good | 1) job thanks | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | I feel that the course did successfully help me to get started in this area of computing. My one disappointment was the removal of the traditional forums/discussions from the main body of the course, although it was possible to discuss things in a single discussion area. This made it less easy to discuss specific questions relating to your current assignment. As before I thought the practical demos were very good. I'm pleased I took the course - I wouldn't have made such good progress working on my own. I hope the Raspberry Pi related courses reinstate the internal discussions - they add to the sense of a common goal being achieved and recover some of the things that aren't available in a MOOC where face to face student/professor interaction aren't available. | 1) thought the practical demos were very | Good | 1) I'm pleased I took the course | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | I feel that the course did successfully help me to get started in this area of computing. My one disappointment was the removal of the traditional forums/discussions from the main body of the course, although it was possible to discuss things in a single discussion area. This made it less easy to discuss specific questions relating to your current assignment. As before I thought the practical demos were very good. I'm pleased I took the course - I wouldn't have made such good progress working on my own. I hope the Raspberry Pi related courses reinstate the internal discussions - they add to the sense of a common goal being achieved and recover some of the things that aren't available in a MOOC where face to face student/professor interaction aren't available. | 2) - I wouldn't have made such | Good | 2) progress working on my own. I | 4.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | This course provided me a good amount of information to use the Arduino Board. | 1) This course provided me a | Good | 1) amount of information to use the | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Excelent! Clear, with student Interaction a good course | 1) Excelent! Clear, with student Interaction a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| hgw1Nkd5EeW8cBKtDAegYw | Good overview of the arduino using practical assignments | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the arduino using practical | 4.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Good content and real examples, all the tools an entrepreneur needs to achieve its goals. COMPLETE | 1) | Good | 1) content and real examples, all the | 5.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good and in portuguese! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and in portuguese! | 5.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course in entrepreneurship, giving good theoretical and practical insights at the same time! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course in entrepreneurship, giving good theoretical | 4.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course in entrepreneurship, giving good theoretical and practical insights at the same time! | 2) Very good course in entrepreneurship, giving | Good | 2) theoretical and practical insights at the | 4.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good Course! Just 3 weeks and I have already learned a lot! Thank you Coursera for this amazing opportunity. I also want to congratulate the teacher Paulo Lemos for being a very good teacher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course! Just 3 weeks and I | 5.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good Course! Just 3 weeks and I have already learned a lot! Thank you Coursera for this amazing opportunity. I also want to congratulate the teacher Paulo Lemos for being a very good teacher. | 2) Paulo Lemos for being a very | Good | 2) teacher. | 5.0 |
| hHc_5i-9EeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good course to learn the basics of Game Theory | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn the basics of | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This is an unexpectedly wonderful course, a fantastic introduction to not only the basics of game theory but also to applications and results you (and I) might not have expected. If you begin the course, do not stop - the first two weeks lay out the basics, without requiring much math background (leaving that for the Stanford/UBC course which is quite good). But the final two weeks are eye-opening as they show uses and discoveries based on game theory, especially with regard to social and economic concerns. Prof. Kandori has done research in these areas and has passion for them - don't miss those sessions. The only drawback to this course might be that it is a bit slow, with much repetition, a useful technique in the classroom but not quite as effective in this online mode. But speeding up the videos one notch might help :) Were Prof. Kandori to speak here (the San Francisco Bay Area) I would eagerly attend - and his ties to Stanford might make that possible - my antenna are raised for such an occurrence. | 1) the Stanford/UBC course which is quite | Good | 1) But the final two weeks are | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Excellent introduction to the subject, good course to follow before diving deeper into Game Theory (as I plan to do). Small problems when showing images but nothing that ruins the experience. Dr. Michihiro Kandori is a great teacher! | 1) Excellent introduction to the subject, | Good | 1) course to follow before diving deeper | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good teacher and good lectures! Awesome! すごい！ | 1) | Good | 1) teacher and good lectures! Awesome! すごい！ | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good teacher and good lectures! Awesome! すごい！ | 2) Good teacher and | Good | 2) lectures! Awesome! すごい！ | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Teaching quality is good, but more example needed. | 1) Teaching quality is | Good | 1) but more example needed. | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | I looked into the course because I'm an Ecology and Evolutionary Biology student that got into Evolutionary Game Theory. I wanted a more basic and fundamental understanding of game theory. Really good lectures - I particularly think the examples/applications are interesting. | 1) fundamental understanding of game theory. Really | Good | 1) lectures - I particularly think the | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good course. Should be followed by Game Theory II | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Should be followed by Game | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It1s a wonderfull course, the lectures are very clear, and you just have to have some discipline to learn the basics of game theory. Good Job | 1) learn the basics of game theory. | Good | 1) Job | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | good to begin with! | 1) | Good | 1) to begin with! | 3.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | I thought the course admirably fulfilled my expectations for a general introduction to Game Theory. It kept maths to a minimum and the explanations were clear and always backed up by examples. Seeed to be very little forum activity, don't know why... maybe that's just says soething about the sort of people who want to learn about Game Theory! It's a good length with a good amount of time dedicated each week. Sometimes it was a bit challenging, but all round pretty good, I thought. | 1) learn about Game Theory! It's a | Good | 1) length with a good amount of | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | I thought the course admirably fulfilled my expectations for a general introduction to Game Theory. It kept maths to a minimum and the explanations were clear and always backed up by examples. Seeed to be very little forum activity, don't know why... maybe that's just says soething about the sort of people who want to learn about Game Theory! It's a good length with a good amount of time dedicated each week. Sometimes it was a bit challenging, but all round pretty good, I thought. | 2) It's a good length with a | Good | 2) amount of time dedicated each week. | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | I thought the course admirably fulfilled my expectations for a general introduction to Game Theory. It kept maths to a minimum and the explanations were clear and always backed up by examples. Seeed to be very little forum activity, don't know why... maybe that's just says soething about the sort of people who want to learn about Game Theory! It's a good length with a good amount of time dedicated each week. Sometimes it was a bit challenging, but all round pretty good, I thought. | 3) bit challenging, but all round pretty | Good | 3) I thought. | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | pretty good starter's course, Professor explains information good, hope for more complicated one, less newbie friendly | 1) pretty | Good | 1) starter's course, Professor explains information good, | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | pretty good starter's course, Professor explains information good, hope for more complicated one, less newbie friendly | 2) good starter's course, Professor explains information | Good | 2) hope for more complicated one, less | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It is good. | 1) It is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good introductory course, great lecturer | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course, great lecturer | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This is very good basic course, a one star missing due to some difficulties in good enough explanations of some of concepts further used. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) basic course, a one star missing | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This is very good basic course, a one star missing due to some difficulties in good enough explanations of some of concepts further used. | 2) missing due to some difficulties in | Good | 2) enough explanations of some of concepts | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | It is good for any green-hand in game the | 1) It is | Good | 1) for any green-hand in game the | 4.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This is a very good introduction to game theory having never before studied this subject I have found that the Lectures are easy to understand and flow very well from one to the other. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to game theory having never | 5.0 |
| hhFDsQ72EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good introduction to Game Theory. Works everything out with intiuition. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Game Theory. Works everything | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course! Amazing! Thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Amazing! Thanks. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course I like it and the way it was given. | 1) | Good | 1) course I like it and the | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course. I have already recommended to a friend. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I have already recommended to | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | not difficult to understand, good basic material, thank you! | 1) not difficult to understand, | Good | 1) basic material, thank you! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course was really informative and the lessons were concisely executed. I recommend the course to anyone looking for a beginner's introduction to coding HTML/Javascript. My only criticism is that I'd like to have more peer-review projects to do, because I think letting other people check someone's work is a good way to see how they can improve. | 1) people check someone's work is a | Good | 1) way to see how they can | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course is quite good, but it if you already have some knowledge about the subject and want to go deeper in it, this is probably not your course | 1) The course is quite | Good | 1) but it if you already have | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It was a good course for a beginner like me. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course for a beginner like me. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good start for the specialization. | 1) | Good | 1) start for the specialization. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very instructive and a good start up. I love the way the lectures are prtesented. helps you get the grab of the materials. | 1) Very instructive and a | Good | 1) start up. I love the way | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! Strong recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Strong recommend. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very well organised, explained and delivered. Good introdution to good web development. The only aspect I would suggest changing is leaving code visible on screen while under discussion as I found myself going back to see the code after watching someone talk about it. Its nice to see faces but I would prefer to see code as it is being explained. | 1) Very well organised, explained and delivered. | Good | 1) introdution to good web development. The | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very well organised, explained and delivered. Good introdution to good web development. The only aspect I would suggest changing is leaving code visible on screen while under discussion as I found myself going back to see the code after watching someone talk about it. Its nice to see faces but I would prefer to see code as it is being explained. | 2) explained and delivered. Good introdution to | Good | 2) web development. The only aspect I | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I was a little lost during projects, there no extensive videos for languages but on the other hand there was good materials and refereed links that could help. | 1) on the other hand there was | Good | 1) materials and refereed links that could | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good class, easy if you've already studied the subject before. But, it does provide you a simple way to get started on some projects. Could use some proofreading on some of it's quizzes (possibly the British English influencing the syntax of the written language). | 1) | Good | 1) class, easy if you've already studied | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's really not good this course told us a very basic things never give us deep detail and in most of course it shows us the code and you should write like this but there is no deep understand what is it | 1) It's really not | Good | 1) this course told us a very | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good course clear and concise | 1) very | Good | 1) course clear and concise | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good introduction to the basics | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the basics | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course to start learning HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 1) | Good | 1) course to start learning HTML, CSS | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good introduction to rapid design, using Bootstrap and jQuery. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to rapid design, using Bootstrap | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good overview of the basics. Fast, and easy... | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the basics. Fast, and | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good course: short, simple but i think it's somehow difficult for people with no programming background. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course: short, simple but i think | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good and practical course | 1) | Good | 1) and practical course | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! I wish I could take a regular semester class, but good job with the amount of material included within this class. I'm looking forward to learning more from this specialty. | 1) take a regular semester class, but | Good | 1) job with the amount of material | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! good examples. | 1) Great course! | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! Very comprehensive! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Very comprehensive! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | so far so good | 1) so far so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course have good material and great passion instructor. As always Mike your are the best..! | 1) This course have | Good | 1) material and great passion instructor. As | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course was very good and provided me enough opportunity to explore my designing skills especially javascript. But the assignments could be more specific. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) and provided me enough opportunity to | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good basic introduction! I appreciate that it looks at both jQuery and javaScript; CSS media queries and Bootstrap, allowing the student to compare the two. | 1) | Good | 1) basic introduction! I appreciate that it | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course to learn basics of website development. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn basics of website | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Like introductory course, is very good and very clear. | 1) Like introductory course, is very | Good | 1) and very clear. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Pretty good introduction. Reminds me of how to do it from scratch... | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) introduction. Reminds me of how to | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Well presented content. It was a little bit weird for me to jump straight to jQuery and spending so little time on Javascript but it works out for the course. I would suggest a couple of more examples and explanation of general programming concepts with providing relevant pdf. Generally a very good and content-rich course. | 1) providing relevant pdf. Generally a very | Good | 1) and content-rich course. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The curse is good, but for me it only worked when I started some other larger courses of each topic separately; I mean, this works as a short overview of everythig, but otherwise, it jumps too quickly from a languaje to the next. | 1) The curse is | Good | 1) but for me it only worked | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It shows the basics of each subject. A good start to learn the technologies HTML5, CSS and JavaScript. | 1) the basics of each subject. A | Good | 1) start to learn the technologies HTML5, | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is well suited for those just beginning their journey into web design, but it is also a good refresher for those of us who haven't played with bootstrap or explored the concepts of responsive website design. | 1) design, but it is also a | Good | 1) refresher for those of us who | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course for someone with a little experience. Total newbies may be lost doing the assignments. Regardless I recommend the course. | 1) | Good | 1) course for someone with a little | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good class. Explanations are thorough and easy to follow. One improvement I could suggest is more specific projects than open ended ones. | 1) | Good | 1) class. Explanations are thorough and easy | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good start to front-end programming. The instructors engaged the audience well and explained the concepts clearly and in detail. There was a exponental jump between week 3 lectures and week 3 quiz. I had to do much additional research on the web to pass that. | 1) Very | Good | 1) start to front-end programming. The instructors | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course. I like it very much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I like it very much. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | So far so good. I totally recommend it. Quite easy for beginners as myself. | 1) So far so | Good | 1) I totally recommend it. Quite easy | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I've learned a good deal about coding in HTML, CSS and JavaScript through this course. My only complaints are that the lecturer often whizzed through typing portions of the code during his lecture that I had to use more time than my schedule allotted reviewing the video slowly, and that some topics in the test questions didn't match any portion of the lecture. | 1) I've learned a | Good | 1) deal about coding in HTML, CSS | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A good course that bet you up and running with HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Once finished you become a basic level web programmer with a all the needed fundamentals to continue your way to an independent and powerful web site development on your own. | 1) A | Good | 1) course that bet you up and | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good introduccion to responsive websites | 1) | Good | 1) introduccion to responsive websites | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good overall high level view of HTML, CSS, Javascript, presented in a easy and understandable manner. You will need to take more courses beyond this to get a solid understanding and practically use it, but this is a good start. | 1) | Good | 1) overall high level view of HTML, | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good overall high level view of HTML, CSS, Javascript, presented in a easy and understandable manner. You will need to take more courses beyond this to get a solid understanding and practically use it, but this is a good start. | 2) use it, but this is a | Good | 2) start. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course! Very interesting! | 1) | Good | 1) course! Very interesting! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I enjoy every lesson of this course. Very good explanations and practices. Congrats to the teachers! | 1) every lesson of this course. Very | Good | 1) explanations and practices. Congrats to the | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Needs way bigger scope and a bit more going into details. The Full Stack Web Development course is somewhat like that. Lectures are good and easy to understand, both visuals and speak are nice and clear. Hopefully next one remains great quality but with more content :) | 1) is somewhat like that. Lectures are | Good | 1) and easy to understand, both visuals | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Fantastic course about web development. Good and direct explanations. | 1) Fantastic course about web development. | Good | 1) and direct explanations. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have only done week one but I love the logical way this is taught. The instructors don't get in the way of the message! They know how to keep it simple in the beginning so that the basics come across clearly. I have taken courses like this before and I still learned something new. I am really looking forward to the next lessons. This class is a good investment of my time. I really appreciate the course and those who put it all together. | 1) next lessons. This class is a | Good | 1) investment of my time. I really | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Really good course. The teachers are cool, I like them a lot :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. The teachers are cool, I | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Not very thorough in my opinion. I would suggest students to finish the web design for everybody course first. It deals with the most important issues of web design such as accessibility, DOM and a lot more CSS in a good depth. This course kind of brushes up the surface and jumps straight to Bootstrap. This would not really be of much help to a beginner. I presume the courses in the rest of the specialization offer a good bit of explanation atleast. This would be a good course for anyone who wants to simply get things done though :) | 1) a lot more CSS in a | Good | 1) depth. This course kind of brushes | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Not very thorough in my opinion. I would suggest students to finish the web design for everybody course first. It deals with the most important issues of web design such as accessibility, DOM and a lot more CSS in a good depth. This course kind of brushes up the surface and jumps straight to Bootstrap. This would not really be of much help to a beginner. I presume the courses in the rest of the specialization offer a good bit of explanation atleast. This would be a good course for anyone who wants to simply get things done though :) | 2) rest of the specialization offer a | Good | 2) bit of explanation atleast. This would | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Not very thorough in my opinion. I would suggest students to finish the web design for everybody course first. It deals with the most important issues of web design such as accessibility, DOM and a lot more CSS in a good depth. This course kind of brushes up the surface and jumps straight to Bootstrap. This would not really be of much help to a beginner. I presume the courses in the rest of the specialization offer a good bit of explanation atleast. This would be a good course for anyone who wants to simply get things done though :) | 3) explanation atleast. This would be a | Good | 3) course for anyone who wants to | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | As the name says: very basic, but it's a very good start to get into the next course in the specialization | 1) very basic, but it's a very | Good | 1) start to get into the next | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Thank you, it gave me good basic for JavaScript. | 1) Thank you, it gave me | Good | 1) basic for JavaScript. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Pretty awesome, nice people teaching and colleagues, a good feedback on every question, and also gave a good basis on the HTML5, CSS3 and Javascript development, but I would like to have more pure javascript solutions instead of jQuery. | 1) nice people teaching and colleagues, a | Good | 1) feedback on every question, and also | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Pretty awesome, nice people teaching and colleagues, a good feedback on every question, and also gave a good basis on the HTML5, CSS3 and Javascript development, but I would like to have more pure javascript solutions instead of jQuery. | 2) every question, and also gave a | Good | 2) basis on the HTML5, CSS3 and | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | the way through which teacher describe the concept is really good. | 1) teacher describe the concept is really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Pretty good. I learned alot in a short of amount of time. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) I learned alot in a short | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good introduction to these different languages. However Javascript is a very tough one to begin with variables, if statements and loops, imho better look for a single course on Javascript. Very useful material and quizzes. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to these different languages. However | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content was simple and well organized out for a good introductory course. The first step is often the most difficult one to take, so it's nice that they kept it easy. | 1) and well organized out for a | Good | 1) introductory course. The first step is | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | other than the quiz.. everything else was good.. quiz was not challenging enough.. | 1) the quiz. . everything else was | Good | 1) . quiz was not challenging enough. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's very good for beginner who already have hands in programming. it gives very basic and important concepts about HTML, CSS and javascript. it also gives a brief history of internet and HTML. | 1) It's very | Good | 1) for beginner who already have hands | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A very good course. It gives you a very good explanation and teach you in a general way, how to create a modern Website using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I have already done my first Webpage and I didnt know how to do it at the begining. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. It gives you a very | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A very good course. It gives you a very good explanation and teach you in a general way, how to create a modern Website using HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I have already done my first Webpage and I didnt know how to do it at the begining. | 2) course. It gives you a very | Good | 2) explanation and teach you in a | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course, useful assignments to ease you in, good tutors, recommended starter course into responsive website basics. | 1) useful assignments to ease you in, | Good | 1) tutors, recommended starter course into responsive | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very low level , im sorry but this cant be even considered a good intro to HTML,CSS im going to stop wasting my time watching this. no chllange in the assignments or questions , + more of an overview of the basics then the basics .. | 1) this cant be even considered a | Good | 1) intro to HTML, CSS im going | 1.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course on the basics and very helpful for just starting out. Foesn't teach too much programming theory, so for those who already know how to program, it's all you need to understand simple web development. | 1) | Good | 1) course on the basics and very | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Sharing a satisfied amount of knowledge, overall very good. The HTML videos were excellent. The one thing missing is the methodology on how someone starts to think and makes JavaScript code that delivers a solution to a problem. How do we do our approach? Flow charts would really help on this matter. | 1) satisfied amount of knowledge, overall very | Good | 1) The HTML videos were excellent. The | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good!! Thanks a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! Thanks a lot! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good for beginners | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good Teaching Thank you for adding this course.It really helped me a lot | 1) | Good | 1) Teaching Thank you for adding this | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good concise overview of the basic web design languages - this is a good jumping off point for people looking to get in to Web Design. Keep in mind though, this covers a very large amount of material in a short amount of time. If you don't have any familiarity with coding already, you will likely need to do a lot of outside research to fill in the gaps. | 1) | Good | 1) concise overview of the basic web | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good concise overview of the basic web design languages - this is a good jumping off point for people looking to get in to Web Design. Keep in mind though, this covers a very large amount of material in a short amount of time. If you don't have any familiarity with coding already, you will likely need to do a lot of outside research to fill in the gaps. | 2) design languages - this is a | Good | 2) jumping off point for people looking | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent course. Even after I finished, I`m still studying. Very practical and with a lot of good suggested sources to improve learning experience. | 1) practical and with a lot of | Good | 1) suggested sources to improve learning experience. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course for beginners. Introduces all the basic concepts. It helps to understand what a responsive website is. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. Introduces all the | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course provides good start for learning web development. I came from the background as experienced programmer, and I can understand some students face difficulty when it comes to javascript. In that case, you can use some suggested material in the course, such as this book online: http://eloquentjavascript.net/index.html. Nice course overall, and I recommend it if you are starting to learn web development. | 1) This course provides | Good | 1) start for learning web development. I | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course covers some aspects of front-end web development lightly and give me a good start to interactive web app.I have an idea to construct my last homework to a very simple game but encountering some troubles.To summarize this course,it is wonderful! | 1) development lightly and give me a | Good | 1) start to interactive web app. I | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | My first course on Coursera.com. Thanks it was helpful for me. Good teachers. | 1) Thanks it was helpful for me. | Good | 1) teachers. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Enjoyed the pace of this course, learned a lot during these 4 sessions. Good teachers, challenging enough assignments and enough chances to redo tasks. Intro level but enough to learn still. | 1) a lot during these 4 sessions. | Good | 1) teachers, challenging enough assignments and enough | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This was a fantastic course! I really enjoyed the quizes after every video. It helped me stay focused during videos and provided a good mental break at times. | 1) focused during videos and provided a | Good | 1) mental break at times. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good foundation, but very basic. | 1) | Good | 1) foundation, but very basic. | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very well presented... during the course i need to practice some javascripts from w3 schools for effective learning..... its a very good courseware.... tq a lot marco mathew and kate... this is very good start for begineers | 1) . . . its a very | Good | 1) courseware. . . . tq a | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very well presented... during the course i need to practice some javascripts from w3 schools for effective learning..... its a very good courseware.... tq a lot marco mathew and kate... this is very good start for begineers | 2) kate. . . this is very | Good | 2) start for begineers | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This is a very good course. Concise. Good review and fresh look into webprogramming. Love i already! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. Concise. Good review and fresh | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This is a very good course. Concise. Good review and fresh look into webprogramming. Love i already! | 2) is a very good course. Concise. | Good | 2) review and fresh look into webprogramming. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 2.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course! Thank You! | 1) | Good | 1) course! Thank You! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A really good introductory course. Excellent pace and clear instructions. When it comes to teaching, there is nothing better than being able to make people understand in a few simple sentences. Well done! | 1) A really | Good | 1) introductory course. Excellent pace and clear | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good teachers, muy buenos profesores. | 1) very | Good | 1) teachers, muy buenos profesores. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Well presented material. Good combo of theory and code and good focus on practical coding side of things. Well laid out and easy to follow. | 1) Well presented material. | Good | 1) combo of theory and code and | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Well presented material. Good combo of theory and code and good focus on practical coding side of things. Well laid out and easy to follow. | 2) combo of theory and code and | Good | 2) focus on practical coding side of | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good for beginners. | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good course. If I must complain about something is that, since the course covers a little too much too fast, the people that is not familiar with the subject might not understand the why or how of things explained. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. If I must complain about | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course. It helps to understand the website basics. Good mix of the theory and the practice. | 1) helps to understand the website basics. | Good | 1) mix of the theory and the | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good start for everyone interested in the creation of responsive websites. It's easy in the beginning but then with JavaScript you have to read additional sources to get the whole picture. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start for everyone interested in the | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I'm only part way through...but this course is super clear. Really hands on and teaches coding using really basic tools instead of another website (like codepen, etc) which keeps it simple and clear. All the lecturers are engaging and have a good speaking style which makes them easy to listen and pay attention to. | 1) lecturers are engaging and have a | Good | 1) speaking style which makes them easy | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | HTML and CSS were stellar explanations. Matt really has a knack for adding humour to his lecture that kept me engaged and helped me understand as well. Cheers. The JS portion though was rough. I felt like Marko has an incredible amount of knowledge but the method of the lecturers, content, and layout was hard to grasp on a first-time go. I had to re-watch every lecturer in the JS and I still am having problems...It's obviously a difficult language though and I'm honestly not sure if there actually IS an easier way to teach it. Marko's enthusiasm really showed though, so it helped keep me coming back for more punishment~ Great job all around to everyone! Really good beginner course. | 1) job all around to everyone! Really | Good | 1) beginner course. | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great flow to the course; good lectures and suplemental material! | 1) Great flow to the course; | Good | 1) lectures and suplemental material! | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good introduction to responsive web design. Apt for total beginners even without programming experience. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to responsive web design. Apt | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course. I've finally understood JS. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I've finally understood JS. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | When they say basic, they mean BAAAASSSSIIIIC. Good course to start with if you're not used to web development. If you have developed web pages and web applications, this course will be a breeze. | 1) they say basic, they mean BAAAASSSSIIIIC. | Good | 1) course to start with if you're | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is very good. It has a very well-defined scope, which is the basic for web development and also the basics to more advanced web development courses. A great reference for those just starting out. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) It has a very well-defined scope, | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good course for learning and starting web development | 1) very | Good | 1) course for learning and starting web | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Instructors were clear with good cohesion between lessons and lectures. Also, used good examples of the principles learned. | 1) Instructors were clear with | Good | 1) cohesion between lessons and lectures. Also, | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Instructors were clear with good cohesion between lessons and lectures. Also, used good examples of the principles learned. | 2) between lessons and lectures. Also, used | Good | 2) examples of the principles learned. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The instructors at the University of London were excellent personalities with very good communication skills. Once again, perfected online education surpasses expensive in-class university classes in preparing people for the digital economy we live in. | 1) London were excellent personalities with very | Good | 1) communication skills. Once again, perfected online | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It is a good course but rather for real beginners on a basic level. But everything is clear. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course but rather for real beginners | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Nice introduction course, i liked more the "style" and html part that the JS indeed, but both are need to make good things ^^ | 1) but both are need to make | Good | 1) things ^^ | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good,thanks to the teacher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) thanks to the teacher. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! A good condensed material | 1) Great course! A | Good | 1) condensed material | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very hard to follow unless you have had a good deal of experience with programming. I would not really recommend. Like the teachers OK, but they all went through too much material way too fast and without proper explanation. I will take other classes on programming and then come back to this one again later (maybe). | 1) follow unless you have had a | Good | 1) deal of experience with programming. I | 2.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course！~ | 1) | Good | 1) course！~ | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good intro to the subject and good mix of technologies, I enjoyed the time learning. Especially I did like the flexibility learning besides my Job. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the subject and good | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good intro to the subject and good mix of technologies, I enjoyed the time learning. Especially I did like the flexibility learning besides my Job. | 2) Good intro to the subject and | Good | 2) mix of technologies, I enjoyed the | 4.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is very good. Well organized, a lot of stuff to learn, great contents. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) Well organized, a lot of stuff | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! Very good intro to the three basic website building languages. | 1) Great course! Very | Good | 1) intro to the three basic website | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great video instructions. Had some tech issues on my end. Not really a good idea to try this on a chromebook if you are just getting started. If you know the work-arounds to make the assignments with a chromebook it's below your level. Still very much worth the time to watch the videos whether or not you are going to complete the work. | 1) on my end. Not really a | Good | 1) idea to try this on a | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Nice course . It give basics of each of languages and good place to start web development. | 1) basics of each of languages and | Good | 1) place to start web development. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I have followed 2 courses at the same time: this one and "HTML, CSS and Javascript". They are covering the similar topics but this class has fallen short on most of the subject. Lecture time is very little. Short videos, and few of them. Each video is mostly non-focused talking, very few examples and so you don't learn much. By comparison, the other class has a lot of videos, each video is much longer and goes into many examples. Time is spent on focusing on the things to learn, and you get a lot out of it. I am dropping out of this specialization and will follow the other one which I hope will bring good content (unfortunately the following classes are not from the same teacher but from the same university). The following classes from this specialization are from the same teacher, so I don't think things will improve much. | 1) one which I hope will bring | Good | 1) content (unfortunately the following classes are | 2.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Got really bonkers listening to the University of London jingle at the start AND end of each of the 38 video's in this course. The content is just ok.. but not explanation is very high level. It is good for someone who has never had experience with web technologies before. | 1) is very high level. It is | Good | 1) for someone who has never had | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 3.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good introductory course for understanding the basic of HTML,CSS and JS. Examples are well explained and the course delivery was good :) . | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introductory course for understanding the basic | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good introductory course for understanding the basic of HTML,CSS and JS. Examples are well explained and the course delivery was good :) . | 2) explained and the course delivery was | Good | 2) :) . | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | What I have seen so far I think it is a good introduction on the topic. The lecturers are lively and clear in their instructions. A casual yet professional feel to the program. | 1) far I think it is a | Good | 1) introduction on the topic. The lecturers | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A very good and user-friendly course | 1) A very | Good | 1) and user-friendly course | 5.0 |
| HITLfhnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very Good course.One who wants to take on web development should definitely take this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. One who wants to take | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | This course provide me an opportunity to know what happened in an international museum.Also the good quality of the impartation encourage me to learn more knowledge about museum education.Thank you very much. | 1) in an international museum. Also the | Good | 1) quality of the impartation encourage me | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | It's a good course. Funny and intelligent, but it can be a little more challenging. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. Funny and intelligent, but it | 4.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | Amazing and very interesting. Good resources for education through Art. | 1) Amazing and very interesting. | Good | 1) resources for education through Art. | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | Very good and informative | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | I learnt a lot from this course and I can apply it my classes forward going. It's a good introduction to being an art educator especially for me as I am not trained in the art area. | 1) my classes forward going. It's a | Good | 1) introduction to being an art educator | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | Very good, complete and interesting course ;) Thanks a lot for sharing your information and strategies so we can all become better teachers. Kids need and deserve that!!! <3 | 1) Very | Good | 1) complete and interesting course ;) Thanks | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | It was great. I loved the fact I could watch the videos and follow the steps at my own pace. The content was really good: objective, clear and the texts were both supportive of the subject presented and open to other approaches. I recommend it to everyone interested in deepen her/his relations with the theme. | 1) own pace. The content was really | Good | 1) objective, clear and the texts were | 5.0 |
| HIUPOchIEeSA1yIACye2oA | I found the presentations to be very clear and focused. In addition, the readings were a good introduction to the foundation and current thinking in the field. I was disappointed in the difficulty in connecting with other students. That would have enhanced the learning experience for me. I am new to Coursera, and understand thismay be a difficult aspect of the programs to control, but it's worth a try. | 1) In addition, the readings were a | Good | 1) introduction to the foundation and current | 4.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Exceptionally very good course - Must for anyone who is doing research on Control systems using game theory !!! Kudos to all the three professors !!! Will definitely do Game Theory 2 !!! | 1) Exceptionally very | Good | 1) course - Must for anyone who | 5.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | This course is great. The teachers provide excellent exposition of the problems, the formalization, and the solution concepts of generic agents and types of agents acting simultaneously, sequentially in games with complete and incomplete information. The math required is middle school probability calculation and equations. The formal definitions of games and concepts are more demanding, but a complete understanding of the formal definition is not required to solve the problem sets or the exam. The teachers are good at giving explanations and examples in a natural language to scaffold the understanding of the formal definitions. | 1) or the exam. The teachers are | Good | 1) at giving explanations and examples in | 5.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | The topic and the class content itself are good, but the introduction is too brief. Hope they can add more stuff! | 1) and the class content itself are | Good | 1) but the introduction is too brief. | 3.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | Great course for introduction. Actually, the course itself does NOT tell detail enough for fully understanding of Game Theory. Extra studies are needed, such as the reference book, the article mentioned in the first week and also Wikipedia.org. But the lecture is good enough for us to know what we should search for:) | 1) Wikipedia. org. But the lecture is | Good | 1) enough for us to know what | 5.0 |
| hJ1Jl-fcEeWwMw6osrJBVw | In my opinion, it gets too technical and it is not a self contained course at all. Neither it is a beginner course for game theory. If someone is looking to understand the real basics of it, should take the Univeristy of Tokyo course. Some lessons were really abstract and I ended up looking for information in other websites to understand it. Another thing... I suppose the three lecturers are incredible good in their respective fields, but in the teaching part, Some Shoham's lessons were like listening to a robot. M. O Jackson is pretty clear in his explanations altough too technical, and Leyton Brown has a very clear way to teach, but I honestly got lost many times in the final exercises. | 1) suppose the three lecturers are incredible | Good | 1) in their respective fields, but in | 3.0 |
| Hm73dlDLEeWeiwqPB940Pw | This course is just AMAZING! I am a composer and I found myself astonished of how much I was lacking, yet, the quizzes translations, man, are so bad, must of the time those where "Straight trough" translations that are complete meaningless on Spanish, it's like they simply used Google translate. You might think "it is not THAT bad", well there are sections that ask you to determine stability based on the length of the line... good luck with that (Spanish usually takes more words to write the same idea) | 1) length of the line. . . | Good | 1) luck with that (Spanish usually takes | 3.0 |
| hmUA37FKEeS5liIACye34Q | Good organized course, Health for all through primary health care described well in context of developing regions. | 1) | Good | 1) organized course, Health for all through | 4.0 |
| hpIHP7ubEeWFzg5riIt8qw | A good solid course which will improve the way you analyse problems and write advice about it. It does take more time than the announcement says. It took me about 4x8 hours, but it depends on how serious you take it of course. | 1) A | Good | 1) solid course which will improve the | 4.0 |
| Hr9lByyfEeWccAqzeA4VPw | Good and interesting course. | 1) | Good | 1) and interesting course. | 4.0 |
| Hr9lByyfEeWccAqzeA4VPw | This course has great potential as it is an extraordinarily timely topic, domestically and globally. The accessible required reading assignments were thought provoking and topical. Also, one of the required videos proved helpful, and a couple of the optional Ted talks were "must see's" for anyone involved in the non-profit sector. It was problematic that there was so little direction with respect to how one might access the required reading materials that were not linked into the course syllabus. In fact, one of the links provided simply directed the learners to a youtube video, extolling the virtues of the book wherein the required chapter was located. Another blatant colleague marketing technique occurred during the course of one of the required videos wherein the organizer interviewed an author about his book. (There was some helpful substantive information that came out of that interview, but for the most part, I felt as though I was watching an infomercial.) Requests for help fell on deaf ears, except for those of co-learners. A small, but annoying, flaw was that the professors were simply reading text from their slides, for the video component of the course--with an additional word thrown in, on occasion, for good measure. It would have been less distracting just to have the slides to read. I wish this course had been designed and taught to the standards I have come to expect from Coursera courses. It could have been one of the most valuable yet. | 1) word thrown in, on occasion, for | Good | 1) measure. It would have been less | 2.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It was a very good course. I enjoyed the learning experience very much. | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) course. I enjoyed the learning experience | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | A really good moth course! The teacher uses a simple way to introduce the Calculus knowledge to us! Thanks, Coursera! | 1) A really | Good | 1) moth course! The teacher uses a | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Lecture videos are good. Assessment of knowledge (quizzes) are weak. | 1) Lecture videos are | Good | 1) Assessment of knowledge (quizzes) are weak. | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very good to learn! | 1) very | Good | 1) to learn! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Really good course. It is really good for people who want to understand calculus. It is not a course for one that have final next week but is sure a great course for those who want to learn it in a solid base. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. It is really good for | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Really good course. It is really good for people who want to understand calculus. It is not a course for one that have final next week but is sure a great course for those who want to learn it in a solid base. | 2) Really good course. It is really | Good | 2) for people who want to understand | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good course!! | 1) | Good | 1) course! ! | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very clear introduction to calculus. Good value! | 1) Very clear introduction to calculus. | Good | 1) value! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It is an excellent course. I am a commerce grad without maths. i find it too good course. It is helping me a lot to understand calculus. | 1) without maths. i find it too | Good | 1) course. It is helping me a | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | A very good course because of its content and its professor. Thank you for your help. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course because of its content and | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It's really an excellent course with it's simple principles showing, great instructor professor JIM has very good communication skills and attentions pay, very satisfy | 1) great instructor professor JIM has very | Good | 1) communication skills and attentions pay, very | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good for beginners, but maybe using examples instead of important concepts as elements of main structure can cause confusion. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners, but maybe using examples | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I have finished this course and moved on to the 2nd part. In sum, the course was excellent and Professor Fowler is terrific at explaining concepts both visually and algebraically. He provides both rigorous and intuitive explanations. I learned a lot and firmed up many concepts. i really appreciated the balance between visual and numerical. The real problem with the course is the quiz CPU. It does not recognize correct answers even when those answers are exactly the same as the ones provided by way of correcting your "wrong" answer. There is something really wrong with the quiz review code. That can be a "downer" when you are seeking a little encouragement after some hard work - and you know your answers are correct - and In Fact have been correct on the same questions in earlier quizzes. So take the coruse - enjoy the learning - but don't be discouraged because Coursera writes Kludgey code. IThe course is not yet over but perhaps someone will see this and make some changes. The professor is clear and enthusiastic. The main problem with this course is the quizzes. On several occasions I have submitted answers that were completely correct, only to find them all graded incorrect. I know they were correct because I had mathematician friends check them after receiving the failing grades. They could not understand why the quizzes were returned that way. On certain occasions, questions on one quiz were graded correct - and then the exact same type of question on another quiz was graded incorrect. In some cases, my answers were exactly the same as those probided by way of demonstrating the correct responses. Identical - yet marked wrong. When there are several ways to formulate an answer, we have no way of knowing what form is required. On a recent quiz, it turned out the answers were required in raw form - not solved to their numeric conclusion. But how are we to know that? I will write more at the end of the course. It is a good course for learning - but don't get upset if you get a bad grade. It is probably not an accurate reflection of your work. A final point - Professor Fowler should learn to pronounce "integral." It is NOT "intregal." It is "integral." He is, after all, a mathematician. You would not want a surgeon to speak of "cradiac care," would you? Otherwise - terrific class. | 1) of the course. It is a | Good | 1) course for learning - but don't | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | this is a good course | 1) this is a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Its a very good course. The teacher teachs with love and attention. I just think could have more exercises in video to help to do on the assignments. I recommend!!!! | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course. The teacher teachs with love | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | best... good to perfect your basic concept of calculus... recommended for everybody... | 1) best. . . | Good | 1) to perfect your basic concept of | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The professor is great and I'm loving this course! I did have to use Khan Academy a couple of times so far but this is awesome. Good luck | 1) so far but this is awesome. | Good | 1) luck | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | good work | 1) | Good | 1) work | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Useful and productive, tutor is good in a help to find a meaning of all this stuff. | 1) Useful and productive, tutor is | Good | 1) in a help to find a | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very very good introduction course which covers single variable differentiation and integration. The teacher is awesome! His enthusiasm is so contagious that I'm going to go through his Calculus Two course as well just because he created it! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) introduction course which covers single variable | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | awesome! it's a dynamic and intersting class ,and the best part is that you learn or practice a lot about math (calculus). so good!.... | 1) a lot about math (calculus). so | Good | 1) . . . . | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | easy to follow, good examples and practice exercises. | 1) easy to follow, | Good | 1) examples and practice exercises. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This is one of the best introductory course to Calculus. The explanations are lucid, the instructor is awesome and the level of problems is good. | 1) and the level of problems is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is really good and clear. Love it | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) and clear. Love it | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | An awesome course! The teacher is good, and the calendar is well organized. However, as to me, there are some points that have not been explained clearly and the some quizzes are just terrible. Hope to see the improvements. | 1) An awesome course! The teacher is | Good | 1) and the calendar is well organized. | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good for Beginnes. Love you Jim Fowler! | 1) | Good | 1) for Beginnes. Love you Jim Fowler! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Excellent, very good teacher | 1) Excellent, very | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good course, I teacher of math | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I teacher of math | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | well-explained, good job | 1) well-explained, | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I took this course a long time ago but I remember that my experience was overly good, the teacher demonstrates the ideas of Calculus in very creative and visible ways and simplifies as much as possible the somewhat complicated ideas of Calculus. I self used also Paul's online notes to accomplish Calculus but if you're not very much into reading and you prefer very simple and clear videos this is the course for you (although I can't guarantee that everybody will relate to the style of this teacher). | 1) remember that my experience was overly | Good | 1) the teacher demonstrates the ideas of | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good. Thanks alot | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thanks alot | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good course that covers some of the most fundamental concepts behind Calculus. Although the lecturer is quite "in your face", the lectures are well structured and well explained. The intro music at every lecture (every 3-5 minutes) is unnecessary and annoying. | 1) | Good | 1) course that covers some of the | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Thank you for such a good calculus course! | 1) Thank you for such a | Good | 1) calculus course! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Free is good. The Professor is a little hurried when he speaks, that distract me from the lessons. However, I prefer this online class to the On Campus math classes I have completed at the Oak Harbor Campus of the Skagit Valley College. | 1) Free is | Good | 1) The Professor is a little hurried | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great teaching methodology - although the test are a bit too centered on number crunching and not reasoning. (a lot of number crunching and no room for little numerical mistake although reasoning is good) | 1) little numerical mistake although reasoning is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good! :) | 1) | Good | 1) :) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good course, although too much long. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, although too much long. | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is best suited for an Intermediate student. Course is good to have since oit convers the topic from its very basic perspective. For graduates this course is more time consuming and dosnt recommended. Advantages: -very simple descriptions -even a non mathematical background student can easily understand -Proofs in all forms(geometric, analatic, practical) descrition. Disav: -basic are explained and consuming too much time -dosnt going for advanced level -no high level explanations or topics. | 1) for an Intermediate student. Course is | Good | 1) to have since oit convers the | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Solid course. Good instructor. The quizzes, however, often were inconsistent on how to input Euler's number so that it could be read by the computer. 1 quiz had an item that did not contain a question (Thank god it was multiple choice) , and the last exam asked you to select between two answers which identical except for the fact that one added zero from x and one subtracted zero from x. | 1) Solid course. | Good | 1) instructor. The quizzes, however, often were | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Terrific instructor. Cover difficult topics well and in a very fine progression with very good transitions. Good explanations and good examples of concepts. Workable, useful knowledge gained. A very fine professor with a clear interest in teaching students. | 1) a very fine progression with very | Good | 1) transitions. Good explanations and good examples | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Terrific instructor. Cover difficult topics well and in a very fine progression with very good transitions. Good explanations and good examples of concepts. Workable, useful knowledge gained. A very fine professor with a clear interest in teaching students. | 2) fine progression with very good transitions. | Good | 2) explanations and good examples of concepts. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Terrific instructor. Cover difficult topics well and in a very fine progression with very good transitions. Good explanations and good examples of concepts. Workable, useful knowledge gained. A very fine professor with a clear interest in teaching students. | 3) very good transitions. Good explanations and | Good | 3) examples of concepts. Workable, useful knowledge | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good course to take! | 1) | Good | 1) course to take! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This class has taught me so much, just keep coming back to it because once I think I've figured something out I realize I didn't learn something else properly. I hope this class remains online and open all the time, it is very helpful to me because I was never really good at math in high school and I have decided to return to college after 10 years and I wish to earn a degree with a concentration and math because now that time has past ive lived a little and Im older I do see how advanced math is used in everyday life and I want to have a part in that. Thank you again for this class! | 1) me because I was never really | Good | 1) at math in high school and | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | amazing,good illustrations, good examples: ) | 1) amazing, | Good | 1) illustrations, good examples: ) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | amazing,good illustrations, good examples: ) | 2) amazing, good illustrations, | Good | 2) examples: ) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good course! the teacher is very enthusiastic and his english is easy to understand, even for persons whose english is not their mother tongue. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! the teacher is very enthusiastic | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very good considering the amount of information conveyed in the short amount of time. A few of the tests were slightly glitchy in the acceptable range of correct answers (in terms of rounding answers) and would only accept things like 17*sqrt(15426) as the answer, even if an equivalent value down to the 6th decimal place was give instead. | 1) very | Good | 1) considering the amount of information conveyed | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I feel that this is a great course for all levels of calculus students- those who have just taken up a calc course in high school, those who want to review calculus for higher studies or even those who want to learn calculus because they find it an interesting subject and want to gain more understanding of it. The instructor has put in a good amount of effort to explain not just the topics themselves but also to build up some level of conceptual understanding and insight, without delving too much in depth and keeping his lectures jargon-free. This has ensured that all learners are on the same level and can reap the benifits of learning calculus. Another take away from the coruse is that learners come to appreciate that calculus is both interesting as well as useful, a total contrast to the popular perception that it is confusing, boring and can be learned only rote learning of forumlas. | 1) The instructor has put in a | Good | 1) amount of effort to explain not | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher Jim seems a very optimistic man. He is always happy. And the animation is just amazing, I never thought that the internet lesson could be so real and funny and successfully. Good luck. | 1) so real and funny and successfully. | Good | 1) luck. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The content is good. Needs better maintenance. Certain bugs and assignment errors should be rectified. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) Needs better maintenance. Certain bugs and | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good course, everything well explained ! | 1) | Good | 1) course, everything well explained ! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | One of the best courses on Coursera. The material is presented in a very interesting way. You can get good skills in Calculus participating in this Course. | 1) very interesting way. You can get | Good | 1) skills in Calculus participating in this | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Hey. It's really perfect ! The great thing in thin course is the professor. He is really good. i'm in the first of Intermediate Level in English and it means my English is not good enough but simple teaching of this professor really good and Be very good in English is not a must for learning. Thank U All ! I'm Ali from Iran. | 1) is the professor. He is really | Good | 1) i'm in the first of Intermediate | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Hey. It's really perfect ! The great thing in thin course is the professor. He is really good. i'm in the first of Intermediate Level in English and it means my English is not good enough but simple teaching of this professor really good and Be very good in English is not a must for learning. Thank U All ! I'm Ali from Iran. | 2) it means my English is not | Good | 2) enough but simple teaching of this | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Hey. It's really perfect ! The great thing in thin course is the professor. He is really good. i'm in the first of Intermediate Level in English and it means my English is not good enough but simple teaching of this professor really good and Be very good in English is not a must for learning. Thank U All ! I'm Ali from Iran. | 3) simple teaching of this professor really | Good | 3) and Be very good in English | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Hey. It's really perfect ! The great thing in thin course is the professor. He is really good. i'm in the first of Intermediate Level in English and it means my English is not good enough but simple teaching of this professor really good and Be very good in English is not a must for learning. Thank U All ! I'm Ali from Iran. | 4) professor really good and Be very | Good | 4) in English is not a must | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Amazing Instructor !! Gives very good insights and relates the concepts holisticaly | 1) Amazing Instructor ! ! Gives very | Good | 1) insights and relates the concepts holisticaly | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is Excellent. The materials used in teaching are very good. I liked the use of colors, the explanations in very details, and not skipping calculations. I liked the explanation behind everything, on how this is used in real life. I liked the enthusiasm of the teacher. He likes what he is doing and he loves Math. I think the limits subject should be taught in more details. I would liked it more if every theorem would have a proof. I think the use of epsilon/delta in practice was too little in this course, and should be expanded (it looks like this is a course for engineers rather than for mathematicians). The most painful problem in this course are the exercises, in 2 aspects. The first aspect: in many cases the exercises repeat themselves in a slightly different form - the diversity of of exercises should be expanded. The second aspect: exercises which require my typing have a lot of parsing issues, which are not clear, and are frustrating: example from integrals: the system would expect an answer like this one: (x)*(E^x) - E^x+C and would not accept a correct answer like this x*E^x - E^x+c. In this sense, I recommend using questions with multiple answers, and leave the open answers only for the cases where you need to type something where there are no parsing issues expected, such as typing numeric values. Thank you for this course. I liked it. | 1) materials used in teaching are very | Good | 1) I liked the use of colors, | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I thought this was a well presented course with good coverage of the material. Only thing holding me back from giving it a five start rating is a few errors in the quizzes need to be fixed. | 1) was a well presented course with | Good | 1) coverage of the material. Only thing | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | good lessons but i cant manage time to listen . but now i decided to be punctual. | 1) | Good | 1) lessons but i cant manage time | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | straightforward and good pace with course material. this course really helps a lot in terms of preparations for more stats and calculus courses. | 1) straightforward and | Good | 1) pace with course material. this course | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good intro to calculus that is not heavy on theory | 1) | Good | 1) intro to calculus that is not | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very very good | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great, very good teacher, in fact superb teacher. Outstanding explanations, easy to follow, very dynamic. I would like have had a teacher like this when in college. Recommend 100%. | 1) Great, very | Good | 1) teacher, in fact superb teacher. Outstanding | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This is a very good course; it help to remind the knowlodges about the introduction at the Calculus I. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course; it help to remind the | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great introduction to calculus. Very clear explanations and good pace. Thoroughly enjoyable! Thank you! | 1) to calculus. Very clear explanations and | Good | 1) pace. Thoroughly enjoyable! Thank you! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | good thank you | 1) | Good | 1) thank you | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This course is not good in giving lessons with examples that will help a with studying for the quizzes. | 1) This course is not | Good | 1) in giving lessons with examples that | 1.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I am taking this course together with my graduation calculus course, and this is pretty much better than all my classes, so far. Very good. | 1) all my classes, so far. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | good. explains the lessons so simply and with a lot of examples so we can learn better. | 1) | Good | 1) explains the lessons so simply and | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is just awesome. What makes this course so good is the enthusiasm with which professor Jim teaches this course. Brilliant! !! | 1) awesome. What makes this course so | Good | 1) is the enthusiasm with which professor | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is very energetic and good speaker. I can see that he worked a lot for this course. Videos have very good details(graphical effects, prepared papers for lesson). He teaches very clearly, i am understanding all the subject despite i am bad at English. | 1) The teacher is very energetic and | Good | 1) speaker. I can see that he | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The teacher is very energetic and good speaker. I can see that he worked a lot for this course. Videos have very good details(graphical effects, prepared papers for lesson). He teaches very clearly, i am understanding all the subject despite i am bad at English. | 2) for this course. Videos have very | Good | 2) details(graphical effects, prepared papers for lesson). | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Prof Fowler has a really effective and engaging method of presenting the course in an accessible manner. The visual aids are used to good effect to illustrate each topic, whilst the module tests really help to cement the knowledge, occasionally boosted by being able to re-watch the relevant lecture should there be any sticking points. | 1) The visual aids are used to | Good | 1) effect to illustrate each topic, whilst | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This is actually good. the tutor is very fun and it makes me feel clearly about calculus. But, it will be more excellent if this course give a short quiz for each topic in end of the section. And for the final test, can this course give more test? I mean like more question in number or kind of test. | 1) This is actually | Good | 1) the tutor is very fun and | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Really good course materials and really effective explanations on topics relative to Caculus. However may not be very effective for people who haven't yet graduated from high school mathematics. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course materials and really effective explanations | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is very well presented and the lecturer's explanation is very clear. Thanks to this course, and the lecturer's enthusiam and passion, I have gain a good appreciation of the subject. | 1) and passion, I have gain a | Good | 1) appreciation of the subject. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Really good explanation. Great teacher | 1) Really | Good | 1) explanation. Great teacher | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Learning is intelligent and differente. Good work teacher. | 1) Learning is intelligent and differente. | Good | 1) work teacher. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I wanted to go back a relearn some calculus long ago. I can't say enough good about this course. I love the professor's passion for his subject - always a mark of a great teacher. He breaks big subjects into small pieces for easy ingestion. | 1) long ago. I can't say enough | Good | 1) about this course. I love the | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Great teacher, good material. It's awesome for those who want to become familiar with calculus. | 1) Great teacher, | Good | 1) material. It's awesome for those who | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It is a good course, but the quiz/exercises are very difficult, and sometimes, unrelated to the topics | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, but the quiz/exercises are very | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | The course is really good, because the teacher is great, but there are some errors in subtitles, and even in some exercises. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) because the teacher is great, but | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | There is some good material in this course. The text is fairly good. But I have two main reservations about the course. The first is that the lectures do not always correspond closely enough with the quizzes, and with the text. There are times when one can take a quiz and think, "How exactly does this relate to the lectures I just saw?" The text has quite a few exercises, but there is a tendency to throw in one or two problems whose difficulty is an order of magnitude above everything else in that section, and I find this discouraging and a waste of time. Save those for a later course, or put them into a separate "Extra Challenges" section. Learning calculus is hard enough without trying to grapple without some really tricky trig problem at the same time. as a single example. The second reservation is with the instructor's manner. Many students find it very enjoyable. I am not one of them. Much of the time, he's OK, especially when the camera is not pointed at him. But as the course progresses, much of the footage is of him at his desk, and the closeups become more and more extreme, the hand-waving and fist-clenching approach sheer windmilling, and the exaggerated eye-rolling, grinning and so forth become so distracting that I can't bear to watch. I realize that the goal was to avoid being a dry-as-dust droning professor, and that is commendable, but there is a happy middle ground between that and hamming. I can almost speculate that there was an impulse to add in cartoon sproing-bonk-cuckoo-klaxon sound effects. (There is actually one such sound effect, but just one, so I won't quibble on that.) I would have found the class more effective with a demeanor that was enthusiastic without being histrionic. I'm sure this is one of those "you either love it or hate it" things, and I may be in the minority. The instructor is not generally one to throw out some concept that has not already been learned and then just motor on without explanation. He errs on the side of overly-detailed explanation, which to me is preferable to skipping over subjects or techniques and assuming you know them. Having said all of this, I repeat that there is good material, and you can learn the fundamentals of calculus for free in this course. | 1) There is some | Good | 1) material in this course. The text | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | There is some good material in this course. The text is fairly good. But I have two main reservations about the course. The first is that the lectures do not always correspond closely enough with the quizzes, and with the text. There are times when one can take a quiz and think, "How exactly does this relate to the lectures I just saw?" The text has quite a few exercises, but there is a tendency to throw in one or two problems whose difficulty is an order of magnitude above everything else in that section, and I find this discouraging and a waste of time. Save those for a later course, or put them into a separate "Extra Challenges" section. Learning calculus is hard enough without trying to grapple without some really tricky trig problem at the same time. as a single example. The second reservation is with the instructor's manner. Many students find it very enjoyable. I am not one of them. Much of the time, he's OK, especially when the camera is not pointed at him. But as the course progresses, much of the footage is of him at his desk, and the closeups become more and more extreme, the hand-waving and fist-clenching approach sheer windmilling, and the exaggerated eye-rolling, grinning and so forth become so distracting that I can't bear to watch. I realize that the goal was to avoid being a dry-as-dust droning professor, and that is commendable, but there is a happy middle ground between that and hamming. I can almost speculate that there was an impulse to add in cartoon sproing-bonk-cuckoo-klaxon sound effects. (There is actually one such sound effect, but just one, so I won't quibble on that.) I would have found the class more effective with a demeanor that was enthusiastic without being histrionic. I'm sure this is one of those "you either love it or hate it" things, and I may be in the minority. The instructor is not generally one to throw out some concept that has not already been learned and then just motor on without explanation. He errs on the side of overly-detailed explanation, which to me is preferable to skipping over subjects or techniques and assuming you know them. Having said all of this, I repeat that there is good material, and you can learn the fundamentals of calculus for free in this course. | 2) this course. The text is fairly | Good | 2) But I have two main reservations | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | There is some good material in this course. The text is fairly good. But I have two main reservations about the course. The first is that the lectures do not always correspond closely enough with the quizzes, and with the text. There are times when one can take a quiz and think, "How exactly does this relate to the lectures I just saw?" The text has quite a few exercises, but there is a tendency to throw in one or two problems whose difficulty is an order of magnitude above everything else in that section, and I find this discouraging and a waste of time. Save those for a later course, or put them into a separate "Extra Challenges" section. Learning calculus is hard enough without trying to grapple without some really tricky trig problem at the same time. as a single example. The second reservation is with the instructor's manner. Many students find it very enjoyable. I am not one of them. Much of the time, he's OK, especially when the camera is not pointed at him. But as the course progresses, much of the footage is of him at his desk, and the closeups become more and more extreme, the hand-waving and fist-clenching approach sheer windmilling, and the exaggerated eye-rolling, grinning and so forth become so distracting that I can't bear to watch. I realize that the goal was to avoid being a dry-as-dust droning professor, and that is commendable, but there is a happy middle ground between that and hamming. I can almost speculate that there was an impulse to add in cartoon sproing-bonk-cuckoo-klaxon sound effects. (There is actually one such sound effect, but just one, so I won't quibble on that.) I would have found the class more effective with a demeanor that was enthusiastic without being histrionic. I'm sure this is one of those "you either love it or hate it" things, and I may be in the minority. The instructor is not generally one to throw out some concept that has not already been learned and then just motor on without explanation. He errs on the side of overly-detailed explanation, which to me is preferable to skipping over subjects or techniques and assuming you know them. Having said all of this, I repeat that there is good material, and you can learn the fundamentals of calculus for free in this course. | 3) this, I repeat that there is | Good | 3) material, and you can learn the | 3.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | A very useful course. Although I studied calculus before , this course was a good revision and helpful in gaining insight. This course is not only about applying formulas, but also understanding them. Recommended for anyone who wants to start studying calculus. | 1) before , this course was a | Good | 1) revision and helpful in gaining insight. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Excellent Course. Good professor and good exercisses. Good job, Professor. | 1) Excellent Course. | Good | 1) professor and good exercisses. Good job, | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Excellent Course. Good professor and good exercisses. Good job, Professor. | 2) Excellent Course. Good professor and | Good | 2) exercisses. Good job, Professor. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Excellent Course. Good professor and good exercisses. Good job, Professor. | 3) Course. Good professor and good exercisses. | Good | 3) job, Professor. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Good teacher | 1) | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | thanks , good challenge | 1) thanks , | Good | 1) challenge | 4.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good course. The lecturer was amazing!!!! The best Math lecturer | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The lecturer was amazing! ! | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | this course is very good for understanding Calculus if you don't believe just give it a try! | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) for understanding Calculus if you don't | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | Very good course to brush up Calculus | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to brush up Calculus | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | best course i ever had .professor was just perfect nothing could be pleasing than seeing his overly happy face. good luck sir !! we all student really appreciate for your efforts . | 1) than seeing his overly happy face. | Good | 1) luck sir ! ! we all | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I think this is really best course on courseera, teacher is just amazing, he is explaining very clearly and with good humor | 1) is explaining very clearly and with | Good | 1) humor | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | This course has been a great source to revise and learn calculus. The textbook and the course quizzes have added great value to the course. Thanks to Dr. Fowler and his team for providing a very good course. It would be great if they could come back with a course for multi-variable calculus. | 1) his team for providing a very | Good | 1) course. It would be great if | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | It's a very good course. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| HRSOu-BiEeOZpyIACyeXpA | I enjoyed it. Jim Fowler does well, his enthusiasm and the time and effort he (and whatever filming and editing team he has) have put into the presentation is impressive. Difficult for me to rate it as a maths course - how would I know whether it covers what it needs and have anything meaningful to stay about the standard of it. I felt I understood what was going on, I passed the quizzes. Maybe that's all good? Occasional bug in the quizes - nothing you can't work around (eg totally blank question but four answers to choose from.) The mathematical symbol rendering doesn't work on the mobile app at all. | 1) passed the quizzes. Maybe that's all | Good | 1) Occasional bug in the quizes - | 4.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course overall. Would be nice if the course offered review of questions we answered incorrectly. That would be helpful feedback. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall. Would be nice if | 4.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very clear, lively and informative. Very good overall! | 1) Very clear, lively and informative. Very | Good | 1) overall! | 5.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | This course is very helpful for me now. After finished this course, It is good to think about how to study, how to commite with others in my life, and how to try to avoide negative feedback in future：） | 1) After finished this course, It is | Good | 1) to think about how to study, | 5.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Really good information and easy to follow. | 1) Really | Good | 1) information and easy to follow. | 4.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Useful but a little bit fluffy (but i guess so is the topic). The material is good, the presentation (the speaker) is awesome: clear spoken and at a good pace. i found the questions in the quiz to be a bit vague. | 1) is the topic). The material is | Good | 1) the presentation (the speaker) is awesome: | 3.0 |
| HUJ11BnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Useful but a little bit fluffy (but i guess so is the topic). The material is good, the presentation (the speaker) is awesome: clear spoken and at a good pace. i found the questions in the quiz to be a bit vague. | 2) awesome: clear spoken and at a | Good | 2) pace. i found the questions in | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Overall a good course! | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The course is quite good and informative in the first two weeks covering a lot of information and a lot of exercises. Week 3 is very unrelated and hard the videos and exercises are bad, and I had to do this part by myself again. Also when we get to the final course project doesn't cover any of these techniques. In my opinion, week 3 should be replaced with something more related to plotting systems and distributions, also one project would be enough. | 1) The course is quite | Good | 1) and informative in the first two | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | A very good introduction to the exploratory analysis and the R's plotting systems. The most advanced exploratory techniques (singular values decomposition, etc.) are not explained in depth but the overall role that these kinds of statistical learning techniques plays in the exploratory analysis is firmly established. Great work with the course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the exploratory analysis and | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good hand-on class | 1) | Good | 1) hand-on class | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The only missing point I would say about this course is how to deal with skew data and/or outliers. Although it is not specific to "cleaning data", I think there is a good opportunity there to at least give some hints on this subject | 1) , I think there is a | Good | 1) opportunity there to at least give | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good introduction to the various graphing systems. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the various graphing systems. | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Pretty good course. Nice content. Middle section on clustering felt random. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course. Nice content. Middle section on | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good class - links and slides have not been updated recently. Frustrating to finish without the exact linkts to the data. | 1) | Good | 1) class - links and slides have | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good course, but the SWIRL exercises (and a few quiz questions) needed to be updated for the latest version of ggplot2. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but the SWIRL exercises (and | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | A lot of broken swirl(), which wouldn't be so bad except *a lot* of this course is based entirely on swirl(). Also the swirl() text was almost verbatim of the lectures one has just watched. All in all, good information, but the swirl() badly needs an update. | 1) has just watched. All in all, | Good | 1) information, but the swirl() badly needs | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Great course, lots of good things to explore! | 1) Great course, lots of | Good | 1) things to explore! | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good course! It's the hardest yet on the Specalization | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! It's the hardest yet on | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Really nice course. Good to put the graphics functions in R to use. I think it would be helpful to have a summary page somewhere that compares the format of how to generate simple plots using each of the 3 packages - just for reference. | 1) Really nice course. | Good | 1) to put the graphics functions in | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | I strongly suggest for future Data scientist, if you know R language with making Plots, you can be a good analytic | 1) making Plots, you can be a | Good | 1) analytic | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Good course overall. There tends to be many lectures that are just lists of commands. Also, they don't seem to be updating the material. Many lectures are several years old and still have typos in them. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall. There tends to be | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good. I enjoyed and learned a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I enjoyed and learned a lot. | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Excellent overview of plotting and clustering. However, there were a few bits that were required for good completion of the projects that weren't covered in detail. Overall an excellent course and specialization. | 1) few bits that were required for | Good | 1) completion of the projects that weren't | 3.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good course for doing practical data analysis. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for doing practical data analysis. | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | The course did a good overview of the different plotting systems in R, but it rushed through clustering. I had to watch the videos of k-means and hierarchical clustering at least 3 times to sort of understand it. The matrix concepts went completely over my head. Otherwise, the projects were very interesting, and I would highly recommend this course to other people. | 1) The course did a | Good | 1) overview of the different plotting systems | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good course. Explains some very peculiar concepts of PCA and SVD very clearly. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Explains some very peculiar concepts | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Some parts of material is good quality, but some is bad - also some show bad practices in R. Extensively use swirl as assignments over self work. It is better to go through good tutorial over R base plotting system and ggplot2. | 1) Some parts of material is | Good | 1) quality, but some is bad - | 2.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Some parts of material is good quality, but some is bad - also some show bad practices in R. Extensively use swirl as assignments over self work. It is better to go through good tutorial over R base plotting system and ggplot2. | 2) It is better to go through | Good | 2) tutorial over R base plotting system | 2.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | pretty good starter course. I liked 40 min Case Study video at the end. It was very helpful to watch the instructor do the analysis from start to finish. | 1) pretty | Good | 1) starter course. I liked 40 min | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | Very good course. Clear instructions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Clear instructions. | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | If you know some R programming and want to learn how to generate plots for your data analysis, this course will give you a good start. I highly suggest doing swirl exercises after watching the lecture videos to reinforce your understanding of the course materials. | 1) this course will give you a | Good | 1) start. I highly suggest doing swirl | 5.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | I have taken the course earlier, so am somewhat familiar with the layout and the materials. Overall it is a very good course and covers a wide range of subject matters. Roger has done a very good job explaining the concepts. I certainly would recommend this course to all who's interested in the subject. I realize that there's limitation on the time people suppose to spend each week, however, I would like to suggest adding homework, in addition to quizzes. Several video clips have some audio issues, not sure if that's fixable. | 1) materials. Overall it is a very | Good | 1) course and covers a wide range | 4.0 |
| hwiBZm0vEeWbyw5d8C-Blw | I have taken the course earlier, so am somewhat familiar with the layout and the materials. Overall it is a very good course and covers a wide range of subject matters. Roger has done a very good job explaining the concepts. I certainly would recommend this course to all who's interested in the subject. I realize that there's limitation on the time people suppose to spend each week, however, I would like to suggest adding homework, in addition to quizzes. Several video clips have some audio issues, not sure if that's fixable. | 2) matters. Roger has done a very | Good | 2) job explaining the concepts. I certainly | 4.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very interesting course outlining the important of good revenue management and flexible pricing to maximize hotel revenue and profits. I would welcome a few more practical exercises DURING the course and not only on the final quiz. Also, it would be good to have the tables and presentations on .pdf or . jpg format as details are not readable behind the presenter. Looking forward to the next course in this specialization, namely Demand Management. | 1) interesting course outlining the important of | Good | 1) revenue management and flexible pricing to | 4.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very interesting course outlining the important of good revenue management and flexible pricing to maximize hotel revenue and profits. I would welcome a few more practical exercises DURING the course and not only on the final quiz. Also, it would be good to have the tables and presentations on .pdf or . jpg format as details are not readable behind the presenter. Looking forward to the next course in this specialization, namely Demand Management. | 2) final quiz. Also, it would be | Good | 2) to have the tables and presentations | 4.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | overall course was very good | 1) overall course was very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| HXsj6jeHEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is highly theoretical. Only good for coming to know the terms that are in use in the industry and their meanings. Very little take away from a practical perspective. Some live example or a case study to be incorporated where the students can apply the principles first hand. | 1) The course is highly theoretical. Only | Good | 1) for coming to know the terms | 2.0 |
| i7N8t4khEeW99gozy_2pgw | very good and knowledge based course | 1) very | Good | 1) and knowledge based course | 5.0 |
| i7N8t4khEeW99gozy_2pgw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| i7N8t4khEeW99gozy_2pgw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | GOOD!I can learn something about the foundation of Graphic Design. | 1) | Good | 1) I can learn something about the | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good explanation and very basic | 1) | Good | 1) explanation and very basic | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course: The instructor, the method, the process for evaluation, everything was good, fun and interesting. Thanks for sharing it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course: The instructor, the method, the | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course: The instructor, the method, the process for evaluation, everything was good, fun and interesting. Thanks for sharing it! | 2) the process for evaluation, everything was | Good | 2) fun and interesting. Thanks for sharing | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thank you for the course!I refreshed something I had learned by myself before, learned some absolutely new stuff and learned some more about things I only heard about before. Videos are very nice and the text is super easy to understand and the teacher's voice is very appealing. There are two things that I want to notice. First of all, I would like this course to be more informative. All weekly videos and tasks can be watched and done in one day now. Give us more videos, more information, let's go deeper! The second thing is that peer reviews seemed ineffective to me. Yeah, on the one hand, that's a real feedback from real people who are not your parents or friends so you can be judged objectively. On the other hand, I'd want to know teacher's opinion, I mean, feedback from someone who has a great experience in design. Personally, I didn't get anything but good marks and good words from my peers, though I believe there are things to improve, I just need someone who can point at them. | 1) Personally, I didn't get anything but | Good | 1) marks and good words from my | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thank you for the course!I refreshed something I had learned by myself before, learned some absolutely new stuff and learned some more about things I only heard about before. Videos are very nice and the text is super easy to understand and the teacher's voice is very appealing. There are two things that I want to notice. First of all, I would like this course to be more informative. All weekly videos and tasks can be watched and done in one day now. Give us more videos, more information, let's go deeper! The second thing is that peer reviews seemed ineffective to me. Yeah, on the one hand, that's a real feedback from real people who are not your parents or friends so you can be judged objectively. On the other hand, I'd want to know teacher's opinion, I mean, feedback from someone who has a great experience in design. Personally, I didn't get anything but good marks and good words from my peers, though I believe there are things to improve, I just need someone who can point at them. | 2) get anything but good marks and | Good | 2) words from my peers, though I | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good basic course on graphic design. I've learned a lot about typography, composition, image making and shapes and colours. The course is very well structured with good videos and practical examples. It's a must do course for everyone that is wanting to learn more about design, | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic course on graphic design. I've | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good basic course on graphic design. I've learned a lot about typography, composition, image making and shapes and colours. The course is very well structured with good videos and practical examples. It's a must do course for everyone that is wanting to learn more about design, | 2) course is very well structured with | Good | 2) videos and practical examples. It's a | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | IT IS A GOOD BASIC COURSE IN DESIGN, NICE FOR EXPERIMENTING. | 1) IT IS A | Good | 1) BASIC COURSE IN DESIGN, NICE FOR | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very basic information but a good beginner's course. | 1) Very basic information but a | Good | 1) beginner's course. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This is a great course for all-time beginners to learn about the most fundamental principles of design. It is not, however, so much a compelling course if you have any notion about design in general or color as it is as bare-bones as it can get. I have really liked the lectures though, and the projects, though they could have been a little bit more challenging, were good examples of a real-life practice. | 1) a little bit more challenging, were | Good | 1) examples of a real-life practice. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A very good way to know the basics of graphic design | 1) A very | Good | 1) way to know the basics of | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good introductory course to Graphic Design. A good staple to get familiar with the very basics before starting learning more. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to Graphic Design. A | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good introductory course to Graphic Design. A good staple to get familiar with the very basics before starting learning more. | 2) introductory course to Graphic Design. A | Good | 2) staple to get familiar with the | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Over all a good experience to get a solid understanding of basic graphic design aspects. | 1) Over all a | Good | 1) experience to get a solid understanding | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good activities , nice complete course | 1) | Good | 1) activities , nice complete course | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good to know basic elements of graphic design | 1) | Good | 1) to know basic elements of graphic | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thats a good course for beginers. In my opinion should be more illustrative with more real and nice examples. | 1) Thats a | Good | 1) course for beginers. In my opinion | 3.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good visual material accompanied by excellent written supplement that allowed us to follow the recorded portion of the course. Interesting exercises and great methodology that allow students to review and provide feedback to others. | 1) Very | Good | 1) visual material accompanied by excellent written | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Its a good course for people who never look at design but its a lot surface. Of course if you want to know the main aspects of design very quikly it course for you. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course for people who never look | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | this course is amazing! very good choice for entry-level designers | 1) this course is amazing! very | Good | 1) choice for entry-level designers | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A very good introduction to this specialization, with fun and thought-provoking exercisees. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to this specialization, with fun | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It gives a very good overview of the fundamentals of graphic design, also how to start thinking the graphical way. | 1) It gives a very | Good | 1) overview of the fundamentals of graphic | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Topic and videos, very good, perfect explanation. Thank you! | 1) Topic and videos, very | Good | 1) perfect explanation. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course, entertaining assignments, a lot of information. Good way to start. | 1) entertaining assignments, a lot of information. | Good | 1) way to start. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The instruction videos are pretty good. The course gives a good overview of the fundamentals. It delivers what it promises. | 1) The instruction videos are pretty | Good | 1) The course gives a good overview | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The instruction videos are pretty good. The course gives a good overview of the fundamentals. It delivers what it promises. | 2) pretty good. The course gives a | Good | 2) overview of the fundamentals. It delivers | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A very good course and has helped understand a lot about The said subject :) | 1) A very | Good | 1) course and has helped understand a | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good fundamentals tutorial | 1) | Good | 1) fundamentals tutorial | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The learning process is a complete experience, full of knowledge, good videos and excellent teachers. I think is a 5 stars quality course, because of the amount of tools teachers give. Each one special and necessary. Graphic Design is about making our soul, heart and brain work together. I believe this course is a great way to get this team to complete our expectations. | 1) a complete experience, full of knowledge, | Good | 1) videos and excellent teachers. I think | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course is simply amazing. Prepare to do a lot of hands on work, and use your creativity. The instructor gives hands on work that is really fun to do, and you end up with the knowledge and the skills to actually make a good poster, especially if you do the bonus assignments, which are really nice. I must note, though, that it is very useful to know how to use computer programs to arrange files and text. I used Adobe Illustrator (like the instructor) and Pages, but basic knowledge of Microsoft Powerpoint or similar is enough, as you will scan hand-drawn pictures and put them in, arrange them, then export them as PDFs. Considering you are on this website, I'd say you are ready! Start ASAP! | 1) the skills to actually make a | Good | 1) poster, especially if you do the | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Brilliant Course. It gives you a good theoretical understanding of modern graphic design. At the same time, it also gives you ample opportunity to make graphic design through its multiple peer reviewed assignments. Personally, I came out with some of my best poster works during this course as it pushed me to experiment beyond what I had done till then. | 1) Brilliant Course. It gives you a | Good | 1) theoretical understanding of modern graphic design. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Overall I think this is a great course and really helpful. However, I had an unpleasant experience on the last week. There is an assignment that asks you to create a single contrast composition of 2 shapes. It says "shapes" and still people are not sure if they can use more count of those shapes. I chose to use 2 shapes, but multiple counts and some people that thought this is not only 2 shapes, but 2 counts as well, chose to grade my work with the lowest rating due to unfulfilled assignment. I think this is Coursera`s fault to begin with. They should word their requirements properly so it does not create confusion. Now, we are left to the good will of a classmate to judge our work and people are not even sure what the assignment asks of us exactly. | 1) Now, we are left to the | Good | 1) will of a classmate to judge | 3.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | So far so good! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | very good introductory course. i enjoyed the assignments, they are not overwhelming, easy to start, and the optional ones offer great opportunity to dig little deeper into graphic design fundamentals. | 1) very | Good | 1) introductory course. i enjoyed the assignments, | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course is the best option to know or review all the graphic design essentials and how to combine them to make a good piece of communication art. I really recommend this course in which you will find an excellent structured program to learn from the basic concepts all the way through the very pillars of the graphic design thinking and creation. | 1) to combine them to make a | Good | 1) piece of communication art. I really | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course for new learners and of course for old students. I personally recommend it to those who want to learn graphic designing. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for new learners and of | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good explanations and great tasks to accomplish. Really didactic. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations and great tasks to accomplish. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Awesome course! It has been a really good and well organised! I am greatly improving! | 1) course! It has been a really | Good | 1) and well organised! I am greatly | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thanks a lot! Great introduction course with interesting lectures and very good professors. I loved the assignments! :) | 1) course with interesting lectures and very | Good | 1) professors. I loved the assignments! :) | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good course. Interesting clear lectures and interesting, enjoyable assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Interesting clear lectures and interesting, | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course with good exercises. A fantastic starting place on your journey to graphic design. Will force you to become familiar with industry standards like Indesign, Photoshop and Illustrator to complete some assignments, which I think it a good thing. The lectures are also enjoyable and well presented. | 1) Great course with | Good | 1) exercises. A fantastic starting place on | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course with good exercises. A fantastic starting place on your journey to graphic design. Will force you to become familiar with industry standards like Indesign, Photoshop and Illustrator to complete some assignments, which I think it a good thing. The lectures are also enjoyable and well presented. | 2) assignments, which I think it a | Good | 2) thing. The lectures are also enjoyable | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good!!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good introduction course with explorational aspect! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction course with explorational aspect! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The material is really good for beginners. In order to make it more useful I think all the tasks should be mandatory, there shouldn't be any optional ones | 1) The material is really | Good | 1) for beginners. In order to make | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good course to learn more about graphic design and some aspects. Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn more about graphic | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good. I am not major in graphic design, but I learn a lot here. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I am not major in graphic | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The materials and knowledge of the fundamentals from this course are helpful. However, the assignments and peer grading threw me off. I did not like the fact that your grade depended on students' review of your assignments. It is all subjective. Good course materials, poor grading system. | 1) your assignments. It is all subjective. | Good | 1) course materials, poor grading system. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This was a great introductory course. I appreciated how much the lectures were chunked down--to make it easier to move through the information each week and that there was a good mixture of required and optional exercises. I had fun! I also liked that this course did not require software such as Indesign, Illustrator, or Photoshop. | 1) week and that there was a | Good | 1) mixture of required and optional exercises. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Its a great course. Even if it's a basic of the Graphic Design, it's pretty detailed and a good start to anyone interested in the subject. | 1) Design, it's pretty detailed and a | Good | 1) start to anyone interested in the | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Maybe too basic sometimes. But the teacher explains everything in a very good way. The platform works amazingly. | 1) teacher explains everything in a very | Good | 1) way. The platform works amazingly. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Simple and very good for beginner! | 1) Simple and very | Good | 1) for beginner! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! High quality. Good peer review | 1) Great course! High quality. | Good | 1) peer review | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course for starters who want to understand - Good Work ;) ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for starters who want to | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course for starters who want to understand - Good Work ;) ! | 2) starters who want to understand - | Good | 2) Work ;) ! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Information was very good and presented in a clear and intriguing manner. I do wish the professors or someone could give some oversight. Some students were nice, but some were very nasty to each other. Ironically, the people with the worst work were the nastiest. | 1) Information was very | Good | 1) and presented in a clear and | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good content, it explains with so much clear and simplycity! Really love the course! | 1) | Good | 1) content, it explains with so much | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | ok, i'm probably not the average student here cause i am old,... saying that i have a fine art qualification and 25 years of 'almost there' design experience to have a point of view. 'almost' being the important part of it... what this module gives you is a very firm understanding of how design works these days. the main lecturer is really good at what he does, and that's probably the most important part of any teacher-student situation. For personal reasons i committed a bit too much on this course, and i am glad to say that whether you feel like devoting 8 hours a week for it or 28 as i did, there is stuff for you to learn. although i already knew pretty much 70% of the material, having the concepts reestablished by this teacher in such structured manner really helped me out. If we're to get sentimental, i can honestly say that i feel this module was the best thing i did this past month, cause through fine art i have been designing for the past 25 years, but this gave me the STRUCTURE to think of DESIGN in relevant terms. awesome.- do it! btw.,i've tried to be as honest as i can possibly be here, hope it helps. if it was crap i would say it's crap. but this one isn't. and of course it's up to you to fully exploit this wonderful possibility. | 1) days. the main lecturer is really | Good | 1) at what he does, and that's | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This had some really good fundamentals and some really helpful exercises. I recommend this to anyone who would like to understand a little more about Graphic Design. | 1) This had some really | Good | 1) fundamentals and some really helpful exercises. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course was very interesting, hands on orientated and it offered me a lot of useful information. I have really enjoyed it! It was also a good motivation to practice graphic design more often, explore the realms of shapes, colours, typography etc. I was really grateful for the peer reviews, but I missed a bit more professional approach sometimes, for instance comments like "I like it" or "It is not that bad" does not tell me much about my work. So in these cases some feedback from someone who already is a graphic designer and knows much more about it than us, students, starting with the graphic design, would be more than welcome. I also missed advices on where to find out more on a particular topic. Overall, taking this course was a very positive experience and would recommend it to anyone who is interested in graphic design. | 1) enjoyed it! It was also a | Good | 1) motivation to practice graphic design more | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course is a good start in understanding the basics of graphic design, I felt it could go a bit deeper into the materials but its a good beginniing :) | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) start in understanding the basics of | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course is a good start in understanding the basics of graphic design, I felt it could go a bit deeper into the materials but its a good beginniing :) | 2) into the materials but its a | Good | 2) beginniing :) | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This is a good course and you will learn to be creative and learn about things you haven't done before. I would suggest anyone who wants to learn the fundamentals to take this course | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course and you will learn to | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good and educational contents. Great practical exercises that help develop knowledge. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and educational contents. Great practical exercises | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I found this course extremely engaging and interesting. The fundamentals are basic but that's what the outline states. It's good for beginners or graphic designers who need a refresher on the basics. You can execute the course at your own pace, following the timeline or completing assignments and lectures ahead of time. I'd highly recommend this course. | 1) that's what the outline states. It's | Good | 1) for beginners or graphic designers who | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course is cool! Good explanation of the concepts and the assignments designed in such a way that a feed back is guaranteed. | 1) This course is cool! | Good | 1) explanation of the concepts and the | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It is a really good course, but it is designed for complete beginers. I took it as a review of fundamentals and didn't learn nothing new, but I didn't have those expectations. I just wanted a pure review of things I already know. It was fun and maybe a bit too easy - even for beginers. :) | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course, but it is designed for | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | An exceptionally good course. Hands-on, and—as the name suggests—all about learning the fundamentals of design, rather than what to click in a piece of software. Highly recommended as an antidote to all the Photoshop tutorials out there. | 1) An exceptionally | Good | 1) course. Hands-on, and—as the name suggests—all | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course. Thoughtful introductions and good briefs. Enjoyed and learned lots | 1) Excellent course. Thoughtful introductions and | Good | 1) briefs. Enjoyed and learned lots | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Course is pretty good as a starting point. Makes you start thinking on different lines and gives a good introduction about the various aspects involved. Getting reviews from other students also helped a lot. So overall, i quite enjoyed the course. Thumbs Up!! :) | 1) Course is pretty | Good | 1) as a starting point. Makes you | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Course is pretty good as a starting point. Makes you start thinking on different lines and gives a good introduction about the various aspects involved. Getting reviews from other students also helped a lot. So overall, i quite enjoyed the course. Thumbs Up!! :) | 2) on different lines and gives a | Good | 2) introduction about the various aspects involved. | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Assignments could be more fun and hard but the course was very good. | 1) hard but the course was very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It's great that the course has a lot of practical assignments! Also it is very important to get feedback on your work from other people that have interest in this field. It's good to learn what works and what doesn't and why. Very useful for me! Thank you! | 1) have interest in this field. It's | Good | 1) to learn what works and what | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A really good course for beginners. Lets you know the basics of graphics design. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course for beginners. Lets you know | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Pros The information is good. This class is good for learning the vocabulary in graphic design. I already understood more general terms like scale and form. I learned new terms like figure/ground and visual contrast (or how graphic design defines it). Cons The teacher's pace for some of the videos is slow for the amount of information. On week 4, the pace slightly quickens. But overall, it's really slow. Verdict I would recommend this course for learning the terms of graphic design or getting a basic understanding of design principles. I also found the assignments fun. If you have some understanding of the basics of design and art, you do not need to watch every video. Feel free to skip on videos covering terms you have a general idea about. | 1) Pros The information is | Good | 1) This class is good for learning | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Pros The information is good. This class is good for learning the vocabulary in graphic design. I already understood more general terms like scale and form. I learned new terms like figure/ground and visual contrast (or how graphic design defines it). Cons The teacher's pace for some of the videos is slow for the amount of information. On week 4, the pace slightly quickens. But overall, it's really slow. Verdict I would recommend this course for learning the terms of graphic design or getting a basic understanding of design principles. I also found the assignments fun. If you have some understanding of the basics of design and art, you do not need to watch every video. Feel free to skip on videos covering terms you have a general idea about. | 2) information is good. This class is | Good | 2) for learning the vocabulary in graphic | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course! Amazing teachers and good content! | 1) Great course! Amazing teachers and | Good | 1) content! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Really good course. I would have given it 5 stars but it could use a little improvement. Too many optional assignments perhaps. They should have been required. The class just didn't engage you enough. That being said I've signed up for the next ones. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I would have given it | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course is pretty good and not difficult to take. I've learned basic graphic design skill via this course. Looking forward to taking more classes here again! | 1) The course is pretty | Good | 1) and not difficult to take. I've | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course for begginers. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for begginers. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I love this course so much, and I have learnt a lot of skills, techniques and knowledge about Graphic Design. Though some of the assignments are optional, I guess is to reduce the workload of the learners, I strongly emphasize learners to try all of them since the results won't affect the overall performance. It is a good introduction course for Graphic Design. | 1) the overall performance. It is a | Good | 1) introduction course for Graphic Design. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Hey, that's pretty good. | 1) Hey, that's pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I really liked this short course. Having not been exposed to any kind of arts classes before (not since elementary school anyway), I felt this instructor explained things in a way (and used examples as he explained) that I could understand. It got me to appreciate just how much you can do just by changing simple things like typeface and size. This class got me doing stuff that I hadn't done in a long time, like painting with water colors. It was not a complicated or challenging class, but it was a very good introduction, which is what I think it was intended to be. It was approachable and it inspires further exploration. | 1) class, but it was a very | Good | 1) introduction, which is what I think | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | good course structure for beginners ! | 1) | Good | 1) course structure for beginners ! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course that teaches you what you need for graphic design. It is a good approach to graphic design. The reviewing system encourages you to talk to your "classmates", there is a very friendly atmosphere. However, it is a bit difficult to get feedback from the institute and the teacher direclty. | 1) for graphic design. It is a | Good | 1) approach to graphic design. The reviewing | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Vale a pena fazer este curso! Muito bom! This is a very good Course! It is worth it! | 1) Muito bom! This is a very | Good | 1) Course! It is worth it! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course with a great range of introductory information with a good selection of exercises to complete. I learnt a lot from this course and had fun doing the assignments. | 1) range of introductory information with a | Good | 1) selection of exercises to complete. I | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very interesting course on Graphic design with a good structure and playful creative assignments. | 1) course on Graphic design with a | Good | 1) structure and playful creative assignments. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It is good for beginners only | 1) It is | Good | 1) for beginners only | 3.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good for beginner | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Really a lot of fun. It would be great if discussions were more active, but overall a good introductory graphic design course. | 1) were more active, but overall a | Good | 1) introductory graphic design course. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course was very well designed and extremely suitable for peeps of all backgrounds. I suppose the only drawback was that I didn't find the course challenging enough. But I went to design school for a few semesters, so I was already pretty familiar with the concepts. Overall, very good practice and a nice refresher. Thanks, Michael! | 1) familiar with the concepts. Overall, very | Good | 1) practice and a nice refresher. Thanks, | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course is great! Well organized, with good assignments and good lessons. The graphics and edition of the videos are really nice. | 1) course is great! Well organized, with | Good | 1) assignments and good lessons. The graphics | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course is great! Well organized, with good assignments and good lessons. The graphics and edition of the videos are really nice. | 2) Well organized, with good assignments and | Good | 2) lessons. The graphics and edition of | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Excellent course. Interesting, simple (in a very good way) and very engaging. Loved it. If only it continued... | 1) course. Interesting, simple (in a very | Good | 1) way) and very engaging. Loved it. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Good useful fundamental course content | 1) | Good | 1) useful fundamental course content | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Even if you are an experimented designer, it's useful to come back to the basics and maybe discover something you've forgot or something new. A good one for people interested in design. | 1) you've forgot or something new. A | Good | 1) one for people interested in design. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good to understand the basics of graphic design | 1) Very | Good | 1) to understand the basics of graphic | 4.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | A good, fun and very didactic introductory course. I'd like to have more courses on graphic design. | 1) A | Good | 1) fun and very didactic introductory course. | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | very interesting course with detailed teaching of the concepts and its application. recommend to anyone who is interested in graphic design, would be a good starting point! | 1) in graphic design, would be a | Good | 1) starting point! | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good, well paced course which gives you a flavor of graphic design. Nicely presented and concepts demonstrated well. I would definitely do more courses from them. | 1) Very | Good | 1) well paced course which gives you | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good lecturer, has very good command of English Language. Impressive | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecturer, has very good command of | 5.0 |
| I82JCSWXEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good lecturer, has very good command of English Language. Impressive | 2) Very good lecturer, has very | Good | 2) command of English Language. Impressive | 5.0 |
| iCIGe_T6EeS-1yIAC7MN4w | its very good. | 1) its very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iCIGe_T6EeS-1yIAC7MN4w | The course was very interesting. It touched upon all currently employed techniques in good detail. The lab-based videos were the most interesting. However, the lectures were too long. It would be a brilliant course if the lectures were cut short and made to the point. | 1) upon all currently employed techniques in | Good | 1) detail. The lab-based videos were the | 3.0 |
| iCIGe_T6EeS-1yIAC7MN4w | very good introduction but as i go through the videos and then do the quiz i feel like the material doesn't highlight exactly what is needed for the quiz. Maybe i'm not taking the video lecture as seriously as i should. Something else to reinforce the material cause it seems a bit condensed. thanks for a wonderful course! | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction but as i go through | 4.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | good but lengthy videos.. | 1) | Good | 1) but lengthy videos. . | 5.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | I use this course as a good resource it has been very helpfull for me the explanation of Dr Provart are incredibly good. | 1) I use this course as a | Good | 1) resource it has been very helpfull | 5.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | I use this course as a good resource it has been very helpfull for me the explanation of Dr Provart are incredibly good. | 2) explanation of Dr Provart are incredibly | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| IfDtq1vFEeSKTyIAC0YL2w | I think it is a very good course about Bioinformatics. The lab content is especially useful to me, | 1) I think it is a very | Good | 1) course about Bioinformatics. The lab content | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Really good course, this course is really challenging. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, this course is really challenging. | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course was good and the assignments were brainstorming. But if we would have the solution for the wrong answers it would be good. We will get to know the mistake. | 1) The course was | Good | 1) and the assignments were brainstorming. But | 4.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course was good and the assignments were brainstorming. But if we would have the solution for the wrong answers it would be good. We will get to know the mistake. | 2) the wrong answers it would be | Good | 2) We will get to know the | 4.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A really good course. I wish I could get the solutions to the assignments though. Some of them were tough, and it would have been nice to know where I was going wrong..... | 1) A really | Good | 1) course. I wish I could get | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very instructive course with clear examples, good theory and derivation explanations. Fair assignments. Highly recommended! | 1) Very instructive course with clear examples, | Good | 1) theory and derivation explanations. Fair assignments. | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A good class made me learn more basic knowledge in the power elecrrical | 1) A | Good | 1) class made me learn more basic | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | This course is a good start point to know about power electronics subject! | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) start point to know about power | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I thought this course was an informative introduction to an important class of electronics. The lecturer was easy to follow, except during certain topics. That, however, is more due to the difficult nature of the subject than a fault of the professor. I found myself pausing and rewatching some portions so I could gain a better understanding but I don't have any problems with that. There is a good balance between more generalized overviews of key circuit concepts and more detailed analyses of specific circuit topologies. You may have to do some outside research to fully understand all details and I know some people may be turned off by that. I believe it is fine, and it is a good way to learn how to find information on your own. I did not have to do this more than a few times (that would actually be annoying). Lastly, the assignments were just challenging enough to force me to actually grasp the material, without making it seem like it was impossible to complete. | 1) problems with that. There is a | Good | 1) balance between more generalized overviews of | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I thought this course was an informative introduction to an important class of electronics. The lecturer was easy to follow, except during certain topics. That, however, is more due to the difficult nature of the subject than a fault of the professor. I found myself pausing and rewatching some portions so I could gain a better understanding but I don't have any problems with that. There is a good balance between more generalized overviews of key circuit concepts and more detailed analyses of specific circuit topologies. You may have to do some outside research to fully understand all details and I know some people may be turned off by that. I believe it is fine, and it is a good way to learn how to find information on your own. I did not have to do this more than a few times (that would actually be annoying). Lastly, the assignments were just challenging enough to force me to actually grasp the material, without making it seem like it was impossible to complete. | 2) is fine, and it is a | Good | 2) way to learn how to find | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course is very good, but would like to make three suggestions: 1) You don't have a feedback from what you made wrong in the exercises. It is usefull to learn from the mistakes. 2) One week is a short lead time for the tasks 3)It might include extra optional tasks regarding simulation | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) but would like to make three | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | More theoretical. Analytical and Intuition is not much developed. Good for getting familiar with switch mode converter circuits. | 1) and Intuition is not much developed. | Good | 1) for getting familiar with switch mode | 3.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A very good beginning to the topic. Using together with the notes and downloadable slides of the videos makes everything easier to comprehend | 1) A very | Good | 1) beginning to the topic. Using together | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | pretty good basic analysis techniques of most common converter circuits. | 1) pretty | Good | 1) basic analysis techniques of most common | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very Good excellent course | 1) Very | Good | 1) excellent course | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Really good introductory course for power electronics!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) introductory course for power electronics! ! | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course! I learned so much about different types of converters. Keep it up the good work! | 1) of converters. Keep it up the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good instructors and the home-works thoroughly test your learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) instructors and the home-works thoroughly test | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course is good, the Lecturer is great. I learned a lot in this course. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) the Lecturer is great. I learned | 4.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course covers the topic in sufficient details and the assignments are quite good. | 1) details and the assignments are quite | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Professor Erickson explains both the mathematical and physical definitions of all converter equations. His methods enable you to tackle more complicated problems while maintaining a physical insight (not just playing with the math). Very good derivation of how to include losses and calculate the efficiency of a dc-dc converter. | 1) just playing with the math). Very | Good | 1) derivation of how to include losses | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A good course | 1) A | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course to learn about power electronics. This course was a bit challenging to complete in one go, good thing that the instructors divided it into multiple sessions. Thanks for offering so great course. | 1) challenging to complete in one go, | Good | 1) thing that the instructors divided it | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good. Questions were good enough for testing the knowledge and lof students. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Questions were good enough for testing | 5.0 |
| IjAlbH3IEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good. Questions were good enough for testing the knowledge and lof students. | 2) Very good. Questions were | Good | 2) enough for testing the knowledge and | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | Very Good Videos for Chemistry! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Videos for Chemistry! | 4.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | Most excellent course. Professor Hutchinson's presentation of chemistry made the learning experience valuable and enjoyable. The course is planned well and delivered in a most professional way. It's apparent that a lot of work went into creating this course. The use of the split screen is a good technique that fully engages the learner, and following the concept development concept throughout the lectures provides a solid foundation for moving from one concept to another. The minor negatives are the pdf file of the CDS material didn't always present correctly (especially tables, a common problem converting Word to pdf) and some of the chapter numbers didn't match ... but these are minor glitches and did not detract from the course itself. I can't say enough good things about this course. I kept thinking how great it would be to attend Rice University and attend Professor Hutchinson's classes. It's quite evident that he loves teaching and it shows in his lectures. I look forward to any future courses offered by Professor Hutchinson and Rice University. | 1) of the split screen is a | Good | 1) technique that fully engages the learner, | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | Most excellent course. Professor Hutchinson's presentation of chemistry made the learning experience valuable and enjoyable. The course is planned well and delivered in a most professional way. It's apparent that a lot of work went into creating this course. The use of the split screen is a good technique that fully engages the learner, and following the concept development concept throughout the lectures provides a solid foundation for moving from one concept to another. The minor negatives are the pdf file of the CDS material didn't always present correctly (especially tables, a common problem converting Word to pdf) and some of the chapter numbers didn't match ... but these are minor glitches and did not detract from the course itself. I can't say enough good things about this course. I kept thinking how great it would be to attend Rice University and attend Professor Hutchinson's classes. It's quite evident that he loves teaching and it shows in his lectures. I look forward to any future courses offered by Professor Hutchinson and Rice University. | 2) course itself. I can't say enough | Good | 2) things about this course. I kept | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | Very Very good, if you want to learn something just try these classes !!! | 1) Very Very | Good | 1) if you want to learn something | 5.0 |
| Ijr8rurHEeSb-yIACwuKNg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Excellent, It was a really good course. I recomend it | 1) Excellent, It was a really | Good | 1) course. I recomend it | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content was good but the assignments weren't structured that well. While reviewing I realised some people made very simplistic stuff like me after following instructions, while others with more design experience created really amazing stuff. They should have included some advanced example for demo. | 1) The course content was | Good | 1) but the assignments weren't structured that | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | A very good course, not just for those who want to become experts, but also for those who know more. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, not just for those who | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good course, maybe more detailed information would be better. | 1) | Good | 1) course, maybe more detailed information would | 4.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good course if you are driven and can teach yourself. I like the instructor's approach. I'm giving 3 stars only because I was looking for something more about techniques.. | 1) | Good | 1) course if you are driven and | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is good, although it repeats a lot from the Fundamentals of Graphic Design. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) although it repeats a lot from | 3.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good for beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners! | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very good course with fun and challenging assignments. My only criticism of this series of courses (the graphic design specialization) is the grading process and lack of instructor interaction. While the peer grading is setup so that it's not too difficult to receive a decent grade if you do the work, there is virtually no instructor feedback on assignments, which is a bit dissapointing. I realize this may be due to the huge number of students, but usually when I pay for a class, interaction and feedback from the instructor is part of the package. Perhaps if you did that, though, then the tuition cost would be much higher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with fun and challenging assignments. | 4.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very practical, great exercise, easy to understand and follow through, the student doesn’t need major computer programs or high quality technology in order to complete each assignment. The design of each assignment is made to use your imaginations, hands on tools and materials. Love the videos, clear, to the point beautiful made. Lots of room to work and do something quite good and unique if the student want! I am really having fun! Thank you! | 1) to work and do something quite | Good | 1) and unique if the student want! | 5.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I started 2 Hours ago.... it's amazing, such good teachers ! | 1) . . . it's amazing, such | Good | 1) teachers ! | 4.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | GOOD COURSE | 1) | Good | 1) COURSE | 4.0 |
| iN8yoSWdEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I found the course videos quite dull and uninteresting. The topics covered could have been taught a lot better. I finished this course only because I wanted to get through the specialization course. I found that the course 'Fundamentals of Graphic Design' did an exponentially better job of explaining image making techniques and composition. The assignments in this course are reasonably good but the instruction videos can definitely benefit from some additional in-depth material. | 1) assignments in this course are reasonably | Good | 1) but the instruction videos can definitely | 2.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good overview of child nutrition. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of child nutrition. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very well explained and videos are easy to understand, however, I recommend this only to parents who are really not giving any thought to their child°s nutrition. Recipes are really basic, though professor is providing good hints on how to "sell" healthy food to our children. In the country, I come from, it is very common to cook for children and we do not have to face to such amount of processed food...yet.. | 1) really basic, though professor is providing | Good | 1) hints on how to " sell" | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is wonderful and very informative for complete beginners with nutrition and cooking. The teacher is knowledgeable of her subject and creates clear content that lends to a good learning experience. I would recommend this course to anyone who is not familiar with nutrition and who has no experience cooking. | 1) clear content that lends to a | Good | 1) learning experience. I would recommend this | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good course. Great information. Easy to follow. Enjoyable all around. Thanks Maya! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Great information. Easy to follow. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course the professor is very good at explaining the material so everybody can follow. | 1) Great course the professor is very | Good | 1) at explaining the material so everybody | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Really good. loved it. She explains so clearly and simple. | 1) Really | Good | 1) loved it. She explains so clearly | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Although I am now a grandmother, I really enjoyed the course and was able to confirm my home's "good eating habits" and detect some bad ones, like sometimes eating with the televison on. I learned more about the environment and effects of eating processed foods or meats. I revel in seeing today's encouragement of having children particpate in healthy food : shopping, preparation and cooking. Thank You !! | 1) able to confirm my home's " | Good | 1) eating habits" and detect some bad | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Video production was very good, and good balance of video and "blackboard". Also, a good balance of practical stuff (like how to cook healthy stuff) and theory (what is a mono-saccharide, and how do they combine to form di-saccarides). Well done! | 1) Video production was very | Good | 1) and good balance of video and | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Video production was very good, and good balance of video and "blackboard". Also, a good balance of practical stuff (like how to cook healthy stuff) and theory (what is a mono-saccharide, and how do they combine to form di-saccarides). Well done! | 2) Video production was very good, and | Good | 2) balance of video and " blackboard" | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Video production was very good, and good balance of video and "blackboard". Also, a good balance of practical stuff (like how to cook healthy stuff) and theory (what is a mono-saccharide, and how do they combine to form di-saccarides). Well done! | 3) and " blackboard" . Also, a | Good | 3) balance of practical stuff (like how | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Its a wonderfully compiled course which teaches us how to encourage and inculcate good and healthy eating habits in children and also gives an insight into what is food and how can food be made more healthy and palatable. Some easy recipes have been taught which will surely interest the children. | 1) us how to encourage and inculcate | Good | 1) and healthy eating habits in children | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good course. A little basic. | 1) | Good | 1) course. A little basic. | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good course and easy to understand. It motivates me to introduce and provide my children (to be) with healthy food. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and easy to understand. It | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It's good to learn about how to cook for children. | 1) It's | Good | 1) to learn about how to cook | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | it's very good but when I sending you finish the course | 1) it's very | Good | 1) but when I sending you finish | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I could learn more deeply and apply them in daily life. Every time I choose my diet, I remember contents of this lecture. Thank you for making such a good lecture and I hope to apply it again. | 1) Thank you for making such a | Good | 1) lecture and I hope to apply | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | After taking a Nordic food diet course where they talked about children's' diets in the Nordic countries and how they were changing the norm, this course covered the basics as to what and why certain foods are good for you. I had been hoping for more complex recipes, but there were some differences to my dishes that I already make which were a nice change. | 1) what and why certain foods are | Good | 1) for you. I had been hoping | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excelent curse for a good food children education. | 1) Excelent curse for a | Good | 1) food children education. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I really loved this course! The instructor was very good, her lectures were informative and easy to follow with stellar graphics. Her videos were fun to watch, and her cooking lessons were very simple; she showed dishes that I would actually cook for my family! Best of all I believe she did a great job stating all the facts and encouraging people to make smart food choices without being judgmental about it, which is no easy task! I am lucky that I am already doing a lot of the things the instructor suggests for my toddler but the best takeaway I got was to take my child to a farmers market. We went this weekend and it was so much fun! I plan to take her there as often as I can. | 1) this course! The instructor was very | Good | 1) her lectures were informative and easy | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | practical approach and good nutrition looked easy and inexpensive. | 1) practical approach and | Good | 1) nutrition looked easy and inexpensive. | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Dr. Maya has done a fantastic job of creating this easy-to-follow course which covers a wide range of fundamental knowledge everyone should know! I work with kids and whilst education is merely one side of it, ensuring they receive good nutrition is equally important. Thank you Dr. Maya! | 1) side of it, ensuring they receive | Good | 1) nutrition is equally important. Thank you | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good basic information for every parent to know. All of us should make time to cook healthier food for our families. | 1) | Good | 1) basic information for every parent to | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | good to learn and very helpful | 1) | Good | 1) to learn and very helpful | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A very good course for every family. Thanks | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for every family. Thanks | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very useful. Good recipes and tips. | 1) Very useful. | Good | 1) recipes and tips. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great info! Good Recipes! Very Practical! | 1) Great info! | Good | 1) Recipes! Very Practical! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I don't think this course is for everyone. It's for the more industrialised societies who eat everything out of a jar. Not for those of us who still cook everyday. Having said that there was some information that was new and useful and some very good ideas to get kids more interested in the food they eat. I enjoyed it. | 1) new and useful and some very | Good | 1) ideas to get kids more interested | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | If you aren't familiar with cooking and nutrition this course is a good fit. However, if you have a bit of background in healthy eating, you may not get as much out of this course. | 1) and nutrition this course is a | Good | 1) fit. However, if you have a | 2.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I like it very much. Both the self peace study and course material. I can control myself. Very Good course !!! | 1) material. I can control myself. Very | Good | 1) course ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I love this course, it really helps with me being a mum who works full time to not get complacent with the fast foods that are readily available, and to go back to cooking properly and sitting down for a good meal. | 1) properly and sitting down for a | Good | 1) meal. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A very good course indeed . A must take course . Very simple and easy to understand . | 1) A very | Good | 1) course indeed . A must take | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The course was very good, very simple to understand and execute in our life. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) very simple to understand and execute | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | it is good | 1) it is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Child Nutrition and Cooking is good educational for those parents need to learn and more widen knowledge in the health of their kids. This content is the best that can recommend in all parents. | 1) Child Nutrition and Cooking is | Good | 1) educational for those parents need to | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | good information to our healthy lifestyle | 1) | Good | 1) information to our healthy lifestyle | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | simple, very good and interesting classe! | 1) simple, very | Good | 1) and interesting classe! | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I think it pretty good for me to learn health! | 1) I think it pretty | Good | 1) for me to learn health! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Easy to follow, and good contents | 1) Easy to follow, and | Good | 1) contents | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | great and good recipes to make with kids | 1) great and | Good | 1) recipes to make with kids | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good place to start for beginners with some scientific information. Easy and quick to do food demonstrations, basic enough that students can build upon them depending on what is available at hand. Some ideas just tend to be redundant throughout the weeks, but I guess that is what she wants to stress on. No to processed food!! :)) I just wish you kept the discussion boards open, so we have a platform to discuss ideas and exchange recipes. | 1) Very | Good | 1) place to start for beginners with | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | i learn so many things with simple explanation, the teacher is amazing , i was affraid that will be so difficult o boring but is great, so good that you forgett taht ypu are taking a class. | 1) o boring but is great, so | Good | 1) that you forgett taht ypu are | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | nice content and videos, good examples. For people in the basic is real good. | 1) nice content and videos, | Good | 1) examples. For people in the basic | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | nice content and videos, good examples. For people in the basic is real good. | 2) people in the basic is real | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | really enjoyed the course and was very informative. I don't have children yet, but it was still good to learn about nutrition for my use and for future reference ! | 1) children yet, but it was still | Good | 1) to learn about nutrition for my | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It is an excellent and easy way to have knowledge about food and nutrition to apply at home with your kids. I am grateful to Maya, she expresses herself very well and she shows she is an expert and a good mother. I super recommend the course. | 1) she is an expert and a | Good | 1) mother. I super recommend the course. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good tips to help making the entire family eat better | 1) Very | Good | 1) tips to help making the entire | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good course for feeding children. very nice instructions. thanks to teacher. | 1) | Good | 1) course for feeding children. very nice | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Some of the information from video to video was repetitive. However, I learned a lot about how organic food is good for people and the environment. Additionally, it was great to see how children can get involved in the kitchen and i hope that any parents who watch this try to get their children to be involved with a small garden or helping to prepare meals. Hands-on is the best way for kids to learn! | 1) lot about how organic food is | Good | 1) for people and the environment. Additionally, | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Brilliant class. Fight the good fight. | 1) Brilliant class. Fight the | Good | 1) fight. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It's very good but It should be given a certificate!! | 1) It's very | Good | 1) but It should be given a | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Excellent class, it gave me good tips and encouragement to start cooking more healthy dishes. | 1) Excellent class, it gave me | Good | 1) tips and encouragement to start cooking | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was a great course with a lot of good information. I continue to use a lot of the suggestions that she gives in this course for my own benefit, as well as share with others. If you need some information about nutrition when it comes to children, this course will give you a great foundation to stand on! | 1) great course with a lot of | Good | 1) information. I continue to use a | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | We don't have children, but I really enjoyed taking this online course on child nutrition and cooking offered by Stanford. Dr. Maya Adam did a very good job with the lecture videos, course content, etc. I just signed up for the Introduction to Food and Health course presented on-demand. You should join me on the journey. | 1) Dr. Maya Adam did a very | Good | 1) job with the lecture videos, course | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good info! | 1) Very | Good | 1) info! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It is a good course.I have learnt lots of fundamental knowledge about nutrition.Thanks very much! | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course. I have learnt lots of | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good information, a bit basic though. I would've enjoyed a more in depth course. | 1) | Good | 1) information, a bit basic though. I | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Changed my mind after watching the cooking. The course on nutrition is just "ok" but the teacher has a very skewed idea about what "healthy cooking" really is and fails to present with reasons for her recipe choices. Anyway I stopped watching the course, again, the nutritional part is fairly good but if you choose to continue the course at least make sure you keep searching for other points of view as well. Best of luck. | 1) again, the nutritional part is fairly | Good | 1) but if you choose to continue | 2.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good!! The teacher are so dedicated and smart! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! The teacher are so dedicated | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The presenter is very confident and extremely passionate about what she is discussing. I have had a change of heart about how to take care of my child's diet. Usually the video presentations are great, very high quality, my only niggle is that sometimes the black screen PPTs go on for a bit too long, and can be repetitive. Overall a very good course. | 1) can be repetitive. Overall a very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course that teaches you the basic for a good child nutrition | 1) teaches you the basic for a | Good | 1) child nutrition | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good but basic information. This class covers some good solid skills everyone should have for reading labels and preparing their own meals at home. | 1) Very | Good | 1) but basic information. This class covers | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good but basic information. This class covers some good solid skills everyone should have for reading labels and preparing their own meals at home. | 2) basic information. This class covers some | Good | 2) solid skills everyone should have for | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course!!! i learned so many things and now i see the in a different way the importance of a good nutrition to my kids.. | 1) different way the importance of a | Good | 1) nutrition to my kids. . | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This is a very useful and wonderfully presented course on child nutrition. This course has given me a good introduction on the various aspects of child nutrition in an extremely engaging manner. The author is very passionate, knowledgeable and enthusiastic about child nutrition. I love her way of presenting many key points with the help of sketches. She has covered this topic in a very holistic manner, even covering topics like sustainable cooking, gardening. I really like all her recipes. They are simple, healthy and delicious. Thanks to this course, I have now become quite interested in the world of fruits and veg, God bless the author and her family for enhancing the health and happiness of many people. | 1) This course has given me a | Good | 1) introduction on the various aspects of | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is not only good and complete but necessary for all humans to watch, listen, learn and practice it in their day a day life. Kid's health is in our hands, and this course contains all the information we need to do the right thing with them. Thanks a lot! | 1) This course is not only | Good | 1) and complete but necessary for all | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good content and best described | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and best described | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It is a really interesting course, it refers to the general public, with smart tips and quick recipies. Also, for those who know nothing about the sience part of lipids, carbohydrates and trace elements, in generall, it constitutes a very informative ''package'' for everyone. There is no specialaization in this kind of coures us I expected, because I am a food technologist, I kwnow most of the parts, but still it is really helpfull and interestin! Verry good job! | 1) is really helpfull and interestin! Verry | Good | 1) job! | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Pretty good, I like it! It is easy to understand and makes me want to try a more healthy life. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) I like it! It is easy | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It was fun doing this course and at the same time was quite informative. The small things matters most is what you realise and long time back Mahatma Gandhi has said most of the things especially the economic and ecological aspects of our food consumption and habits and has predicted the difficulties we would face. JC Kumarappa on Economy of Permanence is a good read in this regard. Excellent presentation and even a kid will watch it with great interest. | 1) on Economy of Permanence is a | Good | 1) read in this regard. Excellent presentation | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good for parents who do | 1) Very | Good | 1) for parents who do | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good course for beginners, but those with higher levels of nutrition knowledge will likely: 1. Find it way too easy; 2. Find that the recipes actually contain rather unhealthy ingredients (e.g., always avoid butter--too unhealthy); and 3. Find the lack of vegetarian, vegan, low-carb, and other diet-lifestyles discouraging. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners, but those with | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Maya Adam is just amazing talking about Child Nutrition and Cooking. Her drawings are really wonderful, they are clear, colorful and enjoy the course as I've never seen it before. Her good mood and knowledges make you feel happier and interested in the course. Congratulation Mrs Adam, I hope you'll continue on this way and wish so much I'll enroll in other courses made by you. | 1) I've never seen it before. Her | Good | 1) mood and knowledges make you feel | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good basic teachings that can get anyone with a family set to start cooking more nutritious and delicious meals for the whole family. I like how simply it is and how one can easily apply the knowledge to their every day lives. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic teachings that can get anyone | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I enjoyed this course very much and found it to be a very good introduction to the science of nutrition and cooking. It wasn't focused on children as much as I thought it would be. I would have liked to know a lot more about portion sizes and calories intake, which weren't much discussed. I knew that some foods were good and others were bad... thanks to the course, I now also know why! I didn't find the course too challenging and thought that Maya Adams was a very pleasant instructor. | 1) found it to be a very | Good | 1) introduction to the science of nutrition | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I enjoyed this course very much and found it to be a very good introduction to the science of nutrition and cooking. It wasn't focused on children as much as I thought it would be. I would have liked to know a lot more about portion sizes and calories intake, which weren't much discussed. I knew that some foods were good and others were bad... thanks to the course, I now also know why! I didn't find the course too challenging and thought that Maya Adams was a very pleasant instructor. | 2) I knew that some foods were | Good | 2) and others were bad. . . | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I am really disappointed with the content of this course. If what you're looking for is the most basic of information on making better choices and remembering to wash your cutting board after handling raw meat, maybe this course is for you. If, however, you come to this course wanting specific information about how to build great meals for babies, toddlers, and young children, or you'd like to know how their needs change over time, this course is not for you. I was hoping for information like how to teach your toddler to chew/eat difficult things (ex: whole apples). I wanted to know at what age/weight you switch to 2% milk. I wanted to know how many calories a meal should be based on height and weight and how that changes over time. I wanted to know medically verified tips on getting the right amount of each nutrient into a toddler's diet and what, if any, extra vitamins should be added. I wanted tips on weaning if you're still nursing a toddler... I guess I just wanted more. In addition, the quizzes are so easy as to be silly. Actual quiz question and correct answer: Which is NOT a good way to approach grocery shopping if healthy choices are desired? Answer: Visit the supermarket hungry and walk through the candy aisle first. COME ON! Did I need a Stanford University course to tell me that one?!?!? While the instructor is knowledgeable, this course is geared toward someone with NO knowledge, not someone who wants to gain a deeper understanding. The videos are painfully slow (am I waiting for a doodle here???) and I could read the entire course worth of transcripts in under a half hour rather than go through all of the videos. And the recipes... good god! I don't think that someone interested in learning more about child nutrition is needing a slow tutorial on how to make basic oatmeal on the stove top. If she'd upped the game- showed basics and then talked about the benefits of adding, say, chia seeds, different fruits, flax, etc. and how best to make a basic bowl of oatmeal into a complete breakfast, that would have been a useful topic. I'm just hugely disappointed. This course is best suited to perhaps a health department; not to someone seeking college level information about a topic that matters to their children's lives. | 1) correct answer: Which is NOT a | Good | 1) way to approach grocery shopping if | 1.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I am really disappointed with the content of this course. If what you're looking for is the most basic of information on making better choices and remembering to wash your cutting board after handling raw meat, maybe this course is for you. If, however, you come to this course wanting specific information about how to build great meals for babies, toddlers, and young children, or you'd like to know how their needs change over time, this course is not for you. I was hoping for information like how to teach your toddler to chew/eat difficult things (ex: whole apples). I wanted to know at what age/weight you switch to 2% milk. I wanted to know how many calories a meal should be based on height and weight and how that changes over time. I wanted to know medically verified tips on getting the right amount of each nutrient into a toddler's diet and what, if any, extra vitamins should be added. I wanted tips on weaning if you're still nursing a toddler... I guess I just wanted more. In addition, the quizzes are so easy as to be silly. Actual quiz question and correct answer: Which is NOT a good way to approach grocery shopping if healthy choices are desired? Answer: Visit the supermarket hungry and walk through the candy aisle first. COME ON! Did I need a Stanford University course to tell me that one?!?!? While the instructor is knowledgeable, this course is geared toward someone with NO knowledge, not someone who wants to gain a deeper understanding. The videos are painfully slow (am I waiting for a doodle here???) and I could read the entire course worth of transcripts in under a half hour rather than go through all of the videos. And the recipes... good god! I don't think that someone interested in learning more about child nutrition is needing a slow tutorial on how to make basic oatmeal on the stove top. If she'd upped the game- showed basics and then talked about the benefits of adding, say, chia seeds, different fruits, flax, etc. and how best to make a basic bowl of oatmeal into a complete breakfast, that would have been a useful topic. I'm just hugely disappointed. This course is best suited to perhaps a health department; not to someone seeking college level information about a topic that matters to their children's lives. | 2) videos. And the recipes. . . | Good | 2) god! I don't think that someone | 1.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It's good for people who are beginners in cooking. | 1) It's | Good | 1) for people who are beginners in | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Great course. Good pace, great visuals. It's an amazing first step to know the basics (without getting bored) and it really make you want to know more and more. Great job! | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) pace, great visuals. It's an amazing | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | My favorite parts from my course are when Mum Adams talks with us from her kitchen. It makes me feel like we are the kitchen together talking mom to mom. She is imparting helpful tips and tricks to be a good mom. The student was not as good at imparting that feeling of closeness. | 1) tips and tricks to be a | Good | 1) mom. The student was not as | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | My favorite parts from my course are when Mum Adams talks with us from her kitchen. It makes me feel like we are the kitchen together talking mom to mom. She is imparting helpful tips and tricks to be a good mom. The student was not as good at imparting that feeling of closeness. | 2) mom. The student was not as | Good | 2) at imparting that feeling of closeness. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good evening, I'm from Mexico and I am a teacher in a School of Nutrition, however, I am Biochemical Engineer, the truth is that this course is very interesting and easy to understand, besides extending the criteria and me about this science. I appreciate the matching available online. Regards. | 1) | Good | 1) evening, I'm from Mexico and I | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Its educational. Good teacher. Thanks to great course, i had enjoyed :) | 1) Its educational. | Good | 1) teacher. Thanks to great course, i | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course has helped me a lot to understand why our children need to eat better, how this helps in their growth and also how this encourages good family values. Thank you! | 1) growth and also how this encourages | Good | 1) family values. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very interesting course. Really good lecturer and well organised classes. Loved it! | 1) Very interesting course. Really | Good | 1) lecturer and well organised classes. Loved | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This is a very good course, however it does not take into consideration certain details we learn in Nutrition. For instance the use of wood type instruments for cooking, they can hide microorganisms and the use of oil to fry when the best option would be baking. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course, however it does not take | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Not very good nor scientific | 1) Not very | Good | 1) nor scientific | 1.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Really useful. Very good lesson. | 1) Really useful. Very | Good | 1) lesson. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This is a great course for new parents who have no background on child nutrition. For those who are already familiar with basic nutrition, most of this course may be a review for you but there's some good information and facts to take away. I wish the instructor had a little more training/skill in the cooking segments (e.g. basic knife skills she said don't cut your finger but held the knife completely wrong, using the knife to point at different ingredients). | 1) review for you but there's some | Good | 1) information and facts to take away. | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I found this course very much valuable for kids as well as other elder people. The teaching method was highly impressive and Dr. Maya Adam really inspired me. I wanted to give 5 stars but I found few things missing, such as food recipes were without quantity of items (especially in written format), gardening was described in a very short format (I felt that it required little bit more detail), market visits could be a very healthy and informative section, some experts advice & suggestion (including famous chefs), some discussion over food available and prepared in hotels/restaurants & also visits over there. Over all it's really a good course and I would definitely recommend to others. My all the best wishes to Dr. Maya Adam such a great work and hope see more from her. Thank you. Regards, Shoukat Shadat Ali | 1) there. Over all it's really a | Good | 1) course and I would definitely recommend | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Clear and useful information. It worked really good for me that it was self-paced. | 1) and useful information. It worked really | Good | 1) for me that it was self-paced. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The pace of the course :) and the speed of narration was very good. In deed it makes anyone understand what is being conveyed. The graphics and animated narrations are fantastic and they talk more effectively. The demonstrations are crisp, complete and very clear and the push towards organic farming is very timely. The course also conveys a very clear message towards the family bonding which is lacking now a days. Many thanks Maya. | 1) the speed of narration was very | Good | 1) In deed it makes anyone understand | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course is very good! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very Good course to know about nutrition, healthy cooking ways and child care. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to know about nutrition, healthy | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | very good way to remember about nutricion and diet | 1) very | Good | 1) way to remember about nutricion and | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A good introduction to child nutrition. I would recommend to anyone looking to learn about nutrition for children and the family. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to child nutrition. I would | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I LOVE IT! GOOD SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR MY FAMILY NUTRITION! | 1) I LOVE IT! | Good | 1) SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR MY FAMILY | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A really interesting course and very helpful when it comes to eating. Not only for children but for oneself too. There course gives you theory and recipes which is a good combination to emphasize the understanding | 1) theory and recipes which is a | Good | 1) combination to emphasize the understanding | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I love this course very very much... i think the lecturer, Maya Adam has done a very good job for making this subject interesting,... I also like the way she explains stuff... she makes it so easy understandable! I hope she will have more course to come.. will defintely enroll again! Please notify me if she has any new upcoming course!! Well done! =) | 1) Maya Adam has done a very | Good | 1) job for making this subject interesting, | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This very well structured course takes you through the basics of nutrition and then applies them to your family's diet. This course not only shows you what good nutrition is compared to the unhealthy elements, this course actually shows you how to cook great meals step by step. I especially loved hearing all about the psychology of supermarket planning to accomplish sales. Inform yourself and enjoy great food the healthy way . . . together! | 1) course not only shows you what | Good | 1) nutrition is compared to the unhealthy | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course indicated to me how important and irreplaceable is healthy eating during children's growth and development. Also, cooking for your child is a beautiful way to spend time together, express love and stimulate your child to develop good habits. During this course I've learned how to easily make several healthy meals and how to deal with everyday problems and healthy eating. Also, I got familiar with some crucial facts like reading nutrition facts labels and the huge impact of processed food on our health and environment. Thank you very much! | 1) and stimulate your child to develop | Good | 1) habits. During this course I've learned | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was a really good course. The information was useful and down to earth and the Tutor was friendly with her presentation. I recommend this course to lots of people, friends and colleagues. | 1) This was a really | Good | 1) course. The information was useful and | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was a good introduction to Coursera for me. Some of the information I already knew, but it was good to learn the "why" behind some of it. There were a few of the quizzes that contained questions from videos that hadn't been covered yet. Her information about food allergies was good, I would like to see her offer a class on just that topic. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to Coursera for me. Some | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was a good introduction to Coursera for me. Some of the information I already knew, but it was good to learn the "why" behind some of it. There were a few of the quizzes that contained questions from videos that hadn't been covered yet. Her information about food allergies was good, I would like to see her offer a class on just that topic. | 2) I already knew, but it was | Good | 2) to learn the " why" behind | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This was a good introduction to Coursera for me. Some of the information I already knew, but it was good to learn the "why" behind some of it. There were a few of the quizzes that contained questions from videos that hadn't been covered yet. Her information about food allergies was good, I would like to see her offer a class on just that topic. | 3) Her information about food allergies was | Good | 3) I would like to see her | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A good mix of theory and practice! | 1) A | Good | 1) mix of theory and practice! | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I really enjoyed this class. The teacher is very upbeat and interesting as well. Lots of good recipe instructional videos. She also breaks nutritional information down until its easily understood. Thanks! | 1) and interesting as well. Lots of | Good | 1) recipe instructional videos. She also breaks | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good and clear content. A bit from an American point of view... I missed some in depth explanation (like the class of the nerv-system or the Glycemic index). Overall easy to watch and good lessons. | 1) | Good | 1) and clear content. A bit from | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good and clear content. A bit from an American point of view... I missed some in depth explanation (like the class of the nerv-system or the Glycemic index). Overall easy to watch and good lessons. | 2) index). Overall easy to watch and | Good | 2) lessons. | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Worst course ever. I stopped partway through. Too many links to outside stuff. Tests/quizes were not based on what was presented in the lessons. Test design is horrible, too many negative questions. Glances over the good true information about nutrition to tell us about free range farms, farmers markets, etc., which most people do not have access to or can not afford. Giving it 1 star is being nice People who sponsored it should get their money back. | 1) many negative questions. Glances over the | Good | 1) true information about nutrition to tell | 1.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good science, great explanations, simple recipes with tips and advice. Strongly recommended to people with little/no cooking and/or science backgrounds - especially new university students and parents. However, I would not consider the professor (she is a doctor though) a skilled chef - while her recipes are great and simple, the techniques she uses are perhaps not the best, given that she is conducting a course that's nearly 20% cooking demonstrations. I would strongly suggest consulting a Jamie Oliver book/video, or Michael Smith to augment this course. TL'DR: Great science and explanations, good recipes, could have used better cooking techniques. Good for uni students/healthy eaters. | 1) | Good | 1) science, great explanations, simple recipes with | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good science, great explanations, simple recipes with tips and advice. Strongly recommended to people with little/no cooking and/or science backgrounds - especially new university students and parents. However, I would not consider the professor (she is a doctor though) a skilled chef - while her recipes are great and simple, the techniques she uses are perhaps not the best, given that she is conducting a course that's nearly 20% cooking demonstrations. I would strongly suggest consulting a Jamie Oliver book/video, or Michael Smith to augment this course. TL'DR: Great science and explanations, good recipes, could have used better cooking techniques. Good for uni students/healthy eaters. | 2) course. TL'DR: Great science and explanations, | Good | 2) recipes, could have used better cooking | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good science, great explanations, simple recipes with tips and advice. Strongly recommended to people with little/no cooking and/or science backgrounds - especially new university students and parents. However, I would not consider the professor (she is a doctor though) a skilled chef - while her recipes are great and simple, the techniques she uses are perhaps not the best, given that she is conducting a course that's nearly 20% cooking demonstrations. I would strongly suggest consulting a Jamie Oliver book/video, or Michael Smith to augment this course. TL'DR: Great science and explanations, good recipes, could have used better cooking techniques. Good for uni students/healthy eaters. | 3) could have used better cooking techniques. | Good | 3) for uni students/healthy eaters. | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very very interesting, and practical in home cooking for working mothers, , give important tips of nutrition about mixing food o all types, speaking of technical issues, video is very good quality, the teacher is clear, and production is very attractive and well created. | 1) of technical issues, video is very | Good | 1) quality, the teacher is clear, and | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A little too basic but it was a good class. Thanks! | 1) too basic but it was a | Good | 1) class. Thanks! | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | very good to be in healthier side after watching 1 week course. | 1) very | Good | 1) to be in healthier side after | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good Course, but I was not able to get a certificate for completing it. | 1) | Good | 1) Course, but I was not able | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | very good advices!! | 1) very | Good | 1) advices! ! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good for public education with general nutrition knowledge integrated with environmental protection, practical behaviors and cooking exercises. | 1) | Good | 1) for public education with general nutrition | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Incredibly good, sane and necessary course. | 1) Incredibly | Good | 1) sane and necessary course. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Super presentation and very good information | 1) Super presentation and very | Good | 1) information | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | It is a good course to general people and even to who have some specialization, to relax and practise English if it is necessary. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course to general people and even | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Very good. Nice choice of person to teach this course Her knowledge and soothing voice and occasional cameos of her kids made this very easy to absorb, relate and want to learn more. My next shopping trip to the store was 90% more healthier than before. I made better decisions about what I want to feed my family....especially my 2 year old granddaughter that pretty much loves all veggies and fruit. Great time to influence her eating habits. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Nice choice of person to teach | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Really good!! I enjoyed a lot!! ;) | 1) Really | Good | 1) ! I enjoyed a lot! ! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | fantastic and informative course and good for the health | 1) fantastic and informative course and | Good | 1) for the health | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good Lessons and solid ideas for all ages, all income levels. Good Job. | 1) | Good | 1) Lessons and solid ideas for all | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good Lessons and solid ideas for all ages, all income levels. Good Job. | 2) for all ages, all income levels. | Good | 2) Job. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | its pretty good | 1) its pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good One!! | 1) | Good | 1) One! ! | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | A very good course and so apetizing ! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course and so apetizing ! | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | The structure and the material taught in this course is excellent. The instructer is a very good teacher. | 1) excellent. The instructer is a very | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | I totally recommend this course, it's didactic, fun and very useful. Even though it's plan for 5 weeks, I get in whenever I can. It's really motivating to change your habits for good. | 1) motivating to change your habits for | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good overall course, basic and got me interested in cooking again! | 1) | Good | 1) overall course, basic and got me | 3.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Condescending, not backed up with evidence and preachy. Somewhere in there are some good ideas for making healthy food for kids but given I'm probably of similar politics to what they're pushing and I found it obnoxious I think they're alienating a lot of people. Must do better. | 1) preachy. Somewhere in there are some | Good | 1) ideas for making healthy food for | 2.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | This course has really good information. Very simple and straightforward and I am happy to say that I am using lots of the tips and ideas with my boys. I did find that some of the tips given were a bit unrealistic however it still makes you want to make better choices about food and your family. | 1) This course has really | Good | 1) information. Very simple and straightforward and | 5.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Good for everyone | 1) | Good | 1) for everyone | 4.0 |
| iQZflcZ7EeOoFhIxOQQuEA | Nice course about eating suggestions and good recipes It could be useful giving details on how making a diet for children, with information about calories they need and so on | 1) Nice course about eating suggestions and | Good | 1) recipes It could be useful giving | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Great course. It is also a good preparation for the PMP test | 1) Great course. It is also a | Good | 1) preparation for the PMP test | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | This is a very good course that supplies really good short video lectures and course material for those who are starting from scratch. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course that supplies really good short | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | This is a very good course that supplies really good short video lectures and course material for those who are starting from scratch. | 2) very good course that supplies really | Good | 2) short video lectures and course material | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good course for a beginner. I feel like I have a much better understanding of the role of a Project manager and a great overview of the phases and steps in the project management process. I am now ready to dig deeper into this information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for a beginner. I feel | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Well organised course structure with a good balance of theory and practical illustrations. | 1) Well organised course structure with a | Good | 1) balance of theory and practical illustrations. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good basics course with fine detailing and motivational teaching. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basics course with fine detailing and | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | good stuff | 1) | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good overview and insights | 1) | Good | 1) overview and insights | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course is very good but they should not promote that much the PMBOK. It is extremely annoying. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) but they should not promote that | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very Good ! Makes you look forward to learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! Makes you look forward to | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good course for a new project manager new to the field to get started with . | 1) | Good | 1) course for a new project manager | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | knowledge presents in a good way | 1) knowledge presents in a | Good | 1) way | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A lot of information in this course but a good structure to get the information into "makes sense now" after weekly review. | 1) information in this course but a | Good | 1) structure to get the information into | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Clear and engaging introduction, well spaced out to let the good stuff soak in. | 1) well spaced out to let the | Good | 1) stuff soak in. | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good and easy to understand course content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easy to understand course content. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The content is good but the quiz and final exam are way too easy... | 1) The content is | Good | 1) but the quiz and final exam | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It is a good introduction to the field | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introduction to the field | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I found this course a really good introdution to the Project Management. I cannot wait for the next one. | 1) I found this course a really | Good | 1) introdution to the Project Management. I | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Great course. Gave me a good overview, actually more than an overview, of project management. Lecture was to the point and easy to understand. Lessons were presented in a very informative and logical manner. I really enjoyed the video tips at the end of each lesson and the panelist discussion in the last lesson. | 1) Great course. Gave me a | Good | 1) overview, actually more than an overview, | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Course content is well-structured and good references are given. What can be improved is that I want to see how these skills can be applied in real life situations. It'd be great if discussion session can be organized by Coursera, basically coordinate students to form discussion groups and meet at least once a week to discuss the topics covered that week. | 1) Course content is well-structured and | Good | 1) references are given. What can be | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very succinct. Good instructor. Valuable information. | 1) Very succinct. | Good | 1) instructor. Valuable information. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | excellent examples and very good videos. | 1) excellent examples and very | Good | 1) videos. | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Amazing! Very good examples and concise information. | 1) Amazing! Very | Good | 1) examples and concise information. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It's a good start for those who want to learn about Project Management. In my case I want to refresh my knowledge and maybe use the Certificate Version to get the chace to take the test as PMP. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start for those who want to | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I liked everything about this course except that some of the lesson materials couldn't be viewed on my iPad as they were flash based. Other than that, the videos were good - not too long, not too short - and the quizzes were suitably based on what was discussed beforehand in the lectures and lessons. I also picked up one of the recommended readings "Fast Forward MBA in Project Management" which I also liked. | 1) Other than that, the videos were | Good | 1) - not too long, not too | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good as overview, but pretty shallow. Only some slides to read through, no real exercises but constant reference to the standard project management book. Pretty fast click-through as start into project management. | 1) | Good | 1) as overview, but pretty shallow. Only | 2.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good for begginers | 1) | Good | 1) for begginers | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | a big WOW to Margaret Meloni's style of instructions! I've tried taking a few online project management course but lost the interest half way, I am determined to complete this one,due to her simple approach of explaining the concepts related,very clear and precise. My understanding about the project management gets better after listening to her lectures. Keep up the good work! | 1) to her lectures. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Nice and very informative, good to start the learning of PMI | 1) Nice and very informative, | Good | 1) to start the learning of PMI | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It is a very good course because introduce in a simple way to the main concepts used in project management | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course because introduce in a simple | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The site is not very user friendly. The information is good though. | 1) very user friendly. The information is | Good | 1) though. | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good one, more examples about real life situations would be valuable | 1) | Good | 1) one, more examples about real life | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Many thanks for this course. I would love it. Materials of the course are were very exactly formulated and understandable. Margaret Meloni made this course as colorful with her melody voice and good explanations. I think i will use knowledge which i got from the course in my future works. | 1) colorful with her melody voice and | Good | 1) explanations. I think i will use | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good course, easy to follow. Stayed away from complicated, deep-dives of information | 1) | Good | 1) course, easy to follow. Stayed away | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It was a good introductory course. Not much detailed but shows you the ins and outs. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) introductory course. Not much detailed but | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A bit confusing in term of structure. We jumped from some sections of the project life cycle to others missing some others. It gave a good general picture of what project management is about. But I'm not quite sure which is the order I should follow when dealing with a project. However I have to say I didn't do the optional readings. At least not yet! Anyway, I think is an overall good course for not initiated people like me | 1) missing some others. It gave a | Good | 1) general picture of what project management | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A bit confusing in term of structure. We jumped from some sections of the project life cycle to others missing some others. It gave a good general picture of what project management is about. But I'm not quite sure which is the order I should follow when dealing with a project. However I have to say I didn't do the optional readings. At least not yet! Anyway, I think is an overall good course for not initiated people like me | 2) Anyway, I think is an overall | Good | 2) course for not initiated people like | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Really good course. I love the way it's done and really appreciate case studies. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I love the way it's | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | This is a good approach on learning the PMBOK guide, gives you the perfect insight on how to stud the guide. Explained everything in an easy manner with good exposure by using different live examples. Easy way to achieve the PDU's for the PMP exam. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) approach on learning the PMBOK guide, | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | This is a good approach on learning the PMBOK guide, gives you the perfect insight on how to stud the guide. Explained everything in an easy manner with good exposure by using different live examples. Easy way to achieve the PDU's for the PMP exam. | 2) everything in an easy manner with | Good | 2) exposure by using different live examples. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good start to understand project management | 1) | Good | 1) start to understand project management | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good. Well presented and covers relevant material. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Well presented and covers relevant material. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | it was a good learning experience , course content is excellent | 1) it was a | Good | 1) learning experience , course content is | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good... | 1) Very | Good | 1) . . | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | very good for a start | 1) very | Good | 1) for a start | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Whilst the text presentation (rather than the usual video) was a little off-putting, the material itself was solid. Whilst there's seemingly some debate regarding how project management is done in some countries and sectors, most of the material here seems a good first step. | 1) of the material here seems a | Good | 1) first step. | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good info | 1) | Good | 1) info | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good high-level intro to PMBOK-based project management. The UC Irvine classes are not particularly demanding, and won't by themselves prepare you to take the PMP exam, but they will give you a decent grounding in the terminology and principles involved. | 1) Very | Good | 1) high-level intro to PMBOK-based project management. | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | There is a LOT of material in this course. The videos go a little too fast at times, so a 10 minute video would usually take me like 20 so I could get some notes from it. The presentations are perfectly structured, but they are a bit long, so again plan on spending a good 20 minutes per presentation if you plan on taking notes and all. Finally, the role of the PMBOK Guide as complimentary material to this class is strongly under-emphasized in the introduction. However, all optional reading is from this guide and another book also mentioned in the introduction. Maybe mention this in the intro so people can make a more informed decision as to buying those books or not. | 1) so again plan on spending a | Good | 1) 20 minutes per presentation if you | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It's a good course, if you're looking to learn the basics of planning projects, and it doesn't take more than a day to complete, it's just a bit of reading. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, if you're looking to learn | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very interesting and a very good starting point for people who want to know to manage projects | 1) Very interesting and a very | Good | 1) starting point for people who want | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | it is really good and worth the time | 1) it is really | Good | 1) and worth the time | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good way to refresh your knowledge about PMP .. but not qualifying as a professional course | 1) | Good | 1) way to refresh your knowledge about | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | good structure, provides a good review of how to structure and manage project. | 1) | Good | 1) structure, provides a good review of | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | good structure, provides a good review of how to structure and manage project. | 2) good structure, provides a | Good | 2) review of how to structure and | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Great! Concise and useful course. Good introduction in Project Management. On the right way to PMP. | 1) Great! Concise and useful course. | Good | 1) introduction in Project Management. On the | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A really good introduction to project management! | 1) A really | Good | 1) introduction to project management! | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good course with best reading materials | 1) | Good | 1) course with best reading materials | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A very good course which taught me several things on Initiating and planning projects. The course was simple and very clear. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course which taught me several things | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A good starter on the topic of project management! | 1) A | Good | 1) starter on the topic of project | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Well structured course, great presenter, really interesting materials, overall the whole 3 Part course is well worth doing. The bonus videos that the presenter does on real life examples are excellent and I've watched some of them multiple times. The course is useful not only aa good introduction to PM tools and techniques but also to reinforce what the role of the project manager actually is. | 1) course is useful not only aa | Good | 1) introduction to PM tools and techniques | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Some good concepts and stories, but lacking in specific techniques. | 1) Some | Good | 1) concepts and stories, but lacking in | 2.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good introduction and nice ideas are put into the course. Really enjoing it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction and nice ideas are put | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | I like this course , iit's full of good information about projects managment Thaks coursera ! | 1) this course , iit's full of | Good | 1) information about projects managment Thaks coursera | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course, as intended probably, is theoretical and gives a good snapshot of project management. Following the PMBOK guide and covering all the relevant portions in the limited time deserves an applause. The only area of improvement, I felt, was the case study.It could have been a little more detailed and has scope of increased level of difficulty. A good course overall and beneficial in almost all walks of work :) Thank you ! | 1) probably, is theoretical and gives a | Good | 1) snapshot of project management. Following the | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | The course, as intended probably, is theoretical and gives a good snapshot of project management. Following the PMBOK guide and covering all the relevant portions in the limited time deserves an applause. The only area of improvement, I felt, was the case study.It could have been a little more detailed and has scope of increased level of difficulty. A good course overall and beneficial in almost all walks of work :) Thank you ! | 2) of increased level of difficulty. A | Good | 2) course overall and beneficial in almost | 3.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Very good courses, it is practical and clear. Everyone should have taking a such courses, because it is in every day life. | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses, it is practical and clear. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good information well presented. An excellent intro to this discipline. | 1) | Good | 1) information well presented. An excellent intro | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | It's really a good course to take a first step in project management | 1) It's really a | Good | 1) course to take a first step | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | A good course introducing Project management | 1) A | Good | 1) course introducing Project management | 4.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Good course for foundation in new projects. | 1) | Good | 1) course for foundation in new projects. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | really good starter for fresh PM. | 1) really | Good | 1) starter for fresh PM. | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Doing this course 'Initiating and Planning Projects' gives learners, practical skills on Project management based on PMBOK methodology which is framed by PMI based on contributions from experienced professionals in the field. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp, clear and lucid style of communicating ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | 1) great. You will encounter lots of | Good | 1) quality reading materials. Quizzes will help | 5.0 |
| iRBJm_LREeSplSIACzYDNg | Doing this course 'Initiating and Planning Projects' gives learners, practical skills on Project management based on PMBOK methodology which is framed by PMI based on contributions from experienced professionals in the field. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp, clear and lucid style of communicating ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | 2) who work for construction projects. Also | Good | 2) for the aspiring project managers. Thanks | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | It is really good for DATA SCIENTIST & ENGINEER to gather raw data from your IoT sensor as a data tool!! Specially, I had fun this course with Raspberry Pi, Pi-Sense. I feel like this course is very easy full-stack course (Front + Back ends). Also, we can easily use NoSQL-node in Node-RED when you finish this course. If you have strong patience, I strongly recommend this course. It's not easy this course because you will implement both SW(Python, Node-RED, Node.js) and HW(Raspberry Pi2, Pi Sens HAT. You can do it!! | 1) It is really | Good | 1) for DATA SCIENTIST & ENGINEER to | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Excellent course from IBM IoT. Enjoyed it very much. The practical assignments were fun. It was great seeing my SensorHat board coming to life. The instructor videos were great and provided enough information to complete the assignments. I liked, it didn't attempt to spoon feed you ... and you needed to search for some of the solutions. Everyone was very helpful answering questions on the forum, and I liked the Coursera environment. Good stuff! | 1) and I liked the Coursera environment. | Good | 1) stuff! | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Good Hands on intro | 1) | Good | 1) Hands on intro | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Good material, easy to understand | 1) | Good | 1) material, easy to understand | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Good course, looking forward to some more advanced | 1) | Good | 1) course, looking forward to some more | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Good course - frustrating at times but you got to put the work in and really read the assignments carefully | 1) | Good | 1) course - frustrating at times but | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Great course to start with Internet of Things. Good to have primary knowledge of coding in nodejs and python. Videos are awesome, instructors are really helpful. 9/10. | 1) to start with Internet of Things. | Good | 1) to have primary knowledge of coding | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Very good introduction to Internet of Things (IoT), Bluemix cloud, Python programming, node.js programming and node-red programming. Very nice teachers and good community. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Internet of Things (IoT), | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Very good introduction to Internet of Things (IoT), Bluemix cloud, Python programming, node.js programming and node-red programming. Very nice teachers and good community. | 2) node-red programming. Very nice teachers and | Good | 2) community. | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Hi, I am an IT specialist (30 years experience). I undertook the course so I could learn about IBM Bluemix and IoT development, and extend my skills/understanding of the environment. However, I have very little good to say about this course offering. I had numerous issues with what was offered: The videos were generally ok, but some had poor audio. There was minimal video (compared to any other course I have done), and more detail and discussion in videos would have been more helpful. Some of the video material is out of date already, as I suspect Bluemix layout has changed - this made navigation a bit confusing. The downloadable Pi image has changed since the course was prepared, and the newer image has different code as standard. I ended up having to muddle-through manually loading packages and dependencies, etc. to get things to work. I lost many hours trying to debug and rework assignment code, just to get it to work for the grader tool. This was further complicated by not having good debug output from the grader to work with. Naturally some of the grader fails were my own fault, but the majority of issues I ran in to could have been avoided by better worded assignments and/or more detail about requirements. Lastly, it was taking sometimes days to get any response to requests for guidance on the forums / discussions. In fact, I think the majority of useful assistance came from other students who had run in to the same issue(s). When you have a course that is such a short time frame, you really need to be providing assistance in a timely manner. I could not, in any good faith, recommend anyone take this course in the future - which is a little saddening. I do thank the lecturers for their efforts thus far, and sincerely hope they can either improve or drop this course offering in the future. | 1) environment. However, I have very little | Good | 1) to say about this course offering. | 1.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Hi, I am an IT specialist (30 years experience). I undertook the course so I could learn about IBM Bluemix and IoT development, and extend my skills/understanding of the environment. However, I have very little good to say about this course offering. I had numerous issues with what was offered: The videos were generally ok, but some had poor audio. There was minimal video (compared to any other course I have done), and more detail and discussion in videos would have been more helpful. Some of the video material is out of date already, as I suspect Bluemix layout has changed - this made navigation a bit confusing. The downloadable Pi image has changed since the course was prepared, and the newer image has different code as standard. I ended up having to muddle-through manually loading packages and dependencies, etc. to get things to work. I lost many hours trying to debug and rework assignment code, just to get it to work for the grader tool. This was further complicated by not having good debug output from the grader to work with. Naturally some of the grader fails were my own fault, but the majority of issues I ran in to could have been avoided by better worded assignments and/or more detail about requirements. Lastly, it was taking sometimes days to get any response to requests for guidance on the forums / discussions. In fact, I think the majority of useful assistance came from other students who had run in to the same issue(s). When you have a course that is such a short time frame, you really need to be providing assistance in a timely manner. I could not, in any good faith, recommend anyone take this course in the future - which is a little saddening. I do thank the lecturers for their efforts thus far, and sincerely hope they can either improve or drop this course offering in the future. | 2) was further complicated by not having | Good | 2) debug output from the grader to | 1.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Hi, I am an IT specialist (30 years experience). I undertook the course so I could learn about IBM Bluemix and IoT development, and extend my skills/understanding of the environment. However, I have very little good to say about this course offering. I had numerous issues with what was offered: The videos were generally ok, but some had poor audio. There was minimal video (compared to any other course I have done), and more detail and discussion in videos would have been more helpful. Some of the video material is out of date already, as I suspect Bluemix layout has changed - this made navigation a bit confusing. The downloadable Pi image has changed since the course was prepared, and the newer image has different code as standard. I ended up having to muddle-through manually loading packages and dependencies, etc. to get things to work. I lost many hours trying to debug and rework assignment code, just to get it to work for the grader tool. This was further complicated by not having good debug output from the grader to work with. Naturally some of the grader fails were my own fault, but the majority of issues I ran in to could have been avoided by better worded assignments and/or more detail about requirements. Lastly, it was taking sometimes days to get any response to requests for guidance on the forums / discussions. In fact, I think the majority of useful assistance came from other students who had run in to the same issue(s). When you have a course that is such a short time frame, you really need to be providing assistance in a timely manner. I could not, in any good faith, recommend anyone take this course in the future - which is a little saddening. I do thank the lecturers for their efforts thus far, and sincerely hope they can either improve or drop this course offering in the future. | 3) manner. I could not, in any | Good | 3) faith, recommend anyone take this course | 1.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Gained very good understanding of how to register and connect an IoT device / gateway to Watson IoT Platform. Use Watson IoT APIs, Python APIs, Node.js APIs to send, receive and process events / commands and learnt how to use a Node-RED UI Flows to handle IoT requests from Raspberry Pi & Sense HAT devices. The hands-on labs and exercises inspired me to try out other examples / ideas to further extend my IoT knowledge boundaries. Thank you! | 1) Gained very | Good | 1) understanding of how to register and | 5.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | Very good introduction to IoT | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to IoT | 4.0 |
| iRl53_BWEeW4_wr--Yv6Aw | The course is awesome. Not too lengthy video with good explanation. The only drawback is the audio quality of some of the lectures. | 1) awesome. Not too lengthy video with | Good | 1) explanation. The only drawback is the | 4.0 |
| ISGr03Q9EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This was a fantastic course as it brings to fulfillment all the learnings of the previous courses. There are practical components which challenge the learner in a good way and bring to the fore reflective learning. | 1) which challenge the learner in a | Good | 1) way and bring to the fore | 5.0 |
| ISGr03Q9EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good course. Specially the assignment where in the participant gets to record the coaching conversation and shares for review. Also, gets a chance to review the assignment of fellow partici | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Specially the assignment where in | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good for start. | 1) | Good | 1) for start. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good introduction to Data Science | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction to Data Science | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good intro | 1) | Good | 1) intro | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good start for the beginners especially for people new to the data science. Topic are not covered in depth but as its just a introductory course so its totally fine.. | 1) | Good | 1) start for the beginners especially for | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course sets the stage for the rest of the Data Science specialisation. You get a lot of textbooks for free and they cover a lot of material. The quizzes are a little bit underwhelming, especially the first week. Too few questions, testing some questionable knowledge (eg, what other courses there are in the specialisation -- hardly a required tool in the data scientist's box). Overall, it's a good preparation for what is to come. It managed to whet my appetite for more , however I'm not sure the course is very useful on its own. | 1) data scientist's box). Overall, it's a | Good | 1) preparation for what is to come. | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a very nice introductory class. It starts with a good background leading to the courses required for Data Science Capstone. | 1) introductory class. It starts with a | Good | 1) background leading to the courses required | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is a very basic introduction and can be completed in very short time period (< 10 h) if you're good with computers. This should be integrated to the next course in the specialisation (R programming) to create a five week course with introduction. | 1) period (< 10 h) if you're | Good | 1) with computers. This should be integrated | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good, Good! My first try at Coursera classes. A well organized class and real field data samples to practive with. | 1) | Good | 1) Good! My first try at Coursera | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good, Good! My first try at Coursera classes. A well organized class and real field data samples to practive with. | 2) Good, | Good | 2) My first try at Coursera classes. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good intro and brief us with the high level knowledge around the data science area | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro and brief us with the | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good and easy introduction to Data Science | 1) | Good | 1) and easy introduction to Data Science | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good course, but it might be a little too introductory for someone who already has some familiarity with programming (although I hadn't used R, I had other experience with a similar language). So for me, I completed this course much more quickly than I anticipated and was really just very eager to move on to the other courses in the specialization. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, but it might be a | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good starter course | 1) | Good | 1) starter course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Its a good course. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course stuff. A little bit too fundamental for a programmer. | 1) | Good | 1) course stuff. A little bit too | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A nice slow intro to Coursera, but not a ton of actual content. Good to get your feet wet, but skippable if you are familiar with the basics of the toolbox or taking courses on Coursera. | 1) not a ton of actual content. | Good | 1) to get your feet wet, but | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good intro to the Data scientist's toolbox. | 1) very | Good | 1) intro to the Data scientist's toolbox. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This is a good course for the beginner in data scientist field. Thank you very much Coursera. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for the beginner in data | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Really good material. | 1) Really | Good | 1) material. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a good introduction to the Data Scientist Tools and processes. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introduction to the Data Scientist Tools | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Quite simple, but still good course | 1) Quite simple, but still | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Fast paced and a great introduction to the field of Data Science. Good background material and now I'm set up with the tools of the trade. | 1) to the field of Data Science. | Good | 1) background material and now I'm set | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | concepts were very good but teaching method/material must improve...some of the materials and methods used are too unstable to be useful for professional use...more work should be done by instructors to separate the 'reliable' concepts/info from 'interesting to know but not ready for mass use' | 1) concepts were very | Good | 1) but teaching method/material must improve. . | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good introduction, as introduction courses go | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, as introduction courses go | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's enough for the beginner. A good guide | 1) It's enough for the beginner. A | Good | 1) guide | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course for Starters | 1) | Good | 1) course for Starters | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Pretty good. Some lectures were good, a couple seemed rushed. Covered the basics OK. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) Some lectures were good, a couple | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Pretty good. Some lectures were good, a couple seemed rushed. Covered the basics OK. | 2) Pretty good. Some lectures were | Good | 2) a couple seemed rushed. Covered the | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is quite good for a start up | 1) It is quite | Good | 1) for a start up | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction, but the professor could have been more descriptive about how to use git/github. These are new concepts for people so it may be difficult to grasp right away. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, but the professor could have | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good intro to the tools | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the tools | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course. I would recommend it to others. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I would recommend it to | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good course, you're not going in-depth but this is just an introductory course for the Data Science master and the tools you will use. You will learn the basics of Git and get acquainted with R and is thus somewhat essential for starters. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, you're not going in-depth but | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's good but easy | 1) It's | Good | 1) but easy | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Intro | 1) | Good | 1) Intro | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great videos, good walk through the materials for those unfamiliar with programming (: | 1) Great videos, | Good | 1) walk through the materials for those | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a good introductory course, but it could be optional for people with some experience in the field, as it is very basic. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introductory course, but it could be | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to data science, however it should have more details and practical examples about Git. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to data science, however it | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course for a first contact with the Data Science world ! | 1) | Good | 1) course for a first contact with | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction, tells you what Data Science actually is. Also teaches you basics of GitHub, R and Rstudio. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, tells you what Data Science | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Thank you, this is Course good | 1) Thank you, this is Course | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Serves as a good overview of the course but not recommended for persons that have some experience performing basic data analytics with git. | 1) Serves as a | Good | 1) overview of the course but not | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good information, good format. | 1) | Good | 1) information, good format. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good information, good format. | 2) Good information, | Good | 2) format. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course for the specialization. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course for the specialization. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course pointing to background reading materials and providing context for following courses as well as supporting the installation of the required software tools. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course pointing to background reading | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Wonderful tools were taught. Good course. The presentation of the tools was appropriate to get started quickly with these tools. Thank you Instructors. | 1) Wonderful tools were taught. | Good | 1) course. The presentation of the tools | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a good intro course to get set up with everything you may need for future courses, but it's not necessary if you are already a little familiar with github and R. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) intro course to get set up | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Does a good job of introducing students to Data Science in general and gets you started with R and github. | 1) Does a | Good | 1) job of introducing students to Data | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | was good..! | 1) was | Good | 1) . ! | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview. But it is confusing for the first class when you have no idea about the topic. | 1) | Good | 1) overview. But it is confusing for | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good and relatively easy course. Perfect to establish personal confidence. | 1) | Good | 1) and relatively easy course. Perfect to | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course for begginers like me. All information is provided very simple and it's easy to understand. Also involves srudents not only looking videos but offer books. In addition you will need to search some information yourself to complete some tasks. Thanks for this great course. | 1) | Good | 1) course for begginers like me. All | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of the most used tools and methods used by Data Scientists. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the most used tools | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good course with all the basic knowledge provided as a stepstone for a Data Scientist. Many thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with all the basic knowledge | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Excellent Course for learning Basics. I had no previous experience with software, computers aside from surfing web, checking e-mails and some Microsoft Office. I'd recommend this course to anyone Interested in data-science or coding in general. The course is easy but not too easy the frustration of dealing with computers exists and I feel it was important for myself to struggle a little bit. I followed the advice of the instructors and sought out solutions to issues. I spent twenty hours a week but if you are tech savvy, take good notes, follow directions and everything goes as planned you could possibly get through the course in a lot less time. There are also a lot of people willing to help. The course shows you how to seek out help efficiently. I didn't request any help this time around had I done so I would have spent half as much time on the course. | 1) if you are tech savvy, take | Good | 1) notes, follow directions and everything goes | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good base formation for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) base formation for beginners. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good courses . | 1) | Good | 1) courses . | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good way to start! Clear and easy to understand. | 1) | Good | 1) way to start! Clear and easy | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It was a good starter course | 1) It was a | Good | 1) starter course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very nice intro - easy to follow. The swirl stuff was especially helpful and a very good way to teach R "in situ". | 1) was especially helpful and a very | Good | 1) way to teach R " in | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Overall the course content is good, but the power points are not engaging and interactive. | 1) Overall the course content is | Good | 1) but the power points are not | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to the Specialization | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the Specialization | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good initial overview and setup for the rest of the series. | 1) | Good | 1) initial overview and setup for the | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | All excellent and a very good introduction. I wish I was able to get my quiz graded without having to pay just to see if I was learning. For the rest, I recommended for a great intro. | 1) All excellent and a very | Good | 1) introduction. I wish I was able | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Basic Course | 1) | Good | 1) Basic Course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Really good course to shed the light on R and Git for newbies | 1) Really | Good | 1) course to shed the light on | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good first step into getting the right programs, learning key vocabulary, and interacting with important websites/programs at a very introductory level. If you are not from a math/statistics background you can still complete the course but you will not understand the previews for later courses completely, that is ok! But consider getting the eBook with this course. My only complaint is the quizzes, it often feels impossible to get a 5/5 based on only what you get from the lectures, there's always 1 question that is completely over the top compared to the other 4, but you can do the quizzes 3 times every 8 hours and just trial and error the 1 gotcha question on each quiz. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) first step into getting the right | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Too good | 1) Too | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good cours for a starter | 1) | Good | 1) cours for a starter | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I have heard a lot of good things about this course. I still have to explore this. | 1) I have heard a lot of | Good | 1) things about this course. I still | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It was good, well-executed course, but it was too basic. I expected more. | 1) It was | Good | 1) well-executed course, but it was too | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Important note: Opt for this course only if you plan to do the entire specialisation. It is developed solely for the specialisation and not as a standalone course. You will not learn much concepts or theories or practice any R programming here. In general this course was basic and good enough to get someone started for specialisation. The video lectures for setting up R, RStudio and Github account were helpful and very basic ( maybe coz I already had an github account). | 1) general this course was basic and | Good | 1) enough to get someone started for | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course for starters. Can be more detailed. | 1) | Good | 1) course for starters. Can be more | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very interesting and good to follow | 1) Very interesting and | Good | 1) to follow | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good preview, but very little is actually learned here. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) preview, but very little is actually | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good but it still too much basic | 1) | Good | 1) but it still too much basic | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good intro to the tools used in data science. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro to the tools used in | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good, but would like a step by step walkthrough for MAC/Windows when setting up the final assignment to ensure everything is correct. | 1) | Good | 1) but would like a step by | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction and instructions to get ready | 1) | Good | 1) introduction and instructions to get ready | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good basic starter course into the world of Data Science and analytics.This can be done in two weeks , four weeks is a stretch. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic starter course into the world | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to a complex topic. I appreciate being eased into this! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to a complex topic. I | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good basic class and collection of the tools. I wish there had been a little more explanation of what we would use the software for, but I found the lecture parts to be both concise and informative. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic class and collection of the | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Easy to understand, good delivery | 1) Easy to understand, | Good | 1) delivery | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good start to the specialization. | 1) A | Good | 1) start to the specialization. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good, explicative. Could have even more information and practice sessions on R. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explicative. Could have even more information | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of the specialization. Probably very good for someone new to R and software development tools in general. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the specialization. Probably very | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of the specialization. Probably very good for someone new to R and software development tools in general. | 2) overview of the specialization. Probably very | Good | 2) for someone new to R and | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good but brief introduction to a number of useful skills. I learned a lot in a short amount of time but I still have a long way to go. I was somewhat disappointed in the lack of communication with a TA or instructor. The message boards were desolate and could not support any kind of a robust discussion of the conceptual issues involved with data science. | 1) A | Good | 1) but brief introduction to a number | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction into basic data science tools and a nice starting point for the data science specialization. Yet, the certificate is a little bit overpriced. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into basic data science tools | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Fine as a general introduction, but not a lot to it. Good explanations of how to use github and get set up. | 1) but not a lot to it. | Good | 1) explanations of how to use github | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to these concepts and tools. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to these concepts and tools. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a very good start! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) start! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I ran into a few unexplained issues with final project but a very good course overall. | 1) with final project but a very | Good | 1) course overall. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good to get started | 1) | Good | 1) to get started | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A very good intro course but must be priced lesser when compared to the other courses in the specialization. | 1) A very | Good | 1) intro course but must be priced | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The way this course has been designed, it is very good for all the beginners | 1) has been designed, it is very | Good | 1) for all the beginners | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good start... | 1) A | Good | 1) start. . . | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good introduction to data science. However, without prior knowledge of statistics, programming, and research methods the course would be fairly difficult to follow. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction to data science. However, without | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good Introduction to Data science | 1) A | Good | 1) Introduction to Data science | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Introductory Class, all though I think some of the videos were too fast. Need to provide more explanation on some of the slides. | 1) | Good | 1) Introductory Class, all though I think | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I found this course to have very useful material and good, clear explanations. My only criticism is that the last of the four weeks has practically no content. There are no lectures and the only assignment is grading the assignments of other students, which at most takes 20 minutes. | 1) to have very useful material and | Good | 1) clear explanations. My only criticism is | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course is a good first into to the topic. I think that the additional reading from the book and the Git manual will supplement it very well. My only complain is that in the first quiz, there was a question regarding some R packages used in Machine Learning that were not covered in the slides. It took me a while to find those so I had to take the first quiz 3 times. I think this question should be revised to guide the student as to how to find these packages. Another alternative would be that in the slides there some guidance in this matter. Otherwise, I liked to course and the final assignments. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) first into to the topic. I | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good as just an introduction to data science. Some more exercises using Github, maybe some collaborative works would have been nice. | 1) | Good | 1) as just an introduction to data | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good foundation for the following classes. | 1) | Good | 1) foundation for the following classes. | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is good, but I think they speak so fast. | 1) It is | Good | 1) but I think they speak so | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good introduction to the language and tools of data science. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the language and tools | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The course is well structured and provides a good introduction, however, I expected a bit more from a course that costs 20 pounds than just a few clips on how to install and set-up software/create a github account etc. This information is available for free online on the websites of the respective software. I understand that such an introduction is needed for the course, but then do not offer it as a separate 20 pound module. Instead include it for free with any other 'specialization' you can buy. | 1) is well structured and provides a | Good | 1) introduction, however, I expected a bit | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Introduction to Data Scientist essential tools | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction to Data Scientist essential tools | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction. Good to learn the way it works.... | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. Good to learn the way | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction. Good to learn the way it works.... | 2) Good introduction. | Good | 2) to learn the way it works. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good pace for the first course. A little more guidance on Git command flow would be help. However, the available Help documentation on Github did the trick. The problem was having to work primarily in the command line which provides limited feedback. | 1) | Good | 1) pace for the first course. A | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Might be a good introduction for those completely new to computational tools, but not useful for those with any background in git or R. Can be safely skipped. | 1) Might be a | Good | 1) introduction for those completely new to | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Introduction | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | The materials are good, but it felt like this class should have a been a 1-week introductory lesson to Data Science. It is definitely now a 4-week class, maybe a a 2-week one if you take very easy. You end up with a basic setup for the next class. That I found very useful. | 1) The materials are | Good | 1) but it felt like this class | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | 4.5 Stars. Decent introduction. Good reading material and quizzes. Would like to have more hands-on assignments. | 1) 4. 5 Stars. Decent introduction. | Good | 1) reading material and quizzes. Would like | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction to Data Science! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Data Science! | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A pretty good introduction. | 1) A pretty | Good | 1) introduction. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great way to learn R and become familiar with how to use it. As a developer with an understanding of Python, Java, C and C++ I could quickly see how to use R, how to extend it and start working with it today. Very good use of supporting tools like Swirl to assist with teaching. | 1) start working with it today. Very | Good | 1) use of supporting tools like Swirl | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | a brief and yet organized and good resource for review old skills i have learnt and new skills that can acquire from here. | 1) a brief and yet organized and | Good | 1) resource for review old skills i | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It has almost no content and isn't actually useful. I've heard later classes in the series are way tougher, so the ramp up isn't at all good. | 1) the ramp up isn't at all | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Course is good and well organised. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) and well organised. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course. I've learnt many things. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I've learnt many things. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a nice introduction, but the material is barely worth a one week orientation lesson (I have completed it in about 4 hours with watching all the videos, taking detailed notes, and completing the quizzes for 100%) . Why should we pay for a specialization preview, we can read info about the separate courses on our own? I am really looking forward the next courses in the specialization since I really need a good course in statistics and this seems to be one, but the first course should be eliminated. The installation of R and github account videos should be added to the next course as an introduction. | 1) specialization since I really need a | Good | 1) course in statistics and this seems | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good start but not very hard if you already programmed bevore | 1) | Good | 1) start but not very hard if | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good introduction to the course. Opening up quizzes to help feedback what we'd learned (for free learners) would have made the course much better! | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the course. Opening up | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good introduction to the subject area. It would be nice to see more real-life examples. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the subject area. It | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good start to the data science specialization. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start to the data science specialization. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction to data science. It gives a general overview on data and its problematics but also tips and help on how to start with the basic tools that will be needed (I haven't done any R programming and didn't have a github account so that was helpful for me). | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to data science. It gives | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good introductory course! | 1) very | Good | 1) introductory course! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good introductory course to get those who are unfamiliar with this topic and type of learning environment acclimated with the necessary skill sets. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introductory course to get those who | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good start! | 1) A | Good | 1) start! | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course is a good, brief introduction to the foundational concepts of data science and some of the tools you can expect to use when doing data analysis with the R programming language. It's best suited to someone who intends to continue at least with the R Programming course that is also a part of this Data Science Specialization. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) brief introduction to the foundational concepts | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It was pretty good, but most of the information is rehashed briefly in the intro to R Programming | 1) It was pretty | Good | 1) but most of the information is | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This was a very professionally done course. It is *very* introductory, which is either good or bad, depending on how you feel about it. | 1) is *very* introductory, which is either | Good | 1) or bad, depending on how you | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to tools if you don't know them already. Otherwise very remedial. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to tools if you don't | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course to start the data studies | 1) | Good | 1) course to start the data studies | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good theory on data usage. | 1) A | Good | 1) theory on data usage. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course. Short and sweet. Nice to be able to access future weeks' lessons and finish ahead of schedule if you wish to. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Short and sweet. Nice to | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | That's a good startup to excite you about the coming courses! | 1) That's a | Good | 1) startup to excite you about the | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | short but good introduction | 1) short but | Good | 1) introduction | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good work | 1) Very | Good | 1) work | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course, but it needs to be more difficult and more in depth. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but it needs to be | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good start in the Data Science world | 1) Very | Good | 1) start in the Data Science world | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great intro course. Good overview of why you need what you will need for the Data Scientist specialization. | 1) Great intro course. | Good | 1) overview of why you need what | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good start, looking to dig in more, as I already have a background in stats data analysis and data viz. | 1) | Good | 1) start, looking to dig in more, | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good overview. Set the expectations for what will happen in the rest of the Data Science classes. Gave a lot of good, basic information for people that are not familiar with git, GitHub, Rstudio, and basic Linux/Unix commands. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview. Set the expectations for what | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good overview. Set the expectations for what will happen in the rest of the Data Science classes. Gave a lot of good, basic information for people that are not familiar with git, GitHub, Rstudio, and basic Linux/Unix commands. | 2) Science classes. Gave a lot of | Good | 2) basic information for people that are | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good pace, sequencing, and mix of lecture and practice. Only suggestion is a bit more time on the "Add", "Commit", which appears to be a very core element of file handling/version management with GitHub. | 1) Very | Good | 1) pace, sequencing, and mix of lecture | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good courses and necessary for people like me who never have a relation to computer science,,, But it is a waste of money...lol | 1) | Good | 1) courses and necessary for people like | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great Course that will provide a good background about Data Science tool set. | 1) Great Course that will provide a | Good | 1) background about Data Science tool set. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Really good starting point for R | 1) Really | Good | 1) starting point for R | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course. However, an overkill as a separate course (and hence charging $30 for it). Courses 1 and 2 could have been clubbed together. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. However, an overkill as | 1.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory weekly lessons .. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory weekly lessons . . | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Nicely taught and good course contents. | 1) Nicely taught and | Good | 1) course contents. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great intro. Having no coding background, this was still a good blend of being shown the basics but still having to figure out a few tiny things on my own. | 1) coding background, this was still a | Good | 1) blend of being shown the basics | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course is (as stated) suitable for beginners on the subject. It gives a very good introduction to it, and helps people learn more about what the data science is all about, how it works and which tools are usedby data scientists. This course helped me to determine if the path I was thinking of taking as a career options is really interesting for me at this point. | 1) the subject. It gives a very | Good | 1) introduction to it, and helps people | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good advises not only for this course, in managing own's difficulties and good tutorials for this tools installation. | 1) | Good | 1) advises not only for this course, | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good advises not only for this course, in managing own's difficulties and good tutorials for this tools installation. | 2) course, in managing own's difficulties and | Good | 2) tutorials for this tools installation. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This introductory course is a good overview, goes pretty quickly through the basics, and gets you prepped for delving deeper in the subject matter. Planning to sign up for the next course in this certificate program. | 1) This introductory course is a | Good | 1) overview, goes pretty quickly through the | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course, but could offer a bit more of a challenge, with actual (basic) problems. Learned about R, although not programming, and more about GitBash and GitHub. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course, but could offer a | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great starting point for Data Science. Gives a very good intro to all the tools used for working with data. | 1) for Data Science. Gives a very | Good | 1) intro to all the tools used | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good material | 1) very | Good | 1) material | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Excellent introduction to the Data Science world. Smooth path. Very good for beginners | 1) Data Science world. Smooth path. Very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction to the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the course. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | it's a very good course | 1) it's a very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | very good content | 1) very | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is ok...Good overview of what is to come! | 1) It is ok. . . | Good | 1) overview of what is to come! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It was a good course. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good intro course - however, it's up to one's own initiative to work independently in order to test out what you've learned from the video lectures. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro course - however, it's up | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good place to start. Tells you just enough to get started and also just enough to get hands dirty to keep learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) place to start. Tells you just | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good starting point for beginner. | 1) A | Good | 1) starting point for beginner. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Gives a good intro to Data Science and makes sure you get the essential tools downloaded. | 1) Gives a | Good | 1) intro to Data Science and makes | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good but needs more assistance with the students. | 1) | Good | 1) but needs more assistance with the | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a very good course for beginners. If you already hace R and gihub it may be a little boring, but remembering the basics is never a bad idea. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course for beginners. If you already | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good course materials, videos and quizzes. Learnt a lot. :D | 1) Very | Good | 1) course materials, videos and quizzes. Learnt | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good course for data science beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for data science beginners. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good and simple | 1) | Good | 1) and simple | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It's a good preview. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) preview. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course about getting the basics for the Data Science specialization, but a bit overpriced, as the content is low, and can easily be done in 4-5 hours. | 1) | Good | 1) course about getting the basics for | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good course with high quality information and good presenters. | 1) A | Good | 1) course with high quality information and | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good course with high quality information and good presenters. | 2) course with high quality information and | Good | 2) presenters. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction class. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction class. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview, I appreciated that the course gets you set up and makes you prove it. More command line and RStudio simple exercises would be nice. | 1) | Good | 1) overview, I appreciated that the course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course is good to get all your programs set up before you start your studies in Data Science. I think it could offer a little bit deeper knowledge of git and github in order to guarantee it will not be a problem later, since they will not be strictly related to data science. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) to get all your programs set | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good start. | 1) A | Good | 1) start. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Course was good, nice introduction to data science and its branches. There was not much of depth. | 1) Course was | Good | 1) nice introduction to data science and | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good composed, explains in a very good manner the complex topic, a general overview about the tools and their connection to each other would be great and helping, as there are many tools to install and understand the functions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) composed, explains in a very good | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good composed, explains in a very good manner the complex topic, a general overview about the tools and their connection to each other would be great and helping, as there are many tools to install and understand the functions. | 2) good composed, explains in a very | Good | 2) manner the complex topic, a general | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction! | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good foundational understanding of tools required | 1) | Good | 1) foundational understanding of tools required | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of existing tools but more information will be useful to dig into the data world. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of existing tools but more | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very basic material, but a good introduction and a necessary step to ensure a baseline of knowledge for future courses in the data science specialization. I would only take this course if you are interested in the specialization otherwise save your money and google the info you need. | 1) Very basic material, but a | Good | 1) introduction and a necessary step to | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A bit easy but a good base. Motivating start. | 1) A bit easy but a | Good | 1) base. Motivating start. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction to Data Science. Well explained and great material | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Data Science. Well explained | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good beginning to a promising journey | 1) A | Good | 1) beginning to a promising journey | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | it's well done, i was expecting more details in the lessons while students it's requested to search many things on internet in order to learn, for instance GitBash. However it's a good first course | 1) for instance GitBash. However it's a | Good | 1) first course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good start for freshman to get into the data science field | 1) | Good | 1) start for freshman to get into | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I really liked it! Good and interesting course! | 1) I really liked it! | Good | 1) and interesting course! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is useful to get to know the software that staticians use and some review about them but it doesn't teach you how to use them. A good introductory course for the specialization track but useless as a unique course. | 1) you how to use them. A | Good | 1) introductory course for the specialization track | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Start | 1) | Good | 1) Start | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good ground level introduction to data science. | 1) | Good | 1) ground level introduction to data science. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course was a great start. It was simple enough to follow, I guess the real deal is in future courses. Definitely leaves a good impression for the rest of the specialization! | 1) in future courses. Definitely leaves a | Good | 1) impression for the rest of the | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good and easily manageable. | 1) | Good | 1) and easily manageable. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a good course, however, I would have liked deeper knowledge in git | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, however, I would have liked | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good and basic understanding of terms. Can be made vast. | 1) | Good | 1) and basic understanding of terms. Can | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very basic, but gets you up and running with R, Git, and Github. I was self-taught, so this course was good to consolidate and refresh on the basics. | 1) was self-taught, so this course was | Good | 1) to consolidate and refresh on the | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This course is good if you have zero background in R and using GitHub. It'll walk you through installing what's necessary and give you basic tips on how to use them. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) if you have zero background in | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good, clear introduction to Data Science. Looking forward to the rest of the modules! | 1) | Good | 1) clear introduction to Data Science. Looking | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introductory course to start with on Data Science | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to start with on | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to data science, primary tools and what the spec. course is about. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to data science, primary tools | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good pace and introduction,thanx | 1) | Good | 1) pace and introduction, thanx | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | This is a good introductory course to some of the tools but it doesn't go into the details of R programming or Data Science. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) introductory course to some of the | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Quite basic, but good to set the needed programs | 1) Quite basic, but | Good | 1) to set the needed programs | 3.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good intro and start of your data scientist career in my opinion. | 1) | Good | 1) intro and start of your data | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good prep for R!!! | 1) | Good | 1) prep for R! ! ! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course to start your basic understanding of Data Science. | 1) | Good | 1) course to start your basic understanding | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to data science necessary tools. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to data science necessary tools. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very simple to understand and very well explained. As a start to the tools used, it is very good. | 1) the tools used, it is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | good way to start a very wide course | 1) | Good | 1) way to start a very wide | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I think more detail statements are needed on PDF. Because I'm not good at listening, so I studied by PDF. | 1) needed on PDF. Because I'm not | Good | 1) at listening, so I studied by | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is a good Introductory. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) Introductory. | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good course for identifying the field of data science and introducing the computing tools of the trade. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for identifying the field of | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | It is generally good course, but I feel it is just a combination of very little tools, skills and ideas. I believe it is quite complicate for me to understand, esspecial git and github. I think it is better to combine this course in other courses where you need it. | 1) It is generally | Good | 1) course, but I feel it is | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good starting point for the Data Science | 1) | Good | 1) starting point for the Data Science | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good start to R, GitHub and Data Science | 1) | Good | 1) start to R, GitHub and Data | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction of what is to come, but nothing too provocative or thought provoking. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction of what is to come, | 2.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction about Data toolbox! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction about Data toolbox! | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to basic tools and future work. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to basic tools and future | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good course to kick start your interest in Data Science. | 1) | Good | 1) course to kick start your interest | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introduction to data scientist's toolbox | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to data scientist's toolbox | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good introductory course. Learnt a more structured approach to categorising statistical methods. Much of the rest of the content was a bit basic, though probably useful to fill in any knowledge gaps pre-course. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. Learnt a more structured | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good starter but a bit slow paced (I think intentionally). | 1) | Good | 1) starter but a bit slow paced | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Very good introduction to the subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the subject. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good overview of Data Science, but geared more towards people who have little background in computer science. Info that *was* presented was very thorough. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of Data Science, but geared | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good basic knowledge on data sc | 1) | Good | 1) basic knowledge on data sc | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Great way to star on the subject, complemented by the book "The elements of data analytic style". Good Job | 1) elements of data analytic style" . | Good | 1) Job | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | A good Introduction to GitHub and Data Science | 1) A | Good | 1) Introduction to GitHub and Data Science | 4.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | Good intro. Very motivating. | 1) | Good | 1) intro. Very motivating. | 5.0 |
| iSxVEG07EeW3YxLB1q9I2w | I'm doing this training for the second time, now as a beta-tester. Particular comments about lecture content, problems, etc. have been put in every lecture. General comments, in short: 1) Related to the new platform and UI design: _ It is cleaner and simpler than the previous one. I like it, BUT... _ It lacks of some useful features: saving intermediate results in quizzes before submit them; calendar; limited number of subforums. _ The most relevant flaw: there are not downloadable versions of lecture slides. Unacceptable! No way to check most of the links we saw in slides (URLs not visible). _ Description and steps in course project appear "too packed" together. I prefer the former design. 2) Related to content: _ The course is mainly for preparing students for the rest of data science specialization program. When you said "toolbox" you mean the concrete toolbox you will need to do the program. Some people expect to have a general introduction to data science but that is only a half of the content. I think this is clear enough in the presentation but for some reasons there are people in forums who protest the content, so maybe you should insist more in this fact. _ I would like to suggest some kind of reorder of material: week 2 is all about installing a running tools and week 3 about key aspects of data analysis. Maybe you can split both types of content between wk2 and wk3 to make wk2 more appealing for not technical oriented students. _ Git is a source of problems for a good portion of people. See my comments in lectures about how Git is explained. | 1) a source of problems for a | Good | 1) portion of people. See my comments | 4.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very useful course. I have learnt a lot. The speaker talks really clearly and not so fast. It's just really good course. | 1) not so fast. It's just really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | I'm enjoying the course, and the instruction is very easy to follow. Five stars for a teacher who not only respects his students but also understands the importance of humor in education. Good job, Yaakov. | 1) the importance of humor in education. | Good | 1) job, Yaakov. | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Loving this course. Yaakov is both very entertaining and very good at explaining things. I'm enjoying every lecture and am learning a lot which is going to help me massively at my job. Thank you very much :) | 1) is both very entertaining and very | Good | 1) at explaining things. I'm enjoying every | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Really good lessons, well ordered and with coding examples for everything. The subjects may seem overwhelming at moments, but I believe that's due to the nature of AngularJS and it's steep learning curve. The assignments are interesting and challenging, and the support provided by the TA is great. Yaakov adds a pinch of humor that makes the course easier to traverse. 100% recommended. | 1) Really | Good | 1) lessons, well ordered and with coding | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Pr. Chaikin is a very good lecturer and gives a lot of dedication to his courses. I haven't seen such support and help from the lecturer on any other Coursera course. | 1) Pr. Chaikin is a very | Good | 1) lecturer and gives a lot of | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Great course!!! Yaakov is a very good teacher, explaining every future of angular in a step by step mode. | 1) ! ! Yaakov is a very | Good | 1) teacher, explaining every future of angular | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Clear lessons, good structure, nice assignments. | 1) Clear lessons, | Good | 1) structure, nice assignments. | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | A really good course!!!! | 1) A really | Good | 1) course! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Excellent! Starts from the bases for understanding not only the how but also the why of the operation of AngularJS Good job Professor! | 1) why of the operation of AngularJS | Good | 1) job Professor! | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Really a good one for beginners | 1) Really a | Good | 1) one for beginners | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Good knowledge transfer given by Yakoov! Keep going! | 1) | Good | 1) knowledge transfer given by Yakoov! Keep | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good, detailed, simple | 1) Very | Good | 1) detailed, simple | 5.0 |
| It7SNTe-EeWCYBKNeFwojw | Pretty good so far. Very useful level of details. Thanks a lot! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) so far. Very useful level of | 5.0 |
| ix6p0FfOEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| IXfI4OuZEeWTQApGcKeRIQ | Very good course ! interesting aproach from the human vision and cognitive system to the differents ways of displaying data | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! interesting aproach from the | 5.0 |
| IXfI4OuZEeWTQApGcKeRIQ | Quite clear, good for introduction | 1) Quite clear, | Good | 1) for introduction | 4.0 |
| IXfI4OuZEeWTQApGcKeRIQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| IXfI4OuZEeWTQApGcKeRIQ | Thank Coursera very much for providing such a good course. Also thank for the teacher from Illinois. | 1) very much for providing such a | Good | 1) course. Also thank for the teacher | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Really good organized , great content and easy learning process. | 1) Really | Good | 1) organized , great content and easy | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Do like it. Thanks a lot for a good practice-value information | 1) it. Thanks a lot for a | Good | 1) practice-value information | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | For me, this is the best of the courses in the Strategic Management & Innovation series. The videos have been kept short and well structured. The lecturer is clear and very composed. The reviews and read ups are purely excellent in driving home practicality of real life scenarios. They give a good understanding of situations companies have found themselves in and specifics applied to weathering storms. An excellent course with excellent delivery. Very applicable to my current job role in coordinating alignment and harmonization of my organisation's group structure. Owolabi, Nigeria | 1) real life scenarios. They give a | Good | 1) understanding of situations companies have found | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This was a very good experience for me. The material was easily digestible but at the same time with at lot of depth. I love how the professor invites you to dig into the more academic material without it being a prerequisite | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) experience for me. The material was | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The Professor knows very well how to express the ideas and concepts at the same time he gives real life examples. The course is very well structured and it has a lot of interesting and useful material! Very good one! | 1) of interesting and useful material! Very | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good structured with well prepared materials support. Thank you, Nikolay. | 1) Very | Good | 1) structured with well prepared materials support. | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good course. But the videos could be condensed in larger and more elaborated movies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. But the videos could be | 4.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Teacher is a little harder to follow and less coherent than others in the specialisation. Still good. | 1) than others in the specialisation. Still | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Thank you for the clarity in which the aspects and importance of implementation and the pitfalls to be avoided was communicated. The case studies adopted were an eye-opener to various aspects of good implementation - be it culture at Netflix & Pixar, or risk mitigation in Samsung and Uber. Much appreciated. | 1) an eye-opener to various aspects of | Good | 1) implementation - be it culture at | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The contents and structure of the course was very good. I enjoyed taking all the sessions. | 1) structure of the course was very | Good | 1) I enjoyed taking all the sessions. | 4.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | TL;DR -- Good videos but short and not always relevant material; the course should be titled "A First Light Introduction to Strategy Implementation" The "Strategy Implementation" course is rather a first introduction to the concepts. The material is quite short: only 30 minutes of videos every week and no interviews with "real-life" managers. The additional articles to read most relate to blue-chip companies that succeeded: Samsung, Toyota, Netflix, Google, and of course the obligatory Apple mentioned in every Strategy course on the planet. However, it would be much more interesting to discuss failures and/or duller companies. Finally, the final peer-review exercise is a bit broken but that is the case of every MOOC peer-graded approach (cf. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/hack-higher-education/problems-peer-grading-coursera to know more). On the upside, videos are well edited and clear and easy to understand. | 1) TL;DR -- | Good | 1) videos but short and not always | 2.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Material was very good and well structured. I think that one main issue is the assignment. We would need much more info/hard facts to make it much more interesting (i.e. less theoritical). Moreover, assignments are reviewed by people 1/ who did not necessarily went through the 2 previous courses 2/ did not see our previous documents ie for course 1 and 2 3/ did not necessarily understand the question (one person complained because I did not answer the question "edgy vs. conservative" => I guess she was misled by the support info which were the same as for the first course). This problem could be avoided by offering a distinct case for each assignment, so that there is no confusion/mis-match. In any case, "mange tak" for all your courses. I went through 3 so far, and the ones from CBS are clearly the best I had (videos - content and speed - slides/ support documents, quizzes). | 1) Material was very | Good | 1) and well structured. I think that | 3.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Excellent speaker ! Good examples so far ! | 1) Excellent speaker ! | Good | 1) examples so far ! | 5.0 |
| iXq6zSWTEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good collection of case studies and articles, in addition to the very well crafted videos. | 1) Very | Good | 1) collection of case studies and articles, | 5.0 |
| IzWUDIo9EeWbIxKn7M-nSQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| J0igZhzvEeSGAiIACxMEjA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| J0igZhzvEeSGAiIACxMEjA | I knew nothing about Jefferson before this course and nothing about his 'age' - not sure I am much the wiser about the latter after it! I enjoyed the tours round the historic sites and I thought the lecturer came over as warm and enthusiastic but it seemed he was preaching about a saint rather than giving a detached academic assessment of a historical figure and I found that it was hard to see the wood for the trees at times. Hagiographic might be an unkind description but it was certainly very respectful to the great man. I also liked the use of a student in cooperation with the lecturer.- he set the scene well and was a good interviewer. | 1) the scene well and was a | Good | 1) interviewer. | 3.0 |
| J0igZhzvEeSGAiIACxMEjA | Useful orientation for a good American who more or less slept through all of his American hx courses in his callow youth. I have a much better sense of the important (if controversal) role Jefferson played in forming the values and structure of the US. | 1) Useful orientation for a | Good | 1) American who more or less slept | 4.0 |
| j3fuwJ3EEeSfuyIACxcGsQ | This course is nice, effective and works like a deep glance for those who are having background knowledge of this subject. It's also good for freshers, but they need to keep on reading books along with these lectures. | 1) knowledge of this subject. It's also | Good | 1) for freshers, but they need to | 4.0 |
| j3fuwJ3EEeSfuyIACxcGsQ | It is good for me. Just feeling. No more. | 1) It is | Good | 1) for me. Just feeling. No more. | 5.0 |
| j7Dwn9djEeWlbgqNCYymGw | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| j7Dwn9djEeWlbgqNCYymGw | Learn some good things | 1) Learn some | Good | 1) things | 5.0 |
| j7Dwn9djEeWlbgqNCYymGw | Very good and really helpful | 1) Very | Good | 1) and really helpful | 5.0 |
| j7Dwn9djEeWlbgqNCYymGw | Pretty good I think | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) I think | 3.0 |
| J8UyJKTsEeWzOhI8vzQnoQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | The sequence of the learning movie are not good and some times while teaching the the movie is ended. Besides, rather than educational material this course refer to several website. | 1) of the learning movie are not | Good | 1) and some times while teaching the | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | Nothing good in this course | 1) Nothing | Good | 1) in this course | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | I normally struggle to give poor reviews to free online content, but there are so many glaring fundamental issues with the presentation and content of this course, that it I feel it's important to warn people not to waste their time with this course in it's current form. The mapping and planning lectures raise some good points, but the rest give only the most basic overview of the topic at hand, glossing over steps enough that you would probably learn just as much watching youtube, or looking around inside wordpress on your own. The delivery of the lectures needs a lot of work, with distracting, erratic pauses between words, and the sound frequently cutting out mid-word as they switch between slides. I found it difficult to make it through more than 15 minutes of content. I gave more than 1 star because the links underneath the slides contain some valuable information, so if you can be bothered trawling through the slides you can gleam some knowledge there. Hopefully the creators of the course take on board the many negative reviews and give a major overhaul to the course, to bring it in line with the quality of almost all other content on Coursera. | 1) mapping and planning lectures raise some | Good | 1) points, but the rest give only | 2.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | Sorry to say that this is the worst Coursera Course I have ever taken, and I've taken quite a few. The instructors did not do a good job at explaining how to use Wordpress. They didn't explain how to use wordpress to make a website that looked more like a website than a blog. They didn't explain the difference between wordpress.com and wordpress.org even though they mentioned them both. They talked about hosting but didn't explain how to do it. They mentioned hosting on bluehost but didn't give any instructions. The few tidbits of information that they did give about using wordpress were so brief with no examples. They mentioned Jetpack but didn't say what it was. They didn't explain what benefit adding the social media icons would have or how to link them. And on I could go. The only good part about this course was the last section where they had guest lecturers, some from Coursera - those were all excellent. | 1) The instructors did not do a | Good | 1) job at explaining how to use | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | Sorry to say that this is the worst Coursera Course I have ever taken, and I've taken quite a few. The instructors did not do a good job at explaining how to use Wordpress. They didn't explain how to use wordpress to make a website that looked more like a website than a blog. They didn't explain the difference between wordpress.com and wordpress.org even though they mentioned them both. They talked about hosting but didn't explain how to do it. They mentioned hosting on bluehost but didn't give any instructions. The few tidbits of information that they did give about using wordpress were so brief with no examples. They mentioned Jetpack but didn't say what it was. They didn't explain what benefit adding the social media icons would have or how to link them. And on I could go. The only good part about this course was the last section where they had guest lecturers, some from Coursera - those were all excellent. | 2) on I could go. The only | Good | 2) part about this course was the | 1.0 |
| jA4AZLlTEeWfYA612mWHZw | Good enough for a fast start. | 1) | Good | 1) enough for a fast start. | 4.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Overall it was good. However, the content delivery could have been better. | 1) Overall it was | Good | 1) However, the content delivery could have | 3.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Good material, insightful thoughts about starting a business. However, course material could be better quality. Looking forward to the following courses. | 1) | Good | 1) material, insightful thoughts about starting a | 4.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Good and straightforward content but with so very little written excercises and thus very little room for lecturer feedback - I would not pay an additional 100$ just to get rated like that (I might consider it if the price included the mentioned books though). Still - I find it a very well designed, concise course. Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) and straightforward content but with so | 3.0 |
| JBCvTm03EeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Practical and useful... good for someone who has thought of opening a business, but who has never actually taken action. | 1) Practical and useful. . . | Good | 1) for someone who has thought of | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good Job, really helpful!!! | 1) | Good | 1) Job, really helpful! ! ! | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Wonderfully designed course. Everyone should take this course for a good addition to knowledge whether one is a marketer or not. | 1) should take this course for a | Good | 1) addition to knowledge whether one is | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good one to begin with. Very well laid out and illustrated. | 1) | Good | 1) one to begin with. Very well | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | the language of this video is to high, it's like to be for reading more than speaking ( Too Formal). The Content is quite good, but it needs more time in order to fully understand it. | 1) Too Formal). The Content is quite | Good | 1) but it needs more time in | 3.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very very good course | 1) very very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This was one of the best professors I have ever had. This course was very interesting, well produced and had a good support material. | 1) interesting, well produced and had a | Good | 1) support material. | 5.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good course. just, it does not go in depth | 1) | Good | 1) course. just, it does not go | 4.0 |
| jcbwGG00EeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good material with more than enough detailing on the subject. Wish it could have more practical examples and exercises. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material with more than enough detailing | 4.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Excellent course, very good professor and material. | 1) Excellent course, very | Good | 1) professor and material. | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very good explanations in each lectures! | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations in each lectures! | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | An absolute gem! Professor really presents the right breadth and depth required whether you are new to Buddhism, experienced Buddhist practitioner or someone who just want to know the Buddhism and its correspondence with Modern psychology (or someone who just want to analyse and review validity either/or/both Buddhism and Modern psychology for themselves). Professional also makes exceptional effort to interview some of the most important names in Modern psychology and Buddhism researches to interpret scriptures and shares their empirical experiences. I must admin, the first 2 weeks was a little tedious for me as those are concepts that I am quite familiar with and that on a practical level, it was introducing fundamental Buddhism concepts, its scholastic interpretations and the importance of experiential aspect of meditation, all of those I was both familiar with (on an experiential level) and contains an academic depth that was not exactly required by me. But from week 3 onwards that's where things get SUPER interesting and fascinating. Professor start debunking different interpretations of the "No-self" notion taught by Buddhism's 2nd sermon. This is an aspect of Buddhism that I always had difficulty accepting its mainstream interpretation and voila - the 3 parts lecture really clears all the mist for good. Office hour provides further doubt clearing and discussions forums are active and bustling with students with all arrays of discussions! A completely random sidenote: This course provides a bonus perks for dog lover from week 2 office hours onwards... :D | 1) really clears all the mist for | Good | 1) Office hour provides further doubt clearing | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Good work, crossing science and buddhism. | 1) | Good | 1) work, crossing science and buddhism. | 4.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Loved this course. It was a lot of fun. The Prof. really cares about the subject and how his students contribute to his own understanding of it. (He takes a lot of time reading students' comments and replying to them during "office hours.") He also reaches out to experts in both psychology and Buddhism and shows you his dialogue with them. Finally, the guiding questions for the assignments are a good challenge and the instructions for structuring the paper very clear. I didn't have time to write the papers but will as soon as I've the time. Bonus: you get to meet his dogs, and they're awesome. | 1) questions for the assignments are a | Good | 1) challenge and the instructions for structuring | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Quite interesting way of analizyng buddhism and psychology. They are definitely closer to each other than I thought. The professor is clear and in love with the subject, which is a good thing, as it's infectious: you'll start to love the lessons and devour the lectures. I'm planning on taking this course again soon. | 1) with the subject, which is a | Good | 1) thing, as it's infectious: you'll start | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Firstly I enjoyed it - it was interesting. Secondly I found it did what it said it would do - it was informative. The teaching was good. The assessments were relevant and did assess learning without being too time consuming or difficult. There was a forum which was interesting. I'd definitely do another one. | 1) it was informative. The teaching was | Good | 1) The assessments were relevant and did | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Good info with thoughtful commentary. A+ course | 1) | Good | 1) info with thoughtful commentary. A+ course | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Good learning experience. | 1) | Good | 1) learning experience. | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | This course was very interesting and well prepared. Not overwhelming but with plenty of good content. | 1) Not overwhelming but with plenty of | Good | 1) content. | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very good and informative, with being too voluminous. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative, with being too voluminous. | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | The course goes a long way in proving what it sets out to prove. However, it would have been good to hear from some people (I am sure they exist) who dispute the stipulated thesis that modern psychology confirms that accuracy of the Buddhist analysis of the human mind. | 1) prove. However, it would have been | Good | 1) to hear from some people (I | 4.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | I liked, this course is very good! | 1) I liked, this course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | very good introduction to Buddhism and psychology. I especially like the interview part. | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction to Buddhism and psychology. I | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | This was my first course in Social Sciences and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Prof Wright maintains a very fine balance between philosophy and science which makes it suitable for all enthusiasts. A good course for beginners in the Buddhist enquiry. | 1) it suitable for all enthusiasts. A | Good | 1) course for beginners in the Buddhist | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | It was pretty good for most of the time. I found the professor engaging and interesting. He was an effortless speaker who never seemed bored--you could tell he was passionate, but did not alienate students by using too much jargon or academe-speak. I sort of fell off of the course toward the end mostly because I felt much of the material began to repeat (or at least became extremely predictable). Overall, really great course. | 1) It was pretty | Good | 1) for most of the time. I | 4.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | This is my first philosophy course. Many concepts were introduced but they are well explained with good reference materials. I have learned a lot thanks to the teacher's dedication in building the course | 1) but they are well explained with | Good | 1) reference materials. I have learned a | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | i learned a lot from this course and helped me a lot. the course was very well structured and the instructor was very good | 1) structured and the instructor was very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Good Balance explaining Modern Psychology and Buddhism as well as how the former has aided to support empirically most of the observations laid out by the latter centuries ago. Lectures are very insightful and carefully crafted turning the whole six week course into a delightful experience to those interested not only in Buddhism but also in Modern Psychology and behavioural theory. | 1) | Good | 1) Balance explaining Modern Psychology and Buddhism | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | An introduction to analysis of Buddhism from the perspective of modern science. Very good teacher. | 1) the perspective of modern science. Very | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | I am finding this course really good. | 1) I am finding this course really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | On to week 2 of this course. Loving this course. Awesome professor, awesome knowledge. Anyone interested in Buddhism will gain very good knowledge from this course!! | 1) interested in Buddhism will gain very | Good | 1) knowledge from this course! ! | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very interesting course. Good depth into the subject matter, a bit more enthusiasm from the professor could go a long way into making the course a bit more vibrant. | 1) Very interesting course. | Good | 1) depth into the subject matter, a | 4.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Just awesome. Highly recommanded. Good for person with some but not extensive knowledge of buddhism. Great teacher, love the subtle humour. Fun and greatly instructive. | 1) Just awesome. Highly recommanded. | Good | 1) for person with some but not | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JdB92adFEeS5zCIAC8pMPA | It was a pleasure learning from this course. It has a lot of practical information with a very good scientific support. Thank you! | 1) of practical information with a very | Good | 1) scientific support. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very Good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good! Amazing! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Amazing! | 5.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good course with clear explanations and good pace. I would add some more extra material to cover some aspects that are not given in deep during the course but overall is a really good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with clear explanations and good | 4.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good course with clear explanations and good pace. I would add some more extra material to cover some aspects that are not given in deep during the course but overall is a really good course. | 2) good course with clear explanations and | Good | 2) pace. I would add some more | 4.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good course with clear explanations and good pace. I would add some more extra material to cover some aspects that are not given in deep during the course but overall is a really good course. | 3) course but overall is a really | Good | 3) course. | 4.0 |
| jFTD2Tu2EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good explanations, and the exercises and power points prepared helped to understanding it better. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations, and the exercises and power | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good contents! However, the lectures are long and a bit rushed. This course is definitely not for everyone! Assignment for week 3 definitely need an extra lecture to explain to do PID tuning. | 1) | Good | 1) contents! However, the lectures are long | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good contents. Excellent assignments. You'll need to work hard to pass it but you enjoy the effort. | 1) Very | Good | 1) contents. Excellent assignments. You'll need to | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really good. Unavoidably complicated at times but presented well. Later assignments are quite difficult. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Unavoidably complicated at times but presented | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | it's good to understand the aerial robotics. it's quite hard for me, as English is not my native language. it's better if all the basic terms can be explained in supplyment material, such as body fixed frame, inertia frame, etc. The assignment is very good and helped me to understand the drones fly and controller. Finally it's better to have all the mathmatical proof in supplyment material if it's too long in the video. | 1) it's | Good | 1) to understand the aerial robotics. it's | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | it's good to understand the aerial robotics. it's quite hard for me, as English is not my native language. it's better if all the basic terms can be explained in supplyment material, such as body fixed frame, inertia frame, etc. The assignment is very good and helped me to understand the drones fly and controller. Finally it's better to have all the mathmatical proof in supplyment material if it's too long in the video. | 2) frame, etc. The assignment is very | Good | 2) and helped me to understand the | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Amazing Course And the mentor is too good. | 1) Course And the mentor is too | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good and thorough, some improvement in assignment instructions may be considered. One of the best courses I have taken, other courses of this specialization also seem very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and thorough, some improvement in assignment | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good and thorough, some improvement in assignment instructions may be considered. One of the best courses I have taken, other courses of this specialization also seem very good. | 2) of this specialization also seem very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The only thing I think that put this course on the back foot is the absence of mentors and TAs. They should be pretty active enough to clear the doubts that pops up while clearing quizzes or programming assignments. Its just the people on the forum that comes handy but even when they are not sure about the concept then the going becomes tough. Apart from that, the course is one of the best of its kind and trust me you will never regret doing this certification !!! Good job team UPenn !!! | 1) doing this certification ! ! ! | Good | 1) job team UPenn ! ! ! | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The video lectures provide an introduction to quadrotor flight dynamics and path planning. The lectures are ok. Unfortunately: At least one of the coding assignments has a significant bug in the termination condition. The mentors will ignore any help requests that deal with the bug in their code. The assignments involve a lot of hand tuning of PD controllers. That's a reasonable task to perform once or twice, but it rapidly becomes extremely tedious and detracts from the other materials that are being taught. The final assignment doesn't do a particularly good job evaluating the required test condition. If you do take the course I'd want you to know: You should expect to modify the provided code to fix their bugs. There are no "gotcha" quiz questions. If you are confused by getting a question wrong you might want to re-try your answer. There seems to be a bug in the way at least one quiz question is set up. On the final assignment you can modify the simulation step where it makes things run in "real time". Removing that step makes the simulation run much more quickly and allows for faster iteration. To conclude: This is a course with a lot of potential, but unless Coursera makes an effort to improve the course I would not recommend it. | 1) final assignment doesn't do a particularly | Good | 1) job evaluating the required test condition. | 1.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | the course is a good topic, but the exercises are mainly teaching you how to write a PD control and tune the PD parameters. | 1) the course is a | Good | 1) topic, but the exercises are mainly | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course provides a good insight into the world of Aerial Robotics and the dynamics involved in controlling the quad-rotors. Were the course fails is it does not explain the basics , there is more focus on trial and error and the questions are not formulated correctly such that they are simple to understand. It could have been better if the Introductory course to the specialization had little mathematical involved or could have been explained in simpler terms or with examples instead of showing the equation in the video. | 1) The course provides a | Good | 1) insight into the world of Aerial | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very interesting course, very good lessons and lectures! but I´ve missed some tips about quadrotors electronics. | 1) Very interesting course, very | Good | 1) lessons and lectures! but I´ve missed | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Great material and very good explanations of the topics. | 1) Great material and very | Good | 1) explanations of the topics. | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Enjoyed the course. It was a good introduction. There is a good room for improvement though: 1- More time should be spent on 3D quadrotor control 2- Trajectory planning was not completely explained; importantly 2d and 3d need a lot more attention with focus on solving for minimum snap trajectory 3- TA support was almost unavailable. TAs should be active during the course | 1) Enjoyed the course. It was a | Good | 1) introduction. There is a good room | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Enjoyed the course. It was a good introduction. There is a good room for improvement though: 1- More time should be spent on 3D quadrotor control 2- Trajectory planning was not completely explained; importantly 2d and 3d need a lot more attention with focus on solving for minimum snap trajectory 3- TA support was almost unavailable. TAs should be active during the course | 2) a good introduction. There is a | Good | 2) room for improvement though: 1- More | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | it is a great course with a very good illustrating and explanation that is easy to understand .. THANK YOU FOR THIS wonderful work | 1) a great course with a very | Good | 1) illustrating and explanation that is easy | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Really fascinating material and loads of good information in the lectures. The homework assignments were satisfying if you can complete them, but unfortunately involved a lot of tedious trial and error. This was especially difficult since running the program can be slow which causes slow iteration of trial and error. I would not have been able to complete the assignments without helpful information in the course discussions. | 1) Really fascinating material and loads of | Good | 1) information in the lectures. The homework | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Extremely well orchestrated lectures and good assignments. | 1) Extremely well orchestrated lectures and | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course is great - a lot of knowledge, good form of the course, helpful instructors. | 1) great - a lot of knowledge, | Good | 1) form of the course, helpful instructors. | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I thought the course was very laid out in going from an overview towards more specific and harder material. For the most part, I thought the assignments were very good and did a thorough job of teaching feedback control. My only problem with the assignments were that they seem to overemphasize a trial and error approach for tuning the k gains. This became very tedious especially on the third assignment where the simulator ran so slowly. | 1) I thought the assignments were very | Good | 1) and did a thorough job of | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This part was good but it would have been much more informative if bit more is added. | 1) This part was | Good | 1) but it would have been much | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | IT is a brief course regarding Robotics, but adequate. It leave lots of room to understand. But provide enough to dig deeper into the Areal robotics. I am able to grasp the course work and work along with the pace set by instructor. All in all it was a good 5 weeks worth of lecture and hands on to simulations. | 1) All in all it was a | Good | 1) 5 weeks worth of lecture and | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | funny good demonstration bad TA good community | 1) funny | Good | 1) demonstration bad TA good community | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | funny good demonstration bad TA good community | 2) funny good demonstration bad TA | Good | 2) community | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A very good course, expecially for the MATLAB part. They can improve with more assignment in MATLAB and with some more theoretical stuff, like more types of trajectories, more types of controllers and so on. However, is one of the best course that I attended online in a few years. I absolutely recommend it. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, expecially for the MATLAB part. | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good. Practical information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Practical information. | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good course. If you love quadrotors and want to learn a lot about the way their control, motion planning, collision avoidance etc work, take the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. If you love quadrotors and | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A good overview on various fields of Robotics, especially control. Quizzes seemed a little ambiguous but lectures and assignments were very informative! | 1) A | Good | 1) overview on various fields of Robotics, | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Excellent course, good planned and good use of online resources. Some things that could be improved are: encouraging students to implementation using hardware, not only simulations, and also there is a lot of material in the course that is rapidly reviewed, some more time could be invested into this. | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) planned and good use of online | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Excellent course, good planned and good use of online resources. Some things that could be improved are: encouraging students to implementation using hardware, not only simulations, and also there is a lot of material in the course that is rapidly reviewed, some more time could be invested into this. | 2) Excellent course, good planned and | Good | 2) use of online resources. Some things | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A tough score, which I have mixed feelings about as there was good stuff in here too. The course material is interesting and moves at a robust pace and I do think they have made an effort despite the fact that much of it appears lifted from one PhD student's dissertation. Realistically I would not recommend this course if you don't have a STEM Bachelor's degree and you will likely find it painful if you have been away from your degree more than three years. None of this is bad, although the material would have benefitted by being spread out by perhaps two more weeks as realistically people who have been in the workplace a long time may need more time, and have less time per week with family commitments. Unfortunately there are a number of areas that need work: 1 - Inconsistencies and errors in the material. Certain unexplained suffixes in equations and worse, changes in the suffixes without indication that they changed or what they are. I don't feel that this was particularly widespread but it did result in some loss of confidence in the course and time being wasted "interpreting" 2 - Tests throughout the course that often provide the relatively limited feedback of "correct well done" or worse I'm sorry to say, the relatively useless feedback "sorry that is not correct", without ANY explanation of why it was correct or more importantly what an incorrect answer should have been and why. I can understand that this will hopefully drive students should do more research, but if they hit a wall, realistically they're going to keep iterating on the answers until you pass and learn nothing because of the time pressure to complete by the end of the week. I wonder if there is a better mechanism that can be used here 3 - TA Support - The lack of TA support coupled with some concern about a history of errors led the students to believe that there was an error in week 3. For 10 days students went back and forth debating which one of the two equations that were supposedly doing the same thing but with missing terms were correct. NOT ONCE did a TA wake up and step in. In the end one of the students flagged the video as "inappropriate" to wake the UPenn organization up. The TA then stepped in and said (I paraphrase) "oh, we just dropped those terms because they're not so important, but we didn't mention that..." If you are not going to adequately support the students, the material had better be bullet-proof and show some linear thinking 4 - The last exam. Keep in mind if you do this course, you had better be comfortable with calculus, linear algebra, vector math/mechanics and it would be helpful to have a head start in Matlab. That said, the last question in the last exam, was an order of magnitude more challenging than everything else set and almost felt like a "shake out" question. I passed the course and had a good understanding of the material, but I suspect that the folks that did, made it through that last question in multiple random fashions. The material itself is relatively academic and the trajectory topic was definitely so. Unfortunately the one example (jerk trajectory) provided appears to have left a lot of students feeling very unsupported based on feedback I saw, and would probably benefit from having an example more fully worked through. As for the final exam, it would be highly desirable for UPenn to provide insight into how they would have solved the last part of the last question as my concern is that there is a whole contingent of people who did this course who didn't come away with as good a grounding on trajectories as they may believe they have | 1) mixed feelings about as there was | Good | 1) stuff in here too. The course | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A tough score, which I have mixed feelings about as there was good stuff in here too. The course material is interesting and moves at a robust pace and I do think they have made an effort despite the fact that much of it appears lifted from one PhD student's dissertation. Realistically I would not recommend this course if you don't have a STEM Bachelor's degree and you will likely find it painful if you have been away from your degree more than three years. None of this is bad, although the material would have benefitted by being spread out by perhaps two more weeks as realistically people who have been in the workplace a long time may need more time, and have less time per week with family commitments. Unfortunately there are a number of areas that need work: 1 - Inconsistencies and errors in the material. Certain unexplained suffixes in equations and worse, changes in the suffixes without indication that they changed or what they are. I don't feel that this was particularly widespread but it did result in some loss of confidence in the course and time being wasted "interpreting" 2 - Tests throughout the course that often provide the relatively limited feedback of "correct well done" or worse I'm sorry to say, the relatively useless feedback "sorry that is not correct", without ANY explanation of why it was correct or more importantly what an incorrect answer should have been and why. I can understand that this will hopefully drive students should do more research, but if they hit a wall, realistically they're going to keep iterating on the answers until you pass and learn nothing because of the time pressure to complete by the end of the week. I wonder if there is a better mechanism that can be used here 3 - TA Support - The lack of TA support coupled with some concern about a history of errors led the students to believe that there was an error in week 3. For 10 days students went back and forth debating which one of the two equations that were supposedly doing the same thing but with missing terms were correct. NOT ONCE did a TA wake up and step in. In the end one of the students flagged the video as "inappropriate" to wake the UPenn organization up. The TA then stepped in and said (I paraphrase) "oh, we just dropped those terms because they're not so important, but we didn't mention that..." If you are not going to adequately support the students, the material had better be bullet-proof and show some linear thinking 4 - The last exam. Keep in mind if you do this course, you had better be comfortable with calculus, linear algebra, vector math/mechanics and it would be helpful to have a head start in Matlab. That said, the last question in the last exam, was an order of magnitude more challenging than everything else set and almost felt like a "shake out" question. I passed the course and had a good understanding of the material, but I suspect that the folks that did, made it through that last question in multiple random fashions. The material itself is relatively academic and the trajectory topic was definitely so. Unfortunately the one example (jerk trajectory) provided appears to have left a lot of students feeling very unsupported based on feedback I saw, and would probably benefit from having an example more fully worked through. As for the final exam, it would be highly desirable for UPenn to provide insight into how they would have solved the last part of the last question as my concern is that there is a whole contingent of people who did this course who didn't come away with as good a grounding on trajectories as they may believe they have | 2) passed the course and had a | Good | 2) understanding of the material, but I | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A tough score, which I have mixed feelings about as there was good stuff in here too. The course material is interesting and moves at a robust pace and I do think they have made an effort despite the fact that much of it appears lifted from one PhD student's dissertation. Realistically I would not recommend this course if you don't have a STEM Bachelor's degree and you will likely find it painful if you have been away from your degree more than three years. None of this is bad, although the material would have benefitted by being spread out by perhaps two more weeks as realistically people who have been in the workplace a long time may need more time, and have less time per week with family commitments. Unfortunately there are a number of areas that need work: 1 - Inconsistencies and errors in the material. Certain unexplained suffixes in equations and worse, changes in the suffixes without indication that they changed or what they are. I don't feel that this was particularly widespread but it did result in some loss of confidence in the course and time being wasted "interpreting" 2 - Tests throughout the course that often provide the relatively limited feedback of "correct well done" or worse I'm sorry to say, the relatively useless feedback "sorry that is not correct", without ANY explanation of why it was correct or more importantly what an incorrect answer should have been and why. I can understand that this will hopefully drive students should do more research, but if they hit a wall, realistically they're going to keep iterating on the answers until you pass and learn nothing because of the time pressure to complete by the end of the week. I wonder if there is a better mechanism that can be used here 3 - TA Support - The lack of TA support coupled with some concern about a history of errors led the students to believe that there was an error in week 3. For 10 days students went back and forth debating which one of the two equations that were supposedly doing the same thing but with missing terms were correct. NOT ONCE did a TA wake up and step in. In the end one of the students flagged the video as "inappropriate" to wake the UPenn organization up. The TA then stepped in and said (I paraphrase) "oh, we just dropped those terms because they're not so important, but we didn't mention that..." If you are not going to adequately support the students, the material had better be bullet-proof and show some linear thinking 4 - The last exam. Keep in mind if you do this course, you had better be comfortable with calculus, linear algebra, vector math/mechanics and it would be helpful to have a head start in Matlab. That said, the last question in the last exam, was an order of magnitude more challenging than everything else set and almost felt like a "shake out" question. I passed the course and had a good understanding of the material, but I suspect that the folks that did, made it through that last question in multiple random fashions. The material itself is relatively academic and the trajectory topic was definitely so. Unfortunately the one example (jerk trajectory) provided appears to have left a lot of students feeling very unsupported based on feedback I saw, and would probably benefit from having an example more fully worked through. As for the final exam, it would be highly desirable for UPenn to provide insight into how they would have solved the last part of the last question as my concern is that there is a whole contingent of people who did this course who didn't come away with as good a grounding on trajectories as they may believe they have | 3) who didn't come away with as | Good | 3) a grounding on trajectories as they | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | 1) assignments done. The course content is | Good | 1) but doing the programming assignments needs | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think this course does not a good job of explaining the mathematics very well. The supplementary material is very good in that regard, compared to the lectures. However, there are too few to make up for it. I would need a few example calculations of similar problems to what we are expected to solve in the exercises. As a result, my learning success is not very satisfactory. | 1) think this course does not a | Good | 1) job of explaining the mathematics very | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I think this course does not a good job of explaining the mathematics very well. The supplementary material is very good in that regard, compared to the lectures. However, there are too few to make up for it. I would need a few example calculations of similar problems to what we are expected to solve in the exercises. As a result, my learning success is not very satisfactory. | 2) well. The supplementary material is very | Good | 2) in that regard, compared to the | 2.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I really enjoyed this course and felt the material was appropriate in scope and quality for an introduction to Aerial Robotics. I have a few issues with it though. While this wasn't a problem for me, I feel those who haven't done maths with vectors and matrices before would struggle with the maths presented here. There was some inconsistency in notation throughout the lectures - though I expect this will be fixed in future runs of this course. Given how much the programming assignments involved tuning PD controllers, I think there should have been some additional material provided on how to go about doing this. The difficulty of the last programming assignment came out of nowhere and given that you need to pass all the assignments in order to pass the course, this made it especially stressful. Having gotten almost full marks on the course until that point, the prospect of that all being for naught because I couldn't complete the final assignment in time was incredibly stressful and unfair. The simulation would fail with a Matlab ode45 error - with absolutely no information as to why that should fail. Trying to debug something by guesswork on a time limit is not a valuable educational experience. I feel all of these issues are fixable though and on balance I think this was a very good course. | 1) I think this was a very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Has allot of typos but the content is good overall | 1) of typos but the content is | Good | 1) overall | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Some good material and I good introduction to aerial robotics. But, it doesn't cover all the theory needed to actually write flight control software for a quad copter. If you are really new to robotics you will need to spend at least 40-50 hours a week "discovering" enough of the details to pass the course. | 1) Some | Good | 1) material and I good introduction to | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Some good material and I good introduction to aerial robotics. But, it doesn't cover all the theory needed to actually write flight control software for a quad copter. If you are really new to robotics you will need to spend at least 40-50 hours a week "discovering" enough of the details to pass the course. | 2) Some good material and I | Good | 2) introduction to aerial robotics. But, it | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This was an excellent course; inspiring, practical and very enlightening. There was a good balance between teaching relevant concept and depth. Thanks a lot Prof. Vijay and your team...well done! | 1) and very enlightening. There was a | Good | 1) balance between teaching relevant concept and | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | A good lecture material. All is presented step by step and clearly. I would like more exercise on the calculation of the rotation matrix on the transformation and displacement of objects. Thanks Professor Vijay Kumar and support team. | 1) A | Good | 1) lecture material. All is presented step | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | So close but yet so far ... Course concepts are interesting and the programming assignments are fun but the presentation can be greatly improved. Criticisms include: (i) The course isn't self contained. Physical concepts like 'resultant moment', 'inertial and body-fixed frame' and 'torque' are used without definition. Mechanics is not listed as a prerequisite but it should be. (ii) Lectures are very mathematical but proofs, intuition and good problem sets are all missing. Listening to a math lecture without doing challenging problems or deriving mathematical results to build intuition can be a waste of time. Check out John Cochrane's Asset Pricing 1 and 2 or Tim Roughgarden's Algo 1 and 2 for great examples of thoughtful problem sets and intuitive derivations. (iii) Way too much powerpoint! Speed reading a static powerpoint slide overloaded with dense mathematical formulas without using pointers or animations to focus the students attention is a recipe for confusion and frustration. I find hand written derivations, even when the handwriting is a little sloppy, much easier to follow than a static page of formulas plus a sound track. Hand written derivations impose a natural pace and focal point to the content. Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, Sebastian Thrun's Artificial Intelligence for Robotics and Andrew Ng's Machine Learning for examples of good derivations of mathematically sophisticated material. (iv) The programming assignments while fun were somewhat ad hoc and disconnected from the lecture material, specifically, the main task of every single assignment was to hand tune a pd controller. No systematic approach was ever described for performing this task. | 1) very mathematical but proofs, intuition and | Good | 1) problem sets are all missing. Listening | 1.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | So close but yet so far ... Course concepts are interesting and the programming assignments are fun but the presentation can be greatly improved. Criticisms include: (i) The course isn't self contained. Physical concepts like 'resultant moment', 'inertial and body-fixed frame' and 'torque' are used without definition. Mechanics is not listed as a prerequisite but it should be. (ii) Lectures are very mathematical but proofs, intuition and good problem sets are all missing. Listening to a math lecture without doing challenging problems or deriving mathematical results to build intuition can be a waste of time. Check out John Cochrane's Asset Pricing 1 and 2 or Tim Roughgarden's Algo 1 and 2 for great examples of thoughtful problem sets and intuitive derivations. (iii) Way too much powerpoint! Speed reading a static powerpoint slide overloaded with dense mathematical formulas without using pointers or animations to focus the students attention is a recipe for confusion and frustration. I find hand written derivations, even when the handwriting is a little sloppy, much easier to follow than a static page of formulas plus a sound track. Hand written derivations impose a natural pace and focal point to the content. Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra, Sebastian Thrun's Artificial Intelligence for Robotics and Andrew Ng's Machine Learning for examples of good derivations of mathematically sophisticated material. (iv) The programming assignments while fun were somewhat ad hoc and disconnected from the lecture material, specifically, the main task of every single assignment was to hand tune a pd controller. No systematic approach was ever described for performing this task. | 2) Ng's Machine Learning for examples of | Good | 2) derivations of mathematically sophisticated material. (iv) | 1.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Very good Course, I recommend it for those who want to achive basic control for UAVs. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course, I recommend it for those | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | The course contains a lot of good tools and techniques needed for a robotics enthusiast, but the material is not very well explained. A lot of background knowledge and self-research is expected to keep up with the course. | 1) The course contains a lot of | Good | 1) tools and techniques needed for a | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good course overall, since I took it the first time it was offered it was still not quite polished. I liked the focus on quadrocopter simulation and creating controllers. I think it would benefit from more specific discussion forums for quizzes/assignments, being able to view past quiz attempts, and cleaning up typos/errors in the material. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall, since I took it | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good ,but many complaints regarding PID tuning from students need to be addressed in the upcoming sessions | 1) | Good | 1) , but many complaints regarding PID | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Overall good course that would definitely make you spend more time reading and learning on the side. Would recommend it those who have good background in college level math like Linear Algebra and a little bit of Robotics Background from a Math perspective - like working with translations, rotations, transformation matrices of that sort to make the transition easier. (There are basic robotic courses online to help with that, like Peter Corke's course). But overall this course requires some significant effort to explore the material from an external perspective. Some issues however - 1. Lack of added resources like reading material to support the course and help advanced students go beyond the course themselves. 2. Severe lack of activity from TA(s) on the forums. It's good that students get to interact among themselves and learn on their own, but every single post should be either answered by a TA to clarify doubts or they should acknowledge that another student's explanation was good enough to answer a particular question. 3. The in-video quizzes weren't up-to-the-mark as per me. One question asked "why" and the answer was literally "because that's how that algorithm is". 4. This is a trend in MOOCs and I don't think it can be helped, but perhaps more assignments that help understand the concepts better with examples would help students go beyond. If this course had such optional assignments that would be great for understanding the concepts with a more hands-on approach. But this is probably not the best platform to do so. Overall would recommend future iterations of this course, especially if the first two points above are improved upon. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course that would definitely make you | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Overall good course that would definitely make you spend more time reading and learning on the side. Would recommend it those who have good background in college level math like Linear Algebra and a little bit of Robotics Background from a Math perspective - like working with translations, rotations, transformation matrices of that sort to make the transition easier. (There are basic robotic courses online to help with that, like Peter Corke's course). But overall this course requires some significant effort to explore the material from an external perspective. Some issues however - 1. Lack of added resources like reading material to support the course and help advanced students go beyond the course themselves. 2. Severe lack of activity from TA(s) on the forums. It's good that students get to interact among themselves and learn on their own, but every single post should be either answered by a TA to clarify doubts or they should acknowledge that another student's explanation was good enough to answer a particular question. 3. The in-video quizzes weren't up-to-the-mark as per me. One question asked "why" and the answer was literally "because that's how that algorithm is". 4. This is a trend in MOOCs and I don't think it can be helped, but perhaps more assignments that help understand the concepts better with examples would help students go beyond. If this course had such optional assignments that would be great for understanding the concepts with a more hands-on approach. But this is probably not the best platform to do so. Overall would recommend future iterations of this course, especially if the first two points above are improved upon. | 2) Would recommend it those who have | Good | 2) background in college level math like | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Overall good course that would definitely make you spend more time reading and learning on the side. Would recommend it those who have good background in college level math like Linear Algebra and a little bit of Robotics Background from a Math perspective - like working with translations, rotations, transformation matrices of that sort to make the transition easier. (There are basic robotic courses online to help with that, like Peter Corke's course). But overall this course requires some significant effort to explore the material from an external perspective. Some issues however - 1. Lack of added resources like reading material to support the course and help advanced students go beyond the course themselves. 2. Severe lack of activity from TA(s) on the forums. It's good that students get to interact among themselves and learn on their own, but every single post should be either answered by a TA to clarify doubts or they should acknowledge that another student's explanation was good enough to answer a particular question. 3. The in-video quizzes weren't up-to-the-mark as per me. One question asked "why" and the answer was literally "because that's how that algorithm is". 4. This is a trend in MOOCs and I don't think it can be helped, but perhaps more assignments that help understand the concepts better with examples would help students go beyond. If this course had such optional assignments that would be great for understanding the concepts with a more hands-on approach. But this is probably not the best platform to do so. Overall would recommend future iterations of this course, especially if the first two points above are improved upon. | 3) from TA(s) on the forums. It's | Good | 3) that students get to interact among | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Overall good course that would definitely make you spend more time reading and learning on the side. Would recommend it those who have good background in college level math like Linear Algebra and a little bit of Robotics Background from a Math perspective - like working with translations, rotations, transformation matrices of that sort to make the transition easier. (There are basic robotic courses online to help with that, like Peter Corke's course). But overall this course requires some significant effort to explore the material from an external perspective. Some issues however - 1. Lack of added resources like reading material to support the course and help advanced students go beyond the course themselves. 2. Severe lack of activity from TA(s) on the forums. It's good that students get to interact among themselves and learn on their own, but every single post should be either answered by a TA to clarify doubts or they should acknowledge that another student's explanation was good enough to answer a particular question. 3. The in-video quizzes weren't up-to-the-mark as per me. One question asked "why" and the answer was literally "because that's how that algorithm is". 4. This is a trend in MOOCs and I don't think it can be helped, but perhaps more assignments that help understand the concepts better with examples would help students go beyond. If this course had such optional assignments that would be great for understanding the concepts with a more hands-on approach. But this is probably not the best platform to do so. Overall would recommend future iterations of this course, especially if the first two points above are improved upon. | 4) acknowledge that another student's explanation was | Good | 4) enough to answer a particular question. | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is a good course with good support. But it still has a few teething problems. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course with good support. But it | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is a good course with good support. But it still has a few teething problems. | 2) This is a good course with | Good | 2) support. But it still has a | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This course was very good and very interesting. The teacher explained things well. The BIG problem with the course is that the level of the lectures no way matched the level of the assignments, especially the last one. It was way too hard compared to the material presented. It was supposed to take 3 hours but it took me more like 50 hours. And from the forum it seems like a lot of people spend 40 or more hours on this one last problem. Was too hard and too much. A lot of prayer and sweat I finally got it with a lot if discussion on the forums. But 40 hours for one problem is crazy. There needed to be a lot more thorough instruction in order to do this problem in a reasonable time. | 1) This course was very | Good | 1) and very interesting. The teacher explained | 3.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Best thing ever!!!! Working out really good. Basic aerial robotics explained in the most effective way. | 1) ! ! ! Working out really | Good | 1) Basic aerial robotics explained in the | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Well balanced mix of theory and practical applicability. Explanation of the material is also very good. The assignments are nicely built on the taught material to stimulate understanding. | 1) of the material is also very | Good | 1) The assignments are nicely built on | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Good! But not Great. Need more elaboration. I don't feel like I am in a class when I saw the lectures. But yes a great place to learn. | 1) | Good | 1) But not Great. Need more elaboration. | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Overall a good course. But I would suggest the following updates: -there are many formulas in the course that are not explained, just dropped in the slides -there are many inconsistencies in notations (for instance the Kv, Kp used sometimes, other times Kd and Kp) -programming labs should be given in an incremental approach; ex. instead of just requesting a full solution for a given problem, a stepwise approach where the functions are built up to produce intermediate results and slowly add complexity to reach that final goal is much more efficient as a learning tool -supplementary notes are not available -slides for the main lectures are available but they are attached to the videos; it would be better if they are added as an item in the course outline. Many other courses on Coursera do the same thing. Also it would spare the presenter to break down the slide pack into parts corresponding to the videos; just place the whole slide pack for a lesson. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course. But I would suggest the | 4.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | I found the course very good. | 1) I found the course very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | This is an excellent course on drones, especially the mathematics and control theory behind it. But the course description misleads people into thinking that this is beginners course, which is not all the case. I would say the pre-requisites are a good background in applies mathematics, basic control theory, familiarity with MATLAB. This is especially suitable for junior year, senior year under graduates and graduate students. | 1) would say the pre-requisites are a | Good | 1) background in applies mathematics, basic control | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Excellent course. Provides a very good ground basis and it is very intuitive regarding applicability and practicability of the concepts learned at the course in real world. | 1) Excellent course. Provides a very | Good | 1) ground basis and it is very | 5.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | Requires MATLAB. In my view, a university should not be promoting a proprietary product. There have been other Cousera courses which used Octave, the free-software implementation of the programming language implemented by MATLAB. I have seen no good reason why Octave should not have been used for this course. | 1) by MATLAB. I have seen no | Good | 1) reason why Octave should not have | 1.0 |
| jHCTx1u-EeWylgpjfV1KVQ | good , like it | 1) | Good | 1) , like it | 5.0 |
| jIaMzuYjEeWomRIq0eOZbw | Very good as introduction to this area of implementation , It will be very interesting to create another course with more advanced topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) as introduction to this area of | 5.0 |
| jlAy87ZEEeWddwqLXioIgw | The applications were too time consuming. Please consider adding a tool that makes graphing easier. The course itself was very good and engaging and without us knowing it, would teach core fundamentals of computing through the coding exercises. | 1) easier. The course itself was very | Good | 1) and engaging and without us knowing | 4.0 |
| jlxKwZz9EeWIXgpWJNgyEw | I highly recommend this course by the Professor Northcraft. Great communication style, pedagogue and with a good sense of humor. Bravo! | 1) communication style, pedagogue and with a | Good | 1) sense of humor. Bravo! | 5.0 |
| jlxKwZz9EeWIXgpWJNgyEw | Very good & useful information that can be easily implemented. | 1) Very | Good | 1) & useful information that can be | 4.0 |
| jnoxprrzEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | good for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| jnoxprrzEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | This is an excellent MOOC. I am a PhD candidate studying human intelligence and spatial cognition specifically associated with problem solving. The content is very well structured and clearly communicated through the lectures. Having been briefly introduced to some of the concepts in my own studies prior to this course I am finding the difficulty level to be quite nice (challenging yet very manageable). The inclusion of various experiments throughout the course is a good idea as it makes it all very interesting. | 1) experiments throughout the course is a | Good | 1) idea as it makes it all | 5.0 |
| JqRWYR9_EeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JqRWYR9_EeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| JqRWYR9_EeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | good curriculum structure and very clear lecturing | 1) | Good | 1) curriculum structure and very clear lecturing | 5.0 |
| JqRWYR9_EeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Very good course!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| JV2US53WEeW4xRJkiwxnYw | I really enjoyed every single lecture, especially that I was also learning French. If you are a lawyer (so you are familiar with the most important legal concepts) and you also possess some good French reading/understanding skills - you don't need to be a French speaker to easily underastand the most of the content of this course. | 1) concepts) and you also possess some | Good | 1) French reading/understanding skills - you don't | 5.0 |
| JV2US53WEeW4xRJkiwxnYw | A very good and useful course, taught with mastery by Prof. Marchand. Highly recommandable for everyone, lawyer or not, dealing with international contracts. | 1) A very | Good | 1) and useful course, taught with mastery | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Approachable level of complexity, and a good basis to understand underlying concepts studied previously (Metallurgist background) | 1) Approachable level of complexity, and a | Good | 1) basis to understand underlying concepts studied | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Systematic. Focusing on Basic Concepts. Good examples for learners. | 1) Systematic. Focusing on Basic Concepts. | Good | 1) examples for learners. | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Very good course content. Thanks to the instructor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course content. Thanks to the instructor. | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Easily understandable. Very good lectures | 1) Easily understandable. Very | Good | 1) lectures | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | The online lectures delivery by Dr Wayne are of a very high quality. Dr Wayne makes learning difficult concepts easy and the presentation is peppered with practical demonstrations of concepts at hand in the video. Learning is highly effective for the interested self-directed learner as there's good engagement and sufficient challenges are created along the way and during lecture delivery for the interested student. | 1) the interested self-directed learner as there's | Good | 1) engagement and sufficient challenges are created | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Awesome introduction to mechanics of materials, lots of material to study and a good teacher, i would recommend this course to everyone. | 1) of material to study and a | Good | 1) teacher, i would recommend this course | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Very good Course for learning fundamentals of mechanic of materials. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course for learning fundamentals of mechanic | 4.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | This course is a very good refresher of the basics and Dr Whiteman has explained things very clearly and precisely. Moreover, If you're following the complete series of courses, you'd have grasped a good command over stress analysis. However, in the last leg of this course, I felt that couple of cases with statically indeterminate structures should have been in more detail. I highly recommend this course to everyone looking for a refresher in "Strength of Materials". I am eagerly waiting for the next part in this series. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) refresher of the basics and Dr | 4.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | This course is a very good refresher of the basics and Dr Whiteman has explained things very clearly and precisely. Moreover, If you're following the complete series of courses, you'd have grasped a good command over stress analysis. However, in the last leg of this course, I felt that couple of cases with statically indeterminate structures should have been in more detail. I highly recommend this course to everyone looking for a refresher in "Strength of Materials". I am eagerly waiting for the next part in this series. | 2) of courses, you'd have grasped a | Good | 2) command over stress analysis. However, in | 4.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Very Simple... Very Interesting... Clear and simple examples... Very good for refreshing with very basics. | 1) and simple examples. . . Very | Good | 1) for refreshing with very basics. | 4.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| K0cCzBtHEeWsqgoIBu2JdQ | Its good to have this subject for review. | 1) Its | Good | 1) to have this subject for review. | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Fun stretching writing skills, would be good if more game-like nuances were added. | 1) Fun stretching writing skills, would be | Good | 1) if more game-like nuances were added. | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I feel that the course was great but I felt confused on the last assignment, we covered a lot of things during the last week but then I was unsure if I should've applied that on our assignment... Also I'm not sure if it is possible but if we could have a chance to ask the teacher questions would be great. I know that there is a lot of people going this courses and maybe it is not possible but still there are things that I feel only the teacher could answer. Overall the course was good :) | 1) could answer. Overall the course was | Good | 1) :) | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Loved the lecturer, he gave me so many good ideas. Learned a lot from this course. | 1) lecturer, he gave me so many | Good | 1) ideas. Learned a lot from this | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I learned good stuff. i gave four star because there could be more content some parts were written instead of a lecture. But i will recommend this course. | 1) I learned | Good | 1) stuff. i gave four star because | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | I am enjoying this course a lot. As a storyteller with screenwriting experience, it is interesting to learn of how the story dynamics work in the world of Game Design. Dariush is an engaging teacher and he provides a lot of good material to work with, as well as references. | 1) and he provides a lot of | Good | 1) material to work with, as well | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The mentor is really good, he is great at explaining what he means and gives you a few great methods for writing. The peers were also great. | 1) The mentor is really | Good | 1) he is great at explaining what | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | It's pretty good, but it has some things I perceive to be flaws. First of all, this course is entirely about writing a narrative for a game. It uses the examples of Starcraft 2 and Angry Birds. Neither of those games are particularly known for their narrative, but he uses Starcraft 2 as a more heavy narrative example and Angry Birds as a light narrative example. He goes on to talk about how adding implicit narrative elements help engage the player by exploiting their emotions, etc. etc. I don't find these examples to be particularly engaging - especially the cynical cash-grab that is Angry Birds. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) but it has some things I | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This was an excellent course, and gives a lot of insight and techniques to develop a good and intriguing story. What I liked the most was how the story would be implemented with the gameplay. I recommend this course to anyone that doesn't know how exactly to develop a good story, or is starting with VG design. | 1) insight and techniques to develop a | Good | 1) and intriguing story. What I liked | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This was an excellent course, and gives a lot of insight and techniques to develop a good and intriguing story. What I liked the most was how the story would be implemented with the gameplay. I recommend this course to anyone that doesn't know how exactly to develop a good story, or is starting with VG design. | 2) know how exactly to develop a | Good | 2) story, or is starting with VG | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good method of passing the knoledge and valuable material and tecnics to start or develop your writing skills, great course, love it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) method of passing the knoledge and | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good base, good start for biginers like me 8) | 1) | Good | 1) base, good start for biginers like | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good base, good start for biginers like me 8) | 2) Good base, | Good | 2) start for biginers like me 8) | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Fun, interesting, good pacing and case studies. Instructor was enthusiastic, knowledgeable and presented material well. | 1) Fun, interesting, | Good | 1) pacing and case studies. Instructor was | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | The content is good but is too focus in the 3 act structure, and don't explain the narration techniques specifically to videogames genres. The assignments were too repetitives and don't add variety or feeling of progression through the course. I recommend the course for who don't know the basis of the narrative structure, but not for people like me who work in the audiovisual world. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) but is too focus in the | 2.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Assignments are good-intended, but I am not sure how helpful they are, as they are really boring and unnecessarily time-consuming. I do not know how could one make them better. In contrast, the videos are really good, they are worth your time even if you know your way around these things. | 1) In contrast, the videos are really | Good | 1) they are worth your time even | 4.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | This is a good course for both who is starting as for those who already have a knowledge and seek advice and new ideas to develop stories for games. However, I think that is ideal for everyone who wanted to learn how to communicate for team the idea of the game. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for both who is starting | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Good overview of narrative and a breakdown of key story elements such as character and setting. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of narrative and a breakdown | 3.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| K28H5jJ0EeWgIQ7IEhB31Q | Very good course that explains the basics of videogame narrative. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course that explains the basics of | 5.0 |
| k2Ty4TonEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | A good introduction to games without chance. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to games without chance. | 4.0 |
| k2Ty4TonEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The course topic itself and the syllabus was interesting and magnetic especially for someone like me who is equally interested in Economics, Game Theory, Mathematics and Computer Science. But I do feel that the concepts can be dealt with more theoretically so as to build formal background. I know it is difficult to make it mathematically heavy but still some of the concepts should have a theoretical explanation and proofs. Overall, course was good and I learnt a lot of new things. | 1) explanation and proofs. Overall, course was | Good | 1) and I learnt a lot of | 4.0 |
| K4eYfU1aEeWigQ4Vtn6olw | If you are new to teaching ESL, this is probably not a good course. I found the homework used topics that a beginner would not be familiar with. I did like how they used various links to supplement the course (ie a chapter from a interesting text book) to help illustrate points in topics. I may retake the course after I have a foundation. | 1) ESL, this is probably not a | Good | 1) course. I found the homework used | 3.0 |
| K4eYfU1aEeWigQ4Vtn6olw | This course was excellent! The material was scaffolded very well, and gave me a very good overview of TBLT, the teaching of reading, and how to create tasks for reading courses. I appreciated the mix of video, readings, interviews, and optional readings. This is the best MOOC I have ever taken, one of the very few MOOCs that I have ever completed, and I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to learn more about TBLT, teaching reading, or being a better second/foreign language teacher in general. | 1) well, and gave me a very | Good | 1) overview of TBLT, the teaching of | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | I felt this class was especially relevant as it discussed the changing trends in delivery and consumption of music products. Always to good to get a historical perspective and some projections on where the industry is headed in this ever changing digital landscape. I highly recommend this course. | 1) consumption of music products. Always to | Good | 1) to get a historical perspective and | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Good, but I expected more... | 1) | Good | 1) but I expected more. . . | 3.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | if u r poor, it makes u good.........if u r good, it makes u better........if u r better, it makes u best!!!!!! | 1) u r poor, it makes u | Good | 1) . . . . . . | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | if u r poor, it makes u good.........if u r good, it makes u better........if u r better, it makes u best!!!!!! | 2) . . . if u r | Good | 2) it makes u better. . . | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | This course provides a really strong basis of understanding the complexities of the music business. It helps you with good and professional practical advice on how to structure your career from both the perspective of the artist and productions companies, all whilst maintaining policy of fairness in the industry. | 1) music business. It helps you with | Good | 1) and professional practical advice on how | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | I liked this course - very informative. The instructor telling industry stories helped with remembering details and none of the videos were too long. It does get a tad complicated as it gets into commissions and copyright details, but never overwhelming. I bought the instructors book but only used it once. Still, it's a good reference for the future. | 1) used it once. Still, it's a | Good | 1) reference for the future. | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Very good information | 1) Very | Good | 1) information | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Very good teacher! An easy approach to a complex issue. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher! An easy approach to a | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Incredible, John and his knoledge and passion change my life for good!!! i feel realli inspire!!!! Thank you so much to everyone, for the course and everything!!! its amazing!!!! | 1) and passion change my life for | Good | 1) ! ! i feel realli inspire! | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Very good! Really help me understand the music market better! =) | 1) Very | Good | 1) Really help me understand the music | 4.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Excellent Course. Got a good idea about how the music industry in America works. Wish it were longer. | 1) Excellent Course. Got a | Good | 1) idea about how the music industry | 5.0 |
| k8B9WjxkEeW7GArkqhNhJw | It is a very good course so far. Thank you so much for the opportunity to take it. (: | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course so far. Thank you so | 4.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Great introduction-- not a single lesson was lacking. Professor Noor is engaging, feels approachable (even behind a screen), and I found the class appropriately challenging. There were times I felt I completely grasped the "important" parts of lectures only to begin a quiz and realize that I didn't. The quizzes really helped me to see that I had to understand much more about how to apply the messages to other situations, or compound scenarios. Good lesson in logic. Computation also matters in this course, which can be tough for someone more used to reading pop-science analyses. I appreciated being held accountable and learned far more than I would if I'd just read a book. | 1) to other situations, or compound scenarios. | Good | 1) lesson in logic. Computation also matters | 5.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Be aware that the beginning overview lectures of this course are radically different than the detailed lectures that come later. The beginning of this course should be sent to anyone that ever tells you that evolution is not a "thing": :D After that, be prepared to do a lot of listening to Big A little a and minutia about how genetics really works. This is a really good course.... not perfect, but really good. One star is removed because I think I would have preferred a bit more development and overview of the "bigger picture" (I fell asleep at times). I sometimes lost the concepts that I was interested in learning through the barrage of details, but for someone who is very seriously studying the subject, then it would be 5 stars. Prof Noor is a good speaker: clear and has a nice voice and personality. | 1) really works. This is a really | Good | 1) course. . . . not perfect, | 4.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Be aware that the beginning overview lectures of this course are radically different than the detailed lectures that come later. The beginning of this course should be sent to anyone that ever tells you that evolution is not a "thing": :D After that, be prepared to do a lot of listening to Big A little a and minutia about how genetics really works. This is a really good course.... not perfect, but really good. One star is removed because I think I would have preferred a bit more development and overview of the "bigger picture" (I fell asleep at times). I sometimes lost the concepts that I was interested in learning through the barrage of details, but for someone who is very seriously studying the subject, then it would be 5 stars. Prof Noor is a good speaker: clear and has a nice voice and personality. | 2) . . not perfect, but really | Good | 2) One star is removed because I | 4.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Be aware that the beginning overview lectures of this course are radically different than the detailed lectures that come later. The beginning of this course should be sent to anyone that ever tells you that evolution is not a "thing": :D After that, be prepared to do a lot of listening to Big A little a and minutia about how genetics really works. This is a really good course.... not perfect, but really good. One star is removed because I think I would have preferred a bit more development and overview of the "bigger picture" (I fell asleep at times). I sometimes lost the concepts that I was interested in learning through the barrage of details, but for someone who is very seriously studying the subject, then it would be 5 stars. Prof Noor is a good speaker: clear and has a nice voice and personality. | 3) 5 stars. Prof Noor is a | Good | 3) speaker: clear and has a nice | 4.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Dr. Noor is a gem. He shows enthusiasm both for his subject, and for teaching. I felt the course was well organized, and provided a good foundational understanding of genetics. Importantly, it was enjoyable. The forum moderators responded promptly, and their answers were well-informed. An excellent course. | 1) was well organized, and provided a | Good | 1) foundational understanding of genetics. Importantly, it | 5.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | Dr Noor's enthusiasm and relaxed teaching style makes even the more technical subject matter seem interesting. Although not always easy I have been compelled to keep pushing forward as I feel I am learning a great deal about myself and species around me. By far one of the best courses I have taken on this platform. I hope to continue studying the area of genetics as a result of this course. Thanks and keep up the good work!!! | 1) course. Thanks and keep up the | Good | 1) work! ! ! | 5.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | quite good | 1) quite | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | good to gain more knowledge | 1) | Good | 1) to gain more knowledge | 5.0 |
| k9p3Qh8kEeWP0w4yK2369w | I found this course very well taught. Especially the lectures wre conceived in a way that it was entertaining and challeging at the same time. Coming for a social science background myself, I was delighted by the way the course eased people from outside the subject area into the field. Additionally, I was able to to do the course without it conflicitng with my job (in my case it actually helped my own research in social science, which made even mor eof a success for me). Prof. Noor did a great job in teaching without overburden and keeping a light tone while making me learn. Only one minor problem: Having never encountered multiple choice during my academic career, I was sometimes thrown off by the wording of questions and answers. I know it is hard to creat quiz-formats that are not based on multiple choice, but it would maybe make the course more comprehensive, i there were. Since this is likely to be a problem with my own experience and does not affect others so much, I would not go as far as deducing anything. A future wish: Maybe a course on the subject, specialising in some subareas based on this course woudl be great. All in all, Prof. Noor and his team did a good job in conceiving and conducting this course. | 1) Noor and his team did a | Good | 1) job in conceiving and conducting this | 5.0 |
| kb8BeBtHEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Useful and Practical. Systematic on the concepts of MOM. Very good class! | 1) on the concepts of MOM. Very | Good | 1) class! | 5.0 |
| kb8BeBtHEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very Good Course... | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. . . | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | A very good course. Need time to be completed. It should continue on and lectures should be available every time regarless of end of quizez or assignments. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Need time to be completed. | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | very good for beginner. if speaking speed can slow a little, will be nicer! | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginner. if speaking speed can | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good and inspiring course. It teaches around 20 different models, not overwhelming you with math but giving you nonetheless a good and solid introduction. Also, the reading material is really good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and inspiring course. It teaches around | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good and inspiring course. It teaches around 20 different models, not overwhelming you with math but giving you nonetheless a good and solid introduction. Also, the reading material is really good. | 2) math but giving you nonetheless a | Good | 2) and solid introduction. Also, the reading | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good and inspiring course. It teaches around 20 different models, not overwhelming you with math but giving you nonetheless a good and solid introduction. Also, the reading material is really good. | 3) Also, the reading material is really | Good | 3) | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Contributed to making me a clearer thinker and was a good refreshment of material from my MSc Business Administration. | 1) a clearer thinker and was a | Good | 1) refreshment of material from my MSc | 4.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Barely in and it's one of the very best most fun courses I've taken. Scott is hugely enthusiastic and articulate in just the right ways. I hope I'm learning as much as I'm having fun letting model patterns float through my brain. I guess that is learning, sorta. I'm excited to complete the course and build on it. A very good sign. Thank you all so much for putting these courses out there. It's fucking fantastic. Okay, it doesn't really get more emphatic than that from me. Thank you again. Tom Bauer. | 1) and build on it. A very | Good | 1) sign. Thank you all so much | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | It's not just for good citizens, it's also for good politicians ! | 1) It's not just for | Good | 1) citizens, it's also for good politicians | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | It's not just for good citizens, it's also for good politicians ! | 2) for good citizens, it's also for | Good | 2) politicians ! | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Really good. Fantastic overview. For my taste it was a bit too easy and it could have gone more in depth in some topics. But I understand the need to keep it general also. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Fantastic overview. For my taste it | 5.0 |
| kbmiwPT-EeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I wasn't planning to follow the whole course and doing assessment and homework. It end up being a good learning and I watched most of the videos. I skipped known information and skimmed to relatively familiar ones / or when there was too much examples. I understand the course was built for common denominator student. Thanks for making this free course. It's much appreciated. - Michel | 1) homework. It end up being a | Good | 1) learning and I watched most of | 4.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Very good! I think week 4 was very time consuming, in contrast with week 3, that was very light. Maybe these contents can be better balanced in the fuute. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I think week 4 was very | 4.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Good one !!! | 1) | Good | 1) one ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| kcW15H3JEeWKYwric11Hpw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| KK4EhXQMEeSc3CIACrbZqg | Good lessons for Financing and Investing in infrastructure | 1) | Good | 1) lessons for Financing and Investing in | 5.0 |
| kKyRFEEiEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| kKyRFEEiEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| kKyRFEEiEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Is good but I am thinking that the course could be better with more information and techniques. Thanks and congratulations!! | 1) Is | Good | 1) but I am thinking that the | 4.0 |
| kKyRFEEiEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Very good knowledge and really this kind of thing will help me to improve to manage my t | 1) Very | Good | 1) knowledge and really this kind of | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I found this course well structured and concise. It covered a lot of the subject with up to date information. It had helpful diagrams and gave good real life examples. Highly recommend for everyone to help understand substance misuse and possible treatments. Also it's role in the wider society. | 1) It had helpful diagrams and gave | Good | 1) real life examples. Highly recommend for | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | good lectures | 1) | Good | 1) lectures | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Great course with a good overview of subject. Mr. Kuhar is a great speaker, easy to understand and very calm. | 1) Great course with a | Good | 1) overview of subject. Mr. Kuhar is | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Very good course, but some external links are no longer working | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but some external links are | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Course give very good information, but the "The addicted brain" its not the correct name. Second part of the course give more detail information about different drugs and body biology, but its not directly related to the Brain. However, the training its very good, just change the label. | 1) Course give very | Good | 1) information, but the " The addicted | 3.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Course give very good information, but the "The addicted brain" its not the correct name. Second part of the course give more detail information about different drugs and body biology, but its not directly related to the Brain. However, the training its very good, just change the label. | 2) Brain. However, the training its very | Good | 2) just change the label. | 3.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | While providing some knowledge about drugs and drug-addiction, I would have preferred a more in-depth guide into the inner workings of the brain related to drugs. Nevertheless it served as a good introduction to addiction. | 1) drugs. Nevertheless it served as a | Good | 1) introduction to addiction. | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I recently graduated with an MSW. I concentrated my course load on children and found addiction knowledge to be lacking upon graduation. Too many families are affected by addiction and in good conscience I couldn't work with children and their families without learning more. This was extremely helpful and the course gave me more passion and knowledge concerning children and addiction in terms of vulnerability, prevention, risk and protective factors. The instructor was wonderful, non-judgmental and very informative. I loved the neurobiology explanations as well. Thank you!!! | 1) are affected by addiction and in | Good | 1) conscience I couldn't work with children | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Excellently presented course. Very informative. Some really good recommended links to read along side the course context. Well thought out. | 1) presented course. Very informative. Some really | Good | 1) recommended links to read along side | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Excellent course, very interesting and with a very good teching method. | 1) very interesting and with a very | Good | 1) teching method. | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Feels underwritten by the DEA, and aimed at perhaps high school students? Very slow pace; info could've been distilled into less than half the lectures (I completed the '7 weeks' in 3 days). Doesn't really distinguish between users without serious problems & addicts (which I believe amplifies gateway effects & experimentation once people meet users who aren't brain damaged or addicts). Creates an exaggerated and arbitrary distinction between prescribed drugs as all good and recreational as all bad, and dismisses any possible benefits of substances that are not legal, noting only that medical marijuana has been helpful for HIV patients, which is certainly an understatement. Components are also helpful for cancer patients, anxiety, and more. Perhaps break this into studies of common drugs, how they work, & effects and separately, the mechanisms of addiction and treatment. However, I appreciated the 'reduce harm' policy economics. | 1) distinction between prescribed drugs as all | Good | 1) and recreational as all bad, and | 1.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | This is a very good introductory course on the various aspects of addiction. I wish they would introduce a second part with more comprehensive information. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introductory course on the various aspects | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | really good and practical course | 1) really | Good | 1) and practical course | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Good course. But a little too easy for psychology majors. | 1) | Good | 1) course. But a little too easy | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Very good trip ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) trip ! | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The individual course topics were evenly distributed and presented in a meticulous, thorough, as well as elaborate manner. The lecturer was inviting and encouraging, whereas the technical specifications of the video lectures and quizzes were exceptionally good. In overall, the ''Addicted Brain'' course positively predisposes me towards opting for more courses provided and sponsored by the Emory University. | 1) video lectures and quizzes were exceptionally | Good | 1) In overall, the ''Addicted Brain'' course | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Highly rated course. A very good choice for youngs and seniors with addiction or not. Very important to prevent addictive trends and to help addicted people, because Dr Michael KUHAR explains very clearly and very simply with a choice of experiment and other examples, complex brain behaviors. Thank you to Emory University and to Coursera too. | 1) Highly rated course. A very | Good | 1) choice for youngs and seniors with | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Short and very understandable lectures. Very interesting topic and the professor is very good and a master on this topic. No need for background on neuroscience since the professor explains everything very well. | 1) topic and the professor is very | Good | 1) and a master on this topic. | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Real interesting and useful course, but since it's not my major, though sometimes hard for me to understand some concept. Still quite good! Nice teacher! | 1) to understand some concept. Still quite | Good | 1) Nice teacher! | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Very good and intresting subject, well organized. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and intresting subject, well organized. | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Somewhat too simple, but still a good basic introduction. | 1) Somewhat too simple, but still a | Good | 1) basic introduction. | 3.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Briefly introduce some concepts of the drug use and some in neuroscience, a good introduction course. | 1) use and some in neuroscience, a | Good | 1) introduction course. | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | As a trainee lawyer I found this course quite good and helpful. In Portugal we have a lot of drug issues. Knowing how drug addiction works in the human brain might be helpful, especially on court, where some individuals are convicted for drug issues when, sometimes, it's not only their choice. Thank you for the course. I hope there are more courses available for this kind of issues. | 1) lawyer I found this course quite | Good | 1) and helpful. In Portugal we have | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Very good introduction to why people become addicts. Key points are learnt are our brains are wired to be addicted, addiction is a brain disease and needs to be seen and treated as such and that coffee which i drink everyday is a drug! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to why people become addicts. | 4.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | I love the material, good presentation too. | 1) I love the material, | Good | 1) presentation too. | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | Very good teacher! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| knivtHEHEeSfpCIACzWBZw | The lecturer explains the facts really good and determined! as someone who English is her second language it is really easy to understand the material. | 1) The lecturer explains the facts really | Good | 1) and determined! as someone who English | 5.0 |
| KoJTHEpJEeWJHwqqqPAooQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| KoJTHEpJEeWJHwqqqPAooQ | Its really Good. | 1) Its really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| KoJTHEpJEeWJHwqqqPAooQ | good explanations, easy to understand | 1) | Good | 1) explanations, easy to understand | 4.0 |
| koPOOn1dEeWKYwric11Hpw | Nice course, instructor is so pretty :p and gives all detail. But those who are weak in English , may face problem to follow. Never the less, good course from one of the best B-School in the world.(IE ranks 12 in Global MBA ranking by FT) | 1) problem to follow. Never the less, | Good | 1) course from one of the best | 4.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | It is a good option to improve our knowledges about english and business | 1) It is a | Good | 1) option to improve our knowledges about | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Excelent! Really good course. | 1) Excelent! Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This cours it's very interesting, it gives you a lot of very good tips for improve your skills communications, some videos are not excellent in terms of edition but i recommend this course for those who are open to learn about writing effective emails and those who want to learn more business terms. | 1) gives you a lot of very | Good | 1) tips for improve your skills communications, | 4.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good! really concise and concrete information that's helpfull in all situations | 1) Very | Good | 1) really concise and concrete information that's | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good content and useful. Great Proffesors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and useful. Great Proffesors. | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | It is basic, but helpful. If you have an intermediate english and you don´t use it much in your job, you can catch up you english practice with many business terms. It also gives some basic but good tips for developing in a team and as a leader. | 1) It also gives some basic but | Good | 1) tips for developing in a team | 4.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good mooc! | 1) | Good | 1) mooc! | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Exceptional teachers, good material and very useful. Highly recommended | 1) Exceptional teachers, | Good | 1) material and very useful. Highly recommended | 5.0 |
| koVAwj03EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course, the videos explain the main topics, providing immediate actions to daily activities. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the videos explain the main | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Thank you, it's a good course. I only wish I could take quiz without purchase a course. I don't need a certificate but I'd like to check my knowledge. That is what quiz for. | 1) Thank you, it's a | Good | 1) course. I only wish I could | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Enjoyable course, final assignment was a bit time-consuming but a good way to apply everything learned. | 1) was a bit time-consuming but a | Good | 1) way to apply everything learned. | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very informative, I had a bit of trouble with notetaking though, sometimes info you needed was all over the place, alot of stop and rewind but still a good course | 1) stop and rewind but still a | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very informative and good explained course. I have learnt valuable things, thanks to Mrs. Loh! The only thing i would complain about are the uncertain and a bit vague instructions for the assignment. It should be stated clearer f.ex. which theories are meant and a more explicit way of instructing the editorial calendar, f.ins. a template or something like that. Nonetheless a very valuable and good made and lucid experience! | 1) Very informative and | Good | 1) explained course. I have learnt valuable | 4.0 |
| KQ7XaDaaEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very informative and good explained course. I have learnt valuable things, thanks to Mrs. Loh! The only thing i would complain about are the uncertain and a bit vague instructions for the assignment. It should be stated clearer f.ex. which theories are meant and a more explicit way of instructing the editorial calendar, f.ins. a template or something like that. Nonetheless a very valuable and good made and lucid experience! | 2) that. Nonetheless a very valuable and | Good | 2) made and lucid experience! | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a really good course for baseline level informaton | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) course for baseline level informaton | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course. I would like more on how to use Hootsuite and Klout. Also which one is better?? I am finding them a challenge to use. I like to search for my own content as I find the suggested content boring...and often not relevant to what I am looking for. I can't understand why I cannot cut and past links. So, like I said a primer on how to use these sites would be good. | 1) to use these sites would be | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good intro to Social. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to Social. | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good !! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great introduction, even I have not learned any course like this can also be good at this. | 1) course like this can also be | Good | 1) at this. | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good introduction to social IMC. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction to social IMC. | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This MOOC bring many relevants social media issues and offers very good insights about how to handle with market demmands. | 1) social media issues and offers very | Good | 1) insights about how to handle with | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course. However It's only a stepstone for the specialization, it's essencial to continue wth the next courses if you really want to succeed in Social. | 1) | Good | 1) course. However It's only a stepstone | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's good course. give me great insight about Social Media. | 1) It's | Good | 1) course. give me great insight about | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Instructor was good. Content of whole program was focused on analytics. Perhaps a better title for this course is Social Media Analytics. | 1) Instructor was | Good | 1) Content of whole program was focused | 2.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good introduction when you are a total learner in this field! For those who already have some expertise it is good to up to date!! I did enjoy it despite my lack of time :-) | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction when you are a total | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good introduction when you are a total learner in this field! For those who already have some expertise it is good to up to date!! I did enjoy it despite my lack of time :-) | 2) already have some expertise it is | Good | 2) to up to date! ! I | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introductory course to social media. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course to social media. | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | this is a very useful and practical class which give me a lot of inspirations,it's good for people who want to have own online business. | 1) me a lot of inspirations, it's | Good | 1) for people who want to have | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This was an absolutely excellent course. I began implementing what I learned into my social strategy immediately, and my Klout score jumped from below 30 to 50 within a matter of days. The professor is very good at explaining everything clearly, and the other experts he brings in really add value. I can't wait for the second course! | 1) of days. The professor is very | Good | 1) at explaining everything clearly, and the | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | not easy to understand but it's a good course indeed. | 1) easy to understand but it's a | Good | 1) course indeed. | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good and practical. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and practical. | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | insightful , gives a good brief of the use of social | 1) insightful , gives a | Good | 1) brief of the use of social | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good class for getting my feet wet. I have the ability to tweet, post and opine in response to blog posts but I feel that for my business I need to have an understanding of Social Media. I intend to use the tools to build my professional persona and gain larger understand of Social. Looking forward to the next MOOC. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class for getting my feet wet. | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was a little short, but packed with good and practical info! | 1) a little short, but packed with | Good | 1) and practical info! | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I really loved this course for three reasons: (1) It was clearly designed for an online audience (as opposed to a recording of a University lecture); (2) it offered good, relevant, clearly-presented information in a concise way, including guest lectures by topical experts; and (3) it was relevant and useful to my current business needs. It met and possibly exceeded my expectations. I was able to glean helpful information and sources without being overwhelming in terms of time expenditure. | 1) a University lecture); (2) it offered | Good | 1) relevant, clearly-presented information in a concise | 5.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good basic overview of social and how it impacts all businesses. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic overview of social and how | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction. But it feels like it is not complete. It is not much without the other courses so you either take the entire specialization or the benefits are not that big :( I feel like the specialization courses are an artificial break to a real university class... if the university class had only the content from those videos, that would not be enough. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. But it feels like it | 3.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | this is very basic and clear about social. it helps me understand about the fielf of social marketing, some concepts, such as social network, virtual community and characteristics of these are essential for making social plan. the exercise seems easy but practical, it is good first step for leaning social marketing. hope to learn next course | 1) seems easy but practical, it is | Good | 1) first step for leaning social marketing. | 4.0 |
| KqKtbzXyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course offers a good insight on social media. However, there are constant references to what will be done on the next MOOCS of the specialization, which gives the sensation that they're advertising themselves, and you are only listening to a mild introduction. | 1) The course offers a | Good | 1) insight on social media. However, there | 4.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Okay, you know how to take some good photos but It would be interesting if you could edit some pictures to emphasize or change their content. That's post-production and it's the content of this course. I really recommend everyone to enroll it! | 1) you know how to take some | Good | 1) photos but It would be interesting | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This course was a little a more challenge, because for a person that hasn't taken any photograph course it is a good example to proceed on photography. it is really a good course and because it is not only focus on DSLR also to smartphones. | 1) any photograph course it is a | Good | 1) example to proceed on photography. it | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This course was a little a more challenge, because for a person that hasn't taken any photograph course it is a good example to proceed on photography. it is really a good course and because it is not only focus on DSLR also to smartphones. | 2) on photography. it is really a | Good | 2) course and because it is not | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Nice One, good Continuation to first 2 courses | 1) Nice One, | Good | 1) Continuation to first 2 courses | 5.0 |
| KRl9hpiaEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Quizes are getting better with every course. Lectures are good. I like the idea of assignments - to show your work and to see works of others. Only one thing: I'd like to get review not only from other students, buy from at least one professional. It's nice to get opinion from "masses", but I'd like to know professional opinion and directions where I could move to be better photographer. | 1) better with every course. Lectures are | Good | 1) I like the idea of assignments | 4.0 |
| KuL4QMbGEeWQSAqHNmfP4Q | This specialization has been nothing short of awesome. This exam really caps it off on a high note. Not only the quizzes were challenging and interesting, they are also very relevant to all the concepts learnt throughout the specialization. The exam consists of a good mix of conceptual, algorithmic, debugging, optimization problems, graph modelling and mathematical computation problems. The very tight time frame of only a few weeks with only 1 single attempt each week forced me to be very careful with my solutions and double check my work carefully before submitting. The only thing that I wish to see is that this exam should be 2 exams instead of just 1 exam. I sort of still hunger for more challenging exercises like this exam. I really hope that this capstone exam course sets a good example for other Coursera courses because challenging mini-exams like this are incredibly valuable tools to validate our knowledge. | 1) specialization. The exam consists of a | Good | 1) mix of conceptual, algorithmic, debugging, optimization | 5.0 |
| KuL4QMbGEeWQSAqHNmfP4Q | This specialization has been nothing short of awesome. This exam really caps it off on a high note. Not only the quizzes were challenging and interesting, they are also very relevant to all the concepts learnt throughout the specialization. The exam consists of a good mix of conceptual, algorithmic, debugging, optimization problems, graph modelling and mathematical computation problems. The very tight time frame of only a few weeks with only 1 single attempt each week forced me to be very careful with my solutions and double check my work carefully before submitting. The only thing that I wish to see is that this exam should be 2 exams instead of just 1 exam. I sort of still hunger for more challenging exercises like this exam. I really hope that this capstone exam course sets a good example for other Coursera courses because challenging mini-exams like this are incredibly valuable tools to validate our knowledge. | 2) this capstone exam course sets a | Good | 2) example for other Coursera courses because | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very good and complete course. A bit difficult for those of us who we were not very fond of Social Media before. Thanks Eric. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and complete course. A bit difficult | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| kvco9XQ4EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I did not find this course as good as the other parts of the specialisation. There were some interesting elements there but also a lot of redundancy. I don't feel like I now have all the tools I need to do a through, structured content marketing analysis. | 1) did not find this course as | Good | 1) as the other parts of the | 2.0 |
| Kz1Vwnd_EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I truly learned a lot from these journalism courses, I am in process of applying to a University here to persue a Masters degree in Journalism. These courses prepared me with a good background and motivation to understand this profession and related academic challenges. | 1) These courses prepared me with a | Good | 1) background and motivation to understand this | 5.0 |
| Kz1Vwnd_EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | I found some of the topics repetitive and trivial, already covered in previous courses of the specialization. However, there was good advice that still makes it a worthwhile course. | 1) of the specialization. However, there was | Good | 1) advice that still makes it a | 3.0 |
| Kz1Vwnd_EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | This was a good review course. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) review course. | 5.0 |
| Kzg9QkDxEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | An intresting combination of philosophy, music (and arts) and their relation to social events. Sebastian Ruth found good examples to clarify the subjects, and he gives the lectures on a pleasant way. | 1) to social events. Sebastian Ruth found | Good | 1) examples to clarify the subjects, and | 5.0 |
| kzmY_qA-EeWHXAr1OpR7HQ | The last assignment is hard to do if you have just pretend project not real one. But whole course is really good. | 1) one. But whole course is really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Objective. Very good material and good practices to help you better build a bibliography for research purpose. Sometimes the multiple answers quiz can be tricky. | 1) Objective. Very | Good | 1) material and good practices to help | 4.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Objective. Very good material and good practices to help you better build a bibliography for research purpose. Sometimes the multiple answers quiz can be tricky. | 2) Objective. Very good material and | Good | 2) practices to help you better build | 4.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Not too comprehensive, but an overall good course. | 1) Not too comprehensive, but an overall | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | This course is very thorough and detailed. As an IT specialist, I have had no exposure to formal research and needed to understand the process. Now I can clearly and confidently say that I can perform good research and obtain formal information and data on any topic, as opposed to just surfing the internet for genuine knowledge. Great course, well done to the instructors. | 1) confidently say that I can perform | Good | 1) research and obtain formal information and | 5.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | The reading material is not good (it' s even bad) , but the course videos are excellent. | 1) The reading material is not | Good | 1) (it' s even bad) , but | 5.0 |
| KzTkolCEEeWxCwowHhzTpQ | Apart for some slightly confusing breaks in the sentences for some speakers, it was very good and relevant information. | 1) for some speakers, it was very | Good | 1) and relevant information. | 4.0 |
| l37U-pjxEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Very good class and a lot of information. Everyone should take this class . | 1) Very | Good | 1) class and a lot of information. | 5.0 |
| l6wYG8nwEeWlsQro2YjIaQ | Excellent course material and assessments. If you want to be good at selling, better take this course. | 1) assessments. If you want to be | Good | 1) at selling, better take this course. | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | very good course to learn risk management and changes. | 1) very | Good | 1) course to learn risk management and | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Very good course!! Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! ! Thank you. | 4.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Very good course that introduced me to key concepts on Project Risks and Changes that a Project Manager will face. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course that introduced me to key | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | I liked this course, i had a lot of interesting things to know. it is good opportunity to use it in my work. | 1) interesting things to know. it is | Good | 1) opportunity to use it in my | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Good introductory Course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory Course | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | really good course. recommend it to all. | 1) really | Good | 1) course. recommend it to all. | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Good class. A little light on material from the previous two. | 1) | Good | 1) class. A little light on material | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | good, really. | 1) | Good | 1) really. | 4.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Good, practical advice. | 1) | Good | 1) practical advice. | 4.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | Really good course, | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, | 5.0 |
| L7stsPOKEeSlpiIAC7NwBA | very good with some great real world examples. | 1) very | Good | 1) with some great real world examples. | 4.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | quite good course, learn a lot | 1) quite | Good | 1) course, learn a lot | 5.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course but not fully completed. Learned a lot about herbalism. | 1) | Good | 1) course but not fully completed. Learned | 3.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good for understanding the philosophy of Chinese Herb concept. To maintain a good health, one should understand the external causes of disease (under Chinese concept) and then why and how our food and Chinese herb can adjust your internal balance back to healthy condition. | 1) | Good | 1) for understanding the philosophy of Chinese | 5.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good for understanding the philosophy of Chinese Herb concept. To maintain a good health, one should understand the external causes of disease (under Chinese concept) and then why and how our food and Chinese herb can adjust your internal balance back to healthy condition. | 2) Chinese Herb concept. To maintain a | Good | 2) health, one should understand the external | 5.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good teacher, explicit explanations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher, explicit explanations. | 5.0 |
| l9ryvRniEeWjrA6seF25aw | A good way to learn chinese culture | 1) A | Good | 1) way to learn chinese culture | 5.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | This course is excellent. I love the way professor Stephen Weber teaches the class and his knowledge of what makes good records. I especially love that he includes the emotional and artistic aspects of production in music. I have a bachelors in Music production from another institution and they did not cover this VITAL aspect. I've always been attracted to music and music making because of the ability to convey emotion through music. THANKS!!! LOVE LOVE LOVE | 1) and his knowledge of what makes | Good | 1) records. I especially love that he | 5.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | This is a great introductory level course to give an overview of the basics of music production. It's a little more focused on songwriting than I had expected, but there is a good amount of technical information as well. You won't come out of this course as the next Steve Albini, but you'll definitely have a great starting point to build from. | 1) had expected, but there is a | Good | 1) amount of technical information as well. | 4.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | Very good structure. Suitable for basic Learner, easy to follow, assigment helps alot on understanding and excersicing our capability. | 1) Very | Good | 1) structure. Suitable for basic Learner, easy | 5.0 |
| LcLAGMEVEeWvUhLEBd1H9w | I found this course in the suggestions list after taking Introduction to Music Production with Loudon Stearns. I audited it, so I couldn't/didn't do the assignments but I found it really interesting so I binge-watched the lectures in the space of a day. The way the course is set up as compared to Intro to Music Prod. it is a lot less detailed technical instruction and more of a broad look at the artistic/aesthetic/philosophical components of various aspects of music production. And since Loudon touches upon this in the other course, I would say the two courses nicely complement each other and are both worth watching all the way through. I think they could be taken in any order, but personally, even though Intro is more technical, I think I got more out of this one having already taken Intro. Even as someone who considers myself pretty good as far as lyrics/songwriting/composition, I still got something new and useful out of those parts and liked the way the instructor put these "creative" parameters in concrete terms. The way he talked about and clarified Vision, Identity, and Intention I personally found very empowering, interesting, and practically useful. I feel like some of these ideas had been floating around in my mind before, but it validated that they were valuable things to be thinking about. There are a couple specific things that popped up in the course that are really cool and useful: for example, the rule of threes, and the information on panning, delay, mixing, etc. Very glad I found it! I hope these keep being offered for free because I find them more efficient for learning than some YouTube videos, and at some point I would consider doing one not just audited but "for real." | 1) as someone who considers myself pretty | Good | 1) as far as lyrics/songwriting/composition, I still | 5.0 |
| lD6srSmGEeWEOhKP8F7imw | It's been a great experience to undergo the capstone project. I should thank Prof. Maksimovic, Prof. Erickson and Prof. Afridi for designing such a good project material and their support for all the questions asked by the students in the forum. I will look forward for the next advanced courses offered by Colorado. Once again thanks to all. | 1) Prof. Afridi for designing such a | Good | 1) project material and their support for | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | This course is very good. I really am enjoying the insight. I have studied and read many books on the Kennedy's and I am happy with this class and the information provided. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) I really am enjoying the insight. | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | good course. professor tries to sell his book too much. it's emba | 1) | Good | 1) course. professor tries to sell his | 4.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | Liked the course a lot, very nice instructor who you like listening to. he articulates very well and has a good voice and pace of speaking. my suggestion would be to include subtitles for the video's of the speeches of JFK, or the intervieuws with former presidents, because the audio is not that clear and for non-native English speakers, difficult to understand. Many thanks, very good course! Veronique | 1) articulates very well and has a | Good | 1) voice and pace of speaking. my | 5.0 |
| lf2q-R6UEeSzvSIAC0KYCQ | Liked the course a lot, very nice instructor who you like listening to. he articulates very well and has a good voice and pace of speaking. my suggestion would be to include subtitles for the video's of the speeches of JFK, or the intervieuws with former presidents, because the audio is not that clear and for non-native English speakers, difficult to understand. Many thanks, very good course! Veronique | 2) difficult to understand. Many thanks, very | Good | 2) course! Veronique | 5.0 |
| lfKT5sS3EeWhPQ55lNYVVQ | very good and informative course | 1) very | Good | 1) and informative course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | VERY GOOD | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course. The good thing about it is the way it is organized. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. The good thing about it | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course. The good thing about it is the way it is organized. | 2) A very good course. The | Good | 2) thing about it is the way | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this course is very good | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | GOOD EXPERIENCE | 1) | Good | 1) EXPERIENCE | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good video | 1) | Good | 1) video | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course had a good content and the exercises were able to make the use of the elements | 1) Course had a | Good | 1) content and the exercises were able | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I loved it. This course only touches the surface of what's HTML, CSS and JS and will by no means make you an expert. However, it is a good starting point. | 1) an expert. However, it is a | Good | 1) starting point. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course, gives you the basics you need to further study about Web Development | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, gives you the basics you | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | That's really a good way to start on web developing major! | 1) That's really a | Good | 1) way to start on web developing | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good way to get hands on experience. While it is challenging to get a quesiton answer - as there is a lot of searching on the forums (rather than having 1-1 or life q&a) | 1) | Good | 1) way to get hands on experience. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I afraid to learn JS until take this course. Course has really good presentation and content to understand behaviour between HTML, CSS and JS. I would definitely recommend to take this course if you are interested in web development. | 1) take this course. Course has really | Good | 1) presentation and content to understand behaviour | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course. The explanations are very clear and easy to understand. There are very good excercices and you can also learn a lot from the assignments. Assignment 3 is paticularly fun with a lot of interesting logic. | 1) easy to understand. There are very | Good | 1) excercices and you can also learn | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very comprehensive, good balance between theory and excercises. | 1) Very comprehensive, | Good | 1) balance between theory and excercises. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course on HTML5/CSS/JavaScript. Enough resources and practices exercises. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course on HTML5/CSS/JavaScript. Enough resources and | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good intro class. The exercises were really helpful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro class. The exercises were really | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is pretty an interesting course, especially the practical tasks, but, after all, it is much better for those who already knows the technologies mentioned in the title. The information is given very quickly during the lectures, so it may be not so useful for web development beginners (even regarding possible background in other areas of software development). That is why I recommend that course for those who is looking for a good HTML, CSS, and JS revision, not introduction. | 1) those who is looking for a | Good | 1) HTML, CSS, and JS revision, not | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is a good course. Just need more hands on training to practice exercises | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course. Just need more hands on | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is good, although the last exercise of the series is a bit too challenging if you want people that have just started with javascript to pass. Also, sometimes it focuses too much on theory and high level examples that don't build up into practical uses of javascript. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) although the last exercise of the | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Course with a very helpful assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course with a very helpful assignments. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was excellent refresh of the knowledge! Not to deep, but good enough for the starting point. Also they give you all the topics beforehand, so you could skip something you know already. But I didn't do that, the course was so nice, that I listened even about the things I knew. | 1) the knowledge! Not to deep, but | Good | 1) enough for the starting point. Also | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is good to put your hands on the javascript when everyone else is using libraries and forgetting the basics. It is nice create the Matching Game. Good course. | 1) It is | Good | 1) to put your hands on the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is good to put your hands on the javascript when everyone else is using libraries and forgetting the basics. It is nice create the Matching Game. Good course. | 2) is nice create the Matching Game. | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It teaches you the basics of html css and javascript. For a starter course in spec. it is ok. I expected a little more from this course, but all in all it was good. | 1) but all in all it was | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything they teach is in very good flow and interesting. The question they ask in between the video is also a good one for better understanding. I cannot find more better than this one. It make you want to learn more, watch more. It's my first experience in coursera, everything they do is awesome, like the weekly assignment, time given to complete the task which is make you want to do more........Thumbs up to this course lecture and Coursera team too. | 1) Everything they teach is in very | Good | 1) flow and interesting. The question they | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything they teach is in very good flow and interesting. The question they ask in between the video is also a good one for better understanding. I cannot find more better than this one. It make you want to learn more, watch more. It's my first experience in coursera, everything they do is awesome, like the weekly assignment, time given to complete the task which is make you want to do more........Thumbs up to this course lecture and Coursera team too. | 2) between the video is also a | Good | 2) one for better understanding. I cannot | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good guide for beginner to learn！ | 1) A | Good | 1) guide for beginner to learn！ | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this is very good course and it is very much helpful in creating skill of web development inside me. i am very much thankful of coursera . | 1) this is very | Good | 1) course and it is very much | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent Course. Perfectly Taught. Good Course Design | 1) Excellent Course. Perfectly Taught. | Good | 1) Course Design | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Too easy, please do not repeat the same thing three times, it's just a waste of time and I'm not stupid. It's also too academic and should focus more on how to build real websites. On the bright side, it does give you some basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Instead of this course, I would much more recommend following "HTML, CSS, and Javascript for Web Developers" by Yaakov Chaikin from John Hopkins university, it taught me good foundations + tricks and good practices for professional web front end developers. | 1) John Hopkins university, it taught me | Good | 1) foundations + tricks and good practices | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Too easy, please do not repeat the same thing three times, it's just a waste of time and I'm not stupid. It's also too academic and should focus more on how to build real websites. On the bright side, it does give you some basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Instead of this course, I would much more recommend following "HTML, CSS, and Javascript for Web Developers" by Yaakov Chaikin from John Hopkins university, it taught me good foundations + tricks and good practices for professional web front end developers. | 2) me good foundations + tricks and | Good | 2) practices for professional web front end | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good for start learning front-end. but you will need some programming skills to understand all features | 1) very | Good | 1) for start learning front-end. but you | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Everything is very good explain it. | 1) Everything is very | Good | 1) explain it. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It´s very good for beginners, help me | 1) It´s very | Good | 1) for beginners, help me | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good basic knowledge to proceed with small projects and to continue the education | 1) | Good | 1) basic knowledge to proceed with small | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introductory course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I enjoyed this course. The materials are presented in an easily understandable manner. The exercises are fun and good for learning. | 1) manner. The exercises are fun and | Good | 1) for learning. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very good. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The content was too basic, but good | 1) The content was too basic, but | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good work - Mustafa & Edward | 1) | Good | 1) work - Mustafa & Edward | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for beginners :-) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners :-) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well taught course but the material for the homework assignments were basically given to us. The answers were handed to us in the homework description. Having said this, the assignments were good. One should have basic program | 1) Having said this, the assignments were | Good | 1) One should have basic program | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good! Even though I already had some web programming exp, I learned a lot of important basics I just did not learn before! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Even though I already had some | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good introduction to basic web-building. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to basic web-building. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good assessments to help understand Javascript, HTML and CSS. | 1) | Good | 1) assessments to help understand Javascript, HTML | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course with good example and instruction. | 1) Excellent course with | Good | 1) example and instruction. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nicely organized contents. Good work with assignments. | 1) Nicely organized contents. | Good | 1) work with assignments. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teachers! In this course you've everything you need to start | 1) | Good | 1) teachers! In this course you've everything | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course having easy to understand classes. The teacher is very clear and confident in what he's talking. The assignments have detailed description, without letting any doubts or giving nightmares to students. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course having easy to understand classes. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, worth the money | 1) | Good | 1) course, worth the money | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good beginner and refresher course for the basics of web development. | 1) | Good | 1) beginner and refresher course for the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good to learn the basics of web development | 1) | Good | 1) to learn the basics of web | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good explained course for beginners. Absolutely loved it! | 1) Really | Good | 1) explained course for beginners. Absolutely loved | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good module comprising great explanations. every starter should take this. I'am happy. | 1) very | Good | 1) module comprising great explanations. every starter | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good exposure and practice. | 1) | Good | 1) exposure and practice. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good for beginning | 1) | Good | 1) for beginning | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it was good course learned alot | 1) it was | Good | 1) course learned alot | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is really good and full of details. However, if you have previous idea about HTML and CSS you will find some parts a bit slow. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) and full of details. However, if | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good to be start from scratch | 1) | Good | 1) to be start from scratch | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course. But it lacks open activities like those given in bootstrap course | 1) very | Good | 1) course. But it lacks open activities | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy to learn and good presentation!! | 1) Easy to learn and | Good | 1) presentation! ! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction course. Assignments could be bit harder, or maybe not so much guided. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course. Assignments could be bit | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good as a first time exposure | 1) Very | Good | 1) as a first time exposure | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Looks good, but the assignment a bit simple. | 1) Looks | Good | 1) but the assignment a bit simple. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | everything has been explained well the way of teaching the content everything was good | 1) of teaching the content everything was | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is a good introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The lectures were straightforward, and the assignments were good exercises of the lecture material. I gave it 4 stars, only because the task of learning HTML and CSS is a bit dry and boring. No fault of the instructor. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is a good introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The lectures were straightforward, and the assignments were good exercises of the lecture material. I gave it 4 stars, only because the task of learning HTML and CSS is a bit dry and boring. No fault of the instructor. | 2) were straightforward, and the assignments were | Good | 2) exercises of the lecture material. I | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course for the beginner | 1) very | Good | 1) course for the beginner | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course to start learning front end development | 1) very | Good | 1) course to start learning front end | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good basic foundation of HTML and CSS. It will help if the grading rubric needs to be more flexible in order to assess smaller outcomes. I found it too binary to be of use for accurate assessment. | 1) | Good | 1) basic foundation of HTML and CSS. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good beginner course. I would've liked more assignments to really drive the points home. And maybe a bit less hand holding in the assignments | 1) | Good | 1) beginner course. I would've liked more | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course for beginners. The instructor explains the material very clearly. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. The instructor explains | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good, clear and easy to learn. more practices can be added to the course | 1) very | Good | 1) clear and easy to learn. more | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | GOOD. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a very good introduction to the basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I found the teacher really great at explaining his classes. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) introduction to the basics of HTML, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great class with good explanations! | 1) Great class with | Good | 1) explanations! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I couldn't purchase the course but I did all the assignments and followed along with the lectures and the instructions. The part I liked the most was the project based way of learning. The slides were well prepared. All in all it was a good and faster way of getting an intro into HTML and Javascript. | 1) All in all it was a | Good | 1) and faster way of getting an | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good BUT no discussion on objects which is very important | 1) very | Good | 1) BUT no discussion on objects which | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great! Some key information was omitted assuming student knew some key concepts, I had to cross reference on the internet to back fill. Otherwise good. | 1) the internet to back fill. Otherwise | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good introductory course, perfect for beginners. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course, perfect for beginners. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Stater Course | 1) | Good | 1) Stater Course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course.. Very crisp presentation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. . Very crisp presentation. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good for very beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for very beginners. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very basic the first week, good introduction the second and awesome after the third. 3 starts represent the median value | 1) Very basic the first week, | Good | 1) introduction the second and awesome after | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good assignments | 1) | Good | 1) assignments | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good base fo become a great web developer! | 1) A | Good | 1) base fo become a great web | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good, but would be better with more examples and exercises of more key aspects. | 1) | Good | 1) but would be better with more | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good One. | 1) | Good | 1) One. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Professor is really goooood! He explains the material from the slides, just as if you were in an actual class, i.e. he doesn't read from some screen. Assignments are challenging but easy at the same time because you submit the full versions in incremental steps. Good learning experience. However, I feel the course is a bit expensive for a three week period. | 1) the full versions in incremental steps. | Good | 1) learning experience. However, I feel the | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good! I learn a lot from it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I learn a lot from it! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course ,good for beginners to start with | 1) Great course , | Good | 1) for beginners to start with | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good lectures, interesting quizes, good assessments. Perfect! | 1) | Good | 1) lectures, interesting quizes, good assessments. Perfect! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good lectures, interesting quizes, good assessments. Perfect! | 2) Good lectures, interesting quizes, | Good | 2) assessments. Perfect! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good to a html/css/javascript introduction. That course will provide the basic stuff you need to know to start learning web development. | 1) Really | Good | 1) to a html/css/javascript introduction. That course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | If you want to be a web developer and have no knowledge of html and css then you can start from this for sure, the basics are cleared in a very good way and the exercises are hard enough to ue your brain for the exercises. | 1) basics are cleared in a very | Good | 1) way and the exercises are hard | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course! Is goes straight to coding, so it´s really fun! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Is goes straight to coding, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I was surprised how good it was. | 1) I was surprised how | Good | 1) it was. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overview of HTML/CSS/Javascript. Nice audio/video quality and preparation. Fun homework assignments and examples. Would have liked more CSS touches. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of HTML/CSS/Javascript. Nice audio/video quality | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course ! | 1) | Good | 1) Course ! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Starter | 1) | Good | 1) Starter | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this course is really good to understand who things work together in front-end web development. And it develops my understanding towards using while and for loops specifically by the really good and smart assignments. | 1) this course is really | Good | 1) to understand who things work together | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this course is really good to understand who things work together in front-end web development. And it develops my understanding towards using while and for loops specifically by the really good and smart assignments. | 2) for loops specifically by the really | Good | 2) and smart assignments. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good ex | 1) | Good | 1) ex | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course ! | 1) very | Good | 1) course ! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for beginners! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It was a good course. It is hard to make it useful and interesting for everyone since students will have varying degrees of knowledge coming in. I know that I learned a lot that I can apply in my work. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course. It is hard to make | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | a good job | 1) a | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good material,Good Teacher,It's amazing | 1) | Good | 1) material, Good Teacher, It's amazing | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good material,Good Teacher,It's amazing | 2) Good material, | Good | 2) Teacher, It's amazing | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | GOOD BUT NOT A FULL COURSE | 1) | Good | 1) BUT NOT A FULL COURSE | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. As a college CS major, I came in with almost 0 experience in the material reviewed in the course, and have completed the course with what I feel to be a strong understanding. A+ work by the team that created the curriculum | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course gave a good basic understanding of HTML, Javascript, & CSS. | 1) The course gave a | Good | 1) basic understanding of HTML, Javascript, & | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good for Web beginners : a must | 1) very | Good | 1) for Web beginners : a must | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course that is very well structured. I learnt a lot about the basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 1) | Good | 1) course that is very well structured. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teacher, simple learning, maybe too basic, mostly with CSS | 1) | Good | 1) teacher, simple learning, maybe too basic, | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good one for the Beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) one for the Beginners. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course to brush up these technologies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to brush up these technologies. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good for introduction!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) for introduction! ! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course the teacher is a good teacher | 1) | Good | 1) course the teacher is a good | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course the teacher is a good teacher | 2) Good course the teacher is a | Good | 2) teacher | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's been a good introduction to HTML, CSS and JavaScript. It's the essential things you need to know. The examples and lectures are great. | 1) It's been a | Good | 1) introduction to HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Such a wonderful course that offers a very good support for the starters. | 1) wonderful course that offers a very | Good | 1) support for the starters. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and didatic. It was very instructional. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and didatic. It was very instructional. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I read many materials about HTML, CSS, JS, created few small projects. I was sure that know it good, but your course opened my eyes. I found many usefull information here. Thanks a lot! | 1) I was sure that know it | Good | 1) but your course opened my eyes. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy to follow. Great examples. Very Good course for a newbie like me. Very satisfied !! Would take other courses with this professor. | 1) Easy to follow. Great examples. Very | Good | 1) course for a newbie like me. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | An Excellent course explanation along with good examples, especially on the Assessment area which let us think out of bound to focus logical part of the code | 1) An Excellent course explanation along with | Good | 1) examples, especially on the Assessment area | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good explanation of the concepts. Need commintment | 1) | Good | 1) explanation of the concepts. Need commintment | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good course, but not free to access the tasks. have to pay to fulfill it. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but not free to access | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a good course for beginner student | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for beginner student | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Course for Front End Developer | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course for Front End Developer | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good course taught in an easily understandable way. Its for the people who are new to website design & coding | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course taught in an easily understandable | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introduction | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Not very good explain javascript. After this course I had many questions about this language, I not understood it enough. | 1) Not very | Good | 1) explain javascript. After this course I | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course with quite a bit of material | 1) | Good | 1) course with quite a bit of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good way to learn the basics of HTML, CSS and Javascript, or refresh your old knowledge and learn some new skills. Very easy to understand even if english is not your language. I recommend it. | 1) A very | Good | 1) way to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | i have finished this course and it is a good introduction to HTML CSS and JS. | 1) this course and it is a | Good | 1) introduction to HTML CSS and JS. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty basic but good | 1) Pretty basic but | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good one. Going from Basics to little bit advance. Nice assignments and Quiz added in course. | 1) | Good | 1) one. Going from Basics to little | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Easy, but good. | 1) Easy, but | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good assignment. | 1) | Good | 1) assignment. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Was good enough for one has prior knowledge. | 1) Was | Good | 1) enough for one has prior knowledge. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it is a very good beginner level course and i enjoyed it a lot | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) beginner level course and i enjoyed | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have used JS before and thought i was pretty good with it. However, I found this course to be really useful and enjoyable. I feel my skill level has gone up a notch. | 1) before and thought i was pretty | Good | 1) with it. However, I found this | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Amazing course! Very good explanation and the structure is perfect, worth it! | 1) Amazing course! Very | Good | 1) explanation and the structure is perfect, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well laid out information and good job | 1) Very well laid out information and | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introductions! Nice work! Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) introductions! Nice work! Thanks | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good exercises | 1) Very | Good | 1) exercises | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is very good - it moves quickly so is best for someone who learns from troubleshooting or has some past experience with coding. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) - it moves quickly so is | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. Good teacher. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Good teacher. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. Good teacher. | 2) Good course. | Good | 2) teacher. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A bit too simple for my liking. And too many repeated content. But overall a good course for an absolute beginner. | 1) many repeated content. But overall a | Good | 1) course for an absolute beginner. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | real good so far | 1) real | Good | 1) so far | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very very good, I learnt so much in this course. Thanks coursera for the oportunity. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) I learnt so much in this | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Quickly covered basic HTML, JS, and CSS. Assignment descriptions were clear. There were a few tricky bits mostly related to styling that were more frustrating than it seems like they should have been, but overall a very good course. However, the project time given for the course is very optimistic, it usually always took much longer. | 1) have been, but overall a very | Good | 1) course. However, the project time given | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good basic overview of HTML, CSS and Javascript. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) basic overview of HTML, CSS and | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good one! Nice professor :) | 1) | Good | 1) one! Nice professor :) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good content easy to learn. | 1) very | Good | 1) content easy to learn. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Teacher was very good. | 1) Teacher was very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introduction to web technologies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to web technologies. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course to start learning the basics of web developpement | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to start learning the basics | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good overview and introduction of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview and introduction of HTML, CSS | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | clear and good example but limited contents | 1) clear and | Good | 1) example but limited contents | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good explanations and reflexion what we did. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations and reflexion what we did. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I thought the video lectures and code examples for this course were really good. The assignments are straight forward and well described. | 1) examples for this course were really | Good | 1) The assignments are straight forward and | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very, very good overview of the basic concepts in HTML, CSS and Javascript. | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) overview of the basic concepts in | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great instructor. The course is concise but full of good observations about how to use HTML and Javascript. | 1) course is concise but full of | Good | 1) observations about how to use HTML | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Learning new skill through succinct teaching was a wonderful experience. The course covered good details of the programming languages, but personally I think it was not in-dept learning. I think more learning material along with advanced assignments should be provided for more vivid learners. Overall, it was a course worth taking for me. -Bhushan | 1) a wonderful experience. The course covered | Good | 1) details of the programming languages, but | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was really useful for me. Good teacher and material. | 1) course was really useful for me. | Good | 1) teacher and material. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good enough for beginners in web development but must have previously programming experience. The assignments are very strong and help understanding more. I think this is a good start point but some other operation on images and styles not covered. | 1) Content is | Good | 1) enough for beginners in web development | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good enough for beginners in web development but must have previously programming experience. The assignments are very strong and help understanding more. I think this is a good start point but some other operation on images and styles not covered. | 2) more. I think this is a | Good | 2) start point but some other operation | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course to teach you the basics :) | 1) | Good | 1) course to teach you the basics | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Completed this course today and it was a very good learning experience. Like Professor said, it is a good start to learn Javascript. The teaching style was simple and to the point. Hope to take another course by Professor Rossiter soon. | 1) today and it was a very | Good | 1) learning experience. Like Professor said, it | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Completed this course today and it was a very good learning experience. Like Professor said, it is a good start to learn Javascript. The teaching style was simple and to the point. Hope to take another course by Professor Rossiter soon. | 2) Like Professor said, it is a | Good | 2) start to learn Javascript. The teaching | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice introduction. Very structured and good assignments. | 1) Very nice introduction. Very structured and | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course and awesome teacher | 1) very | Good | 1) course and awesome teacher | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I would highly recommend this course to someone willing to learn HTML, CSS and JS from scratch. Good pace, material and assignments make this course interesting and useful. | 1) HTML, CSS and JS from scratch. | Good | 1) pace, material and assignments make this | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great introduction to the basics of all three areas. It may feel easy if you have programming experience, but it will give you a good introduction to what's to come in the following courses. | 1) but it will give you a | Good | 1) introduction to what's to come in | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well detailed course with very good instructor who makes this course more interesting. But one more thing, the assignment is not fully related to the lectures and materials. Students need to read and learn by themselves from other sources to learn more for completing the assignments. This is tough for students who do not have programming background and join here to learn. | 1) Well detailed course with very | Good | 1) instructor who makes this course more | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course, very good for beginners who would like to study HTML, CSS & JS. | 1) Great course, very | Good | 1) for beginners who would like to | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good class, professor is very entertaining. Concepts take into account the latest & greatest of HTML & JS. In general, i think a price of $79 is too high for a MOOC class of 3 weeks duration | 1) Very | Good | 1) class, professor is very entertaining. Concepts | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Overall a good course! | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good . | 1) very | Good | 1) . | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good well delivered course. Sometimes the instruction is a little repetitive, but that may be a good thing for beginners. The instructions can also sometimes be a bit vague, overall a good course though. | 1) | Good | 1) well delivered course. Sometimes the instruction | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good well delivered course. Sometimes the instruction is a little repetitive, but that may be a good thing for beginners. The instructions can also sometimes be a bit vague, overall a good course though. | 2) repetitive, but that may be a | Good | 2) thing for beginners. The instructions can | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good well delivered course. Sometimes the instruction is a little repetitive, but that may be a good thing for beginners. The instructions can also sometimes be a bit vague, overall a good course though. | 3) be a bit vague, overall a | Good | 3) course though. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a pretty good course for learning basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I already had some experience with these three languages, so consider that when reading this review. I found that the amount of information they cram into this three week course was pretty substantial, which I think is a positive aspect of the course. They don't just teach you what you need to complete the exercises, they teach you a lot of things that even more experienced users of this language may have forgotten. That being said, I don't think the amount of information covered is realistically anyone could retain in three weeks. I would instead see this course as a crash course as to what features are available with these three languages, then save the course slides as sort of a reference for when you go off on your own. My favorite part of this course is that the exercises are unique and fun. The HTML assignment is sort of boring, but that's because HTML is boring, but the exercises that use javascript are a lot of fun. To conclude, I think this course would be great for brand new web developers and also for people who just need a refresher. Good luck! | 1) This is a pretty | Good | 1) course for learning basic HTML, CSS, | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a pretty good course for learning basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I already had some experience with these three languages, so consider that when reading this review. I found that the amount of information they cram into this three week course was pretty substantial, which I think is a positive aspect of the course. They don't just teach you what you need to complete the exercises, they teach you a lot of things that even more experienced users of this language may have forgotten. That being said, I don't think the amount of information covered is realistically anyone could retain in three weeks. I would instead see this course as a crash course as to what features are available with these three languages, then save the course slides as sort of a reference for when you go off on your own. My favorite part of this course is that the exercises are unique and fun. The HTML assignment is sort of boring, but that's because HTML is boring, but the exercises that use javascript are a lot of fun. To conclude, I think this course would be great for brand new web developers and also for people who just need a refresher. Good luck! | 2) people who just need a refresher. | Good | 2) luck! | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. I like it very much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I like it very much. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | its very good | 1) its very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course is good as an introduction. explanation of various other important properties in CSS to build a web page with different layouts could have been an added advantage. Though the course has given me a good understanding. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) as an introduction. explanation of various | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course is good as an introduction. explanation of various other important properties in CSS to build a web page with different layouts could have been an added advantage. Though the course has given me a good understanding. | 2) the course has given me a | Good | 2) understanding. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent very good introduction especially recommended javascript | 1) Excellent very | Good | 1) introduction especially recommended javascript | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | One of the best course I have ever take, what I like the most is on assignment part. The lecturer give me a good instruction of assignment which helped me did it perfectly. Step by step, knowing that I need to develop these step by step logic required to solve the problems. | 1) part. The lecturer give me a | Good | 1) instruction of assignment which helped me | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | So far so good | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This class does not go in depth enough for debutant people to figure out how to do the assessments or gain a good understanding of what is covered. | 1) do the assessments or gain a | Good | 1) understanding of what is covered. | 1.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well structured. A good introduction course. | 1) Very well structured. A | Good | 1) introduction course. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for begineers | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for begineers | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I came to learn all basics of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Assignments are really good and the additional resources are really helpful too. I'd recommend this course to start with if you want to become a professional web developer. | 1) CSS and JavaScript. Assignments are really | Good | 1) and the additional resources are really | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good class, not only lecture,but the homework also very good . | 1) Very | Good | 1) class, not only lecture, but the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good class, not only lecture,but the homework also very good . | 2) lecture, but the homework also very | Good | 2) . | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good introduction class for the basics of web development. Don't expect to come out a full fledged Javascript programmer but it gives you the important parts of DOM manipulation. If you want to start with web development, go and check this class out. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction class for the basics of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | really good course!! | 1) really | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good at getting his point across and, I found that he always explained with good depth. I would recommend this course to anyone | 1) very | Good | 1) at getting his point across and, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good at getting his point across and, I found that he always explained with good depth. I would recommend this course to anyone | 2) found that he always explained with | Good | 2) depth. I would recommend this course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course to learn some basics. Skip it if you are at an intermediate level. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn some basics. Skip | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course! The professor is doing an incredibly good work at delivering the material in an accessible and understandable way! I wish he had more courses on Coursera. I would attend all of them. TOP!!! Thank you! | 1) The professor is doing an incredibly | Good | 1) work at delivering the material in | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, the methods and pace was not good enough. I wonder if those new to these topics learnt anything | 1) A | Good | 1) course, the methods and pace was | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, the methods and pace was not good enough. I wonder if those new to these topics learnt anything | 2) the methods and pace was not | Good | 2) enough. I wonder if those new | 2.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Indeed! Instructor goes thru quite a number of HTML, CSS and JavaScript examples. A good starting point. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Indeed! Instructor goes thru quite a | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Indeed! Instructor goes thru quite a number of HTML, CSS and JavaScript examples. A good starting point. | 2) HTML, CSS and JavaScript examples. A | Good | 2) starting point. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course and covers a wide range of topics especially in JavaScript. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course and covers a wide range | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good. | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very very good course :) | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very compact and intensive course. Love the great opportunity to learn from such a good teacher. | 1) opportunity to learn from such a | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Amazing presentation. Good content | 1) Amazing presentation. | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and systematical introduction to basics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and systematical introduction to basics. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Intro to the front-end holy trinity! | 1) | Good | 1) Intro to the front-end holy trinity! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very professional course. I learnt a lot of good stuff! | 1) course. I learnt a lot of | Good | 1) stuff! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for beginners with no experience or prior knowledge. The lessons and projects were designed well to have you put together everything you learned in the courses at the end. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners with no experience | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is very good for people who want to get some knowledge of HTML, CSS and Javascript. While it is not that long, it gives you practical experience and teaches you to do some practical things. I'd rather recommend it to people who already have some basic experience with web and programming (in any language), but the bar is not that high even for beginners. Module videos and explanations are good and David Rossiter, who created the course, has my thanks and respect. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for people who want to get | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is very good for people who want to get some knowledge of HTML, CSS and Javascript. While it is not that long, it gives you practical experience and teaches you to do some practical things. I'd rather recommend it to people who already have some basic experience with web and programming (in any language), but the bar is not that high even for beginners. Module videos and explanations are good and David Rossiter, who created the course, has my thanks and respect. | 2) beginners. Module videos and explanations are | Good | 2) and David Rossiter, who created the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course but it is kinda fast for new people | 1) very | Good | 1) course but it is kinda fast | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A nice introductory course, short but with a lot of stuff covered, good for busy people. I only miss some jquery introduction. Thanks professor David Rossiter. | 1) with a lot of stuff covered, | Good | 1) for busy people. I only miss | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course - requires dedication, concentration and hard work. I think that I got a lot, but still long way is in front of me. It depends what are you searching for in online course - that is crucial question, for my vision this was perfect choice, right to the target. Thanks a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course - requires dedication, concentration and | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | If you don't have any experience in HTML, CSS or JavaScript, this is a very good introduction to that topic. It covers all the basics which are needed to be able to follow the next courses of this module. Also the lecturer speaks very clear and it is very easy to understand him. | 1) or JavaScript, this is a very | Good | 1) introduction to that topic. It covers | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | pretty good | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good for begineers... | 1) | Good | 1) for begineers. . . | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very detailed and great, clear lectures. Very good quizzes and hands-on assignments. Highly recommended for absolutely beginner. | 1) detailed and great, clear lectures. Very | Good | 1) quizzes and hands-on assignments. Highly recommended | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good place to learn the basics of web development. | 1) | Good | 1) place to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well explained, very carefully designed course I have to say. Good to see that so clearly organized. Only one thing maybe, I found the assignments, especially the last one, not very close to what I expected (like form validation...), maybe not too interesting. But maybe I'm wrong, I see that as a newbie in JavaScript. | 1) designed course I have to say. | Good | 1) to see that so clearly organized. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course! Content is easy to comprehend and flexible. Professor is good having clear communication. I highly recommend this course for the beginners or if you want to refresh theses skills. | 1) to comprehend and flexible. Professor is | Good | 1) having clear communication. I highly recommend | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | a good start to learn web design from this course. | 1) a | Good | 1) start to learn web design from | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well-designed courses, good exercises. | 1) Well-designed courses, | Good | 1) exercises. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good explanations, good instructors | 1) | Good | 1) explanations, good instructors | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good explanations, good instructors | 2) Good explanations, | Good | 2) instructors | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | it's a good course to learn for beginners | 1) it's a | Good | 1) course to learn for beginners | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great Course ....Good assignments and Great lectures | 1) Great Course . . . . | Good | 1) assignments and Great lectures | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is really good and the way of explaining HTML codes is really very heipfull for beginners. I would recommend this course for every newbie who wants to make a good foundation for web development. Thanks. | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) and the way of explaining HTML | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is really good and the way of explaining HTML codes is really very heipfull for beginners. I would recommend this course for every newbie who wants to make a good foundation for web development. Thanks. | 2) newbie who wants to make a | Good | 2) foundation for web development. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. Whether you're a beginner or intermediate, this course will boost your skills in HTML, CSS and JS. One of the best courses I've taken in a while. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Whether you're a beginner or | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is really a very good and perfect base for web developers who start their career..!! | 1) This is really a very | Good | 1) and perfect base for web developers | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's very good ... | 1) It's very | Good | 1) . . . | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good and interesting course. I think it should have a bit more formalization. For example, in HTML part there was no information about W3C validation tool. Also for example there was no accent on some essential parts of HTML: 1. According the W3C specification, the src attribute of <img> tag must be present 2. There was no accent that for attribute of <label> tag should correspond to the ID of form element so in homework review I saw situations when this attribute was set to name instead of ID. | 1) | Good | 1) and interesting course. I think it | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course covers a lot of ground and builds a good foundation of knowledge in the subject. | 1) lot of ground and builds a | Good | 1) foundation of knowledge in the subject. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Content is good but can include more advanced topics in Javascript like various patterns eg IIFE, Module etc. Also, I reckon there should have been some material on Javascript classes,objects etc. As a whole this tutorial is excellent but could have been even better wit above topics included in detail. | 1) Content is | Good | 1) but can include more advanced topics | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teaching | 1) | Good | 1) teaching | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course has a very good level , very well structured , I enjoyed doing it and I learned a lot of things in a very short period of time .It is very intensive and very professionnal. | 1) This course has a very | Good | 1) level , very well structured , | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. Happy to have finished it! | 1) | Good | 1) course. Happy to have finished it! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Gives you the basics what you need to develop your skills further! Good one! | 1) need to develop your skills further! | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is really good and interesting for people, who want to understand basics of HTML, CSS and JS. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) and interesting for people, who want | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have enjoyed this course a lot. The lectures are good and the assignments interesting. The grading process could be a little less 0/1... all or nothing is a little harsh. But it is a small flaw. | 1) course a lot. The lectures are | Good | 1) and the assignments interesting. The grading | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction to the base of web developpment | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the base of web | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introductory course to some essential components of Web Development! | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course to some essential components | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A lot of information, easy to understand, good quality of lectures and interesting practical exercises! Thanks! | 1) lot of information, easy to understand, | Good | 1) quality of lectures and interesting practical | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a very good course to start learning HTML ,CSS and JavaScript. To get the experties suggested material is useful. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course to start learning HTML , | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. But it doesn't fit for beginners in programming. You need to have some base in HTML/CSS and programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. But it doesn't fit for | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its pretty basic but it is a good start for the entire specialization.Thank you | 1) pretty basic but it is a | Good | 1) start for the entire specialization. Thank | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course but I think it needs more Javascript materials. | 1) | Good | 1) course but I think it needs | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Pretty good introduction course. Not very thorough as all starters, but nicely composed and presented. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) introduction course. Not very thorough as | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This was a good introduction to HTML, CSS and JavaScript. I recommend taking it simultaneously with another beginning course on the same material though because not all aspects of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript can be addressed in a single course. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good starter course. | 1) | Good | 1) starter course. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I am enjoyed your course. Good instructions! | 1) I am enjoyed your course. | Good | 1) instructions! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Perfect course! Very good teacher! It help me with HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Big thanks to David Rossiter! | 1) Perfect course! Very | Good | 1) teacher! It help me with HTML, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. By Rafael Rodriguez from Venezuela. | 1) | Good | 1) course. By Rafael Rodriguez from Venezuela. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good overview of all three core web technologies. The price seems a bit high though if you're considering the verified certificate. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of all three core web | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Is a good introduction | 1) Is a | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good lessons! | 1) | Good | 1) lessons! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good entry to front-end web design | 1) A very | Good | 1) entry to front-end web design | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction to the big three web languages that are a prerequisite to web programming. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the big three web | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! Thanks! | 1) | Good | 1) course! Thanks! | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good mooc. Clearly and dynamic. I learned to much, thanks to make this mooc! | 1) | Good | 1) mooc. Clearly and dynamic. I learned | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good starting point for we design | 1) | Good | 1) starting point for we design | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I really learnt a lot! Lectures are thorough and go in depth into the topics. After this course you cannot call yourself a developer yet but you'll be on the way to become a good one! :) | 1) on the way to become a | Good | 1) one! :) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for greenhand! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for greenhand! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good instructor and well organized course, thank you | 1) | Good | 1) instructor and well organized course, thank | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, with useful examples and methodology! | 1) | Good | 1) course, with useful examples and methodology! | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Originally, I rated this course 3-stars. However, I have since decided it is worth 1-star after taking the next course in the series, Bootstrap. I thought that there wasn't enough time to cover all the material to make this course good. After taking the next course, I see that it is possible to deliver a lot of material and concepts in short order. However, it takes thinking, planning, and dedication. I think this course is TERRIBLE and seriously needs an overhaul. After taking this course, you barely know any CSS and despite passing assignments that don't challenge, you're probably worse off than a student who fails in school. The course suffers from the extremely short timeframe. Covering one of each of the three core topics a week is just insufficient to provide any sort of depth to this course. While there are supplementary readings, Coursera and the participating institutions need to understand that there are those who are taking courses to get more than a one page Wiki style coverage of a topic. | 1) the material to make this course | Good | 1) After taking the next course, I | 1.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good teacher ! Clear and short lessons and very usefull exercices. Thank you | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher ! Clear and short lessons | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course, very appreciate the teacher's affords. He using very understandable English to give us each presentation, thank you! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, very appreciate the teacher's affords. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good for the ones who just started also the ones need to refresh their mind. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for the ones who just started | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction with practice. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction with practice. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good for start | 1) | Good | 1) for start | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | There are many free courses on the internet focused on HTMl, CSS and Javascript, some of them good, some of them not so good... This one... is PERFECT!! | 1) CSS and Javascript, some of them | Good | 1) some of them not so good. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | There are many free courses on the internet focused on HTMl, CSS and Javascript, some of them good, some of them not so good... This one... is PERFECT!! | 2) good, some of them not so | Good | 2) . . This one. . . | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course and contain a lot of important materials. | 1) | Good | 1) course and contain a lot of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and easily explained concepts with useful examples. Recommended for newbies as well as experienced programmers for a quick refresh | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easily explained concepts with useful | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this course was good for me.prior to this course i have no idea of html,css,javascript.explanation was good.. | 1) this course was | Good | 1) for me. prior to this course | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this course was good for me.prior to this course i have no idea of html,css,javascript.explanation was good.. | 2) of html, css, javascript. explanation was | Good | 2) . | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I am totally new in this new HTML language, CSS and Java Script. I like the quality of the information provided in the videos. For a new student like me this is really useful but still, I am not able to cope with the speed of the course. But still, the information is good and I am going to continue until the end. Thanks! | 1) course. But still, the information is | Good | 1) and I am going to continue | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | a good intro course for people don't have experience on these topics. | 1) a | Good | 1) intro course for people don't have | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good lessons!!! I learned a lot of new things, specially JavaScript. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons! ! ! I learned a | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good starting point. If you know the three languages this course could be basic, but (as lot of dev are) if you lack JS knowledge it's a good starting point too! | 1) | Good | 1) starting point. If you know the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good starting point. If you know the three languages this course could be basic, but (as lot of dev are) if you lack JS knowledge it's a good starting point too! | 2) you lack JS knowledge it's a | Good | 2) starting point too! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teaching! | 1) | Good | 1) teaching! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good explanation by professor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanation by professor. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good material for beginners | 1) very | Good | 1) material for beginners | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good cource | 1) very | Good | 1) cource | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | many many good informathion | 1) many many | Good | 1) informathion | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's so good! | 1) It's so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I found it very useful. Good introduction to web development :) | 1) I found it very useful. | Good | 1) introduction to web development :) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good basic introduction of HTML and Javascript, challenging assignments. Thanks to Dave Rossiter and all the course team for interesting learning! | 1) | Good | 1) basic introduction of HTML and Javascript, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I really loved this course. It is very good structured and easily understandable. And great respect for the assignments, they were enough difficult to make me really understand the material and to master my basic skill of HTML, CSS and JavaScript. | 1) loved this course. It is very | Good | 1) structured and easily understandable. And great | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good for beginners and intermediate programmers to review the concept of HTML, CSS and JavaScript basics! | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners and intermediate programmers to | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Well explained course and good for the beginners. | 1) Well explained course and | Good | 1) for the beginners. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course that explain all you need in these 3 languages | 1) A very | Good | 1) course that explain all you need | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I love the way the presentations are set up. It's clear and obvious what the material is about and I know exactly what I'm about to learn so when I go back and need a reference I can easily select the module and figure out if it's what I need or not. The assignments make good use of the concepts we learned in the lectures. Very good course, yet also challenging to complete some of the tasks. I recommended a friend to join me in successive courses in this specialization. | 1) need or not. The assignments make | Good | 1) use of the concepts we learned | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I love the way the presentations are set up. It's clear and obvious what the material is about and I know exactly what I'm about to learn so when I go back and need a reference I can easily select the module and figure out if it's what I need or not. The assignments make good use of the concepts we learned in the lectures. Very good course, yet also challenging to complete some of the tasks. I recommended a friend to join me in successive courses in this specialization. | 2) we learned in the lectures. Very | Good | 2) course, yet also challenging to complete | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Some of the videos are a bit too slow phased, but all in all it is a really good introductory course to HTML, CSS and Javascript. Would like to see a part two for each subject with some more in dept coverage of the subjects. | 1) in all it is a really | Good | 1) introductory course to HTML, CSS and | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course, I learn a lot | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learn a lot | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good introductive course. It's easy to follow, it's explicative and offers extra resources to complement the contents and deep. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introductive course. It's easy to follow, | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Overall it's a good intro if you know nothing or very little about those topics. That said, the class is too slow. Homework is too easy and boring. It's all about following very specific (long) instructions - "put this line of JS here", "create a function called Foo", etc. Grading is done by peers, even though it could be automated. Participation requires running arbitrary JS written by other students. | 1) Overall it's a | Good | 1) intro if you know nothing or | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course with a great instructor, it covers so much stuff and it's pretty well explained. Recommended! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course with a great instructor, it | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This was very interesting course. I enjoyed it thoroughly. The projects at the end of every week are really good and makes you explore the subject and the language. The lectures were good too. | 1) end of every week are really | Good | 1) and makes you explore the subject | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This was very interesting course. I enjoyed it thoroughly. The projects at the end of every week are really good and makes you explore the subject and the language. The lectures were good too. | 2) and the language. The lectures were | Good | 2) too. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good basic explanation. Expecting some more in-depth hard topics to be covered. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic explanation. Expecting some more in-depth | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Clear materials, good examples, good pace, well thought through assignments. Prof did a great job! Thank you. | 1) Clear materials, | Good | 1) examples, good pace, well thought through | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Clear materials, good examples, good pace, well thought through assignments. Prof did a great job! Thank you. | 2) Clear materials, good examples, | Good | 2) pace, well thought through assignments. Prof | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Quick Ad contains sufficient topics for a beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) Quick Ad contains sufficient topics for | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The class has a lot of good information but I felt as though it was a bit disorganized. There were way too many people taking the class but not enough to grade the assignments. On the plus side I was able to switch to another session of the class while keeping all of my progress so hopefully my assignments will get graded this time around and I'll be able to complete the class. If an auto-grader or a way to ensure that everybody who turns in assignments will get those assignments graded back quickly could be implemented this would be a stellar class. Despite it's faults though I would still recommend it as I did learn a fair amount of HTML, CSS and JS quickly. I look forward to additional classes from this university. Thank you for your efforts. | 1) The class has a lot of | Good | 1) information but I felt as though | 3.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course, good teacher, good lessons, a lot of new things! | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) teacher, good lessons, a lot of | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course, good teacher, good lessons, a lot of new things! | 2) Excellent course, good teacher, | Good | 2) lessons, a lot of new things! | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very well presented. Clear explanations, but not dumbed down. This 3 week course obviously won't teach you everything you need to know about front-end development, but if you want a good start in HTML, CSS and JavaScript, this is the course to take. | 1) development, but if you want a | Good | 1) start in HTML, CSS and JavaScript, | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very useful and interesting first week of the course also good exmplanation. | 1) first week of the course also | Good | 1) exmplanation. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction course. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course! ;) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! ;) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good course; got me started on the path of web development. The lessons and explanation were very good and clear. Thanks. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course; got me started on the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good course; got me started on the path of web development. The lessons and explanation were very good and clear. Thanks. | 2) The lessons and explanation were very | Good | 2) and clear. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The grading is kinda problematic because you can just grade with 1 or 0 nothing in between. Also for the assignments it is hard sometimes to figure out how to solve the problems and external materials are needed. The professor is really good though and so are the lectures!!!! | 1) are needed. The professor is really | Good | 1) though and so are the lectures! | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good basic introduction to the subjects and interesting practical assignments. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic introduction to the subjects and | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like a lot the final assignment, it was simple but entertainment. Of course, this was pretty basic stuff but is an introduction, it´s good anyway. The teacher is great so I have not complaints with this course. Good to know that you can´t master CSS, HTML and javascript just by watching some videos so is necessary to practice and read additional resources. Thanks a lot for the course, I´m looking forward to take other courses with teacher David here in courser. | 1) stuff but is an introduction, it´s | Good | 1) anyway. The teacher is great so | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like a lot the final assignment, it was simple but entertainment. Of course, this was pretty basic stuff but is an introduction, it´s good anyway. The teacher is great so I have not complaints with this course. Good to know that you can´t master CSS, HTML and javascript just by watching some videos so is necessary to practice and read additional resources. Thanks a lot for the course, I´m looking forward to take other courses with teacher David here in courser. | 2) have not complaints with this course. | Good | 2) to know that you can´t master | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course but it moves very fast! Stay caught up with the work and you will do good! | 1) the work and you will do | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is THE BEST course I have ever taken on coursera or else. Very simple but effective, complex things are made bit simple to learn. Just in 3 weeks, covered a good contents. Specially the way of teaching was bit simple but outstanding. Pleasure to be a part of this course | 1) Just in 3 weeks, covered a | Good | 1) contents. Specially the way of teaching | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great Course! The lecturer explains in accessible language the new material.He explained in detail examples of tasks. Very interesting control tasks. I really liked it! If you have no experience with Javascript, Welcome, and you will have a good basis for the continuation of the study of the language! | 1) Welcome, and you will have a | Good | 1) basis for the continuation of the | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good introduction course | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Videos, Very helpful, easy to understand. Great value course. | 1) | Good | 1) Videos, Very helpful, easy to understand. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good level of detail for newcomers to web technologies. The assignments are good but I would say too easy in that most of the work in figuring out what to do is actually done for you in the outline of what to submit. | 1) A | Good | 1) level of detail for newcomers to | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good level of detail for newcomers to web technologies. The assignments are good but I would say too easy in that most of the work in figuring out what to do is actually done for you in the outline of what to submit. | 2) to web technologies. The assignments are | Good | 2) but I would say too easy | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice Teaching . Provides good examples and also explains them well | 1) Nice Teaching . Provides | Good | 1) examples and also explains them well | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is very complete. The lecturer explains very well. He presents the contents in a nice way and he always give good examples to accomplish the subjects. I definitely recommend this course! | 1) nice way and he always give | Good | 1) examples to accomplish the subjects. I | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent! A good introduction to frontend development :-) | 1) Excellent! A | Good | 1) introduction to frontend development :-) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course to learn HTML CSS and JS | 1) Really | Good | 1) course to learn HTML CSS and | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good explanation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanation. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor and excellent information and great courses in the specialization. The instructor is extremely good | 1) the specialization. The instructor is extremely | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good lecturer! Thank you very much. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecturer! Thank you very much. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like this approach. It gives you the hunger for more JavaScript after you have completed the course. Very good intro course, it covered a lot. | 1) you have completed the course. Very | Good | 1) intro course, it covered a lot. | 4.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The best teacher ever! I really like this course. Everything is good, every week. | 1) really like this course. Everything is | Good | 1) every week. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent teacher and very good course | 1) Excellent teacher and very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course flow goes smoothly. Exercises are good. In starting I felt reviewing classmate assignment task boring, but later on realized it is very helpful and we can get idea of different logic and thinking process. Overall good experience. | 1) Course flow goes smoothly. Exercises are | Good | 1) In starting I felt reviewing classmate | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course flow goes smoothly. Exercises are good. In starting I felt reviewing classmate assignment task boring, but later on realized it is very helpful and we can get idea of different logic and thinking process. Overall good experience. | 2) different logic and thinking process. Overall | Good | 2) experience. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content and very well taught. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and very well taught. | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good tutorial | 1) | Good | 1) tutorial | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good one Actually | 1) Very | Good | 1) one Actually | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course, definitely worth | 1) | Good | 1) Course, definitely worth | 5.0 |
| LgWwihnoEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Hi, I got promoted as a beta tester only 4 days ago, which was too short to review the whole course. So, here's my review for the first two weeks. The course is nice and easy to follow. It looks like beginner level. However, since it seems aimed at beginners, I think the teacher should put more emphasis on - good practices (i.e. when there are several ways to do something, always indicate which one is recommended). - accessibility for people with disabilities, which should be a priority when creating new website Also, I think that 3 weeks is a bit too short. The first week should at least be split in two so that students get more time to practice HTML/CSS coding. Lastly, there should be many more practice quizzes and (why not?) optional projects. Thank you for having me as a beta tester. | 1) should put more emphasis on - | Good | 1) practices (i. e. when there are | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | While the lectures were good, one of the mentors wasn't profesional at all, she was nasty, though the other one was very fine. But my chief complaint is the terrible method (in creative writing classes only ?) of using peer reviews to pass the class. I had a non-English-speaking person NOT pass me, a former English teacher, for no other reason than he misread the assignment. So I had to resubmit. I don't know who finally passed me, I think the peer review process is a shambles, and it lets Coursera personnel out of the process of doing grading and opens a can of worms with an incompetent peer reviewer having the power to not pass me. I don't think I will be taking creative writing classes again at Coursera, as going through that broken peer review process and having one mentor being off the wall just wasn't worth my time and anxiety. | 1) While the lectures were | Good | 1) one of the mentors wasn't profesional | 2.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I really loved this course! I have always loved reading poetry and have tried my hand at it periodically over many years. I learned a lot , wrote some poems that I like, and most of all enjoyed the teacher so very much. He made it so much fun, that I found myself laughing out loud several times. The workshop idea was also good, and I learned from reading the others' poems. Thank you for this course. ! | 1) times. The workshop idea was also | Good | 1) and I learned from reading the | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | The course itself is amazing. I learned so much. I used to only write prose poetry and thanks to this course I was able to write different forms. Besides the mentors' give such great comments and they are always eager to help. Also the professor is funny and choose really good poems to analyse. The only thing that was a pity is that people post their work, but few people want to actively comment on other people's poetry. It is not as participative as it could be. However, some workshops to comment to get comments. All in all, truly amazing course! | 1) professor is funny and choose really | Good | 1) poems to analyse. The only thing | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Fantastic course. I'm not very good at actually completing MOOCs (something about not having to answer to anyone, I suspect!) but the reviewing of classmates' work was done nicely, enough pressure to mean the assignments actually got done, without requiring an unreasonable amount of time. Douglas is a fantastic teacher and really inspiring; the course has revitalised my writing in just the way I needed! | 1) Fantastic course. I'm not very | Good | 1) at actually completing MOOCs (something about | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | I didn't know how to write good poems. This course has taught me how. Thank you. | 1) I didn't know how to write | Good | 1) poems. This course has taught me | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | The course material is very good. The most obvious issue with the course, is that peer revision takes a very long time, which means that you will get overdue assignments no matter what. For instance, after three weeks I'm still waiting for a revision that I wanted to use for the final workshop. I assume that instructor involvement in project revision is impossible in this kind of online course; but perhaps, if the issue is that people aren't getting their work reviewed, there could be an incentive for reviewers, for example, get an instructor/mentor review, if you submit at least, say, 10 thorough peer reviews. | 1) The course material is very | Good | 1) The most obvious issue with the | 3.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | This is a very good class. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) class. | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Course was very informative. I gain added insight. I am so much more knowledgeable now. Poems, Rhyme, Meters, and Revision. I am glad that I took this course. What I have gained insight into, I will use. Thanks to a good instructor. for all the poetic Information and I enjoyed the workshop. I completed on today, 10-05-2015. "Thank you" | 1) I will use. Thanks to a | Good | 1) instructor. for all the poetic Information | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Good delivery and enough technicals to keep interested poets learning! | 1) | Good | 1) delivery and enough technicals to keep | 5.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Very nice course, with interesting material, taught in a witty and engaging manner, and pretty good prompts. I had a very nice experience! | 1) witty and engaging manner, and pretty | Good | 1) prompts. I had a very nice | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Not as much creative flexibility as I thought there would be. Writing to prompts left very little room to create poetry that felt like my own. Good short course (knocked it out in a couple of days) for revising/learning techniques. | 1) poetry that felt like my own. | Good | 1) short course (knocked it out in | 3.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Gently entertaining introduction to writing poetry with some good examples and advice. | 1) introduction to writing poetry with some | Good | 1) examples and advice. | 4.0 |
| lHabnht2EeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | loved the whole experience, there should be a part 2 and when I get paid (and get a good grade) I will purchase the certificate. | 1) I get paid (and get a | Good | 1) grade) I will purchase the certificate. | 5.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | It's only an introductory course but it is good. | 1) an introductory course but it is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | The instructors do know their subjects and Paul Rodriguez has a wonderfully clear, practiced, to the point delivery. However, the class was not designed well. It appears the instructors did not work together to create the course material or have a well-thought agenda. What we have are concepts introduced without sufficient or any explanation, coursework that involves tweaking software instead of understanding the data transformations, rambling lectures, and no sense of accomplishment. I mostly spent my time working through confusing assignments where the key was to find an example, copy it and tweak it. What was it producing? How was it working? Why were the results significant? Those questions were left unanswered. Learning how software works is important, but we learned neither how it works or why. Also, the course did not build upon the previous Big Data courses. I expected to learn how Machine Learning fits as a piece in the overall puzzle of Hadoop and Big Data. But this class felt thrown together. It's not worth the cost and it's a shame to UCSD. The Big Data series has been overall a disappointment. There are a few good instructors, but they can't save a series of courses that have been poorly thought through. | 1) a disappointment. There are a few | Good | 1) instructors, but they can't save a | 1.0 |
| loAmvxJgEea8fxLSgUgxeQ | Good introductory course for machine learning, but it is just that: an introduction with no prerequisites. For me, it has been useful to get a general overview and get hands on some interesting concepts, tools and techniques. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course for machine learning, but | 3.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Useful information for on the job application or even private interactions, as well. Easy to follow, common sense, and good advice. | 1) Easy to follow, common sense, and | Good | 1) advice. | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Good, basic information on conflict resolution. Interviews were very valuable. | 1) | Good | 1) basic information on conflict resolution. Interviews | 3.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | A good course! The assignments were fun to write. Some videos were redundant, but overall I enjoyed it greatly. | 1) A | Good | 1) course! The assignments were fun to | 4.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Good survey of traditional communication methodologies and processes. Could be enhanced with inclusion of e-empowered tools such as blogs, e-conferencing, issue research producing position papers, etc. Remember KNOWLEDGE IS POWER! | 1) | Good | 1) survey of traditional communication methodologies and | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | This Course has a good and practical approach to conflict resolution in any a Organization. | 1) This Course has a | Good | 1) and practical approach to conflict resolution | 4.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Great cursory course, provides a good but brief and succinct overview of conflict resolution. | 1) Great cursory course, provides a | Good | 1) but brief and succinct overview of | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | The course is good but very basic. Suggested for individuals who have never had any exposure to information on conflict or humanities | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but very basic. Suggested for individuals | 2.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | great course, a good introduction to the subject. easy to understand | 1) great course, a | Good | 1) introduction to the subject. easy to | 5.0 |
| LrTP0yv9EeWccAqzeA4VPw | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| LTwsxXPTEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Good course for Climate Change learners | 1) | Good | 1) course for Climate Change learners | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | It was an excellent course. I learnt good strategies for organizing my time. I recommend it. | 1) was an excellent course. I learnt | Good | 1) strategies for organizing my time. I | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | good course to help me get organized | 1) | Good | 1) course to help me get organized | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Should also exist for no-teachers : everyone needs a good organisation! | 1) for no-teachers : everyone needs a | Good | 1) organisation! | 4.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | The course is a very good guide on how to get yourself organized following the Together system. The videos are not overly long, the assignments are directly related to the approach and system they are trying to guide you in. This works well for in-service teachers. | 1) The course is a very | Good | 1) guide on how to get yourself | 4.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | It was very good.. useful, creative and made me different | 1) It was very | Good | 1) . useful, creative and made me | 5.0 |
| lUcQU1MNEeSstCIAC1GOZw | Very well for unorganized professors. And for those who already are, good tools and well explanations. Also for non well-english speaking people... Thanks for this interesting course! | 1) And for those who already are, | Good | 1) tools and well explanations. Also for | 5.0 |
| lvoZZyzfEeWl3A7Kuc0JCQ | It was good to get to work on an individual project at the end of the specialization. The requirements for the capstone were unclear as the videos present a huge project compared to the 4 weeks, 3-5 hours per week commitment indicated for this capstone and there is talk of self-sustainability for the solution etc. that ultimately is not in the review criteria. Applying common sense and scoping the project to the commitment does work out to a good learning by doing experience. | 1) It was | Good | 1) to get to work on an | 4.0 |
| lvoZZyzfEeWl3A7Kuc0JCQ | It was good to get to work on an individual project at the end of the specialization. The requirements for the capstone were unclear as the videos present a huge project compared to the 4 weeks, 3-5 hours per week commitment indicated for this capstone and there is talk of self-sustainability for the solution etc. that ultimately is not in the review criteria. Applying common sense and scoping the project to the commitment does work out to a good learning by doing experience. | 2) commitment does work out to a | Good | 2) learning by doing experience. | 4.0 |
| LwM5OhquEeWjrA6seF25aw | very very good course | 1) very very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| LwM5OhquEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good as a very simple overview. This is more high school level than college level... but if that is what you are looking for, then worth the small investment of time and effort it will take. | 1) | Good | 1) as a very simple overview. This | 4.0 |
| LwM5OhquEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's a good course. Provides some very important information about reproductive health. Young adolescent men and women should take this course before beginning their sexual life. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. Provides some very important information | 4.0 |
| LWzwe3KxEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good, thorough and interactive course on portfolio management and construction! | 1) Very | Good | 1) thorough and interactive course on portfolio | 4.0 |
| LWzwe3KxEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Learned so much. Great course - good mix of video instruction, mini quizzes & questions, graded quizzes etc. to keep your attention. Also, the information is current and practical. Definitely recommend. | 1) Learned so much. Great course - | Good | 1) mix of video instruction, mini quizzes | 5.0 |
| LWzwe3KxEeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good course with valuable and relevante examples and explanations | 1) | Good | 1) course with valuable and relevante examples | 4.0 |
| lXG8rtQ9EeS4NCIAC7KEDw | Very interesting, high scientific content, topics are progressives and lead to a good comprehension of the physical phenomenon on going. Exercices are a good complement to the main lecture. Experiment captured in video were a very good surprise. | 1) are progressives and lead to a | Good | 1) comprehension of the physical phenomenon on | 4.0 |
| lXG8rtQ9EeS4NCIAC7KEDw | Very interesting, high scientific content, topics are progressives and lead to a good comprehension of the physical phenomenon on going. Exercices are a good complement to the main lecture. Experiment captured in video were a very good surprise. | 2) phenomenon on going. Exercices are a | Good | 2) complement to the main lecture. Experiment | 4.0 |
| lXG8rtQ9EeS4NCIAC7KEDw | Very interesting, high scientific content, topics are progressives and lead to a good comprehension of the physical phenomenon on going. Exercices are a good complement to the main lecture. Experiment captured in video were a very good surprise. | 3) captured in video were a very | Good | 3) surprise. | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Quite good course to increase your cryptography skills... | 1) Quite | Good | 1) course to increase your cryptography skills. | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | This is a tough course.but teaching is very good. | 1) tough course. but teaching is very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Good choice, recommend to everyone! | 1) | Good | 1) choice, recommend to everyone! | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | This is just a great course. The subject was new to me, and while it was difficult, I learned a lot and actually got a good grade. Prof. Boneh is engaging and very clear in his explanations. | 1) a lot and actually got a | Good | 1) grade. Prof. Boneh is engaging and | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Teacher is very clear and the course contents are very good. This course is highly recommendable to any who is interested in crypto. | 1) and the course contents are very | Good | 1) This course is highly recommendable to | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Very good course, it's easy to understand the concepts and the programming assignments help to understand the details of the implementation of the algorithms. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it's easy to understand the | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | pretty good, well explained and clear | 1) pretty | Good | 1) well explained and clear | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Very good course with a level accessible without the need to be a mathematical guru. Maybe some videos are a little beat too long. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with a level accessible without | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | quite good | 1) quite | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Very good course, clear lecture. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, clear lecture. | 4.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | It's hard, yet it's really good. | 1) It's hard, yet it's really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Really good course, instructor provides real life examples a tries to avoid the mathematic abstractions to minimum - relying rather on intuition and pictorial examples. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, instructor provides real life examples | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | very good.... | 1) very | Good | 1) . . . | 5.0 |
| lYw3nxuGEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Real good course | 1) Real | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | I loved this course. I am pretty good at grammar, but it was good to review some rules. I took it in four days, each day I completed one week. Every day I spent on average two hours on the course. | 1) loved this course. I am pretty | Good | 1) at grammar, but it was good | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | I loved this course. I am pretty good at grammar, but it was good to review some rules. I took it in four days, each day I completed one week. Every day I spent on average two hours on the course. | 2) good at grammar, but it was | Good | 2) to review some rules. I took | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | I don't know about the graded homework, but the videos are good and clear, and the exercises are very usefull. I still have to practice by my own, though. | 1) graded homework, but the videos are | Good | 1) and clear, and the exercises are | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | this course is very good | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| m0Du-7_DEeWn-wqIckNy5Q | Well defined courses for student. A student or any age of person can understand easily in couples of times. Good work by Coursera. Best thing is that they give financial aid for poor students and i am one who get aid. Very thanks you for this. | 1) understand easily in couples of times. | Good | 1) work by Coursera. Best thing is | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good concept clear | 1) | Good | 1) concept clear | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good overview, though sometimes hard to follow if you're a complete newbie | 1) | Good | 1) overview, though sometimes hard to follow | 4.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Well explained content, though at times the presentation felt a little slow. Solid coding assignments that do a good job of reenforcing the course materials. A couple small topics weren't explained clearly but overall it's been a very informative class. Thanks for the knowledge! | 1) Solid coding assignments that do a | Good | 1) job of reenforcing the course materials. | 4.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | An example of how a course should look like. It has everything you need to learn : 1) good videos 2) good materials 3) a teacher that is active on the forum 4) very well explained projects 5/5 would recommend :D Going of to listen third part of this specializations. | 1) you need to learn : 1) | Good | 1) videos 2) good materials 3) a | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | An example of how a course should look like. It has everything you need to learn : 1) good videos 2) good materials 3) a teacher that is active on the forum 4) very well explained projects 5/5 would recommend :D Going of to listen third part of this specializations. | 2) learn : 1) good videos 2) | Good | 2) materials 3) a teacher that is | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good tips for the double AA. | 1) | Good | 1) tips for the double AA. | 4.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course is awesome, even to who know a little about Ruby on Rails. There are much tips to help you develop a good application. | 1) tips to help you develop a | Good | 1) application. | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good course. The professor explains a lot from the framework and other concepts of web development. Very worth it!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The professor explains a lot | 4.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very practical course! Keep the good work. Thanks for your effort! | 1) Very practical course! Keep the | Good | 1) work. Thanks for your effort! | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very informative, good material and explanation. | 1) Very informative, | Good | 1) material and explanation. | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent course, good combination of broad strokes and practical, specific tips. | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) combination of broad strokes and practical, | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It is a very good course! | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course overall, wish more topics were covered but it's OK. | 1) | Good | 1) course overall, wish more topics were | 4.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Nice course. A good overview upon: routing, helper, controller, nested resources | 1) Nice course. A | Good | 1) overview upon: routing, helper, controller, nested | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | A good overview of action pack and active record. Thanks for your effort dear course creators. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of action pack and active | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good homework and good examples. | 1) | Good | 1) homework and good examples. | 3.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good homework and good examples. | 2) Good homework and | Good | 2) examples. | 3.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good and resumed analysis of ActiveRecord and ActionPack | 1) Very | Good | 1) and resumed analysis of ActiveRecord and | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great explanation of not so easy to understand concepts. Lecturer provides good example that can help material better and see how what you've learned can be applied to real world scenarios. | 1) easy to understand concepts. Lecturer provides | Good | 1) example that can help material better | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M0etLDe9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Muito bom ! Very Good ! Learned the easy way of develop web applications. Thanks ! | 1) Muito bom ! Very | Good | 1) ! Learned the easy way of | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | very very good! | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very Good! Thanks for everything. See you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thanks for everything. See you. | 4.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very Good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | It is very good to understand how the brain works. I totally recommend the course. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) to understand how the brain works. | 4.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very good! Excellence Course and professors !!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Excellence Course and professors ! ! | 5.0 |
| M7W0H9_dEeS2ayIAC7NlsA | Very good !!!!!!! Recommended | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! ! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | A very good courser, especially for people like me that have a lot experience in coding c program but want to learn something more to advance my career. I'll recommend this course to my friend. | 1) A very | Good | 1) courser, especially for people like me | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course is good overall but needs more to focus on new things in C++ and not on algorithms. I would recommend this course if you are struggling with C++,it goes throw the basics and tells you how the STL works. The homework are hard and that is a big plus :) | 1) The course is | Good | 1) overall but needs more to focus | 4.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This was very good course to learn about the differences between C and C++. I have been C programmer for some time and never had a C++ introduction until this course. | 1) This was very | Good | 1) course to learn about the differences | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The course content is good. But it needs some polishing... Major comment: The assignment submission/review process should be improved. Grading system is not clearly defined at the time of submission. Some grading question are inherently subjective "Is the code at least somewhat efficient?". But even for inherently objective questions "Is the code correct?" (as does it give the correct answer" the staff does not provide the correct answer... I think the staff should create some automated review for what is objective: does the code compile? does it yield the correct answer? is it efficient enough? (Just like many other courses on Coursera) And only when it passes the automatic review, use peer grading for coding style. Finally there a lot of confusion with the deadlines. Minor comments: Lucky Coursera has an option to play twice faster! Not that the content is too easy, but the talking ... pace ... is ... hum... very ... ... slow. Also how come for a programming course the slides with code are so poorly formated??? | 1) The course content is | Good | 1) But it needs some polishing. . | 3.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I would like thank Prof. Ira Pohl for the excellent lectures in the course C++ for C programmers Part A. The build up of C++ using C as a background gave me a good understanding of the various features of C++ and how one can make use of these features to write programs in a good idiomatic programming style. The lectures presented with a blend of data structures and algorithms provided much insight into programming in C++. Looking forward to the Part B of the course. | 1) as a background gave me a | Good | 1) understanding of the various features of | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | I would like thank Prof. Ira Pohl for the excellent lectures in the course C++ for C programmers Part A. The build up of C++ using C as a background gave me a good understanding of the various features of C++ and how one can make use of these features to write programs in a good idiomatic programming style. The lectures presented with a blend of data structures and algorithms provided much insight into programming in C++. Looking forward to the Part B of the course. | 2) features to write programs in a | Good | 2) idiomatic programming style. The lectures presented | 5.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This course provides good overview graph algorithms. It is not an extensive C++ course though. | 1) This course provides | Good | 1) overview graph algorithms. It is not | 4.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course, the content is great and well organized. The slides with code are a bit of an embarrassment for the University of California. The code is presented on what looks like a power point slide with bullets so the formatting and alignment is totally messed up, and then there are no shortage of typo's and code errors. But, the material is very good and Ira Pohl does an excellent job presenting it. All in all a great course and exactly what I was looking for. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the content is great and | 4.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course, the content is great and well organized. The slides with code are a bit of an embarrassment for the University of California. The code is presented on what looks like a power point slide with bullets so the formatting and alignment is totally messed up, and then there are no shortage of typo's and code errors. But, the material is very good and Ira Pohl does an excellent job presenting it. All in all a great course and exactly what I was looking for. | 2) errors. But, the material is very | Good | 2) and Ira Pohl does an excellent | 4.0 |
| M9dntkEoEeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Explanation is really Good. Contents could be more elaborate. | 1) Explanation is really | Good | 1) Contents could be more elaborate. | 4.0 |
| Ma4VrW0zEeWEewoyD2Bc5Q | Good learning experience | 1) | Good | 1) learning experience | 4.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Unfortunately, didn`t enjoy this course at all. I have gone through 7 courses on Coursera and finished them with the biggest pleasure and great results. This time I had to leave the course before finishing because: 1st: content is organized awfully (for example "HTML overview" - I knew all the material so I have an idea how it should look like, but lecturer started from the middle of all concepts, than moved to the beginning and together it looked like an unlinked content. I have simply lost a logic inside this. 2nd: Very difficult to get an idea: lecturer doesn`t try to simplify the content, even opposite - I had a feeling, that he makes easy things complicated for a reason. My husbend is a programmer with 10 years experience and when he watched the lecture he said, that even for him it was difficult to understand all the thing (things he actually knows). All these terms used, no relevant examples, too complex words and so on - I lost concentration, I had to google a lot of unknown terms, I had to stop lecture every 30 seconds to reread or repeat the peace of lecture, because I could not understand it. As I mentioned, I know HTML well, but it was described so complex, that it was difficult to link my actual knowledge to lecturer words. 3rd: not international student friendly. Use of complex words in places where they were not necessary, complex structures, too fast language... I am pretty good in English, but had to stop video and to google translate some "smart" words lecturer used without particular need - I don`t mean definitions, just some epithets to make his speech "smarter". I completed Coursera specialization by Michigan University and it was completely easy with plain text, short sentences, so well made for international student. 4th: this is boring. I am sorry, but this is true. I am interested in all these questions, but for some reasons I lose my attention every time. Maybe the reason is in all points I have just mentioned, but I didn`t enjoy this course at all and it was the first time I didn`t enjoy something connected with web app development. Please, don`t be mad at me - lecturer is a very charming and charismatic person, but I simply don`t like how the material is presented. 5th: I have a feeling like all slides are taken from some scientific books and lecturer reads comments from some science articles, it is not like described with own words, simplified for better comprehension, cleared with own real-life examples and in atmosphere of friendly conversation with some emotions and humor. Please, take my feedback just as my personal opinion and hope other students will enjoy it more. | 1) language. . . I am pretty | Good | 1) in English, but had to stop | 2.0 |
| maX993EhEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | good course - give the big picture perspective. especially if you using ruby on rails! | 1) | Good | 1) course - give the big picture | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good course. you gain good tools to make efficient and effective decisions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. you gain good tools to | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good course. you gain good tools to make efficient and effective decisions. | 2) Very good course. you gain | Good | 2) tools to make efficient and effective | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This was a very useful course with very good lectures and examples. | 1) a very useful course with very | Good | 1) lectures and examples. | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This is good for new born managers | 1) This is | Good | 1) for new born managers | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A good overview of tools for juniors or university students just getting into things. Easy to understand. It might not have the depth satisfy more senior professionals, but could be a good refresher if not. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of tools for juniors or | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A good overview of tools for juniors or university students just getting into things. Easy to understand. It might not have the depth satisfy more senior professionals, but could be a good refresher if not. | 2) senior professionals, but could be a | Good | 2) refresher if not. | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | It was good to understand | 1) It was | Good | 1) to understand | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good introduction to problem solving. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to problem solving. | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A good refresher for rather common sense subject matter. I enjoyed the teacher's relaxed style. | 1) A | Good | 1) refresher for rather common sense subject | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Mostly common sense, but it is a good reinforcement. I like listening to the stories/examples but they could have been shorter and the course would have felt like a more efficient use of time. | 1) common sense, but it is a | Good | 1) reinforcement. I like listening to the | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good course. You can get a common sensen how to make | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. You can get a common | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Fast, efficient, not very time-consuming. However, the instructor was relatively boring and most of the material was common sense. I came out of the course learning almost nothing, but the certification looks good on my resume. | 1) almost nothing, but the certification looks | Good | 1) on my resume. | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good course, interesting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, interesting. | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | The course is a very straight forward overview of problem solving and decision making principles. A good introduction to using various supporting decision tools. Short and effective module. | 1) solving and decision making principles. A | Good | 1) introduction to using various supporting decision | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good learning and presentation | 1) | Good | 1) learning and presentation | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | good, but too simple and basic | 1) | Good | 1) but too simple and basic | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good course but it is missing detailed explanations for some topics. | 1) | Good | 1) course but it is missing detailed | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good and usefull course. | 1) | Good | 1) and usefull course. | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | A very good course, i liked very much the examples used, i do wish there where some practical exercises. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, i liked very much the | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | It is a good course but not everything was as clear as in other courses. Anyway it provides a lot of very useful information. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course but not everything was as | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | It was good insight into problem-solving in companies. | 1) It was | Good | 1) insight into problem-solving in companies. | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good course with well explained topics. | 1) | Good | 1) course with well explained topics. | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Good but very theoretical | 1) | Good | 1) but very theoretical | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Theoretically good course, could have been made more interesting by including more examples or cae studies. | 1) Theoretically | Good | 1) course, could have been made more | 2.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | This was a very good course. The practical examples were useful. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course. The practical examples were useful. | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | From the title It could look like it's something very basic and that's common knowledge, but it gives a good foundation to what we normally do in a regular basis and it also shows different ways of thinking and approaching problems and solutions. | 1) common knowledge, but it gives a | Good | 1) foundation to what we normally do | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Great course! It has very good material | 1) Great course! It has very | Good | 1) material | 4.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Very good and very clear. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and very clear. | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | Wonderful!!! I'm learning a lot. It does a very good job at explaining problem solving and decision | 1) a lot. It does a very | Good | 1) job at explaining problem solving and | 5.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | It's a good course but not great. Something is missing and I can't pinpoint what. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course but not great. Something is | 3.0 |
| MdNTKtdhEeSgyyIAC4cL9g | It could be better if there were more working/practice examples, but it lays down a good overview of the techniques and decision making process. | 1) examples, but it lays down a | Good | 1) overview of the techniques and decision | 3.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | good examples. great structure. | 1) | Good | 1) examples. great structure. | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Great course! The content was produced very well. The course offers the slides as PDFs & makes other materials available for download as well. The information was extremely good & informative. I say this as someone who has taken multiple business classes already on entrepreneurship, as well as reading several books, & listening to many podcasts. The only things I would suggest as improvements are to in some of the optional content interviews at the end of the course it appears that they used a stereo recording which seems great but is a pain when you listen with headphones. You'll have only one headphone speaker with any sound. Also it would be great if the optional audio recordings at the end would be available for download or some other method. | 1) as well. The information was extremely | Good | 1) & informative. I say this as | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Essential materials and good teachers. | 1) Essential materials and | Good | 1) teachers. | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good starter material, though that's my totally inexperienced opinion. If anything, perhaps too easy, but more often than not I found valuable information, whether it was new material, or something I thought was plain and straight forward but turned out not to be the case or worked in a different way! | 1) | Good | 1) starter material, though that's my totally | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Totally recommended and a good start for the series. Also very motivational. | 1) Totally recommended and a | Good | 1) start for the series. Also very | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good pace and very valuable information shared in this course. I recommend the additional optional cases. Thats golden! | 1) | Good | 1) pace and very valuable information shared | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good course. I did find the quizes not as challenging as the Marketing and Accounting courses I took through Wharton/ Coursera. Sometimes it seems some of the Professors talk very quickly as opposed to the Core MBA offerings. Overall, great content. Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) course. I did find the quizes | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Really pragmatic! I have started to use it in my business and hope to get a good result! | 1) business and hope to get a | Good | 1) result! | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Very good course, amazing content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, amazing content. | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Good course. But the content is very less.You should include some readings and longer videos.Thank you everyone. | 1) | Good | 1) course. But the content is very | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Very good faculty.... good practical examples | 1) Very | Good | 1) faculty. . . . good practical | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Very good faculty.... good practical examples | 2) Very good faculty. . . . | Good | 2) practical examples | 5.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Overall, a good course. Slow at first. The class first had me concerned if I was going to learn anything new, but toward middle way, the relevancy really picked up. I am very curious to see what the Wharton School team of professors have to share in the next class. | 1) Overall, a | Good | 1) course. Slow at first. The class | 4.0 |
| MEgKOpw3EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Overall good course. The slides should've been presented in only one document per module - like almost all previous courses of Wharton. All of the optional videos with interviews had audio problems (I could only hear them from the left speaker). | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course. The slides should've been presented | 4.0 |
| meQ0ic9uEeWu4RLrx6VBYw | A very good, quite difficult, comprehensive course. Octave is mentioned but I believe anything can be used (I'll be using Python) because the assignments only ask for results, not the code. It's not for beginners, concepts are well explained and course is taught to a high standard. | 1) A very | Good | 1) quite difficult, comprehensive course. Octave is | 5.0 |
| mfjjVlfwEeS-9SIACw8Vcg | its very good. Basic concepts explained very well. | 1) its very | Good | 1) Basic concepts explained very well. | 5.0 |
| mfjjVlfwEeS-9SIACw8Vcg | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| mfjjVlfwEeS-9SIACw8Vcg | Just completed week 1 of this course. Really good revision for my high school economics! Courses like this on Coursera help me to revise my knowledge continuously and improve my grasp of micro-economic concepts. | 1) week 1 of this course. Really | Good | 1) revision for my high school economics! | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | very good want to learn more | 1) very | Good | 1) want to learn more | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | ..good for us musicians :) | 1) . . | Good | 1) for us musicians :) | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | While the lectures were good, this course had annoying issues, such as in-video questions asking us to refer to previously shown material (which isn't easy given the Coursera interface). A few assignment questions were also poorly formulated. The course would have really benefited from .pdf reference material, for review and elaboration of topics presented in lectures. At minimum, a list of relevant equations would have helped. The acoustics part of the content seemed somewhat sketchy and hand-wavy; the assumptions and limitations behind the rule-of-thumb equations and models presented weren't given much weight, so I wasn't able to get a good grasp of when they were relevant*. The electronics part was more reasonable, but still suffered from some over-simplification (for example, the model of guitar pickups didn't include magnetic hysteresis). All in all, the course was worth taking, but I think the material deserves more rigor. *All models are wrong. But some of them are useful. | 1) While the lectures were | Good | 1) this course had annoying issues, such | 3.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | While the lectures were good, this course had annoying issues, such as in-video questions asking us to refer to previously shown material (which isn't easy given the Coursera interface). A few assignment questions were also poorly formulated. The course would have really benefited from .pdf reference material, for review and elaboration of topics presented in lectures. At minimum, a list of relevant equations would have helped. The acoustics part of the content seemed somewhat sketchy and hand-wavy; the assumptions and limitations behind the rule-of-thumb equations and models presented weren't given much weight, so I wasn't able to get a good grasp of when they were relevant*. The electronics part was more reasonable, but still suffered from some over-simplification (for example, the model of guitar pickups didn't include magnetic hysteresis). All in all, the course was worth taking, but I think the material deserves more rigor. *All models are wrong. But some of them are useful. | 2) I wasn't able to get a | Good | 2) grasp of when they were relevant*. | 3.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Need a good foundation with knowledge of calculus(integrals), electrical engineering and wave and acoustics. Not just a course to pick up for fun. | 1) Need a | Good | 1) foundation with knowledge of calculus(integrals), electrical | 1.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Good course. I enjoyed watching the lectures, especially from Bocco. The quizzes were also very representative of the course materials. Thanks for a good learning experience. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I enjoyed watching the lectures, | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Good course. I enjoyed watching the lectures, especially from Bocco. The quizzes were also very representative of the course materials. Thanks for a good learning experience. | 2) the course materials. Thanks for a | Good | 2) learning experience. | 5.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | A very good Course!! | 1) A very | Good | 1) Course! ! | 4.0 |
| mG15ZhQ9EeWCWhKuhISYpw | Good course for audio enthusiasts. A compilation of basic electric circuits and audio waves. I enjoyed very much. Would be great if lecture notes were provided. Thanks | 1) | Good | 1) course for audio enthusiasts. A compilation | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Excellent course, well organized and good summaries after each lecture. | 1) Excellent course, well organized and | Good | 1) summaries after each lecture. | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Very good introductory course that embraces a broad range of topics. The depth of coverage, however, is somewhat shallow in comparison to other scientific courses aimed at beginners, such as the outstanding 'Origins' course from the University of Copenhagen. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course that embraces a broad | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Really enjoyable and with enough detailed information. I totally recommend this course to anyone interested in a good introduction to the field of astrobiology. Professor Cockell comunicates the contents clearly and makes you feel engaged. It was a wonderful learning experience. | 1) course to anyone interested in a | Good | 1) introduction to the field of astrobiology. | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | I am really enjoying this course. The content is displayed clearly providing a good overview of what astrobiology is. | 1) content is displayed clearly providing a | Good | 1) overview of what astrobiology is. | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Good course, gently showing an introduction. Had the playspeed at 1.25x the entire time though, otherwise they talked too slow. | 1) | Good | 1) course, gently showing an introduction. Had | 3.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This course has been extremely helpful, captivating, and thoroughly enjoyable! I learned so much from this course, and it has only intensified my interest and curiosity for this field. PROS: -Oganization and structure of the content -Balanced in terms of duration, difficulty, etc. -Delivery of the instructor, who was very engaging and maintained interest throughout the course, and his personal interest and knowledge in this field was clearly evident. -The assignments were well weighted, relevant, and a good indicator of my understanding of the course content. CONS: -None! So thank you to the instructor, the institute, and everyone else involved in providing this wonderful course. I look forward to more in the future! | 1) were well weighted, relevant, and a | Good | 1) indicator of my understanding of the | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Very Good course. The teacher is very clear and enthusiastic. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The teacher is very clear | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | A very good course, very well presented and didactic. It would be interesting if it were upgraded to the latest results (2013-2015) regardless, I recommend it to everyone interested. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, very well presented and didactic. | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | A good idea about how begin and the evolution of life in our world and possible habitable extraterrestrial worlds in our solar system or planets orbiting stars, based in our own world. | 1) A | Good | 1) idea about how begin and the | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Very good course. The instructer is clear in what he wants us to learn, and uses a great selection of visuel repressentations. This course earns 5 stars indeed | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The instructer is clear in | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Thank you very much for this course. I think I now have a good understanding of what Astrobiology is and how it is possible to look out for life on other planets. Hopefully some of the big questions of astrobiology will be answered :) | 1) I think I now have a | Good | 1) understanding of what Astrobiology is and | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Extremelly interesting material and good wrapping, I enjoyed watching lectures. Guess I'll continue studying biology as the course made me think about things and I need more info. Thanks a lot, great course | 1) Extremelly interesting material and | Good | 1) wrapping, I enjoyed watching lectures. Guess | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Good inte onto the area. | 1) | Good | 1) inte onto the area. | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Fundamentals are good | 1) Fundamentals are | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Almost perfect (for the intro level it was designed for). I would suggest that next time, if possible, instructor image could be a little smaller and the actual images illustrating the points he is talking about a little bigger and more diverse. But that is a minor, please, don't get me wrong. The course was very very good, thank you a lot. Also, the off-line written forum-style discussions were very very good. | 1) wrong. The course was very very | Good | 1) thank you a lot. Also, the | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Almost perfect (for the intro level it was designed for). I would suggest that next time, if possible, instructor image could be a little smaller and the actual images illustrating the points he is talking about a little bigger and more diverse. But that is a minor, please, don't get me wrong. The course was very very good, thank you a lot. Also, the off-line written forum-style discussions were very very good. | 2) written forum-style discussions were very very | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This good course; but I have none of those cards, as I can do to pay the course | 1) This | Good | 1) course; but I have none of | 4.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Good course,it gives me more understanding about astrobiology and extraterrestrial life.Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) course, it gives me more understanding | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | Super good course | 1) Super | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mG1NQnUvEeS8UyIACzYI5Q | This is a very good course and very useful for everyone who is interested in the Astrobiology field. Thank you very much COURSERA for adding this course. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course and very useful for everyone | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | A bit fast paced but overall really good! | 1) bit fast paced but overall really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Complete idiot. He doesn't have any critical view of his field (which is unfortunately full of crappy studies). Also, I hope he didn't choose the logo from his university. It's a good metaphor for the course though, shiny but absolutely ridiculous. | 1) logo from his university. It's a | Good | 1) metaphor for the course though, shiny | 1.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | good to start | 1) | Good | 1) to start | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Very good course, very bad accent:) even being Russian I could hardly understand sometimes | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, very bad accent:) even being | 4.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Not too difficult and good structure. Very interesting | 1) Not too difficult and | Good | 1) structure. Very interesting | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Excellent introductory course that I enjoyed a lot. Level was good - some was easy, some requested some more intense focus. Especially the terminology and the names of all the brain regions ;-) Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | 1) I enjoyed a lot. Level was | Good | 1) - some was easy, some requested | 5.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | This was a good introductory course that I enjoyed and found elatively easy to follow | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introductory course that I enjoyed and | 4.0 |
| mGM6AmlPEeSdNiIACrbZkA | Great speaker. Knowledgable and has a good way of presenting his information. I suggest that he adds objectives to every week's material as it can be confusing at times what we are exactly expected to learn. | 1) Great speaker. Knowledgable and has a | Good | 1) way of presenting his information. I | 4.0 |
| MiSSCJLtEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | I want to thank you for the opportunity to have done this wonderful course! Thank you for the opportunity! too liked the initiative and how valued the real importance of India! The course was suberb! Congratulations! I loved it! Very good managed and presented! Thank you! | 1) suberb! Congratulations! I loved it! Very | Good | 1) managed and presented! Thank you! | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Really Great, PDF and apps are captured with snapshots and explained in sort and crisp with diagram as compare to just sentences. Good for start up of android app development. Thanks to author and content creator to bring interest on this course. I recommended to all my team members and they also started this course | 1) diagram as compare to just sentences. | Good | 1) for start up of android app | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | It is most useful,interesting and important course the basics they are given are very good. | 1) basics they are given are very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Build Your First Android App (Project-Centered Course) is a well organised course with good introductory material covering basics of the android development. I recommend this course to anyone who is new to Android development or anyone who wants to brush up their android development basics. You'll need to work through out this 5 week course. The course material is consolidated with Quizzes. By the end of the course you will know how to prototype, design and code an android application with the best practices in mind using a rubric. Instructors of this course are good too in terms of knowing their stuff and being able to convey and explain it in simple terms. | 1) is a well organised course with | Good | 1) introductory material covering basics of the | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Build Your First Android App (Project-Centered Course) is a well organised course with good introductory material covering basics of the android development. I recommend this course to anyone who is new to Android development or anyone who wants to brush up their android development basics. You'll need to work through out this 5 week course. The course material is consolidated with Quizzes. By the end of the course you will know how to prototype, design and code an android application with the best practices in mind using a rubric. Instructors of this course are good too in terms of knowing their stuff and being able to convey and explain it in simple terms. | 2) rubric. Instructors of this course are | Good | 2) too in terms of knowing their | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | this course was good for every begginner who has no basic understanding about android.. it help me alot to learn the basic | 1) this course was | Good | 1) for every begginner who has no | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Took the free version of this course to learn some basic building blocks of Android app dev and to dive back into programming, already having Java knowledge from long ago. For my purposes it was a good intro. For a totally new coder this might not be best as there isn't deep explanation of the code itself. But for the rest, it allows you to quickly dive in. | 1) For my purposes it was a | Good | 1) intro. For a totally new coder | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | I think it's a great tester course with very good Blocks of code, and these blocks of code are not seen until week 4 and 5. Week 3 was a hands on km to miles, and miles to km app, good hands on. I explored the course, so I'd not do any of the exercises, but did the final assignment from what I suggested I will create in week two. I created a great app, but wasn't able to share it, so i'll put it on github. | 1) a great tester course with very | Good | 1) Blocks of code, and these blocks | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | I think it's a great tester course with very good Blocks of code, and these blocks of code are not seen until week 4 and 5. Week 3 was a hands on km to miles, and miles to km app, good hands on. I explored the course, so I'd not do any of the exercises, but did the final assignment from what I suggested I will create in week two. I created a great app, but wasn't able to share it, so i'll put it on github. | 2) miles, and miles to km app, | Good | 2) hands on. I explored the course, | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Poor material, terrible french accent, not a good Android course at all. I don't raccoment it unless you're a total novice at Android development. | 1) material, terrible french accent, not a | Good | 1) Android course at all. I don't | 1.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Good basic course hard to get lost but does require some follow through if things are unfamiliar | 1) | Good | 1) basic course hard to get lost | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Good overall but you should use better microphone, because sometimes it's hard to understand and improve your English. | 1) | Good | 1) overall but you should use better | 3.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Very good class. Need to have some knowledge of Java ideally. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. Need to have some knowledge | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | The course if well-organized and the instructors do a very good job. However, three weeks of slides and theory and then only the last two weeks of seeing code hardly makes the course project-centered in my mind. Also, requiring learners to upgrade to run an autograder on a quiz is ridiculous! | 1) and the instructors do a very | Good | 1) job. However, three weeks of slides | 2.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Nicely targeted for the programmer needing a jump start into Android while having a good base in Java. | 1) start into Android while having a | Good | 1) base in Java. | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | good very good | 1) | Good | 1) very good | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | good very good | 2) good very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Very Good course, simple and deep. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, simple and deep. | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Good ! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Well organized course. Refined down to details. Gradual introduction of topics, good test-case, the skill of the Professor is excellent. | 1) to details. Gradual introduction of topics, | Good | 1) test-case, the skill of the Professor | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | This is a very good hands-on course to introduce new students to learning Android programming. I have basic knowledge of Java and found this course easy to understand and follow. Suggestion: Change the graded quiz to practice quiz so that non-paying students can submit and check their answers and learn from it. Or find another alternative to Coursera since it is not 100% free for students. I look forward to another building blocks Android course in the future! Thank you for this course! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) hands-on course to introduce new students | 5.0 |
| mKzzYp5YEeWVBgpelZA5Jw | Very Good Course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. | 5.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Brian tries to achieve too much in too little time. It addresses important issues and it gives a good overview, including some hidden gems (Machine Learning vs Stats, for example), but it feels mostly too rushed and superficial for my taste/expectations, and it fails to connect to my previous knowledge (and I have a PhD in Maths, although no strong Stats background), hence little added value for me when I cannot relate to what is being discussed. | 1) important issues and it gives a | Good | 1) overview, including some hidden gems (Machine | 3.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Is good to have some data science background to enroll in this course, overall still good to learn and get the hint of how real life data scientist life is. | 1) Is | Good | 1) to have some data science background | 4.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Is good to have some data science background to enroll in this course, overall still good to learn and get the hint of how real life data scientist life is. | 2) enroll in this course, overall still | Good | 2) to learn and get the hint | 4.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good Presentation; informative & engaging | 1) | Good | 1) Presentation; informative & engaging | 5.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good review on how to work and interact with the team during the data analysis pipeline! | 1) | Good | 1) review on how to work and | 5.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good concepts - apply to anyone new to data science. Lot of good 'read further' links and materials. Learnt a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) concepts - apply to anyone new | 4.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good concepts - apply to anyone new to data science. Lot of good 'read further' links and materials. Learnt a lot. | 2) new to data science. Lot of | Good | 2) 'read further' links and materials. Learnt | 4.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Brian, Jeff, and Roger: Thank you very much for all the data science courses, really great. I generally rate them 5 stars. But for this one, I'm giving 3 stars, not because the content is not good (it is; it provides good practical and experiential information), but rather because the material seems repetitive at times either within the same course or with topics in the other courses. Also, the sequencing and lectures seem sometime a bit disjointed. May I humbly suggest an idea: Integrate the key points of this course relating to real-world examples and the sharing of real-world experiences into one of the other courses. Thank you. Robert Al-Jaar, PhD robert.aljaar@rassociates.biz | 1) not because the content is not | Good | 1) (it is; it provides good practical | 3.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Brian, Jeff, and Roger: Thank you very much for all the data science courses, really great. I generally rate them 5 stars. But for this one, I'm giving 3 stars, not because the content is not good (it is; it provides good practical and experiential information), but rather because the material seems repetitive at times either within the same course or with topics in the other courses. Also, the sequencing and lectures seem sometime a bit disjointed. May I humbly suggest an idea: Integrate the key points of this course relating to real-world examples and the sharing of real-world experiences into one of the other courses. Thank you. Robert Al-Jaar, PhD robert.aljaar@rassociates.biz | 2) not good (it is; it provides | Good | 2) practical and experiential information), but rather | 3.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The video quality and content were good. Unfortunately, there were a lot of spelling errors and grammatical mistakes in the written portions. | 1) The video quality and content were | Good | 1) Unfortunately, there were a lot of | 3.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The course is a good compilation of essential concepts to avoid pitfalls during analysis. Most material is given a short intro only, so a good data science background is needed to appreciate the material presented here. | 1) The course is a | Good | 1) compilation of essential concepts to avoid | 5.0 |
| MMnLaEEjEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The course is a good compilation of essential concepts to avoid pitfalls during analysis. Most material is given a short intro only, so a good data science background is needed to appreciate the material presented here. | 2) a short intro only, so a | Good | 2) data science background is needed to | 5.0 |
| mnCMltWCEeWFqw71fuUDrw | Very good course on the basics of coaching and training. sometimes we wish to learn more but it is only an introduction. The videos are really well made and the professor really knows her subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on the basics of coaching | 5.0 |
| mnCMltWCEeWFqw71fuUDrw | Up-to-date materials. Has good grasp of sports science concepts. | 1) Up-to-date materials. Has | Good | 1) grasp of sports science concepts. | 5.0 |
| mqcQFm6vEeWJ-wrnmCvZZw | Very good course. It has transformed my approach to career development. Before I was not sure about how to manage my career and I was trying to learn a lot of skills without thinking about how to use them. This course has provided me with the tools and methodology that I need to be more strategic and focused in my career management. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It has transformed my approach | 5.0 |
| mqcQFm6vEeWJ-wrnmCvZZw | Good course with so many tools for career self management. I think this is an essential course for those who are entering the workplace environment, those who are entrepreneurial, and those who have experience but want to develop and advance their skills. Thanks! | 1) | Good | 1) course with so many tools for | 5.0 |
| mqcQFm6vEeWJ-wrnmCvZZw | Good general guidance, Richard Sellers was the most useful. Interesting how even established in a career can be considered a "generalist". | 1) | Good | 1) general guidance, Richard Sellers was the | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Excellent Mandarin course from the Peking University. You will have a good introduction to spoken Mandarinn, basis expressions and even how to write a few characters. | 1) Peking University. You will have a | Good | 1) introduction to spoken Mandarinn, basis expressions | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course for beginners. you gain much knowledge from this. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. you gain much | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It's not my first time to take a beginners course in Chinese so I already know some of the words and phrases, but this course was a good refresher course, too. The lessons were short and easy to remember. I think the expressions taught were also very practical. I hope there is a second part so I can continue my lessons in Chinese. Xie xie! | 1) phrases, but this course was a | Good | 1) refresher course, too. The lessons were | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good for beginners. Focuses on conversational skills without needing to know characters. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. Focuses on conversational skills | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Excellent Course outline and it's a good start for beginners. I request Coursera to start an advance course on Chinese Language in continuation of this course . | 1) Excellent Course outline and it's a | Good | 1) start for beginners. I request Coursera | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Really well made, easy to access this language and explainations in english are really good quality. Just a pleasure to learn chinese. .... | 1) and explainations in english are really | Good | 1) quality. Just a pleasure to learn | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Has been a very good experience. The way that you learn is easy and clear to take the first contact with this language. | 1) Has been a very | Good | 1) experience. The way that you learn | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | muy bueno. he aprendido bastante. very good, i had learn so much. | 1) muy bueno. he aprendido bastante. very | Good | 1) i had learn so much. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very Good Instructor, and very well presented material. Loving this course. Worth it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Instructor, and very well presented material. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | v good and I learn v easy | 1) v | Good | 1) and I learn v easy | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | One should keep in mind that the course is only a guidance. It is way not enough to achieve any fluency. But it is a good starting point. The teacher is charming, and the vocabulary you are going to learn is really useful in many real life situations. Just keep practicing independently as much as you can! | 1) any fluency. But it is a | Good | 1) starting point. The teacher is charming, | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I think it is a very good course, but for me, it was too dense, which led to me not finishing it. More emphasis should be on repetition and deepening of the acquired knowledge. | 1) I think it is a very | Good | 1) course, but for me, it was | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I had learned Chinese before and I also started to review what I had learned recently. Some of the sentences in this course I'm already familiar with. However, what I like most about the course is that it also focuses on the pronunciation, which I'm not really good at. In addition to that, learning using only Pinyin is really easy to follow because you do not have to remember the difficult written characters of Chinese. Thank you very much for an informative course! | 1) the pronunciation, which I'm not really | Good | 1) at. In addition to that, learning | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I loved this course , so good, now I have the basic notions to start a conversation in Chinese. Thanks to the creators of this course for giving me the opportunity to do it, I recommend it so muchi./Me encantó este curso, muy bueno, ahora ya tengo las nociones básica para entablar una conversación en chino. Gracias a los creadores de este curso por darme la oportunidad de poder realizarlo, lo recomiendo bastante. | 1) I loved this course , so | Good | 1) now I have the basic notions | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | as good as any other language course ive taken that costed actual money | 1) as | Good | 1) as any other language course ive | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Pretty good course! Congratulations!!! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course! Congratulations! ! ! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is good - it focuses on hearing pronunciations, which is good and supports my other learning which I am doing mostly from a book (also learning the characters). | 1) This course is | Good | 1) - it focuses on hearing pronunciations, | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is good - it focuses on hearing pronunciations, which is good and supports my other learning which I am doing mostly from a book (also learning the characters). | 2) focuses on hearing pronunciations, which is | Good | 2) and supports my other learning which | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Is so hard learning Chinese but this is a good course :) | 1) learning Chinese but this is a | Good | 1) course :) | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good for beginners, as well as for those who need to review some knowledge and skills. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners, as well as for | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good for the beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) for the beginner. | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good course for the beginners, who knows absolutely nothing about chinese | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for the beginners, who knows | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It is a very good course for beginners, I learnt a lot and discovered how there are many mnemonic way to learn chinese | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course for beginners, I learnt a | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Really good course. But you need to study hard, because not everything is written on the board. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. But you need to study | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Really good, bite-sized information to get started on Mandarin | 1) Really | Good | 1) bite-sized information to get started on | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good lessons. Slow and progressive | 1) Very | Good | 1) lessons. Slow and progressive | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good for beginners! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners! | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Pretty good course for beginners. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | nicely explained; good for begginers | 1) nicely explained; | Good | 1) for begginers | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good easy to follow and learn. | 1) Very | Good | 1) easy to follow and learn. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | it i good | 1) it i | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I think, for beginners, it's a good job but the quiz is really hard to use !! | 1) I think, for beginners, it's a | Good | 1) job but the quiz is really | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | is it good lesson for beginner to learn chinese | 1) is it | Good | 1) lesson for beginner to learn chinese | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Gorgeus. The teacher is good, the material is presented superbly. I loved. I thought learning Chinese would be very complex study, but no. Is very tasty study with Coursera. | 1) Gorgeus. The teacher is | Good | 1) the material is presented superbly. I | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good simple lesson plans for beginners to follow. A great introduction to the language. | 1) | Good | 1) simple lesson plans for beginners to | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good start/review | 1) | Good | 1) start/review | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This is a very good introduction to Chinese, but would help to people that doesn´t have any person to practice match with some people online that would like to chat or talk with the students of the course. It will be nice, to include some part of the phonetic of the words to understand how is a better speaking. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to Chinese, but would help | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | good good fdsfdsfsjjfjnefvk ekjvbkvh brkh4 3vk vk4r vk4 kv k34v rk4r vg4 kv | 1) | Good | 1) good fdsfdsfsjjfjnefvk ekjvbkvh brkh4 3vk vk4r | 2.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | good good fdsfdsfsjjfjnefvk ekjvbkvh brkh4 3vk vk4r vk4 kv k34v rk4r vg4 kv | 2) good | Good | 2) fdsfdsfsjjfjnefvk ekjvbkvh brkh4 3vk vk4r vk4 | 2.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A very good course for anyone wanting to learn basic spoken mandarin and the Pinyin. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for anyone wanting to learn | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | good course for traveler but there are a little of grammar part so you can speak a simple sentence but if you want to create some new sentence it's quite hard. | 1) | Good | 1) course for traveler but there are | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A good introduction, but it would be nice to learn a little more about written Chinese and some basic grammar. Also, like all on-line courses, this one tests how good the student is at listening, but not how good they are at speaking. You can get high marks but still be unable to utter a single word or read any Kanji characters. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction, but it would be nice | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A good introduction, but it would be nice to learn a little more about written Chinese and some basic grammar. Also, like all on-line courses, this one tests how good the student is at listening, but not how good they are at speaking. You can get high marks but still be unable to utter a single word or read any Kanji characters. | 2) on-line courses, this one tests how | Good | 2) the student is at listening, but | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A good introduction, but it would be nice to learn a little more about written Chinese and some basic grammar. Also, like all on-line courses, this one tests how good the student is at listening, but not how good they are at speaking. You can get high marks but still be unable to utter a single word or read any Kanji characters. | 3) is at listening, but not how | Good | 3) they are at speaking. You can | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Really good for understanding the basics of Chinese in pinyin! | 1) Really | Good | 1) for understanding the basics of Chinese | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very interesting to learn the basis of Chinese ; very simple and clear! It is also a good basis to prepare the HSK but in my opinion it would have been interesting to have also the chinese characters writen in order to learn both at the same time! | 1) and clear! It is also a | Good | 1) basis to prepare the HSK but | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It was pretty good course though became a bit tough at the end. It will be great if there was a continuation of this course. Looking forward to continue my Chinese learning! | 1) It was pretty | Good | 1) course though became a bit tough | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | hello from Russia...it's very good course for learning Chinese language. i like it! | 1) from Russia. . . it's very | Good | 1) course for learning Chinese language. i | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course for beginners. In my opinion, its strong point is simplicity (it does not require much effort and yet allows you to learn something useful, and also makes you think that Chinese is not unbearably complex language after all) and broad range of topics (probably gives you all words necessary to survive short trip to China). What I didn't like in this course is lack of explanation: student is required to memorize entire sentences, but nothing was said about word ordering, personal pronouns and other basic structural features of language. I would also like to have more tests/ exercises with feedback, probably some review tests covering previous lessons. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. In my opinion, | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A good first encounter with chinese that leaves several gaps that may push students to keep studying and making research regarding chinese language. | 1) A | Good | 1) first encounter with chinese that leaves | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Everything is very well! Ilike the material and the professor who is teaching us. She is very good. Thank you very much. But the only problem for me is that the wrong pronunciation is given by the professor. For me it wasa psycological issue. Because, I would remember the variant how you should not do! AndI think it is better to make an example only the right variant and repeting this several times as a tongue twister. During the course I am trying to avoid this wrong examples, trying to scroll later and not to hear them. Everything else I like very much! | 1) is teaching us. She is very | Good | 1) Thank you very much. But the | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This Course is good for new learners. I enjoyed this course. | 1) This Course is | Good | 1) for new learners. I enjoyed this | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course :)! | 1) | Good | 1) course :)! | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This teacher reminds me of old aunties that tried to tell me how to think. "That's just the way it is" is never a good reason for me. | 1) way it is" is never a | Good | 1) reason for me. | 2.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | by the way, it was a good start for me to learn the first time chinese. Thank you! | 1) by the way, it was a | Good | 1) start for me to learn the | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I think about this course it´s good for begginers | 1) I think about this course it´s | Good | 1) for begginers | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It would be a good choice for beginners. | 1) It would be a | Good | 1) choice for beginners. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Excellent course for beginner . I f you can provide the level 1, 2, 3 etc will be tremendously good. | 1) 2, 3 etc will be tremendously | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I'm so sad that this course is complete! This was a wonderful class with a very good instructor whose logical and gentle approach made learning easy! I would highly recommend making additional courses in Chinese language. Luckily, there is a class in Chinese characters available, but I would love to see Xiaoyu Liu! | 1) a wonderful class with a very | Good | 1) instructor whose logical and gentle approach | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | muy buen curso. A very good course. | 1) muy buen curso. A very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very solid content, with distinct sections and themes. No writing makes it into a good introductory course but also is something more serious learners need to study on their own alongside the course. | 1) No writing makes it into a | Good | 1) introductory course but also is something | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | its going good so far | 1) its going | Good | 1) so far | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I´ve missed Chinese hanzi. But apart from that the course and tests are all good. | 1) the course and tests are all | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The teacher is very good. It is also good that it has the words written in Mandarin at the end of the material. I just finished the course but now I am learning the Chinese characters for the vocabulary presented in these lessons. I loved this course! I will come back to revise it often. | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) It is also good that it | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The teacher is very good. It is also good that it has the words written in Mandarin at the end of the material. I just finished the course but now I am learning the Chinese characters for the vocabulary presented in these lessons. I loved this course! I will come back to revise it often. | 2) is very good. It is also | Good | 2) that it has the words written | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good course! It was my first contact with Chinese language and I learnt so much, thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! It was my first contact | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is very good for people without any knowledge of Chinese. I think if anyone wants to learn Chinese in this course will make the first step. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for people without any knowledge of | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I think any course of Chinese must include characters. To teach only a too basic sentences in pinyin is not a good experience. Nonetheless, I like this course. | 1) sentences in pinyin is not a | Good | 1) experience. Nonetheless, I like this course. | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good course, gives a glance about all the basic expressions / sentences you could need in a daily use in China. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, gives a glance about all | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good course and well structured. The difference to other fragmented online videos "teaching" Chinese is the thought through build-up and the professional didactic value. Recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and well structured. The difference | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It is really good course, fine video and sound quality were most likely for me. Also it's very good lessons order. | 1) It is really | Good | 1) course, fine video and sound quality | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It is really good course, fine video and sound quality were most likely for me. Also it's very good lessons order. | 2) likely for me. Also it's very | Good | 2) lessons order. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A good course to begin with Chinese | 1) A | Good | 1) course to begin with Chinese | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The course is a very practical approach to the language. The main goal of it being to help you get by in the country. It's title should be Surviving in China 101. Although misleading for people wanting to learn the language to an extensive level, it's definitely a good base to have and to build on. The material is presented in a very accessible manner and the quizzes help you master the key elements acquired within each session. Overall, great class if you plan visiting the country and want to be able to get by without a translator as we all know that not all Chinese natives speak English. | 1) an extensive level, it's definitely a | Good | 1) base to have and to build | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Fantastic! Very good! | 1) Fantastic! Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Well, it is a fairly good introduction to chinese. It's short and easy. However, I expected much more from the course. | 1) Well, it is a fairly | Good | 1) introduction to chinese. It's short and | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | An exceptionally good course for learning how to speak basic Chinese with very clear phonetics and word by word explanations. | 1) An exceptionally | Good | 1) course for learning how to speak | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good as a standard introduction to chinese. We learnt similar words in our first-semester course at uni. I'd personally also like to learn the simplified chinese symbols but that's just my opinion. Weekly deadlines are good but if we keep going I won't revise anything. I'd rather have the course force me to repeat some of the words and constructs I have learnt in former courses. The assignments should be harder too. | 1) | Good | 1) as a standard introduction to chinese. | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good as a standard introduction to chinese. We learnt similar words in our first-semester course at uni. I'd personally also like to learn the simplified chinese symbols but that's just my opinion. Weekly deadlines are good but if we keep going I won't revise anything. I'd rather have the course force me to repeat some of the words and constructs I have learnt in former courses. The assignments should be harder too. | 2) just my opinion. Weekly deadlines are | Good | 2) but if we keep going I | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Videos proceed way too fast for complete beginners and things are explained without enough underlying basics. Plus there is not really enough chance for repetitions in the videos. Tonal explanations are good, except for the green line where you are not told how to choose what part of that tone to pronounce every time. Overall, it could be a great course but falls short because the videos proceed way too fast and without enough repetitions or even practice exercises to be able to remember the phrases afterwards. | 1) in the videos. Tonal explanations are | Good | 1) except for the green line where | 1.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It is quite good course for beginners those are Latin-Language-speaking people. You don't need to learn a chinese characters. So, it is very simple. But, I think that these lectures lacks logiccal explanation. Even in beginning, the logical sturucte is undoubtedly important for further learning. And, Quiz are really easy. So, you can finish this course even in a day if you have a sufficient time. I do not think that this course will make someone really spaek Chinee in China. But, this should be recommended for only those are interested in Chinese and do not have a plan to go to china. | 1) It is quite | Good | 1) course for beginners those are Latin-Language-speaking | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Very good! 太好了。 | 1) Very | Good | 1) 太好了。 | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A very good course. A very good teacher! Xiexie! :) | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. A very good teacher! Xiexie! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | A very good course. A very good teacher! Xiexie! :) | 2) A very good course. A very | Good | 2) teacher! Xiexie! :) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | I am having a really good experience. The classes are very easy to understand and the quizzes help me fix the knowledge. I highly recommend this course for people who want to learn the first words in Chinese. | 1) I am having a really | Good | 1) experience. The classes are very easy | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The material lets you go practically at your own pace, and it is good to teach people how to speak before confusing them with characters. | 1) your own pace, and it is | Good | 1) to teach people how to speak | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Ni Hao, I liked the course, good course content though the first week which includes the tones was tough as it is hard to memorize the same. But as English phrase says, "try try till you succeed"or keeping trying till you succeed.So we have to keep trying the tones till we succeed. Would like to thank the Professor for the video lectures. XieXie | 1) Ni Hao, I liked the course, | Good | 1) course content though the first week | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This is a very good course to learn some basic expressions and, most of all, get a good first grasp of Chinese pronunciation. However I found the course structure quite repetitive over the seven weeks: Every other module is structured in the same way: "Which fruit do you like? Apple, banana, orange...", then the week after it's "Which sport do you like? Basketball, cycling, running". For a seven-week course this was not challenging enough. But it's a good start. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course to learn some basic expressions | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This is a very good course to learn some basic expressions and, most of all, get a good first grasp of Chinese pronunciation. However I found the course structure quite repetitive over the seven weeks: Every other module is structured in the same way: "Which fruit do you like? Apple, banana, orange...", then the week after it's "Which sport do you like? Basketball, cycling, running". For a seven-week course this was not challenging enough. But it's a good start. | 2) and, most of all, get a | Good | 2) first grasp of Chinese pronunciation. However | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This is a very good course to learn some basic expressions and, most of all, get a good first grasp of Chinese pronunciation. However I found the course structure quite repetitive over the seven weeks: Every other module is structured in the same way: "Which fruit do you like? Apple, banana, orange...", then the week after it's "Which sport do you like? Basketball, cycling, running". For a seven-week course this was not challenging enough. But it's a good start. | 3) not challenging enough. But it's a | Good | 3) start. | 3.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Is a very good course for learn chinese, I learn much in this course. | 1) Is a very | Good | 1) course for learn chinese, I learn | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This course is very good. Easy , teacher great congratulations everyone! I hope next edition. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) Easy , teacher great congratulations everyone! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Fine sensible teacher, excellent enunciation and pacing. I shall be returning to this course every few months to keep improving my pronunciation bit by bit. It is impossible to recommend this course too highly for beginners -- and I say this as an expert on introductory languages. I have been English-French bilingual as a child, and Japanese-English as an adult. In addition I have learned six or eight languages at the tourist level, and can do "Hello, I'm here from the gas company, to read yur meter..." plus thank you, which way? Where's the light switch? and so forth in 24. (I live in Toronto, so there are lots of languages around...) This means I've seen both good and bad language courses. This course is one of the good ones. | 1) ) This means I've seen both | Good | 1) and bad language courses. This course | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Fine sensible teacher, excellent enunciation and pacing. I shall be returning to this course every few months to keep improving my pronunciation bit by bit. It is impossible to recommend this course too highly for beginners -- and I say this as an expert on introductory languages. I have been English-French bilingual as a child, and Japanese-English as an adult. In addition I have learned six or eight languages at the tourist level, and can do "Hello, I'm here from the gas company, to read yur meter..." plus thank you, which way? Where's the light switch? and so forth in 24. (I live in Toronto, so there are lots of languages around...) This means I've seen both good and bad language courses. This course is one of the good ones. | 2) This course is one of the | Good | 2) ones. | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Pretty cool. Requires good listening skills and attention skills and ver well detailed. | 1) Pretty cool. Requires | Good | 1) listening skills and attention skills and | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | The teacher is good!!.. I like the way as she taught and gave every lesson | 1) The teacher is | Good | 1) ! . . I like the | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | It is a very good course to immerse in the basic Mandarin-Chinese language. I learned with an easy way and the best thing is that the teacher is Chinese, a native Mandarin speaker. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course to immerse in the basic | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Stands up to its name. A very good course to start learning Mandarin. Now, the horror of the language "Mandarin" is no more and I can communicate for the necessary matters in Mandarin. | 1) up to its name. A very | Good | 1) course to start learning Mandarin. Now, | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | This was a good intro class. Would be nice to have an intermediate class. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) intro class. Would be nice to | 4.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course. I like it :) | 1) | Good | 1) course. I like it :) | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Not a very good course layout | 1) Not a very | Good | 1) course layout | 1.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | Good course for beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| mTJHKj0pEeSGwyIACxCdDw | it's easy to understand. really good course. | 1) it's easy to understand. really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| MTVdFqgyEeWbLRJn4j8c4Q | Superb! Easy to comprehend, good lecture. I would recommend our students to take these lectures. I would wish part3 focused on network analysis. Thank you for providing us the clue to fMRI analysis. Hironaka Igarashi | 1) Superb! Easy to comprehend, | Good | 1) lecture. I would recommend our students | 5.0 |
| Mue2M1z0EeWqJhKypiGv4w | The course is inspiring :-) The topics are interesting, and the learning materials are well designed by questions and answers, I like the part of Pause & Reflect. The part of quiz is sooooo good, when you submit your answers, you can read a detailed analysis of the correct solutions, that is very helpful. | 1) The part of quiz is sooooo | Good | 1) when you submit your answers, you | 5.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | I think it is a good class overall but the pace is fast and the resources that can help you is lacking. This will be good for someone who already kind of understands bioconductor. | 1) I think it is a | Good | 1) class overall but the pace is | 4.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | I think it is a good class overall but the pace is fast and the resources that can help you is lacking. This will be good for someone who already kind of understands bioconductor. | 2) you is lacking. This will be | Good | 2) for someone who already kind of | 4.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Course is not good at all. The instructor assumes that you have a good genomic background. | 1) Course is not | Good | 1) at all. The instructor assumes that | 1.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Course is not good at all. The instructor assumes that you have a good genomic background. | 2) instructor assumes that you have a | Good | 2) genomic background. | 1.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | In no way is there enough information given to be able to complete this quiz questions. A total frustration to try to figure out. You can't even figure out what datasets you are expected to analyze! You have to pick one from hundreds that are available! UPDATE: Revising my rating to 3. Course and material improved as course progressed. Week1 very discouraging, but I'm glad I stuck with it. Other weeks were very good. | 1) with it. Other weeks were very | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | I learned a lot from this class and the instructor is good. | 1) this class and the instructor is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Four stars because the content is good. Not five stars because the english is not so good and for a non-english expert it can be difficult to understand, and the subtitle contains quite often errors. | 1) Four stars because the content is | Good | 1) Not five stars because the english | 4.0 |
| mUSYT5noEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Four stars because the content is good. Not five stars because the english is not so good and for a non-english expert it can be difficult to understand, and the subtitle contains quite often errors. | 2) because the english is not so | Good | 2) and for a non-english expert it | 4.0 |
| mwj3ASWcEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mwj3ASWcEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | really good and useful course | 1) really | Good | 1) and useful course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Nice explanation of concepts, and very helpful with getting started on the programming assignments. The algorithms are explained well in pseudo code, and the instructor does a good job at explaining why they work the way they do. The math is not very challenging, so I never felt frustrated. I only wish there was not such an emphasis on Graphlab. Although they do allow you to use other methods to finish the assignments, it feels as though more attention is given to explaining how Graphlab works instead of standard, free python libraries. I understand that they're trying to push a product, but I don't want to pay for something I'll only be using for a few courses. More attention should be given to sklearn. | 1) code, and the instructor does a | Good | 1) job at explaining why they work | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course on Regression but statistical inferences could have been added to give a completion feeling | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on Regression but statistical inferences | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course content but it can be very difficult to get help if you are stuck on something. | 1) | Good | 1) course content but it can be | 3.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course. I really liked it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I really liked it. | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | the material is solid and using python is a good way to learn machine learning programming | 1) solid and using python is a | Good | 1) way to learn machine learning programming | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Fantastic course. Perfect balance of practice and theory. I have tried learning regression a number of times now and after doing this course I feel like I finally have a good grasp on it. Absolutely no complaints. | 1) feel like I finally have a | Good | 1) grasp on it. Absolutely no complaints. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very good introduction to Machine Learning: Regression, covering the wide range of topics and explanations in lucid way. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Machine Learning: Regression, covering | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good class, But it would be much better if the quiz is open to those who doesn't pay. | 1) | Good | 1) class, But it would be much | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | very good coverage of a wide range of topics. impressive! | 1) very | Good | 1) coverage of a wide range of | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good to have deep insight into regression and various popular algorithm | 1) | Good | 1) to have deep insight into regression | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Started a little slow, and it may seem repetitive if you see all videos from one week in one day, otherwise I feel it has a good pace.The content was interesting and well explained. | 1) otherwise I feel it has a | Good | 1) pace. The content was interesting and | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Overall, the course was really good. But, it would be great if the concept of co-ordinate descent was explained much more clearly. | 1) Overall, the course was really | Good | 1) But, it would be great if | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really good course. Professors are incredible. Very dynamic. The notes and videos are superb. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Professors are incredible. Very dynamic. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course to get the foundations right. Emily has done an excellent job in explaining the material and she reinforces the concepts with examples. I strongly believe this course will provide the required skills to explore further topics in this area. Great Job and thanks to Coursera for providing us this platform. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to get the foundations right. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I do not this regression :D Honestly, I can not thank Carlos and Emily enough given such a solid and casual understanding. I am looking forward to every new Session and ofcourse the Capstone. But still a long way there, which is good news, more time with Carlos and Emily... yeah! | 1) a long way there, which is | Good | 1) news, more time with Carlos and | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really good course. Provides basic theoretical and hands on knowledge in the regression. Step by step programming quiz some times not demonstrate enough best practices or conceptual ideas. For example I would expect that if at step 1 we asked to assess performance based on single feature then at step 2 based on several features and compare results. But in most of the cases such comparison not proposed and results not explained. In addition it is not always clear why prediction accuracy better or worse. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Provides basic theoretical and hands | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This was a deep dive into all things regression and I guess having a background in mathematics helped out a lot with following the material. However, I wish there was a better distribution of quizzes and assignments throughout the weekly lessons because they seemed to all come during the end of the lesson. All in all this was a very good course and I wish that I would have taken a similar course during my undergrad. | 1) in all this was a very | Good | 1) course and I wish that I | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's a really good course. I congratulate you. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course. I congratulate you. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good class | 1) | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course, will teach you a lot about regression and it will become second nature doing it on your own. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, will teach you a lot | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | this was a really boring course not for the contet bu the teacher i fell bored every video because the theacher was really slow in everything tha she was showing, it is realy dificult to get focussed in the real topics when the teacher spend a lot of time explaining things at the end wont be evaluated. As an example I am not english native speaker but a had to put the playback speed to 1.50x in order to not get bored in all videos, it was really dificult to follow the teacher at the normal velocity , i just got sleep every video. and as a record i really like this topic so it is the tacher, I took the first course and it was a good experience but this one is owfull | 1) first course and it was a | Good | 1) experience but this one is owfull | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good overall theoretical and practical explanation of the material, I was also able to use scikit learn and pandas without any difficulties instead of graphlab create. | 1) | Good | 1) overall theoretical and practical explanation of | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very well taught course. Also very good instructors. I really enjoyed this course. | 1) very well taught course. Also very | Good | 1) instructors. I really enjoyed this course. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very good course. Glad all the assignments are also compatible with pandas and scikit-learn | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Glad all the assignments are | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I've spent a bit of time going through the Specialisation (paid for one course here) and other courses online that offer Machine Learning with Python. I looked at books too. I've come to the conclusion that it's unforgivable to teach it using graphlab (that you have to pay for after free licence expiry) when everyone else teaches scikit learn (sklearn) for good reason.The tools used on this course are also not very good. Everyone else teaches using text editors - for a good reason, you learn how to code properly. The lessons are also dry and there are far too many of them. | 1) else teaches scikit learn (sklearn) for | Good | 1) reason. The tools used on this | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I've spent a bit of time going through the Specialisation (paid for one course here) and other courses online that offer Machine Learning with Python. I looked at books too. I've come to the conclusion that it's unforgivable to teach it using graphlab (that you have to pay for after free licence expiry) when everyone else teaches scikit learn (sklearn) for good reason.The tools used on this course are also not very good. Everyone else teaches using text editors - for a good reason, you learn how to code properly. The lessons are also dry and there are far too many of them. | 2) this course are also not very | Good | 2) Everyone else teaches using text editors | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I've spent a bit of time going through the Specialisation (paid for one course here) and other courses online that offer Machine Learning with Python. I looked at books too. I've come to the conclusion that it's unforgivable to teach it using graphlab (that you have to pay for after free licence expiry) when everyone else teaches scikit learn (sklearn) for good reason.The tools used on this course are also not very good. Everyone else teaches using text editors - for a good reason, you learn how to code properly. The lessons are also dry and there are far too many of them. | 3) using text editors - for a | Good | 3) reason, you learn how to code | 1.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great overview, good intro to Python as well. | 1) Great overview, | Good | 1) intro to Python as well. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good for everybody! | 1) | Good | 1) for everybody! | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is well structured. It covered a good parts of details I was missing on my machine learning path. | 1) is well structured. It covered a | Good | 1) parts of details I was missing | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Amazing course with good balance of visual material, practice, and optional math. Thanks Emily and Carlos, you are great teachers! | 1) Amazing course with | Good | 1) balance of visual material, practice, and | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | These Machine Learning classes have been fantastic so far, really enjoying them. Very good coverage of topics and challenging exercises to drive home the learning. The effort put into developing the classes has been superb and I look forward to the rest of the specialization. | 1) so far, really enjoying them. Very | Good | 1) coverage of topics and challenging exercises | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Course has covered regression in sufficient details and gave practical aspect of it. Thanks to Emily for very good content and teaching | 1) it. Thanks to Emily for very | Good | 1) content and teaching | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The best Machine learning course I ever took. I compare it very favourably to Jeff Leek's course, or Andew Ng's course - which are both good in their own right. A lot of effort went into making this a really good course. I very much recommend it. | 1) Ng's course - which are both | Good | 1) in their own right. A lot | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The best Machine learning course I ever took. I compare it very favourably to Jeff Leek's course, or Andew Ng's course - which are both good in their own right. A lot of effort went into making this a really good course. I very much recommend it. | 2) went into making this a really | Good | 2) course. I very much recommend it. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very good starting to the journey to Machine Learning. Just one disappointment, I was expecting the classification and clustering courses to start together but the specialization has been delayed by a long time now. | 1) A very | Good | 1) starting to the journey to Machine | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I like this course a lot. Frankly speaking, this is my first completed course on Coursera. The instructor is so good that I could easily follow everything in the class. Give lots of credits to the assignments. They're very easy to follow for me. I really enjoy working on them. Thanks a lot!!! | 1) on Coursera. The instructor is so | Good | 1) that I could easily follow everything | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good introduction to linear regression. The quizzes are moderately difficult, and can be somewhat time consuming. There is a lot of depth to this topic, and tho this course touches on a lot of it, it won't be enough to get a very thorough understanding. In general I'm really glad I took this course | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to linear regression. The quizzes | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The video lectures are particularly clear and with a good balance between intuition and details. The assignments are interesting and they require some time even if they are not the most challenging. Nice the choice to use Graphlab but to give detailed instructions also for Pandas and leaving the possibility open to use different software. I will certainly take the following ones. If you are not interested in the the full specialization and already have some exposure to python notebooks, it is possible to follow this course without the previous one. | 1) are particularly clear and with a | Good | 1) balance between intuition and details. The | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent presentation of fundamental concepts and good overview of some specific methods. | 1) Excellent presentation of fundamental concepts and | Good | 1) overview of some specific methods. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very-very good! | 1) Very-very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Lasso, l2 regularization, ridge regression, etc. - appropriate level of technical detail, first principles discussion, etc. means that a lot of good info was packed into this course. | 1) etc. means that a lot of | Good | 1) info was packed into this course. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The course was mostly well taught, and having the two programming assignments each week was useful. One so you could learn the technique, and another so you could learn the underlying algorithm. Some of the topics were occasionally light and too fast on the detail, but overall a very good course. | 1) the detail, but overall a very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really good course | 1) Really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A lot of new concepts were introduced with good clarity. All the math was less rigorous which was perfect to understand and get hold on important techniques. | 1) of new concepts were introduced with | Good | 1) clarity. All the math was less | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is very detailed and have lot of information about regression, should be taken by anyone who wants to become master in it. But each lesson should be given a week, otherwise it becomes over whelming. Assignments are good as well, though some of them should have better instruction. There should have been a programming assignment on kernal regression as well, as it is one of the upcoming technique. | 1) it becomes over whelming. Assignments are | Good | 1) as well, though some of them | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very, very good course, high-quality teaching, and well-developed quizzes and assignments. The course is challenging enough to feel motivated and satisfied when finishing a week's work, but not so challenging as to scare people (or me, at least) away. I hope (and trust) that you keep up the good work in the courses to come. If there was one thing I could change, it would be to include a discussion of statistical significance/inference (as suggested by Emily towards the end). It is unclear now how that can be analyzed in the Graphlab environment, even though it is a very important topic for practical purposes. | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) course, high-quality teaching, and well-developed quizzes | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very, very good course, high-quality teaching, and well-developed quizzes and assignments. The course is challenging enough to feel motivated and satisfied when finishing a week's work, but not so challenging as to scare people (or me, at least) away. I hope (and trust) that you keep up the good work in the courses to come. If there was one thing I could change, it would be to include a discussion of statistical significance/inference (as suggested by Emily towards the end). It is unclear now how that can be analyzed in the Graphlab environment, even though it is a very important topic for practical purposes. | 2) trust) that you keep up the | Good | 2) work in the courses to come. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good structure, but maybe a bit too basic and slow pace. | 1) | Good | 1) structure, but maybe a bit too | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great course! Good balance of theory and practical application. I'm glad that we didn't use GraphLab as much as in the first course and more exercises were implementing the algorithms. My one recommendation for improvement would be to revise some of the assignments with an eye for making the instructions more clear. There were a few--particularly week 5--where I understood the concepts, but it was very unclear what exactly we were being asked to do. Looking forward to the next course! | 1) Great course! | Good | 1) balance of theory and practical application. | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A great course that will take you way past what you may remember of linear regression from high school or college days. This course is part math, part algorithms and part application (in Python). I loved it. The instructors are good and the material is generally well presented (I took the course the first time through, so there seemed to be a few gaps / rough edges.) This course may be intimidating if you don't like mathematical notation, or if you have never used Python before. It may also be challenging if your high school / college freshman calculus is rusty. The concepts aren't super hard (basic statistics, integration, differentiation, matrix math but with multi-variate twists), but you will need to think carefully through some lessons to appreciate them. The online tests are good - and the instructions for each week's problems are detailed. There is enough guidance to clearly show what needs to be done, but enough gaps to bridge that you're made to think about the problem at hand. | 1) I loved it. The instructors are | Good | 1) and the material is generally well | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A great course that will take you way past what you may remember of linear regression from high school or college days. This course is part math, part algorithms and part application (in Python). I loved it. The instructors are good and the material is generally well presented (I took the course the first time through, so there seemed to be a few gaps / rough edges.) This course may be intimidating if you don't like mathematical notation, or if you have never used Python before. It may also be challenging if your high school / college freshman calculus is rusty. The concepts aren't super hard (basic statistics, integration, differentiation, matrix math but with multi-variate twists), but you will need to think carefully through some lessons to appreciate them. The online tests are good - and the instructions for each week's problems are detailed. There is enough guidance to clearly show what needs to be done, but enough gaps to bridge that you're made to think about the problem at hand. | 2) appreciate them. The online tests are | Good | 2) - and the instructions for each | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course touches on basic concepts quite nicely and should help students with adequate math background to gain a good understanding of regression on both high and low level. A text book and optional exercises could help attain better theoretical ground for regression. In general, references and suggested reading are missing from this specialization. I would also like to see optional programming assignments on publicly available data sets other than the repeatedly used house prices data. | 1) adequate math background to gain a | Good | 1) understanding of regression on both high | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course, but could improve the quiz. Currently the quiz are too easy for ML learners. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but could improve the quiz. | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A very good course! Especially that scikit-learn can be used as framework for solving assignments and at the same time exercises for programming of learning algorithms from scratch. Thanks! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! Especially that scikit-learn can be | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | One of the best courses I have taken! Very good balance of depth and breadth of the material. | 1) best courses I have taken! Very | Good | 1) balance of depth and breadth of | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is one of the best online courses out there and not just about Machine Learning. The course was very well organized and the teaching staff was very helpful in resolving whatever issues cropped up. I would suggest you to provide additional readings/ references at the end of the course in 'Closing remarks'. Thank you Profs. Emily and Carlos for the wonderful course. Keep up the good work! I am looking forward to the next one. | 1) the wonderful course. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! I am looking forward to | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good and Insightful | 1) | Good | 1) and Insightful | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I really got a lot of the course. The material is explained very well. The programming assignments helped further the understanding. The recap video that summarizes the entire module in 10-15 min is also very good. | 1) in 10-15 min is also very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | In the end of the course it became a bit boring to work with the same dataset over and over again. But I learned a lot about such algorithms as LASSO, Ridge regression. I guess that overall there's a good balance between math, theory and practice. | 1) I guess that overall there's a | Good | 1) balance between math, theory and practice. | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a very good course | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course with detailed explanations, both great lecturers, lets you choose environment of your liking for the assignments(python and graphlab are preferred). The explanations are detailed and clear and assignments are very practical. One of the best courses and Specializations on the Coursera I have taken so far. If you contribute lot of time and effort, you will learn a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with detailed explanations, both great | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I found this an excellent introduction to the topic with a good mix of well presented material and practical application using the IPython notebooks. I would love to have the course finish with a project where we apply the learned methods to a different data set. | 1) introduction to the topic with a | Good | 1) mix of well presented material and | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good, good practise! Good lectures! | 1) Very | Good | 1) good practise! Good lectures! | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good, good practise! Good lectures! | 2) Very good, | Good | 2) practise! Good lectures! | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good, good practise! Good lectures! | 3) Very good, good practise! | Good | 3) lectures! | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good balance between theory and practice. Nice demonstration and explanation of several concepts. Doesn't limit to explaining using linear regression functions build into e.g. python but also shows the mechanisms behind. Excellent course! | 1) | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. Nice | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course. I'd love to be course mentor :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I'd love to be course | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Wonderful lectures and good assignments. Very, very clear presentations. Minor drawbacks: there's no assistance available for the assignments (which can be quite difficult). The quizzes require sometimes information that is not directly available in the video lectures. Note that it takes more hrs per week than mentioned (but it's worthwhile!). | 1) Wonderful lectures and | Good | 1) assignments. Very, very clear presentations. Minor | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Liked this course, really good assignments which help you to master the concepts thought in the lectures. Thanks a lot for making this available for us. | 1) Liked this course, really | Good | 1) assignments which help you to master | 5.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course! Teachers are perfect and knowledge is overall, but the exercise need some improvement. | 1) | Good | 1) course! Teachers are perfect and knowledge | 4.0 |
| mxdq5kIJEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I've studied machine learning quite a bit in school as well as on my own, but I wish this class was how I learned the first time around. Everything is explained so clearly and well-balanced between practical understanding vs underlying theory. Definitely serves as a good review for those of us who are looking to get back into machine learning! | 1) underlying theory. Definitely serves as a | Good | 1) review for those of us who | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good professors Good content, well structured and presented | 1) Really | Good | 1) professors Good content, well structured and | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good professors Good content, well structured and presented | 2) Really good professors | Good | 2) content, well structured and presented | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent course. Good examples, tips and tricks. No matter how experienced are you, this course definitively adds value. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) examples, tips and tricks. No matter | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Adequate information to grasp on. Learn something useful. But the videos are a bit boring that sometimes I have a hard time to carry on. Hope to share more interesting video examples and reading materials. Good effort but spice up the video a bit with salient stuff instead of pure talking and notes would be good. | 1) interesting video examples and reading materials. | Good | 1) effort but spice up the video | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Adequate information to grasp on. Learn something useful. But the videos are a bit boring that sometimes I have a hard time to carry on. Hope to share more interesting video examples and reading materials. Good effort but spice up the video a bit with salient stuff instead of pure talking and notes would be good. | 2) pure talking and notes would be | Good | 2) | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | this course provides a good structure of how to influence people. very useful! | 1) this course provides a | Good | 1) structure of how to influence people. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Opening the quizes and the internal acreditation for free should be a most for such a good course like this. Its a shame that "non premium" users have access to only the video material. | 1) be a most for such a | Good | 1) course like this. Its a shame | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | It's a very good Course for everybody!! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) Course for everybody! ! | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I heard about this course in a article on business insider. The in depth explanation provided as well as the related practical experiences makes it more interesting. Congratulations for the team for putting together such a good content . | 1) team for putting together such a | Good | 1) content . | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very useful course with very good tactics to use in our daily working environment where there might be a lot of influence for personal gains, that is, manipulation. | 1) Very useful course with very | Good | 1) tactics to use in our daily | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good informative course. The course should cover a little bit of Change Management Concept. Well designed and planned. | 1) | Good | 1) informative course. The course should cover | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Fantastic course. Engaging and good balance between theory and practice. | 1) Fantastic course. Engaging and | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course has great quality videos and gave me good insights on the topic. | 1) great quality videos and gave me | Good | 1) insights on the topic. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good training and it has proved to be really useful. I knew some of things things already, but having them in a structured way is extremely useful for me. | 1) Really | Good | 1) training and it has proved to | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Amazing Course! Great influential instructors. Very good training content! | 1) Amazing Course! Great influential instructors. Very | Good | 1) training content! | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good! I have found clear and concise concepts, very valuable. Very useful for using in all kind of relationships. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I have found clear and concise | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good concepts, very useful tips shared in this course. I reduced 1 star because, it has very less illustrations. Interactions, live examples could have been added in the content. Especially the video background is not good. It matters because, it's distracting while listening the class. | 1) | Good | 1) concepts, very useful tips shared in | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good concepts, very useful tips shared in this course. I reduced 1 star because, it has very less illustrations. Interactions, live examples could have been added in the content. Especially the video background is not good. It matters because, it's distracting while listening the class. | 2) Especially the video background is not | Good | 2) It matters because, it's distracting while | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Clearly structured material, excellent lecturer, interesting an engaging - overall very good course. | 1) interesting an engaging - overall very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good, maybe include more practical examples | 1) Really | Good | 1) maybe include more practical examples | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Dear Coursera This was my first Coursera course at all. The course is in general is interesting and it give a good theoretical approach and examples how to turn this theory in practice. The discussion possibility is also very useful. Learning from your classmates is great. The discussions are respectfull and if somebody has a different opinion or view this is seen as "added value" and is not judged negatively. The only thing missing is the possibility to have live and direct conversation with the teachers. I did a training where we had the opportunity for one hour to ask questions in a chat and the teacher was answering them in a live webinar. That was really usefull and would make it a "five"***** star course. Overall, I would attend/take a Coursera training any time again. Great plattform! | 1) is interesting and it give a | Good | 1) theoretical approach and examples how to | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Extremely well articulated! English is not my native language, and the teacher was very good at repeating important words so I was able to understand it fully. I loved the way the teacher reached out to our mind by making us think rather than telling "predigested" material. He presented facts and suggestions that fired my interest. This course lets you as a student form your own opinions and your own strategies based on facts and suggestions. The community was also very good at commenting and helped me expand my own "horizon" | 1) language, and the teacher was very | Good | 1) at repeating important words so I | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Extremely well articulated! English is not my native language, and the teacher was very good at repeating important words so I was able to understand it fully. I loved the way the teacher reached out to our mind by making us think rather than telling "predigested" material. He presented facts and suggestions that fired my interest. This course lets you as a student form your own opinions and your own strategies based on facts and suggestions. The community was also very good at commenting and helped me expand my own "horizon" | 2) suggestions. The community was also very | Good | 2) at commenting and helped me expand | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very course. Good explaination of the influence that is already taking place in our everyday live. This course tells the way's to influence others. Another part of the puzzle with things occur and sometime nog go as planned in influencing others. | 1) Very course. | Good | 1) explaination of the influence that is | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Awesome!! Very good techniques for our life. | 1) Awesome! ! Very | Good | 1) techniques for our life. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. I learned good topics do apply in my carreer. Congratulations. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I learned good topics do | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. I learned good topics do apply in my carreer. Congratulations. | 2) Good course. I learned | Good | 2) topics do apply in my carreer. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very pleasant lecturing style with good visualisation of basic ideas. Hands-on approach with a range of good examples. Highly recommended to anyone wanting to understand how some people seem to end up imposing their ideas more than others - and become one of them! | 1) Very pleasant lecturing style with | Good | 1) visualisation of basic ideas. Hands-on approach | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very pleasant lecturing style with good visualisation of basic ideas. Hands-on approach with a range of good examples. Highly recommended to anyone wanting to understand how some people seem to end up imposing their ideas more than others - and become one of them! | 2) Hands-on approach with a range of | Good | 2) examples. Highly recommended to anyone wanting | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | GOOD. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good and useful content. Instructors offer a lot of real life examples. I probably will pursue the whole specialization! | 1) Really | Good | 1) and useful content. Instructors offer a | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A good, well designed course but very heavily aimed towards those mid-career in a corporate environment. Still worth a look for others, but the assignments will take significant extra thought. Sadly the discussion forums fail at bridging this gap because forum participation framed as mandatory (it is not) in the lecture videos has rendered them a wall of pure noise. | 1) A | Good | 1) well designed course but very heavily | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | It is good but it should continue with some advanced course, this one seems to be very predictive.. | 1) It is | Good | 1) but it should continue with some | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I loved this course. It gives a lot of good information to help when I need to influence other people, but my favorite thing is the tips it gives for avoiding others' influence and manipulation. | 1) course. It gives a lot of | Good | 1) information to help when I need | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good materials, good professors and very well put together cours. If there is one thing I would improve is response to questions from the students by the professors. | 1) | Good | 1) materials, good professors and very well | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good materials, good professors and very well put together cours. If there is one thing I would improve is response to questions from the students by the professors. | 2) Good materials, | Good | 2) professors and very well put together | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | This is a good and effective course for managing your network and learning how to influence people. Many tactics are provided for learners, so we can try different ways in different situations to get a better influencing. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) and effective course for managing your | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A lot of material to memorize, but very good information not only on how to influence others, but on keeping others from influencing you in a negative manner and turning their tactics back on them. This is also a great course if you are into politics and news media/advertising/marketing. You will really learn a lot and the speakers have good voices, fast paced, good video and dialogue that will not bore you as in other lectures. | 1) of material to memorize, but very | Good | 1) information not only on how to | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A lot of material to memorize, but very good information not only on how to influence others, but on keeping others from influencing you in a negative manner and turning their tactics back on them. This is also a great course if you are into politics and news media/advertising/marketing. You will really learn a lot and the speakers have good voices, fast paced, good video and dialogue that will not bore you as in other lectures. | 2) a lot and the speakers have | Good | 2) voices, fast paced, good video and | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A lot of material to memorize, but very good information not only on how to influence others, but on keeping others from influencing you in a negative manner and turning their tactics back on them. This is also a great course if you are into politics and news media/advertising/marketing. You will really learn a lot and the speakers have good voices, fast paced, good video and dialogue that will not bore you as in other lectures. | 3) speakers have good voices, fast paced, | Good | 3) video and dialogue that will not | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good, the spelling is clear and easy to understand, even for who doesn't speak and/or listen in English and the content is awesome. | 1) Very | Good | 1) the spelling is clear and easy | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good course, easy understanding and well explained as well. Concepts very useful for professional and personal life. I recommend to everyone who are often envolved with people. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, easy understanding and well explained | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very interesting course and has highlight the awareness in me for good politics. | 1) highlight the awareness in me for | Good | 1) politics. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great insights, very useful contents. The assignments are a good addition to the lectures & quizzes - it makes it more interactive and "forces" you to think about the content more deeply and in relation to your own experiences. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) | 1) useful contents. The assignments are a | Good | 1) addition to the lectures & quizzes | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I thought all of the information was great but at times the course was just very bland especially in terms of presentation. Also, the title is somewhat misleading and the presumptions that the course creators make about its students assume I am a business guy sitting in an office or a part of some team which makes the activities that you HAVE to do in order to pass the course a bit harder to complete. This is good because if what the activity desn't really apply to your situation it makes good practice to imagine a situation - not soo imaginative the task is incredibly easy - and apply what you've learned. However, as I've said, if what you're being asked to do is harder to apply than the activity in many ways isn't all that practical. I prefer Cumulative tests as well because they assess everything you've learned and whether you've retained the information or not. | 1) bit harder to complete. This is | Good | 1) because if what the activity desn't | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I thought all of the information was great but at times the course was just very bland especially in terms of presentation. Also, the title is somewhat misleading and the presumptions that the course creators make about its students assume I am a business guy sitting in an office or a part of some team which makes the activities that you HAVE to do in order to pass the course a bit harder to complete. This is good because if what the activity desn't really apply to your situation it makes good practice to imagine a situation - not soo imaginative the task is incredibly easy - and apply what you've learned. However, as I've said, if what you're being asked to do is harder to apply than the activity in many ways isn't all that practical. I prefer Cumulative tests as well because they assess everything you've learned and whether you've retained the information or not. | 2) apply to your situation it makes | Good | 2) practice to imagine a situation - | 3.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very good course to understand the various tactics involved in influencing people and how to protect ourselves from getting influenced by others. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to understand the various tactics | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Amazing!! And Surprising with Correct Information displayed in fun interactive and inspirational way. Keep up the GOOD work!! :) | 1) and inspirational way. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! ! :) | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excelent course. Really good to apply in my company. | 1) Excelent course. Really | Good | 1) to apply in my company. | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | I really liked this course. It was concrete and well prepared and interesting, easy to archive. I had an experience in similar training classes, so I consider that is really useful to repeat or learn, if you a new in this topic. For me, is the must that the professor(s) was good in public speaking, other way I will feel boring. I would like to suggest this course to others. Kind regards, Kateryna. | 1) the must that the professor(s) was | Good | 1) in public speaking, other way I | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | good one. | 1) | Good | 1) one. | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Thank you very much for the course. It was very good - would have been perfect if the slides would have been provided :) Would be great if there would be a course: Influencing People part 2 | 1) for the course. It was very | Good | 1) - would have been perfect if | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent material, good organization and presentation. But - too many ("demanding"?) peer-reviewed assignments for such a short course. | 1) Excellent material, | Good | 1) organization and presentation. But - too | 2.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good, I learned a lot and I'm really satisfied. | 1) Really | Good | 1) I learned a lot and I'm | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good class. Gives real life examples and helpful tips to make yourself better at workplace. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. Gives real life examples and | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | With the right balance of time spent on videos, good amount of scientific background supported by studies and excellent practical tips to put the theory into practice! Very clear language and simple / easy to follow structure. Learned a lot with it and highly commend it! Well done. | 1) balance of time spent on videos, | Good | 1) amount of scientific background supported by | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | good knowledge! | 1) | Good | 1) knowledge! | 4.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | As both a healthcare professional and an executive for a healthcare organization I am blown away by how good the courses within the Leading People and Teams specialization are. I found Coursera through my own search for personal professional development and every course I have done has been top notch but the courses in this specialization really raise the bar. I have encouraged my peers and subordinates to take the courses within the Leading People and Teams Specialization and we may actually do a coordinated effort to get leaders and aspiring leaders into this Coursera specialization. | 1) I am blown away by how | Good | 1) the courses within the Leading People | 5.0 |
| myQGkjlZEeWJaxK5AT4frw | A very good course. Useful and applicable to one and all. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Useful and applicable to one | 4.0 |
| mZ_Ph_cGEeW_Fg5kRHBRWw | all good | 1) all | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | It's a very good course, I learned a lot and enjoyed it a lot too | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course, I learned a lot and | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Good course to learn the concepts deeply and make it registered by the brain, especially if you test and think things in parallel by yourself. Starting the second course right now. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn the concepts deeply | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | The instructors are good and have made the course a lot of fun. This course has been simplified enough to appeal to even high school students. | 1) The instructors are | Good | 1) and have made the course a | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Very good course.Learning by making games is such a fantastic way to grow. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Learning by making games is | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Excellent way of teaching interactively. Very good exercise problems to revise and learn by practice. Occasional use of humor also adds interest to the course. | 1) Excellent way of teaching interactively. Very | Good | 1) exercise problems to revise and learn | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Loved it ! I learned alot and it was buildt up really good :) | 1) and it was buildt up really | Good | 1) :) | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Good design and very informative. I would just like to see maybe a tab or easier way to access all the links given in the video without having to go through the video again. | 1) | Good | 1) design and very informative. I would | 5.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Good projects. The videos were a little too focused on watching someone code rather than instructional however. | 1) | Good | 1) projects. The videos were a little | 4.0 |
| n2zunIlgEeWSMw6QLoDNsQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Well presented material. Good pace od lectures - short but fully understandable. Different instructors (you won't get bored ;)). Very good programming assigments. | 1) Well presented material. | Good | 1) pace od lectures - short but | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Well presented material. Good pace od lectures - short but fully understandable. Different instructors (you won't get bored ;)). Very good programming assigments. | 2) (you won't get bored ;)). Very | Good | 2) programming assigments. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I had already done "Algorithms: Design and Analysis Part 1", so this course was not as good as that one. This course had lot of programming questions, which I find very good to have for any course. I just hope next courses of the specialization will be beneficial for my career. | 1) so this course was not as | Good | 1) as that one. This course had | 3.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I had already done "Algorithms: Design and Analysis Part 1", so this course was not as good as that one. This course had lot of programming questions, which I find very good to have for any course. I just hope next courses of the specialization will be beneficial for my career. | 2) programming questions, which I find very | Good | 2) to have for any course. I | 3.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very well structured, good choice of content. All video lectures are engaging and you can feel a lot of though was put into making algorithms explanations both clear and concise. Many thanks to the lecturers. | 1) Very well structured, | Good | 1) choice of content. All video lectures | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall is good course with many exercises, forum is supportive, however mentors/instructors never answered my questions (i guessed they bothered only with the very first session when course was launched) Language is sometimes overly complicated and hard to grasp the main principles of the algorithm (e.g. dynamic programming week 5) I watched youtube to understand same ideas but explained in much simpler way. | 1) Overall is | Good | 1) course with many exercises, forum is | 3.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | A comprehensive course, good for building strong basics and a the same time prepares one for competitive coding. | 1) A comprehensive course, | Good | 1) for building strong basics and a | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good collection of task and learning materials. Definitely worth it! More numbers theory and algorithms reading could be included. But agree, it better to read books referenced. Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) collection of task and learning materials. | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall this was a good course. Some of the presenters need to work on their presentation skills (personally I had no problems with the accents). I also felt that the sections on dynamic programming seemed a bit rushed and I needed to spend a bit of time researching this on third parties before I felt comfortable completing the exercises. The grading system was really cool and the exercises seemed well thought-out and thorough. I'd recommend this course to existing developers without a computer science background. Those who want more mathematical rigour should look into the Tim Roughgarden/Stanford course. | 1) Overall this was a | Good | 1) course. Some of the presenters need | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Some features of this course are too good like Dynamic Programming. Thanks for helping me out . | 1) features of this course are too | Good | 1) like Dynamic Programming. Thanks for helping | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | It`s a very good course that covers some of the most fundamental concepts behind algorithms! | 1) It`s a very | Good | 1) course that covers some of the | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good subject and very good topics presented. Professors are very good. And the video presentation is awesome. | 1) Very | Good | 1) subject and very good topics presented. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good subject and very good topics presented. Professors are very good. And the video presentation is awesome. | 2) Very good subject and very | Good | 2) topics presented. Professors are very good. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good subject and very good topics presented. Professors are very good. And the video presentation is awesome. | 3) good topics presented. Professors are very | Good | 3) And the video presentation is awesome. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Strong Points: -Course content is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance the understanding of concepts Weak Points: -Some of the presenters need to strengthen their presentation skills -Lectures slides aren't good enough | 1) Strong Points: -Course content is well-organized | Good | 1) assignments that enhance the understanding of | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Strong Points: -Course content is well-organized -Good assignments that enhance the understanding of concepts Weak Points: -Some of the presenters need to strengthen their presentation skills -Lectures slides aren't good enough | 2) their presentation skills -Lectures slides aren't | Good | 2) enough | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good instruction and examples. Easy to understand. So great so far! | 1) | Good | 1) instruction and examples. Easy to understand. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good course. Basic course for Computer Science graduates. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Basic course for Computer Science | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good homeworks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) homeworks. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course gives a good overview on the algorithms types and problems, but it's cannot be used as standalone source of algorith,s learning. You should use good textbook as well. The programming challenges are really interesting (and challenging), sometimes it took for me a couple of evenings to complete all five week assignments. Thanks! | 1) The course gives a | Good | 1) overview on the algorithms types and | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course gives a good overview on the algorithms types and problems, but it's cannot be used as standalone source of algorith,s learning. You should use good textbook as well. The programming challenges are really interesting (and challenging), sometimes it took for me a couple of evenings to complete all five week assignments. Thanks! | 2) algorith, s learning. You should use | Good | 2) textbook as well. The programming challenges | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good introduction to algorithms ! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to algorithms ! | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The ideas I learned about the classical algorithms and their run-times are really useful and interesting. The problems are also very good. | 1) interesting. The problems are also very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Def a useful skills to have when starting to interview for jobs. This is a hard course to teach to begin with. I found the lectures really boring, too long, hard to understand and just not really motivated well. I think the homework problem are good, but they are very time consuming. You need to use various methods to find edges cases and though that might be a good skill to have as well, it's just too much to get done in one week and somewhat frustrating when you're only stuck in one test case. I think this could be an excellent course with a few modification on the slides and adding more motivations and making shorter homework problems that focuses on the main part of the material for that as oppose to things we've already covered in the previous week. At the moment, I don't think I'll continue this specialization the way it's designed. | 1) I think the homework problem are | Good | 1) but they are very time consuming. | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Def a useful skills to have when starting to interview for jobs. This is a hard course to teach to begin with. I found the lectures really boring, too long, hard to understand and just not really motivated well. I think the homework problem are good, but they are very time consuming. You need to use various methods to find edges cases and though that might be a good skill to have as well, it's just too much to get done in one week and somewhat frustrating when you're only stuck in one test case. I think this could be an excellent course with a few modification on the slides and adding more motivations and making shorter homework problems that focuses on the main part of the material for that as oppose to things we've already covered in the previous week. At the moment, I don't think I'll continue this specialization the way it's designed. | 2) and though that might be a | Good | 2) skill to have as well, it's | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course material is very good indeed, but some of the instructors were somewhat difficult to understand because of strong accents. Subtitles were largely inaccurate. | 1) The course material is very | Good | 1) indeed, but some of the instructors | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Really challenging, starts easy but gets heavy and time consuming after 3rd week. Be prepared to study additional material and spend some hours cracking the weekly assignments. Satisfying when you accomplish it. Maybe a good idea could be to combine algorithms and data structures and separate in 2 courses Algo & Data Structures 1, and Algo & DS 2. I feel, a better knowledge of DS could have help me to solve the Algo assignements faster. | 1) when you accomplish it. Maybe a | Good | 1) idea could be to combine algorithms | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall Good introductory course for beginners . Assignments are very well thought and lectures are quite good. covers most of the topic. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) introductory course for beginners . Assignments | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Overall Good introductory course for beginners . Assignments are very well thought and lectures are quite good. covers most of the topic. | 2) well thought and lectures are quite | Good | 2) covers most of the topic. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very Good course. Best to prepare for campus placement tests. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Best to prepare for campus | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Algorithmic Toolbox consists of a series of slides containing slimmed down explanations on introductory algorithmic concepts, followed up with programming assignments. The slides are the centrepiece of the course, as the presenters rarely stray from the bullet points and pseudocode they're comprised of. I learned a lot during this course. Although, to gain confidence in your knowledge, this is a course that will require you to seek out additional materials to supplement your learning. Perhaps unsurprising being an introductory course, but the presenters struggle when faced with setting expectations. Throughout the course presenters often gloss over fairly complex concepts, treating them as they were trivial knowledge. This applies to mathematical definitions, proofs where most steps are skipped, tree diagrams without the context of their underlying theory, or bullet points used in place of what could be detailed explanations. All material is left equally weighted. Rather than providing explanations like: "We don't need to go into detail on this, only x concept from it is important for what we want to focus on. Reference this chapter in this book for more detail." presenters would read mathematical definitions verbatim from the slides and move on. I was often unsure of how much I would need to know about such concepts. In terms of communication ability, the presenters don't hold up against many of the free/low-cost services I'm accustomed to using, for example: MIT OpenCourseWare, Udacity, edX, Khan Academy, Code School, Treehouse, etc. Perhaps unsurprising, as these competing services often feature professional communicators rather than professional researchers. But the marketplace for quality online education is definitely becoming a competitive one. Users now expect nothing less than presenters with exceptional communication/teaching ability. In most videos the presenters read verbatim from the slides and motion with their hands to explain concepts that would be better broken down on a whiteboard. Rarely straying from the slides, the times the presenters go into more depth on a concept, you get a scribble in the corner of a slide, lacking the clarity I've come to expect when approaching complex concepts from master educators like YouTuber PatrickJMT or Khan Academy. After a couple weeks into the course, I just went straight to the slides, read MIT's Introduction to Algorithms, and skipped most of the course videos. But all things considered, the course served as a good curriculum to guide my focus through the introductory concepts, regardless of where I sought it out. | 1) considered, the course served as a | Good | 1) curriculum to guide my focus through | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Great course. The team is doing a great work improving it all the time and the grading system and lecture are really good as well. | 1) grading system and lecture are really | Good | 1) as well. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Great assignments -- Keep up the good work guys! | 1) Great assignments -- Keep up the | Good | 1) work guys! | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | This course is very good to start algorithmic coding. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) to start algorithmic coding. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | This is a good course, and I liked the quality of video lectures. The material is structured and lets the students understand the basic approaches they can follow to solve algorithmic tasks. Also a good plus is that there are assignments. First, they are of different complexity - so anyone will find an interesting task there. Second, there are prepared starter files for 3 languages - so you spend time working on algos, not on bootstrapping projects. And third - grading is automatic. Just for fiuture - as a more engaging thing there could be also made tasks to review of other people's assignments (as it is done in other courses) and implementing a test case which makes a wrong solution to fail (which is something like TopCoder does). But this idea is too raw and needs more thinking. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course, and I liked the quality | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | This is a good course, and I liked the quality of video lectures. The material is structured and lets the students understand the basic approaches they can follow to solve algorithmic tasks. Also a good plus is that there are assignments. First, they are of different complexity - so anyone will find an interesting task there. Second, there are prepared starter files for 3 languages - so you spend time working on algos, not on bootstrapping projects. And third - grading is automatic. Just for fiuture - as a more engaging thing there could be also made tasks to review of other people's assignments (as it is done in other courses) and implementing a test case which makes a wrong solution to fail (which is something like TopCoder does). But this idea is too raw and needs more thinking. | 2) to solve algorithmic tasks. Also a | Good | 2) plus is that there are assignments. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Update: As I proceed to wk 5, I know why there are some complaint on Dynamic programming, Reduced to 2 stars. Lectures are totally useless for the assignment, The course is really good until week 4 when it deteriorates very quick. No matter how many times I re-watch the lecture, I can't understand much. I ended up using wikipedia for the quiz instead :P I can't use much of the course forum since there are too many posts there and it keep crashing my chrome. This course gets my 3 stars from the first 3 weeks alone, otherwise it gonna be 0-2 stars. | 1) the assignment, The course is really | Good | 1) until week 4 when it deteriorates | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good content and great professors, I like the short duration of lectures and more emphasis on assignments.. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and great professors, I like | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I always wanted to improve the algorithms and data structures field. The books wasn't so efficient. Especially they weren't so practical. These courses are the first courses where I really got a lot of knowledge. Especially because of assignments. All lectors are very good in explanation of the material and tell many additional useful things. These courses are the really good base, after which you can open the books related to algorithms and read more details if you needed. I am definitely going to complete the whole specialization! The only thing which was not convenient for me is that both courses Algorithmic Toolbox and Data Structures are started at the same time. It was difficult to find out the time for both courses and spend enough time to solve all assignments instead of only enough for passing. Anyway, now I am started the second iteration of the course and I am going to solve all assignments which I skipped. Big thanks to Daniel, Alex, Pavel, Neil and Mike! Regards, Sergey | 1) of assignments. All lectors are very | Good | 1) in explanation of the material and | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I always wanted to improve the algorithms and data structures field. The books wasn't so efficient. Especially they weren't so practical. These courses are the first courses where I really got a lot of knowledge. Especially because of assignments. All lectors are very good in explanation of the material and tell many additional useful things. These courses are the really good base, after which you can open the books related to algorithms and read more details if you needed. I am definitely going to complete the whole specialization! The only thing which was not convenient for me is that both courses Algorithmic Toolbox and Data Structures are started at the same time. It was difficult to find out the time for both courses and spend enough time to solve all assignments instead of only enough for passing. Anyway, now I am started the second iteration of the course and I am going to solve all assignments which I skipped. Big thanks to Daniel, Alex, Pavel, Neil and Mike! Regards, Sergey | 2) things. These courses are the really | Good | 2) base, after which you can open | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Even though this course covers a lot fundamentals for introduction to algorithm, the course itself is not designed as good as I expected. For starters, the weekly problem designs aren't very good. Some problem statements are ambiguous and not very clear unless you read more than one time or take a closer look at the examples. Often, the input format/arguments are designed to take redundant info. Some problem even has more than one possible correct outputs, which is just confusing for learning purpose. In terms of lecture videos, it's good that there are some classic algorithm problems being demonstrated in the video, however the linkage between how to express a problem in mathematical languages is poorly explained. For example, in the lecture of edit distance, the realization of the matrix was not well explained at all. I personally appreciate a lot of the thorough proving steps introduced in the lectures, however I personally think the proofs are often not well explained to the audience (I also understand that it's more difficult to explain proving steps). Considering the large variety of audience, I would recommend the instructors separate the comprehensive more in-depth knowledge into optional videos, in this way the audiences could decide if they want to spend time in optional videos or not based on their own needs, meanwhile the instructors could spend a little bit more time to explain the difficult concepts better. Overall, I know that talking and analyzing algorithms can be kinda of boring and challenging, but I wish the course videos could be stated in a more interesting and intriguing way. | 1) course itself is not designed as | Good | 1) as I expected. For starters, the | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Even though this course covers a lot fundamentals for introduction to algorithm, the course itself is not designed as good as I expected. For starters, the weekly problem designs aren't very good. Some problem statements are ambiguous and not very clear unless you read more than one time or take a closer look at the examples. Often, the input format/arguments are designed to take redundant info. Some problem even has more than one possible correct outputs, which is just confusing for learning purpose. In terms of lecture videos, it's good that there are some classic algorithm problems being demonstrated in the video, however the linkage between how to express a problem in mathematical languages is poorly explained. For example, in the lecture of edit distance, the realization of the matrix was not well explained at all. I personally appreciate a lot of the thorough proving steps introduced in the lectures, however I personally think the proofs are often not well explained to the audience (I also understand that it's more difficult to explain proving steps). Considering the large variety of audience, I would recommend the instructors separate the comprehensive more in-depth knowledge into optional videos, in this way the audiences could decide if they want to spend time in optional videos or not based on their own needs, meanwhile the instructors could spend a little bit more time to explain the difficult concepts better. Overall, I know that talking and analyzing algorithms can be kinda of boring and challenging, but I wish the course videos could be stated in a more interesting and intriguing way. | 2) the weekly problem designs aren't very | Good | 2) Some problem statements are ambiguous and | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Even though this course covers a lot fundamentals for introduction to algorithm, the course itself is not designed as good as I expected. For starters, the weekly problem designs aren't very good. Some problem statements are ambiguous and not very clear unless you read more than one time or take a closer look at the examples. Often, the input format/arguments are designed to take redundant info. Some problem even has more than one possible correct outputs, which is just confusing for learning purpose. In terms of lecture videos, it's good that there are some classic algorithm problems being demonstrated in the video, however the linkage between how to express a problem in mathematical languages is poorly explained. For example, in the lecture of edit distance, the realization of the matrix was not well explained at all. I personally appreciate a lot of the thorough proving steps introduced in the lectures, however I personally think the proofs are often not well explained to the audience (I also understand that it's more difficult to explain proving steps). Considering the large variety of audience, I would recommend the instructors separate the comprehensive more in-depth knowledge into optional videos, in this way the audiences could decide if they want to spend time in optional videos or not based on their own needs, meanwhile the instructors could spend a little bit more time to explain the difficult concepts better. Overall, I know that talking and analyzing algorithms can be kinda of boring and challenging, but I wish the course videos could be stated in a more interesting and intriguing way. | 3) In terms of lecture videos, it's | Good | 3) that there are some classic algorithm | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Feedback in assignment is not good enough. For example, for the points and segment, there are no correct answer in output as a reference. | 1) Feedback in assignment is not | Good | 1) enough. For example, for the points | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very, very good! | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | The course starts very promising, but it gets worse week after week, culminating on a barely understandable week about dynamic programming. That’s when I gave up and decided to write this review instead, with just one assignment missing to complete the course. Some of the teachers aren’t native english speakers, which is fine, but their english is very hard to understand. I found myself having to watch some portions of the videos over and over again in order to understand what was being said. I tried reading the transcripts instead, but the they’re even worse! It seems that they were automatically generated from the videos, thus suffering with the poor pronunciation. The teachers use mathematical sophistication that feels unnecessary, but to be fair, they do mention it on the FAQ as part of the necessary background. However, even though it’s an online course, they barely use any teaching method besides very raw slides, some dry mathematical proofs and someone speaking about the content. The only resources offered to help learning are a few open source visualizations. I expected much more. The only good aspect from this course are the assignment checkers, which allow you to write your solutions in multiple languages. I deeply regret the money and time I spent on this course. | 1) I expected much more. The only | Good | 1) aspect from this course are the | 2.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good lectures and programming assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures and programming assignments. | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Gives you very good insight into Algorithms basics that gets you going great with advanced courses. | 1) Gives you very | Good | 1) insight into Algorithms basics that gets | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Videos are very well explained, the exercises comes with several difficulties, good to apply what you learn and push a bit more. I was able to retake some stuff that I've forgotten and learn new stuff. As a 12 year experienced engineer, I'm please that I took this course. | 1) the exercises comes with several difficulties, | Good | 1) to apply what you learn and | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | the content if very good, but lecturers are terrible. you better read slides and read any book you like. watching their videos it wast of time. | 1) the content if very | Good | 1) but lecturers are terrible. you better | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good course.But I wish there was a final assignment which covered all the weeks like a module exam to revise what we have learnt in all 4 weeks | 1) | Good | 1) course. But I wish there was | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good coverage of the material, with several videos dedicated to individual topics, accompanied with complementing problem sets which have a decent selection of semi-optional advanced problems. | 1) | Good | 1) coverage of the material, with several | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | It would be good to have mathematics concepts also included in the course, maybe a refresher kind of thing which would be helpful for some one who is out of touch for a while | 1) It would be | Good | 1) to have mathematics concepts also included | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good. Waiting for session to began. | 1) | Good | 1) Waiting for session to began. | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | I really think this is a good course, but some of them is hard to understand for me as beginner. | 1) I really think this is a | Good | 1) course, but some of them is | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | A very good introduction to Algorithmic techniques. Well worth the cost of entry! | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to Algorithmic techniques. Well worth | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good Algorithms are taken together . | 1) | Good | 1) Algorithms are taken together . | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very Good. Waiting new courses~ | 1) Very | Good | 1) Waiting new courses~ | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Amazing Course. I have been looking for this kind of course for months. Must for anyone who wants to be good in Competitive Programming and Algorithms | 1) for anyone who wants to be | Good | 1) in Competitive Programming and Algorithms | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good course on algorithms,particularly useful for competitive programming. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on algorithms, particularly useful for | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | good course with some very nice idea. I like the fact you can use a lot of languages for you programming assesment, the content is really helpful, I would like to have more indications from the grading system to save time. | 1) | Good | 1) course with some very nice idea. | 4.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | Very good quality! | 1) Very | Good | 1) quality! | 5.0 |
| nA4RUW01EeW8nRIpKnwp7Q | A very good course on Algorithms. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course on Algorithms. | 4.0 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Excellent as the previous ones for the same reasons! I truly love this specialization! Very good job! | 1) I truly love this specialization! Very | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| NCNTU5w4EeWNCwqI4rnUgw | Very Well done course. In its simplicity it is able to provide awesome tips for a such vast and complex subject. The professors are very very good. | 1) subject. The professors are very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | Excellent theoretical view and very good exposure to real life excel modeling | 1) Excellent theoretical view and very | Good | 1) exposure to real life excel modeling | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | I am really enjoying the course. A lot more practical than other courses I have taken. It would be good to have an option to submit assignments and purchase the certificate at the end rather than the current way. Hope Courser will take this into consideration. | 1) I have taken. It would be | Good | 1) to have an option to submit | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | Good instructors, well explanation and can apply for real world. | 1) | Good | 1) instructors, well explanation and can apply | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | It is a good course | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NDBJAUWDEeWbNhIvIryYow | Nice brief lectures with good market applications. The lectures were relevant to real market places examples. Keep it up HEC Paris. Shaban | 1) Nice brief lectures with | Good | 1) market applications. The lectures were relevant | 5.0 |
| nEZQiqBbEeWw6Q7sxrDlWQ | Way of presentation is too good. Beautiful and simple language appropriate examples Ma'am makes every topic simple | 1) Way of presentation is too | Good | 1) Beautiful and simple language appropriate examples | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good start for object oriented techniques and the way java works. | 1) Very | Good | 1) start for object oriented techniques and | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course with very good explanation of concepts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with very good explanation of | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course with very good explanation of concepts. | 2) Very good course with very | Good | 2) explanation of concepts. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thanks a lot! Please keep up the good work. | 1) a lot! Please keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Over my expectations! The videos are very clear and oriented to learning. The structure of the course can't be better and the teachers are really good!. | 1) better and the teachers are really | Good | 1) . | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good overview of the fundamental concepts of Java | 1) very | Good | 1) overview of the fundamental concepts of | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Covered Java and OOP very well. Good projects, as well. | 1) Covered Java and OOP very well. | Good | 1) projects, as well. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | An awesome course to refresh or learn oops concepts ,the project is also very good and the best thing is that the course is taken by amazing teachers. | 1) , the project is also very | Good | 1) and the best thing is that | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course very helpful for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course very helpful for beginners | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a brilliant course. Starts from the basics of object oriented programming covering all the topics in intermediate details. Also, the final assignment helps you to add additional features and test your creativity! A must for beginners and a good course to review the fundamentals of OOAD. | 1) A must for beginners and a | Good | 1) course to review the fundamentals of | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I loved the way instructors designed, developed and delivered course. This course gave me really good insights into object oriented programming. And I thoroughly enjoyed working on project. | 1) course. This course gave me really | Good | 1) insights into object oriented programming. And | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a good course. It help me strengthen the knowledge about interface, abstract class and experience of developing related skills. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course. It help me strengthen the | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is really good , you will learn many basic stuffs about object oriented programming concepts | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) , you will learn many basic | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | it's good for me to know about java by the map program. | 1) it's | Good | 1) for me to know about java | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very good course! At the beginning it might look simple, but gets challenging after the first two weeks. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! At the beginning it might | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I am impressed by this course. Keep doing good job! | 1) impressed by this course. Keep doing | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good. Project need to be has less dependency considering the offline users and limited machine capability. | 1) | Good | 1) Project need to be has less | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good Fundamentals | 1) Very | Good | 1) Fundamentals | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good lecture, and good explanation. Fix my two knowledge missing point even after i graduate from college. | 1) | Good | 1) lecture, and good explanation. Fix my | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good lecture, and good explanation. Fix my two knowledge missing point even after i graduate from college. | 2) good lecture, and | Good | 2) explanation. Fix my two knowledge missing | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | awesome practice and good GUI framework | 1) awesome practice and | Good | 1) GUI framework | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good course and beautiful lectures. But the programming assignments should be little more tough. | 1) A | Good | 1) course and beautiful lectures. But the | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a solid course. The videos are a bit low quality, and the API's used are sorta derpy, but the content is good. | 1) sorta derpy, but the content is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | When I signed up for this course I had already taken a year's worth of Java classes and was quite well prepared. My overall opinion of the course is that it was really good and the instructors did a good job by presenting clear videos of some beginning - intermediate level concepts. I especially liked Christine's and Mia's presentations. The videos on memory models were really great and helped me a lot. The assignments were really interesting too as they collected and mapped real time data of earthquakes onto a map, but some of the external libraries being used in UnfoldingMaps could have been explained a little better as to what their implementations were. In the beginning it was a little confusing trying to figure out the superclasses even though the Javadocs for them were available. I also felt that the Interaction Design Lab in Germany - the folks who implemented the UnfoldingMaps could have made the Javadocs of their classes a little more detailed. Further explanation of how to use the classes built into the course would have been very helpful. Hence the 4/5 stars given. But overall I really enjoyed the class and am really looking forward to the second class in the sequence. Well done! | 1) course is that it was really | Good | 1) and the instructors did a good | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | When I signed up for this course I had already taken a year's worth of Java classes and was quite well prepared. My overall opinion of the course is that it was really good and the instructors did a good job by presenting clear videos of some beginning - intermediate level concepts. I especially liked Christine's and Mia's presentations. The videos on memory models were really great and helped me a lot. The assignments were really interesting too as they collected and mapped real time data of earthquakes onto a map, but some of the external libraries being used in UnfoldingMaps could have been explained a little better as to what their implementations were. In the beginning it was a little confusing trying to figure out the superclasses even though the Javadocs for them were available. I also felt that the Interaction Design Lab in Germany - the folks who implemented the UnfoldingMaps could have made the Javadocs of their classes a little more detailed. Further explanation of how to use the classes built into the course would have been very helpful. Hence the 4/5 stars given. But overall I really enjoyed the class and am really looking forward to the second class in the sequence. Well done! | 2) good and the instructors did a | Good | 2) job by presenting clear videos of | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good for understanding. Challenges are awesome. | 1) | Good | 1) for understanding. Challenges are awesome. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, but topics covered are mixed with Java GUI library, Algorithm, OO of Java language. It would be good if this course can focus on OO feature of Java only. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but topics covered are mixed | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, but topics covered are mixed with Java GUI library, Algorithm, OO of Java language. It would be good if this course can focus on OO feature of Java only. | 2) of Java language. It would be | Good | 2) if this course can focus on | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | pretty good but expected more of helping writing own programs | 1) pretty | Good | 1) but expected more of helping writing | 3.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really help on building up good foundation of OOP. | 1) Really help on building up | Good | 1) foundation of OOP. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. Much more challenging than I expected. Definitely helped me become a better programmer. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Much more challenging than I | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course, it gives good knowledge about the important parts of java such as inheritance and polymorphism. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it gives good knowledge about | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course, it gives good knowledge about the important parts of java such as inheritance and polymorphism. | 2) Very good course, it gives | Good | 2) knowledge about the important parts of | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | really good explanations and gave a kick start to new comers. | 1) really | Good | 1) explanations and gave a kick start | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I have been following this course since mid 2015 and I found it very good. But because of my busy schedule I usually switch the session. But this time I am really motivated to devote some time for this great course to learn OOP. I have learned a lot in my university about java programming but they did not teach us these stuff which are practiced. we solved a lot of problems there but they had nothing much about using java libraries and OOP. Thanks all the lecturers from UCSD and Coursera for such a great course. | 1) 2015 and I found it very | Good | 1) But because of my busy schedule | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is good!!! I learnt a bit of Java beforehand but not the object oriented concept. Would definitely attend the courses by UC San Diego again as well as pay for the course when I can afford it! | 1) It is | Good | 1) ! ! I learnt a bit | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | in the beginning of the course i thought i'll get a good experience as usual on coursera, but i was wrong ... a lot of things >> to be introduced in next course confusing data types & working with things i don't know about it. you've said that, anyone with basics of programming could pass this course and after 6 months i couldn't. please be sure about the prerequisites next time. | 1) course i thought i'll get a | Good | 1) experience as usual on coursera, but | 1.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good beginner content, touches on some good foundations for java | 1) | Good | 1) beginner content, touches on some good | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good beginner content, touches on some good foundations for java | 2) Good beginner content, touches on some | Good | 2) foundations for java | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good instructors and good course material :) | 1) | Good | 1) instructors and good course material :) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good instructors and good course material :) | 2) good instructors and | Good | 2) course material :) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | OOP in Java was a fantastic course! The syllabus was really good and the assignments were really cool! | 1) fantastic course! The syllabus was really | Good | 1) and the assignments were really cool! | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good Expaination | 1) | Good | 1) Expaination | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The best specialization I've seen on Coursera. The course material is good and each to understand. Great 1st programming course for beginners. | 1) on Coursera. The course material is | Good | 1) and each to understand. Great 1st | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Loved it Interactive learning and good implementation of all the theory taught Would recommend everyone to check it out. | 1) Loved it Interactive learning and | Good | 1) implementation of all the theory taught | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good series for learning Java and OO Principles. The big application approach is very interesting as we can see the whole picture even when we know little yet. The interviews with software engineers are very enlightening. | 1) Very | Good | 1) series for learning Java and OO | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good for beginner, thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginner, thank you | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course, good combination of theory and practice..videos are very well explained and include useful information, nice assignments that are not too difficult but also not too simple. It even includes a social aspect with the peer review part in the end. | 1) Great course, | Good | 1) combination of theory and practice. . | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is insightful and intuitive. The professors have done a great job. If you are already a programmer in some other language, you might find some topics a bit primitive but the project that is at the end of the module should be a good exercise even for the experienced programmers. And, to recreate the entire project on your own would be a great exercise. It will also gear you up nicely for the next course in the specialization. | 1) of the module should be a | Good | 1) exercise even for the experienced programmers. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | An excellent course for taking a step forwards in Java programming. The instructors are great and I love the concept challenge videos as they help clarify new concepts. The programming assignments are good although sometimes felt like they were not challenging enough. The course material isn't that long and the course could easily be completed in 2-3 weeks or even less. Despite that it is not an introductory course to Java, I was able to follow along smoothly without prior Java experience. However previous programming experience is required. | 1) new concepts. The programming assignments are | Good | 1) although sometimes felt like they were | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good introductory course in Java and OOP principles, well designed and structured, provides perfect programming assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course in Java and OOP | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good !!! I love it !! | 1) | Good | 1) ! ! ! I love it | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, but a few loose ends that could be tightened up. Definitely helped with my rusty java skills. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but a few loose ends | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very good course with a direct application in an interesting and engaging project. The video lectures are well structured and lots of additional information is provided. I would recommend this course to all java beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course with a direct application in | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Little bit tough.Very good course | 1) Little bit tough. Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A well-knit coursework and pretty straightforward approach towards understanding concepts in OOP that comes with a good project to practice on. | 1) in OOP that comes with a | Good | 1) project to practice on. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Awesome course. Assignments are fun and I got a lot of things to learn. I was good in Java before starting the course, but still learned a lot. | 1) of things to learn. I was | Good | 1) in Java before starting the course, | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great Course! the lecturer and the learning flow is good... | 1) lecturer and the learning flow is | Good | 1) . . | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course for learn the principles of oop with java. | 1) | Good | 1) course for learn the principles of | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a relatively short and easy course, but it has good lecture videos and programming assignments. Also, I think that you would have to already have fairly good computer programming skills (either in Java or some other language) to take this course, because it pretty much jumps right into adding complex functionality to existing programs to extend their behavior. | 1) and easy course, but it has | Good | 1) lecture videos and programming assignments. Also, | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a relatively short and easy course, but it has good lecture videos and programming assignments. Also, I think that you would have to already have fairly good computer programming skills (either in Java or some other language) to take this course, because it pretty much jumps right into adding complex functionality to existing programs to extend their behavior. | 2) would have to already have fairly | Good | 2) computer programming skills (either in Java | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, ideal for the first half of a second course in computer science. A little java experience is recommended buy you'll probably be ok if you have program in a statically type programming language before because you can pick up java very quickly. The lectures are very good, I think that the teachers are excellent expositors but I feel that they could be more detailed. The project is about representing earthquakes in a map and you are always increasing the complexity. Finally you need to add your own extension which I found an excellent opportunity to test your imagination and your capacity to create new things. The only cons of the course for me is the way assignments are evaluated. I think it has to do with the fact that they are interactive. You have to answers questions in a Quiz related to the week content and the project. But the are not very demanding, therefore they do not reflect how much you really know. In general I recommend taking this course if you are in self study journey in computer science, even more the specialization start to get more interesting and demanding in the follow up courses, more complete and detailed. | 1) | Good | 1) course, ideal for the first half | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, ideal for the first half of a second course in computer science. A little java experience is recommended buy you'll probably be ok if you have program in a statically type programming language before because you can pick up java very quickly. The lectures are very good, I think that the teachers are excellent expositors but I feel that they could be more detailed. The project is about representing earthquakes in a map and you are always increasing the complexity. Finally you need to add your own extension which I found an excellent opportunity to test your imagination and your capacity to create new things. The only cons of the course for me is the way assignments are evaluated. I think it has to do with the fact that they are interactive. You have to answers questions in a Quiz related to the week content and the project. But the are not very demanding, therefore they do not reflect how much you really know. In general I recommend taking this course if you are in self study journey in computer science, even more the specialization start to get more interesting and demanding in the follow up courses, more complete and detailed. | 2) very quickly. The lectures are very | Good | 2) I think that the teachers are | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very Good Course. The Programming Assignment were a bit challenging. It first looked all alien but the Instructions were very helpful and I enjoyed a lot while doing it. This is the best course I have taken up on Coursera and for that matter any online course.It was very interactive. Thank you Coursera. Keep it up | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. The Programming Assignment were a | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a very good class for learning Java! The three teachers are very excellent and nice. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) class for learning Java! The three | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course. It explains in simple way all basic material that you must know about OOP. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It explains in simple way | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is very good explained. However the practice relies a lot in code that cannot be explained like applets or mapping components... Sometimes you need more time to go through the documentation of a graphic library that you will never use again than in doing the actual assignment's core thing. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) explained. However the practice relies a | 3.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great introduction to OOP with Java. This is not a pure theoretical course, neither a entirely practical course... It is both, so the instructors present the material with a good balance between theory and practice. Part of your assignment tasks is to explore on Java classes and learn how to use their methods (functions) in your own programs, which gives you a taste of a daily programmer job. The end of course project stimulates your creativity! Nonetheless, this course will be challenging for someone who has not been exposed to any OOP concepts before. Make sure to practice a lot and go to the discussion forums, which are a great resource for help, at any moment you need it. | 1) instructors present the material with a | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. Part | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very good course for people who are interested in Java | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for people who are interested | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. The exercises have found it very good. I have learned a lot | 1) The exercises have found it very | Good | 1) I have learned a lot | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent approach to teaching Java; i loved the hands on, concept challenges and modules at the end of each course. I wish my professors in university were 1/2 as good as them. | 1) professors in university were 1/2 as | Good | 1) as them. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Coursera gives Universities the flexibility to show their own style of teaching and sharing knowledge. I really love this course, good project. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- However, good course is not only the instructor's' responsibility, but also the students' active involvement. I rate 4 because we need more students get involved in developing this course like creating wiki notes. Extra material to read etc. | 1) knowledge. I really love this course, | Good | 1) project. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- However, good course is | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Coursera gives Universities the flexibility to show their own style of teaching and sharing knowledge. I really love this course, good project. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- However, good course is not only the instructor's' responsibility, but also the students' active involvement. I rate 4 because we need more students get involved in developing this course like creating wiki notes. Extra material to read etc. | 2) this course, good project. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- However, | Good | 2) course is not only the instructor's' | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Outstanding course. It's readily apparent that the course developers put a lot of thought and effort into this course. The mapping example that was used throughout the course was a good choice. | 1) used throughout the course was a | Good | 1) choice. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Every instructor explains the concept in a nice and clear way. The course structure they designed is very logical and well organized. So, it's very easy to follow. Plus, they did a very good job picking core topics in OOP. A must-take class if you're interested in OOP. | 1) follow. Plus, they did a very | Good | 1) job picking core topics in OOP. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | So far so good! I am really excited for this course | 1) So far so | Good | 1) I am really excited for this | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course was very good. I did learn more from this course. Instruction and video tutorials were vivid including the help topics. Very glad to have joined this course. | 1) This course was very | Good | 1) I did learn more from this | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good introduction to JAVA for the intermediate developer. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to JAVA for the intermediate | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course. Some courses that are "object-oriented" start with simple variable declarations and they are extremely boring to work through as there is very little progress in each week. Others assume you know a lot and they are very confusing. This one is very good if you have been exposed to programming before and want to learn object oriented approach. It isn't too easy or hard. Instructors take the time to explain concepts rather than simply using them. Highly recommended. | 1) very confusing. This one is very | Good | 1) if you have been exposed to | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very intuitive! Easy to understand! Good! | 1) Very intuitive! Easy to understand! | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Incredibly Good! Improve my Java Skills in the next level. | 1) Incredibly | Good | 1) Improve my Java Skills in the | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is really great and the explanations are very clear! Instructors are so inspirational! I think the good idea is to develop such a project from scratch, without using given starter code. Thank you a lot! | 1) are so inspirational! I think the | Good | 1) idea is to develop such a | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Rly good course | 1) Rly | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good and challenging ~ ! | 1) | Good | 1) and challenging ~ ! | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Super course. You get through a lot of aspects of object oriented programming in JAVA. The course has a very good balance between learning, doing and thinking. | 1) JAVA. The course has a very | Good | 1) balance between learning, doing and thinking. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good practical overview of Java language with good exercises that emphasize the course contents. | 1) A | Good | 1) practical overview of Java language with | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good practical overview of Java language with good exercises that emphasize the course contents. | 2) practical overview of Java language with | Good | 2) exercises that emphasize the course contents. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course is good for any range of students from novice to experienced programmers . | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for any range of students from | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very crisp explanations. Treatment on polymorphism was very good. The only thing I did not like was that we were forced to cast a few times during our assignments, and usually this is not a good practice to be taught to someone. | 1) explanations. Treatment on polymorphism was very | Good | 1) The only thing I did not | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very crisp explanations. Treatment on polymorphism was very good. The only thing I did not like was that we were forced to cast a few times during our assignments, and usually this is not a good practice to be taught to someone. | 2) and usually this is not a | Good | 2) practice to be taught to someone. | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I learnt some good tricks on this course, it came at the this time for what I was doing at work. I recommend this course as it covers most of the basics, and encapsulated difficult parts, all you do call a method to do something. | 1) I learnt some | Good | 1) tricks on this course, it came | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a good course to take. As we learn OOP in a better understandable way. Instructors explain the concepts well. Also I always like working with maps and as this course assignments are based on map data, plotting data on real maps it like it more. But it would be great if the course have taught to execute the same code through java jar. As using Papplet via eclipse is easy but how to use the same code via computer terminal is quite tricky as we don't find any main method in our code. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course to take. As we learn | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good "introduction" to Java programming. It definitely helps to be familiar with Java already and one should really be able to "read" code and deduce what it does in order to do well on the quizzes. | 1) Very | Good | 1) " introduction" to Java programming. It | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good explanations, easy examples and easy to follow | 1) | Good | 1) explanations, easy examples and easy to | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good explanations and fun project. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations and fun project. | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, but the project of map isn't so clear. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but the project of map | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course! The activities were nice, and challenging. The instructors did a good job of explaining things in diverse ways. | 1) and challenging. The instructors did a | Good | 1) job of explaining things in diverse | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course with it i better understand the java structure. | 1) | Good | 1) course with it i better understand | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good pace and interesting topics. Getting ready to take the next one. | 1) | Good | 1) pace and interesting topics. Getting ready | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Although I agree that the mapping library that is used for the programming assignments adds something visually interesting to the course, I felt that it added an unnecessary level complexity when it came understanding the object-oriented aspects of the language. I spent a lot of time trying to understand how to use a library that I won't likely use again just to be able to apply the core programming concepts being taught in that lesson. Having said this, I felt a good sense of accomplishment after getting through the final project. | 1) Having said this, I felt a | Good | 1) sense of accomplishment after getting through | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course to start learning java with OOPS | 1) | Good | 1) course to start learning java with | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good, well paced course. Big advantage is the short duration of the video-lectures. I prefer a few short ones over one long lecture. | 1) | Good | 1) well paced course. Big advantage is | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | starting from week2 the way of explaining the materials isnt good | 1) way of explaining the materials isnt | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good interaction | 1) | Good | 1) interaction | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good for starters. Very detailed explanations of core programming principles in Java. | 1) | Good | 1) for starters. Very detailed explanations of | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Nice course with very good lectures | 1) Nice course with very | Good | 1) lectures | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Some of the questions are not Java related ones at all which I couldn't see much of a helping point, e,g. What are the coordinates of rio de janeiro?. There were also a few of questions that I found a bit confusing because the code provided is plain white and it's a bit hard to focus on it. I'd rather want to customize the color of the presented code just like modern IDEs do. Everything else seems rather okay and intuitive. So far so good, guys :) | 1) okay and intuitive. So far so | Good | 1) guys :) | 4.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | So far so good. I am really enjoying the review. | 1) So far so | Good | 1) I am really enjoying the review. | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| NFiJtRnpEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good work by the team behind this. I express my sincere gratitude towards all the ones behind this, and would like to express special thanks to my beloved professors. -Muhammed Swafuvan | 1) | Good | 1) work by the team behind this. | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's a good course but it lacks web socket and socket io . Please add a few lessons for them | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course but it lacks web socket | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good enough to be an intro. | 1) | Good | 1) enough to be an intro. | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This was a good introduction to the topic, although a little slowly paced for my tastes, but I am a long time professional programmer, so I have much more background to draw on than many of the students. I started with this course, which encouraged me to go back and take more from the sequence. I recommend taking them in order. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic, although a | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pretty Good | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent teaching. First of all, i thank Dr.k.Muppalla for such wonderful teaching with good exercises. this course will help all those who want to learn about web services. | 1) Muppalla for such wonderful teaching with | Good | 1) exercises. this course will help all | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's a good course that covers a good amount of rich material in a short amount of time. Wish there was some more explanation on certain plugins we are using outside of just 'this is what you do'. Course files would help quite a bit when completing assignments, especially with the amount we are modifying our local projects. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course that covers a good amount | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's a good course that covers a good amount of rich material in a short amount of time. Wish there was some more explanation on certain plugins we are using outside of just 'this is what you do'. Course files would help quite a bit when completing assignments, especially with the amount we are modifying our local projects. | 2) a good course that covers a | Good | 2) amount of rich material in a | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Thank you good course | 1) Thank you | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent. Well structured and good balance between theory and practice. | 1) Excellent. Well structured and | Good | 1) balance between theory and practice. | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good course！！！！！！！ | 1) | Good | 1) course！！！！！！！ | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Not a very good course. The assignments are not very clear. Could have done much more like integrating front-end etc in place of that loopback module. Was really disappointed with this one. Should have given 0 stars but gave 3 stars for Jogesh Muppala as he is my favourite teacher when it comes to MOOC | 1) Not a very | Good | 1) course. The assignments are not very | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good introductory course spanning full-stack server side development. I liked the structured flow of lessons and excercises. A great minus though is that this course has little to none focus on testing. While in the middle of this course I lack insight into testing strategies with node js. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course spanning full-stack server side | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pretty good course. I wouldn't be able to learn so much on my own. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course. I wouldn't be able to | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's good course to get start with! But I think there's no deployment explanation, he doesn't tell how to integrate back-end to Front-End... I'm/was just a Front-End with no experience at all with any Back-End and I struggled to be able to finish last assignment. With 0 experience on Mongoose/MongoDB he was requesting a lot of things to be done out of our range of knowledge. He explains deeply all the steps on the Authentication, I would go strait to the practical knowledge in the cases of Authentication and would go deeper in MongoDB commands and Mongoose stuff. I feel myself weak after this course in those things. Furthermore, the Express Router and how NodeJS/Express Work are pretty well explained wich is really important. Sincerely I'd really made this course 1 or 2 weeks larger ( at least)! But It's a good starting point. He is a good teacher with a good sense of humor, his lesson are never boring so is good spending a lot of hours with Pr. Muppala ! | 1) It's | Good | 1) course to get start with! But | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's good course to get start with! But I think there's no deployment explanation, he doesn't tell how to integrate back-end to Front-End... I'm/was just a Front-End with no experience at all with any Back-End and I struggled to be able to finish last assignment. With 0 experience on Mongoose/MongoDB he was requesting a lot of things to be done out of our range of knowledge. He explains deeply all the steps on the Authentication, I would go strait to the practical knowledge in the cases of Authentication and would go deeper in MongoDB commands and Mongoose stuff. I feel myself weak after this course in those things. Furthermore, the Express Router and how NodeJS/Express Work are pretty well explained wich is really important. Sincerely I'd really made this course 1 or 2 weeks larger ( at least)! But It's a good starting point. He is a good teacher with a good sense of humor, his lesson are never boring so is good spending a lot of hours with Pr. Muppala ! | 2) ( at least)! But It's a | Good | 2) starting point. He is a good | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's good course to get start with! But I think there's no deployment explanation, he doesn't tell how to integrate back-end to Front-End... I'm/was just a Front-End with no experience at all with any Back-End and I struggled to be able to finish last assignment. With 0 experience on Mongoose/MongoDB he was requesting a lot of things to be done out of our range of knowledge. He explains deeply all the steps on the Authentication, I would go strait to the practical knowledge in the cases of Authentication and would go deeper in MongoDB commands and Mongoose stuff. I feel myself weak after this course in those things. Furthermore, the Express Router and how NodeJS/Express Work are pretty well explained wich is really important. Sincerely I'd really made this course 1 or 2 weeks larger ( at least)! But It's a good starting point. He is a good teacher with a good sense of humor, his lesson are never boring so is good spending a lot of hours with Pr. Muppala ! | 3) good starting point. He is a | Good | 3) teacher with a good sense of | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's good course to get start with! But I think there's no deployment explanation, he doesn't tell how to integrate back-end to Front-End... I'm/was just a Front-End with no experience at all with any Back-End and I struggled to be able to finish last assignment. With 0 experience on Mongoose/MongoDB he was requesting a lot of things to be done out of our range of knowledge. He explains deeply all the steps on the Authentication, I would go strait to the practical knowledge in the cases of Authentication and would go deeper in MongoDB commands and Mongoose stuff. I feel myself weak after this course in those things. Furthermore, the Express Router and how NodeJS/Express Work are pretty well explained wich is really important. Sincerely I'd really made this course 1 or 2 weeks larger ( at least)! But It's a good starting point. He is a good teacher with a good sense of humor, his lesson are never boring so is good spending a lot of hours with Pr. Muppala ! | 4) is a good teacher with a | Good | 4) sense of humor, his lesson are | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's good course to get start with! But I think there's no deployment explanation, he doesn't tell how to integrate back-end to Front-End... I'm/was just a Front-End with no experience at all with any Back-End and I struggled to be able to finish last assignment. With 0 experience on Mongoose/MongoDB he was requesting a lot of things to be done out of our range of knowledge. He explains deeply all the steps on the Authentication, I would go strait to the practical knowledge in the cases of Authentication and would go deeper in MongoDB commands and Mongoose stuff. I feel myself weak after this course in those things. Furthermore, the Express Router and how NodeJS/Express Work are pretty well explained wich is really important. Sincerely I'd really made this course 1 or 2 weeks larger ( at least)! But It's a good starting point. He is a good teacher with a good sense of humor, his lesson are never boring so is good spending a lot of hours with Pr. Muppala ! | 5) lesson are never boring so is | Good | 5) spending a lot of hours with | 3.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very Good Thanks Alot | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thanks Alot | 5.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good course !!! | 1) | Good | 1) course ! ! ! | 4.0 |
| ngZrURn5EeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Niihyrb2EeSNXyIAC0mVOQ | The first lesson was very good i will today and maybe tomorrow see the next lesson and i hope that it is also good | 1) The first lesson was very | Good | 1) i will today and maybe tomorrow | 5.0 |
| Niihyrb2EeSNXyIAC0mVOQ | The first lesson was very good i will today and maybe tomorrow see the next lesson and i hope that it is also good | 2) i hope that it is also | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | While U.S. politics is important for many other disciplines, this course didn't have that much depth in my opinion to really be applicable on demands of international student and point of view. Still, very interesting lectures and good talks. | 1) view. Still, very interesting lectures and | Good | 1) talks. | 3.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Very good course. Introductory. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Introductory. | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | Quality speakers and current topics with good discussion | 1) Quality speakers and current topics with | Good | 1) discussion | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | This course gives a lot of new ideas and concepts, along with good discussions on key topics facing public policy and those whom want to make or be involved in it. I have studied by myself for the FSOT, but this course I believe is instrumental in my self-education on political science- public policy. I think all people should take such a course not for their career but for better understanding foreign and domestic policies, and getting into more intellectual debates not like on social media sites. | 1) new ideas and concepts, along with | Good | 1) discussions on key topics facing public | 5.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | I thought it was a great course. It really prompted me to consider the different aspects of the political landscape and how it will look drastically different in the coming years as my generation enters into the field. I recommend this course as a good starting ground for those wanting to gain more perspective for those considering the public service route. | 1) I recommend this course as a | Good | 1) starting ground for those wanting to | 4.0 |
| NiK99anHEeS88iIAC1WehA | This class would do well to have supplemental or required readings and much more difficult quizzes. I think it would be possible to have one's wisdom teeth removed and complete this course on a binge-watching spree while on pain killers. That shouldn't be possible. Good lecturers, though. | 1) pain killers. That shouldn't be possible. | Good | 1) lecturers, though. | 2.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good content. Really informative. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content. Really informative. | 4.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good start for learning History of GD. | 1) | Good | 1) start for learning History of GD. | 4.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Pretty good for such a short course - interesting ideas and exposure to new concepts. Thanks! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) for such a short course - | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This is a very important course in understanding the history of graphic design. Good job to the creators of this course. | 1) understanding the history of graphic design. | Good | 1) job to the creators of this | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | it gives a good understanding of graphic design evolution from post second WW to contemporary time. Very focused on American design. | 1) it gives a | Good | 1) understanding of graphic design evolution from | 4.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good course where you get a short summary of modern graphic design, from the industrial revolution until the late 70s | 1) Very | Good | 1) course where you get a short | 5.0 |
| NjakpyWaEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good information given. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) information given. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| NjbaFTRfEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | All in all this was a very good course. Jeremy Ghez is a bright and inspiring teacher. The content of the course was extremely interesting and well put together. I would have certainly enjoyed to have some sections of the course expanded, which was my only disappointment. I thought the assignments were very well handled and def | 1) in all this was a very | Good | 1) course. Jeremy Ghez is a bright | 4.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | Very informative, taught with great pictures and at a good pace. | 1) with great pictures and at a | Good | 1) pace. | 5.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | good and informative presentation | 1) | Good | 1) and informative presentation | 4.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | A fascinating course but delivered in a rather wooden fashion by the lecturer. Good illustrations. I would have liked to have known more of the overall value (if any) of the Jewish contribution in the context of Chinese economic development i.e. was it of any overall importance- did it make any difference? Is it still relevant? | 1) rather wooden fashion by the lecturer. | Good | 1) illustrations. I would have liked to | 3.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | Excellent class with good use of photographs and video. The professor was clear and interesting. Content was fascinating. | 1) Excellent class with | Good | 1) use of photographs and video. The | 5.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | Course content was nice. Delivery was good. Learn a lot that I have never been aware of. Course logistics was lacking. Hard to keep track where one was. Information about the course was sparse. | 1) Course content was nice. Delivery was | Good | 1) Learn a lot that I have | 3.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | A really lovely course; good pacing, fantastic presentation. Lovingly crafted. | 1) A really lovely course; | Good | 1) pacing, fantastic presentation. Lovingly crafted. | 5.0 |
| nnd5lshWEeSA1yIACye2oA | One of the best courses I have taken on Cousera. Very good instructor. It was more work than some of the courses I have taken because of the number of peer assessments, but I have really enjoyed it. I would be interested in taking other courses from Nanjing University and/or this instructor. | 1) I have taken on Cousera. Very | Good | 1) instructor. It was more work than | 5.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | As others have said, the first four courses were good - I learned a lot from the videos and materials. However, the capstone project was a waste of time. Why a company failing in its industry was chosen as the focus is beyond me. In addition, the concepts learned in the previous four courses were only about 1/3 of the requirements of this capstone project - the problem statement and strategy portions could have been done without having taken the four previous courses at all. This seemed like a very generic project with almost no collaboration between the professors who taught the previous four courses. I expected a lot more from a Wharton-led course - very disappointing. | 1) said, the first four courses were | Good | 1) - I learned a lot from | 1.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | good closing course but peer reviewing and no prof is little untraditional. | 1) | Good | 1) closing course but peer reviewing and | 3.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | Capstone provided a very good platform to use all the knowledge gained in the specialization courses... | 1) Capstone provided a very | Good | 1) platform to use all the knowledge | 5.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | Good to be able to apply the lessons from the individual courses in one, single project, but I missed having actual teachers to review my work as well | 1) | Good | 1) to be able to apply the | 3.0 |
| NNe5CEW4EeW8ow5lHOiKYQ | The peer review is not a good idea for this course. I expected to have valuable inputs from Wharton staff to my submission. | 1) The peer review is not a | Good | 1) idea for this course. I expected | 3.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good and informative course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative course. | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good basic and quick overview of rhinosinusitis and treatments. Great for those who want an introductory review of the sinuses. I highly recommend this course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic and quick overview of rhinosinusitis | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Pretty good!!! | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good review of sinus function and disease | 1) Very | Good | 1) review of sinus function and disease | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | It is very good course , i get good new information thanks | 1) It is very | Good | 1) course , i get good new | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | It is very good course , i get good new information thanks | 2) very good course , i get | Good | 2) new information thanks | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Thank you for going through the basics and differentiating the pathologies for us. As a pediatrician, we often get pushed to treat with antibiotics any little sniffle, but it is so good to ground the knowledge again and be assured we are doing the best for our patients. Thank you. | 1) little sniffle, but it is so | Good | 1) to ground the knowledge again and | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | interesting & straight-forward. Good for anyone seeking more information in medicine :) | 1) interesting & straight-forward. | Good | 1) for anyone seeking more information in | 5.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good course! The teacher was knowledgeable and the material was in consonance with my expectations. My only complaint was about the quizzes which i found to be too short. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! The teacher was knowledgeable and | 4.0 |
| NnouyjuOEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Great overview of the role of sinus surgery. Very well presented with good audio visual material. I would have liked a more comprehensive review of the medical reasons and workup of a chronic sinus case though! | 1) sinus surgery. Very well presented with | Good | 1) audio visual material. I would have | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Pretty good.. A bit tough compared to the rest though. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) . A bit tough compared to | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | This is a good series course to coach Agile process with generic pro | 1) This is a | Good | 1) series course to coach Agile process | 5.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good Course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. | 4.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Very useful to know different tecniques for software project/product planning. Although some of those tecniques are (in my opinion) not very relevant in an Agile environment (like work breakdown structures, pert or gant charts) the course is good to learn how to use those tools and also to ask ourselves whether or not they are actually relevant or useful if we follow the Agile approach. | 1) or gant charts) the course is | Good | 1) to learn how to use those | 4.0 |
| NpTR4zVwEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good teacher. More coding exercises would improve the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher. More coding exercises would improve | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good couse.i love it | 1) Very | Good | 1) couse. i love it | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I really liked this course because Colleen explained the history and background of HTML 5, it wasn't straight to the tags and semantics and syntax; I find knowing the background really helpful to figure out what you can do. The lessons are dynamic, never boring and the supplementary material is good. | 1) boring and the supplementary material is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good class. Covers the basics well. Great instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) class. Covers the basics well. Great | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Nice Course. Very Good for Beginners like me. | 1) Nice Course. Very | Good | 1) for Beginners like me. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen is everything that's right with the world, I can't say enough good things. | 1) the world, I can't say enough | Good | 1) things. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is good to be with you thanks a lot | 1) It is | Good | 1) to be with you thanks a | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good course for Beginner | 1) very | Good | 1) course for Beginner | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good introductory course, love it | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course, love it | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course for an overview of what HTML5 is like! I would have preferred it, however, if there still was a kind of instant autograder, like a parser or something. The lecturer is quite good as well! | 1) or something. The lecturer is quite | Good | 1) as well! | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good and profond course that is fun too :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) and profond course that is fun | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Easy to understand but a bit tricky, good teaching, am very satisfied. | 1) to understand but a bit tricky, | Good | 1) teaching, am very satisfied. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very beginner stuff. Shows a bit of everything. Puts stress on HTML5 tags and accessibility - that is very good. | 1) and accessibility - that is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was fun, engaging and educative. Good instructor. she did so great. | 1) It was fun, engaging and educative. | Good | 1) instructor. she did so great. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's really good for beginners! I didn't believe that at the beginning, because i was really new and it was hard for me to understand some things at first time. But if you don't give up, you will succeed! Lectures are simple and easy for understanding. I strongly recommend this course. | 1) It's really | Good | 1) for beginners! I didn't believe that | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very straightforward. Good teaching. Nice materials. | 1) Very straightforward. | Good | 1) teaching. Nice materials. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | 1) eye opening focus on accessibility and | Good | 1) content on the DOM structure. The | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I would have given this course 5 stars if not for the final exam, which is to look at a jpeg and then write code to make a web page look exactly like the jpeg. The issue is that there are many ways to get a page to look like the image and you will still fail the exam. The course creators have realized this and you now have supporting questions that you can pass the course on even if your page code is not validated as correct. In my opinion there are so many better ways this final exam could have been handled, for instance i would have like to have seen a few more questions in the exam, and once passed you could see a forum area open up for us all to paste our code in or link to a page where we could discuss with teachers and moderators etc. personally I believe that sort of approach would add more value. The above being said the content of the course is excellent for beginners with an eye opening focus on accessibility and good content on the DOM structure. The course will provide you with a good set of tools to get a basic page up on the internet. | 2) course will provide you with a | Good | 2) set of tools to get a | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is pretty much good as it lay down the foundation of web development. It teaches how to design a raw website and how to reach the accessibility. A very good course. | 1) This course is pretty much | Good | 1) as it lay down the foundation | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is pretty much good as it lay down the foundation of web development. It teaches how to design a raw website and how to reach the accessibility. A very good course. | 2) to reach the accessibility. A very | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a good course for beginners who want to understand to learn basic code and do web design. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for beginners who want to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | this is a very good course need more examples. | 1) this is a very | Good | 1) course need more examples. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course, good explanation. Thanks | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) explanation. Thanks | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good learning experience ... thanks to colleen van lent ... | 1) | Good | 1) learning experience . . . thanks | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good introduction in HTML5 | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction in HTML5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | this is very interesting course and the way they teaches us. its very good. thank you so much | 1) way they teaches us. its very | Good | 1) thank you so much | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is, in my opinion, a very good introduction to HTML. The instructor is top notch and the delivery is very smooth. The content isn't too technical, starts a a very basic level without being too simplistic, builds up to an interesting final project, and the entire course can be mastered in just a few hours | 1) is, in my opinion, a very | Good | 1) introduction to HTML. The instructor is | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course to start learning on how to build an html webpage from nothing. Great tutor, easy to understand and good pace throughout the course. | 1) Great tutor, easy to understand and | Good | 1) pace throughout the course. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good beginner course. | 1) | Good | 1) beginner course. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good for beginners for website developer. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners for website developer. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course was not easy for an absolute beginner like myself. However, I was able to master the material by putting in extra time and effort. The instructor was clear and informatinve. This gave me a good beginning in coding. | 1) and informatinve. This gave me a | Good | 1) beginning in coding. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good basics . Do th3e CSS course after it asap :) . they both are a very good combo . Instructor is good , i haven't much used the discussion forums | 1) | Good | 1) basics . Do th3e CSS course | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good basics . Do th3e CSS course after it asap :) . they both are a very good combo . Instructor is good , i haven't much used the discussion forums | 2) . they both are a very | Good | 2) combo . Instructor is good , | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good basics . Do th3e CSS course after it asap :) . they both are a very good combo . Instructor is good , i haven't much used the discussion forums | 3) very good combo . Instructor is | Good | 3) , i haven't much used the | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Lecture videos are very good and Easy to follow. | 1) Lecture videos are very | Good | 1) and Easy to follow. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course for begineer | 1) | Good | 1) course for begineer | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent. This is a very good introduction to HTML. | 1) Excellent. This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to HTML. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good information and great instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) information and great instructor. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really basic course, great for everyone who haven't seen or written any code in their whole life. Teacher is surely likeable and content is easy to follow even during busy, full of work week. It teaches mostly about tags and how to put them together in proper way. I really liked constant reminders about accessibility, that definitely helps with making good habits. | 1) accessibility, that definitely helps with making | Good | 1) habits. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excelent! the courses from this teacher are very well put together and clear even if you have never done any serious web development/design! I would recomend this to anyone who wants to make a start in professional webdevelopment/design! im very happy i took this course its worth it! i even got a certificate from the University of Michichan! this is good on my CV! | 1) the University of Michichan! this is | Good | 1) on my CV! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good start if you know absolutely nothing about HTML. If you are perfectly comfortable with basic HTML tags then this is not the course you need. Onward to CSS. | 1) A | Good | 1) start if you know absolutely nothing | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good, | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Amazing! The professor is really good. She explains things really well and the course is really for beginners like me. Thank you | 1) Amazing! The professor is really | Good | 1) She explains things really well and | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The caliber of questions in the quizzes is quite advanced. I would be fine with that, as the challenge of writing correct html5 is a good challenge. However much of these questions were not covered in the lectures or the required and optional reading. Learning the correct html tag syntax is not intuitive--one has to be shown examples. If no examples have been covered, how can a quiz-taker be expected to create the proper tags? This strikes me as bad pedagogy. In order to answer the questions and prepare the requested page of html tags, it became necessary for a beginner such as me to research elsewhere in order to answer the questions. In that case, I began wondering why I was taking this course, rather than just reviewing the many free html5 explanations on the Internet. Further the very general response to the submitted page of html gives me no help when I am simply told something isn't right and I should review the lessons--again. I expected better feedback. I found this course to be fascinating from the lecture point of view, but "abusive" in terms of quiz expectations. I was going to take the CSS3 course from the series, but now I plan on looking for this education elsewhere. | 1) of writing correct html5 is a | Good | 1) challenge. However much of these questions | 2.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | If you don't have any previous knowledge about this topic this is a very good starting point. It's very well organize and with a hands-on approach that makes easy to understand and learn. | 1) this topic this is a very | Good | 1) starting point. It's very well organize | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | First course out of 5, so far so good! Definitely basic understanding of HTML but I was still able to learn a few new tricks I did not already know going into this. Excited to see what's next in CSS! | 1) out of 5, so far so | Good | 1) Definitely basic understanding of HTML but | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good course for beginner! A lot of knowledges about hosting, domains etc. But not so much about directly HTML5. I would be better to extend this course for 4 weeks! Thank you, Colleen! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for beginner! A lot of | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Perfect course very good and talented teacher, explains everything takes nothing for granted I would recommend to everyone who wants to learn front end web | 1) Perfect course very | Good | 1) and talented teacher, explains everything takes | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course to start with | 1) | Good | 1) course to start with | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good course for beginner, lots of HTML elements are covered in detail during the classes and you will get a good knowledge about HTML. If you code along the course and do all the assignments to practice in the end of the course you will have solid foundation for continued learning and programming in HTML5. It is course that I recommend to enroll. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for beginner, lots of HTML | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good course for beginner, lots of HTML elements are covered in detail during the classes and you will get a good knowledge about HTML. If you code along the course and do all the assignments to practice in the end of the course you will have solid foundation for continued learning and programming in HTML5. It is course that I recommend to enroll. | 2) classes and you will get a | Good | 2) knowledge about HTML. If you code | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good for those who are starting with HTML or don't have prior experience. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for those who are starting with | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lectures. Relevant quizzes. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures. Relevant quizzes. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good course to begin with. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to begin with. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's really from the basics, the teacher it's very good explaining, and the adittional materials are great! | 1) the basics, the teacher it's very | Good | 1) explaining, and the adittional materials are | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good start for beginners | 1) very | Good | 1) start for beginners | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | really good course | 1) really | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen is an amazing instructor. Her unique and humble teaching approach made me feel like I was present in a classroom, and that's a good thing! | 1) in a classroom, and that's a | Good | 1) thing! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is very well planned and the information about the W3C Validator is very good. It helps me a lot to improve my code and make it perfect (almost). Thanks and Keep up the good work!! | 1) about the W3C Validator is very | Good | 1) It helps me a lot to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is very well planned and the information about the W3C Validator is very good. It helps me a lot to improve my code and make it perfect (almost). Thanks and Keep up the good work!! | 2) (almost). Thanks and Keep up the | Good | 2) work! ! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good introduction in general. However, more practical exercises are required. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction in general. However, more practical | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good basic introduction. The final project was a little challenging because some of the questions used coding that wasn't reviewed in either the textbook or in the lectures. The lectures were otherwise very informative and well-structured. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic introduction. The final project was | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good introduction. Maybe it could be improved by adding sample codes. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction. Maybe it could be improved | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | While the textbook used in this course provide a lot of useful background to the Internet, it's history and trends...etc All good knowledge. I am not sure it's the best teaching tool for this course. It lacks the structure to build up a solid foundation of HTML. If the course stops here, the text may be a good reference for students to explore on their own. With CSS and javascript later in the series, I felt a stronger (both in depth and coverage) HTML proficiency is needed. | 1) and trends. . . etc All | Good | 1) knowledge. I am not sure it's | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | While the textbook used in this course provide a lot of useful background to the Internet, it's history and trends...etc All good knowledge. I am not sure it's the best teaching tool for this course. It lacks the structure to build up a solid foundation of HTML. If the course stops here, the text may be a good reference for students to explore on their own. With CSS and javascript later in the series, I felt a stronger (both in depth and coverage) HTML proficiency is needed. | 2) here, the text may be a | Good | 2) reference for students to explore on | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good introduction to the HTML5 part of web development. Some parts of the course could have gone faster, but all in all I think I gained a very good understanding of the material from Prof van Lent. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to the HTML5 part of | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good introduction to the HTML5 part of web development. Some parts of the course could have gone faster, but all in all I think I gained a very good understanding of the material from Prof van Lent. | 2) I think I gained a very | Good | 2) understanding of the material from Prof | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I'd give it a 3.5, but it's not possible so I'm leaning more towards a 4 than a 3. The most positive thing about the course was Prof. van Lent who really knows her stuff. She also has a calm, soothing manner of explaining things and moves with it at the right pace. The content was easy to follow and quizzes were useful. Final assignment was messed up and they really should fix that, but the additional eight questions were basically a transcript of the code itself, and if you did your own code, you shouldn't have had any problem distinguishing the bad code from the good one. Extra stuff for those who successfully finished the course was a nice touch. The real downside of it all was the 'staff'. I got my question answered nine days after I posted it, when I had already finished. I've also seen some rude and condescending yet sparse answers to other students. Similar (but worse) things happen in CSS3 course as well. I don't know who those people are and how they got their jobs, but they should be replaced. Or sent to professional conduct and time management class. | 1) distinguishing the bad code from the | Good | 1) one. Extra stuff for those who | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Nice introduction. Good presenting style which is clear and easy to follow. | 1) Nice introduction. | Good | 1) presenting style which is clear and | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Easy ,good,rich and the best course to start HTML5 . | 1) Easy , | Good | 1) rich and the best course to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a good course for an introduction to HTML (some parts of HTML5). This course does not have details about HTML5 ! | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for an introduction to HTML | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is a very good way to learn HTML. It hold you accountable to the material and is easy to understand. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) way to learn HTML. It hold | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good HTML beginners practice | 1) A | Good | 1) HTML beginners practice | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good start point for absolute beginners, so many thanks for discussing Accessibility Issues. considering them is a must for any web page designer and developer. | 1) very | Good | 1) start point for absolute beginners, so | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good build up | 1) | Good | 1) build up | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is at a good pace for people new to web design. I learned fairly well through it. Colleen is an excellent lecturer and understands the initial processes of learning to teach the course well. | 1) This course is at a | Good | 1) pace for people new to web | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good intro, gave a good introduction to HTML5 if you know nothing about it or have had some experience in the past and want to dip your toes in. | 1) | Good | 1) intro, gave a good introduction to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good intro, gave a good introduction to HTML5 if you know nothing about it or have had some experience in the past and want to dip your toes in. | 2) Good intro, gave a | Good | 2) introduction to HTML5 if you know | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really good course!!! Week 1 and week 3 are must for every beginner!!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! ! ! Week 1 and | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course with in depth explanation and good quizzes! | 1) course with in depth explanation and | Good | 1) quizzes! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is really up-to-date and fun as well. And the professor's really good. | 1) as well. And the professor's really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is clear and well-paced for someone who is beginner like me. The instructor was great. Even if you've worked with earlier versions of HTML, this is a good update to HTML5 and how to code cleanly, with good syntax. The coding along lessons are both fun and challenging, so download Sublime or a text editor right away and try things out in your first lesson if you want to get the most out of it. Overall, this was a really good course. I am excited to continue taking the rest of the Web Design certificate . | 1) versions of HTML, this is a | Good | 1) update to HTML5 and how to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is clear and well-paced for someone who is beginner like me. The instructor was great. Even if you've worked with earlier versions of HTML, this is a good update to HTML5 and how to code cleanly, with good syntax. The coding along lessons are both fun and challenging, so download Sublime or a text editor right away and try things out in your first lesson if you want to get the most out of it. Overall, this was a really good course. I am excited to continue taking the rest of the Web Design certificate . | 2) and how to code cleanly, with | Good | 2) syntax. The coding along lessons are | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is clear and well-paced for someone who is beginner like me. The instructor was great. Even if you've worked with earlier versions of HTML, this is a good update to HTML5 and how to code cleanly, with good syntax. The coding along lessons are both fun and challenging, so download Sublime or a text editor right away and try things out in your first lesson if you want to get the most out of it. Overall, this was a really good course. I am excited to continue taking the rest of the Web Design certificate . | 3) it. Overall, this was a really | Good | 3) course. I am excited to continue | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course! Overall probably a little too basic but definitely a good introduction. | 1) little too basic but definitely a | Good | 1) introduction. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction for beginners and a great way to lay solid basis for more advanced developers. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for beginners and a great | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good.... | 1) very | Good | 1) . . . | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good to have this tutorial, hopefully i can implement what i've been learning so far, and in the end make it real to the problem to be encountered | 1) | Good | 1) to have this tutorial, hopefully i | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good introduction course with concise information about the subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction course with concise information about | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Basic introduction to HTML5. Though there were some issues with final project submission etc. but it was a good start in the world of HTML5. Also, when coupled with the other two courses of CSS3 and Javascript, it would really be a dangerous combination. Looking forward for other courses. | 1) submission etc. but it was a | Good | 1) start in the world of HTML5. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | the basic of html but really good for a person that want to begin to learn html like me. the best challenge was to make the final project. I did it. | 1) the basic of html but really | Good | 1) for a person that want to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | pretty good! | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good and clear introductory course. Additonal learning material (the book) is really helpful | 1) Very | Good | 1) and clear introductory course. Additonal learning | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Could have been good if there is a practical assignment. | 1) Could have been | Good | 1) if there is a practical assignment. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good intro to the HTML material, which is an entry level into coding in itself. Since its intro it doesn't cover the vast array of of available tricks accessible within the language and there may be instances where you have to seek tips elsewhere on the internet. By the end of it all you should be able to build some basic HTML elements. With that, there are still some tidbits about the basics of HTML (tags) that I still have questions regarding importance/use of. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro to the HTML material, which | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | If there had been a working autograder for the last final project this course would have been worth it somehow. What does that mean? - The lectures provided valuable information. - The quizzes generally made sense (in relation to the lectures). - Learning how to code wasn't really possible. Why is that? - There is only one programming assignment. - The autograder doesn't give any feedback at all why resp. where things go wrong. That's everything but good style (for software as well as for learning). - Code snippets can't be tested individually. That's very bad behavior in programming. - At the end working code that meets the teached rules is marked as wrong. You are lost without any clue. So probably you can learn something. Unfortunately you can't possibly finish the course with a feeling of success. | 1) things go wrong. That's everything but | Good | 1) style (for software as well as | 2.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent communication for those who are truly beginner. Valuable information and clear explanation of the good practice in writing code and the key for how to create web pages with accessibility | 1) information and clear explanation of the | Good | 1) practice in writing code and the | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | its a good starting for web developing.. | 1) its a | Good | 1) starting for web developing. . | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good starter | 1) | Good | 1) starter | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course! The professor shows the basics with good examples, making easy to understand, changing the coding, testing and fixing errors. Besides, There are a lot of resources extremely useful for those who want to go deeper and learn more!!! Congrats! | 1) The professor shows the basics with | Good | 1) examples, making easy to understand, changing | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The good: This course really shows how to code in the 'right' way both syntax and semantics, so the theory is covered better than in other courses. There are good explanations on how to host your site, whch is not less important than learning coding. The bad: More examples and practice are needed, it's hard to get everything so quickly. I had some initial background so i handeld that ok, but for total newbies it might be too frustrating. The final assignment should be changed imo to peer review, the quiz is not the right way to do it imo. Thanks, learned alot. | 1) The | Good | 1) This course really shows how to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The good: This course really shows how to code in the 'right' way both syntax and semantics, so the theory is covered better than in other courses. There are good explanations on how to host your site, whch is not less important than learning coding. The bad: More examples and practice are needed, it's hard to get everything so quickly. I had some initial background so i handeld that ok, but for total newbies it might be too frustrating. The final assignment should be changed imo to peer review, the quiz is not the right way to do it imo. Thanks, learned alot. | 2) than in other courses. There are | Good | 2) explanations on how to host your | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course for basic HTML knowledge~ | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for basic HTML knowledge~ | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very detailed instructions. Good for begeniers. | 1) Very detailed instructions. | Good | 1) for begeniers. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, but weird final evaluation check. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but weird final evaluation check. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course is very good. It opened up my world of web design and development. Besides the instructor is knowledge about what she teaches. Thank you | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) It opened up my world of | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I thing the course is good for an introduction perspective. | 1) I thing the course is | Good | 1) for an introduction perspective. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good introduction | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Such a nice course. Very good for an introductory course | 1) Such a nice course. Very | Good | 1) for an introductory course | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent, clear and to the point. It is good to see a focus on both standards compliance and accessibility, that latter al too often being ignored. Covers a fair amount of ground in three weeks but has fairly narrow ambitions; to make the most of this one needs to view it in the context of the full specialisation. | 1) and to the point. It is | Good | 1) to see a focus on both | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents and details would be good, but this was a good start into HTML5 | 1) | Good | 1) lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents and details would be good, but this was a good start into HTML5 | 2) additional contents and details would be | Good | 2) but this was a good start | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good lecturer and presentation. Some additional contents and details would be good, but this was a good start into HTML5 | 3) be good, but this was a | Good | 3) start into HTML5 | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good start but needs more examples within the course and more projects to work on | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start but needs more examples within | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Actually it is too good. I have completed priorly when shall I get statement of accomplishment? | 1) Actually it is too | Good | 1) I have completed priorly when shall | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course to understand the basics of HTML 5. | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand the basics of | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's good to know about some knowledge about tags in details and cpanel and ftp | 1) It's | Good | 1) to know about some knowledge about | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was a very good course. I understood everything. My only complaint is that the tests questions were repetitive and so it would be easy to cheat on a second or third attempt and also the final quiz should have been more about writing your own code. I think what should have been tested was the end product by the autograder rather than the exact code. I'm not sure how that would work but it would result in a more precise grade rather than the 87.5% everyone gets and also help the student write his/her own code rather than proofreading and selecting others. I did thoroughly enjoy the course and am looking forward to Course two of the series on CSS3. | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) course. I understood everything. My only | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good course for anyone who wants to start learning basics of web-development. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for anyone who wants to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course! I recommend to everyone! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I recommend to everyone! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This course was really good and it taught me some of the basic stuff that other beginner tutorials often overlook. One such thing was web hosting. Many HTML tutorials teach us how to make web pages, but not how to host those web pages. Great Effort! Thank You for teaching us! | 1) This course was really | Good | 1) and it taught me some of | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good classes. Colleen makes it easy to understand, even for those who aren't experienced in web development/design. | 1) very | Good | 1) classes. Colleen makes it easy to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course for those of us who want to learn about the basics of creating a webpage / website. I'm very glad I took this course and now signed up for CSS. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for those of us who | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course was a very good introduction to web programming. While I have dabbled with html in the past, I didn't know anything about semantics, which this course emphasizes. Great course. I'll be starting the CSS course soon. Thanks! | 1) The course was a very | Good | 1) introduction to web programming. While I | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Its a good opportunity to learn latest technologies.And resources that you are providing to learn are really good | 1) Its a | Good | 1) opportunity to learn latest technologies. And | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Its a good opportunity to learn latest technologies.And resources that you are providing to learn are really good | 2) are providing to learn are really | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really good and introdutory, although i had previous contact with HTML it was also a great way of getting to know better HTML5 and its semantic. Beyond that, the focus on accessibility is an amazing feature. | 1) Really | Good | 1) and introdutory, although i had previous | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course to get started writing good, clean, readable and accessible HTML! | 1) Excellent course to get started writing | Good | 1) clean, readable and accessible HTML! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Video Lectures are good. Quiz taking method is Great. Liked. Thanks for the course. | 1) Video Lectures are | Good | 1) Quiz taking method is Great. Liked. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good course for those who want to learn from the very basics and know the roots of web designing. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for those who want to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It is a great course for starters, to get a good basic knoledge of how the HTML5 language works... from know on I go ahead and study and apply new tags. Thanks from Colombia teacher Colleen | 1) course for starters, to get a | Good | 1) basic knoledge of how the HTML5 | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very basic introduction. Good for anyone new to HTML | 1) A very basic introduction. | Good | 1) for anyone new to HTML | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Brilliant professor! Good course! | 1) Brilliant professor! | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good for starting a career from Scratch | 1) Very | Good | 1) for starting a career from Scratch | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course probably should be a bit longer to go into more detail on certain things. I have HTML experience, but no HTML5, figured this would be a good beginners course. Felt the final coding assignment was a bit vague as far as instructions and the video. I can use different tags to make the page look similar to the professors layout, and not be exact in what's required. | 1) HTML5, figured this would be a | Good | 1) beginners course. Felt the final coding | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's HTML5 in a nutshell, simple as that. I knew HTML4 before and I got a good introduction to new HTML5. Thanks. | 1) HTML4 before and I got a | Good | 1) introduction to new HTML5. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Straightforward and well organized intro to html5. Of course it won't teach everything about htm5, but it's a good one to help you step into it! | 1) everything about htm5, but it's a | Good | 1) one to help you step into | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course for very beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for very beginners. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good introduction to web development | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to web development | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A very good course for the beginners who want to learn HTML. I'm glad that i enrolled for this course. Thank you Coursera. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for the beginners who want | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I really enjoy the course. Good job teacher. | 1) I really enjoy the course. | Good | 1) job teacher. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Good Course and contents. Colleen has explained every concept very deeply and descriptively. I have enjoyed the learning. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course and contents. Colleen has explained | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course for beginner, and for good choice for those who know a little about web and want to go through all the basic concepts again. The instructor explain concepts form tags to deployment clean and well. | 1) Great course for beginner, and for | Good | 1) choice for those who know a | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Is a good course | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good intro to the very basics. emphasis on good standards. not enough in-depth analysis or practices. maybe for the next upcoming series. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the very basics. emphasis | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | good intro to the very basics. emphasis on good standards. not enough in-depth analysis or practices. maybe for the next upcoming series. | 2) to the very basics. emphasis on | Good | 2) standards. not enough in-depth analysis or | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Awesome Course very good resourses and a very good instructor who learns the basics it really helped me. thanks coursera, Mrs. van lent and umich :) | 1) Awesome Course very | Good | 1) resourses and a very good instructor | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Awesome Course very good resourses and a very good instructor who learns the basics it really helped me. thanks coursera, Mrs. van lent and umich :) | 2) very good resourses and a very | Good | 2) instructor who learns the basics it | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good course and well explained by D.Collen thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) course and well explained by D. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was very good for beginners and very very good explanation had done. | 1) It was very | Good | 1) for beginners and very very good | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was very good for beginners and very very good explanation had done. | 2) good for beginners and very very | Good | 2) explanation had done. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really great course: informative and with very good teacher! | 1) great course: informative and with very | Good | 1) teacher! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Is a great course! The explanations are very good! I recomend this course to everyone regardless of his knowledges over html. | 1) great course! The explanations are very | Good | 1) I recomend this course to everyone | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It was good but little bit too fast, and not obvious, i suppose it would be better it was over 6weeks for HTML5 things only. | 1) It was | Good | 1) but little bit too fast, and | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | my teacher is excellent. she is nice heart and true way of thinking. i prayer is always do a nice work. and God listen her prayer. my teacher is excellent way of teaching and good explanation. i understand each lecture and keep her way of logic in my mind. thank you my teacher. my best way always for you. | 1) is excellent way of teaching and | Good | 1) explanation. i understand each lecture and | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a very good course for a working professionals. I learned a lot from this course. The auto-grader did not work as smoothly. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course for a working professionals. I | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction to HTML5 and you will encourage to learn more about the whole stuff :) | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to HTML5 and you will | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very Good Course to learn just the very basics of HTML. You'll learn a lot from it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course to learn just the very | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good head-start to learning HTML5. | 1) A | Good | 1) head-start to learning HTML5. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good,but I think somewhere is not clear. | 1) | Good | 1) but I think somewhere is not | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's really good, you learn a lot and the professor is awesome | 1) It's really | Good | 1) you learn a lot and the | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, good teacher, very usefull. Thanks! | 1) | Good | 1) course, good teacher, very usefull. Thanks! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, good teacher, very usefull. Thanks! | 2) Good course, | Good | 2) teacher, very usefull. Thanks! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Great course, with a good speed and information to start your journey to create websites. | 1) Great course, with a | Good | 1) speed and information to start your | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The class was good. The instructor is great and she is very knowledgeable. I just wish there were more content in the class. | 1) The class was | Good | 1) The instructor is great and she | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | It's a good course for introducing students to html. it gives a broad intro but you have to take it slow | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for introducing students to html. | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good, clear quality lectures. the right amount of work involved to do some learning without having to rearrange my life. overall very good course. | 1) | Good | 1) clear quality lectures. the right amount | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good, clear quality lectures. the right amount of work involved to do some learning without having to rearrange my life. overall very good course. | 2) to rearrange my life. overall very | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course. Looking forward to go to next level | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Looking forward to go to | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The course is very good. It is not so easy to pass the quizes but it does get you hooked on HTML | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) It is not so easy to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good for beginner, but I think it would be better to add more practice in the course. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginner, but I think it | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A lot of repetitive information here, throughout each lesson. I was expecting a bit more coding opportunities. However, I'm not new to HTML and think this is still a good introduction for brand-brand new coders (like ages 12-15). Good refresher for those out of it for a decade or so (like me). | 1) and think this is still a | Good | 1) introduction for brand-brand new coders (like | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A lot of repetitive information here, throughout each lesson. I was expecting a bit more coding opportunities. However, I'm not new to HTML and think this is still a good introduction for brand-brand new coders (like ages 12-15). Good refresher for those out of it for a decade or so (like me). | 2) brand-brand new coders (like ages 12-15). | Good | 2) refresher for those out of it | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good course but more assignments should be included except the quizzes .... | 1) Very | Good | 1) course but more assignments should be | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Couple hiccups with the autograder, but otherwise this course was very good. After messing around with HTML for years, it was about time I learned what the deal with HTML5 is. Just the right length, and definitely an Easy level of difficulty. | 1) but otherwise this course was very | Good | 1) After messing around with HTML for | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Very good. it would be great if our teacher suggests us some guide book or task book.tks | 1) Very | Good | 1) it would be great if our | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is an excellent introduction to the world of web design. I knew absolutely nothing about HTML before, but after the course I have found an interest in coding that I never realised I had. Great teacher, and good course structure that is easy to understand and follow. I am looking forward to learning more in the next course in this Introduction to Web Design series. | 1) realised I had. Great teacher, and | Good | 1) course structure that is easy to | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Videos were OK, practice quizzes somewhat helpful. However, the final autograder quiz was extremely temperamental and gave no usable feedback. This resulted in frustration and made what should have been a good experience a very bad one. Updated course to three stars since a change was made to be able to pass the final quiz without needing to pass the autograder submission. | 1) made what should have been a | Good | 1) experience a very bad one. Updated | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This was one of the excellent course. A good quality fundamentals and concept oriented. | 1) one of the excellent course. A | Good | 1) quality fundamentals and concept oriented. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really good Job:) Well Paced and awesome work :) Keep it up :) Thank You :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) Job:) Well Paced and awesome work | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | I liked this course and the professor was good, just wished they gave an extra week. | 1) this course and the professor was | Good | 1) just wished they gave an extra | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen is amazing teacher! This course is very good for the beginner like me, I like coding after I learn it :) | 1) amazing teacher! This course is very | Good | 1) for the beginner like me, I | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Really good course for beginners. Allows for some experimentation, while giving students the basics. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for beginners. Allows for some | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | The instructor might be a good web developer, but neither she nor anyone else on her team know how to write a parser. Unfortunately, that is exactly what they attempted to do for grading Final Projects. Unless you are ready to suffer through several hours of tearing your hair out because their parser does not accept perfectly written code, don't take this course. The only thing you'll learn through the experience is that some people should stay as far away from writing autograders as the planet would allow them. Additionally, the information presented in this course is available in several better structured and presented versions both on Coursera and other MOOC platforms. So you don't need this course in particular in order to learn the material. | 1) The instructor might be a | Good | 1) web developer, but neither she nor | 1.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Could be the best course on HTML5, but autograder is a pure nightmare. There's a good chance to fail your final project because of technical issues. So, 5 stars for the content, 0 stars for the autograder, 3 stars as a final mark. | 1) is a pure nightmare. There's a | Good | 1) chance to fail your final project | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | For beginners this is a good course to start with. I don't recommend this course for experienced programmers. | 1) For beginners this is a | Good | 1) course to start with. I don't | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good introduction to HTML 5, I like the way it explains about disabilities. But the final test, was just a battle to pass the parser more than the code itself. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to HTML 5, I like | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a good course for anybody interested in learning about HTML but has no technical knowledge. Professor Lent has kept things simple, yet engaging. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for anybody interested in learning | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good introduction to HTML5. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to HTML5. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen, the instructor, was very good. The autograder was not good and wasted people's time. | 1) Colleen, the instructor, was very | Good | 1) The autograder was not good and | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Colleen, the instructor, was very good. The autograder was not good and wasted people's time. | 2) very good. The autograder was not | Good | 2) and wasted people's time. | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Just very good! | 1) Just very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Hate auto grading. Overall good basic course. | 1) Hate auto grading. Overall | Good | 1) basic course. | 3.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent class. Video lectures are very accessible and good content. The automatic parser is a pain, and can be improved. I spent a lot of time to get code that was working and giving the correct output to pass the tests. | 1) Video lectures are very accessible and | Good | 1) content. The automatic parser is a | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | This is a very good course for beginners. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Overall this is a very good course. I had some experience with HTML5, but this course showed me the nuances of standard practice that I was otherwise missing. The instructor was very articulate and offered example with every topic. | 1) Overall this is a very | Good | 1) course. I had some experience with | 4.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Good course, great teacher and above all recognized educational institution that offers it; which adds to the credibility ! Im onto the next one CSS3. | 1) | Good | 1) course, great teacher and above all | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | Excellent course. From the basics neat and clean explanation really good. Liked it very much. | 1) basics neat and clean explanation really | Good | 1) Liked it very much. | 5.0 |
| nQ5d7TbQEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | very good for beginners | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners | 5.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | A very good course. Required readings and lectures are detailed. Will help create a strong platform for the human decision making bias and behavioral aspects on decision making. Detailed example and real cases make help better understand and relate the concepts. The instructors are great. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Required readings and lectures are | 5.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The subject matter is good, but the course does not adequately explain behavioral finance concepts. Most of the course consists of slide decks to read. There is a dearth of video content. I expected better quality from a course provided through Duke University. | 1) The subject matter is | Good | 1) but the course does not adequately | 2.0 |
| NSxhuc9cEeWczg7kSY_tVQ | The video lectures are not adequate, too much self-study effort is needed to have a good understanding of the subject. The time allocated for this topic is not enough. | 1) effort is needed to have a | Good | 1) understanding of the subject. The time | 1.0 |
| NtRu6kfmEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | Good course for beginners, provides basic information about Open MP and MPI usage as well as some useful practical exercises. Also includes profiling/optimization session with Intel C/C++ compiler with good step-by-step instructions. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners, provides basic information | 5.0 |
| NtRu6kfmEeWk9g4dP2hYVQ | Good course for beginners, provides basic information about Open MP and MPI usage as well as some useful practical exercises. Also includes profiling/optimization session with Intel C/C++ compiler with good step-by-step instructions. | 2) session with Intel C/C++ compiler with | Good | 2) step-by-step instructions. | 5.0 |
| nUeuF3EkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | The content of the course is very good, but I guess there always are few people. My submission of assignments could not have been reviewed for a long time. | 1) content of the course is very | Good | 1) but I guess there always are | 1.0 |
| NuH3s9uFEeWoKQ6POrXqdQ | It was very good thanks :D | 1) It was very | Good | 1) thanks :D | 4.0 |
| NuH3s9uFEeWoKQ6POrXqdQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| NuH3s9uFEeWoKQ6POrXqdQ | This course was actually quite helpful for learning Chinese, and it provides fascinating information about Chinese culture. Besides learning the language, you'll learn about holidays, foods, and art, and you'll hear Chinese music. Unfortunately, I could not give the course a good rating because I found some quiz questions impossible to complete. This questions required answers to be typed in Pinyin or in Chinese characters. However, the course gave no information on how to type the Pinyin tone marks or Chinese characters into the response boxes. I tried asking about this in a discussion forum, but got no answer. | 1) could not give the course a | Good | 1) rating because I found some quiz | 2.0 |
| NuH3s9uFEeWoKQ6POrXqdQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| nUm5Ry-iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Interactive, very well organized, good communication with the mentors, also updated information. | 1) Interactive, very well organized, | Good | 1) communication with the mentors, also updated | 5.0 |
| nvfMcDxTEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| nvfMcDxTEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Good course, really enjoyed the project. | 1) | Good | 1) course, really enjoyed the project. | 5.0 |
| nvfMcDxTEeW7GArkqhNhJw | very good! This project is very helpful! | 1) very | Good | 1) This project is very helpful! | 5.0 |
| NvjGfPeCEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very Good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 4.0 |
| NvjGfPeCEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | It's great! Thank you for the very good and important work!))) | 1) great! Thank you for the very | Good | 1) and important work! ))) | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | excellent course, but you need a very good basic on neuroscience | 1) course, but you need a very | Good | 1) basic on neuroscience | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Absoultely Astoundishing. I will highlight the best points: There is a companion textbook. This really helps to consolidate knowledge and sear for new information, although I should say that the tutorials are much complete. There are tutorial notes given to the students. This is crucial. If one was to organize all the course content from just watching the videos it would be impossible. The tutorial notes give a great start for your own knowledge structuring. This course is no light thing. My impression from some of other MOOC sites is that they are much superficial. Their courses seem a good joke at simulating college level education. Medical neuroscience is not like that. You should expect a standard college level neuroscience course. Professor White is amazing. When you think he couldn't surprise you with his teaching methods, he plays music for you! It is better than going to classes. Trust me. I had a neuroscience course in university and I couldn't stad attending classes. I wouldn't have passed wasn't it for Medical Neuroscience. The course subject is just fascinating. Have you ever wondered that there are sensory labeled lines? Did you know that you cannot feel pain unless you have a specific receptor for it? Well, I don't know about you, but for me, that is simply magic. This course will really make you have smarter conversations. Have you wondered launching a neuroscience topic during your date? "Well, did you know that no one really precisely knows how we can see? yes, because what your eyes "see" is just a pattern of light, and it is inverted horizontally and laterally! This is simply the best course I have ever attended What are you waiting for? | 1) much superficial. Their courses seem a | Good | 1) joke at simulating college level education. | 5.0 |
| Nyq7nXzPEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Lots of self study required by anyone from a non-biology/medical background. This is a very interesting topic, and is a good course. | 1) very interesting topic, and is a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| NZmNZlzAEeW3Vw7jVMSMiw | A good refresher well explained though good examples. | 1) A | Good | 1) refresher well explained though good examples. | 4.0 |
| NZmNZlzAEeW3Vw7jVMSMiw | A good refresher well explained though good examples. | 2) A good refresher well explained though | Good | 2) examples. | 4.0 |
| NZmNZlzAEeW3Vw7jVMSMiw | It's a good course although I wished it used more strategic techniques. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course although I wished it used | 4.0 |
| o4yIjxxHEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | A good course for beginners. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 4.0 |
| o4yIjxxHEeWo5g5SXpDA8Q | Good introductory course! | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course! | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | Good course. I would like it better if there are more depth in theories and analysis/examples used in lectures are more reflecting social media and the use of more cutting edge innovation in communication technology. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I would like it better | 4.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | Intresting and well structured course to give an overview of communication science, inc the history of it. It is not a hands on course to learn something to do but a good introduction course. I did it before going deeper into PR. | 1) learn something to do but a | Good | 1) introduction course. I did it before | 4.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | The course was very good. Learnt a lot.Thank you. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) Learnt a lot. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | Great! Concise and comprehensive at the same time! Exactly what an introductory class should offer you: a good presentation of the field and a healthy sense of curiosity. | 1) introductory class should offer you: a | Good | 1) presentation of the field and a | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | i think its a good way to introduce someone with little experience to communications science | 1) i think its a | Good | 1) way to introduce someone with little | 4.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | Really interesting course. Useful and applicable in marketing, branding and public relations. Also good for those who want to expand their understanding of mass media and socio-cultural influence on each and every of us. | 1) marketing, branding and public relations. Also | Good | 1) for those who want to expand | 5.0 |
| O6SzVx2GEeSKwCIACzUCbQ | A ver good course! | 1) A ver | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| o7P0ctXYEeWFqw71fuUDrw | I was excited when I got started with the course. When I completed it, I'd say that I became inspired to learn and find out more about the subject. The lessons are really interesting and thought-provoking at times. But if there will ever be a good find in this course, it is going to be Mike - an expert in the field of planetary science and one who is very enthusiastic about solar system. Best course! | 1) if there will ever be a | Good | 1) find in this course, it is | 5.0 |
| o7P0ctXYEeWFqw71fuUDrw | Very good lecturer - keeps things interesting and uses of figures and results from published peer-reviewed papers. Explains things from first principles and does a very in depth historical analysis of the topics studied. Only criticism I would give would be to have more regular feedback or tests regarding what is learnt. There are 4 topics in this course for the 10 week duration and there's only a test at the end of each topic. A test at the end of each week would keep students on their toes. Nevertheless, still a 5 star course. Thanks for letting me take this! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecturer - keeps things interesting and | 5.0 |
| o7P0ctXYEeWFqw71fuUDrw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| O941HzsyEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | The course was nicely prepared and structured, in my opinion it lacked a bit of content compared to the rest of the specialization. But it's a good rounding up of everything we learned before. | 1) of the specialization. But it's a | Good | 1) rounding up of everything we learned | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good. Thank you very much! I learned a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thank you very much! I learned | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Prof. Robert Austin is great in sharing knowledge and seems very resourceful. His teaching style (even over digital media) is very engaging and creates interest to learn more. Along with that, course materials are also good. | 1) with that, course materials are also | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I liked the course a lot, the references were great and gave me great insight about Strategic Management. The lecturer was really good, specially if you compare him to the one in Strategy Formulation. | 1) Strategic Management. The lecturer was really | Good | 1) specially if you compare him to | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | It looks a good course from its contents. | 1) It looks a | Good | 1) course from its contents. | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good class about Strategic Management. You will learn the history of strategy, you will study the different kind of strategy, the modern era of strategy,... It's a good start if you want to know more about Strategy in general. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class about Strategic Management. You will | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good class about Strategic Management. You will learn the history of strategy, you will study the different kind of strategy, the modern era of strategy,... It's a good start if you want to know more about Strategy in general. | 2) strategy, . . . It's a | Good | 2) start if you want to know | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good introduction into the different concepts | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into the different concepts | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Awesome course and very good style of teaching. Wish I could get the certificate as I don't have enough money to get one. Any ways thanks. | 1) Awesome course and very | Good | 1) style of teaching. Wish I could | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good primer on strategy. | 1) Very | Good | 1) primer on strategy. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | There were lots of good case examples that illustrates various strategy approaches. The simplified approach is good for people who does not have business foundation. He is also good presenter and has good lecturing skills. | 1) There were lots of | Good | 1) case examples that illustrates various strategy | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | There were lots of good case examples that illustrates various strategy approaches. The simplified approach is good for people who does not have business foundation. He is also good presenter and has good lecturing skills. | 2) strategy approaches. The simplified approach is | Good | 2) for people who does not have | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | There were lots of good case examples that illustrates various strategy approaches. The simplified approach is good for people who does not have business foundation. He is also good presenter and has good lecturing skills. | 3) have business foundation. He is also | Good | 3) presenter and has good lecturing skills. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | There were lots of good case examples that illustrates various strategy approaches. The simplified approach is good for people who does not have business foundation. He is also good presenter and has good lecturing skills. | 4) is also good presenter and has | Good | 4) lecturing skills. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good. Clear and sufficient. | 1) | Good | 1) Clear and sufficient. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very Good and helpful | 1) Very | Good | 1) and helpful | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The best course uptil now. ! The tutor in the videos explains very good. | 1) tutor in the videos explains very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | It's a great course! The instructor is very good and makes interesting lessons. | 1) great course! The instructor is very | Good | 1) and makes interesting lessons. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | very good,one of the best moocs on strategy. | 1) very | Good | 1) one of the best moocs on | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This is the essential course for understanding basics and importance of business strategy. Also the language used in the course is simple English so thos who are not good in English, don't worry. | 1) English so thos who are not | Good | 1) in English, don't worry. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The case studies are interesting. The course content is interesting, and the "history" of strategy is a very good point of view to start. The capstone project is a real project, that requires 3-4 hours if done properly. | 1) history" of strategy is a very | Good | 1) point of view to start. The | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | The right kick for a good start | 1) The right kick for a | Good | 1) start | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | It's clear and offers a very good foundation. Supplementary material is helpful. However in my view the course needs more practical illustrations of how some of the different strategy definition and approaches are practised (or not) today by modern-day companies. Some of the material was too abstract and was somewhat difficult to relate to. | 1) It's clear and offers a very | Good | 1) foundation. Supplementary material is helpful. However | 3.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good professor, good voice speed allowing us to follow in the same wa | 1) | Good | 1) professor, good voice speed allowing us | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good professor, good voice speed allowing us to follow in the same wa | 2) Good professor, | Good | 2) voice speed allowing us to follow | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I had rated this course 4 star earlier but, I am downgrading it to 2 star now as the course managers - coursera + CBS seem to have abandoned the coursera while the program is still running and being charged upwards of hundreds of dollars. The final peer assignment date has passed by close to 2 weeks and the grading process is not completed, neither there is any communication from course managers about the same. Very disappointing from Coursera and CBS. For free, the course may be still useful as early introduction to strategy but as paid course, refrain for the time being. My earlier review below. ----- Delivery of the course - presentation, videos, sequencing and articles for each video are very well organized and executed. Referring cases studies is good as well. However, the material seems simplified and is very much a basic course and not intermediate or advanced course. Additionally, the quizzes are very simple and have ample room to increase the difficulty level in order to make the course more challenging. | 1) and executed. Referring cases studies is | Good | 1) as well. However, the material seems | 2.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | VERY GOOD | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | A very good course which helps in understanding the basic strategy management principles | 1) A very | Good | 1) course which helps in understanding the | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | This course is really awesome. Opens up totally different thought process and introduces to some European firms which are really good. | 1) some European firms which are really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Clear types of strategic approach. A good quiz to reinforce the learning Short and sweet with real examples. | 1) Clear types of strategic approach. A | Good | 1) quiz to reinforce the learning Short | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good learning. And good quality of videos. | 1) Very | Good | 1) learning. And good quality of videos. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good learning. And good quality of videos. | 2) Very good learning. And | Good | 2) quality of videos. | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very dynamic, good teacher, quality material, it gives you different approaches about strategy as concept and shows you what can we learn from the past about strategists and how it is being applied these days. | 1) Very dynamic, | Good | 1) teacher, quality material, it gives you | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Useful, good insights, the idea of analyzing the history of strategy | 1) Useful, | Good | 1) insights, the idea of analyzing the | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Super interesting course, engaging instructor. Good pointers to interesting articles for further reading. I highly recommend it! | 1) Super interesting course, engaging instructor. | Good | 1) pointers to interesting articles for further | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Good course, capstone project was interesting | 1) | Good | 1) course, capstone project was interesting | 4.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| oC5XlyT_EeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | Quite good - great examples. Complete and easy to follow. | 1) Quite | Good | 1) - great examples. Complete and easy | 4.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | Wonderful experience for someone who has been out of university for so long. Will be spending time reading the philosophers much more carefully. I had to read too fast in order to do the writing assignments, unfortunately. It is ironic that the writing assignments are to make one reflect and learn, but they force one to read too quickly rather than to enjoy the readings. Good course, however. | 1) rather than to enjoy the readings. | Good | 1) course, however. | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | This course is wonderful and I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it. BUT, it is not well monitored, the peer review process is broken and questions are not answered, making it frustrating. For example, I wrote an essay and received a non-passing grade. I re-wrote it and submitted it. The comments back were very good, but the grade remained a non-passing one. Very difficult to figure it out. I posted a request for clarification and received no response. So, course GREAT, administration of course, not so much. | 1) it. The comments back were very | Good | 1) but the grade remained a non-passing | 3.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | A truly inspiring, engaging course. I really appreciate the interdisciplinary nature and Mr. Roth's enthusiasm and humor. He is also very good at explain potentially very difficult subjects. I LOVE the inclusion of art and | 1) and humor. He is also very | Good | 1) at explain potentially very difficult subjects. | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | Excellent content, very good explanation, interesting lectures. Though | 1) Excellent content, very | Good | 1) explanation, interesting lectures. Though | 5.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very interesting lectures. I found this to be a very good learning opportunity. The professor has a very good grasp of his topic. | 1) found this to be a very | Good | 1) learning opportunity. The professor has a | 4.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | Very interesting lectures. I found this to be a very good learning opportunity. The professor has a very good grasp of his topic. | 2) opportunity. The professor has a very | Good | 2) grasp of his topic. | 4.0 |
| ODnbKv_6EeSa0SIACyGBQw | It's a little annoying, because the videos are the same all the time... but the professor is very good, he knows so much about filosofy! | 1) . but the professor is very | Good | 1) he knows so much about filosofy! | 3.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very nice content and very well explained. Examples are good too. | 1) and very well explained. Examples are | Good | 1) too. | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | I found this course lacking in providing sufficient coverage of the basics in the course videos and lacking a useful and directed reading list. I spent far too much time researching command syntax and using try and error to find what worked with the provided code. Disappointing as topics covered are good. | 1) code. Disappointing as topics covered are | Good | 1) | 2.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | very good content. | 1) very | Good | 1) content. | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very Good Course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Overall I think the course was good. This course requires you to do a lot of self study and research on every single topic. It only covers the very basic and core topics. I would have liked it to have more hands on or practical examples. | 1) Overall I think the course was | Good | 1) This course requires you to do | 3.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very good material, very good professor! | 1) Very | Good | 1) material, very good professor! | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Very good material, very good professor! | 2) Very good material, very | Good | 2) professor! | 5.0 |
| ofcUj5MCEeWI6BJRAK7IKQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oFRMKhbHEeWKlgqs7LdhRw | The course itself is good, however the assessments need to be worked on | 1) The course itself is | Good | 1) however the assessments need to be | 3.0 |
| ofu7SKAEEeSrqiIAC46RtQ | It's really good. I am revising these concepts in the best possible ways through this course! | 1) It's really | Good | 1) I am revising these concepts in | 5.0 |
| ofu7SKAEEeSrqiIAC46RtQ | good course....!! | 1) | Good | 1) course. . . . ! ! | 5.0 |
| OJkRmJz-EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Very good overview of the relevant concepts | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of the relevant concepts | 5.0 |
| ol2EQDE6EeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | It is good course.I expect part2 with english subtitle. | 1) It is | Good | 1) course. I expect part2 with english | 5.0 |
| olJcuUKiEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | The worst Coursera course I have taken. Total waste of time. The lectures are boring and have no real content. The supplementary materials are good though. | 1) real content. The supplementary materials are | Good | 1) though. | 1.0 |
| olJcuUKiEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The material is good and the professors quirky way of presenting is interesting to me at least. I'm enjoying his lectures and am able to follow his examples. | 1) The material is | Good | 1) and the professors quirky way of | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Very good course. The tutor is simply awesome! His passion oozes out through every thought, word, gesture. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The tutor is simply awesome! | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | content is not good, too scattered content, cannot find focus. assignments are meaningless. | 1) content is not | Good | 1) too scattered content, cannot find focus. | 1.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | good; but not as good as the other modules in the specialisation; the instructions for the assignments are a bit too convoluted, clarity would be added not by adding more information, but by reducing the text. | 1) good; but not as | Good | 1) as the other modules in the | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good theory and presentation | 1) | Good | 1) theory and presentation | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good combination of theory and practice. For the assignments you have to conduct an observation and an interview and analyse your collected data, without doing this as a researcher there won't be a complete understanding of the discussed theory. | 1) | Good | 1) combination of theory and practice. For | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | The content and material were really good, interesting and challenging. I wanted to thank you very much for this really great introductory course. | 1) The content and material were really | Good | 1) interesting and challenging. I wanted to | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | good course, well thought through. some of the lectures didn't quite get the message across clearly and some of the assignments didn't quite measure what they intended, but overall i was much impressed, thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) course, well thought through. some of | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good course and teacher, learned a lot and kept me interested | 1) | Good | 1) course and teacher, learned a lot | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | This is a very good course that is helpful both to UG students and experts in this topic. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course that is helpful both to | 5.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | A very good course, although I think there are a couple of improvements that can be made. I flagged a few comments on various areas of the class. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, although I think there are | 4.0 |
| OmgIw0C2EeWZtA4u62x6lQ | Good, but it lacks proper materials to come back to - slides are very heavy and not clear and transcript is missing connections to slides. | 1) | Good | 1) but it lacks proper materials to | 3.0 |
| oovXvNmbEeW6jg7jFY56EQ | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | very good course. nice insights | 1) very | Good | 1) course. nice insights | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | The structure was great, and the videos excellent. Everything was explained simply and the case studies were good. The only problem is that the final assignment is geared only towards professionals, who have a senior enough position and authority to actually try the tools. If the person doing the course is a college student or taking a break, or a low level employee, the assignment isn't really suited to them. | 1) simply and the case studies were | Good | 1) The only problem is that the | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A good introduction into the topic of design thinking. Even thought the participants only will get real understanding of the material when executing them in real life, as with so many topics that are being sought, this course helps you to understand what is special to design thinking. It helped me to distinguish it from e.g. agile/scrum, and be able to work within a design thinking team. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction into the topic of design | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good introduction to design thinking. Provides some useful tools that I have already used in my personal and professional projects and will continue to use in the future. Every video lesson was well done and tied the overall theme into the content well. Highly recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to design thinking. Provides some | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Its a good course for beginners and provides some good insights on how to change the thought | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course for beginners and provides some | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Its a good course for beginners and provides some good insights on how to change the thought | 2) course for beginners and provides some | Good | 2) insights on how to change the | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good course that features intersting lecturers that provide you with real insights. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course that features intersting lecturers that | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Good course... Why don't you bring entire specialization here | 1) | Good | 1) course. . . Why don't you | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Content is fairly good with weak story line and connection across the various modules. Also the lack of in session quiz modules or weekly quiz module to re-inforce learning is disappointing. It's also possible that i was expecting a lot from a course on design thinking and what it turned out to be was just a scratching of the surface of what the definition of Design Thinking is all about. Having read numerous books on Lean Thinking, Agile development, Minimum Viable Propositions, etc. I was really expecting a solid rigorous approach to the world of design thinking. This course let me down and I just managed to scrape through at the end...almost gave up. | 1) Content is fairly | Good | 1) with weak story line and connection | 3.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great course! It gave me some great new viewpoints from which to problem solve. The case studies were relevant and interesting, and the guest speakers were good as well. I wish discussions had been a little more structured - it was kind of a free-for-all which led to a lot of off-topic nonsense to weed through. After the second week, I really stopped checking in because it was too time consuming and that's a little sad. But that would be my only suggestion for improvement. | 1) interesting, and the guest speakers were | Good | 1) as well. I wish discussions had | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Could be better! But is good and very useful. | 1) Could be better! But is | Good | 1) and very useful. | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Good course! The flow of the modules fit perfectly. But I wished they uploaded the lecture slides and the templates for the design thinking process. | 1) | Good | 1) course! The flow of the modules | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A true learning experience. Good for breaking paradigms and think differently plus efficiently | 1) A true learning experience. | Good | 1) for breaking paradigms and think differently | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good course, an a very good amendment to the book! Thank you very much Regards Stefan | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, an a very good amendment | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good course, an a very good amendment to the book! Thank you very much Regards Stefan | 2) Very good course, an a very | Good | 2) amendment to the book! Thank you | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Nice Course, right to the point. Good use of some of design tools. Probably will be better if the course has more in depth info and more tools but is really helpful. | 1) Nice Course, right to the point. | Good | 1) use of some of design tools. | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A good beginning to help structure the thinking process | 1) A | Good | 1) beginning to help structure the thinking | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | The lectures where nice, but the course was too short, the last exam was not quite good. As i have no chance to try out all these techniques at work, I had trouble to remember where I had to use something similar. Was lucky to find one | 1) the last exam was not quite | Good | 1) As i have no chance to | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | excellent course. it is an good tool as a companion for those who bought the books from professor Jeanne Liedtka. | 1) excellent course. it is an | Good | 1) tool as a companion for those | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Good Insights.. | 1) | Good | 1) Insights. . | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | It's a very good course, I think it can be structured in a better way, also it doesn't explain a lot of innovaation process, rather, it gives you an overview of the tools and best practices. If you're looking for a suplement of your design thinking knowledge this is it. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course, I think it can be | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Informative, good presentations and examples. | 1) Informative, | Good | 1) presentations and examples. | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | A very interesting course, with lots of good content. I am excited to learn more now about design thinking. The video featuring Dr. Hess was hilarious! I would love to take a course with him! | 1) very interesting course, with lots of | Good | 1) content. I am excited to learn | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | This is a good class to get insights on the creative process and to add tools into your toolbox for developing ideas and how to potentially form a great idea from a challenge by providing a solution. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) class to get insights on the | 4.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Great course with clear ideias and good examples. | 1) Great course with clear ideias and | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | Very good course I recommend to everyone interested in learning new ways to develop solutions in any field of business or beyond, Jeanne is a great teacher an explains all with simplicity and easy understanding. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course I recommend to everyone interested | 5.0 |
| opCIcU3SEeWeiwqPB940Pw | jeanne liedtka is a good teacher. | 1) jeanne liedtka is a | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| OPehmvpeEeSTISIAC3lNCw | Interesting course. I recommend it for the material and good explanation of the course. Congratulations and thank you for the knowledge. | 1) recommend it for the material and | Good | 1) explanation of the course. Congratulations and | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | This instructor is fantastic. He is exceptionally thorough and his delivery is very good as well. This is a course definitely worth taking if you are interested in learning more about the cloud. | 1) thorough and his delivery is very | Good | 1) as well. This is a course | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Good at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 1) | Good | 1) at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Good at explaining concepts Good Quizzes& assignments | 2) Good at explaining concepts | Good | 2) Quizzes& assignments | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | I enjoyed the contents and homeworks. Overall the delivery was very good, and I have grasped a lot. The main reason that I won't give 5 stars is the program assignment. I have spent and wasted 3 weeks to work on the tools, yes, tools, not the subject matter. Course should clearly indicate that the assignment only works in Linux/UNIX environment, and need to further test the scripts in most popular Linux OS platforms, different c++ versions, and different python versions. | 1) homeworks. Overall the delivery was very | Good | 1) and I have grasped a lot. | 4.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Very useful course. It built my Cloud Computing basis from scratch. Fisrt course gives me the enthusiasm to start the later ones. A good place for studying and sharing with course mates. Thank you! | 1) to start the later ones. A | Good | 1) place for studying and sharing with | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | Professor Indranil Gupta is apt in his explanations. Course Material is highly relevant. Good foundation course for cloud computing. | 1) explanations. Course Material is highly relevant. | Good | 1) foundation course for cloud computing. | 5.0 |
| op_vMOGiEeWr4g7T_DyXNw | a very good course for cloud study. the content is colorful , a lot of examples to support deep understanding of the concepts. The biggest drawback is that maybe there can be some small programming assignment after each week's course. And the standard answers of the Week5 quizz have some bugs. | 1) a very | Good | 1) course for cloud study. the content | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Its a very good course for introduction to Public speaking, however some missing components were like how to hand mic etc | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course for introduction to Public speaking, | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very Good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good structure and does a good coverage of the subject going from concepts to practices in a way that is easy to follow. | 1) Very | Good | 1) structure and does a good coverage | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good structure and does a good coverage of the subject going from concepts to practices in a way that is easy to follow. | 2) Very good structure and does a | Good | 2) coverage of the subject going from | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | The teacher Dr. Matt McGarrity did a great job, it's very good course. | 1) did a great job, it's very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | very nice and the professor teaching is good | 1) nice and the professor teaching is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Certainly a great and useful topic considering PS skill take a long time to nurture, and good speakers are not born, they trained themselves. Also the respectable instructor interact with the students in a lively and efficient manner. Keeping it all simpler | 1) a long time to nurture, and | Good | 1) speakers are not born, they trained | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | This is a amazing class, I have gain a lot of tools for getting over the public speaking apprehension and becoming a better speaker. The lectures are pretty straight-forward with good guidance for each topic given for the section of the course. The peer review for assignments is helpful with feedback as well as some tips from other students who enroll in the course. I have noticed my speaking confidence has grown to where I'm at a comfortable stance when speaking publicly, as well as sounding intelligence and elaborating topics better. I do believe this is a must take course if you wish to improve your ability to communicate publicly. | 1) The lectures are pretty straight-forward with | Good | 1) guidance for each topic given for | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very well done with lot of good and back examples. I really enjoy it. | 1) Very well done with lot of | Good | 1) and back examples. I really enjoy | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I really like the teacher, who is also an excellent speaker himself. The arrangement of the course is clear, persuasive and interesting. Good course. | 1) course is clear, persuasive and interesting. | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good but too long | 1) | Good | 1) but too long | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good to introcution | 1) | Good | 1) to introcution | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I like this course a lot as it provides a very good structure to the discipline of public speaking and a lot of practical recommendations and examples. | 1) lot as it provides a very | Good | 1) structure to the discipline of public | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | very good for me and chinese | 1) very | Good | 1) for me and chinese | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I tried very hard to keep up to it but the monotone and forceful assertions without much hands on or without any lighter moments so to say got me to slide off. I left and resumed and left in cycles, wanting to make good of the course but the over seriousness and authoritative way of teaching finally got the better of me. Sorry, not for me! :/ | 1) left in cycles, wanting to make | Good | 1) of the course but the over | 2.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | it's a really good class for who wants to practice their speaking skills. it's very practical too. | 1) it's a really | Good | 1) class for who wants to practice | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good course, essential!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, essential! ! ! | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | very good course on public speaking . Well described and designed for easy learing | 1) very | Good | 1) course on public speaking . Well | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Dr. McGarrity was inspirational and extremely funny. His delivery of the material was excellent. Perfect combination of good content and great course leader presentation. Very detailed and relevant, with great examples. (The only suggestion would be to share more examples of others speakers, besides political) All sessions were valuable. The course was comprehensive and interesting. Thank you very much for putting this content together. Cheers from Brazil, Carla Romano | 1) material was excellent. Perfect combination of | Good | 1) content and great course leader presentation. | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Great course. Public Speaking is like playing the piano: to get good at it, you have to do it every single day. | 1) like playing the piano: to get | Good | 1) at it, you have to do | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Wasnt punctual, still helped me immensely. Good course to take if youre really serious. | 1) Wasnt punctual, still helped me immensely. | Good | 1) course to take if youre really | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | So far (lesson 9) very good. well structured, well delivered a real pleasure to follow. Sincere thanks. | 1) So far (lesson 9) very | Good | 1) well structured, well delivered a real | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | For a course on public speaking online, it is pretty good, however the course is still an online public speaking course. There are hurdles that you can't really get over. Also, the material is all presented in one way by one presenter which tends to get boring after a while. The material is not always fresh throughout the weeks, and there seems to be too much of a focus on the details of speaking. I think the course could be improved by focusing more on the mindset that we should approach speaking with and how that mindset works out in practice. I left this course after 6 & 1/2 weeks feeling uninspired by the material. | 1) public speaking online, it is pretty | Good | 1) however the course is still an | 3.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | this lecture is in a very good structure and practicial. i like the way professor deliveries the contents. It's acttrictive and the language is easy to understand. Also, the examples explaine the concept well. It;s really awsome! | 1) this lecture is in a very | Good | 1) structure and practicial. i like the | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good way to enhance ourselves | 1) | Good | 1) way to enhance ourselves | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | This course has been extremely helpful and fun. I have learned allot from it, and have enjoyed it's intense amount of knowledge. Each week, my perspective on what a good public speaker was changed. I was even able to apply it to everyday things in life. Such as listening to a sermon on Sunday, or participating in a audit with my employer. Overall I greatly appreciate the effort made here to educate more public speakers. I have learned so much and am not looking forward to the end of this course in a few weeks! Thank you to all who made this possible- ~A Student | 1) week, my perspective on what a | Good | 1) public speaker was changed. I was | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | It appeared to be a very good course for me. Not only the content is good (may be for some students it will seem quite obvious - not for me, actually), but the tutor itself is kind of role model of a person who is good at public speaking. I think even just watching the videos without doing any exercises will increase the watchers' public speaking skills. | 1) It appeared to be a very | Good | 1) course for me. Not only the | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | It appeared to be a very good course for me. Not only the content is good (may be for some students it will seem quite obvious - not for me, actually), but the tutor itself is kind of role model of a person who is good at public speaking. I think even just watching the videos without doing any exercises will increase the watchers' public speaking skills. | 2) me. Not only the content is | Good | 2) (may be for some students it | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | It appeared to be a very good course for me. Not only the content is good (may be for some students it will seem quite obvious - not for me, actually), but the tutor itself is kind of role model of a person who is good at public speaking. I think even just watching the videos without doing any exercises will increase the watchers' public speaking skills. | 3) model of a person who is | Good | 3) at public speaking. I think even | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | A very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I could not follow the course but I think the teacher is quite good and goes through the essential needed for a good oral. I'll try to follow some more lessons... | 1) I think the teacher is quite | Good | 1) and goes through the essential needed | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | I could not follow the course but I think the teacher is quite good and goes through the essential needed for a good oral. I'll try to follow some more lessons... | 2) through the essential needed for a | Good | 2) oral. I'll try to follow some | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good course, valuable information, great peer review method, outstanding teacher. I strongly recommend this course, and advice you to practice the video assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, valuable information, great peer review | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | A good way to overcome your fears of public speaking. | 1) A | Good | 1) way to overcome your fears of | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | This is real excellent course for us to undersand how to be a good speaker. I learned how to structure the lecture, I learned how to identify a good presentation. The last portion is my favor part as a English as 2nd language speaker. | 1) to undersand how to be a | Good | 1) speaker. I learned how to structure | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | This is real excellent course for us to undersand how to be a good speaker. I learned how to structure the lecture, I learned how to identify a good presentation. The last portion is my favor part as a English as 2nd language speaker. | 2) I learned how to identify a | Good | 2) presentation. The last portion is my | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Everyone must do it! Very good! | 1) Everyone must do it! Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | This course was really good to learn for Introduction to public speaking. | 1) This course was really | Good | 1) to learn for Introduction to public | 4.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very, very good!!! | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Good and useful course! | 1) | Good | 1) and useful course! | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Just love the way this subject is taken on: practical and clear. From the start it takes away the preconception that good speakers are just born. This course states: good speeches are just the result of good, careful preparation, and there are ways to learn how to do exactly that. I never thought it would be possible to learn to speak in public like this, but it is. There are lots of examples analyzed to the core elements, and exercises to be uploaded as videos for peer assignments. Great to get feedback, and to be able to refine and record again the same speech with its help. Perfect also that you can follow it on your own on demand, and advance according to your own schedule. And of course, it is a pleasure to see the main teacher speaking! | 1) it takes away the preconception that | Good | 1) speakers are just born. This course | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Just love the way this subject is taken on: practical and clear. From the start it takes away the preconception that good speakers are just born. This course states: good speeches are just the result of good, careful preparation, and there are ways to learn how to do exactly that. I never thought it would be possible to learn to speak in public like this, but it is. There are lots of examples analyzed to the core elements, and exercises to be uploaded as videos for peer assignments. Great to get feedback, and to be able to refine and record again the same speech with its help. Perfect also that you can follow it on your own on demand, and advance according to your own schedule. And of course, it is a pleasure to see the main teacher speaking! | 2) are just born. This course states: | Good | 2) speeches are just the result of | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Just love the way this subject is taken on: practical and clear. From the start it takes away the preconception that good speakers are just born. This course states: good speeches are just the result of good, careful preparation, and there are ways to learn how to do exactly that. I never thought it would be possible to learn to speak in public like this, but it is. There are lots of examples analyzed to the core elements, and exercises to be uploaded as videos for peer assignments. Great to get feedback, and to be able to refine and record again the same speech with its help. Perfect also that you can follow it on your own on demand, and advance according to your own schedule. And of course, it is a pleasure to see the main teacher speaking! | 3) speeches are just the result of | Good | 3) careful preparation, and there are ways | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | The teacher is very good and has excellent teaching skills. This course helped me in my job, academic and personal life. | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) and has excellent teaching skills. This | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | Excellent course, good exercises and great teacher. | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) exercises and great teacher. | 5.0 |
| OrpXgQt0EeS5diIACoo5jQ | My gracious thank to Matt sir and I have developed a lot of qualities from the course. I think that I will a good speaker one day and that day is n | 1) I think that I will a | Good | 1) speaker one day and that day | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | The structure of this course is really good. The slides demonstrates everything clearly. The speed that the instructor talks is good too. | 1) structure of this course is really | Good | 1) The slides demonstrates everything clearly. The | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | The structure of this course is really good. The slides demonstrates everything clearly. The speed that the instructor talks is good too. | 2) speed that the instructor talks is | Good | 2) too. | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Very good course. while it does not cover everything. the teacher does a great job explaining things in a simple manner. My feed back would be to move ANOVA into this module. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. while it does not cover | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Does a good job of explain a complicated topic in a very simple and understandable way | 1) Does a | Good | 1) job of explain a complicated topic | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Good Explanation | 1) | Good | 1) Explanation | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Good course well taught. | 1) | Good | 1) course well taught. | 5.0 |
| oSAFEslDEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | An extremely good introductory course. A must for undergraduates. The style of teaching is fluid and you learn concepts step by step. For more advanced learners the only drawback I see is that this is, by default, an introductory course.But still for advanced learners it can be a great (and I really mean great) refresher. | 1) An extremely | Good | 1) introductory course. A must for undergraduates. | 4.0 |
| oSDxwswyEeWXgg4wnpJx-w | Excellent course. The material is very well presented. You get the chance to understand the intuitions behind many concepts relating to SNA in a very systematic manner. Can serve as a good basis for M.Sc or Phd level students that are interested to explore this area. The evaluation process is really well defined and the length of course is really appropriate. Thanks, Prokopis | 1) systematic manner. Can serve as a | Good | 1) basis for M. Sc or Phd | 5.0 |
| oSDxwswyEeWXgg4wnpJx-w | Very good course on Social Networks, and also a hard one even for graduate level. Generally assignments are not too tough but fully understanding all the concepts take lots of extra readings. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on Social Networks, and also | 5.0 |
| OUTGOrvTEeWuCAqiwoZfSw | A good course for consolidating essential Excel skills, may be a little basic for some but a good introduction and lead in to the specialisation. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for consolidating essential Excel skills, | 4.0 |
| OUTGOrvTEeWuCAqiwoZfSw | A good course for consolidating essential Excel skills, may be a little basic for some but a good introduction and lead in to the specialisation. | 2) little basic for some but a | Good | 2) introduction and lead in to the | 4.0 |
| OUTGOrvTEeWuCAqiwoZfSw | Awesome course for beginners. Explanation with examples are really good and easily understandable. | 1) beginners. Explanation with examples are really | Good | 1) and easily understandable. | 5.0 |
| ow0AdTeOEeWnxw5wP_KHTw | This was hard, but I was happy and the end and have a good grade. Thank to my classmates , thank to ESSEC | 1) and the end and have a | Good | 1) grade. Thank to my classmates , | 5.0 |
| ow4CDdJIEeS9RyIACzUXlQ | Very good and interesting course. The assignments could have been a little more difficult for me, but it was good tht they made you think about how you can improve yourself and how you can help others. Also reading each others assignments was really helpful and inspiring. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course. The assignments could | 4.0 |
| ow4CDdJIEeS9RyIACzUXlQ | Very good and interesting course. The assignments could have been a little more difficult for me, but it was good tht they made you think about how you can improve yourself and how you can help others. Also reading each others assignments was really helpful and inspiring. | 2) difficult for me, but it was | Good | 2) tht they made you think about | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Great course with good objectives of business writings. | 1) Great course with | Good | 1) objectives of business writings. | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | This is very good and I would recommend it, but it is quite short compared to other Coursera courses that I have paid for. I think they should add more content for the price they are charging. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) and I would recommend it, but | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | It was very good! | 1) It was very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Sue Robins is an excellent instructor in the art of business writing. She will help you navigate the nuances and best practices behind a good business document | 1) nuances and best practices behind a | Good | 1) business document | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A good brush up and clear information. A bit basic for me personally. This should be stated more clearly. | 1) A | Good | 1) brush up and clear information. A | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good. Overall it is basic, speaker could talk faster and in general the course could move a lot faster. Room for improvement. | 1) | Good | 1) Overall it is basic, speaker could | 3.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good and interesting course, I recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course, I recommend! | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good and practical course with very applicable content. | 1) | Good | 1) and practical course with very applicable | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | I learned a lot with this course, but there are not so many exercises for students to train the content learned. The lectures are very good. | 1) content learned. The lectures are very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good teacher. Is clear in her speech and in visual aids as well. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher. Is clear in her speech | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | It is a good brush up course but a lot of it was common sense. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) brush up course but a lot | 2.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Learning wise , a good course. Certificates for individual courses of the series would have been good. | 1) Learning wise , a | Good | 1) course. Certificates for individual courses of | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Learning wise , a good course. Certificates for individual courses of the series would have been good. | 2) of the series would have been | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Thank you very much! It was very useful. The material of the course were right, prompt and good collected. | 1) the course were right, prompt and | Good | 1) collected. | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Informative and easy to understand, even though the course could have benefit more if we actually get a few peer-review exercises regarding the type of writing we learned from the course. Overall, good for beginner. | 1) we learned from the course. Overall, | Good | 1) for beginner. | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | It helps me a lot.it is a good choice for you to learn it.and i love the teacher. | 1) me a lot. it is a | Good | 1) choice for you to learn it. | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A really good foundation for writing. A good refresh of the fundamentals. | 1) A really | Good | 1) foundation for writing. A good refresh | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | A really good foundation for writing. A good refresh of the fundamentals. | 2) really good foundation for writing. A | Good | 2) refresh of the fundamentals. | 5.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Some lessons were a bit obvious, but lots of good content overall. | 1) a bit obvious, but lots of | Good | 1) content overall. | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | Good but basic level for Business Writing. | 1) | Good | 1) but basic level for Business Writing. | 4.0 |
| oZwETNccEeSV9iIAC0wBBw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| O_jWsQCnEeWKrCIAC49PHA | I thank you so much for creating this course. It has helped me right now and will help me in the future. I can tell you that your video player is very efficient. It streams very well and all teachers that were involved in this program did a very good job with their topics and were able to get it right to the finest points. Thanks again for everybody involved and that has dedicated time to put this online program together. Sincerely, Steve Cardona | 1) in this program did a very | Good | 1) job with their topics and were | 5.0 |
| O_jWsQCnEeWKrCIAC49PHA | There are ideas we are all familiar with in this course. Good ones for a new teacher who may be oblivious but there is little concrete information about what those ideas look like in a class setting. For example, there might be a discussion of leadership or respect but no ideas about what those look like. It's a lot of teacher talk with no substance. | 1) all familiar with in this course. | Good | 1) ones for a new teacher who | 1.0 |
| O_jWsQCnEeWKrCIAC49PHA | Quick course on the foundations to be applied on a daily basis in the classroom. They provide with useful information and videos on how to develop from a beginning teacher. I found the course a bit too quick and not going too in depth with certain topics; but overall quite good. | 1) with certain topics; but overall quite | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| o_VGekEUEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Quite a good resource | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) resource | 4.0 |
| o_VGekEUEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Dr. Soren explains very well all the subjects, making them very easy to be followed and understood. There is a very mix of technics during the course, using videos, maps, 3D representations, etc. Dr. Soren is really good and very, very nice person. The only thing I miss, is more weeks of course to enjoy even more this subject. It could be great to have a second part of the course, to have the chance of study Rome deeper and deeper :-) Greatings from Spain! | 1) representations, etc. Dr. Soren is really | Good | 1) and very, very nice person. The | 5.0 |
| o_VGekEUEeWKOBLv1z6n9w | Good content, but odd mashing of video presentations. B | 1) | Good | 1) content, but odd mashing of video | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really loved this second python course I took. Good explaination in the video which helps to make the excersices without looking into a book!! | 1) this second python course I took. | Good | 1) explaination in the video which helps | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good, fundamental, useful | 1) | Good | 1) fundamental, useful | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is excellent. The platform has some aspects not so good - some parts still don't show up as 'done', so the progress line is always wrong. Also, the platform is not structured for a course consisting of a number of courses in series, leaving the dates etc wrong. Chapter 1 and 2 should ideally show up as completed, as theey are repeated in every module (which is fine, but the platform should take care of those members who have done these in a previous module? | 1) platform has some aspects not so | Good | 1) - some parts still don't show | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I can not believe how much I've learned and how comfortable I feel. Getting better all the time. Dr. Chuck's courses are wonderful and with some good self-study on top of the course, you'll be doing some pretty cool stuff in no time. Looking forward to continuing on this path. :) | 1) courses are wonderful and with some | Good | 1) self-study on top of the course, | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It a good practice to learn python | 1) It a | Good | 1) practice to learn python | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A really exciting course! Loads of new information, the course is well designed and good built. The teaching level also is very high. | 1) the course is well designed and | Good | 1) built. The teaching level also is | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course. Good exercises, good coverage of everything. Great for beginners. | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) exercises, good coverage of everything. Great | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course. Good exercises, good coverage of everything. Great for beginners. | 2) Great course. Good exercises, | Good | 2) coverage of everything. Great for beginners. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | was good | 1) was | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thank you for a good course! It was a bit easy but anyway very useful. I'll go ahead with you. Thanks one more! | 1) Thank you for a | Good | 1) course! It was a bit easy | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really excellent course. Great pacing with a really good book (did not watch the videos). The book is fantastic. | 1) course. Great pacing with a really | Good | 1) book (did not watch the videos). | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Dr. Chuck has provided a great depth of knowledge that was easily understood. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Dr. Chuck has provided a | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good one to go thru, best in class. | 1) | Good | 1) one to go thru, best in | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good... i m liking it | 1) | Good | 1) . . i m liking it | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | to simple, not sure enough practice to be good at python | 1) not sure enough practice to be | Good | 1) at python | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very detailed explanations and the excersises were pretty good to learn and practice. | 1) explanations and the excersises were pretty | Good | 1) to learn and practice. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good material with funny explainings. Recommended for all beginners on coding. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material with funny explainings. Recommended for | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr Charles Sevenrance really made the good point of the materials. This class is related to the fundamental principle of data structure and the lecturer really made it easy to understand. Perfect course for beginners. Thank you Dr Charles Severance, thank you Coursera! | 1) Dr Charles Sevenrance really made the | Good | 1) point of the materials. This class | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good stuff , very good material really usefull | 1) very | Good | 1) stuff , very good material really | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good stuff , very good material really usefull | 2) very good stuff , very | Good | 2) material really usefull | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I'm a PHP Developer with a several years experience. I was finding a good way to learn a new language. This course helped me a lot along my way. | 1) years experience. I was finding a | Good | 1) way to learn a new language. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good source for learning lists, dictionaries and tuples in python | 1) Very | Good | 1) source for learning lists, dictionaries and | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good for python self learner. | 1) | Good | 1) for python self learner. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Explanations is pretty well, but it is not so difficulty. So it's good for beginners. | 1) is not so difficulty. So it's | Good | 1) for beginners. | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, very helpful | 1) | Good | 1) course, very helpful | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | pretty good and awsome | 1) pretty | Good | 1) and awsome | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very useful and helpful courses, good for anyone even without programming background | 1) Very useful and helpful courses, | Good | 1) for anyone even without programming background | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great lectures, and a good tempo - not too much, not too little :) | 1) Great lectures, and a | Good | 1) tempo - not too much, not | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think teacher is really good, he is humourous and explain things clearly. However if you really want to master Python, you have to write codes,not just the assignment,it's not enough.And when you get stuck, you need to check in the reference book(Python for Informatics). So I hope more and more students will enroll in this course and enjoy programming. | 1) I think teacher is really | Good | 1) he is humourous and explain things | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good!! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very helpful for people looking to become professional programmers. Very good lecturer and very organised course. | 1) looking to become professional programmers. Very | Good | 1) lecturer and very organised course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course! :-) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! :-) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great class for beginners! Good overview of the various data structures. | 1) Great class for beginners! | Good | 1) overview of the various data structures. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Another excellent course in this series! I find that I am completing assignments quicker and with less help needed which leads me to believe I'm actually learning! Great pace and good info...highly recommended for beginners or those who want to learn another language. | 1) I'm actually learning! Great pace and | Good | 1) info. . . highly recommended for | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good and easy to follow introduction into Python. No pressure, clear and pleasantly presented material - a good place to start learning Python | 1) | Good | 1) and easy to follow introduction into | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good and easy to follow introduction into Python. No pressure, clear and pleasantly presented material - a good place to start learning Python | 2) and pleasantly presented material - a | Good | 2) place to start learning Python | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners! | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is so awesome! As usual, concepts are very well explained by using good examples. I have also taken Dr.Chuck's Python for Everybody course. I am a beginner in learning Python and have some programming experience from my school's class. Honestly these two courses together have helped me most in understanding and using Python. I have also taken some other Python courses but these two really are the best for me. You can start from scratch and then build up step by step. Strongly recommend! | 1) are very well explained by using | Good | 1) examples. I have also taken Dr. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good explanations. Concepts are presented in a comfortable way. So much instructive. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations. Concepts are presented in a | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | really good course, recommended | 1) really | Good | 1) course, recommended | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This continues to be a stellar introduction to programming. Thank you for all of your hard work and good humor. | 1) all of your hard work and | Good | 1) humor. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course. the shell wasn't working properly at all | 1) | Good | 1) course. the shell wasn't working properly | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course to start learning Python collections. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to start learning Python collections. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | VERY GOOD lessons for python！！ | 1) VERY | Good | 1) lessons for python！！ | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, attractive course! Thanks Dr. Chuck for interesting, practical and detailed approach in teaching this course of Python! Thanks for humor and professionalism in lectures! Best regards, Alex | 1) Very | Good | 1) attractive course! Thanks Dr. Chuck for | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A very good course for beginners. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for beginners. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, I liked it! | 1) | Good | 1) course, I liked it! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good and clear explanations in the videos as well as some helpful examples and detailed informations in additional materials (wiki, online-books etc.) | 1) | Good | 1) and clear explanations in the videos | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome experience. Dr. Chuck is a good teacher, gives real time examples, walked us through his world tour. Perfect Videos , sessions.I would give 10/10 for Dr.Chuck , Sir you are the best. | 1) Awesome experience. Dr. Chuck is a | Good | 1) teacher, gives real time examples, walked | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course, it's worth trying! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, it's worth trying! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good course for data structures in python... Gives a great learning experience with problem solving abilities... | 1) A | Good | 1) course for data structures in python. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course for a non-technical background. I highly recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for a non-technical background. I | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good introductory course | 1) very | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good for starting with learning Python | 1) | Good | 1) for starting with learning Python | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good for beginners. Would be nice if there were more assignments. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. Would be nice if | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I enjoyed taking this course very much. The classes were well thought-out and laid a good foundation for understanding Python Data structures. While prior experience is helpful, I think the lectures were clear enough for even someone new to Python to grasp. I would recommend this course to anyone looking to build on the basic knowledge of Python. | 1) were well thought-out and laid a | Good | 1) foundation for understanding Python Data structures. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | all good stuff | 1) all | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course! Extremely helpful :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Extremely helpful :) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course . I enjoyed it . | 1) Very | Good | 1) course . I enjoyed it . | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is good. But the videos are too long....maybe they can be split into parts,which would make them easier to complete | 1) It is | Good | 1) But the videos are too long. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good presentation | 1) Very | Good | 1) presentation | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good course to follow the basic course. Enjoyed doing this. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to follow the basic course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course was really good and I am fascinated by the way they teach us. I am really interested in taking up other courses of my interest offered by University of Michigan. | 1) The course was really | Good | 1) and I am fascinated by the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A very good course and teacher ! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course and teacher ! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Totally not worth having the certificates. Easy assignments. Good for people who never programmed before. | 1) worth having the certificates. Easy assignments. | Good | 1) for people who never programmed before. | 1.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Way too easy assignments. Only good for people who never did any kind of programming. For the rest it's not worth the money. | 1) Way too easy assignments. Only | Good | 1) for people who never did any | 1.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Beautifully crafted course. It had given good insight on Python Data Structures. | 1) Beautifully crafted course. It had given | Good | 1) insight on Python Data Structures. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course for people who want to learn Python from scratch. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for people who want to | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr.Chuck explains everything in detail, he is a really good lecturer. | 1) in detail, he is a really | Good | 1) lecturer. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | pretty good! | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Understood the basics of python till data structures of python. the sessions were good. quick n easy learning. | 1) structures of python. the sessions were | Good | 1) quick n easy learning. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Dr. Charles, is a good instructor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Dr. Charles, is a good | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Dr. Charles, is a good instructor. | 2) good course. Dr. Charles, is a | Good | 2) instructor. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent Way to learn Python. I am completely new to programming, but able to complete the course with in the time and now I am comfortable with the basics python programming. Charles made it a simple thing. His way of teaching, taking it step by step is very nice. Assignments are simple and at the same time ensures that we are good to go to next chapter. Support for questions while doing assignments is great. Thanks to University of Michigan for allowing us completing assignments as well, without payment. This is very great. Giving chance to every one to complete assignments and in addition providing support during assignments is actually shows the social commitment of University that education should be available to every one . | 1) same time ensures that we are | Good | 1) to go to next chapter. Support | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good BASIC course to get familiar with python data structures. Teaching slides and video clear and pleasant. | 1) Very | Good | 1) BASIC course to get familiar with | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good For beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) For beginners. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good introduction to basic data structures! | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to basic data structures! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good Introduction to data structure coding | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction to data structure coding | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This module was a very good introduction for me to learn the basic tools of Python and its unseen behind process. For the ones who can write algorithms in other languages, this is a perfect introduction. | 1) This module was a very | Good | 1) introduction for me to learn the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The professor is particularly good at explaining. He builds from previous lessons and it's easy to get an understanding of the topic. The pace and content are just right. | 1) The professor is particularly | Good | 1) at explaining. He builds from previous | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good and helpful! I appreciate Dr Chunk! Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and helpful! I appreciate Dr Chunk! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good step up in difficulty while also remaining at a good pace. | 1) | Good | 1) step up in difficulty while also | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good step up in difficulty while also remaining at a good pace. | 2) difficulty while also remaining at a | Good | 2) pace. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Gives you a good overview about the data structures available in python. | 1) Gives you a | Good | 1) overview about the data structures available | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's a good course. I liked it. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. I liked it. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | simple and easy for Python beginners, the instructor also has a textbook that could be good instruction. | 1) has a textbook that could be | Good | 1) instruction. | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course! Clearly demonstrated and easy to follow! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Clearly demonstrated and easy to | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is well paced for beginners with good assignments and sample code. | 1) is well paced for beginners with | Good | 1) assignments and sample code. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good follow on from the first part of the course. Started to create slightly useful programs. Can't wait to continue on and finish the entire 5 part series. | 1) Really | Good | 1) follow on from the first part | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A really good course. And it's really fit students who have pass the course" Python for Everyone" and want to learning more about python. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course. And it's really fit students | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very very good, and I love the way professor teaches the course. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) and I love the way professor | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is a very good course! | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good foundation for Python development. | 1) A | Good | 1) foundation for Python development. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good introduction to the most used data structures in Python such as lists, dictionaries, and tuples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the most used data | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | learned a lot. dont forget to read the book its great. the class is a good pace and dr chuck is a great teacher. wish mentors answered more questions on the forums | 1) its great. the class is a | Good | 1) pace and dr chuck is a | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | GooD! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course is great for beginners and Dr Chucky is very good teacher. | 1) beginners and Dr Chucky is very | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good for beginners. | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good intro to python data structures. If you are experienced in other languages, you will probably find this course very easy, but it still provides a decent foundation, and introduces you to some concepts that may not be present in your dynamic language of choice (e.g. there are no tuples in javascript or ruby). | 1) | Good | 1) intro to python data structures. If | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good refresher for old ex programmer :-). Well paced wirhe good material and decent free book | 1) | Good | 1) refresher for old ex programmer :-). | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good refresher for old ex programmer :-). Well paced wirhe good material and decent free book | 2) ex programmer :-). Well paced wirhe | Good | 2) material and decent free book | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good and fund. Some new concept such as list, dictionary, etc, may be better explained for ones not very familiar with these. | 1) | Good | 1) and fund. Some new concept such | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course is extension to Python for everybody and is as good as the first course. The chapters in both courses are well aligned and flow very well from the beginning to end. | 1) Python for everybody and is as | Good | 1) as the first course. The chapters | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The lectures were good and to the point. I learned all the basics and the differences between data structures. The quizzes were quite good, with some nice traps set in them. The programming assignments supported the lectures well, though I felt there could've been more of them (perhaps just as ungraded bonus problems). | 1) The lectures were | Good | 1) and to the point. I learned | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The lectures were good and to the point. I learned all the basics and the differences between data structures. The quizzes were quite good, with some nice traps set in them. The programming assignments supported the lectures well, though I felt there could've been more of them (perhaps just as ungraded bonus problems). | 2) data structures. The quizzes were quite | Good | 2) with some nice traps set in | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's Very suitable for beginners. And it's a Very good introductory course. | 1) for beginners. And it's a Very | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good use of your time | 1) | Good | 1) use of your time | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Profoundly good for Python enthusiast like me. | 1) Profoundly | Good | 1) for Python enthusiast like me. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good lecture! | 1) | Good | 1) lecture! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Quite comprehensive and easy for understanding. Good course for both beginners in programming and far more experienced audience. | 1) Quite comprehensive and easy for understanding. | Good | 1) course for both beginners in programming | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Course moves at a good pace. The instructor seems genuinely passionate about the subject and presents worked solutions 'warts and all' which is a great opportunity to see how to think out the problems. | 1) Course moves at a | Good | 1) pace. The instructor seems genuinely passionate | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is a good introduction for new beginners, interesting and funny. However, not recommended to someone with bases | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introduction for new beginners, interesting and | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good professor, and useful assignments | 1) | Good | 1) professor, and useful assignments | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This course is great as it has an excellent instructor who is really good at teaching and explaining all bits about programming on Python. | 1) an excellent instructor who is really | Good | 1) at teaching and explaining all bits | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thanks | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good and easy-learning course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and easy-learning course! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is a very good course, even for non-programmers. Charles Severance makes a difference in this course. He explains the way that you can understand, it is very helpful. So that, I am still learning Python language. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course, even for non-programmers. Charles Severance | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Fair course. Severance is a good lecturer but necessary to read all notes and the book chapter in addition to the lecture in order to understand the principles. Learned a lot from the course. | 1) Fair course. Severance is a | Good | 1) lecturer but necessary to read all | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course to understand about the data structures in Python. Supported by nice quiz and thought provoking assignments. Really enjoyed the course and proud of myself in completing this course successfully. Would strongly recommend this course to aspiring Python programmers. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to understand about the data | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Step wise learning and good explanation | 1) Step wise learning and | Good | 1) explanation | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think this course was really good, it was a challenge for me, the instructor was good | 1) I think this course was really | Good | 1) it was a challenge for me, | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think this course was really good, it was a challenge for me, the instructor was good | 2) challenge for me, the instructor was | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good material. And I really like that the class has TAs helping with the homework. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material. And I really like that | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, the teacher is still amazingly great! | 1) Very | Good | 1) the teacher is still amazingly great! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good Course for python | 1) | Good | 1) Course for python | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. I wish there were more problems to work. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I wish there were more | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, fun to learn. If you know programming and just want to know how to use python, you can complete this course in a day. | 1) | Good | 1) course, fun to learn. If you | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The professor is very good at teaching, and I've learned a lot from him! | 1) The professor is very | Good | 1) at teaching, and I've learned a | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very well structured course, really good for the beginning! | 1) Very well structured course, really | Good | 1) for the beginning! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course, would recommend. | 1) | Good | 1) course, would recommend. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's a good intro into Python | 1) It's a | Good | 1) intro into Python | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Professor is really good at teaching. | 1) Professor is really | Good | 1) at teaching. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, well structured and explained. I loved the course and its content. I recommend it for who wants to learn Python. | 1) Very | Good | 1) well structured and explained. I loved | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good structured and useful, though the pace is a bit fast (or my pace because I finished the Course in two weeks) | 1) Very | Good | 1) structured and useful, though the pace | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course... Stressing at times. I very much liked Charles, good at teaching | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. . . Stressing at times. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course... Stressing at times. I very much liked Charles, good at teaching | 2) times. I very much liked Charles, | Good | 2) at teaching | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course to start learning Python! | 1) | Good | 1) course to start learning Python! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good content with a nice bit of character and playfulness from the professor. Be prepared to find your own ways to practice and solidify the skill, though. | 1) | Good | 1) content with a nice bit of | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's the second course of the Python specialization course. Dr. Chuck just made programming so funny and consice. Very good for beginners even if you don't have any background. I love this course. Thank you Dr. Chuck :) | 1) programming so funny and consice. Very | Good | 1) for beginners even if you don't | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Awesome second course from Chuck. He explains the material well and provides a great foundation in Python and coding. The mentors are responsive and helpful when you have questions, and the exercises are a good level of challenge but not so difficult they are frustrating. | 1) questions, and the exercises are a | Good | 1) level of challenge but not so | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good one..!! :) | 1) | Good | 1) one. . ! ! :) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good lectures. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course for beginner | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginner | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good course, I wish we could have more practical exercise but It is a really great way of learning! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, I wish we could have | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good explaining on data structures, however shallow for people who already have good programming skills. | 1) | Good | 1) explaining on data structures, however shallow | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good explaining on data structures, however shallow for people who already have good programming skills. | 2) shallow for people who already have | Good | 2) programming skills. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is very good explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks for this good course. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It is very good explained. Nothing more to say. Thanks for this good course. | 2) more to say. Thanks for this | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course, perfect for a continuation of the Python learning process | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, perfect for a continuation of | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good introduction to data structures | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to data structures | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | so good !!! its very nice | 1) so | Good | 1) ! ! ! its very nice | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | for beginners is wary good :) | 1) for beginners is wary | Good | 1) :) | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good introduction to the material. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the material. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good,I have finished it. | 1) very | Good | 1) I have finished it. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good course！ | 1) very | Good | 1) course！ | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good entry-level course, i used it to refresh some basic python knowledge for 3rd course | 1) | Good | 1) entry-level course, i used it to | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | For a programming starter,it is a good course which easily to understand and including quantities of useful technology.The courser is the base of next chapter | 1) a programming starter, it is a | Good | 1) course which easily to understand and | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very informative class. Some of the hard topics in the last 2 chapters are not explained in a way that matched with the code terminology but good examples were given to help figure it out further. | 1) matched with the code terminology but | Good | 1) examples were given to help figure | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Well developed, very clear and fast movement at the same time. Good exercises to practice. The method of teaching is encouraging and not boring at all. | 1) fast movement at the same time. | Good | 1) exercises to practice. The method of | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thorough explanation, good pace for people that need time to take in the information. | 1) Thorough explanation, | Good | 1) pace for people that need time | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Probably good for anyone coming from a non-programmer background. If you're a programmer, can learn everything in a few hours just by looking at any Python tutorial. | 1) Probably | Good | 1) for anyone coming from a non-programmer | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Like the others part of the course... excellent! :). If you want a really good introduction to Python, this is the way ;). | 1) :). If you want a really | Good | 1) introduction to Python, this is the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Fantastic course! Great teacher, clear explanations and good examples I suggest this course, 5 stars!!! | 1) course! Great teacher, clear explanations and | Good | 1) examples I suggest this course, 5 | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good courses! Helps me understand the fundamental thing about programming is the algorithms plus data structures! | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses! Helps me understand the fundamental | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good explanation. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course to learn the basics of Python's Data structures! | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn the basics of | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This is one of the best online course I ever had.The course content is top notch .The assignments are at very good standards.I strongly recommend | 1) . The assignments are at very | Good | 1) standards. I strongly recommend | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good course , thank you coursera | 1) | Good | 1) course , thank you coursera | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent intoroductory course into Python. good pace and excellent assessment environement. | 1) Excellent intoroductory course into Python. | Good | 1) pace and excellent assessment environement. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Simple datastructures ..and a very good lecture | 1) datastructures . . and a very | Good | 1) lecture | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good conclusion to learning the fundamentals of Python, after the first class. I've already been programming in Python for awhile, but there was some basics I had missed, which was extremely helpful for me to learn about. I'm very excited for the next classes! | 1) Very | Good | 1) conclusion to learning the fundamentals of | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Exercise were good. | 1) Exercise were | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I know Python but wanted to refresh and brush up my basics. I have not gone through the video lectures and doing the exercises directly. I found the exercises very well built. Good for learning the basics. | 1) found the exercises very well built. | Good | 1) for learning the basics. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good stuff! Enjoyed it very much. | 1) | Good | 1) stuff! Enjoyed it very much. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good, everything nicely explained and a humoristic teacher. | 1) Very | Good | 1) everything nicely explained and a humoristic | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Overall good | 1) Overall | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good introduction - fun to watch and learn. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction - fun to watch and | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good elementary course | 1) | Good | 1) elementary course | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | So faranother good course to built on top on the first class, however, i wish the professor would have made a video on the notation in Python (.,:() etc) | 1) So faranother | Good | 1) course to built on top on | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good to build python basic data the concept clear | 1) | Good | 1) to build python basic data the | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good and very understanable | 1) | Good | 1) and very understanable | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Loved the weekly exercise | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Loved the weekly exercise | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | More coding exercises, as optional for example, would be nice. Otherwise good course and guide videos. | 1) for example, would be nice. Otherwise | Good | 1) course and guide videos. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good to follow | 1) Very | Good | 1) to follow | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good explanation on small small concept. | 1) very | Good | 1) explanation on small small concept. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great experience as a hobbyist. My first Coursera course that I actually managed to complete. Graded Assignments are very good, they test a student in most areas and probe alternate ways of writing code. Professor is great, love the tea toast and the graduation hat :). Thank you Professor Severance for this wonderful course. Only one feedback: The Quizzes are way too easy and in most cases doesn't require any critical thinking on the part of the student. The complexity needs to be increased a bit. | 1) to complete. Graded Assignments are very | Good | 1) they test a student in most | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very interesting course and straightforward. the lecturer is really really good in explaining in an easy to follow way and his examples and exercises were using exactly the knowledge you have to gain from this course | 1) straightforward. the lecturer is really really | Good | 1) in explaining in an easy to | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | This was a good course, the lecturer is excellent. My only complaint was that the quizzes and assignments were not challenging enough. There should be some more difficult assignments and problems included in this course. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course, the lecturer is excellent. My | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A good continuation of skills learned in the first python course | 1) A | Good | 1) continuation of skills learned in the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good explained for a beginner in programming. Begins easy, but you get more and more an in-depth explanation of programming. Awesome professor, explains it very well and keeps me motivated. | 1) Really | Good | 1) explained for a beginner in programming. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent! Very easy to follow and with good piece of python knowledge. I would do the tasks a bit more demanding. | 1) Very easy to follow and with | Good | 1) piece of python knowledge. I would | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course! Thank you Dr. Chuck! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Thank you Dr. Chuck! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good class - couldn't have asked for better | 1) Very | Good | 1) class - couldn't have asked for | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good coverage of topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) coverage of topics. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good, but it is better to give more excercises | 1) | Good | 1) but it is better to give | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for someone who is interested in Python, beginner. | 1) | Good | 1) course for someone who is interested | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr. Chuck is very good at teaching this class! His dedication to this course makes students know more about the essence of Python! Go Dr. Chuck! Go Python! | 1) Dr. Chuck is very | Good | 1) at teaching this class! His dedication | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr. Chuck is very very good at what he is doing ,he has humor and helped a lot to understand all things about this course!Thank you very much. | 1) Dr. Chuck is very very | Good | 1) at what he is doing , | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Continuing with part 2 of the specialization, this course was as good and interesting as the first one. Dr. Chuck knows how to lay the fundamentals of progamming in an understandable and easy way to digest the content. The best part is that you get time to practice and resolve by yourself each problem finding your own strengths and weakness and work into improve your skills. | 1) the specialization, this course was as | Good | 1) and interesting as the first one. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | pretty good course for 1st timers, but spending more time on showing how to draw flow charts may be better | 1) pretty | Good | 1) course for 1st timers, but spending | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Course is good for begineers who want to learn programming. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) for begineers who want to learn | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very very good!! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Really good lecturer explains things awesomely | 1) Really | Good | 1) lecturer explains things awesomely | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | So good! | 1) So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Even if you are an experienced python developer, this course is a good review of the basic data structures. The assignments are great exercises. Dr. Chuck is a good instructor | 1) python developer, this course is a | Good | 1) review of the basic data structures. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Even if you are an experienced python developer, this course is a good review of the basic data structures. The assignments are great exercises. Dr. Chuck is a good instructor | 2) great exercises. Dr. Chuck is a | Good | 2) instructor | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for beginners. Not enough depth for people who want to master python and do some real projects with it. | 1) | Good | 1) course for beginners. Not enough depth | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good teacher and a very good introduction for python data structures | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher and a very good introduction | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good teacher and a very good introduction for python data structures | 2) Very good teacher and a very | Good | 2) introduction for python data structures | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | The course is very good, but, on top of all, the sense of humor and the excelent mood of the teacher makes this a better experience than I ever had with any other comparable course. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) but, on top of all, the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. Excellent for beginners and explained very well. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Excellent for beginners and explained | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. The last week's lesson on Tuples seemed pretty straightforward, but the last assignment seemed to require "stretching" a bit beyond the material outlined in the videos. I eventually got the answer, but felt a little bewildered and surprised at first as all previous weeks had lecture material and reading that made it rather easy to complete the assignments! I suspect subsequent courses in this specialization will be harder! Overall, this was a great course though | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The last week's lesson on | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good Class! | 1) | Good | 1) Class! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's a good course to learn about data structures for beginers. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course to learn about data structures | 3.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course. Good intro to data structures. Good instructor. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) intro to data structures. Good instructor. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent course. Good intro to data structures. Good instructor. | 2) course. Good intro to data structures. | Good | 2) instructor. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It's kinda easy course. It's good for beginner. I would recommend this course because the prof give lectures interesting and logical, so that I can follow up the class at ease. | 1) It's kinda easy course. It's | Good | 1) for beginner. I would recommend this | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good lessons, interesting assessments. Good for beginner and interesting for who (like me) has already got programming experience as it provides some nice point of view and examples. | 1) | Good | 1) lessons, interesting assessments. Good for beginner | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good lessons, interesting assessments. Good for beginner and interesting for who (like me) has already got programming experience as it provides some nice point of view and examples. | 2) Good lessons, interesting assessments. | Good | 2) for beginner and interesting for who | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | extremely good course. highly recommendable | 1) extremely | Good | 1) course. highly recommendable | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good course for beginners | 1) very | Good | 1) course for beginners | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Also the 2nd course in this specialization is really good, I got through it quite fast but along the way I started to see the fact that I was making less mistakes and was able to fix my own mistakes without checking all the lectures again. I'm really starting to get it, off to the next course! BTW: dr. Chuck is amazing :) | 1) course in this specialization is really | Good | 1) I got through it quite fast | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I found this to be a great introduction to python data structures. The way everything was explained made them easy to understand and, even as someone with a little bit of python experience, there were new things to learn. Videos and explination were all understandable and the excercises were, in my opinion, a good challenge and helped reinforce the things you learned in the lectures. I reccomend this course to those looking to learn python and, specifically, to those who completed the first part in this 5 part course or want to learn more about lists, tuples and dictionaries. | 1) excercises were, in my opinion, a | Good | 1) challenge and helped reinforce the things | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | A very good course to take | 1) A very | Good | 1) course to take | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Easy to follow, good pace, good supporting materials. | 1) Easy to follow, | Good | 1) pace, good supporting materials. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Easy to follow, good pace, good supporting materials. | 2) Easy to follow, good pace, | Good | 2) supporting materials. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good for beginners. Good introduction to data structures too! | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners. Good introduction to data | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good for beginners. Good introduction to data structures too! | 2) Very good for beginners. | Good | 2) introduction to data structures too! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | All credit goes to the lecturer. It was explained in a very good way. to build the base strong. I started python with strings, but now I feel like taking the basic course also like loops and functions. Thank you very much Dr Chuck. | 1) It was explained in a very | Good | 1) way. to build the base strong. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great teaching and good examples! Thank you University of Michigan | 1) Great teaching and | Good | 1) examples! Thank you University of Michigan | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Just like the first one, really nice layout of the course and good explanations throughout the course book. | 1) nice layout of the course and | Good | 1) explanations throughout the course book. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great job, very good quality items ... | 1) Great job, very | Good | 1) quality items . . . | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | It was very useful and I am good in completing the course well within the schedule. | 1) was very useful and I am | Good | 1) in completing the course well within | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Excellent Course :) Keep up the good work :) | 1) Excellent Course :) Keep up the | Good | 1) work :) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course. Join and enjoy. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Join and enjoy. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good paceand good practical examples. | 1) | Good | 1) paceand good practical examples. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good paceand good practical examples. | 2) Good paceand | Good | 2) practical examples. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very, very good and informative | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) and informative | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Brilliant lecturer. Good and not boring lectures, clear explanations and excellent lecture slides. Highly recommended. | 1) Brilliant lecturer. | Good | 1) and not boring lectures, clear explanations | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | pinpoints main python challenges about data parsing, and provides clever practice exercises (I understand now why and when using a tuple, dict or list). Good mindset... | 1) using a tuple, dict or list). | Good | 1) mindset. . . | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Instructor, course materials, information, presentation, everything for most part was very good. Only complaint is the user interface needs a lot of work done so it behaves " normal "... Even trying to fill out this review is some what of a pain as it's just awkward... Phone access needs equal amount of improvements. However, other than user interface, everything was good. | 1) everything for most part was very | Good | 1) Only complaint is the user interface | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Instructor, course materials, information, presentation, everything for most part was very good. Only complaint is the user interface needs a lot of work done so it behaves " normal "... Even trying to fill out this review is some what of a pain as it's just awkward... Phone access needs equal amount of improvements. However, other than user interface, everything was good. | 2) other than user interface, everything was | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Great course for enhancing knowledge of Python and its data structures! Assignments were good and the professor was fantastic! | 1) and its data structures! Assignments were | Good | 1) and the professor was fantastic! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good lectures, easy to follow. Good coverage with what felt like the right level of difficulty. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures, easy to follow. Good coverage | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good lectures, easy to follow. Good coverage with what felt like the right level of difficulty. | 2) Good lectures, easy to follow. | Good | 2) coverage with what felt like the | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course! Like it! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Like it! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Dr. Chuck is always a safe bet for a good course. | 1) always a safe bet for a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good no non-sense course. For learning how to program without much theoretical overhead (can be attained later with a greater comfort level), this is a course on the proper path. | 1) | Good | 1) no non-sense course. For learning how | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course for beginners without programming background. You will be able to learn many fundamental topics that you need to know in order to be a good and efficient programmer. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners without programming background. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course for beginners without programming background. You will be able to learn many fundamental topics that you need to know in order to be a good and efficient programmer. | 2) know in order to be a | Good | 2) and efficient programmer. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. very Informative. I never felt so comfortable on python basics before. Thanks Dr. Chuck :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. very Informative. I never felt | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Fabulous course. The lectures are good. Quizzes and assignments have started to be, applying what you've "learned", not just regurgitation. Very nice. The bonus material show how the different technologies are related and the genesis of many of them by individuals who participated in then. Very cool. Thanks much. It was most enjoyable. I also like that you can move at your own pace. If you're new to the profession, a quick learner or re-tooling, it's move as fast or as slow as you want. This is been very helpful for myself. I'm retooling and have become a "college" student again. Great fun. Thanks much!! | 1) Fabulous course. The lectures are | Good | 1) Quizzes and assignments have started to | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good material. | 1) very | Good | 1) material. | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Thank You Dr. Chuck for a great course for a good foundation on data structures in Python! | 1) for a great course for a | Good | 1) foundation on data structures in Python! | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good explanations of data collection types that are used in python. Exercises could probably be a bit more challenging, but it will do for absolute beginners. Thank you. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations of data collection types that | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | I think this course is very concise and fundamental. Very good for beginners! | 1) is very concise and fundamental. Very | Good | 1) for beginners! | 4.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good work, Dr Chuk! | 1) | Good | 1) work, Dr Chuk! | 5.0 |
| P--h6zpNEeWYbg7p2_3OHQ | Good course for the Beginners to learn PYTHON | 1) | Good | 1) course for the Beginners to learn | 5.0 |
| p6GNi4gDEeW0iQ6RUMSWEQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| Pc2juyEIEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | I have some suggestions: 1. Use consistent English throughout the course due to this is an English class. 2. one "upload" button is enough in the assignment . . . so it doesn't confuse people 3. Specify the minimum grade to pass the assignment if it 80%, then say 80% . . . However, overall the course is good, and I love learning other culture! Kind of a new experience for me. Thank you very much! ^_^ Xie Xie . . . | 1) . However, overall the course is | Good | 1) and I love learning other culture! | 3.0 |
| Pc2juyEIEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | The course is good but it has too much Chinese, and I'm not Chinese. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) but it has too much Chinese, | 3.0 |
| Pc2juyEIEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | It's a good lecture! I learned a lot skills from it. If it could be a litter bit shorter, I will feel more comfor | 1) It's a | Good | 1) lecture! I learned a lot skills | 4.0 |
| Pc2juyEIEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | very good ! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| pCa5-xauEeWEjBINzvDOWw | Good questions in quizzes and great understanding | 1) | Good | 1) questions in quizzes and great understanding | 5.0 |
| pD1uvzvKEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | This course provides a concise and balanced look at the aids epidemic,and social responsibility and response to it. I think it is comprehensive in the resources that we can access, additional videos, books, professionals, advocates and patients. Definitely a good starting off point for someone who wants a detailed introduction to the topic. I will review the materials again and again. Thank you. Good job. | 1) professionals, advocates and patients. Definitely a | Good | 1) starting off point for someone who | 5.0 |
| pD1uvzvKEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | This course provides a concise and balanced look at the aids epidemic,and social responsibility and response to it. I think it is comprehensive in the resources that we can access, additional videos, books, professionals, advocates and patients. Definitely a good starting off point for someone who wants a detailed introduction to the topic. I will review the materials again and again. Thank you. Good job. | 2) materials again and again. Thank you. | Good | 2) job. | 5.0 |
| pD1uvzvKEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | Very usefull course. Good explanation about the disease and actual course. | 1) Very usefull course. | Good | 1) explanation about the disease and actual | 4.0 |
| pD1uvzvKEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | Really good course! Amazing interviews | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! Amazing interviews | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Was quite good but getting less and less useful, too abstract, lacking detail. Examples too academic, needs to be more practical. | 1) Was quite | Good | 1) but getting less and less useful, | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course has been very good, and i will recommend it to anyone who wants to learn functional programming. | 1) This course has been very | Good | 1) and i will recommend it to | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | really good lessions, clean and well structured - but you need intermediate++ level to enjoy! | 1) really | Good | 1) lessions, clean and well structured - | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | This course has some really good material but the way it has been presented is very disjointed and does not really do the job of properly illustrating Functional Program Design. Although topics such as Signal and FRP are interesting they serve little value in day to day use and assignments focusing on Futures would be far more beneficial. | 1) This course has some really | Good | 1) material but the way it has | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | At times instructions for problems are really vague. Every method should have comments or be test covered like it was in the first course. For example I had to spend some time, looking through the parser to discover that spaces in calculator expressions are mandatory. Technically it was in the description, but it was not clear at all and I was stuck with the idea that I'm doing something generally wrong so i had to write a whole test(that was kinda ad-hoc and not a good practice at all) to reach that tiny problem. Otherwise the course is really really great. It made me progress a lot in my scala skill, while keeping me interested in the problems and learning some new data structs ect. Keep up the good work! | 1) was kinda ad-hoc and not a | Good | 1) practice at all) to reach that | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | At times instructions for problems are really vague. Every method should have comments or be test covered like it was in the first course. For example I had to spend some time, looking through the parser to discover that spaces in calculator expressions are mandatory. Technically it was in the description, but it was not clear at all and I was stuck with the idea that I'm doing something generally wrong so i had to write a whole test(that was kinda ad-hoc and not a good practice at all) to reach that tiny problem. Otherwise the course is really really great. It made me progress a lot in my scala skill, while keeping me interested in the problems and learning some new data structs ect. Keep up the good work! | 2) data structs ect. Keep up the | Good | 2) work! | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Good review of essential concepts. Lazyness and Signals ... and quickcheck! | 1) | Good | 1) review of essential concepts. Lazyness and | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Great follow up and good introduction to streams. | 1) Great follow up and | Good | 1) introduction to streams. | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Good course. Next step to get specialization in Scala and FP. Many thanks, Pavel | 1) | Good | 1) course. Next step to get specialization | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Offers outstanding depth in parallel concepts and the weekly programming samples are really interesting and fun. Some good community discussion but not a lot of participation by instructors. The theoretical material is covered very quickly and there are not a lot of practice exercises to master those concepts. | 1) are really interesting and fun. Some | Good | 1) community discussion but not a lot | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Thanks EPFL good course and has certainly broaden my awareness of the possibilities of using Scala. | 1) Thanks EPFL | Good | 1) course and has certainly broaden my | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The course is generally good, but it seems to be a bit of a hybrid of several different courses. Perhaps the videos should be updated so that references in the videos to "the next several weeks" in the last week of the course, don't confuse students. | 1) The course is generally | Good | 1) but it seems to be a | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The subject is really interesting, and some of the shown approaches really "close to the edge". However, there is too much "cut and paste" from other courses. this makes this one difficult to follow. It has lost "coherence". The cross-references don't make any sense, and the assignments fall too short with regard to the content. I think the remake from the original "Functional Programming ___ in Scala" + "Reactive Programming" has not been as successful as it should. This new format within Coursera (everything shorter, more expensive and with less people involved) is not as good as the original one. Maybe this is the only way they can make enough money to sustain the whole... but the "more idealistic" start was far more pleasant. | 1) less people involved) is not as | Good | 1) as the original one. Maybe this | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The course in general is not as good as Martin Odersky's first course, but it still has interesting bits to learn about functional programming. Everything topic feels very disconnected to each other. Lastly, the last part of the course is specially disorganized. I didn't feel like the assignment captured everthing that was taught. | 1) course in general is not as | Good | 1) as Martin Odersky's first course, but | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Good course. Both parts were interesting but I enjoyed more Odersky's than Meijer's. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Both parts were interesting but | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | A few last lectures (Future, Try) lack pretext, or at least appear somewhat out of order, unless one is familiar with the topic. Generally, higher score (10 out of 10, or 9 out of 10) could have been made a little harder to get. Adding a couple of extra optional problems for one point each could be a good idea. | 1) one point each could be a | Good | 1) idea. | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Perfectly organized lectures and challenging exercises as before (With Principles course). Keep up the good work team. Thanks. | 1) (With Principles course). Keep up the | Good | 1) work team. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | The course was nice but not structured very good, especially week 4. From time to time you have a feeling that this course is more like a compilation of lectures made for other courses with similar topic. Especially confusing are moments when during the lecture author references previous materials you expected to know from lectures you've never heard. That's strange. | 1) was nice but not structured very | Good | 1) especially week 4. From time to | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | A good introduction to design of more complex Scala programs in a functional manner. Left a few things to be desired some places, such as: less legacy from the previous "reactive programming in scala" course; a discussion of immutable options for functional reactive programming; and a demonstration of an implicits-based implementation of Functional Reactive Programming, as was mentioned. For the most part a great course though. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to design of more complex | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | very good lectures and hands on example. | 1) very | Good | 1) lectures and hands on example. | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Mostly as good as the course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" I took couple of years ago. However, some of the videos are clearly taken from another courses and referencing to content not in this course. Especially the final week's content is very confusing, topics changing constantly without clear context and presentation. (I actually purposedly skipped the last few videos, as they seemed completely off the track and it was very hard to get anything out of them.) The exercices were good, starting where the previous course ended, and most of the videos were clear and well done (basically the videos by Martin). | 1) Mostly as | Good | 1) as the course " Functional Programming | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Mostly as good as the course "Functional Programming Principles in Scala" I took couple of years ago. However, some of the videos are clearly taken from another courses and referencing to content not in this course. Especially the final week's content is very confusing, topics changing constantly without clear context and presentation. (I actually purposedly skipped the last few videos, as they seemed completely off the track and it was very hard to get anything out of them.) The exercices were good, starting where the previous course ended, and most of the videos were clear and well done (basically the videos by Martin). | 2) of them. ) The exercices were | Good | 2) starting where the previous course ended, | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Great course. Good continuation of the principles one. | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) continuation of the principles one. | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Great class. Keep up the good work! | 1) Great class. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Good introductory course that covered a lot of concepts | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course that covered a lot | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Maybe an unfair comparison but I am comparing this with the principles of reactive programming. That had much more contents such as actors, etc. Having said that this is a good course by itself. | 1) Having said that this is a | Good | 1) course by itself. | 4.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | A great course, come jump in and learn good programming skills. | 1) course, come jump in and learn | Good | 1) programming skills. | 5.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | If you're new to Scala and/or functional programming, then the material covered here will be very valuable. However, I was fairly disappointed. Much of the coursework was pulled from the original "Functional Programming in Scala" course, as well as the "Principles of Reactive Programming" course. Indeed, there are references to material from those courses that are not actually included here, which must be a little confusing for anyone who hasn't taken those courses. The first two assignments came, respectively, from those two courses also. There wasn't as much emphasis on architecting a functional program as I might have expected from the title. Instead, the course focused more on using functional principles when implementing computations. The coverage of functional reactive programming (FRP) was very good, but again, I would have expected more of a 30,000ft overview of how to design an application using FRP. In short, I felt this course to be a little incoherent and disjointed. | 1) functional reactive programming (FRP) was very | Good | 1) but again, I would have expected | 3.0 |
| PeZYFz-zEeWB_AoW1KYI4Q | Very good course. Sad that it is at the same time as the Functional Programming Principles in Scala, which is clearly a pre-requisite. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Sad that it is at | 4.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | nice videos, good compilation of materials that make learning about this part of history easier than if on own | 1) nice videos, | Good | 1) compilation of materials that make learning | 4.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | A good introduction to the History of Spaceflight, was great to learn more about how the mankind could to start exploring the space. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the History of Spaceflight, | 4.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | A good course, but a few slight errors and the lack of the last modules leave it at 4/5 stars. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, but a few slight errors | 4.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | It was really good course, got to know lot of new things. I am glad that I took this course. | 1) It was really | Good | 1) course, got to know lot of | 5.0 |
| pFHWsjyCEeW7GArkqhNhJw | Good course, but could be more challenging. For people growing up with the space race it has a lot of interesting video and written material. But there are a lot of simple errors in the material and the assignments. Hopefully that will be addressed. I'd give it 4/5 once it's all sorted. Recommended if you can cope with the odd frustration. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but could be more challenging. | 3.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | The course is well-structured, clear and coherent. The assessments are quite good too. Recommend it! | 1) and coherent. The assessments are quite | Good | 1) too. Recommend it! | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | Excellent course. If you are struggling with high school chem, or need a good foundation for college chem - this course moves you through the concepts and gives you lots of practice problems. | 1) high school chem, or need a | Good | 1) foundation for college chem - this | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | It is a good course for beginners, but it is too slow for advanced learners who want to refresh their knowledge. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for beginners, but it is | 4.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | Very good !!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | Very Good course ! Hope to see Organic Chemistry and some Biology courses by University of Kentucky like this. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course ! Hope to see Organic | 5.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | amazing course. all topics about chemistry are here, very good quizes. a good course | 1) topics about chemistry are here, very | Good | 1) quizes. a good course | 4.0 |
| PGQphxLCEeSD_CIACooXkA | amazing course. all topics about chemistry are here, very good quizes. a good course | 2) are here, very good quizes. a | Good | 2) course | 4.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | GREAT COURSE! The only reason for the 4 stars, is that I would have liked it to be a bit longer, get more info, practice more. Otherwise, it was a trove of good information and a good way to start getting all the docs ready for investors. THUMBS UP! and THANKS PROFESSOR! | 1) Otherwise, it was a trove of | Good | 1) information and a good way to | 4.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | GREAT COURSE! The only reason for the 4 stars, is that I would have liked it to be a bit longer, get more info, practice more. Otherwise, it was a trove of good information and a good way to start getting all the docs ready for investors. THUMBS UP! and THANKS PROFESSOR! | 2) trove of good information and a | Good | 2) way to start getting all the | 4.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | I am having a good time learning about new concepts & reading from the resources provided in the courses. | 1) I am having a | Good | 1) time learning about new concepts & | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | A very good course. It gives a very good insights into the finance required for start-ups. This course is a must for all the future entrepreneurs. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. It gives a very good | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | A very good course. It gives a very good insights into the finance required for start-ups. This course is a must for all the future entrepreneurs. | 2) good course. It gives a very | Good | 2) insights into the finance required for | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | It is unbelievable how much you can learn and implement the startup funding concept in to real business entity. Great course for anyone looking to get good insight and understanding of raising startup capital for new venture. | 1) course for anyone looking to get | Good | 1) insight and understanding of raising startup | 5.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | Hi Team, Course is good. Videos and contents need to be updated on regular basis, sometimes data discussed is bit outdated. | 1) Hi Team, Course is | Good | 1) Videos and contents need to be | 3.0 |
| PifzBSv3EeWLVg5w1LoYqQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PK8RF2g8EeSYbSIACzWPZQ | I like MoMA courses and wish MoMA good luck! | 1) like MoMA courses and wish MoMA | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| PK8RF2g8EeSYbSIACzWPZQ | Really good ideas and good assignments. | 1) Really | Good | 1) ideas and good assignments. | 5.0 |
| PK8RF2g8EeSYbSIACzWPZQ | Really good ideas and good assignments. | 2) Really good ideas and | Good | 2) assignments. | 5.0 |
| pkE92hJhEearKQowajWNkQ | This is an excellent intro course. The instructor clearly had a lot of fun preparing videos, and it's contagious. There is a high-level of polish here - even pacing, helpful study guides, solid video production values and active teaching assistant in the forums. I learned a lot in this class, but aside from that it was just a good time :). | 1) from that it was just a | Good | 1) time :). | 5.0 |
| pkE92hJhEearKQowajWNkQ | This course is a great introduction to music theory. I have been playing by ear for a long time and i now finally understand some of the things that i did before. I recommend this course to those that one to get a good foundation in music. | 1) those that one to get a | Good | 1) foundation in music. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This course very good | 1) This course very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | A good overall module with interesting Information that can be applied to every-day work routine. Also the PDFs that accompany each week's module are very good and you can prin out and keep them for future reference. If I have to make a negative comment is that I have found the tests too easy to pass, however, the important is that w | 1) A | Good | 1) overall module with interesting Information that | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | A good overall module with interesting Information that can be applied to every-day work routine. Also the PDFs that accompany each week's module are very good and you can prin out and keep them for future reference. If I have to make a negative comment is that I have found the tests too easy to pass, however, the important is that w | 2) accompany each week's module are very | Good | 2) and you can prin out and | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Amazing knowledge driven course by Amazing person , i will recommend this course to every one Too Good Rob Stone (y) | 1) this course to every one Too | Good | 1) Rob Stone (y) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | As a new operations supervisor, eyeing a PMO position in the future, this course has greatly given me an idea and good foundation of what Project Management is all about. This course has all the more sparked my interest in the field and would definitely pursue it one way or another. The instructor was very engaging, gave good illustrations/examples for every topic/sub-topic. I like how fluently he spoke of the subject/course and made things simple to understand. Thank you Coursera for this venue to learn more! | 1) greatly given me an idea and | Good | 1) foundation of what Project Management is | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | As a new operations supervisor, eyeing a PMO position in the future, this course has greatly given me an idea and good foundation of what Project Management is all about. This course has all the more sparked my interest in the field and would definitely pursue it one way or another. The instructor was very engaging, gave good illustrations/examples for every topic/sub-topic. I like how fluently he spoke of the subject/course and made things simple to understand. Thank you Coursera for this venue to learn more! | 2) The instructor was very engaging, gave | Good | 2) illustrations/examples for every topic/sub-topic. I like | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good. Even as a reasonably experienced PM I learned a few extra things. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Even as a reasonably experienced PM | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Overview with key terminology and process information. Good introduction and/or refresher. | 1) with key terminology and process information. | Good | 1) introduction and/or refresher. | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | quite easy, good for beginners | 1) quite easy, | Good | 1) for beginners | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good to know the general concept of project mamagement | 1) Very | Good | 1) to know the general concept of | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The information is quite useful, but they are not provided in an organised way. Sometimes, I got confused because of overlapping materials. However, in general, it's a good course to have an overview and some useful tools of project management. | 1) materials. However, in general, it's a | Good | 1) course to have an overview and | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good course for foundation | 1) | Good | 1) course for foundation | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good for beginners in project management.... | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners in project management. . | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Excellent course, but i suggest the full version should be made available for people that want to increase their knowledge but have no fund. Good job author. | 1) their knowledge but have no fund. | Good | 1) job author. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It's a good course. It is very simple. It's just exposition and quizzes. Great for beginners. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course. It is very simple. It's | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | No enthusiasm to hold attention but good content | 1) No enthusiasm to hold attention but | Good | 1) content | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very basic. I guess if you have no education or experience its good. | 1) have no education or experience its | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Course with good content and overview of project management, albeit being a bit too simplistic. | 1) Course with | Good | 1) content and overview of project management, | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good teaching style | 1) Very | Good | 1) teaching style | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Thank you very much for the great course! Very useful information not only in the PM area, but also in the management in general. Also very good flexible approach with moving deadlines, as sometimes it is very difficult to find time among busy schedule to listen to the course. | 1) the management in general. Also very | Good | 1) flexible approach with moving deadlines, as | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good effort from Prof Stone in providing as much real-life relevance to the course. | 1) | Good | 1) effort from Prof Stone in providing | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good teacher ! Introduce the basic of engineering project including the elements of the engineer, WBS, how to be a good project manager and so on. Very helpful for the beginners. What I suggest is the teacher could use more gesture or facial expression or more vivid examples rather than cilck the mouse and just read the PPT. Anyway, that's helps me have a rough view of the PM, thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) teacher ! Introduce the basic of | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good teacher ! Introduce the basic of engineering project including the elements of the engineer, WBS, how to be a good project manager and so on. Very helpful for the beginners. What I suggest is the teacher could use more gesture or facial expression or more vivid examples rather than cilck the mouse and just read the PPT. Anyway, that's helps me have a rough view of the PM, thank you! | 2) engineer, WBS, how to be a | Good | 2) project manager and so on. Very | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | very good summary/introduction | 1) very | Good | 1) summary/introduction | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | its good course, My only note is the instructor talk real fast | 1) its | Good | 1) course, My only note is the | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very clear and concise course. Maybe a bit to basic. Good for introduction purposes | 1) course. Maybe a bit to basic. | Good | 1) for introduction purposes | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | great course, good amount of information which is explained well | 1) great course, | Good | 1) amount of information which is explained | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good course. Found it simple and easy to understand. Very practical tips and advice. Thanks. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Found it simple and easy | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Real good Co | 1) Real | Good | 1) Co | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course give us a brief idea of how we should manage a project. Very good! | 1) we should manage a project. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has very good content, specially if you are looking for basic concepts, you can find those here, although it doesn't go deeply on them, gives you what you need to get started, it's a fast pace so you have to keep up, and use of side materials/web to complement the course. | 1) It has very | Good | 1) content, specially if you are looking | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great course, presented in a clear an professional manner. Good examples and pointing to proper additional material. I just do not understand why the work load in the last week is very large compared to the three previous weeks. Still, I enjoyed it. | 1) in a clear an professional manner. | Good | 1) examples and pointing to proper additional | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good introductory course. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has been a good overview about how to manage projects. At this level it could be useful also for personal projects and not necessarily for professional ones | 1) It has been a | Good | 1) overview about how to manage projects. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good overview of project management. Well presented and good examples. Would suggest it as must intro for people who will study project management more in depth and people who work in the non profit sector who may be called upon to organize projects. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of project management. Well presented | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good overview of project management. Well presented and good examples. Would suggest it as must intro for people who will study project management more in depth and people who work in the non profit sector who may be called upon to organize projects. | 2) of project management. Well presented and | Good | 2) examples. Would suggest it as must | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | I love this course. Very specific. With tons of practical information. Good examples. | 1) specific. With tons of practical information. | Good | 1) examples. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good, could be better. | 1) | Good | 1) could be better. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Gives a good overview of project management. Useful as a first course for project manager wannabes. | 1) Gives a | Good | 1) overview of project management. Useful as | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It's a good training to do your project by your way. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) training to do your project by | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good foundational couse | 1) | Good | 1) foundational couse | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good One!!! | 1) | Good | 1) One! ! ! | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good introduction to Project Management. Many subjects were covered but there was a possibility to add details into some of them. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Project Management. Many subjects | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has a good level, but there is room for improvement. Keep on the good work! Thanks! | 1) It has a | Good | 1) level, but there is room for | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It has a good level, but there is room for improvement. Keep on the good work! Thanks! | 2) room for improvement. Keep on the | Good | 2) work! Thanks! | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Thank you so much University Of California, Irvine this class has been one of my favorite since I've joined Coursera. In the course I've learn so much about project management & everything related to this subject. One of my favorite part of this course is when I can take the quiz as many times as I want in order for me to get right & pass the course. Thank you so much University Of California, Irvine & Coursera Keep up the good work. | 1) Irvine & Coursera Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good content | 1) | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good presentation from the lecturer, Rob Stone. Information was given very clearly and very easy to understand. Materials needed for further reading are given. | 1) Very | Good | 1) presentation from the lecturer, Rob Stone. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good course， but just a little bit easy. For those who had no idea or experience about project management, it iis a good start point. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course， but just a little bit | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good course， but just a little bit easy. For those who had no idea or experience about project management, it iis a good start point. | 2) about project management, it iis a | Good | 2) start point. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good for me now | 1) | Good | 1) for me now | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good one... | 1) | Good | 1) one. . . | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Course is greate, really! But one thing was not as good, as I want - teachers pronunciation. Other things were great! Thanks! | 1) But one thing was not as | Good | 1) as I want - teachers pronunciation. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | I thought the course was really well mastered and I enjoyed it very much for the posture of the professor. I felt it was well prepaired and things were put in ways to bring the comprehension towards it in a good format. | 1) the comprehension towards it in a | Good | 1) format. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This is an interesting course containing all the necessary basics for someone interested in Project Management. The instructor supports all the concepts with good use of interesting examples. I enjoyed this course thoroughly. | 1) instructor supports all the concepts with | Good | 1) use of interesting examples. I enjoyed | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Great introductory course for PM. While it was a good review in some areas, I felt I learned a lot of new concepts each lesson. Relatively quick class but with great application. | 1) for PM. While it was a | Good | 1) review in some areas, I felt | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good, but very very basic | 1) | Good | 1) but very very basic | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | As a PMP, I am glad to recommend this course to all of the people who want to get an overview about the project management. Based on the good experiences, the instructor provide almost of the important things on project management in the limit pages. I learned more, thank you for your excellent work. Best Wishes, Emma | 1) the project management. Based on the | Good | 1) experiences, the instructor provide almost of | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | A good course for someone new to project management. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for someone new to project | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Quite a good course and is very easy to understand. | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) course and is very easy to | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good material, gave me a better understanding of not only project management but also how to join into a project and having the final goal and the larger picture in mind. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material, gave me a better understanding | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better. 1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display. 2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure. 3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy). 4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is trueowl@trueowl.com) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge. Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme. Thank you! | 1) the PMBOK very often. That is | Good | 1) as the PMBOK worth (must? ) | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better. 1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display. 2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure. 3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy). 4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is trueowl@trueowl.com) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge. Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme. Thank you! | 2) software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a | Good | 2) example, but I am sure not | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course had many information provided and thanks for that. But there are some things I disliked and I guess by fixing them the course would become much much better. 1. The information refers to the PMBOK very often. That is good, as the PMBOK worth (must?) reading for any PM, but it is a bit difficult to understand anything while a teacher just retranslates something, from any book — especially not written by the one — with poor examples. The much better way for lecturer is to explain it by oneself, not by just staying there and repeating what I can read from my display. 2. I dislike fixating to any software. Maybe Microsoft Project is a good example, but I am sure not the only one at first, and as I am a Mac person who has personal Macbook and Mac Pro at work I am not going to use Windows only for one application. There are plenty of them these days, the same or just similar. The key is not a software itself but the methodology using in the one. The methodology is worth understanding, for sure. 3. Grammar mistakes and misprints. It looks a little strange that no one reviewed the materials: neither on Coursera (I am sure it is not so easy to review every course) nor the creators. I am highly puzzled about how it could be possible: if it is a free course for someone there are also many of those who are paying for the courses, and the courses also represent the University. How the University cannot find someone to check the mistakes before publications? (To be precise there are tiny mistakes related to headers and graphics which make the materials looks untidy). 4. Materials production is very poor in details, even for the key ones: typography, colours, thickness of the fonts and lines. There are no contrasts, no highlighting — that looks as a draft, not as a final course worth spending the time, effort and money. If there are no people available to help with producing the materials of a good quality you can ask people from trueowl inc. (the website is trueowl.com and the working email is trueowl@trueowl.com) to help with it. They — we, as I am member of the team — are highly concerned about educational materials and motivated to enhance the quality of the materials, even for free of charge. Anyway I am glad I finished this course, as it gave me understanding which way should I continue with diving deeper into the theme. Thank you! | 3) with producing the materials of a | Good | 3) quality you can ask people from | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Informative course, very well organized, and very useful tools & strategies presented in the course. The presentations are a bit deadpan, and the assignments aren't overly helpful (only quizzes), but the content is good. | 1) (only quizzes), but the content is | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | The course is a nice introduction to those new to the field. However, if more examples are given through the way, and a good project is included in the course, I would have given it 5 stars. | 1) given through the way, and a | Good | 1) project is included in the course, | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good lecturer, very knowledgeable about the field. Simple course, with a lot of valuable information. Thank you for sharing your knowledge! | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecturer, very knowledgeable about the field. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | this course is very good for those who wanna go beyond sky.. | 1) this course is very | Good | 1) for those who wanna go beyond | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good one to understand project management basics. | 1) | Good | 1) one to understand project management basics. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Its a good nice short course that will allow persons to grasp the basic concepts of project management. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) nice short course that will allow | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good lecture ! | 1) | Good | 1) lecture ! | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Information was good, a bit dry at points and the presenter didn't seem that enthused to be presenting. Overall decent course on an important and relevant topic. | 1) Information was | Good | 1) a bit dry at points and | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Really good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | This course really provide basic knowledge for project management, it is good for fresh learners. | 1) knowledge for project management, it is | Good | 1) for fresh learners. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It was a very good introduction to the project management | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) introduction to the project management | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | really good intro | 1) really | Good | 1) intro | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good overview of project management language and principles. The modules were easy to watch and in manageable parts. I enjoyed the course and feel like it has prepared me to learn more in project management. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of project management language and | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | It was a good quick overview. Something more indepth would have had some exercises but this gave a thorough snap shot. Thank you | 1) It was a | Good | 1) quick overview. Something more indepth would | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good for introducing someone to Basics for Project Management | 1) Very | Good | 1) for introducing someone to Basics for | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good material and strong overview of project management. The only improvement I'd suggest is the instructor needed to slow down the delivery of his presentations. His quickly moved through the slides at numerous points (especially with the clicker). Other than that, it was a good course. | 1) | Good | 1) material and strong overview of project | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good material and strong overview of project management. The only improvement I'd suggest is the instructor needed to slow down the delivery of his presentations. His quickly moved through the slides at numerous points (especially with the clicker). Other than that, it was a good course. | 2) Other than that, it was a | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good and very practical content ready to be applied. | 1) | Good | 1) and very practical content ready to | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good but brief course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) but brief course. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Needs to be a bit more complex and detailed in order to help people get a good understanding of the complexities and issues involved in project management. Please use real world PM uses, not going to work..Show examples of project management that went horribly wrong..lots of those examples as well. | 1) order to help people get a | Good | 1) understanding of the complexities and issues | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | A great overview, not any real depth, some practice examples would be nice. Good for those who have never done PM at all as a primer. | 1) some practice examples would be nice. | Good | 1) for those who have never done | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Prof Rob Stone is a very good speaker and has made the videos very informative. The content is very small, which is good because it makes the course very lean, but bad because it merely scratches the surface of project management world. | 1) Prof Rob Stone is a very | Good | 1) speaker and has made the videos | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Prof Rob Stone is a very good speaker and has made the videos very informative. The content is very small, which is good because it makes the course very lean, but bad because it merely scratches the surface of project management world. | 2) content is very small, which is | Good | 2) because it makes the course very | 3.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good quick start for beginners in Project management. Can be suggested for CAPM preparation | 1) | Good | 1) quick start for beginners in Project | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good introductory course on Project Management. I recommend | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course on Project Management. I | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | good. but not extensive enough. | 1) | Good | 1) but not extensive enough. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Good course and well teachers well students. | 1) | Good | 1) course and well teachers well students. | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Really Good. Clears the concepts of a beginner. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Clears the concepts of a beginner. | 5.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Decent introduction to the basics of Project Management. Good for those who want to understand the basic framework of project management. | 1) to the basics of Project Management. | Good | 1) for those who want to understand | 4.0 |
| PLnREdJzEeSeOiIACzWBkQ | Very good, i think it just need more practice homeworks | 1) Very | Good | 1) i think it just need more | 4.0 |
| POZJ3uOtEeSoXCIACw4Gzg | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| POZJ3uOtEeSoXCIACw4Gzg | Good quality. | 1) | Good | 1) quality. | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | A very good short overview! | 1) A very | Good | 1) short overview! | 4.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | Really good course, gives good overview of The Hague Courts and Tribunals. I am definitely enrolling for a follow up course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, gives good overview of The | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | Really good course, gives good overview of The Hague Courts and Tribunals. I am definitely enrolling for a follow up course. | 2) Really good course, gives | Good | 2) overview of The Hague Courts and | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | Some good content. However, text has numerous spelling mistakes and there is no involvement by academic staff. Nor can one see one's answers to quizzes once done., nor standard answers provided. As with so many Coursera MOOC's, little involvement by fellow students in discussion fora. No certificate on completion, which is a pity because the cost of a purchased one is somewhat prohibitive for third world students with our exchange rates. | 1) Some | Good | 1) content. However, text has numerous spelling | 2.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | good for law students | 1) | Good | 1) for law students | 5.0 |
| prHAajqwEeWXuQopUhAqaw | I will give it a 4, but 3.5 would be my review if the 3.5 mark would be available. Strenghts of the course: Solid and elegant presentations, good readings, and the interviews presented with the ICJ judge and the PCA secretary added value. Weakeness and Opportunites: No slides, excessivelly short course in video resources (discounting the interviews, it had about 20-40 minutes of videos, what is clearly insuficient, when benchmarking with other offerings in the MOOC 'arena') and allowing quizzes to be taken on a 2x per hour is not in my opinion adequate. It makes it too easy and fast to finish the course and does not create an incentive to review the materials. Leiden should focus in presenting more specializations in the educational fields that it has reputation - Law, Tax Law, International Studies, in order to capture more value from the current lack of offerings of specializations in that niche markets. Threats: There is a lot of offerings on the MOOC space, with a finite time availability to make choices. By having courses that are very short, there is the risk that people become inclined to chose other offerings that offer more video resources and other materials. Besides my opinion - I am a critic by design, thank you for continuing offering courses in this platform. I wish you luck. Ricardo Oliveira | 1) the course: Solid and elegant presentations, | Good | 1) readings, and the interviews presented with | 4.0 |
| pSaP4p3ZEeW_wArffOXkOw | good learning method | 1) | Good | 1) learning method | 5.0 |
| Pw5_EDSEEeWHeRJ9CdC5xQ | Like it! Good information to get in touch with the experiences in accessibility that are occurring outside my country. :) | 1) Like it! | Good | 1) information to get in touch with | 4.0 |
| Pw5_EDSEEeWHeRJ9CdC5xQ | This course has been fantastic! I learned a lot of the Laws of Disability and the Requirements that Institutions must provide. I have Epilepsy which causes me to be a slower learned, so it's good to be refreshed on what I did know, and for me to be updated on what I didn't know previously. Thank You! -Justin Dougherty Winter Park, FL USA | 1) be a slower learned, so it's | Good | 1) to be refreshed on what I | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | Good overview over the material. Many thanks to the teacher. | 1) | Good | 1) overview over the material. Many thanks | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | Very good course. I learned a lot of new things | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I learned a lot of | 4.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | If you could create a course Topology as good as this one it would be heavenly. Thanks | 1) could create a course Topology as | Good | 1) as this one it would be | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | The proposed material is very good. The classes are very didactic and with good examples! | 1) The proposed material is very | Good | 1) The classes are very didactic and | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | The proposed material is very good. The classes are very didactic and with good examples! | 2) classes are very didactic and with | Good | 2) examples! | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | Very good course. The professor introduces evey element in a careful and insightful approach | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The professor introduces evey element | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | this course is fantastic, is a good option for learn about complex analysis. | 1) this course is fantastic, is a | Good | 1) option for learn about complex analysis. | 5.0 |
| PwuYBQZREeW5gyIACwQVNg | Wonderful. I have been waiting for this course for some time. It begins somewhat basic, and progresses really fast, to cover some deep topics in complex analysis theory. Also, the instructor, Prof. Petra Bonfert-Taylor, does a very good job at explaining concepts simply, by not being too pedantic (e.g., with the topological preliminaries). Overall, really satisfied and grateful! | 1) Prof. Petra Bonfert-Taylor, does a very | Good | 1) job at explaining concepts simply, by | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | Extremely good course, with the ability to impart an abundance of information in a short format. | 1) Extremely | Good | 1) course, with the ability to impart | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | The professor was very pleasant to listen to. The pacing was overall good, though the last few lessons have quite a bit of information packed in. My only real complaint was that I was hoping for more explicitly direct links to be made to modern events. Still, very enjoyable class. | 1) listen to. The pacing was overall | Good | 1) though the last few lessons have | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | I very much liked this course. Iam reading this book: http://www.amazon.com/History-Modern-Middle-East-5th/dp/0813348331 this course is a good addition. I think it is necessary to also read about the topics because the course covers a lot. Still without reading I think this is an interesting introduction to get an overview of the past centuries. One may get lost in some of de details but the teaching is very good so you will always get something out of this course. Hopefully more courses on the middle east will be available on Coursera in the future. | 1) amazon. com/History-Modern-Middle-East-5th/dp/0813348331 this course is a | Good | 1) addition. I think it is necessary | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | I very much liked this course. Iam reading this book: http://www.amazon.com/History-Modern-Middle-East-5th/dp/0813348331 this course is a good addition. I think it is necessary to also read about the topics because the course covers a lot. Still without reading I think this is an interesting introduction to get an overview of the past centuries. One may get lost in some of de details but the teaching is very good so you will always get something out of this course. Hopefully more courses on the middle east will be available on Coursera in the future. | 2) details but the teaching is very | Good | 2) so you will always get something | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | Full of information, great analysis, suitably detailed. A great personal touch as well. This requires attention and thought as a good course should. Highly recommended. | 1) requires attention and thought as a | Good | 1) course should. Highly recommended. | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | Good course with abundant materials and charming lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) course with abundant materials and charming | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | A good overview of middle eastern politics in the 18-19th century. The pace of the course is very brisk, especially if you're not familiar with imperial history, but if you do some of the readings it will be very easy to follow the pace. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of middle eastern politics in | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | Professor Asher Susser is a very good speaker, and the course is very well organized. The subjects he discuss are very interesting; I enjoyed listening to him for hours. I will absolutely participate in the second part of this course as well as the course about the modern history of Israel. | 1) Professor Asher Susser is a very | Good | 1) speaker, and the course is very | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | This is a good course. Thanks a lot. :) | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course. Thanks a lot. :) | 4.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | I have lernt a lot about the history and tradition of Middle East from this lesson, which is good for my major, for I study arthistory. | 1) East from this lesson, which is | Good | 1) for my major, for I study | 5.0 |
| PZNTj2DEEeWVEg5QpF1H_w | Excellent course! Though sometimes I feel like the lectures can be redundant... But it's also good to really make sure the main points stick. | 1) redundant. . . But it's also | Good | 1) to really make sure the main | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Very very good course | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | A good introductory course which provides a general overview of the the US Energy System. The delivery is clear and succinct. Could be expanded to cover the global energy system. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course which provides a general | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good introductory course on energy. The data shown is 3 years old (2012-2013) but the trend analysis presented holds good for a long time. Professor is very practical minded. I gave it a 4 star because more coverage required on Nuclear Power. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course on energy. The data | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good introductory course on energy. The data shown is 3 years old (2012-2013) but the trend analysis presented holds good for a long time. Professor is very practical minded. I gave it a 4 star because more coverage required on Nuclear Power. | 2) but the trend analysis presented holds | Good | 2) for a long time. Professor is | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Very good course and complete... Best Regards, | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and complete. . . Best | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Under the time constraint, its a good summary! | 1) Under the time constraint, its a | Good | 1) summary! | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | This course is easy to understand and simple, so this good for audience who are looking for basic glogics behind Energy. | 1) to understand and simple, so this | Good | 1) for audience who are looking for | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | it's a good course actually for overview about energy but not for specialization | 1) it's a | Good | 1) course actually for overview about energy | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | In all it's a good course to know some basics, but the data and some of the informations are out of date. It seems most datas are from late 2012 early 2013, things have changed. | 1) In all it's a | Good | 1) course to know some basics, but | 3.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Really not good. I am trying to find out how to un enroll | 1) Really not | Good | 1) I am trying to find out | 1.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good course, but be aware of the 101 part. One of the minuses is that a lot of information provided in the course is about US (to be honest i expected more world related data) and the professor is not that emotional / interesting (sometimes monotoneous). | 1) | Good | 1) course, but be aware of the | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good info, but a bit outdated and dull. | 1) | Good | 1) info, but a bit outdated and | 3.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Good if you want to fall asleep. The content is probably interesting, but they would have some use of advice from the entertaining industry. | 1) | Good | 1) if you want to fall asleep. | 1.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Very good overview of US Energy and how the facts should shape policy | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of US Energy and how | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | It is a comprehensive course presented form a good expert in the field. The course added to my knowledge | 1) a comprehensive course presented form a | Good | 1) expert in the field. The course | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | First of all, thank you for the course, as it enables students to get a bit more up-to-date and knowledgeable in the topic. On the other hand, unfortunately it's not worth one's time as it didn't deliver very good quality, nor on its promise regarding "The Big Picture". Pros: Easy to understand. Self-paced. Objectivity and positive overall message. Cons: Overall quality and clarity of the lectures is not very good. Lectures are a bit hard to follow, not because of the complexity of the topic, but because of some controversial and outdated data, and the speaking and presentation style of the lecturer. Assignments contain too many trivial questions, but also some mistakes which makes some questions impossible to answer correctly, based on the lectures, or at all. No staff engagement or feedback on the forums, which is especially problematic regarding to aforementioned mistakes. The title and description of the course don't inform students that it is completely US-centric, and mostly concentrating on petroleum/oil. So along with a lot of important topics, "The Big Picture" is missing. | 1) time as it didn't deliver very | Good | 1) quality, nor on its promise regarding | 2.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | First of all, thank you for the course, as it enables students to get a bit more up-to-date and knowledgeable in the topic. On the other hand, unfortunately it's not worth one's time as it didn't deliver very good quality, nor on its promise regarding "The Big Picture". Pros: Easy to understand. Self-paced. Objectivity and positive overall message. Cons: Overall quality and clarity of the lectures is not very good. Lectures are a bit hard to follow, not because of the complexity of the topic, but because of some controversial and outdated data, and the speaking and presentation style of the lecturer. Assignments contain too many trivial questions, but also some mistakes which makes some questions impossible to answer correctly, based on the lectures, or at all. No staff engagement or feedback on the forums, which is especially problematic regarding to aforementioned mistakes. The title and description of the course don't inform students that it is completely US-centric, and mostly concentrating on petroleum/oil. So along with a lot of important topics, "The Big Picture" is missing. | 2) of the lectures is not very | Good | 2) Lectures are a bit hard to | 2.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Got good understanding about energy demand, supply and its independence. Good content and lecture. | 1) Got | Good | 1) understanding about energy demand, supply and | 4.0 |
| q6P-8ed8EeSglCIACzUL2A | Got good understanding about energy demand, supply and its independence. Good content and lecture. | 2) energy demand, supply and its independence. | Good | 2) content and lecture. | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | Well-structured course, Dr. Pienta and his fellow team-members are passionate in what they do, and that's evident during the course, but I can't help to think that they have barely scratched the surface here... The lectures are good, they provide a lot of information, but the quizzes offer no challenge whatsoever. That was somewhat disappointing, it felt like I was cheating. All in all, I don't regret buying and completing the course, but I really hope that Dr. Pienta's team will be back soon with a more challenging and advanced course. | 1) here. . . The lectures are | Good | 1) they provide a lot of information, | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | Very good introduction. light-weight explanations. Better animations and videos could enhanced the learning process. questions are too easy. Needs more complex tasks to integrates the different sections together. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. light-weight explanations. Better animations and | 3.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | very good course and explains deeply yet clearly the biology of cancer | 1) very | Good | 1) course and explains deeply yet clearly | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | I think this was a very good course and I definitely got out of it what I expected. I think anyone interested in advancing their knowledge on the general basics of cancer, this is a good place to start. | 1) I think this was a very | Good | 1) course and I definitely got out | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | I think this was a very good course and I definitely got out of it what I expected. I think anyone interested in advancing their knowledge on the general basics of cancer, this is a good place to start. | 2) basics of cancer, this is a | Good | 2) place to start. | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | A very good primer on the most common cancer types. I hope to see a more advanced iteration of this course for those who want deeper understanding. | 1) A very | Good | 1) primer on the most common cancer | 5.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | So far it's a very good course. I always wanted to learn about cancer as it took two lives from my family. I would give it a FIVE STAR if the professors could explain more elaborately as I have very little experience in this field. Thanks a lot | 1) So far it's a very | Good | 1) course. I always wanted to learn | 4.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | Very good for beginners who have no inkling to cancer biology at the slightest. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for beginners who have no inkling | 5.0 |
| q78Cq1x8EeW9BBKT5ztNhQ | until now very informational. the lecturers are very good and share the information in a enjoyable way. | 1) very informational. the lecturers are very | Good | 1) and share the information in a | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very very Good and interesting | 1) Very very | Good | 1) and interesting | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | A course that really makes you feel good | 1) course that really makes you feel | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very interesting class with good example and lots to learn | 1) Very interesting class with | Good | 1) example and lots to learn | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course- simple to follow videos- not so long that you cant concentrate- and its fun as well. Very well researched course- I like the way the optional readings are grouped by module- this helps pace you correctly and give you the flexibility to explore a particular topic further. Handy practical guidance on avoiding the happiness mistakes we make day to day- I didn't realise so many I make myself. Thanks Prof Raj and team! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course- simple to follow videos- not | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | very very good | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Extremely well taught, excellent supply of materials and very good collaborators. A must enroll class for everybody! | 1) excellent supply of materials and very | Good | 1) collaborators. A must enroll class for | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good contents. Interactive. Useful for life. | 1) | Good | 1) contents. Interactive. Useful for life. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Currently Doing this course. Pretty good it is. | 1) Currently Doing this course. Pretty | Good | 1) it is. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I am still a student under this course but i am all starting to get happy and happy about myself and my life day by day, this course is the best and i recommend it to everyone who want to lead a happy and lovely life , we all have problems in our life ,buts its always good to be happy from small things that gives us happiness everyday. | 1) our life , buts its always | Good | 1) to be happy from small things | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course, Really helps you to be happy! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, Really helps you to be | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course for a life of happyness. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for a life of happyness. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course. Professor Raghunathan is extremely invigorating lecturer and the course is full of great information. One thing that bothered me, though, was how the maximizer and desirability for control test scores were not explained further. Edit: I think my point about DC and maximizer scales sounded a bit more negative than I meant. Very minor thing, but as the course was so good otherwise it stuck out to me. In my case, I got "contradicting" scores (low DC, high maximizer) and the following discussion mostly addressed the overly controlling case. This left me at first a little uncertain whether the corresponding habit of the highly happy would suit me. (It does.) I highly recommend this course for everyone who wants to learn what makes people happy! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Professor Raghunathan is extremely invigorating | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good course. Professor Raghunathan is extremely invigorating lecturer and the course is full of great information. One thing that bothered me, though, was how the maximizer and desirability for control test scores were not explained further. Edit: I think my point about DC and maximizer scales sounded a bit more negative than I meant. Very minor thing, but as the course was so good otherwise it stuck out to me. In my case, I got "contradicting" scores (low DC, high maximizer) and the following discussion mostly addressed the overly controlling case. This left me at first a little uncertain whether the corresponding habit of the highly happy would suit me. (It does.) I highly recommend this course for everyone who wants to learn what makes people happy! | 2) but as the course was so | Good | 2) otherwise it stuck out to me. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good and useful course. And all the knowleges which I'd got from it I began to use now and will continue to use later in my usual life. P.S. Sometimes there were too many names of researchers in the videos, but all of the findings were interesting by themselfes. And I want to give personal gratitude to Prof. Raj: thank you Mr. Raj for your positive, passion and help! I wish you a life of happiness and fulfillment! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course. And all the | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good, simple, quite complete to a happier life. | 1) | Good | 1) simple, quite complete to a happier | 3.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I really enjoyed this course! Dr. Raghunathan has a lot of energy and is very engaging in the videos for each module. The information is clear and easy to understand, yet at the same time, has led to serious improvements in my life. Not only that, the assignments in this class get each of us to reach out and connect with people in our communities in an organic and comfortable manner. Also, there are a lot of very good book recommendations throughout the course and I highly recommend checking some of them out!! I've already recommended this course to friends in my "real life", and I hope that this review will sway someone to enroll. Stay well! | 1) there are a lot of very | Good | 1) book recommendations throughout the course and | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | A very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This is probably my fourth course at Coursera. And the first one I could complete properly. I have had to leave the rest because of the time and effort they asked for, and for a working professional, it's just that much harder to give in so many hours! With this course, I feel at ease watching the lectures and felt the tension melt away rather than having an add on pressure. The best part is that I finished this course within 4 weeks rather than the stipulated 6 weeks(which shows how good Dr. Raj is, kudos to him!) The only thing I felt missing was a sense of feedback from the professors, like in a real classroom. When people indulge themselves in courses involving such vigour and enthusiasm, they expect to find a feedback from the professor as well. Maybe a sense of real time involvement. But then again, I'll congratulate Dr. Raj and the team at ISB for making such a brilliant course. I have already made many of my friends sign up for this! Cheers. | 1) the stipulated 6 weeks(which shows how | Good | 1) Dr. Raj is, kudos to him! | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good fun & very thought-provoking. Deductions for sometimes lousy sound quality of videos and inane placing of quizzes. | 1) | Good | 1) fun & very thought-provoking. Deductions for | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | it is good to get interacted with the course | 1) it is | Good | 1) to get interacted with the course | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | A very good course. My only suggestions would be to extend the course for a week or even two. The time and amount of work needed to complete the last week's assignments were inconsistent with the other weeks. To have done my best with the final quiz and assignment, I should have spent a significant amount of time reviewing material from previous weeks. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. My only suggestions would be | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I paid to get a certificate and did achieve good marks on the tests and assignments up to week 4 if memory serves. And still, I "dropped out" before the end of the course. Why? - the tests trip you on little bits of trivia, as opposed to assess your understanding of key concepts. Another course, “learning how to learn”, has the best tests in that regard; - the modules are too long. When you do this in addition to working, it becomes a chore; - the assignments: instructions are tedious & confusing. As for the assignment themselves, I couldn’t shake the feeling that I was a test subject with data being gathered in the back. Not what I signed up (and paid) for. So it’s a pity and I do regret having had to stop attending this online class. I was attracted to the topic, I enjoyed the personality of the host, but all the above made it a chore. | 1) get a certificate and did achieve | Good | 1) marks on the tests and assignments | 2.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | very informative, fun and motivating! keep up the good work <3 | 1) fun and motivating! keep up the | Good | 1) work <3 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Lectures are short and engaging. Good info. Great prof! Would like a little more evidence for some of the concepts presented but overall GREAT! | 1) Lectures are short and engaging. | Good | 1) info. Great prof! Would like a | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good, practical, just to the point, with lots of quotes and evidence on studies that suppport course affirmations. Really enjoyable! | 1) Very | Good | 1) practical, just to the point, with | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course delivered a ton of very good perspectives, insights, and data to help you grasp an all-important topic which is not typically explored on an academic level. Instead of bombarding you with opinions, this course approaches the topic in both an analytical and personal way, inviting you to explore and expand your own definitions of happiness while learning the science behind it. I found my consciousness of as well as my knowledge about happiness elevated substantially through this course's teachings, and I would recommend it to anyone serious about living an intentional and happy life. | 1) course delivered a ton of very | Good | 1) perspectives, insights, and data to help | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | It`s perhaps the most beautiful course made by really good people. Thanks to professor raj and coursera. | 1) most beautiful course made by really | Good | 1) people. Thanks to professor raj and | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | So far, so good! Just about to start week 2 of this course and it has been good so far. | 1) So far, so | Good | 1) Just about to start week 2 | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | So far, so good! Just about to start week 2 of this course and it has been good so far. | 2) this course and it has been | Good | 2) so far. | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | It isn't rocket science... but this is an informative, fun, upbeat course ... useful to practitioners, educators, and anyone that works with people... plus just good fun self-help! | 1) with people. . . plus just | Good | 1) fun self-help! | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Excellent course on whats important in life. Have ordered the book too. Should be a good read. Shall recommend the course to a lot of them. | 1) the book too. Should be a | Good | 1) read. Shall recommend the course to | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course , For Living more better | 1) | Good | 1) course , For Living more better | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Extremely Good | 1) Extremely | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good for everybody | 1) Very | Good | 1) for everybody | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Loving the class so far. Good to know that I am on the right path in obtaining and maintaining | 1) Loving the class so far. | Good | 1) to know that I am on | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | the contents of the course were very good. It is essential material that everyone should learn about as early as possible in their life. It should be essential learning in each school. All the material is based on scientific facts. there are, however, reasons why I did not rate this course with 5 points. The amount of material takes a lifetime to digest and adopt. To cram this into a few weeks was not the appropriate way to teach it. there were way too many videos one was supposed to watch within a single week. Sometimes even the summary videos for a single week took 20 minutes. That is just not right. I was so busy memorizing the material that I did not find the time to adopt it in my daily life. what a pity. it will take me many months to really digest the material | 1) contents of the course were very | Good | 1) It is essential material that everyone | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I've taken about 70 MOOCs across multiple platforms. Of those 70, I've completed about 12. Of those 12, about 4 were good. This is one of those four. Sometimes the videos were a little long, but the work was inspired and the science behind the content was great. I did every assignment (rare for a MOOCer, as you probably know). This was totally worth my time. I hope you find it to be worth yours. Enjoy! | 1) Of those 12, about 4 were | Good | 1) This is one of those four. | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Its a good class but a little fast paced. The teacher is enthusiastic and energized. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) class but a little fast paced. | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Really really enjoyed this course. Interesting and thought provoking material, all very well presented and referenced. The inclusion of various guest speakers, video and film clips, and a good dose of humour (only occasionally flat) all helped make this a very enjoyable 6 weeks. If you have a curiosity about happiness, especially your own, but a mindset that values the evidence over other's opinions, then I strongly recommend this course. | 1) video and film clips, and a | Good | 1) dose of humour (only occasionally flat) | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | THE COURSE HAS BEEN SUCH AN EYE OPENER AT DEFINING ONE SELF,THE JOURNEY OF LEARNING THE WRONG AND COORECTING IT TOO.IT HELPED IDENTIFY AND SIMPLFY FRO ME MY LIFE..IT CONNECTED ME TO MYSELF,...I CAN SAY I UNDERSTAND BETTER,,I GAINED INSIGHT AND WITH THAT THE ABILITY TO ACCEPT MY SELF AND MY SITUATIONS AND ALSO TO CONNECT THE DOTS AS I CAN SAY.. THANKS A LOT A BIGGGG LOT..TO EACH AND EVERY ONE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TEAM OF COURSERA THIS COURSE IS EXCELLENT...PROF RAJ YOURE TOO GOOD!!!!! | 1) . . PROF RAJ YOURE TOO | Good | 1) ! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course is a whirlwind of joy and good humor. The main recipes for happiness and fulfillment are exposed in a structured manner. The main speakers are not taking themselves too seriously. | 1) is a whirlwind of joy and | Good | 1) humor. The main recipes for happiness | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | The program was well put together. The class was what I call "bottom heavy" because the last part of the class had a lot of really good and relate-able information. I found my self replaying classes 2 -3 time to get the full value of what was being presented. I found myself saying "wow" a lot. Could someone tell the lady that does the 6 week class to turn off her clock when on line. I dropped that class, the coo-coo was distracting | 1) class had a lot of really | Good | 1) and relate-able information. I found my | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course has been really eye opener. The research on happiness done by Prof. Mr Raj is amazing. The way the course is designed is very nice. There are systematic contents in every week. I must the exercises also are very good and I did not feel that I am doing this course on virtual platform. Kudos to all the team who have really put an effort to make this course available on Coursera! I would highly recommend this course to all my friends, colleagues and relatives. Cheers and Thank you. | 1) must the exercises also are very | Good | 1) and I did not feel that | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good content, oo long, too many words to get to the point, and too many instructions on assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, oo long, too many words | 3.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good job . .keep it up | 1) | Good | 1) job . . keep it up | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very very good, The course is so interesting and has no boring spots. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) The course is so interesting and | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good and inspiring course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and inspiring course! | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This course has made me be more thankful of the people around me and wanting to contribute to society in a good way. | 1) to contribute to society in a | Good | 1) way. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Instead of These Classes Spiritual Classes will be good ... | 1) These Classes Spiritual Classes will be | Good | 1) . . . | 1.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Awesome course. I want to thank all the people who worked on this course. Especially I want to express gratitude to Prof. Raj, he is a really good teacher, I watched every video with a big interest. Your students in universities are big luckers to have such a great teacher. Prof. Raj and his team have done a big job, learned a lot of materials, took a lot of interviews etc. just for preparing this terrific course for us. Thank you so much. English is not my native language, maybe I did some mistakes, but I hope I've expressed my gratitude pretty clear. | 1) Prof. Raj, he is a really | Good | 1) teacher, I watched every video with | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Good course in this competitive world. | 1) | Good | 1) course in this competitive world. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Very good and helpful course. I really appreciate the chance to learn a lot from this interesting course too. So, thanks to everyone that's involved in this course. It's really 1 of the best course ever! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and helpful course. I really appreciate | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | very good class | 1) very | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I've got a lot of knowledge about how to define and getting your own happiness. And i have a new perspective on many area level and how to living this life in a good way. | 1) to living this life in a | Good | 1) way. | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Great course. It is so awesome that a concept such as happiness can be studied academically... and yield good results! :) 10/10 | 1) studied academically. . . and yield | Good | 1) results! :) 10/10 | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | I love this course! It helped me a lot in becoming stable and happy person. It helps in making life balanced. Thanks to Professor Raj! He is a mentor and seems like a good friend too. The fun lectures give so much useful insight about happiness and life. About how we go through our life journey by being unnecessarily sad, however we can take responsibility of our emotions and actually be happy. Thanks for making this course. :) | 1) a mentor and seems like a | Good | 1) friend too. The fun lectures give | 5.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | This was a very good course and it offered many reasons why people aren't happy and techniques on how to change. There were some instances where it was confusing and/or the information was too segmented. I liked that the videos were short, but sometimes that contributed to the segmentation of a lesson. I would recommend this course to others. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course and it offered many reasons | 4.0 |
| QEXoJRBmEeWhsgqB1eduww | Exceptional instructor. Arguments based in sound science. Presentation a bit hokey at times, but all in good fun. | 1) hokey at times, but all in | Good | 1) fun. | 5.0 |
| qF20_N8YEeSg1CIAC5NHJw | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | This is a very educational course.I came to know about various facts and this course is very helpful if you have your your interest in universe.all the points are explained in a very good manner.I thank professor Djorgoviski for this course.thanks caltech. | 1) points are explained in a very | Good | 1) manner. I thank professor Djorgoviski for | 5.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | A fine course and a necessary preliminary for the following course by the same good professor. | 1) the following course by the same | Good | 1) professor. | 5.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| QgmoVdT2EeSlhSIACx2EBw | Need to review some question. Example: The universe is 13.8 billion years. No unit for computational question. Two questions for one field to fill. A good idea to add an indication how to write an exponential number. Use Coursera tools to check if the answer is a number by student. | 1) for one field to fill. A | Good | 1) idea to add an indication how | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | its relatively a good course, although i expected the analogy to be more of a conflict manager.s perspective rather than being in the saddle of a party to the conflict. However it still helps in conflict resolution | 1) its relatively a | Good | 1) course, although i expected the analogy | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Good, to the point. Quick and easy tools to identify the sources and types of conflict and the tools you can use to successfully resolve conflict. | 1) | Good | 1) to the point. Quick and easy | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Is a good course | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | It is good organized and structured. Interviews are very interesting. Business cases too simple. I would recommend to make the first impression of the subject. | 1) It is | Good | 1) organized and structured. Interviews are very | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | A great course that equips you to manage a conflict filled world with ease, bringing people, organizations and nations together to live and operate in peace, harmony and good understanding for greater achievement. | 1) and operate in peace, harmony and | Good | 1) understanding for greater achievement. | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | I didn't learn a whole lot -perhaps it is because I'm not coming into a professional setting as a newbie anymore? I found a lot of the examples juvenile - 'wearing a robe to the office' or 'stealing things'. I was looking for more substantial examples of idealogical conflict I guess -stuff that is harder to resolve than being a person of integrity and making good decisions. I know this is just module 1, but the content didn't feel valuable for the most part. The assignments were alright. | 1) a person of integrity and making | Good | 1) decisions. I know this is just | 2.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Good class to attend to learn about types of conflict. | 1) | Good | 1) class to attend to learn about | 5.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | Very good class | 1) Very | Good | 1) class | 4.0 |
| QKGzLQoYEeWKzSIAC7Uk8A | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good. thanks you for help me to improve. | 1) Very | Good | 1) thanks you for help me to | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Its good | 1) Its | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | No programming demonstrations, but this is a very good introduction! thx! | 1) demonstrations, but this is a very | Good | 1) introduction! thx! | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | So far So good | 1) So far So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good instructor his teaching way is good!!!! hope so its easy ahead... | 1) | Good | 1) instructor his teaching way is good! | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good instructor his teaching way is good!!!! hope so its easy ahead... | 2) Good instructor his teaching way is | Good | 2) ! ! ! hope so its | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good but more examples missing | 1) Very | Good | 1) but more examples missing | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It well designed course. It has good composition of basics and as well as use cases details. Thanks to instructor for good explanation. | 1) It well designed course. It has | Good | 1) composition of basics and as well | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It well designed course. It has good composition of basics and as well as use cases details. Thanks to instructor for good explanation. | 2) cases details. Thanks to instructor for | Good | 2) explanation. | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent course, with good video lectures. However, the written course materials, especially in terms of slides and assignment instructions, suffer from poor grammar and an occasional lack of clarity. | 1) Excellent course, with | Good | 1) video lectures. However, the written course | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good Course with good learning, but at some places it becomes extremely boring which drifts away the excitement and commitment towards the course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course with good learning, but at | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good Course with good learning, but at some places it becomes extremely boring which drifts away the excitement and commitment towards the course. | 2) Good Course with | Good | 2) learning, but at some places it | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | it is really good course. but the lecturer should speak slower and more focus on the important issues. Thanks overall is a good course. | 1) it is really | Good | 1) course. but the lecturer should speak | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | it is really good course. but the lecturer should speak slower and more focus on the important issues. Thanks overall is a good course. | 2) important issues. Thanks overall is a | Good | 2) course. | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course for broad end-to-end discussion of database design and management. Lectures are decent, assignments and practice problems are pretty helpful. Class takes 3-4 hours/week on average, though it varies by week. Would have like to see more advanced discussion for some of the easier topics/shorter weeks. | 1) | Good | 1) course for broad end-to-end discussion of | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good review of DBMS concepts and practice, I felt it was a nice refresher. | 1) | Good | 1) review of DBMS concepts and practice, | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | i will be applying for a bussiness intelligence job within 1 month, and within the first few lessons im feeling very much confident that taking this course is a good step towards my database management career. | 1) that taking this course is a | Good | 1) step towards my database management career. | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very good course that teaches you many important skills in preparation for the next courses. It does start off with the basics of SQL DDL and DML that most professionals may already know, but later modules that cover design concepts and practice are very good. There are a few errors in the videos but these are easy to spot. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course that teaches you many important | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very good course that teaches you many important skills in preparation for the next courses. It does start off with the basics of SQL DDL and DML that most professionals may already know, but later modules that cover design concepts and practice are very good. There are a few errors in the videos but these are easy to spot. | 2) design concepts and practice are very | Good | 2) There are a few errors in | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The course is very well structured and provides good resources of practical data sets. I would recommend others to do this course. | 1) is very well structured and provides | Good | 1) resources of practical data sets. I | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good course to learn backend | 1) A | Good | 1) course to learn backend | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The specialization is great, and the course breadth and topics described in each is equally good. For this course, however, I felt like I could have covered what was taught by myself with a book, i.e. I didn't feel like it was class room level engaging with the explanations. I realized this is a one way MOOC, but I've taken courses off and on since they came out, and some others felt more interactive. This was more of here's a slide, I will read what's on the slide and explain some topics. The assignments were not bad, but definitely took more time than stated (just keep that in mind). The other thing that would help immensely is having TAs in the course. It's possible that they may get some later, but I've felt I learned/got feedback a lot more in courses with TAs. That said, this is an excellent introduction to databases course, and there's not many of them out there. If I had to go it again, I would, and I also paid for getting the cert - if anything for career advancement and having it on your LinkedIn profile as a starter DB course. | 1) topics described in each is equally | Good | 1) For this course, however, I felt | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good introduction to database and basic SQL | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to database and basic SQL | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | i learned a lot from this course , its fun and it has very good exercises | 1) its fun and it has very | Good | 1) exercises | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This course is very good! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good introduction to database management, the professor explain very good and you can learn so much, also arouses interest in exploring the topic. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to database management, the professor | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good introduction to database management, the professor explain very good and you can learn so much, also arouses interest in exploring the topic. | 2) database management, the professor explain very | Good | 2) and you can learn so much, | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Not enough implication from the instructors in the course. Students are left alone with the material, without any answers to there questions on the course. Peer review process subject to personal interpretation and leading to frustration for the students. That's quite unfortunate as this provides a bad experience whereas the course might have been good without that. | 1) whereas the course might have been | Good | 1) without that. | 2.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Pros: The course content covers a lot of relevant topics on Database Management. Things like Basic SQL queries, Database Normalization, Conceptual and Logical databases, and making ER diagrams are covered in the course. Cons: Prof Mannino is a bit robotic in his reading out of long sentences and the constant pace of talking. There is tons of repetition of sentences and words mere seconds after they were just spoken. The lectures seem to be a collection of bullet points. The assignments and the peer review structure is really a low point. There's no specific grading rubric - so points allocation is random and based on your peer's assessment. I had many instances where my right answers were marked as wrong. There is nothing you can do to correct it. Moreover, the questions are iterative and thus the same apparent error carries on and you get multiple wrong scores. Assignments need to be submitted in documents. Separate documents for each question !! At times, even a one-line answer needs to be in a separate document. Pictures of database diagrams need to be pasted in said documents. It was a bit frustrating to take screenshots all the time. Especially when you make a small correction, and have to take screenshots AGAIN, then paste it AGAIN, and upload AGAIN !! Summary: Take the course for it's content, and use the assignments as good practice. Don't take the grading seriously. Also, focus on the content rather than the delivery by the professor, and you will still be able to get some value out of the course (and the specialization by extension) | 1) content, and use the assignments as | Good | 1) practice. Don't take the grading seriously. | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Short videos, but good Practice problems and Assignments. | 1) Short videos, but | Good | 1) Practice problems and Assignments. | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good entry into database thinking. Homework is a tad on the high side for people who just want to learn on the side. Also, not clear why diagrams can't be automated directly from the database programs e.g. Access. Why would I draw an ERD and then design a database separately - better just design the tables and the diagram directly; then you have your ERD from the program e.g. Access or Filemaker. | 1) A | Good | 1) entry into database thinking. Homework is | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good but with some errors in assignments and not real support via the forum - some question has not been answered | 1) | Good | 1) but with some errors in assignments | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good introductory course. I would recommend allowing for extra time to get the database software up and functioning so that you aren't crammed for time trying to get it configured and do the assignment in week 2. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. I would recommend allowing | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Fair enough. Good material and content for someone new or that needs to remember basic concepts about databases. Not needed if the main focus is DWH and experience with DB exists | 1) Fair enough. | Good | 1) material and content for someone new | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very, very good course about databases fundamentals and design. | 1) This is a very, very | Good | 1) course about databases fundamentals and design. | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Severe lack of support (zero) from the professor or TAs. Some wrong solutions were provided for assigments but were never addressed or acknowledged that it will be fixed. Some assignment files are not Mac friendly or is just not viewable by all students (I can't tell). Materials are quite good but grading is subject to broad interpretations and there is no human to provide guidance on what are the best practices. To think that I paid for the specialisation in order to take the graded assignment AND I have to do the grading BUT I do not receive support? This is ridiculous. I will have to think three times before I pay for a Coursera course in the future. Never again. I will not recommend this to others. | 1) (I can't tell). Materials are quite | Good | 1) but grading is subject to broad | 1.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good teacher and very helpful and learning style and really appropriate course content. thumbs up | 1) very | Good | 1) teacher and very helpful and learning | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The course is very good | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course material and wonderful instructor. Was able to learn a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) course material and wonderful instructor. Was | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | excelent material. Good task and Assignments | 1) excelent material. | Good | 1) task and Assignments | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course. Clarified some basic concepts, got some hands on experience on using databases, ERD drawing tools. Need a bit more detailed explanation for the topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Clarified some basic concepts, got | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very good introduction to databases, how the evolved, what they do and why we need them. The presentations are easy to follow and a good number of resources is provided to deepen the understanding and to practice. While there are, of course, technical chapters that require the student to delve into a high level of detail, a large focus is on understanding the business problem that needs to be solved. Detailed knowledge and practice are necessary, but knowing how to join tables is not what makes a good database manager. Understanding and assessing requirements, identifying missing or redundant information are far more important. Thanks, Michael, for this course. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to databases, how the evolved, | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very good introduction to databases, how the evolved, what they do and why we need them. The presentations are easy to follow and a good number of resources is provided to deepen the understanding and to practice. While there are, of course, technical chapters that require the student to delve into a high level of detail, a large focus is on understanding the business problem that needs to be solved. Detailed knowledge and practice are necessary, but knowing how to join tables is not what makes a good database manager. Understanding and assessing requirements, identifying missing or redundant information are far more important. Thanks, Michael, for this course. | 2) are easy to follow and a | Good | 2) number of resources is provided to | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a very good introduction to databases, how the evolved, what they do and why we need them. The presentations are easy to follow and a good number of resources is provided to deepen the understanding and to practice. While there are, of course, technical chapters that require the student to delve into a high level of detail, a large focus is on understanding the business problem that needs to be solved. Detailed knowledge and practice are necessary, but knowing how to join tables is not what makes a good database manager. Understanding and assessing requirements, identifying missing or redundant information are far more important. Thanks, Michael, for this course. | 3) tables is not what makes a | Good | 3) database manager. Understanding and assessing requirements, | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | really good one! | 1) really | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good for beginners, truly wide scope of topics. also some assignments' conditions are not transparent and contradictory thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners, truly wide scope of | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | looking good, so far | 1) looking | Good | 1) so far | 3.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The course has good material and solid assignment. It would be five star if it goes more deep in some topics | 1) The course has | Good | 1) material and solid assignment. It would | 4.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qLFYrxnoEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | To be an introduction, it is a good course. | 1) be an introduction, it is a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| qO2z-Zz8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | The content covers very good the most important theories and concepts in macro economy and explains in detail the relationship between them. I wish the course would take more advantage of interactive multimedia tools in order to support the spoken word with visual means. | 1) The content covers very | Good | 1) the most important theories and concepts | 3.0 |
| qO2z-Zz8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Very good course, as all in the specialization, the professor shows a great devotion to getting the students to understand these very complex topi | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, as all in the specialization, | 4.0 |
| qO2z-Zz8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | This is a good course, but be sure you have a foundational level of understanding of Macroeconomics before starting - it doesn't provide a lot of background before diving into more advanced topics. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course, but be sure you have | 3.0 |
| qO2z-Zz8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Good material, fair presentation, too many peer evaluations. | 1) | Good | 1) material, fair presentation, too many peer | 1.0 |
| QO7QgCzfEeWv_w7cMMH1Uw | Good hands on course. The self built amplifier circuit feels like a hack but works around the voltage level issues adequately without the mezzanine board which was not available at the time the course was prepared. | 1) | Good | 1) hands on course. The self built | 4.0 |
| qogqSFgBEeWBNwpVGuknww | He terribly prepared us for quizes and gave about 4 examples in the entire course. I filled a notebook with about 40 pages of notes, about 3 of which were useful for the quizes. Though content was good, but i found myself looking things up because of his somewhat neive explanations of difficult concept. | 1) for the quizes. Though content was | Good | 1) but i found myself looking things | 2.0 |
| qogqSFgBEeWBNwpVGuknww | Good course, needs updating, since it was a first generation course. Worth taking, but make sure to review a bit of Calculus, especially integration. | 1) | Good | 1) course, needs updating, since it was | 4.0 |
| qogqSFgBEeWBNwpVGuknww | It's a really good, well-paced course. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) well-paced course. | 4.0 |
| qogqSFgBEeWBNwpVGuknww | Topics presented well for comprehension, good lecture quality. These topics are covered in grad level statistics courses at certain universities. | 1) Topics presented well for comprehension, | Good | 1) lecture quality. These topics are covered | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent Course!!! Enjoy the learning experience!!! Highly recommend this course to anyone who wants to learn Tableau. Good Luck. | 1) anyone who wants to learn Tableau. | Good | 1) Luck. | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent course, well presented Good Job Luca | 1) Excellent course, well presented | Good | 1) Job Luca | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course! Open you mind for fast a appealing visualisation of data and turning it into insights. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Open you mind for fast | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thanks very much for great content and especially, Ms. Jana Schaich Borg for brilliant presentation skills, lovely voice and good looking as well. Please participate. This is highly recommend course. | 1) brilliant presentation skills, lovely voice and | Good | 1) looking as well. Please participate. This | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Loved the Tableau section and the instructor is a good communicator. It'd be great to have a whole course about this BI Software | 1) section and the instructor is a | Good | 1) communicator. It'd be great to have | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Absolutely outstanding course. It stretched me - late nights grappling with the data, learning Tableau, recording a blooper-free presentation. So many takes! But this course was not just about Tableau; it was about clarifying goals, planning before diving into the data, putting yourself in the shoes of the client and good presentation principles. Great practical exercise at the end - make sure you put aside plenty of time for this. | 1) the shoes of the client and | Good | 1) presentation principles. Great practical exercise at | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Could've learnt this on youtube - really not very good. Dr. Egger's courses are rigorous and full of math. This is just a bunch of pretty pictures. Shouldn't be included in this specialization. | 1) on youtube - really not very | Good | 1) Dr. Egger's courses are rigorous and | 1.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A very good broad introduction to Tableau. | 1) A very | Good | 1) broad introduction to Tableau. | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | There's a lot of great information in this course and it's presented in a very good way. However, like the excel course in this specialization, most of the material isn't about using Tableau. 1 week is about running a project, 2 weeks are about using Tableau, and the final 2 weeks are about presentation. If you're interest isn't mainly in Tableau, I would recommend the course. However, if you're taking this course to learn Tableau, I would suggest not paying for it. | 1) and it's presented in a very | Good | 1) way. However, like the excel course | 2.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Amazing course with good start up | 1) Amazing course with | Good | 1) start up | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good. The teacher is awesome! | 1) Very | Good | 1) The teacher is awesome! | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course may be misleading aspiring data analysts and scientists: it may give the false impression that, with the tools learned here, you will be able to analyze your data by yourself. In fact, you would be completely missing on large chapters of statistics and, as a result, you would often end up drawing wrong conclusions and believe you did a great job. For example, what is the point of giving you a single 10-minutes video on how to do regression in Tableau if you don't even know regression (which is AT LEAST a one-term course in graduate school, and only after several other prior basic stats courses)? BEWARE: get a much larger background in statistics before applying anything you learn here in real life. Some minimal stats knowledge should be recommended as a pre-requisite for this course, or else you end up doing like those monkeys using a statistical software without really understanding what they are doing and drawing conclusions with blissful ignorance. The problem is: some of your audience will know and will notice, more often than you might think and you will end up looking like an idiot. Sorry to be negative here, but I think I owe you, my co-student, at least a warning: do learn more stats elsewhere!! ... good luck. | 1) stats elsewhere! ! . . . | Good | 1) luck. | 2.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | really good one.... best course on visualization. | 1) really | Good | 1) one. . . . best course | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Its a good course, but I feel too much details in week 3 course content. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course, but I feel too much | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course and very nice demonstrations on Tableau. | 1) | Good | 1) course and very nice demonstrations on | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really polished videos, really thorough explanations of how to do everything, really great overview of different functionalities that gave us a good balance of breadth and depth. Fantastic course. | 1) different functionalities that gave us a | Good | 1) balance of breadth and depth. Fantastic | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I really enjoyed the lectures. The introduction to Tableau was broad enough to get a feel for possibilities and gave plenty of resources to further look for guidance as needed. In addition, the focus was not just on the technical tool but relaying the differences in visualization for analysis and visualization for persuasion. I enjoyed her lecturing and felt like the visual science and very specific actionable takeaways were good. | 1) and very specific actionable takeaways were | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good explanation ! | 1) | Good | 1) explanation ! | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really great course! Very well organized, material is engaging and really well presented. Covers everything you need to know to get started with Tableau (hands on!). If you already work with Tableau, will be quite easy for you to complete the course, but you may still learn a few cool tricks from Jana. I also really liked the first week of the course where Jana went over the general concepts of being a good data analyst. They aren't shocking or extremely eye opening, but nonetheless it is very important to truly understand. I found it interesting the way she presented them. Great job with the course! Most engaging course I personally tried on Coursera so far :) | 1) the general concepts of being a | Good | 1) data analyst. They aren't shocking or | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | interesting lectures, real project using the tools presented in the course, and you get all the basic functions of Tableau for granted! good job! | 1) basic functions of Tableau for granted! | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good brush on Tableau. Great that the course included a 6 mo license to Tableau Desktop! However while more complex topics where touched, they were rushed also. An extra week or two at the more advanced stuff would've been beneficial. Some of the quizzes also were a bit silly and focusing on minor things. | 1) | Good | 1) brush on Tableau. Great that the | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good introduction course for this tool. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course for this tool. | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good class but could do with a bit more explanation of the Tableau features | 1) | Good | 1) class but could do with a | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Not perfect, but overall pretty good. No support from instructor or teaching assistants in the course forums. | 1) Not perfect, but overall pretty | Good | 1) No support from instructor or teaching | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I completed this course, was looking for more of Tableau. This course if giving lot of good concepts in terms of problem solving skills, Visualization and some Tableau. Overall a good course. | 1) This course if giving lot of | Good | 1) concepts in terms of problem solving | 3.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I completed this course, was looking for more of Tableau. This course if giving lot of good concepts in terms of problem solving skills, Visualization and some Tableau. Overall a good course. | 2) Visualization and some Tableau. Overall a | Good | 2) course. | 3.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really liked the course. Very well designed and carried away. The only thing I wasn't too happy was the final project as the data was not easy to understand. As a beginner when we have to focus more on Tableau related features, I ended up spending more time understanding the data which didn't really help me. Otherwise, it was a good course. Surely, it put me on a fast track for Tableau. | 1) help me. Otherwise, it was a | Good | 1) course. Surely, it put me on | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good syllabus and challenging assignments with real data. Great lecturer too. | 1) | Good | 1) syllabus and challenging assignments with real | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good videos well presented. Good intro into data viz and Tableau | 1) | Good | 1) videos well presented. Good intro into | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good videos well presented. Good intro into data viz and Tableau | 2) Good videos well presented. | Good | 2) intro into data viz and Tableau | 4.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Nice course..good example and hand on assignments. | 1) Nice course. . | Good | 1) example and hand on assignments. | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good content! Thoughtful insight on approaching problem solving in data analysis world. | 1) | Good | 1) content! Thoughtful insight on approaching problem | 5.0 |
| QoJxNRnoEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | wonderful design of content, good business examples. | 1) wonderful design of content, | Good | 1) business examples. | 5.0 |
| qoYa6HE8EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | a very good and comprehensive course. The videos are very informative and the presentations are also very good. Some details can be added into ESOP development and how to budget for employee compensation. | 1) a very | Good | 1) and comprehensive course. The videos are | 4.0 |
| qoYa6HE8EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | a very good and comprehensive course. The videos are very informative and the presentations are also very good. Some details can be added into ESOP development and how to budget for employee compensation. | 2) and the presentations are also very | Good | 2) Some details can be added into | 4.0 |
| qoYa6HE8EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | This course will give you a good view of how the different components of the pay mix affect employee compensation. The instructors in this course did a great job in reiterating the different aspects so that learning the material is easy and intuitive. While there are references to the other courses in the Specialization, this course can be taken as a stand-alone without missing anything. | 1) This course will give you a | Good | 1) view of how the different components | 5.0 |
| QPsZPf2gEeSvCSIAC12B5Q | Very good, broad introduction to many of the issues surrounding this epidemic. My only criticism (and why I only gave it 4 stars) was the unbridled self-congratulatory tone and Emory-centeredness of the course. I realize this is probably a function of why Universities create these free courses. There is a marketing aspect to it. But it did get a little tedious. | 1) Very | Good | 1) broad introduction to many of the | 4.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | Liked the course, but it was a little easy (took four days total to do the material for the whole course). Many questions were left unanswered (such as how dependent the credibility intervals are on the choice of prior distribution and the assumed distribution of the data), and it didn't touch on later topics that are interesting (MCMC sampling). Again, good beginning course, but I was looking for more in depth study. | 1) that are interesting (MCMC sampling). Again, | Good | 1) beginning course, but I was looking | 3.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | Very nice course that in my opinion nicely fits between Bolstad and Gelman in difficulty (talking in popular Bayesian Data Analysis books). Herbert Lee does a very good job at building one's intuition and understanding in the general Bayesian inference. Good starting point for moving on with Bayes. | 1) books). Herbert Lee does a very | Good | 1) job at building one's intuition and | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | Very nice course that in my opinion nicely fits between Bolstad and Gelman in difficulty (talking in popular Bayesian Data Analysis books). Herbert Lee does a very good job at building one's intuition and understanding in the general Bayesian inference. Good starting point for moving on with Bayes. | 2) understanding in the general Bayesian inference. | Good | 2) starting point for moving on with | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | The material is good, but I've found the lectures challenging to understand even having some background in math. It would be good if all the definitions and key facts were stated more prominently in the lectures, as opposed to algebraic transformations which most readers can hopefully do on their own. | 1) The material is | Good | 1) but I've found the lectures challenging | 3.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | The material is good, but I've found the lectures challenging to understand even having some background in math. It would be good if all the definitions and key facts were stated more prominently in the lectures, as opposed to algebraic transformations which most readers can hopefully do on their own. | 2) background in math. It would be | Good | 2) if all the definitions and key | 3.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | Good course. This course is quite challenging for people who don't major in math or physics. However, it isn't so difficult to understand as the post half of this course has a lot in common. In my experience, understanding the concept of priors and posterior estimation is the core of this course. Have fun learning this course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. This course is quite challenging | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | it's very helpful for me to understand the Bayesian statistics. things are clearly stated and the quiz are good. Many thanks! It's better to have a further course on the Monte Carlo. It's better if the regression can be talked more in details. | 1) clearly stated and the quiz are | Good | 1) Many thanks! It's better to have | 5.0 |
| Qqmr3fBKEeWLaBLI8fdMlw | This course is a very good introductory of bayesian statistics. But it better that you have known the basic statistics inference. | 1) This course is a very | Good | 1) introductory of bayesian statistics. But it | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | More in-depth work with ArcMap and associated principles. Redundant to a degree with the intro to the specialization, but good blend of instruction and assignments. | 1) the intro to the specialization, but | Good | 1) blend of instruction and assignments. | 4.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | wonderfull and usefull course, now i m able to manage data for analyse and design it for a good understanding | 1) analyse and design it for a | Good | 1) understanding | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | good efforts,thank you so much | 1) | Good | 1) efforts, thank you so much | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Another really good course on GIS. I followed on from the first in the specialisation and I think I would have been quite lost without doing that. I like to follow the videos with the demo materials in an open version of ArcGIS - this can be quite hard as some of the demo materials are very big and my laptop struggles to keep up with big processing, a slight improvement could be to have smaller demo files. | 1) Another really | Good | 1) course on GIS. I followed on | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very good and beneficial. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and beneficial. | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Excellent course and I thoroughly enjoyed and learned a great deal of GIS! This combined with excellent teaching approach of the instructor, Nick Santos and the good balance of theory and hands-on makes this course absolute recommendation! | 1) the instructor, Nick Santos and the | Good | 1) balance of theory and hands-on makes | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Well paced, well structured, good fun. | 1) Well paced, well structured, | Good | 1) fun. | 5.0 |
| qqP6hnElEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Fascinating, really well taught with good assignment! Looking for to the rest of the specialisation! | 1) Fascinating, really well taught with | Good | 1) assignment! Looking for to the rest | 5.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Some content is good and informative but there's a big problem with the teacher accent (adding a "ch" at the end of half the words) and his diction (hesitating on the other half the words). Also it seems that the course was created in a rush and lacks a lot of polishing(*). Sometimes the course assumes a good level in computer science and then 2 minutes later it explains how to do a decimal to binary conversion! This makes many videos boring but the slides are not provided so you really have to view the videos entirely. I've followed much harder courses with pleasure but here it was torture to finish it. Also most of the course is just definitions of some specific terms and not practical explanations. I agree that defining a few words is important but here it's just too much. *: Some videos are in reverse order, some are stopped in the middle of a sentence, some quizzes are bugged and don't give credit properly and there's nobody to help students... | 1) Some content is | Good | 1) and informative but there's a big | 1.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Some content is good and informative but there's a big problem with the teacher accent (adding a "ch" at the end of half the words) and his diction (hesitating on the other half the words). Also it seems that the course was created in a rush and lacks a lot of polishing(*). Sometimes the course assumes a good level in computer science and then 2 minutes later it explains how to do a decimal to binary conversion! This makes many videos boring but the slides are not provided so you really have to view the videos entirely. I've followed much harder courses with pleasure but here it was torture to finish it. Also most of the course is just definitions of some specific terms and not practical explanations. I agree that defining a few words is important but here it's just too much. *: Some videos are in reverse order, some are stopped in the middle of a sentence, some quizzes are bugged and don't give credit properly and there's nobody to help students... | 2) polishing(*). Sometimes the course assumes a | Good | 2) level in computer science and then | 1.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | No one responds to questions. Lectures are not as good as other courses in the specialization and no slides available. | 1) to questions. Lectures are not as | Good | 1) as other courses in the specialization | 1.0 |
| qqRBbiEREeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | The audio can be difficult to understand. Partially because of the Professor's accent and partially because the recording is poor. If you can get past that, it's a good course and the professor knows his stuff. | 1) can get past that, it's a | Good | 1) course and the professor knows his | 3.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Exceptionally good and challenging. Occasionally over my head but pushing me to make the effort to understand. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) and challenging. Occasionally over my head | 5.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Very good and complete description of how life evolved on earth and the conditions associated with specialization and dispersion. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and complete description of how life | 5.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | Excellent. Very comprehensive course that has relevance to academic research scientists and those with less scientific training. This is accessible for those with busy schedules and encourages and provides information for further reading on the topics. A very good historical overview but critically with up-to-date recent research developments. The graphics, visualizations, animations and on-site demonstrations work very well. I highly recommend. | 1) reading on the topics. A very | Good | 1) historical overview but critically with up-to-date | 5.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | The course content is very very good and not superficial as some courses we see around here. I liked very much how the order of subjects where build. However, if you allow me to give a *constructive* criticism, please let me say that the strategy chosen to ask lectures to read from previous written scripts, instead of letting them present more naturally, was a bad one. I understand that in order to make the legends/captions available, the lecturers kinda read from scripts their talks and this was very bad. It would be much better next time if you allow each speaker give the talk naturally as they want, with no reading, and then latter produce the subtitles. The lecturers are reseachers and not ACTORS so the final result of reading word by word what they were saying compromised a lot the final quality of their talks. Please don't get me wrong, I just trying to be constructive giving back somehow the time and effort spent by you guys to prepare such nice course. | 1) The course content is very very | Good | 1) and not superficial as some courses | 4.0 |
| QRDjcWLVEeWFkQ7sUCFGVQ | stilVery good and contain very recent data that actually can help people who are isted | 1) stilVery | Good | 1) and contain very recent data that | 4.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Gives an overall idea of being an entrepreneur! Good MOOC :) | 1) overall idea of being an entrepreneur! | Good | 1) MOOC :) | 4.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Very Good Course and the Professors explained the material very well. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course and the Professors explained the | 4.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | good course and well presented by both. | 1) | Good | 1) course and well presented by both. | 2.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Good course, the ideas are organized , some many real example have been explained. I recommend this course for all people who have ideas in their minds. | 1) | Good | 1) course, the ideas are organized , | 4.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Good quality. Very instructive and inspirational. Thank you! | 1) | Good | 1) quality. Very instructive and inspirational. Thank | 5.0 |
| qu8u8vqKEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | very good...! | 1) very | Good | 1) . . ! | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Good course. Few things towards the end of course were not quite clear to me. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Few things towards the end | 4.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Course is good and they are working hard on having advisors available. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) and they are working hard on | 4.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Really interesting course. I actually thought it was at least as good as the first and followed up on that material nicely. Overall, the content is extremely practical and gives you everything you need to plan and run a design | 1) thought it was at least as | Good | 1) as the first and followed up | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Having successfully completed 'Getting Started: Agile Meets Design Thinking' I found this module partially confusing. It is also based on Alex Cowans' venture design process but this time on each step you do things that differ from what was taught in the previous course. Things seem to be complementary but you should not expect to go through a structured process over all courses. They are all based on the same process but shed light on different aspects. I also have the imporession that the didactics of this second course still coudl be improved a lot. Quizzes are currently reworked and bugs fixed and the team is very responsive. It still was a good learning experience and doing Design sprints is a great approach. From the review of assignments I can say that a few students seem to adapt better to the structure of the course that I did. But most seemed to be equally if not more confused. Doing reviews wasn't fun because formally most students got enough points but content-wise I perceived it as rather messy assignments to review. :/ | 1) very responsive. It still was a | Good | 1) learning experience and doing Design sprints | 3.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Pretty good material. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) material. | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | A practical, useful course on how to actually run these sessions. If you've run a design workshop, I think you'll appreciate the level of detail. If you're not going to run a design sprint or any kind of workshop in the next few months, maybe you skip over some of the checklists. That said, the main point of the course is practical preparation for doing these type of sessions, and for that I think it's very good. | 1) for that I think it's very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qVetW596EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | I thought it was good. Design sprints are popular but in practice there's a lot of detail you're left to figure out for yourself. The level of detail here was helpful for getting started. I would recommend taking their Course 1 (Agile and Design Thinking)- this seems to assume you know those concepts, which I guess is fair enough since it is one of Coursera's specializations. | 1) I thought it was | Good | 1) Design sprints are popular but in | 5.0 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | The lectures were good but when it came to quizzes and assignments, we do not know what to do? The questions were very complicated and not stated in the Lectures | 1) The lectures were | Good | 1) but when it came to quizzes | 1.0 |
| Qx-vkAocEeWAYyIACmGIdw | Absolute genial curse, really interesting for adquire new conceps and probably new ideas from this course... The teacher is really kindly and explain the things very very good, very friendly and easy to learn... Another important point is the data the techer leave at finish of each class, very interesting papers for read and learn... I liked a lot and I hope this techer and University will do another training similar to this... Thanks to all team for this impressive and interesting training... Thanks. | 1) and explain the things very very | Good | 1) very friendly and easy to learn. | 5.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Very informative course. I am interested in psychology and this psychology in work is a very good course for those who work. | 1) psychology in work is a very | Good | 1) course for those who work. | 4.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Exceptionally good course in content, topic, applicability, interest and quality. Highly recommended to new leaders or anyone wanting to improve their ability to relate with, evaluate and motivate their coworkers and subordinates. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) course in content, topic, applicability, interest | 5.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Very interesting course, I really appreciate seeing the real world application of psychological theories and the material was presented in a variety of ways to gain and hold the learner's attention. The extra reading and additional video resources further enhanced my understanding of the subject matter. The material was delivered simply and effectively. Thank you! Good Job! | 1) delivered simply and effectively. Thank you! | Good | 1) Job! | 5.0 |
| qXxuFBUnEeWhTg59fTWfpQ | Really good course. I took this course to gain some knowledge, to know what psychology is about. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. I took this course to | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good to start programming in C language, but something used in homework doesn't mentioned in class material | 1) | Good | 1) to start programming in C language, | 4.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | A very good class. I love the lesson of the history of the math! | 1) A very | Good | 1) class. I love the lesson of | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | good lesson | 1) | Good | 1) lesson | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | A good introductory course. Easy and you can begin to program after taking the course. You may skip the first few chapters since they may not be about the techniques you want to learn. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. Easy and you can | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The content is good but should be more organized. More instructions and explanation should be provided for exercises. Particularly, the auto grading system should be improved. Besides a simple term like "compile error", more explanation should be provided to help students debugging. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) but should be more organized. More | 4.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Lecturer is pretty good | 1) Lecturer is pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Pretty good,especially for the rookie like me. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) especially for the rookie like me. | 5.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very good course, recommend to take, but homework is kind of beyond what has been taught. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, recommend to take, but homework | 4.0 |
| Qzq_RhPlEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very Good Class | 1) Very | Good | 1) Class | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | There were the occasional moments when I had a hard time clearly understanding what the lecturer meant. Otherwise pretty good. | 1) what the lecturer meant. Otherwise pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Teacher is good, also the contens are very interesting. However i felt the capstone must be clearer in order to follow the previous one. They have both the same situation, but there is something missing between capstone 1 and 2. Maybe it is the way it is conceibed, the questions were not clear at all. | 1) Teacher is | Good | 1) also the contens are very interesting. | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | good concepts | 1) | Good | 1) concepts | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good introduction to the basics of strategy formulation - includes some basic concepts in defining strategy, a few concepts related to strategy analysis and strategic decision making. Course ends with an opportunity to demonstrate learning objectives through a capstone case on E-Types design agency. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the basics of strategy | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | The course content itself was good, however the final assignment was vague and confusing. I think my coursemates had the same problem; all of the submissions I reviewed failed to discuss in any way at least one of the learning objectives. | 1) The course content itself was | Good | 1) however the final assignment was vague | 3.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good examples and themes. | 1) | Good | 1) examples and themes. | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This is a very simple, brief and useful course. The modules are short, concise but do not go into lot of details. Is a good course to audit/browse for free but may not be good enough against a verified option. Anyways, paying for verified course is subject to personal value derivation. While I had rated earlier for the above reasons before the course finished. I am facing the exact same problem with this course as I faced with earlier course. The grading process is badly constructed for final assignment. In fact, now I am learning from coursera staff that may be there are not enough students to grade my peer review assignment. So please do audit this course but do not be trapped in specialization. Cheers.. | 1) into lot of details. Is a | Good | 1) course to audit/browse for free but | 2.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | This is a very simple, brief and useful course. The modules are short, concise but do not go into lot of details. Is a good course to audit/browse for free but may not be good enough against a verified option. Anyways, paying for verified course is subject to personal value derivation. While I had rated earlier for the above reasons before the course finished. I am facing the exact same problem with this course as I faced with earlier course. The grading process is badly constructed for final assignment. In fact, now I am learning from coursera staff that may be there are not enough students to grade my peer review assignment. So please do audit this course but do not be trapped in specialization. Cheers.. | 2) for free but may not be | Good | 2) enough against a verified option. Anyways, | 2.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | A very good follow-up to the strategic management course in the strategic management specialisation. I had fun learning everything. | 1) A very | Good | 1) follow-up to the strategic management course | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good information and very heavy if you are working a full time job and are not generally involved in strategy planning. I strongly suggest that you use time to listen and re-listen to the presentation. | 1) | Good | 1) information and very heavy if you | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Another good course from Copenhagen University... Must join.. | 1) Another | Good | 1) course from Copenhagen University. . . | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Good experience of learning. | 1) | Good | 1) experience of learning. | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Excellent sessions and good instruction. | 1) Excellent sessions and | Good | 1) instruction. | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Could be improved.. the ideas seem disconnected there is no clear flow of the ideas presented in different weeks and the specific actions to formulate a strategy. but overall good course with excellent frameworks. Thanks a lot Coursera | 1) to formulate a strategy. but overall | Good | 1) course with excellent frameworks. Thanks a | 3.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | It was a very good experience to take this course. Thank you! | 1) It was a very | Good | 1) experience to take this course. Thank | 4.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Great education and a very good setup, but the final assignment is very vague, so it's challenging. I think that when a professor gives a vague assignment, he should be the one grading the work, because peer grading only works best when they know exactly what they are supposed to be grading. | 1) Great education and a very | Good | 1) setup, but the final assignment is | 5.0 |
| r0e9gyUAEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Great course with good material and lecturer | 1) Great course with | Good | 1) material and lecturer | 4.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Great course, would have been better, if authors added more assignments and material to study as graphs have so many applications. Anyways, I do believe that motivated learners will go ahead and find more challenges for themselves. As always, thanks to all the instructors, keep up the good work! | 1) all the instructors, keep up the | Good | 1) work! | 4.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Good Questions and very good Test Cases. | 1) | Good | 1) Questions and very good Test Cases. | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Good Questions and very good Test Cases. | 2) Good Questions and very | Good | 2) Test Cases. | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Really Good Course , Problems are of good quality , the content is time saving and easy to understand. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Course , Problems are of good | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Really Good Course , Problems are of good quality , the content is time saving and easy to understand. | 2) Good Course , Problems are of | Good | 2) quality , the content is time | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Very good explanations. The course assignments were well thought-out and were the right difficulty. | 1) Very | Good | 1) explanations. The course assignments were well | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Very good. Lacking somewhat in homework difficulty and advanced problems. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Lacking somewhat in homework difficulty and | 4.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Good work ! Every concept is well explained ! | 1) | Good | 1) work ! Every concept is well | 5.0 |
| R1xPlXlzEeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | Good Course material and Assignment. | 1) | Good | 1) Course material and Assignment. | 4.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | This course provides a very good introduction to both Public and Private Key Cryptography. | 1) This course provides a very | Good | 1) introduction to both Public and Private | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | This is a really good course to get a high level overview of cryptography, the main elements and concepts, and the teacher is really didactic | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) course to get a high level | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | The professor is excellent. He covers a lot of subjects using good analogies without loosing depth. There are programming assignments to help you grasp the material. | 1) covers a lot of subjects using | Good | 1) analogies without loosing depth. There are | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | Very useful insight about Cryptography, very good practical assignments. I advise it to everyone interested in Cyber Security. Very stimulating. | 1) Very useful insight about Cryptography, very | Good | 1) practical assignments. I advise it to | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | This course was enjoyable and challenging. Early lessons cover historical ciphers, along with some fun programming challenges to attack them. Later lessons dive into modern cryptography. This is more challenging and you will need to study some number theory if you have not done so previously. I ended up buying Prof Katz' book and also Concrete Mathematics to fully get my head around the subject matter. The treatment is not superficial. This is where I dropped one star from the review - I thought that the course could have done a better job of covering the theory in this space, or at least pointing to sources to study it, or mentioning it as a pre-requisite. I also thought that the course could have done a better job of describing how all the pieces come together - the discussion is there, but it is light and somewhat assumed you will get it. The only thorough discussion is specifically for SSL / TLS late in the lecture series. Overall, a good and challenging course. This is not an easy MOOC - so only take it if you are interested in a challenge and don't mind extra study time. | 1) in the lecture series. Overall, a | Good | 1) and challenging course. This is not | 4.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | An enjoyable trip through the history of crypto schemes, and practical attacks against them. By the end of this class you will have a good basic understanding of modern cryptography and real world implementations used online everyday. It's designed in a balanced way so that both those with a Mathematics background and those with programming backgrounds can both keep up. | 1) this class you will have a | Good | 1) basic understanding of modern cryptography and | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | It's really good | 1) It's really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| r32oHRuLEeWxXBLj8jbgsw | I felt it was a good introduction to cryptography. There were quizzes and programming assignments throughout the course to assess knowledge. | 1) I felt it was a | Good | 1) introduction to cryptography. There were quizzes | 5.0 |
| R3QoIjeuEeWCYBKNeFwojw | Very good and interesting course, and thank you for writting subs in my native language. Дякую! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course, and thank you | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Very good course, I wish it had been a little longer. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I wish it had been | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Excellent course and perspective on mapping paths and routes, anybody planning for this should ensure good knowledge of MatLab, it took me longer to complete the course than I expected due to my lack of familiarity with MatLab. | 1) anybody planning for this should ensure | Good | 1) knowledge of MatLab, it took me | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Good Introductory Course but can be better. | 1) | Good | 1) Introductory Course but can be better. | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | A good course to get started with robotic motion planning. It starts from shortest path algorithm, configuration space to probabilistic roadmap and potential filed. | 1) A | Good | 1) course to get started with robotic | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Good but can do better. | 1) | Good | 1) but can do better. | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Good Introduction to some of the Algorithms in Computational Planning . More of training in assignment than explanation in video | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction to some of the Algorithms | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Good course, completely satisfied. Could have used a bit more material though. For example more tie-ins to the first course would not have been difficult. | 1) | Good | 1) course, completely satisfied. Could have used | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Interesting material, and good assignments. However this is no assistance when by TAs if you have questions, which is important since there is no feedback on assignments and hard to know where you went wrong. | 1) Interesting material, and | Good | 1) assignments. However this is no assistance | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Very good introduction course for motion planning. Could be better if there is more interactions with the TAs. Also the matlab assignments have some minor mistakes which takes time to figure it out. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction course for motion planning. Could | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Very good material and cool assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) material and cool assignments. | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | If the course had the same information and effort as week1 over all 4 weeks i would gave 5 stars, although the assignments are pretty good and I learnt something new, however the assignments are fun but the grader is annoying as the single error output is..... something is wrong... try again?! | 1) stars, although the assignments are pretty | Good | 1) and I learnt something new, however | 1.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The assignments in this course take much more time than indicated. Feedback from staff is minimal. If you are not a good programmer, think twice. Nevertheless, the lectures are interesting and well taught. So if you do not want a certicficate, I recommend this. | 1) minimal. If you are not a | Good | 1) programmer, think twice. Nevertheless, the lectures | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The lectures were good, but many assignments had errors (graders, errors in code) | 1) The lectures were | Good | 1) but many assignments had errors (graders, | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The topic is interesting and the lectures itself were good. The explanations of the algorithms and concepts was clear and easy to understand. However, the amount of material covered is very little. I think there should either be more concepts thought or they should be covered in more depth. Quizzes: The quizzes were very weak. They didn't really tell you weather you understood the concept or not. If one of the answers was wrong there was no information which one it was. So you have no idea which lecture you should watch again. Assignments: The assignments were very bad prepared. In some assignments there were bugs in the provided code, we weren't supposed to edit. The assignments itself are rather easy and can be completed quite quickly, if there wasn't the grader. From the grading you got no information what was wrong or which tests passed or failed. Most of the time it wasn't the case that the algorithm failed, instead the output was not as expected by the grader, although it was as described in the assignment. But you never knew. This part has to be improved a lot. Overall I have to say that I expected much more from University of Pennsylvania, especially after taking the first part of the Specialization which was of good quality. | 1) interesting and the lectures itself were | Good | 1) The explanations of the algorithms and | 1.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The topic is interesting and the lectures itself were good. The explanations of the algorithms and concepts was clear and easy to understand. However, the amount of material covered is very little. I think there should either be more concepts thought or they should be covered in more depth. Quizzes: The quizzes were very weak. They didn't really tell you weather you understood the concept or not. If one of the answers was wrong there was no information which one it was. So you have no idea which lecture you should watch again. Assignments: The assignments were very bad prepared. In some assignments there were bugs in the provided code, we weren't supposed to edit. The assignments itself are rather easy and can be completed quite quickly, if there wasn't the grader. From the grading you got no information what was wrong or which tests passed or failed. Most of the time it wasn't the case that the algorithm failed, instead the output was not as expected by the grader, although it was as described in the assignment. But you never knew. This part has to be improved a lot. Overall I have to say that I expected much more from University of Pennsylvania, especially after taking the first part of the Specialization which was of good quality. | 2) of the Specialization which was of | Good | 2) quality. | 1.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | So I'll start with the positives. The material was appropriate and interesting and well presented. CJ Taylor is an enthusiastic lecturer and the material was presented in an enjoyable easy to understand way and having finished the course, I definitely want to learn more about computational motion planning. The problems I have with this course though are numerous. This is the second part of the Robotics Specialization and compared to the first part, this course was very weak. There was very little lecture material and the course felt thin - as if it were 2 weeks of material stretched over 4. There were many instances where the lectures could have gone in to much more detail and just didn't, I appreciate that you can't cover everything in lectures, but would it have killed you to provide or at least point to some good additional reading resources? The assessments were the worst part. The quizzes barely tested what I had learnt and could mostly be solved by common sense. What I find shocking is that there were so few questions with few multiple choice answer that you could easily brute-force these quizzes if you really wanted to. Compare this to the Aerial Robotics course where the quizzes took time and forced me to think and understand what was discussed in lecture. The programming assignments were shockingly bad. They were hard for completely the wrong reasons. I spent most of my time on them not coding the solution, but trying to figure out what was actually wanted and fixing bugs that were in the provided code that we WEREN'T EVEN SUPPOSED TO EDIT. The autograder would never tell you why you were wrong, just "I'm sorry, your solution didn't pass all of our test cases." This meant that finding the solution was based on guesswork rather than considered thought. This was made even worse by the fact that some simulations took a long time to run which made iterating guesses very slow - and doing this on a time limit is just pointlessly stressful. One of the assignments had the solution already in the source code as the instructors had forgotten to take it out. The final assignment wouldn't even run out of the box without fixing bugs in the provided code. This would have taken seconds to check had the person who wrote it bothered to check their work beforehand. Thing is, the tasks provided in principle weren't that hard, they were actually kind of too easy. Dijkstra's algorithm isn't that difficult to implement from scratch, and yet all that was asked of us was to implement a small 10 line for-loop. That said, I appreciate that as a software engineer, I might find this sort of thing much easier than most, but even so I don't feel as though the programming assignments helped me learn anything. Overall, regardless of how interesting the material was, this course was very shoddily put together. I appreciate this is the first time the course has been run, but this really felt phoned in and unacceptable. I paid money for this course and the quality of it is notably worse than most free MOOCs I have taken. I feel ripped off and I sincerely hope that the next section is better otherwise I doubt I will bother to continue until the end. I thought Penn University was better than this. | 1) or at least point to some | Good | 1) additional reading resources? The assessments were | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The first two assignments certainly tested knowledge of the subject however the last two assignmnets were lacking. Good course that does what it is supposed to do. More feedback from test cases would be very helpful. | 1) the last two assignmnets were lacking. | Good | 1) course that does what it is | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Overall decent course. This course focused less on the theory aspects in the course videos, which bothered me a lot considering I am paying for it. But the explanations were still good for those algorithms. The assignments were good as well. I liked how they made us work on them instead of the first course where we were mostly tuning parameters. Hopefully MOOCs start having challenging assignments too. The instructor explained really well too! I didn't really end up visiting the Discussion Forums for this course at all. So can't comment on the participation from other students or TAs. Future Advice - Considering how other courses offer about 1-2 hours of course videos, I think this course could offer a lot more. One assignment problem focusing on one algorithm, while having other challenging algorithms taught in those videos to be left for our own implementation would help students a lot more i believe. | 1) it. But the explanations were still | Good | 1) for those algorithms. The assignments were | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Overall decent course. This course focused less on the theory aspects in the course videos, which bothered me a lot considering I am paying for it. But the explanations were still good for those algorithms. The assignments were good as well. I liked how they made us work on them instead of the first course where we were mostly tuning parameters. Hopefully MOOCs start having challenging assignments too. The instructor explained really well too! I didn't really end up visiting the Discussion Forums for this course at all. So can't comment on the participation from other students or TAs. Future Advice - Considering how other courses offer about 1-2 hours of course videos, I think this course could offer a lot more. One assignment problem focusing on one algorithm, while having other challenging algorithms taught in those videos to be left for our own implementation would help students a lot more i believe. | 2) for those algorithms. The assignments were | Good | 2) as well. I liked how they | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Some really good concepts introduced at just the right level. | 1) Some really | Good | 1) concepts introduced at just the right | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | In this course we will get to know about shortest path algorithm such A*, Dijkstra's, concept of configuration space and path planning in the same, developing Probabilistic road maps and RRT and also a bit about Artificial potenial fields. All the algorithms are neatly explained. The material though very short(in terms of total hours of video lectures) is nicely compiled. The quality of the MATLAB exercises is very good with few issues here and there. We can extract a lot about MATLAB implementation of different simulations by spending time understanding the given code and also implementing missing sections as part of the assignment. Overall, a great course. | 1) of the MATLAB exercises is very | Good | 1) with few issues here and there. | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Most of the homework assignments aren't graded correctly out of the box and have errors. Also, only specific solutions are selected. Otherwise it's great material at a good pace. | 1) Otherwise it's great material at a | Good | 1) pace. | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | I think there is need to provide clearer instructions on how to get the programming assignments done. The course content is good, but doing the programming assignments needs to be more clarified. | 1) assignments done. The course content is | Good | 1) but doing the programming assignments needs | 3.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | The Assignments are more of Trial and Error and not very helpful. The Course Material and Content is good. Teaching Staff is nowhere to be found. | 1) The Course Material and Content is | Good | 1) Teaching Staff is nowhere to be | 2.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | A well presented, high-level, overview of computational robot planning. Students should understand the basics of how to apply some of the key fundamental techniques when they have completed this course. It should provide a good grounding for future study or research | 1) this course. It should provide a | Good | 1) grounding for future study or research | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | as an introduction is a really good course. The assignments are interesting and can get you to understand what you are doing. However, the grading system used for the assignment is frustrating.. it is never known what it is actually graded and even if your solution is correct compared to what written in the assignment pdf, most of the times is considered wrong without saying why. | 1) as an introduction is a really | Good | 1) course. The assignments are interesting and | 4.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | This course is good, but maybe it is a little bit to easy and only cover a small part of knowledge. However, I think it's okay for a introduction course. I hope there will be course dig into more deeply and wilder knowledge | 1) This course is | Good | 1) but maybe it is a little | 5.0 |
| r8zaNVu-EeW0ugrg2GGh4Q | Damn good!! and bit difficult | 1) Damn | Good | 1) ! and bit difficult | 4.0 |
| raZNrgNGEeaJMgqy4cb6jQ | I really liked this part of the TESOL, Teach English Now! Technology Enriched Teaching. Thank you very much. I have found some good tips and useful web-sites to work with in class. I think I have gained some ideas how to make technology sticky in the class as a tool but not as a distraction, Thank you very much. | 1) very much. I have found some | Good | 1) tips and useful web-sites to work | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Interesting course. Motivating instructors. Tests were sometimes a bit too much about semantics and too little about applying knowledge in a practical way (which the course intro hinted on). But it was good value, manageable next to job and private life and fun to do. You won't regret it. | 1) intro hinted on). But it was | Good | 1) value, manageable next to job and | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Interesting course with good and clear explanation. Easy to understand and with fun! Thank you! | 1) Interesting course with | Good | 1) and clear explanation. Easy to understand | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Good structure... funny prof! ... alot to digest but worth it. | 1) | Good | 1) structure. . . funny prof! . | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Although I am not a native speaker,but I try me best to understand it!Good teacher!Good Coursera! | 1) try me best to understand it! | Good | 1) teacher! Good Coursera! | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Although I am not a native speaker,but I try me best to understand it!Good teacher!Good Coursera! | 2) best to understand it! Good teacher! | Good | 2) Coursera! | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very insightful topic! A good overview of the use of analytics in accounting! | 1) Very insightful topic! A | Good | 1) overview of the use of analytics | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Thanks to the Professor Brian Bushee for the good explanations. I learned a lot. I find the module 4 so difficult for me. The Prof Christopher Ittner is speaking like CNN journalist and not easy for a non native US or English speaker like me to follow. | 1) the Professor Brian Bushee for the | Good | 1) explanations. I learned a lot. I | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Really good teachers that made a "boring" theme (that I had in college) very interesting to watch and study. | 1) Really | Good | 1) teachers that made a " boring" | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Very good course well presented especially as the topic can be fairly complex. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course well presented especially as the | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Brain Bushee's videos are really impressive. Some areas are too technical for a beginner to understand. The rest of the material provide good understanding... | 1) The rest of the material provide | Good | 1) understanding. . . | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | While I enjoyed this course and the topics covered, I don't feel like the course content matched what the course description stated it was supposed to. I enrolled in the Business Analytics Specialization course with a focus on analyzing a business from the inside, not outside. Of the 4 weeks of the course, I'd say that only week 4 was valid from an internal perspective but it was kept very high level. I'd say this course could be good for a specialization in business market analysis, but not as advertised. I also found the cartoon classroom questions to be very annoying, almost as bad as fingernails on a blackboard. | 1) I'd say this course could be | Good | 1) for a specialization in business market | 2.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | So good... | 1) So | Good | 1) . . | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | good overview of analytics options within accounting. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of analytics options within accounting. | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This was a good course, no doubt about it. But i felt, that the subject needed more depth that the course framework allowed. I would have liked if it had a part 2 for this course for people who wanted to go little more hands-on in this subject. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course, no doubt about it. But | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Finally i am able to complete this course. This course was little tougher than the other 3 courses due to some complicated accounting spreadsheet calculations. But i finally i am able to make it. Good Luck to rest of the folks. | 1) i am able to make it. | Good | 1) Luck to rest of the folks. | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Definitely good course for those working in either accounting or analytics. It gave me new ideas on how to apply analytical methods. Interesting examples on how to identify number management and how analytics can help to set up non-financial metrics that drive financial outcomes. | 1) Definitely | Good | 1) course for those working in either | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Good course if you are a beginner. Analytics is only 1 module (#3) and it is a good one. | 1) | Good | 1) course if you are a beginner. | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | Good course if you are a beginner. Analytics is only 1 module (#3) and it is a good one. | 2) module (#3) and it is a | Good | 2) one. | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | It's ok. Bushee is very knowledgeable and a very enthusiastic teacher, but his lessons are too dense compared to the content in the rest of the Wharton BA programs. I actually like all the detail, but I think it's covered too quickly and the course should probably be made longer to deal with it all. There are ratios and balance sheet jargon just flying at you at a breathless pace. It would be better to focus on a few key ones and then walk through the examples a little more slowly. The quizzes were extremely tricky with too many choose more than one answers. It was difficult to find the parts of the video to review missed questions because 1) the transcripts are machine generated and make it difficult to search specific words and 2) it's difficult to remember where the concept was covered because there was so much in each video. The last week felt very disconnected from the first week and like it belonged in a different course almost. It was pretty good, though. I liked how it contained specific examples and charts. | 1) different course almost. It was pretty | Good | 1) though. I liked how it contained | 3.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | I believe this is a very good course. Even I'm am a software engineer, I can understand how to manipulating the finacial report and how to detect them. | 1) I believe this is a very | Good | 1) course. Even I'm am a software | 5.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This is my feedback as a Beta-Tester for the course: Week 1 I thought that the videos were clear, well organized and flowed well from topic to topic. There was a clear logic as the professor developed the various ratios. What was missing for me was some in-line quizzes. Not the “tell me what I just told you type” but rather ones that make you think. So, for example, in the final video for Week 1, the optional video, instead of just suggesting that the students “play” with the spreadsheet, I think it would be better to give them an actual task or two… “change the assumption about X to <this value>. What is the impact on the Y ratio? Why?” I liked that he showed what numbers needed to be changed to make the share valuation closer to $55. But rather than just telling us the answer, this would be another opportunity to have the students stop the video and go try it themselves. With a specific task, it is likely that more students will go and work with the spreadsheet. This is where the real learning takes place. One of the things that I really liked about the design of prior courses by Professor Bushee was the fact that he had examples throughout the videos that had you apply the information right away. But, perhaps this is just me. I know that I learn a lot better by doing rather than just watching the videos and going “yeah… that makes sense. I understand…” I also recognize that some students, in past courses, have probably said they don’t find the in-line quizzes valuable. But, is that a reflection of the value of in-line quizzes as a whole or just in-line quizzes that simply require “parroting” something said in the video. I’m sure that the professor can come up with lots of examples. In Week 1 Video 1 the in-line quiz might provide some numbers for De-levered Net Income, Sales, Average Total Assets and Average Shareholder’s Equity and asking for the results of each of the ratios in the Dupont Analysis. And maybe a “think about what this means” type question that is not necessarily “marked” but for which an answer is provided in the video. Alternatively, he could have the students change some specific things in the Woof Junction spreadsheet and indicate what impact that has on the ratios and why. Week 1 Video 2 offers lots of similar opportunities with the Profitability and Turnover Ratios. Perhaps requiring the students to work backwards from a specific ratio to determine gross profit would be effective. Or, perhaps a question that relates strategy specifically to the ratios. For example, what would happen to the Gross Margin if Woof introduced a credit card and days receivable increased to 31.6 in 2015? Just something to engage people with the materials. All of the videos offer similar opportunities and I think having specific problems or questions will enhance the learning experience rather than just suggesting that they “go look at the spreadsheet”. The audience for these courses tends to be quite a bit different from your average upper tier university student and probably needs a bit more “hand holding” and “direction” in order to be successful. Also, if Professor Bushee expects students will watch the optional videos anyway, why make them optional? In the case of the Valuation Video, despite some of the mathematics being a little “scary” for some students, I think that the information there is really useful and helps to solidify an understanding of the spreadsheet. I’m wondering if an in-quiz question would be helpful. Perhaps it might provide a new set of financials for Woof Junction and ask for ratio calculation and what that means in terms of their position in the marketplace or something similar. Just some practice questions to get people working with the information. Same comments basically apply for the remainder of the weeks. I think that it would help the students to have some in-line quizzes – this not only breaks up the longer videos and helps to keep students focused but also provides a reinforcement of key concepts. I really liked the quiz for Week 1 even though I struggled with the questions where there are multiple correct responses. The quiz effectively reinforces the information covered very well and requires one to think about what was covered in the lectures. You may want to remind students that the questions may change from quiz to quiz. In many of these on-demand courses, the quiz questions do not change and students may be in the habit of not rereading the questions they have gotten correct on previous attempts. Week 2 – Revenue After Cash Collection at 7:39 – talking about Days Unearned Revenue and mentions that an “increase means slower future recognition”. A bit more explanation around what that means would be useful. Week 3 – no particular additional comments on the lectures other than some in-line questions might be good.. I found Benford’s Law really interesting. Week 4. It would be really nice to have something to break up the lectures – some in-line quiz questions might help. This would also help to reinforce the material. Week 4 quiz Question 9 -, the double negative wording of the question and the correct response may cause confusion for students – particularly for those for whom English is not their native language. Overall Comments I enjoyed the course and learned a lot. I was wondering whether it would be possible to provide a summary document with all the key information from each week related to the ratio calculations and the key things to look for related to those ratios. I know that the ratios are provided in the spreadsheet but it might be good to have a written summary with some supplemental information about how to use the ratios. I think in-line quizzes or practice questions would be helpful for students – perhaps ones that asked students to do specific things in the spreadsheet and come back with an answer. They don’t need to be long or complicated – just something that gets people into the spreadsheets and working with them early. You may want to do something stronger to encourage them to “play” with the spreadsheet. Many will feel reluctant to change the numbers in the spreadsheet for fear of “messing” it up. Perhaps a reminder that they can change whatever they want because if they mess something up they can always download it again. Or they can save a copy and play in that leaving the original untouched. It also might be a good idea to have a “playground” sheet where there is a simple set of Financial Statements and the students can try changing things in the financial statements and see the impact on the key ratios without having to move from one spreadsheet to another – so, a combination of the Original tab and the first two columns of the Ratios tab. You might even want to have two columns for the ratios – one for the ratios with the original numbers that does not change (fixed values) and one for the changed numbers, so students can see the effect of the changes easily. In terms of the spreadsheets, I thought that the Original, the Ratios and the CommonSize tabs were fairly straight forward and relatively easy to understand. That may not be the case for people less familiar with MS-EXCEL but I don’t know what the target audience is for this course so the students may all be proficient with the tool. On the Valuation tab, I was wondering if the numbers in Row 41 should be highlighted in some way to emphasize that they are Years. That is not clear on first glance. There are a lot of mistakes in the subtitles. I pointed out many of these by flagging the specific videos where they occurred. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the beta-test of this course. I hope that my comments are helpful and that I have not missed too much that causes students issues as the course goes live. | 1) than some in-line questions might be | Good | 1) . I found Benford’s Law really | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This is my feedback as a Beta-Tester for the course: Week 1 I thought that the videos were clear, well organized and flowed well from topic to topic. There was a clear logic as the professor developed the various ratios. What was missing for me was some in-line quizzes. Not the “tell me what I just told you type” but rather ones that make you think. So, for example, in the final video for Week 1, the optional video, instead of just suggesting that the students “play” with the spreadsheet, I think it would be better to give them an actual task or two… “change the assumption about X to <this value>. What is the impact on the Y ratio? Why?” I liked that he showed what numbers needed to be changed to make the share valuation closer to $55. But rather than just telling us the answer, this would be another opportunity to have the students stop the video and go try it themselves. With a specific task, it is likely that more students will go and work with the spreadsheet. This is where the real learning takes place. One of the things that I really liked about the design of prior courses by Professor Bushee was the fact that he had examples throughout the videos that had you apply the information right away. But, perhaps this is just me. I know that I learn a lot better by doing rather than just watching the videos and going “yeah… that makes sense. I understand…” I also recognize that some students, in past courses, have probably said they don’t find the in-line quizzes valuable. But, is that a reflection of the value of in-line quizzes as a whole or just in-line quizzes that simply require “parroting” something said in the video. I’m sure that the professor can come up with lots of examples. In Week 1 Video 1 the in-line quiz might provide some numbers for De-levered Net Income, Sales, Average Total Assets and Average Shareholder’s Equity and asking for the results of each of the ratios in the Dupont Analysis. And maybe a “think about what this means” type question that is not necessarily “marked” but for which an answer is provided in the video. Alternatively, he could have the students change some specific things in the Woof Junction spreadsheet and indicate what impact that has on the ratios and why. Week 1 Video 2 offers lots of similar opportunities with the Profitability and Turnover Ratios. Perhaps requiring the students to work backwards from a specific ratio to determine gross profit would be effective. Or, perhaps a question that relates strategy specifically to the ratios. For example, what would happen to the Gross Margin if Woof introduced a credit card and days receivable increased to 31.6 in 2015? Just something to engage people with the materials. All of the videos offer similar opportunities and I think having specific problems or questions will enhance the learning experience rather than just suggesting that they “go look at the spreadsheet”. The audience for these courses tends to be quite a bit different from your average upper tier university student and probably needs a bit more “hand holding” and “direction” in order to be successful. Also, if Professor Bushee expects students will watch the optional videos anyway, why make them optional? In the case of the Valuation Video, despite some of the mathematics being a little “scary” for some students, I think that the information there is really useful and helps to solidify an understanding of the spreadsheet. I’m wondering if an in-quiz question would be helpful. Perhaps it might provide a new set of financials for Woof Junction and ask for ratio calculation and what that means in terms of their position in the marketplace or something similar. Just some practice questions to get people working with the information. Same comments basically apply for the remainder of the weeks. I think that it would help the students to have some in-line quizzes – this not only breaks up the longer videos and helps to keep students focused but also provides a reinforcement of key concepts. I really liked the quiz for Week 1 even though I struggled with the questions where there are multiple correct responses. The quiz effectively reinforces the information covered very well and requires one to think about what was covered in the lectures. You may want to remind students that the questions may change from quiz to quiz. In many of these on-demand courses, the quiz questions do not change and students may be in the habit of not rereading the questions they have gotten correct on previous attempts. Week 2 – Revenue After Cash Collection at 7:39 – talking about Days Unearned Revenue and mentions that an “increase means slower future recognition”. A bit more explanation around what that means would be useful. Week 3 – no particular additional comments on the lectures other than some in-line questions might be good.. I found Benford’s Law really interesting. Week 4. It would be really nice to have something to break up the lectures – some in-line quiz questions might help. This would also help to reinforce the material. Week 4 quiz Question 9 -, the double negative wording of the question and the correct response may cause confusion for students – particularly for those for whom English is not their native language. Overall Comments I enjoyed the course and learned a lot. I was wondering whether it would be possible to provide a summary document with all the key information from each week related to the ratio calculations and the key things to look for related to those ratios. I know that the ratios are provided in the spreadsheet but it might be good to have a written summary with some supplemental information about how to use the ratios. I think in-line quizzes or practice questions would be helpful for students – perhaps ones that asked students to do specific things in the spreadsheet and come back with an answer. They don’t need to be long or complicated – just something that gets people into the spreadsheets and working with them early. You may want to do something stronger to encourage them to “play” with the spreadsheet. Many will feel reluctant to change the numbers in the spreadsheet for fear of “messing” it up. Perhaps a reminder that they can change whatever they want because if they mess something up they can always download it again. Or they can save a copy and play in that leaving the original untouched. It also might be a good idea to have a “playground” sheet where there is a simple set of Financial Statements and the students can try changing things in the financial statements and see the impact on the key ratios without having to move from one spreadsheet to another – so, a combination of the Original tab and the first two columns of the Ratios tab. You might even want to have two columns for the ratios – one for the ratios with the original numbers that does not change (fixed values) and one for the changed numbers, so students can see the effect of the changes easily. In terms of the spreadsheets, I thought that the Original, the Ratios and the CommonSize tabs were fairly straight forward and relatively easy to understand. That may not be the case for people less familiar with MS-EXCEL but I don’t know what the target audience is for this course so the students may all be proficient with the tool. On the Valuation tab, I was wondering if the numbers in Row 41 should be highlighted in some way to emphasize that they are Years. That is not clear on first glance. There are a lot of mistakes in the subtitles. I pointed out many of these by flagging the specific videos where they occurred. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the beta-test of this course. I hope that my comments are helpful and that I have not missed too much that causes students issues as the course goes live. | 2) the spreadsheet but it might be | Good | 2) to have a written summary with | 4.0 |
| rc5KG0aUEeWG1w6arGoEIQ | This is my feedback as a Beta-Tester for the course: Week 1 I thought that the videos were clear, well organized and flowed well from topic to topic. There was a clear logic as the professor developed the various ratios. What was missing for me was some in-line quizzes. Not the “tell me what I just told you type” but rather ones that make you think. So, for example, in the final video for Week 1, the optional video, instead of just suggesting that the students “play” with the spreadsheet, I think it would be better to give them an actual task or two… “change the assumption about X to <this value>. What is the impact on the Y ratio? Why?” I liked that he showed what numbers needed to be changed to make the share valuation closer to $55. But rather than just telling us the answer, this would be another opportunity to have the students stop the video and go try it themselves. With a specific task, it is likely that more students will go and work with the spreadsheet. This is where the real learning takes place. One of the things that I really liked about the design of prior courses by Professor Bushee was the fact that he had examples throughout the videos that had you apply the information right away. But, perhaps this is just me. I know that I learn a lot better by doing rather than just watching the videos and going “yeah… that makes sense. I understand…” I also recognize that some students, in past courses, have probably said they don’t find the in-line quizzes valuable. But, is that a reflection of the value of in-line quizzes as a whole or just in-line quizzes that simply require “parroting” something said in the video. I’m sure that the professor can come up with lots of examples. In Week 1 Video 1 the in-line quiz might provide some numbers for De-levered Net Income, Sales, Average Total Assets and Average Shareholder’s Equity and asking for the results of each of the ratios in the Dupont Analysis. And maybe a “think about what this means” type question that is not necessarily “marked” but for which an answer is provided in the video. Alternatively, he could have the students change some specific things in the Woof Junction spreadsheet and indicate what impact that has on the ratios and why. Week 1 Video 2 offers lots of similar opportunities with the Profitability and Turnover Ratios. Perhaps requiring the students to work backwards from a specific ratio to determine gross profit would be effective. Or, perhaps a question that relates strategy specifically to the ratios. For example, what would happen to the Gross Margin if Woof introduced a credit card and days receivable increased to 31.6 in 2015? Just something to engage people with the materials. All of the videos offer similar opportunities and I think having specific problems or questions will enhance the learning experience rather than just suggesting that they “go look at the spreadsheet”. The audience for these courses tends to be quite a bit different from your average upper tier university student and probably needs a bit more “hand holding” and “direction” in order to be successful. Also, if Professor Bushee expects students will watch the optional videos anyway, why make them optional? In the case of the Valuation Video, despite some of the mathematics being a little “scary” for some students, I think that the information there is really useful and helps to solidify an understanding of the spreadsheet. I’m wondering if an in-quiz question would be helpful. Perhaps it might provide a new set of financials for Woof Junction and ask for ratio calculation and what that means in terms of their position in the marketplace or something similar. Just some practice questions to get people working with the information. Same comments basically apply for the remainder of the weeks. I think that it would help the students to have some in-line quizzes – this not only breaks up the longer videos and helps to keep students focused but also provides a reinforcement of key concepts. I really liked the quiz for Week 1 even though I struggled with the questions where there are multiple correct responses. The quiz effectively reinforces the information covered very well and requires one to think about what was covered in the lectures. You may want to remind students that the questions may change from quiz to quiz. In many of these on-demand courses, the quiz questions do not change and students may be in the habit of not rereading the questions they have gotten correct on previous attempts. Week 2 – Revenue After Cash Collection at 7:39 – talking about Days Unearned Revenue and mentions that an “increase means slower future recognition”. A bit more explanation around what that means would be useful. Week 3 – no particular additional comments on the lectures other than some in-line questions might be good.. I found Benford’s Law really interesting. Week 4. It would be really nice to have something to break up the lectures – some in-line quiz questions might help. This would also help to reinforce the material. Week 4 quiz Question 9 -, the double negative wording of the question and the correct response may cause confusion for students – particularly for those for whom English is not their native language. Overall Comments I enjoyed the course and learned a lot. I was wondering whether it would be possible to provide a summary document with all the key information from each week related to the ratio calculations and the key things to look for related to those ratios. I know that the ratios are provided in the spreadsheet but it might be good to have a written summary with some supplemental information about how to use the ratios. I think in-line quizzes or practice questions would be helpful for students – perhaps ones that asked students to do specific things in the spreadsheet and come back with an answer. They don’t need to be long or complicated – just something that gets people into the spreadsheets and working with them early. You may want to do something stronger to encourage them to “play” with the spreadsheet. Many will feel reluctant to change the numbers in the spreadsheet for fear of “messing” it up. Perhaps a reminder that they can change whatever they want because if they mess something up they can always download it again. Or they can save a copy and play in that leaving the original untouched. It also might be a good idea to have a “playground” sheet where there is a simple set of Financial Statements and the students can try changing things in the financial statements and see the impact on the key ratios without having to move from one spreadsheet to another – so, a combination of the Original tab and the first two columns of the Ratios tab. You might even want to have two columns for the ratios – one for the ratios with the original numbers that does not change (fixed values) and one for the changed numbers, so students can see the effect of the changes easily. In terms of the spreadsheets, I thought that the Original, the Ratios and the CommonSize tabs were fairly straight forward and relatively easy to understand. That may not be the case for people less familiar with MS-EXCEL but I don’t know what the target audience is for this course so the students may all be proficient with the tool. On the Valuation tab, I was wondering if the numbers in Row 41 should be highlighted in some way to emphasize that they are Years. That is not clear on first glance. There are a lot of mistakes in the subtitles. I pointed out many of these by flagging the specific videos where they occurred. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the beta-test of this course. I hope that my comments are helpful and that I have not missed too much that causes students issues as the course goes live. | 3) untouched. It also might be a | Good | 3) idea to have a “playground” sheet | 4.0 |
| RcnRZHHtEeWxvQr3acyajw | good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| rFd0LFDqEeWjfw5p9aPb_w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good course for life | 1) very | Good | 1) course for life | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good instructors and content , i enjoyed it | 1) | Good | 1) instructors and content , i enjoyed | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It is a great course. It contains many necessary information for good speaking and understanding English. Also I am very fond of links to another web-sites where I could listen to dialogues and talks. | 1) It contains many necessary information for | Good | 1) speaking and understanding English. Also I | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good online course. I personally learned a lot. | 1) very | Good | 1) online course. I personally learned a | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Really it's good course but i feel that it's only for beginners so it won't make us professionals. | 1) Really it's | Good | 1) course but i feel that it's | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good cours to prepared un interview in English, and | 1) Very | Good | 1) cours to prepared un interview in | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | the is course is really good and smart in interdous | 1) the is course is really | Good | 1) and smart in interdous | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very Good courses | 1) Very | Good | 1) courses | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | It's a good course | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good but supporting material are poor | 1) | Good | 1) but supporting material are poor | 3.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Really good course, with real life tips that help us to improve our communication. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, with real life tips that | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good, l recomend | 1) very | Good | 1) l recomend | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good jobjob | 1) | Good | 1) jobjob | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good course. I recommend. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I recommend. | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I'm satisfated with this course. It gives your easy and good skills growth. | 1) course. It gives your easy and | Good | 1) skills growth. | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Quite good | 1) Quite | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very Good, Congratulations for the ideia. Great course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Congratulations for the ideia. Great course. | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very good, friendly teaching by the teachers, really like it, thanks for sharing! | 1) Very | Good | 1) friendly teaching by the teachers, really | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | This course has a great potential, but the subject of each week was very superficial. The speaker is very good, your english is clear and easy to understand. The subject covered is interesting, but could be more deeper. | 1) very superficial. The speaker is very | Good | 1) your english is clear and easy | 3.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | I liked so much this course! Very useful and helpful! Good tips and explanation. I loved moreover the additional resourses. | 1) this course! Very useful and helpful! | Good | 1) tips and explanation. I loved moreover | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | As an advanced English speaker, for me this course goes too little into improvement of pronounciation. The tips for conversations - small talk, phone, online etc. - are only very basic as well. Good course for beginners though and I also liked the interspersal of little questions and tasks along the way (although also too simple imo). Very good - but obviously only paid content - are the teamwork assignments. | 1) are only very basic as well. | Good | 1) course for beginners though and I | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | As an advanced English speaker, for me this course goes too little into improvement of pronounciation. The tips for conversations - small talk, phone, online etc. - are only very basic as well. Good course for beginners though and I also liked the interspersal of little questions and tasks along the way (although also too simple imo). Very good - but obviously only paid content - are the teamwork assignments. | 2) (although also too simple imo). Very | Good | 2) - but obviously only paid content | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good course for improving communication skills. | 1) very | Good | 1) course for improving communication skills. | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | simple and easy to learn... good stuff | 1) and easy to learn. . . | Good | 1) stuff | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good for pronunciation | 1) | Good | 1) for pronunciation | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | it is great to hear fro you. good job!! | 1) is great to hear fro you. | Good | 1) job! ! | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Very Nice job i am very glad because i like this lesson is very useful to gain my knowledge very much. Thank you so much and i wish you Good luck for better work and more courses. | 1) so much and i wish you | Good | 1) luck for better work and more | 4.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good advices, very useful web pages to practise and well-prepared teachers. Very good course. | 1) | Good | 1) advices, very useful web pages to | 5.0 |
| RFyNbG0iEeW9CAqYJHF3zQ | Good advices, very useful web pages to practise and well-prepared teachers. Very good course. | 2) to practise and well-prepared teachers. Very | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | good game design introduction course, lots of concepts, great! | 1) | Good | 1) game design introduction course, lots of | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Really good course! Gives you the basic foundations you need for the specialization. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! Gives you the basic foundations | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I enjoyed a lot to have classes with the teacher of this course. O'Donnel helped me alot showing us some importants essays of Game Design and guiding us in the way to how to have a simple idea and work on it in order to make it in a good game. Thanks! | 1) order to make it in a | Good | 1) game. Thanks! | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very interesting course. I am already familiar with software dev documentation, so a lot of it was not new for me. The style of teaching in the previous course was more pleasant for me. But I am well aware it is just a personal preference. Very good course indeed. Thanks! | 1) is just a personal preference. Very | Good | 1) course indeed. Thanks! | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Great course. A very good balance between practice and theory. This a very well documented course. | 1) Great course. A very | Good | 1) balance between practice and theory. This | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very interactive and good practical knowledge about game design development | 1) Very interactive and | Good | 1) practical knowledge about game design development | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Teaching style a little loose for me, but man did he make me work on my assignments. The information is valuable and the references are beneficial. My take-away from attending this course gives a good base on how to think about a game and set things up properly from the start. No quick short cuts here. Just good old fashion hard work and how to approach things logically to get things done constructively and productively. | 1) from attending this course gives a | Good | 1) base on how to think about | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Teaching style a little loose for me, but man did he make me work on my assignments. The information is valuable and the references are beneficial. My take-away from attending this course gives a good base on how to think about a game and set things up properly from the start. No quick short cuts here. Just good old fashion hard work and how to approach things logically to get things done constructively and productively. | 2) No quick short cuts here. Just | Good | 2) old fashion hard work and how | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This is a great course, if you want to hear The Questions you need to Answer to make a good game design for your game. It does not give you the answers, but it gives you a road map to follow. Downside of the course are Quizes and Peer Reviews. Quizes sometimes have shady and non-clear answers, especially for non-native English speakers. Assignments grading criteria makes your peers to choose from 1 to 5. And 5 is "you did so awesome, that you've impressed your peer very much". And this is not happening often. | 1) need to Answer to make a | Good | 1) game design for your game. It | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This was a very good course, however the assignments were too long to complete in only a week. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course, however the assignments were too | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Sometimes it was difficult to follow! but good overall | 1) it was difficult to follow! but | Good | 1) overall | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | It's a really good course but I feel like you need more time to really do the assignments, one week between assignments is kind of little time to do all the design. Sometimes the lectures are not directly relationed with the assignments. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course but I feel like you | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course. A unique experience for who's interested in these topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. A unique experience for who's | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The information is good but is going too fast and I don't feel I have learned much from it. I'm on week 3 and I'm still not sure of how to make my assignments in a proper way. The quizzes are very confusing too and sometimes I felt frustrated. | 1) The information is | Good | 1) but is going too fast and | 2.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course has a good starting point, but there are so many things that ended up being wrong that I just can't force myself to give it more than 3 stars (and I'm not sure if it should be 3 or 2 stars). I think this is also the first course on Coursera that didn't get 5 stars from me (not sure if I've given 4 stars once only). So the bad parts first: Assignments are so unrealistic it's unbelievable. Week 1 is doable. Week 2 is problematic if you have a complex idea, let's say it's still doable, but you would certainly need more time than expected weekly hour work. Week 3 is insane. It is so out of the scope of this course. And week 4 is even worse, I had to use pen and paper and then explain only 1 of the core mechanics (even that used more than expected weekly hour work). Some of the quizzes are not fully clear if you are not a native English speaker. Sometimes I had to re-read things several times, and still wasn't sure what I was doing wrong (I realized that only after I managed to literally guess the correct answer). And most of all grading is the worst I've seen in any course. All of it based on a personal opinion. Hey I even managed not to get full points for a "document is HTML/PDF/....". I mean - how can I not get full points there? It either is or is not a HTML. It's so much subjective that it's making it awful. Now about the good parts: Professor did a great job, the course inspired so many ideas for me. The material is concise and it was a pleasure listening to this course. Most of the courses are too slow for me, so I have to fast forward them to 1.5 and some even to 2 times speed. I've run this course only on 1.25 speed, which is a good thing. I'm not a native English speaker. | 1) This course has a | Good | 1) starting point, but there are so | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course has a good starting point, but there are so many things that ended up being wrong that I just can't force myself to give it more than 3 stars (and I'm not sure if it should be 3 or 2 stars). I think this is also the first course on Coursera that didn't get 5 stars from me (not sure if I've given 4 stars once only). So the bad parts first: Assignments are so unrealistic it's unbelievable. Week 1 is doable. Week 2 is problematic if you have a complex idea, let's say it's still doable, but you would certainly need more time than expected weekly hour work. Week 3 is insane. It is so out of the scope of this course. And week 4 is even worse, I had to use pen and paper and then explain only 1 of the core mechanics (even that used more than expected weekly hour work). Some of the quizzes are not fully clear if you are not a native English speaker. Sometimes I had to re-read things several times, and still wasn't sure what I was doing wrong (I realized that only after I managed to literally guess the correct answer). And most of all grading is the worst I've seen in any course. All of it based on a personal opinion. Hey I even managed not to get full points for a "document is HTML/PDF/....". I mean - how can I not get full points there? It either is or is not a HTML. It's so much subjective that it's making it awful. Now about the good parts: Professor did a great job, the course inspired so many ideas for me. The material is concise and it was a pleasure listening to this course. Most of the courses are too slow for me, so I have to fast forward them to 1.5 and some even to 2 times speed. I've run this course only on 1.25 speed, which is a good thing. I'm not a native English speaker. | 2) making it awful. Now about the | Good | 2) parts: Professor did a great job, | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | This course has a good starting point, but there are so many things that ended up being wrong that I just can't force myself to give it more than 3 stars (and I'm not sure if it should be 3 or 2 stars). I think this is also the first course on Coursera that didn't get 5 stars from me (not sure if I've given 4 stars once only). So the bad parts first: Assignments are so unrealistic it's unbelievable. Week 1 is doable. Week 2 is problematic if you have a complex idea, let's say it's still doable, but you would certainly need more time than expected weekly hour work. Week 3 is insane. It is so out of the scope of this course. And week 4 is even worse, I had to use pen and paper and then explain only 1 of the core mechanics (even that used more than expected weekly hour work). Some of the quizzes are not fully clear if you are not a native English speaker. Sometimes I had to re-read things several times, and still wasn't sure what I was doing wrong (I realized that only after I managed to literally guess the correct answer). And most of all grading is the worst I've seen in any course. All of it based on a personal opinion. Hey I even managed not to get full points for a "document is HTML/PDF/....". I mean - how can I not get full points there? It either is or is not a HTML. It's so much subjective that it's making it awful. Now about the good parts: Professor did a great job, the course inspired so many ideas for me. The material is concise and it was a pleasure listening to this course. Most of the courses are too slow for me, so I have to fast forward them to 1.5 and some even to 2 times speed. I've run this course only on 1.25 speed, which is a good thing. I'm not a native English speaker. | 3) 1. 25 speed, which is a | Good | 3) thing. I'm not a native English | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The concepts are good and important, writing the assignments was not so easy :) It feels like there is a missing link between the concepts & the writing the documents. For example -the last exercise (prototype) was not good at all for most people I checked (including myself?). On a secondary importance level: some of the questions/answers are hard to understand or related to extras (movies, for example) I did not I need to see, so it was a bit frustrating. | 1) The concepts are | Good | 1) and important, writing the assignments was | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The concepts are good and important, writing the assignments was not so easy :) It feels like there is a missing link between the concepts & the writing the documents. For example -the last exercise (prototype) was not good at all for most people I checked (including myself?). On a secondary importance level: some of the questions/answers are hard to understand or related to extras (movies, for example) I did not I need to see, so it was a bit frustrating. | 2) -the last exercise (prototype) was not | Good | 2) at all for most people I | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | great teacher, good material and excellent examples. He knows how to teach =) | 1) great teacher, | Good | 1) material and excellent examples. He knows | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course, allows you to actually "think" and implement a game, which I love. Only issue is the grading. I would change the name of the scoring, makes it easy for people to give bad grades. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, allows you to actually " | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The information is great, but I think they need to make this course in two phases because there was a lot of information to process and the assignments need more time if you want to do a good work. The other part that I didn't like was that the information doesn't really correspond to what you actually need to do for your assignments, I think the course needs more videos and examples of how to create the required documents. | 1) if you want to do a | Good | 1) work. The other part that I | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The templates are very good, but the course videos are too general. | 1) The templates are very | Good | 1) but the course videos are too | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course material is good, and Casey always gives further reads and references. I specially liked to have book references and I started to read one of those. I found however a disconnection between the idea of using the MDA/DPE framework described in the course, and the actual projects which were more into creating the set of documents used in game design to collect the details, create a better picture, and think better about the game. In some way, the iterative process of coming back to the idea, from document to document, helped to refine the game, but it happened more as something natural. I wished we would have had some sort of checklist to evaluate and apply during the design process the framework. As feedback to the instructor, I think he needs to stop using the ending word "right?" to finish his sentences. At some point, of the course it became really difficult to follow, right?. right?. right? ... ufff ... Also, I believe he knows a lot, but a bit of preparation and flow in his lectures would be appreciated. Maybe the use of some sort of autoclue, would help. Last, but this could be more for the course editors, the instructor has good slides and material, but usually during the lectures the slides disappear (just in the moment one need to focus his attention in the written material) and the instructor appears in first plane. I think you could keep the instructor in a PIP box all the time, and perhaps put him in first plane only at the beginning and end. | 1) The course material is | Good | 1) and Casey always gives further reads | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The course material is good, and Casey always gives further reads and references. I specially liked to have book references and I started to read one of those. I found however a disconnection between the idea of using the MDA/DPE framework described in the course, and the actual projects which were more into creating the set of documents used in game design to collect the details, create a better picture, and think better about the game. In some way, the iterative process of coming back to the idea, from document to document, helped to refine the game, but it happened more as something natural. I wished we would have had some sort of checklist to evaluate and apply during the design process the framework. As feedback to the instructor, I think he needs to stop using the ending word "right?" to finish his sentences. At some point, of the course it became really difficult to follow, right?. right?. right? ... ufff ... Also, I believe he knows a lot, but a bit of preparation and flow in his lectures would be appreciated. Maybe the use of some sort of autoclue, would help. Last, but this could be more for the course editors, the instructor has good slides and material, but usually during the lectures the slides disappear (just in the moment one need to focus his attention in the written material) and the instructor appears in first plane. I think you could keep the instructor in a PIP box all the time, and perhaps put him in first plane only at the beginning and end. | 2) the course editors, the instructor has | Good | 2) slides and material, but usually during | 3.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good course if you are interested in games and/or game design. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course if you are interested in | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | it would have been cool if they could have tied in some of the projects from the last course and talked about ways to better organize their design, but all in all this was a pretty good intro to game design. There were a lot of links to outside resources which was cool too. | 1) in all this was a pretty | Good | 1) intro to game design. There were | 5.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | At the start, I felt this course was mostly uninteresting, irrelevant and unnecessary. Pretty much a waste of time. But as things progressed, I discovered there were lots of great theory and concepts introduced that play a critical role in how the game industry and professionals need to think and work. My only complaint after having completed this course is that the instructors didn't do a good job explaining why this course should be taken. Once you're in and working your way through, you should see the importance. But on first glance it sounds irrelevant. | 1) that the instructors didn't do a | Good | 1) job explaining why this course should | 4.0 |
| rKbbMST9EeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very good brainstorming expirience! Thanks :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) brainstorming expirience! Thanks :) | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Good course to introduction in energy business. | 1) | Good | 1) course to introduction in energy business. | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | It is a very good course to get a pretty high-level overview of global energy business. For someone without a business background, the use of business fundamentals such as supply and demand curves and the use of strategic frameworks added a lot to my understanding of the subject matter. Thank you. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course to get a pretty high-level | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Good content and GREAT assignments. Main problem is that the lecture videos are unscripted and could easily be made more concise. The other thing that worried me was that most of the assignments that I peer reviewed had missed large parts of the question. I would rather have my work marked by people who have read the question properly. | 1) | Good | 1) content and GREAT assignments. Main problem | 3.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Very well structured course with a good introduction of thinking about the world energy business. Videos are very crisp and development of the course from broad base info of energy options to the strategy tools involved in making energy decisions is very well thought out. | 1) Very well structured course with a | Good | 1) introduction of thinking about the world | 4.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | I have benefited a lot from this course and the professor teaches perfectly. Thank you for such a wonderful opportunity. I will recommend it to as many people as I could and for people in this Energy Sector its a good brief of the market. | 1) in this Energy Sector its a | Good | 1) brief of the market. | 5.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Good material. The notes or transcripts were rather poorly done, making for a lot of editing to get the supplied text to a usable form. More interviews with outside experts would have been welcome. Case studies were informative and useful. | 1) | Good | 1) material. The notes or transcripts were | 4.0 |
| RKMa0PTnEeSR9SIAC7LYOA | Very smooth, easy and gives a good insight in energy business. | 1) Very smooth, easy and gives a | Good | 1) insight in energy business. | 5.0 |
| RLshf_xsEeWa_RIigsB41Q | very good one | 1) very | Good | 1) one | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I would say 3-4 stars. Week 3 was kind of dense really. The assignment was also a little over my head not due to the complexity but certain aspects were not covered in length. Week 4 was good though, and it was enjoyable. Overall a really nice introduction to R and I would certainly recommend this course to my friends. | 1) covered in length. Week 4 was | Good | 1) though, and it was enjoyable. Overall | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Decent class with good programming assignments. I wish there had been more examples of actually writing code in the lectures, but that is my only complaint. | 1) Decent class with | Good | 1) programming assignments. I wish there had | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course material and Assignments. Good assignment in the end to exercise grey cells. | 1) Excellent course material and Assignments. | Good | 1) assignment in the end to exercise | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent. Good work!! | 1) Excellent. | Good | 1) work! ! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good tools. Fun data. | 1) | Good | 1) tools. Fun data. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very nice course. Good assignments and challenging quizes. | 1) Very nice course. | Good | 1) assignments and challenging quizes. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a very good introduction to R. The material is good and this works well as a introduction to R if you have either high interest or some programming experience. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) introduction to R. The material is | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a very good introduction to R. The material is good and this works well as a introduction to R if you have either high interest or some programming experience. | 2) introduction to R. The material is | Good | 2) and this works well as a | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course, learn a lot of R and statistics | 1) | Good | 1) course, learn a lot of R | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is a good overview to R Programming, though the lectures leave much to be desired, at least for a programming beginner. Watching the videos left me confused about key concepts, which I absorbed much better through the Swirl interactive exercises, the discussion forums and other examples online. Of course we are supposed to be "hackers," but I enjoyed this course much more once I just turned off the video, read through the slides and focused on other areas where I could learn the concepts. Also, the discussion forums were great for helping with key issues, and the homework assignments were also outstanding for making sure you absorb and apply concepts. So it's worth taking - just keep in mind the videos may not be for everyone... | 1) This is a | Good | 1) overview to R Programming, though the | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Quite a good course. I enjoyed working with swirl. | 1) Quite a | Good | 1) course. I enjoyed working with swirl. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I really enjoy it although it is tough for a begginer specially the assigments but there is help in the internet and the forum so it is fun and good to learn thanks lot | 1) forum so it is fun and | Good | 1) to learn thanks lot | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I liked the course very much because Mr Peng has given me very good grounding of the basics of R. I wish to keep learning more about R because this course has certainly motivated me enough to pursue the next course on R. Thanks team for having me as a participant. All the best to Mr Peng :-) | 1) Mr Peng has given me very | Good | 1) grounding of the basics of R. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | 1) last assignment. The level was really | Good | 1) I found it a bit daunting | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will break down the review into the contents and comment on them. Before doing that and saving the trouble for people who do not like to read a lot - This course is an awesome kick-starter for R-programming. Video Lectures : The speed and content are just perfect. The concepts covered in each lecture and the manner in which it was taught just made them stick well in my mind. 2. Quiz - They were simple so I infer that they are meant to test how well we have learnt the concepts. 3. Swirl Practice Programming Assignments - A very innovative way to teach us in the R console itself. I really enjoyed playing with it. 4. Programming Assignment - It was a sheer pleasure to do the last assignment. The level was really good. I found it a bit daunting at first but then caught up by reviewing some concepts. 5. Discussion Forums - I couldn't be very active in terms of replying but I never missed to hear what mentors had to say. I owe thanks to mentors for their awesome posts that gave deeper insights especially Al Warren. I highly recommend this course. Prof. Peng - your videos are really good and far from boring. And yes, Thank you Coursera. | 2) Peng - your videos are really | Good | 2) and far from boring. And yes, | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Intro to R. Basics of ggplot2 should have been covered along with base graphs or as a separate unit | 1) | Good | 1) Intro to R. Basics of ggplot2 | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very informative and a good learning process. Assignments help in thorough understanding. | 1) Very informative and a | Good | 1) learning process. Assignments help in thorough | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | From my past experience, I know it’s not easy for people to take suggestions. But I still want to have a try this time. I had high hopes for this course, but I am quite disappointed. I think Dr. Peng needs to improve his teaching skills. 1. Good teaching is clear, concise, and right to the point. So please slow down, speak. Don’t mumble. 2. Programming is a practical skill. So the best method to learn programming is to use step-by-step demos. You can talk about a concept for 5 to 10 minutes but I still can’t get it. Use a demo and I can get it right away. 3. Don’t just try to cover the materials so you think you have done the teaching, try to understand how your students learn and make sure they really get it. 4. If you haven’t covered some concept, don’t assume your students will understand it by magic. A good teacher can make the learning experience effortless and fun, a poor teacher makes it like a torture. | 1) to improve his teaching skills. 1. | Good | 1) teaching is clear, concise, and right | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | From my past experience, I know it’s not easy for people to take suggestions. But I still want to have a try this time. I had high hopes for this course, but I am quite disappointed. I think Dr. Peng needs to improve his teaching skills. 1. Good teaching is clear, concise, and right to the point. So please slow down, speak. Don’t mumble. 2. Programming is a practical skill. So the best method to learn programming is to use step-by-step demos. You can talk about a concept for 5 to 10 minutes but I still can’t get it. Use a demo and I can get it right away. 3. Don’t just try to cover the materials so you think you have done the teaching, try to understand how your students learn and make sure they really get it. 4. If you haven’t covered some concept, don’t assume your students will understand it by magic. A good teacher can make the learning experience effortless and fun, a poor teacher makes it like a torture. | 2) will understand it by magic. A | Good | 2) teacher can make the learning experience | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | really good course, but i really prefer more demos in the course, instead of simply presenting codes in the board. | 1) really | Good | 1) course, but i really prefer more | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good starting course | 1) | Good | 1) starting course | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good course but it should be a little more interactive. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course but it should be a | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Overall a good crash course and introduction to R. Its a lot to learn in 4 weeks and some of the assignments were challenging (which I liked). I think the course is worth taking but I do wish the material and assignments were packaged better - more aligned. Just be prepared to spend a lot of time online reading, researching, and learning some concepts on your own. Don't expect to learn everything from the lectures and materials to be successful in this course. | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) crash course and introduction to R. | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good 2 day crash course on R programming basics | 1) Very | Good | 1) 2 day crash course on R | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I will recommend it 100% for those who want to learn R. There are good teachers, explanations, assignments... But it may have some tricky exercises for those who have not programmed before. | 1) want to learn R. There are | Good | 1) teachers, explanations, assignments. . . But | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Difficult at times, I regularly used outside websites like stackoverflow to help with assignments, but that's how the real world works, there's no way that the lectures could solve all your problems. Favorite: writing my own functions that searched real databases and returned means, ranks, and useful info. I felt like I took a huge step forward in my goal for data science. Least favorite: Assignment #2, it felt completely unrelated to anything I learned, I wasted hours just to find out it was redundantly simple and in the end I didn't even find out if my code worked, the grade was peer-reviewed based on if you could correctly upload it to github and if it "looked" like it would work. (How would I know! LOL, I assumed all my peers' code was good enough) Would 100% take this course again. | 1) assumed all my peers' code was | Good | 1) enough) Would 100% take this course | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It begins from the very basics of R and has a good and comprehensive order to the most advanced functions. | 1) basics of R and has a | Good | 1) and comprehensive order to the most | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introductory curse of R language, teaches you everything you need to start your own projects, shows you resources to start learning on your own. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory curse of R language, teaches | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I'm not saying R Programming has to be a gripping subject, but this course is pretty dull. The value of good teaching methods is often underrated in transferring knowledge. | 1) is pretty dull. The value of | Good | 1) teaching methods is often underrated in | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course was a good experience, but I wish there were more explained tasks of difficult functions and loops before giving difficult exercises. Also I find this course a little bit boring for me and sometimes very difficult (especially in peer graided assignment) | 1) This course was a | Good | 1) experience, but I wish there were | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course for biginner | 1) | Good | 1) course for biginner | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good introduction to R!! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to R! ! | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good course.I would recommend others to go through this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I would recommend others to | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | very good introductory course. It was very fun and challenging overall. Especially for the last exercise | 1) very | Good | 1) introductory course. It was very fun | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introduction, fair examples. Worth the effort. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, fair examples. Worth the effort. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good first course for beginners | 1) A | Good | 1) first course for beginners | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It's a good preparation for a PhD prospective applicant like me. The course is tough but VERY USEFUL and INTERESTING! Thanks all Professors! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) preparation for a PhD prospective applicant | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Well taught. Materials were good. Lessons increased knowledge. | 1) Well taught. Materials were | Good | 1) Lessons increased knowledge. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introduction to R | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to R | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A very useful course that teaches techniques I could implement at work almost from day 1. Prof. Peng teaches the material in a very clear, well structured manner, and provides good real life examples. The course provides a suite of tools and techniques for data analysis that's a great starting point to build from. | 1) clear, well structured manner, and provides | Good | 1) real life examples. The course provides | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It gives you the basic idea of R coding. Swirl is very good. Homework 3 is a little bit tricky. Overall it's a good class. | 1) of R coding. Swirl is very | Good | 1) Homework 3 is a little bit | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It gives you the basic idea of R coding. Swirl is very good. Homework 3 is a little bit tricky. Overall it's a good class. | 2) little bit tricky. Overall it's a | Good | 2) class. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent! Well tought, good ebook! | 1) Excellent! Well tought, | Good | 1) ebook! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I really do not like the R language, I think it is sloppy and inconsistent. This class did ok teaching the basics of R, but it did not do anything toward teaching testing of R code (a key part of writing code!), best practices for modularization and factoring, and so on. In other words, it teaches you how to write R code that kind of works, but does not teach you how to write good code in R. | 1) not teach you how to write | Good | 1) code in R. | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Its good but found it a little theoretical. | 1) Its | Good | 1) but found it a little theoretical. | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I was initially going to give this 3 stars but it would have been a biased score as I found the programming assignments too hard otherwise everything else was great, so I've added a star to counter my own bias. The programming assignments for a novice like me who has only completed the Data Scientist Toolbox course (which was the only prerequisite as far as I know but may have missed this in the opening spiel) would have significant difficulty completing and comprehensively understanding the programming assignments in any meaningful way (i.e. to reuse the knowledge in a different context or question). I completed all of the videos, swirl programming tasks, took fairly decent notes, exams/tests and still had to look elsewhere for much more guidance than I would have thought necessary on the programming assignments as I found them too hard to do on my own. I am not that smart though and this review can only capture part of my own subjective experience. Other than that, as I really enjoyed learning about R and analysing data in general as well as the way Robert Peng's teaching style and demeanour I really enjoyed it. Trying to work out if my failure to understand and reapply is a lack of my fully grasping the material and if so whether to continue grappling with R and programming in general. I've started the third course of the specialisation so will give you more feedback once I'm done there. Thanks very much for the course and keep up the good work. | 1) the course and keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good content , nice flow of information . | 1) | Good | 1) content , nice flow of information | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Overall it's good. And I think PPT may be much more helpful if there is a video of professor, and some animations. | 1) Overall it's | Good | 1) And I think PPT may be | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is an exceptionally good course provided by coursera....Thanks a bunch !!! | 1) This is an exceptionally | Good | 1) course provided by coursera. . . | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Course is good. Every Data scientist aspirant should go for it. | 1) Course is | Good | 1) Every Data scientist aspirant should go | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good exercises and challenging course, but very hard if you do not know any R beforehand. | 1) | Good | 1) exercises and challenging course, but very | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This was a good class. The lectures were interesting. The swirl package was fun for the most part. And the message boards were actually informative and helpful.The actual programs we were required to write could be used for other things in business or health science, and therefore were practical. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) class. The lectures were interesting. The | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course was mostly self learning. It gave me a framework to go along but what is presented in lecture and assignments are completely different. The discussion board and mentors are really good resources and can provide pointers to move along. It is definitely not a class that can provide sufficient information to learn and build applications, but the individual's effort in passing the quizzes and the projects will. It is up to the student to figure out through stack overflow, youtube, and other search result to figure out how to complete these assignments. I believe the assignments given from this class are realistic to real-world situations. | 1) discussion board and mentors are really | Good | 1) resources and can provide pointers to | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is a little too deep into programming and a little light on learning the basics of R. I would recommend splitting out the more advanced programming concepts in this course and offering them in a course near the end of the specialization. This course should be higher level and give the user a wider view of R. Currently this course seems to assume significant knowledge of R or programming in general, making it not a good early course in the specialization. | 1) in general, making it not a | Good | 1) early course in the specialization. | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good course for developing solid understanding of R programming language. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for developing solid understanding of | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good exercises for beginners | 1) | Good | 1) exercises for beginners | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It´s a good R course. | 1) It´s a | Good | 1) R course. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Course does not do a good job actually explaining R or training you on how to properly use it. The lectures go over the material very fast and you do not get much out of them, and then the assignments throw complex problems that are very difficult. You spend most of your time Googling to learn it, and I find that I would have learned R better if I just did that to start without this course. Maybe if you aren't new to R and have a programming background, it may not be so bad, but if you are new to R and not an experienced programmer, this is not the class to take to learn it. | 1) Course does not do a | Good | 1) job actually explaining R or training | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introduction to R Programming. It would be especially good if at the end of the course there were some model answers, though I appreciate the problem of answers transgressing into the public domain! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to R Programming. It would | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introduction to R Programming. It would be especially good if at the end of the course there were some model answers, though I appreciate the problem of answers transgressing into the public domain! | 2) R Programming. It would be especially | Good | 2) if at the end of the | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | in starting going good .hope for next slide i am not good in programming please make for easy for new student .. | 1) in starting going | Good | 1) . hope for next slide i | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | in starting going good .hope for next slide i am not good in programming please make for easy for new student .. | 2) for next slide i am not | Good | 2) in programming please make for easy | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good for begineers.... but needs some more projects to be explained | 1) | Good | 1) for begineers. . . . but | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | tutorial contents suit the first timer very well, ofcourse i used the R-programming book for further reading but the contents in this course suited my speed and awareness.. was able to learn R very effectively, specially the swirl was very good experience. | 1) effectively, specially the swirl was very | Good | 1) experience. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course to learn R who plan to or are into data science/statistical field. | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn R who plan | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good course. ..highly recommended... | 1) | Good | 1) course. . . highly recommended. . | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good ! help me a lot , so appreciate ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! help me a lot , | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good subject. but it's a little bit too difficult for newbies. | 1) | Good | 1) subject. but it's a little bit | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | very good!! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A very good introduction to R programming. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introduction to R programming. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is not a course for a beginner in programming. If you are interested in learning R, I would recommend going to DataCamp and starting there. The lecture videos were not engaging, and the jump from the lecture and quizzes to the programming assignments was quite significant (as others have pointed out). The lecturer for this course does have a pre-programming assignment on his GitHub repository to aid in the first programming assignment, but this was not easy to locate nor advertised well (had to scroll through discussion forums before I saw someone mention it). The swirl assignments were the only saving grace for a class that was otherwise not engaging or structured well. The class could stand to be restructured: for example, it would have been nice for the lectures to cover the str() function before our first programming assignment. Overall, this class does seem to be a good choice for a "refresher" course if you already have some experience coding in R, but be wary if you have little to no programming experience. | 1) class does seem to be a | Good | 1) choice for a " refresher" course | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Nice course with good introduction, but needs more guidance on homeworks | 1) Nice course with | Good | 1) introduction, but needs more guidance on | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good intro to R programming. Like the assignment project and swirl package to help on hands-on R programming exercise. Even I didn't pay for the specialization, I love the way assignment is organized and gives expected output/results to your code, so I get to know if my code is correct or not. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to R programming. Like the | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course to begin with. | 1) | Good | 1) course to begin with. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Course was good, but the material covered was at a fairly high level and done too quickly. This course could use some demos and since its a core foundation for the rest of the courses, maybe it should be a longer more in-depth program. | 1) Course was | Good | 1) but the material covered was at | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course. Good videos, very nice programming exercises. Perfect for someone who wants to learn R for the first time. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) videos, very nice programming exercises. Perfect | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course lecture was ok, Swirl was pretty good. The assignment was confusing and the instructions were not very clear. | 1) lecture was ok, Swirl was pretty | Good | 1) The assignment was confusing and the | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | in this course is a good Idea teke the swirl() section | 1) in this course is a | Good | 1) Idea teke the swirl() section | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is a very nice introduction to R. I would advise to complete the swirl assignments as they provide good practice to memorise the commands. Sometimes it feels like swirl use a lot of positive reenforcement to the point of getting the impression of being trained like a dog. Still I felt a great sense of accomplishment completing the course. | 1) the swirl assignments as they provide | Good | 1) practice to memorise the commands. Sometimes | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A very good course for begineers. :) | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for begineers. :) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good structured course, also good for not native speaking people | 1) Very | Good | 1) structured course, also good for not | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good structured course, also good for not native speaking people | 2) Very good structured course, also | Good | 2) for not native speaking people | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great class with good support examples! | 1) Great class with | Good | 1) support examples! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This class was really good. Coincidentally I was struggling with this type of code. The case is challenging but very well delivered. The material is great. | 1) This class was really | Good | 1) Coincidentally I was struggling with this | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The professor expressed the concept really good and it is quite easy to understand. | 1) The professor expressed the concept really | Good | 1) and it is quite easy to | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Great course to start getting your hands into R. While the lectures are OK and the Swirl exercises are great, the course falls a bit short in building you up to tackling the weekly programming assignments. I had to spend a lot of time researching on my own to complete the assignments. I don't mind that, but I could do that on my own without paying for the course. I'm paying because I want to learn R quickly without spending hours researching what could have easily been described in the lectures. A lot of times, the course mentors in the discussion forums provided the best guidance. I would have liked each programming exercise to build upon the last one, so that at the end of the course I would have a great R product to review later. As it is, each programming assignment can stand on its own. When learning to programming in a new language, I prefer small, quick victories that build upon one another to accomplish a great task. This is the reason for not giving full 5-stars. Otherwise, Dr. Peng does a good job at providing material. And, be sure to check out his podcast, Not So Standard Deviations, to remind you that even people who have been in this field for years still find some areas challenging. It gives us R beginners some mental support. | 1) 5-stars. Otherwise, Dr. Peng does a | Good | 1) job at providing material. And, be | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Content to learn programming language. | 1) | Good | 1) Content to learn programming language. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Never used R until I took this course. This was a good course to start with and helped me dive into the world of R. | 1) took this course. This was a | Good | 1) course to start with and helped | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Course. Learnt a lot. Thank you :) | 1) | Good | 1) Course. Learnt a lot. Thank you | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Lays a solid foundation for R. Good lectures. | 1) Lays a solid foundation for R. | Good | 1) lectures. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I guess this course is part of one of the best Data Science specializations. The lecturers are very knowledgable and they explain extremely good. If you want to learn R in combination with the data science, this specialization is certainly very recommended for you. | 1) very knowledgable and they explain extremely | Good | 1) If you want to learn R | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good course. Cover the necessary topics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Cover the necessary topics. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good fundamental overview of the programming language. I also liked the pace of the course. | 1) | Good | 1) fundamental overview of the programming language. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introductory course with well presented material. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course with well presented material. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Support material is decent but some more examples in video lectures would be good | 1) examples in video lectures would be | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good! though i still not good at R, but i can follow swirl now, thx, i'll go on | 1) | Good | 1) though i still not good at | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good! though i still not good at R, but i can follow swirl now, thx, i'll go on | 2) good! though i still not | Good | 2) at R, but i can follow | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is good course for beginner to understand the R programming itself. | 1) This is | Good | 1) course for beginner to understand the | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I am really unhappy with this course. Coming to R with some background in statistics and SQL, but lacking programming experience, I assumed this would be an introduction. The material in the lectures is straightforward enough, and the swirl exercises are easy to get through and informative, but the assignments are, without exception, based on writing functions in R with basically zero experience. Having no background or frame of reference for best practices in syntax, logic, etc, and very little information in the lectures or supplementary material to help, I found these to be almost impossible to complete. Furthermore, there's no mechanism or provision in the course to review the assignments after they're submitted. So not only did I not feel like I was doing the work correctly, I can't get feedback, and the lecturer doesn't break down the rationale behind the assignment, and how he would have done it or why. In addition, the assignments bear only a tangential relationship to the lecture material. So I would be feeling good coming out of a lecture and going through swirl exercises, only to be plunged into a programming assignment that was far too advanced for the small steps I felt I had taken in my overall competence with the language and material. I don't doubt that someone with better knowledge of programming can get through this stuff, but this class should be reserved for advanced learners only, or maybe be broken up into two courses. I feel like I wasted $49. | 1) material. So I would be feeling | Good | 1) coming out of a lecture and | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Challenging course, but in a good way. | 1) Challenging course, but in a | Good | 1) way. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It is a good overview of R! | 1) It is a | Good | 1) overview of R! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I must confess that this course is difficult for who is beginning programming with R, the assignments require a lot of work and they are very involved. Nevertheless, I´m extremely satisfied. The book and the lectures are very good and the quizes and exercises forces you to really understand what you are doing or you cannot pass...it is what I really wanted! Thank you Coursera and special thanks to the instructor for his great work! | 1) book and the lectures are very | Good | 1) and the quizes and exercises forces | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Hi all, Very good introduction into R basics. | 1) Hi all, Very | Good | 1) introduction into R basics. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This is simply a great course. Well pased and full of information. The instructor is easy to understand and makes a good job introducing the language. Prepare yourself though - it is quite a lot of material. Allow yourself to "fail" at some point as you can take the course again. | 1) easy to understand and makes a | Good | 1) job introducing the language. Prepare yourself | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Assignment is a bit too hard for entry level students, especially if we have to complete it in a week considering some students might be full time employees or students. However, assignment is very good for practice. Might consider adding more contents to let students learn more about build their own functions. | 1) or students. However, assignment is very | Good | 1) for practice. Might consider adding more | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Clean and very well structured. A good starting point to search for a book with similar structure. | 1) Clean and very well structured. A | Good | 1) starting point to search for a | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good and useful | 1) | Good | 1) and useful | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good intro to R | 1) | Good | 1) intro to R | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course was very good and brief. | 1) This course was very | Good | 1) and brief. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | its good and still more programming problems can be discussed to ease the learners to dive interest in R. | 1) its | Good | 1) and still more programming problems can | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It was a good class to begin with however it would have helped to tailor it more towards newcomers to programming language in general. I also would have like it if Roger would have highlighted or circled, or something to specify where in the slide he was talking about. I felt that at times it was hard to follow where exactly he was talking about and what part of the code/function he was mentioning. Im a visual learner and that would have been greatly beneficial. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) class to begin with however it | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is very helpful to learn R, swirl videos explain clearly all the technical skill. Assignments are very good to push my skill. | 1) the technical skill. Assignments are very | Good | 1) to push my skill. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course to learn R | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn R | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Overall it's a good course and I've learned a lot from it. But I think It'd be great to have more examples and context on how and why use those functions. To me R is a really quirky language and isn't really intuitive to use and it doesn't have a lot of functions that other programming languages have such as push and pop for lists. I remember spending like 5 hours trying to get it to work in a way that I'm more used to but then realized it could be done in a completely different manner. Most of the time I spend so much time on trivial stuff which I think can be avoided if more explanation is provided. | 1) Overall it's a | Good | 1) course and I've learned a lot | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It's good introduction, but the assignment are rather poor. Not worth paying for it | 1) It's | Good | 1) introduction, but the assignment are rather | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very very good! Thanks. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) Thanks. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | really good course | 1) really | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I am experienced in C++/C etc and some 50% of the videos i had to rewind. The assignments are really good though | 1) to rewind. The assignments are really | Good | 1) though | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Thanks to Coursera and Prof. Roger D. Peng for offering such a wonderful course on R Programming. Before the start of this session, my knowledge of R Programming is NIL. After attending the session, I'm confident that I could program in R and level of my knowledge is more than that of fresher. Thanks for the well designed course on R. The Quizzes and Assignments are good and helped me test my understanding. These helped me improve my confidence level as well. I appreciate Professors special video session before difficult assignment. Just following these sessions closely, I could complete the assignment to my satisfaction and have confidence to attempt and complete. I completed this course in the old format. Do I need to repeat it in the new format ? The Discussion Forums are amazingly helpful in sharing subject knowledge and making the learning Fun. Getting help from some corner of the world and getting thanks from some other corner of the world makes this learning truly Universal and great Fun. Thanks again to Coursera and Prof. Roger D. Peng. Wishing Coursera and my Professors all the best and Success always. Best Wishes, S. Ramalakshmanan | 1) R. The Quizzes and Assignments are | Good | 1) and helped me test my understanding. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course, a bit too hectic for newbies but totally worth the effort. | 1) | Good | 1) course, a bit too hectic for | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good course with high quality information and good presenters. | 1) A | Good | 1) course with high quality information and | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good course with high quality information and good presenters. | 2) course with high quality information and | Good | 2) presenters. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course gave a good overview of R language. The knity gritty things could have been explained better - for example the result of splitting a data frame does nor return a data frame etc. It wasn't for some one who had never programmed in his life. | 1) The course gave a | Good | 1) overview of R language. The knity | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent introduction to R. I really liked the "swirl" interactive portion of the course. The coding assignments were very good also. | 1) course. The coding assignments were very | Good | 1) also. | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This was a good introduction to R programming. The assignments were very challenging, and it didn't always seem like the lessons properly prepared you for them, but I guess they just required some "hacking" skills (the initiative to find your own answers, on Google, StackOverflow, etc.). The step-by-step optional Swirl R assignments were very useful. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to R programming. The assignments | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The content and the speed that they teach you R are actually good. But considering that we now have to pay 45€/49$ for the course you will expect more polished videos and quizzes. Some of the videos are just stutters, repetitions and filling words. It's seems like they have been in a rush without decent preparation. Also one of the quiz questions was simply wrong. This should be fixed. Furthermore some of the commands they present are deprecated and cannot be used anymore. | 1) they teach you R are actually | Good | 1) But considering that we now have | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Overall this was a good course. It does assume some prior knowledge/experience of programming, which makes some parts of he course challenging for a newbie. However, I would recommend it to anyone beginning the R journey. | 1) Overall this was a | Good | 1) course. It does assume some prior | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course overall but assignments have too little guidance in how they should be completed and can its easier to use material from future lessons to solve the problems | 1) | Good | 1) course overall but assignments have too | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | R programming is good for beginner. | 1) R programming is | Good | 1) for beginner. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course should have more assignments of R Programming. Remaining are good. | 1) assignments of R Programming. Remaining are | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good and easy cours ! | 1) | Good | 1) and easy cours ! | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course is a good starting point for learning the bits and pieces of R. It shows you how to work with data in a fairly easy manner. The course is well explained and the exercises are challenging. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) starting point for learning the bits | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | is good but is necessary a width explication for several homeworks | 1) is | Good | 1) but is necessary a width explication | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Challenging, but it gives a good idea on rprogramming, should be taken with other learning tools outside coursera | 1) Challenging, but it gives a | Good | 1) idea on rprogramming, should be taken | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introduction to R. Without my programming background, I think this course would be more difficult. For example, when I think I should use a switch statement in an assignment, I already know what a switch is, I just need to search online to learn how to do it in R. At the same time, speaking as someone who's worked in software engineering, a lot of any programming job is not about being taught everything but being taught enough to then go out, search online, and find out what you need to get the job done. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to R. Without my programming | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really enjoy this course even i have done lot of programming and expert in other language but content is good and very easy to understand | 1) in other language but content is | Good | 1) and very easy to understand | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good for beginners, it's challenging but once you dedicate to the course, you definitely find it useful and motivating | 1) | Good | 1) for beginners, it's challenging but once | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good ! I learned a lot about R programming. Thank you very much ! | 1) Really | Good | 1) ! I learned a lot about | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very very good one to start our R Journey ... | 1) Very very | Good | 1) one to start our R Journey | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good class. Some of the concepts required a good deal of research to understand and use, but that research is really the heart of modern development anyway. | 1) A | Good | 1) class. Some of the concepts required | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | A good class. Some of the concepts required a good deal of research to understand and use, but that research is really the heart of modern development anyway. | 2) Some of the concepts required a | Good | 2) deal of research to understand and | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Nice, swirl lessons are very good | 1) Nice, swirl lessons are very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I would reduce the requirement of using Git. Otherwise, good course. | 1) the requirement of using Git. Otherwise, | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | i generally think the course needs a lot of improvement as after week 1 the assignments and quizzes don't seem to relate to the course content. we are at very different levels so a more gentle easing and explanation of ideas is necessary other than this apparent quantum leap from one stage to the next. i have had to do a different course else where and i am getting the sort of good introduction into the R language, its not practical to expect everyone to understand the ideas in 4 weeks.programming is hard enough as it is. | 1) i am getting the sort of | Good | 1) introduction into the R language, its | 1.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good introduction to R! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to R! | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good Introductory course on R language | 1) | Good | 1) Introductory course on R language | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | While this course advances at a fast pace, and Week 1 fits the needs of beginners, Week 2 is intermediate. It took me 9 months to be able to complete Week 2's assignments! Still, the course is quite good as a measure of progress for beginner-intermediate R programmers, and it helped me a lot in my way to Data Science. I'm sure coming back to pay for the whole certification. | 1) assignments! Still, the course is quite | Good | 1) as a measure of progress for | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | It was a decent introduction to R programming IF you already have some programming experience. I would never recommend this as a first programming experience to a novice programmer. That would be like throwing someone who has never swam in the Atlantic without a life boat! That said, if you have some programming knowledge to begin with, the Week 2 and Week 4 programming assignments were good. Week 3 was disjointed; it had NOTHING to do with the lectures from that week. I found the Week 3 programming assignment to be tor easy and, frankly, not very valuable as a learning tool. | 1) and Week 4 programming assignments were | Good | 1) Week 3 was disjointed; it had | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | This course helps to become good in learning fundamentals of R Programming language. The assignments were challenging and helped me learn a lot | 1) This course helps to become | Good | 1) in learning fundamentals of R Programming | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course, good examples, good tutor :-) | 1) Excellent course, | Good | 1) examples, good tutor :-) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent course, good examples, good tutor :-) | 2) Excellent course, good examples, | Good | 2) tutor :-) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I think more detail statements are needed on PDF. Because I'm not good at listening, so I studied by PDF. | 1) needed on PDF. Because I'm not | Good | 1) at listening, so I studied by | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good course with perfect interactive exercises | 1) | Good | 1) course with perfect interactive exercises | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I really enjoyed learning R and stepping up the skills for using R. I really appreciate this great opportunity to learn exquisite classes for free at home. I do think this is as amazing as the Industrial Revolution. It is the Educational Revolution! BUT it seems errors occur (in some assignments), and I feel the level of classes is getting higher/tougher suddenly. I feel overwhelmed and challenged from assignments in week 3. &YOU GUYS TALK TOO FAST. (well, it surprisingly didn't affect to my understanding though). PLEASE! like myself, there are many many ESL students taking this course. I really don't think my English is poor (trust me, my undergraduate major is English lit and i wrote my final thesis for master's degree in ENGLISH as an ESL) but sometimes doing assignments and understanding lectures were challenging... Maybe that's because it takes time to get used to all the technical terms that has nothing to do with my major or career so far. But I think, not just JHU, but all the good universities providing courses need to consider ESL students who wanna learn more and pursue their dreams. Also it will be really great there are more ways to earn some degrees and more support for using the knowledge and skills I learned here for my career. (with reasonable price!) Thank you for the wonderful course, JHU! Hope I can go to JHU in US someday. | 1) not just JHU, but all the | Good | 1) universities providing courses need to consider | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I am very frustrated by the disconnect between the lectures and programming assignment in this course. The lectures are very basic, but that makes sense for an intro-type course. The programming assignments, however, have very little connection to the lectures. I have some experience using software with command-based interface (including R) for statistical analysis, and I am relatively good at searching and finding information independently, but this course was way too hard even for me. I might revisit programming assignments again once I have more time and more experience with the application, just for the sake of completing the course, but I kind of find it silly that I need experience with R to pass the course intended for people with little to no experience with R. | 1) statistical analysis, and I am relatively | Good | 1) at searching and finding information independently, | 2.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course to start learning R,but still missing some explanations in the lectures regarding programming assessments. | 1) | Good | 1) course to start learning R, but | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Really good structure and introduction to R. It stands as a solid foundation for the rest of the specialisation. | 1) Really | Good | 1) structure and introduction to R. It | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Excellent teaching and good course | 1) Excellent teaching and | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | The course videos are hard to follow. The Swirl package is good | 1) to follow. The Swirl package is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good introduction to programming with R. Surprisingly large amount of content for short period of time | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to programming with R. Surprisingly | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good. this lecture inspire me to work hard. study hard and think hard. | 1) | Good | 1) this lecture inspire me to work | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course. Would have been great to see a few more examples to explain concepts but otherwise great flow and good support through swirl coding practices. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Would have been great to | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Good course. Would have been great to see a few more examples to explain concepts but otherwise great flow and good support through swirl coding practices. | 2) concepts but otherwise great flow and | Good | 2) support through swirl coding practices. | 4.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | Awesome Course, Good documented, effective videos and great new platform. Thanks Coursera for offering such a nice courses. | 1) Awesome Course, | Good | 1) documented, effective videos and great new | 5.0 |
| RMFRum1BEeWXrA6ju0fvnQ | I rate this course as the beta-testing (not that I had completed this course prior the beta started). 1) the course is still very good with a lot of explanations and examples 2) I liked the part about debugging because we don't see often this topic when learning a new language. 3) I liked (but it's only a cosmetic thing) that all the slides have the same template/organization ; it's easier later when we looked back at the lessons to find what we search. 4) one (very) minor comment : I watched the videos with subtitles (english) and sometimes it also writes when the instructor thinks "loud", or repeat a word several times | 1) 1) the course is still very | Good | 1) with a lot of explanations and | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Enjoyed the course. Very informative. Though Prof. Barbara is an introvert herself, her advocating face to face interactions made me rethink possibilities in my daily routine for such an experiment. Hopefully my results will be as good as the science claims. :) | 1) Hopefully my results will be as | Good | 1) as the science claims. :) | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It's good for all aspect of your life. | 1) It's | Good | 1) for all aspect of your life. | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good course but not enough new information and knowledge as expected | 1) | Good | 1) course but not enough new information | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good class. The discussion format with the group chatting was a little tedious even though the information was interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) class. The discussion format with the | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | The course gives u a number of examples, where u are just making a different choice to be not happy and u just have to flip the coin ...and everything would be AMAZING. A very good course, thank you professor and COURSERA | 1) everything would be AMAZING. A very | Good | 1) course, thank you professor and COURSERA | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Excellent course, great professor and very good quality content. Thank you | 1) Excellent course, great professor and very | Good | 1) quality content. Thank you | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It is a very interesting course. I was quite taken. The teacher is good in her solos, and quite good while in the group. I dind't really like the massive use of the terms "kind of" (often used to explain concepts) and for this reason I still have to finish it. I will quickly 'cause I 'm looking forward to learning something else. | 1) was quite taken. The teacher is | Good | 1) in her solos, and quite good | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It is a very interesting course. I was quite taken. The teacher is good in her solos, and quite good while in the group. I dind't really like the massive use of the terms "kind of" (often used to explain concepts) and for this reason I still have to finish it. I will quickly 'cause I 'm looking forward to learning something else. | 2) good in her solos, and quite | Good | 2) while in the group. I dind't | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Really good, but to short! | 1) Really | Good | 1) but to short! | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | The material here is good, especially for a MOOC, and it seemed like they tried to make it dynamic with the use of questions, discussion, interviews, and extension activities. I'm disappointed, however, that the course focused so heavily on Frederickson's work to the exclusion of others. While I understand that this is where she would feel the most comfortable and familiar, to start with her broaden-and-build theory and continually reference her lab's work, with the additional readings often being her books, it felt limited. I would have liked more of a discussion of the contributions of other psychologists like Seligman, Csikszentmihalyi, Peterson, Diener, Lyubomirsky, etc. Along with that, it could have addressed topics other than emotions (or been titled The Positive Psychology of Emotions), like character strengths, flow, or institution change. I love the fact that this course exists, and it's a good foundation to build on, but it still feels too narrow to claim the title Positive Psychology. | 1) The material here is | Good | 1) especially for a MOOC, and it | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | The material here is good, especially for a MOOC, and it seemed like they tried to make it dynamic with the use of questions, discussion, interviews, and extension activities. I'm disappointed, however, that the course focused so heavily on Frederickson's work to the exclusion of others. While I understand that this is where she would feel the most comfortable and familiar, to start with her broaden-and-build theory and continually reference her lab's work, with the additional readings often being her books, it felt limited. I would have liked more of a discussion of the contributions of other psychologists like Seligman, Csikszentmihalyi, Peterson, Diener, Lyubomirsky, etc. Along with that, it could have addressed topics other than emotions (or been titled The Positive Psychology of Emotions), like character strengths, flow, or institution change. I love the fact that this course exists, and it's a good foundation to build on, but it still feels too narrow to claim the title Positive Psychology. | 2) this course exists, and it's a | Good | 2) foundation to build on, but it | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I had fun, that's a good sign. There is something to take away from this course for everyday living so that is good too. Perhaps I was expecting a bit more research discussions, it seemed all nice with the chats but maybe less 'pedagogic' than I might have expected. | 1) I had fun, that's a | Good | 1) sign. There is something to take | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I had fun, that's a good sign. There is something to take away from this course for everyday living so that is good too. Perhaps I was expecting a bit more research discussions, it seemed all nice with the chats but maybe less 'pedagogic' than I might have expected. | 2) for everyday living so that is | Good | 2) too. Perhaps I was expecting a | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good class, knowledgeable professor. I would have preferred if some of the longer sessions (closer to 20 minutes) were split into two sessions. I didn't like the conversational style of this course, though, because it felt impersonal. It would have felt more personal to me if it had just been Dr. Fredericks on camera. I thought the session where Kelly Stacks was interviewed was worthwhile and good to include. | 1) | Good | 1) class, knowledgeable professor. I would have | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good class, knowledgeable professor. I would have preferred if some of the longer sessions (closer to 20 minutes) were split into two sessions. I didn't like the conversational style of this course, though, because it felt impersonal. It would have felt more personal to me if it had just been Dr. Fredericks on camera. I thought the session where Kelly Stacks was interviewed was worthwhile and good to include. | 2) Stacks was interviewed was worthwhile and | Good | 2) to include. | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good. Easy to understand with simple exercises. Lots of things are learnt. But better be more interesting with more ways of presenting and showing. | 1) | Good | 1) Easy to understand with simple exercises. | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I enjoyed and found the course useful for my personal purposes and possibly for professional purposes. It was a good mix of talks, readings and personal reflection. | 1) for professional purposes. It was a | Good | 1) mix of talks, readings and personal | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | not only very useful information, but very good therapy! | 1) only very useful information, but very | Good | 1) therapy! | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Thank you for such wonderful course! The time, I've spent with lessons of professor Barbara Fredrickson, was one of the best moments of my last years. I appreciate its practical side and good scientific experimental basis! | 1) I appreciate its practical side and | Good | 1) scientific experimental basis! | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | This is a nice and easy course. The chat sessions were fun and interesting. The professor got me interested enough to continue on to Tibetan Meditation because she touched on some related topics. She tried to make it a worthwhile experience, which it was. There were good interviews and good supplemental material. This was very worthwhile. Its a positive touch when course leaders take the time to dress well and make a good visual impression, as they would in a "real" physical classroom. I think that positive psychology could be a slippery topic, hard to substantiate in a way, but it was a door opener for me. I felt like this was a fine introduction to this area of psychology, which, if understood correctly, is beginning to blossom. | 1) experience, which it was. There were | Good | 1) interviews and good supplemental material. This | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | This is a nice and easy course. The chat sessions were fun and interesting. The professor got me interested enough to continue on to Tibetan Meditation because she touched on some related topics. She tried to make it a worthwhile experience, which it was. There were good interviews and good supplemental material. This was very worthwhile. Its a positive touch when course leaders take the time to dress well and make a good visual impression, as they would in a "real" physical classroom. I think that positive psychology could be a slippery topic, hard to substantiate in a way, but it was a door opener for me. I felt like this was a fine introduction to this area of psychology, which, if understood correctly, is beginning to blossom. | 2) was. There were good interviews and | Good | 2) supplemental material. This was very worthwhile. | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | This is a nice and easy course. The chat sessions were fun and interesting. The professor got me interested enough to continue on to Tibetan Meditation because she touched on some related topics. She tried to make it a worthwhile experience, which it was. There were good interviews and good supplemental material. This was very worthwhile. Its a positive touch when course leaders take the time to dress well and make a good visual impression, as they would in a "real" physical classroom. I think that positive psychology could be a slippery topic, hard to substantiate in a way, but it was a door opener for me. I felt like this was a fine introduction to this area of psychology, which, if understood correctly, is beginning to blossom. | 3) to dress well and make a | Good | 3) visual impression, as they would in | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Excellent! Very good course on personal and social area, which could also give you an "up" professionally by making your day and better! Thanks for this very important knowledge sharing!!! | 1) Excellent! Very | Good | 1) course on personal and social area, | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good course. I have learned skills to take forward into the workplace. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I have learned skills to | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | VERY GOOD COURSE, VERY GOOD TEAM, REALLY APPRECIATING IT :) | 1) VERY | Good | 1) COURSE, VERY GOOD TEAM, REALLY APPRECIATING | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | VERY GOOD COURSE, VERY GOOD TEAM, REALLY APPRECIATING IT :) | 2) VERY GOOD COURSE, VERY | Good | 2) TEAM, REALLY APPRECIATING IT :) | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It's a good course and the contents are very helpful. There are important components like negativity bias and loving-kindness meditation. However I somehow feel it lacks a more systematic or scientific approach since lots of the materials goes on with a free and open discussion that very much depends on subjective views or feelings of selected individuals who joined the discussion. Take another example, "What is Love" session clearly depends an individual's own view. It contradicts "triangular theory of love" and the lecturer doesn't even explain why. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course and the contents are very | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Nice cours which is sometimes a littlebit difficult for not native speakers (english). Some words are unfamiliair and need translations to understand. Very good to follow and nice to learn. | 1) and need translations to understand. Very | Good | 1) to follow and nice to learn. | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very interesting course. Fairly interactive. The structure could have been better to make it clear what we had learnt and give us more of a take away after each week and at the end. Although there were a lot of academic links each week, the course didn't explore the differing perspectives and ideas, it was more focussed on Barbara's own theories. Definitely a good introduction and great personal learning! | 1) on Barbara's own theories. Definitely a | Good | 1) introduction and great personal learning! | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good study | 1) | Good | 1) study | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A very good course but it was a little narrow because it focused on the professor's own research. Perhaps one or two lectures on other trends ad research results from the wider field of positive psychology would be apt. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course but it was a little | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A really good Course with Interesting Strategies W | 1) A really | Good | 1) Course with Interesting Strategies W | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | very good course,. i recomend it,. | 1) very | Good | 1) course, . i recomend it, . | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A good basic course for positive psychology. Really like the panel discussion and the interactive questions. Do find it is a bit too basic for people who are in the psychology field. But recommended for people who want an introduction to positive psychology. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic course for positive psychology. Really | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Its great course. Teaching method and techniques are so good. and so helpful to learn how to be positive in real life. | 1) Teaching method and techniques are so | Good | 1) and so helpful to learn how | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | I found the presentation of the topic very convincing: I'll try to foster micro-moments of positivity resonance in the future and I am fully convinced that this will have a significant positive impact on my life. The videos were good: not too long and each making a point. I'm not a big fan of the round table format, but I admit it was appropriate for the topic. The only aspect where I see room for improvement is the type of assignments: the quiz was part of the course but the weekly exercise was not. It is maybe worthwhile to create some little assignments with a peer-review, to foster a deeper investment of the participants into the course. | 1) on my life. The videos were | Good | 1) not too long and each making | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | a good scientific course from one of the leaders of positive pscyhology. explains many key scientific evidences for happiness and positivity. good for curious learners. the course is free. | 1) a | Good | 1) scientific course from one of the | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | a good scientific course from one of the leaders of positive pscyhology. explains many key scientific evidences for happiness and positivity. good for curious learners. the course is free. | 2) scientific evidences for happiness and positivity. | Good | 2) for curious learners. the course is | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | It's very interesting.and the professor is very good as well. | 1) interesting. and the professor is very | Good | 1) as well. | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Good information and very interesting thoughts! Everybody should familiar him/herself with this theory, could make us all a bit nicer, happier and positive! | 1) | Good | 1) information and very interesting thoughts! Everybody | 4.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | An instructive way to enhance and streamline the positive side of life. I learnt that positive emotions are as essential as a healthy diet, good sleep and daily exercises. Dr. Barbara Fredrickson radiates positivity. | 1) as essential as a healthy diet, | Good | 1) sleep and daily exercises. Dr. Barbara | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A good course, but maybe a little lacking in depth. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, but maybe a little lacking | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | This course seems like a good start for people who do not major in psychology. The idea expressed in the course is likely to contribute to people's daily lives. | 1) This course seems like a | Good | 1) start for people who do not | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | the course is interesting and challenging. it presents the positive psychology paradigm in a broad and exhaustive way. the loving kindness meditation is a special gift that will be with me forever. I especially appreciate how the lessons were managed, with the small group of four "students" who were then interviewed as experts in their fields of study or practice. I only have to complain about the video quality. especially long videos used to interrupt after the first 5 minutes, both image and sound or image only. the only way to go further was refreshing continuously. so I hadn't any chance to do all the embedded activities. my general review is: excellent course to have a first glance at positive psychology and a good platform to dive in from. | 1) glance at positive psychology and a | Good | 1) platform to dive in from. | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Really a good course for people who suffers a lot in modern society. Some ways to cultivate positive emotions on this course really help me a lot. And the most important thing while learning this course is to practicing and applying it into reality, which is really amazing~~ | 1) Really a | Good | 1) course for people who suffers a | 3.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | A very good way for get a view on Positive Psycholgy. I like the lessons | 1) A very | Good | 1) way for get a view on | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | very good. | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Dr. Barbra Fredrickson sheds light on a subject that is essential to the fulfillment of a well lived life. This is the good stuff. As I implement these simple practices into my everyday life I reap the rewards of energy, joy and closeness to others that is so often lacking in modern times. I highly recommended this course to everyone! | 1) well lived life. This is the | Good | 1) stuff. As I implement these simple | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rNpCSyQbEeWXzxJxfIL00w | Very interesting and useful course. It was very easy, but I think there is a lot of good information in here about how positive emotions and attitudes affect the mind, body, and society. | 1) think there is a lot of | Good | 1) information in here about how positive | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good one. Nicely paced. Necessary challenge included.. | 1) | Good | 1) one. Nicely paced. Necessary challenge included. | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Thank you! Please keep up the good work. | 1) Thank you! Please keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good course, I learned a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learned a lot! | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Since my majors was bioengineering, whenever my computer science friends discussed about data structures and their importance, I always wondered what data structures are and why they hold so much importance. The course and the instructors who have beautifully designed and developed it, gave me really good insights into data structures. Thank you Coursera, UCSD, Mia Minnes, Christine Alvarado, Leo Porter! | 1) and developed it, gave me really | Good | 1) insights into data structures. Thank you | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | It was really a very good course, you can learn many data structures and its implementations along with programing assignments and quizes which are quite challenging. The idea of concept challenge was awesome. You could learn performing efficiency of the algorithms, benchmarking, linked lists trees hashmaps and other data structures. | 1) It was really a very | Good | 1) course, you can learn many data | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | good course,i get much knowledges about java | 1) | Good | 1) course, i get much knowledges about | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | A very good course. Sets a very strong base in data structures. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. Sets a very strong base | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Great course to introduce intermediate level data structures to the person learning Java. I have previously used these structures in other languages, but this was a good way to knock the rust off my Java skills and update myself on Java implementations. Instructors are great! | 1) other languages, but this was a | Good | 1) way to knock the rust off | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Well Done - I enjoyed these key concepts and how they were put across. Also the testing methods are pretty good. | 1) Also the testing methods are pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The concepts introduced and the application of concepts in problems is very good. | 1) of concepts in problems is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good but it was also good to let the students do some of the codings, I found the coding part actually very simple and short | 1) | Good | 1) but it was also good to | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good but it was also good to let the students do some of the codings, I found the coding part actually very simple and short | 2) Good but it was also | Good | 2) to let the students do some | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course about algorithms. | 1) | Good | 1) course about algorithms. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good course containing interesting and fun projects! Professors' explanations make the topics easy to understand. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course containing interesting and fun projects! | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | very good lecture format :) | 1) very | Good | 1) lecture format :) | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The overall course is good. But might touch too little on Big O? Not sure. But still good course! | 1) The overall course is | Good | 1) But might touch too little on | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The overall course is good. But might touch too little on Big O? Not sure. But still good course! | 2) Big O? Not sure. But still | Good | 2) course! | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good series for learning Java and OO Principles. The big application approach is very interesting as we can see the whole picture even when we know little yet. The interviews with software engineers are very enlightening. | 1) Very | Good | 1) series for learning Java and OO | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The course is extremely good. It would be still better if there is inclusion of basics to create a UI. | 1) The course is extremely | Good | 1) It would be still better if | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Well structured and explained, and, as always, provides very good programming assignments. Love this specialization! | 1) explained, and, as always, provides very | Good | 1) programming assignments. Love this specialization! | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Introductory course to data structures. The lectures are good, however the assignments are too much guided. Sometimes you can get it done without actually understanding what is going on. | 1) to data structures. The lectures are | Good | 1) however the assignments are too much | 3.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | A very good course. The concepts are common and basic but the projects are fun and useful. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. The concepts are common and | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Here I had a good introduction to regular expressions also I like the design of the project. | 1) Here I had a | Good | 1) introduction to regular expressions also I | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | good course, but... paid, I can't submit the task | 1) | Good | 1) course, but. . . paid, I | 3.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome! Excellent methodology and contents! It goes to the point. Assignments are cool and help to understand the concepts. Perhaps, I found it a little bit easy, but this is also good because I can adapt my tight schedule to follow the deadlines while also remain motivated. ;-) | 1) bit easy, but this is also | Good | 1) because I can adapt my tight | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Was a good course for data structures and a good overview of Big O notation | 1) Was a | Good | 1) course for data structures and a | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Was a good course for data structures and a good overview of Big O notation | 2) course for data structures and a | Good | 2) overview of Big O notation | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) :) | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | I'm graduated in System Analysis, not Computer Sciences, and learned to program only by experience. After 20 years it's a good deal but still I missed the theoretical background and this always annoyed me. I knew and used to make good use of all the structures presented in this course but never could quite explain how or why, or talk in asymptotic notations. Now I can. I didn't stop here, I do take some topics to deep dive during the lectures. It's being a great experience and I only wish I could have more time to keep myself always enrolled in some course. | 1) experience. After 20 years it's a | Good | 1) deal but still I missed the | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | I'm graduated in System Analysis, not Computer Sciences, and learned to program only by experience. After 20 years it's a good deal but still I missed the theoretical background and this always annoyed me. I knew and used to make good use of all the structures presented in this course but never could quite explain how or why, or talk in asymptotic notations. Now I can. I didn't stop here, I do take some topics to deep dive during the lectures. It's being a great experience and I only wish I could have more time to keep myself always enrolled in some course. | 2) I knew and used to make | Good | 2) use of all the structures presented | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course to understand the basics of data structures and performance of different data structure implementations | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand the basics of | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good Course. The assignments were fairly challenging and required 3-5 hours per assignment. The instructors were really good. This was the first course on Coursera which I fully completed. I liked working with a large software project as part of the assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. The assignments were fairly challenging | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good Course. The assignments were fairly challenging and required 3-5 hours per assignment. The instructors were really good. This was the first course on Coursera which I fully completed. I liked working with a large software project as part of the assignments. | 2) per assignment. The instructors were really | Good | 2) This was the first course on | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | This course covers some of the industry standard applications and they can be implemented. This really challenges the programmer to sit down and work some of the very good algorithms. And it shows the real usage of the Java data structures. Professors Christine, Mia and Leo's teachings were very professional and helpful. A word about the projects. After a student finishes the projects, they can confidently say they did something good with the data structures in Java. Thank you for the course instructors and everyone who worked behind this. Highly recommended for the serious Java programmers. | 1) and work some of the very | Good | 1) algorithms. And it shows the real | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | This course covers some of the industry standard applications and they can be implemented. This really challenges the programmer to sit down and work some of the very good algorithms. And it shows the real usage of the Java data structures. Professors Christine, Mia and Leo's teachings were very professional and helpful. A word about the projects. After a student finishes the projects, they can confidently say they did something good with the data structures in Java. Thank you for the course instructors and everyone who worked behind this. Highly recommended for the serious Java programmers. | 2) can confidently say they did something | Good | 2) with the data structures in Java. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good course. This is a very right course for Java learners, will be touched on all basic stuff that are needed in Java. I will highly recommend this course for my colleagues. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. This is a very right | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good lectures. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lectures. | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very well structured. Information complete and good exercises. | 1) Very well structured. Information complete and | Good | 1) exercises. | 4.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Are you good at data structures ? If not, this will be the best course to start with. You learn the data structure and implement right away in your project assigment. Very practical. | 1) Are you | Good | 1) at data structures ? If not, | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | The course curriculum is well designed and teaches students the basic data structures needed to be a successful software engineer. The project is good, and the weekly assignments are challenging. | 1) successful software engineer. The project is | Good | 1) and the weekly assignments are challenging. | 5.0 |
| RO728xoIEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Amazing course! Very clear explanation of data structures and some basic algorithms. Very good preparation for the interviews. The only drawback is that the lecture slides are not available for downloading. | 1) structures and some basic algorithms. Very | Good | 1) preparation for the interviews. The only | 4.0 |
| Rqo3iKNbEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | the prof is so good, even an amateur cant help falling in love with the subject | 1) the prof is so | Good | 1) even an amateur cant help falling | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good lectures, well-designed videos and tests. However, coordinators are low responsive. No extra reading is provided. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures, well-designed videos and tests. However, | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | it's really good for a student in planning department. | 1) it's really | Good | 1) for a student in planning department. | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Very good, easy to follow. Exams are well designed and offer a good training. Videos can sometimes be a bit boring to watch. | 1) Very | Good | 1) easy to follow. Exams are well | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Very good, easy to follow. Exams are well designed and offer a good training. Videos can sometimes be a bit boring to watch. | 2) are well designed and offer a | Good | 2) training. Videos can sometimes be a | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | This tutor is very knowledgeable. I like the way she communicates and connects things. She seems to have very good hold over the topics she deals with. I especially liked the interviewees she brought in to give us an 'expert' or extra perspective on the topics of each week she dealt with. kudos to this professor. | 1) things. She seems to have very | Good | 1) hold over the topics she deals | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | very good course, but I never recieved the feedback I needed on the forum | 1) very | Good | 1) course, but I never recieved the | 3.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | It was a really good course, very easy to understand and was good in keeping the interest up. I would only recommend they offered some, at least optional, exercises to help grasp the content. | 1) It was a really | Good | 1) course, very easy to understand and | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | It was a really good course, very easy to understand and was good in keeping the interest up. I would only recommend they offered some, at least optional, exercises to help grasp the content. | 2) very easy to understand and was | Good | 2) in keeping the interest up. I | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good pacing, good explanations, reasonable expectations. | 1) | Good | 1) pacing, good explanations, reasonable expectations. | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good pacing, good explanations, reasonable expectations. | 2) Good pacing, | Good | 2) explanations, reasonable expectations. | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent lectures, good tests, too many peer evaluations! | 1) Excellent lectures, | Good | 1) tests, too many peer evaluations! | 1.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | The course is very good, language very clear, concepts explained very well. Congratulations to the team from Amsterdam University! | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) language very clear, concepts explained very | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | One of the best courses! Good in-lecture questions. :) | 1) One of the best courses! | Good | 1) in-lecture questions. :) | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. It should be complemented with | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Good Course. It should be complemented with reading of Neuman, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Social Science, which gives a far better overview of the contents of week 1 and 2 (insights into the scientific method). Nevertheless the rest of the weeks are very good and should provide a great framework of Quantitative methods for a undergraduate student, who can then complement this framework with some detailed additional readings, if it is of his liking. All in all, I really ended my fisrt college semester with an excellent knowledge in quantitative methods, for which I have to thank, in part to Miss Scholten for this wonderful course. | 2) rest of the weeks are very | Good | 2) and should provide a great framework | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | The material has a very good quality. The teacher explains the subject very well and the videos are very supportive. The build-up in the course is well-thought and works like a charm, I am excited to continue with the specialization. | 1) The material has a very | Good | 1) quality. The teacher explains the subject | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Simply Amazing! Tough, but really good! | 1) Simply Amazing! Tough, but really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I really enjoyed this course overall (and it was somewhat easy for me because I have some background in this already), but there were some technical issues especially regarding accessing assignments. It would be nice if there was a more robust group of volunteer tutors/teaching assistants or something to answer questions or deal with these technical issues, especially the final exam not working for a while for me and some other people. But, I enjoyed the illustrations (drawings) and cute examples, and also the lecturer did a pretty good job on camera. I would probably give this course a 4.5 if possible, but I am hesitant to give it a full 5 points because of the technical issues. Anyway I would recommend the course to someone who wants a survey of quantitative methods to prepare for future study. | 1) also the lecturer did a pretty | Good | 1) job on camera. I would probably | 4.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | great course. instructor used simple language, applied concepts and good examples. lecture slides are well prepared. | 1) used simple language, applied concepts and | Good | 1) examples. lecture slides are well prepared. | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I definitely learned a lot — I liked how there was a quiz and a brief written assignment every week. Good course! | 1) a brief written assignment every week. | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excelent, one of the most good teacher that i ever have. Recomended 100% | 1) Excelent, one of the most | Good | 1) teacher that i ever have. Recomended | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Really enriching course material and the method of explaining by Annemarie Zand Scholten. It gave me a good overview of the quantitative approach to contrast it with the qualitative approach i have been following at my workplace. The course material is very comprehensive and also the transcripts provided for each module. The detailed word to word transcripts really help to revise material while doing assignments and preparing for exams. The assignments really makes one think and helps to digest the course material in the process. The concepts and style of illustrations used in the video are also extremely helpful to understand the content heavy topic. The bonus video material provide the completeness due to the applied examples discussed in them. Overall a very satisfying learning experience! Great! | 1) Zand Scholten. It gave me a | Good | 1) overview of the quantitative approach to | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | A very good teacher and interesting and clear videos. Besides, the tasks have been demanding. | 1) A very | Good | 1) teacher and interesting and clear videos. | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Just three stars so far, I've just started the course late... I think it looks good tho. | 1) . . I think it looks | Good | 1) tho. | 3.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I really enjoyed this course. The concepts and expectations were clear, the quizzes had good explanations for the answers, and the illustrations really helped to make each of the topic areas more understandable. | 1) expectations were clear, the quizzes had | Good | 1) explanations for the answers, and the | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Excellent course!!! Very well explained, clear examples, good and rich content This is a MUST DO one!!! | 1) ! Very well explained, clear examples, | Good | 1) and rich content This is a | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | The actual educational value of this course is quite high. The score I can offer it in good faith is dragged down by the additional "assignments" like "Write you own quiz question!" and the expectation to review the quiz questions thought up by other students. Such things in a scientific course are unnecessary and may actually be counterproductive because of the reliance upon other students and their grasp of the material. If they are to remain part of this course, they really should be treated as supplementary and not required to complete the course. It really detracts from the experience for those of us who come here to learn and not to socialize. | 1) score I can offer it in | Good | 1) faith is dragged down by the | 3.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I learned much more in this course than other courses about quantitative methods. It is clear and useful and inspiring. The quizzes are very good, because they are not only about konwledge,but also about whether you can apply the knowledge. And the interviews are very good too, which give us more information in different subjiects, or from different perspectives. But I feel the speaker's speaking speed is a little fast, and I hope that there will be exercise or quizzes in which we are given situation,and asked to come up with RQ, methods, analysis, etc. | 1) and inspiring. The quizzes are very | Good | 1) because they are not only about | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I learned much more in this course than other courses about quantitative methods. It is clear and useful and inspiring. The quizzes are very good, because they are not only about konwledge,but also about whether you can apply the knowledge. And the interviews are very good too, which give us more information in different subjiects, or from different perspectives. But I feel the speaker's speaking speed is a little fast, and I hope that there will be exercise or quizzes in which we are given situation,and asked to come up with RQ, methods, analysis, etc. | 2) knowledge. And the interviews are very | Good | 2) too, which give us more information | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | I think this course is awesome. I recommend everybody to take it. Professor is excellent. Material is extremely useful. It doesn't matter your background you will find it very interesting. It will help you be a good researcher. | 1) It will help you be a | Good | 1) researcher. | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Clear video's with good examples. Good structure. | 1) Clear video's with | Good | 1) examples. Good structure. | 5.0 |
| rTTFFgb8EeWJMSIAC7Jl0w | Clear video's with good examples. Good structure. | 2) Clear video's with good examples. | Good | 2) structure. | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very nice , clear, precise, interesting and usefull. Very good speaker! | 1) clear, precise, interesting and usefull. Very | Good | 1) speaker! | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Although not as strong as the other palaeontology courses by the University of Alberta, the current courses takes much the same approach and uses the same teaching techniques as these other courses. As such, it easily and effectively gets the millions of years of early vertebrate evolution across clearly and concisely. The video lectures are both interactive and fun, and the course notes are both informative and well adjusted to the video lectures. If there is anything to be remarked upon, then it's the slight lack of depth as pertains to the material covered. This, however, is hardly surprising considering the highly complex material (drawing from fields as osteology, paleoecology, evolutionary and developmental biology, palaeontology and more), the speed at which it is discussed, and the level of accessibility that is provided. Overall, a very good course, and one I very much enjoyed following! | 1) that is provided. Overall, a very | Good | 1) course, and one I very much | 4.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | it is good for maths students who haven't studied biology and struggle with understanding palaeontology. vertebrates have been explained very well. | 1) it is | Good | 1) for maths students who haven't studied | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | WOW, I learned a lot form this and it was fairly educational but not overwhelming or difficult. This instructor really gets the points across without being to easy or hard. A very good class. | 1) to easy or hard. A very | Good | 1) class. | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | I think this was a great module wich gave a good insight into the early vertebrate evolution. I willl definatly reccomend it to any who is interessted in this topic. | 1) a great module wich gave a | Good | 1) insight into the early vertebrate evolution. | 5.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | i like this. this is good. good can be fun. fun has rewards...yay, i win | 1) i like this. this is | Good | 1) good can be fun. fun has | 4.0 |
| ru6DZ3Q6EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | i like this. this is good. good can be fun. fun has rewards...yay, i win | 2) i like this. this is good. | Good | 2) can be fun. fun has rewards. | 4.0 |
| RUyctXVFEeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Good course with details on certain topics. It will be better if we could have the slides presented for download for future reference. The amount of time the slides are show at times is insufficient to copy down all the notes. | 1) | Good | 1) course with details on certain topics. | 4.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course for understanding Programming!!! Daler | 1) | Good | 1) course for understanding Programming! ! ! | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good way of explaning all the process from web scraping/mining/crawling to final clean vizualtion,thanks a lot! | 1) | Good | 1) way of explaning all the process | 5.0 |
| rwRs6Tn9EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good professor, great course, great specialization! | 1) | Good | 1) professor, great course, great specialization! | 5.0 |
| Rwzrl_9rEeS9ISIACxWDhA | Lots of good parts to the course. Found the ODE examples very useful. Feel like it tailed off at the end in terms of detail and utility. Also, it seemed less adapted to the format than other courses such as Machine Learning by Andrew Ng and Computational Neuroscience by Rajesh Rao. | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) parts to the course. Found the | 3.0 |
| Rwzrl_9rEeS9ISIACxWDhA | Very informative course with good exercises. Would recommend having PDE example code, as well. | 1) Very informative course with | Good | 1) exercises. Would recommend having PDE example | 4.0 |
| Rwzrl_9rEeS9ISIACxWDhA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| s5sEkwAHEeW9ISIACxWDhA | This is an amazing course. I´m really happy. I had a really good time with the bibliography, the topics, and the teacher. ¡THAKS A LOT! | 1) really happy. I had a really | Good | 1) time with the bibliography, the topics, | 5.0 |
| s5sEkwAHEeW9ISIACxWDhA | Excellent course, the best context to read and understand very good writers and important ideas. Thank you. | 1) context to read and understand very | Good | 1) writers and important ideas. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| S8Vh0SypEeWGvAojQA48rw | this is a very good specialization course for entrepreneur to be. I recommend it to everyone | 1) this is a very | Good | 1) specialization course for entrepreneur to be. | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Interesting, informative and easy to understand. Good! | 1) Interesting, informative and easy to understand. | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | it is good | 1) it is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Highly Informative.... good detailing right from basic concepts... | 1) Highly Informative. . . . | Good | 1) detailing right from basic concepts. . | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Is so cool to me, the oportunity and is very terrific the explications... Very Good! | 1) terrific the explications. . . Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Really good material. Lectures are fun to watch and easy to follow. | 1) Really | Good | 1) material. Lectures are fun to watch | 4.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Good course on Infectious diseases; rather broad which includes social and belief perspectives. Good points are: the part on the "social networks" which enable the student in better understanding on the patterns of transmission; the part on agriculture and zoonosis and their impact on infections in humans. Parts where I expected a bit more: the part on the "dynamics", mostly on the SIR framework (I actually I choose to take this course hoping to get a deeper and practical understanding of this type of modeling). | 1) | Good | 1) course on Infectious diseases; rather broad | 3.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | Good course on Infectious diseases; rather broad which includes social and belief perspectives. Good points are: the part on the "social networks" which enable the student in better understanding on the patterns of transmission; the part on agriculture and zoonosis and their impact on infections in humans. Parts where I expected a bit more: the part on the "dynamics", mostly on the SIR framework (I actually I choose to take this course hoping to get a deeper and practical understanding of this type of modeling). | 2) which includes social and belief perspectives. | Good | 2) points are: the part on the | 3.0 |
| SAZf_ay2EeS5uiIACk-Zyg | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | very practical course, liked especially the tips about how to structure a good story, all the elements of a good story and usage of external sources like TED talk as an example | 1) tips about how to structure a | Good | 1) story, all the elements of a | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | very practical course, liked especially the tips about how to structure a good story, all the elements of a good story and usage of external sources like TED talk as an example | 2) story, all the elements of a | Good | 2) story and usage of external sources | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's a good course, with valuable information about Storytelling applied for Leadership in organizations. However, don't expect much depth in the classes. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, with valuable information about Storytelling | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Content is good, but exercises could be improved, should also add a few interactive quizzes (e.g. a quiz before the segment to ask what they think are the 3 - 4 factors of X,Y,Z; then a quiz at end to summarize). Also add sources. | 1) Content is | Good | 1) but exercises could be improved, should | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | the course is very good, but in comparison with the first course with dr Leigh Thompson, the instructor in a little bit monotonus, and the screenplay does not have any illustrations which is needed badly. otherwise the course is very good and informative and a big thanks to the instructor and his respected assistants | 1) the course is very | Good | 1) but in comparison with the first | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | the course is very good, but in comparison with the first course with dr Leigh Thompson, the instructor in a little bit monotonus, and the screenplay does not have any illustrations which is needed badly. otherwise the course is very good and informative and a big thanks to the instructor and his respected assistants | 2) badly. otherwise the course is very | Good | 2) and informative and a big thanks | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great information. Several months later I want a refresher since the material was very good, but I don't think the assignments were involved enough for the material to sink in long term (at least not for me). | 1) refresher since the material was very | Good | 1) but I don't think the assignments | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This was a good course although the assignment at the end left a lot of room for improvement. Instructions were not clear and as a result, most of the assignments I graded didn't meet the scoring matrix... | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course although the assignment at the | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course with a lot of great speakers. I would recommend this course to anyone wanting to broaden their leadership and communication abilities | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with a lot of great | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The course content was very good. However, I would have liked to see assignments for each | 1) The course content was very | Good | 1) However, I would have liked to | 4.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Interesting course! Very useful information. But it's a little difficult to manage 3 writing tasks simultaneously, it would be good to warn students about big task at the end of the course. | 1) writing tasks simultaneously, it would be | Good | 1) to warn students about big task | 5.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good, I missed a deepening of Storytelling elements | 1) Very | Good | 1) I missed a deepening of Storytelling | 3.0 |
| sCE0nT-OEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The first two weeks are focused on self growth, while the third is too focused on the company... I think it is a little bit incoherent. Anyway, it is a good course! | 1) bit incoherent. Anyway, it is a | Good | 1) course! | 3.0 |
| SGiLw7UgEeWbLRJn4j8c4Q | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course is very good. It would have been nice to have the slides hence four stars. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) It would have been nice to | 4.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Really good second SEO Course. Smoothly takes the learner in the deeper knowledge and the new set of skills for a true SEO knowledge. | 1) Really | Good | 1) second SEO Course. Smoothly takes the | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | The course materials are very good for anyone who wants to get into SEO. I only gave 4 stars because I personally dislike the quizzes. They don't focus on what's important but rather on small detail questions that don't really matter. Other than that it's a great course! Most of it you can find in books too but with videos & the community it's more fun to learn on Coursera. | 1) The course materials are very | Good | 1) for anyone who wants to get | 4.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | This course has good thematic. Your benefit is you can understand basis of SEO. | 1) This course has | Good | 1) thematic. Your benefit is you can | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | The teacher is very good, her explanations are always very clear and she is giving practical advice. She is also sharing a lot of her professional experience, very useful to get a better understanding of the field. | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) her explanations are always very clear | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | A very good cours! | 1) A very | Good | 1) cours! | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Ably length videos with good blog sites to read on. | 1) Ably length videos with | Good | 1) blog sites to read on. | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Challenging, thorough and engaging. Repetitive in a good way, by gently going back over content you almost learn by default. The quizzes are professionally prepared and sometimes tough to pass! This is good as you are obliged to think hard, even go back through materials or ask others for advice until the knowledge sticks. Highly recommended and of great practical value. | 1) thorough and engaging. Repetitive in a | Good | 1) way, by gently going back over | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Challenging, thorough and engaging. Repetitive in a good way, by gently going back over content you almost learn by default. The quizzes are professionally prepared and sometimes tough to pass! This is good as you are obliged to think hard, even go back through materials or ask others for advice until the knowledge sticks. Highly recommended and of great practical value. | 2) sometimes tough to pass! This is | Good | 2) as you are obliged to think | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course with all the in and outs. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with all the in and | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | 1) | Good | 1) content, but blocked quizes in free | 2.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | The material is interesting and new, on that part the instructor is doing a good job. What is really VERY annoying about this course is the fact that in case you have questions/problems relating anything of the course material and you (as said by the instructor) post them to the discussion forums, there is COMPLETELY NO REPLY neither from the instructor, nor from the Coursera. There were obvious mistakes in one of the quizzes and lots of students were posting and discussing this in the forums (as this was actually preventing students from passing the course), but there was no answer whatsoever. I find this very unprofessional, especially because of the fact that this was a paid course. I do not know (and I also do not care) who is responsible for this - Coursera or the instructors, but this is something that should not be present in any of the courses on Coursera. I liked the first course very much, but the mentioned part of the second course was so annoying that I really would not recommend taking this course to new students. Sorry. | 1) part the instructor is doing a | Good | 1) job. What is really VERY annoying | 1.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Good, but too slow at times considering it is just a high level view of basics. Distractingly weird hand gestures. | 1) | Good | 1) but too slow at times considering | 3.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good course. Awesome content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Awesome content. | 5.0 |
| SG_K6nEmEeWxvQr3acyajw | Very good content but it only gives a general view on each topic not going too deep on technical SEO and keyword research. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content but it only gives a | 5.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | The content and the assignment were of high quality and I really enjoyed the case I had to work on. So overal the course was very good, but negative was that the course was a bit too long, I understand Coursera needs to finance the course, so it is better to have a long one and earn a lot of subscription fees. Bu the extra review rounds felt redundant, and because the course was so long it was difficult to keep focussed on it. | 1) So overal the course was very | Good | 1) but negative was that the course | 4.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | I must say that the Capstone Project was a good assignment. The issue is that the Peer Reviews were bad. I had to resubmit my assignment due to a student that choose to give me 0's when the other reviewers gave me 5's. There was also a bias to what each reviewer thought the capstone should cover so you had no idea which direction to update your work because the next reviewer may feel that the type of analysis you did was not Necessary. The course needs a specific Rubric and specific methods each person has to use in order to complete the assignment. For example, Must Use the Four Forces Model when evaluating Strategy. This way everyone knows what to expect and what to look for. Otherwise you can get a low grade on a great project because a Classmate thought you should have used another model so he gave you a 1 or 0 when the model you used demonstrated your knowledge. Capstones need to be monitored either by a student or assistant to protect against trolls that don't read your work and give you the lowest score. Otherwise the Course was great and the information was definitely well put together. The Peer Reviews brought my overall grade lower because I didn't get the High Mark I should have. | 1) that the Capstone Project was a | Good | 1) assignment. The issue is that the | 2.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Thanks to Nicolai Pogrebnyakov and All Specialization Sectors. Good Course. If you want to have Practical Strategy Formulation and Implementation habits than Enroll !!! | 1) Nicolai Pogrebnyakov and All Specialization Sectors. | Good | 1) Course. If you want to have | 5.0 |
| sHs1AyWUEeWtRg6boA3D-Q | Very interesting topics for projects! And real executive from "Bombardier" has reviewed my work! It is good surprise. | 1) has reviewed my work! It is | Good | 1) surprise. | 5.0 |
| shV98lfdEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | I found the course very interesting but was rather skeptical at first as I have tried several different other courses on science writing before. This course has definitely made a difference. I thank the instructor and the team for such a good job. | 1) and the team for such a | Good | 1) job. | 5.0 |
| shV98lfdEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | It's good for undergraduates, and people returning to academia (say, before starting a Master's course). It's a very short simple introduction. I kind of wish it had more examples of language to use in academic writing, contrasting good and bad examples. Some of the quiz questions and final exam questions need some proofreading. The videos from about week 3 to 4 have poor sound quality, but still understandable. | 1) It's | Good | 1) for undergraduates, and people returning to | 3.0 |
| shV98lfdEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | It's good for undergraduates, and people returning to academia (say, before starting a Master's course). It's a very short simple introduction. I kind of wish it had more examples of language to use in academic writing, contrasting good and bad examples. Some of the quiz questions and final exam questions need some proofreading. The videos from about week 3 to 4 have poor sound quality, but still understandable. | 2) to use in academic writing, contrasting | Good | 2) and bad examples. Some of the | 3.0 |
| shV98lfdEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | During this course, I learned so many tips for writing a good research paper in English. | 1) so many tips for writing a | Good | 1) research paper in English. | 5.0 |
| SifJJ1fVEeWT8xIUiEQHHQ | Very good instructor. Engaging, clear, concise explanations. No mumbling. | 1) Very | Good | 1) instructor. Engaging, clear, concise explanations. No | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Excellent course with an equally good format | 1) Excellent course with an equally | Good | 1) format | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | That's very good course for training and sharing the useful idea with the varied s | 1) That's very | Good | 1) course for training and sharing the | 4.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | This is one of the best management/leadership courses I have ever taken. The material is very creative and helps increase our attention span. My favorite part is learning from the additional resource/links posted (TED talks, youtube links, etc). They are very interesting and I learnt so much in so little time. Keep up the good work. | 1) so little time. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Its very useful course. Useful in terms of our on personality development, development in terms of a company and to develop in terms of social good. | 1) to develop in terms of social | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | A very comprehensive Leadership development program. Course content is very relevant, detailed and updated. I personally had good learning from the program. Excellent instructors. | 1) detailed and updated. I personally had | Good | 1) learning from the program. Excellent instructors. | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | One of the best leadership courses I have participated in. Really good combination of theory and much emphasis on actual how to do and real world scenarios. Great course! If you are tired of the normal theory bla bla this is really a course for you. You learn a lot and then you get to follow Jim Barton on his journey from a bean counter to a CEO of a manufacturing company. | 1) courses I have participated in. Really | Good | 1) combination of theory and much emphasis | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Very good course. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thank you. | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | Really good course, high quality! I can recommend this one to anyone wanting to have some more stuff on their bread :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, high quality! I can recommend | 5.0 |
| sK74dCWgEeW8-A6tkjXxWQ | It is an excellent course. Mix of reading, watching, reflection on material makes learning easy and efficient. And Jim Barton's story is a good case-study for analyses of all aspects of leadership. Many thanks for instructors, it's a great job! | 1) And Jim Barton's story is a | Good | 1) case-study for analyses of all aspects | 5.0 |
| SKOeUY7CEeW2aQ7olstw0Q | its a good course but have some problems in the quizzes | 1) its a | Good | 1) course but have some problems in | 3.0 |
| SN5tm_tBEeScRyIAC3-PxA | An exceptional class that covers a very complex topic in a digestible and usable way. It's a good balance between concept and application. | 1) digestible and usable way. It's a | Good | 1) balance between concept and application. | 5.0 |
| sNx-mzaXEeWa2g6sjqf03Q | It had been an amazing experience to be the part of this CAPSTONE project. It is not a meager learning experience but a practical experience of applying whatever has been learned. Keep the good work going. | 1) whatever has been learned. Keep the | Good | 1) work going. | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It is best to have a strong statistical background before taking this course. Lots of statistical calculations and procedures. If you don't have a strong background in statistics , there is a good chance you will get lost at some point in the course. There is no questions that the instructor of this course is an accomplished mathematician, I just found it hard to follow his lectures as he got deeper into various statistical aspects of the course. | 1) in statistics , there is a | Good | 1) chance you will get lost at | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course isn't for the faint hearted, you need a decent background in statistics, intermediate mathematics and good grounding in excel. All of these are covered well in the course but there's a lot to take in and I can imagine it being quite tough for those not so familiar. That said, the topics, examples and tools provided are exactly those required to build a good foundation in Business Analytics and I imagine, Data Science. Prof. Egger as always, delivers the course with great aplomb and shares his considerable knowledge in a wise but unassuming manner. Highly recommended. | 1) background in statistics, intermediate mathematics and | Good | 1) grounding in excel. All of these | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course isn't for the faint hearted, you need a decent background in statistics, intermediate mathematics and good grounding in excel. All of these are covered well in the course but there's a lot to take in and I can imagine it being quite tough for those not so familiar. That said, the topics, examples and tools provided are exactly those required to build a good foundation in Business Analytics and I imagine, Data Science. Prof. Egger as always, delivers the course with great aplomb and shares his considerable knowledge in a wise but unassuming manner. Highly recommended. | 2) exactly those required to build a | Good | 2) foundation in Business Analytics and I | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Not so good. The course explains mathematical models and Excel applications but both are not detailed. There are many mistakes in PPTs and assignments. | 1) Not so | Good | 1) The course explains mathematical models and | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good Presentation | 1) | Good | 1) Presentation | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | It's more statistics than Excel itself, wich is good but I think the name doesn't fit to it | 1) statistics than Excel itself, wich is | Good | 1) but I think the name doesn't | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Well, it'll be good if you set the expectation that you're learning information theory and binary classification in this course, with Excel being the tool by which you use to learn those concepts. However, do not expect this course to be entirely about Excel, it is not. With the right expectation, this is a great course! | 1) Well, it'll be | Good | 1) if you set the expectation that | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very important course if you want to know more about data analysis. Fascinating materials (Markowitz optimisation, linear regression, information gain, binary classification...) with both theoretical and practical aspects! In spite the fact you won't learn much about VBA skills, this course will definitely give you a very good basis for addressing any data analysis problem with Excel. | 1) will definitely give you a very | Good | 1) basis for addressing any data analysis | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | so far, so good | 1) so far, so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good - step by step and clear. | 1) very | Good | 1) - step by step and clear. | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The Course is fine, explanations and videos are a bit hard to follow at times. The final assessment is in my opinion very bad, as it i appears to me quite unrelated to the course it self. The lectures are quite abstract and the exam is a practical application of the concept. The instructions of the course also aren't very good as you need to do each part of the final project at the end of each week. I would strongly suggest to not take this course unless you have many spare hours. | 1) of the course also aren't very | Good | 1) as you need to do each | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course. Wish it was more hands on working with excel. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Wish it was more hands | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content but badly structured | 1) | Good | 1) content but badly structured | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The attendants might already have a good foundation of econometric and probability statistics before taking this course. Some definitions might be difficult to understand especially how it would be applied in real life. | 1) The attendants might already have a | Good | 1) foundation of econometric and probability statistics | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | this course is definitely NOT for beginners. you MUST have intermediate to advanced knowledge of statistics and math. I had to resort to google and khan academy extensively just to grasp the concepts in this course. This course also does not teach you everything about excel, let alone master it. you just refer to pre made excel sheets for quizzes. thats it. Good luck figuring those out. | 1) excel sheets for quizzes. thats it. | Good | 1) luck figuring those out. | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This is my first Coursera course and I wasn't sure what to expect. I was hoping for a good experience but preparing myself for mediocrity. I finished the course at 2am on Monday morning and I've been really impressed, both with the Coursera "infrastructure" and with the quality of the teaching from Daniel Egger and his team. I live in South Africa where tertiary educational standards vary widely, and appear to be on the decline. More and more, we are going to need MOOCs like this from the best universities in the world. More specifically, relating to this course, I found the video lectures well presented and the quizzes thoughtfully prepared. The Excel models really helped with grasping the concepts and practice. A couple of suggestions: a) The course FAQ makes light of the background knowledge necessary to cope with the course. It needs to be more honest about the need for mathematics and statistics. Linear regression is not for sissies, in my opinion. b) Please tell us at the START of the course that we should attack the project week by week. This advice isn't (unless I missed something) given until you open the week 6 project. Ahem... it's too late by then! I spent a very frantic 4 nights last week crunching the project work, 4 quizzes and the assignment. I got to bed at 2.30am, and i'm not a night owl. Overwhelmingly though, a really interesting course. I'm already starting the next one. | 1) expect. I was hoping for a | Good | 1) experience but preparing myself for mediocrity. | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The content of the course was good. However, I did not like the presentation of the material, moreover such a topic would need to be covered by a longer duration course. | 1) The content of the course was | Good | 1) However, I did not like the | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I really enjoyed the course. Professor was very good at explaining everything. And the team was very helpful. And this course is definitely for people who already has a good backround in exel and working with data. | 1) enjoyed the course. Professor was very | Good | 1) at explaining everything. And the team | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I really enjoyed the course. Professor was very good at explaining everything. And the team was very helpful. And this course is definitely for people who already has a good backround in exel and working with data. | 2) for people who already has a | Good | 2) backround in exel and working with | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I expected far more handy real life Excel examples, not to see a teacher speaking and writing stat formulas for hours. The idea of this course is very good, it has some room for improvement. | 1) idea of this course is very | Good | 1) it has some room for improvement. | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good Courses! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Courses! | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Really good course, I think the most value is at the end when you are able to apply the concept learned in the final assignment | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, I think the most value | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very helpful course. Intense concepts covered and good examples to master them. Thanks! | 1) helpful course. Intense concepts covered and | Good | 1) examples to master them. Thanks! | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | So far so good!! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good is increible this course for practice | 1) very | Good | 1) is increible this course for practice | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good, but no material and lack of structure | 1) | Good | 1) but no material and lack of | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Lots of good information. However, this course could be structured a lit bit better. More examples and small practice exercises within the lectures would significantly improve the retention of material. You should posses at least basic knowledge of statistics. | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) information. However, this course could be | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I would like to have more example, it feels there is mostly theory. The quizzes were super easy, I dropped out at final project, I couldn't get through the first questions. The course (and especially the final project) requires a good basis in statistics beforehand. The assistants are super helpful and patient. | 1) especially the final project) requires a | Good | 1) basis in statistics beforehand. The assistants | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course was somewhat challenging and having no experience in this at all it really paid off to learn about models. It would do me good to take a statistics course and i plan on doing so this upcoming semester, to maximize my benefits from a course like this. | 1) about models. It would do me | Good | 1) to take a statistics course and | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course requires good knowledge of statistics as a pre-requisite. | 1) The course requires | Good | 1) knowledge of statistics as a pre-requisite. | 1.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good course to enhance Excel Analysis | 1) | Good | 1) course to enhance Excel Analysis | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content and practical examples. | 1) | Good | 1) content and practical examples. | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is good, but I feel it's too difficult. It would be good to suggest 'optional' prerequisite course if there is any. Thanks Dr. Egger. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) but I feel it's too difficult. | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is good, but I feel it's too difficult. It would be good to suggest 'optional' prerequisite course if there is any. Thanks Dr. Egger. | 2) it's too difficult. It would be | Good | 2) to suggest 'optional' prerequisite course if | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good but the final project could have been setup up with better instructions. | 1) | Good | 1) but the final project could have | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent and reasonably challenging course. One of the courses that would be extremely hard without a solid foundation in maths. The final project is massive and time-consuming - I didn't see it coming and was surprised, not in a good way ;) You better start working on the final assignment since the beginning of the course. | 1) and was surprised, not in a | Good | 1) way ;) You better start working | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course for all | 1) | Good | 1) course for all | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good content, some materials were difficult but the video lecture were rushed. | 1) | Good | 1) content, some materials were difficult but | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | The course is more on analysis techniques as opposed to Excel shortcuts, tips and tricks. It certainly helps if you have a good background in algebra-level math; if you're looking for a course on how to be an Excel Power User, this might not be the best fit. Otherwise, what I learned here is useful for me. Thanks! | 1) certainly helps if you have a | Good | 1) background in algebra-level math; if you're | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good teachers/instructors. | 1) Very | Good | 1) teachers/instructors. | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Course contents are rather deep which is good and makes it challenging. Explanations could be better and there should be more content on some topics for better understanding. Someone with background in statistics would find this course more useful than on who only has basic knowledge of statistics. Nevertheless, it inspired me to learn from other sources to fill the gaps in my understanding. | 1) contents are rather deep which is | Good | 1) and makes it challenging. Explanations could | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | I learnt a lot from this course. The first week seemed very straight forward and I was worried the course was a bit too rudimentary. From there it stepped up four or five gears and I had to work hard to reinforce the concepts and apply the concepts. A really great course for any analyst or anyone seeking the true insight in data. The discussion board is a wealth of knowledge and a good read with tutors posting very plain english easier to understand answers to questions. | 1) a wealth of knowledge and a | Good | 1) read with tutors posting very plain | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Excellent course. Focusses mainly on data analysis in Excel rather that teaching you all excel function. A good way to learn both. I recommend anyone interested in data analysis to take this course. The exercises are challenging to answer. It's fun solving them | 1) teaching you all excel function. A | Good | 1) way to learn both. I recommend | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good! Useful for both new learners and expertise. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Useful for both new learners and | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | very good training. | 1) very | Good | 1) training. | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Entering this course with a pretty in-depth knowledge of Excel, it was good to be able to brush up on some things I don't use on a day-to-day basis such as VLOOKUP and STANDARDIZE functions. The subject material is quite good, AOC and Binary Classifications were very interesting to learn about and have tons of applications, particularly in operation optimization problems/cases. One point of suggestion would be to double-check and clean up the accompanying Excel files. Some of the material was confusing to follow along with. If you could define cells, arrays, and tables for instance it would make the material much more intuitive to follow-along with. | 1) in-depth knowledge of Excel, it was | Good | 1) to be able to brush up | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Entering this course with a pretty in-depth knowledge of Excel, it was good to be able to brush up on some things I don't use on a day-to-day basis such as VLOOKUP and STANDARDIZE functions. The subject material is quite good, AOC and Binary Classifications were very interesting to learn about and have tons of applications, particularly in operation optimization problems/cases. One point of suggestion would be to double-check and clean up the accompanying Excel files. Some of the material was confusing to follow along with. If you could define cells, arrays, and tables for instance it would make the material much more intuitive to follow-along with. | 2) functions. The subject material is quite | Good | 2) AOC and Binary Classifications were very | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | They have a lot of good material. It will probably be better the second time around. | 1) They have a lot of | Good | 1) material. It will probably be better | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good those who want make their career in business analytic field | 1) Very | Good | 1) those who want make their career | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course, great professor and great TA in community discussion. Can't give 5 stars as course introduction and content are not really matching. As per introduction anybody can take and learn this course, but indeed it is far from reality. If you don't have good math and statistic background then you better learn them first... I personally learnt a lot from this course even though could not get the certificate. Thanks everyone. | 1) from reality. If you don't have | Good | 1) math and statistic background then you | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | good course for combining stats and excel, but it is difficult for new learners with no knowledges on stats at all | 1) | Good | 1) course for combining stats and excel, | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good intro and fundamentals, but focuses far too much on finance. | 1) | Good | 1) intro and fundamentals, but focuses far | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course. Loved Daniel's teaching. I have a request to make coming from healthcare/ lifesciences background and a starter to analytics it would be very very helpful if Daniel can include basic/ elementary videos on probability and statistics/ Bio-Statistics in this course to enable us to go deeper. Else a separate course on BioStatistics and probability would be WOW. Looking forward for more courses from Daniel. Thanks, Swetha | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Loved Daniel's teaching. I have | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is very good! The inconvenient is the lack of exercices, however, the explanation are clear and relevant; we go to the basics. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) The inconvenient is the lack of | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Really interesting course and material and a very good instructor. This would be a 5 stars course if it wasn't for the final project. During lessons some concepts of statistics were taken as known (which is okay). However the final project required to utilize a combination of all new learned material on a whole different level of difficulty compared to the preceding quizzes. I did not expect that jump in difficulty and enjoyed the course a lot but the final project just was a struggle. | 1) course and material and a very | Good | 1) instructor. This would be a 5 | 3.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good topic and resources to learn. However the business terminologies sometimes are confusing. | 1) | Good | 1) topic and resources to learn. However | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great course! Excellent videos and good exercises. | 1) Great course! Excellent videos and | Good | 1) exercises. | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | So many equations presented without explaining why these things work or how they are derived. I'm having a hard time seeing the relevance. Also, I learned a lot of these statistics in college and the explanations provided in these lessons actually confused me about things I already know. Very disappointed in this course. Especially since part 1 of the specialization was so good. | 1) 1 of the specialization was so | Good | 1) | 2.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | GREAT ClASS!!!....The instructor is very good at explaining difficult topics the spreadsheets are very clear and comprehensive really enjoying this class | 1) . . The instructor is very | Good | 1) at explaining difficult topics the spreadsheets | 5.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | A very good COURSE....i was looking it sinc a long time thank you COURSERA | 1) A very | Good | 1) COURSE. . . . i was | 4.0 |
| SpO4HBnoEeWjrA6seF25aw | Exceptionally good. great experience. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) great experience. | 4.0 |
| SpWNUyTfEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | very good muito bom | 1) very | Good | 1) muito bom | 5.0 |
| SpWNUyTfEeWxbhIkPfddLQ | Very easy and good explanations | 1) Very easy and | Good | 1) explanations | 5.0 |
| SPXfEJz9EeWILQ7D3uPEMw | Concepts are well explained with very good examples.Also doing it in excel makes it easier. Thanks!Great course for beginners | 1) Concepts are well explained with very | Good | 1) examples. Also doing it in excel | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Great course. A good review of material I learned back in University a couple of year ago. | 1) Great course. A | Good | 1) review of material I learned back | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Really good. Worth the time invested double. | 1) Really | Good | 1) Worth the time invested double. | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Good video classes, good written/complementary material. | 1) | Good | 1) video classes, good written/complementary material. | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Good video classes, good written/complementary material. | 2) Good video classes, | Good | 2) written/complementary material. | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | I learned a lot about statistics without doing any maths :) The course is a good introduction to stats and I feel more confident reading clinical researchs papers now | 1) maths :) The course is a | Good | 1) introduction to stats and I feel | 5.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | It's a good course if you want a general overview of the statistics of clinical research. Personally I was hoping for a little more depth in some of the statistical methods. Some links or suggested readings on the methods would be great as we move along the course. Overall a delightful course. Everything is clearly explained. Thank you Dr. Koppler! | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course if you want a general | 4.0 |
| sQB40x47EeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Great course-really helps to gain insight into all the statistical info when reading the literature. This course has been particularly good in terms of understanding study results and how I can apply research findings to my clinical practice. | 1) literature. This course has been particularly | Good | 1) in terms of understanding study results | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Good course, interesting theory, opens up a new thinking process for planning classes. The dual purpose classes, i.e. content plus the development of some of those characters strengths discussed in the course will certainly be much more problematic than presented; also the evaluation of character strengths will certainly be problematic for some time to come, but the course is till worth taking. | 1) | Good | 1) course, interesting theory, opens up a | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | It is very good | 1) It is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Loved it. Some good practical things to implement in the class. | 1) Loved it. Some | Good | 1) practical things to implement in the | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | It is a very good course. Enjoying myself and learning a lot many new things! | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course. Enjoying myself and learning a | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | very good so far. | 1) very | Good | 1) so far. | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Very good course, easy to attend and informative. I learned new things in a pleasant way. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, easy to attend and informative. | 4.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | Fun, down-to-earth, with great interviews with awesome researchers! Levin is energetic and he gives very good advice that really help you practice the content in the course. | 1) is energetic and he gives very | Good | 1) advice that really help you practice | 5.0 |
| SrM6V-3pEeSJZSIAC0gHUg | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | Very good class - many examples brought in to the lectures and exercises help with comprehension. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class - many examples brought in | 5.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | It was a nice and informative experience. It was a good introductory to basic concepts and skills which base the way for further reading on the subject. | 1) and informative experience. It was a | Good | 1) introductory to basic concepts and skills | 4.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | A course with a good concept | 1) A course with a | Good | 1) concept | 5.0 |
| svzDI2FSEeW6DxKCi866Kw | While focused on the subject of public health systems, this course is also a good experience for anybody who is simply interested in the benefits of systems thinking and the applications of causal models. While there are a few hiccups in the course content (a couple files not available as of Mar 2016), the overall experience here is excellent. The instructors break down each topic into understandable elements and provide excellent real world examples. Overall, I greatly enjoyed this course and recommend it to others. | 1) systems, this course is also a | Good | 1) experience for anybody who is simply | 4.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | A good introductory course to historical fiction and the mechanics of writing it. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course to historical fiction and | 4.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | Very informative. Kept my attention throughout the lectures. And at my little UVA, too. Loved most all of it. Keep up the good work. | 1) all of it. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | Amazing teacher, great course, good balance and variety of books. I hope there's a Part 2, I'd do that in a heartbeat! | 1) Amazing teacher, great course, | Good | 1) balance and variety of books. I | 5.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | A very interesting course. Only negative thing is that some of the authors are not very good at leading a lecture, and seem to stumble in their words a lot. | 1) of the authors are not very | Good | 1) at leading a lecture, and seem | 4.0 |
| SxjkGailEeSy_SIAC49HnA | I really enjoyed this course. It was my first one in Coursera and it was very helpful to do it at my own pace. I found very useful advice regarding sources and research strategies. The seminars were very good and also the conversations. The sound could be improved but having subtitles helps to overcome the technical issues. Thank you. | 1) research strategies. The seminars were very | Good | 1) and also the conversations. The sound | 4.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | I really love the way how they prepare this course. Thank you so much. Good job! | 1) this course. Thank you so much. | Good | 1) job! | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Good overview of evolution. I appreciated the videos discussing how to best teach evolution in the classroom. The instructors assume you have some science knowledge, so if you do not, you may find some vocabulary and topics are not explained as well as they should be. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of evolution. I appreciated the | 4.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | This course served as a very good introduction to evolution. | 1) This course served as a very | Good | 1) introduction to evolution. | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | This was a fun & educational course, designed for folks with not much biology or evolution background. A few of the lectures explained things poorly -- I would have been confused if I didn't have a lot of background knowledge. Overall, a good experience. | 1) lot of background knowledge. Overall, a | Good | 1) experience. | 4.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Very good overview of Evolution. Thank you to both instructors | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of Evolution. Thank you to | 5.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | Basic, but good. | 1) Basic, but | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| sxMQEV4hEeSF2SIACy-E9A | A good course for students who want to know about the evolution of life | 1) A | Good | 1) course for students who want to | 5.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | The instructions are very good, and it's nice to work on real big data. Also it is very helpful for hearing information about how a data scientist should consider problems carefully. Without taking the class, it wouldn't be easy for me to rationalize for example cost and sensitivity issues. However I took out one star because of the instruction for the final assignment being out of date. Although the task it self is not too hard to figure out. The initial instruction on how to start using AWS was outdated. | 1) The instructions are very | Good | 1) and it's nice to work on | 4.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Very good exercise to pick up PIG and AWS environment. It is best to pick up jupyter notebook prior to taking this class for the first exercise. I like how David has been able to present so much content in a 3 weeks lesson. | 1) Very | Good | 1) exercise to pick up PIG and | 5.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | Nice lectures with lot of good information. AWC setup instruction need to update according new AWC interface. | 1) Nice lectures with lot of | Good | 1) information. AWC setup instruction need to | 3.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | First professor was incredibly good at giving an overview over design choices in data visualizations. Second professor sadly somehow spoke too fast and had less of a red thread through his presentations. The first and second week of courses were good, the third week however was too hypothetical and one-sided. | 1) First professor was incredibly | Good | 1) at giving an overview over design | 4.0 |
| sxQd3zI6EeWtEArDRuZAUQ | First professor was incredibly good at giving an overview over design choices in data visualizations. Second professor sadly somehow spoke too fast and had less of a red thread through his presentations. The first and second week of courses were good, the third week however was too hypothetical and one-sided. | 2) and second week of courses were | Good | 2) the third week however was too | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Good course but I hope if there are readings after each video to improve the understanding of information with more simplifying the content of ethics lesson. | 1) | Good | 1) course but I hope if there | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | Basically good. As I want to know the practical guidance of how to conduct a RCT, this course is not sufficient . | 1) Basically | Good | 1) As I want to know the | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | a very good introduction to clinical trail | 1) a very | Good | 1) introduction to clinical trail | 4.0 |
| SzQW47gfEeW2iwpbOuagWQ | A rare course in clinical trials, and also a good one. Strongly recommend for those interested in clinical research! There's a reason why Bloomberg school of public health is one of the best healthcare research institution in the world. It is very fortunate to learn from such expertise in clinical research through this course. | 1) in clinical trials, and also a | Good | 1) one. Strongly recommend for those interested | 5.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Very good practice to get deep know about your future target market. | 1) Very | Good | 1) practice to get deep know about | 5.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Using MOOC 2, I was really hoping we would go more in depth on (free) tools like Google Analytics. I would have liked information on how to better utilize the information I get from Twitter, Pinterest, and Facebook's built in analytics tools as well. I know I'm under-utilizing them at present, and there's good stuff there. In spite of claims to the contrary, the Lexalytics and IBM Bluemix videos did feel like extended infomercials. Moreover, I work for a small non-profit, and we have neither the funds or bandwidth to utilize programs like this. I think the time could have been better used doing a deeper dive with Klout and SocialMention. I'm working on the assignment now and feel like we barely scraped the surface with both of these programs. There are just too many tools being introduced in this MOOC, and not enough practical learning. Tools are fantastic, but it's important to be utilizing them properly, otherwise I end up feeling like I'm wasting time. | 1) under-utilizing them at present, and there's | Good | 1) stuff there. In spite of claims | 2.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Wow! I feel like a whole new world has opened up to me. This specialization is more fun than work! The discovery and new tools are amazing! I can't say enough good about all of the courses in this specialization! | 1) are amazing! I can't say enough | Good | 1) about all of the courses in | 5.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | I liked this course, but there is room for improvement. For the assignment where you list keywords and hashtags associated with your target audience using Social Mention, the keyword results are only as good as the search term you use. And there was not much guidance on how to determine that search term. For instance, my target market is comprised of sales and marketing managers in corporate and creative environments. What should I search for to find out what they are talking about? I truly don't know. I took a guess and completed the assignment, but it would be helpful to understand the strategy for using social mention successfully. Secondly, the IBM Blue Mix section did not work. I signed up (using my Coursera email) but never received a confirmation email. I checked my spam folder. I created a support ticket through IBM and received support emails, but never got the confirmation email. They re-sent it several times but it never came through. Viewing the discussions, I was not the only one this happened to. And I had stopped watching the videos because I thought I needed that access to finish the course. Getting that straightened out would be a huge improvement. | 1) the keyword results are only as | Good | 1) as the search term you use. | 3.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | I found it was very interesting, for sure, but maybe too focused some times. Also, it seems good for listening to twitter, for example, but not other social medias that could be much more interesting in different situations. | 1) focused some times. Also, it seems | Good | 1) for listening to twitter, for example, | 3.0 |
| t1gZRTXyEeW6RApRXdjJPw | Much harder than MOOC 1, but I think I learned a little more, too, combined with the MOOC 1 experience. Good stuff! | 1) combined with the MOOC 1 experience. | Good | 1) stuff! | 5.0 |
| t2hchZe2EeWjfxIrc5BW9Q | It's a good start for beginners, but I also found it useful for refresh my knowledge about this theme. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) start for beginners, but I also | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Very good and challenging! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and challenging! | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Sometimes, when I worked the spreadsheets out, the data differed from that on the examples. The items in the course were good and built up well. Some more details would have been nice. The instructor went over some spreadsheet steps quite fast. | 1) The items in the course were | Good | 1) and built up well. Some more | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good course. Not excellent, but useful nonetheless! | 1) | Good | 1) course. Not excellent, but useful nonetheless! | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Some of the explanations are not clear, and the knowledge net is not clear as previous chapter. But it is still good for me overall! | 1) previous chapter. But it is still | Good | 1) for me overall! | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Pros: Very good information and methods for running real life business models. The course provided the spreadsheet modules which allowed you to tinker around and learn them. I consider myself a power Excel user and I picked up some very good new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: I did Week 2 on my lunch break. Some questions on the quizzes were a bit vague. Probably need some working knowledge of Excel before taking this class. If you need to complete a lot of modeling with your job, this is a good course to pick up some skills. | 1) Pros: Very | Good | 1) information and methods for running real | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Pros: Very good information and methods for running real life business models. The course provided the spreadsheet modules which allowed you to tinker around and learn them. I consider myself a power Excel user and I picked up some very good new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: I did Week 2 on my lunch break. Some questions on the quizzes were a bit vague. Probably need some working knowledge of Excel before taking this class. If you need to complete a lot of modeling with your job, this is a good course to pick up some skills. | 2) and I picked up some very | Good | 2) new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Pros: Very good information and methods for running real life business models. The course provided the spreadsheet modules which allowed you to tinker around and learn them. I consider myself a power Excel user and I picked up some very good new modeling methods. Very concise. Cons: I did Week 2 on my lunch break. Some questions on the quizzes were a bit vague. Probably need some working knowledge of Excel before taking this class. If you need to complete a lot of modeling with your job, this is a good course to pick up some skills. | 3) with your job, this is a | Good | 3) course to pick up some skills. | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | It's a good course, with quite a bit for a newbie to learn. Would have appreciated more in-depth examples in the lectures though, as I often found a gap in the lectures and the questions asked in the quiz. Even otherwise, good stuff. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, with quite a bit for | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | It's a good course, with quite a bit for a newbie to learn. Would have appreciated more in-depth examples in the lectures though, as I often found a gap in the lectures and the questions asked in the quiz. Even otherwise, good stuff. | 2) asked in the quiz. Even otherwise, | Good | 2) stuff. | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | The lecture was quite good but some questions of the quiz made me confused, maybe it can be written in a different expression. | 1) The lecture was quite | Good | 1) but some questions of the quiz | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good introduction | 1) | Good | 1) introduction | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Exercises should be better designed and I think that first week of this course and the whole previous one are too basic. They could be assumed for 99% of people and I think it would be a good idea to create an optional preparation module containing them. That would save time and perhaps open opportunities for more advanced material to be included. | 1) I think it would be a | Good | 1) idea to create an optional preparation | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | It was a good course. The quizzes should be corrected since some questions are ambiguous. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course. The quizzes should be corrected | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Great introductory course for the subject. There were some parts, especially at the start of this course, in which the subject matters were being explained too simplistically and very quickly - not a good combination to maximize ones efforts. | 1) and very quickly - not a | Good | 1) combination to maximize ones efforts. | 4.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Overall the course was good, but the quiz assignments need work. When entering formula's there should be more clarity. Formula's can be entered in many ways and even when right were often counted as wrong. | 1) Overall the course was | Good | 1) but the quiz assignments need work. | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Very basic, but that's the point. A good review of the capabilities of spreadsheets for simulating scenarios with a probabilistic mindset. | 1) basic, but that's the point. A | Good | 1) review of the capabilities of spreadsheets | 5.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This course was very average to me. Compared to the first course in the specialization, Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling, which was absolutely great. What I liked: Good info on the tools in excel that are needed. What I didn't like: Time spent on content that necessarily wasn't regarding models; the critical material was buried in videos and was very brief. More time should have been spent. Additionally the quiz questions were subjective at times based on what was said on video and the formula answers weren't correctly graded in many cases. This course could have been much better, maybe I was just spoiled by the first course. | 1) was absolutely great. What I liked: | Good | 1) info on the tools in excel | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | This course needs a total overhaul; in its current state it is a detriment to both Coursera and the Wharton Online brand. First, there was relatively little content; there was less than an hour of lectures each week and no actual programming involved. Second, the material was pitched at a very basic level, but not in a good way. Third, the tests didn't manage to even test the material being covered. For example, when given a mean and stdev, when asked to find a value, often the lecture would use an approximation ( i.e., a 2-tailed 95% distributed = 2.00 std devs. ) This is a class on excel: there is NO excuse for not introducing norm.s.inv and norm.s.dist when asking that question. When the test required the "approximation" rather than the exact calculation? Everything about this course was wrong, it needs to be scrapped and thrown away. | 1) basic level, but not in a | Good | 1) way. Third, the tests didn't manage | 1.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | Good course overall | 1) | Good | 1) course overall | 3.0 |
| tAfppJ3KEeWoKRLkmmHLTQ | A separate class for spreadsheets and modeling isn't bad perse. The best way to teach these models is to integrate them during finance or accounting, or whatever specific class you are trying to learn. That said this is probably a good resource for someone with 0 and I mean absolutely NO experience with excel. However my gut feeling also tells me that those who have had 0 experience with excel will not be able to follow the models shown in this class. | 1) That said this is probably a | Good | 1) resource for someone with 0 and | 3.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | This is a great course, and your created material can go towards a good developmental and presentation portfolio. | 1) created material can go towards a | Good | 1) developmental and presentation portfolio. | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | a good way to begin to express our ideas | 1) a | Good | 1) way to begin to express our | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | Good course, especially since you have the option to take it for free. Nice assignments that gets you to think outside the box or challenge. Recommend it if you wanna keep yourself busy and learn. | 1) | Good | 1) course, especially since you have the | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | I've known a lot of new things and they make me become a better designer and think more about what is a good design. | 1) think more about what is a | Good | 1) design. | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | The good best practice and insight in the topic was greate | 1) The | Good | 1) best practice and insight in the | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | really good | 1) really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | This course was great, like other courses from this series. But this one was especially hard for me because it requires a lot of drawing, something I'm not so good at. But anyway, great course, recommended! | 1) of drawing, something I'm not so | Good | 1) at. But anyway, great course, recommended! | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | I would have liked to get input on my work by an instructor instead of just other students, but it was a good exercise to hone my skills. I wouldn't pay for credit because I feel like my work isn't being professionally graded. | 1) other students, but it was a | Good | 1) exercise to hone my skills. I | 4.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | Really good course, must be done with the rest of the specialization. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, must be done with the | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | A very good experience, but if it could've helped me to find a job it would have been even better. | 1) A very | Good | 1) experience, but if it could've helped | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | This is one of my favorite courses since it encourages creativity and really contributes to good game design practices. | 1) encourages creativity and really contributes to | Good | 1) game design practices. | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | One of the best courses I've ever taken on-line. Good explanations and artist's examples, and the assignments were awesome. Thanks! | 1) best courses I've ever taken on-line. | Good | 1) explanations and artist's examples, and the | 5.0 |
| tCC8OzJzEeWLGgqjU3pHlw | I believe that exaggerated the amount of minutes per video and lack of theory, but it was still a good course. | 1) theory, but it was still a | Good | 1) course. | 3.0 |
| TCmaO25NEeWdfRLY06XVmw | good course, writing an interpreter in racket was fun | 1) | Good | 1) course, writing an interpreter in racket | 5.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | The videos did not seem very interactive. The teacher just read the slides. Good as an introduction, but not very hand-on course. | 1) The teacher just read the slides. | Good | 1) as an introduction, but not very | 3.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | simple and good guide to theoretical knowledge about user experience | 1) simple and | Good | 1) guide to theoretical knowledge about user | 5.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | Very useful course that gave a nice insight into the broad area of UX. Very good starting point for further studies. | 1) the broad area of UX. Very | Good | 1) starting point for further studies. | 5.0 |
| TcSA6RwWEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | The course is good. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TEfLGl5WEeW5iQpSR8Sfhw | This course could have delved in more depth in the respective subject. What was presented was good but I felt that more could have been presented. | 1) respective subject. What was presented was | Good | 1) but I felt that more could | 3.0 |
| teQEkL-gEeWw3xJ2buBW3w | Well-balanced approach to basic synthesizer patches, along with a good portion of composition and arrangement. Highly recommended. | 1) basic synthesizer patches, along with a | Good | 1) portion of composition and arrangement. Highly | 4.0 |
| teQEkL-gEeWw3xJ2buBW3w | Good background course for learning the basics of electronic synthesis using oscillators, filters and envelopes. | 1) | Good | 1) background course for learning the basics | 5.0 |
| teQEkL-gEeWw3xJ2buBW3w | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| teQEkL-gEeWw3xJ2buBW3w | The right Step towards building basics after introduction to Synths. Some very good inputs like Manual control of the Filter cutoff etc.... Overall Extremely informative. | 1) after introduction to Synths. Some very | Good | 1) inputs like Manual control of the | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I came into this class with already quite a bit of self-taught experience with Pro Tools. I think this course provided an excellent foundation with the software. It covered the full arc of getting started, learning the fundamentals, and then concluding with a final project that incapsulated many different skills and functionalities in order to present a final production of a song. You have to put in the work but if you follow through on the instructions carefully, I think you'll be rewarded. Chrissy is a compelling and adept explainer of things and she also peppers in some good fun and humor along the way. It's clear that she's very knowledgeable and navigates through Pro Tools with ease (keyboard short cuts are vital). My main goal here was to make my workflow much more organized, smooth, and structured while also becoming much more confident in my mixing abilities. Chrissy explains in very simple and clear terms how to accomplish these tasks which left me feeling satisfied. Good job! | 1) and she also peppers in some | Good | 1) fun and humor along the way. | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I came into this class with already quite a bit of self-taught experience with Pro Tools. I think this course provided an excellent foundation with the software. It covered the full arc of getting started, learning the fundamentals, and then concluding with a final project that incapsulated many different skills and functionalities in order to present a final production of a song. You have to put in the work but if you follow through on the instructions carefully, I think you'll be rewarded. Chrissy is a compelling and adept explainer of things and she also peppers in some good fun and humor along the way. It's clear that she's very knowledgeable and navigates through Pro Tools with ease (keyboard short cuts are vital). My main goal here was to make my workflow much more organized, smooth, and structured while also becoming much more confident in my mixing abilities. Chrissy explains in very simple and clear terms how to accomplish these tasks which left me feeling satisfied. Good job! | 2) tasks which left me feeling satisfied. | Good | 2) job! | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course with all the basics covered and clearly explained with good examples. | 1) basics covered and clearly explained with | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Although it is a very informative class and Chrissy is a good teacher, I am finding this class to be EXTREMELY troublesome unless one possesses the means to purchase a great deal of equipment and product to work within Pro Tools. It should be noted that Pro Tools First (the "FREE" version I downloaded) is a DETRIMENT to learning in this course and will effect your grade negatively. I am also dismayed by the lack of community participation in the forums. On other Berklee / Coursera classes, this hasn't been nearly as much of a problem. | 1) informative class and Chrissy is a | Good | 1) teacher, I am finding this class | 2.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very Good Course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course! | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good course explained in a clear and nice way! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course explained in a clear and | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | This course is a good shortcut to start Music Production using Pro Tools. Practical tips and relevant information. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) shortcut to start Music Production using | 5.0 |
| tEqImn2kEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Very good tool to get introduced into the serious DAW world. Recommended! | 1) Very | Good | 1) tool to get introduced into the | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Too much math! This course was not at all what I was expecting it to be... which could be both good and bad, depending on your own perspective. It concentrates heavily on the logistical side of negotiations via mathematical analysis to figure out "what's at stake" in a negotiation (i.e. "the pie") and less so on learning actual negotiation techniques. I got halfway through the first week before deciding to un-enroll. That said, Professor Nalebuff has a very engaging teaching style and presents each lecture in a dynamic fashion via animation. If you are a math whiz who excels in algebra and can do complex mathematical equations quickly on the fly, then this course will definitely benefit you. If you are like me, however, and looking for a course that will focus more on artistry and practical real-world application, then this course is not for you. | 1) . . which could be both | Good | 1) and bad, depending on your own | 2.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | This course is a great resource of negotiation skills for me (some one new to Strategic / Managerial Skills). I cleared this course with good score and purchased the certificate for this course as well and this to my professional skills. I would recommend this course to someone who is looking to grow negotiation / strategic and or managerial skills. | 1) Skills). I cleared this course with | Good | 1) score and purchased the certificate for | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Very well made course. The lecture are fun and not boring at all! It's a very good introduction, and the main takeaway is that you'll learn why and how to negotiate fair. For a beginner in negotiation, this course lays a very good foundation, and opens the eyes, broadens the view on what negociation really is meant to be. | 1) boring at all! It's a very | Good | 1) introduction, and the main takeaway is | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Very well made course. The lecture are fun and not boring at all! It's a very good introduction, and the main takeaway is that you'll learn why and how to negotiate fair. For a beginner in negotiation, this course lays a very good foundation, and opens the eyes, broadens the view on what negociation really is meant to be. | 2) negotiation, this course lays a very | Good | 2) foundation, and opens the eyes, broadens | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Nice views on negotiations, and well explained. Gives a good introduction. | 1) negotiations, and well explained. Gives a | Good | 1) introduction. | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | The lecturer uses good examples and the animations helped visualize what he was talking about in lectures. | 1) The lecturer uses | Good | 1) examples and the animations helped visualize | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Good course about negotiation and linked elements to make a better negotiation. | 1) | Good | 1) course about negotiation and linked elements | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | This course is great. There is excellent training material and the live exercises add a lot of value. There is a lot of very good theory, which is very useable, pleasantly explained, articulated very well and highly memorable. I love the principled approach that is used and the concepts that are explained. | 1) There is a lot of very | Good | 1) theory, which is very useable, pleasantly | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | very good strategys of negotiation! | 1) very | Good | 1) strategys of negotiation! | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | The good: introduction of some deep concepts that I haven't seen yet, in a clear format. What could be better: I would have preferred the course to focus more on the technical aspects, and there were quite large sections that I thought didn't add much to the information content. Thankfully there was enough good for it to get a high rating overall. | 1) The | Good | 1) introduction of some deep concepts that | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | The good: introduction of some deep concepts that I haven't seen yet, in a clear format. What could be better: I would have preferred the course to focus more on the technical aspects, and there were quite large sections that I thought didn't add much to the information content. Thankfully there was enough good for it to get a high rating overall. | 2) information content. Thankfully there was enough | Good | 2) for it to get a high | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Many "good to know" things both for professionals but even for simple things in life like buying an new apartment or go out and buy anything. Highly recommended. | 1) Many " | Good | 1) to know" things both for professionals | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Interesting course, useful principles and good animation lecture. | 1) Interesting course, useful principles and | Good | 1) animation lecture. | 4.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Great Teacher. Great examples. Only issue i did not like what that you had to find a partner to negotiate with and I found it a bit difficult to find people in my time zone who spoke good English. Other than that it was a great course and I recommend it for any one who want to go into business, law or retail management | 1) in my time zone who spoke | Good | 1) English. Other than that it was | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | very good training and pratical , it provides a completely new vision on negotiation. | 1) very | Good | 1) training and pratical , it provides | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Barry is a great teacher. I have read many of his papers and books, but I never imagine how good and insightful he was as a teacher. | 1) books, but I never imagine how | Good | 1) and insightful he was as a | 5.0 |
| tGbJuel4EeSnMSIACzuFJw | Beautiful made lecture. (Be so kind to excuse my miserable English. It is still under construction) After I had to change my proficiency, from being a truck driver to a total different job type by doing sales on telephone, my new boss (new and different company) urged me. She urged me, to invest in my private time learning how to make money on the phone. Instead of irritating potential customers by doing weird offers. After a good while of understanding, why is the other side willing to invest in products, my wage is remarkably higher. By compare of some weeks before. I understand also, to invest in ideas which are worth to pay for. And I started with one bought book to learn "Game Theory 101: The Complete Textbook". The other two books are introduced by Prof. Barry Nielbuff. Yes, my QUIZZ-answers are WRONG. Nevertheless I learn what is going on. And that helps me doing a much better job. With great fun. Just want to say ... ... Thank you all. | 1) by doing weird offers. After a | Good | 1) while of understanding, why is the | 5.0 |
| THaE_RqwEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I've been to college, so I'm not the target audience for this course, but I was curious to see what would be covered and to learn more about colleges today. I felt the course covered mostly simplistic, obvious stuff and left out a lot that many students wonder about. One topic that was covered was the different activities of professors. I wished I'd known more about this when I started college. Of course I knew they did research, but I thought they were primarily there to teach. This is true at some colleges, but at others, the amount and quality of research can determine whether a professor gets to continue working there and reach tenure. So teaching may not be the first priority for some professors. Students may find that chunks of courses are devoted to a professor's research interests, which could enrich or derail the course. This could have been covered in more depth. Other things that could have been covered: why some courses are so large and the function of recitation sections and graduate teaching fellows for those and smaller courses; what a seminar is; the existence of course reviews that can help with selecting classes and professors; how to deal with not getting into a course you really need to take (wait lists, professorial overrides, etc.); when pre-requisite courses are really necessary and when they're just recommended; dropping courses; GRADES (how the college grading system works, what happens when you fail a course, academic probation, earning honors); campus codes of conduct (greater freedom as with class attendance; smoking and drinking rules, harassment policies) and disciplinary actions (disciplinary probation, expulsion); good campus activities for shy students. | 1) and disciplinary actions (disciplinary probation, expulsion); | Good | 1) campus activities for shy students. | 3.0 |
| THaE_RqwEeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction about American College life | 1) | Good | 1) introduction about American College life | 5.0 |
| thUSy6N6EeWzOhI8vzQnoQ | This course was very good, learned a lot, great | 1) This course was very | Good | 1) learned a lot, great | 5.0 |
| thUSy6N6EeWzOhI8vzQnoQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course is great! It has really got me excited about teaching English in China. All the concepts are explained clearly and with metaphors that make you think a bit deeper than you might have otherwise. And if you do all the courses in their Teaching English for Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) series (8 in total), you earn yourself a coveted TESOL certificate! Good luck! | 1) earn yourself a coveted TESOL certificate! | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I have just finished the first course of this specialization. I don't expect it all to be as easy as this was for me. I'd say the coolest thing, the way I see it is that, throughout the whole course, they never talked about grammar or rules, rather about how we learn best; how students are affected by teachers; pitfalls of teacher burnout, how to's a few, and how not to, yes, but they mostly stayed toward the positive. Sure, there were some things which might be a little exclusively for language teaching, but I'd say, more, really, the things they explained were about teaching and learning in general. Anyway, I can get that grammar stuff out of books , on the net, or even on the Youtube. It's what makes me a good or a better or a worse or a useless teacher I want to learn. And up until NOW, it's exactly THAT they've been helping me with. One real waker-upper was when they suggested that neither the world, nor the classroom is ever (and never going to be) perfect. THAT was a load off my mind, and one of the most encouraging teacher helps I've EVER had: like, "Don't look at what you don't have, but what you DO have is what makes you a "professional"! (even if the lights go out!) Many Thanks! ---Rey Hudson | 1) Youtube. It's what makes me a | Good | 1) or a better or a worse | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Thanks, this course is an evidence of the advantages of a mooc and a good use of the technology, i learned a lot and i'll keep in mind all your advice. I want to go through all the courses of the specialization, even though i don't have the $$ to purchase for the courses certification, the important thing is that i'm learning a lot and my future first students will be the real certification and rectification of what i have leaned, giving my best self to teach them. Teachers. You are awesome. thanks | 1) advantages of a mooc and a | Good | 1) use of the technology, i learned | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I loved it! You're very good at motivating us to become better language instructors! Thank you so much! | 1) I loved it! You're very | Good | 1) at motivating us to become better | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | A wonderful course on how to teach. Dr Dixon beautifully conveys all essentials of a becoming a good teacher. Very glad to have taken this course. Thank you Dr. Dixon and Arizona State University. | 1) all essentials of a becoming a | Good | 1) teacher. Very glad to have taken | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The Foundational Principles portion of this specialization is really comprehensive, but also not complex enough that a new learner can't complete and understand the material. There is a strong focus on teacher technique that I appreciated. There is a good combination of audio-visual material and reading material. I prefer to learn through reading so it was nice to intersperse articles and authentic research with the lessons. Would definitely recommend this to new and seasoned learners! | 1) that I appreciated. There is a | Good | 1) combination of audio-visual material and reading | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I found this course very good for new teachers, but a little repetitive for experience teachers. Still, a great course implemented with knowledge and enthusiasm. | 1) I found this course very | Good | 1) for new teachers, but a little | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Great course, learnt a lot and got some good ideas to improve my technique | 1) learnt a lot and got some | Good | 1) ideas to improve my technique | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Amazing instructors and a very well designed course. It was easy to follow, understand and apply the principles. Highly recommend! Good luck future teachers! :) | 1) and apply the principles. Highly recommend! | Good | 1) luck future teachers! :) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | It's so good. Teachers are really nice and funny! And I learned a lot! I love your metaphors about language! | 1) It's so | Good | 1) Teachers are really nice and funny! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Pretty cool stuff, getting off to a good start. Interesting, useful and relevant! | 1) cool stuff, getting off to a | Good | 1) start. Interesting, useful and relevant! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | It is always good to review some Foundational Principles. Good course. | 1) It is always | Good | 1) to review some Foundational Principles. Good | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | It is always good to review some Foundational Principles. Good course. | 2) good to review some Foundational Principles. | Good | 2) course. | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | A very good and useful course! It helped me to make my teaching better!!! Thank you!!!! | 1) A very | Good | 1) and useful course! It helped me | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very good course. You actually learn a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. You actually learn a lot. | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course gave a great baseline for getting started in TESOL. I learned as much from watching the professor model good teaching as I did from the content of the videos. I highly recommend this course if you are considering teaching English to speakers of other languages. | 1) much from watching the professor model | Good | 1) teaching as I did from the | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The People Teaching this course are the best and they have so much life and show a good interest, they actually teach and they make the course enjoyable and by so doing i was able to pass all my quizzes and assignments. | 1) so much life and show a | Good | 1) interest, they actually teach and they | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very good and useful course!!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I found the information presented in a very orderly fashion. The presenters communicated their ideas in a clear and fun fashion. It was good learning new techniques as well as being affirmed in what I have done in the way of teaching so far. I would highly recommend this course to anyone who is teaching language. | 1) clear and fun fashion. It was | Good | 1) learning new techniques as well as | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | A very interesting course to get an overall view of English teaching. Very well structured and with good and complete material. | 1) teaching. Very well structured and with | Good | 1) and complete material. | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I think it's a really good opportunity to be able to obtain a TESOL certificate online and this course seems to be able to do it very efficiently. However, I have found the approach of the style of the lessons a little bit slow and too dramatic- and somewhat even childish. I'm sure the planning of this certificate program is to ensure that people who take it will remember it so that they can really make use of it in their profession- so they probably avoided long and boring lectures. But still, I must admit that the lessons look a little bit annoying sometimes :) Still, thank you for the opportunity. | 1) I think it's a really | Good | 1) opportunity to be able to obtain | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Good introduction to the course! | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the course! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course is excellent! In fact, the professor, Dr. Shane Dixon is an expert able to capture and keep our attention. More yet, the content and the approach used are really good! The way Dr. Shane conduct the course and explain how to become a better teacher make this course a must for future teachers. I highly recommend, not just for english teachers, but those who wants to improve their abilities as professors at colleges and universities. | 1) and the approach used are really | Good | 1) The way Dr. Shane conduct the | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I thought the course was good although some of the material a bit basic but it definitely will help with my teaching. | 1) I thought the course was | Good | 1) although some of the material a | 3.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Course is fun, easy, enjoyable and beneficial. Prof. Shane is a very talented presenter and managed to pull me into the lectures. My only concerns are: The length of the course was too short and it was not very deep. In other words In my opinion they could have easily added another course worth of material to this course without it becoming overbearing. It made me feel that their stretching the number of courses you have to take to finish the specialization. Other wise its a good course. Great instructor and good content! | 1) the specialization. Other wise its a | Good | 1) course. Great instructor and good content! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Course is fun, easy, enjoyable and beneficial. Prof. Shane is a very talented presenter and managed to pull me into the lectures. My only concerns are: The length of the course was too short and it was not very deep. In other words In my opinion they could have easily added another course worth of material to this course without it becoming overbearing. It made me feel that their stretching the number of courses you have to take to finish the specialization. Other wise its a good course. Great instructor and good content! | 2) a good course. Great instructor and | Good | 2) content! | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course is taught in a easy way approachable for everybody. The images, graphics, metaphors are really good to make you understand the content. | 1) The images, graphics, metaphors are really | Good | 1) to make you understand the content. | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | thats good | 1) thats | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Well organised and helpful material. The lessons were easy to follow and posed thought provoking questions. Good for seasoned professionals and beginners. | 1) follow and posed thought provoking questions. | Good | 1) for seasoned professionals and beginners. | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I loved the course, easy going, direct, concise, the videos were very good, completely recommend it :) | 1) direct, concise, the videos were very | Good | 1) completely recommend it :) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Really good and informative. | 1) Really | Good | 1) and informative. | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | I learned a lot from this course because it is very well presented. You can tell that the instructors are enjoying what they are doing. I learned a lot from this course. Keep up the good work and more success to this course! | 1) from this course. Keep up the | Good | 1) work and more success to this | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | As a Foundations Course it is excellent, allowing giving a good introduction that is not difficult, allowing you to decide whether you want to continue with the rest of the certification. | 1) it is excellent, allowing giving a | Good | 1) introduction that is not difficult, allowing | 5.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Good basic course for anyone interested in starting to study language teaching | 1) | Good | 1) basic course for anyone interested in | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course is really good for the ones, who, like me, want to learn more about teaching English for basic learners. | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) for the ones, who, like me, | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | On overall its a very good course, but assignment submission was a bit confusing ! | 1) On overall its a very | Good | 1) course, but assignment submission was a | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course is good enough--a means to an end. The 4-part, six weeks apart format is kind of bothersome because the wait period sort of dampens the momentum and enthusiasm created during the first course (especially if you complete the whole thing in a week-end). The course is well put together and infused with a little humor. The visuals are good and if you're in the right mood, the course is enjoyable and ifun to interact with folks from around the world. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) enough--a means to an end. The | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The course is good enough--a means to an end. The 4-part, six weeks apart format is kind of bothersome because the wait period sort of dampens the momentum and enthusiasm created during the first course (especially if you complete the whole thing in a week-end). The course is well put together and infused with a little humor. The visuals are good and if you're in the right mood, the course is enjoyable and ifun to interact with folks from around the world. | 2) a little humor. The visuals are | Good | 2) and if you're in the right | 4.0 |
| TIDJWBwuEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This class felt a bit elementary . . . but it had some good material as well. I would appreciate a bit less overacting and goofiness (which actually praised in the course) and have a bit more academic material. In one of the videos, the professor suggested that teaching should be slightly above the student's level but not too high. This course seemed to be a bit lower than my level (but I have taken education courses in the past). | 1) . . but it had some | Good | 1) material as well. I would appreciate | 3.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very interesting course that provides a comprehensive, yet accessible, account of the global financial crisis as well as of its causes and consequences. Both Prof. Metrick and Mr. Geithner do a great job in explaining the materials using clear slides and easily understandable graphics and figures. The course setup is also clear and can easily be completed. The quizzes offer a good opportunity to keep track of the course contents (maybe extend them to 3-4 questions instead of just 2?). Perhaps a comprehensive final exam reviewing the materials of all prior weeks would be sensible, as one might have forgotten what topics were discussed in week 1 or 2 while learning the contents of week 11. | 1) be completed. The quizzes offer a | Good | 1) opportunity to keep track of the | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Learned quite a lot! The course was structured very good. | 1) lot! The course was structured very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | this curse was very good i learned enghish and financial themes thank you | 1) this curse was very | Good | 1) i learned enghish and financial themes | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | A very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Excellent comeback on the crisis and the elements why, how and what has been done. Also a good overview of the outcome for European countries. | 1) what has been done. Also a | Good | 1) overview of the outcome for European | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | very good discussion about the cronology, causes and outcomes of the global financial crisis | 1) very | Good | 1) discussion about the cronology, causes and | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course, very good professors; no community assistants for answering in the discussions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, very good professors; no community | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good course, very good professors; no community assistants for answering in the discussions. | 2) Very good course, very | Good | 2) professors; no community assistants for answering | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good explanation of the background of the crisis, and the impact on U.S. and E.U. as well. I never understood the term "shadow banking" before; now I do. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation of the background of the | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very informative and engaging course. Very good lecture presentations by two leading subject matter experts. About the only drawback was the lack of teaching assistance interaction on the course discussion forums and maybe even an occasional drop in by one of the instructors from time to time. | 1) Very informative and engaging course. Very | Good | 1) lecture presentations by two leading subject | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Awesome course and the simplicity of demonstrating the concepts is quite good. | 1) of demonstrating the concepts is quite | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Very good overview over a topical area - more in-depth exercises for testing one's own understanding might have been helpful | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview over a topical area - | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | it is very good course. Thank you for new experiance. | 1) it is very | Good | 1) course. Thank you for new experiance. | 5.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Some good information but very much a political course, not much of an economics course. Stating, as if it is a given, late in the course, that there are times when it is okay to introduce a moral hazard. Erroneously defining fiat money early in the course. Stating, again as if it were a given, that deficit spending is naturally the right answer to a crisis. When politicians and their pawns develop a course should we be surprised that the answer is always more government intervention? Oh, if only we had more tools to stop this, never realizing their role in creating the crisis. | 1) Some | Good | 1) information but very much a political | 2.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Good fundamental summary of the GFC. Worth the time. | 1) | Good | 1) fundamental summary of the GFC. Worth | 4.0 |
| tjqUXz-5EeWpogr5ZO8qxQ | Despite working in financial industry, and having a very good understanding of the crisis. they way the course has been structured to disseminate the information gradually and structurally really appeals to me. I have learned things I did not know, and to me that is the | 1) financial industry, and having a very | Good | 1) understanding of the crisis. they way | 4.0 |
| tKpNgsa4EeWg0QoHq3JjoQ | Over my expectations!!! Really good introductory course. | 1) Over my expectations! ! ! Really | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Once again a good course but the quizzes are improvable. I had 98%, I don't say it because I didn't know the answers. Many questions just don't make sense. Other than that the course was very interesting! | 1) Once again a | Good | 1) course but the quizzes are improvable. | 4.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Generally a good course. I was disappointed with the instructions in the Week 3 assignment. In past courses within the certification, the instructions have noted specifically what was required. Here, the instructions around the Google Business Page part of the assignment did not include some specific elements we were being evaluated one. | 1) Generally a | Good | 1) course. I was disappointed with the | 4.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good course! very useful and practical! | 1) | Good | 1) course! very useful and practical! | 5.0 |
| TN6htXEnEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Course itself is excellent, cases are very good and practical, but the only thing is lots of technical issues with the assignments and quizzes. Therefore only 3 stars. | 1) itself is excellent, cases are very | Good | 1) and practical, but the only thing | 3.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | So far so good..I enjoy each and every lecture | 1) So far so | Good | 1) . I enjoy each and every | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | This course was very insightful and interesting. The lectures was very good and I liked the recommended scientific articles that we could download and read for extra information. I would definitely recommend this course. | 1) and interesting. The lectures was very | Good | 1) and I liked the recommended scientific | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Good work and research by prof fess or so and researchers | 1) | Good | 1) work and research by prof fess | 4.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | I really enjoyed the course and learned a great deal. The instructors were very good. | 1) great deal. The instructors were very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Very good definitions about each topic, concise presentations, clear. Teachers with broad expertise on the subject. | 1) Very | Good | 1) definitions about each topic, concise presentations, | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Loved this exceptional course a good foundation for the subject of Bacteria, Chronic Infections & Biofilms I have an avid interest in the subject and have followed the work closely of Alan Macdonald Pathologist, Dr Eva Sapi and many other pioneers in the field of chronic disease and biofilms. Thank you :) | 1) Loved this exceptional course a | Good | 1) foundation for the subject of Bacteria, | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Really good! Totally recomended... | 1) Really | Good | 1) Totally recomended. . . | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Really Good | 1) Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Has a good organization, good topics and also a great number of teachers. | 1) Has a | Good | 1) organization, good topics and also a | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Has a good organization, good topics and also a great number of teachers. | 2) Has a good organization, | Good | 2) topics and also a great number | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | Good introduction to the medical side of bio-film studies. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the medical side of | 4.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | The course was good, but there was a flaw in a fact that there were several lecturers. Some fact were repetitive, especially the interviews didn't bring anything new, and the tests sometimes were too specific. Anyway, I find the information given in this course extremely useful. The last module was the most exiting one, with clear structure and some really interesting themes to discover. | 1) The course was | Good | 1) but there was a flaw in | 4.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | A very good introductory course !! | 1) A very | Good | 1) introductory course ! ! | 5.0 |
| towthzydEeW0tw4knrMo3Q | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| TpvXIzxZEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| TpvXIzxZEeWjyxInT4zYJQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very enjoyable. Well distributed and didactic. Medical and paramedical personal should refresh their knowledge. Good illustrations and simple to follow. Thanks. | 1) paramedical personal should refresh their knowledge. | Good | 1) illustrations and simple to follow. Thanks. | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | good lessons | 1) | Good | 1) lessons | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | good one | 1) | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | very good videos and not too detailed explanations | 1) very | Good | 1) videos and not too detailed explanations | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | very complete and detailed materials provided. good illustration. | 1) very complete and detailed materials provided. | Good | 1) illustration. | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | A very nice experience! Good to review the majority of the lessons that I've learned a few years a go. Some (minor) issues with the quality of the videos but the overall rate of the course is very good! | 1) A very nice experience! | Good | 1) to review the majority of the | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | A very nice experience! Good to review the majority of the lessons that I've learned a few years a go. Some (minor) issues with the quality of the videos but the overall rate of the course is very good! | 2) rate of the course is very | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | very good course!!! | 1) very | Good | 1) course! ! ! | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | very good and lots of excellent information, well presented. | 1) very | Good | 1) and lots of excellent information, well | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | The two professors are amazing, very good course! | 1) The two professors are amazing, very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very comprehensive course. However, I found one professor to teach above the level of an introductory course. This is kind of a misnomer. To me, this course was not introductory. It was very difficult. Although, it would be good for someone that is taking the MCAT's. My points are: Very comprehensive, quite a lot of information (if you don't have chemistry and microbiology backgrounds it is easy to get lost), quite difficult tests and quizzes, rewarding if you can finish it. | 1) very difficult. Although, it would be | Good | 1) for someone that is taking the | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Nice videos, well explained. The powerpoints are extremely useful and clear. However sometimes there is a confusion between what is said in the videos and in the lecture notes and the quiz questions. It may just be me however. Apart from that last thing, the rest is all good! | 1) last thing, the rest is all | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | The course is very complete and very good, I learned a lot! | 1) course is very complete and very | Good | 1) I learned a lot! | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good introductory course that allowed me to understand key body system. High quality lectures understandable for beginners with desire to get better understanding how body functions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course that allowed me to | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | A good course that covers all the basics. | 1) A | Good | 1) course that covers all the basics. | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good for a undergraduate student. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) for a undergraduate student. Thanks | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | All the content provided is very good and the tests are of a good level too. Was just sad that the course on GI system didn't say a word about the extra organ represented by our microbiome, that nothing was said about the immune system, hematopoiesis, developmental physiology and genetics, the detailed functions of the liver (nothing on the prduction of urea and the detox mechanisms), and some behavioral aspects could be interesting. | 1) All the content provided is very | Good | 1) and the tests are of a | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | All the content provided is very good and the tests are of a good level too. Was just sad that the course on GI system didn't say a word about the extra organ represented by our microbiome, that nothing was said about the immune system, hematopoiesis, developmental physiology and genetics, the detailed functions of the liver (nothing on the prduction of urea and the detox mechanisms), and some behavioral aspects could be interesting. | 2) and the tests are of a | Good | 2) level too. Was just sad that | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good basics. One star dropped for being a little too theoretical. Sometimes would have been nice to know more why some things are the way they are in the body. | 1) Very | Good | 1) basics. One star dropped for being | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Excellent overview of the topic and a good launching point for further studies. Requires some basic chemistry but otherwise easy to get into. | 1) overview of the topic and a | Good | 1) launching point for further studies. Requires | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | This course is very good!!! | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good course, the videos followed a very good sequence and presented clinically relevant information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the videos followed a very | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good course, the videos followed a very good sequence and presented clinically relevant information. | 2) course, the videos followed a very | Good | 2) sequence and presented clinically relevant information. | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | The content is quite clear the course is going good so far ; however, i recommend the lecturer be more lively to help other be more interested in the course | 1) quite clear the course is going | Good | 1) so far ; however, i recommend | 3.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very instructive and good didactics. I learned a lot with this course. | 1) Very instructive and | Good | 1) didactics. I learned a lot with | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Good professional course | 1) | Good | 1) professional course | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | I think it's a very good course, but there are parts that can be improved and some that should be addressed in more leisurely fashion, this is the case of the nervous system and the endocrine system. Thank you very much for your effort. | 1) I think it's a very | Good | 1) course, but there are parts that | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Very good course,recommended | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, recommended | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Good course, somewhat more than a basic understanding of biology is needed. | 1) | Good | 1) course, somewhat more than a basic | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Excellent course. It contains a lot of details, do not be fooled by the "introductory". Instructors are very good and clearly explain the topics. You get lecture notes with each topic too. If you complete this course, you will have a good understanding of the human physiology. | 1) " introductory" . Instructors are very | Good | 1) and clearly explain the topics. You | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Excellent course. It contains a lot of details, do not be fooled by the "introductory". Instructors are very good and clearly explain the topics. You get lecture notes with each topic too. If you complete this course, you will have a good understanding of the human physiology. | 2) this course, you will have a | Good | 2) understanding of the human physiology. | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | I would like to rate this fabulous course as excellent under Dr. Emma Jakoi and Dr. Jennifer Carbrey, brilliant instructersThank you very much for all the kind explanation given for my questions, and good video quizzes, enjoyable problem sets and mind provoking exams. Regards and lots of thanks. Indira Raghunathan | 1) explanation given for my questions, and | Good | 1) video quizzes, enjoyable problem sets and | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | The structure is a bit confusing, and the review is not quite as intensive as I would like. Otherwise, it's awesome. The videos are good, the instructors speak at speeds just right, most of the slides are sparsely worded and well illustrated, the concepts are explained in depth... Awesome is the word. | 1) Otherwise, it's awesome. The videos are | Good | 1) the instructors speak at speeds just | 4.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | So good. | 1) So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Wonderful course. The lectures connected many key conceptions together, and made a good story. It is a very good introduction to physiology. But is you want to know more, you need to investigate the text book. Also, I really thing physiology is still a living discipline, and more new things is adding on it. All in all, I like this course, but I need to know more. | 1) key conceptions together, and made a | Good | 1) story. It is a very good | 5.0 |
| Tr9rK6JtEeSwKiIACiONVg | Wonderful course. The lectures connected many key conceptions together, and made a good story. It is a very good introduction to physiology. But is you want to know more, you need to investigate the text book. Also, I really thing physiology is still a living discipline, and more new things is adding on it. All in all, I like this course, but I need to know more. | 2) good story. It is a very | Good | 2) introduction to physiology. But is you | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | This was a good introduction to the principles and concepts of project management. I completed this course as part of professional development for my current job, and learned some good terminology and best practices. If you have experience with project management or want to learn more advanced concepts, I imagine this course would not be for you. If you're looking for a good introduction to project management that you can build on later, this is a good place to start. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to the principles and concepts | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | This was a good introduction to the principles and concepts of project management. I completed this course as part of professional development for my current job, and learned some good terminology and best practices. If you have experience with project management or want to learn more advanced concepts, I imagine this course would not be for you. If you're looking for a good introduction to project management that you can build on later, this is a good place to start. | 2) my current job, and learned some | Good | 2) terminology and best practices. If you | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | This was a good introduction to the principles and concepts of project management. I completed this course as part of professional development for my current job, and learned some good terminology and best practices. If you have experience with project management or want to learn more advanced concepts, I imagine this course would not be for you. If you're looking for a good introduction to project management that you can build on later, this is a good place to start. | 3) you. If you're looking for a | Good | 3) introduction to project management that you | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | This was a good introduction to the principles and concepts of project management. I completed this course as part of professional development for my current job, and learned some good terminology and best practices. If you have experience with project management or want to learn more advanced concepts, I imagine this course would not be for you. If you're looking for a good introduction to project management that you can build on later, this is a good place to start. | 4) build on later, this is a | Good | 4) place to start. | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | The capstone provides a good opportunity to apply the material from previous courses. Very well organized, and grading is fairly prompt. Thanks. | 1) The capstone provides a | Good | 1) opportunity to apply the material from | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | This is a unique experience of learning. You learn the concepts and practice them by project and reviewing others project. This is really good. | 1) reviewing others project. This is really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | An excellent finale for the program, giving us the oportunity to apply most of the knowledge received through the different courses. The capstone project is clear, easy to understand in terms of structure and requirements. It lacks some of the contents of the course but most of the content is included. Once again thanks to Ms Meloni, all the team from UCI and Coursera, keep the good work! | 1) from UCI and Coursera, keep the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | I think the capstone is a really good technique to put everything I've learned from this specialization into real-life use. I understand it even better now. Thank you | 1) think the capstone is a really | Good | 1) technique to put everything I've learned | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Excellent summation of preceding courses. Peer review was particularly helpful in comparitively evaluating your own project and how one can improve their use of these tools. Very good course. | 1) their use of these tools. Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | It was a good exercise, but there were some inconsistencies between the assignment rubric that was published and the grading key the students use to evaluate your work. More alignment between these two would be helpful. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) exercise, but there were some inconsistencies | 4.0 |
| trDN9vgGEeSW1SIAC3oCCQ | Great Final Project. It's just the right amount of work to put into good used everything learned on the previous courses. It really ties everything down | 1) amount of work to put into | Good | 1) used everything learned on the previous | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | Good for entering stage learners. I like to texts and reference reading materials which are significant and informative in the field. Benefit a lot. | 1) | Good | 1) for entering stage learners. I like | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | Very good course - the team put together thought provoking video material, and the reading material was well thought out for this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course - the team put together | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | A very good course and very engaging | 1) A very | Good | 1) course and very engaging | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | I would like to give you the High Marks .This Course is properly arranged and it includes most of the needed factors student like us specially a student from Sri Lanka ,This is really good. And would like to guaranty this course to my friends. Macy!!! | 1) Sri Lanka , This is really | Good | 1) And would like to guaranty this | 5.0 |
| trgWdYiKEeWfngrMqWa91Q | Very good videos and article sharing! | 1) Very | Good | 1) videos and article sharing! | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It was good and informative. But i did not feel challenge while taking the course. Good course for beginners. | 1) It was | Good | 1) and informative. But i did not | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It was good and informative. But i did not feel challenge while taking the course. Good course for beginners. | 2) feel challenge while taking the course. | Good | 2) course for beginners. | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | A complete course if you follow the readings dutifully, good material, but the videos seem a little shallow and you wont learn much just sprinting through it, though you may pass. | 1) if you follow the readings dutifully, | Good | 1) material, but the videos seem a | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very interesting course, good starting point to get deeper into cyber security as a field! | 1) Very interesting course, | Good | 1) starting point to get deeper into | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This course was really good but not too deep. I went on to study the CISSP manual and some additional training. This is a great course if you want an introduction to cybersecurity. | 1) This course was really | Good | 1) but not too deep. I went | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I had some issues with this course which is why I rated it a 2. First off, let me start by saying this is a very good overview of what the Cybersecurity Terms are, but I wish it went deeper into the subject. 1. Having to pay just to take the quizzes for an overview course is kind of a joke. I could see asking for money if you went into more detail information regarding each lesson, but just telling me what each term means and then pointing me to a website, then asking for 50 bucks is kind of cheap considering no in-depth information was ever given. 2. Why did you have all of those people that are in the field of cybersecurity just read off a list of terms? You could have done that, kind of a waste of time for those other people. I am guessing that you had to pay them. Which would explain why you are asking 50 dollars just to take the quizzes. 3. Where was the real life experience? Explain to me the most common mistakes people make with each of the different type of networks as securities. That would at least be worth 50 dollars, for some real world practical use. I could have easily googled these terms and have in the past. I thought it would contain more detailed information about the subject considering is technically an online course. | 1) by saying this is a very | Good | 1) overview of what the Cybersecurity Terms | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Really good course for the basics of Cyber Security. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for the basics of Cyber | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | the only reason to take this course is because the certification will look good on your resume. don't expect to learn anything new if you are already in IT or related field. i passed the tests without going over the material. there is a shortage of original content, although their graphics and effects department did a good job, and mostly they expect you to read outside resources. audit the course for free to get familiar with the content but only pay if you need the certification for professional reasons. | 1) is because the certification will look | Good | 1) on your resume. don't expect to | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | the only reason to take this course is because the certification will look good on your resume. don't expect to learn anything new if you are already in IT or related field. i passed the tests without going over the material. there is a shortage of original content, although their graphics and effects department did a good job, and mostly they expect you to read outside resources. audit the course for free to get familiar with the content but only pay if you need the certification for professional reasons. | 2) graphics and effects department did a | Good | 2) job, and mostly they expect you | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | 3 introduction videos each week, and tons of links for reading? Do not want. The worst course I ever took. Not enough Video material with good explanations. All we got - links to articles which we can found ourselves without any help. | 1) took. Not enough Video material with | Good | 1) explanations. All we got - links | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | A good course for persons those who are employed as in security role to an any organisation. I appreciate the method of distance learning to all on online. Thanks. | 1) A | Good | 1) course for persons those who are | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Course material reference readings were good but videos were pathetic. It was more like a high school kid reading the slides. | 1) Course material reference readings were | Good | 1) but videos were pathetic. It was | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good Course. Google Search knowledge required | 1) | Good | 1) Course. Google Search knowledge required | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Boring course... useless videos... only the referential resources and exercises are good | 1) the referential resources and exercises are | Good | 1) | 2.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very good course. However, you need to do a lot of reading. The videos are simply introductions to the topics. The course has a lot of reading. The readings are great resources, however, some of them are very very long. I wish the videos had more of a lecture component. The final was difficult as you had no idea what would and what would not be on it. Great information, in-depth course, but it could have more video/lecture resources. It could also have more information concerning the information on the final exam. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. However, you need to do | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | More like a good guide then an explaining lesson. | 1) More like a | Good | 1) guide then an explaining lesson. | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | A lot of personal work and complementary readings, good course. | 1) of personal work and complementary readings, | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very informative, easy to understand well explained! good instructors | 1) informative, easy to understand well explained! | Good | 1) instructors | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Gets you to know the basics of Cyber Security. This definitely is a foundation course and has good topics. If you are looking out for information on Cyber Security and do not have a clue about where to start from, this course is recommended for you. | 1) is a foundation course and has | Good | 1) topics. If you are looking out | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good learning. | 1) | Good | 1) learning. | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This is my first class here at Coursera and it was fantastic: good teachers, good reading material. | 1) at Coursera and it was fantastic: | Good | 1) teachers, good reading material. | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This is my first class here at Coursera and it was fantastic: good teachers, good reading material. | 2) and it was fantastic: good teachers, | Good | 2) reading material. | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very good course. Some readings and the final test are not so easy for people with other mothertongue than english but it is possible. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Some readings and the final | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | good courses | 1) | Good | 1) courses | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | I Felt like this was a very in depth course, the reading material was very good. At times I thought the instructional videos were very short - I would have liked them to have been longer, perhaps going into more depth about some of the topics covered in the reading materials - I was not fond of the written portion of the course - I would have preferred exams to the written portion. thanks. | 1) course, the reading material was very | Good | 1) At times I thought the instructional | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very good beginner level course | 1) Very | Good | 1) beginner level course | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | A good course for people who are trying to lean the basics of cyber security. Regards, Kashif | 1) A | Good | 1) course for people who are trying | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It's good to learn new about cyber security and assignment are good. | 1) It's | Good | 1) to learn new about cyber security | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | It's good to learn new about cyber security and assignment are good. | 2) about cyber security and assignment are | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | very good for begainers and if you want to start at security i suppose that course | 1) very | Good | 1) for begainers and if you want | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good but not so deep as I expected. | 1) | Good | 1) but not so deep as I | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Interesting! It´s a good choice! | 1) Interesting! It´s a | Good | 1) choice! | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good basic course | 1) | Good | 1) basic course | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This is quite a good course. However it's pretty basic and if you are trying to dig deep into Cybersecurity I suggest taking the Cybersecurity specialization. | 1) This is quite a | Good | 1) course. However it's pretty basic and | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Video content barely summarizes the outline of each module. The questions in the quiz are not "though provoking". Peer discussion are rather superficial and do not cover half the content of the course. Readings are OK, show good sources, but there is no real discussion about them in the videos or in the quizzes. | 1) the course. Readings are OK, show | Good | 1) sources, but there is no real | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Very Good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Is a little basic introduction to InfoSEC but is nice a good to start. | 1) to InfoSEC but is nice a | Good | 1) to start. | 3.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Too good | 1) Too | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good information, would have preferred more in-depth lectures and detailed information. More lecturer interaction/engagement on the issues.Overall I enjoyed the course and it was great. | 1) | Good | 1) information, would have preferred more in-depth | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This was a good introduction to the field of Cybersecurity, but I wished for a more in depth coverage of many of the topics and other topics. This class would not be a preparation for the Security+ exam, for example, but it is a good start as an overview of Cybersecurity. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to the field of Cybersecurity, | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | This was a good introduction to the field of Cybersecurity, but I wished for a more in depth coverage of many of the topics and other topics. This class would not be a preparation for the Security+ exam, for example, but it is a good start as an overview of Cybersecurity. | 2) for example, but it is a | Good | 2) start as an overview of Cybersecurity. | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | a very good introductory course to CyberSecurity. It covers all main arguments, with a neat overall picture. Highly recommended as first course, then step further with Software Security and Cryptography! | 1) a very | Good | 1) introductory course to CyberSecurity. It covers | 5.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Minimal video efforts, not enough content, and long readings. Definetly not a good course to get a verified certificate | 1) and long readings. Definetly not a | Good | 1) course to get a verified certificate | 1.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| tWgmnb03EeS5IyIACyCAHg | Good amount of knowledge | 1) | Good | 1) amount of knowledge | 4.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | It might have been a better option to conduct the class in the instructors' mother tongue with English subtitles, though concepts are well enough communicated. I am a Francophone and I still find it not easy to understand the English (having French translation in my mind.) A good introductory class to have a first glimpse at the general context of academic publishing. Good general overview to rethink the steps of publishing plans for early stage researchers. | 1) translation in my mind. ) A | Good | 1) introductory class to have a first | 3.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | It might have been a better option to conduct the class in the instructors' mother tongue with English subtitles, though concepts are well enough communicated. I am a Francophone and I still find it not easy to understand the English (having French translation in my mind.) A good introductory class to have a first glimpse at the general context of academic publishing. Good general overview to rethink the steps of publishing plans for early stage researchers. | 2) the general context of academic publishing. | Good | 2) general overview to rethink the steps | 3.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | Very good and interesting for a beginner like me, I hope others also find use of this freely available quality material. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting for a beginner like | 4.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | A good course who teaches the way you have to do to write correctly a scientific paper, and gives an idea about the process of publish, it is useful and necessary for those who wants to continuous study and have their own work knows on the fields who works and research. | 1) A | Good | 1) course who teaches the way you | 3.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | It is good, but there is a student speaking that is really difficult to understand. | 1) It is | Good | 1) but there is a student speaking | 3.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | It's pretty good. Once you finish it, you'll have a good tool for improving papers. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) Once you finish it, you'll have | 5.0 |
| TYSbV73jEeW1WAr3aepXuw | It's pretty good. Once you finish it, you'll have a good tool for improving papers. | 2) you finish it, you'll have a | Good | 2) tool for improving papers. | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | A really good and interesting course. Well presented and with interesting data to keep everyone involved. | 1) A really | Good | 1) and interesting course. Well presented and | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Good course, but outdated. The SDGs were agreed upon in 2015 and there are already ajor efforts ongoing to implement them. The course only mentioned the draft SDGs, which changed considerably later on. Therefore, the course is useful for Background Information on SDGs, but not to get up-to-date with the SDG process. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but outdated. The SDGs were | 2.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | So far, the best course I took. Very timely and relevant. Coming from a very technical/scientific background, this course taught me about the nuances of governance, policy-making, corporate responsibility among many other things. It is good to have a historical and global perspective of economic development, the aggregate of human activities and our impact to the planet. While it seemed bleak to accomplish the goals set forth to obtain sustainable development, Dr. Sachs ended in a hopeful note. We do need more people that will ask and answer the question: "Why not?" I wish to learn more, if not work to help sustainable development a reality. While the SDGs are interconnected, I hope there will be a more detailed online course about each to the extent that people can focus on one or two. For my part, I would like to learn more about the underpinnings of SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy. SDGs 12 and 10 also form my core personal values and causes. Now looking for related-reading materials. | 1) among many other things. It is | Good | 1) to have a historical and global | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | very good knowledge | 1) very | Good | 1) knowledge | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | started quite good, but slow videos and the last quiz was about just numbers. it is good to know what are the measurements, but if we won't teach about that too, the more concrete informations and not numbers would be more informative and useful. | 1) started quite | Good | 1) but slow videos and the last | 3.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | started quite good, but slow videos and the last quiz was about just numbers. it is good to know what are the measurements, but if we won't teach about that too, the more concrete informations and not numbers would be more informative and useful. | 2) was about just numbers. it is | Good | 2) to know what are the measurements, | 3.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course is a "merit good" that it must be taught to everyone | 1) This course is a " merit | Good | 1) that it must be taught to | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Extremely well done videos, Professor Sachs is articulate and clear. The videos are a bit lengthy 25 minutes each so this asks quite some time investment. The quiz are not easy, one must often look up charts and work with various statistical methods which were not always easy to manage - hence the 4 instead of 5. However this does force one into mining world organizations for data so overall it's a good learning process. It never fails to amaze me how much data we have collected globally and for so long! | 1) for data so overall it's a | Good | 1) learning process. It never fails to | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | It was like reading a good book, I couldn't keep away! | 1) It was like reading a | Good | 1) book, I couldn't keep away! | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Course provided me great insight regarding different dimension of development and what is the appropriate definition of 'development'. The least developed countries of today will achieve the status of 'most developed countries' however, the cost that environment has paid for the present 'most developed countries' need to be taken care of with a balanced approach. The shackles of poverty can only be removed by social inclusion and creating good public policy. This course has added a new perspective about sustainable development. | 1) removed by social inclusion and creating | Good | 1) public policy. This course has added | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | good class | 1) | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course was absolutely fantastic, I cannot say enough good things about it! I could go on and on about the wonderful things about it but I would rather keep this short and to the point: if you are reading this review, take this course! | 1) absolutely fantastic, I cannot say enough | Good | 1) things about it! I could go | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Very interesting, with really good material and actual lectures. | 1) Very interesting, with really | Good | 1) material and actual lectures. | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | I really enjoyed how expert Professor Sachs is on sustainable development. He seems to know a lot about the subject and we can see a spark on his eyes when he is teaching. Moreover, the lectures and quizzes are comprehensive and well organized. However, apart from the last Week, I think that solutions for the many problems that Professor Sachs presents are not showed properly. Although there are many issues unsolved, there may be a lot of good examples throughout the world to be presented together with these issues. Kind Regards, Rodolfo | 1) there may be a lot of | Good | 1) examples throughout the world to be | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | It's a really good course and it is very complete. It gathers a lot of issues and it shows the principle problems and the possible solutions to each one. Besides, Prof. Sachs gives an humanitarian approach with which I fully agree. The only recommendation I have is to give an accomplishment certificate because it´s a very long course and we have to put a lot of effort to finish it. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) course and it is very complete. | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | It was very informative, one could discuss and compare the situation in different countries in politics. The course was oriented to America and especially to New York, where the Professor is working, but it also gave me a very good overall look on the global situation. Thank you very much for the great course! | 1) it also gave me a very | Good | 1) overall look on the global situation. | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | This course proves to be very informative, and the quizzes push to discover new sources for course material. However, it is highly focused on the programs set by the UN and could provide more solutions and feedbacks on what is being done. Very much oriented toward public policies. Good experience overall. | 1) Very much oriented toward public policies. | Good | 1) experience overall. | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | VERY GOOD THANKS A LOT | 1) VERY | Good | 1) THANKS A LOT | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | A course that helps you reflect on the mankind's contemporary and future challenges. This course warns the mankind to change its trajectory for its own good. After completing this course, I wonder why many governments are oblivious to serious threats that endanger homo-sapiens and decided to do what I can do within the sphere of my influence to save our beautiful planet "Earth". Thank you Dr. Sachs! | 1) change its trajectory for its own | Good | 1) After completing this course, I wonder | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Excellent course, comprehensive material, good classes! | 1) Excellent course, comprehensive material, | Good | 1) classes! | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Full of the diverse sub topics about sustainable development the course is pretty good in motivating you to consider this astounding subject that sadly requires a let's say continuation to allow you to make every thing that is discussed part of your life. | 1) sustainable development the course is pretty | Good | 1) in motivating you to consider this | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Very good course, I enjoyed it very much and appreciated the educated and polite style of Prof. Jeffrey Sachs. I would have appreciated a copy of the figures and grafique shown. The course release in 2012 would need to be updated. The Quizz need a real involvement of the student to be completed; challenging but I personnaly appreaciated very much. The Quizz would need some profound revision since some links are not available anymore and some answer are simply wrong. A Statement from the Columbia University / Prof. J. Sachs would have been welcome since completing the 14 week course imply a real involvement from the student. Overall very appreciated course, Thank Prof. Sachs! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I enjoyed it very much | 3.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Love it. Proff Sachs did not put me to sleep and that is a good thing!! Made me eager to learn. | 1) to sleep and that is a | Good | 1) thing! ! Made me eager to | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | I havent finished yet, so far has been very good. | 1) yet, so far has been very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | The content is good. The delivery of lectures can be more engaging, with aid of visuals to illustrate and emphasize important concepts. | 1) The content is | Good | 1) The delivery of lectures can be | 4.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | so good!! just wish this sort of topic was compulsory in the school curriculum | 1) so | Good | 1) ! just wish this sort of | 5.0 |
| T_hpstgKEeSA2iIAC22KLw | Learning chapter after chapter ! The videos are amazing and the quality of data and they way it is exposed is really good ! | 1) way it is exposed is really | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good for both inexperienced and experienced photographer. Gives you a better understanding of photography as a creative expression, and will definitely make you a better photographer. | 1) | Good | 1) for both inexperienced and experienced photographer. | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very good intro into photography! | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro into photography! | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The course covered the material thoroughly, but the presentation could be improved: 1. the examples, charts and other helpful aside additions could be left on screen during the relevant discussion. I often had to pause and go back to study the material that was only briefly displayed. 2. Using the screen for just a video of the lecturer speaking seems a waste of the many video techniques that could be included, with the lecturer in a small window at the side. 3. Although the lecturers tried not to favor one brand over another, at times it seemed like we were watching an infomercial. Maybe this can't be helped, as all the camera's features, and their accessories, were described in detail. I for one have a camera that I want to learn to use more professionally. Purchase suggestions could be moved to an addendum. In my opinion it should not be in the body of the course material. I am finding a lot of good information in the course, and am continuing with the second section. | 1) I am finding a lot of | Good | 1) information in the course, and am | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Pretty good, especially about composition and advices for hardware, bags, and discretion. A good basic course. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) especially about composition and advices for | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Pretty good, especially about composition and advices for hardware, bags, and discretion. A good basic course. | 2) for hardware, bags, and discretion. A | Good | 2) basic course. | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very good coarse...I am now taking #3 soon be finished, its just keeps getting better all the time...its so good I may move to Michigan, .... but then who would root for USC (Trojans- the real USC | 1) Very | Good | 1) coarse. . . I am now | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very good coarse...I am now taking #3 soon be finished, its just keeps getting better all the time...its so good I may move to Michigan, .... but then who would root for USC (Trojans- the real USC | 2) the time. . . its so | Good | 2) I may move to Michigan, . | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Really good course for clear concept about camera and exposure, focusing. aperture. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for clear concept about camera | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good: very wide and also deep in transferring knowedge assignments are clear and challenging because they require a story to which the shots ghave to follow Not so good: sometimes the shown examples are show too shortly, and the videos toggle between professor and motiv to fast. Show both at the same time woiuld help the (iOs) app is a bit limited (e.g. assessments can not be edited). | 1) | Good | 1) very wide and also deep in | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good: very wide and also deep in transferring knowedge assignments are clear and challenging because they require a story to which the shots ghave to follow Not so good: sometimes the shown examples are show too shortly, and the videos toggle between professor and motiv to fast. Show both at the same time woiuld help the (iOs) app is a bit limited (e.g. assessments can not be edited). | 2) shots ghave to follow Not so | Good | 2) sometimes the shown examples are show | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The professor explanation was good for beginners. | 1) The professor explanation was | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This course content was brilliant. It is a good course for everyone, from beginner to the well seasoned photographer.I think Mark & Peter will find a way to enlighten you in this course. | 1) content was brilliant. It is a | Good | 1) course for everyone, from beginner to | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | A very good course that introduces you to a lot of photography related concepts and terms. The assignments are very hands on and fun to do. The course also gives you great pointers for choosing a new camera! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course that introduces you to a | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | A fantastic introduction to photography, it is a well organized course with clear examples and a very easy to follow pace. If you're new to photography and would like to start building your knowledge about this toipic, this is the course to go. On the other hand, if you're an experienced photographer or have notions of photography, this will be a really easy course for you, but you will certainly gain a good insight into the topics you already know. | 1) but you will certainly gain a | Good | 1) insight into the topics you already | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good and informative beginner photograph course. | 1) | Good | 1) and informative beginner photograph course. | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | love it very good | 1) love it very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good basic course that helps you familiarize and get started with a lot of the camera setup and photography principles. | 1) | Good | 1) basic course that helps you familiarize | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Fundamental but good course for photography. | 1) Fundamental but | Good | 1) course for photography. | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | A very good course. The information is really useful and the professors explain it in a simple way. It was not very interesting for me to listen to the functions of i-phone ans sumsung, I think it's better to do this information not obligatory but on choice | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. The information is really useful | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very good, got me to learn the basics about photography and many other things i didn't know! | 1) Very | Good | 1) got me to learn the basics | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good introduction. Covers fundamentals clearly. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction. Covers fundamentals clearly. | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very good. Easy for beginners to follow up | 1) Very | Good | 1) Easy for beginners to follow up | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Absolutely Excellent. Tutors delivering this course are so knowledgeable but also present the information very well. They speak clearly and at such a good pace for learners. Thank you Professors Peter and Mark. | 1) speak clearly and at such a | Good | 1) pace for learners. Thank you Professors | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This topic is excellent, I learnt lots of things from this course. Thanks to Proffers Peter to provide such good session. | 1) to Proffers Peter to provide such | Good | 1) session. | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The content of the course is good and I feel it would be beneficial for beginners or those who want to top up their technical / academic knowledge on the subject. I found the terrible editing of the lectures distracting though, and it felt like no one bothered to over-see the final version that was published. I also don't think the fact that one has to pay so much to access the assessments, which many other courses don't do at all, is conducive to creating a strong engagement in the course. I wouldn't for example be encouraged to take another course from this series (not sure if one is offered). | 1) The content of the course is | Good | 1) and I feel it would be | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Nice！ I've been wanting to learn how to make a good photo, this course helped a lot. Thanks! | 1) to learn how to make a | Good | 1) photo, this course helped a lot. | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Introduction course to all the basic camera controls from button functions to memory card formatting to type of camera bag to use. Good place to start if you want to begin with the physical aspects of photography. | 1) type of camera bag to use. | Good | 1) place to start if you want | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | it is a very good course, it help the beginner understand more what is photography! | 1) it is a very | Good | 1) course, it help the beginner understand | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The instructors have structured this course rather well, focusing on fundamental principles to enable you to take good photographs (even without a sophisticated camera). What is 'good'? Well, this course is geared to make one dwell on that, steering you to give some thought about how you can photograph even everyday subjects interestingly; and the peer review process serves well in learning how to view your own work, and that of others, objectively. By the end of this course, you may be eager to invest in a better camera, or to sign up for the next module in the series. :) Thank you, Prof. Peter Glendinning and Prof. Mark Sullivan. | 1) principles to enable you to take | Good | 1) photographs (even without a sophisticated camera). | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | The instructors have structured this course rather well, focusing on fundamental principles to enable you to take good photographs (even without a sophisticated camera). What is 'good'? Well, this course is geared to make one dwell on that, steering you to give some thought about how you can photograph even everyday subjects interestingly; and the peer review process serves well in learning how to view your own work, and that of others, objectively. By the end of this course, you may be eager to invest in a better camera, or to sign up for the next module in the series. :) Thank you, Prof. Peter Glendinning and Prof. Mark Sullivan. | 2) without a sophisticated camera). What is | Good | 2) Well, this course is geared to | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Good basic Info | 1) | Good | 1) basic Info | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Very effective and comrehensive course. I learned a lot in this course. Trainers were good. | 1) lot in this course. Trainers were | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Basic photography course, but a good place to start or to refresh your memory | 1) Basic photography course, but a | Good | 1) place to start or to refresh | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Great course! But videos are not very good technically. Too much "jumping". | 1) course! But videos are not very | Good | 1) technically. Too much " jumping" . | 4.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | Pros:Good concepts. Peter Glanding is a very good teacher. Cons: Too short and concepts explained too quickly. | 1) concepts. Peter Glanding is a very | Good | 1) teacher. Cons: Too short and concepts | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | I have thoroughly loved and enjoyed watching videos and attempting assignments. Also Prof. Peter and Prof. Mark are really good teachers. I learned all that I could better from them rather than back in college. Hope to do more courses with them and also continue being a Spartan! And yes, hoping to meet the professors in person someday. | 1) Peter and Prof. Mark are really | Good | 1) teachers. I learned all that I | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | This was a good introduction to understanding the Exposure, Aperture and Shutterspeed. Peter presents the information in a concise and clear format. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introduction to understanding the Exposure, Aperture | 5.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | There were some technical challenges that made this course not as fun. The content was good. If you make the assignments easier to submit (for example: provide a box to write a statement as opposed to uploading one) it will remove frustration and increase enjoyment. | 1) not as fun. The content was | Good | 1) If you make the assignments easier | 3.0 |
| U-SKLJVlEeWF6gpQJiw6hQ | A good course | 1) A | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | It is really the best Statistics course that i have ever done. After doing all the course in statistics i'm very much confident in statistics. The course and Specialization is very clear, concise, nice explanation with example videos to have better understanding of the theory. It is highly recommended course for anyone interested to learn statistics in their career. Please do the maximum the course in the specialization to have good grasp of statistics if you are beginner like me :) | 1) course in the specialization to have | Good | 1) grasp of statistics if you are | 5.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | Very good introductory course for inferential statistics. It is wise to complete the first course Introduction to Probability and Data of this specialization before enrolling into this one to grasp the concepts. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course for inferential statistics. It | 4.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | This course is really well prepared. The material is very clear and good resources are provided for further learning. The quizzes and labs are always relevant to the course content. | 1) The material is very clear and | Good | 1) resources are provided for further learning. | 5.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | The teaching is good, the course is a little heavy and a lot to take in in the later weeks. But, as a further grounding for statistics and R, I would very much recommend it. | 1) The teaching is | Good | 1) the course is a little heavy | 4.0 |
| u3goXsk9EeWT3Aqsn0BGnQ | It has a little expensive tuition fee than other courses such as Data Science (Johns Hopkins) and Data life (HarvardX_edx). But I decided this course rather than choosing the others because I felt that it was well organized and quite good supplements. What I like most about this course is instructor. She looks like enthusiastic to give a her idea and wisdom. It attracts me to take this course even though it is expensive relatively. Anyway, I appreciate her for dedicated teaching in advance. | 1) it was well organized and quite | Good | 1) supplements. What I like most about | 5.0 |
| u41Z-k3PEeWjfw5p9aPb_w | Thankful that a course like this exists, as most MOOCs are quite basic. And thanks to Coursera for running the courses even though attendance seems to be low (darn, that pesky calculus pre-requisite). Lecture quality is varied--some quite good (such as the lectures in Boot Camp I) and others seem like he hadn't looked at his notes for a long time. It's great to hear a stats professor talk about the strengths and weaknesses of many approaches. It complements a mathematical statistics book quite well. It would have been nice to have had some problems that were more challenging. Overall, while the Johns Hopkins Data Science MOOCs are pretty good, they are a bit more basic than what's available through MIT and Stanford. | 1) pre-requisite). Lecture quality is varied--some quite | Good | 1) (such as the lectures in Boot | 4.0 |
| u41Z-k3PEeWjfw5p9aPb_w | Thankful that a course like this exists, as most MOOCs are quite basic. And thanks to Coursera for running the courses even though attendance seems to be low (darn, that pesky calculus pre-requisite). Lecture quality is varied--some quite good (such as the lectures in Boot Camp I) and others seem like he hadn't looked at his notes for a long time. It's great to hear a stats professor talk about the strengths and weaknesses of many approaches. It complements a mathematical statistics book quite well. It would have been nice to have had some problems that were more challenging. Overall, while the Johns Hopkins Data Science MOOCs are pretty good, they are a bit more basic than what's available through MIT and Stanford. | 2) Hopkins Data Science MOOCs are pretty | Good | 2) they are a bit more basic | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good update | 1) | Good | 1) update | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Provides a good start to anyone who is interested in understanding the basic specifications related to cellphones..SoC, CPU, GPU concepts are explained well! | 1) Provides a | Good | 1) start to anyone who is interested | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | I found this course interesting and engaging. i originally worried about whether I would be able to understand the instructor's accent. But, there was no problem understanding the instructor's English. The material is a good introduction and I learned quite a bit. | 1) instructor's English. The material is a | Good | 1) introduction and I learned quite a | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good and to the point content. Very informative | 1) Very | Good | 1) and to the point content. Very | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good glance on the technologies in this current trend. Good to keep ourselves updated and learned. | 1) A | Good | 1) glance on the technologies in this | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A good glance on the technologies in this current trend. Good to keep ourselves updated and learned. | 2) the technologies in this current trend. | Good | 2) to keep ourselves updated and learned. | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good lecture and educational. Extremely bad thing that is not offered and for free. same bad is that they are not try to explain more, (for students with less tech skills). In any case i am happy with the course and i will continue with the specialization, but regardless my decision to continue, my very fair rate will stay low, (especially for the fact that they didn't offer the course and for free). | 1) | Good | 1) lecture and educational. Extremely bad thing | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good intro, but the quizzes could be more challenging. | 1) | Good | 1) intro, but the quizzes could be | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good stuff, i would also compare Windows Phone to them as well. :) Nice work. | 1) | Good | 1) stuff, i would also compare Windows | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | the lecture gave industrial terms and key words which is good but it is mainly reading from the slides, no elaboration or illustration. | 1) terms and key words which is | Good | 1) but it is mainly reading from | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A very basic course for smartphone technology. For a laymen its good choice to cover all basics but not for a technical person. | 1) smartphone technology. For a laymen its | Good | 1) choice to cover all basics but | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good about smart phone | 1) Very | Good | 1) about smart phone | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good if you want to know in detail about the smartphones development history and lots of basic things | 1) | Good | 1) if you want to know in | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good level, excellent teacher!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) level, excellent teacher! ! ! | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | While informative I question the value of memorizing release years of os updates. Then again, it was an easy entry into the broader specialization. I think it is always a good thing to ease students in with a less challenging intro course much like a video game begins with an easy level and slowly gets harder. | 1) I think it is always a | Good | 1) thing to ease students in with | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | A brief introduction to all the need to know's about smartphones from day 1 providing enough detail for any audience. Would definetely suggest taking notes or watching again for people new to the concept. For me a good review of every smartphone technology. Thank you | 1) to the concept. For me a | Good | 1) review of every smartphone technology. Thank | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Very good content and presentation, Thank you | 1) Very | Good | 1) content and presentation, Thank you | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It's a good explanation about the technologies used on smartphones but it mote a comparison of what we had and what we have now. It's nothing really new and fundamental for this specialization. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) explanation about the technologies used on | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good structure but a basic course. It´s a good compilation of information about iOS and Android. I think that some generic informations should be also consider on this course no matter if it´s iOS or android. Some videos explaining the features like (gps, siri, multi-core processor...) would be good. | 1) | Good | 1) structure but a basic course. It´s | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good structure but a basic course. It´s a good compilation of information about iOS and Android. I think that some generic informations should be also consider on this course no matter if it´s iOS or android. Some videos explaining the features like (gps, siri, multi-core processor...) would be good. | 2) but a basic course. It´s a | Good | 2) compilation of information about iOS and | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good structure but a basic course. It´s a good compilation of information about iOS and Android. I think that some generic informations should be also consider on this course no matter if it´s iOS or android. Some videos explaining the features like (gps, siri, multi-core processor...) would be good. | 3) processor. . . ) would be | Good | 3) | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | GOOD COURSE TO START WITH. VERY OK. | 1) | Good | 1) COURSE TO START WITH. VERY OK. | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | good introduction to smartphone | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to smartphone | 3.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good job. | 1) | Good | 1) job. | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | really really good and best ever with this prof. | 1) really really | Good | 1) and best ever with this prof. | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Good course for summarize | 1) | Good | 1) course for summarize | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | It was ok. I knew pretty everything. Good for beginners. | 1) was ok. I knew pretty everything. | Good | 1) for beginners. | 5.0 |
| UA9HkQ8QEeWuEBJhzy2uFw | Thank you a very good overview of all the features and history of smartphones - iOS and Android. Some explanation of some of these features would have been useful Also, please consider Microsoft as well | 1) Thank you a very | Good | 1) overview of all the features and | 4.0 |
| uhCqzJVDEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | Great class. Good pacing, topics wide ranging and approached from a variety of angles. Loved it! | 1) Great class. | Good | 1) pacing, topics wide ranging and approached | 5.0 |
| uhCqzJVDEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | very good course! | 1) very | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| uhCqzJVDEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | good course, wish it went into more depth but overall worth one's time | 1) | Good | 1) course, wish it went into more | 4.0 |
| uhCqzJVDEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | This is a very good class | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) class | 5.0 |
| UHpTmhtHEeWBKhJRV_B8Gw | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| UIi0kNpgEeWP9RIK11q74w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | This class isn't very good. It is confusing and not well explained, and the quizzes are too short and badly written. I gave up on week 5 (of 6) because I just didn't feel i was learning very much, particularly about what the title of the course would suggest you'd be learning about. | 1) This class isn't very | Good | 1) It is confusing and not well | 2.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | This course has helped me to understand biological psychology of humans towards music. Based on this knowledge i am confident to create music which will seem good to the ears of humans. | 1) to create music which will seem | Good | 1) to the ears of humans. | 5.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | The second part of the course is very good. But first part, with introductions and definitions were very "heavy". | 1) part of the course is very | Good | 1) But first part, with introductions and | 3.0 |
| ujxZm0T9EeWhnQozdayc-w | Good video content, but quizzes need to be revised. | 1) | Good | 1) video content, but quizzes need to | 4.0 |
| Uq0cvh6TEeS2uyIACzGOcw | Fantastic Course; A bit heavy on the statistics, but very interesting to learn about a transition in food culture. Would be interesting to see a course abou other places can apply the findings to change their own good culture. | 1) the findings to change their own | Good | 1) culture. | 5.0 |
| Uq0cvh6TEeS2uyIACzGOcw | Good course organization and enlightening information. The videos are well peaced and the overall lectures quite clear and full of content. I just wish you could present further reading and complementary material. | 1) | Good | 1) course organization and enlightening information. The | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I find the course material at Coursera all very good. What is lacking is the peer review system. I understand that there is no way they could offer these courses at these prices. It is however the only reservation I have. | 1) course material at Coursera all very | Good | 1) What is lacking is the peer | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content is good, although it is very "USA centered". It is very good for people with small experience in the professional market, no just the games area, but all areas. Casey is a great teacher, he makes boring stuff be less boring. The only negative point of the course are the assignments. Again, like in the previous course, the assignments are too subjective, too personal, hard to do and evaluate. Unlike last course (Game Design), I really recommend this one, useful stuff. | 1) The course content is | Good | 1) although it is very " USA | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course content is good, although it is very "USA centered". It is very good for people with small experience in the professional market, no just the games area, but all areas. Casey is a great teacher, he makes boring stuff be less boring. The only negative point of the course are the assignments. Again, like in the previous course, the assignments are too subjective, too personal, hard to do and evaluate. Unlike last course (Game Design), I really recommend this one, useful stuff. | 2) USA centered" . It is very | Good | 2) for people with small experience in | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Great topics, and a good amount of information to know about of. | 1) Great topics, and a | Good | 1) amount of information to know about | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is very good for understanding the rest of what is needed to successfully complete games. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for understanding the rest of what | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I was most excited about taking this class (in fact, it's how I found the specialization as a whole) and I did not get as much out of it as I was hoping for. :-\ I think that it's geared to too wide of an audience, so we didn't get as specific as I was anticipating. I also felt that a lot of the time of the videos were taken up by telling us what not to do. ("You don't want to be too far to this side, but you don't want to be too far to the other side, right?") I did get some good information out of this class, but I found a disconnect between the lectures and the homework. When we were assigned an elevator pitch as an assignment, it might have been nice to have seen some examples of elevator pitches--what makes a good (or a bad) elevator pitch? What kind of things would be a good idea to include? Concrete examples would have been super helpful. Submitting my homework and then seeing that other people did vastly different stuff made me question my own submission (Did we just take it in a different direction or did I (or they) misunderstand the assignment?) but since we're all peer reviewing, it's a case of the blind leading the blind there. This also happened with the SWOT Document...which I don't think was even mentioned in the lectures at all in-depth. Again, it would have been helpful to have seen some concrete examples, as I've never heard of that document before. | 1) " ) I did get some | Good | 1) information out of this class, but | 2.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I was most excited about taking this class (in fact, it's how I found the specialization as a whole) and I did not get as much out of it as I was hoping for. :-\ I think that it's geared to too wide of an audience, so we didn't get as specific as I was anticipating. I also felt that a lot of the time of the videos were taken up by telling us what not to do. ("You don't want to be too far to this side, but you don't want to be too far to the other side, right?") I did get some good information out of this class, but I found a disconnect between the lectures and the homework. When we were assigned an elevator pitch as an assignment, it might have been nice to have seen some examples of elevator pitches--what makes a good (or a bad) elevator pitch? What kind of things would be a good idea to include? Concrete examples would have been super helpful. Submitting my homework and then seeing that other people did vastly different stuff made me question my own submission (Did we just take it in a different direction or did I (or they) misunderstand the assignment?) but since we're all peer reviewing, it's a case of the blind leading the blind there. This also happened with the SWOT Document...which I don't think was even mentioned in the lectures at all in-depth. Again, it would have been helpful to have seen some concrete examples, as I've never heard of that document before. | 2) examples of elevator pitches--what makes a | Good | 2) (or a bad) elevator pitch? What | 2.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | I was most excited about taking this class (in fact, it's how I found the specialization as a whole) and I did not get as much out of it as I was hoping for. :-\ I think that it's geared to too wide of an audience, so we didn't get as specific as I was anticipating. I also felt that a lot of the time of the videos were taken up by telling us what not to do. ("You don't want to be too far to this side, but you don't want to be too far to the other side, right?") I did get some good information out of this class, but I found a disconnect between the lectures and the homework. When we were assigned an elevator pitch as an assignment, it might have been nice to have seen some examples of elevator pitches--what makes a good (or a bad) elevator pitch? What kind of things would be a good idea to include? Concrete examples would have been super helpful. Submitting my homework and then seeing that other people did vastly different stuff made me question my own submission (Did we just take it in a different direction or did I (or they) misunderstand the assignment?) but since we're all peer reviewing, it's a case of the blind leading the blind there. This also happened with the SWOT Document...which I don't think was even mentioned in the lectures at all in-depth. Again, it would have been helpful to have seen some concrete examples, as I've never heard of that document before. | 3) kind of things would be a | Good | 3) idea to include? Concrete examples would | 2.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | very good course :) | 1) very | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | It is a very good course that covers multiple things, most of them would take an entire course to learn all the aspects but the teacher does a great effort to point most of the important things for the business. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course that covers multiple things, most | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | So far so good! | 1) So far so | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The Good > A lot of content > Provided a lot of outside reading material > Passionate professor > A lot of good refreshers (about CVs, teamwork, business practices) Suggestions > I hope in the future more time could be spent on monetization theories and practices > More emphasis on mobile games (as much as I dislike them) > Maybe some type of "case study" examples about games from conceptualization to publishing | 1) The | Good | 1) > A lot of content > | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The Good > A lot of content > Provided a lot of outside reading material > Passionate professor > A lot of good refreshers (about CVs, teamwork, business practices) Suggestions > I hope in the future more time could be spent on monetization theories and practices > More emphasis on mobile games (as much as I dislike them) > Maybe some type of "case study" examples about games from conceptualization to publishing | 2) Passionate professor > A lot of | Good | 2) refreshers (about CVs, teamwork, business practices) | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | It was good and useful to get a better idea about the industry | 1) It was | Good | 1) and useful to get a better | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Course assignments have nothing to do with the lectures. Most of the assignments could have been copy-pasted stuff from the previous course in this specialization. Same as with previous course - review point organization leaves too many space for individual opinions. Assignment with a video clip is something I didn't expect at all. I had to download a bunch of free software to make it, and I didn't make it good enough, because I'm not skilled in using those programs. Of course, it then reflected my average score, because review point system is too much oriented toward personal opinions of others. I felt this course gave me the least out of this specialization, and I also felt this course scratched a lot of things, but didn't quite get into many details that could have been mentioned (maybe even instead of the assignments that were quite dull to me). There is a section of clips that is a bit useless to those outside of USA. Unlike previous course, this one was at least doable inside the expected work hours / week (except for the video assignment which took me a bit more), and that's why I'll give it 1 point higher than previous course. This review might sound a bit harsh, even though it's not the intention. With a bit of polishing, it could become really great, but it really could use some of the improvements I have mentioned above. | 1) it, and I didn't make it | Good | 1) enough, because I'm not skilled in | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Very good course, I learned a considerable amount from it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learned a considerable amount | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | good course, teach much about entrepreneurship... Unfortunately, most of the examples are by and only U.S citizens =( | 1) | Good | 1) course, teach much about entrepreneurship. . | 5.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | The course was very superficial, mostly with tips and hints. It's good to be aware that the option for performing the quizes and tasks were unavailable, making it hard to evaluate the experience of the course fully. | 1) mostly with tips and hints. It's | Good | 1) to be aware that the option | 2.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is good for someone that's interested in starting up a company - for video game development or really any kind of self-employed, consulting, freelance or even small business company. I've been self-employed for 15+ years and can honestly say I didn't learn anything that I hadn't already known. But my experiences in entrepreneurship and this course both are similar in content, meaning the class is a good resource for those who don't know where to start. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for someone that's interested in starting | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This course is good for someone that's interested in starting up a company - for video game development or really any kind of self-employed, consulting, freelance or even small business company. I've been self-employed for 15+ years and can honestly say I didn't learn anything that I hadn't already known. But my experiences in entrepreneurship and this course both are similar in content, meaning the class is a good resource for those who don't know where to start. | 2) content, meaning the class is a | Good | 2) resource for those who don't know | 4.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This is a good course, but being a professional in the software industry, I know many of the teachings described here. It was still a good refresher to have. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course, but being a professional in | 3.0 |
| urbm-CT-EeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This is a good course, but being a professional in the software industry, I know many of the teachings described here. It was still a good refresher to have. | 2) described here. It was still a | Good | 2) refresher to have. | 3.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | The course is good only for those people who have only started thinking about launching their first business | 1) The course is | Good | 1) only for those people who have | 3.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | good enough | 1) | Good | 1) enough | 5.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Content is good and teaching material is of good quality. Some more examples of the application of the concepts discussed during the lectures could make this course even more interesting. | 1) Content is | Good | 1) and teaching material is of good | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Content is good and teaching material is of good quality. Some more examples of the application of the concepts discussed during the lectures could make this course even more interesting. | 2) good and teaching material is of | Good | 2) quality. Some more examples of the | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Very good insight for potential entrepreneurs! | 1) Very | Good | 1) insight for potential entrepreneurs! | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Very good information but the videos could be a bit more exciting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information but the videos could be | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Good Content, and a lot of knowledge its highly recommended to read the opportunity analysis canvas book before watching the videos. the Audio in many Videos is mono not stereo | 1) | Good | 1) Content, and a lot of knowledge | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | well this introduction is good and i learn the basic of the entrepreneurship | 1) well this introduction is | Good | 1) and i learn the basic of | 5.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | It is a course with lots of information but the delivery is a little weak. It is a presentation with an instructor in the corner but he or she mostly just reads the presentation aloud. There needs to be much more interaction, much more animation and passion, and the use of "real" people in a "real" environment. I can tell you that my mind wondered constantly because of the lack of passion and interest in the subject being conveyed by the presenter as well as the monotonous delivery. Again, the content is valuable and solid, but that in and of itself does not make for a good course. | 1) itself does not make for a | Good | 1) course. | 3.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | An interesting course with good information and interesting lectures. Guest speakers is also a positive thing for the course | 1) An interesting course with | Good | 1) information and interesting lectures. Guest speakers | 4.0 |
| URpKtPs6EeSnBSIACi-PoQ | Good to learn quite a few new stuff. | 1) | Good | 1) to learn quite a few new | 5.0 |
| UShq4HPgEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| UShq4HPgEeWi0g6YoSAL-w | The course material was good but the lectures being in Spanish with English translations was difficult to follow. I was disappointed in the short videos with subtitles. | 1) The course material was | Good | 1) but the lectures being in Spanish | 3.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good one. Detailed. Too much of video clips from television etc. Can avoid those. | 1) | Good | 1) one. Detailed. Too much of video | 4.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | A good introductory course in astronomy that extends even to intermediate astronomy. I highly recommend it! | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course in astronomy that extends | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | The astronomy course exceeded my expectations. I learned a great deal from the video lectures and the astrpoedia textbook. I was surprised that preparing for the essay questions was also a good source for added knowledge in researching for the assignments. I am indebted to Chris Impey for the excellent lectures and course. Everything was well presented and explained well but I could not get up to understand much of the last lesson – Life in the Universe. In summary, great course and recommend it without reservations. Kudos and thanks to Chris Impey. | 1) the essay questions was also a | Good | 1) source for added knowledge in researching | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very Good Course I Love Astronomy Difficult butt Helpful course. I'm gain 89.8%. Good Percentage. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course I Love Astronomy Difficult butt | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very Good Course I Love Astronomy Difficult butt Helpful course. I'm gain 89.8%. Good Percentage. | 2) Helpful course. I'm gain 89. 8%. | Good | 2) Percentage. | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | its really good | 1) its really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This course is bad! I had come upto week 4. While Chris Impey is knowledgeable and good, the course structure is very poor and leaves a lot to be desired. I would venture to make some suggestions: a. Restrict each video to a max of 7 minutes. More than that makes one sleepy. b. Reduce the number of videos in each module to a max of say 6. c. Instead of having Chris expound it like an audio reading, please include some slides, pictures,tables so that the matter to be learnt becomes self evident and Chris doesn't have to speak so much. A good example is the Coursera "The Global Financial Crisis", which I am also doing currently. d. If you feel all the material in this course has to be studied, then to achieve the objectives in (a) and (b) above, divide this course into two parts, Astronomy: Exploring Time and Space - part I & II. e. The written assignments are very simple and do not require any mental resources other than memory. Can you make the questions more challenging? For example, in Telescopes (Assignment 2), can you not ask a question like "In addition to Atacama, Chile, using Google earth, which other parts of the globe may be suitable for installation of ground based telescopes?" or "To obviate the blurring effect of the atmosphere, discuss the possibility of high altitude balloon based telescopes?" or "What do you feel about the fact that since today's mobile phones have high computing ability, their components can be used to make a low-cost space based interferometric telescopes?" Kudos to Chris and his team! On the whole, knowledge wise, this is a good course. | 1) While Chris Impey is knowledgeable and | Good | 1) the course structure is very poor | 1.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This course is bad! I had come upto week 4. While Chris Impey is knowledgeable and good, the course structure is very poor and leaves a lot to be desired. I would venture to make some suggestions: a. Restrict each video to a max of 7 minutes. More than that makes one sleepy. b. Reduce the number of videos in each module to a max of say 6. c. Instead of having Chris expound it like an audio reading, please include some slides, pictures,tables so that the matter to be learnt becomes self evident and Chris doesn't have to speak so much. A good example is the Coursera "The Global Financial Crisis", which I am also doing currently. d. If you feel all the material in this course has to be studied, then to achieve the objectives in (a) and (b) above, divide this course into two parts, Astronomy: Exploring Time and Space - part I & II. e. The written assignments are very simple and do not require any mental resources other than memory. Can you make the questions more challenging? For example, in Telescopes (Assignment 2), can you not ask a question like "In addition to Atacama, Chile, using Google earth, which other parts of the globe may be suitable for installation of ground based telescopes?" or "To obviate the blurring effect of the atmosphere, discuss the possibility of high altitude balloon based telescopes?" or "What do you feel about the fact that since today's mobile phones have high computing ability, their components can be used to make a low-cost space based interferometric telescopes?" Kudos to Chris and his team! On the whole, knowledge wise, this is a good course. | 2) have to speak so much. A | Good | 2) example is the Coursera " The | 1.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | This course is bad! I had come upto week 4. While Chris Impey is knowledgeable and good, the course structure is very poor and leaves a lot to be desired. I would venture to make some suggestions: a. Restrict each video to a max of 7 minutes. More than that makes one sleepy. b. Reduce the number of videos in each module to a max of say 6. c. Instead of having Chris expound it like an audio reading, please include some slides, pictures,tables so that the matter to be learnt becomes self evident and Chris doesn't have to speak so much. A good example is the Coursera "The Global Financial Crisis", which I am also doing currently. d. If you feel all the material in this course has to be studied, then to achieve the objectives in (a) and (b) above, divide this course into two parts, Astronomy: Exploring Time and Space - part I & II. e. The written assignments are very simple and do not require any mental resources other than memory. Can you make the questions more challenging? For example, in Telescopes (Assignment 2), can you not ask a question like "In addition to Atacama, Chile, using Google earth, which other parts of the globe may be suitable for installation of ground based telescopes?" or "To obviate the blurring effect of the atmosphere, discuss the possibility of high altitude balloon based telescopes?" or "What do you feel about the fact that since today's mobile phones have high computing ability, their components can be used to make a low-cost space based interferometric telescopes?" Kudos to Chris and his team! On the whole, knowledge wise, this is a good course. | 3) whole, knowledge wise, this is a | Good | 3) course. | 1.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Very good and full of interesting information. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and full of interesting information. | 5.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good course inviting the scientific thought process to evolve instead of believing the old stories. | 1) | Good | 1) course inviting the scientific thought process | 4.0 |
| usIwBhODEeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Good explanations about the topics. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations about the topics. | 4.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | One of a kind, course on diabetes. It contains few levels of difficulty. Weeks 1 & 2 can be passed without watching the lectures at all. Weeks 3 and 4 are some serious molecular science,presented by the top head on this course Jens Juul Holst in perfect English. So far, so good. Week 5 is somewhat easier than previous weeks. | 1) in perfect English. So far, so | Good | 1) Week 5 is somewhat easier than | 5.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | Good one! | 1) | Good | 1) one! | 5.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | I WOULD LIKE MORE COURSES LIKE THIS, A LOT OF INFORMATION AND GOOD TEACHERS | 1) THIS, A LOT OF INFORMATION AND | Good | 1) TEACHERS | 4.0 |
| UTmoThr5EeWqIgq-TOy4Xw | extremely good | 1) extremely | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Its an excellent course. Many difficult concepts have been explained in plain language with good examples. | 1) been explained in plain language with | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| UwQkL5z8EeWJORITtzkPnQ | good course to learn something more in the markets | 1) | Good | 1) course to learn something more in | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | very good coarse...would like a copy for reference.... what can we do about that? oh and by the way this coarse is so beautiful...I took photography for four years at a local junior college and didn't learn (or remember) nearly as much while being challenged and having fun at the same time.... its is so good you want to learn more....and you sure can, I am on fire trying to find out MORE. I now read quite a few articles about photography in various publications, as most "latest" info comes through the grapevine. I always inquire as " How did he do that"? it's amazing how much I don't know! Good job guys | 1) very | Good | 1) coarse. . . would like a | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | very good coarse...would like a copy for reference.... what can we do about that? oh and by the way this coarse is so beautiful...I took photography for four years at a local junior college and didn't learn (or remember) nearly as much while being challenged and having fun at the same time.... its is so good you want to learn more....and you sure can, I am on fire trying to find out MORE. I now read quite a few articles about photography in various publications, as most "latest" info comes through the grapevine. I always inquire as " How did he do that"? it's amazing how much I don't know! Good job guys | 2) . . . its is so | Good | 2) you want to learn more. . | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | very good coarse...would like a copy for reference.... what can we do about that? oh and by the way this coarse is so beautiful...I took photography for four years at a local junior college and didn't learn (or remember) nearly as much while being challenged and having fun at the same time.... its is so good you want to learn more....and you sure can, I am on fire trying to find out MORE. I now read quite a few articles about photography in various publications, as most "latest" info comes through the grapevine. I always inquire as " How did he do that"? it's amazing how much I don't know! Good job guys | 3) amazing how much I don't know! | Good | 3) job guys | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | Simple yet comprehensively explained course that inspires confidence in beginners and I guess works, as a good platform for amature photographers to brushup the basics. | 1) and I guess works, as a | Good | 1) platform for amature photographers to brushup | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | This course was awesome! It totally unlocked the secrets of ISO, shutter speed, aperture, focal length, and focal distance. Now instead of floundering around by zooming in and out hoping to get a good shot, I can compose a shot in manual mode and get close to the exposure or effect I was intending to get. (Well, most of the time anyway.) | 1) and out hoping to get a | Good | 1) shot, I can compose a shot | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | I am in love with coursera team, Faculty and their work for the youth and people who are trying to get educated and don't have the resources to do so. Keep up the good work. | 1) to do so. Keep up the | Good | 1) work. | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The glitches with Coursera itself are not excusable and should be taken as a black mark against the organization. They made the professors and Michigan State look less than average and caused confusion among the students. The material is good and it makes me learn about the camera that I use and try new things. | 1) among the students. The material is | Good | 1) and it makes me learn about | 3.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | It is a very good course, both professsors using simple , clear but detail explantion to teach us ! Thanks a lot! | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course, both professsors using simple , | 5.0 |
| UYzGkJfFEeWqkw5zNB248Q | The only content I had access to were lectures, but I still want to say that I really liked this course. And I'm looking forward to another courses of this specialization. I'm a music student with bachelor's degree in Computer Science and dozens of coursera certificates (from the times they were free), I'm curious about everything. I used to say that I'll learn to paint when I retire :) But it turned out that I can do pretty good photos without having to wait until retirement. It's not the same thing, of course, but it's a visual art. This course and "Cameras, Exposure, and Photography" teached me a lot and brought so much joy into my life. I'm not planning to make money as a photographer, but I'm happy to have an opportunity to create better and better photographs. Thank you, Prof. Glendinning and Prof. Sullivan. And thanks to everyone who helped to create this course. My photos can be found here, in case you're curious: https://www.flickr.com/photos/140271759@N03/ Most of them are made with my old cheap digital camera, only a few with a new DSLR. I would never have the courage and motivation to buy it without your courses. Thanks again for all the happiness photography brings into my life :) | 1) out that I can do pretty | Good | 1) photos without having to wait until | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | good, looking forward to practical application | 1) | Good | 1) looking forward to practical application | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This was an excellently carved course with very good examples, which could be related to day to day application in digital world. Thanks a lot. | 1) an excellently carved course with very | Good | 1) examples, which could be related to | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Learnt new things. Reading material is good. Instructor clearly explains the concepts. | 1) Learnt new things. Reading material is | Good | 1) Instructor clearly explains the concepts. | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | It was a good course. Concepts like ZMOT and CDJ were the most interesting topics in these course !! Thanks. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course. Concepts like ZMOT and CDJ | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | I found that the five points to learn for each module become overly distracting. I hope the course doesn't face any constraint to get the five points. Otherwise, the course is fairly good. | 1) points. Otherwise, the course is fairly | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Highly recommend. A clear, practical and well presented overview of the digital marketing field, with an emphasis on the equal playing field: Kevin makes an effort to provide free resources and tools so that any marketer may use the power of digital analytics unhampered by resource limitations. Which is a good thing because marketers often work with budget constraints. Convincing companies to invest more in marketing, which can be a long term strategy, may not always be easy. The course covers basic concepts, ethics, history as well as practical methods. A very useful addition to my marketing knowledge base, and toolbox. | 1) by resource limitations. Which is a | Good | 1) thing because marketers often work with | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good basics | 1) | Good | 1) basics | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very special, good insight and directions to grap digital analysis subjects. | 1) Very special, | Good | 1) insight and directions to grap digital | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good instructor and good structure and pace to the class. Would have liked more real-life examples, and would have liked peer review questions that required more thought and strategy behind them. "Which channel do you like more" isn't really that intriguing a question. Instead, a different question could have been "How might you leverage each channel for different purposes?" | 1) Very | Good | 1) instructor and good structure and pace | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good instructor and good structure and pace to the class. Would have liked more real-life examples, and would have liked peer review questions that required more thought and strategy behind them. "Which channel do you like more" isn't really that intriguing a question. Instead, a different question could have been "How might you leverage each channel for different purposes?" | 2) Very good instructor and | Good | 2) structure and pace to the class. | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good course, concise | 1) | Good | 1) course, concise | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good foundational course to get an understanding of concepts and first principles in Digital | 1) | Good | 1) foundational course to get an understanding | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This course did a good job of explaining the practical application on several complex marketing theories. | 1) This course did a | Good | 1) job of explaining the practical application | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Interesting course and good basic knowledge! I wish we had more practice though. | 1) Interesting course and | Good | 1) basic knowledge! I wish we had | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This was a good course, but a bit elementary. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course, but a bit elementary. | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Great intro into analytics. The required reading is woefully outdated, but still gives good basic info that one can then build upon with more recent data. | 1) is woefully outdated, but still gives | Good | 1) basic info that one can then | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good course for people who wants to have an overview of all the options, possibilities and tools existing in the Marketing Analytics field | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for people who wants to | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The lecture presents Google's ZMOT marketing model, how it benefited (and shaped) marketing research and strategies to increase conversion and loyalty. It is a good contextual introduction if you never heard of "search engine marketing", "cost per acquisition" or "click through rate". If you know the basics, it is probably not a good use of your time. I didn't like that the content feels like evangelism for (paid) google services, and most sources of the course are either random blogs or related to interested parties (google, twitter). I still learnt a couple of cool metrics I didn't know about, but the course didn't bring any added value to the blog links provided. | 1) conversion and loyalty. It is a | Good | 1) contextual introduction if you never heard | 2.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | The lecture presents Google's ZMOT marketing model, how it benefited (and shaped) marketing research and strategies to increase conversion and loyalty. It is a good contextual introduction if you never heard of "search engine marketing", "cost per acquisition" or "click through rate". If you know the basics, it is probably not a good use of your time. I didn't like that the content feels like evangelism for (paid) google services, and most sources of the course are either random blogs or related to interested parties (google, twitter). I still learnt a couple of cool metrics I didn't know about, but the course didn't bring any added value to the blog links provided. | 2) basics, it is probably not a | Good | 2) use of your time. I didn't | 2.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | If you have slightly dabbled in the digital marketing space, you have probably come across what you will learn in this class. But overall, it was a very good beginner course. | 1) But overall, it was a very | Good | 1) beginner course. | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good class but very little case studies or real world example. | 1) | Good | 1) class but very little case studies | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Not so good! There is much water | 1) Not so | Good | 1) There is much water | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good overview of digital marketing neeeds | 1) Very | Good | 1) overview of digital marketing neeeds | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | great course, very good insights about the new marketing reality | 1) great course, very | Good | 1) insights about the new marketing reality | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good introduction into the material. It's great how rating other students' writeups helps you penetrate the material yourself, especially since there are no right or wrong answers. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into the material. It's great | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This course is good introduction in digital marketing. | 1) This course is | Good | 1) introduction in digital marketing. | 3.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Interesting content and very well designed course. Instructor is good at explaining concepts. | 1) very well designed course. Instructor is | Good | 1) at explaining concepts. | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | This course delivered a lot of good, practical information on how to work with digital analytics to improve customer content, engage with customers and potential customers, and use quantifiable data for decision making. Take it to improve your understanding of digital analytics. | 1) This course delivered a lot of | Good | 1) practical information on how to work | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Good overview of digital analytics. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of digital analytics. | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Basic, but good knowledge | 1) Basic, but | Good | 1) knowledge | 4.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good course. The material is very well presented and the quizzes and assignments are very consistent with the course material. I would recommend it to anyone who wishes to dig a little deeper into marketing analytics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The material is very well | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | It's a very introductory class, only works for newbies of digital marketing. Maybe it's a good start point. | 1) of digital marketing. Maybe it's a | Good | 1) start point. | 2.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Really good course. Mr Hartman is an excellent instructor, the lectures are well presented and lecture notes are easy to follow. Together with the required reading the course content feels really "complete". Highly recommended. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Mr Hartman is an excellent | 5.0 |
| u_Rrw_tfEeSuiSIACwuNww | Very good in case if you are working in marketing, web analytics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) in case if you are working | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | very good and useful,what I really mean is that this couse is very useful 4 new-man. | 1) very | Good | 1) and useful, what I really mean | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v-MRpkhJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good! The examples provided in the course makes it unique and extremely valuable! The final exercise is great! | 1) Very | Good | 1) The examples provided in the course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | we are expecting some more similar good content mooc courses from michigan state university, regarding digital marketing , inbound marketing, internet of things,etc | 1) we are expecting some more similar | Good | 1) content mooc courses from michigan state | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I really can recommend this course to everyone who wants to structure his negotiations. I would describe myself as an experienced business negotiator, but the scientific approach to issues you encounter before, in and after a negotiation really helped me to improve my personal results. Mr Siedel is a very good speaker, who gives very realisitc and sometimes fun examples. I am really glad that I have found this course! | 1) results. Mr Siedel is a very | Good | 1) speaker, who gives very realisitc and | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good lecture on Negotiation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) lecture on Negotiation. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A very good course. I would only add the need to translate into other languages (Portuguese). | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. I would only add the | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good professor ! thank you so much Sir | 1) Very | Good | 1) professor ! thank you so much | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very Good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | So Good | 1) So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A really good tool to understanding how works the world of negotiations! | 1) A really | Good | 1) tool to understanding how works the | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course and material; sometimes a bit too technical and detailed on defining specific components of a negotiation, but helpful overall. | 1) | Good | 1) course and material; sometimes a bit | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | It's a good course!just a observation that isn't 100% translated. Tasks and evaluation is in english. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course! just a observation that isn't | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good level of depth and clear explanation with a lot of good examples. | 1) | Good | 1) level of depth and clear explanation | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good level of depth and clear explanation with a lot of good examples. | 2) clear explanation with a lot of | Good | 2) examples. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The best online course I have taken in my life. I like so much the way in what the professor explains every concept of the course. It was a really good experience start with a course like this. | 1) the course. It was a really | Good | 1) experience start with a course like | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This is a very good course.It covers all the aspects of negotiations.The professor delivering the lectures makes sure that the lectures are enjoyable.I had a great time listening to him and participating in the exercises. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course. It covers all the aspects | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I have so far, loved the examples given in this course ! The teacher gets you to be very interactive by asking you to answer some questions in the videos. The subject is interesting, and the way the courses are is a good way to make you quick learn about it. | 1) way the courses are is a | Good | 1) way to make you quick learn | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A good course which informs about the necessary skills | 1) A | Good | 1) course which informs about the necessary | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This was a very good course covering negotiation theory from a very interdisciplinary perspective. It covered behavioral sciences, game theory, and interpersonal communications aspects with potential implications to negotiation. | 1) This was a very | Good | 1) course covering negotiation theory from a | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Really good!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | really good I like the course | 1) really | Good | 1) I like the course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I think this course is interesting, full of good experiences and examples, a real tool for becoming a good negotiator. | 1) this course is interesting, full of | Good | 1) experiences and examples, a real tool | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I think this course is interesting, full of good experiences and examples, a real tool for becoming a good negotiator. | 2) a real tool for becoming a | Good | 2) negotiator. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very useful course in order not only to improve your negotiations in business firms , but also good for your daily communications and deals. will let you decide correct choice's and prevent traps and failure's during your negotiations. | 1) in business firms , but also | Good | 1) for your daily communications and deals. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course for those who want to learn about negotiations. I like very much the videos with all the examples. | 1) | Good | 1) course for those who want to | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good and useful technics with lots of examples to help you understand and memorize | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful technics with lots of | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A very good course, held by a very clear and understandable professor with a really good way of teaching and explaining such a complex argument. This is really helpful not only applied to business but also in everyday life. After this course i'm able to look at negotiations with a different perspective by understanding the scenario in which i'm involved. I suggest this course to all the people, it gives you a boost in your life | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, held by a very clear | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A very good course, held by a very clear and understandable professor with a really good way of teaching and explaining such a complex argument. This is really helpful not only applied to business but also in everyday life. After this course i'm able to look at negotiations with a different perspective by understanding the scenario in which i'm involved. I suggest this course to all the people, it gives you a boost in your life | 2) and understandable professor with a really | Good | 2) way of teaching and explaining such | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very inspiring everyone must take these courses very good | 1) everyone must take these courses very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good material and final. Quizzes at the end of each week would be helpful. Also, the videos could have been quite a bit shorter. | 1) | Good | 1) material and final. Quizzes at the | 3.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very very good! Professor Siedel, thank you very much. I missed more math, but I think It would be a different course then. Recommended. | 1) Very very | Good | 1) Professor Siedel, thank you very much. | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent course. Very easy to follow, and puts up some good challenges. And George is very knowledgable. | 1) to follow, and puts up some | Good | 1) challenges. And George is very knowledgable. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good! It's my 2nd course on Coursera after "Learning how to learn" and I supposed to meet small quizes after each unit, just to remember the material better. | 1) Very | Good | 1) It's my 2nd course on Coursera | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good to understand. | 1) | Good | 1) to understand. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | just loving the way arbitration , negotitaion and mediation are explained. really good!!! | 1) negotitaion and mediation are explained. really | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great content, Professor's really good. Thanks! | 1) Great content, Professor's really | Good | 1) Thanks! | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good introduction, over focus on legal terms to my opinion, but most of the course deal with how to nego' and how to make successful nego'. | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction, over focus on legal terms | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I appreciate this course because has some examples practical and good explanations | 1) because has some examples practical and | Good | 1) explanations | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good intro on how to approach deals making and dispute resolution analysis. | 1) | Good | 1) intro on how to approach deals | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Course that can help you get tools for understanding world of negotiation. Very good theoretical part. Easy for learning even for non English speakers. | 1) for understanding world of negotiation. Very | Good | 1) theoretical part. Easy for learning even | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This course gave some very good and useful insights on negotiation and its tact | 1) This course gave some very | Good | 1) and useful insights on negotiation and | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good context, however, long videos, didn’t catch my attention. | 1) | Good | 1) context, however, long videos, didn’t catch | 2.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | This is a terrific course and I would strongly recommend it to anyone who feels he is not a very good negotiator. In particular, I believe that people in the technology fields would most benefit from this course as they are typically weaker in the soft skills departments than other people in other fields. | 1) feels he is not a very | Good | 1) negotiator. In particular, I believe that | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | mostly it was good, should have quizzes in each section | 1) mostly it was | Good | 1) should have quizzes in each section | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course. I feel I got a lot out of it to fine-tune some of my tactics. One thing that I would find useful - there are many terms introduced throughout the course. It would help if there was a reference link to jargon where I could look up the meaning of terms. | 1) | Good | 1) course. I feel I got a | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | fantastic,good | 1) fantastic, | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course, structure, content, and engaging fellow students -- big Thanks UofM! :)) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, structure, content, and engaging fellow | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | I think Mr. George Siedel is an excellent teacher and this course is quite good overall. Thanks to coursera for providing such high quality courses. | 1) teacher and this course is quite | Good | 1) overall. Thanks to coursera for providing | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The teacher really consider the students from different countries make the course in a good path. | 1) countries make the course in a | Good | 1) path. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course. It was focused mostly on US-based low, so not everything applies to business in my country. I would be more than happy if I find training/hints section extended in the future. Anyway, I really enjoyed it | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It was focused mostly on | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course for daily life and work. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for daily life and work. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The course content was good. | 1) The course content was | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | 4/5: Professor is a good teacher and very well versed in the material, which is very relevant. Only issue I had, which justifies a solid 5/5 becoming a 4/5 in my opinion, was that it was a little too slow. | 1) 4/5: Professor is a | Good | 1) teacher and very well versed in | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The lectures are fairly good. However the course could have been made more valuable by either providing the slides used in each module or excerpts from the recommended book could have been provided instead of just an Amazon link to purchase the book. | 1) The lectures are fairly | Good | 1) However the course could have been | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very useful. There are many interesting practical things in the course. Professor Seidel have very good diction. I'm satisfied ;) | 1) the course. Professor Seidel have very | Good | 1) diction. I'm satisfied ;) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | An excellent course, with plenty of practical examples! Another good aspect is that it touched on the legal aspects of negotiation and contracts, which is important since so many types of negotiation have a formal and legal element. There's even an opportunity to practice a realistic negotiation with other students via video calling. | 1) with plenty of practical examples! Another | Good | 1) aspect is that it touched on | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | It's so good. | 1) It's so | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The course is very and very good and usefull, but it's easier for the attendants to take the quiz by the end of each Module and do the final test shorter (about 10-15 questions are enough) | 1) The course is very and very | Good | 1) and usefull, but it's easier for | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | He is certainly a very good teacher, but he is boring. He uses this same monotonous tone,but seeing the content it does help us understand. | 1) He is certainly a very | Good | 1) teacher, but he is boring. He | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Enjoyed it a lot, very good lecturer! Like his book too. Definitely will recommend to other people | 1) Enjoyed it a lot, very | Good | 1) lecturer! Like his book too. Definitely | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A very good insight to another way of negotiating. I am only half way through but already thinking differently. | 1) A very | Good | 1) insight to another way of negotiating. | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | A good course | 1) A | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Really good program, amazing profesor. I really enjoy this opportunity. | 1) Really | Good | 1) program, amazing profesor. I really enjoy | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great course! simple, straight to the point, and good exercises to learn | 1) simple, straight to the point, and | Good | 1) exercises to learn | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | It was definitely a bad idea to take up this course as my first MooC I took seriously. Professor George J. Siedel’s course was too well-structured, consistent and practical, and have raised my MooC expectations level so high, that now, being absolutely hungry with massive online education, I face certain difficulties in finding a course to keep to the same level. But I go on believing that it's possible. As for the practical application of the knowledge obtained - it’s too early to make conclusions, but having tried some techniques in reality, I find them very helpful. What’s also great: now, getting a bit deeper in some of the issues raised by the course, say, negotiator’s decision making psychology, I find out that what I see in 10 different sources, had already been covered by this only course. And the final practical task was a bit of mind-blowing for me. In a good sense. Thank you very much for the experience! | 1) of mind-blowing for me. In a | Good | 1) sense. Thank you very much for | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course. Covers the key aspects of negotiation in useful bitesized pieces. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Covers the key aspects of | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good! George Siedel was an amazing teacher with a lot of great tips, tricks and tools to use in real life negotiations. I am very appreciative for the opportunity to complete this course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) George Siedel was an amazing teacher | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good experiences and explainations from the professior. Hope you guys enjoy this course as i did | 1) Very | Good | 1) experiences and explainations from the professior. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good and interesting course with lots of information on how to negotiate. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course with lots of | 4.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good, interesting, amazing professor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) interesting, amazing professor. | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Really useful, though some of the ADR methods are not common in my city, still pretty good. | 1) common in my city, still pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v0l76HmGEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good. I learned o lot by this course for it provides a broaden horizon of knowledge and skills! | 1) very | Good | 1) I learned o lot by this | 5.0 |
| V2Rnzt9KEeWVFwqmKx7D2Q | good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| V5SinKHsEeSqoSIACzsKQg | Really good!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) ! ! ! ! ! ! | 4.0 |
| V5SinKHsEeSqoSIACzsKQg | its totally worth it! am glad i did it and would recommend the same to everyone interested in understand the health issues in global basis. good luck! | 1) the health issues in global basis. | Good | 1) luck! | 5.0 |
| V5SinKHsEeSqoSIACzsKQg | Good range of material covered, interesting lectures, very engaging and enthusiastic professor. | 1) | Good | 1) range of material covered, interesting lectures, | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I feel that the lecture material lacks proper explanation of the key concepts but the questions in quizzes are good although the lectures should have been more conceptual rather than theoretical | 1) but the questions in quizzes are | Good | 1) although the lectures should have been | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The Course material and method of testing the understanding of the student needs to be improved. Despite the low quality of the quizzes, the course is very inspiring. The examples showed are very good and the lectures concentrated on teaching the underlying concept rather the Mathematics involved, which was refreshing. | 1) inspiring. The examples showed are very | Good | 1) and the lectures concentrated on teaching | 3.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course was very good, but I guess there were too many quizzes, and the instructions / questions in the quizzes and other assignments are not unambiguous. That could be improved. Other than that I liked the course and the specialization very much. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) but I guess there were too | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This is the worst course online I've done so far. I would not recommend it to anyone as it stands, regardless of the student's background, this course is just poor and lacking. The premise of this course is a promising one, the topic is still in its infancy and seems very interesting. Having said that, this is about everything positive that I can say about this course. For starters, the videos seem good at first, but later it becomes very superficial and monotone. The content is many times just rushed through and it's visible that the lecturers at several occasions have difficulty even to read their own slides! However, the worst part of the course are the quizzes. There are 24 graded quizzes in total, to pass the course you need to pass all 24 of them! To make matters worse, the minimum passing marks for each quiz is 80%, that wouldn't have been such an issue if most quizzes had 5 or more questions, which is not the case, most of the quizzes have 4 or less questions. This is such an unreasonable requirement, if you miss only one question in a quiz with 3 questions there's already no chance to pass the course! The content of each quiz is also very troublesome, we are essentially being graded for trivia, a considerable number of the questions are very superficially related to not related at all to the subject of each lecture. Instead of using the questions to delve deeper into the topic at hand, they only create confusion with futilities. A little example, the topic of a subject was about the mechanical properties of using multiple templates and a question in its quiz was about an electric circuit that is never shown in the question itself, only briefly shown in the lecture video for about 10s, minimal information is given without any explanation of what they mean and we are asked to enter a formula as the answer for which also almost no information is given about which notation we should use for the formula itself. There are other cases where there are multiple choice questions which have incorrect answers accepted by the grader. In one instance, two of the options available are contradictory to each other, however the accepted answer was the one involving both. In another instance, there was more than one solution available to an answer, however the grader accepted only one and there was no information in the question itself to narrow down the possible answers to the desired one. Finally, there is no active community by the TA and professors, I have never had a single answer form a TA or professor, only sporadical replies from a mentor, who has no authority to fix any issue by him or herself. All these issues just point to how poorly this course was designed. It had such high hopes, but they fell short flat. In doing this course, I found myself reverse engineering most of the questions just to try to find an accepted answer and try to understand what it meant. The imposed 8-hour period between attempts at the quizzes only hindered my progress. I was focused and engaged in studying for each quiz, however, after 3 failed attempts I had an imposed break period that makes little sense. In the end, this course only made me feel like the very object of my learning: a robot. I am really disappointed with this course. | 1) course. For starters, the videos seem | Good | 1) at first, but later it becomes | 1.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Well illustrated. Good to learn. Especially for starters and someone who's interested in robotics. | 1) Well illustrated. | Good | 1) to learn. Especially for starters and | 5.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This course covers very interesting topics, but there are some serious shortcomings in the lectures. Too much information is just omitted or taken for granted. Some of the lecturers are rather inexperienced. Reading or reciting mathematical expressions in a monotonous voice without actually pointing to the visual representation of the lecture material makes it very difficult to follow. Better care should also be taken with the quizzes - if one looks at the comments or questions posted by some learners, it is clear that we simply don't understand the question, or a question is answered correctly in essence , but the quizz expected more (or less) precision without stating so . Finally for some reason the support from Technical Advisors was also lacking in the specific session that I did, contributing to my frustration and rather negative experience of what could be a very good course | 1) of what could be a very | Good | 1) course | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course was very good overall. I just wish if there was a little more mathematics involved. For the rest of the part, it is pretty good for beginners and enthusiasts in Robotics. Hope to see the advanced version of it sometime too. | 1) The course was very | Good | 1) overall. I just wish if there | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course was very good overall. I just wish if there was a little more mathematics involved. For the rest of the part, it is pretty good for beginners and enthusiasts in Robotics. Hope to see the advanced version of it sometime too. | 2) of the part, it is pretty | Good | 2) for beginners and enthusiasts in Robotics. | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Good course. Stands well in the specialization. It was a bit buggy throughout tho. And the assignments could have focussed more on the control part. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Stands well in the specialization. | 3.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Good teachers but a lot of questions in the quizzes were very ambiguous and unrelated to the Course Content. | 1) | Good | 1) teachers but a lot of questions | 3.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I think this was a poorly structured online course. Especially for someone who is attempting this course having experienced two excellent previous courses in the specialization. It was good only in few patches but the link was seriously missing. I realize this area is a bit more advanced but with all due respect to the knowledgeable instructors, they could have emphasised more on basic building blocks rather than cramming in so much information which my bandwith couldn't handle it. I did guesswork in almost all the quizzes after week 2 which further adds to my disappointment. I think the Robotics specialization is better off without this course because there is little or no value addition here. Expecting a lot better from the next course in the series. | 1) courses in the specialization. It was | Good | 1) only in few patches but the | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | The course provides good exposure to the problems in legged robotics. The course lists multiple references to the books and articles, reading which is necessary to make this course more useful. I wish some more time would be devoted to dynamic models, including kinetic and potential energy calculation of the SLIP and other models. But one can find this kind of information elsewhere, for example, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhk9xLjrmi4 and http://ocw.mit.edu/2-003SCF11 | 1) The course provides | Good | 1) exposure to the problems in legged | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | In some ways good, but deeply flawed. The assignments were weakly correlated with the lectures, and no explanation was given for correct answers or for incorrect answers. I believe the authors would have benefited greatly from getting outside feedback from an advanced undergraduate or beginning graduate student, rather than each other. | 1) In some ways | Good | 1) but deeply flawed. The assignments were | 2.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This course helped me identify my interest at the intersection of biomechanics and robotics. The lectures were very motivating which gave a birds eye view of the background and research in mobility of legged robots. While watching the lectures, I expected programming assignments involving simulation of dynamics and control of the templates and further perform compositions with them but didn't find them much. In a few assignments, the wording of the questions was ambiguous or the grader accepted only certain answers; hence, consumed a lot of time. However, the TAs were very helpful in clearing most of the doubts very quickly which also made solving the assignments easier. Further, it provided references to abundant resources to steer the student in the right direction to pursue specific interests. Overall, this four-week course provided a very good intuitive understanding of the dynamics and control of legged mobility in animals and robots. | 1) this four-week course provided a very | Good | 1) intuitive understanding of the dynamics and | 4.0 |
| v8BCQVu-EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is really good! The videos are excellent , hold the attention . | 1) This course is really | Good | 1) The videos are excellent , hold | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | I really enjoyed this course. It was fabulous/ All materials were amasing good, interesting and helpful. Thanks so much. | 1) was fabulous/ All materials were amasing | Good | 1) interesting and helpful. Thanks so much. | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Plenty of good material and excellent videos describing topics. | 1) Plenty of | Good | 1) material and excellent videos describing topics. | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | I love anything art and it is teaching me a lot. Very good course | 1) is teaching me a lot. Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | So good course but the great absent is Sir Edwar Hopper . | 1) So | Good | 1) course but the great absent is | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | I took the course because I'm an Art enthusiast and a hobby artist. Previously I was disgusted at anything called "Modern Art" because it made no meaning to me, maybe I just encountered the wrong or naive pieces of work, or I think the major reason I had no complete idea what Modern Art stood for. I was a staunch follower of depictive fine arts, but this course has changed my views about the subject and now I see this domain with a fresh and a better perspective. This course was actually fun to take and I'm motivated to watch the videos again and again as they have been made to be very interesting and the readings though lengthy were quite good. It was a great course andI hope MoMA gets more courses like this on Coursera. I would love to take more of these. Thanks MoMA and Coursera | 1) the readings though lengthy were quite | Good | 1) It was a great course andI | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | This course is designed for school teachers and, perhaps, for art museum's workers. I'm neither, but I took this course because I'd like to know more about the modern art. The course is essentially a merge of two independent parts, namely, videos about artworks and papers about different theories of education in art. I took this course because of artworks, so I was not interested in papers. Videos were great; especially the first one in each lesson. Even my husband, who isn't fond of art in general, found these videos interesting. In videos, lecturer explains history and meaning of each piece of art. Required reading was dramatically different. First, students are required to read at least 10 pages (art papers) about approaches in teaching AND at least 4 articles in museum's website PER WEEK. Actually, careful reading not just browsing does take a lot of time, in fact, it takes way more time per week than claimed. In addition, these reading were not useful for me! I am not interested in teaching art, and reading same facts about artworks that I've heard in lectures is waste of my time. Seriously, I and most of people grasp most of the ideas from the first time; even if not, I would watch the video again. Why should I do extra reading that brings me no extra knowledge? On a good side, one can pass quiz without any reading. Just a bit of thinking process, and you pass with 5/6 or 6/6 score. Overall, the course is attractive because of amazing videos. However, I believe that this course must be reorganized in two different courses - one would be about artworks and understanding of art, another would be about teaching techniques in art. | 1) me no extra knowledge? On a | Good | 1) side, one can pass quiz without | 3.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | It is good to understand the Modern Art and Ideas. | 1) It is | Good | 1) to understand the Modern Art and | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good information. Can be a bit longer. Completed too quickly. Can improve on the quizzes | 1) | Good | 1) information. Can be a bit longer. | 4.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Very good course, well constructed, | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, well constructed, | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good video production, successful combination of video content and reading resources as well as very interesting weekly topics. | 1) | Good | 1) video production, successful combination of video | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Nice themes and very good tips for teachers! | 1) Nice themes and very | Good | 1) tips for teachers! | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Good way to learn how to present an art work and express personal interpretation. | 1) | Good | 1) way to learn how to present | 4.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Keep up the good work. Great course, so far. | 1) Keep up the | Good | 1) work. Great course, so far. | 5.0 |
| v9CQdBkhEeWjrA6seF25aw | Great video lessons and extra reading material to expand concepts and ideas. The course has also very good rhythm and short tests at the end of each lesson are great to understand the important points of the course. | 1) ideas. The course has also very | Good | 1) rhythm and short tests at the | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | Thourough course, full of interesting material to expand knowledge on the topic. Prof. Picker's videos are extremely well done, with examples, and a good line of explanations that usually start far from the issues to get back to the issue and connect de dots. | 1) well done, with examples, and a | Good | 1) line of explanations that usually start | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| V9_aHBU7EeWfzgpfp_iBVw | It was a privilege listening to this passionate and clear guide through the history of technology and antitrust with all the relevant docs . Each time I finished a segment I could not help listening to the next one. Like in a good tv series! | 1) the next one. Like in a | Good | 1) tv series! | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | that is good course | 1) that is | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | A good introduction to the area of project management. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the area of project | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | It gave a very good functional over view of project planning and management. | 1) It gave a very | Good | 1) functional over view of project planning | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | very good introduction course of project management, high | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction course of project management, high | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Good course to understand the basics. | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand the basics. | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Very good introduction to project management, gives indeed the fundamentals! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to project management, gives indeed | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Learned a lot! Very good information and the assignment was a fun and great exercise for implementing the things learned. | 1) Learned a lot! Very | Good | 1) information and the assignment was a | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This class was a good overview of the topic of project management with an entertaining and well spoken teacher. This videos and content were engaging but not over whelming. | 1) This class was a | Good | 1) overview of the topic of project | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Very good intro to project management. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to project management. | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This is a good introductory course to Project Management. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) introductory course to Project Management. | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Fantastic course, with great videos and materials. Yael is great at communicating the fundamentals via her videos, supplemental materials & case studies (really good examples of theory in practice). Great for anyone wanting to refresh/solidify their fundamentals in Project Management (for those already with work experience), as well as beginners who are interested in getting a solid foundation. I highly recommend this course to anyone interested in understanding the Fundamentals of Project Management. | 1) supplemental materials & case studies (really | Good | 1) examples of theory in practice). Great | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | The course has important insights about the Planning a Project. I really liked it and it was not time consuming, you can do it easily with your daily routine. Really good! | 1) easily with your daily routine. Really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This course shares a lot of valuable information but could use a good deal of refinement. I really would have liked to have seen downloadable PDFs with the diagrams representing different models so that I could easily go back and reference them without having to find the particular moment in a video where it was shown. I also wish the videos were designed with better instructional strategies--the best Coursera courses (like those from Northwestern's Kellog School of Management) introduce material, expand on it, and then summarize the most important parts in each video--this helps the learner Here the learner is on their own. There's a lot of great information to pick up on, but some retooling from the UVA Darden School of Business would be greatly appreciated improvement. | 1) valuable information but could use a | Good | 1) deal of refinement. I really would | 3.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | good content and focused presentation | 1) | Good | 1) content and focused presentation | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This is a really good course to learn the basics in project management. It was a very successful 1st step for me. I am looking forward to do more courses in PM. Thank you prof for making the course interesting. :) | 1) This is a really | Good | 1) course to learn the basics in | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | It is a very good and intensive course of project management. Some pieces of information have been provided little bit balled, which made me make mistakes in quizzes. However I enjoyed all the stuff. Thanks a lot! | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) and intensive course of project management. | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Exams are not very good - some ambiguous, misleading or wrong-data questions/answers. | 1) Exams are not very | Good | 1) - some ambiguous, misleading or wrong-data | 3.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | A really good course. I especially like the practical supplementary lectures on MS Project and Excel. Would be better if the assessments took on more challenging formats than just multiple choice quizzes. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course. I especially like the practical | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Great Teacher. Good examples, information delivered on the spot. Learned so much in this course! :) | 1) Great Teacher. | Good | 1) examples, information delivered on the spot. | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Very Good Course indeed | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course indeed | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | A good course on PM and the concepts were well presented | 1) A | Good | 1) course on PM and the concepts | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | For the first time i took the course here, to be honest for me it was a little exam, i was thinking hmm, Could i do that??? This is a new field for me. Result: Yes, i did it!:-) Now, i like online way of learning! First of All i want to thank the University of Virginia and the lecturer Mrs. Yael Grushka-Cockayne and of course to you Coursera team and Leader! Good Luck guys! Thank you again!!! Fidan Badalova | 1) to you Coursera team and Leader! | Good | 1) Luck guys! Thank you again! ! | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | VERY GOOD and PROFESSIONAL. I enjoyed every single lecture 😀 | 1) VERY | Good | 1) and PROFESSIONAL. I enjoyed every single | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Pros: Basics were explained well. A good kick start for beginners who are travelling towards learning Project planning and management. Cons: Wish we had assignments to practice MS Project to a certain extent. Some of the Quiz questions were confusing (Esp. the 3rd week quiz) | 1) Pros: Basics were explained well. A | Good | 1) kick start for beginners who are | 3.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Good for me | 1) | Good | 1) for me | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Good Course Nice material and the best is the professor explanation | 1) | Good | 1) Course Nice material and the best | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | A very good insight into the basics of Project planning, easily executable strategy and MSprojects intro was eye-opener. Tried on one small project and was able to feel the difference before the course came to an end. Thankyou very much. Some more information and detailing required in project execution(week 4). | 1) A very | Good | 1) insight into the basics of Project | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Good course for anyone like to learn management of projects and how to start it | 1) | Good | 1) course for anyone like to learn | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Content is really well tailored and the course is well spread over the 4 weeks. The material is good and the explanation is good. Tools provided do the job. | 1) the 4 weeks. The material is | Good | 1) and the explanation is good. Tools | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Content is really well tailored and the course is well spread over the 4 weeks. The material is good and the explanation is good. Tools provided do the job. | 2) is good and the explanation is | Good | 2) Tools provided do the job. | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | The course is well planned with very good backup of Videos. All videos are very informative, to the point and easy to understand. I rate this course 4 star. Thanks | 1) course is well planned with very | Good | 1) backup of Videos. All videos are | 4.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | Really good course. Worth attending! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Worth attending! | 5.0 |
| VcGV0kxGEeWKRQoYMLwAUw | This course was a very valuable introduction to project planning & management and the terminology and techniques used. It also provided a good amount of information and was not dragged out over a long period of time. | 1) techniques used. It also provided a | Good | 1) amount of information and was not | 5.0 |
| VfuJSYYDEeW99gozy_2pgw | A good compliment for the course of the modern jewish state. It cleared up many doubts. thank you | 1) A | Good | 1) compliment for the course of the | 5.0 |
| VfuJSYYDEeW99gozy_2pgw | The main lecturer is a particularly good teacher, who speaks fluently and knowledgeably about this difficult topic. Her empathy is obvious, which makes it that much more meaningful to me. Can't wait to take the second course. A great introduction to the Holocaust. | 1) The main lecturer is a particularly | Good | 1) teacher, who speaks fluently and knowledgeably | 5.0 |
| VfuJSYYDEeW99gozy_2pgw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| VfuJSYYDEeW99gozy_2pgw | Very good content, but technical issues (poor closed captioning, ambiguous question on the exams, a couple of readings that were a little esoteric for an introductory course) led me to mark the course down a star. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, but technical issues (poor closed | 4.0 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | Quite disappointed, I thought we'd have something more structured or at least different from the previous courses. The content is here and good, but I was expecting reviews from pro U.X and not student like the previous courses. The good upgrade though is that we have clear examples of submission before we send ours. | 1) courses. The content is here and | Good | 1) but I was expecting reviews from | 3.0 |
| vGGtBxVGEeW_mxLPrCkAqw | Quite disappointed, I thought we'd have something more structured or at least different from the previous courses. The content is here and good, but I was expecting reviews from pro U.X and not student like the previous courses. The good upgrade though is that we have clear examples of submission before we send ours. | 2) student like the previous courses. The | Good | 2) upgrade though is that we have | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | So good! | 1) So | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great Course and serves as a good starting point for web designing. | 1) Great Course and serves as a | Good | 1) starting point for web designing. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good intro course, i just wish it had more drilling exercises in CSS. | 1) | Good | 1) intro course, i just wish it | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | I cannot believe how much I have learned in this course. I went to knowing zero about web development to being able to style a whole page. Colleen is such a good instructor and the homework was pretty difficult, but very rewarding! Definitely a good class for beginners like me. I have taken classes through springboard, and i did not feel like they were as organized as this one. | 1) whole page. Colleen is such a | Good | 1) instructor and the homework was pretty | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | I cannot believe how much I have learned in this course. I went to knowing zero about web development to being able to style a whole page. Colleen is such a good instructor and the homework was pretty difficult, but very rewarding! Definitely a good class for beginners like me. I have taken classes through springboard, and i did not feel like they were as organized as this one. | 2) difficult, but very rewarding! Definitely a | Good | 2) class for beginners like me. I | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good for the novice. The course is designed step by step intro which help a lot. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for the novice. The course is | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | A good balance between basic principles and practical applications in quite some detail. Great for those who taught themselves to copy&edit CSS to taste but were missing the underlying structure to really understand and apply it. | 1) A | Good | 1) balance between basic principles and practical | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good pace and great teaching skills. I was a complete novice but I now pretty well understand the basics & can anticipate what is reachable. Not a 5-star though because the continuity between lessons is sometimes a bit blur. | 1) | Good | 1) pace and great teaching skills. I | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Its a good course but I expect more.. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course but I expect more. . | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very helpful introductory course to get one started to make beautiful-looking web pages. The instructor is friendly and paces each lesson perfectly. All in all a very good experience. | 1) perfectly. All in all a very | Good | 1) experience. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | A good introductory course. | 1) A | Good | 1) introductory course. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good course for complete beginners. Thank you! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for complete beginners. Thank you! | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Designing websites requires planning, a good sense of artistic theory, and creativity. This course is essential for creating pleasing (to the eye) websites. | 1) Designing websites requires planning, a | Good | 1) sense of artistic theory, and creativity. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | This course is a good start if you already have a little experience with CSS. As a neophyte, I found that there was too much material for the amount of presentation time. I needed many more examples and exercises. I felt dejected each time the instructor said not to worry about getting it right and just experiment -- that's easy to say if you aren't being graded. The fact is that the material is extensive and often complicated, and it's imperative for me, as a student, to be correct as fast as possible. The result is that my grade (A) does not reflect my comprehension of the material. I managed to commit the material presented to short term memory so that I could pass the course, but as always happens when someone crams, the information is gone from my head. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) start if you already have a | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good course. I learned a lot! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I learned a lot! | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good beginner course providing solid basics . Instructor is excellent | 1) | Good | 1) beginner course providing solid basics . | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good information and great instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) information and great instructor. | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good for css | 1) Very | Good | 1) for css | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It's a good course for beginner, lots of CSS properties and pseudo-class selectors are covered in detail during the classes and you will get a good knowledge about CSS. If you code along the course and do all the assignments to practice in the end of the course you will have solid foundation for continued learning and programming in CSS3. It is course that I recommend to enroll. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course for beginner, lots of CSS | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It's a good course for beginner, lots of CSS properties and pseudo-class selectors are covered in detail during the classes and you will get a good knowledge about CSS. If you code along the course and do all the assignments to practice in the end of the course you will have solid foundation for continued learning and programming in CSS3. It is course that I recommend to enroll. | 2) classes and you will get a | Good | 2) knowledge about CSS. If you code | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good teacher, I learnt the basis and it's pretty cool but I'd like a bit more of responsive design in here. | 1) | Good | 1) teacher, I learnt the basis and | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Interesting course and very good teacher. | 1) Interesting course and very | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good course but i hadn't take my certificate . | 1) | Good | 1) course but i hadn't take my | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It is a good course for beginners in CSS. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for beginners in CSS. | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | + Coleen is a good and funny teacher; + videos are easily to understand also for not english native speakers; + I learned some things and tricks despite the fact that I am already using CSS3 in my daily work. - in my opinion it is necessary to have some experience with CSS before joining this course. Commitment: I needed about 10 hours/week of study | 1) + Coleen is a | Good | 1) and funny teacher; + videos are | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | This has to be the poorest educational experience Ive ever had. Virtually nothing is explained. The instructor says time & time again that she's not going to bother to explain in detail and that we should go out & explore all these free resources if we want to learn. SO WHY DID I PAY FOR THIS CLASS? Honestly, save your money. This is nothing but a rip-off and I am shocked that an institution like U of M would allow such a sloppy, lazy product to be out there under its brand. To make matters worse, we are instructed time & time again to go out onto the discussion board and ask for help when she doesn't want to bother explaining a concept. 1. Everyone else taking this class is confused too - how could they possibly be of any help to me? 2. The staff who comes onto the boards are just about as rude & unhelpful as any I've ever seen. They literally say "well, did you WATCH the lecture?" Ummm- yes I did & it directed me to come here for help. I feel duped. This is a scam and I can only say I am sorry I paid my money for this. If you really want to learn CSS, get yourself a good book on the subject and/or utilize the free material out on the internet. This will absolutely waste hours of your time and way too much of your money for what they are providing. | 1) to learn CSS, get yourself a | Good | 1) book on the subject and/or utilize | 1.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Not as good as HTML course, nevertheless perfect choice! | 1) Not as | Good | 1) as HTML course, nevertheless perfect choice! | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | A good basic course , Really appreciate | 1) A | Good | 1) basic course , Really appreciate | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great course! Teacher moves at a good pace and doesn't have any crazy hand movements (that drives me crazy!) Material is interesting and the projects are a good way to apply what you've learned. Peer grading is spotty, as always. | 1) Great course! Teacher moves at a | Good | 1) pace and doesn't have any crazy | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great course! Teacher moves at a good pace and doesn't have any crazy hand movements (that drives me crazy!) Material is interesting and the projects are a good way to apply what you've learned. Peer grading is spotty, as always. | 2) interesting and the projects are a | Good | 2) way to apply what you've learned. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is really well paced and good contents. However I think it should have a bit more indepth contents regarding CSS rules/priorties. | 1) course is really well paced and | Good | 1) contents. However I think it should | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Colleen is a very good teacher. She is very clear in all her explanations and she gives a lot of material to look into more deeply. | 1) Colleen is a very | Good | 1) teacher. She is very clear in | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Is a very good course to understand CSS3 Philosophy and core concepts! | 1) Is a very | Good | 1) course to understand CSS3 Philosophy and | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great explanations by Colleen van Lent. A good number of assignments but maybe the final one could have involved styling a few of the pages in the Ultimate Frisbee website. | 1) explanations by Colleen van Lent. A | Good | 1) number of assignments but maybe the | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good class. The video sessions are well built and clear. Also, the homeworks are short but can help you get started with css pretty well. Congratulations on the course and thanks for sharing it on coursera. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. The video sessions are well | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good entry level course that covers accessibility of Web design as well. | 1) | Good | 1) entry level course that covers accessibility | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Missing key examples and explanation of so many terms a good try though I appreciate their effort to provide free knowledge. | 1) explanation of so many terms a | Good | 1) try though I appreciate their effort | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It good know some known logic to work with CSS3. | 1) It | Good | 1) know some known logic to work | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | I think this course does a great job of introducing CSS3 and giving you a good taste of what it can do. It would have been nice to have an optional video on ways to create a 3-column layout, as well as mentioning collapsible margins. Overall, a great introduction. | 1) introducing CSS3 and giving you a | Good | 1) taste of what it can do. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good lecturer and presentation. Although not comprehensive, this is a good introduction to CSS3. | 1) | Good | 1) lecturer and presentation. Although not comprehensive, | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good lecturer and presentation. Although not comprehensive, this is a good introduction to CSS3. | 2) Although not comprehensive, this is a | Good | 2) introduction to CSS3. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It is a good way to be introduced to this language. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) way to be introduced to this | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | good basics | 1) | Good | 1) basics | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Nice, good explenation and practises. Logic order. Costs time, but he... no pain, no gain;) | 1) Nice, | Good | 1) explenation and practises. Logic order. Costs | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Truly a good learning experience and sure learnt alot new things about CSS3 and boosted my confidence in working on it. Looking forward for a new MOOC on advanced concepts of css and many more. Thank you Colleen for the wonderful learning experience. | 1) Truly a | Good | 1) learning experience and sure learnt alot | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excellent course! Well paced and the course really builds skills in using CSS3! Highly recommend this course to anyone looking to get a good grounding in CSS or who wants to go over the basics again. | 1) to anyone looking to get a | Good | 1) grounding in CSS or who wants | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Excelent course. Good balance between being comprehensive and holding interest. The assignments are also appropriate and comlkement the course well. | 1) Excelent course. | Good | 1) balance between being comprehensive and holding | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | It gives a good overview how CSS works | 1) It gives a | Good | 1) overview how CSS works | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very well explained. I think the professor is very good. But I expected to dive a little more in some details. | 1) I think the professor is very | Good | 1) But I expected to dive a | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | a very good, simple, effective serires | 1) a very | Good | 1) simple, effective serires | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very lively, clear, good pace, place for personnal work, a constant remainder about accessibility. However, confusion in assignment instructions spoils a little the flow. | 1) Very lively, clear, | Good | 1) pace, place for personnal work, a | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | GOOD introduction for css | 1) | Good | 1) introduction for css | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course for starting, thank you very much for it | 1) | Good | 1) course for starting, thank you very | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good overview, but very detailed and definitely not for beginners - especially due to a lack of personal attention. I have had to supplement a lot of the material I missed through other resources. Still, a fairly good overview of CSS3 for those who already have a little understanding. | 1) | Good | 1) overview, but very detailed and definitely | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good overview, but very detailed and definitely not for beginners - especially due to a lack of personal attention. I have had to supplement a lot of the material I missed through other resources. Still, a fairly good overview of CSS3 for those who already have a little understanding. | 2) through other resources. Still, a fairly | Good | 2) overview of CSS3 for those who | 3.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good sequel to the Introduction to HTML5 course. In my opinion, the best beginner level web design specialization on Coursera. Colleen Van Lent is a great lecturer. | 1) | Good | 1) sequel to the Introduction to HTML5 | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | The course is really good! Thank you! | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) Thank you! | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great for learning the basis and get the grip of things, also it focus a lot in good practices! | 1) also it focus a lot in | Good | 1) practices! | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Really good course. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course. Easy to follow for unexperienced students. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Easy to follow for unexperienced | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | While I love Dr. van Lent's teaching style, I was somewhat disappointed in the course as a whole. After about the first week the instructor was not heard from again on the forums. It wasn't until about the last week that some official teaching staff started to make an appearance. This was an issue as, especially in the first week, as there was a good deal of discrepancy between what was on the grading rubric, what was provided in description for the homework, and what was in an optional video that described the homework. All with no official direction as to what was correct, or how things should be properly graded. The students were just left to themselves to try and interpret what the instructor meant, and what was the proper thing to do in regards to the peer grading. This continued, albeit to a far lesser extent, through the remainder of the course. While I don't expect instructors to be in the forums all that often, I do expect them to clear up obvious issues, and to make some type of official statement as to how students should proceed. I believe this was the first offering of this course, and I hope as it offered again those discrepancies are fixed, and perhaps more official teaching staff are able to monitor the forums. As far as the material itself, it is pretty good, and covers most of the basics well. As I said at the start, I really love Dr. van Lent's teaching style. She is very encouraging, and easy to understand. She is also very human, making mistakes as she goes along, and correcting them. I feel this gives the student a good experience of the real world iterative process that coding is, that even with experience mistakes are still made, and to be expected, and how to go about doing some debugging to correct those mistakes. | 1) first week, as there was a | Good | 1) deal of discrepancy between what was | 2.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | While I love Dr. van Lent's teaching style, I was somewhat disappointed in the course as a whole. After about the first week the instructor was not heard from again on the forums. It wasn't until about the last week that some official teaching staff started to make an appearance. This was an issue as, especially in the first week, as there was a good deal of discrepancy between what was on the grading rubric, what was provided in description for the homework, and what was in an optional video that described the homework. All with no official direction as to what was correct, or how things should be properly graded. The students were just left to themselves to try and interpret what the instructor meant, and what was the proper thing to do in regards to the peer grading. This continued, albeit to a far lesser extent, through the remainder of the course. While I don't expect instructors to be in the forums all that often, I do expect them to clear up obvious issues, and to make some type of official statement as to how students should proceed. I believe this was the first offering of this course, and I hope as it offered again those discrepancies are fixed, and perhaps more official teaching staff are able to monitor the forums. As far as the material itself, it is pretty good, and covers most of the basics well. As I said at the start, I really love Dr. van Lent's teaching style. She is very encouraging, and easy to understand. She is also very human, making mistakes as she goes along, and correcting them. I feel this gives the student a good experience of the real world iterative process that coding is, that even with experience mistakes are still made, and to be expected, and how to go about doing some debugging to correct those mistakes. | 2) the material itself, it is pretty | Good | 2) and covers most of the basics | 2.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | While I love Dr. van Lent's teaching style, I was somewhat disappointed in the course as a whole. After about the first week the instructor was not heard from again on the forums. It wasn't until about the last week that some official teaching staff started to make an appearance. This was an issue as, especially in the first week, as there was a good deal of discrepancy between what was on the grading rubric, what was provided in description for the homework, and what was in an optional video that described the homework. All with no official direction as to what was correct, or how things should be properly graded. The students were just left to themselves to try and interpret what the instructor meant, and what was the proper thing to do in regards to the peer grading. This continued, albeit to a far lesser extent, through the remainder of the course. While I don't expect instructors to be in the forums all that often, I do expect them to clear up obvious issues, and to make some type of official statement as to how students should proceed. I believe this was the first offering of this course, and I hope as it offered again those discrepancies are fixed, and perhaps more official teaching staff are able to monitor the forums. As far as the material itself, it is pretty good, and covers most of the basics well. As I said at the start, I really love Dr. van Lent's teaching style. She is very encouraging, and easy to understand. She is also very human, making mistakes as she goes along, and correcting them. I feel this gives the student a good experience of the real world iterative process that coding is, that even with experience mistakes are still made, and to be expected, and how to go about doing some debugging to correct those mistakes. | 3) feel this gives the student a | Good | 3) experience of the real world iterative | 2.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Great course in the sense that we start from scratch to be able to do good design. But I think week 3 should have an assignment too (we don't really have to play with position, transition, etc ...), and that week 4 was too light (not a lot of new stuff, and only design a table as assignment). | 1) scratch to be able to do | Good | 1) design. But I think week 3 | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Very good teacher | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| Vh4RJTk8EeWJaxK5AT4frw | Good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I really delight in doing this courses, I think they are amazing for new teachers, but also a very good refreshment of good practices (best practices) for experienced teachers. | 1) new teachers, but also a very | Good | 1) refreshment of good practices (best practices) | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I really delight in doing this courses, I think they are amazing for new teachers, but also a very good refreshment of good practices (best practices) for experienced teachers. | 2) also a very good refreshment of | Good | 2) practices (best practices) for experienced teachers. | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I found this course helpful and full of useful information. The instructors present enjoyable and fun to watch videos. Get the most out of the course but being active on the forums. Most Peer reviewers gave good feedback. | 1) the forums. Most Peer reviewers gave | Good | 1) feedback. | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | It's such a nice good Course. It focuses on the essentials of Lesson Design and Assessment. As a novice English Teacher, I'd highly recommend this course. | 1) It's such a nice | Good | 1) Course. It focuses on the essentials | 4.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Very good and useful course!!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and useful course! ! ! ! | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | This course was very helpful. There were many tips and hints and practical suggestions on how to design a lesson in the course. It was exactly what I needed to learn. Though we all had a lot of fun, it took me quite a lot of energy and mental efforts to complete all the assignments. Good job, guys! | 1) efforts to complete all the assignments. | Good | 1) job, guys! | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | Very very interesting!!! This is a great course! Keep up the good work! | 1) a great course! Keep up the | Good | 1) work! | 5.0 |
| vIC_m1i_EeWzUQ41NnCQkQ | I think this course is excellent and very helpful for someone who want to improve his/her teaching skills. Very clear, no boring and the teachers are amazing! especially the female teacher I think she is so beautiful, gorgeous. That is a good way to catch the attention of the students! | 1) so beautiful, gorgeous. That is a | Good | 1) way to catch the attention of | 5.0 |
| VIUTXB0IEea20BJooCBlFw | Dr. Sinnott-Armstrong does an amazingly thorough and detailed job, and the progression of the course is well planned and well executed. I wanted to give the course a higher rating, but unfortunately, the good doctor's explanatory skills only served to confuse and frustrate me, the further I progressed through the course. Extemporaneous examples were unintentionally and unnecessarily muddled. There were numerous misspoken or confused terms that could easily have been re-recorded or edited. And the splicing between the old course and the new one is sometimes discontinuous (though, to be fair, they warn us about that at the beginning). Nevertheless, I would still highly recommend the course to anyone looking for a thorough-going university-level course in critical thinking, and basic argumentation. | 1) a higher rating, but unfortunately, the | Good | 1) doctor's explanatory skills only served to | 3.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | it is pretty good | 1) it is pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | Very good course! I learned much more than what I expected! It is also great help for my psychology course and project. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! I learned much more than | 5.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | Very helpful. But could be more interactive, more activities to do. Maybe include peer assessed tasks where we can create good questionnaire items by each topic. Lecturers are like frozen - no or very little emotions. | 1) assessed tasks where we can create | Good | 1) questionnaire items by each topic. Lecturers | 4.0 |
| vrTPjkqzEeWB9g55-yieoQ | It is very good course! I can apply to my Ph.D research. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) course! I can apply to my | 5.0 |
| vtYNwf__EeS9ISIACxWDhA | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | good explaination | 1) | Good | 1) explaination | 4.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | Pretty good lectures and helpful for entrepreneurs | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) lectures and helpful for entrepreneurs | 5.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | Other than a few technical glicthes with the videos in both firefox and chrome browsers, this is a very good course. I learned to use a great visual tool for developing my business model. I would have liked to have joined in the discussions and tasks but, I think coursera is charging too much for this course. | 1) chrome browsers, this is a very | Good | 1) course. I learned to use a | 4.0 |
| VTyPXbMXEeW-cQqGkhsQ8w | It's very good the way to describe the diferent segments to build your own business model and to give s better structure to your business idea. I'm giving 4 stars because the only way to complete the course or to interact with it is by paying the full certificate. But besides this fact it is very complete. | 1) It's very | Good | 1) the way to describe the diferent | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | The videos are really informative and cover most of the common concerns/excuses we have to avoid a physically active life style. I could connect to everything in the course and have improved my activity times from the past 3 weeks. This course definitely has given me a good push to improve myself. | 1) course definitely has given me a | Good | 1) push to improve myself. | 5.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Very good course with good information. I just need to keep doing the things I learned. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course with good information. I just | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Very good course with good information. I just need to keep doing the things I learned. | 2) Very good course with | Good | 2) information. I just need to keep | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Good basic background for starting out. I wanted a little more but no complaints. Good simple instructions and knowledge build including the SMART principle | 1) | Good | 1) basic background for starting out. I | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | Good basic background for starting out. I wanted a little more but no complaints. Good simple instructions and knowledge build including the SMART principle | 2) a little more but no complaints. | Good | 2) simple instructions and knowledge build including | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | This course is a good introduction to getting active, and it provides a plethora of useful resources that can help you get started. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction to getting active, and it | 4.0 |
| vU4CeqTaEeW2ORLv1OUyFQ | This course is very good for all. if we start practicing by noting daily achieving we can win . | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for all. if we start practicing | 5.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | introduces the fundamentals of Tableau and gave examples of story board, explored basic functions of Tableau, a good introduction course to Tableau. | 1) explored basic functions of Tableau, a | Good | 1) introduction course to Tableau. | 4.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | very good content and standard basics | 1) very | Good | 1) content and standard basics | 5.0 |
| VuRXs3EiEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Too good to start with Visualisation! | 1) Too | Good | 1) to start with Visualisation! | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | pretty good ，learn with c++ primer helps a lot | 1) pretty | Good | 1) ，learn with c++ primer helps a | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | This course is very good ！！！ | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) ！！！ | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | a vey good course of c++ | 1) a vey | Good | 1) course of c++ | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | very very good | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Great course to help you get start with C++. Give a lot of details about class. It is good enough thinking that it is a online free course. | 1) of details about class. It is | Good | 1) enough thinking that it is a | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very good ! I like it very much ! | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! I like it very much | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| vV5KmA_3EeWPhwrBf2tcNQ | Very Good Course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course. | 5.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | good for anyone with basic tax training and would like to dig deeper | 1) | Good | 1) for anyone with basic tax training | 5.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Is a good course because there are more different elements of international tax that improve my skills | 1) Is a | Good | 1) course because there are more different | 5.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | The course gives a short but good overview of the discussions within the international taxation. | 1) The course gives a short but | Good | 1) overview of the discussions within the | 4.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | Excellent course, well taught by experts and influential industry professionals. Has good resources. If in business, NGO, or Gov this course is a must. | 1) experts and influential industry professionals. Has | Good | 1) resources. If in business, NGO, or | 5.0 |
| VxTqEC8iEeWUWxIOAnoaFQ | An amazingly good course. I strongly recommend. | 1) An amazingly | Good | 1) course. I strongly recommend. | 5.0 |
| VyHnEjaTEeWfzhKP8GtZlQ | for me too much graded questions - but in generall the course is good | 1) but in generall the course is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| vzTi2jefEeWnxw5wP_KHTw | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| W-hoIJw3EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Useful. I feel some areas such as strategy, getting to MVP etc could benefit from more case studies and materials to work through. The overall content of the lectures is good but to internalise it there needs to be more 'work' for the students to engage in rather than just a quiz at the end. | 1) overall content of the lectures is | Good | 1) but to internalise it there needs | 3.0 |
| W-hoIJw3EeWJORITtzkPnQ | Very good and informative and I like the fact that there are a lot of examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and informative and I like the | 5.0 |
| w8XFGTVyEeWW9BKhJ4xW0Q | A good mix of required but tedious information and inspirational focus on learning outcomes. | 1) A | Good | 1) mix of required but tedious information | 5.0 |
| W9XMEny5EeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | I have taken a course about VC, and this course is about not needing VC. It's great to have different opinions, and this course offers an easy-to-understand format which consists of introductions of concepts and interviews from startups and investors. Very good course for moving past theoretical ideas and implementation of solutions in real business situations. | 1) interviews from startups and investors. Very | Good | 1) course for moving past theoretical ideas | 5.0 |
| W9XMEny5EeW3pg6oA-kqJQ | I have done a few courses on entrepreneurship and venture capital, so I was quite curious to see what this course had to offer, taking the opposite approach. And I must say, that it has been the most valuable learning experience so far for me on Coursera. It's really good and it gave me confidence that I'm on the right track, because I will much rather work with my customers than investors, and then bootstrap until I have to money to grow. | 1) for me on Coursera. It's really | Good | 1) and it gave me confidence that | 5.0 |
| Wa2LIymGEeWFggqB2SRvtQ | Good!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | very good learnt a lot but , a small suggestion is that please work out even more problems it helps us strengthen concepts . Thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) learnt a lot but , a | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Rather good one for beginners! | 1) Rather | Good | 1) one for beginners! | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | The prof was so good at explaining the theories and setting the foundation for his upcoming courses. He made math and physics fun. | 1) The prof was so | Good | 1) at explaining the theories and setting | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Great course. Very straight forward. Good real world examples. | 1) Great course. Very straight forward. | Good | 1) real world examples. | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Basic knowledge of Engineering Mechanics, very good recap of College level Physics. Great examples in Engineering Applications. | 1) Basic knowledge of Engineering Mechanics, very | Good | 1) recap of College level Physics. Great | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | good method to learn this course, thanks! | 1) | Good | 1) method to learn this course, thanks! | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | It is a good online courses. I like the way Mr. Whitney present to us, he is using a tools to show us the phenomenon. Overall I like this course! | 1) It is a | Good | 1) online courses. I like the way | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course for an introduction at the concept of vector, force, momentum, and static law. Good teacher, english is not difficult to understand... Free text book available (optional) | 1) | Good | 1) course for an introduction at the | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good course for an introduction at the concept of vector, force, momentum, and static law. Good teacher, english is not difficult to understand... Free text book available (optional) | 2) vector, force, momentum, and static law. | Good | 2) teacher, english is not difficult to | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | i recommend this course to any mechanical engineer out there. good basic | 1) to any mechanical engineer out there. | Good | 1) basic | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good!!! But try to cover more topics.... | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! ! But try to cover | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Excellent way of teaching..crystal clear teaching of concepts..excellent use of models and providing good practice problems side by side | 1) excellent use of models and providing | Good | 1) practice problems side by side | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Sir, Honestly, I am a true beneficiary of this course. I have completed my Engineering and it has been 10 long years. I dont remember understanding this subject as clearly as I do today. Thank you so much for clarifying the topics in a very lucid way. Its a dream come true to be able to learn from top instructors and top universities. I have scored a overall grade of 86.5%. I hope I was a good student :-). Wish you and your family a very happy and prosperous new year 2016! All the best. Best Regards Charan Siddachar | 1) 5%. I hope I was a | Good | 1) student :-). Wish you and your | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good introduction, excellent instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, excellent instructor. | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good overview of engineering statics. However, I wish the homework and/or practice problems were built into the coursera platform like the quizzes. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of engineering statics. However, I | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | All lessons is teached in a very good way. Thanks alot. | 1) lessons is teached in a very | Good | 1) way. Thanks alot. | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Dr. Whiteman explains the subject in a very good way, also using models and demos that help for better understanding. I definitely learned a lot from this course | 1) explains the subject in a very | Good | 1) way, also using models and demos | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | 4.5, Not perfect, but very clear and consistent (I'm only in week 2 and this is my first coursera course) there are some topics that I feel need a little more clarification, but that is my only complaint. Perhaps it would be a good idea for the site to have a FAQ for each individual course. The Professor or course instructor, could answer these questions for future course sessions. Perhaps there's a reason this idea wouldn't work, but it would be nice to see from the student's perspective. | 1) complaint. Perhaps it would be a | Good | 1) idea for the site to have | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Well-paced course with good accompanying exercises. | 1) Well-paced course with | Good | 1) accompanying exercises. | 5.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Hard work but very well explained, lots of exercises and good content from a great university. | 1) well explained, lots of exercises and | Good | 1) content from a great university. | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Ideal for Highschool students/graduates who want to pursue further higher educational engineering subjects. A little bit challenging, yet entertaining, and worthy of participating in. Good luck for all!! | 1) entertaining, and worthy of participating in. | Good | 1) luck for all! ! | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Good & useful course but with some errors. | 1) | Good | 1) & useful course but with some | 4.0 |
| WChOZHTVEeSi3yIACzSGcw | Very good course, even better if the homework exercises would be provided with the possibility to check your own answers. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, even better if the homework | 4.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | This was a good course, a little hard to follow at times but very beneficial. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) course, a little hard to follow | 3.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | It is ironic that a course about virtual instruction is one of the worst online courses I have taken. The content was good, if a little outdated (hence the two stars vs only one), but the course design and delivery were lacking. The videos were excruciating for visual learners (or really any non-auditory learners). The video for Week 2, Lesson 2, for example, had a single static image on the screen for eleven minutes. Words were added to the image during that time, but all in all there were 26 words of text on the slide. Really?!? ELEVEN MINUTES. 26 WORDS. Give me a transcript or make it an audio file. Don't keep me chained to my laptop watching a static image for ELEVEN MINUTES! The instructor droned and was clearly reading from a script. She did not even use the video to highlight key terms or spotlight key references. Whenever she mentioned a reference I wanted to look at, I had to either hope it was on the course reference page (many of them weren't there) or try to figure out how to spell the author's name based on her pronunciation of it. It was just really, really hard to get through. The tests were also poorly designed. What states do x y or z. Who cares? I don't live in those states. Which online school has this policy? Again who cares? Maybe a question about why states/schools have different approaches or how outcomes differ between states/schools, but memorizing a laundry list of which state or school has which policies and practices is useless and did not advance the learning objectives in any way. | 1) I have taken. The content was | Good | 1) if a little outdated (hence the | 2.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Some materials are useful but the teacher has no idea of teaching techniques and good presentation. Very bad choice for the University of Irvin, California to entrust such an interesting course to such an incompetent and feeble instructor. She is reading in a monotonous way and nothing more. Her presentations have no meaning. She does not appear in the video lectures. She can not introduce animated elements. The materials she selected are sometimes and only somehow relevant. The most of the materials have only percentages, and small details on history. A course of poor quality. | 1) no idea of teaching techniques and | Good | 1) presentation. Very bad choice for the | 1.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | A paradox that a course about virtual instruction is the worst course I've done on Coursera. I am on a verge of quitting it. 1. Despite lots of good information, there is no effort to present it in an interesting and engaging way. 2. Virtual educators say that the students should interact with the platform every 3-4 minutes and yet they give you 15 min video to listen to and look at the same picture. 3. No forums available but the notice about forums interrupts all the videos. | 1) quitting it. 1. Despite lots of | Good | 1) information, there is no effort to | 1.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | 1) Although the content is | Good | 1) the course itself does not reflect | 1.0 |
| wD1C7I_eEeWZyg6bf_Oxkw | Although the content is good, the course itself does not reflect in any way what a good asynchronous course should be. Where is the discussion board? How can one communicate with the instructor or with other classmates? Although peer review of an assignment is one aspect of asynchronous and synchronous education, said assignment should also be reviewed by an instructor, especially when said instruction carries so much weight. In addition, I think overall the tests are unfair. I was marked wrong twice for a question that asked my opinion! Also, in the "check all that apply" questions, if one misses one of the answers, the whole question is marked wrong. Finally, many of the test questions themselves are irrelevant to the content of the course. One last thing- the course says it's a five week program, but there are only 4 weeks. Something needs to be adjusted. | 2) reflect in any way what a | Good | 2) asynchronous course should be. Where is | 1.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Quite good in average. Will be better to have always or very often the slides in background. Few presenters were not much interesting. Good examples given, but sometimes I do not see how proposition can be used on daily basis | 1) Quite | Good | 1) in average. Will be better to | 3.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Quite good in average. Will be better to have always or very often the slides in background. Few presenters were not much interesting. Good examples given, but sometimes I do not see how proposition can be used on daily basis | 2) Few presenters were not much interesting. | Good | 2) examples given, but sometimes I do | 3.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is help full to managers and is fair in teaching skills. The picture quality is good and the real time examples are nicely explained. The course and syllabus is framed in a correct format. The course is very good for up coming stars. | 1) teaching skills. The picture quality is | Good | 1) and the real time examples are | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | This course is help full to managers and is fair in teaching skills. The picture quality is good and the real time examples are nicely explained. The course and syllabus is framed in a correct format. The course is very good for up coming stars. | 2) correct format. The course is very | Good | 2) for up coming stars. | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course, really enjoyed it!!! A lot of tips and very complete process, before recruiting, recruiting, selecting, onboarding and developing talent. | 1) | Good | 1) course, really enjoyed it! ! ! | 4.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | I enjoyed the course overall, but the HR component/perspective was only somewhat useful. Beware of the final unit (week 4): the takeaways and the final quiz are not well aligned. In the week's final project, though the questions doesn't ask for them, be sure to explain your rationales. When reviewing your peers' work, the points rely on whether you've explained yourself. Cheri Alexander's inclusion of videos felt like filler and the notion of having to create a video as an assignment is time-consuming and ultimately not necessary to our learning. Because I experienced a great course with two of the three professors in Leading Teams, I can only conclude that Professor Alexander designed the final assignment, criteria, and quiz. These components were not clear. Fortunately, my classmates were very supportive and understood the spirit of the assignment. It's a good class, but I enjoyed the first one in this specialization more. | 1) spirit of the assignment. It's a | Good | 1) class, but I enjoyed the first | 3.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Good course. As an HR practitioner I have found a lot of relevance in the concepts of the course, as well as pragmatic and useful tools to use as a starting point. | 1) | Good | 1) course. As an HR practitioner I | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | Really good summary of TM aspects | 1) Really | Good | 1) summary of TM aspects | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The first and the last week propose basic, but self-explaining inputs in an uninteresting manner. Nevertheless, there are some quite good take aways. Out of the four courses of the specialization, Managing Talent is the weakest | 1) manner. Nevertheless, there are some quite | Good | 1) take aways. Out of the four | 2.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | The class gave a very good insight into the various aspects of Talent Management. It included very helpful tools as well as detailed explanations. A big thank you to the professors. Having worked in the field of Talent Management for quite some time I finally have the theoretical knowledge to back up my daily work! | 1) The class gave a very | Good | 1) insight into the various aspects of | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | As both a healthcare professional and an executive for a healthcare organization I am blown away by how good the courses within the Leading People and Teams specialization are. I found Coursera through my own search for personal professional development and every course I have done has been top notch but the courses in this specialization really raise the bar. I have encouraged my peers and subordinates to take the courses within the Leading People and Teams Specialization and we may actually do a coordinated effort to get leaders and aspiring leaders into this Coursera specialization. | 1) I am blown away by how | Good | 1) the courses within the Leading People | 5.0 |
| we5nljlYEeWO-Qq6rEZAow | very good one :D (Y) | 1) very | Good | 1) one :D (Y) | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Very good class about the history of a complex situation in Palestine. Teachers are clear, they don't take any side and we learn a lot. It's important to have a good point of view of one of the oldest and complex conflict of modern times. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class about the history of a | 5.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Very good class about the history of a complex situation in Palestine. Teachers are clear, they don't take any side and we learn a lot. It's important to have a good point of view of one of the oldest and complex conflict of modern times. | 2) lot. It's important to have a | Good | 2) point of view of one of | 5.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | The course was extremely informative and managed to explain complex circumstances very simple. I highly recommend this course therefore. I was able to learn new things about the history of Israel which were never brought to me like that by history teachers. Great opportunity to broaden knowledge. Suggestions: Although the course was very good structured sometimes sophisticated history terms in the context of Israel and Palestine occurred in a video and were explained properly one video later. But because they were explained shortly after and it happened only like three times I would suggest to have a little box with terms like Lechi or Palmach, White Paper from thetime they occur first right beneath every video. The interviews with the experts of each fields had sometimes an odd audio recording and one person therefore spoke louder then the other and I had to turn my speakers on full volume sometimes. If the course gets rerecorded one day I suggest to look into those samples in particular. Thanks for this great course. | 1) Suggestions: Although the course was very | Good | 1) structured sometimes sophisticated history terms in | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Excellent content and delivery. Gave me a good perspective of history around Israel and Palestine. | 1) content and delivery. Gave me a | Good | 1) perspective of history around Israel and | 5.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | content is good but its not made interesting. | 1) content is | Good | 1) but its not made interesting. | 3.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Firstly i think for a coursera course it is not Long enough at all. There are not enough assignments which motivate studying and fixing the newly learned things in the memory. There are neither required nor recommended readings at all. For me reading is a very good Addition to the Videos so that you can slowly think about the thoughts and arguments. Especially in a topic which is undoubtly very controversal in public as in academia like especially the history of Israel and Palestine from the 30s onwards it is important to give different narratives of history to the students. There are no narratives critical to british colonialism at all mentioned, instead of the White paper of 1939. After all the course represents a very one sided an biased narrative which is presented to a global audience of students. Even if a certain narrative is preferred by the teaching scholars, which is completely acceptable and natural, not just in the field of history, it nevertheless is important to cover different narratives fairly and as neutral as possible, which does not happen in this course. When mentioned other narratives are quickly downplayed or denied, and repeatedly dichotomies like the "inferior" arabs, the "ferocity" of the arab oposition and so on are mentioned or cited without beeing problematized at all. Nevertheless the Course was a reminder of many Things I learned before, and brings up some interesting historic connections and key points. | 1) For me reading is a very | Good | 1) Addition to the Videos so that | 3.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Good, concise course. The reason I didn't give it a higher rating is because I found it difficult (not impossible) to follow some of professor Eyal Naveh speach. His first language is not English, so I do not expect him to speak perfect English. However, I would expect the subtitles/transcript not to have basic mistakes. This became important when professor Naveb interview another person in Hebrew, as I found I could not really trust the subtitles. I think it wouldn't take much to make it an excellent course. My cheeky suggestion is to have a specialisation with The Emergence of the Modern Middle East by Professor Asher Susser as nucleus and a series of shorter, more in depth courses on certain of the bigger countries, such as Egypt, Turkey and Iran, similar to this one on Israel. | 1) | Good | 1) concise course. The reason I didn't | 3.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Really enjoyed the information and perspective from the course. The only issue is that everything is from the Israeli point of view - the course would benefit from some discussion/inclusion from other perspectives. Still, it gave me a good background on the issues, and I would take more classes from the same institution. | 1) perspectives. Still, it gave me a | Good | 1) background on the issues, and I | 3.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | good for people who wanna know the brief. would be better with more details and sorties | 1) | Good | 1) for people who wanna know the | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | In the end it is a good course. The videos might seem short, but are filled with tons of information. It has guest professors who were very interesting, and I hope they could have give their perspective on the subjects as well. There is no reading material, which is kinda sad. And it's naturally a little partial in favor to jews, but that's only natural. Prof. Susser, though, seems a lot more objective. I thank very much the professors for this course. | 1) In the end it is a | Good | 1) course. The videos might seem short, | 3.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | Very good class though at times it could be hard to hear some of the audio lessons | 1) Very | Good | 1) class though at times it could | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | A good synopsis of the history of Israel. I enjoyed learning about this subject, and especially enjoyed the interviews and conversations. | 1) A | Good | 1) synopsis of the history of Israel. | 4.0 |
| wEl1EleDEeWTbwotamPtlQ | This is a great introduction to Israel and Middle Eastern politics. It's not too tough- everything is broken down into very manageable 7 or 8 minute lessons, so it's easy to acquire a general understanding of the factors that led to the formation of Israel. Students looking for an in-depth examination may be disappointed, but if you're curious about this fascinating and very relevant chapter of history, this course will give you a good overview, and leave you hungry to learn more. | 1) this course will give you a | Good | 1) overview, and leave you hungry to | 4.0 |
| Wi6g78WsEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Really good course for understanding Korean Economic development | 1) Really | Good | 1) course for understanding Korean Economic development | 5.0 |
| Wi6g78WsEeWCSBJ1_yk7Tw | Lovely course! For me, a brazilian student, it is very good study another country that was as poor as my country and become a great economy. Lovely teacher and staff! | 1) a brazilian student, it is very | Good | 1) study another country that was as | 5.0 |
| wjL4-4_TEeW93wo8Ha4kow | A very good and useful course! Thanks a lot for the great tasks and well-defined topics. I did not have any experience in LaTex and now I feel more confident with this program. The course is very valuable, well-structured and I appreciate lecturer's efforts very much! | 1) A very | Good | 1) and useful course! Thanks a lot | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | While I was primarily taking this course as a prerequisite for the next course in the specialization (which covers MongoDB in a bit more depth), I found this to be a well-organized introduction to a compelling framework. The instructor did a good job of presenting the content in a way that should be accessible for new developers, while still being relevant to experienced developers looking to round out their skills by learning a new framework. Acknowledging that this is a review of the course and not the framework, it's worth noting that Meteor itself is promising in its ability to quickly deploy sophisticated client-server web applications. My firm has well-established boilerplate templates based on Node.js and Gulp.js and a few dozen dependency packages that satisfy many of the same capabilities, but which were developed over a period of months and come with a much steeper learning curve. The scope of modern capabilities that Meteor offers out-of-the-box for "free" is quite impressive, and allows developers to dive into the interesting parts without the overhead of configuring services and establishing a build process. My only criticism is the cost, if you're looking to attain a verified certificate. At least from the perspective of a professional developer, the course was a bit light on content by comparison to other Coursera classes with the same pricing structure. I was able to complete the initial coursework in less than a week, while still attending my day job (although it did take additional time to complete the course project). Ultimately, this would be more compelling at a $49 price point, at least relative to other Coursera offerings. | 1) compelling framework. The instructor did a | Good | 1) job of presenting the content in | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Introduction to Meteor.js is a very good course that was well taught by the instructor. Dr Matthew ye King made the course so easy to follow. This will be the simplest course you will ever have to pass thanks to the brilliant instructor. | 1) to Meteor. js is a very | Good | 1) course that was well taught by | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great course. The final assignement is a bit difficult compared to the course's teaching though. It did push me to do a bit of research on the web (which is good), but it would have been great to have a bit more explanations on how to develop features such as search or websites suggestion (I have no idea whatsoever if my implementation was correct). | 1) research on the web (which is | Good | 1) but it would have been great | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good as intro | 1) very | Good | 1) as intro | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Videos are easy to understand and follow, but there's sometimes to little background knowledge about writing good apps, security and good practices. The communication with the server and what would look like the final working product is not explained at all. | 1) to little background knowledge about writing | Good | 1) apps, security and good practices. The | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Videos are easy to understand and follow, but there's sometimes to little background knowledge about writing good apps, security and good practices. The communication with the server and what would look like the final working product is not explained at all. | 2) about writing good apps, security and | Good | 2) practices. The communication with the server | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Really good introduction. Enough to get you started on your next Meteor project. | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction. Enough to get you started | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good intro to Meteor. Instructor was very understable. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro to Meteor. Instructor was very | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great introduction to Meteor. Its good for prototyping. To be production ready you need to learn more stuff, like security and performance. | 1) Great introduction to Meteor. Its | Good | 1) for prototyping. To be production ready | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A bit old version of Meteor, but a good course for basics. Saddly this old version and the way we done, gonna be deprecated soon. | 1) old version of Meteor, but a | Good | 1) course for basics. Saddly this old | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good solution to begin with meteor. Many features illustrated in short videos. | 1) A | Good | 1) solution to begin with meteor. Many | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good pace. Sep by step, no rush at all. This course made me fall in love with Meteor. Meteor is Unbelievable magic Framework. | 1) Very | Good | 1) pace. Sep by step, no rush | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Greatest course material ever and the professor is a great professor in deed, rather than his knowledge in the field, he has good a character | 1) knowledge in the field, he has | Good | 1) a character | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | quite good | 1) quite | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good course for beginners on using Meteor.js framework. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course for beginners on using Meteor. | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The production of this course could be much clearer and as such this is a very tedious course. The actual subject matter is good if you have some experience with JavaScript. The video is constantly switching between the professor and the code. As such, you'll find yourself constantly replaying certain parts to see what is typed. In some instances, the code is actually "off-screen". Is there really any value to seeing the professor (rather than just hearing)? The key information is in the code! Either leave the video on the code the entire time and run the audio for the teacher, or, add another window where the live code is visible the entire time. It's important that this is the live code. Simply providing the final product doesn't allow the novice user to see how it is built. | 1) course. The actual subject matter is | Good | 1) if you have some experience with | 3.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The most valuable course in the specialization by far. The first two were pretty good too, but kind of too easy for me. | 1) far. The first two were pretty | Good | 1) too, but kind of too easy | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good course. I learned a lot from the course, very well explained. | 1) A | Good | 1) course. I learned a lot from | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | It's a good course if you want to learn meteor but a lot of people would like to have support at discussions from a professor since a lot of questions stay unanswered or with wrong answers. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course if you want to learn | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good learnig about the basics of this awesome framework. | 1) Very | Good | 1) learnig about the basics of this | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good introduction into Meteor. The Pace is good and the instruction is engaging. The last assignment can be a bit tricky for the challenges. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into Meteor. The Pace is | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good introduction into Meteor. The Pace is good and the instruction is engaging. The last assignment can be a bit tricky for the challenges. | 2) introduction into Meteor. The Pace is | Good | 2) and the instruction is engaging. The | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good idea to teach MeteorJS!!! | 1) | Good | 1) idea to teach MeteorJS! ! ! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good start in getting acquainted with the Meteor.js framework. I would definitely recommend the course for everyone who starts his journey to Meteor web development. | 1) A very | Good | 1) start in getting acquainted with the | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good introduction to Meteor.js the real time application development very fast. Those who want to do full stack development without learning server side language can try Meteor.js | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction to Meteor. js the real | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course on MeteorJS... | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on MeteorJS. . . | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent! A really good introduction! | 1) Excellent! A really | Good | 1) introduction! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction. Very good presented. It just | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | 2) Very good introduction. Very | Good | 2) presented. It just makes you want | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction. Very good presented. It just makes you want to learn more of Meteor. I can absolutely recommend this course to newbies to Meteor.js. Good methodology regarding speed, content and presentation of the course. | 3) course to newbies to Meteor. js. | Good | 3) methodology regarding speed, content and presentation | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Excellent keep it up Coursera good work. Very nice instructors | 1) Excellent keep it up Coursera | Good | 1) work. Very nice instructors | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good intro to meteor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to meteor. | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | really good | 1) really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | a very good introduction to meteor | 1) a very | Good | 1) introduction to meteor | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | If you want to learn Meteor - well - I just fell in love with this course. It is very, very good. | 1) this course. It is very, very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good!!! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! ! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Really good course, I'm like it :) | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, I'm like it :) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Awesome introduction to Meteor.js with very clear examples and explanation. It could be less "directed" and a bit more general, but as a starter course, it's very good. | 1) as a starter course, it's very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A very good course about Meteor JS and Mongo DB | 1) A very | Good | 1) course about Meteor JS and Mongo | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | This is a good course for introduction to Meteor.js. I think the content is very complete for the beginner level. And the Dr. Matthew explains each one the topics, even the details of the code, very well. It was a luck to have taken this course. I'm thinking strongly take the whole specialization. Thanks University of London & Goldsmith. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course for introduction to Meteor. js. | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great course! Clear steps and good explanations by Matthew! | 1) Great course! Clear steps and | Good | 1) explanations by Matthew! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good!! | 1) | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | The Course content is good. And the teacher is awesome...he explains everything quite well. | 1) The Course content is | Good | 1) And the teacher is awesome. . | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course on an introduction to Meteor.js. The course is a nice speed and flows well. It would be nice if there were more assignments in the weeks 1 - 3. You can create ones on your own (which I did), but it would be nice if there were more guided or outlined ones. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on an introduction to Meteor. | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Great course! I felt that Meteor is a good platform but I did not know how really fast it is and how fast actually you can learn and start using it! Great job guys! | 1) I felt that Meteor is a | Good | 1) platform but I did not know | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | As good as it was up till now, with introduction to Meteor.js the course really starts to shine. The education concept remains the same - during the lecture you receive a direction, while the rest of learning is expected to be done independently by reading relevant resources on the Web. The course still provides a working code and one can get away with boilerplated code, but it defeats the purpose of learning. The final assignment, if done properly, teaches lot and I'm extremely excited about how much I can do now. I'm also excited to work with a Meteor.js framework, which, allegedly, the hottest thing on the web right now. Really looking forward to start the next module. | 1) As | Good | 1) as it was up till now, | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very Good introduction to Meteor | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to Meteor | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Just write in terms of workload. Good mixture of projects and quizzes. Good teacher and content, explained in an easy to understand way. | 1) Just write in terms of workload. | Good | 1) mixture of projects and quizzes. Good | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Just write in terms of workload. Good mixture of projects and quizzes. Good teacher and content, explained in an easy to understand way. | 2) Good mixture of projects and quizzes. | Good | 2) teacher and content, explained in an | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course and good introduction to Meteor.js. I knocked it down one star because the assignments are not as effective as they could be. Weeks 1-3 are short, easy quizzes. Only in week 4 is there a programming assignment, and it is a doozy. More than 6 hours for me--nothing like the 30 minutes it claims (however, I will point out it was a good assignment and I learned a lot). I think if the assignments were structured more like the U of Hong Kong web development courses this would be a five star course. | 1) | Good | 1) course and good introduction to Meteor. | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course and good introduction to Meteor.js. I knocked it down one star because the assignments are not as effective as they could be. Weeks 1-3 are short, easy quizzes. Only in week 4 is there a programming assignment, and it is a doozy. More than 6 hours for me--nothing like the 30 minutes it claims (however, I will point out it was a good assignment and I learned a lot). I think if the assignments were structured more like the U of Hong Kong web development courses this would be a five star course. | 2) Good course and | Good | 2) introduction to Meteor. js. I knocked | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good course and good introduction to Meteor.js. I knocked it down one star because the assignments are not as effective as they could be. Weeks 1-3 are short, easy quizzes. Only in week 4 is there a programming assignment, and it is a doozy. More than 6 hours for me--nothing like the 30 minutes it claims (however, I will point out it was a good assignment and I learned a lot). I think if the assignments were structured more like the U of Hong Kong web development courses this would be a five star course. | 3) will point out it was a | Good | 3) assignment and I learned a lot). | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | A good useful course for beginners. The last assignment takes much more than 30 minutes though, it takes at least a few hours, unless you are an experienced developer. | 1) A | Good | 1) useful course for beginners. The last | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | El curso es bueno, pongo 2 estrellas por la calificación que dejan librada a los pares. En mi caso, en la última tarea, realicé el 100% de lo solicitado y por errores de los servidores de meteor (que andan cuando quieren), me calificaron con un 65%......Eso tira abajo todo el esfuerzo que hiciste. Y no se puede replicar, salvo por este post. Me ha pasado lo mismo con otra entrega en el segundo módulo. --------------------- The course is general is good. I put two-stars by the review classmates process. In my case, in the last task I made 100% of requested and because meteor servers has timeout errors, classmates scored with 65% ...... That shoots down all the effort that You did in tasks. And you can replicate only here !!! I was thinking in do the specialization...but after that, forget it! | 1) --------------------- The course is general is | Good | 1) I put two-stars by the review | 2.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | very good course! Lovely explanations and nice videos. | 1) very | Good | 1) course! Lovely explanations and nice videos. | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good pace, perfect explanation of terms and mechanisms. | 1) | Good | 1) pace, perfect explanation of terms and | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Good one, thanks | 1) | Good | 1) one, thanks | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | Very good introduction! I hope it continues to the next level! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction! I hope it continues to | 4.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wKPtohoHEeWwrBKfKrqlSQ | good but small | 1) | Good | 1) but small | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Gave me a good outlook of the path to inspirational leadership. | 1) Gave me a | Good | 1) outlook of the path to inspirational | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Really good course | 1) Really | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | The course was well framed but the live discussion was a little bit unwanted in this web world. The features and examples were good. Overall good work done. | 1) world. The features and examples were | Good | 1) Overall good work done. | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | The course was well framed but the live discussion was a little bit unwanted in this web world. The features and examples were good. Overall good work done. | 2) features and examples were good. Overall | Good | 2) work done. | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Underwhelmed. If this had been a free course I might have gone up to two stars, but I probably wouldn't have finished. This course attempts to take complex social awareness and patterns and reduce them to an understandable set of skills to be practiced... but it fails. I find it to be full of new-age dreamy ramblings that do not really help in the real world. Leadership is influence, which comes as a mixture of experience and intention. This course seems to discount experience in favour of "sense", used in this context as a poorly-translated summing up of the physical senses and their analysis. This course requires you to create an intimate written self-portrait, which you then find yourself sharing with a stranger and comparing. The exercise is interesting, and a lot of students have bought into the premise that this is a "genuine conversation" and allows them to explore their ability to know another person. I am the heretic in the room: I think the student wish to appear intelligent to their peers and the emperor is in fact shamefully unclad. If this is what the world considers a "genuine" conversation then the world is a shallower place than I had thought. This course, unfortunately, over-promises and under-delivers, and I am not in the least tempted to take the next one in the series. A good concept, but poorly planned, poorly translated, and poorly executed. Valerie clearly understands her topic but the summarizing of it for this framework is not a success. | 1) next one in the series. A | Good | 1) concept, but poorly planned, poorly translated, | 1.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | The course was excellent. very hands-on approach. It enabled me realize important behaviours and attitudes of a good leader. The first step was focused on introspection and understanding yourself to develop your type of leadership. Great beginning for the specialization! | 1) important behaviours and attitudes of a | Good | 1) leader. The first step was focused | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Some good points. Spends a lot of time on self-advertisement. Takes a lot of time to get to the point. | 1) Some | Good | 1) points. Spends a lot of time | 2.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Good start for the specialization | 1) | Good | 1) start for the specialization | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | this course is good | 1) this course is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Very informative and engaging...... good self analysis sessions included. | 1) engaging. . . . . . | Good | 1) self analysis sessions included. | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Really a good course for improving slef awarness!!! | 1) Really a | Good | 1) course for improving slef awarness! ! | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | This was one of the best MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture content that explains various concepts to start building leadership skills and the ACE terminology helps in recollecting the concepts. The assignments in terms of self-portrait and conversation was awesome and was a totally new experience. Loved the course thoroughly and made a good friend as well ! | 1) the best MOOC I completed recently. | Good | 1) lecture content that explains various concepts | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | This was one of the best MOOC I completed recently. Good lecture content that explains various concepts to start building leadership skills and the ACE terminology helps in recollecting the concepts. The assignments in terms of self-portrait and conversation was awesome and was a totally new experience. Loved the course thoroughly and made a good friend as well ! | 2) the course thoroughly and made a | Good | 2) friend as well ! | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | it's good but can be better they have to give more examples about the concept | 1) it's | Good | 1) but can be better they have | 2.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | good to start your study of leadership skills | 1) | Good | 1) to start your study of leadership | 4.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | A very good surprise! | 1) A very | Good | 1) surprise! | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | pretty good. | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Wl5ych5kEeWFIxLDnS6_kQ | Good for interpersonal Development skills. The teaches seems very nice and experienced | 1) | Good | 1) for interpersonal Development skills. The teaches | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Good course to understand basic causes of Climate Change | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand basic causes of | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Its a very good course for students interested in learning all about Global warming and its impacts | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course for students interested in learning | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | A very approachable introduction to climate science and the dangers of global warming from respected ocean chemist Prof. David Archer. Good online resources in the form of climate models from U Chicago. | 1) respected ocean chemist Prof. David Archer. | Good | 1) online resources in the form of | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Good points: 1) Great instructor; 2) applicable content; 3) great for physics students. Bad points: 1) Lacking of a "Formulae booklet" to use as reminder and reference for formulas and constants - when working on the models for this course; 2) The exercises approach should be reviews, making more use of the tools available in the Coursera interface (example: Assigments in text format (discursive) should use the own coursera interface, instead make us upload .TXT or .DOC files). Extra: I did not finish the course, the format and content do not achieve my personal objectives, as a software developer and environmentalist. But i really enjoyed the general approach and goal. | 1) | Good | 1) points: 1) Great instructor; 2) applicable | 4.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Very good, interesting and essential course. Everybody should know the Earth's climate basics since everybody is living on Earth | 1) Very | Good | 1) interesting and essential course. Everybody should | 5.0 |
| wmoTBzyAEeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Great class with a very gifted professor. The level of the class is very good! Advanced when this is needed and simple when necessary. | 1) level of the class is very | Good | 1) Advanced when this is needed and | 5.0 |
| wn9xfDvLEeWdUgozVKt3nw | clear instruction, a very good course for beginner to learn SEM. | 1) clear instruction, a very | Good | 1) course for beginner to learn SEM. | 5.0 |
| wn9xfDvLEeWdUgozVKt3nw | Good But slowly repeated times | 1) | Good | 1) But slowly repeated times | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good content. The lessons are clear and relevant, with good examples. The course would be "excellent" if the instructor would be involved with the forums and would answer questions that were posted directly to her. But I still think it is a great deal for managers to take this course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) content. The lessons are clear and | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good content. The lessons are clear and relevant, with good examples. The course would be "excellent" if the instructor would be involved with the forums and would answer questions that were posted directly to her. But I still think it is a great deal for managers to take this course! | 2) lessons are clear and relevant, with | Good | 2) examples. The course would be " | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Really good information for people starting companies and figuring out how to lead manage future employees. Some of the videos were cut off at the end and a word misspelled on the quiz. Other than that great job keep up the great work! | 1) Really | Good | 1) information for people starting companies and | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good audio quality and good pacing and presentation of content. | 1) Very | Good | 1) audio quality and good pacing and | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good audio quality and good pacing and presentation of content. | 2) Very good audio quality and | Good | 2) pacing and presentation of content. | 4.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good but slightly basic. Great starting point. | 1) Very | Good | 1) but slightly basic. Great starting point. | 3.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | To the point and powerful. I like the assignments and I was surprised with how much we focused on our own thought model and value system rather that external circumstances & people. I expected a course on "how to manipulate (coach) different personality types. It turns out that good coaching starts with me. | 1) personality types. It turns out that | Good | 1) coaching starts with me. | 5.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good for those who start, inspirational for whoever. Thanks. Blaho | 1) Very | Good | 1) for those who start, inspirational for | 3.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course feels quite weak, especially for the paid course, for these reasons: Models (Leader as Mentor, Coach, etc..., CTFAR model), which are given in this course, are given as is, with no references on how they were developed, authorship, and how good the results of application are. Almost no (just one) external references for reading to better understanding course material. The amount of material (about 3 hours of video, 4 quizzes, 2 discussions and 1 assignment) doesn't feel like it's a month's course, more like a one/one-and-a-half week. No references on topics, described as "hard" during the course (for example, identifying your values), which would make this topics less "hard". No instructor interaction on the course forum (I don't know if this should be like this or not, but it still feels bad). However, the final assignment is good and practice oriented. | 1) they were developed, authorship, and how | Good | 1) the results of application are. Almost | 2.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course feels quite weak, especially for the paid course, for these reasons: Models (Leader as Mentor, Coach, etc..., CTFAR model), which are given in this course, are given as is, with no references on how they were developed, authorship, and how good the results of application are. Almost no (just one) external references for reading to better understanding course material. The amount of material (about 3 hours of video, 4 quizzes, 2 discussions and 1 assignment) doesn't feel like it's a month's course, more like a one/one-and-a-half week. No references on topics, described as "hard" during the course (for example, identifying your values), which would make this topics less "hard". No instructor interaction on the course forum (I don't know if this should be like this or not, but it still feels bad). However, the final assignment is good and practice oriented. | 2) bad). However, the final assignment is | Good | 2) and practice oriented. | 2.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | i supposed that may be i am not very clever so the content and the question after the class also make me confused. a little bit disapoint with this course. but i saw a lot people below think this a good course so may be i am wrong. | 1) lot people below think this a | Good | 1) course so may be i am | 3.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | For Good Coach | 1) For | Good | 1) Coach | 5.0 |
| wnxlH3Q8EeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Basic, but good content | 1) Basic, but | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | Very good content. Subject wheel explained and good practical exercises. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content. Subject wheel explained and good | 5.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | Very good content. Subject wheel explained and good practical exercises. | 2) good content. Subject wheel explained and | Good | 2) practical exercises. | 5.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | I enjoyed this course a lot! It gives a good introduction to the topic of real time systems, the lessons are well organized and you don't need to be a computer science expert to learn and understand the material taught in the course. The course not only teaches theory but gives you practical guidelines and very useful examples/assignments to illustrate how the theory is used in practice to solve typical problems and design real time systems , which is the feature I liked most about this course. This "hands-on" approach is very useful to the practitioner, with some inexpensive and simple hardware at your disposal the open-source software tools introduced in the course can get you quite far in designing your own real time system! Needless to say, no course is perfect and there are always things that can be improved. For example, the wording of the assignments and quizzes in this course is in dire need of an update/edit. | 1) course a lot! It gives a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic of real | 4.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | The course is very good in my opinion. There are some little drawbacks though. The assignments are not very difficult but expect you to be autonomous in setting up the environments; this was a bit of a hurdle for some students. Also the reviews could be better. The review feedback depends on how well the reviewer understood the subject; more concrete instructions would be good as well as more precise criterias for the grading of the peer review. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) in my opinion. There are some | 4.0 |
| Wp6z-dymEeWUwhJ351EtdQ | The course is very good in my opinion. There are some little drawbacks though. The assignments are not very difficult but expect you to be autonomous in setting up the environments; this was a bit of a hurdle for some students. Also the reviews could be better. The review feedback depends on how well the reviewer understood the subject; more concrete instructions would be good as well as more precise criterias for the grading of the peer review. | 2) subject; more concrete instructions would be | Good | 2) as well as more precise criterias | 4.0 |
| WQMNShxYEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | This course have good teachers and material. The articles of peers which you should read and assess are very Interesting, deep and curious. | 1) This course have | Good | 1) teachers and material. The articles of | 4.0 |
| WQMNShxYEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | The ideas are good, but I dislike the presentation. It's hard to read the screen and quotes when they're only on the screen for a few moments. Lengthy lists are presented, however, I need to pause the video if I want to know anything that's on the list beyond the first two points. These are often the only points explained. If one is only concerned with the spoken word, then you'll gather an okay amount of information. | 1) The ideas are | Good | 1) but I dislike the presentation. It's | 3.0 |
| WQMNShxYEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | Challenge but very worthwhile to refocus on what creates a good learning environment. | 1) to refocus on what creates a | Good | 1) learning environment. | 5.0 |
| WRmBJpeLEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | Good course but more room for improvement | 1) | Good | 1) course but more room for improvement | 4.0 |
| WRmBJpeLEeWiKgp3mpfjeQ | I really enjoyed learning about magic in the middle ages and am grateful for the opportunity offered by the University of Barcelona. The lectures were clearly spoken and the content was good. However, I would have liked to go more into detail about the practices of magic, I missed that a little bit. For example, the specifics of several charms/ingredients/etc are only treated on a few occasions. I have now also enrolled in different courses on Coursera and I can say that this course could have been organised better, with better assignments, quizzes, etc. So there is still room for improvement. | 1) clearly spoken and the content was | Good | 1) However, I would have liked to | 4.0 |
| wS6YM72kEeSuIiIAC0uZhw | Nice topics, good explanations and luckly also in spanish | 1) Nice topics, | Good | 1) explanations and luckly also in spanish | 5.0 |
| wS6YM72kEeSuIiIAC0uZhw | i don't no spanish and video is in Spanish. i tried hard to understand. Gujarati Language is not good. can I help to tranlation in Gujarati. I am Gujarati. I have difficulty in 8.1 .I have answered all correct answers.Somany times given only 4 correct answers. I am B.Sc, B.Ed with Maths. I have taught Maths in 10,11,12 th class. i will also join new course. Can you give certificate for Pre-Calculus? Any fees for that? Thanks. Jasubhai D.Desai | 1) to understand. Gujarati Language is not | Good | 1) can I help to tranlation in | 4.0 |
| wS6YM72kEeSuIiIAC0uZhw | It's a good course to remember concepts. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course to remember concepts. | 5.0 |
| wSAQVkpJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | An excellent introduction or a refresher course to this field! Provides a good amount of content for a 4-week course. The self-paced aspect of the course is also very helpful if you would like to make your own schedule. | 1) course to this field! Provides a | Good | 1) amount of content for a 4-week | 5.0 |
| wSAQVkpJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | was searching for an online course in the field of public health and found this .....its a brilliant course and was worth it...............good job guys......thank | 1) . . . . . . | Good | 1) job guys. . . . . | 4.0 |
| wSAQVkpJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | Very good course, especially the week 2 about especific diseases. I miss the role of animal production in the outbreaks, talking about the IOE | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, especially the week 2 about | 4.0 |
| wSAQVkpJEeW8cBKtDAegYw | A very interesting course and a good introduction to the topic. Would be beneficial if one could gain official credits or points towards an online degree with an expanded/more in-depth course volume. | 1) A very interesting course and a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic. Would be | 3.0 |
| wsC6Z0BQEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| wsC6Z0BQEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| wU9rptfZEeSQpiIAC2iNcA | Good general change management strategies as they relate to a complex health care environment | 1) | Good | 1) general change management strategies as they | 3.0 |
| wU9rptfZEeSQpiIAC2iNcA | I am not connecting to the instructor at all. The material is well managed and organized but I am not able to really hear or understand. Further, my connection to the site is disturbing. In this and a couple of other courses, the video lectures jump around and begin in the middle of the lecture. Between these two issues, I am not having a good experience with this course. I live in the US and have graduate degrees in public health . | 1) issues, I am not having a | Good | 1) experience with this course. I live | 2.0 |
| wU9rptfZEeSQpiIAC2iNcA | I am so impressed with the content of this course as it pertains to how applicable it is to my health care setting. I work as a charge nurse in a small hospital in St Lucia and I can identify. Keep up the good work all. | 1) I can identify. Keep up the | Good | 1) work all. | 5.0 |
| Wv_qFVYzEeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | I don't mean to be harsh, but this course is increibly boring and sluggish. The reading material is heavy, the lecturers speak so slowly and dispassionately that it's impossible to engage with the subject. I'm sure that there is really good content here, but I couldn't find it. | 1) I'm sure that there is really | Good | 1) content here, but I couldn't find | 1.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good course to understand keys questions and methodology to manage each step of data analysis process | 1) | Good | 1) course to understand keys questions and | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course gives a really good guide on how to define data science questions correctly and how to work with sharp goals during the hole Data Analysis funnel from the definition of the Data Science question to the communication of it's results. | 1) This course gives a really | Good | 1) guide on how to define data | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good balance between content and presentation | 1) Very | Good | 1) balance between content and presentation | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's a good course, and the professor is good too. I highly recommend it. = Es un buen curso, y el profesor es bueno también. Lo recomiendo completamente. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, and the professor is good | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's a good course, and the professor is good too. I highly recommend it. = Es un buen curso, y el profesor es bueno también. Lo recomiendo completamente. | 2) good course, and the professor is | Good | 2) too. I highly recommend it. = | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good... very important... Maybe too fast for a single week... | 1) Very | Good | 1) . . very important. . . | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good learning of data analysis principles. | 1) | Good | 1) learning of data analysis principles. | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Personally not a big fan of Roger Peng's approach while teaching. The lessons get a bit confusing, and so does the questions from the quiz. Jeff Leek's approach is more calm and simple. Nevertheless, the course in general is really good. | 1) the course in general is really | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good course. starts well and is overall very informative. thank you for offering us this info! | 1) | Good | 1) course. starts well and is overall | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good and quick lessons on Data analysis. Managers should appreciate this course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and quick lessons on Data analysis. | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Teaches how to think about a problem more than the specific tools that can be used to solve them. Good practical examples. | 1) can be used to solve them. | Good | 1) practical examples. | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good and interesting course, I recommend! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course, I recommend! | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good start to my carrer in the data science field! | 1) Very | Good | 1) start to my carrer in the | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course but not good from coursera to not give honor certificate like it used to give. edx still gives..very disappointed with coursera. | 1) | Good | 1) course but not good from coursera | 1.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course but not good from coursera to not give honor certificate like it used to give. edx still gives..very disappointed with coursera. | 2) Good course but not | Good | 2) from coursera to not give honor | 1.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | For learn method and idea about data analysis ,it is good. | 1) about data analysis , it is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course gives me a general understanding of the whole process of data analyses. Pretty good! | 1) whole process of data analyses. Pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Easy to understand what speaker is trying to explain, Good question design, not easy to pass all but really consistent with lecture content. | 1) what speaker is trying to explain, | Good | 1) question design, not easy to pass | 5.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Everything is good except the duration. It could be of three weeks. | 1) Everything is | Good | 1) except the duration. It could be | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Critical thinking is essential at the moment of working over data. This was a nice course with a very good theory about all the process,which a data analyst has to perform. | 1) a nice course with a very | Good | 1) theory about all the process, which | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Too theoretical for my needs but gives a good background to how to approach analytics. | 1) for my needs but gives a | Good | 1) background to how to approach analytics. | 3.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course for the fundamentals of making sure data analysis is done correctly. These are good things to keep in mind when you are managing a data science team. | 1) | Good | 1) course for the fundamentals of making | 4.0 |
| X1RtV0EiEeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course for the fundamentals of making sure data analysis is done correctly. These are good things to keep in mind when you are managing a data science team. | 2) analysis is done correctly. These are | Good | 2) things to keep in mind when | 4.0 |
| X3F5IHK0EeWi0g6YoSAL-w | This is an well done, interesting class with a lot of good information, but the course seems much too biased toward active portfolios and management. The videos from UBS add nothing to the class and seem more like advertisements for UBS than class material. That being said, I highly recommend this class and Specialization as a whole. | 1) interesting class with a lot of | Good | 1) information, but the course seems much | 4.0 |
| X4ituSzfEeWl3A7Kuc0JCQ | Good course on communication strategies using VOIP which will be useful for the Capstone project. | 1) | Good | 1) course on communication strategies using VOIP | 4.0 |
| X4ituSzfEeWl3A7Kuc0JCQ | Course is very good! It would be better if the lessons are more on practical side or practical quiz output | 1) Course is very | Good | 1) It would be better if the | 4.0 |
| XczDJRhBEeaUCRJWL-pjpQ | I thoroughly enjoyed the course and I will definitely be sharing my experiences with other people. It has helped me look at the social problem in my community in a different lens. I learnt a lot from reviewing other peers work and i quite liked the activities that we had to do. they were engaging, out of the box and enjoyable. The videos lessons are short an straight to the point an are jam packed with information. The extra reading material for each week was also helpful. All in all it was good. I highly recommend it. | 1) helpful. All in all it was | Good | 1) I highly recommend it. | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | good form of assignments | 1) | Good | 1) form of assignments | 4.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | The Course is simple yet informative. Sometimes we ignore very simple yet strong concepts. This course is very good for beginners. Also useful for those who wish to brush up their concepts. | 1) strong concepts. This course is very | Good | 1) for beginners. Also useful for those | 4.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | The explanations are very intuitive and comprehensible. The lecturer did a great job and simulators provided are as good. Thank you | 1) job and simulators provided are as | Good | 1) Thank you | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | The best thing about the course is that it doesn't seem rushed. Everything is explained at a good pace. Moreover, the syllabus is quite unique in the sense that it seamlessly connects theory with the real world. | 1) rushed. Everything is explained at a | Good | 1) pace. Moreover, the syllabus is quite | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good, absolutely essential for understanding current affairs! | 1) Very | Good | 1) absolutely essential for understanding current affairs! | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | This course was very helpful for me to know about the indicators that gives you the hint about how healthy the economy is ! This course allowed me to read the news about economics, how to interpret the figures mentioned in the news, how good the policy makers are whether appropriate/inappropriate considering the situation, where the rest of the countries stand in todays world. On top of it assignments and final exam made my understanding even deeper and precise. Thanks to IE Business school and Coursera platform for offering such a wonderful course for a begineer like me. | 1) figures mentioned in the news, how | Good | 1) the policy makers are whether appropriate/inappropriate | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Good course, well structured. Just needs some technical improvements in order to be able to review wrong / right answers in quizzes. Nice to have a second more advanced course in this topic. Joaquín | 1) | Good | 1) course, well structured. Just needs some | 4.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Easy and short. Good introduction into how government can influence real economy. | 1) Easy and short. | Good | 1) introduction into how government can influence | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Great course from a substantial University and also a great Professor. The course is very well organized and the Professor conveys difficult concepts with an understandable way. You not only will be able to read newspapers and understand what is going on the economy, yet you will get the knowledge to see behind politics. A well educated citizen can make good decision. | 1) A well educated citizen can make | Good | 1) decision. | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | vary good | 1) vary | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good course. The final assignment was 'stretching' and I enjoyed this challenge! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. The final assignment was 'stretching' | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good content, instructors, materials and exercise. I give 5 stars with a small remark: Some technical issues, grading and recognition enhancements, would leave this course even better. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, instructors, materials and exercise. I | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | This is a very good course to understand macro economics & how to read current world economic scenario. I did this course once in past & I am not taking it again. It is good to do once in 6 months until you master it... | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course to understand macro economics & | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | This is a very good course to understand macro economics & how to read current world economic scenario. I did this course once in past & I am not taking it again. It is good to do once in 6 months until you master it... | 2) not taking it again. It is | Good | 2) to do once in 6 months | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | Very good course. Explained in a clear and interesting way by the professor. Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Explained in a clear and | 5.0 |
| XeB2pvgkEeS36CIACw8Krw | cool course and good quality | 1) cool course and | Good | 1) quality | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | If you have time, it is a good course to start to understand how SEO works. If (like me) you work and don't have time, it can be a little too much useless especially in some parts of it. | 1) you have time, it is a | Good | 1) course to start to understand how | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | a very good start to so | 1) a very | Good | 1) start to so | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | A good course having history, evolution, and career search in SEO. | 1) A | Good | 1) course having history, evolution, and career | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | It provides a broad overview, but materials are not very refined and the course does not provide a good structured approach to the subject. At least it did not for me, leaving me wondering as to what next steps could be if I wanted to explore further. | 1) the course does not provide a | Good | 1) structured approach to the subject. At | 1.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Very good kick off | 1) Very | Good | 1) kick off | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good intro to the topic. I suggest reading the suggested books and blogs to fully appreciate it. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to the topic. I suggest | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | A good course and helps in better understanding of SEO. Great for beginners. | 1) A | Good | 1) course and helps in better understanding | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Very good introductory Course. Although SEO is a practical subject, it is important the strong theory and practical fundaments that this Course teaches to the learners. Thanks Rebekah. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory Course. Although SEO is a | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Content is good but there is no practice whatsoever. So much theory can become boring at times. | 1) Content is | Good | 1) but there is no practice whatsoever. | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | It started slowly for someone who already put some effort into learning things about SEO. Starting from week 2, it was great and gave a good overview of the topic. | 1) it was great and gave a | Good | 1) overview of the topic. | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Really To the point and easy to understand. Very good teaching faculty. | 1) point and easy to understand. Very | Good | 1) teaching faculty. | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Perhaps a bit too basic (and thus boring). But holding out hope it'll prove to be a good foundation for the rest of the specialization | 1) hope it'll prove to be a | Good | 1) foundation for the rest of the | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | it is too good .. | 1) it is too | Good | 1) . . | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good overview to get started. The part on SEO as a profession is far too long. Otherwise an exccellent course. | 1) | Good | 1) overview to get started. The part | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Remarkable. Very understandable, good explained with a lot of additional readings that are important, covered all the topics related to the history of search engines, programs etc. Can't wait to get to part 2 of this SEO course. Thank you! | 1) Remarkable. Very understandable, | Good | 1) explained with a lot of additional | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Very good introduction to the SEO industry. It either gets you interested or not. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the SEO industry. It | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good information presented, but I can't get past the outdated teaching method of using the first 45 to 60 seconds of each video to talk about what the video is going to cover, then spending 30 seconds repeating those bullet points at the end of each video. Some videos are 4 minutes long, so more than half of the content is not actually content, it is essentially the instructor reading the outline for the upcoming content. It's a waste of both instructor and learner time. There are errors in the materials, and since there is no instructor feedback/interaction, there is no way to find out what was meant (including in reading assignments). All you can do is submit a ticket to get it fixed and hope that it gets corrected for the next people who take this course. | 1) | Good | 1) information presented, but I can't get | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Worth all the effort. Meticulously scripted to guide you through the complexities of SEO, with gentle repetition and some tough assessments that required me to go back over parts of the module until I understood it. A good system of multiple-choice questions and peer review as assessment. | 1) module until I understood it. A | Good | 1) system of multiple-choice questions and peer | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | My search for a "good understanding of SEO process" was over after this course..! Now I'm raring to get more.. thanks! | 1) My search for a " | Good | 1) understanding of SEO process" was over | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good Introduction! | 1) | Good | 1) Introduction! | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good content, but blocked quizes in free version is bad idea. | 1) | Good | 1) content, but blocked quizes in free | 2.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This course is concise and provides a very good overview of the SEO industry. But I just wish there were more content. I finished all the four weeks' modules and tests within one day. | 1) is concise and provides a very | Good | 1) overview of the SEO industry. But | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | It is a good one but needs to more practice and training. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) one but needs to more practice | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great introductory course to SEO. The content is brilliant and the lecturer is clear. It would be good if there would be a teaching stuff to assist the students in their threads in the forums. | 1) lecturer is clear. It would be | Good | 1) if there would be a teaching | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good introductory course take you through the evolution of search algorithms and what they were designed to optimize/penalize. Also introduced some good online resources. Looking forward to the next course in the | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course take you through the | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good introductory course take you through the evolution of search algorithms and what they were designed to optimize/penalize. Also introduced some good online resources. Looking forward to the next course in the | 2) designed to optimize/penalize. Also introduced some | Good | 2) online resources. Looking forward to the | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | very good introduction. better than I expected. | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction. better than I expected. | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | A good course with a lot of information and valuable insight! | 1) A | Good | 1) course with a lot of information | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Great introductory course on SEO! Good foundation of the basics and feel confident about moving on to the next course! | 1) Great introductory course on SEO! | Good | 1) foundation of the basics and feel | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This is a wonderful Course to understand the Basics of SEO. A person who don't know anything about SEO can learn many things. (Not recommended for those who have good understanding of SEO Basics before) | 1) (Not recommended for those who have | Good | 1) understanding of SEO Basics before) | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good intro to SEO. I felt like there was a lot, if not too much, time spent on the history of SEO and search engines, but otherwise, it was a well-structured course. | 1) | Good | 1) intro to SEO. I felt like | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Weeks 2-4 contained good information about how Google searches for websites, and a quick outline of how Google's algorithms calculate which sites get ranked. Week 1 was out of place, and a poor introduction to the rest of the material. | 1) Weeks 2-4 contained | Good | 1) information about how Google searches for | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Quite good | 1) Quite | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This is very good course for those who want to understand the basics of SEO. Thank you for providing such useful and up to date information! | 1) This is very | Good | 1) course for those who want to | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good introduction course, but I hoped that there would be more assignments. Completed course in 3 days | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course, but I hoped that | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | good content | 1) | Good | 1) content | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I come with zero knowledge in SEO. But since the introduction lesson is good, even I getting to understand about SEO quickly. Thumbs up for the course director. | 1) But since the introduction lesson is | Good | 1) even I getting to understand about | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good Course on introducing basics of SEO | 1) | Good | 1) Course on introducing basics of SEO | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | A great introduction to SEO and a good review on the history and development of search. | 1) great introduction to SEO and a | Good | 1) review on the history and development | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | I failed to figure out how to translate the theory (presented in the lectures) into practice (the only assignment, a website audit). I would have benefited from another application assignment that was a stepping stone to the full-blown audit. Information was interesting, but not sure this is a good course for someone new to the nitty gritty of SEO. | 1) but not sure this is a | Good | 1) course for someone new to the | 2.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | nice course good information | 1) nice course | Good | 1) information | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good, thorough and informative description of SEO | 1) | Good | 1) thorough and informative description of SEO | 4.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This was a good introductory course for what can be difficult technical material. For someone like myself who doesn't have much of a tech background, I found the instruction to be delivered at a solid pace. | 1) This was a | Good | 1) introductory course for what can be | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This was an excellent introdusctory course, aimed at explaining the possible roles that an SEO professional may adapt and also provided a very good overview of the current SEO best practices. I would definately recommend it to everyone looking for a good start in the field. | 1) adapt and also provided a very | Good | 1) overview of the current SEO best | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | This was an excellent introdusctory course, aimed at explaining the possible roles that an SEO professional may adapt and also provided a very good overview of the current SEO best practices. I would definately recommend it to everyone looking for a good start in the field. | 2) it to everyone looking for a | Good | 2) start in the field. | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | GOOD | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | A very good and easy to learn course. A prefect introduction for a new guy who wants to make a career in this niche. | 1) A very | Good | 1) and easy to learn course. A | 5.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 3.0 |
| XEjjlXEkEeWhZxJhllGpHQ | Really good for this modern era. | 1) Really | Good | 1) for this modern era. | 5.0 |
| XgJjBB9pEeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Good themes which brightened my way of learning to teach | 1) | Good | 1) themes which brightened my way of | 5.0 |
| XgJjBB9pEeWS6wrbVw_uEw | Doing this course, was an opportunity for me to know why I should have a good knowledge about my learners and their learning. | 1) know why I should have a | Good | 1) knowledge about my learners and their | 5.0 |
| xg_cj6KwEeWiwAqQT7MHVQ | I highly recommend this course, with a lot of advises from real life, very clear communication style and with a real good sense of humor. There is no time for being bored. Excellent ! | 1) communication style and with a real | Good | 1) sense of humor. There is no | 5.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | An entremely good effort, gives you a wonderful introduction to the wonderful world of Survey Research in general and data collection overall. One of the plus point is that it directs you towards quite a few new sources of data that is pretty interesting if you are an active researcher. | 1) An entremely | Good | 1) effort, gives you a wonderful introduction | 4.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | The deliver papers are great but slides are poor. In overall, a good course to begin learning about Data Collection and Analysis. | 1) slides are poor. In overall, a | Good | 1) course to begin learning about Data | 4.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | A good overview of surveys and data collection methods. The Total Survey Error framework is good, but its application isn't shown as strongly as it should be. Regardless this is a good primer for future material. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview of surveys and data collection | 4.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | A good overview of surveys and data collection methods. The Total Survey Error framework is good, but its application isn't shown as strongly as it should be. Regardless this is a good primer for future material. | 2) The Total Survey Error framework is | Good | 2) but its application isn't shown as | 4.0 |
| xj2LNEUVEeWE9A7XSkBY3w | A good overview of surveys and data collection methods. The Total Survey Error framework is good, but its application isn't shown as strongly as it should be. Regardless this is a good primer for future material. | 3) should be. Regardless this is a | Good | 3) primer for future material. | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | it was very good to learn from the best brains of an institute , it helped me a lot to know about How Telephony goes digital , Shifting Landscapes, what happen to dial tone and many more . thanks to you, you are doing a great job. | 1) it was very | Good | 1) to learn from the best brains | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Gooed clear presenters. Give a good idea of how connectivity works. Last module was a bit obvious (IoT applications) | 1) Gooed clear presenters. Give a | Good | 1) idea of how connectivity works. Last | 3.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | This is a good course to get up to speed with what has happened, we were there for some of it, but did not know the inside story. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course to get up to speed | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good overview, but would like to see more context (why is this important to know?). The history is interesting, but how does it affect my apps today? Lots of typos and grammar errors in the knowledge checks. Would like to see slides with text so I can read and listen. | 1) | Good | 1) overview, but would like to see | 3.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Not really technical, but a good overview over the past years and even centuries... | 1) Not really technical, but a | Good | 1) overview over the past years and | 3.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | It was very nice experience doing this course. Very nice contents and very good explanation. | 1) course. Very nice contents and very | Good | 1) explanation. | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Fairly good overview of events and technologies leading up to IoT. | 1) Fairly | Good | 1) overview of events and technologies leading | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good review of the history. | 1) | Good | 1) review of the history. | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good content | 1) | Good | 1) content | 2.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Pretty good course which get you clear about what the IoT is on the top of the shell. | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course which get you clear about | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | A very good theoretical course, highly recommended | 1) A very | Good | 1) theoretical course, highly recommended | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | It is good but for an introduction its too long. | 1) It is | Good | 1) but for an introduction its too | 2.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | I would suggest to review quiz questions, because in some cases several answers are correct, but still just one accepted as right one. But in general very good course with very broad introduction to telecommunications and IoT. Thank You! | 1) right one. But in general very | Good | 1) course with very broad introduction to | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good Overview of IoT. | 1) | Good | 1) Overview of IoT. | 5.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Great Course, I hoped it would have gone into a bit more detail, but it was good to get a tour through the history of computer networks. | 1) bit more detail, but it was | Good | 1) to get a tour through the | 4.0 |
| XJUJYyzXEeWWqBIFfWmDPQ | Good Course for Evolution of IoT | 1) | Good | 1) Course for Evolution of IoT | 4.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Good explanation of concepts, would be better if add more interaction | 1) | Good | 1) explanation of concepts, would be better | 4.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | I really enjoyed this class a lot! The assignments directly tested the weekly material and I thought they were useful activities. The end quiz was good to re-think the entire course and reflect on all of the material we learned. | 1) useful activities. The end quiz was | Good | 1) to re-think the entire course and | 5.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Really interesting course. Good introduction to the dynamics of group behavior and collaboration. Nice overview of advantages of crowdsourcing, but no mention of any ethical or economic concerns. | 1) Really interesting course. | Good | 1) introduction to the dynamics of group | 5.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | the assignments wasn't that good | 1) the assignments wasn't that | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | THE COURSE IS GOOD. | 1) THE COURSE IS | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | The teacher is not very good at explaining things in simpler terms. The lessons were kind of hard to understand. | 1) The teacher is not very | Good | 1) at explaining things in simpler terms. | 3.0 |
| xL0drBU7EeWpKw4zIcjkHw | Good course. Especially enjoyed the crowdsourcing lectures. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Especially enjoyed the crowdsourcing lectures. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great experience! This course is really well structured. It have short but very objective lessons with really good take home messages. Easy to understand, and no time consuming. Congratulations to the organizers, specially to Maya Adams. I recommend this course to every one. | 1) but very objective lessons with really | Good | 1) take home messages. Easy to understand, | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good work! I really recommend this course to who care about their health. | 1) Very | Good | 1) work! I really recommend this course | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Overall good course, but maybe too easy | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course, but maybe too easy | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I found this a very good course, the reason I rate it so low is because the quizzes had a minimum of questions and these were very basic ones. The actual course content was interesting and informative and covered in depth . | 1) I found this a very | Good | 1) course, the reason I rate it | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | A very good course recommended for health personnel and lay person ;-) Learnt a lot especially about healthy home cooking recipes | 1) A very | Good | 1) course recommended for health personnel and | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Helped me learn a lot more on what is good for me and is not good for me. | 1) a lot more on what is | Good | 1) for me and is not good | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Helped me learn a lot more on what is good for me and is not good for me. | 2) good for me and is not | Good | 2) for me. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good for healthy living | 1) | Good | 1) for healthy living | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This was an easy course and I found the information very helpful in making you aware of processed food. I think it could have been a bit richer by exploring some other areas of health and food. I felt like the main focus was on processed food. The good thing though I learnt so much about processed food and I'm making every effort to cut it and eventually eliminat it from my diet. | 1) focus was on processed food. The | Good | 1) thing though I learnt so much | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Thanks so much for this course. It is really helpful. Good Luck with your future Courses. | 1) this course. It is really helpful. | Good | 1) Luck with your future Courses. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | After taking this course, I know what the Nutrition Facts of food means and what type of food is good for health. | 1) and what type of food is | Good | 1) for health. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Quite good for those in need of heathy living basics | 1) Quite | Good | 1) for those in need of heathy | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Interesting topic and very good information Not enough content (my opinion) Tests where way to easy, I could take them all without first watching the videos, and my grade ist above 90%. The questions are (espacially in Week 3 and 4) easy to solve with logic and a basic intelligence. Please work on making it harder! :) | 1) Interesting topic and very | Good | 1) information Not enough content (my opinion) | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course. It would be nice to have 1 or 2 healthy meal recipes at the end of the course as an example. I like that I can work on the course as I have time. The only downside is posting comments for each chapter because it is not an active discussion. | 1) | Good | 1) course. It would be nice to | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introducing regarding healthy eating and the dangers of highly processed food. I recommend this course for everyone interested in these topics! | 1) | Good | 1) introducing regarding healthy eating and the | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I strongly recommend. If you don't have any knowledge about food - this course is for you. However, if you know some basic stuff you won't learn anything new, but still it is good reminder and very strucured. It is very short, could be completed in about an hour and a half. What I didn't like during the lectures - Maya (the lector) was not talking with her normal voice, but kind of slow and unnatural, which for me was extremely anoying. At the end, when she is showing some recepies it is so much better. | 1) anything new, but still it is | Good | 1) reminder and very strucured. It is | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good quality introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) quality introductory course | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introduction! I wish it was deeper though | 1) | Good | 1) introduction! I wish it was deeper | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | it's good and important to learn the knowledge from the course to maintain my health. I already changed my eating habit after the course. Thanks! | 1) it's | Good | 1) and important to learn the knowledge | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It was really short, but has very good information. | 1) was really short, but has very | Good | 1) information. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | good stuff, but a bit preachy | 1) | Good | 1) stuff, but a bit preachy | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good for general knowledge about healthy di | 1) | Good | 1) for general knowledge about healthy di | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good content but extremely basic | 1) | Good | 1) content but extremely basic | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good & easy learning....liked it. | 1) | Good | 1) & easy learning. . . . | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Short, easy to watch videos fulled with high quality content and good ideias to incorporate healthy habbits in our daily life. | 1) fulled with high quality content and | Good | 1) ideias to incorporate healthy habbits in | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Covers the basics and must know well . All though it's for Western particularly American audience however it has many generic facts too . It was very helpful and has convinced me enough to have a good diet | 1) convinced me enough to have a | Good | 1) diet | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | pretty good | 1) pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very interesting and enjoyable, I think the mix between information about food and recipes for healthy food is a good one. I do think that for example adding recipes to lectures about certain types of food would make it an even better combination. For people living outside the US, the information about healthy diets might seem a bit US centered. | 1) recipes for healthy food is a | Good | 1) one. I do think that for | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's free and would serve many to be passed through at least 10-20 mins per few days. Good info. | 1) least 10-20 mins per few days. | Good | 1) info. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good and interesting course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting course! | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Simplicity and good piece knowledge about fundamentals of food and related habits throughout the course keeps the person bound with the course. | 1) Simplicity and | Good | 1) piece knowledge about fundamentals of food | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I seriously loved this course!! Good information, excellent teacher!!! I just wish you could get a certificate for this class. Would recommend to anyone! | 1) I seriously loved this course! ! | Good | 1) information, excellent teacher! ! ! I | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's a good course, I wished it was a paid course with a certification (a diploma) with more number of lectures that one can study in his or her part time upto one year. Dr Maya, your teaching style is excellent. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course, I wished it was a | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good course!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! ! | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good content! Easy to understand and very practical ! Loved it | 1) Very | Good | 1) content! Easy to understand and very | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | very good thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) thank you | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | good overall conversation about food | 1) | Good | 1) overall conversation about food | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very educational and fun way to learn. Instructor was very good at explaining key concepts and I especially enjoyed the new recipes I learned during the cooking seminar. | 1) way to learn. Instructor was very | Good | 1) at explaining key concepts and I | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very basic course with lots of common sense. But could be good for someone who never thought about their diet before. | 1) of common sense. But could be | Good | 1) for someone who never thought about | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good advice, well packaged, enjoyable. | 1) | Good | 1) advice, well packaged, enjoyable. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I really like this course. For me, it was a good introduction to know how to eat properly and how I should combine my food. The way Maya teach is clear and close, and you can understand and assimilate easily the concepts. Also, the videos of the last lesson are very helpful. | 1) course. For me, it was a | Good | 1) introduction to know how to eat | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | If you no nothing about this topic, lectures are very good. | 1) about this topic, lectures are very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great course on nutrition. It highlights the key concepts and gives a good knowledge of the food industry. It also enables us to understand the major problems related to food & health as well as how to tackle them. | 1) the key concepts and gives a | Good | 1) knowledge of the food industry. It | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Utterly disappointing. I hoped for a fact-based education on current scientific thinking in nutrition. Instead, this course consists of a couple of people's opinions on eating, without cited evidence, presented in a feel-good documentary-lite format with good camerawork and cute children. This is a high school public service announcement, not a university course; not what I'd expect from Stanford or Coursera. | 1) in a feel-good documentary-lite format with | Good | 1) camerawork and cute children. This is | 1.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good "basics" course. Great for beginners and reminders! I was hoping for something more advanced & was a bit disappointed. I am probably more knowledgeable than most however. The statement made regarding "eating fruits & veggies regardless of whether they have pesticides or not" was a bit tough for me as I became ill in part due to pesticides and still am. I might always be. I understand eating veggies in place of other foods (i. e. - processed foods) as I eat very little meat anymore. But coming from Stanford and someone as educated as he is, that was shocking. It makes me wonder who funded this course. | 1) | Good | 1) " basics" course. Great for beginners | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | very good. I love u | 1) very | Good | 1) I love u | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introductory course covering a wide range of concepts. I particularly liked the lecturer - good tone and pace. | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course covering a wide range | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introductory course covering a wide range of concepts. I particularly liked the lecturer - good tone and pace. | 2) I particularly liked the lecturer - | Good | 2) tone and pace. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introduction to the food and very easy to understand | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the food and very | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | its a very good start when you doesn't know nothing about the food or habits | 1) its a very | Good | 1) start when you doesn't know nothing | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Its good. It will motivate a person to have healthy diet :) | 1) Its | Good | 1) It will motivate a person to | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | good overview of the basics for people who want to improve their health (and don't realize that the standard American diet is making them sick). | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the basics for people | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introduction course | 1) | Good | 1) introduction course | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good introduction to a more healthy life style. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to a more healthy life | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | A good basic review of healthy eating habits. | 1) A | Good | 1) basic review of healthy eating habits. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I really liked the course. It presents simple and yet very good and applicable principles that I'm trying to apply in me everyday meals. Thank you! | 1) It presents simple and yet very | Good | 1) and applicable principles that I'm trying | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good Course for better understanding of daily diet and food habits. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course for better understanding of daily | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It is interesting and helpful in developping good diets. | 1) is interesting and helpful in developping | Good | 1) diets. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Easy, quick and healthy! Like a good lifestyle should be. Very informative material, especially for those with less knowledge about the first steps into a healthy lifestyle. Good basics for starters and freshup for those with more skills. | 1) Easy, quick and healthy! Like a | Good | 1) lifestyle should be. Very informative material, | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Easy, quick and healthy! Like a good lifestyle should be. Very informative material, especially for those with less knowledge about the first steps into a healthy lifestyle. Good basics for starters and freshup for those with more skills. | 2) first steps into a healthy lifestyle. | Good | 2) basics for starters and freshup for | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very well presented course. To certain degree, the concepts are basic. If you're looking for a course that explains the physiological effects of sodium or the chemical reaction of glucose, this is not it. However, it gives sensible advice about how to eat well for a healthy life. I took away a number of good ideas. Also, the course helped me put into a wider context some things I already knew in a disjointed manner, which helped me to understand them better. Good structure, script, presentation (including interaction between the presenters), visuals... In summary, I feel following this course was time well spent. | 1) I took away a number of | Good | 1) ideas. Also, the course helped me | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very well presented course. To certain degree, the concepts are basic. If you're looking for a course that explains the physiological effects of sodium or the chemical reaction of glucose, this is not it. However, it gives sensible advice about how to eat well for a healthy life. I took away a number of good ideas. Also, the course helped me put into a wider context some things I already knew in a disjointed manner, which helped me to understand them better. Good structure, script, presentation (including interaction between the presenters), visuals... In summary, I feel following this course was time well spent. | 2) helped me to understand them better. | Good | 2) structure, script, presentation (including interaction between | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This is less of a university level course and more of a long infomercial for Michael Pollen books with a cooking show at the end. There is no interviews with nutritionists or scientists. In fact, there really isn't much here in the way of science at all. The cooking videos are fun with some good recipes. | 1) cooking videos are fun with some | Good | 1) recipes. | 2.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It´s a very good course, based on the information you get about food and eating. The best i get from this course is that i got interested in cooking and adding more vegetables to my plate. | 1) It´s a very | Good | 1) course, based on the information you | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course in a sense of introduction to healthy eating habits. Would like to see more advanced courses with larger emphasis on vegetarian/vegan lifestyle | 1) | Good | 1) course in a sense of introduction | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Short and effective course. Good information and practical advice. Would recommend to anyone interested in what they're eating and what they could be eating! | 1) Short and effective course. | Good | 1) information and practical advice. Would recommend | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good! Everybody should see this course and try to get a better diet. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Everybody should see this course and | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good as a introduction course! Its clear and easy! Congratulations for the contents! | 1) Very | Good | 1) as a introduction course! Its clear | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Fundamental, but pretty good! | 1) Fundamental, but pretty | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Really good, I enjoyed from the begining to the end. | 1) Really | Good | 1) I enjoyed from the begining to | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good!! The best | 1) Very | Good | 1) ! The best | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's a very good introduction to nutrition and food | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) introduction to nutrition and food | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great information that is presented in short segments that highlight that topic. Very basic but good information that is a great refresher and good introduction to learning to eat healthier. Excellent presentation and enjoyable format. | 1) highlight that topic. Very basic but | Good | 1) information that is a great refresher | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great information that is presented in short segments that highlight that topic. Very basic but good information that is a great refresher and good introduction to learning to eat healthier. Excellent presentation and enjoyable format. | 2) that is a great refresher and | Good | 2) introduction to learning to eat healthier. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good info, maybe a bit basic. Would love a more in depth follow up. Thanks for all your hard work. | 1) | Good | 1) info, maybe a bit basic. Would | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is very useful and helpful for those who want to stay healthy for their own live and the family especially if they want to instill good habit for the children in eating healthy food. | 1) especially if they want to instill | Good | 1) habit for the children in eating | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course, easy to follow and informative. I regret that the content was so basic, I would have loved more depth particularly when the instructor is so knowledgeable and such a good speaker! | 1) | Good | 1) course, easy to follow and informative. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good course, easy to follow and informative. I regret that the content was so basic, I would have loved more depth particularly when the instructor is so knowledgeable and such a good speaker! | 2) is so knowledgeable and such a | Good | 2) speaker! | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good content | 1) | Good | 1) content | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good material, very basic but very meaningful | 1) | Good | 1) material, very basic but very meaningful | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Way too easy.. I was expecting more information in nutritional science. Still there's some useful tips for us to choose good food and improve our health | 1) useful tips for us to choose | Good | 1) food and improve our health | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good course overall. It gave me some good thought nuggets to keep in mind for the future. At times the course felt more like it was trying to sell the notion of home cooking rather than being about "food and health". Sometimes terms were hastily presented and maybe assumed to be common knowledge, which left me confused in one of the quizzes ("serum triglycerides", for instance). The course touches on interesting topics that could've been elaborated more on, for instance how transfats are made. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course overall. It gave me some | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good course overall. It gave me some good thought nuggets to keep in mind for the future. At times the course felt more like it was trying to sell the notion of home cooking rather than being about "food and health". Sometimes terms were hastily presented and maybe assumed to be common knowledge, which left me confused in one of the quizzes ("serum triglycerides", for instance). The course touches on interesting topics that could've been elaborated more on, for instance how transfats are made. | 2) course overall. It gave me some | Good | 2) thought nuggets to keep in mind | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good introduction to health & foods :) Nothing much new if some of u have seen already the doco in defense of food :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to health & foods :) | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This is a must! Good tips and advices to gain health by the food you eat and the way you eat. Great teachers, short videos, easy to follow. | 1) This is a must! | Good | 1) tips and advices to gain health | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Great way to understand some basics! The only thing to have in mind is that it's US based info, so you will have to research more about your culture and your society. But it's good. | 1) culture and your society. But it's | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good, succint , well presented and informative course | 1) | Good | 1) succint , well presented and informative | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | I was hoping for something a little more technical. This course might be good for someone who has no previous knowledge of the nutrition content of food or how to cook. It would be perfect for kids getting ready to head off to college who've never cooked for themselves. | 1) more technical. This course might be | Good | 1) for someone who has no previous | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good basic information. Easy to understand by anybody | 1) | Good | 1) basic information. Easy to understand by | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Really very basic, anyone with an interest in the subject is likely to know most of this already. nicely presented though, good quality videos. | 1) of this already. nicely presented though, | Good | 1) quality videos. | 2.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This seems like a good overview for those new to the kitchen, and/or health concerns more generally. For someone interested in deepening their understanding, it's of more limited value--but it is presented as an introduction. I wish there were readings to supplement the videos. | 1) This seems like a | Good | 1) overview for those new to the | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Overall, I found this course to be a good refresher given my prior knowledge / skill base. I could see this course being very good for absolute beginners with little to no knowledge of nutritional concepts or cooking. I personally was looking for more advanced / in-depth information about nutritional science in order to better equip me to be a knowledgeable resource for my clients (with whom I primarily work around health / wellness related issues). Additionally, the cooking ideas / concepts were all practices that I already utilize in my own kitchen / feeding my own family. One section that I did find incredibly helpful was the discussion about the different types of fats. As it stands, I would definitely recommend this course to a client, friend, or family member starting out at a beginner's level (like my fiance) or anyone who needs a refresher. | 1) found this course to be a | Good | 1) refresher given my prior knowledge / | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Overall, I found this course to be a good refresher given my prior knowledge / skill base. I could see this course being very good for absolute beginners with little to no knowledge of nutritional concepts or cooking. I personally was looking for more advanced / in-depth information about nutritional science in order to better equip me to be a knowledgeable resource for my clients (with whom I primarily work around health / wellness related issues). Additionally, the cooking ideas / concepts were all practices that I already utilize in my own kitchen / feeding my own family. One section that I did find incredibly helpful was the discussion about the different types of fats. As it stands, I would definitely recommend this course to a client, friend, or family member starting out at a beginner's level (like my fiance) or anyone who needs a refresher. | 2) could see this course being very | Good | 2) for absolute beginners with little to | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | To me , you were preaching to the choir. I have been trying to follow Pollan's ideas for years. I was hoping for new information, but for me it was a rehash of stuff I have heard ad infinite. this did not seem like a class. This seemed more like an advertisement for healthy eating with it constant music and sparse content. Certainly it did not have the rigorous content that would have been required in a college level credited class. It was certainly not as interesting nor as informative as the Berkeley class "edible education 101" Still as an advertisement for good eating it was well done. If you found an audience out there somewhere who had not heard these messages, then you have succeeded and I applaud you for that. | 1) 101" Still as an advertisement for | Good | 1) eating it was well done. If | 3.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Lots of good tips and reminders one may have forgotten in this busy lifestyle most of us live. | 1) Lots of | Good | 1) tips and reminders one may have | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Its a good and simple intro. the the very important world of eating healthy, ergo being happy. I would complement it with Michael´s Pollan book "In Defense of Food". Excited to continue my learning journey... | 1) Its a | Good | 1) and simple intro. the the very | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This course is a good introduction to basic nutrition guide lines for people who have never learned about nutrition before. | 1) This course is a | Good | 1) introduction to basic nutrition guide lines | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Really good and useful!! Thank you!!! | 1) Really | Good | 1) and useful! ! Thank you! ! | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Nice for a first approach, easy to follow. Good content. | 1) a first approach, easy to follow. | Good | 1) content. | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Simple and to the point. Good practical tips to lead a healthier life style while enjoying a variety of foods. | 1) Simple and to the point. | Good | 1) practical tips to lead a healthier | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Good introduction into nutrition | 1) | Good | 1) introduction into nutrition | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | It's a really good introduction to food and health in our daily lives. It would be great to continue by understanding how we can solve a lot of health issues. The Dr. Kousmine succeeded through her researches to fight against the cancer and other diseases. Thanks again Maya for your great courses. | 1) It's a really | Good | 1) introduction to food and health in | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Information is very straight forward and short, which is very good for people, who claim they do not have time. I think this course sums up and clarifies many things I watched and learned over the years in a very orderly manner. | 1) forward and short, which is very | Good | 1) for people, who claim they do | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | They talked a little about LDL and HDL which is good. But the rest was just a summary of avoid processed foods, eat less and eat less meat and ways to do it. It is important, but I thought the course lacked science and it was very very short. | 1) about LDL and HDL which is | Good | 1) But the rest was just a | 2.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | This s a very good course for the new so called busy generation. | 1) This s a very | Good | 1) course for the new so called | 4.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Quality course with valuable content. Good experience! | 1) Quality course with valuable content. | Good | 1) experience! | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Hi, I was looking for a good introduction course to food and nutrition and, alas, this is not it. I knew 90% of the things discussed in this course, and I was expecting more, but all I got was very basic advices ("eat less", "don't eat crap", etc.), all with videoclips and music which got annoying really quick. Disappointing. Take care. | 1) Hi, I was looking for a | Good | 1) introduction course to food and nutrition | 1.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Very good course raising nutritional and healthy awareness to this generation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course raising nutritional and healthy awareness | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Awesome course. I won't say that it was way too easy for me to solve the quizzes. I have been reading for a while before I took this MOOC. Loved everything about this course. Both the instructors were amazing, especially Dr. Maya Adam. Would love to take another course with her. Some really good additions to my knowledge database. Though it was good to learn how to access a proper food market to buy good food. Thank you guys for such an amazing learning experience. I will be waiting for another course from the same team. ADIOS!!!! | 1) another course with her. Some really | Good | 1) additions to my knowledge database. Though | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Awesome course. I won't say that it was way too easy for me to solve the quizzes. I have been reading for a while before I took this MOOC. Loved everything about this course. Both the instructors were amazing, especially Dr. Maya Adam. Would love to take another course with her. Some really good additions to my knowledge database. Though it was good to learn how to access a proper food market to buy good food. Thank you guys for such an amazing learning experience. I will be waiting for another course from the same team. ADIOS!!!! | 2) my knowledge database. Though it was | Good | 2) to learn how to access a | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Awesome course. I won't say that it was way too easy for me to solve the quizzes. I have been reading for a while before I took this MOOC. Loved everything about this course. Both the instructors were amazing, especially Dr. Maya Adam. Would love to take another course with her. Some really good additions to my knowledge database. Though it was good to learn how to access a proper food market to buy good food. Thank you guys for such an amazing learning experience. I will be waiting for another course from the same team. ADIOS!!!! | 3) a proper food market to buy | Good | 3) food. Thank you guys for such | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Amazing! Just amazing! Provided with good advice based on science. | 1) Amazing! Just amazing! Provided with | Good | 1) advice based on science. | 5.0 |
| xMqZG1wyEeWd6BJKWlaBIw | Could be added more technical question, but I understand that the course is trying to reach as much people as possible. However explaining a bit more details about minerals, which was not mention, would be good. Extending to flavonoids and some other stuff which most poeple is unaware would be interesting. | 1) which was not mention, would be | Good | 1) Extending to flavonoids and some other | 4.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Very good, well informed and fun course to do! | 1) Very | Good | 1) well informed and fun course to | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | This course is just packed with so much information. I mean that in a good way too. John pieces the whole history of rock in a way the is digestible, engaging and interesting. I primarily watch the videos. I'm a music fan and just love learning more about rock's trajectory. Didn't know that there was so much history to it. And in case this wasn't enough, be sure to check out part 2. Thoroughly enjoyed learning more about the history of rock and music. | 1) information. I mean that in a | Good | 1) way too. John pieces the whole | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Good overview of the rock industry and good survey of music. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the rock industry and | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Good overview of the rock industry and good survey of music. | 2) overview of the rock industry and | Good | 2) survey of music. | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Fantastic!! Really enjoyed the course Informative and enjoyable course which helped me understand the history of Rock/Popular music upto 1970. Prof Kovach's lectures helped me explore music and artists who I had long forgotten or did not even know of. This is a good course for both professionals like Dj's, student's as well as lay people like me who love both music as well as history. The only problem I had is that one had to do a lot of hunting on the net and that took a lot of my time. But it was well worth it because of what I heard and saw. The quizzes were sometimes too detailed and memory oriented. Maybe a more conceptual framework of questions can be considered in the future. Will definitely do Part 2 shortly! Thanks Prof Kovach and the Team. We are blessed by your effort and dedication | 1) even know of. This is a | Good | 1) course for both professionals like Dj's, | 5.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | Good course, but I was disappointed that clips of some of the music weren't played. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but I was disappointed that | 4.0 |
| xOBaY1ibEeS-oiIAC0UN8Q | This nice course helped me to understand the rock music in more systematical, organized way. The lecturer was very good, the visual part of the videos helped a lot, and supplementary materials too. The only disappointment I had with sometimes too specific questions in the quizzes, which meant that I must stop the video all the time to make an enormously specific notes, and this kinda spoils the integrity here. Nevertheless it was a great experience, and I definitely plan to go to the part 2 in the next year. | 1) organized way. The lecturer was very | Good | 1) the visual part of the videos | 5.0 |
| xQHOMy81EeWPngoW78wA_Q | Very exciting, informing and educative. A great platform to examine if the promises of federalism and decentralization has truely lived up to expectations given the huge challenges of diversity, democracy and good governance in Africa. | 1) huge challenges of diversity, democracy and | Good | 1) governance in Africa. | 5.0 |
| xQHOMy81EeWPngoW78wA_Q | Great course and very well explained. I have decided not to click the maximum puntuation because the course focused on Africa less than I expected. It focuses much more on Federalism and Decentralization, which is good. However, I missed more info about Africa. Congrats for the interesting course! | 1) on Federalism and Decentralization, which is | Good | 1) However, I missed more info about | 4.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Awesome content ,very well drafted and explained course content. I am thankful to the coursera team, who has discovered such kind of really good course and specialization. | 1) has discovered such kind of really | Good | 1) course and specialization. | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Yet again, professor Michael Mannino presents a very well prepared course that achieves optimal results in limited time. in this course, he ties everything together from the first two courses and gives good practice with real world requirements. just putting these courses on my CV helped me to get my first job with Data Warehouses. and then i found myself well prepared for the challenges of my new job. THANK YOU! | 1) the first two courses and gives | Good | 1) practice with real world requirements. just | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course for improving working with SQL in Data Warehouses | 1) | Good | 1) course for improving working with SQL | 4.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | This is another very good and useful, hands-on course. I am looking forward to Course 4 in the Specialization. | 1) This is another very | Good | 1) and useful, hands-on course. I am | 5.0 |
| xRA5cxnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Excellent Professor and good lesson | 1) Excellent Professor and | Good | 1) lesson | 5.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I thought this class was incredibly useful. It has a lot of good information, as well as good ideas on further reading a student can do to further their own knowledge after the course is completed. I found this to be one of the more useful classes in this specialization. | 1) useful. It has a lot of | Good | 1) information, as well as good ideas | 5.0 |
| xtpKLngcEeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I thought this class was incredibly useful. It has a lot of good information, as well as good ideas on further reading a student can do to further their own knowledge after the course is completed. I found this to be one of the more useful classes in this specialization. | 2) of good information, as well as | Good | 2) ideas on further reading a student | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Very good course! Comprehensive, clear, well explained and summarized. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Comprehensive, clear, well explained and | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Very good course that gets to some extremely important aspects of what leadership is. I found it a nice refresher with some good suggested and mandatory reading assignments. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course that gets to some extremely | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Very good course that gets to some extremely important aspects of what leadership is. I found it a nice refresher with some good suggested and mandatory reading assignments. | 2) it a nice refresher with some | Good | 2) suggested and mandatory reading assignments. | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Pretty easy, good intro into management concepts | 1) Pretty easy, | Good | 1) intro into management concepts | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Good organization and lecture format, but stressfully strict rubrics on the assignments given the peer review structure. | 1) | Good | 1) organization and lecture format, but stressfully | 3.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Very well-organized, high quality materials... Good job guys!!! | 1) well-organized, high quality materials. . . | Good | 1) job guys! ! ! | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | This basics is always good I really enjoy this course | 1) This basics is always | Good | 1) I really enjoy this course | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | It helped me to understand better the principles of a leader and how to be a good | 1) leader and how to be a | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| XupniISSEeWcSw7mZ7gPOw | Nice insights! Good course with actually steps to follow to overcome the issues presented! Really a great course! Teacher's great, I wish he'd loose a little the "army style" speech and grading system but you know, diversity is what makes this world great! Thanks! | 1) Nice insights! | Good | 1) course with actually steps to follow | 5.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | The course provides a good framework to deal with business problems. It is very simple, but effective. | 1) The course provides a | Good | 1) framework to deal with business problems. | 4.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | It's a very interesting course. The instructor is very good too. However I think there are not as much content as it could be. Each week has only 30 minutes top. | 1) interesting course. The instructor is very | Good | 1) too. However I think there are | 4.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Short videos with lost of good information. | 1) Short videos with lost of | Good | 1) information. | 5.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Short course with some good ideas and examples. | 1) Short course with some | Good | 1) ideas and examples. | 4.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | A short yet informational course. Good informational density for such a short course. | 1) A short yet informational course. | Good | 1) informational density for such a short | 4.0 |
| xx-VwD-OEeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Good course, very well structured and understable materials | 1) | Good | 1) course, very well structured and understable | 4.0 |
| XYsEz8XxEeWIJRKecECAWw | Good course to take before starting any online college program. Going online for college is great with this experience! | 1) | Good | 1) course to take before starting any | 5.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | Positives:- Good practice with the exciting world of script writing Learnt how to use the scriptwriting software Celtx.com Some aspects of the videos were helpful and instructive e.g. teaching us how to write a cold open Areas of improvement:- The beginner's course is entirely graded on peer reviews where one could get a range of divergent opinions on the same story, at times scathing and not constructive. Reviewers (who are purported to be beginners themselves) also at times give seemingly 'blind' grades without sharing constructive comments. The questions that you are graded on e.g. Do you feel immersed in the story? Is the story unique? are highly subjective and solely dependent on the reviewer's fleeting preferences. It would help if the questions were more nuanced and focused on the structure and technical aspects of script writing e.g. format, grammar, three part structure Lessons were too short and instructional (less than 10 mins of videos for each lesson) only for certain areas; it seemed like one of the major takeaways was to keep writing which is sensible but not helpful from a beginner's point of view. Suggestions:- To maintain some objectivity in grading: Mask the general comments section when a reviewer is giving his comments as negative comments from other peers could influence more negativity and vice versa. Give some guidelines on reviewing to prevent the grading process from turning into trolling. Would appreciate more helpful lessons with deeper content! | 1) Positives:- | Good | 1) practice with the exciting world of | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I thoroughly enjoyed this class. It gives you an excellent regiment and list of characteristics that would make your pilot and potential series desirable. My only real issue, which makes it 4 instead of 5 stars, is that the student feedback is somewhat limited in that not all students really understand how to give notes. Often times they are very vague ("good effort, write with move consision") not offering enough particulars to know what you should be looking to improve. But that's the inherent limitation of a course offered in this format. Not a reflection on the curriculum itself. | 1) times they are very vague (" | Good | 1) effort, write with move consision" ) | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | Well-paced course that encourages you to write, and sets reasonable deadlines that are so important for procrastinators. Don't agree with the statements that reading scripts and watching films won't help you as a writer, as I've found doing both extremely useful in learning to analyze and write more efficiently and effectively. Enjoyed the sessions, got some good feedback, and am continuing to work on the subsequent episodes of my new series. | 1) effectively. Enjoyed the sessions, got some | Good | 1) feedback, and am continuing to work | 4.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | I like the course, it is pretty good to learn screenplay, but They need to explain a little some topics that new writers maybe don't understand. Submerge more in some topics and explain it. | 1) like the course, it is pretty | Good | 1) to learn screenplay, but They need | 3.0 |
| XZomz77LEeWn1ApTWZT9Yw | Quite good introductory course on script writing, enjoyed writing my first pilot episode of my series | 1) Quite | Good | 1) introductory course on script writing, enjoyed | 4.0 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | Very good course. Maybe a few pointers on actual drawing would be helpful, especially for people like me who really have a handicap, or at least | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Maybe a few pointers on | 4.0 |
| X_ZG4rVzEeWq2A7HIftJ6w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | the course is very helpful,easy to understand ,reading materials were good too. | 1) to understand , reading materials were | Good | 1) too. | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Great! Nice layout, good and thorough presentation of almost all the relevant matter. Also the people presenting it are really nice and not that American-ish over the top enthousiasm. | 1) Great! Nice layout, | Good | 1) and thorough presentation of almost all | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Good course with very good cause and reference material. | 1) | Good | 1) course with very good cause and | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Good course with very good cause and reference material. | 2) Good course with very | Good | 2) cause and reference material. | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | A good introduction to the Organic Solar Cells world. | 1) A | Good | 1) introduction to the Organic Solar Cells | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Hi First of all I just want to write I have a background in mechanical engineering and I know the working principles of solar cells quite well. I just wanted to check out this course. I started this course but I find that it is very difficult to concentrate. I tried pinpointing exactly what the problem was and I came up with following: There is too much talking and not enough going on visually. I know you have a person in front of a white screen, and a few visual effects such as floating words and diagrams. It is just not working for me. I have a hard time remembering what you said. I can pause and go back again which is always nice but the info still doesn't stick. This especially true for the LCA part, which I don't even think is a difficult concept to grasp. I think the best courses I have seen online is not particularly rehearsed and it is usually just a guy, with a pen, running you through some examples to illustrate the working principles. Afterwards they do an everyday life example. I find that these courses always help me a lot. I am sorry about the 2 stars but I hope you see it as a room for improvement. It is probably a first time for you guys to use an online platform as a media so it will take a couple of iterations to get it right. I did like when you illustrated Isc and Voc in terms and abbreviations. More stuff like that, possibly also with an electrical diagram etc and som flow analogy. If I can propose anything it would be to organize it a bit more like Michigan Universitys Python learning series. I think it is quite good and the assignments are also challenging but you learn a lot. Anyway thanks a lot for the course. I hope you will find a way that works. | 1) series. I think it is quite | Good | 1) and the assignments are also challenging | 2.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Very good course overall. There was a problem with the formulas in several quizzes, though. One couldn't get the app to reflect a formula properly, which resulted in the questions being qualified as wrong. Otherwise nice, interesting course Congrats, and thanks for sharing your knowledge folks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course overall. There was a problem | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | I started the course with high hopes, and i was beginning to enjoy the subject matter. But it became very tough for me to continue because the sound in the videos was not very clear. It became very difficult understanding what the instructors said, either because the placement of the mic was not very good or the instructors were not speaking very clearly | 1) of the mic was not very | Good | 1) or the instructors were not speaking | 2.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Very good! Thank you. | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thank you. | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The course gave me a good, in-depth understanding of OPVs and how further developing the technology surrounding them could help solve the energy crisis. The material was thorough and the quizzes were challenging without being frustrating and encouraged you to learn more about the topics discussed. My only problem was that I was unable to access a community forum so a few times I was stuck on an assignment and had no way to find out information to help me. Instead I just had to guess and work through it alone which wasn't horrible but I would have like to have been able to discuss it with other people taking the course. Overall a good course that has gotten me very excited about OPVs and the future of solar technology. | 1) The course gave me a | Good | 1) in-depth understanding of OPVs and how | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The course gave me a good, in-depth understanding of OPVs and how further developing the technology surrounding them could help solve the energy crisis. The material was thorough and the quizzes were challenging without being frustrating and encouraged you to learn more about the topics discussed. My only problem was that I was unable to access a community forum so a few times I was stuck on an assignment and had no way to find out information to help me. Instead I just had to guess and work through it alone which wasn't horrible but I would have like to have been able to discuss it with other people taking the course. Overall a good course that has gotten me very excited about OPVs and the future of solar technology. | 2) people taking the course. Overall a | Good | 2) course that has gotten me very | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The most valuable insight was at the end. We can be so focused on efficiency of solar conversion that we forget it is not the only factor in producing a useful product. I know this but the specific example embeds the insight to better use it in other situations. Overall the course gave a good overview, though it was a mixture of the very simple (calculations) and difficult (the explanation of the polymers) that needed more pointers to appropriate further reading. Useful to know that the effect of cell shadowing in the series cells has a small effect on output. I hope the project gets funding to continue the research. | 1) situations. Overall the course gave a | Good | 1) overview, though it was a mixture | 4.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The course was a very nice introduction to OPV, the material is pretty good and the lessons were punctual. I have just three tings to take into consideration: 1- I am colorblind, so, I recommend you to identify each line on the lesson "Characterization of Polymers" because I had to ask somebody which color was each curve. 2- I recommend you to add a little bit more information about conjugated polymers. 3- It would be amazing if you make a document in pdf with all the reading materials (I would pay for it even though the information is free in your page, because is more easy to check a document than a webpage). | 1) to OPV, the material is pretty | Good | 1) and the lessons were punctual. I | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The course is a good introduction to Organic Photovoltaics. The instructors have done a good job to present a rather complicated topic in a manner that is accessible to a common audience. However, there are a few areas of improvement that can be noted for future versions of this course: First, All material is given equal priority in the course. I think what the instructor can do is to summarize the important "take aways" at the end of each video lesson. This helps the learner grasp the concept better Second, The explanation can be a little clearer - especially the topic of polymerization. Someone without an organic chemistry background, can find it frustratingly hard. Third, the tests are sometimes not in line with the previous video lessons and the reading material. The tests should be much much sharper. Fourth, the reading material should be improved vastly in terms of English quality, structure and presentation of key points. Sometimes, the learner can find it hard to understand some topics (ex: stability and materials) because it is inadequately explained. These topics should be explained better. Overall, a great start - but can be better. Well done and Thank You! | 1) The course is a | Good | 1) introduction to Organic Photovoltaics. The instructors | 3.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | The course is a good introduction to Organic Photovoltaics. The instructors have done a good job to present a rather complicated topic in a manner that is accessible to a common audience. However, there are a few areas of improvement that can be noted for future versions of this course: First, All material is given equal priority in the course. I think what the instructor can do is to summarize the important "take aways" at the end of each video lesson. This helps the learner grasp the concept better Second, The explanation can be a little clearer - especially the topic of polymerization. Someone without an organic chemistry background, can find it frustratingly hard. Third, the tests are sometimes not in line with the previous video lessons and the reading material. The tests should be much much sharper. Fourth, the reading material should be improved vastly in terms of English quality, structure and presentation of key points. Sometimes, the learner can find it hard to understand some topics (ex: stability and materials) because it is inadequately explained. These topics should be explained better. Overall, a great start - but can be better. Well done and Thank You! | 2) Photovoltaics. The instructors have done a | Good | 2) job to present a rather complicated | 3.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | It's pretty good. Very interesting and easy to use. I like the examples and all the figures. | 1) It's pretty | Good | 1) Very interesting and easy to use. | 5.0 |
| Y1sD7WReEeSPwSIACy-XPg | Very good for getting an overview of the field. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for getting an overview of the | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very good insights into contemporary business | 1) Very | Good | 1) insights into contemporary business | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | This course is really very in depth and is a good mix of solid theory and real world application. I think it's a must for anyone in advertising, sales or marketing. | 1) very in depth and is a | Good | 1) mix of solid theory and real | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very well defined and good materials! | 1) Very well defined and | Good | 1) materials! | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | A very good course with an excellent Professor who teaches step by step properly. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course with an excellent Professor who | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Good intro course to marketing analytics! Professor is a little goofy with his squash, but it's endearing after a bit. | 1) | Good | 1) intro course to marketing analytics! Professor | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Good theoretical knowledge. The program create awareness about Marketing analytics, The program could be improved with more detailed examples across different industry. It would be logical to have a part 2 where theory is applied for practical learning. | 1) | Good | 1) theoretical knowledge. The program create awareness | 3.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very good information a little confusion with the regression it's like doing algebra but I like the course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information a little confusion with the | 3.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Amazing course. But buying certificate is not good | 1) course. But buying certificate is not | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Good Topics and learnt the unkwon | 1) | Good | 1) Topics and learnt the unkwon | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Was good... I would like to see more "Analytics" | 1) Was | Good | 1) . . I would like to | 4.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very good course on Marketing Analytics. Especially good for someone looking to enter the field of marketing analtytics or for marketing managers who are trying to be more data driven. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on Marketing Analytics. Especially good | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | Very good course on Marketing Analytics. Especially good for someone looking to enter the field of marketing analtytics or for marketing managers who are trying to be more data driven. | 2) good course on Marketing Analytics. Especially | Good | 2) for someone looking to enter the | 5.0 |
| y20FTlDPEeWMlwoziUhyxQ | It has great content. A good investment of your time. | 1) It has great content. A | Good | 1) investment of your time. | 3.0 |
| yBXw74emEeWRYRLoE9jCoQ | Good course, gave it four rather than five starts because: The discussion boards were too prescriptive which did not lead to any open discussions. The videos referred to course material that was not always there. On the plus side, I found the course material useful and well structured. The personal journal was an essential part of the course and it should be emphasized as such. Without it I would not have learnt as much. | 1) | Good | 1) course, gave it four rather than | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent. Learned three distinct set of skills. 1) Product design that makes the job easy for the user. 2)Elements of importance in designing layout for soft screen 3)Conducting experimental studies on users.Great course!!! Good teaching Scott... | 1) on users. Great course! ! ! | Good | 1) teaching Scott. . . | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Overall it was mostly good but the maths was not well enough explained and some of the course materials felt out of date. | 1) Overall it was mostly | Good | 1) but the maths was not well | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It was a good course overall, but some of the material was very complex and would require more than 3 weeks of study. I am not sure whether it will be useful in a real life, especially calculating Chi-squared and such. I also wish the professor would simplify the language in which he speaks in the lectures. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course overall, but some of the | 3.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good tips for testing experiments | 1) | Good | 1) tips for testing experiments | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A really good course - much more concrete and in-depth than the previous one in the specialization. | 1) A really | Good | 1) course - much more concrete and | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Thank you very much for this interesting course! I still do these excersizes and try to notice good and bad design solutions in everything what surrounds me. I love this course and I am reading now Don Norman's 'The Design of Everyday Things' to understand design principles more deeply. It's an upgrade for me! | 1) these excersizes and try to notice | Good | 1) and bad design solutions in everything | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Another very good class in this specialization. | 1) Another very | Good | 1) class in this specialization. | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good course! the final was much more logical than the first course | 1) very | Good | 1) course! the final was much more | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | THE COURSE IS GOOD. | 1) THE COURSE IS | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good One... there are few rough edges but a good start | 1) | Good | 1) One. . . there are few | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good One... there are few rough edges but a good start | 2) are few rough edges but a | Good | 2) start | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course wasn't good. Many of the assignment instructions and questions were poorly written, and students clearly had trouble understanding what was asked of them. The assignments also weren't very deep or imaginative, and some of them requested very specific answers relying in keywords from the lectures rather than ensuring that the students had really understood the concepts. The design principles were introduced at such a surface level as to be just silly rather than useful. This was kind of a waste of my time. | 1) This course wasn't | Good | 1) Many of the assignment instructions and | 1.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I enjoyed this course a lot. Very useful information about basic design principles (within subject design, between subject design, online studies, etc). Also good to catch up and remember things from past studies. | 1) subject design, online studies, etc). Also | Good | 1) to catch up and remember things | 5.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good explanation of few design ideas and technics. | 1) | Good | 1) explanation of few design ideas and | 4.0 |
| YcfRNRoCEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really good introduction to interactive design | 1) Really | Good | 1) introduction to interactive design | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good, however instructions for the assignments are not complete. Often, instructions for the assignments that are required in the grading criteria are buried in the discussion forums, sometimes in multiple threads. And the method of grading is also only explained in the discussion forum. This can lead to the peer review grades being difficult to assign. The assignment pages should be updated to properly include ALL requirements and an explanation of how to grade the assignment. | 1) Course content is | Good | 1) however instructions for the assignments are | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course to learn Bootstrap! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course to learn Bootstrap! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is good. It helps have clarity around Bootstrap elements, and covers basics on things like Less and Sass. At the end you will not be a super expert, but you will be able to understand how to build a basic webpage and how to use support elements like less, sass, and package management tools. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) It helps have clarity around Bootstrap | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very interesting course and a good overview of Bootstrap. The teacher's style helps a lot to grab new concepts. | 1) A very interesting course and a | Good | 1) overview of Bootstrap. The teacher's style | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good professional advices. Much more than a simple tutorial. | 1) | Good | 1) professional advices. Much more than a | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, i liked the exercises. It is well explained, but you also need to learn/read from other sites (what is linked as resource), to be able to do the weekly tasks. I liked this approach, the teacher is explaining the lectures well. | 1) | Good | 1) course, i liked the exercises. It | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent for absolute beginners! But, if you have good experience in CSS & JavaScript you might play it at 1.5X, it is too informative to be attended by someone who knows even a little, it might be boring, then. Generally, the course is very informative, rich, instructions based and have very good exercises covering all the course content with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | 1) absolute beginners! But, if you have | Good | 1) experience in CSS & JavaScript you | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent for absolute beginners! But, if you have good experience in CSS & JavaScript you might play it at 1.5X, it is too informative to be attended by someone who knows even a little, it might be boring, then. Generally, the course is very informative, rich, instructions based and have very good exercises covering all the course content with a good-as-a-start hands on experience. | 2) rich, instructions based and have very | Good | 2) exercises covering all the course content | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course on Bootstrap and Responsive design. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course on Bootstrap and Responsive design. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Found all the lessons very well explained. The exercises were clear and helped a lot to put all in action. The shared PDF's are a good guide. About the videos It seems to me a challenge to put many concepts in short ones, less than 10min of duration. I am very satisfied, even some videos could be considered too long. ;-) | 1) action. The shared PDF's are a | Good | 1) guide. About the videos It seems | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice course. Deep knowledge. Links to extra information. Good practice. Understandable explanations. | 1) Deep knowledge. Links to extra information. | Good | 1) practice. Understandable explanations. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is very good course and very much useful for us. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) course and very much useful for | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Course for begineers | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course for begineers | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teaching method | 1) | Good | 1) teaching method | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course offers good material and covers the minimum requirements of bootstrap. The additional resources provided by the instructor are great for futher reading. The problem is the instructor delivers the material in an organized way but he is very slow. | 1) The course offers | Good | 1) material and covers the minimum requirements | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course proposal is very good, but the material and the examples need to be improved. | 1) The course proposal is very | Good | 1) but the material and the examples | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good basic course | 1) | Good | 1) basic course | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I think the classes and the exercises could be far more dynamic and didactic, but besides of that is a good course to get a grip of Bootstrap if you follow along writing the code and if you tinker a little by yourself afterwards. But it's definitely for people with solid JS and CSS bases. | 1) but besides of that is a | Good | 1) course to get a grip of | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good course with clear explanation, thank you | 1) | Good | 1) course with clear explanation, thank you | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a good course where I come across bower and CSS how to use the function for the UI frameworks. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) course where I come across bower | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I have learned many thing by attending the class, which is good for helping me find a job. | 1) by attending the class, which is | Good | 1) for helping me find a job. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | really good | 1) really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this is a good course to get started on front-end web frameworks , and the teaching was very good . | 1) this is a | Good | 1) course to get started on front-end | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | this is a good course to get started on front-end web frameworks , and the teaching was very good . | 2) , and the teaching was very | Good | 2) . | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | nice course and good instructor. but talks too slow, I completed whole course at audio speed x1.5. | 1) nice course and | Good | 1) instructor. but talks too slow, I | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Before , I have heard alot about Bootstrap in jobs requirements , from my class mates and so on ... I don't know why I didn't have enough courage to start learning Bootstrap by myself .... after completing this course .. I can consider myself good at using the power of Bootstrap ... this course gives me a strong push towards enrolling Web world and diving deeper and learning more ... thanks Coursera thanks Honk Kong University thanks Dr. Jogesh K. Muppala | 1) . . I can consider myself | Good | 1) at using the power of Bootstrap | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course with great teacher | 1) | Good | 1) course with great teacher | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good class. Lots of fun. | 1) | Good | 1) class. Lots of fun. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | 老师讲的很好，就是有些拖沓。实验部分希望老师在最后可以给出源码。 A good course, good teacher, except that sometimes the teacher is kind of slow. And I do really hope that teacher could give us the final codes right after every exercise. | 1) 老师讲的很好，就是有些拖沓。实验部分希望老师在最后可以给出源码。 A | Good | 1) course, good teacher, except that sometimes | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | 老师讲的很好，就是有些拖沓。实验部分希望老师在最后可以给出源码。 A good course, good teacher, except that sometimes the teacher is kind of slow. And I do really hope that teacher could give us the final codes right after every exercise. | 2) 老师讲的很好，就是有些拖沓。实验部分希望老师在最后可以给出源码。 A good course, | Good | 2) teacher, except that sometimes the teacher | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Last assignment does not have full instructions on how to complete it. Otherwise a good course. | 1) how to complete it. Otherwise a | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I enjoyed the course. Not a difficult course but the course experience was great. Instructor was also really good at explaining concepts. | 1) was great. Instructor was also really | Good | 1) at explaining concepts. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very interesting, actual material and good teacher. | 1) Very interesting, actual material and | Good | 1) teacher. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good ! This course help me a lot. Really appreciate ! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! This course help me a | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I enjoyed this course and felt it to be a good introduction to Bootstrap. The time allocations were not realistic, though. I have a fairly strong (albeit outdated) background in programming and web design, but I still felt that I spent a lot more more time than what was allocated for learning. I imagine that this can be very discouraging to beginners. I am looking forward to the remaining modules. | 1) and felt it to be a | Good | 1) introduction to Bootstrap. The time allocations | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Enjoyed the course! I learned bootstrap before from codeschool, but it wasn't as good as this course! | 1) from codeschool, but it wasn't as | Good | 1) as this course! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This bootstrap course is very nice , every components are explained nicely. Assignments also good. Waiting for next angular js lecture | 1) components are explained nicely. Assignments also | Good | 1) Waiting for next angular js lecture | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for programmers new to this area. Course is prepared very well. It was very useful for me. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for programmers new to this | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice lecture and good for starter to learn | 1) Nice lecture and | Good | 1) for starter to learn | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Such a good tutorial for beginner,Thank you so much for this. | 1) Such a | Good | 1) tutorial for beginner, Thank you so | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This was a four star course and the links to additional information were a good resource. 3 stars for the discussions which were left unanswered much of the time and not a highly active mentor group. Much was left to student when stuck and exasperated options. | 1) links to additional information were a | Good | 1) resource. 3 stars for the discussions | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. The assignments are a bit too easy since they give the code in the assignment details basically, but still the course gives a good introduction to bootstrap and other web frameworks and tools. | 1) | Good | 1) course. The assignments are a bit | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. The assignments are a bit too easy since they give the code in the assignment details basically, but still the course gives a good introduction to bootstrap and other web frameworks and tools. | 2) but still the course gives a | Good | 2) introduction to bootstrap and other web | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor. Good content, and very good explanations. Very good additional resources. | 1) Excellent instructor. | Good | 1) content, and very good explanations. Very | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor. Good content, and very good explanations. Very good additional resources. | 2) Excellent instructor. Good content, and very | Good | 2) explanations. Very good additional resources. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent instructor. Good content, and very good explanations. Very good additional resources. | 3) content, and very good explanations. Very | Good | 3) additional resources. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good informative course for starters on bootstrap. | 1) | Good | 1) informative course for starters on bootstrap. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course ,Good content for Bootstrap. | 1) | Good | 1) Course , Good content for Bootstrap. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course ,Good content for Bootstrap. | 2) Good Course , | Good | 2) content for Bootstrap. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good! | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Exceptional Tutorial... This is really a nice tutorial. Well presented and explained. Practical activity is too good. Thanks | 1) and explained. Practical activity is too | Good | 1) Thanks | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Overall a good course | 1) Overall a | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is good. Gives a brief overview of Javascript. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) Gives a brief overview of Javascript. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The course is good. I already use Bootstrap and still finding useful information here. But the sound is too silent. Also teacher speaks too slow, it makes listening even more difficult. | 1) The course is | Good | 1) I already use Bootstrap and still | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was very informative and assignments were very good. trainer was clear and good. | 1) very informative and assignments were very | Good | 1) trainer was clear and good. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was very informative and assignments were very good. trainer was clear and good. | 2) very good. trainer was clear and | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good. | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course, working on one large website project. The lecturer talks a little slowly, but makes things very clear. Some of the review criteria for the assignments are wrong for example "div-xs-12" should have been "col-sm-12" , which makes fair grading difficult at times. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course, working on one large website | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | i think the assignment of this course was very good and i think any one that did the assignment by himself ,have learned some good web dev skills . | 1) assignment of this course was very | Good | 1) and i think any one that | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | i think the assignment of this course was very good and i think any one that did the assignment by himself ,have learned some good web dev skills . | 2) by himself , have learned some | Good | 2) web dev skills . | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good video lectures | 1) Very | Good | 1) video lectures | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good intro to bootstrap | 1) | Good | 1) intro to bootstrap | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course, but a little expensive to participate. it's terrible that i cannot submit the assignment. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but a little expensive to | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First, the assignments always had poor instructions. It wasn't until grading time you would find out what the criteria are. (After your assignment is submitted) Secondly, there was no documentation/help for the fact the Windows needs a webserver to run content in this section. (Many versions of Windows can't do this) Discovered/resolved over many hours, when course content would not work. The actual course content was sparse/not much to it other than "Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap." After how good the first course was/how much ground it covered, this course was frustrating, poorly documented, and a disappointment. | 1) Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap. " After how | Good | 1) the first course was/how much ground | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course content is very good! but i got stuck sometimes because some program installation is very annoying(ex... bower...). | 1) This course content is very | Good | 1) but i got stuck sometimes because | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The teacher is very good! He explains very well and the material is very carefully prepared. Great Course! | 1) The teacher is very | Good | 1) He explains very well and the | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Difficult to understand, not a good explainer. | 1) Difficult to understand, not a | Good | 1) explainer. | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very helpful course to get hands on using Bootstrap framework and in order to learn the responsive approach of modern web development. This course provides a good insight on front-end development. I also discovered a very nice editor called Brackets (recommended in the lessons) and used it to test the examples on my computer. Brackets has a great feature for live preview in the Chrome browser. The material has a very good structure and detail level. I want to thank to Jogesh Muppala for teaching this course. | 1) web development. This course provides a | Good | 1) insight on front-end development. I also | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very helpful course to get hands on using Bootstrap framework and in order to learn the responsive approach of modern web development. This course provides a good insight on front-end development. I also discovered a very nice editor called Brackets (recommended in the lessons) and used it to test the examples on my computer. Brackets has a great feature for live preview in the Chrome browser. The material has a very good structure and detail level. I want to thank to Jogesh Muppala for teaching this course. | 2) browser. The material has a very | Good | 2) structure and detail level. I want | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. Thank you HKUST! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thank you HKUST! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course. If you want to learn about Front-End Web UI Frameworks and Tools then this is the best source for you. The instructor is so awesome and his teaching methods are very comprehensive. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. If you want to learn | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A lot of necessaty informaton, good explonations. | 1) A lot of necessaty informaton, | Good | 1) explonations. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course was a good introduction at Bootstrap and front end development. It was a pleasure to listen to the lecturer. | 1) This course was a | Good | 1) introduction at Bootstrap and front end | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. It explores most of the Bootstrap components. It gives you more that enough information to start building a nice responsive website. Many thanks to the professor and his colleagues! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It explores most of the | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | jogesh mupalla should be more descriptive about his explanation, he should explain if not all then most of the components of the bootstrap coding , which he sometimes skips or misses, otherwise the course is good | 1) or misses, otherwise the course is | Good | 1) | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is excellent. I like the "learn by doing" method adopted and during the course you built a good website. The last part dedicated to node.js, bower and npm is very helpful to understand how to use these web tools. | 1) during the course you built a | Good | 1) website. The last part dedicated to | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good content, and covered a lot in a short span of time | 1) | Good | 1) content, and covered a lot in | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good. Thank you | 1) Very | Good | 1) Thank you | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | +++ PROs First +++ + Pretty in-depth discussion of bootstrap + You may watch the videos at 1.75x or 2x speed; you would enjoy the course a lot more + You learn a lot towards the end of the course + Homeworks were pretty good --- CONs --- -- The bootstrap lessons are pretty much copy pasting code -- Week 4: Web Tools could be a little bit longer with even more examples about grunt, and Yo (we didn't see any example use cases on those topics) | 1) the course + Homeworks were pretty | Good | 1) --- CONs --- -- The bootstrap | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good lecture and assignment. Let me learn a lot of things. | 1) | Good | 1) lecture and assignment. Let me learn | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Nice course with good explanation. | 1) Nice course with | Good | 1) explanation. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course content is good and it is well structured. Instructor is also quite knowledge and explains the concepts well. Definitely recommended. | 1) Course content is | Good | 1) and it is well structured. Instructor | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I was expecting the assignments to be harder. But overall a really good introduction to Bootstrap. | 1) be harder. But overall a really | Good | 1) introduction to Bootstrap. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. Enjoy it a lot. Thank you Professor Jogesh. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Enjoy it a lot. Thank | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really good course. Well structured and with a great teacher. It is really worth it. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Well structured and with a | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Professor. Very knowledgeable | 1) | Good | 1) Professor. Very knowledgeable | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good and interesting. I had great fun! | 1) Very | Good | 1) and interesting. I had great fun! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good Course | 1) Very | Good | 1) Course | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really the best!!! But It will be good if lecture includes some errors we can make and silly mistakes which affects results adversely. Jogesh sir is very good teacher and he is clear and brief in less time | 1) ! ! But It will be | Good | 1) if lecture includes some errors we | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Really the best!!! But It will be good if lecture includes some errors we can make and silly mistakes which affects results adversely. Jogesh sir is very good teacher and he is clear and brief in less time | 2) results adversely. Jogesh sir is very | Good | 2) teacher and he is clear and | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Overview of Bootstrap, its usage and frameworks. | 1) | Good | 1) Overview of Bootstrap, its usage and | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good but the assignments are minor changes instead of full blown impls | 1) | Good | 1) but the assignments are minor changes | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course! It will be much better if the slides can be packaged in a zip file for the learners to download. | 1) | Good | 1) course! It will be much better | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course to begin with Bootstrap | 1) | Good | 1) course to begin with Bootstrap | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome Course. One of the best courses , i have been part of on coursera. well paced, very rich in content, very good delivery of the ideas,. Assignments very good. A value for time i just wish practice quiz to have more number of question, and more challenging. A VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO JOGESH. THANKS A LOT | 1) paced, very rich in content, very | Good | 1) delivery of the ideas, . Assignments | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Awesome Course. One of the best courses , i have been part of on coursera. well paced, very rich in content, very good delivery of the ideas,. Assignments very good. A value for time i just wish practice quiz to have more number of question, and more challenging. A VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO JOGESH. THANKS A LOT | 2) of the ideas, . Assignments very | Good | 2) A value for time i just | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very nice introduction. Very structured and good assignments. | 1) Very nice introduction. Very structured and | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course and awesome teacher | 1) very | Good | 1) course and awesome teacher | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very useful course! I feel like I have a good idea of how to use Bootstrap and am using it in all of my projects right now. | 1) I feel like I have a | Good | 1) idea of how to use Bootstrap | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course :) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great professor and good explanations with a bit of a challenge with the assignments which made you have to make sure you understand the material. | 1) Great professor and | Good | 1) explanations with a bit of a | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course for learning Bootstrap, delivered well by the instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) course for learning Bootstrap, delivered well | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course and very helpful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and very helpful. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course to take to advance bootstrap framework knowledge. | 1) | Good | 1) course to take to advance bootstrap | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very good course. The best what I have seen in this area. I would make only some minor changes but I didn't watch the first course so there might be some complementary information what I don't know or wanted this course to have. The first 3 weeks is nice package for learning Bootstrap. | 1) A very | Good | 1) course. The best what I have | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good Course for bootstrap introduction | 1) | Good | 1) Course for bootstrap introduction | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | the course is very good... perfect explanations and challenging assignments | 1) the course is very | Good | 1) . . perfect explanations and challenging | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It gives you a lot of information about Bootstrap and various tool you can use for Front-End Web Development. It gives you hand on experience with Bootstrap and how it functions. It doesn't explain to you everything which can be a good thing or bad thing depending on how you see it. Overall it's a great course that makes you see how Web UIs are made. | 1) you everything which can be a | Good | 1) thing or bad thing depending on | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I like the way of explanation, and good to know some more interesting things in bootstrap | 1) like the way of explanation, and | Good | 1) to know some more interesting things | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course covers all the basics | 1) | Good | 1) course covers all the basics | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course contains almost every aspect of bootstrap and is a great course for anyone to get started with frontend frameworks. The teacher Jogesh sir has a very good way of teaching. Happy feeling after studying this. | 1) teacher Jogesh sir has a very | Good | 1) way of teaching. Happy feeling after | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It‘s very difficult to listen what the teacher say. The teacher is not good for expression. 感觉老师表达能力有所欠缺，听起来很吃力，说话语速很不流畅，应该要好好改进一下。真想退款了 | 1) teacher say. The teacher is not | Good | 1) for expression. 感觉老师表达能力有所欠缺，听起来很吃力，说话语速很不流畅，应该要好好改进一下。真想退款了 | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good walkthru of the basics of bootstrap (and more) | 1) | Good | 1) walkthru of the basics of bootstrap | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This course is very good. I took me from zero Bootstrap to a very competent level. I was even able to make a side website project that I now use at work. There are minor things that are not explained, but extra material is provided, so no problem. | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) I took me from zero Bootstrap | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It's a good introduction to understand how Bootstrap works. | 1) It's a | Good | 1) introduction to understand how Bootstrap works. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course on the topic, I say. Good and detailed videos and explanations, a lot of links to improve your knowledge when / where you want to read more on topic(s) , nice and challenging enough topics for practice and checking your understanding. Thank you very much, Jogesh K. Muppala for such interesting and deep course. | 1) course on the topic, I say. | Good | 1) and detailed videos and explanations, a | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good teacher with a complete material , excellent examples and exercises . Congratulations !! | 1) Very | Good | 1) teacher with a complete material , | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a very good course to be introduced to Bootstrap. During the course, you create your own website so you always use the things you just learned. Also, the course is very well structured. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course to be introduced to Bootstrap. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is a good course. Even though the exercises are not graded, they are important. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course. Even though the exercises are | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very Good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course that slowly builds up a web site with exercises and assignments. Instructor has good sense of humor which makes the lectures interesting and fun. | 1) with exercises and assignments. Instructor has | Good | 1) sense of humor which makes the | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | First course by David Rossiter set the bar very high. This is like going through a manual or series of instructions. Would like 2 courses to be taken by David and 2 by Jogesh...Else the style becomes very monotonous. The course by David was awesome. This is not as good | 1) was awesome. This is not as | Good | 1) | 1.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good course. Thanks | 1) very | Good | 1) course. Thanks | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | 4rd assignment is tooooo easy - i expect here complicated task with non-trivial work with modules but not this child's plays. Other assignments and lectures looks good, but here is too many errors in subtitles - not critical but in every video i detect at least 1-2 | 1) plays. Other assignments and lectures looks | Good | 1) but here is too many errors | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | It is slow. but very good. | 1) It is slow. but very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good introductory course. You do have to be somewhat familiar with HTML, CSS and Javascript to get the most of it. The course is sometimes superficial, but it does teach you a lot in very little time. Great course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course. You do have to | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Perfect course! Explanation is very good and the examples help you get through all assignment. | 1) Perfect course! Explanation is very | Good | 1) and the examples help you get | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | wonderful. very good training | 1) wonderful. very | Good | 1) training | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A very detailed and professional class for web developers. It is very good for someone who want to focus on web development!! I was your student in HKUST android class, thank you professor! | 1) for web developers. It is very | Good | 1) for someone who want to focus | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Thanks for all Prof. Joseph Muppala! Good Course! | 1) Thanks for all Prof. Joseph Muppala! | Good | 1) Course! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Amma mia ! ,Good course. | 1) Amma mia ! , | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good teacher with expirience. Help to understand and learn a lot of Bootstrap features. And thanks for node.js, and for bower in last week. Thanks you, Jogesh Muppala. | 1) | Good | 1) teacher with expirience. Help to understand | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course, I learn quite a lot from it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, I learn quite a lot | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good coverage of bootstrap, but the other parts were very briefly touched upon (nodejs, bower etc.) | 1) | Good | 1) coverage of bootstrap, but the other | 3.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This is the second course in the Full Stack series by Hong Kong University. Because I find the first course in this series very interesting (the assignments are challenging and easy to understand; the professor does a very good job in explaining the materials), I continue to take the second course, which is this one, a shoot. However, it is a complete disappointment. In every single assignment, it requires a file, which is built by going through every single lectures of the course. That means I have to go through every videos and copy his code to my code in order to get the file. If you have a lot of time, that is perfectly fine. However, if you are a college student like me, you properly will not be able to commit that much time. Personally, when I take a course, I take a look at the assignment and then see what knowledge I need to have in order to complete the assignment. Because of this, I may watch the lecture or just Google out the answer. Requiring a file in order to complete an assignment strips away my liberty in doing so. Furthermore, if you miss a step in the video, your file may very well be ruined and you need to rewatch the video again to see what you missed. Also, the course is extremely slow paced. I have to play back rate to x1.5 normal speed. Sadly, even with faster speed, the lectures are also poorly structured. There are many other materials online that can cover the same amount of information in less time and easier to understand. Combined with the required file for each assignment, this course can easily be a torture. | 1) understand; the professor does a very | Good | 1) job in explaining the materials), I | 2.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | NIce Examples of bootstrap and good idea about bower library package manager and node.js | 1) NIce Examples of bootstrap and | Good | 1) idea about bower library package manager | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course on Boostrap. It was great to have an introduction to this framework. The teachers did a good job in explaining the concepts. The videos and the materials are very good. It would be great to have a follow-up course to learn more advanced stuff. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on Boostrap. It was great | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course on Boostrap. It was great to have an introduction to this framework. The teachers did a good job in explaining the concepts. The videos and the materials are very good. It would be great to have a follow-up course to learn more advanced stuff. | 2) this framework. The teachers did a | Good | 2) job in explaining the concepts. The | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course on Boostrap. It was great to have an introduction to this framework. The teachers did a good job in explaining the concepts. The videos and the materials are very good. It would be great to have a follow-up course to learn more advanced stuff. | 3) videos and the materials are very | Good | 3) It would be great to have | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good explanations of all bootstrap materials. The last assignments are just too easy. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations of all bootstrap materials. The | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very good ! | 1) very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course for greenhand. | 1) | Good | 1) course for greenhand. | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A good course, content are a little bit too much in 4 weeks study. Exercises and assignment are easy. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, content are a little bit | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its awesome course, very good for people want to learn Bootstrap, Node.js.... Building website from start is a good approach. Jogesh Muppala just rocked it. Eagerly waiting for AngularJs sessions. | 1) Its awesome course, very | Good | 1) for people want to learn Bootstrap, | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its awesome course, very good for people want to learn Bootstrap, Node.js.... Building website from start is a good approach. Jogesh Muppala just rocked it. Eagerly waiting for AngularJs sessions. | 2) Building website from start is a | Good | 2) approach. Jogesh Muppala just rocked it. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good learning course for new UI techniques | 1) | Good | 1) learning course for new UI techniques | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | very comprehensive and good introduction to Bootstrap and jQuery | 1) very comprehensive and | Good | 1) introduction to Bootstrap and jQuery | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course for introductory purposes nevertheless practice makes perfection | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for introductory purposes nevertheless practice | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Course was amazing , Moreover the professor knows how to deliver the content and make it simple and easy. Good part it starts from scratch to build a web with bootstrap. | 1) and make it simple and easy. | Good | 1) part it starts from scratch to | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good course. | 1) | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good but should be longer | 1) Very | Good | 1) but should be longer | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Great course. exercise and assignment are carefully designed to reiterate the concept. Practical tools are like LESS/SASS are covered. The approach to have students help grade each other homework is very good. | 1) grade each other homework is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | I really like this course. It provides a wide aspect of bootstrap and good exercise. Learned a lot from this course. | 1) a wide aspect of bootstrap and | Good | 1) exercise. Learned a lot from this | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Proffesor Jogesh K. Muppala is probably the best instructor I have ever met in Coursera. He is active on discussions and really help us to understand the topic. He is also has a great sense of humor and his lecture videos are magnificent. Good Work :) | 1) and his lecture videos are magnificent. | Good | 1) Work :) | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content, lots of exercises to get familiar, very good professor. | 1) Very | Good | 1) content, lots of exercises to get | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good content, lots of exercises to get familiar, very good professor. | 2) of exercises to get familiar, very | Good | 2) professor. | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Good introduction with practice. Unfortunately no certificate of accomplishment is available. This makes the Coursera platform less interesting. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction with practice. Unfortunately no certificate | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | A great course! A good mix of walkthroughs and challenges with a nice dose of humor mixed in. Jogesh is a great professor. If you want to learn bootstrap, look no further than this course! | 1) A great course! A | Good | 1) mix of walkthroughs and challenges with | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | This one is much harder and time consuming, compared to the first course of the specialization. Also, to receive maximum points for assignment, you need to think ahead and make things assignment don't ask you directly (like "removing the script if you're not using it, you'll receive 5 pts"). Good course anyway. | 1) it, you'll receive 5 pts" ). | Good | 1) course anyway. | 4.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good materials and practices. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) materials and practices. Thanks! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course. Good preparation for the course by instructor, and guidance in discussion forums. If you want to learn a good amount in short period of time, this is recommended. Nice set of assignments that give you a feeling of accomplishing something with what you are learning. | 1) Excellent course. | Good | 1) preparation for the course by instructor, | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Excellent course. Good preparation for the course by instructor, and guidance in discussion forums. If you want to learn a good amount in short period of time, this is recommended. Nice set of assignments that give you a feeling of accomplishing something with what you are learning. | 2) If you want to learn a | Good | 2) amount in short period of time, | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | The best course i ever attend to. Lectures are very good and the Teacher Jogesh K. Muppala is the Best of the Best, keep up with the excellent job. | 1) ever attend to. Lectures are very | Good | 1) and the Teacher Jogesh K. Muppala | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course. Thank to Prof. Muppala! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Thank to Prof. Muppala! | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Very good course on Bootstrap and its uses | 1) Very | Good | 1) course on Bootstrap and its uses | 5.0 |
| ycQnChn3EeWDtQoum3sFeQ | Its a good course. Covers all the basic concepts. | 1) Its a | Good | 1) course. Covers all the basic concepts. | 4.0 |
| yE4SeOsyEeWaMA7Pe7xMzw | Good introduction to embedded systems development with "OS". but it needs to include better & more code examples | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to embedded systems development with | 4.0 |
| yE4SeOsyEeWaMA7Pe7xMzw | very good for basic fundamentals | 1) very | Good | 1) for basic fundamentals | 5.0 |
| yEfdpZz9EeWlGQ5Xb9b0kw | Just taking part of the course material was rewarding. A good basic introduction to Organization Design. Looking forward to the next step in Designing the Organization | 1) the course material was rewarding. A | Good | 1) basic introduction to Organization Design. Looking | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | 1) Not worth the money and time. The reason I say this is because the same concepts are reviewed and explained in lot more fun, creative, and interactive manner at other free of cost resources like Khan academy, youTube channels, etc 2) Who is the audience? I don't think instructor has any idea of target audience. Are these meant for novice or advanced learners ? 3) Why so serious? My philosophy is that if I want to appear in video, i better learn to cheer up. Seriously i mean after dealing with rush hour traffic and psychopath boss, I don't want to see a unhappy serious looking face throughout a course. Not good for my heart! Sorry if it is a mean (not statistic mean!) or anything but I have come here investing my money and time (out of my family time) . And I am not happy with this course. The only reason I have to complete this course is because of the requirement in specialization degree. I won't mind getting my refund back on this course. | 1) looking face throughout a course. Not | Good | 1) for my heart! Sorry if it | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | There are better (Free!) courses out there to learn basic inferential statistics. Khan Academy is a great place to start, and Udacity has a great class that gives a good intuitive understanding. The main reason to take this class is if you are trying to finish the entire Data Science program. Otherwise, look elsewhere for an intro stats class. The instructor clearly knows the material, the class just does not do a good job of transfering that knowledge. | 1) a great class that gives a | Good | 1) intuitive understanding. The main reason to | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | There are better (Free!) courses out there to learn basic inferential statistics. Khan Academy is a great place to start, and Udacity has a great class that gives a good intuitive understanding. The main reason to take this class is if you are trying to finish the entire Data Science program. Otherwise, look elsewhere for an intro stats class. The instructor clearly knows the material, the class just does not do a good job of transfering that knowledge. | 2) class just does not do a | Good | 2) job of transfering that knowledge. | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I liked this course, and found the lectures interesting and would give them perfect marks on being instructive. However, I found that there are some speling errors here and there, and a remarkable frequency of sirens audible in the lectures (is JHU in a difficult neighborhood?), and sometimes it was hard to recover the plots from the git repository. But, more importantly the curriculum and teach was very good, and the use of examples after the theory makes it much easier to grasp difficult concepts. | 1) the curriculum and teach was very | Good | 1) and the use of examples after | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | As someone who's new to the world of data science and doesn't have a university degree this course was very hard to get a good grasp on. That's partly the "cause" of how the course was taught which was assuming you had all the knowledge at hand of all the stuff Statistical Inference is about. For people that are starting this stuff it might be nice to have a introductory course of Statistical Inference as I did not finish this course by just watching the course video's and additional information, I had to look up additional resources which explained the material better. Still, a big thank you for explaining statistical inference and opening my eyes regarding this topic, it surely helped getting me to the next step in what Data Science is all about and makes it ever more interesting! | 1) was very hard to get a | Good | 1) grasp on. That's partly the " | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Good course. Very interesting. pace is very high | 1) | Good | 1) course. Very interesting. pace is very | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Need to improve the clarity of the lectures, but it´s a good course though. | 1) of the lectures, but it´s a | Good | 1) course though. | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | good curse, but it's hard by short time to study all lessons and practice it. | 1) | Good | 1) curse, but it's hard by short | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It is a good course, well taught. A full comprehension of the subjects however needs more work and research than what is needed to pass the course. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, well taught. A full comprehension | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course is tough, informative. Good for people who want a summary of all the statistical concepts you can use for data science. You'll get the most out of this course not by expecting it to be beginner, because it is not. This course is best supplemented by having background knowledge in statistics. Meaning, learners would be much better off if he/she did some statistical course before. This course will provide the practical experience of implementing statistical concepts in R. | 1) This course is tough, informative. | Good | 1) for people who want a summary | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I've taken several statistics, data science, and R courses. This is one of the worst. I took others' advice, and I also strongly suggest looking to other sources to learn Statistical Inference before taking this course. Khan Academy, DataCamp, Udacity, Duke (Coursera), and Columbia (edX) all have great courses. Though they vary in depth, each leaves you with a good understanding of the concepts they teach. | 1) depth, each leaves you with a | Good | 1) understanding of the concepts they teach. | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It was a pretty good course with really great examples. I feel the instruction was a bit too droll and mechanical. | 1) It was a pretty | Good | 1) course with really great examples. I | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Content runs a bit fast but good course for stat inference with R focus. | 1) Content runs a bit fast but | Good | 1) course for stat inference with R | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Good to know the basics | 1) | Good | 1) to know the basics | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course was more like a glossary. Not quite good but practical | 1) more like a glossary. Not quite | Good | 1) but practical | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | An Excellently conceived course with good content and a competitively efficient evaluation components viz., assignments and quizzes. | 1) An Excellently conceived course with | Good | 1) content and a competitively efficient evaluation | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Teaching material is very good. But I feel the Professor's explanation is monotonic and uses more of textual definitions rather than simple explanations which are required for starters. | 1) Teaching material is very | Good | 1) But I feel the Professor's explanation | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Not beginner friendly, might be good as a refresher for grad students | 1) Not beginner friendly, might be | Good | 1) as a refresher for grad students | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Many videos lacked associated pdf slides so confusing to watch. Some topics on slides were not covered in videos. A supplemental video for those would be great even of optional. Brian Cato is a good presenter, however, more examples needed to be done showing how to work out various statistical problems both by traditional method and using R. | 1) of optional. Brian Cato is a | Good | 1) presenter, however, more examples needed to | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Good refresher course. It'd be a little steep of a learning curve for someone new to hypothesis testing/confidence intervals in four weeks. | 1) | Good | 1) refresher course. It'd be a little | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course gives a really good overview in statistical Inference. | 1) This course gives a really | Good | 1) overview in statistical Inference. | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | At times the content can be confusing. Some points are clearly explained. "Data Analysys Tools" course is a good complement in order to understand the subject. | 1) Data Analysys Tools" course is a | Good | 1) complement in order to understand the | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good class to get a feel for statistics | 1) Very | Good | 1) class to get a feel for | 4.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course, which is part of Data Science Specialization Course, which is a BEGINNER specialization, doesn't explain as it should to BEGINNERS. They try to explain, complex topics in 3 minutes ... If I didn't need the certificate, I would definitely not waste my time on this course. Youtube videos from khan academy or Brandon Foltz (Statistics 101) are much more valuable, you really get the topic and they are free. The professors didn't want to spend time preparing good material, from my point of view, the preparation is very poor. The course is more oriented to teach you to be a "data monkey". You know the code you need to write, but you don't get what are you doing ... Where do these formulas come from? | 1) didn't want to spend time preparing | Good | 1) material, from my point of view, | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Homework, lectures, and the quiz are completely out of sync. Bayes rule is introduced and appears in the homework but no where else. Things appear on the quiz that aren't in the home work or lecture. This was put together from scraps of another lecture, but in an incoherent fashion. When Caffo tells the viewer that they'll need to use other resources, he wasn't kidding. I dropped this the first time when I kept introducing things that completely had not been introduced, took another stats class, then came back and aced it. I don't mind accelerated learning or using other resources, but there's guide for which concepts are needed and where coverage for them can be found. This leaves little recourse but to know stats already, or go learn it before taking this course. Otherwise you don't know enough to even go find the pieces you need. Incidentally, the dude who does the lectures for Khan Academy does a fantastic job and the lectures are a joy to watch, though some people might prefer something that moves less slowly and carefully and perhaps they would prefer something that glosses over the fundamental concepts more. If that's the case, I can't say enough good things about Biostatistical Analysis by Zar but thoroughly, logically categorizing statistical methods with short, clear examples, references to the original research, and building up one concept after another in logical order. The chapters are short, but the first 16 or so should give you a good enough foundation to deal with about any intro stats class. As it is, Caffo's presentation needs some serious testing and remodeling, but there's no indication that it'll match what Khan Academy did regardless of how much work goes in. At best, it's a bitter pill you can swallow if you already know the concepts. | 1) the case, I can't say enough | Good | 1) things about Biostatistical Analysis by Zar | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Homework, lectures, and the quiz are completely out of sync. Bayes rule is introduced and appears in the homework but no where else. Things appear on the quiz that aren't in the home work or lecture. This was put together from scraps of another lecture, but in an incoherent fashion. When Caffo tells the viewer that they'll need to use other resources, he wasn't kidding. I dropped this the first time when I kept introducing things that completely had not been introduced, took another stats class, then came back and aced it. I don't mind accelerated learning or using other resources, but there's guide for which concepts are needed and where coverage for them can be found. This leaves little recourse but to know stats already, or go learn it before taking this course. Otherwise you don't know enough to even go find the pieces you need. Incidentally, the dude who does the lectures for Khan Academy does a fantastic job and the lectures are a joy to watch, though some people might prefer something that moves less slowly and carefully and perhaps they would prefer something that glosses over the fundamental concepts more. If that's the case, I can't say enough good things about Biostatistical Analysis by Zar but thoroughly, logically categorizing statistical methods with short, clear examples, references to the original research, and building up one concept after another in logical order. The chapters are short, but the first 16 or so should give you a good enough foundation to deal with about any intro stats class. As it is, Caffo's presentation needs some serious testing and remodeling, but there's no indication that it'll match what Khan Academy did regardless of how much work goes in. At best, it's a bitter pill you can swallow if you already know the concepts. | 2) or so should give you a | Good | 2) enough foundation to deal with about | 1.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Good overview of the fundamentals, including how to avoid some common statistical fallacies. | 1) | Good | 1) overview of the fundamentals, including how | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I found this course really good introduction to statistical inference. I did find it quite challenging but I can go away from this course having a greater understanding of Statistical Inference | 1) I found this course really | Good | 1) introduction to statistical inference. I did | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | The instructor is not very good when compared to the others that are involved in this specialization. | 1) The instructor is not very | Good | 1) when compared to the others that | 2.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This is a great course taught by a clever teacher but... The content is presented in a very dry, not easy to grasp, manner. In several cases, I had to use external sources to understand the content and/or derive it by myself. When I finally understood the content I couldn't understand why it is presented in such a cryptic manner when the concepts are rather simple to grasp and the math not so advanced. Professor Caffo is a good communicator in some occasion (the module on Power for example was incredibly well communicated). But most of the time he just throw us some result without properly setting the context and concepts, as if it was understood that we already know most of what he is talking about. (Not the case!) I plan to make a document that follows the course module and fill in the missing piece of contextual information, derivations and concepts. But this takes a lot of time. If/when it will be completed, I will try to find a way to share it with future generation of students. Because, honestly, the content of this course is not so hard and shouldn't be! | 1) so advanced. Professor Caffo is a | Good | 1) communicator in some occasion (the module | 3.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It was a good course especially for beginners like me. Though i would advice to continuously keep digging more about other packages also and also going through stack overflow for various hurdles encountered during doing programming assignment. I would recommend this course to everyone who wants to know about data analysis using R language in particular. | 1) It was a | Good | 1) course especially for beginners like me. | 5.0 |
| YfjiOHROEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good reminder of mathematical statics which I had on studies. | 1) Very | Good | 1) reminder of mathematical statics which I | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Is a very good course! I loved it, because the topics are important | 1) Is a very | Good | 1) course! I loved it, because the | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | it is very good | 1) it is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | The good course and i learn so much from it. | 1) The | Good | 1) course and i learn so much | 4.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | it's a good course , but it could be offering more, like when we answer a questions wrongly, it could offer corrections and also we need more details with video journalism. | 1) it's a | Good | 1) course , but it could be | 4.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Very good. I loved that course and the teachers! | 1) Very | Good | 1) I loved that course and the | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | We had some technicals problems, but this is a good course. | 1) technicals problems, but this is a | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | It's a course of very good quality, but personally I wanted something more challenging. I believe that since there are advanced version of texts, there should also be advanced version of tests in order to make people like me work harder. I would also like to see more peer-reviewed assignments, these are very good. | 1) It's a course of very | Good | 1) quality, but personally I wanted something | 4.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | It's a course of very good quality, but personally I wanted something more challenging. I believe that since there are advanced version of texts, there should also be advanced version of tests in order to make people like me work harder. I would also like to see more peer-reviewed assignments, these are very good. | 2) more peer-reviewed assignments, these are very | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | This course is good for my English ability. A lot of people all over the world entry this course,and I could read the stories they wrote. The experience | 1) This course is | Good | 1) for my English ability. A lot | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Very good and helpful course on journalism | 1) Very | Good | 1) and helpful course on journalism | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Very, very good! | 1) Very, very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | good coursera for me！ | 1) | Good | 1) coursera for me！ | 5.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | This course good for people who have intermediate level in English language, also it is very useful to gain double outcome or result which is your get more for English language skill and you know about jurnalism. Anyway thanks to AE and UPENN to provide this course for foreigners, also special thanks to people who involved making this course. | 1) This course | Good | 1) for people who have intermediate level | 4.0 |
| yFZxWd8aEeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Very good for me. I'm happy to be doing this course from Brazil. | 1) Very | Good | 1) for me. I'm happy to be | 5.0 |
| Yg0QhCDeEeWXzxJxfIL00w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Yg0QhCDeEeWXzxJxfIL00w | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yGzRJSWJEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I took this course to practice my Spanish, hoping it would be like the course Learning How to Learn that is in English. If you can watch that course in English instead or along with this one or even just reading the Spanish subtitles, I would suggest that course instead as it is truly amazing. This one is good... as far as it goes. It's hard to follow in the footsteps of Learning How to Learn though because it's one of the best courses in anything I've ever taken. This was a good course to practice my Spanish listening though! There are a few good ideas in here, so worth it. | 1) is truly amazing. This one is | Good | 1) . . as far as it | 4.0 |
| yGzRJSWJEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I took this course to practice my Spanish, hoping it would be like the course Learning How to Learn that is in English. If you can watch that course in English instead or along with this one or even just reading the Spanish subtitles, I would suggest that course instead as it is truly amazing. This one is good... as far as it goes. It's hard to follow in the footsteps of Learning How to Learn though because it's one of the best courses in anything I've ever taken. This was a good course to practice my Spanish listening though! There are a few good ideas in here, so worth it. | 2) I've ever taken. This was a | Good | 2) course to practice my Spanish listening | 4.0 |
| yGzRJSWJEeWs4gorU6Q1Yw | I took this course to practice my Spanish, hoping it would be like the course Learning How to Learn that is in English. If you can watch that course in English instead or along with this one or even just reading the Spanish subtitles, I would suggest that course instead as it is truly amazing. This one is good... as far as it goes. It's hard to follow in the footsteps of Learning How to Learn though because it's one of the best courses in anything I've ever taken. This was a good course to practice my Spanish listening though! There are a few good ideas in here, so worth it. | 3) listening though! There are a few | Good | 3) ideas in here, so worth it. | 4.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | good course！ | 1) | Good | 1) course！ | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Excellent course although can be confusing and difficult to keep track of where you are in the evolutionary chain. Especially good followup to Dino 101. I will definitely take other courses. Excellent lecturers and lectures! | 1) are in the evolutionary chain. Especially | Good | 1) followup to Dino 101. I will | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Overall good course, although at times narrow understanding of right answers. | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course, although at times narrow understanding | 4.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | As good as Dino 101...just too short! | 1) As | Good | 1) as Dino 101. . . just | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good course! Very interesting! I had a good time learning! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! Very interesting! I had a | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Very good course! Very interesting! I had a good time learning! | 2) course! Very interesting! I had a | Good | 2) time learning! | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Wonderful course. Good material set at a good pace. | 1) Wonderful course. | Good | 1) material set at a good pace. | 5.0 |
| yj814XQ_EeWIfhKr_WcYsQ | Wonderful course. Good material set at a good pace. | 2) course. Good material set at a | Good | 2) pace. | 5.0 |
| Yj9bIu-LEeWJRgpWnDLcCw | This course is much better put together than the one on company position (balance sheet). It's still not terribly in-depth, but as an overview for those unfamiliar with accounting, it has quite a bit of good information. | 1) it has quite a bit of | Good | 1) information. | 4.0 |
| Yj9bIu-LEeWJRgpWnDLcCw | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | 1) Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very | Good | 1) instructor, good content, well-designed. | 5.0 |
| Yj9bIu-LEeWJRgpWnDLcCw | Enjoyed this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, good content, well-designed. | 2) this course thoroughly. Very good instructor, | Good | 2) content, well-designed. | 5.0 |
| YjCOKcQTEeWI6BLH_IXMZw | Its a very good course and educative. Y'all should sign up. Thank you Coursera! | 1) Its a very | Good | 1) course and educative. Y'all should sign | 5.0 |
| YjCOKcQTEeWI6BLH_IXMZw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | As a petroleum engineer , I can say that this course offers very good insight into the Hydrocarbon value chain. OIl & gas is so vast and very intricately related with many business and technical aspects. Candidates looking to get a foot hold will find this very useful. Use this course see where and how you can fit into the OIl & gas industry. | 1) say that this course offers very | Good | 1) insight into the Hydrocarbon value chain. | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | A good MOOC to learn much about the Oil & Gas industry. | 1) A | Good | 1) MOOC to learn much about the | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | The Course was good and clear at it's first part. The second was little below it. | 1) The Course was | Good | 1) and clear at it's first part. | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Short, sweet and to the point. Very good course. | 1) sweet and to the point. Very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Thats an excellent course. It teaches you really good different topics of oil explorations and government rules related to it. There are technical classes and economical classes. Excellent course to do if you have free times for 2 weeks. | 1) excellent course. It teaches you really | Good | 1) different topics of oil explorations and | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | The course is complete helps me a lot with my training and helps me to contribute with new knowledge, I really liked give good rating of 10/10. | 1) new knowledge, I really liked give | Good | 1) rating of 10/10. | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | easy to understand and good build up of the curriculum, very educational form my perspective as a financial market | 1) easy to understand and | Good | 1) build up of the curriculum, very | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Solid course giving a very good high-level overview of the topics. | 1) Solid course giving a very | Good | 1) high-level overview of the topics. | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | It is a good course for any one interested in the field of oil & gas industry and all the processes associated with them. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for any one interested in | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Very detailed yet covers alot of subject matter. Professor is precise and detailed about each topic, while giving good examples. I would recommend this course to any person wishing to get a good snapshot of the Energy Sector and wishing to make a career with any number of direct or indirect companies involved in this industry. | 1) detailed about each topic, while giving | Good | 1) examples. I would recommend this course | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Very detailed yet covers alot of subject matter. Professor is precise and detailed about each topic, while giving good examples. I would recommend this course to any person wishing to get a good snapshot of the Energy Sector and wishing to make a career with any number of direct or indirect companies involved in this industry. | 2) any person wishing to get a | Good | 2) snapshot of the Energy Sector and | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Good introduction to the oil and gas industry. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the oil and gas | 5.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | it's a good start for those who interested in this field , and an excellent review for petrol Engs and geoscientists | 1) it's a | Good | 1) start for those who interested in | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Very good course, but not much of emphasis was out on downsteam and industrail products | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, but not much of emphasis | 4.0 |
| yJFvuj06EeWBrBIWi3mmCw | Great course. Good material, well presented (pun intended). | 1) Great course. | Good | 1) material, well presented (pun intended). | 5.0 |
| yn4BHt70EeWDLBKS83bB7Q | I signed up for Intro to Satellite Communications to learn about the industry to go along with a new job. The instructors did a fantastic job explaining the material and used a lot of good diagrams and metaphors to help explain complex topics. I felt I learned a great deal about SatCom, Radio Frequency theory, and internet protocol through this course. My only suggestion would be to help those of us who don't have a mathematics background to better understand many of the formulas and equations used in the course, as I struggled to comprehend some of these topics, but understood the general concepts. Other than perhaps "dumbing down" or spending more time on the math portion, great course, great professors, and I would definitely recommend this to anyone who is interested in communication. | 1) material and used a lot of | Good | 1) diagrams and metaphors to help explain | 5.0 |
| yn4BHt70EeWDLBKS83bB7Q | It is a good course to understand Satellite communication from system engineering point of view.Course content is well arranged to address Commercial aspects of Satellite communication, Application of satellite communication for different services. It also includes expert talk which gives insight in the Satellite communication for career point of view. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course to understand Satellite communication from | 4.0 |
| yn4BHt70EeWDLBKS83bB7Q | Well constructed, very good overview material and a great refresher course. | 1) Well constructed, very | Good | 1) overview material and a great refresher | 5.0 |
| yn4BHt70EeWDLBKS83bB7Q | I was very impressed by the course it helped to have a better understanding of Satellite communications. But I was a bit dissapointed about the networking and services it was a bit light. Overall it is a very good course. | 1) light. Overall it is a very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good understanding on energing concepts, experiences from Scandanavian countries and gets me exploring possibilities in our environment/ cities. | 1) | Good | 1) understanding on energing concepts, experiences from | 4.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Such a good class! The experts are excellent and there are free video's and reading links. Thank you! | 1) Such a | Good | 1) class! The experts are excellent and | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Exceptionally good. For those who wish to know the base of sustainable cities and how to make them reality in the future, this is the best course to lookout for. Good supplementary reading material and good presentations on on-going research in this field. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) For those who wish to know | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Exceptionally good. For those who wish to know the base of sustainable cities and how to make them reality in the future, this is the best course to lookout for. Good supplementary reading material and good presentations on on-going research in this field. | 2) the best course to lookout for. | Good | 2) supplementary reading material and good presentations | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Exceptionally good. For those who wish to know the base of sustainable cities and how to make them reality in the future, this is the best course to lookout for. Good supplementary reading material and good presentations on on-going research in this field. | 3) for. Good supplementary reading material and | Good | 3) presentations on on-going research in this | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good videos and lectures. Excellent course | 1) | Good | 1) videos and lectures. Excellent course | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Very good course!!! I'll recomend for sure!! Thank you! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course! ! ! I'll recomend for | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | It is a good introductory course, but I think it should go deeper each week content. Being slightly more technical. I recommend this course. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) introductory course, but I think it | 4.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good. One more written assignment would have been good (the one in week 2 was great), and perhaps more incentives or reminders to use the forum. Some of the reading seemed rather hard going and academic and theoretical, but the course was good as an intro to issues related to public policy, getting to know the keywords used, and showing the systemic shifts in cities over the last 2 decades towards a more multi stakeholder approach for a more decarbonated economy. | 1) | Good | 1) One more written assignment would have | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good. One more written assignment would have been good (the one in week 2 was great), and perhaps more incentives or reminders to use the forum. Some of the reading seemed rather hard going and academic and theoretical, but the course was good as an intro to issues related to public policy, getting to know the keywords used, and showing the systemic shifts in cities over the last 2 decades towards a more multi stakeholder approach for a more decarbonated economy. | 2) more written assignment would have been | Good | 2) (the one in week 2 was | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good. One more written assignment would have been good (the one in week 2 was great), and perhaps more incentives or reminders to use the forum. Some of the reading seemed rather hard going and academic and theoretical, but the course was good as an intro to issues related to public policy, getting to know the keywords used, and showing the systemic shifts in cities over the last 2 decades towards a more multi stakeholder approach for a more decarbonated economy. | 3) and theoretical, but the course was | Good | 3) as an intro to issues related | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Overall good course (the first MOOC I ever took, so inexperienced in grading these courses), but some areas of improvement remain. I would however suggest less redundancy. Too many papers/videos start with an overview of the problems we are facing, but I would think most students are aware of these problems coming into the course, and if not, they need not be repeated so many times. Also, some of the papers seem to use a very redundant and roundabout way of communicating information, with a lot of repetition and sometimes over-contextualization. Shorter sentences/readability do not make for worse science. :-) | 1) Overall | Good | 1) course (the first MOOC I ever | 4.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Good course, relevant topics, however they could have been elaborated in a more detailed way. | 1) | Good | 1) course, relevant topics, however they could | 4.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Damn good one!!! | 1) Damn | Good | 1) one! ! ! | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Great course with interesting lectures and a good structure! | 1) course with interesting lectures and a | Good | 1) structure! | 5.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Could be even more details and demanding in terms of content, overall it is a good introduction to the topic | 1) of content, overall it is a | Good | 1) introduction to the topic | 3.0 |
| yO13mkySEeW_MgoxMAgbMQ | Very good, however the inclusion of conference talks tend to be less interesting than professeur targeted lessons. | 1) Very | Good | 1) however the inclusion of conference talks | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | After completing this course you'll have a good idea on how professional PMs schedule and budget complex projects. It will also teach you some valuable techniques that can be applied to projects you may be handling in your own work. I was unfortunately not impressed by the fact that the final exam was quite simple, simply borrowing questions already asked during the lesson quizzes. | 1) completing this course you'll have a | Good | 1) idea on how professional PMs schedule | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good course contents, easy to follow | 1) Very | Good | 1) course contents, easy to follow | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good basics for the budgeting and scheduling projects. Materials are detailed. | 1) | Good | 1) basics for the budgeting and scheduling | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good Course | 1) | Good | 1) Course | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | easy to understand and good explanation. | 1) easy to understand and | Good | 1) explanation. | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good information and good to see current highly praised project managers being interviewed and giving their opinions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) information and good to see current | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good information and good to see current highly praised project managers being interviewed and giving their opinions. | 2) Very good information and | Good | 2) to see current highly praised project | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Attention: Margaret Maloney Hello My name is Sajid Mirza and I am taking the course on project management. I am really enjoying the course and it has been really a good experience. During the course I have noticed a typo error which if my understanding is correct, may please be modified. Details are as below: Introduction to Project Management, Lesson3 (Budget and scheduling week4, lesson 4.2), during the lesson at CPM: Duration and forward pass, section 3.23 the figure shows “EF” of activity “b” as 4 same as “LF’ of activity “a”, However, in the bonus video and in the PMBOK at page 176-177, it requires to add 1 in the EF of the successive activity. May please correct if my understanding is right. Thanks and Regards Sajid Mirza | 1) and it has been really a | Good | 1) experience. During the course I have | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Helpful course to get a good understanding of budgeting and scheduling projects. Obviously, nothing trumps experience, however this course supported me in how to think about the budgeting and scheduling aspect of a project, and what are the key terms and ideas to keep in mind during that process. | 1) Helpful course to get a | Good | 1) understanding of budgeting and scheduling projects. | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | A good overview for budgeting and scheduling projects. The course focuses on the basics, but also does a good job of introducing more advanced methods for both financial and schedule management. | 1) A | Good | 1) overview for budgeting and scheduling projects. | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | A good overview for budgeting and scheduling projects. The course focuses on the basics, but also does a good job of introducing more advanced methods for both financial and schedule management. | 2) the basics, but also does a | Good | 2) job of introducing more advanced methods | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Accessibility, quality and clarity of instruction, good graphics, useful discussion from a variety of experts. All reasons for my high rating of this course | 1) Accessibility, quality and clarity of instruction, | Good | 1) graphics, useful discussion from a variety | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | A really good lesson on project scheduling and budgeting. | 1) A really | Good | 1) lesson on project scheduling and budgeting. | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Really good practical ideas and guidelines to work upon the Project Scheduling and Budgeting. | 1) Really | Good | 1) practical ideas and guidelines to work | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good practical lecture and coursework on variables/requirements on accurate budgeting and scheduling. Offers both good theory and practical examples. | 1) | Good | 1) practical lecture and coursework on variables/requirements | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good practical lecture and coursework on variables/requirements on accurate budgeting and scheduling. Offers both good theory and practical examples. | 2) accurate budgeting and scheduling. Offers both | Good | 2) theory and practical examples. | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | A little more complex, good for someone who has already seen a company go through the budgeting and scheduling processwould like to see more information on the videos since I feel like there were points missing that you had to read through and guess instead what was important. | 1) A little more complex, | Good | 1) for someone who has already seen | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Was really helpful and the structure of the course is good. | 1) the structure of the course is | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good introduction for persons interested in learning m | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction for persons interested in learning | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good Work | 1) | Good | 1) Work | 3.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | read materials are quite good | 1) read materials are quite | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good and very informative | 1) | Good | 1) and very informative | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | This a well paced class which does a good job of breaking down the fundamentals of project management cost accounting. | 1) well paced class which does a | Good | 1) job of breaking down the fundamentals | 3.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | In my opinion this is a very recommendable course. It's worth all the time one spend with it. The explanations are very good an also understandable for non-native english speakers. One gets ideas how to avoid pitfalls and, why some steps that are requested by the bosses at the very first moment ("how much, how long") must not be answered before other steps (mainly WBS) is done. | 1) with it. The explanations are very | Good | 1) an also understandable for non-native english | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Very good | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good, practical advice. | 1) | Good | 1) practical advice. | 4.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good job | 1) | Good | 1) job | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Good training. | 1) | Good | 1) training. | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Doing this course 'Budgeting and Scheduling projects' gives learners, a practical approach to Project management based on PMBOK methodology. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp and clear communication of ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | 1) great. You will encounter lots of | Good | 1) quality reading materials. Quizzes will help | 5.0 |
| YOH__fNOEeSbSyIACxeWxg | Doing this course 'Budgeting and Scheduling projects' gives learners, a practical approach to Project management based on PMBOK methodology. Prof Margaret Meloni is a great teacher. Students will enjoy her crisp and clear communication of ideas. Slides are well designed. Video quality and sound quality is also great. You will encounter lots of good quality reading materials. Quizzes will help you to test your knowledge as you progress. Overall, an excellent course fit for project managers and project team members who work for construction projects. Also good for the aspiring project managers. Thanks to Prof Margaret and UC Irvine for the great course. | 2) who work for construction projects. Also | Good | 2) for the aspiring project managers. Thanks | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A really great course, you should definitely take this second after Algorithmic Toolbox, as that has an easier learning curve for the very 'CS professor' style code (lots of single letter variables and other quirks) and how projects should be submitted and tested. That said, there is a lot of good learning in this course. Make sure you have some good Algorithms textbooks to accompany the lectures, they have recommendations in the course. I personally use Sedgewick's book and CLRS which aren't exactly what they suggest, but work well. Take your time with the learning, make sure you really understand the concepts before moving on to the homework. Use multiple sources to learn (they provide plenty of links!) and you'll do well. In response to a very politely asked request for clarity: I rated this 4/5 rather than 5/5 stars as I found that for my preferred language (Python) some of the starter files were very poorly created. This meant I often have to rewrite the initial parsing of the inputs because it would create variables that contained incorrect or incomplete input data. Further, there were some non-harmful quirks like semi-colons or parameters shadowing Python reserved words in the code. The next course in this series, Algorithms on Graphs, did not seem to have any of these issues, though! | 1) said, there is a lot of | Good | 1) learning in this course. Make sure | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A really great course, you should definitely take this second after Algorithmic Toolbox, as that has an easier learning curve for the very 'CS professor' style code (lots of single letter variables and other quirks) and how projects should be submitted and tested. That said, there is a lot of good learning in this course. Make sure you have some good Algorithms textbooks to accompany the lectures, they have recommendations in the course. I personally use Sedgewick's book and CLRS which aren't exactly what they suggest, but work well. Take your time with the learning, make sure you really understand the concepts before moving on to the homework. Use multiple sources to learn (they provide plenty of links!) and you'll do well. In response to a very politely asked request for clarity: I rated this 4/5 rather than 5/5 stars as I found that for my preferred language (Python) some of the starter files were very poorly created. This meant I often have to rewrite the initial parsing of the inputs because it would create variables that contained incorrect or incomplete input data. Further, there were some non-harmful quirks like semi-colons or parameters shadowing Python reserved words in the code. The next course in this series, Algorithms on Graphs, did not seem to have any of these issues, though! | 2) course. Make sure you have some | Good | 2) Algorithms textbooks to accompany the lectures, | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Overall the course is good. The last two weeks on AVL and Splay trees need more examples and felt a bit rushed. | 1) Overall the course is | Good | 1) The last two weeks on AVL | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I liked this course alot. If you are a student and come from the previous course, you may only read the cons, since this course has the same spirit as the previous. Pros: 1. The lectures contain quite a good material which is somehow difficult and they made me to pay attention. The lectures are based on dasgupta's book and MIT course book. 2. There are links to additional materials, I found the dijkstra's book and MIT course book, so I was able to gain extra information for topics which interested me. Also slides are very useful 3. The forum! This course has a life forum where you can find help or share your ideas. 4. The teaching stuff! They are answering student questions and taking part in discussions Cons: Having compared this course with the previous one from the set, this course suffers from luck of interesting problems. The previous course has more than ~25 problems and for each module it has advanced problems,even more they added extra problems during the course running. This course has ~12 problems and only one advanced for the whole course!. Only this advanced problem made me take a piece of paper and a pen and draw trees, and play with toy examples. Only for this problem I wrote a stress test. That is the most fun for me of studying! If this course didn't have this advanced problem, I would barely give it 3 stars. P.S. Theaching stuff, please conider to add extra problems, the first course is awesome and it is way too good. This course is good, but it think you may develop it not only the first one. Otherwise students may get dissapointed if they come from the previous course. I hoped that you would have added extra problems, so I slowed down, my expectation didnt come true :( | 1) 1. The lectures contain quite a | Good | 1) material which is somehow difficult and | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I liked this course alot. If you are a student and come from the previous course, you may only read the cons, since this course has the same spirit as the previous. Pros: 1. The lectures contain quite a good material which is somehow difficult and they made me to pay attention. The lectures are based on dasgupta's book and MIT course book. 2. There are links to additional materials, I found the dijkstra's book and MIT course book, so I was able to gain extra information for topics which interested me. Also slides are very useful 3. The forum! This course has a life forum where you can find help or share your ideas. 4. The teaching stuff! They are answering student questions and taking part in discussions Cons: Having compared this course with the previous one from the set, this course suffers from luck of interesting problems. The previous course has more than ~25 problems and for each module it has advanced problems,even more they added extra problems during the course running. This course has ~12 problems and only one advanced for the whole course!. Only this advanced problem made me take a piece of paper and a pen and draw trees, and play with toy examples. Only for this problem I wrote a stress test. That is the most fun for me of studying! If this course didn't have this advanced problem, I would barely give it 3 stars. P.S. Theaching stuff, please conider to add extra problems, the first course is awesome and it is way too good. This course is good, but it think you may develop it not only the first one. Otherwise students may get dissapointed if they come from the previous course. I hoped that you would have added extra problems, so I slowed down, my expectation didnt come true :( | 2) awesome and it is way too | Good | 2) This course is good, but it | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I liked this course alot. If you are a student and come from the previous course, you may only read the cons, since this course has the same spirit as the previous. Pros: 1. The lectures contain quite a good material which is somehow difficult and they made me to pay attention. The lectures are based on dasgupta's book and MIT course book. 2. There are links to additional materials, I found the dijkstra's book and MIT course book, so I was able to gain extra information for topics which interested me. Also slides are very useful 3. The forum! This course has a life forum where you can find help or share your ideas. 4. The teaching stuff! They are answering student questions and taking part in discussions Cons: Having compared this course with the previous one from the set, this course suffers from luck of interesting problems. The previous course has more than ~25 problems and for each module it has advanced problems,even more they added extra problems during the course running. This course has ~12 problems and only one advanced for the whole course!. Only this advanced problem made me take a piece of paper and a pen and draw trees, and play with toy examples. Only for this problem I wrote a stress test. That is the most fun for me of studying! If this course didn't have this advanced problem, I would barely give it 3 stars. P.S. Theaching stuff, please conider to add extra problems, the first course is awesome and it is way too good. This course is good, but it think you may develop it not only the first one. Otherwise students may get dissapointed if they come from the previous course. I hoped that you would have added extra problems, so I slowed down, my expectation didnt come true :( | 3) way too good. This course is | Good | 3) but it think you may develop | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The course material was good and the understanding of the subject was satisfactory . :) Thank You and keep us updated . | 1) The course material was | Good | 1) and the understanding of the subject | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great course! As soon as you'll understand how the splay tree works and use a hint from the assignment, the rope problem (the best so far) will no longer be a problem. The course could have been improved though by giving a brief overview of B-trees and Red-Black trees. Anyways, thanks to all the instructors for their hard work and good luck to the all the learners! | 1) instructors for their hard work and | Good | 1) luck to the all the learners! | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | VERY GOOD | 1) VERY | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | This course is well paced and covers all the data structures needed to code efficiently. This course also provides good real life problems in the form of assignments. | 1) code efficiently. This course also provides | Good | 1) real life problems in the form | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A very good course if you want to learn how we organize data in such a way that we can perform specific operations with low computing cost. This course is language agnostic so it becomes more about learning the fundamental structures and less about troubleshooting the language you use. Very good course! | 1) A very | Good | 1) course if you want to learn | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | A very good course if you want to learn how we organize data in such a way that we can perform specific operations with low computing cost. This course is language agnostic so it becomes more about learning the fundamental structures and less about troubleshooting the language you use. Very good course! | 2) troubleshooting the language you use. Very | Good | 2) course! | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | the last lecture was too fast. Would be good to divide this into two parts. Rest all is great stuff. | 1) lecture was too fast. Would be | Good | 1) to divide this into two parts. | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great content followed up with good programming exercises. Please keep up the good work! | 1) Great content followed up with | Good | 1) programming exercises. Please keep up the | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Great content followed up with good programming exercises. Please keep up the good work! | 2) programming exercises. Please keep up the | Good | 2) work! | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | [Slightly updated according to Michael's questions] The course is fine, but comparing to the previous one - Algorithmic Toolbox - this one is weaker and with lesser quality. Pros: the course contains some interesting data structures and valuable observations. The starter files for assignments are in place. Related books are given after each video session. All the tasks have automatic grader. There is a couple of interesting tasks to do. Cons: the material is mostly lectures, and there is even a video where lecturer just reads the article from Wiki (Splay tree - has the same information with same lack of some proofs). Expected: add quizzes as it was in the first course. The course has less weeks - only 4 as comparing to 5 in AT. So various important data structures are not discussed. The course has less homework - 3 tasks each week as comparing to 5 in AT. And all 3 are usually just implementations of some basic algos seen in lectures. I consider the course valuable due to a number of good videos and a couple of good tasks to do. But in general, this course has the area for improvement. | 1) valuable due to a number of | Good | 1) videos and a couple of good | 3.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | [Slightly updated according to Michael's questions] The course is fine, but comparing to the previous one - Algorithmic Toolbox - this one is weaker and with lesser quality. Pros: the course contains some interesting data structures and valuable observations. The starter files for assignments are in place. Related books are given after each video session. All the tasks have automatic grader. There is a couple of interesting tasks to do. Cons: the material is mostly lectures, and there is even a video where lecturer just reads the article from Wiki (Splay tree - has the same information with same lack of some proofs). Expected: add quizzes as it was in the first course. The course has less weeks - only 4 as comparing to 5 in AT. So various important data structures are not discussed. The course has less homework - 3 tasks each week as comparing to 5 in AT. And all 3 are usually just implementations of some basic algos seen in lectures. I consider the course valuable due to a number of good videos and a couple of good tasks to do. But in general, this course has the area for improvement. | 2) good videos and a couple of | Good | 2) tasks to do. But in general, | 3.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | the teachers are good and the visualization of lectures are very nice. | 1) the teachers are | Good | 1) and the visualization of lectures are | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Really awesome Course , Must take it as a software Engineer and if you have already learned these things , It will open your eyes and make you correct your mistakes. Simple explanations in videos and covering all intermediate data structures. Problems are also good companion to the course content and allowing us to implement in many languages . | 1) intermediate data structures. Problems are also | Good | 1) companion to the course content and | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Quite good course. | 1) Quite | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I like this course very much! Rope is the cleverest task I have ever done! Of course, I hope in future I will work on even more difficult problems, but this is pretty good already for me as a student! | 1) difficult problems, but this is pretty | Good | 1) already for me as a student! | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I always wanted to improve the algorithms and data structures field. The books wasn't so efficient. Especially they weren't so practical. These courses are the first courses where I really got a lot of knowledge. Especially because of assignments. All lectors are very good in explanation of the material and tell many additional useful things. These courses are the really good base, after which you can open the books related to algorithms and read more details if you needed. I am definitely going to complete the whole specialization! The only thing which was not convenient for me is that both courses Algorithmic Toolbox and Data Structures are started at the same time. It was difficult to find out the time for both courses and spend enough time to solve all assignments instead of only enough for passing. Anyway, now I am started the second iteration of the course and I am going to solve all assignments which I skipped. Big thanks to Daniel, Alex, Pavel, Neil and Mike! Regards, Sergey | 1) of assignments. All lectors are very | Good | 1) in explanation of the material and | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | I always wanted to improve the algorithms and data structures field. The books wasn't so efficient. Especially they weren't so practical. These courses are the first courses where I really got a lot of knowledge. Especially because of assignments. All lectors are very good in explanation of the material and tell many additional useful things. These courses are the really good base, after which you can open the books related to algorithms and read more details if you needed. I am definitely going to complete the whole specialization! The only thing which was not convenient for me is that both courses Algorithmic Toolbox and Data Structures are started at the same time. It was difficult to find out the time for both courses and spend enough time to solve all assignments instead of only enough for passing. Anyway, now I am started the second iteration of the course and I am going to solve all assignments which I skipped. Big thanks to Daniel, Alex, Pavel, Neil and Mike! Regards, Sergey | 2) things. These courses are the really | Good | 2) base, after which you can open | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Good course, but the problem set is too small. They will be much better if they are more. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but the problem set is | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Good coverage of data structures. Also emphasizes stress testing to develop your solutions. Can be challenging, but well worth the struggle. | 1) | Good | 1) coverage of data structures. Also emphasizes | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | Good explanations and resources. | 1) | Good | 1) explanations and resources. | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | The fact that test cases are not available is extremely frustrating and time consuming. I absolutely disagree with the instructors about the reason why test cases are hidden. Michael Levin Hi, Learning new complex things is time consuming, it is essential, and it is ok. Without this time spent you wouldn't have learned even half of what you've learned while trying to find your mistakes yourself. Also, the testing techniques presented here are indispensable in the real life, and many learners of the Algorithmic Toolbox course have already confirmed this Hello Mr. Levin, First please forgive me for communicating with you in this place. I am not sure if there is a direct way to answer you, but I believe you will have access to my response. I entirely agree with what you said that this needs time and I do not mind spending time learning new things. That is why I am here in the first place. But I think that hiding the test sets misplaces the balance where this time is being spend. Let me give you an example: week 3 – hash chains - assignment no. 2. I wrote the app, submitted this and it failed on test no. 5. Having generated tons of test cases I was nowhere closer as all looked good, but still failed your engine. As it turned out the problem was not with the algorithm implemented but with the presentation layer. ‘Check x’ command when x is not found in the hash table should return blank line and my program returned nothing. I could not find this in the specification hence lots of hours trying to figure out the solution. It was not a bug with the program, it was the problem how the data is presented. I do not mind spending time developing solutions to the assignments. I would love if there were more advanced (even optional) problems to solve but I want to spend this time on the algorithm and solving the task rather than trying to figure out how to display the data. Please, do not get me wrong, I absolutely adore the course, lectures are brilliant and my opinion should be regarded as a constructive criticism even if you do not agree with me. Thank you again for what you are doing. Regards, Marcin | 1) was nowhere closer as all looked | Good | 1) but still failed your engine. As | 4.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | the problem is very good,the teacher has a good teaching. | 1) the problem is very | Good | 1) the teacher has a good teaching. | 5.0 |
| yOZEQ3lwEeWb-BLhFdaGww | the problem is very good,the teacher has a good teaching. | 2) very good, the teacher has a | Good | 2) teaching. | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | I think this course is pretty good | 1) I think this course is pretty | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Very good introduction for those musicians who want to get into the world of Jazz improvisation. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction for those musicians who want | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | good,and continue. | 1) | Good | 1) and continue. | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | The class covered a good variety of subjects to learn. There are some key areas of improvement: 1) You should build more examples in the lectures. The lectures were short to start with, but adding more examples and passages would have helped. 2) Xylophone is perhaps the worst instrument to use to teach this course, especially with the camera facing the front of the xylophone. It was very hard to see what notes were being hit by the mallets (especially when using chords) and therefore it was very difficult to understand (visually) what Gary was doing. I suggest using a keyboard and having the camera shooting from the above of the keyboard (look at how several people have done this on YouTube). This way you can see what notes are being hit, held, and you can see them from a pianist's view. The material was good, but because of the two areas above the teaching was not as effective. | 1) The class covered a | Good | 1) variety of subjects to learn. There | 2.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | The class covered a good variety of subjects to learn. There are some key areas of improvement: 1) You should build more examples in the lectures. The lectures were short to start with, but adding more examples and passages would have helped. 2) Xylophone is perhaps the worst instrument to use to teach this course, especially with the camera facing the front of the xylophone. It was very hard to see what notes were being hit by the mallets (especially when using chords) and therefore it was very difficult to understand (visually) what Gary was doing. I suggest using a keyboard and having the camera shooting from the above of the keyboard (look at how several people have done this on YouTube). This way you can see what notes are being hit, held, and you can see them from a pianist's view. The material was good, but because of the two areas above the teaching was not as effective. | 2) a pianist's view. The material was | Good | 2) but because of the two areas | 2.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Gary Burton, do I need to explain more... Very Good. | 1) to explain more. . . Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Very good! But it isn't for beginner players. | 1) Very | Good | 1) But it isn't for beginner players. | 4.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Very good... Thanks!!! | 1) Very | Good | 1) . . Thanks! ! ! | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Very good and simplified instruction. But I think it needs one more week discussion to improve improvisation. Also, grades are usually late. | 1) Very | Good | 1) and simplified instruction. But I think | 3.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | A very good and educational course, but you have to know your basic theory before you get started. | 1) A very | Good | 1) and educational course, but you have | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | Very Good. | 1) Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | This is a really hard course for an intermediate player. But it is an outstanding course, and it is amazing, if you think about it, to have hours of free access to Gary Burton. Students of Jazz will enjoy it, but it requires advanced chord theory, the ability to sight read, and a damned good ear to follow along. Some of the materials are strictly by sound, so if you can't follow chord changes you might be lost. That said, this course helped me improve my playing in several ways. I was kind of blown away by what I was able to achieve in the later lessons. | 1) to sight read, and a damned | Good | 1) ear to follow along. Some of | 5.0 |
| ypgDPuPQEeSyBSIAC9REKg | this is a good course, just I thing who want enroll the course need a few knows about music, but really I recommend the course | 1) this is a | Good | 1) course, just I thing who want | 4.0 |
| YPGkFhCNEeWvmQrN_lODCw | is good for person who do not have a knowledge about finances | 1) is | Good | 1) for person who do not have | 4.0 |
| YPGkFhCNEeWvmQrN_lODCw | Very good course. I enjoyed taking it. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I enjoyed taking it. | 4.0 |
| YPGkFhCNEeWvmQrN_lODCw | is very good !! esta estupendo | 1) is very | Good | 1) ! ! esta estupendo | 5.0 |
| YPGkFhCNEeWvmQrN_lODCw | is a good course to know basic knowledge about finanzas. so good | 1) is a | Good | 1) course to know basic knowledge about | 4.0 |
| YPGkFhCNEeWvmQrN_lODCw | is a good course to know basic knowledge about finanzas. so good | 2) know basic knowledge about finanzas. so | Good | 2) | 4.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Great explanations and very good assignments. | 1) Great explanations and very | Good | 1) assignments. | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Good course for a free one. Thank you for all of your great work. Somehow, the pace is too fast. Covering about 2 sections per week is by far too hard to read the book along with the class. There's no practice exercise to strengthen what you learn. The assignment is very hard and sometime don't directly implement the knowledge you learn in that week. Sometime the video sound is too quiet (but you can read the transcript when it happened.) The book is better in my opinion. | 1) | Good | 1) course for a free one. Thank | 3.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Great course. Awesome assignments, very good and descriptive video lectures. Lecture material is also composed in a very practical way. You not only see some Algorithm/Data Structure, but can see what is its practical application and how it was invented. | 1) Great course. Awesome assignments, very | Good | 1) and descriptive video lectures. Lecture material | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Exceptionally good. I am a working professional with 13+ years of development experience and still found this course to be full of high value and knowledge. I really never looked at these algorithms the way it is represented in this course. I am very thankful to Coursera and Princeton University for making this course available to everyone. | 1) Exceptionally | Good | 1) I am a working professional with | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | I really liked the videos and the lecture slides. I think the assignments were really good as well, but had the feeling sometimes small but important informations were missing or not placed well enough. I read the description for the 8puzzle half a dozen times, but that this is not actually solving the task in the optimal amount of moves but rather in some arbitrary amount of moves (we just output the optimal moves) somehow escaped my attention. | 1) I think the assignments were really | Good | 1) as well, but had the feeling | 4.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | It was an amazing experience. Many thanks for such a good theoretical information and challenging practice. Every single time I had one question - can I do better. Knowledge obtained from this course is outstanding. Thank you again | 1) experience. Many thanks for such a | Good | 1) theoretical information and challenging practice. Every | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Good course! | 1) | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | I've been through several courses over the past year, some really good, some pretty poor, both here and on Edx, but this one has really no match to find. I would recommend this to anyone, and especially to those planning on creating a MOOC, as this one is really a state of the art :) | 1) over the past year, some really | Good | 1) some pretty poor, both here and | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Good course course with good instruction from professors | 1) | Good | 1) course course with good instruction from | 5.0 |
| yQcuJCOcEeagwg7hVay0BQ | Good course course with good instruction from professors | 2) Good course course with | Good | 2) instruction from professors | 5.0 |
| yS8ezjDPEeW-zwq84wShFQ | John Holbo is a very good narrator, I liked his book and videos very much. He made it more easy to get through the material, which sometimes is challenging (especially if english is not your native tongue) | 1) John Holbo is a very | Good | 1) narrator, I liked his book and | 4.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | It is a very good platform for learning all about breast cancer | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) platform for learning all about breast | 5.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | Very good information. Thank y | 1) Very | Good | 1) information. Thank y | 4.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | very good thank you | 1) very | Good | 1) thank you | 5.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | I am really impressed with the way Dr A.Chagpar teaches and explains , A very good teacher. Sushma Batra | 1) teaches and explains , A very | Good | 1) teacher. Sushma Batra | 5.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | Good course, great instructor. | 1) | Good | 1) course, great instructor. | 4.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| YUAc977OEeWk7gqXCJNO4w | very good and informative course, really enjoyed it. | 1) very | Good | 1) and informative course, really enjoyed it. | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | very good for beginners and lecturer is very nice . | 1) very | Good | 1) for beginners and lecturer is very | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good content as long as you have some familiarity with programing and computer configuration. | 1) | Good | 1) content as long as you have | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | 1) | Good | 1) course, but I expected something a | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, but I expected something a little more detailed and to last a little longer. The videos were good, but w little long for the amount of content that they contained. For instance, a few videos could be compressed to the size of one video and still contain the relevant content. | 2) a little longer. The videos were | Good | 2) but w little long for the | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | It is indeed a good course, especially because of learning about UNIX and the GPIO pins. I missed reading material, since the videos are too short for learning something in a deep way. | 1) It is indeed a | Good | 1) course, especially because of learning about | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good for total beginners. If you have even some level of experience with programming/fiddling with computers this is too slow paced. | 1) | Good | 1) for total beginners. If you have | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | good introduction to raspeberry but very few about python programming, expected more | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to raspeberry but very few | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Professor Harris does a good job overall, but he does not explain Python syntax in depth. I audited the course and found it quite simple. However, I recommend a paid subscription to get the most out of it. | 1) Professor Harris does a | Good | 1) job overall, but he does not | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good lecture and content. However, disappointing that even when I audit the course, I cannot take the exams. This is contrary to most of the other Coursera courses where you can. If you cannot afford to participate you have limited access to the testing material. I'm not impressed. | 1) | Good | 1) lecture and content. However, disappointing that | 2.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Nice course. Gives a good thousand-foot view of the Pi, Python programming, and how you can use Python to manipulate the GPIO pins on the Pi. | 1) Nice course. Gives a | Good | 1) thousand-foot view of the Pi, Python | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course. Nice pace and good explanations. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Nice pace and good explanations. | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course. Nice pace and good explanations. | 2) Good course. Nice pace and | Good | 2) explanations. | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Some of the stuff is a bit overall but the instructor still manages to cover a lot of a material and he manages to explain it in a good manner. And then you just gotta love engineering. No other field would get away with talking about a bus full of slaves. | 1) manages to explain it in a | Good | 1) manner. And then you just gotta | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Great course, simple illustrative videos of lectures and some good excercises/assignments. | 1) illustrative videos of lectures and some | Good | 1) excercises/assignments. | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Very good course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Very good course for those beginning to get their hands dirty on raspberry pi | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for those beginning to get | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | very good intro to Raspberry Pi. I wish there were more actual projects using the hardware components of the device, but overall, it was a good course | 1) very | Good | 1) intro to Raspberry Pi. I wish | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | very good intro to Raspberry Pi. I wish there were more actual projects using the hardware components of the device, but overall, it was a good course | 2) device, but overall, it was a | Good | 2) course | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | It is very good explained but it is just an small introduction about how to use the Raspberry Pi in a IoT framework. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) explained but it is just an | 3.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good introduction to Raspberry Pi platform | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to Raspberry Pi platform | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, just publish what hardware is needed ahead of time not at the beginning of the first week! | 1) | Good | 1) course, just publish what hardware is | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, professor Ian is very good. Only I miss a more deep discussion and maybe more complex assignments. Thanks a lot! | 1) | Good | 1) course, professor Ian is very good. | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good course, professor Ian is very good. Only I miss a more deep discussion and maybe more complex assignments. Thanks a lot! | 2) Good course, professor Ian is very | Good | 2) Only I miss a more deep | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | its a good course, a brief introduction to raspberry pi. | 1) its a | Good | 1) course, a brief introduction to raspberry | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good class for beginners with Raspberry Pi | 1) | Good | 1) class for beginners with Raspberry Pi | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Although I missed the input of TAs, mentors and the Professor and didn't find the generalised thread as useful as the classic Coursera forums I still found the course to be interesting. As with the Arduino course I found the Demos to be the best part. I'm hoping I'll learn a lot in the second RPi interfacing course. I think it would be especially good if the RPi and the Arduino were connected in the next or some later course. I think also that some interaction between the Professor and the material on the presentation would enhance the lessons. What I enjoyed most was actually writing the programs and getting the circuits to work. | 1) I think it would be especially | Good | 1) if the RPi and the Arduino | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | So far good. I really like the "smaller detail without too much detail" approach. The RaspberryPi is easy to master given excellent support by the Pi Foundation but then there is little too much to access. This course kind of streamlines what one needs to know. I have been using the Pi since 2 months but already feeling more confident thanks to this course and I have just finished only Module 1. | 1) So far | Good | 1) I really like the " smaller | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | Good for anybody that want to start learning Raspberry Pi. Lectures are concise and get you experimenting quick. | 1) | Good | 1) for anybody that want to start | 4.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | I love this course, Professor is very good, he goes slowly explains very good, | 1) love this course, Professor is very | Good | 1) he goes slowly explains very good, | 5.0 |
| yVldYUd5EeWb5ArkqfgJBw | I love this course, Professor is very good, he goes slowly explains very good, | 2) good, he goes slowly explains very | Good | 2) | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Great look to the integration problems, drawing and theoretical exercises was not as good. | 1) and theoretical exercises was not as | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | I love open source tools description. It is really good designed course to refresh your basic. Good job from instructor side to make this course enjoyable. | 1) source tools description. It is really | Good | 1) designed course to refresh your basic. | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | I love open source tools description. It is really good designed course to refresh your basic. Good job from instructor side to make this course enjoyable. | 2) designed course to refresh your basic. | Good | 2) job from instructor side to make | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | A good course, but the learning curve in the middle shoots up so the hill is quite steep to climb. Some typos here and there in documentation, but overall a great course that really challenges you to think hard. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, but the learning curve in | 4.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | very good course | 1) very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | For me this course is one of the most important in BI. We had good teachers that helped us to understand the important issues. | 1) most important in BI. We had | Good | 1) teachers that helped us to understand | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | great course with hands on practice of the concepts. Getting the tools installed is a little frustrating but once you get past that part there are a lot of good exercises to apply what you are learning. | 1) part there are a lot of | Good | 1) exercises to apply what you are | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Very good course | 1) Very | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Not enough implication from the instructors in the course. Students are left alone with the material, without any answers to there questions on the course. Peer review process subject to personal interpretation and leading to frustration for the students. That's quite unfortunate as this provides a bad experience whereas the course might have been good without that. | 1) whereas the course might have been | Good | 1) without that. | 2.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good for Beginners to go for. | 1) | Good | 1) for Beginners to go for. | 3.0 |
| yWjlOBnoEeWg_RJGAuFGjw | Good course. Give basic concept and practical experience in data cube designing and data integration. | 1) | Good | 1) course. Give basic concept and practical | 4.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Very good, but I wish for more analysis of what self-destructive metrics mean and how to handle them (who own the metric, etc) | 1) Very | Good | 1) but I wish for more analysis | 4.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good material, but even better external material shown by links to blogs or related stuff. Too focused in SCRUM. Maybe other methodologies are worth to explain. I'll not buy it since I'm a SM, but if you are beginning with this topics or want to pursue a SM certificate, this course definitively can help you. | 1) | Good | 1) material, but even better external material | 4.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Pretty good course for Product Managers with respect to the review & metrics - with agile and scrum as the methodology | 1) Pretty | Good | 1) course for Product Managers with respect | 5.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | It is a very good course that keeps up to high standards of the specialization. Also in parallel this course has decreased educational load that student is bearing making a more comfortable entrance to the challenge of capstone course. | 1) It is a very | Good | 1) course that keeps up to high | 5.0 |
| ywoUFzVxEeWWBQrVFXqd1w | Good Course. | 1) | Good | 1) Course. | 4.0 |
| yXMpEJw3EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Course was quite helpful, but it is good for only beginners. Thanks for Offering this course. | 1) was quite helpful, but it is | Good | 1) for only beginners. Thanks for Offering | 4.0 |
| yXMpEJw3EeW6bw4ogk2HGQ | Lot off myths about the finances were cleared in this course. The quizes were also good. Thank you professors for the valuable inputs. | 1) this course. The quizes were also | Good | 1) Thank you professors for the valuable | 5.0 |
| z27B3GC0EeWHVg55pNeHQQ | Very good course to understand corporate finance.. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to understand corporate finance. . | 5.0 |
| z27B3GC0EeWHVg55pNeHQQ | pretty good one | 1) pretty | Good | 1) one | 5.0 |
| z27B3GC0EeWHVg55pNeHQQ | Good course, quite challenging! | 1) | Good | 1) course, quite challenging! | 5.0 |
| z27B3GC0EeWHVg55pNeHQQ | This course has a good logical approach. | 1) This course has a | Good | 1) logical approach. | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This course is very informative and gives us a pretty good understanding of memory and its working in short amount of time. More over this course also entertain using movies. you will learn in this more effectively and the perspective of us looking at the movies changes. Thank you Professor Seamon for this creative course work, that you designed. Also we can understand our memory and our personality. Highly recommended course. Thank you Coursera | 1) informative and gives us a pretty | Good | 1) understanding of memory and its working | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Very good course. It complete its purpose and manage to teach a lot of things in a simple and fast way, wich is the objetive of Coursera. Also, the forum is full of discussions, wich is interesting. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. It complete its purpose and | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Really enjoyed this course. Funny way to learn a lot about memory through common known movies. Highly recommended. Good teacher, thanks for this :) | 1) through common known movies. Highly recommended. | Good | 1) teacher, thanks for this :) | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | This "should be" a five star course. It is a great topic, with wonderful clips from movies and is well-written. Why only 3 stars then? For a class about film little was adopted from good storytelling and filming techniques. The Prof slumped in his chair and clasped his hands in front of his chest for most of the course and spoke in a wispy, pedantic voice that made me uncomfortable in my body to listen to. I kept on wanting to tell him to sit up and breath and speak naturally! On top of that, the sound quality was simply awful! If the Prof were to take some acting or presenting lessons and improvements to the sound quality were made (or a professional actor hired to present the material) it could be one of the best courses ever, but instead, it was hard to get through for me even though the material fascinates me as I'm learning neuroscience and love movies. The world of MOOCs are different than your old standard classroom style. Visual and auditory presentation really counts. | 1) about film little was adopted from | Good | 1) storytelling and filming techniques. The Prof | 3.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | Good times! | 1) | Good | 1) times! | 5.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It's a very good course discovering the function of memory and how we maintain good memory, while principle and mechanism of memory's formation did not be revealed were the leaving regrets. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course discovering the function of memory | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | It's a very good course discovering the function of memory and how we maintain good memory, while principle and mechanism of memory's formation did not be revealed were the leaving regrets. | 2) of memory and how we maintain | Good | 2) memory, while principle and mechanism of | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | I haven't finished the course yet, so far so good! I would love to see more variety of films from other countries too. I'm convinced this course will evolve as further research on memory continues making the huge 'memory and aging' issue much more accesible. Thank you! | 1) the course yet, so far so | Good | 1) I would love to see more | 4.0 |
| z2uvwHGtEeWLqw7zlLhRzQ | So far, so good. I am absolutely loving the association of psychological concepts with famous movies. I am certain it's gonna help me remember these concepts for a long time! | 1) So far, so | Good | 1) I am absolutely loving the association | 5.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | A good instructor and interesting assignments, but the information presented was quite shallow. I don't feel that I learned much from this course. | 1) A | Good | 1) instructor and interesting assignments, but the | 1.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | Very clear course with many exercices and a good combo with the other courses of this specialisation with the introduction of a different teacher | 1) course with many exercices and a | Good | 1) combo with the other courses of | 4.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | The course is very good. | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | Really good course. Helped me understand the importance of interviews in making a product Helped me come up with many ideas for a single problem gave me a 260 degree view of user experience | 1) Really | Good | 1) course. Helped me understand the importance | 5.0 |
| Z3yHdBVBEeWvmQrN_lODCw | Very good course, as a standalone course, some sections are slightly too short, but the information is great, very useful, nicely presented and works when put into practice. Thanks! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, as a standalone course, some | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | This is a great course for learning game development in Unity. I had a reasonable amount of experience programming and using the engine but this taught me good techniques for writing efficient code and organising my projects properly. I would recommend it to anyone looking to get into Game Development! | 1) the engine but this taught me | Good | 1) techniques for writing efficient code and | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Great course but for the amount of content provided and how much was taught this course is certainly overpriced...still a good introductory course, teaching very basic stuff. | 1) certainly overpriced. . . still a | Good | 1) introductory course, teaching very basic stuff. | 3.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | I think it's a good start for anyone who loves to make game | 1) I think it's a | Good | 1) start for anyone who loves to | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | good course and good teaching. But the problem is when explaining about unity software the letter are so small in tutorial to follow | 1) | Good | 1) course and good teaching. But the | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | good course and good teaching. But the problem is when explaining about unity software the letter are so small in tutorial to follow | 2) good course and | Good | 2) teaching. But the problem is when | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Well.. It is a good course. Concepts are well taught. I enjoyed it. You should try the course. | 1) Well. . It is a | Good | 1) course. Concepts are well taught. I | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Very interesting course. Really gets you deeper into Unity. Starting week 2, but so far its been really good. | 1) but so far its been really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Interesting and good performed. | 1) Interesting and | Good | 1) performed. | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | This course was really good from the information available and the follow along for the course. The biggest issues I had were that Unity had issues between the different releases for the various platforms. The import of the assets on Windows 10 required some extra lifting that was not covered by the videos. And the teachers were not very present on the message board. Which seems to be an ever-present problem in this Specialization. | 1) This course was really | Good | 1) from the information available and the | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | I feel it very similar to the first course. Yes, you make a bigger game, it's more complex, we review more script stuff, and the project is more challenging. However, I feel that it's mainly about joining the pieces together, and following the instructions from the videos. I would like to see more exercises where there is the need to do stuff by yourself. Example: add the code to Sparty script to enable double jump. Then, after we complete the assignment, show us the correct result, so that we also practice scripting, and do the rest of the course with the right script. Also, I think it would be good to add a small course related to the artist's work, just as there is for the designer (Principles of Game Design) and the programmer (this course), but that's outside of the scope of this review. | 1) Also, I think it would be | Good | 1) to add a small course related | 4.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Very good hands-on course. It is giving me very good bases and pushes to further study Unity3D. | 1) Very | Good | 1) hands-on course. It is giving me | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | Very good hands-on course. It is giving me very good bases and pushes to further study Unity3D. | 2) course. It is giving me very | Good | 2) bases and pushes to further study | 5.0 |
| Z7-ViyT-EeW5pgpJEN0S6w | This course provides you with *everything* you need to build your own 2D platform game. The first 3 weeks are hands on courses, and by week 4 the training wheels come off and you are to build your own platformer to show to your colleagues. Packed with inside information, good teacher, if you are interested in Unity or Video Games this course is for you! | 1) your colleagues. Packed with inside information, | Good | 1) teacher, if you are interested in | 5.0 |
| z7qyITcjEeWnxw5wP_KHTw | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| Zba0dJLREeSb9SIACzCJlg | It is a really good course. I learned a lot. It is an essencial tool for teachers. Thank you | 1) It is a really | Good | 1) course. I learned a lot. It | 5.0 |
| Zba0dJLREeSb9SIACzCJlg | Best course for music teachers and students as well. From this course one can learn basic to advanced things and proper method to play the instrument. The instructor also teaches the lessons interestingly in a new way, and shares many good different techniques to learn by heart the tunes. | 1) a new way, and shares many | Good | 1) different techniques to learn by heart | 5.0 |
| zFT002OEEeS5wCIAC4UKdg | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | A great course for introducing programmers to games programming. I would have awarded 5 stars, but felt some of the material might be have been covered in more detail for absolute beginners. Personally I didn't have any problems with the course, but I could imagine beginners struggling on some sections. However, there is an excellent community forum that has friendly people helping out (including myself!) so I'm sure everyone that had problems could find the solutions or ask for help. Good fun and you get to create a "game" during the course! Thanks Dr. T - you did good =) | 1) the solutions or ask for help. | Good | 1) fun and you get to create | 4.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | A great course for introducing programmers to games programming. I would have awarded 5 stars, but felt some of the material might be have been covered in more detail for absolute beginners. Personally I didn't have any problems with the course, but I could imagine beginners struggling on some sections. However, there is an excellent community forum that has friendly people helping out (including myself!) so I'm sure everyone that had problems could find the solutions or ask for help. Good fun and you get to create a "game" during the course! Thanks Dr. T - you did good =) | 2) Thanks Dr. T - you did | Good | 2) =) | 4.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Good way to learn the Game programming. Of course, The good way to learn beginning C#. One course make two harvests! | 1) | Good | 1) way to learn the Game programming. | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Good way to learn the Game programming. Of course, The good way to learn beginning C#. One course make two harvests! | 2) the Game programming. Of course, The | Good | 2) way to learn beginning C#. One | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Nice course, instructor is really amazing, learned a lot on game programming, and it is actually a really good course for entrance level c# programming. | 1) and it is actually a really | Good | 1) course for entrance level c# programming. | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Awesome course! Dr Tim is the best. Classes are light and humorous. All the examples are very practical and the assignments are smartly designed. I recommend it to anyone who wants a hands on start on making games, even with no prior programming experience, which was my case. But don't be fooled: if you do all the assignments, labs and projects, the course will be quite demanding. A good sign. Looking forward the next C# courses from Dr Tim. | 1) course will be quite demanding. A | Good | 1) sign. Looking forward the next C# | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Maybe at begin, it is a little difficult. But once you can catch up with your teacher and classmates, you will find it will be OK. If you are a beginner with little knowledge or no basic knowledge about C# program, it is a good challenge for you to have a try. If you are a experienced programmer or already get some program concept/skill(no matter it is C/C++ or Java), it's good for you to have a practice. | 1) about C# program, it is a | Good | 1) challenge for you to have a | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Maybe at begin, it is a little difficult. But once you can catch up with your teacher and classmates, you will find it will be OK. If you are a beginner with little knowledge or no basic knowledge about C# program, it is a good challenge for you to have a try. If you are a experienced programmer or already get some program concept/skill(no matter it is C/C++ or Java), it's good for you to have a practice. | 2) it is C/C++ or Java), it's | Good | 2) for you to have a practice. | 5.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | Good introduction to C# and a nice gentle introduction to the XNA/MonoGame framework. It's lots of hard work for beginners for but seasoned C# programmers might be better off just learning MonoGame on their own. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to C# and a nice | 4.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | The software video tutorials need to be updated ..for example mac users need to use different programs which raises all sorts of different questions on where to go and where to find what Dr. T is working with for the lesson , second this is for beginners we would like to know why we are typing certain commands and what they do ... he has a good attitude but explanations need to be a little more detailed on what things are ,what they do and why we are using them... for any mac user you will be better off using parallels to install Windows and use this lessons with the programs he is working on like Visual Basic which is only for Windows .... | 1) . . . he has a | Good | 1) attitude but explanations need to be | 2.0 |
| ZgdEeNmtEeWIyg6KWmLgkQ | The course is very good, but I was missing a piece of installation and configuration of mono and XNA in Visual Studio 2015 Community | 1) The course is very | Good | 1) but I was missing a piece | 4.0 |
| zHCX4hJgEeaX4g6xdats6w | Maybe the best course of all the specialisation. Good balance between theory and hand-ons. I would give the fifth star with more details and explanations in some hand-ons (mainly the ones from the last lesson). In summary, a good introductory course to graph analysis. | 1) best course of all the specialisation. | Good | 1) balance between theory and hand-ons. I | 4.0 |
| zHCX4hJgEeaX4g6xdats6w | Maybe the best course of all the specialisation. Good balance between theory and hand-ons. I would give the fifth star with more details and explanations in some hand-ons (mainly the ones from the last lesson). In summary, a good introductory course to graph analysis. | 2) the last lesson). In summary, a | Good | 2) introductory course to graph analysis. | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | It is a good course, interesting subject. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course, interesting subject. | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Very interesting course with good advices and examples from expert. | 1) Very interesting course with | Good | 1) advices and examples from expert. | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | It quit good | 1) It quit | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Very short not good It doesnt give anything about entrepreneurship | 1) Very short not | Good | 1) It doesnt give anything about entrepreneurship | 1.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | A good refresher but did not get to know anything new. | 1) A | Good | 1) refresher but did not get to | 3.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | This course offers a good general overview on the essentials of entrepreneurship. | 1) This course offers a | Good | 1) general overview on the essentials of | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Great and good job. Thank you.. | 1) Great and | Good | 1) job. Thank you. . | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Well delivered, thorough overview, especially good for complete beginners. | 1) Well delivered, thorough overview, especially | Good | 1) for complete beginners. | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Nothing really new. Very good for newbies in the field. Short and easy to handle presentations and topics. | 1) Nothing really new. Very | Good | 1) for newbies in the field. Short | 2.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Very good introduction presented in clear language and interesting fashion. David has great instructor skills that keeps you engaged with the videos all the time. Thanks | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction presented in clear language and | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | The first two sections, in particular, offer a lot of value and content for people thinking about starting a business. The latter lessons are a bit less "mind blowing" but they still offer value and can serve as good reminders to those who already know the basics of business. | 1) offer value and can serve as | Good | 1) reminders to those who already know | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | It is a good course for those who want to be a entrepreneur but don't really know what that means. The course gives a lot to think about and consider when opening a business. It is also a quick and easy to learn course. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for those who want to | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good introduction, but just that an introduction. As they say a Macro-overview. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction, but just that an introduction. | 3.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good course, interesting information, but tests were not always clear for me (could not clear understand what it is asking about). | 1) | Good | 1) course, interesting information, but tests were | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Its very good introduction to topic and concepts. | 1) Its very | Good | 1) introduction to topic and concepts. | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | It is very good at motivating undertake, but need much more to learn how. | 1) It is very | Good | 1) at motivating undertake, but need much | 3.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good high level overview for someone considering entrepreneurship or trying to map out what skills they need to prioritize. If you're already in the game -- skip it, too basic. | 1) | Good | 1) high level overview for someone considering | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | The lecture is short but the presenter has good experiences to share with us. Module 4 is the essential of whole lecture. | 1) is short but the presenter has | Good | 1) experiences to share with us. Module | 4.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good information. When you compare this course to others available on Coursera, such as UVA Darden's Design Thinking or University of Maryland courses on Entrepreneurship, this course does not have the same level of information, nor was the same care put into completing the course materials. For instance, the last three or so classes were missing, yet it was still possible to take and pass the final review. | 1) | Good | 1) information. When you compare this course | 3.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good Teacher | 1) | Good | 1) Teacher | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | good information, thanks | 1) | Good | 1) information, thanks | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | solid basic understanding of process of business learned some good bits of knowledge. | 1) of process of business learned some | Good | 1) bits of knowledge. | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good course on the various Ps, legal needs, technology needs and what it means to be Inc. Lacked details on how you go about running a business .. so lets say I wanted to start a business analysis consulting firm besides getting a business number what else do I need to hire people, earn revenue and run the business profitably. | 1) | Good | 1) course on the various Ps, legal | 3.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | its good course.. which makes me to learn roles and responsibility of an entrepreneur. | 1) its | Good | 1) course. . which makes me to | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Objective course with a good, simple path to start working on your business. | 1) Objective course with a | Good | 1) simple path to start working on | 5.0 |
| zKZY59dlEeSQOCIAC0ELFw | Good info but limited. I would like to see some more in depth series based on the topics touched in this class. | 1) | Good | 1) info but limited. I would like | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a course very completed and it give you a good sight of the classical theories, entering you to the social thinking. | 1) completed and it give you a | Good | 1) sight of the classical theories, entering | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a fantastic lecture. The content is clear and succinct. The lecturer is good at teaching the complex in a simply way. | 1) clear and succinct. The lecturer is | Good | 1) at teaching the complex in a | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The content of this course is very good to cover some greatest thinkers in human history. It is important to know them and their thoughts to understand the society and oneself. One thing could be improved is the exercises. They're repeative and fail to inspire me. | 1) content of this course is very | Good | 1) to cover some greatest thinkers in | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good foundational view of sociology | 1) | Good | 1) foundational view of sociology | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good intro. Being a Engineer with a couple courses of humanties, this was a solid base for further reading. Pay attention to the readings! | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro. Being a Engineer with a | 4.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very good, can't wait for the course expanding on modern sociology. | 1) very | Good | 1) can't wait for the course expanding | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Excellent overview on the major sociological thinkers from Adam Smith to Norbert Elias. A very good introduction to the subject. Beware though - the professor is an engaging teacher, but his quizzes are tough. You actually have to do some of the recommended readings to answer the questions - there are at least three questions in each quiz based on the writings of the sociologist who is the subject of the test. | 1) Smith to Norbert Elias. A very | Good | 1) introduction to the subject. Beware though | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Great course. Not only is the topic interesting and the lectures informative and clear, but the lecturer is thoroughly engaged, obviously loves the subject and his enthusiasm is infectious. Really well put together by the team at University of Amsterdam. I found the readings interesting and the regular tests were challenging. I feel like this stretched my brain, in a good way. Can we follow on course about the modern greats of sociology? Please?! | 1) this stretched my brain, in a | Good | 1) way. Can we follow on course | 5.0 |
| zn0YnhqsEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Professor Bart is a really good teacher. Take this course and you will see. I have studied sociology at University of São Paulo, the biggest and the "best" university of Latin America (according to international ranking), since 2009. However, during all this time I never found a Professor like him. | 1) Professor Bart is a really | Good | 1) teacher. Take this course and you | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course, complex concept was taught in a brain friendly way. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, complex concept was taught in | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | A really great course. Simple to follow and understand, but provides insights into the basics of statistics. Almost no math which is good news for non-experts and makes the course more accessible for a broader audience. The lecturers explain the intuition behind the fundamental things in statistics, which I find very important before studying the statistical tests (inferential statistics). Feels like it opened my eyes. Thank you very much Matthijs Rooduijn and Emiel van Loon! | 1) statistics. Almost no math which is | Good | 1) news for non-experts and makes the | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I have started this course again and again. Although the lectures themselves are clear enough, the quizzes are sometime so confusing and don't reflect the way that topic was taught. The worst part is R lab. I understand nothing of it. It makes no sense. I should not be part of a basic statistics course. I have wasted my money on a specialization that I can't get because I will not, and simply cannot learn R. They should have made that clear this would involve programming. I am only now thinking of learning from the videos but have given up the hope of getting a specialization certificate. The instructor in the first two session was still engaging, but starting in the third lesson the instructor is so boring and his voice makes me drowsy. Plus his sentences are so long and confusing. He has a horrible way to explain something. They need to keep in mind this is BASIC statistics, so cut down on the jargon. He does introduce the terms in 3.01 but just after one video the words don't magically sit in my memory. I've given 3 stars because although I have to work double hard just to make sense of what the instructor says by reading a book on basic statistics, at least the videos provide a structure, good examples and after watching them a few times things become clear. | 1) least the videos provide a structure, | Good | 1) examples and after watching them a | 3.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Really a good course. Worth learning. | 1) Really a | Good | 1) course. Worth learning. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a brilliant course to learn statistics from scratch. The instructors are too good and their teaching methods and examples are very lucid. A must visit course for everyone who wants to get their statistics correct | 1) from scratch. The instructors are too | Good | 1) and their teaching methods and examples | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good class for beginners, everything is well explained and illustrated with examples. I highly recommend this course for those who want to understand statistics easily | 1) Very | Good | 1) class for beginners, everything is well | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course, although sometimes instructions/questions are unclear | 1) | Good | 1) course, although sometimes instructions/questions are unclear | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The supervisor and the content is extremely good. | 1) supervisor and the content is extremely | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | The course is really good. i was little bit familiar with statistics but after this course everything became clear in my mind and don,t have any confusion also . | 1) The course is really | Good | 1) i was little bit familiar with | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | very good 5.0 | 1) very | Good | 1) 5. 0 | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Too good | 1) Too | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | It's a very good course to start learning statistics! I love instructors, they are so funny! | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) course to start learning statistics! I | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a great course. It was challenging but not discouraging. I think that there is a high probability that I learned something very useful. Now that I have said the most important words now I would like to give a thumbs down on the Data Camp R section. I found it to be frustrating and discouraging. You can find better information and tutorials on YouTube. Check out"MarinStatsLectures. A text book is also a great help. I bought Elementary Statistics at a used book store for $4.00 US. And it correlated very nicely with the course. If you are interested in statistics this course is a good first step. | 1) in statistics this course is a | Good | 1) first step. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very well paced, adn clearly explained. Transcripts are good though note you'll need to annotate them with the equations discussed. | 1) paced, adn clearly explained. Transcripts are | Good | 1) though note you'll need to annotate | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course, but it seems there are some errors in the quiz and labs | 1) | Good | 1) course, but it seems there are | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Simple explanations that make the topic rather easy to learn and having a visual aid (the drawings) I find it to be so much more friendly that I've really come to enjoy what I'm learning (I'm mostly a visual learner so to me this is very good). So far it has been a great course with R labs that can help reinforce the ideas and give a bit more practice in the subject, I do recommend the course. | 1) so to me this is very | Good | 1) So far it has been a | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I always dreaded Statistics. This course made me really understand the basics of statistics. Well explained and good examples. Thanks | 1) basics of statistics. Well explained and | Good | 1) examples. Thanks | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Basic intro to Stats & R. Very good if you are starting either / both. | 1) intro to Stats & R. Very | Good | 1) if you are starting either / | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course, the explanations are made very accessible through understandable and sometimes funny examples. Learned many of new things, despite having finished a course on statistics in my university. Especially the R component helped me greatly; despite already having some experience, the datacamp modules were very helpful. Oh, and great Dutch accents :) | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, the explanations are made very | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | I am at the third week, that is very well explained. Sometimes I may need to watch the video again, but in general I am very satisfied. I think it could be good both for people who want to learn and people who want to review. | 1) satisfied. I think it could be | Good | 1) both for people who want to | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course to polish up your statistics knowledge. | 1) | Good | 1) course to polish up your statistics | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is really awesome. Designed well. Looks like a lot of efforts have been taken by the team to build this course. Kudos to everyone. Keep up the good work and thank you very much. | 1) Kudos to everyone. Keep up the | Good | 1) work and thank you very much. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good introductory course to statistics and probability. This course is both entertaining and rigorous. I recommend this course without any hesitation to beginners and people who want to refresh their knowledge and skills in basic statistics. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course to statistics and probability. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This is a very informative and good course for beginners who wants to explore basic statistics along with R lab. Ofcourse, I felt little tought when i tried to do R lab but finally got it!! Overall course was very informative and would definitely recoment for those who wants to learn statistics thanks for professors and the team of University of Amsterdam for conducting this course. | 1) This is a very informative and | Good | 1) course for beginners who wants to | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | In my opinion this course is a good way to learn basic statistics. I do think the R part and the statistics part could be more integrated in order to learn R better and to use it more efficiently. For me the studytime was double the time that was stated even though I was already familiar with some of the concepts and calculations. I feel like some weeks the subjects should have gotten a little more explanation with video's or other supportive material, maybe some assigments to make in order to check wether you know and understand the material. Maybe you could compare content and way of teaching to the Duke University statistics course, this is not a better course per se but does do some things differently whilst both teaching stats and R. | 1) my opinion this course is a | Good | 1) way to learn basic statistics. I | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good to get the intuition behind the theory, but it is a high level course. | 1) | Good | 1) to get the intuition behind the | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course, nice illustrations that really support the course! | 1) | Good | 1) course, nice illustrations that really support | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course for someone with background of statistics. The instructors are lucid but cover a lot in 7 weeks, they delve into intuitive insights of statistics. It is advisable to keep a textbook handy while undergoing this course. In the end good job University of Amsterdam! | 1) | Good | 1) course for someone with background of | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good course for someone with background of statistics. The instructors are lucid but cover a lot in 7 weeks, they delve into intuitive insights of statistics. It is advisable to keep a textbook handy while undergoing this course. In the end good job University of Amsterdam! | 2) undergoing this course. In the end | Good | 2) job University of Amsterdam! | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good explainations with plenty of examples | 1) Very | Good | 1) explainations with plenty of examples | 4.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great presentation, easy to understand with good examples. Way to go | 1) Great presentation, easy to understand with | Good | 1) examples. Way to go | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | This course is an excellent, comprehensive, introduction to Stats. It is challenging, but in a very good way. Expectations are set sufficiently high that you need to grasp the concepts to succeed. Excellent MOOC!! | 1) is challenging, but in a very | Good | 1) way. Expectations are set sufficiently high | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Great explanations. Clear examples. I love the stories and the drawings. Good thought pedagogical concept. | 1) love the stories and the drawings. | Good | 1) thought pedagogical concept. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course, nice examples! Carry on with the good work! | 1) Very | Good | 1) course, nice examples! Carry on with | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Very good course, nice examples! Carry on with the good work! | 2) nice examples! Carry on with the | Good | 2) work! | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Excellent introduction to statistics. Clearly and concisely explained with good examples. | 1) statistics. Clearly and concisely explained with | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | Good lectures, but the R-lab is horrible. Do not take this class. | 1) | Good | 1) lectures, but the R-lab is horrible. | 1.0 |
| ZNeGqEC2EeWC4g7VhG4bTQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | very good course) | 1) very | Good | 1) course) | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | A comprehensive overview of web programming, good for a noob, or as a review whose previous web programming experience may have been limited to the national supercomputing consortium's free (now archived) HTML manual. The content of this specialization will get you up to speed quickly. As with all Coursera courses, it is up to you to unfold the concentrated content on your own time. This lecturer makes it easy to do so. I highly recommend this course! | 1) A comprehensive overview of web programming, | Good | 1) for a noob, or as a | 5.0 |
| zN_XyjlAEeWCYBKNeFwojw | excellent work! the online office hours is a very good method! | 1) online office hours is a very | Good | 1) method! | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | a very good introductory course. as a novice in 3d printing it helped me a lot understanding the basics of 3d printing. | 1) a very | Good | 1) introductory course. as a novice in | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Good place to start if you don't know anything about 3D printing. | 1) | Good | 1) place to start if you don't | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Good introductory course, just a little bit to short for my like. Gus | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course, just a little bit | 4.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | It provides not only a good overview about 3D Printing but stimulates people who attend it to look for more. Great course to start the journe | 1) It provides not only a | Good | 1) overview about 3D Printing but stimulates | 4.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | A very good introductory course in 3D Printing for everybody at every level. | 1) A very | Good | 1) introductory course in 3D Printing for | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | good introduction to 3D printing | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to 3D printing | 3.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Very good introduction to the subject, instructor never looses the attention with new topics and examples. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introduction to the subject, instructor never | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | a very good overview that makes you long for | 1) a very | Good | 1) overview that makes you long for | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | If you know little or nothing about additive, and it sounds interesting, this is a good place to start! | 1) it sounds interesting, this is a | Good | 1) place to start! | 4.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | A good course, please provide more practice quiz in depth. | 1) A | Good | 1) course, please provide more practice quiz | 4.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Very good and helpful introduction to 3D Printing | 1) Very | Good | 1) and helpful introduction to 3D Printing | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | it's a very good an easy to understand first inmersion in the world of 3d printing | 1) it's a very | Good | 1) an easy to understand first inmersion | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | It was exactly like the lecturer said it would be like. The only hard part is the last part, where we had to actually remix an existing 3D model .I think this part of the lecturer video should have had an in depth look at how to use the 3D app.Nevertheless the course was good I learnt a lot of new stuff and not to give out any spoilers.....Its worth it. | 1) 3D app. Nevertheless the course was | Good | 1) I learnt a lot of new | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | A good Introduction to 3D printing. | 1) A | Good | 1) Introduction to 3D printing. | 4.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | The course was great! I think its a great point to start in 3d printing, it has lot of information, links, interviews and it easy to understand. Keep up the good work!!! | 1) easy to understand. Keep up the | Good | 1) work! ! ! | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Very good intro to 3d printed. | 1) Very | Good | 1) intro to 3d printed. | 5.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Good information but way too short for what Coursera charges. | 1) | Good | 1) information but way too short for | 3.0 |
| zo2jLrZHEeWVcRIZgPr_Xw | Thank you for this course, very good course. | 1) Thank you for this course, very | Good | 1) course. | 5.0 |
| ZQDT5AS2EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | a great eye opener for a chorister newbie like myself. Although I cannot fully comprehend the rich material and experience shared, the course set me on a good direction on my musical interest discovery | 1) the course set me on a | Good | 1) direction on my musical interest discovery | 5.0 |
| ZQDT5AS2EeWmBSIAC9UI2A | At first I wondered how could there be so much to know about rehearsing ensembles. All info except a bit is valid for all ensembles from a rock group to orchestra. Dr Evan Feldman is a pleasure as an instructor as he has passion, a good delivery and lots of experience and knowledge. I liked the actual rehearsal videos as he put to practice the techniques, I only wished we could have seen the same in the choral and orchestra segments as opposed to just a dialogue with the also very knowledgeable conductors. This was professionally done and the info is so very important. I took the course as I am part of several ensembles but recently joined a university orchestra and this opened my eyes up to the process which had seemed hap hazard but clearly was not, Macro - micro, phrasing work, intonation,sectional work etc all have their place during the rehearsal. | 1) instructor as he has passion, a | Good | 1) delivery and lots of experience and | 5.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | its really good | 1) its really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | very helpful Courses & Good teach | 1) very helpful Courses & | Good | 1) teach | 5.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | Another good course in this specialisation. | 1) Another | Good | 1) course in this specialisation. | 4.0 |
| zs3YSHQ6EeWrAxJQXw-8PQ | I enjoy this course a lot. It very good. | 1) this course a lot. It very | Good | 1) | 4.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Good course! Ask you to think out of the box and bring some new concepts and perspectives to the table. | 1) | Good | 1) course! Ask you to think out | 4.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | The course is extremelly good!To point out,the information is necessary in real life,in real life content! | 1) The course is extremelly | Good | 1) To point out, the information is | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | And enthusiastic presenter on a subject which I've not had exposure to - supported by some interesting short interviews. I found the sessions less academically challenging than other Coursera's - but that is probably OK because of the nature of the course. It's not an essential course in my life, but interesting and probably a good starting point for MOOC newbies. And I'll be checking back to see if the Prof appears in something else. | 1) life, but interesting and probably a | Good | 1) starting point for MOOC newbies. And | 4.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Thanks teacher.This course is good enough for me to start my own business now.Hopefully,you can get my invitation to visit my company thes few years.Thank | 1) Thanks teacher. This course is | Good | 1) enough for me to start my | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | This is a course that teaches good intentions and careful planning can change the world, starting with you. The University of Virginia offers valuable knowledge in this course and anyone with an interest in business would benefit from the philosophical arguments presented in this course about ways of thinking about individuals, communities and societies to make a positive difference in the world utilizing philanthropy and social responsibility, as two concepts of many, to improve financial and cultural well-being. | 1) This is a course that teaches | Good | 1) intentions and careful planning can change | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | One of the most intriguing and thought-provoking courses I have ever done. I'm really pleased of finding and doing this course. It responds to my desire of doing good to society through business. | 1) responds to my desire of doing | Good | 1) to society through business. | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | New ideas, good teacher | 1) New ideas, | Good | 1) teacher | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Nice and refreshing. Interesting view on some of the better alternatives or good ways of running business. Definitely gave me some good ideas. | 1) some of the better alternatives or | Good | 1) ways of running business. Definitely gave | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Nice and refreshing. Interesting view on some of the better alternatives or good ways of running business. Definitely gave me some good ideas. | 2) running business. Definitely gave me some | Good | 2) ideas. | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | It is somehow good ... not excellent! | 1) It is somehow | Good | 1) . . . not excellent! | 3.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | This course is very interesting, and everything is there should be known to start a business. But basically, it just says to respect everyone and everything. This course lacks some content. It repeats itself. It says the same things over and over again, just in different words. It's still a very good course, and it motivates you doing to do something with great values. | 1) different words. It's still a very | Good | 1) course, and it motivates you doing | 3.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | This course gave me the good knowledge of the New models of business in society. | 1) This course gave me the | Good | 1) knowledge of the New models of | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Very good course about the new models of business based in Corporate Responsibility and Conscious Capitalism | 1) Very | Good | 1) course about the new models of | 5.0 |
| zSmzLR5LEeS6wiIACzGPEQ | Very good course. I am enjoying it immensely. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I am enjoying it immensely. | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Excellent course. It has a perfect rhythm and the teacher has a good pronunciation which it is a important detail for no native english like me. I recommend strongly. | 1) rhythm and the teacher has a | Good | 1) pronunciation which it is a important | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | A good starting point to learn more about the "Ancient Greeks" | 1) A | Good | 1) starting point to learn more about | 4.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Excellent course! I'd like to thank the professor for such good lectures | 1) to thank the professor for such | Good | 1) lectures | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Fantastic course. Nicely paced with good lectures and background reading. Highly recommended if you want to learn about history of ancient Greece, with a side order of drama, literature, lives of women, slaves and metics (do the course and you will know who they are). Highly recommended. | 1) Fantastic course. Nicely paced with | Good | 1) lectures and background reading. Highly recommended | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | It is a good course and the instructor is very knowledgeable on the subject. It´s just that, after a while studying about wars it seems that there´s no ending or purpose. It is a very good analisys though. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course and the instructor is very | 4.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | It is a good course and the instructor is very knowledgeable on the subject. It´s just that, after a while studying about wars it seems that there´s no ending or purpose. It is a very good analisys though. | 2) or purpose. It is a very | Good | 2) analisys though. | 4.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | I've found this course extremely helpful as I teach Greek history to my high school classes. Professor Andy explains crucial events in enough detail yet the videos are concise enough to watch multiple in one evening with good comprehension. Thank you so much for the lectures and great resources! They are invaluable to my planning my unit on Ancient Greece! | 1) watch multiple in one evening with | Good | 1) comprehension. Thank you so much for | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Professor Andy lectures really made me enjoy my time spent learned and studying about the Ancient Greeks, now having skimmed the top of some history of the Ancient Greeks I look to discover more by myself and as suggested in this course. "Think like the Greeks." Good day. | 1) " Think like the Greeks. " | Good | 1) day. | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Very good course. I'm enjoying this immensely. Maybe a little less recommended reading, some of the readings are repetitions. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I'm enjoying this immensely. Maybe | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Limited in scope but very good for the time/topics it covers. | 1) Limited in scope but very | Good | 1) for the time/topics it covers. | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | The reading assignments were really good and the pace of the course was very effective. | 1) The reading assignments were really | Good | 1) and the pace of the course | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Very very good course! | 1) Very very | Good | 1) course! | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | I loved this course and I was a bit sad when I finished it. I found it very interesting and the teacher was very good explaining and making it simple enough. The material used (presentations, maps, photos) really helped to round up the lessons. Overall, a ver | 1) interesting and the teacher was very | Good | 1) explaining and making it simple enough. | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | The profesor is excepcional, and have a very good english, Thank you | 1) is excepcional, and have a very | Good | 1) english, Thank you | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | What an excellent course! The lecturer sets a good pace and is very engaging. The subject matter is interesting, and the course hours per week are very reasonable. I also really like the MCQs to consolidate your learning at the end of each lecture. | 1) excellent course! The lecturer sets a | Good | 1) pace and is very engaging. The | 5.0 |
| zTzjmvssEeSDoyIAC1CH0g | Good introduction to the period - balances political history with wider social and cultural topics. Well supported by original source material. Maybe the expectations of weekly reading are set a little high for many students. I personally found the sections on early Greece particularly interesting as I was least familiar with that era. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the period - balances | 4.0 |
| zUyBBjnyEeWCYBKNeFwojw | very good i leran to much | 1) very | Good | 1) i leran to much | 5.0 |
| zwNXQiWXEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | This is a very good course if you are considering a career in graphic design, it does not concentrate a lot on the technique but rather on the creative process and the theory. The assignment are not too intense yet very helpful in giving that exposure to the role of the graphic designer. I definitely recommend it if you are a beginner or even if you already know some techniques but want to learn more about the theory. Also, throughout the course you get very valuable recommendations for further readings, I found that very helpful. | 1) This is a very | Good | 1) course if you are considering a | 5.0 |
| zwNXQiWXEeWCGRL6mLoB5w | Good way to get started with doing from just listening or reading. | 1) | Good | 1) way to get started with doing | 3.0 |
| zwqURwiiEeahpQ5cgS1w4w | i like the course. It is useful and the professor is highly good explaining | 1) useful and the professor is highly | Good | 1) explaining | 5.0 |
| zwqURwiiEeahpQ5cgS1w4w | good | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| zwqURwiiEeahpQ5cgS1w4w | A simple and useful course on logistics in the context of supply chain management that helps even learners who have no previous experience to learn these topics which are of great importance in the modern world. Assignments with a practical orientation, good quality of audio and video and a great instructor are other points worth mentioning. | 1) world. Assignments with a practical orientation, | Good | 1) quality of audio and video and | 5.0 |
| zyGo9ph2EeSyKiIAC0EFDA | Great lessons from a great teacher with good cases. | 1) lessons from a great teacher with | Good | 1) cases. | 5.0 |
| _3FDkYE5EeWuHwqbqMyacw | very Good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _3l2SpONEeW2aQ7olstw0Q | Very good class. A lot of different subject with a lot of different teachers. | 1) Very | Good | 1) class. A lot of different subject | 5.0 |
| _AAoM1DLEeW02w4zzsdA1Q | REally Good | 1) REally | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _AAoM1DLEeW02w4zzsdA1Q | This pretty good but maybe should explore more than just theory septma chords blues and jazz encganche something that although is very good explanation leaves you anelando something more modern. | 1) This pretty | Good | 1) but maybe should explore more than | 4.0 |
| _AAoM1DLEeW02w4zzsdA1Q | This pretty good but maybe should explore more than just theory septma chords blues and jazz encganche something that although is very good explanation leaves you anelando something more modern. | 2) encganche something that although is very | Good | 2) explanation leaves you anelando something more | 4.0 |
| _aXKkBnJEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Interesting topic, but the course is not organized well. Sometime the professor gives us a good lecture with lots of interesting details, sometimes he's just rambling. | 1) Sometime the professor gives us a | Good | 1) lecture with lots of interesting details, | 3.0 |
| _aXKkBnJEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | im beginning to like this course the professor is very good at making the study of the constitution lively | 1) this course the professor is very | Good | 1) at making the study of the | 4.0 |
| _aXKkBnJEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Started a tad late but the class is great. We have a very good professor and his dialect is perfect. | 1) is great. We have a very | Good | 1) professor and his dialect is perfect. | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | One of the best MOOCs I have done. I learned a huge amount about how the Muslim countries became what they are now. I recommend this course to anyone interested in understanding international politics. Dr Afsah is a very good lecturer, and the course is well-paced and easy to follow. | 1) politics. Dr Afsah is a very | Good | 1) lecturer, and the course is well-paced | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | A very good instructor with a balanced approach in an overview in most aspects of Muslim countries. | 1) A very | Good | 1) instructor with a balanced approach in | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Really good course! | 1) Really | Good | 1) course! | 4.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Really good course, I recommend it to anyone working in the MENA region as a journalist, or business person. Great presentation of the subject. Professor Afsah's teaching style, insights and critical theory approach combined with pragmatic reflections is very enlightening and useful for me as a journalist working in Islamic nations. I like the recap checks mid lesson, that's useful, as I'm working and get tired, so it's a good check on my own concentration levels. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course, I recommend it to anyone | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Really good course, I recommend it to anyone working in the MENA region as a journalist, or business person. Great presentation of the subject. Professor Afsah's teaching style, insights and critical theory approach combined with pragmatic reflections is very enlightening and useful for me as a journalist working in Islamic nations. I like the recap checks mid lesson, that's useful, as I'm working and get tired, so it's a good check on my own concentration levels. | 2) and get tired, so it's a | Good | 2) check on my own concentration levels. | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | Dedicated resource person. Good reading materials. Challenging quizzes and assignments. | 1) Dedicated resource person. | Good | 1) reading materials. Challenging quizzes and assignments. | 4.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | The course was good. But the real situation has been changing drastically. A supplement or extension of course is required to cover the up to date situation about IS activities, syria Iraq etc. | 1) The course was | Good | 1) But the real situation has been | 5.0 |
| _ehbrDx9EeWFSA6UPWxRyQ | well reasoned and thoughtful, and good reading materials handed out for studies. The whole structure and organization is compreshensive | 1) well reasoned and thoughtful, and | Good | 1) reading materials handed out for studies. | 5.0 |
| _HnWrRtDEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | THIS course is only good if you have basic knowledge regarding ,materials science and this course is highly based on research papers and research domain . Overall a good course . | 1) THIS course is only | Good | 1) if you have basic knowledge regarding | 2.0 |
| _HnWrRtDEeWP9g4JMjGIiQ | THIS course is only good if you have basic knowledge regarding ,materials science and this course is highly based on research papers and research domain . Overall a good course . | 2) and research domain . Overall a | Good | 2) course . | 2.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Summarized it up really good, made it engaging and interesting for everyone to learn. | 1) Summarized it up really | Good | 1) made it engaging and interesting for | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Good course with varied content and I very much liked the way it was build up (individual, business, cities, nations). Reason why I rated it 3 stars (only) is that the course was too easy - however I'm a sustainability professional. Maybe the word "introduction" can be taken into the title - as the course would serve as a good intro-course for practical application of sustainability. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) PS: the videos of the Parkers can be deleted from my point of view | 1) | Good | 1) course with varied content and I | 3.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Good course with varied content and I very much liked the way it was build up (individual, business, cities, nations). Reason why I rated it 3 stars (only) is that the course was too easy - however I'm a sustainability professional. Maybe the word "introduction" can be taken into the title - as the course would serve as a good intro-course for practical application of sustainability. Geoffrey (The Netherlands) PS: the videos of the Parkers can be deleted from my point of view | 2) the course would serve as a | Good | 2) intro-course for practical application of sustainability. | 3.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | very good! | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | A lot of examples and really good lectures. | 1) A lot of examples and really | Good | 1) lectures. | 4.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | I enjoyed the course. The available teaching materials and presentations were very good and helped me better understand the sustainable concepts and initiatives carried out in the countries of Scandinavia and that can serve as examples for other countries, especially developing countries like Brazil. tvillarim@gmail.com | 1) teaching materials and presentations were very | Good | 1) and helped me better understand the | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Very good introductory course. It gives a very good and comprehensive insight in the different aspects of a greener economy. This should be a standard course in lots of educational programs. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course. It gives a very | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Very good introductory course. It gives a very good and comprehensive insight in the different aspects of a greener economy. This should be a standard course in lots of educational programs. | 2) introductory course. It gives a very | Good | 2) and comprehensive insight in the different | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | I hope you make a longer version of this, maybe a part 2 and 3, it is so very well done and incredibly interesting I really enjoy the expirience and learn many things of interest, the interviews where so good and helpful, keep up the great job | 1) of interest, the interviews where so | Good | 1) and helpful, keep up the great | 5.0 |
| _j_95QpWEeWoRw4pD4cXmw | Amazing and inspiring. Especially love the interviews at the end of each week. Very good pace and amount of information. Teacher are experts in their field. Love every minute of the lecturers! | 1) the end of each week. Very | Good | 1) pace and amount of information. Teacher | 5.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | It is a good general overview about recruiting, but I would like more information about staff planning as well, how to forecast the workforce needs. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) general overview about recruiting, but I | 3.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Very good course and insightful. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course and insightful. | 5.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | very good course but the last part ( on bording ) need to be better | 1) very | Good | 1) course but the last part ( | 4.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | Good insights on Hiring and Onboarding Employees and the key to this course is the best practices followed and how differently we think when onboarding a new hire | 1) | Good | 1) insights on Hiring and Onboarding Employees | 4.0 |
| _Mms-nE8EeWKsgrp3VnvAw | good i love this course and the material also thank you coursera for providing us this course | 1) | Good | 1) i love this course and the | 5.0 |
| _PYZqCETEeW5Rwo0txKkgQ | Good MOOC | 1) | Good | 1) MOOC | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very deep and gives a good understanding of the basics of macroeconomics for non economists | 1) Very deep and gives a | Good | 1) understanding of the basics of macroeconomics | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | This is very good. I so much Coursera. | 1) This is very | Good | 1) I so much Coursera. | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | good course ! Thankyou ! | 1) | Good | 1) course ! Thankyou ! | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | too good | 1) too | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good online class if you are taking AP Macroeconomics in high school. Gives a good overview and serves as a great study guide! | 1) Very | Good | 1) online class if you are taking | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good online class if you are taking AP Macroeconomics in high school. Gives a good overview and serves as a great study guide! | 2) Macroeconomics in high school. Gives a | Good | 2) overview and serves as a great | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | very good introduction for non specialist beautiful, simple and powerful frameworks user to explain the concepts. | 1) very | Good | 1) introduction for non specialist beautiful, simple | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | nice explanation of concepts. good for newbies to the domain | 1) nice explanation of concepts. | Good | 1) for newbies to the domain | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | good! | 1) | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good, impartial and nice overview of macroeconomics | 1) Very | Good | 1) impartial and nice overview of macroeconomics | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Good introduction to the world of Macroeconomics with rundown on real world principles. | 1) | Good | 1) introduction to the world of Macroeconomics | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | very good | 1) very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good course. Practical and clear. A little too much math on some very specific lessons that frankly are too abstract but in general, its a great course. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. Practical and clear. A little | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Clear, gradual, well structured. Good examples. | 1) Clear, gradual, well structured. | Good | 1) examples. | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | The course content is really good. However, in the last module, some sentence restructuring would be appreciated. | 1) The course content is really | Good | 1) However, in the last module, some | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Simply amazing, this course was exactly what I expected, and a little bit further. If you need a good background in Macroeconomics, I strongly recommend that Course. Prof Peter Navarro, explains in a easy way and the course is well structured. Thank you Coursera and Professor Peter Navarro. | 1) bit further. If you need a | Good | 1) background in Macroeconomics, I strongly recommend | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good! Macroeconomics and economy history - good idea! | 1) Very | Good | 1) Macroeconomics and economy history - good | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very good! Macroeconomics and economy history - good idea! | 2) good! Macroeconomics and economy history - | Good | 2) idea! | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | This course is good and quite useful, as a Macroeconomics assistance, it helps me to learn more thoroughly and I can learn to way to teach my students, in a more comprehensive way , besides ,it's free of charge, really good for me, thanks! | 1) This course is | Good | 1) and quite useful, as a Macroeconomics | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | This course is good and quite useful, as a Macroeconomics assistance, it helps me to learn more thoroughly and I can learn to way to teach my students, in a more comprehensive way , besides ,it's free of charge, really good for me, thanks! | 2) , it's free of charge, really | Good | 2) for me, thanks! | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | I didn't do this type of course before. When I first select this topics because of my curiosity and started to watch and found something different. I am a student of economics but seems to me dismal. Now it seems I am learning from. Good work. Love it! | 1) it seems I am learning from. | Good | 1) work. Love it! | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very interesting course. History of Macroeconomics is a little bit boring. I forgot it immediately after exam. But everything else is very good! | 1) exam. But everything else is very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Good guide of Macroeconomics, but there are some sensitive contents for learners of China in the last few weeks. | 1) | Good | 1) guide of Macroeconomics, but there are | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Great course. Very easy to understand, effective slides, somewhat challenging tests, clear voice by the professor, professionally done. The only gripe I have is feeling like I did not learn as much as I wanted to. I do not think this is reflective of the professor or his style, it may have to do more with the subject. Macroeconomics is a social science, not much intense, groundbreaking material. Overall good, I would suggest it if you want a broad understanding of macroeconomic theories, the history, and its implications. | 1) not much intense, groundbreaking material. Overall | Good | 1) I would suggest it if you | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very well explained and not too fast. The quizzes were challenging but fair. I can totally recommend this course, because it gives you a good insight in macroeconomics and was not too theoredical. I also would like to thank Cousera for this great learing opportunity. | 1) course, because it gives you a | Good | 1) insight in macroeconomics and was not | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | tl;dr : I recommend it. Good introduction to macroeconomics. Gives lots of insights and mechanisms. Long course, but it was necessary. A second part would be much appreciated, maybe with more econometrics to give a measure to all these effects. | 1) tl;dr : I recommend it. | Good | 1) introduction to macroeconomics. Gives lots of | 4.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very fruitful contents, and Professor explains everything with the good examples, so it was really easy to understand. I am thinking to enroll the MicroEcon course of him, too! | 1) and Professor explains everything with the | Good | 1) examples, so it was really easy | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | It presents a lot of different aspect of macro economics in a really short time which is good. But because of that, it doesn't give a good understandings of each problem. Nice introduction, but I will start another class on the subject which I would have liked to avoid. | 1) a really short time which is | Good | 1) But because of that, it doesn't | 3.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | It presents a lot of different aspect of macro economics in a really short time which is good. But because of that, it doesn't give a good understandings of each problem. Nice introduction, but I will start another class on the subject which I would have liked to avoid. | 2) of that, it doesn't give a | Good | 2) understandings of each problem. Nice introduction, | 3.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Well done. Logical progression of learning, good examples, clearly spoken. There were quite a few spots where sound or video cut out for several minutes while the other (either sound or video) continued to work. Not sure if it was my computer or a course issue. One quiz (i believe week 10 or 11) had a question with two right answers. You could either choose 3) all of the above or 4) answers 1&2 (which were both correct). I believe '4' was the correct answer. Very well created overall...nice job. | 1) Well done. Logical progression of learning, | Good | 1) examples, clearly spoken. There were quite | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | It's good for freshman! | 1) It's | Good | 1) for freshman! | 5.0 |
| _UsmIV-PEeSnpyIACzWBsQ | Very Good course for beginners in Economics. Very well explained principles using real-life examples and history as well. One thing I might suggest is maybe update the course regularly so that some of the things you say about developing nations are consistent with what is actually being observed today. I'm from Kenya as it is and I found some of the material very media-sensitized for developed nations. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for beginners in Economics. Very | 4.0 |
| _xNLlFY4EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | very interesting course, with good examples. Just the fact it is french with quizz in english makes it not that easy!!! Some of the module are just too theoretical. But nice, very good overall | 1) very interesting course, with | Good | 1) examples. Just the fact it is | 5.0 |
| _xNLlFY4EeWKXg4Y7_tPaw | very interesting course, with good examples. Just the fact it is french with quizz in english makes it not that easy!!! Some of the module are just too theoretical. But nice, very good overall | 2) just too theoretical. But nice, very | Good | 2) overall | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very good course to learn business basics like taxes, positions that are helpful for starting a business, also about stocks, bonds or else. I really recommend this course for people who is not aware of business or they are at a basic level so they can have a bigger and simple picture of what involves. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course to learn business basics like | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Well, The course helped me to realize the need to check on my savings and expenses and more so planning on money as a whole. If the courses were offered without having to be necessarily purchased in order to make the quiz part valid, It would be good. | 1) quiz part valid, It would be | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Topics were basic but good, but I cannot understand why a physics undergrad with no screen presence and mispronunciations was asked to lead this course instead of the MBA professor who was advertised. I found that there were at least a couple of places that were ageist and overly simplistic in talking about retirement planning and there were moments that there was a paranoid anti-government vibe that I found off-putting. | 1) Topics were basic but | Good | 1) but I cannot understand why a | 2.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Basic course and good for high school to undergraduates as the title suggest. Good for overview of managing your finance. Budgeting which is the cornerstone of managing money is well talked about. Very limited coverage on the investing portion and I disagree that intelligent speculation in the stock market is the way to educate individuals starting out on investment. I would prefer Dr Navarro teaching this topic and hearing his perspective on stock market. Asking people to cash out when a stock lose 10% is equivalent to selling low and buying high. A better question is has the business change when the stock price drops. A better read would be The intelligent investor. | 1) Basic course and | Good | 1) for high school to undergraduates as | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Basic course and good for high school to undergraduates as the title suggest. Good for overview of managing your finance. Budgeting which is the cornerstone of managing money is well talked about. Very limited coverage on the investing portion and I disagree that intelligent speculation in the stock market is the way to educate individuals starting out on investment. I would prefer Dr Navarro teaching this topic and hearing his perspective on stock market. Asking people to cash out when a stock lose 10% is equivalent to selling low and buying high. A better question is has the business change when the stock price drops. A better read would be The intelligent investor. | 2) to undergraduates as the title suggest. | Good | 2) for overview of managing your finance. | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Learn the importance of good solid financial insights and gain confidence in your financial future. | 1) Learn the importance of | Good | 1) solid financial insights and gain confidence | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This is a good course. The only reason I am giving it 3 stars is because it was very general for me. But, for undergraduates and beginners, this is a good introduction and for them I would rate it 4 or higher. One suggestion, make this course a little harder by introducing some numerical problems or making the course with some more depth. I would reccomend these course to almost all freshmen and sophomores as essential to building good financial skills for their future. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) course. The only reason I am | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This is a good course. The only reason I am giving it 3 stars is because it was very general for me. But, for undergraduates and beginners, this is a good introduction and for them I would rate it 4 or higher. One suggestion, make this course a little harder by introducing some numerical problems or making the course with some more depth. I would reccomend these course to almost all freshmen and sophomores as essential to building good financial skills for their future. | 2) undergraduates and beginners, this is a | Good | 2) introduction and for them I would | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This is a good course. The only reason I am giving it 3 stars is because it was very general for me. But, for undergraduates and beginners, this is a good introduction and for them I would rate it 4 or higher. One suggestion, make this course a little harder by introducing some numerical problems or making the course with some more depth. I would reccomend these course to almost all freshmen and sophomores as essential to building good financial skills for their future. | 3) and sophomores as essential to building | Good | 3) financial skills for their future. | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Comprehensive. But some terms are aligned to the US and European economy. But I still had a good time learning about the basics. | 1) economy. But I still had a | Good | 1) time learning about the basics. | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This course is very good for anyone who wants to tackle MBA fundamentals. Both instructors, prof Navarro and Alex LeBon, are easy going and friendly. I also really enjoyed their jokes and quotations! :D | 1) This course is very | Good | 1) for anyone who wants to tackle | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Helpful tips, good advice. | 1) Helpful tips, | Good | 1) advice. | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Thanks very much for the course! I really liked the optional exercise because they guide me to what to do on real life about what to do, and how to do it. Really loved your teachings. The only thing I would like to say I didn't like was the images behind you, I really enjoy people on real life background, maybe you should just seat at the coffee shop of your university or at an open area. Those photos are good, but I just think the scenario of the university or any other real would be more eye catching. | 1) an open area. Those photos are | Good | 1) but I just think the scenario | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Good basics! | 1) | Good | 1) basics! | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Good preliminary overview of these aspects of life, career and business. | 1) | Good | 1) preliminary overview of these aspects of | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | the lessons are well arranged and easy to understand. the tutors are well conversed with the topics being taught and appear to be excited about imparting the knowledge. it has been my pleasure to be part of this MOOC and am well equipped to handle my money matters considering am a medical doctor by profession so this course has been an excellent eye opener to me. keep up the good work and i look forward to more from you!! | 1) opener to me. keep up the | Good | 1) work and i look forward to | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Really good course and educates you on how to be prosperous and responsible monetarily. Additionally, Alex provided a very good insight on 5 functional areas a prospective MBA candidate may work. My deepest thanks to Dr Peter Navarro, Prof Greg Archer and Alex. | 1) Really | Good | 1) course and educates you on how | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Really good course and educates you on how to be prosperous and responsible monetarily. Additionally, Alex provided a very good insight on 5 functional areas a prospective MBA candidate may work. My deepest thanks to Dr Peter Navarro, Prof Greg Archer and Alex. | 2) monetarily. Additionally, Alex provided a very | Good | 2) insight on 5 functional areas a | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This course has been structured in such a way that any individual would able to understand the contents without the prior requirement of learning the jargon. All presentations are nicely done, good and simple explanation. Examples were given in each lecture in order to enhance our understanding. | 1) jargon. All presentations are nicely done, | Good | 1) and simple explanation. Examples were given | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Pay attention, this is information you will use for the rest of your life. Good introduction to many financial issues. | 1) for the rest of your life. | Good | 1) introduction to many financial issues. | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Good general information on basic financial literacy. | 1) | Good | 1) general information on basic financial literacy. | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | This course contained good information and it was discussed in a clear and easily understandable fashion. I was a bit disappointed though that the level was pitched quite low and so didn't answer a lot of the questions I have. If you have next to no financial literacy, however, this would be an invaluable course. | 1) This course contained | Good | 1) information and it was discussed in | 3.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | good to do this course for future | 1) | Good | 1) to do this course for future | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very useful. It is a good collection of common and uncommon sense and the guys are nice. Well done! | 1) Very useful. It is a | Good | 1) collection of common and uncommon sense | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Good introductory course | 1) | Good | 1) introductory course | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very good basic overview of all the topics which we should be learning in School! Managing finances, evaluating loans and planning for the future with investments are all discussed | 1) Very | Good | 1) basic overview of all the topics | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very good course. I knew some of the things in the course but I was clueless about some others. Very information. I do recommend this course for people who never put too much consideration into personal finance before. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I knew some of the | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very well done. Good structure. interesting insights. Easy to remember examples. | 1) Very well done. | Good | 1) structure. interesting insights. Easy to remember | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | I enjoyed the course as it was nicely structured even though most is just general knowledge. The other thing was that you have to buy the certificate, other courses offer at least certificate of participation for free. Good luck to everyone. Thanx. | 1) least certificate of participation for free. | Good | 1) luck to everyone. Thanx. | 4.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very good course. I've learnt lots of practical know | 1) Very | Good | 1) course. I've learnt lots of practical | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Very good introductory course, it's simple and allows any person without financial studies to understand how to manage money. | 1) Very | Good | 1) introductory course, it's simple and allows | 5.0 |
| __JK5M3TEeSa0iIAC9RQCQ | Nice course, though much of the content is relatively basic and only qualitative (for a professional, might be good for a new student). Wouldn't recommend following *all* the advice (e.g. on topics such as debt) but it's anyway interesting to have the perspective, and it definitely makes very interesting points. | 1) qualitative (for a professional, might be | Good | 1) for a new student). Wouldn't recommend | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good course | 1) | Good | 1) course | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This course was really awesome! I enjoyed doing the assignments and the way how the content was being taught was impressive. Very good! | 1) was being taught was impressive. Very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Really Good Course for Intermediate level | 1) Really | Good | 1) Course for Intermediate level | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It's a very good introductory course that I will definitely suggest to anyone who wants to start over. The videos and especially the programming assignments are wonderful. But if you don't pay for a certificate you will not be able to participate in the module quizzes, a bit frustrating when you put a serious amount of effort. | 1) It's a very | Good | 1) introductory course that I will definitely | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It makes you a clear and brilliant programmer~~ Very good!! | 1) a clear and brilliant programmer~~ Very | Good | 1) ! | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course for learning java for beginners. | 1) Very | Good | 1) course for learning java for beginners. | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The programming exercises are very good to reinforce the concepts learnt in the video lectures. The guide lines in the programming exercise are very clear and helpful making the problems not that hard to deal with and yet very enjoyable. | 1) The programming exercises are very | Good | 1) to reinforce the concepts learnt in | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Except for a few problems regarding the clearness of some of the homeworks' statements, hence the stars, this is an excellent beginner's course for anyone interested in Java. I am currently taking the follow up course "Java Programming: Arrays, Lists, and Structured Data" and for the moment it seems as good as this one, although with the same few problems. | 1) for the moment it seems as | Good | 1) as this one, although with the | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very nice introduction to Java. Of course using BlueJ and EduDuke libraries (that is libraries crafted specifically for the course that are nor used in real life) gives this feeling of not coding for real. But that's good. Real coding comes in the later courses of this specialization so this approach seems to be very good for introducing people to Java without wasting to much time to details being unimportant on the early stages of learning. | 1) not coding for real. But that's | Good | 1) Real coding comes in the later | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very nice introduction to Java. Of course using BlueJ and EduDuke libraries (that is libraries crafted specifically for the course that are nor used in real life) gives this feeling of not coding for real. But that's good. Real coding comes in the later courses of this specialization so this approach seems to be very good for introducing people to Java without wasting to much time to details being unimportant on the early stages of learning. | 2) this approach seems to be very | Good | 2) for introducing people to Java without | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course and quite unique approach... could have been more interesting and fun! Video presentation is too geeky at times. | 1) | Good | 1) course and quite unique approach. . | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good intro for beginning students | 1) | Good | 1) intro for beginning students | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Another great selection of topics and problems. I enjoyed this course. Very good balance in terms of concepts and test problems. | 1) problems. I enjoyed this course. Very | Good | 1) balance in terms of concepts and | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | The course is good overall. However, the final project might be a little difficult for a beginner in Java programming | 1) The course is | Good | 1) overall. However, the final project might | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | very very good | 1) very very | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good 1 | 1) | Good | 1) 1 | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | It is a good course for starters. | 1) It is a | Good | 1) course for starters. | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | I really liked the course mainly due to providing a clear vision to all sub tasks needed to solve before and during programme development; I liked very much that the solution is started with problem statement and analysing; this helps to set good practice to problem solving and decision making: before digging into implementation one must understand the task; analyse it and get what is involved and needed to say the job is done and then find a solution, implement it and check that implemented solution does what it was intended to do; thank you very much for clarifying it | 1) and analysing; this helps to set | Good | 1) practice to problem solving and decision | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | A good intro into Java. As this is Part 2 of the Specialization, I would have liked to have seen a greater introduction into more of Java's collections than just String manipulation and CSV using an apache lib. | 1) A | Good | 1) intro into Java. As this is | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Nice way to introduce yourself to Java. Duke lecturers are really good. | 1) to Java. Duke lecturers are really | Good | 1) | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good! I like because I am learning many things. Thanks. | 1) Very | Good | 1) I like because I am learning | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a good Java Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 I followed two videos and I'm learning in my way. I left the course because the ammount of time required was too high. For example, for one part of an exercise I spent a total of 12 hours distributed in 3 days. For the other part of the exercise I spent 1 hour. Also, in the part one, the last exercise was tremendouly difficult for begginers and for someone (my case) that know one language. You are making people hate Java. This is not for begginers. I have to say that the part of codepen and HTML was great. Fortunatelly, I didn't pay. But I think that paying for this course is a waste of money. I had a good experience in other Coursera programming course: "An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python" of Rice Unviersity. The examples were awesome and the tests were reasonable, quite the opposite to this course. Also, Eclipse is so much better than BlueJ in many ways, also into learning... And there's more things that must be improved, but no time and no money. I'm very dissapointed to this course and Duke Univeristy. | 1) This is a | Good | 1) Java Tutorial: https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 | 1.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | This is a good Java Tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBWX97e1E9g&list=PLE7E8B7F4856C9B19 I followed two videos and I'm learning in my way. I left the course because the ammount of time required was too high. For example, for one part of an exercise I spent a total of 12 hours distributed in 3 days. For the other part of the exercise I spent 1 hour. Also, in the part one, the last exercise was tremendouly difficult for begginers and for someone (my case) that know one language. You are making people hate Java. This is not for begginers. I have to say that the part of codepen and HTML was great. Fortunatelly, I didn't pay. But I think that paying for this course is a waste of money. I had a good experience in other Coursera programming course: "An Introduction to Interactive Programming in Python" of Rice Unviersity. The examples were awesome and the tests were reasonable, quite the opposite to this course. Also, Eclipse is so much better than BlueJ in many ways, also into learning... And there's more things that must be improved, but no time and no money. I'm very dissapointed to this course and Duke Univeristy. | 2) waste of money. I had a | Good | 2) experience in other Coursera programming course: | 1.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | good point to start. | 1) | Good | 1) point to start. | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good for novice developers trying to learn Java. Not good for experienced developers trying to learn Java. | 1) | Good | 1) for novice developers trying to learn | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good for novice developers trying to learn Java. Not good for experienced developers trying to learn Java. | 2) developers trying to learn Java. Not | Good | 2) for experienced developers trying to learn | 3.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Good course, it seemed too easy at times since they provided alot of guides to solving the programming problems but I might be biased since I have some programming background. Overall I would recommend for beginners interested in learning java. | 1) | Good | 1) course, it seemed too easy at | 4.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Awesome, the words will be less to describe how good this course is........... | 1) will be less to describe how | Good | 1) this course is. . . . | 5.0 |
| __y3wBnnEeW9dA4X94-nLQ | Very good course taking into consideration the first week | 1) Very | Good | 1) course taking into consideration the first | 4.0 |